Results of the substance and style of force

Results of the substance and style of force:

Emotions that can only be like, dislike, sadness, hurt, fear and uncertainty (confusion) are the results or products of the style of force or how force is prolonging, changing speed, strength and direction well or poorly shielded by the force of self preservation.

Thus if the person’s mental force of going against self is stirred attractively or repulsively by something happening under the shielding of his force of self preservation, he experiences like or dislike. If his mental force of going against self is prolonging or accelerating in speed and strength poorly shielded by his force of self preservation, he experiences sadness or hurt respectively. If his force of going against self drops in speed and strength so that the force of self preservation rises rapidly in speed and strength unopposed, he experiences fear. If his force of going against self is changing haphazardly in speed, strength and direction poorly controlled by his force of self preservation he experiences uncertainty or confusion or turmoil.

 

Stress, restlessness, distraction (daze) and giddiness are the results or products of force itself (the substance of force), of permitting force to act on the mind. It does not matter if the force is internal or external, whether it is generated by fabricating style (stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness) or fabricating emotion (attractive or repulsive stirring of force to like and dislike), so long as you permit force to act on your mind, you must experience stress, restlessness, distraction and giddiness that have beginning, intensity and ending.

My thesis:

Force ultimately and indirectly through emotions, stress, restlessness, distraction and giddiness is at the heart of all beings’ here sufferings that can reach tormenting homicidal suicidal proportions with seemingly no way out.

Throughout the ages and even today, no one has discerned or understood and explained the nature of mental forces and how they are agents behind emotions, stress, restlessness and distraction.

 

I have now comprehensively elucidated the nature of mental forces, reduced all the emotions or colourful names people give to emotions to simply like, dislike, sadness, hurt, fear and confusion. I have explained that stress, restlessness, distraction (daze) and giddiness are simply the compulsory results of exposure to force, any force that is not only unpleasant but harms the mind progressively that will end in a shattered mind.

There are only two forces in the mind of a being, it is the force of going against self that is the drive of whatever the person perceives, thinks, says or does and the accompanying style (the constant prolonging, speed, loudness and direction changes) with which he perceives, thinks, speaks and does. Force is always blind and can only have duration, speed, strength and direction. Because force is blind and cannot listen or obey reason, an opposite force must exist to resist and bring generated force to a stop so that a new sequence of activity can begin instead of waiting for the generated force to expend itself. This opposing force is the force of self preservation whose resistance must be overcome before anything can happen and it can rise in strength to prematurely curtail what the force of going against self is activating.

Further this force of self preservation normally shields the person’s consciousness from the full brunt of the actions of the force of going against self and whenever it fails to shield, the person experiences painful emotions like sadness, hurt and confusion. Thus when the person’s force of going against self is fashioning style (stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness) or like and dislike, it is well shielded by his force of self preservation and so not painful although it leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.

I have explained that all the emotions people give many different fanciful names to or indirectly refer to by many labels can be examined and classified to simply the primary opposites like or dislike and the secondary undesirable sadness, hurt, fear and confusion.

Thus anger/rage/wrath/disgust/disappointment is unfocussed dislike whilst hate is focussed or directed dislike. When a person complains, he is disliking. Jealousy is simply dislike for someone as a result of his possessing something that you like.

Thrill, excitement, fascination, interest, greed, lust, sensuous, eagerness, envy, pride are all forms of like.

When the person’s force of going against self is prolonging poorly shielded by his force of self preservation his consciousness experiences sadness that can descend to depression.

When his force of going against self is accelerating in speed and strength out of control of his force of self preservation, hurt is the result.

Fear is the consciousness experience of a sudden drop in speed and strength of his force of going against self accompanied by a sudden rise in speed and strength of his force of self preservation that tends to pull him away from what he was saying or doing.

Confusion is when his mental force is changing in speed, strength and direction haphazardly as a result of something happening.

Worry, anxiety, nervousness all have elements of aroused fear. Grief is a compound of sadness and hurt.

Stress, restlessness, distraction and giddiness are the inevitable consequences of permitting force to act on your mind. They have duration and strength and take time to dissipate once stirred.

What the Buddha may have meant:

What the Buddha may have meant in the sutta is that if you want to partake in sensuality you must make sure you are rich (in conviction, conscience, concern and discernment in skilful actions) because if you are poor (in conviction, conscience, concern and discernment in skilful actions) it is inevitable that you will rack up debts that must be discharged painfully in the animal world or hell. The truly wise is not attached or clinging everywhere and they thus enjoy the highest happiness and are released, not indebted to this world.

Crony capitalism still very much alive:

Apparently the government imposed a new rule that required fishermen to use insulated container made by one company that is likely to be linked to vested interests.

Apparently companies linked to relatives of Dr M benefitted from new rules to stick ‘genuine’ logos on medicine and cigarettes.

PERHAPS ONLY IN MALAYSIA CAN THEY BE SO CRASS AS TO IMPOSE RULES THAT OBVIOUSLY BENEFITS ONE COMPANY TO THE DETRIMENT OF EVERYONE ELSE, MAKES FISHMONGERS INCUR EXPENSE BY HAVING TO BUY NEW CONTAINERS THAT ARE PASSED ON TO CONSUMERS.

THIS IS CALLED BLOOD SUCKING AND THOSE INVOLVED ARE PARASITES WHO DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE HEADED EVEN FOR HELL.

Importers ask Govt to review insulated box decision

 

PORT KLANG: Fish importers and exporters have appealed to the Government to reconsider its decision requiring them to only use insulated fish containers from one supplier.

Klang Hai Sai Fish Importer Association committee member Tan Chee Meng said the Government’s move has burdened them further in an already soft global economy.

Dumped: Protesters throwing an LKIM fish container recommended for use by the Government into the sea in anger after the protest at Port Klang yesterday.

“Why do we have to pay more to get a container of similar quality?” he told reporters during a protest by some 20 fish importers and exporters at the barter trade jetty here yesterday.

A number of fish wholesalers and importers held a similar protest in Selayang on Thursday.

The ruling, which requires at least 10% of the number of boxes carried in one load to be insulated fish containers, came into effect on Sunday.

The Fisheries Development Autho-rity of Malaysia (LKIM) said it was not compulsory for local distributors and fish wholesalers to use the containers but they were encouraged to do so.

Tan said the new blue containers cost RM205, compared to the RM125 and RM135 they had paid for each of the containers currently in use.

He said there were a number of manufacturers who produced such containers, adding that they could buy the boxes directly from them, but said LKIM only allowed containers from one supplier

 

Mugabe tried to murder his rival in staged car accident:

Mugabe’s rival and PM survived a car accident with a lorry but his wife was killed. This may be a staged accident, any would be assassin would drive a lorry to maximize his survival chances and reflects how evil Mugabe is.

What is stress, restlessness and distraction?

Stress, restlessness, distraction and giddiness are the compulsory results of exposure of a mind to force, are caused by any force acting on the mind. They have onset, intensity and duration.

Just as pricking oneself with a pin causes pain, exposure of the mind to force causes deformity of the consciousness or the force compresses and distorts or deforms the consciousness and this causes pain or stress. With increasing duration and intensity of force, the stress or pain of compression and deformity increases and with the reduction or cessation of the application of force, the consciousness which has elasticity or recovery, returns to its original uncompressed, undistorted configuration which is always less suffering. With heedless repeated applications of force, the consciousness can become permanently compressed and distorted in a way that is consistent in that person and differs from others so that the person’s mind is permanently compressed and warped, suffers stress that is permanently and never falls below a idling level that is consistent with him. With age and abuse, this idling or minimal level of stress tends to increase to become increasingly unbearable.

STRESS IS THE PAINFUL OR DISAGREEABLE CONSCIOUSNESS STATE AS A RESULT OF THE COMPRESSION AND DISTORTION OF THAT CONSCIOUSNESS BY THE APPLICATION OF FORCE. IT HAS INTENSITY AND DURATION AND SUBSIDES ONCE THE EXPOSURE TO FORCE SUBSIDES BUT WITH LIFELONG EXPOSURE TO FORCE, THE CONSCIOUSNESS BECOMES PERMANENTLY COMPRESSED AND DISTORTED BY FORCE SO THAT STRESS NEVER FALLS BELOW A THRESHOLD THAT INCREASES WITH AGE.

There are several causes of restlessness but ultimately it is the constant unnecessary activation of force. Because in truth the activity of force never ceases, it is constantly active in the minds of ordinary people because there is constant use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force that is totally unnecessary in whatever they perceive, think, speak and do, the constant activity of force is itself restless, what they call periods of calm or stillness is merely the use of force to suppress or dampen this constant urge by their force of going against self to activate or desire to prolong, change speed and strength.

THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IN ORDINARY PEOPLE IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVE EXCEPT PERHAPS IN DEEP SLEEP, BECAUSE IT IS CONSTANTLY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN WHATEVER PERCEPTION, THOUGHT, SPEECH AND DEED THAT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND THIS IS ITSELF RESTLESS, WHAT THEY CALL STILLNESS IS BRIEF PERIODS WHEN THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION MANAGES TO INDUCE A PERIOD OF RELATIVE INACTIVITY. A PERSON MAY NOT BE FIDGETTING OR VOCALIZING BUT HIS MIND IS STILL RESTLESS, FLEETING FROM ONE FRIVOLOUS THOUGHT TO ANOTHER.

Whatever a person says or does can be examined and objectively determined to be either necessary or unnecessary, meaningful or meaningless, only for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.

WHATEVER THAT IS MEANINGLESS OR UNNECESSARY, ONLY NECESSARY EG TO IMPRESS OTHERS CAN BE ACTIVATED AT ANY TIME ON THE WHIM AND FANCY OF THAT FOOL AND WHAT CAN BE ACTIVATED AT ANY TIME THAT YOU ACTIVATE FREQUENTLY (IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OTHERS) IN TIME BECOMES CONSTANT, THERE IS A CONSTANT URGE TO ACTIVATE IT FOR NO REASON BECAUSE IT NEEDS NO REASON, IS MEANINGLESS.

WHATEVER IS MEANINGFUL, SPECIFIC FOR AN OCCASION NEEDS REASON TO ACTIVATE AND BECAUSE REASON DOES NOT OCCUR ALL THE TIME, IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BECOME RESTLESS.

WHATEVER PEOPLE FALSELY SAY OR DO TO IMPRESS OTHERS, THE STYLE OR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT THEY FIND IMPRESSIVE IS MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW AND THUS CAN OCCUR ALL THE TIME OR BECOME RESTLESS.

The application of force, whatever force on the consciousness is to distort it, that although it may recover to some extent, may become permanently distorted and it is this distortion that is the cause of distraction, inability to concentrate or absorb what is happening. Like the lens of a camera, the consciousness can become out of focus due to the application of force so that objects cannot be sharply focused. When a person lapses into a daze, it may be just an episodic descent into deeper distortion of the consciousness as a result of a situational exposure to more intense force. For example, something distressing has happened (news of death of daughter) and the person becomes emotionally aroused and the intense emotions distort his consciousness more severely than usual such that he cannot concentrate and may even lose contact with reality.

THUS DISTRACTION OR THE INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE OR DESCENT INTO A DAZE MAY SIMPLY BE THE RESULT OF FORCE ACTING ON A MIND TO DISTORT IT SUCH THAT IT CANNOT FOCUS AND WHEN IT IS INTENSE, THE PERSON LOSES TOUCH WITH REALITY AND DESCENDS INTO A DAZE.

Giddiness too is a result of chronic exposure to force and it may be the sensation of an unsteady consciousness that is seized by force that is changing in speed, strength and direction.

IT DOES NOT MATTER THE FORCE ACTING ON YOUR MIND IS GENERATED BY YOURSELF OR OTHERS YOU FOOLISHLY PERMIT TO ACT ON IT, IT DOES NOT MATTER THAT THE FORCE IS DUE TO EMOTIONS (STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY OR REPULSIVELY TO LIKE OR DISLIKE) OR TO FABRICATE STYLE (USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS), SO LONG AS FORCE IS PERMITTED TO ACT ON A CONSCIOUSNESS, THE MANDATORY RESULTS ARE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION AND GIDDINESS THAT HAS BEGINNING, DURATION AND STRENGTH AND ENDING.

WITH THE ABSENCE OF FORCE ACTING ON THE MIND (PAYING ATTENTION NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS), STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION AND GIDDINESS ALL COME TO A PERMANENT EFFORTLESS END.

You can use force to control your lust or greed but that is an unstable or false absence of lust or greed. You need mental force to be lustful or greedy. Once you have deprived your mind of force, you do not use force to fabricate style or like and dislike, whence can lust and greed which require mental force to activate, arise?

Mad Koh:

Dr Koh does not realize he is mad or will be in time.

You do not wish for a woman or non woman CM but when it happens it happens. Being a CM should be a matter for merit, not sex and so his spoken desire to see a woman as CM just for the sake of having a woman CM is designed either to pander to the audience or because of advanced false logic or perception.

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER A CM IS MALE OR FEMALE SO LONG AS SHE OR HE IS ABLE AND SO YOU DO NOT WISH TO HAVE A FEMALE OR MALE CM BUT IF IT HAPPENS, IT HAPPENS AS A MATTER OF COURSE, NOT BECAUSE SHE IS FEMALE AND YOU DESIRE TO BREAK PRECEDENCE, DR KOH AND YOU WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG DOES NOT REALIZE HE IS EMBRACING INSANITY.

WHAT HAS SEX GOT TO DO WITH BEING CM?

Lead the way with a woman CM, Koh urges Penang

A woman chief minister for Penang? It is Gerakan president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon’s wish that Penang will take the lead by having the first woman chief minister in the country.

 

Is it any surprise you are restless?

You may not be aware of what you are doing but if I can demonstrate that there are constant forceful stretching of your syllables, changes in speed and loudness and these have equivalents in your perceptions, thinking and doing then your mental force is constantly active or constantly prolonging, changing speed and strength when you are awake.

IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVE, CONSTANTLY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH TO FASHION STYLE AND ALSO THE EMOTIONS, IS IT ANY SURPRISE THAT THE MENTAL FORCE CANNOT REMAIN STILL, CONSTANTLY WANT TO BE ACTIVE WHICH IS DE FACTO RESTLESSNESS, AN URGE TO DO OR SAY SOMETHING, ANYTHING THAT MUST BE PRE-RECORDED OR REHASHED.

RESTLESSNESS IS THE NATURAL STATE OF STYLISH, EMOTIONAL PEOPLE, WHATEVER STILLNESS THEY EXPERIENCE ARE APPARENT THAN REAL, IS ENFORCED UNSTABLE STILLNESS, ENFORCED BY THEIR FORCES OF SELF PRESERVATION. AS THEY GROW OLD THEIR RESTLESSNESS BECOME MORE INTENSE AND HAPHAZARD AND THEY ARE DOOMED TO MAD INCOHERENT RESTLESSNESS THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH.

IF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVATING TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE NAME OF FABRICATING FOR SHOW STYLE TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS, TO FABRICATE EMOTIONS, IS IT A SURPRISE YOU ARE RESTLESS, YOU HAVE A STRONG URGE TO DO OR SAY SOMETHING THAT IS NEVER FRESH BUT A REHASH OF WHAT IS RECORDED IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX?

Restlessness always has cause and it is totally blameworthy:

Restlessness is never without cause but it always has a cause and it is totally blameworthy and so if you suffer from restlessness that is not the way to safety but to perdition.

IF YOU NEVER USED FORCE CONSTANTLY TO CONSTANTLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, YOU NEVER PERMIT OTHERS TO IMPART FORCE ON YOU IN THE NAME OF GETTING ALONG AND MATERIAL GAINS, YOU CANNOT BE RESTLESS.

THERE IS A REASON WHY PEOPLE ARE RESTLESS AND IT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY ACTIVATING THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO FABRICATE STYLE, NAMELY STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS TORMENTING TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.

THERE IS A PERMANENT, FREE EFFORTLESS CURE TO RESTLESSNESS AND IT NAMELY TO PAY ATTENTION TO PERSISTENTLY MAKE EFFORT TO NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.

THUS IF YOU SUFFER FROM RESTLESSNESS, THERE MUST BE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS BUT COMPLETELY BLAMEWORTHY, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED RESTLESSNESS TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS THAT WILL END WITH MAD RESTLESSNESS THAT IS NEVER FUN BUT TORMENTING AND IS THE PATH TO PERDITION EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.

Mocked vegetarian meat is insane and deception:

You see nothing wrong, but mock meat is deception, why is there need to dress up vegetables as meat? It is meaningless and deception and so anyone who sees nothing wrong, who even thinks it is good is deluded.

MOCKED MEAT USING VEGETABLES IS DOING WHAT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND MEANINGLESS AND IT IS A FORM OF DECEPTION AND THEREFORE IT IS SINFUL RATHER THAN FUN OR MERITORIOUS AND IT IS DELUSION TO PERCEIVE SO.

Vegetarian fare that appeals

By YIP YOKE TENG

 

MOCK meat was created to make vegetarian cuisine appealing and acceptable to more people, especially those who find it difficult to do without meat. It was a good move both ethically and environmentally.

However, as mock meat is usually made of flour with dashes of colouring and flavouring, it does not find favour with the health-conscious. High consumption is certainly not recommended.

The three causes of restlessness:

The constant activation of mental force to fabricate style or constant prolonging, changing speed and strength is one cause of restlessness. Being a robot or rehashing whatever one says or does to meet demands of the situation wherein one is merely an overrated disc jockey selecting and supplying force to playback is another reason. Doing or saying whatever is objectively unnecessary is the third reason.

If you are merely a disc jockey selecting and supplying power to whatever you say or do that is from a copy in your mental jukebox then because it is not you who is responsible for your speech and actions but it is your mental jukebox that you have entrusted to carry it out, with numerous renditions there is an automatic urge to render that may be inappropriate and hard to suppress rather than hard to initiate.

THUS THE FACT THAT A PERSON IS RESTLESS IS AN INDICATION THAT HE IS A ROBOT AND IT IS HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS ACTIONS AND SPEECH THAT WITH NUMEROUS USAGES HAS A TENDENCY TO AUTOMISM OR ACTIVATION THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE OR FOR THE SAKE OF ACTIVATION AND THAT IS RESTLESSNESS.

Whatever that is said or done that is in truth unnecessary is practicing controlled restlessness.

IT IS NOT FOR YOU OR ME OR EVEN GOD OR ANYBODY TO SAY WHETHER SOMETHING YOU SAID OR DID, HOW (YOUR STYLE) YOU SAID OR DID IT IS NECESSARY OR NOT BUT IT IS OBJECTIVE, UNIVERSAL OR APPLIES TO EVERYONE; EVERYTHING AND HOW SOMETHING IS SAID OR DONE CAN BE EXAMINED AND DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY OR UNNECESSARY, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS.

IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DID, HOW YOU SAID OR DID IS IN TRUTH UNNECESSARY YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED DOING WHAT IS UNNECESSARY THAT WILL LAPSE INTO UNCONTROLLED DOING OR SAYING WHAT IS UNNECESSARY AND THAT IS DE FACTO RESTLESSNESS.

Do agree effort and plan has to be made to dress a vegetable as a meat eg fashion it into a sausage or steak? If you agree you need energy and effort to do so and if it is meaningless, for show so that vegetable deceives you as meat then you are practicing controlled restlessness that will lapse into restlessness.

In the same way if your style in speech or action is unnecessary then you are practicing something that is unnecessary that because it is unnecessary can happen at any time and whatever can happen can happen all the time if you keep practicing it all the time.

THUS BECAUSE PEOPLE KEEP PRACTICING TIME ALL THE TIME BECAUSE THEY THINK IT IS IMPRESSIVE OR PLEASES OTHERS, STYLE THAT IS MEANINGLESS AND UNNECESSARY HAS BECOME CONSTANT.

ANYTHING THAT CAN HAPPEN AT ANY TIME BECAUSE IT IS UNNECESSARY AND FREQUENTLY PRACTICED IS RESTLESS.

Yes but:

You have often heard others say ‘yes, but’ and you yourself is likely to have used it regularly, often even without awareness let alone awareness it is spoken falsity and conflict inducing. For instance, people say “I agree with you but we must be realistic”, “it is true, but”.

Whatever is true has no ‘buts’ and the ‘but’ belies the stated agreement or renders it insincere or false. Thus by saying, “yes, but” you have spoken a falsity that subjects you to karma and suffering. No matter how you see no wrong or you and the other person is right to say ‘yes, but’ it stirs conflict and you are conditioning yourself and others to conflict that will end in torment for you and others.

IF YOU MUST SAY ‘BUT’ THEN DON’T SAY ‘YES’, IF YOU MUST SAY ‘YES’ THEN DON’T SAY ‘BUT’ BECAUSE IT RENDERS WHAT YOU SAID AS ‘YES’ FALSE AND GENERATES CONFLICT IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS.

WHATEVER IS TRUE HAS NO BUTS AND WHATEVER HAS ‘BUTS’ IS NOT TRUE EXCEPT IN THE FALSE PERCEPTION OF THE PERSON.

Deluded scientists:

Recently scientists announced that they have detected premeditated planning in animals for the first time and made a fuss out of it. They observed a chimpanzee in a zoo collecting stones that he later used to throw at visitors.

That this is the first instance of premeditation in animals is not true because a wide variety of animals are capable of planning for the future. Squirrels and many animals routinely bury nuts underground so that they can retrieve and eat later when there is a dearth of nuts. Even crocodiles stash their prey somewhere so that it will decay and be easier to tear or eat.

Thus scientists who are emotional get thrilled when they see something that appears novel like a chimp hoarding stones to throw later not realizing there are parallels elsewhere.

IF IT IS TRUE THAT ALL ANIMALS ARE LIKE HUMAN BEINGS, YOU TOO HAVE BEEN AN ANIMAL FOR COUNTLESS AGES AS THE BUDDHA TELLS YOU, IT IS NOT A SURPRISE OR MARVELLOUS THAT ANIMALS CAN PLAN BUT IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT THEY TOO ARE CAPABLE OF PLANNING JUST AS HUMANS ARE.

A PERSON WHOSE MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED BY EVENTS TO BECOME EXCITED CAN COME TO SILLY CONCLUSIONS THAT SOMETHING IS UNIQUE WHEN IT HAS PARALLELS IN THE ANIMAL WORLD, IS ‘OLD HAT’. SCIENTISTS SHOULD KNOW BETTER BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE EMOTIONAL AND DELUDED, THEY ARE CAPABLE OF STICKING THEIR FEET IN THEIR MOUTHS.

Why what is for show is rehashed:

If what you say or did or how you said or did it is for show, to impress others, you must find what and how said or did impressive and because you falsely perceive it as impressive you will want to reproduce it in the future to again impress others and hence you will commit what is for show to as faithful memory and reproduction as you can.

NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY DENY, IF WHAT AND HOW YOU SAY OR DO IS FOR SHOW, YOU MUST FIND HOW AND WHAT YOU SAY IMPRESSIVE AND BEING IMPRESSIVE AND DESIRING TO IMPRESS OTHERS YOU MUST COMMIT WHAT & HOW YOU SAID AND DID TO MEMORY SO THAT YOU CAN REHASH IT AGAIN TO IMPRESS OTHERS AGAIN. THUS BECAUSE EVERYTHING PEOPLE SAY OR DO IS CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY INTENDED TO IMPRESS, WHAT IS SAID OR DONE MUST BE REHASHED AND THE PERSON IS A ROBOT.

How force not reason is the basis of people’s actions:

People are kidding themselves if they think it is genuine reason not force that is the basis of their actions.

For instance if I was to say the Buddha is the highest, He himself said He is the highest, even higher than God, those who are Christians or Muslims are likely to be upset, their anger may be aroused and driven by their anger they may scoff at the Buddha and say He is false or mad thinking their action in dismissing the Buddha is based on reason, they may tender the false reason or excuse, how can a mere man be greater than God?

THEIR REJECTION OF BUDDHA AS BEING THE HIGHEST AND THE HIGHEST TEACHER AS HE STATED IS NOT BASED ON GENUINE REASON BECAUSE THEY CANNOT KNOW OR SEE WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS FALSE, NOR HAS GOD TOLD THEM IT IS FALSE BUT STIRRED BY ANGER, DRIVEN BY FORCE (ANGER IS STIRRED FORCE), FORCE IS THE BASIS OF THEIR DISMISSING THE BUDDHA AND AS A RESULT THEY ARE SUBJECTING THEMSELVES TO PENALTY. JUST AS FAITH IN THE HIGHEST RESULTS IN THE HIGHEST RESULTS, SCOFFING THE HIGHEST MAY ALSO RESULT IN THE HIGHEST PENALTY.

HERE AS IT IS IN MANY OTHER PLACES, PEOPLE THINK IT IS REASON THAT IS BEHIND THEIR ACTION BUT IT IS FORCE. IN OTHER SITUATIONS WITH MAY NOT BE GENUINE REASON BUT REHASHED ROTE RULES REASON OR PROGRAMMED RULES LOGIC THAT IS FALSE BECAUSE IT IS ACTIVATING PLANS DRIVEN BY FORCE THAT IS THE BASIS OF THEIR ACTIONS.

Mumbo jumbo in the quest of exaggeration:

Quote: In just two hours on Tuesday, Kuala Lumpur saw more rain than it normally would in two months.

Not just that. The rain, which started in the afternoon, was so intense that it caused Sungai Gombak to quickly swell and overflow.

The rain (Tuesday) was so heavy and the intensity so great that Sungai Gombak could not cope with the buildup of water.

Comment: Rather than ‘not just that’ it is ‘as a result of that’ because she is talking about the same thing about 2 months rain in two hours and the intensity of rain that the river overflowed. Again ‘so heavy’ is the same thing as ‘the intensity is so great’ and she has false perception that she is talking about two different things when she is mindlessly repeating herself.

If she knew or understood what she is saying she would not have said it and it is because she is speaking without understanding what she is saying that she has exposed a fundamental flaw in her understanding by what she said that must be rote, copied from others without understanding in the name of exaggeration.

The judge acquitted Razak on the basis of his affidavit:

It seems the affidavit which Razak produced that I thought incriminated rather than exonerated him, short of someone else paying the murderers, they took it upon their own initiative to kill her, the judge justified his acquitting Razak by saying that the affidavit acquitted him as no objections were made to points made on the affidavit.

Quote: "In the absence of the rebuttal evidence against them (statements in the affidavit), coupled with the fact that there is no legal onus for him to rebut any statutory presumption, there is clearly no reason for the statements to be ignored and rejected," the judge said.

Either the judge is very naive or it is just an excuse for him to acquit Razak but if he believes his judgment is logical, the affidavit is credible when it is not credible, he has false perception and logic that will end in madness.

IN MY MIND THE AFFIDAVIT ‘SHOT RAZAK IN HIS FOOT’ AND YET THE JUDGE FOUND THAT THERE IS NO REASON FOR RAZAK TO LIE AND BECAUSE NO ONE REBUTTED THE AFFIDAVIT, IT MUST BE THE TRUTH AND THUS ABSOLVES HIM.

Sirul admitted he was going to be paid $50,000:

Quote: Extract from Sirul’s caution statement: Azilah tells Sirul that they are going to be paid RM50,000-RM100,000 to kill Altantuya.

 

Comment: If it is true that Sirul alleged he would be paid money to kill Altanturya then it is ‘astounding’ that the court seem disinterested to find out who it was who was going to pay him to kill her.

IF IT IS TRUE THAT SIRUL IN HIS CAUTIONED STATEMENT ADMITTED HE WAS BEING PAID TO KILL HER, IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE THAT THE JUDGE HAS SHOWN NO INTEREST IN PURSUING WHO IT WAS WHO WAS TO PAY SIRUL TO KILL HER.

HOW CAN THE JUDGE CONCLUDE THIS CASE WITHOUT BRINGING THE PERSON WHO OFFERED MONEY TO JUSTICE?

Laziness is a plan based on force not reason:

People experience laziness frequently and talk about it but they only approximately know its nature, they do not know exactly what it is.

They know approximately that laziness is a disinclination for work perhaps in preference for doing nothing.

Laziness is based on force, based on dislike or the stirring of the person’s mental force repulsively at the thought of doing work based on a plan that is repetitively rehashed and so the lazy man is a robot. If you think laziness is reasonable, based on reason you may be right or have wrong perception. Because laziness is based on force, it is conditioning or addictive so that each time the person practices laziness he addicts himself further to laziness until it becomes compelling.

Being hardworking is the opposite and is also a plan based on force, it can be genuine or for show. For instance the sight of one’s boss can trigger the feckless worker to act hardworking and eager in order to impress the boss what a conscientious worker he is.

When genuine, being hardworking too is a plan based on force (like) not reason in which the person keeps pushing himself to work and refuses to rest that is addictive and can be tormenting because to force yourself to keep working even beyond reasonable limits is torment.

THUS LAZINESS AND ITS OPPOSITE, HARDWORKING ARE PLANS BASED ON FORCE (DISLIKE AND LIKE FOR WORK) AND THEY ARE CONDITIONING. IF YOU THINK THEY ARE BASED ON REASON, ARE REASONABLE AND NOT ROBOTIC, YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT LEADS TO MAD PERCEPTION.

SLOTH OR LAZINESS IS ONE OF FIVE HINDRANCES THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINS ONE IN SUFFERING.

There is no need to be lazy (dislike) or hardworking (liking) when faced with work but what is required is a specific assessment of the situation whether one should attend to work or it is feasible to delay work. Thus using reason, the person who is not lazy or hardworking decides on each occasion without liking or disliking when to embark or not embark on work.

Laziness is just dislike for work:

Laziness is just dislike or the stirring of one’s mental force repulsively at the sight of work. At milder levels of laziness, the person may be unaware that his mental force has been stirred repulsively as is his basis for being laziness. His mental force stirred repulsively by the sight of work, he will find some excuse as to not embark on work eg he is sick or busy or he keeps procrastinating until his final excuse is that it is now too late that it is impossible for him to do so.

Hardworking is just liking or the stirring of one’s mental force attractively at the sight of work. It is addictive such that the hardworking person cannot resist doing work, will keep on cleaning his house obsessively until it is spick and span.

BECAUSE LAZINESS AND HARDWORKING IS BASED ON FORCE IT IS BLIND AND DANGEROUS, DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE SPECIFICS OF EACH OCCASION.

LAZINESS IS JUST DISLIKE FOR WORK THAT IS CONDITIONING TO ARISE WITH INCREASING EASE/FREQUENCY TO INCREASING INTENSITY THAT THEN TRIGGERS OFF PLANS THAT ARE REHASHED FOR THE PERSON TO DELAY OR NOT DO THE WORK REQUIRED OF HIM.

People have reason to be lazy:

If you do not want to do something, it is your boss or wife that insists you do it, it is not surprising that you should be reluctant or disliking to do it.

If what you are doing is meaningless, which is objective, applies to you, no matter how you perceive it as meaningful, then it is not surprising you should have resistance or dislike for doing it. The style with which people always do things with is unnecessary and no matter how they perceive it as meaningful, deep inside they know it is meaningless and there will be loathing.

If what you do has an unnecessary accompanying style that requires much more effort eg the use of force and energy to prolong, change speed and strength, it is to be expected that it would be harder to accomplish, is partially meaningless and therefore you will have resistance to do it.

IF WHAT YOU DO IS MEANINGFUL (ACHIEVES TRUE FRUITS), NOT FOR SHOW OR DEMANDED BY OTHERS, HAS NO ACCOMPANYING STYLE (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE) THAT REQUIRES EXTRA EFFORT OR WASTE OF ENERGY THEN THERE IS NO REASON WHY YOU SHOULD BE LAZY.

Force not reason is the basis of people’s actions:

People don’t just experience like and dislike in its many guises, sadness, hurt, fear and confusion, they are all proxies of force and they are the basis of their actions and by extension force is the basis of their actions.

BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND & HARMFUL, IF FORCE DIRECTLY (AGGRESSIVENESS) AND INDIRECTLY (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, ETC) IS THE BASIS OF YOUR ACTIONS, IT IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER SOONER OR LATER BECAUSE ACTIONS BASED ON BLIND HARMFUL FORCE CAN BE EXPECTED TO LEAD TO DISASTER EVEN FATALITY SOONER OR LATER.

Thus when a person is lazy it is not reason but it is dislike or the stirring of mental force repulsively that is the basis of his inaction or not doing work, not reason. One day his laziness may lead to disaster or even his death by dereliction.

Similarly the hardworking person is not meritorious or reasonable but it is blind harmful liking or addiction to work that is the basis of his industriousness.

IT MAY BE THE TRUTH THAT OFTEN IF NOT ALWAYS IT IS FORCE DIRECTLY AS AGGRESSIVENESS OR INDIRECTLY AS EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, FEAR, HURT AND CONFUSION) THAT IS THE BASIS OF EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTUALLY ROBOTS’ ACTIONS), FORCE IS WHAT MOTIVATED THEM, NOT REASON.