The Buddha is correct

 

The Buddha is absolutely correct:

What the Buddha said that there are 5 hindrances (covetousness, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, sloth and torpor) applies to all beings, even animals.

Covetousness, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, sloth and torpor can be clearly objectively defined and shown to be present or absent in any being, it does not matter if you insist you are Christian, Muslim or great independent atheistic scientist.

If covetousness, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, sloth and torpor are shown to be present in a being, he is said to be hindered, obstructed and detained in ignorance and suffering even to tormenting levels without escape even when an escape is possible.

If covetousness, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, sloth and torpor are shown to be absent in a being, he is said to be unhindered, unobstructed and liberated from ignorance and suffering.

For those who are discerning, even animals are visibly beset by ill will and restlessness even to violent levels, they are covetous (desire to acquire a harem, possess food, chase off competitors for food and mates), slothful (lazy) and prefer to sleep (torpor).

You may think you are a great thinker and independent scientist, philosopher but so long as you possess covetousness, ill will, restlessness, doubt and uncertainty, sloth and torpor you are hindered and detained in suffering.

AND TO ONE WHO DISCERNS, ALL BEINGS HERE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE WONDERFULLY ENLIGHTENED TO THE NATURE OF THINGS AND THEMSELVES DISPLAY ALL NOT SOME OF THE FIVE HINDRANCES COVETOUSNESS, ILL WILL, RESTLESSNESS, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY, SLOTH AND TORPOR AND THEY MUST BE DETAINED IN SUFFERING, HEADED FOR MORE SUFFERING IN OLD AGE AND THENCE PERDITION AFTER DEATH.

Some scientists may be indifferent to money (although that may be apparent than true) but they are covetousness for fame, want to make a name for themselves and impress others with their intellect. Even Einstein enjoys and is therefore covetous of female company, is thrilled by females swooning over him, he is addicted to smoking and his violin and that too is attachment or covetousness. (You don’t see the Buddha thrilled by women company or smoking or violin playing). Scientists too display ill will, they can attack rival theories and forcibly using unfair means to uphold their own theories. Scientists can be shown to suffer restlessness, be beset and even admit to doubt and uncertainty about their own theories and they are all beset by laziness and torpor.

You may be hardworking as a scientist or to make money with your job but that is not the hardworking that leads to release from suffering. The hardworking the Buddha described is to work immediately to banish suffering or stress that has arisen until a time comes when stress, restlessness and distraction no longer arises or arises with great difficulty.

Rather than spending your time sleeping and dreaming, the Buddha advocates alertness, to be totally aware of what is happening around and within your mind and body so that you can eliminate unwholesome thoughts, emotions and events occurring. 

THERE ARE THESE FIVE HINDRANCES THAT THE BUDDHA SAID CAN OBSTRUCT A BEING, KEEP HIM IN SUFFERING AND HE DESCRIBED THEM AS COVETOUSNESS, ILL WILL, RESTLESSNESS, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY, SLOTH (LAZINESS) AND TORPOR (ADDICTED TO SLEEP).

WHETHER THESE FIVE HINDRANCES ARE PRESENT IN ANY BEING CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED, IF NOT BY YOU THEN BY THOSE WHO DISCERN.

TO ONE WHO DISCERNS ALL BEINGS HERE POSSESS A FULL HOUSE OF THESE FIVE HINDRANCES, THE FIVE HINDRANCES APPLIES TO THEM NO MATTER HOW SMALL OR GREAT THEY THINK THEY ARE, WHATEVER RELIGION THEY MAY PROFESS.

IF YOU MANIFEST THE FIVE HINDRANCES, YOU ARE SAID TO BE HINDERED, DETAINED IN SUFFERING NOW, LATER AND THEREAFTER EVEN TO TORMENTING LEVELS.

Why do you have a wife?

If you are not covetous, why do you have a wife or children? All beings here are covetous, they (irrationally) want to possess, they want this and that, even if they do not have a wife or children, there are other things they covet like a car, fame or status.

Even though you and everyone here covet (and suffer and is hindered because of it), it is possible not to covet anything at all and rather than suffering, it is the letting down of a burden, release from suffering not just here but free of covetousness, you experience heavenly unfettered or unencumbered existence seeing and knowing everything as a heavenly being.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO TRULY NOT COVET (IT IS WHEN YOUR MIND DOES NOT HAVE ANY DESIRE OR URGE TO POSSESS) EVEN THOUGH YOU AND EVERYONE HERE CANNOT HELP IT. IF YOU TRULY DO NOT COVET, YOU ARE UNHINDERED, RELEASED FROM SUFFERING NOT JUST NOW BUT IN THE FUTURE AND HEADED EVEN FOR HEAVENLY ETERNAL LIFE.

Why do you use force unnecessarily?

If you don’t have ill will, why do you constantly use force unnecessarily to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that stresses yourself and all who hear?

ANYONE WHO USES FORCE WHEN IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY HAS ILL WILL BECAUSE THAT USED FORCE IMPACTS ON OTHERS.

THERE IS NO NEED TO USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS EXCEPT FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, TO STIR OTHERS EMOTIONS OR MENTAL FORCES AND SO ANYONE WITH STYLE OR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES HAVE ILL WILL WHICH IS ONE OF THE FIVE HINDRANCES THE BUDDHA DESCRIBED, SCIENTIST OR NOT, RELIGIOUS OR NOT.

ILL WILL IS ESSENTIALLY RADIATING FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARILY AT OTHERS.

COVETOUSNESS IS BASICALLY POSSESSIVENESS.

When is someone lazy and torporous?

When you are suffering and there is a cause of your suffering that you can do something about but you refuse or decline to do so, you prefer to drift along, do nothing and you prefer sleep you are said to be hindered by sloth and torpor.

Sleep is not the way to heaven but maintaining the status quo and a return to this world not necessarily as humans but as animals.

If there is cause to your suffering and it is the sinful or harmful things you do, the way you constantly use force to prolong, change speed and strength of force that creates insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction then if you prefer to do nothing or sleep then you are hindered by sloth and torpor.

IF YOU ARE SUFFERING AND THERE IS A CAUSE TO YOUR SUFFERING THAT YOU CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT AND YOU DON’T AND YOU PREFER TO SLEEP, YOU ARE SLOTHFUL AND TORPOROUS.

Blow to Japan’s PM in Tokyo Poll:

Even though they are unaware there is a propensity (fancy word for liking or attraction) to use words wrongly that convey force where force is not involved, it (propensity) comes from urge or attraction that is conditioning such that it is the default way of perceiving and conveying things that force is involved when it is not.

It is a setback not blow to Japan’s PM. The results of the poll is a setback, does not possess force required to deliver a blow. It is a way of putting things or style in the substance of speech that is false.

EVERYTIME A PERSON USE FORCEFUL WORDS, WORDS THAT CONVEY FORCE IN SITUATION WHERE IT DOES NOT APPLY HE IS CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO BE ADDICTED TO IT AND BECAUSE IT IS PERCEIVING FALSELY THAT FORCE IS INVOLVED WHEN IT ISN’T HE IS FLIRTING WITH FUTURE INSANITY OR FALSE PERCEPTION.

Just a loss not even setback:

The role of a newspaper is to provide news or an accurate report of something that has happened. Leave others to decide for themselves if the polls result is a setback or not.

What has actually happened is that Japan’s ruling party lost in a Tokyo poll and that is what should be reported if you claim to be a purveyor of truth. To describe it as a blow or setback is the more, an interpretation or view of what happened that is false and comes from evil.

THUS IF YOU ARE TO BE TRUE TO YOUR DUTY AS NEWS PROVIDER, YOU MERELY REPORT WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND THAT MEANS REPORT THAT JAPAN'S RULING PARTY LOST THE TOKYO POLL, NOT THAT IT IS A BLOW TO THE PM OR SETBACK. 

How can he be the counsellor?

Confronted by the inference that someone may be the counsellor Jesus described, incredulous or ‘refusing to accept’ (only force not true reason can make a person refuse to accept) emotional people ask the question they do not realize is false & they have no right to ask.

“How can he be the counsellor?” is not the simple question it is supposed or disguised to be but it is an expression of incredulity; that the person cannot accept the possibility or it is impossible for the person to be the counsellor Jesus described, even when he does not see and know that he is not the counsellor.

If a person sees and knows it is true then he says, “You are not the counsellor or I see and know you are not the counsellor or you cannot be the counsellor” and the fact that he asks ‘how can he be the counsellor’ reflects he is speaking without knowing and thus speaking un-righteously to question and dismiss something that he did not see or know.

You have a right to ask others’ questions but that does not mean he must provide you with the answer. You can ask God all sorts of things but that does not mean God must reply tell you the true answers of your questions.

“Are you the counsellor” or “Is he the counsellor” is a true question applicable to the situation and is very different from the dismissive “how can (or it is impossible) he be the counsellor?”

THE PERSON WHO ASKS ‘HOW CAN HE BE THE COUNSELLOR” IS SPEAKING FALSELY, DOES NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS AND IS LIABLE FOR PUNISHMENT BECAUSE WHAT HE MEANS IS THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE IS THE COUNSELLOR WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING THAT THIS IS SO. IT IS DIFFERENT FROM ASKING “IS HE THE COUNSELLOR” THAT IMPLIES YOU DO NOT KNOW AND IS REQUESTING AN ANSWER BUT ‘HOW CAN HE BE THE COUNSELLOR’ IS A DISMISSAL OR SCOFFING DISGUISED AS A QUESTION.

EXACTLY WHAT YOU MEAN WHEN YOU ASK, “HOW CAN HE BE THE COUNSELLOR” CAN BE KNOWN IF NOT BY YOU THEN BY THOSE WHO DISCERN.

IF YOU MEAN ‘IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, INCREDULOUS, CANNOT BE BELIEVED THAT HE IS THE COUNSELLOR’ THEN YOU DID NOT SAY WHAT YOU MEANT, YOU DID NOT MEAN WHAT YOU SAY BECAUSE YOU MEANT “IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO BE THE COUNSELLOR” NOT “HOW CAN HE BE THE COUNSELLOR” WHICH IS A QUESTION THAT REQUIRES AN ANSWER THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE OR COME TO A CONCLUSION EVEN WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING IT IS TRUE HE IS NOT THE COUNSELLOR.

THUS MANY THINK THEY ARE ON SOLID GROUND SAYING THE THINGS THEY SAY BUT THEY ARE ON QUICKSAND, IN DANGER OF BEING SWALLOWED BY THE QUICKSAND INTO TORMENT.

What Jesus said in the New testament must be meaningful or true. Thus without naming the counsellor, it implies that based on the description, a person who is discerning can see and know who the unnamed counsellor is.

IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE READING THE DESCRIPTION JESUS GAVE TO IDENTIFY THE COUNSELLOR THEN JESUS IS SPEAKING FRIVOLOUSLY. THEREFORE BASED ON THE DESCRIPTION JESUS GAVE IT IS POSSIBLE FOR SOME, FOR THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING TO IDENTIFY THE COUNSELLOR.

Jesus said the counsellor will take from what is his and make it known to you. Did anyone discover and alerted you to Jesus’ foretelling the coming of another counsellor?

Jesus said he had much more to say to you but you cannot bear it now. Did a consciousness change in recent years and after 1977 make you able to bear or understand what you could not previously? If that is the case then I was the trigger to the change in 1977 and also in recent years.

I have spoken about many things that no man has ever spoken thus about, I have described to you that there are basically 5 emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, confusion and fear) and how they are fed by the power generator of style, namely the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that have equivalents in motion, thought and even perception and how they lead to insoluble tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction.

SADNESS AND FEELING HURT ARE NOT JUST SUFFERING BUT THEY ARE CONDITIONING TO BECOME EVEN MORE INTENSE WITH TIME AND I HAVE SHOWN YOU A FREE PERMANENT CURE TO THEM. STOP USING FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH SYLLABLES AND THAT IS THE END OF SADNESS. STOP ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WHEN SPEAKING AND THAT IS THE PERMANENT EFFORTLESS END OF HURT.

JESUS SAID IT IS TO YOUR ADVANTAGE THAT THE COUNSELLOR COMES, ISN’T IT TO YOUR ADVANTAGE IF SOMEONE TRIGGERS COUNSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT ALLEVIATE YOUR SUFFERING, IMPROVES YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND TEACHES YOU HOW TO PERMANENTLY EXIT SORROW AND HURT?

NOTWITHSTANDING THAT I MAY NOT BE THE COUNSELLOR, BY THE BUDDHA’S CRITERIA I AM SOMEONE OF EXCEPTIONAL NOBILITY AND HE SAID THAT ANYONE WHO SCOFFS AT THE NOBLE ONES ARE HEADED FOR PERDITION.

Obama’s tough love:

Africa identifies with Obama and Obama’s message to Africa can be described as ‘stop feeling sorry for yourself, pull up your socks and grab whatever opportunities come your way’ that has been described as ‘tough love’ by a BBC writer.

TRUE LOVE IS NEVER TOUGH BECAUSE TRUE LOVE HAS NO FORCE TO BE TOUGH. WHATEVER IS TOUGH IS NOT LOVE. THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED ‘LOVE’ AND THE PERSON IS SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT LOVE IS. WHAT HE CALLS ‘LOVE’ IS ‘LIKE’ THE MEANINGLESS IMPERMANENT STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY THAT IS SUFFERING NOT BLISS.

HE IS STIRRING CONFLICT IN HIMSELF AND OTHERS TO PRESENT LOVE AS BEING ABLE TO BE TOUGH OR HURTING.

Obama may not be as bad as Bush but like Americans, he is more worldly wise and beholden to vested interests to be the good man he is supposed to be.

PEOPLE LIKE TENGKU RAZALEIGH AND ANWAR MAY HAVE MORE INTEGRITY THAN OBAMA, WHO IS A PRODUCT OF THE ENTRENCHED CRASS POLITICAL SYSTEM. WITHOUT SINFULLY CALCULATINGLY PANDERING TO LOBBIES AND PLAYING OFF FACTIONS OR WHEELING AND DEALING IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE POLITICIAN TO BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE USA AND SO OBAMA IS NO ANGEL, FAR FROM IT, YOU HAVE TO BE QUITE MAD TO WANT TO BE US PRESIDENT AND SO IT IS, THAT WHAT ANWAR AND TENGKU RAZALEIGH SAYS MAKES MORE SENSE TO ME THAN OBAMA.

Aargh @*%!!!. Scientists say swearing helps reduce pain

It reflects the depth of delusion of people even those who are supposed to be intelligent when they can conclude that swearing reduces pain when it ADDS considerably to the pain.

The Buddha said that when hit by pain, foolish emotional people hit themselves with two arrows, the first arrow being the physical pain and the second arrow being the emotional reaction of anger or rebellion. The wise person only feels the first physical pain, he does not stir his mental force to foolishly unnecessarily intensify his pain.

YOU SWEAR ONLY BECAUSE YOU ARE FURIOUS OR ANGRY WITH INCURRING A PAINFUL EXPERIENCE AND THAT SWEARING REFLECTS VIOLENT STIRRING MENTAL FORCE THAT INCURS FURTHER PAIN ON THE MIND THAN IF IT DID NOT SWEAR AND THUS IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION OF MANKIND EVEN TOP SCIENTISTS THAT THEY CAN PERCEIVE THE OPPOSITE, THAT STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO SWEAR CAN REDUCE THE PAIN.

You don’t need supernatural powers to teach:

Jesus said the counsellor is to your advantage to come and he will teach you all things. He said unless a man is reborn again in spirit and water not physically he cannot go to heaven. This implies that as they are, ordinary humans cannot go to heaven, there is something fundamentally and even totally wrong with them, their constitution is wrong.

No supernatural powers are required for one person to teach another. What is required is words that accurately describe the problems afflicting those who are taught, those taught paying attention to what is said and seeing the truth of what is said (eg there are constant stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness and these lead to stress, restlessness and distraction) and then putting what is taught into practice to exit stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt.

THUS IF THE REASON YOU ARE SUFFERING IN THIS WORLD INSTEAD OF ENJOYING HEAVENLY BLISS IS BECAUSE YOU ARE SINNING, YOU ARE PERSECUTING YOURSELF AND OTHERS WITH THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THEN THE ONLY WAY FOR YOU TO STOP SUFFERING IS FOR YOU TO SEE HOW YOU ARE SINNING AND PUT A STOP TO THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THE ONLY THING ANOTHER PERSON CAN DO FOR YOU IS TO TEACH YOU WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE, TO POINT IT OUT TO YOU AND YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS FOR THAT.

IS THERE ANYONE PERSON TODAY WHEN THE PLAYING FIELD IS LEVEL FOR EVERYONE OR IN THE PAST WHO HAS SAID THIS, WHO HAS SAID THAT IT IS THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, THAT LEADS TO SADNESS AND HURT?

IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE, APPLIES TO EVERYONE HERE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELLOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO SAY IT TO BENEFIT YOU AND IF I HAVE ALREADY SAID SO, I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM, RENDERED HIM REDUNDANT.

NOTHING CAN HAPPEN WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF GOD AND SO WHAT I DID, CHANGE THE CONSCIOUSNESS IN 1977 AND RECENT YEARS MUST BE WITH THE FATHER’S APPROVAL AND WHAT I SAY TOO MUST BE EITHER WHAT I HEAR THAT YOU DO NOT HEAR OR I MUST BE SO SMART AS TO THINK OF IT BY MYSELF WITHOUT GUIDANCE.

You must change in a fundamental way:

Jesus said unless a man is born anew (in spirit and of cleansing water) he cannot go to heaven, it is not a matter of being born in a womb again.

In other words, a person must change himself in a fundamental way as if he was born again or totally different to go to heaven.

THEREFORE YOU MUST CHANGE YOURSELF NOT COSMETICALLY (EG PUT ON NEW CLOTHES) BUT IN A FUNDAMENTAL OR TOTAL WAY TO GO TO HEAVEN.

THE ONUS IS THEREFORE ON YOU TO CHANGE OR REFORM YOURSELF NOT ON OTHERS OR GOD, WHO DOES NOT NEED TO CHANGE.

WHAT IS FUNDAMENTAL THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE DOING THAT THEY CANNOT SEE OR SEE AS GOOD THAT THEY NEED TO CHANGE?

IT IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS FOR SHOW AND CAUSES STRESS IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, IS THE CAUSE OF SADNESS AND HURT AND NEEDS TO BE ABOLISHED IN ORDER FOR THE PERSON TO EMBRACE SANITY AND GO TO HEAVEN AND IF YOU CANNOT SEE YOURSELF STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU NEED SOMEONE TO TELL YOU AND THEREAFTER IT IS UP TO YOU TO SEE AND REFORM.

The way we act and do things:

Ong Tee Keat, MCA president
He has expounded the need to change the way we think and the way we act and do things. He rightly asked that we go beyond tolerance to acceptance of differences so that we can live and work together as one people to build a nation that can truly compete internationally on merits.

It is not the way we think or do things that need to change, that is about style not substance and meaningful change is about what we did in the past that we have now abandoned, what we did not do in the past that we now do.

If we killed and cheated in the past, we now do not kill and cheat. This is not about the way we did in the past but we now changed but WHAT we did in the past that we now abandon.

THUS ANYONE WHO PREACHES THAT WE MUST CHANGE THE WAY THINK OR DO THINGS IS TALKING ABOUT A MEANINGLESS CHANGE IN STYLE, IF BY CHANGING THE WAY WE THINK AND DO THINGS YOU MEAN CHANGING WHAT WE THINK AND DID, YOU ARE A MAN WHO SPEAKS IN A MUDDLED WAY. YOU SELDOM IF EVER HEAR POLITICIANS SAY WE MUST CHANGE WHAT WE THINK AND DO BUT THEY USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS SAY WE MUST CHANGE THE WAY WE THINK OR DO THINGS, REFLECTING THEIR IGNORANCE OR DELUSION OF WHAT THEY SAY THEY THINK IS FULL OF MEANING WHEN IT IS NONSENSE.

WHEN A PERSON THINKS AND DOES WITHOUT STYLE THERE IS NO WAY HE THINKS AND DOES THAT NEEDS CHANGING OR CAN BE CHANGED.

IT IS NOT THE WAY WE THINK AND DO THAT NEEDS CHANGE, IT IS USELESS TO CHANGE FROM ONE STYLE TO ANOTHER BUT WHAT WE DO OR THINK NEEDS CHANGE.

Forced or intended?

Whatever a person says or does can be objectively determined by those who are discerning as either forced or fully intended or meant.

When is it said to be forced?

When a copy of what someone said or did exists in his memory and he is rehashing from memory, it is said to be forced because what he merely does is to use force to activate and power through to completion the plan of what he wants to say or do that always has accompanying style intended to impress, please, intimidate or dominate apart from the (rehashed) meaning of what is said or done.

And to one who is discerning, whatever that is said or done by stylish emotional people are forced never truly intended. When there is a lot of force behind what they say or did, when substantial force is stirred they think they mean it but the aroused force that accompanied it merely indicates it is blind meaningless force that is behind it, not reason.

When is something said or done intended or meant?
When there is no copy of what is said or done in the person’s memory from which he activated it, he specifically composed what he said or did for the occasion and afterwards he does not memorize what he said or did with the purpose of rehashing it later, it is said to be fully intended or meant.

Even though it is not seen in this world, everyone here is a parrot rehashing from a repertoire of recorded substance and style plans of what to say or do, it is possible to speak and do anything specifically composed for the occasion and it is the incomparably saner and meaningful way to exist and is the way of heaven.

TO CONVERT ONESELF FROM A REHASHING PARROT TO A LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION COMPOSER OF ACTIONS AND SPEECH WOULD BE TO BE TRULY BORN AGAIN, CLEANSED FROM THE TAINT OF DISHONEST CHEATING REHASHING TO BECOME A TRULY LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERSON.

Obama’s fallen teleprompter:

Recently Obama’s teleprompter fell and broke into pieces whilst he was speaking at the White House, disrupting his speech.

Thus he was not speaking specifically composed for the moment but he was rehashing and it may even be wholesale from a written speech, not by him but his handlers.

ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME, IN TIMES OF ANXIETY (GLARE OF PUBLICITY) AND IN MORE COMPLICATED SITUATIONS THEY HAVE TO RESORT TO A TELEPROMPTER IN ORDER TO REMEMBER TO SAY WHAT THEY SAY EVEN EXACTLY THE WAY THEY WANTED IT SAID.

THE FACT THAT OBAMA WAS SPEAKING USING A TELEPROMPTER IS PROOF HE IS REHASHING, NOT JUST THERE BUT ALWAYS HE IS REHASHING AND IT IS CLEARLY EVIDENT TO THOSE WHO DISCERN. IF YOU CANNOT TELL HE IS REHASHING, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU SEE AND THEREFORE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND FALSELY.

Rehashing is tormenting and enslaving:

So long as everything progresses slickly it appears fine and can be passed on as genuine but when something happens unexpectedly as when the teleprompter falls and is broken, the president is in trouble because what he wanted to say as planned has been taken from him and he does not know what to say because he is dependent on the teleprompter to say what he wanted to say.

THUS ANYONE WHO THINKS HE IS A MASTER OF HIS PARROTING IS A FOOL BECAUSE HE IS A SLAVE DEPENDING ON HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX FOR WHATEVER HE SAYS OR DOES AND SHOULD THE MENTAL JUKEBOX SUFFER GLITCHES, REFUSE TO SPEW OUT APPROPRIATE PLANS OR ACTIVATE INAPPROPRIATELY WITHOUT PERMISSION, HE IS TROUBLED, EVEN FEELS HE HAS LOST FACE AND DRIVEN TO SUICIDE.

IT IS NOT HIM THAT IS PERSONALLY SAYING OR DOING THINGS BUT IT IS HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX OR PARROT THAT IS DOING IT ROBOTICALLY FOR HIM AND WHAT THE PERSON CAN DO IS TO SELECT WHICH PROGRAM TO ACTIVATE AND THEN SUPPLY FORCE THAT IS VARIABLE TO CARRY OUT. SOMETIMES HE SUPPLIES TOO MUCH FORCE AND THE SPEECH OR ACTION BECOMES INAPPROPRIATE. OFTEN THE JUKEBOX BYPASSES HIM AND ACTIVATES AUTOMATICALLY WITHOUT REQUEST AS A KNEE JERK REFLEX TO PERCEIVED INPUTS THAT USUALLY MEANS ACTIVATE THIS PARTICULAR PLAN OF SPEECH OR ACTION.

Covetousness:

Covetousness has been identified by the Buddha as one of five hindrances that obstructs a being and maintains him in suffering to return to this world again and again.

Whilst there are other reasons why beings are detained in this world of suffering even to tormenting levels, covetousness is one reason and all beings in this world are afflicted with covetousness, they want, they want to possess and own or acquire and they not only see nothing wrong, they see it is right and good to be recommended to others. Yet the truth that cannot be denied is covetousness is evil, is based on blind force and blinding, is always suffering and conditioning so that the covetous person gets more intensely covetous with age, every time he covets he is conditioning or bonding himself more strongly to coveting.

NOT A CENT OF WHAT YOU OWNED OR ANYTHING YOU ACQUIRED HERE CAN BE TAKEN WITH YOU WHEN YOU DEPART FROM THIS WORLD AND SO ALL YOU COVET WILL BE LOST WHEN YOU DEPART AND YOU ARE A FOOL TO COVET THINGS HERE THAT DOES NOT LAST, WILL PERISH. STILL IT DOES NOT STOP FOOLISH IRRATIONAL GREEDY MEN FROM COVETING AND AS A RESULT OF COVETING THEY ARE HINDERED AND DETAINED HERE NOT TO ENJOY BUT TO SUFFER EVEN TO TORMENTING LEVELS EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.

You would not spend so much time and devote so much effort planning and working to make money or earn wages if you were not covetous. Even hippies are covetous, they covet and smoke pot, covet hedonistic pleasures and ‘free sex’.

Coveting is based on force, never reason, it is the stirring of a person’s mental force attractively that then motivates him to acquire the object of his stirred attraction (eg money, car, Rolex watch, pretty girl, Hi Fi, heroin) according to plans that he may device and then rehash repetitively.

Coveting is addictive so that it becomes increasingly compelling for the object (eg money) that you covet and once coveting is intensely programmed in the mind it can be transferred to new objects to be coveted eg shares, property, stamps, cars, etc.

Coveting draws and consumes the person’s attention such that when matured, coveting occupy the mind of the coveting person and thus blots out whatever that is wholesome or blissful that might otherwise alight on his attention if he were not to occupy his mind constantly with coveting.

WHAT SHALL I EAT, WHAT SHALL I WEAR TOO IS A FORM OF COVETING. THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT COVET DOES CARE FOR WHAT HE SHALL EAT OR WEAR AND SO WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS IN ACCORDANCE TO WHAT JESUS SAID.

Today is all about you, the people of Malaysia:

Najib: Today is all about you, the people of Malaysia.

This is a sweeping false grandiose statement that is intended to flatter or please its targets not without purpose but with purpose that thus pleased or flattered you will be drawn to support him.

Why is what he said always false?

It is not TODAY but what Najib is going to say or the enterprise he is going to announce that is supposedly about you, the people of Malaysia and therefore it is false to say ‘today’ rather than ‘what I am going to say’ is about you.

Even what he is about to say or announce may not be totally about you but it may be a ploy to be seen to be doing something, it may not work or even work negatively.

EMOTIONAL PEOPLE WHEN CONFRONTED BY SUCH SPEECH WILL BE STIRRED, SOME RESENTFULLY BUT THEY CANNOT TELL WHY IS IT THEY ARE IRKED. THERE IS NO NEED TO BE IRKED OR DISLIKING, A PERSON WHO SEES AND UNDERSTANDS KNOWS WHAT IS SAID IS FALSE AND IN WHAT WAYS IT IS FALSE. HE DOES NOT ACCEPT IT AND THUS CANNOT BE CONNED BY OTHERS.

Goldman’s virtual profits:

Quote: Less volatility in stock markets, rises in global share prices and involvement in many firms' rights issues and takeovers had boosted profits, it said.

Goldman Sachs reported bumper profits and it is rumoured that it will reward its CEO staff handsomely for it.

How can rising share prices elevate its profit? Did it sell shares to realize those profits? If share prices were to plunge again, does it mean rising losses again?

IT IS RIDICULOUS AND DANGEROUS TO BOOK PROFITS BASED ON RISING GLOBAL SHARE PRICES AND THUS BOOKED, TO REWARD STAFF BECAUSE SUCH PROFITS ARE VIRTUAL, CAN EASILY REVERSE AND THEN SHOULD YOU CONFISCATE THE BONUSES YOU PAID STAFF?

AIG may have used government money to pay Goldman Sachs for credit default swaps that it actually could not honour and without such repayments, Goldman Sachs may not be looking so pretty and because the money paid by AIG did not come from itself but the government, it is still a bailout that made Goldman Sachs so profitable.

Geitner urges Gulf States to invest in US:

Even if the US is in desperate financial trouble and need others to keep lending to the US, it is no reason for anyone, finance secretary or not to tell others what to do with their money because it incurs serious karma.

IT IS NONE OF ANYBODY ELSE’S BUSINESS WHAT PEOPLE DO WITH THEIR MONEY AND YOU DO NOT ADVICE THEM WHAT TO DO WITH THEIR MONEY UNLESS YOU WANT A NOOSE AROUND YOUR NECK.

THUS ANYONE WHO WOULD PROFFER SUCH ADVICE IS NOT WISE BUT A FOOL AND YOU HAVE A FOOL AS SECRETARY OF FINANCE.

IF THE US HAD BEEN RESPONSIBLE AND LIVED WITHIN ITS MEANS IT WOULD NOT BE INDEBTED TO OTHERS TO NEED TO SHORE UP ITS FINANCES BY ASKING OTHERS TO INVEST IN IT. IF IT DOES, IT MEANS IT IS IN TROUBLE AND TO ASK OTHERS TO RISK THEIR MONEY LENDING TO YOU IS EVEN MORE GRAVE IN KARMIC TERMS.

That is covetousness for you:

Why doesn’t Geitner speak to Bangladesh or Ethiopia about investing in the US? The reason he doesn’t is because he knows these countries have no money. It is money that he covets for the US that he identifies with and stands to gain indirectly.

Why doesn’t Geitner tell the Gulf States to invest in China? The reason is because he indirectly through the US wants the money.

THUS UNWITTINGLY TO HIMSELF AND OTHERS, WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT IS COVETOUSENESS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS A HINDRANCE DETAINING THE FOOL IN THIS WORLD TO SUFFER.

Investing is a fancy name for speculating or gambling and there are risks in investing in the US and so by calling others to invest in the US you are calling on others to speculate to risk their money for potential gains.

By advising others you want others to listen to what you want them to do (invest in the US) and when they listen, they become robots obeying your command. It is never meritorious but karma incurring to convert others to become robots of your advice.

ANYONE WHO IS CREATING KARMA FOR HIMSELF AND DOES NOT KNOW IT IS A FOOL AND YOU HAVE A FOOL FOR A FINANCE SECRETARY AND SO ALL THESE PRONOUNCEMENTS OF GREEN SHOOTS AND AN END TO THE RECESSION SOON MAY REFLECT DELUSION THAN SEEING AND KNOWING.

Can the Fed see the future?

The US economy will sink at a slower pace than previously thought in 2009, thanks to a rebound in the second half of the year, the Federal Reserve says.

How can the Fed say the US economy will sink at a slower pace thanks to a rebound in the second half of the year?

It is only July now and many things can happen still like a swine flu outbreak or another financial crisis so how can the Fed say thanks to a rebound in the second half of the year that has not passed?

Based on such rosy pronouncements, bulls will push up prices and unless the Fed has a totally reliable crystal ball, it is acting recklessly, presumptuously to thank a rebound that has yet materialized.

Emotion is the basis of Fed’s statement:

Emotion or force not genuine reason is the basis of the Fed’s statement that thanks to a rebound in the second half of the year (that has yet materialized) the US economy will sink at a slower pace.

Anxious to do whatever they can to resuscitate the economy and perceiving falsely that confidence is a key (when it may be the truth that the financial system and economy is wrecked or mired in debts that will not go away easily and mere psychology cannot reverse), they falsely try to engineer a recovery by talking up the economy. By saying the economy will sink slower, they are trying to cheer people up so that thus cheered they will be exuberant and indulge in actions that will stimulate the economy and thus revert to the boom of the good old days.

If the economy has a flu then sweet talk may cause a recovery but if the economy has a cancer then whatever sweet talk will not do anything more than a brief respite.

BY GENUINE REASON THE FED HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY WHAT HAS NOT HAPPENED WILL HAPPEN. BY EMOTION, BY UNRIGHTEOUS DESIRE TO TALK UP THE ECONOMY BY WHATEVER MEANS POSSIBLE, IT HAS A MOTIVE TO DO SO.

‘May’ not ‘will’ sink at a slower pace:

Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say.

The statement as reported was that The US economy will sink at a slower pace than previously thought in 2009, thanks to a rebound in the second half of the year.

IF IT IS TRUE ‘WILL’ WAS USED INSTEAD OF ‘MAY’ THEN THE PERSON IS SPEAKING CARELESSLY, UNRIGTHEOUSLY AS IF HE KNEW IT WILL HAPPEN.

One speaking rightly says the US economy MAY sink at a slower pace. It is actually totally unnecessary to even say this but this is an expectation and as the Buddha said, you must not have any expectations of the future, let alone material expectations.

You are prejudging the future by building expectations that can be dashed and the wise person will have as few expectations as he can.