Brown gold:

Brown gold:= o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

Cocoa has been labelled as brown gold because it is now a valuable commodity. 

It is a fabrication that is not harmless but dicing with false perception that is also conditioning or addictive to call something valuable as brown or yellow or blue gold. Just because cocoa is brown and valuable does not mean it is brown gold but because you labelled it as such you are foolishly conditioning yourself to perceive it as such that will end in loss of control and mad perception that what is not brown gold is brown gold and you have karma for inciting others to similarly perceive valuable cocoa as brown gold. 

COCOA IS COCOA AND GOLD IS GOLD, SO TO LABEL COCOA THAT HAS RISEN IN PRICE AS BROWN GOLD IS TO NOT LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY BUT TO EXAGGERATE THAT COCOA IS SO WONDERFUL IT IS BROWN GOLD AND EVEN IF YOU STILL KNOW COCOA IS NOT GOLD, YOU ARE FOOLISHLY, IMPERCEPTIBLY CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS FALSE, COCOA IS BROWN GOLD IS TRUE AND THIS WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION. FURTHER CALLING COCOA BROWN GOLD IS ADDICTIVE SO THAT THE FOOL DEVELOPS AN INCREASING URGE TO LABEL OTHER THINGS AS THINGS THEY ARE NOT EG OIL AS BLACK GOLD. YOU THINK THIS IS HARMLESS INDULGENCE BUT YOU MAY BE A FOOL WITH WRONG VIEW THAT IT IS OK AND EVEN CORRECT TO CALL COCOA BROWN GOLD AND THE DESTINATION OF WRONG VIEW ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. 

Fish migrating to the poles: 

Quote: Changing ocean temperatures will force many fish species to migrate towards the poles, hitting fish stocks, scientists warn. 

Comment: The fishes’ food may not migrate with them and so by migrating driven by warm water, the fish may find a destination devoid of their usual food and may become extinct. 

THUS GLOBAL WARMING HAS A POTENTIAL OF CREATING ‘HAVOC’ OR DEVASTATE THE BALANCE OF SPECIES SO THAT MANY SPECIES WILL GO EXTINCT AND WITH THEM, ULTIMATELY MAN TOO WILL PERISH POSSIBLY FAR SOONER THAN YOU THINK. 

Giving presents is about force not reason: 

People make much fuss about occasions like Valentine’s Day and selecting gifts for the opposite sex and think it is meaningful when it is meaningless, cultivating attachment to this world of suffering (and therefore not denying yourself as Jesus commanded) and it is all about force not reason. 

Some people give presents on occasions like Valentine’s Day because others do it and they are aping or they think it is expected of them or just to please others in which case it is insincere, hypocritical and ritualistic and they are robots merely mechanically doing what others do on certain occasions. 

If you genuinely give a gift to another, the motive is usually to bond yourself to the other person, you like (attracted to, which is about blind meaningless force not reason) the other person and want to give a gift that will stir the other person’s liking or attraction to you so that hopefully she will be more bonded to you (bonding is about force not reason). 

THUS THE GIVING OF GIFTS IS ABOUT FORCE NOT REASON AND IF YOU THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL, YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION. 

OFTEN PEOPLE GIVE GIFTS AS A RITUAL BECAUSE OF EXPECTATION, TO KEEP UP WITH APPEARANCES AND SO THEY ARE DOING IT ROBOTICALLY ACCORDING TO A PLAN AND THAT IS ABOUT FORCE NOT REASON. 

SOMETIMES THEY GIVE BECAUSE THEY LIKE THE PERSON AND THEY WANT TO GIVE THE GIFT TO STIR THE OTHER PERSON’S LIKE FOR THE GIFT AND THEREFORE THE GIVER AND THE MOTIVE IS TO INCREASING BOND THE OTHER PERSON TO YOU. 

WHY DON’T YOU GIVE A BEGGAR A DIAMOND? THEREFORE GIVING IS MOSTLY SELFISH AND MOTIVATED AND INTENTION IS KARMA. 

Valentine’s Day gifts not just for the ladies 

Stories by LIM CHIA YING and OH ING YEEN 

 

Valentine’s Day gift suggestions for the ladies are easy to find, but just what can women give their male partners? Whether the gift is cologne, clothing or gadgets, StarMetro speaks to some women to find out what they have in store for their other-halves. 

BUYING a gift for a guy for Valentine’s Day is not neccessarily an easy task, though for the girls who know their partners well enough, it’s not too difficult. 

However, as the years go by, even the best shopper out there would be hard-pressed to add variety to the list of presents. Some say it doesn’t matter what the gift is, as long as it is from the heart. 

Of course, gift exchanges are meant to express appreciation and undying love, so the gifts end up being tangible, and often practical, declarations of love. Customer service personnel Anuradha Jegathesan is celebrating her first Valentine’s Day with her boyfriend this year, making it special. 

“I bought him a long-sleeved shirt from Guess, which I got at a pretty good price. The best part is that it is grey as that’s his favourite colour,” Jegathesan said. 

The 25-year-old said she did not have a problem getting a gift for a guy. 

“In my opinion, clothing is probably the best gift as your guy would wear it,” she said. 

She has known her boyfriend Chad Lyonne, 30, for six months and they are planning to have a nice dinner and adjourn to a pub afterwards for drinks. 

She said her boyfriend was a football fan but she wouldn’t get him a jersey any time soon, mainly because he’s a Liverpool fan while she was an Arsenal fan. 

“When it comes to football, we do have one thing in common – a dislike for Manchester United,” Anuradha said. 

Senior public relations executive Cynthia Tang, who has been with her boyfriend for nine years, said she would usually get him something that he liked. 

“I’ve have given him a pen, an iPod, neckties and cufflinks in the past. The most expensive present I’ve bought was the iPod which cost more than RM1,000,” said Tang, 26. 

over the years.  

She said her boyfriend was into the finer things in life and she didn’t want to spoil the surprise by revealing what she had settled on this year, saying instead that it was more of a “sports package.” 

“Gifts need not necessarily be expensive and sometime something personal or even a small gesture like cooking for him would be a perfect choice,” Tang added. 

PR executive Beatrice Wang, who is currently single, had put her creativeness to good use when she presented handmade stuff to her ex-boyfriend. 

“I would buy stuff and personalise it, like a wooden box which I decorated with pictures and filled with Hershey’s Kisses. 

“Also, I once gave him custom-made cufflinks, as I didn’t want to have another 30 people in town wearing the same thing,” Wang, who is in her 20s, said. 

This Valentine’s Day, Wang is heading back to Johor to be with her family to celebrate her grandmother’s birthday. 

“Ultimately, Valentine’s Day is about the people you love, and it’s not just about couples,” she said. 

Adhering to the principle that the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach, some girls opt for a gastronomical gift. 

Graphic designer Vicky Yap, 23, will be making an English breakfast-style lunch for her boyfriend this Saturday. She will also be getting him an external hard drive as she remembered that he mentioned that he wanted one for his movie collection and gaming activities. 

“While enjoying lunch, we’ll be drinking the Japanese flower tea he bought me for Christmas. At night, we’ll be having dinner at The Daily Grind at Bangsar Village, one of the restaurants we’ve listed down in our quest for the best burger in town,” she said. 

Psychology student Foong Suet Ling, 22, remembered that her Valentine’s Day date enjoyed her homemade sandwiches. 

“On Valentine’s Day, I will be baking him an apple crumble with a pinch of love to symbolise that he’s the apple of my eye. Plus, it’s more personalised if I make it myself.” 

She described her relationship as still being in the courtship stage. 

“I think that Valentine’s Day is the day we express our love for our loved ones but that doesn’t mean we cannot do that the other 364 days of the year. 

= v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />Gadget crazy: Yap has decided to pick out a portable hard drive for her boyfriend.  

“Sometimes, I think its quite overrated, considering the over-priced set meals and Valentine’s Day-related things.” 

Aside from the usual gifts, some have decided to go for the unconventional and more personal gifts. 

A 21-year-old Utar student who only wanted to be known as Eileen said she would be giving her boyfriend underwear today. 

“I decided on underwear as it’s a funny and an unvonventional gift. I just have to make sure I get the right size. 

“We have nothing special planned for Valentine’s Day because we’re very cynical and not into the hype. I’m just going to hang out with him at his house the whole day. 

“This year marks the seventh year we’ve been together,” she added. 

She is without understanding: 

 

Their attraction for her stirred, ordinary people might think she is a good understanding person when for one who discerns, she is one of the many in this world with no understanding. She is just a rehashing robot with her likes and dislikes that have similarities and differences from others and probably quite materialistic or sensual, attracted to sights, sounds, smells, tastes and touch. 

In order to interact with her you must also be a robot who can speak and do things that she likes to do or say so that you can have some common robotic rehashed activities together. 

People talk about sharing common interests and hobbies and so it is that these interests and hobbies are all plans in which the person is a robot of and in order to share those interests or hobbies, you too must develop those interests and thereby convert yourself into those specific robotics. 

THE SMILING AND EAGERNESS ON HER FACE AND BODY IS ALL REHASHED AND SHE IS A MINDLESS ROBOT WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND AND IT IS YOUR ATTRACTION FOR HER THAT DECEIVES YOU THAT SHE IS A WONDERFUL AND ‘REAL LIVE’ PERSON. 

By the time leaves fall from trees: 

Like it or not the United States will be forced to nationalize large swathes of its banking system by the time the leaves fall from the trees in Washington. 

‘By the time the leaves fall from trees in Washington’ is a totally unnecessary, beating around the bush, style in the substance of speech. 

What can be simply put as nationalization by this autumn has been stylishly, emotional fabricated to impress others. 

WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, IF YOU SPEAK THUS THERE IS SUFFERING EVEN TORMENT AHEAD OF YOU BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS AND YOU PERCEIVE IT AS MEANINGFUL, IT IS WASTE OF ENERGY AND NOT LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY THAT COMES FROM EVIL. 

I was correct about Singapore: 

Many years ago I said that whilst the Malaysian government wasted the nation’s wealth on moronic enterprises like Putra Jaya, Sepang airport, formula one, Commonwealth games, KLCC twin towers and many more, the Singapore government is likely to squander its wealth maximizing returns investing in assets overseas they deem is good value when it is overpriced. 

I think Temasek’s net worth has been revised downwards from 187 billion to something like 120 billion mostly because of losses related to investments in UBS, Merrill Lynch and Citibank that has been described to paying the price of a Rolls Royce to get a Morris Mini. 

I think the birds have yet to come home to roost, many other investments eg banks, hotels and telcos in Korea, Indonesia, Australia, etc will collapse in price so that the people’s savings would be substantially wiped off, and many Singaporeans are now expressing concern. 

Mdm Ho, wife of the PM has resigned as head of Temasek and they have foolishly selected a Mr Goodyear, former CEO of BHP who looks like a slick talker and dishonest man not to be trusted with your money. 

People look to the white man for answers but he is just as great a fool, dishonest and ruthless as anyone else. Some years ago DBS appointed an American to head it. I think that too is deluded because American practices are hocus pocus and now proven to be a recipe for ruin. 

THE MALAYSIAN ATTITUDE IS AS IF THEY CANNOT ADD ONE PLUS ONE BUT THE SINGAPORE ATTITUDE IS THAT THEY ARE PENNY WISE AND POUND FOOLISH AND NOW THEY HAVE PAID THE PRICE, WHAT THEY HAVE SO HARD EARNED WILL BE SQUANDERED AWAY IN THEIR PURSUIT FOR GREATER RETURNS OVERSEAS AND SUBSCRIPTION TO THE HYPE ABOUT THE GLOBAL ECONOMY. 

JUST AS I WAS CORRECT ABOUT SINGAPORE LONG BEFORE ANYONE SAID THE SAME, I MAY BE CORRECT IN ALL THE THINGS I SAY AND IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME OR DIFFER, YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. 

A TABLE FULL OF FOOLS: 

 

You may recognize the people in the picture and they are all fools because they are all smiling and smiling is not just meaningless, for show, it is harmful, it harms their minds with stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate and conditions or addicts them to the same. 

If they did not perceive smiling as meaningful they would not be smiling and it is precisely because they FALSELY perceive smiling as meaningful and good when it is a meaningless exercise of mental force robotically according to a rehashed plan that harms their minds, prevents clear thinking, that they smile. 

IF YOU THINK YOU CAN FOOLISHLY, MINDLESSLY SMILE LIKE A ROBOT AND YET CLEVERLY STEER THE WORLD OUT ITS ECONOMIC QUAGMIRE, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED LIKE THEM, HEADED FOR THE SCRAPYARD OF WRONG VIEW: HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB. 

The Buddha’s definition of a fool: 

Anyone who misconducts himself in thought, speech and action is a fool because he is headed for repayment in pain or suffering and because all ordinary people misconduct themselves, they are fools. 

Smiling is never freshly composed specifically for an occasion but it is mindlessly rehashed insincerely to impress, please, intimidate and deceive others. Thus if the purpose of your smile is to deceive others that you liked when you did not you are lying with your face and lying can send you to hell. 

The sultan of Perak jumped the gun: 

I think it is clearly spelled out in the constitution that if the MB has lost the confidence of the assembly (by vote) then he must step down and if he refuses then it may be the right of the Sultan to dismiss him. 

In this case, the MB was not subject of a no confidence vote and the sultan presumptuously sacked him. 

SULTAN OR NO SULTAN, IF HE HAS INFRINGED ON HIS RIGHT AS SPELT OUT IN THE CONSTITUTION AND THE SULTAN HIMSELF WAS A JUDGE, THERE IS DIVINE PUNISHMENT FOR HIM THAT IS FAR WORSE THAN HUMAN PUNISHMENT. HE DID WHAT HE DID FOR REASONS BEST KNOWN TO HIM BUT IT CAN BE KNOWN BY GOD AND IF IT IS PERFIDIOUS THEN JUDGMENT AWAITS. 

The sultan trusted what Najib said: 

Why should the sultan trust what Najib said which must be that the BN now has attained the required numbers to govern. 

The proof of that is in a vote of confidence in the assembly and no vote was carried out. 

NAJIB HAS NEVER PROVEN HIMSELF TO BE A FAUNT OF TRUTH AND THUS THE SULTAN IS FOOLISHLY AND PRESUMPTUOUSLY TAKING AS TRUTH WHAT NAJIB SAID TO DISMISS THE MB. UNLESS HE HAS OBJECTIVE PROOF OF THAT, PROCEDURES MUST BE FOLLOWED, HE IS FOOLISHLY PRESUMPTUOUSLY DISMISSING THE MB, SHOWING HIS HAND OF UNFAIRNESS. 

Even hell awaits the three defectors: 

You may realize the serious consequences of reneging on your pledge. 

As a result of these three assemblymen reneging on their pledges to resign, the state government has fallen.  

If they had refused to sign the pledge they may not have been selected to contest and hence by reneging on their pledge they have made themselves liars. 

Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say and it is very careless to say you will resign and then refuse. 

FOOLS EAGERLY MAKE PROMISES EVEN OVER TRIVIAL MATTERS THAT OFTEN FORGET IMMEDIATELY NOT REALIZING THEY WILL BE CALLED TO ACCOUNT WITH CONSEQUENCES THAT ARE FAR MORE PAINFUL THAN THEY EVER DREAMT POSSIBLE. 

THE WISE MAKE FEW PROMISES AND THEY KEEP THEIR PROMISES THAT THEY MAKE. 

THUS THE ELECTION COMMISIONER HAS WRONG VIEW THAT IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB TO SAY THAT BECAUSE THE ASSEMBLYMEN SAID THE LETTERS WERE INVALID, THEY ARE EXCUSED. 

Selling like hot cakes: 

There is nothing that says that if a cake is hot it must sell rapidly and if it is cold it won’t sell and so to equate selling like hot cakes with robust demand is false association. 

IT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT A DANGEROUS CULTIVATION OF FALSE PERCEPTION TO PERCEIVE THAT SELLING LIKE HOT CAKES MEANS DOING ‘ROARING’ BUSINESS BECAUSE JUST BECAUSE A CAKE IS HOT DOES NOT MEANS IT WILL SELL WELL. 

The sultan doesn’t like DAP and Pas? 

It may be that the sultan did what he did because he did not like the DAP-PAS government although it seemed to be popular with the masses. 

Don’t like is based on force not reason, it is a repulsive stirring of his mental force by PAS-DAP and so if that is the source of his action, it is based on blind irrational force that will end in madness and it is dangerous to base one’s actions on force not reason. 

He and his son spoke many times ‘eloquently’ about justice and the rule of the law and as qualified lawyers they should know better and if their actions belie their eloquent words they are asking for judgement. 

ONE MUST NEVER BASE ONE’S DECISIONS ON ONE’S LIKING OR DISLIKING BECAUSE IT IS DANGEROUS TO BASE ONE’S ACTIONS ON AN ATTRACTIVE OR REPULSIVE STIRRING OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE. 

EVEN IF NAJIB SAID HE HAD THE NUMBERS, THINGS CAN CHANGE VERY FAST AND THE CORRECT THING FOR THE SULTAN WHO IS ABOVE THE FRAY IS TO TELL NAJIB TO TENDER A VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE WHEN THE STATE ASSEMBLY CONVENES (IN APRIL) AND ONCE THE VOTE IS SUCCESSFUL AND THE MB REFUSES TO RESIGN, HE CAN SACK HIM. BY SACKING HIM WITHOUT A VOTE, THE SULTAN EXPOSES HIMSELF AS PARTIAL, SIDING WITH ONE SIDE FOR REASONS BEST KNOWN TO HIM. 

THE PEOPLE LIKE PAS-DAP BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THE SULTAN SHARE THE SAME LIKE. 

Genuine reason was never the basis of the sultan’s actions: 

Anyone including the sultan who says that genuine reason was the basis of his action in sacking the PAS DAP government is a fool who is kidding himself. 

The sultan may satisfy himself that he sacked the government because it has lost the numbers to rule. 

Even if it has lost the support, the Sultan can only sack him if he refuses to resign in the face of reality. 

But where is the evidence the MB has lost the numbers? Is it based on the hearsay by Najib or is it based objectively on a vote of no confidence in the assembly? 

THUS IF THE SULTAN THINKS HE WAS CORRECT, HE WAS MERELY ACTING ACCORDING TO THE LAW TO SACK THE MB, HE IS DELUDING HIMSELF BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER OBJECTIVELY DEMONSTRATED BY VOTE THAT THE MB HAS LOST SUPPORT LET ALONE HE REFUSED TO RESIGN. 

HENCE IF HIS DECISION TO SACK THE MB IS NOT BASED ON TRUE REASON, IT MUST BE BASED ON FALSE REASON (HE WRONGLY INTERPRETED THE LAW) OR BASED ON FORCE OR DISLIKE (THINGS PAS-DAP DID MAY HAVE UPSET HIM, DID NOT PLEASE HIM AND HE WANTS TO GET RID OF THEM). 

UNTIL THE ASSEMBLY HAS VOTED NO CONFIDENCE AND THE MB REFUSES TO RESIGN, THE SULTAN HAS NO GENUINE OR TRUE REASON TO SACK THE MB AND BECAUSE THIS NEVER OCCURRED, THE REASON THE SULTAN SACKED THE MB MUST BE FALSE, MUST BE BASED ON DISLIKE FOR THE GOVERNMENT PERHAPS BECAUSE THEY DID NOT PLEASE HIM OR BECAUSE HE WAS INCOMPETENT, HE MISINTERPRETED THE LAW. 

On what basis can the sultan sacked the MB? 

If you agree that the Sultan cannot sack an elected government on whim or fancy then there must be a reason for sacking it. 

Did the MB do wrong, has he been convicted of corruption or murder or rape that he must be removed from office? 

If not then surely it is because he has lost the support of the majority in the assembly. 

But this has not been objectively demonstrated, no vote was carried out. Just as the UMNO rep can jump ship but then return to the ship, the same may also happen so you are presumptuous that nothing will change. 

The defecting assemblymen must also be given the opportunity to turn Judas and personally vote to topple the government, an opportunity that was denied them by the sultan’s presumptive action. 

THE ONLY BASIS FOR THE SULTAN TO RIGHTLY DISMISS THE MB MUST BE THAT HE HAS LOST MAJORITY SUPPORT AND HE REFUSES TO RESIGN BUT THIS HAS NOT BEEN PERMITTED TO HAPPEN AND THE SULTAN HAS PRESUMPTUOUSLY ACTED (PRESUMPTION THE BUDDHA SAYS IS A DEFILEMENT OF HIS MIND) WITHOUT WAITING FOR REALITY TO EMERGE AND THEREFORE HE ACTED FALSELY. 

DON’T PRESUME THAT IT IS A MERE FORMALITY THAT THE VOTE WILL OCCUR AND THE MB WILL LOSE AND REFUSE TO RESIGN. WAIT TO HEAR FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH AND ALLOW THE RENEGADES TO CONSUMMATE THEIR JUDAS ROLE BY VOTING TO TOPPLE THE GOVERNMENT. 

BECAUSE THE SULTAN CANNOT SACK ON A WHIM AND THE MB HAS COMMITTED NO WRONG, HE MUST HAVE SACKED ON THE BASIS THAT HE HAS LOST SUPPORT. BUT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN IN A VOTE AND HE JUMPED THE GUN WITH KARMA DUE TO HIM. 

Najib’s karma: 

Even if the renegade assemblymen were not bribed, Najib was wrong in directly approaching the sultan to dismiss the MB. 

Without Najib’s approach, the sultan would not have done it himself and it is not proper and thus wrong for Najib to approach the sultan, inciting him to do wrong. 

The correct thing to do is to convene or to await for the assembly to vote no confidence and then the MB should resign. 

THUS EVEN IF THE ASSEMBLYMEN WERE NOT INDUCED CORRUPTLY TO SWITCH, NAJIB HAS SERIOUS KARMA IMPROPERLY APPROACHING THE SULTAN BYPASSING DUE PROCESS TO DISMISS THE MB. 

Wrong comes from another wrong, never right: 

Wrong always ensues from a previous wrong, never right and because Najib was wrong to approach the sultan to replace the government, his action in garnering the defectors too must come from a wrong, they were bribed and it was a plot to unrighteously wrest control from the PKR. 

If you think that wrong can come from right, Najib’s unrighteous bypass of procedure to directly get the sultan to sack the government can come from right, the assemblymen defected without inducement, without corruption, you may be right or have wrong view that is the way to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha. 

WRONG NEVER COMES FROM RIGHT AND THEREFORE BECAUSE NAJIB WAS WRONG TO BYPASS DUE PROCESS TO GET THE SULTAN TO WRONGFULLY DISMISS THE STATE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT A VOTE, HIS WRESTING OF POWER BY DEFECTION MUST ALSO COME FROM WRONG, THEY WERE LIKELY BRIBED. 

DON’T HOLD YOUR BREATH FOR THE TRIUMPH OF GOOD OVER EVIL, THE PEOPLE DO NOT DESERVE GOOD GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THEY TOO ARE NOT TRULY GOOD. IN THE PAST THEY THINK THEIR SELFISH INTERESTS LIE IN A BARISAN GOVERNMENT AND NOW THEY ARE VOTING OPPOSITION NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE GOOD BUT OUT OF SELFISH INTEREST BECAUSE THEY SEE THEY ARE BEING CHEATED AND WHAT THEY GET ARE EXPENSIVE SCRAPS FROM THE BN GOVERNMENT. 

The Buddha said: Should a person commit evil, let him not do it again and again. Let him not find pleasure therein, for painful is the accumulation of evil. 

Evil is always done using force according to a plan that is addictive and so it is hard to wean oneself off evil because every evil deed is not only suffering but conditioning so that it becomes increasingly compelling to do evil until the fool has bequeathed himself a mass of karma that will result in much pain, the Buddha tells you, ‘painful is the accumulation of evil’. 

Obnoxious not pleasing: 

For one who has savoured the peace and sanity of speaking and doing things without use of force to prolong, change speed or strength of force, I find style or the mindless constant use of force to prolong or stretch syllables, change speed and loudness no matter how ‘gentle’ or ‘soft and mild’ obnoxious, intolerable and evil not pleasant to the ear or eye and benevolent as normal people seem to perceive. They can take issue with other people’s styles (eg don’t like the angry or arrogant way he spoke) but they do not realize they too have styles that are just as disagreeable to others. 

IT IS A PERVERSION OF PERCEPTION WHICH IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN TO PERCEIVE STYLE OR THE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS CHARMING AND GOOD BECAUSE NO MATTER HOW GENTLE, SUCH FORCE CHANGES ARE EVIL AND HARMFUL, UNPLEASANT TO THE UNPERVERTED EAR. 

JUST AS WATER AND OIL DO NOT MIX, THIS WORLD WHICH IS AN UBIQUITOUS WORLD OF CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS DOES NOT MIX WITH A WORLD OF PEACE AND TRUE HAPPINESS WHERE THERE IS NO USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. 

The Buddha: "[3] And furthermore, just as the ocean does not tolerate a dead body -- in the same way, if an individual is unprincipled, evil, unclean and suspect in his undertakings -- the community has no communion with him. Holding an immediate meeting, they banish him from the community.  

Anyone who sports style, who knowingly or unknowingly uses force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness is like a dead body that the ocean does not tolerate and cast out, those who are true and good have no communion with him. 

Force must be used and stirred to be nice: 

There is such a thing called being nice and that is what stylish people frequently practice.  

There is such a thing called being good and it is not to be confused with being nice. 

In order to be nice, you must use force to say or do something with prolonging, changing speed and strength of force, say or do things that are often dishonestly false so that the recipient’s mental force is stirred attractively by how and what you say or do. 

Because radiating force is harmful to others, in order to be truly good you must not radiate force or bombard the other person with force prolonging, changing speed and strength (there must be no style in what you say or do) and you say or do things that truly benefit the other person rather than stirring his mental force attractively to you or what you say or do. 

IF HOW YOU SAY OR DO SOMETHING HAS FORCE CHANGES THAT IS INTENDED TO STIR THE OTHER PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED TO YOU OR WHAT YOU SAY OR DO AND YOU DO NOT REALIZE IT, YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING. 

WHATEVER SAID OR DO THAT HAS FORCE CHANGES (EG SPEAK OR DO WITH EAGERNESS) THAT IS CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSKY INTENDED TO STIR THE LISTENER’S MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY IS FALSELY, HARMFULLY NICE NEVER TRULY GOOD. 

FORCE MUST BE USED TO FASHION STYLE, TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO BE NICE. 

FORCE MUST BE STIRRED, YOU MUST STIR THE LISTENER’S MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY TO HOW AND WHAT YOU SAY TO BE NICE. 

Without using force you cannot be nice: 

Without stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness that requires the use of force, you cannot be nice to anybody.  

If there is stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness in your speech you must be nice and that is controlled torment that will finally end in uncontrollable torment or insanity. 

YOU CANNOT SPEAK ANGRILY, NASTILY, SARCASTICALLY, HAUGHTILY, FEARFULLY, SADLY, EXCITEDLY OR EAGERLY IF THERE IS NO USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. 

THIS IS A WORLD WHERE BEINGS ARE ALL FALSELY, FORCEFULLY, HURTFULLY NICE NOT GOOD TO EACH OTHER, KILLING OR POISONING EACH OTHER WITH NICENESS THEY CALL GOODNESS.