Deluded Not Holy Men:

Quote: Millions of Hindus take holy bath in Ganges.
Thousands of Hindu holy men began the plunge near the town of Allahabad at dawn.
Pilgrims believe that bathing at the confluence of three of Hinduism's holiest rivers washes away their sins. The new moon night, or Mauni Amavasya, is celebrated on Friday, making it the most auspicious day in the six-week-long festival.
"The planetary alignment is such that sun rays, when they fall on the Ganges, turn the river water into nectar. So bathing here today is equivalent to drinking nectar," he says.

What they are doing is not only false but they are deluded and headed for perdition.
The Buddha:
Bahuka and Adhikakka, Gaya and Sundarika,Payaga and Sarassati, And the stream Bahumati -- A fool may there forever bathe, Yet will not purify his black deeds.
What can Sundarika bring to pass?What can the Payaga and the Bahuka?They cannot purify an evil-doer,A man performing brutal and cruel acts.
One pure in heart has evermoreThe Feast of Cleansing and the Holy Day; One pure in heart who does good deedsHas his observances perfect for all times.
It is here, O brahmin, that you should batheTo make yourself a safe refuge for all beings.And if you speak no untruth,Nor work any harm for breathing things,
Nor take what is not offered,With faith and with no avarice,To Gaya gone, what would it do for you?Let any well your Gaya be!

It is not bathing in the holy river that makes that day auspicious but you truly have an auspicious day as the Buddha described below:

Bhaddekaratta Sutta: An Auspicious Day
The Blessed One said: "Monks, I will teach you the summary & exposition of one who has had an auspicious day."
The Blessed One said:
One would not chase after the past,nor place expectations on the future.What is past is left behind.The future is as yet unreached.Whatever quality (things worthy of attention) is present (at the moment)one clearly sees right there,right there.Unvanquished, unshaken,that's how one develops the mind.
Ardently doing one's duty today,for -- who knows? -- tomorrow death may come.There is no bargainingwith Death & his mighty horde.
Whoever lives thus ardently,relentlessly both day & night,has truly had an auspicious day:So says the Peaceful Sage.
"And how does one chase after the past? One gets carried away with the delight of 'In the past I had such a form (body)'... such a feeling'... such a perception'... such a thought-fabrication"... such a consciousness.' This is called chasing after the past.
"And how does one place expectations on the future? One gets carried away with the delight of 'In the future I might have such a form (body)'... such a feeling'... such a perception'....
"And how is one not vanquished with regard to present qualities? There is the case where one who is versed in the teachings, well-trained, does not see form as self, or self as possessing form, or form as in self, or self as in form.
"He/she does not see feeling as self, or self as possessing feeling, or feeling as in self, or self as in feeling.
"He/she does not see perception as self…...
"He/she does not see thought-fabrications as self….
"He/she does not see consciousness as self, or self as possessing consciousness, or consciousness as in self, or self as in consciousness. This is called not being vanquished with regard to present qualities.

Police’s Monumental Blunder Or Faux Pas:
From what I gather, the authorities are adamant that only Razak & the two policemen are involved.
(Surely unless you have brought all to account, you have established the prime aim of prosecution, which must be who ordered not abetted the killing or you have tried your best and failed and declared publicly you failed should you then reluctantly charge these lesser three in court? Therefore the fact that charges have been brought against these three so rapidly must indicate police have decided they are the only ones involved or they have reasons that they will not divulge to stop further prosecution)
If it is true that Razak did not order but only abetted the murder as charged and the policemen did not commit murder by themselves or ordered it themselves, then there must be a fourth person who ordered the murder because a murder cannot be committed spontaneously without someone ordering it.
If the police have established DEFINITELY that no one else is involved, Razak must be the one who ordered and he should be charged with ordering rather than abetting. Any murder mandates someone who ordered and someone who executes whilst an abettor is an option.
How did the police establish or why are they so confident that Razak should only be charged with abetting and not ordering the murder unless they know who ordered the murder? For instance, if the policemen had confessed who ordered the murder then of course police know who ordered and this is the reason why they are so confident as to charge Razak only with abetting. If police do not know with certainty, they have not established who ordered the murder, how can they charge Razak with only abetting? How can they not charge Razak with ordering when there are no others involved as they insist and all murders must have an instigator?
IF ONLY THESE THREE ARE INVOLVED AND RAZAK MERELY ABETTED OR ASSISTED THE MURDER AS CHARGED, WHO ORDERED THE KILLING? YOU MEAN THE POLICEMEN BOTH ORDERED AND EXECUTED THE MURDER OR THIS MURDER HAPPENED SPONTANEOUSLY WITHOUT ANY ONE ORDERING AND RAZAK MERELY ABETTED THEM?
THUS IN DECLARING ONLY THREE ARE INVOLVED AND CHARGING RAZAK ONLY WITH ABETTING, THE AUTHORITIES MAY HAVE COMMITTED A FAUX PAS OR MONUMENTAL BUNGLE AND IT APPEARS THAT EVERYONE INVOLVED INCLUDING PROFESSIONALS ARE NONPLUSSED OR AT LOSS AT THIS PREPOSTEROUS SITUATION.
HOW COME NO ONE, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE PROFESSIONAL INVOLVED IN THIS CASE HAS NOT POINTED OUT THIS FUNDAMENTAL ABSURDITY THAT CANNOT BE REFUTED THAT EXPOSES THE AUTHORITIES AS NOT COMING TOTALLY CLEAN?
WHY IS THE POLICE SO RELUCTANT TO CHARGE RAZAK WITH ORDERING THE MURDER? IS IT BECAUSE THE TWO POLICEMEN HAVE CONFESSED WHO ORDERED AND THEY KNOW WHO ORDERED AND ORDERING CARRIES A MANDATORY DEATH SENTENCE FOR RAZAK IF CONVICTED?
THUS THE PERSON OF DISCERNMENT ARMED WITH REASON CAN WORK OUT THE TRUTH IN ANY SITUATION. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THERE IS A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE BECAUSE WHAT FOOLISH PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT JUST AS YOU EXIST NOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO EXIST AFTER YOU DIE IN HELL, THE ANIMAL WORLD, AS GHOSTS OR IN HEAVEN, THERE IS GOD AND HE SEES AND KNOWS ALL (ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA & JESUS), DIVINE PUNISHMENT IS FAR MORE PAINFUL AND EVERLASTING THAN HUMAN JUSTICE.
(Jesus said the counselor will convince you of sin, righteousness and judgment. Am I not convincing you of sin here and elsewhere as no man has done?)
A Far Fetched Affidavit:
The affidavit produced by Abdul Razak’s lawyers may have unwittingly ‘shot him in the foot’, although its implications may escape the public, judge and prosecution who cannot connect the dots.
What the affidavit admits is that Razak had an affair with Altantuya and she has become a nuisance to him by demanding money and blackmailing him such that he wanted the matter resolved in manner he did not specify but the judge presumptuously stated as ‘get rid of her’. In the affidavit Razak said he only asked Azila to arrange patrols around the house and told him not to do anything untoward against Altantuya. If any such thing were to happen to her, her family will look for me.
When harassed by Altantuya, Razak did not go directly to the police but sought the help of a contact, DSP Musa who recommended C/Insp Azilah (one of the two accused and reported Najib’s bodyguard).
Quote: On the morning of Oct 18, C/Insp Azilah called Razak and told him that he had killed six or more people before and therefore could help him stop the harassment.
THE ADMISSION THAT AZILAH BOASTED ABOUT HAVING KILLED SIX OR MORE PEOPLE AND THEREFORE COULD HELP RAZAK STOP THE HARRASSMENT MAY BE A FACT BUT ONLY A SELF SERVING HALF OF THE STORY OF WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED THAT IS INTENDED TO CAST AZILAH IN BAD LIGHT AND THE FULL STORY MAY BE THAT AZILAH SAID THAT IN THE CONTEXT OF A REQUEST TO HIM THAT HAS BEEN CONVENIENTLY LEFT OUT TO GET RID OF ALTANTUYA, WHAT AZILAH SAID WAS TO ASSURE THAT HE WAS UP TO THE TASK.
DOES C/INSP AZILAH’S BOAST THAT HE HAS KILLED SIX OR MORE PEOPLE BEFORE SUGGEST SOME POLICE PERSONNEL WORKED AS HIRED EXTERMINATORS WHO USUALLY GET AWAY WITH IT?
The affidavit admits that Razak and Azilah were in contact in the few days that culminated in her disappearance in front of his house. When Azilah was informed that Altantuya had come to Razak’s house on 19th Oct, he instructed that she should be kept engaged to await his arrival with another policeman and woman all in plainclothes in an unmarked police car to take her away after which she was never seen again.
It may be just a coincidence or it may be another inadvertent eye opener that Razak should meet DSP Musa at the DPM’s office on official business the next day and Razak said he asked DSP Musa about what happened to Altantuya to which the latter said that Azila has not reported to him.
Are police personnel legally permitted to do police business in a private capacity as seems to have occurred in this case, doing things for Razak and taking Altantuya away in an unmarked police car without the police force’s knowledge?
If Razak did not order the policemen to kill Altantuya but they recklessly did what was uncalled for, then it is the policemen who should be solely charged with her murder not Razak, unless they falsely implicated him.
IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE THAT ON A MATTER OF SUCH IMPORTANCE AS EXTERMINATING SOMEONE THAT APART FROM BEING GRUESOME, NEEDS CONSIDERABLE PLANNING TO CONCEAL FROM DETECTION AND LABOR & CAN HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES TO THEM IF THEY ARE CAUGHT THAT POLICE OFFICERS WHO ARE BODYGUARDS OF THE DPM AND THEREFORE SHOULD HAVE REASONABLE COMMON SENSE, DID NOT CLARIFY WITH RAZAK PRECISELY WHAT HE HAD IN MIND SHOULD BE DONE TO ALTANTUYA, THAT THEY SHOULD TAKE IT ON THEIR OWN INITIATIVE TO KILL HER AND DESTROY HER BODY BASED ON THE (IMPOSSIBLE) MISSIVE ‘GET RID OF HER BUT DON’T HARM HER’.
KILLING ANOTHER ON SOMEONE’S BEHEST IS NOT LIKE GOING OUT FOR DINNER BUT INVOLVES CONSIDERABLE PLANNING AND EFFORT TO CONCEAL IT FROM PUBLIC GAZE AT EVERY STAGE AND YOU ARE A FOOL IF YOU DID NOT THINK OF THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF DISCOVERY. HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL SIMPLY GO TO THE GREAT TROUBLE AND RISKS OF MURDERING ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER WITHOUT ASCERTAINING FOR SURE THAT IS THE REQUEST?
Unless the policemen inexplicably carried out the murder on their own, they must know who ordered them to kill and if they have stated who ordered the killing eg Razak, surely Razak should be charged with ORDERING the killing not ABETTING the killing. Why is Razak still charged with abetting when he obviously either directly or indirectly ordered the killing unless it was someone else who ordered the killing, and Razak is merely the scapegoat and therefore in a Freudian slip, the police stuck with a charge of abetment.
SINCE RAZAK BUT NOT THE POLICEMEN OR APPARENTLY ANYONE ELSE HAS ANY MOTIVE TO HAVE HER KILLED & HE HAS ADMITTED CONTACTING AND INSTRUCTING THE PERSONS IMPLICATED IN THE KILLING TO ‘DO SOMETHING TO HER’, HE SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH ORDERING RATHER THAN ABETTING. WHY ARE THE POLICE AVERSE TO CHARGE RAZAK WITH ORDERING BUT PREFER TO CHARGE HIM WITH ABETTING? IF RAZAK MERELY ABETTED, WHO ORDERED THE KILLING? SURELY IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO BRING THE PERSON WHO ORDERED THE KILLING RATHER THAN THE ONE WHO ABETTED?
SURELY THE POLICEMEN KNOW WHO ORDERED THEM TO DO THE KILLING AND SO UNLESS THEY ARE PLEADING NOT GUILTY OR TAKING COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY THEMSELVES IT MUST BE EASY ESTABLISHING WHO ORDERED THE KILLING. IF THESE POLICEMEN DID NOT KILL HER THEN WHAT DID THEY DO TO HER AFTER THEY TOOK HER AWAY FROM RAZAK’S HOUSE SO THAT SHE ENDED UP DEAD IN THAT MANNER?
IT APPEARS RAZAK IS UNUSUALLY READY TO CONCEDE THAT HE HAS AN AFFAIR WITH ALTANTUYA AND SO HE HAS MOTIVE TO HARM HER BUT HE DID NOT DO SO, HE ADMITS HE ENGAGED THE POLICEMEN INVOLVED BUT ONLY TO PATROL HIS HOUSE AND SPECIFICALLY TOLD THEM TO ‘GET RID OF HER’ WITHOUT HARMING HER, WHAT HAPPENED TO HER SUBSEQUENTLY IS THE FAULT OF THE POLICE OFFICERS. BY CONCEDING LIMITED LIABILITY, HE IS DIVERTING ATTENTION FROM THE PERSON WHO ORDERED THE MURDER IF HE EXISTS, THAT IS RAZAK IS OFFERING HIMSELF AS A SACRIFICIAL GOAT BUT ONLY TO A LIMITED EXTENT.
Excerpts of affidavit:
He employed P. Balasubramaniam (a private investigator) on Oct 16, but the harassment (by Altantuya) continued, so he sought out DSP Musa Safri, whom he had befriended through his work at the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.
Razak said he asked DSP Musa to get police to patrol near his house for security reasons and the DSP introduced him to C/Insp Azilah Hatri.
On the morning of Oct 17, Altantuya came to see him at his house but his wife found out about it as he was not home.
“That night, there was a commotion outside my house and I immediately called DSP Musa. I also called the private investigator.
“Furthermore, DSP Musa had assured me that C/Insp Azilah would call me to help regarding the harassment,” he said.
“I told C/Insp Azilah not to do anything untoward against Altantuya. If any such thing were to happen to her, her family will look for me. I believe that as a police officer, he would not commit crime,” Razak said. (Razak carefully trying to distance himself from having ordered murder)
“I only asked him to get police to patrol around my house. I gave him my address and (that of) Hotel Malaya where the deceased was staying.”
The next day, on Oct 19, there was another commotion outside Razak’s house and he called C/Insp Azilah again.
“Azilah told me to ask my private investigator to continue talking to Altantuya until he arrived,” he said, adding that he again told C/Insp Azilah not to do anything untoward.
“Moments later, Azilah telephoned me and told me that he had arrived outside my house and that 'malam ini encik boleh tidur nyenyak (sir, tonight you shall sleep soundly) '.”
He said C/Insp Azilah, Kpl Sirul Azhar Umar and a policewoman then took Altantuya away in a police car.
Razak claimed that he had met DSP Musa at the Deputy Prime Minister’s office and asked what happened to Altantuya but DSP Musa said C/Insp Azilah did not update him.
Judge: Enough grounds to prove Razak abetted (or should it be ‘ordered’?) in murder
SHAH ALAM: A High Court judge found the events in Abdul Razak Baginda’s tell-all affidavit suggested his involvement in the murder of his Mongolian lover Altantuya Shaariibuu.
“The events clearly showed that there was enough grounds to prove that he abetted (why only abetted and not he ordered it when as the case appear to be, there is no one else who would benefit from her death or wanted her dead except Razak?) in the murder allegedly committed by two police personnel,” said Justice K.N. Segara.
Razak’s counsel Wong Kian Kheong read out the events on the morning of Oct 18 last year where Chief Insp Azilah called Razak and told him that he had killed six or more people before and therefore could help stop the harassment by the woman.
Wong (referring to affidavit and reading): I (Razak) told Chief Insp Azilah not to do anything untoward against Altantuya. If any such thing were to happen to her, her family will look for me. I believe that as a police officer, he would not commit a crime. I only asked him to get police to patrol around my house. I gave him my address and Hotel Malaya where the deceased was staying.
Judge: Whatever for did he give the address of the hotel to this man who said he had killed before? The relationship had ended in 2005 and suddenly, she is back in the picture in 2006. You don’t call the authority but a crime was committed after that.
Wong: The accused took Chief Insp Azilah as a police officer who can help.
Judge: Is your client an ordinary layman for you to give me such an answer?
Wong: My client did admonish Chief Insp Azilah.
Judge: Why call Azilah and not the police directly?
Wong: To protect the family.
Judge: This is your version but there are a lot of gaps. This is one man who claimed he had killed yet you went to him.
Wong: But the accused had admonished him.
Judge: Who is he to admonish a police officer? He had no right. Is he the boss of this person? Is he the IGP? These are questions that you cannot run away from answering.
Wong: He wanted Azilah to help him in a legal manner.
Judge: Come on, you expect the court to believe this? (He is mocking and that is unbecoming of a judge who should be unemotionally and deal with facts. Suffice to say “I do not believe”, the come on is derisive with karma attached). He has such a big establishment. He can just walk into the Brickfields police station and see someone. Anyway, I have not formed any conclusion about your client’s guilt. I am only questioning based on what is stated in the affidavit.
“The whole thing is here. He called the person to get rid of her. (Razak never said he wanted to get rid of her, the judge is speaking carelessly). No need to go any further in relation to abetment. The police officer is no longer helping him as a police. He is there in his personal capacity. This particular episode has flashed the entire abetment act.”
Justice Segara said that it was in this light that the court would look at the case.
“We will only know at the time of the trial when we hear all the other people’s versions. Then, we will know whether he had asked to kill or not. At the moment, he abetted in contacting Azilah, knowing very well that he had killed six people,” he said.
When counsel read out the next day’s events but skipped the part that Razak had gone to the Deputy Prime Minister’s office for official reason, Justice Segara said:
“Why did you skip that? There is nothing to worry. He just went there. It is in the affidavit. He should have known better and go straight to the police or IGP and not embarrass the DPM.
“Facts must surface. You cannot hide. The truth will always prevail.”
Wong then read out the omitted part. Here Razak claimed that he had met DSP Musa in the DPM’s office and asked what happened to Altantuya but DSP Musa said Chief Insp Azilah did not update him.
A few days later, Razak asked DSP Musa again and the latter gave the same answer as before.
This part of the affidavit, the judge said, was an attempt to drag people in and create embarrassment.
.
Questions regarding purchase of Sukhoi aircraft worth RM3.24 billion (Apparently written by Anwar Ibrahim)The purchase of 18 Sukhoi Su-30MK aircraft by the Ministry of Defence worth US$900 million (RM3.24 billion) raises serious questions on the integrity and transparency of the deal.The Ministry of Defence procured the aircraft from a Russian state company, Federal State Unitary Enterprise ‘Rosoboronexport’ on 19 May 2003. Part of the deal includes the RM90 million Malaysian space program.Under the deal, IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd. was appointed as the local agent for the Russian state company and was set to receive 12 percent (12%) of the total purchase price, worth US$108 million (RM380 million). In a letter dated 18 February 2004 from S. V. Chemezov, the First Deputy Director-General of the Russian state company, to the Minister of Defence, the Russian state company authorised former cabinet minister Datuk Seri Mohd Adib Adam as Chairman of IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd. to liaise with the Minister of Defence to facilitate the process.On 29 March 2005, Mohd Zainuri Mohd Idrus, a director for IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd., filed a suit and petition against Mega Heights Sdn. Bhd.; Integrated Manufacturing Technologies Sdn. Bhd.; Datuk Seri Mohd Adib; his son Ahmad Azam; his sister Askiah Adam (all directors of IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd.); as well as the company secretary for IMT Defence, Loke Foon Keng; and IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd. to prevent the company from sacking him from his position.In the hearing, Mohd Zainuri alleged that Datuk Seri Mohd Adib Adam and Askiah Adam wanted to prevent him from exposing the reality of the Sukhoi deal. He also alleged that he had lost faith in their ability to protect the interests of IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd.High Court Judge Siti Mariah Ahmad rejected separate applications from Datuk Seri Mohd Adib and Loke Foon Keng to dismiss the petition from Mohd Zainuri.However, in 2006, the Judge Siti Mariah Ahmad granted Datuk Seri Mohd Adib and Mega Heights Sdn. Bhd. leave to commence committal proceedings against Mohd Zainuri and his two lawyers for leaking the details of the Sukhoi deal. In December 2006, the Court allowed an application from Mohd Zainuri to strike off Askiah Adam as a defendant to the suit.On 30 September 2006, Mohd Zainuri lodged a police report (AMPANG/017696/06) at the Ampang District Police Headquarters alleging Datuk Seri Mohd Adib had stolen the US$108 million (RM 380 million) commission that was supposed to be channelled to the company.According to the report, Datuk Seri Mohd Adib had secretly registered a new company registered in Labuan bearing a name similar to IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd., allegedly in order to channel the commission illegally to the new company. The report was then sent to the Commercial Crime Investigations Department Headquarters.Malaysians have the right to know: What really transpired in the antics alleged by Mohd Zainuri in IMT Defence Sdn. Bhd.? Why haven’t the police or the Anti-Corruption Agency begun investigations on the allegations made in the police report? Why do we see a pattern of questionable agents being appointed in procurement deals worth billions of ringgit by the Ministry of Defence?Ultimately, we want to know: Who are the real beneficiaries of these dubious defence deals? Does it include as alleged, close family members of the Minister of Defence? ANWAR IBRAHIM16 January 2007
Affidavit Affirms Guilt That Must Be Greater Than Admitted:
Those who are guilty usually concede guilt that is lesser never more than reality (unless there is incentive), and therefore if Razak’s affidavit is implausible, his guilt must be greater and cannot be lesser than he contends.
And what did Razak contend in his (carefully but foolishly crafted) affidavit?
He acknowledged he had an affair with Altantuya but he only asked C/Insp Azilah to get police to patrol around his house and not to harm Altantuya.
Because it is not credible that a policeman who was only told to get police to patrol around his house (and nothing else, according to the affidavit) ended up murdering the woman, his role must be greater than that. Disposing of someone is not like going down a street to run an errant for someone, so without considerable financial inducement and specific instructions few if any will undertake murder on his own initiative or so casually, even if they think they can get away scot-free.
How feasible or what can regular police patrol achieve or is it likely cost effective for police to regularly patrol around his house when he already has his own guards?
THUS THE NETT EFFECT OF PRODUCING AN AFFIDAVIT THAT IS IMPLAUSIBLE IS TO CONFIRM BY THE HORSE’S MOUTH THAT HIS ROLE IN ALTANTUYA’S DEATH IS GREATER THAN JUST GETTING THE POLICE TO PATROL AROUND HIS HOUSE. IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEANS HE ORDERED THE MURDER FOR IT MAY STILL BE JUST ABETTING AS CHARGED BUT ABETTING TO A GREATER DEGREE.
ANWAR SPENT SIX YEARS IN PRISON FOR ABUSE OF POWER FOR ALLEGEDLY TRYING TO SUPPRESS INVESTIGATIONS INTO HIS HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT. RAZAK HIMSELF HAS NO POWER TO ORDER A DELETION OF IMMIGRATION RECORDS (AS REPORTED BY ANWAR) AND TO GET BAIL FOR A NON BAILABLE OFFENCE. ARE THESE NOT ABUSE OF POWER BY UNKNOWN POWERFUL PEOPLE?
THE FACT THAT HE GOT BAIL FOR THIS SERIOUS OFFENCE (WHEN THE POLICE OFFICERS DID NOT) IS CLEAR INDICATION THAT THERE ARE POWERFUL PEOPLE BEHIND THE SCENES PULLING STRINGS AS BEST AS CAN TO ASSIST HIM AND THEREFORE THERE IS MORE TO THIS AFFAIR THAN MEETS THE EYE.
IF IT IS PURELY A PRIVATE MATTER OF AN ANALYST’S SEXUAL AFFAIR THAT WENT BADLY WRONG, WHY SHOULD IMMIGRATION RECORDS OF ALTANTUYA’S VISITS TO MALAYSIA BE SECRETLY DELETED? IS IT BECAUSE THE RECORD WILL BE TELLING? WITHOUT A POWERFUL PERSON PULLING STRINGS CAN THIS HAPPEN?

Why I Must Supersede The Counselor:

EVEN IF THEY WORSHIP WEALTH, HEALTH AND SENSATE PURSUITS, THERE IS NO MORE IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION FOR BEINGS IN THIS WORLD THAN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT REGULARLY BESETS OR HOUNDS THEM, THAT BECOME INCREASINGLY INTRACTABLE AND WILL DESTROY THEIR MINDS AND SEND THEM TO PERDITION IF THEY MERELY TRIED TO MANAGE OR CONTAIN THEM.

THAT THERE IS NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN STRESS IS EMPHASIZED REPEATEDLY BY THE BUDDHA:
"Very good, Anuradha. Both formerly & now, it is only stress that I describe, and the cessation of stress."
"'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' There is the case where a monk is endowed with discernment of arising & passing away -- leading to the right ending of stress.
"Therefore your duty is the contemplation: 'This is stress...This is the origination... the cessation... the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress.'"
"And what is disclosed by me? 'This is stress,' 'This is the origination of stress,' 'This is the cessation of stress,' 'This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress'. And why are they disclosed by me? Because they are connected with the goal. They lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding.

THUS IF SOMEONE WERE TO COME ALONG AND SPELL OUT PRECISELY THE ORIGINS OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (NAMELY CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AN LOUDNESS THAT HAVE EQUIVALENTS IN MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTIONS), HOW IT IS TOTALLY CURABLE, HE HAS BENEFITED ALL BEINGS IN A WAY THAT CAN BE CONSTRUED AS INCOMPARABLE AND UNIMAGINABLE IN THE PAST.

I know and I can see that everyone including animals and insects in this world constantly stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness and these have their equivalents in their motion, thinking and way they perceive (see, hear, smell, taste and touch) and they are the prime if not only reasons why they must be beset by insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that will be imparted on all others who interact with them and therefore these are also the instruments through which they sin by hurting others as they hurt themselves.

A stretched syllable sounds distinct and cannot be mistaken for a syllable without stretching.

A stretched syllable with speed change (changes in pitch or frequency) sounds distinct and cannot be mistaken for a stretched syllable without speed change.

Speech with speed changes between syllables and words is distinct and cannot be mistaken by those who are discerning for speech without speed changes between syllables and words.

A stretched syllable with loudness change (changes in pitch or frequency) sounds distinct and cannot be mistaken for a stretched syllable without loudness change.

Speech with loudness changes between syllables and words is distinct and cannot be mistaken by those who are discerning for speech without loudness changes between syllables and words.

Speech with combined constant stretching of syllables, constant changes of speed and loudness within and between stretched syllables is distinct and cannot be mistaken by those who are discerning for speech without stretching, changes in speed and loudness.

For any given vocalization by a person or animal or insect, I can demonstrate how different it will sound if there are no stretching of notes, no changes of speed and loudness.

THUS BECAUSE WHAT I SAY THAT HAS NOT BEEN SAID BY ANYONE IS UNIVERSAL, APPLIES TO ALL BEINGS TRAPPED IN THE LOWER REALMS, IS THE FUNDAMENTAL KEY TO THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST BESET THEM AND WITH WHICH THEY PERSECUTE ALL OTHERS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH THEM, WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO DWELL IN SOME FORM WHAT I SAID IF HE IS TO BE OF ADVANTAGE TO YOU TO COME, CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND SIN AND TEACH YOU ALL THINGS. IF I HAVE DONE SO, I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM.

I TRIGGERED CHANGES IN THE CONSCIOUSNESS THAT SWEPT AROUND THE WORLD AFTER 1977 AND UNLESS THERE ARE CO-TRIGGERS, I MUST BE THE TRIGGER OF THE CONTINUED CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS BECAUSE I DID NOT COPY ANYONE WHEN I SET OUT TO CHANGE MYSELF IN AN UNPRECEDENTED WAY THAT WENT AGAINST THE NORMS & CREED OF SOCIETY. IF THESE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES ARE TO THE ADVANTAGE OF EVERYONE THEN THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO CAUSE THEM TO OCCUR IF HE IS TO BE TO YOUR ADVANTAGE TO COME. IF I HAVE DONE SO, I WILL HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM.

JESUS SAID HE HAS YET MANY THINGS TO SAY TO YOU BUT YOU CANNOT BEAR THEM NOW BUT WHEN THE COUNSELOR COMES HE WILL GUIDE YOU TO ALL THE TRUTH. THIS SUGGESTS THAT CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS EXISTING MADE YOU UNABLE TO BEAR WHAT JESUS WANTED TO SAY TO YOU THEN BUT WHEN THE COUNSELOR COMES, THE LIFTING OF CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS WILL THEN MAKE YOU ABLE TO BEAR WHAT YOU COULD NOT THEN. THUS WHOEVER MADE YOU ABLE TO BEAR WHAT YOU COULD NOT BEAR PREVIOUSLY MUST BE THE COUNSELOR.
JESUS SAID HE WILL COUNSEL, HE WILL ADVICE YOU AND THEREFORE WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ADVICE YOU AND TAKE FROM WHAT IS HIS AND MAKE IT KNOWN TO YOU. IF HE SPEAKS LIKE OTHER MEN AND THE CHURCH THEN THERE IS NO NEED FOR HIM TO COME. IN ADDITION THE COUNSELOR WILL APPEAR LIKE SOMEONE WHO SPEAKS ON HIS OWN AUTHORITY BUT IT IS NOT SO BECAUSE WHATEVER HE HEARS (THAT OTHERS DO NOT HEAR) HE WILL SPEAK. IF THE COUNSELOR KNOWS EVERYTHING HE WILL NOT NEED TO HEAR.

THUS WHOEVER DISGREES WITH ME, TAKES ISSUE WITH WHAT I SAY (EG I DISAGREE WITH YOU, I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEONE OR SMILING AND LIKING IS GOOD) IS PITTING HIMSELF AGAINST ME, FOOLISHLY PITTING HIMSELF AGAINST A POINT OF VIEW THAT IS UNIQUE, NEVER BEFORE PRESENTED TO YOU. IF I AM CORRECT AND SMILING (LAUGHTER WITHOUT SOUND) AND LIKING (FORCEFUL BLIND ATTRACTION FOR SOMEONE THAT APPLIES FORCE ON YOUR MIND TO HARM IT) THEN YOU WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN BUT PERMITTED TO FULFILL YOUR WRONG VIEWS THAT ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA HAS TWO DESTINATIONS: HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.

ANYONE WITH REASONABLE DISCERNMENT WILL REALIZE THAT PEOPLE STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES (EG ‘AAAAHHH’ INSTEAD OF ‘AH’, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. IF IN ADDITION HE HAS PAID ATTENTION AND MADE EFFORT TO STOP HIMSELF FROM STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS HE WILL HAVE EXPERIENCED A FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION HE NEVER DREAMT POSSIBLE TO NOT QUIBBLE WITH ME, TO REALIZE HE IS PITTING HIMSELF AGAINST AN UNUSUAL IF NOT UNIQUE PERSON. IF YOU HAVE NOT TRIED THE INCOMPARABLE DIFFERENCE NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BESTOWS, YOU HAVE NOT RIGHT TO DISMISS WHAT I SAY UNLESS YOU WANT TO COURT JUDGMENT.

OBJECTIVE OR UNEMOTIONAL READERS MAY CONCLUDE I UNCANNILY FIT THE DESCRIPTION OF THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED:
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (like Jesus was a counselor, a person who came), to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (Jesus says the world that may include you cannot receive or accept or welcome the counselor) neither sees (can recognize) him nor knows (have knowledge, can work out or have been told) him; you know (Jesus did not say you can recognize him but you can work out who he is or know him) him, for he dwells with you (if the counselor is a counselor in your mind and you still need Jesus to tell you he dwells with you he must be a hard to detect or false counselor. If the counselor is someone who dwells physically with you and you do not realize then Jesus is merely informing you that he will be dwelling in your midst), and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant for the counselor to come).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (If consciousness changes are possible and it alleviates suffering then whoever is the counselor must also cause consciousness to change)And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Did a consciousness change in recent years enable you to bear what you could not previously?) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority (if he does not appear as someone speaking on his own authority why should Jesus inform you so?), but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (have I not taken from what is Jesus’ and the Buddha’s and declared to you in a way that no man has ever done? Jesus said let your yes be yes only, anything more comes from evil. I have demonstrated in many ways how people including those who call themselves good never let their yes be yes only but emotionally do and say much more that comes from evil). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.

THE BUDDHA SAID A PERSON WHO PREACHES FROM THE TEACHINGS AND DISCIPLINE DECLARED BY HIM IS RARE AND BECAUSE I HAVE NOT JUST PREACHED BUT PREACHED IN A WAY THAT IS UNIQUE THAT DIFFERS FROM ALL OTHERS TODAY AND IN THE PAST, I AM A RARE, EVEN UNIQUE PERSON ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.

Lion Kisses Benefactor:

It is to be expected from what the Buddha said that everyone (including him) have existed as animals countless times in the past that this lion appears to be expressing gratefulness that is of an order that equals and even exceed the capability of many humans.
The lion had been abused, beaten and starved to near death whilst working in a circus but was nursed back to health by the woman in the picture.
Give me a kiss, you big softie

Through the bars of his cage, Jupiter the former circus attraction stretches his giant paws around the neck of Ana Julia Torres and appears to plant a kiss on her lips.
"This hug is the most sincere one that I have received in my life."
Jupiter was rescued six years ago from a traveling menagerie in which he was beaten and starved almost to death. Since then, Miss Torres has seen a frightened and disturbed animal blossom into one of the friendliest creatures in her care.
***
What Jesus said: And I tell you, make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous mammon, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal habitations is in line with what the Buddha said that you can exist as animals and the human state is a rare brief window for you to redeem yourself. If you are born and die as animals building a pile of skeletons that is as high as a mountain for the duration of an eon or Age that would be a form of eternal habitations.
The Buddha had said he cannot think of anything more tormenting than hell or the animal womb.
Even though the suffering accompanying human existence far outweigh whatever pleasures, even for those exceptionally endowed with wealth, health and sources of sensate pleasures, the Buddha said that the human state is hard to obtain and it comes to an end faster than the angels who move faster than the sun and moon that move faster than a man who can catch four falling arrows. Compared to the billions of years you spend in eternal punishment as animals or non human beings, the century lifespan of a man is like a blink of an eye.
Recent more accurate isotope dating of a human skull found in South Africa reaffirms evidence that modern man only existed no more than 60,000 years and yet in that time and from being nearly wiped out 10,000 years ago by a super volcano eruption at Lake Toba Sumatra mankind has brought the earth to the brink of disaster. Thus out of the 4 billion years of the earth’s existence, there is only a window of 60,000 years that is near the close of the Age in which you are permitted to exist as humans.
The Buddha said ordinary people have suffering due to them that is as vast as an ocean and as long as an eternity and they have already shed their blood that is greater than the four great oceans from having their necks cut as animals (cattle, sheep, hens, pigs and humans), there have been many eons each of which may last many billions of years.
THUS YOU SHOULD REFLECT THAT EVEN THOUGH THE HUMAN STATE CAN BE BESET BY TORMENTING SUFFERING, IT IS A VERY HARD TO GET STATE AND THE NEXT OCCASION YOU RETURN AS A HUMAN MAY BE EVEN IN ANOTHER ETERNITY THAT YOU WILL SPEND WANDERING AS ANIMALS THAT THE BUDDHA DESCRIBED AS A TORMENTING STATE OF EXISTENCE.
Vulnerability to Upset Is Warning Of Grave Future Danger:
If you can be upset by anything that has happened, your mind can be disturbed or emotionally disturbed by what someone else did or said, it is warning that you are not safe but in danger of future suffering that may not end with death but may extend even for another eternity.
It is possible to train one’s mind in a way to get rid of all mental force or emotions such that one cannot be disturbed or perturbed by whatever others say or do to you. It is not just saints that need to achieve such (true not acted) equanimity of true but if anyone should cherish a release from his suffering, he must make effort to be permanently calm and clearly thinking and a crucial step in that direction is to pay attention to stop stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness when speaking.
IF YOUR MIND CAN BE UPSET BY THINGS PEOPLE SAY OR DO, ARE VULNERABLE TO SADNESS, WORRIES, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY, THEY ARE INDICATORS OF FUTURE WOE.
Time Is Passing You By:
Even though you are unaware of it, unaware even that you are stretching your syllables, whilst you are busy stretching your syllables, time is ticking away and passing you by and in order for anyone to stretch his syllables, he must detach himself from reality or the present to enter a private world of prolonging.
Because it only takes a moment to articulate a syllable, if you stretch it, you are prolonging its duration which is impossible because time cannot be prolonged and therefore you must excuse yourself from the present to enter a private world of stretching or prolonging that is detached from the present, out of synchrony with the present and hopefully reenter the loop of reality once you finished your stretching or prolonging.
Because people constantly stretch or prolong all their syllables to greater or lesser extent, they have therefore permanently isolated themselves from the present, residing in their own private or inner make believe world. In truth they are constantly rehashing, rendering by regurgitation from memory and trying to insert what they rehash into the current situation and faking they are present when they are somewhere else in their own private worlds and only intermittently monitoring their environment to sample what is going on.
IT ONLY TAKES A MOMENT THAT IS STANDARD FOR EVERYONE TO SAY A SYLLABLE AND IF YOU MUST STRETCH OR PROLONG IT, YOU MUST REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THE MOMENT OR REALITY TO PROLONG IT BECAUSE TIME WAITS FOR NO MAN AND THE MOMENT WILL NOT WAIT FOR YOU TO FINISH STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES AND SO YOU MUST BE LEFT BEHIND FOR YOU TO ACCOMPLISH YOUR EXPRESSION OF YOUR SYLLABLE THAT TAKES ONLY A MOMENT.
THEREFORE STRETCHING SYLLABLES OR PROLONGING THE TIME WITH WHICH TO SAY IT IS NOT CHARMING OR BENEFICIAL BUT A FORM OF PERVERSION OF WHAT IS EVIL, FALSE AND STRESSFUL IS GOOD AND TRUE.
What Is Stress?
Stress is merely the seizure of the mind and body (muscles) by force as a result of constant unnecessary application of force often to intense levels through forceful stretching of the syllables and units of motion, changes in speed and loudness (strength of force).
Stress is the sum of the consciousness experience of force seizing the mind and body in a spasm that it then struggles to shake off by various ploys (eg smoking, take a drink, sports or disengagement) and inevitably takes time, effort and difficulty to reduce to a more tolerable level but never fully exit (unless one ceases applying force on one’s mind through one’s often unconscious style).
The mental experience of stress is always painful and associated with restlessness, giddiness and distraction or inability to pay attention or absorb or understand information input eg what one reads or hears.
The bodily experience of stress includes muscular tension, elevated blood pressure and heart beat.
EVERY TIME YOU EXPERIENCE STRESS, YOU ARE FEEDING YOUR MIND WITH POISON THAT IS NOT ONLY UNPALATABLE BUT INCREMENTALLY HARMS IT SO THAT IT IS HEADED FOR DOOM. STRESS IS NOT BLAMELESS BECAUSE IT CAN BE ELIMINATED BY NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND WHEN YOU ARE STRESSED, YOU IMPART ALL OTHERS WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH YOU WITH STRESS.
Stress Cannot Be Managed:
Quote: Stress management courses, stress management advice.
Comment: It is not harmless wrong view but it is deadly wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb to think and encourage others to think they can manage their stress. Further because stress is forceful and conditioning, your continued dalliance with stress is conditioning yourself ever so tightly to stress so that it becomes easier to arouse to more intense levels that will become harder to shed and you are headed for final mad uncontrollable stress.
The right view concerning stress is that it has a cause in the person’s behavior namely his forceful stretching of syllables and units of motion, his constant forceful changing of speed and strength of force (loudness) and his acceptance or willing exposure of himself or receptiveness to the same from others.
Stress cannot be managed just as poison cannot be managed but one must pay attention to identify all forceful stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness in one’s speech and thinking and then to painstakingly make effort to put them to a permanent stop. One learns to detect stretching, changes of speed and loudness in all others’ speech and learn not to accept or appreciate them without disliking them (just because you do not appreciate others’ style does not mean you must dislike them because disliking applies force to your mind).
If you think you can coexist with stress, you are like a man who thinks he can sleep with a viper. One day it will surely bite you fatally. If you try to encourage others to do so, you are creating karma for leading others similarly to woe.
CONSTANT APPLICATION OF FORCE ON YOUR MIND:
WHETHER A PERSON IS APPLYING FORCE ON HIS MIND IS SOMETHING THAT CAN BE DETERMINED OBJECTIVELY AND IT NOT SOMETHING I CAN ACCUSE OTHERS AND THEY CAN DENY.
THE TRUTH IS THAT ALL BEINGS TRAPPED HERE, WHAT THE BUDDHA CALLS THE LOWER REALMS THAT INCLUDE HELL, THE ANIMAL WORLD AND MAN ARE CONSTANTLY APPLYING FORCE TO THEIR MINDS BY CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS (STRENGTH OF FORCE).
IF IT IS TRUE YOU ARE CONSTANTLY APPLYING FORCE ON YOUR MIND, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO STRESS AND WILL ULTIMATELY DAMAGE YOUR MIND TO DESCEND INTO INSANITY.
JUST AS PERSON WHO USES HIS MIND AS A PUNCHING BAG SHOULD EXPECT THAT IT WILL ONE DAY SHATTER, ANYONE WHO IS CONSTANTLY APPLYING FORCE ON HIS MIND, ALLOWING OTHERS TO APPLY FORCE ON HIS MIND SHOULD EXPECT HIS MIND TO SHATTER.
ANYONE WHO IS EMOTIONAL, WHO CAN BE ANGRY, WHO LIKES AND DISLIKES IS APPLYING FORCE ON HIS MIND AND DICING WITH TORMENT.
A Purpose of Style Is To Persecute Others:
An important purpose of style is to punish others, make others suffer. People know the added force in how they speak and do things annoy others, cause suffering in others and they have a sadistic pleasure in seeing others suffering and harassed by them.
Thus apart from being for show, to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others, the purpose of style is also to cause suffering to others.
NO MATTER HOW STYLISH PEOPLE MAY DENY TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS, AN IMPORTANT PURPOSE OF STYLE IS AGGRESSION, TO LASH AT OTHERS, TO MAKE OTHERS SUFFER BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE SUFFERING AND THEY HAVE A SECRET PERVERSE PLEASURE IN SEEING OTHERS SUFFER OR MADE UNCOMFORTABLE BY THE WAY THEY SAY OR DO THINGS TO OTHERS.
Loss Of Control Not Uncontrolled:
Dislike is not so much a case of the being force of going against self being uncontrolled as its control being lost by the force of self preservation.
Whenever the force of self preservation is the top dog, it is controlling and dictating to the force of going against self as it drives and powers all that being’s activities in speech, motion, perceiving and thinking, that being has the consciousness experience of liking whatever it is saying, doing, thinking and perceiving.
Whenever the force of self preservation is struggling to control or has lost control of the force of going against self as it drives and powers all that being’s activities in speech, motion, perceiving and thinking, that being has the consciousness experience of dislike for whatever it is saying, doing, thinking and perceiving.
Different people have different capacity for liking and disliking, their like and dislike as a result of conditioning by self and others have become very strong. Just like you can go to a gym and develop your muscles, you can work to exercise your mental force so that you develop a liking and disliking that can accelerate rapidly to great intensity and be hard to shake off.
As the person’s force of going against self becomes very powerful and it can accelerate rapidly to gain great strength, it becomes harder for his force of self preservation to control it and the person’s disliking becomes increasingly easily aroused, compelling or involuntary and it is agonizing rather than a pleasure and he is a danger to himself or others because once provoked he can be homicidal.
IT IS THE PERSON’S FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVE, CONSTANTLY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT MUST BE CONSTANTLY OPPOSED OR MODULATED BY HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION AND SO LONG AS THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IS IN CONTROL OF THE SITUATION, THE PERSON EXPERIENCES LIKING FOR WHATEVER IS HAPPENING, WHATEVER HE IS SAYING OR DOING BUT AS SOON AS HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IS STRUGGLING TO CONTROL OR HAS LOST CONTROL OF HIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF (EG HIS ANGER IS AROUSED BY WHAT YOU SAID), HE EXPERIENCES DISLIKE THAT IS AT THE CORE OF ANGER, HATRED, SADNESS, JEALOUSY. GREED, LUST, ENVY, PRIDE & EXCITEMENT ARE NOTHING MORE THAN LIKE DRESSED UP IN FANCY CLOTHES FOR THE OCCASION.
The Buddha is the highest:
The Buddha said he had spent seven eons (each may last billions of years) as the holder of power or all powerful one) and he came by himself (nobody sent him, therefore he is as he says, the One Who Thus Comes) in this destined to be his last life to teach those with ears the way out of suffering either to heaven or if they were wise to a complete cessation of all further existing. He claimed to be the Perfect One, the Knower Of All and no one in the cosmos can do anything to him. He never claimed to the only Buddha but he said each eon has its Buddha and he is this eon’s self awakened one. Only He could awake himself whilst his deputies and disciples were awakened by him.
By contrast, Jesus was sent by his Father with a message to humans (not animals).
The Buddha is higher than God because he knows things that God does not know and he knows things about God that He himself does not know.
On one occasion, God said He will make the Buddha disappear and the Buddha invited Him to do so but He found He could not make the Buddha disappear but instead the Buddha can make God unable to see but only hear the Buddha. If God was higher than the Buddha then He should be able to see the Buddha all the time or the Buddha should not be able to make himself invisible to God.
Yet continued existence as a separate being has no allure to the Buddha because once enlightened, a being has no desire for further separate existence which is ultimately false or illusory. Conceit is one of five upper fetters that bind beings to continued existence in the pure realms. The other fetters are attachment to form, the formless, ignorance and restlessness or a desire for change. Nirvana is the unchanging or changeless.
Quote:
Baka Brahma: If you (the Buddha) were not born of earth, water, fire, air, gods, the lords of the populace, brahma, âbhassarà, Subhàkinnà, Vehapphalà, the Almighty brahma, I will now disappear you. (Baka Brahma tells the Buddha He will disappear the Buddha)
The Buddha: Brahma if it is possible do so.
Then Brahma saying I will make the recluse Gotama disappear was not able to do so.
Then bhikkhus, I (the Buddha) said, “Brahma I will make you disappear. Then I performed a fete of super normal power in which Brahma, his retinue and his gathering could not see me, yet could hear me and I said this verse.”“I saw fear in being and non-being, not desiring any being. [1]I did not hold with interest to anything.”
Prolong & Change:
The mantra of all beings in this world is to mobilize their mental forces to prolong (stretch), change speed and strength of force whatever activity in speech, motion, perceiving and thinking that they undertake.
STYLE IS NEVER LEARNT USING REASON BUT COPIED BY ROTE USING FORCE FROM OTHERS EITHER SINGULARLY OR AMALGAMATING THE STYLES OF A NUMBER OF PEOPLE. THEREFORE JUST AS THERE IS NO REASON OR MEANING IN STYLE, REASON IS NOT NEEDED TO ADOPT STYLE, ONE MERELY USE FORCE TO APE OTHERS OR CONDITION ONESELF TO A STYLE OF ONE’S LIKING OR MAKES ONE’S MENTAL FORCE UNDULATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN A MANNER CONTROLLED BY ONE’S FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION.
Copying another person’s style is essentially perceiving or experiencing and memorizing as faithfully as possible the way with which the force in the style of the posture, motion and speech that one is desirous of copying is stretching, changing speed and strength. Nowhere in this sequence is reason or meaning required to be present but on the contrary, the presence of reason is inimical to the learning or copying of others’ styles because one will realize the adoption of style requires waste of energy, applies force on the mind that leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.
Children copy adults’ behavior, copy adults (eg their parents) ways of posturing, doing things and speaking. They copy how to speak angrily and tell off others like their parents do.
Thus all style in posture, motion and speech, how one sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches may be copied wholesale or with modifications from the styles visible present in others or even animals (just as apes imitate human behavior like smoking a cigar, humans imitate animal behavior)
An Appeal To Emotion Not Reason:
Quote: For 45 minutes, Yoong Thau hung on to a tree branch with one arm while clutching a year-old toddler tightly with the other. Beneath him was raging floodwaters 2.5m deep and the nearest building was 400m away.
Comment: Even without listening to the style of his rendering that is likely to be equally dramatic or stylish, the description is graphic reflecting the writer is a person engrossed in this world and either intentionally or unwittingly trying to similarly entrap others in this world. He is appealing to your emotion not reason.
A person who let his yes be yes only, who appeals to your reason rather than emotion, says that Yoong held on to a tree branch with one hand and his toddler with the other in flood waters that were 2.5m deep for 45 minutes.
THUS IN THIS CASE THERE IS STYLE IN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT HE SAYS AS WELL AS STYLE IN THE WAY HE SAYS IT IF IT WAS SPOKEN. RATHER THAN INNOCUOUS AND ME NITPICKING, WHAT HE SAID AND THE WAY HE SAID IS DEADLY FOR HIMSELF, CONDEMNING TO EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING. IF YOU HAVE BEEN WANDERING MANY EONS WITH EACH EON MANY BILLIONS OF YEARS LONG AND YOU HAVE SHED BLOOD FROM HAVING YOUR HEAD CUT THAT IS AS VAST AS THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS, THEN IT IS NO SURPRISE SUCH DRAMATIC LANGUAGE IS DEADLY. JESUS SAID YOU MUST BE PERFECT, AS YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN IS PERFECT.
Style Is By Definition Meaningless:
Style is whatever that is unnecessary in one’s postures, speech and motion. Because it is unnecessary, it is meaningless and therefore style is meaningless and if you incessantly forcefully practice what is unnecessary, you are willing yourself to be mad and this the end point of all people who are stylish.
Contrary to popular belief, what is necessary and unnecessary in carrying out something is not subjective but it can be objectively determined and universally applies to everyone.
For instance, in order to form a syllable, the vocal apparatus must be configured in a certain shape and air exhaled at a certain speed and force. It is unnecessary to change pitch and loudness by exhaling with accelerating speed and strength of force or prolong the syllable by maintaining exhalation longer than necessary. In addition it is unnecessary to change the speed at which syllables and words are formed or change loudness between syllables and words.
In order to reach for a cup of tea, it is necessary to move the hand from A to B at a constant reasonable speed and strength of force, it is unnecessary to describe a curved path with accelerating speed and strength of force.
How movements are stretched:
All movements however complex can be broken down into fundamental units of movements from point A to B.
All fundamental units of movement can be stretched in a straight line, in a curved or rotated way.
For instance if you twist your body around its axis in your stance in order to be stylish or sexy, you twist your head to look to the side, twist or rotate your shoulder the other way and your hips yet another way, you are stretching your body in a twisted or rotated way.
When a proud man lifts his chin high and puffs his chest forwards as he walks, he is stretching his neck in a curved way, puffing his chest forwards in a curved way.
When you tap a key with accelerating speed and strength of force, you are stretching your motion in a straight line that would have taken your finger way past the key if it was not there to arrest it.
THUS ALL MOVEMENTS AND POSTURES OF PEOPLE WHO ARE STYLISH ARE ALWAYS STRETCHED AND THEY CAN BE STRETCHED IN THREE WAYS EITHER IN A STRAIGHT LINE, CURVED LINE OR ROTATED OR TWISTED AROUND THE AXIS OF THE MOVEMENT.

What Is Style?

Style is nothing more than the way with which you posture your body parts (including face, limbs and torso), the way you move and speak, the characteristic stereotyped or repeated things you say or do that differ from others.
Pouting your lips or scowling or grinning or looking sullen or standing with one hip and shoulder presenting ahead of the other, your chin held high and head tilted to one side that differs from others is your style of POSTURE or STANCE.
Moving with stretched (usually curved or rotated) units of motion, constant changes in speed and strength of force (usually accelerating from A to B) that is typical of you but differs from others is your style of movement. In addition there are meaningless habitual movements that are for show or involuntary (eg clapping or wringing your hands, gesturing when talking) that constitute your style.
Speaking with stretched syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness that is typical of you but differs from others is your style of speech. In addition there are meaningless habitual things you say (eg small talk about weather, current affairs or favorite phrases like ‘that’s the way it is, ho, ho, ho’) that are for show or involuntary that constitute your style.
Style has no meaning, does not require meaning or reason but force is indispensable to put the body into the required postures, to stretch, change speed and strength of force.
Although style has no meaning, it has purpose or is intended for show specifically to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others.
Not only do stylish people want to impress you but they want and even demand you be impressed by their style. If you do not they may punish you by withholding favors. If you are exerting psychological pressures on others to display that they are impressed with you that makes them hypocrites and induces stress, restlessness and distraction in them, then in wanting others to be impressed by your antics, you are persecuting others with karma not merit attached.
All ordinary people and animals, even insects have a style that can be discerned objectively by someone who knows what style is and it is this style that pervades all their activities namely how they see, hear, smell, eat, think, move and vocalize that is the source of the insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that beset them, conditions them ever more intensely and is doomed for loss of control and insanity and with which they persecute others in their presence.
Nothing to do with reason:
Whenever the style and even substance of what you say or do is meant to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others, what is transmitted has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with blind unreasoning force. The fact that you perceive your style is meaningful reflects that you have advanced false perception and logic.
Whenever a person is deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated or dominated by the style or substance of what someone said or did, it is his mental force directly or emotion indirectly that is stirred, not his reason or rationality that is addressed. In other words, deceiving, impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others which are the only purposes of style have nothing to do with reason but are entirely the transmission and reception of force. Thus style is meaningless but entirely a transaction of force between an intending practitioner and his complicit or appreciative recipient.
It is the force in the style of what someone said or did, never reason or calm clear thinking that is transmitted that induces or coerces the recipient to believe or comply with or accept what is said or done to become deceived, intimidated or dominated.
When someone is impressed by the style of what you say or do, what merely happens is that he LIKES the way it is said or done to him or his mental force of going against self has been stirred in an undulating rise and fall in strength and speed as a result of witnessing your particular style. If he is unimpressed, he always dislikes your style although he may pretend he is impressed or indifferent and in this case, his mental force is roused by the sight or sound of your style that caused it to rise unabated in speed and strength that he may then conceal from view or deny to himself and you.
When someone is pleased by the style with which you say or do something that is reverential or deferential in a fabricated or for show way, his mental force has been stirred to like the style of how you say or do, and this has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with stirring the pleased person’s mental force.
Whenever you have a style (eg speaking angrily) to intimidate another, you want him to be intimidated or fearful and therefore the transmission of your mental force to intimidate him is more important than what you say.
Whenever you have a style to dominate a person (eg speak and posture like a doctor), you again are transmitting force that you want the other person to receive so that he becomes subservient.
THUS THE PURPOSES OF STYLE THAT ARE TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH APPEALING TO THE REASON OF THE RECIPIENT BUT THEY ARE ALL ABOUT USING FORCE TO COERCE THE RECIPIENT TO BE DECEIVED (FORCEFULLY ACCEPT THE FALSITY PROFFERED), IMPRESSED (LIKE), PLEASED (LIKE), INTIMIDATED (FEAR) OR DOMINATED (FORCE HIMSELF TO SUBMIT). THE TARGET OF STYLE IS THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE NEVER HIS REASON OR CALM CLEAR THINKING. THEREFORE IF YOU ARE A MAN OF STYLE, THERE IS STYLE TO WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE PRINCIPALLY OR ENTIRELY & A MAN OF REASON ONLY NOMINALLY OR MINIMALLY.
STYLE IS ALL ABOUT USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OR LOUDNESS THAT IS ADDRESSED TO RECIPIENTS’ MENTAL FORCES CAUSING THEM TO BECOME STIRRED TO BE DECEIVED (FORCEFULLY ACCEPT WHAT IS FALSEFULLY SAID OR DONE), IMPRESSED (LIKE), PLEASED (LIKE), INTIMIDATED (AROUSING FEAR) OR DOMINATED (FORCE THEMSELVES TO SUBMIT).
AND IT IS THIS INCESSANT APPLICATION ON THE STYLISH PERSON’S MIND AND TRANSMISSION OF FORCE TO OTHERS IN STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT IS ETHE ESSENCE OF STYE THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT ASSAILS THE STYLISH PERSON AND PERSECUTES HIS RECIPIENT WHILST INEXORABLY CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO FORCE, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTABILITY THAT WILL END IN MADNESS OR LOSS OF CONTROL.
THUS IF YOU HAVE A STYLE IN HOW YOU PERCEIVE (SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE AND TOUCH), THINK, SPEAK, POSTURE AND MOVE YOU HAVE A SIGNIFICANT CONSTANT PART OF YOU, YOUR STYLE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH FORCE AND YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE NOT TRUE REASON WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FORCE. IF YOU THINK YOU ARE A MAN OF REASON NOT FORCE, YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF THAT WILL END IN TRAGEDY.
REASON OR MEANING IS ALWAYS SPECIFIC FOR A PARTICULAR OCCASION, THEREFORE THE PURPOSE OF STYLE THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE THAT ARE NOT SPECIFIC FOR A PARTICULAR OCCASION BUT GENERALLY APPLIED TO MANY OTHER OCCASIONS CANNOT BE REASON. STYLE HAS AIMS OR OBJECTIVES NOT REASON OR DOES NOT TRANSMIT A SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION MESSAGE.
FURTHER ALL STYLE CANNOT BE REPRODUCED LIVE FRESH FOR EACH OCCASION BUT MUST BE COMMITTED TO MEMORY AND RENDERED BY ROTE STANDARDIZED FOR ALL OCCASIONS ARISING AND THEREFORE IT IS IMPERSONAL OR HYPOCRITICAL APART FROM CONVERTING THE PERSON INTO A ROBOT WITHOUT HIS AWARENESS. PEOPLE LIKE TO THINK THEY ARE WONDERFUL ALIVE PEOPLE BUT THEY ARE ISOLATED FROM REALITY, ONLY MONITORING WHAT IS HAPPENING AROUND INTERMITTENTLY, CONSTANTLY REHASHING BY ROTE WHAT THEY SAY, DO OR POSTURE WHILST THEY ARE LOST IN THEIR PRIVATE WORLD OF FANTASY AND SCHEMING.
STYLE IS USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS (MINDLESSLY) COPIED FROM OTHERS (BECAUSE ONE LIKES THE STYLE DISPLAYED) AND IT IS ALL ABOUT USING MENTAL FORCE TO PUT ONE’S BODY & FACES INTO CERTAIN STYLISH POSTURES, USING FORCE TO STRETCH ONE’S UNITS OF MOTION AND SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING, IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS.
THE RECEPTION OF STYLE PRESENTED TO YOU IS NOTHING MORE THAN AROUSING LIKE (IMPRESSED, PLEASED) OR DISLIKE (UNIMPRESSED, UNPLEASED) OR FEAR (INTIMIDATED OR DOMINATED) IN YOUR MIND IN COMPLIANCE TO WHAT THE STYLISH PERSON WANTS AND THIS (DECEIVED, IMPRESSED, PLEASED, INTIMIDATED OR DOMINATED) IS NOTHING MORE THAN YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS AS A RESULT OF THE UNDULATING RISE AND FALL OR UNABATED RISE OF YOUR FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF OR THE UNABATED RISE OF YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION (FEAR) AS A RESULT OF THE IMPACT OF THE FORCE IN THE STYLE THAT IS PRESENTED TO YOU.
WHENEVER YOU SPEAK ANGRILY, THE ANGRY WAY YOU SPEAK IS YOUR STYLE THAT IS INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE THE OTHER PERSON TO GET WHAT YOU WANT.
The Dark Side Of America:
In the aftermath of the Iranian Islamic Revolution and the holding of American hostages at its embassy, America had an interest in toppling the Iranian government by whatever convenient means preferably without spilling American blood.
America thought that an attack by Iraq on Iran will topple the Iranian Islamic government. Thus it was said that with America’s covert encouragement and provision of detailed satellite photos of Iranian positions may have emboldened Saddam to attack Iran thinking victory is certain. America also secretly supplied components to make chemical and biological weapons that were used against the Iranians and later used against the Kurds. There were stories that American advisers were covertly engaged in the conflict.
In the early days of Saddam’s rule, American intelligence supplied Saddam with the names of alleged communists that enabled Saddam to arrest and exterminate them.
Thus Saddam may be a demon who has killed millions both Iraqis and Iranians but behind the scenes it may be the Americans who were more culpable in pulling the puppet strings, who provided him with encouragement and means for genocide just as Bush may be largely a puppet being manipulated by a rightwing cabal behind the throne.
According to BBC, CIA agents who were supposed to be in Vietnam were at the hotel when Robert Kennedy was shot and one of them had boasted he was there when the ‘SOB’ JFK was shot and he was there when RFK was shot. CIA operatives may be angry with Kennedy because they blame him for the Bay of Pigs fiasco and apparently JFK wanted to disengage from Vietnam. Chile’s Pinochet dethroned Allende with the CIA’s help.
Not such a no brainer:
Just as Bush’s rightwing cabal foolishly thought it was a no brainer to storm and win in Iraq but instead they are bogged down in a quagmire, Saddam may have been seduced by America to think it is a no brainer invading and conquering Iran making himself a great Arab hero with the covert decisive aid of American satellite photography. Without American prompting and provision the means, Saddam may not have dared launch his Iranian adventure.
America has proven in many ways that it is far from righteous.
It is not averse to hold prisoners often without scrupulously ascertaining their guilt in illegal prisons in East Europe and Guantanamo Bay.
America is not averse to brutal torture and abuse of prisoners as demonstrated at Abu Ghraib.
America is not averse to fire rockets at wedding parties and houses in residential areas based on the hearsay that there are combatants.
America is not averse to telling lies eg weapons of mass destruction as an excuse to intervene.
America is not averse to rape and massacres of civilians, to killing defenseless wounded combatants merely on the fear they may be suicide bombers.
America is not averse to using banned weapons like phosphorus bombs that burn skin.
Right wing Americans resorted to all kinds of wrongdoing and dirty tricks, eg illegal contributions, smear, sabotage, disenfranchising black voters, even tampering with the voting mechanism in order to win elections.
America is living way beyond its means at the expense of the world because it is quite happy to keep paying for its purchases by pieces of paper that it prints that the foolish world is quite happy to keep receiving.
The Buddha is the highest:
The Buddha said he had spent seven eons (each may last billions of years) as the holder of power or all powerful one) and he came by himself (nobody sent him) in this destined to be his last life to teach those with ears the way out of suffering either to heaven or if they were wise to a complete cessation of all further existing. He claimed to be the Perfect One, the Knower Of All and no one in the cosmos can do anything to him. He never claimed to the only Buddha but he said each eon has its Buddha and he is this eon’s self awakened one. Only He could awake himself whilst his deputies and disciples were awakened by him.
By contrast, Jesus was sent by his Father with a message to humans (not animals).
The Buddha is higher than God because he knows things that God does not know and he knows things about God that he himself does not know. He can do things to God eg make him unable to see the Buddha but God cannot make the Buddha unable to see Him.