Unimaginably Good

Quote: The BBC's Gaza correspondent Alan Johnston says it is "unimaginably good" to be free after 114 days in captivity.
ANYTHING THAT CAN BE IMAGINED IS IMAGINABLE AND TO SAY THAT TO BE FREED IS UNIMAGINABLY GOOD IS SAYING WHAT IS ABSURD AND COURTING MADNESS. IT IS TO HYPE OR EXAGGERATE HOW GOOD IT IS. YOU MEAN TO BE FREED IS ETERNAL LIFE IN HEAVEN?
HOWEVER GOOD IT IS TO BE FREED IT CAN BE IMAGINED BY HIM AND OTHERS AND IT IS MISCHIEVOUS MISLEADING OTHERS TO SAY IT IS UNIMAGINABLE.
HE IS NOT INNOCENT FROM PICTURES OF HIM AND HIS RELEASE AND ESCAPE FROM DEATH IS ONLY A TEMPORARY REPRIEVE IN THE DIVINE SCHEME OF THINGS.
There are truly unimaginable things:
There are things that are imaginable and things that are truly unimaginable.
The consciousness changes after 1977 and in recent years are truly unimaginable because no one could imagine that they are possible before they happened. I certainly could not imagine the consciousness changes that I initiated on both occasions were possible.
If you should argue that similarly the goodness of his release is truly unimaginable to him, you may be right or have advanced false perception and argumentative or antagonistic that will end in doom.
He may feel extremely emotionally delighted to be released but that is still imaginable by him and others.
What can & cannot be imagined:
It is not arbitrary whether something is imaginable or not but what can and cannot be imagined can be clearly objectively defined.
Whatever can occur or are regularly occurring in the existing scheme of things can be imagined by some if not all. If there are some in the community who have experienced captivity and certain death and then been released, the spectrum of elation that they felt can be imagined by them if not by all others in the community and if there are some who can imagine then it is clearly not unimaginable which is used to falsely exaggerate and falsely elevate one’s feat.
In contrast the consciousness changes after 1977 and in recent years which have never been acknowledged by anyone has never been experienced in the scheme of things by inhabitants trapped in earthly existence, that no one could imagine can happen beforehand otherwise they or I would have brought about the change much earlier. Because the consciousness change is an unmistakable change and no one on earth had experienced it before it is truly unimaginable and that is no hype or delusion.
Exclusivity that distinguishes you also finger you:
The very exclusivity that foolish people crave in order to set them apart from others also fingers them because they are not so anonymous.
If Altanturya was a Malaysian girl or resident in this country a case can be made that there are many people in this country who would want her killed but because Altanturya is a foreigner who hardly knows anyone in this country, there cannot be many people in this country who want to kill her let alone want to kill her at the same time as Razak has declared he wants to.
How many Malaysians have Mongolians as girl friends? The number of Malaysians who have Mongolian girl friends who will be automatically suspect if a Mongolian girl was murdered must be a very exclusive subset. If Altanturya was from a more popular country for having girl friends like America or Australia or Indonesia then the subset of people having them as girl friends must be greater. Because Mongolia is an exotic country for Malaysia, there must be very few who have Mongolian girl friends and at the same time want to kill them.
How many people have the privilege of calling the bodyguards attached to the deputy PM to take away Mongolian girl friends who have become a nuisance and know that she is there for the taking alone on a particular night in front of a particular house that is not his?
How many people in Malaysia have access to C4 explosives to blow people up? If you think it is necessary to use C4 when other explosives will do, you just want overkill to show off how special you are, you have mad logic and perception.
How many people in Malaysia can get the immigration entry records of not just someone but a particular Mongolian girl who was murdered deleted? It may in truth be totally unnecessary to delete the records but it reflects perverted thinking to do so.
If very few or no others fall into the criteria that are relevant to this case then the person who matches the criteria must be responsible for Altanturya’s death.
Not knowing what you speak:
If you mean what you say, you know what you are talking about, how is it possible for you to say that it is unimaginably good to be free after 100 days in captivity? Surely you have experienced it and should be able to imagine it and therefore it is not unimaginable. Surely you are aware that there are others who have undergone the same predicament as you or even much worse (spending many years in captivity) and therefore you cannot say it is ‘unimaginably good’?
The reason why he said it is because he is an emotional robot who is spewing out the substance and style of what he said by rote because the emotion of the occasion has overwhelmed him and just wants to hype it up for himself and the expectant audience. A robot never understands the meaning of what it says or does, it only carries out in speech and action what it has been programmed to when certain stimuli are detected and so it is ordinary people are robots who spew out speech without knowing the meaning of what they are uttering.
What is truly unimaginable:
Before the advent of the internet, handphones, car, aeroplane or TV it is true that it is unimaginable for people to imagine live with internet, handphones, etc.
Thus for something to be ascribed as unimaginable it must not have happened to all the inhabitants in a community. For instance the people with white skin may be unimaginable to red Indians before they arrived.
Anwar Case Thrown Out:
Quote BBC headline: Anwar case thrown out.
Comment: If you think Anwar’s court case can be thrown out that implies the use of force to throw you have false perception and it reflects the person is a man of force not reason that he chose the word ‘thrown out’ when he could have said ‘rejected’ or dismissed.
Rejection and dismissing does not convey force and if you believe a court case can be rejected or dismissed, you have correct perception. If you believe a court case can be thrown out you are in danger of being thrown into hell.
Divine & Human Law:
There is such a thing called human law that you can see and know and such a thing called divine law that you may deny or doubt to your chagrin if it turns out to exist.
Divine law is supreme, perfect, serious, far more painful and everlasting in its punishment, inescapable and takes precedent over human law which is relative, imperfect (flawed even wrong), less painful & can be escaped.
Thus in the eyes of human law, Razak who has conceded that C/Insp Azilah and his underling who were seconded to him to resolve his problem with Altanturya killed her without his approval, is blameless and will escape any punishment if it is true he did not order them to kill her.
However in the eyes of divine law, even if Razak did not order them to kill her, he is guilty and punishment is inevitable and far graver than he ever dreamt possible and ignorance (that you are liable for punishment just by calling the policemen who ended up killing her) is not an excuse so as not to incur punishment.
Therefore by acknowledging that the policemen were brought into the affair by him but they killed her without his assent, this is not an unfortunate train of event as viewed by human law but it unwittingly incriminates Razak as guilty with punishment due to him that is far graver and everlasting than he ever dreamt possible. If it turns out he lied, he did request them to kill her in a way as to obliterate all evidence then he has further compounded his punishment.
No one will admit more guilt than he is liable but they will usually admit just sufficient to get away. Thus by Razak’s admission, it was the two policemen seconded to him who killed Altanturya, either because he knows it because he was party to it or he was reliably told by the police that he believed. Therefore it is unlikely if not impossible that someone other than these policemen or their proxies killed her and it is unlikely if not impossible that there is anyone else unconnected to Razak (excludes Najib who is linked to Razak) in this country where Altanturya cannot possibly know many in high places who also knew Altanturya well to want to dispose of her permanently to order the killing. It is impossible the two policemen or their proxies killed her as a random senseless rogue crime because rogue policemen do not have access to C4 explosives or the deletion of immigration records.
How is divine law far more serious, painful and everlasting?
As the Buddha said even a trifling deed can send a person to hell, the man who spat at a private Buddha boiled in hell for hundreds of thousands of years and became a leper and beggar, Jesus said the man who scolds his brother ‘you fool’ is in danger of the fire of hell, you will be judged for every careless word you say, whoever disagrees with the counselor will not be forgiven, not in this Age or the Age to come, such minor deeds as spitting, scolding someone and speaking carelessly can have far reaching painful and everlasting consequences for you, whether you realize or not.
When you are punished here, your agony ends once you pass out or away but in hell there is no passing out. According to the Buddha you can be put on a rack and sharp instruments will be jabbed into your limbs and body repeatedly and you are not allowed to pass away or out until you have repaid your debt.
Karma will pursue you however long it takes. It was said that Moggalana, one of the Buddha’s two deputies who was Satan of one previous eon, had to be bludgeoned by dogged hired assassins of a rival religious faction who kept coming to pursue him even when he made himself invisible to them in past attempts in a final repayment for past debts before he passed away for a last time after ‘dragging’ himself in pain to see the Buddha for a last time. (The Buddha’s two deputies had to and passed away before the Buddha himself passed away).
I Got Nothing To Do With You:
She (Razak’s secretary) said the analyst told the Mongolian woman: “I’ve got nothing to do with you. If you want to do anything, go ahead.”
It would be true if I were to say I have nothing to do with Razak or Altanturya but it is impossible it is true Razak has nothing to do with Altanturya.
If what Razak said is true then Altanturya is mad, wrong or a nuisance to keep trying to see Razak.
Not only is it hurtful but it is not true or a blatant (unconscious) lie that the speaker and most if not all listeners are unaware it is a lie.
(Something said is only hurtful if it is false but emotionally or angrily said as if it is true to wrong the addressed person)
Razak has admitted he had an affair with her so how can it be true he got nothing to do with her? When Razak was trying to get under her pants he would have sworn then he has everything to do with her (and more) but now that he wants to shirk responsibility he has conveniently denied he got nothing to do with her.
Therefore this statement that his secretary quoted that was supposed to cast Altanturya in bad light as pestering Razak and painting Razak as a saint actually indicates he is a liar and shirks his responsibility. Only if he never had any relationship with Altanturya will his statement then be true.
THIS STATEMENT 'I GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU' WAS TENDERED OBVIOUSLY TO CAST ALTANTURYA IN BAD LIGHT AND RAZAK IN GOOD LIGHT WITH ALL THOSE RELEVANT THINKING IT IS SO WHEN IT IS A NASTY STATEMENT AND A LIE THAT CAN EVEN SEND HIM TO HELL AND THOSE WHO PERCEIVE IT AS RIGHTEOUS WHEN IT IS FALSE AND HURTFUL ARE DELUDED AND HEADED FOR PERDITION THEMSELVES.
THIS STATEMENT AS IN MANY OTHER PLACES INDICATES RAZAK IS A LIAR NOT A MAN OF TRUTH AS HE AND HIS ASSOCIATES ARE TRYING TO SELL TO THE PUBLIC. BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE THEMSELVES GUILTY OF DUPLICITY, THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG AND EVEN THINK RAZAK MAY HAVE A CASE TO SAY WHAT HE SAID.
THE NUMBER OF LIES ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE CONSCIOUS THEY PERPERTRATE COMPARED TO WHAT THEY HAVE ACTUALLY COMMISSIONED IS LIKE THE TIP OF AN ICEBERG. WHEN THEY FIRST TOLD A NEW LIE THEY MAY EXPERIENCE DISCOMFORT AND BE CONSCIOUS THEY ARE LYING BUT AFTER THEY HAVE TOLD THAT SAME LIE MANY TIMES THEY PERCEIVE THAT LIE AS TRUE OR SEE NOTHING WRONG. JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD AND THEREFORE THE SUFFERING DUE TO PEOPLE FOR TELLING LIES MAY BE AS THE BUDDHA SAID, LIKE AN OCEAN COMPARED TO THE FEW DROPS THAT REMAIN IN THOSE WHO ARE NOBLE AND EVEN THIS IS UP TO SEVEN MORE LIFETIMES.
Quote: Siti Aisyah (Razak's secretary) said she and her two colleagues had also been told by Abdul Razak that Altantuya had blackmailed him for money before and that they were not to let her into the office if she showed up.
Comment: This is likely intended to cast Altanturya in bad light or to attack her; she deserved to die. If this is true then it is self incriminating by admitting that Razak has potential motive to kill her and so did he do it? Thus such information is irrelevant to the trial except in the false perception and logic of those involved. Razak cannot now deny that there is no reason why he should want to kill Altanturya because he has admitted Altanturya was abusive (shouted he was a bastard, come out) and blackmailed him.
How many if any high standing others in Malaysia not linked to Razak will have motive or reason to kill her bearing in mind she is not resident here and comes from an exotic foreign country?
"Energy security is extremely important to all nations throughout the world, and of course in protecting and securing Australia's interests," Mr Nelson (Australian Defence Minister) said.
Speak for yourself and do not speak for other nations that never appointed you as their spokesman. Even Australia did not appoint him her energy spokesman so he should strictly speak on his own behalf that energy security is important to him (but not me). Not all nations treat energy security as extremely important and therefore what he said is false and sweeping to exaggerate the validity of his argument or suggest that Australia's involvement in Iraq is totally rational. Because he sees nothing wrong, even thinks what he said is valid, he is headed for mad perception that what is false is true. When you perceive ants crawling all over you and ghosts haunting you when there are none, let me hear you scoff at mad perception.
You want me to believe what you said is true that energy security is extremely important to all nations? If you don't want others to believe it is so, why do you say so? Are you mad?
Do you believe what you say is true that energy security is extremely important to all nations? If you believe it is true then you are deluded because it is impossible that all nations should think so.
Quote: The Latest Twist In The Case
There are no twists in any case but it reflects the predilection of the writer to scandalize or make more salacious a topic that he chooses ‘twist’. The latest development or information or news about the case is more objective or neutral. If you think there can be twists in a case, you like to see twists in things you may be a conspiring twist and turning person yourself heading for perdition not truth and safety.
It is false perception that makes one perceive there can be twists and the latest twist in an event. Whatever happens or comes to light comes to light, twisting is a figment of your false imagination that you want to inoculate into others with karma attached not merit.
If you want to do anything, go ahead:
If you do not know the meaning of what you say then you are a fool who does not know what he is talking about. What kind of analyst are you who does not know what he is talking about? Does he not analyze or reflect on the veracity of what he says?
By saying ‘if you want to do anything, go ahead’, you mean you have no objections, you are totally agreeable which is not possible and therefore Razak is speaking falsely. He clearly objected to her coming to try to see him. If you don’t mean what you say, you don’t know what you say means you may be made to eat your words.
What he would like happen is that Altanturya disappeared and never saw him again.
The frightening truth:
Quote: Michael Booth's road test reveals the frightening truth.
Comment: The truth is just what happened and that cannot be frightening. It is a person’s mental force or specifically emotions that make something perceived as frightening. As the Buddha said that the sage is like a mountain unshaken by whatever happens.
IF YOU BELIEVE TRUTH CAN BE FRIGHTENING THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION, IF YOU ARE FRIGHTENED BY LEARNING ABOUT OR SEEING SOMETHING, YOU ARE A SLAVE OF FEAR IN DANGER OF ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING NOT SAFE.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID TRUTH IS THE HIGHEST OF SAVORS SO HOW CAN TRUTH BE FRIGHTENING?
Challenging her not giving her permission:
By saying ‘if you want to do anything, go ahead’, Razak is not giving Altanturya his unreserved permission to do whatever she pleases but he is actually challenging her to do what she wants to do.
Challenges never come from reason, is never guided by reason but challenges come from emotion or mental force. Therefore Razak is a man of force not reason.
You have perverted perception and logic if you think ‘if you want to do anything, go ahead’ is the same as “I challenge you to do anything regarding our affair”. Thus Razak does not say what he means or mean what he said, not just here but in many more places.
If Altanturya had informed his wife about their affair or spoken to the press about their relationship, would Razak be truly indifferent?
Intimidating not challenging:
Actually Razak is trying to intimidate Altanturya. By giving her permission to do anything she wants it implies he is not afraid of anything she might do which will be futile and therefore she would be wise to desist and get lost.
There must be a purpose or intention to what Razak is saying otherwise he is mad. He will be but is not mad yet and therefore there is purpose or intention in what he says, ‘if you want to do anything, go ahead’ and it is to say I am not afraid of whatever you might do and I therefore dare you to go ahead.
What he said and what he meant:
When Razak said ‘if you want to do anything’ what is said is not to support Altanturya for whatever she might contemplate doing but to hint that he is not afraid of anything she can do, and when he said ‘go ahead’ he is not giving Altanturya unqualified permission to go ahead but to challenge her to do so as he is confident he can negate her.
Goats never challenge people who are more powerful than them (eg you would not challenge Mike Tyson to a fight in a ring because they are cowards and big bullies who will challenge people they are sure they will win or prevail over. What they do not realize is that God can make them cowering wrecks and for challenging the weak to an unequal fight they may be fed to the lions in some life to come.
Makes No Sense:
Why should Razak be concerned about anything Altanturya might want to do that he should need to tell her to go ahead if she wants except that he is likely to be referring not to anything she wants to do but specifically to things Altanturya might want to do regarding issues between them.
Therefore when Razak said ‘if you want to do anything, go ahead’ he is challenging Altanturya to go ahead and do anything she may be contemplating regarding issues surrounding their relationship that may be calling her bluff, he is that confident or powerful as to be unafraid thereby discouraging her from taking any actions she might be contemplating.
If you are calling someone’s bluff you are misrepresenting yourself or lying about yourself as more confident or invincible as you truly are.
If you are truly that invincible then you are trying to intimidate someone with what you say, you do not mean what you say that she is free to do anything she wants but you are scoffing at her.
Altanturya is an independent person and does not need anyone or Razak to tell her she can do anything she wants, so why is he saying so? Is he mad or is there an emotional message that is more important or the only aim of what is said.
WHAT RAZAK SAID THAT ‘IF YOU WANT TO DO ANYTHING, GO AHEAD’ DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE BUT WHAT HE IS HINTING AT THAT HE NEVER SAID IS: IF YOU WANT TO DO ANYTHING REGARDING ISSUES BETWEEN US, I DARE YOU TO GO AHEAD BECAUSE I AM NOT AFRAID.
IF YOU THINK IT IS A MATTER OF SEMANTICS, IT IS UNDERSTOOD WHAT RAZAK SAID IS THE SAME AS WHAT I INTERPRETED HE SAID, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE LAXED OR CARELESS INTERPRETATION.
From superior fabrications as a requisite comes superior consciousness:
Because as the Buddha said, consciousness comes after and from fabrications, it follows that from poor quality fabrications comes poor quality consciousness and from high quality or virtuous fabrications comes high quality consciousness.
And this has been borne out in practice because when there was a significant improvement of the fabrications (perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing) there has automatically followed a significant improvement in the consciousness state as is evident by the consciousness changes that followed after 1977 and in recent years when significant behavioral or fabrication changes (where there had been none before) brought about alleviating consciousness changes.
No matter who you are, even if you are a stupid person who finds concepts hard to grasp, your consciousness state is not immutable but as the Buddha said, it is determined or governed by your fabrications or how virtuous in speech and conduct, how and what you think and perceive. Although in the normal course of events you experience a steady decline in the quality of your consciousness state as you age, it is possible for a being to experience improving consciousness states if he improved his fabricating.
Therefore the Buddha is prescient and has penetrative wisdom. What he said is true or reflects reality here as in other things he said and you will be a fool to doubt him not realizing there will be serious karma for doubting the highest teacher if he turns out to be so.
COMPARED TO SINFUL EMOTIONAL STYLISH SPEECH AND ACTIONS WITH CONSTANT FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, SINLESS, UNEMOTIONAL UNSTYLISH SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT HAVE NO PROLONGING, CHANGES OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IS INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR AND LEADS TO A CONSCIOUSNESS STATE THAT IS INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR.
COMPARED TO CONSTANT STYLE FREE THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING, TO BE ABLE AT WILL TO SWITCH OFF THINKING, DOING AND SAYING WHEN THERE IS NO NECESSITY IS AN EVEN MORE SUPERIOR WAY OF FABRICATING THAT LEADS TO AN EVEN MORE SUPERIOR CONSCIOUSNESS STATE OF EXISTENCE.
COMPARED TO NOT FABRICATING BY NOT THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING, NOT TO PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE IS AN EVEN HIGHER STATE OF FABRICATING THAT ACCORDS AN EVEN HIGHER STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS THAN THE STATE OF NO THINKING.
He Broke His Promise:
A case could be made that when Razak spoke of “I’ve got nothing to do with you. If you want to do anything, go ahead” he was not denying the past but clumsily referring to the future that thenceforth he wanted to have nothing with her and she can do as she pleased.
In that case he broke his promise because he continued to hound Altanturya by employing intimidating private investigators and as is likely he is seriously involved with her death.
‘I GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU’ CANNOT TRULY REFER TO THE PAST AS IT CANNOT BE DENIED THEY HAD A RELATIONSHIP BUT IF IT IS CLUMSILY INTENDED TO REFER TO THE FUTURE THEN HE BROKE HIS PROMISE TO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BY HOUNDING HER WITH PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS AND AS IS LIKELY IMPLICATED IN HER DEMISE. HIS ACTIONS MAKE A MOCKERY OF WHAT HE SAID, “IF YOU WANT TO DO ANYTHING, GO AHEAD”.
Dr M: Anwar has no chance to become prime minister:
Whilst that statement sounds like a very reasonable assessment of Anwar’s potential to become PM in a system that is heavily manipulated to favor the incumbents (opposition deprived of use of the media, election fraud, financial clout of the ruling party), Dr M’s purpose for saying that cannot be objective but it reflects his implacable hatred and need to ridicule Anwar.
Exactly what his intention in saying that may be known; if it is to ridicule, did he say “I want to ridicule Anwar’s chances of becoming PM?” If he did not say so but he said ‘Anwar has no chance of becoming PM’ then he did not mean what he said but what he meant was he wanted to ridicule Anwar’s chances of becoming PM.
Although unlikely, it is conceivable that all the top Barisan leaders may be killed by a bomb or by an earthquake at a meeting and in that vacuum, Anwar may stand a chance of being PM and therefore to say Anwar has no hope is presumptuous.
The implications of what the Buddha said:
(Name me one philosopher or scientist who has taught you that your consciousness state is not fixed but comes from and is governed or determined by how and what you perceive, think, speak and do)
It follows from what the Buddha said that it is not your blameless genes or biochemical processes or the foods you take that govern your consciousness state, how much consciousness suffering or inability to concentrate you experience but it is your fabrications that can only be how and what you perceive (through sight, sound, touch, taste and smell), think, speak and do. And it is how exalted your consciousness state is and not how much medicine or science you know that will determine how long and exalted you exist in bliss after you pass away from here.
If you think your present consciousness state is immutable, permanent, blameless then you have wrong view that may not be harmless but leads to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.
Therefore depending on how you sin or abuse yourself and others with how and what you perceive, think, speak and do, your consciousness sufferings (stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate) govern your mind and detain you in the lower realms of suffering.
To perceive, think, speak and move without added forceful prolonging, changing of speed and strength of force is incomparably superior than the default state of all beings here namely the constant (unnecessary) added forceful prolonging, changing of speed and strength of force that persecutes self and others with stress, restlessness and distraction that governs their consciousness state woefully.
To be able to exist fully conscious fully perceiving without thinking when there is no need to think, something ordinary people are incapable of and have never experienced is a higher state in which to exist compared to constant perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing at constant speed and strength of force without prolonging.
To be able to exist fully conscious not only without thinking but without perceiving nor not perceiving is an even higher of state of consciousness.
Once you have achieved discursive thinking and conduct without forceful prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force, you are rewarded with one eon or Age in heaven.
Once you have achieved no thinking, you are rewarded with two eons or Ages in heaven.
By further establishing well the equanimity to joy and detachment to abide mindful and aware, experiencing pleasantness with the body too that the noble ones say mindful abiding in pleasantness with equanimity, he attains the third higher state of mind that leads to four eons in heaven with death.

By further establishing well the dispelling of pleasantness and unpleasantness, and earlier having dispelled pleasure and displeasure without unpleasantness and pleasantness and purifying mindfulness with equanimity attains to the fourth higher state of mind that leads to 500 eons in bliss.

By further overcoming all perceptions of matter (form) and going beyond perceptions of anger, not attending to various perceptions, [1] With boundless space attains to the sphere of space. He becomes fully satisfied in it, strives after it and prospers in it. Becoming intent on it and making much of it, without falling away from it, he dies and is born with the gods of the sphere of space that leads 20,000 eons in bliss.
By further overcoming all the sphere of space with boundless consciousness attaining to the sphere of consciousness he attains a lifesan of 40,000 eons in bliss.
By further overcoming all the sphere of consciousness, with there is nothing he attains to the sphere of no-thingness and attains a lifespan of 60,000 eons in bliss.
IT IS BECAUSE OF IGNORANCE THAT A BEING FABRICATES AND IT IS FORMIDABLE FABRICATIONS THAT STAND IN THE WAY OF THE DISPELLING OF IGNORANCE THAT LEADS TO ENLIGHTENMENT. HIGHER QUALITY OR VIRTUOUS FABRICATIONS IS SUPERIOR TO LOWER QUALITY SINFUL FABRICATIONS AND LESS FABRICATING IS BETTER THAN MORE FABRICATING. THUS NO THINKING BUT STILL PERCEIVING IS HIGHER THAN THINKING AND PERCEIVING AND NO PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING ABD NO THINKING IS HIGHER THAN PERCEIVING AND NOT THINKING. THE TOTAL CESSATION OF ALL FABRICATING OR ENLIGHTENMENT IS THE HIGHEST.
IF YOU DON’T CARE, YOU FOLLOW OTHERS TO NOT JUST CONSTANTLY FABRICATE BUT FABRICATE IN PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING WITH CONSTANT FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THEN IT WILL BE YOUR LOT TO WANDER FROM LIFE TO LIFE BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETON THAT IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN IN AN EON OR AGE.
A hierarchy of fabricating:
In terms of how long and how well a being’s consciousness is released from suffering there is a hierarchy:
High quality or more virtuous fabrications (perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing) is higher than poor quality or un-virtuous fabrications. Apart from the harmful use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force there are no determinants of the quality of a person’s fabrications. Therefore do not underestimate the importance of style that is nothing more than the use of force to prolong, change speed, strength and direction in the perpetration of evil.
Less fabricating is better than more fabricating. Just perceiving is better than perceiving and thinking. Just perceiving and thinking is better than perceiving with thinking and speaking and doing.
No fabricating is better than fabricating. No fabricating in perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing (enlightenment) is better than any remaining fabricating.
THEREFORE IF YOU LIKE (ARE ATTRACTED TO) TO PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO THINGS YOU WILL BE TRAPPED IN THE LOWEST REALMS OF EXISTENCE.
The More You Fabricate The More You Suffer:
There is only one principle governing fabricating and it is that the more you fabricate the more you or your consciousness must suffer.
Quality does not come into play where fabricating is concerned, there is only the quantity of fabricating and the more you fabricate the more you suffer.
Having a style in your perceiving, thinking, speaking or movement is not a matter of quality of your fabricating but a matter of additional fabricating the style that attends your fabrications that result in additional suffering.
When you speak or do something with style you must use additional force to fabricate the prolonging, changing speed, direction and strength of force that characterizes your style.
Thus if you do not have to spit or sneeze and you do so you are fabricating more that leads to more suffering no matter how genuine and harmless you think your spitting and sneezing is. If in addition there is prolonging and violent acceleration in speed and strength of force in your spitting or sneezing you must suffer proportionally more than the person who spits and sneezes at constant speed and strength without prolonging.
If you speak (eg saying ‘oh my goodness’) or do something (shake your legs) unnecessarily you are fabricating in speech and motion unnecessarily that will cause suffering to yourself more than to someone who does not and if in addition you say or do what you say or do with stretching, changes in speed and strength of force you must suffer more than a person who speaks and does things at constant speed and strength without prolonging.
If you just perceive without thinking or speaking or doing you suffer less than a person who perceives, thinks, speaks and does.
Smiling Is A Fabrication:
No matter how genuine and wholesome you think your smile is, it is a fabrication just as all expressions with face, body and limbs are. Therefore no matter how you may attest that your smiles and expressions are genuine you must suffer more in stress, restlessness and distraction compared to someone who does not smile or express himself. Further you are conditioning yourself to fabricate such that now the urge to fabricate is very hard to resist and you are headed for torment if you do not turn back.
Perceiving Is The Most Fundamental Fabrication:
There are these four fabrications that a mind is capable and they are perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing.
Of these four fabrications perceiving in sight, sound, touch, taste and smell is the most fundamental or primary, thinking is the next (ordinary people think all the time they are conscious) whilst speech and motion are less fundamental (ordinary being can control themselves not to speak or move some of the time but they cannot stop themselves thinking or perceiving even though it is possible and they have not experienced the incomparable superiority not thinking and perceiving accords).
ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN STOP THEMSELVES OCCASIONALLY FROM TALKING OR MOVING BUT THEY CANNOT STOP THEMSELVES FROM THINKING OR PERCEIVING WHEN THEY ARE CONSCIOUS AND THEREFORE THINKING AND PERCEIVING ARE MORE FUNDAMENTAL AND INVOLUNTARY MODES OF FABRICATING.
Each of these four different types of fabrications can be undertaken either unadulterated or uncorrupted just by themselves or in a fabricated or corrupted way, corrupted by force, with forceful prolonging, changing speed, strength of force and direction where possible. This additional fabricated way or style in fabricating is the universal bane of beings trapped here and in the lower realms and is the only cause of the mental torment they experience and the instrument by which they persecute all others including their ‘loved’ ones.
A person’s consciousness state is governed or determined in a negative way by the quantity of his fabrications. Thus if you are capable of not speaking and not moving but you choose to speak and move a lot, your consciousness suffers correspondingly. A person who has little inclination to speak or do things suffer less than a person who cannot resist talking and doing things.
Thus the person who is not just constantly perceiving and thinking (when conscious) and who speaks and moves excessively (for show to impress or please others) but does so with constant prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force of all his fabrications must suffer much more than the person who does exactly the same but without style or fabricated way of perceiving or constant prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force in his perceptions, thinking, speaking and moving.
Even though ordinary people cannot do so and do not realize it is possible to do so, it is possible to exist fully conscious and only perceiving without thinking or saying or doing anything and this accords that person with an incomparably more blissful consciousness state.
According to the Buddha it is even possible for a person to exist neither perceiving nor not perceiving and this is a higher, more blissful state than one who is constantly perceiving when conscious.
A person who can stop thinking is higher than the person who cannot.
A person who can stop perceiving is higher than the person who cannot.
Why you will regret if you don’t meditate:
Just by sitting still and not speaking (something easier said than done in restless people), you have momentarily stilled the two base fabrications of speech and motion that is always conducted with forceful prolonging, changing of speed and strength of force that considerably reduces the load of fabricating impacting on your consciousness. And as your skill in meditation progresses, your thinking become more calm and reasoned without forceful prolonging, changes in speed and strength that is the requisite pathway to a final cessation of thinking if you manage to progress to this level. How high up after you achieve an effortless cessation of thinking is up to you and your reward is even up to 60,000 eons or Ages in bliss not returning to this world of goats.
THUS THE BUDDHA SAID, ‘MEDITATE NOW CUNDA, DON’T AFTERWARDS REGRET’.
There is nothing unchristian about meditation:
Did Jesus tell you to pray in private or public? He said shut the door and pray in secret and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.
The first purpose of meditation is to isolate yourself from the toxic influences of others. Seclusion is the first purpose of meditation to allow you breathing space and time for reflection.
The second purpose of meditation is to stop moving and speaking that again gives your mind some much needed rest so that it can get a hold of itself.
The next purpose of meditation is to calm and slow your thinking making it more purposeful and reasoned rather than wildly, mischievously, dingdong arguing with yourself and others. If you can stop yourself from thinking, then that is a greater achievement. It is universal that anyone who can exist without thinking is happier than a man who cannot stop thinking.
Therefore any Christian who opposes meditation is not a man of reason but an emotional, prejudiced man.
THERE IS NOTHING MYSTICAL OR MYSTERIOUS ABOUT MEDITATION, IT IS SIMPLY AND ONLY ABOUT FIRST ISOLATING YOURSELF FROM THE CORRUPT INFLUENCES OF OTHERS, NEXT STOPPING YOURSELF FROM TALKING AND MOVING (FABRICATIONS THAT NEGATIVELY AFFECT YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS) AND THEN WORKING TO CALM OR SLOW DOWN AND RATIONALIZE YOUR THINKING UNTIL YOU CAN EFFORTLESSLY STOP THINKING AT WILL.
The purposes of meditation:
The purpose of meditation is to address the five hindrances.
The five hindrances are preoccupation and worries about matters of the world, ill will (desire to harm others), restlessness, sloth (laziness and torpor (dull, diffuse unfocused mind or sleepiness) and doubt and uncertainty and towards this end one secludes oneself and refrains from speaking or moving and pays attention to the condition of one’s mind and body.
"And when, Aggivessana, the ariyan disciple is possessed of mindfulness and clear consciousness, then the Tathagata disciplines him further, saying: 'Come you, monk, choose a remote lodging in a forest, at the root of a tree, on a mountain slope, in a wilderness, in a hill-cave, a cemetery, a forest haunt, in the open or on a heap of straw.' He chooses a remote lodging in the forest...or on a heap of straw. Returning from alms-gathering, after the meal, he sits down cross-legged, holding the back erect, having made mindfulness rise up in front of him, he, by getting rid of coveting for the world, dwells with a mind devoid of coveting, he purifies the mind of coveting. By getting rid of the taint of ill-will, he dwells benevolent in mind, compassionate for the welfare of all creatures and beings, he purifies the mind of the taint of ill-will. By getting rid of sloth and torpor, he dwells devoid of sloth and torpor; perceiving the light, mindful, clearly conscious, he purifies the mind of sloth and torpor. By getting rid of restlessness and worry, he dwells calmly the mind subjectively tranquilized, he purifies the mind of restlessness and worry. By getting rid of doubt, he dwells doubt-crossed, unperplexed as to the states that are skillful, he purifies the mind of doubt.
The Buddha is right:
Whether you or everyone in this world likes it or not, you think, not just sometimes but all the time. If it is possible for you to stop thinking and yet be fully conscious and it is an incomparably superior state with which to exist, the Buddha is right and prescient to tell you that.
Only if you do not think or you think and thinking is an unadulterated pleasure and not to think is terrible will the Buddha be wrong.
Whether you or everyone in this world like it or not, you perceive, not just sometimes but all the time when you are conscious. If it is possible for you to neither perceive nor not perceive and yet be fully conscious and it is an incomparably superior state with which to exist, the Buddha is right and prescient to tell you that.
Only if you do not perceive (impossible) or you perceive and it is an unadulterated stress, restless and distraction free pleasure whilst not to perceive is terrible will the Buddha be wrong.
Whether you or everyone in this world like it or not, you like and dislike (your mental force is stirred attractively or repulsively by events), not just sometimes but all the time when you are conscious. If it is possible for you to neither like nor dislike (your mental force is not stirred to be attracted or repulsed) and it is an incomparably superior state with which to exist, the Buddha is right and prescient to tell you that.
Only if you do not like or dislike (impossible because you are frequently speaking of liking and disliking) or you like and dislike and they are an unadulterated stress, restless and distraction free pleasure whilst not to like and dislike is terrible will the Buddha be wrong.
WHETHER PERCEIVING, THINKING, LIKING AND DISLIKING IS UNADULTERATED PLEASURE OR THEY ARE OPTIONAL FABRICATIONS THAT ARE ALWAYS STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING IS OBJECTIVE AND APPLIES TO EVERYONE.
If you disagree with the Buddha you must continue to perceive, think, like and dislike incessantly and if you think God sanctions your belief but yours is the pathway to torment then you asked for it.

No One Is A Master Of The Five Hindrances:
If the five hindrances (covetousness for the world, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty and sloth and torpor) are not relevant to all ordinary people the Buddha would not have taught about them. It is because all ordinary people are beset by them, are detained by them that the Buddha addressed them and taught meditation with the purpose of eradicating them.
No one decides “I shall now entertain doubt and uncertainty” or “I shall now switch off doubt and uncertainty” but the truth is doubt and uncertainty are resident in them because they practice and accept falsity, they only use force to suppress them and present themselves as confident and certain but as soon as their forces of self preservation flag, they are tired or stressed, they are besieged by doubt and uncertainty that causes them to become cynical and scoff that there is any meaning in life.
In the same way, no one is the master of his covetousness for the world, ill will, restlessness, sloth and torpor but they are slaves of their covetousness for the world, ill will, restlessness, sloth and torpor that drive them to do or say things that they afterwards regret.
Because it is the five hindrances that is dictating to you not you who is the master of the five hindrances and they are forceful and conditioning, as you grow old, your covetousness, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty and sloth and torpor increases and becomes harder to control and you are heading for doom, loss of control and madness.
THE PURPOSE OF MEDITATION IS TO SECLUDE ONESELF FROM THE POISONOUS INFLUENCES OF OTHERS SO THAT ONE CAN KEEP IN TOUCH WITH ONESELF, TO STOP ONE’S SPEECH AND BODILY FABRICATIONS, SLOW DOWN AND RATIONALIZE ONE’S THINKING SO THAT HOPEFULLY A TIME WILL COME WHEN THINKING CAN EFFORTLESSLY STOP AND BRING MINDFULNESS TO THE FORE AND THEREFORE DISPEL SLOTH AND SLEEPINESS.
Men Are Not Born Equal:
Beings are not equal but there is a hierarchy of virtuousness, discernment, wisdom and concentration of the mind that differs from being to being that distinguishes or condemns them.
As Sariputta, the Buddha’s deputy said, the man who is guilty and knows he is guilty is higher than the man who is guilty and does not know he is guilty. The man who is innocent and knows he is innocent is higher than the man who is innocent and does not know he is innocent.
In the same way, the man who can speak without stretching syllables, changing of speed and loudness is higher than the man who cannot because he suffers less and does not persecute others.
The man who can neither like nor dislike is higher or more accomplished than the man who cannot.
The man who can stop thinking at will whilst fully conscious, he only sees and hears and does or not does is higher than the man who cannot.
The man who can neither perceive nor not perceive is higher than the man who always perceives (sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches).
Thus if you are a man who is constantly stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, constantly liking and disliking and constantly thinking and you cannot see it is so or you think the man who can refrain from doing so is your equal or peer then you have wrong view and the destination of wrong view according to the Buddha is hell or the animal womb. How can a person of wrong view go to heaven?