Opportunity knocks: Tony Tan

 

Opportunity knocks: Tony Tan

Why is this statement always false and driven by force not guided by genuine reason?

It is false because it implies an opportunity to make money or gain when it can also be an opportunity to lose money.

It is written in a style (opportunity knocks like someone knocking a door) to stir greed or attraction for gain. Genuine reason will never guide a person to inform others that opportunity knocks but it is aroused greed in the person (perhaps with vested interest, he stands to gain if others follow what he advices) that stirs him to speak in a way to arouse greed and haste in others to find out what that opportunity is and ‘grab it’.

THE STATEMENT IS ALWAYS FALSE BECAUSE IT IS NOT A GUARANTEED PATH TO GAIN BUT CAN LEAD TO LOSS.

IT IS DRIVEN BY FORCE NOT UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE HIS GREED STIRRED BY THE PERCEPTION OF A WINDOW FOR GAIN OPENING DRIVES HIM IGNORE POTENTIAL BLAME OR BRICKBATS IF HIS ADVICE PROVES DISASTROUS AND EMOTIONALLY ADVICE OTHERS TO SEIZE THE MOMENT. EVEN IF YOU DISCOUNT DEADLY KARMA, HE IS PUTTING HIS REPUTATION ON THE LINE BY ADVICING OTHERS HOW TO INVEST AND POTENTIALLY LOSE THEIR MONEY.

Motive is to impress and tempt:

What are the possible motives for the person to say ‘opportunity knocks’ in relation to banking opportunities in Asia as a result of this economic crisis?

The primary motive is likely to impress others at his ‘discernment’ or far sightedness, or expertise, the ability to spot a trend or opportunity for gain where others are ‘nonplussed’.

Another motive may be greed, he is excited by the prospect of an avenue for gain he has ‘discovered’ and thus spurred by that excitement, he wants to tell others so that he may generate a self fulfilling herd instinct.

What he and others who listen do not realize is that this opportunity for gain is also an opportunity for loss, something they do not envisage or downplay. Singapore got burnt investing in UBS and Merrill Lynch and so it is not farfetched that the East Asian economies are not so robust as to be the new engines of growth to generate banking profits.

Self serving:

If letting others know of the opportunity knocking would harm his own chances of gain, it is unlikely if not impossible he will speak publicly of the opportunity but keep it close to his chest. It is only if revelation of the opportunity is likely to benefit him will he reveal publicly the opportunity to tempt others to follow suit and hopefully what he said will become self fulfilling.

Because what is said is driven by force (greed) with the intention to impress and tempt others to join in, it is at least partially sourced from force that is blind and whatever is sourced from blind force is dangerous, either by underestimating or totally ignoring risks present and so such a person is dicing with disaster. By tossing a coin you will get it right half the time and so he may succeed sometimes with his gambles but because it is betting driven by force or emotion, sooner or later one bet will fail even ‘spectacularly’.

Newcastle: A year to forget

Newcastle was disastrously relegated despite a team with many stars.

No matter how ‘disastrous’ a year is, you never strive, never use force (only force can erase) to forget it.

Just as they foolishly speak of years to forget they also speak of years to remember (with relish, again and again) when everything was fine and they won ‘everything’.

AS A RESULT OF THEIR USING FORCE TO FORGET UNPLEASANT MEMORIES AND USING FORCE TO DWELL AGAIN AND AGAIN OVER THEIR PLEASANT MEMORIES, IT IS NOT A SURPRISE PEOPLE’S MEMORIES ARE LOPSIDED WITH BLANK PATCHES THAT THEY DON’T HAVE MEMORY.

FORGETFULNESS IS THE WAY TO REPEATING THE SAME ERRORS AND SINS THAT LEAD TO PAIN, IS SUFFERING, EXPOSES ONE TO LOSSES AND IS THE WAY TO PERDITION NOT HEAVEN SO THE WISE PERSON WILL NEITHER STRIVE TO FORGET PAINFUL MEMORIES NOR RELIVE AGAIN AND AGAIN ‘PLEASANT’ MEMORIES BUT LET MEMORIES BE, UNTAMPERED.

Even though Newcastle had a disastrous year, why should anyone need to forget it except that they are emotional people who are hurt by memory of what happened. It is mad to forget what happened and so it is anyone who tell others to forget is asking for suffering themselves.

Tkl

 

People 'get happier as they age'

This is false, what kind of study is it that comes out with false results?

The person selected in the picture is obviously to depict happiness but he is not happy, smiling is not happy but itself tormenting and he is in a permanent serious daze or detachment from reality that is always suffering.

The suffering of all emotional stylish people worsen with age because their minds are shattered by the lifelong use of force to prolong, change speed and strength, they have conditioned themselves to rapidly rising intense emotions and they are losing control of their rehashing that become increasingly inappropriate or mad.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE TO BE HAPPIER AS THEY GROW OLD BUT WITH AGE, LOSS OF FACULTIES, EMOTIONAL INCONTINENCE, DEEPENING DAZE AND RESTLESSNESS THEIR SUFFERING INCREASES AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR PERDITION AFTER DEATH.

Older people appear better able to control their emotions

Most people get happier as they grow older, studies on people aged up to their mid-90s suggest.

Despite worries about ill health, income, changes in social status and bereavements, later life tends to be a golden age, according to psychologists.

They found older adults generally make the best of the time they have left and have learned to avoid situations that make them feel sad or stressed.

The young should do the same, they told the American Psychological Association.

One who understands needs no studies:

If you understand what you see, you do not need any studies.

If you don’t understand what you see, you can do all the studies in the world and still come out with deluded conclusions like most people get happier as they grow older.

FOR ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS, ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONAL, STYLISH AND REHASHING ROBOTS AND THEY SUFFER FROM EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION AND FEAR), AGGRESSIVENESS, RIGID REHASHED BEHAVIOR, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (DAZE) WHICH ARE CONDITIONING TO BECOME INCREASINGLY EASILY TO AROUSE TO INTENSE LEVELS THAT GETS HARDER TO SHAKE OFF AND WITH DEGENERATION OF THEIR MINDS AND CONTROL THEY ARE HEADED FOR LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD EMOTIONS (MAD ANGER, EXCITEMENT, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION AND FEAR), MAD VIOLENCE, MAD ROTE INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR, MAD STRESS, RESTLESS AND DAZE SO HOW CAN THEY GET HAPPIER AS THEY GROW OLD? FOR ONE WHO SEES, HE SEES THAT THIS IS SO, AS THEY GROW OLD EVEN THOSE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VERY GOOD VISIBLY SUFFER MORE.

THUS IT REFLECTS THEIR INABILITY TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND THAT SO CALLED EXPERTS NEED TO CONDUCT STUDIES THAT ARE NOT ONLY FUTILE BUT WILL COME TO DELUDED CONCLUSIONS IN LINE WITH THEIR INABILITY TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND.

German export surge ignites hope:

There is a style or way the message is put that is intended to convey force to stir emotion in readers as represented by ‘surge’ (acceleration in speed and strength) and ‘ignite’ (explosion).

There is actually no force involved in the matter and it is his false perception that it is that will end in insanity for him.

What truly happened is that German exports increased substantially (not surged) giving rise (not ignite) to hope for economic recovery.

BECAUSE IT IS FORCE NEVER REASON OR SEEING TRULY THAT IS THE BASIS OF PEOPLE’S ACTIONS, IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT THEY WILL AUTOMATICALLY, ALWAYS IN A REHASHED WAY USE WORDS THAT STIR FORCE IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS EVEN WHEN FORCE IS NOT INVOLVED. ANYONE WHO TRUSTS WHAT SUCH A PERSON SAY IS A FOOL BECAUSE WHAT HE SAYS IS BASED ON BLIND FORCE NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

The purpose of style:

The purpose of style or the use of force to stretch syllables or units of motion, change speed and strength, is to stir emotion (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear) in self and others.

The purpose of stirring emotion is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others which are all false meanings that belie or undermine whatever the substance of what is said or done.

In addition the purpose of style is to distract or divert the attention of the listener to the substance of what is said or done. It is because what they say or do is dishonest, false or meaningless, they do not understand what they say or do that is copied from others that people have to speak with force changes that are a potent distracter, diverts attention from the false substance of what is said or done. If what you say or do is deceptive, you want others to agree with your false, harmful proposals, it is desirable that their attention is diverted at least partially from the substance of what is said so that thus diverted he is more agreeable.

THUS THE PURPOSE OF STYLE IS TO STIR EMOTIONS THAT ARE INTENDED TO PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS AND THE OTHER PURPOSE IS TO DISTRACT, TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM THE FALSE MANIPULATIVE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID. FORCE IS A GREAT DISTRACTOR BECAUSE YOU NEED FORCE TO DIVERT ATTENTION AND SO THE CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IS A MESMERIZING DIVERTER OF ATTENTION.

Just to please and impress others:

What she is doing, smiling and leaning forwards to greet others is never genuine but forced, according to a rehashed plan (robotic) just to please and impress others perhaps because she perceives it is expected of her and she wants to impress with her friendliness that is for show or faked.

This is controlled forcing herself to do or say things that go against herself to please and impress others that will end in loss of control and insanity. Whoever you are, if you smile and say or do things to please and impress others, you are practicing controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable insanity and you are not blameless but fully guilty.

THUS IF YOU SEE THE PICTURE AND SEE NOTHING WRONG, SEE SHE IS MARVELLOUS AND GRACIOUS WHEN SHE IS ROBOTICALLY FAKING IT CREATING SEVERE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FOR HERSELF AND OTHERS, THEN YOU SEE BUT DO NOT SEE AND THEREFORE DO NOT UNDERSTAND, YOU UNDERSTAND FALSELY.

More to please than impress:

What he is doing with his grim look and raised hand is not so much to impress others as to please them, what he does is actually meaningless but he is forcing himself to do so to please others that he is aware and saluting them.

This too is a path to future insanity you do not believe or understand.

You see and understand but you understand falsely that what he is doing is meaningful and friendly when it is rote, rehashed and he is insincerely forcing himself to acknowledge the presence of reporters.

HIS FACE IS EXPRESSING DISLIKE AND YET HE IS WAVING TO EXPRESS LIKE AND SO HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED CONFLICT THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLED CONFLICT.

Lawyer’s arrest shakes China’s rights movement:

This statement is false and designed to stir emotion.

Leave the shaking to others, just let your yes be yes convey what has happened and that is only, “China’s right movement lawyer arrested”.

Just because a few are shaken does not mean the whole movement is shaken and of what use is it to be shaken?

Unconsciously the statement conveys force (shaken) and wants to stir emotion and it is totally meaningless to be shaken, of what use is it to be shaken? The rational response is ‘can anything be done about the arrest’? If nothing can be done about the arrest, all the shaking in the world will not do anything so it is mad to discuss ‘shaking’.

He is sceptical:

The man with his arms folded has the expression on his face of scepticism or he does not like what he is hearing and that is meaningless and crazy.

EVEN IF WHAT HE HEARS IS FALSE, WHY SHOULD ANYONE BE SKEPTICAL OR REJECTING? YOU JUST SEE AND KNOW IT IS FALSE, WHY STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO DISLIKE OR SCOFF OR REJECT IT?

HE HAS AN ATTITUDE OF REJECTION, OF SCOFFING AND WHEN HE HEARS OR SEES THINGS HE DOES NOT LIKE, HE USES FORCE (NEVER REASON) TO REJECT IT. BECAUSE IT IS CRAZY TO USE FORCE TO REJECT WHAT YOU DON’T LIKE OR STIRS YOUR MENTAL FORCE REPULSIVELY, HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS.

AND SO IT IS THAT STYLISH PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONAL, THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR AND THEN THEIR STIRRED LIKE OR DISLIKE DRIVES THEM TO ACCEPT OR REJECT WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR AS TRUE OR MEANINGFUL AND IT IS MAD AND DANGEROUS TO USE FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND HARMFUL AS YOUR RECEPTIONIST.

How important are the consciousness changes?

To one who sees and understands, the world has changed consciously after 1977 and yet again in recent years, although they still suffer (through continued sin) everyone has visibly changed and they have all benefitted to greater or lesser extent from the consciousness changes.

How important are the consciousness changes?

This world is an abiding torment for everyone here, they only fake they are happy whilst hiding mind bending torment that drives them even to homicidal and suicidal limits with no way out of their miseries.

This world can compared to a black solid sphere in which everyone is trapped inside with no apparent means of escape possible. There is an escape hatch in the solid enveloping wall but it is finely fitted into the wall that it is not palpable or visible so that trapped beings cannot see or feel it. Even if by chance an inhabitant should locate this escape hatch, unless he applied persistent sufficient force to keep knocking at it, it will not relent to open and allow exit of the trapped person.

Now that someone has discovered this almost undiscoverable concealed hatch and by using sufficient persistent force to cause it to open to allow trapped beings to escape, many decline to escape, prefer to stay and find life here alluring.

What they do not realize is that a time will come when this trapdoor will be sealed again and they will then be trapped here to be tormented for even another eternity or Age (enough time for you to build a pile of skeletons as high as a mountain according to the Buddha) if they don’t make effort to extricate themselves.

EVERYONE HERE IS TORMENTED AND THIS WORLD IS AN ALMOST IMPOSSIBLY HARD PLACE TO ESCAPE BECAUSE IT IS COMPLETELY ENCLOSED, SHROUDED IN DARKNESS AND THE HATCH DOOR IS INVISIBLE AND IMPALPABLE AND WILL NOT OPEN UNLESS SUFFICIENT FORCE IS APPLIED IN A SUSTAINED MANNER TO OPEN IT. BY THEMSELVES BEINGS HERE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CAUSE THE HATCH TO OPEN. NOW THAT THE HATCH IS OPEN AND A WAY OUT OF THIS QUAGMIRE MADE KNOWN (PAY ATTENTION TO STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS), THE BEING WILL RUE EVEN IN ETERNAL REGRET IF HE DID NOT SEIZE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO ESCAPE THIS WORLD OF MEANINGLESS, FRUITLESS TORMENT.

Rewards for truth and goodness:

If you are true and good the reward is one eternity or Age in a formed heaven enjoying bliss without suffering.

If in addition you can effortlessly cease thinking at will, that is two Ages or eons in heaven.

If in addition you can stop liking and disliking at will that is four Ages in heaven.

If in addition you can stop feeling pain and pleasure that is 500 Ages in heaven.

If you can overcome all perceptions of form to access the sphere of the infinitude of space then that is 20,000 eons of bliss for you.

If you can further overcome all perceptions of space to access the sphere of the infinitude of consciousness that is 40,000 eons of bliss for you.

Finally if you can overcome all perceptions of consciousness to access the sphere of nothingness or activities that is 60,000 eons of heaven bliss.

IF YOU OVERCOME ALL FABRICATIONS TO DISPELL YOUR IGNORANCE THEN THAT IS ENLIGHTENMENT AND THERE IS NO MORE BECOMING, NO DESTINATION FOR ENLIGHTENED ONES.

IF YOU ARE FALSE AND BAD THEN THAT IS ETERNAL PUNISHMENT, DEATH AFTER DEATH IN ETERNAL HABITATIONS BUILDING UP A PILE OF SKELETON HIGHER THAN A MOUNTAIN AND SHEDDING TEARS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.

Whether a person is true and good (how virtuous he is) is objective; can be objectively determined and not subject to dispute. As the Buddha said, great is the gain in concentration of the mind when perfected by virtue, great is the gain in wisdom when perfected by concentration and depending on how the person has further developed his mind (instead of worthless material and sensual pursuits), by stopping thinking, liking and disliking, stilling all pain and pleasure, overcoming all perceptions of form, consciousness and fabrications he attains higher and higher and more extended lifespans.

Feeding on itself:

"This [sugar market] train is running express," said Alex Oliveira, senior sugar analyst for Newedge USA in New York.

"It's feeding on itself."

It is impossible for something to feed on itself, it sounds nice to stir emotion but it is false. What he is trying to say is that the problem is getting worse.

IF YOU PERCEIVE THAT FEEDING ON ITSELF IS THE SAME AS ‘GETTING WORSE’ YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.

He is not the first to use the phrase nor is this the first or last time he used it and so it is that it is copied from others, memorized and rehashed robotically without understanding truly what it means because it sounds impressive or emotional and he wants to rehash it to impress or stir emotion.

AND SO IT THAT PEOPLE READ AND THINK THEY READ THE TRUTH WHEN THEY READ FALSITY, THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND BUT THEY UNDERSTAND FALSELY IN A REHASHED FASHION AND DON’T UNDERSTAND, NOT JUST HERE BUT IN MORE PLACES THAN THEY REALIZE.

Najib vows to eradicate corruption:

He obviously thinks the statement casts him in good light and he wants to impress the populace with his resolve for goodness.

However that statement is false in many ways and it reflects negatively on him rather than positively.

Firstly corruption does not depend on him alone, it depends on others whose determination to be corrupt is beyond his control, he is not that powerful as to eradicate corruption from all the tough vested politicians around him not just in UMNO but BN. You must be very powerful to impose your will on the party. It may be impossible for anyone to eradicate corruption in this world and if you perceive you can, you may have wrong view that the Buddha said is the way to hell or the animal womb. He vowed to eliminate corruption not control corruption and so if any corruption remains, he has failed to fulfil his vow and there is punishment far more painful and everlasting for failing to fulfil vows.

Secondly it is impossible to eradicate corruption unless you yourself are clean. If you yourself are corrupt, it is hypocritical and impossible that a corrupt man can eliminate corruption.

NOTHWITHSTANDING DIVINE PUNISHMENT THAT IS FAR WORSE THAN YOU DREAM POSSIBLE FOR NOT FULFILLING VOWS, BY MAKING HOLLOW PROMISES FOR SELFISH IMMEDIATE GAINS, YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY BY TELLING YOURSELF YOU WILL DO CERTAIN THINGS WHEN YOU WILL FAIL TO DO SO AND THAT IS FUTURE TORMENT EVEN IN THIS LIFE.

Optimistic women live longer:

This statement is never constructed out of understanding but driven by emotion and therefore force that is blind.

Of what use is the information even if it is true?

Are you going to cultivate an optimistic nature just to live longer? If you do so, you are artificially fabricating according to a plan of how to be optimistic in mind, speech and actions and that is being a robot and you become a slave that is tormenting, so what is there to be optimistic about being a slave of optimism?

Apart from encouraging you to falsely adopt an optimistic nature, it may be to generate envy that the grass is greener over the fence and that is about stirring force not reason.

OPTIMISM (BEING POSTIVELY OR FORCEFULLY ATTRACTIVE OR LIKING) AND PESSIMISM (BEING FORCEFULLY NEGATIVE OR DOWNPLAYING) ARE FALSE ROBOTIC REHASHING STATES OF THE MIND GOVERNED BY FORCE AND BOTH ARE SUFFERING. ONE SHOULD NEITHER BE OPTIMISTIC NOR PESSIMISTIC.

TO BE OPTIMISTIC CONSUMES ENERGY, IS STRESSFUL, IS AN ATTITUDE THAT IF CONSTANT CAN BECOME MADDENING RATHER THAN PLEASURABLE IT IS MADE UP TO BE.

What is optimism?

Do agree that you have to do something in order to be optimistic?

Whilst there are differences between individuals as to what is exactly optimistic, it generally means one must be hopeful (hope or long for the best) and be of chirpy (‘happy’ or delighted frame of mind) disposition. You need force to long for the best, to be chirpy or have your mental force stirred attractively.

Thus the person who would be optimistic must cultivate a longing with force for the best and a chirpy or eager or liking or attracted attitude.

This constant roiling of force is tiring, stressful and maddening after a while rather than pleasurable.

Optimism is a program:

Optimism is a program that you have to install into your mind and then act according to that plan of how to be optimistic that has similarities and differences with others. First you have to decide what is considered optimistic by looking around and copying (eg humming a chirpy tune as you go about your daily chores, have a smile on your face all the time, walk with a spring in your steps, think positive thoughts, wear bright colourful clothes) and then you memorize it and keep practicing to activate the plan. Although initially you may forget to be optimistic, in time it is automatic that you exhibit optimistic behaviour but rather than a pleasure it is touted to be, it is robotic and tormenting.

Window too small for Teoh to fall through:

Apparently the window from which Teoh was alleged to have fallen through to his death does not open widely and the gap is too small for him to fall through easily.

And it appears there is a balcony that is more likely to be the site from which he fell.

If it is true there is a balcony and it is inaccessible to Teoh (locked) then someone must have opened the balcony and brought him there and perhaps threatened to throw him down holding him at the belt that unexpectedly gave way.

IF IT IS TRUE THE WINDOW IS TOO SMALL AND THERE IS A BALCONY THAT IS NORMALLY INACCESSIBLE TO TEOH THEN IT MEANS SOMEONE MUST HAVE CAUSED TEOH’S FALL AND IT COULD NOT BE DAP OPERATIVES WHO COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE KEYS.

Dr M challenges BN to retake PR states:

This is a foolish man talking heaping further karma on himself.

Does Jesus, God or the Buddha challenge you to do anything or challenge you to go to heaven?

YOU NEED FORCE NOT UNDERSTANDING TO CHALLENGE. YOU HAVE A PROPOSAL AND YOU CHALLENGE ANYONE WHO WILL TAKE UP THE CHALLENGE TO UNDERTAKE IT. IN ORDER FOR SOMEONE TO TAKE UP YOUR CHALLENGE HE MUST BECOME A ROBOT OF YOUR CHALLENGE AND THEREFORE IT IS EVIL TO CHALLENGE OTHERS TO DO SOMETHING NOT BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DO IT BUT BECAUSE YOU CHALLENGED THEM TO DO SO. THERE IS GRAVE KARMA INVOLVED AND YOU ARE A FOOL TO CHALLENGE OTHERS, TO ASK THEM TO PROVE THEMSELVES, EG CHALLENGE A MAN TO SEDUCE A GIRL.

Why style mandates being a rehashing robot:

Anyone who manifests style or stretching, changing speed and strength in his speech and actions must be rehashing and is a robot.

The reason is because no one can pay SIMULTANEOUS attention to two concurrent events and so if he is paying attention to his style or stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness he cannot pay attention to the substance of what is saying or doing and so he can only render substance and style simultaneously by rendering the combo to memory and rehashing with attention needed just as a tape recorder can render the substance and style of the music pre-recorded without any consciousness, let alone attention.

Just as you cannot be at the same time paying attention to your driving or walking when you are paying attention to your talking on the hand phone, you have to precariously keep switching attention to monitor both simultaneous activities and sometimes you get carried away with your conversation you forget your driving so that an accident occurs, in the same way, people are not paying full attention to the style and substance of what they say, they are merely switching attention between or paying full attention to how stylish they sound without paying attention to the meaning of what they say and sometimes they speak without paying attention to either style or substance.

THEY MERELY PAY INTERMITTENT AND SOMETIMES NO ATTENTION TO MONITOR (NOT COMPOSE) THE SUBSTANCE OR STYLE OF WHAT THEY SAY, LET ALONE PAY ATTENTION TO COMPOSE IT SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION AND SO IT IS THAT THE SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO OF SPEECH AND ACTION CANNOT BE RENDERED LIVE BUT MUST ALWAYS BE MEMORIZED AND REPLAYED AS RECORDED WITHOUT ATTENTION NEEDED.

BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO AT THE SAME TIME PAY ATTENTION TO COMPOSING THE FORCE CHANGES (STYLE) AND THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS BEING SAID, THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO MUST BE MEMORIZED AND REHASHED FROM MEMORY AND THEREFORE THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS AND MOVES WITH STYLE MUST BE A ROBOT.

Permanently divided attention:

Because no one can pay full attention at the same time to the force changes and the substance of what he said, he must either keep switching attention to monitor both or pay no attention to both, the person who speaks with style is constantly practicing dividing or scattering his attention such that in time his attention is permanently divided or unfocussed, scattered or diffuse and he struggles to focus.

ANYONE WHO BOMBARDS ANOTHER WITH SUBSTANCE AND STYLE SPEECH IS ALSO FORCIBLY ATTEMPTING TO DIVIDE HIS ATTENTION WITH KARMA ATTACHED NOT MERIT.

THUS WHOEVER SPEAKS WITH STYLE OR ACCOMPANYING FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IS PRACTICING DIVISION AND SCATTERING OF HIS ATTENTION THAT WILL END IN AN EASILY EVEN PERMANENTLY DIVIDED ATTENTION THAT STRUGGLES TO FOCUS ON SOMETHING HAPPENING.

Why rehashing does not require attention:

The reason you can walk without paying attention as when you are speaking on the phone whilst walking or admiring the scenery is because the steps are standardized, a facsimile or carbon copy of the previous one.

WHATEVER IS REPRODUCED FROM A PLAN OR PROGRAM IN THE MIND ONLY REQUIRES SOMETHING TO SCAN OR READ THE PROGRAM AND THEN MECHANICALLY RENDER IT. IF EACH STEP IS DIFFERENT THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR IT TO BE REHASHED.

THUS IF A SPEECH OR ACTION CAN BE REDUCED TO A STANDARDIZED FIXED FORM, IT CAN BE COMMITTED TO MEMORY AND SUBSEQUENTLY RETRIEVED AND SCANNED OR MECHANICALLY READ AND REPRODUCED BY THE ACTUATORS (SPEECH APPARATUS OR LIMBS) WITHOUT ANY ATTENTION REQUIRED, WHATEVER ATTENTION PRESENT IS ACTUALLY TO EXPERIENCE OR MONITOR THE RESULTS OF THE REHASHING RATHER THAN FABRICATING IT.

IT DOES NOT MATTER IF SOMETHING REHASHED HAS A SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE, SO LONG AS THE COMBO CAN BE STANDARDIZED, FIXED AND SET IN RECORDING, IT CAN BE RETRIEVED, MECHANICALLY READ AND FED TO THE ACTUATORS WITHOUT ANY ATTENTION NEEDED TO EITHER SUBSTANCE OR STYLE, WHATEVER ATTENTION IS NEEDED ONLY TO MONITOR THE QUALITY OF REPRODUCTION AND TO EXPERIENCE THE EFFECTS OF THE PLAYBACK.

THUS REHASHING REQUIRES NO UNDERSTANDIMG, WHAT IS REHASHED IS FIXED, NOT NEGOTIABLE, ALL THE PERSON HAS TO DO IS SELECT IT AND PASS IT TO THE SCANNER THAT WILL READ AND PASS IT TO THE ACTUATORS.

Not only can people rehash, it is the only thing they know:

If you agree that a person paying full attention to composing the force changes of the style of what he is saying cannot at the same time pay full attention to composing the substance of what he is saying then the who simultaneous substance and style combo must be rehashed, reproduced from memory and the person is a robot.

Not only can people rehash but it is the only thing they know how to do because rehashing is tormenting, is being a slave whilst not to rehash is freedom from torment and so anyone who can compose live for the occasion will never permit himself to rehash and so rehashing is always full time and the person does not know how to compose live specific for the occasion. Whatever new speech or behaviour they learn must be falteringly recorded and replayed even as they first rehash it eg watching their tutor examine, memorizing it as they attempt to copy his actions.

If you observe yourself carefully, sometimes a tune or song you hear keeps playing again and again in your mind and you find it difficult to get rid of it until you are distracted. This recurring copy of the song can serve as a template for you to practice singing in a similar style and with time you can consistently reproduce the same substance and style of the song such that others recognize what you are singing.

Again, if I were to ask someone to remember a song they are familiar eg Elvis singing ‘No More’, they will be able to mentally recall even with ‘uncanny’ precision Elvis rendering the song as they have heard it many times before and based on this mental recollection of the song they can similarly practice physically how to sing like Elvis the same song Elvis sang and they are essentially training themselves to rehash wholesale.

THEREFORE NOT ONLY CAN PEOPLE REHASH (BECAUSE THE MEMORY APPARATUS IS PRESENT IN THEIR MINDS TO RECORD EXTERNAL TEMPLATES AND ALSO RECORD THEIR RENDITIONS OF THAT EXTERNAL TEMPLATE), REHASHING IS THE ONLY THING THEY KNOW AND THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME AND VERY WELL.

Styled speech can never be live:

Styled speech or speech with simultaneous force prolonging, changing speed and strength of the words spoken can never be composed live specific for an occasion but it must be first recorded or memorized and replayed from memory without any attention needed to replay it.

Even if it is the first time a person is performing an action eg a medical student mimicking his tutor’s demonstration how to examine a patient’s abdomen, he is reproducing (mechanically) his examination from a mental image of how and what the tutor is doing. Some students with better memorizing and rehashing ability are better at copying faithfully what the tutor demonstrated whilst poorer inattentive robots reproduce a poorer version of what he saw and memorized.

WHATEVER ATTENTION REQUIRED IN REHASHING IS WHEN THERE ARE DISTRACTIONS, THE REHASHER IS STRUGGLING TO STAY IN THE PRESENT, WHAT IS BEING REHASHED IS COMPLICATED AND LESS COMMONLY REHASHED AND SO UNFAMILIAR AND THE REHASHER THEN HAS TO SUMMON MORE ATTENTION TO CAREFULLY READ THE RETRIEVED SEQUENCE OF WORDS IN HIS MIND.

Because there is no copy to read from in live speech or action, the person must pay full attention throughout his speech or action in order to COMPOSE it.

BECAUSE THERE IS NO PRE-EXISTING COPY IN LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION SPEECH, THE PERSON MUST PAY FULL ATTENTION THROUGHOUT HIS SPEECH TO COMPOSE IT.

BECAUSE A PERSON CAN ONLY PAY FULL ATTENTION TO ONE THING AT A TIME, HE CANNOT PAY FULL ATTENTION TO TWO THINGS AT THE SAME TIME, IF A PERSON WITH STYLED SPEECH IS PAYING FULL ATTENTION COMPOSING THE LITANY OF COMPLEX FORCE CHANGES (VARYING PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH) FOR THE DURATION OF HIS SPEECH, HE CANNOT BE PAYING FULL ATTENTION TO THE SUBSTANCE OR WORDS OF WHAT HE IS SAYING, HE MUST RAPIDLY AND FREQUENTLY SWITCH ATTENTION BETWEEN COMPOSING HIS WORDS AND COMPOSING HIS STYLE (FORCE CHANGES). THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE AND SO THE PERSON WHO CHERISHES STYLE MUST FIRST COMMIT THE DESIRED SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO OF WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY TO MEMORY AND THEN RETRIEVE AND REGURGITATE FAITHFULLY THE FIXED COMBO OF SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY FROM MEMORY.

IT IS ONLY SPEECH THAT IS TOTALLY FREE OF FORCE CHANGES THAT PERMIT LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION COMPOSING BECAUSE HE CAN PAY FULL UNDIVIDED ATTENTION TO THE WORDS HE IS SAYING WITHOUT THE SIMULTANEOUS DEMAND OF PAYING ATTENTION TO COMPOSE THOSE FORCE CHANGES ACCOMPANYING.

Provide the tape recorder with a tape of a song and it will faithfully replay that song consistently each time without any attention or consciousness involved or needed, not just in machines but humans too.

Often people have an irresistible urge to say certain things (eg ‘good mooorninggg!!!) when certain situations occur, the mental jukebox is automatically retrieving and replaying the well worn phrases for him without any attention or need for him to select it. The reasons why people sometimes have to pay attention rehashing is when their minds are struggling to focus, there are distractions on their minds, strong emotions have been aroused, what they want to say is more complicated and less often rehashed, otherwise what they say and do that is mechanically rehashed can be reeled out slickly with great speed and force without any attention at all to reproduction, the only attention present is to vicariously marvel at how charming and smart his speech is and to select, stop and start new rehashed sequences.

BECAUSE A PERSON CAN ONLY PAY ATTENTION TO ONE THING AT A TIME AND HE MUST PAY FULL ATTENTION TO FRESHLY COMPOSE A LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION SPEECH THAT HAS NO COPY TO REFER TO, SPEECH WITH A SIMULTANEOUS COMBO OF STYLE OR FORCE CHANGES AND WORDS SPOKEN CANNOT BE RENDERED LIVE BECAUSE IF THE PERSON WERE TO PAY FULL ATTENTION COMPOSING ALL THE COMPLICATED FORCE CHANGES OF HIS SPEECH, HE CANNOT PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THE WORDS HE IS SPEAKING AND IF HE IS PAYING FULL ATTENTION COMPOSING THE WORDS HE IS SPEAKING, HE CANNOT PAY FULL ATTENTION TO COMPOSE THE (CONSISTENT) FORCE CHANGES THAT REPRESENTS HIS STYLE. AND THUS THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO OF SPEECH MUST BE COMMITTED TO RECORDING OR MEMORY AND THEN READ OFF THAT MENTAL RECORDING MECHANICALLY LIKE A STYLUS READS THE RECORD GROOVES OR THE TAPE HEAD READS THE MAGNETIC TAPE SIGNALS AND CONVERT THEM INTO SOUNDS WITH VARYING SUBSTANCE AND STYLE CHANGES.

THUS WHOEVER YOU ARE, SO LONG AS THERE IS OBJECTIVELY ACCOMPANYING FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN YOUR SPEECH, YOU ARE REHASHING AND A ROBOT.

THE IMPORTANT THING IS THAT YOU ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR SPEECH BUT YOUR MENTAL PARROT OR JUKEBOX IS AND THIS JUKEBOX WITHOUT WHICH YOU CANNOT FUNCTION, YOU TOTALLY DEPEND ON IT TO CARRY OUT ALL SPEECH AND ACTION CAN FAIL OR GO MAD OR MALIGNANT, RENDERING INAPPROPRIATELY AND THAT IS TORMENT.

On some songs, Paul McCartney plays piano, bongo, guitar all at once. This is physically impossible and what is done is that he plays all the instruments separately and they are merged into a single soundtrack to give the impression he is playing all the instruments at the same time when it is recorded separated and merged together.

LIVE SPEECH NEEDS FULL ATTENTION ALL THE TIME FOCUSED ON THE WORDS THAT ARE SPOKEN.

REHASHED SPEECH NEEDS NO ATTENTION AT ALL, AS A TAPE RECORDER NEEDS NO ATTENTION REPRODUCING A SONG, JUST GIVE IT A TAPE OF THE SONG AND IT WILL PLAY IT, NO QUESTIONS ASKED. ATTENTION IS NEEDED FOR HUMAN REHASHING BECAUSE THEIR MINDS CAN BE DISTRACTED, CLUTTERED, ROILED BY STRONG EMOTIONS, THE TRACK HE WANTS TO PLAY IS SELDOM PLAYED AND HE HAS TO PAY ATTENTION READING IT CAREFULLY. OTHERWISE THE ONLY ATTENTION NEEDED IN REHASHING IS TO SELECT THE CORRECT TRACK AND MONITOR THE ‘MARVELLOUS’ RESULTS OF HIS CHARMING SLICK SPEECH.

Lazy and uncommitted to truth:

If you are lazy, dishonest, uncommitted to truth, have no qualms, you just want to get along with others and get what you want from this world, you commit everything you want to say or do that will get what you want (eg hello darling, you are the most beautiful girl I have ever seen) to memory and just lazily, impersonally reel off what you want to say from memory.

You are like the company CEO who is totally dependent on his secretary to get everything done, you cannot personally do anything, you only delegate. Should the secretary go sick or die, you are in great strife because you don’t know how to do anything.

THUS ANYONE WHO REHASHES IS LAZY AND INDIFFERENT, UNCOMMITTED TO TRUTH AND JUST WANT TO GET ALONG THINKING EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE WHEN HE IS HEADED FOR MAD ROBOTIC FAILURE AND THEN EVEN AN ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH.

Vying to be read:

One reason people sometimes need to pay attention to what they rehash is that there are many different recordings intruding vying to be read and the reading machine in their mind can only cope with a few tracks at a time.

Thus in the midst of rendering a complex sequence of speech, another sequence of speech or bodily action intrudes to vie for reading and so the person struggles to focus on completing the reading of what is at hand. Sometimes retrieval is lost halfway and the person struggles to relocate the lost segment.

And so when people pause in speech it is not to think but to search their jukeboxes for appropriate sequences to rehash.

Just a supplier of force and selector:

Once a person has been inducted into the world of rehashing, he is reduced to the role of selector of which recorded tracks to play and how much force to supply and even these functions are sometimes taken from him, usurped by his mental force.

Thus when the stylish person is amenable, in relative control of himself, his mood permits, he can regulate how much force he supplies eg little, moderate or strong force is applied to what he wants to say or do that is rehashed.

THUS IF HE FEELS LIKE IT, HE WANTS TO IMPRESS A GIRL WITH HIS GENTLENESS, HE SUPPLIES LESS FORCE TO WHAT HE SAYS AND SO SOUNDS GENTLE. WHEN HE WANTS TO INTIMIDATE ANOTHER, HE ADDS MORE FORCE TO SOUND ANGRY EVEN IF HE IS NOT ANGRY.

SOMETIMES THE EMOTION IS AROUSED TOO STRONGLY OR HE IS INEBRIATED BY STRESS THAT HE CANNOT CONTROL THE FORCE HE APPLIES TO HIS SPEECH AND THEN HIS MENTAL FORCE USURPS OR TAKES OVER HIS FUNCTION TO SUPPLY MAXIMAL FORCE THAT HE CANNOT CONTROL AND HE IS DANGER EVEN OF DEATH IF HE GETS INTO A FIGHT.

Even his role as selector of what to say or do can similarly be taken away from him, when his mental force or emotion is strongly aroused, it is irresistible for him to say or do certain things that he has done or said many times before. Sometimes something said or done becomes very slick and the jukebox automatically renders it for him without him selecting as when he greets someone always thus, ‘hello hi, how are you?’

THE TRUTH IS THAT THE PERSON OF STYLE WHO REHASHES IS REDUCED TO THE ROLE OF MERELY SUPPLYING VARIABLE FORCE AND SELECTOR OF WHICH SEQUENCES TO ACTIVATE AND EVEN THESE ROLES ARE SOMETIMES USURPED BY HIS MENTAL FORCE THAT WHEN AROUSED STRONGLY DETERMINES HOW STRONGLY AND WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES.

YOU THINK YOU ARE A MASTER OF YOURSELF, EVEN THE UNIVERSE BUT YOU ARE JUST A SUPPLIER OF VARIABLE FORCE AND SELECTOR, AND EVEN THESE TOO ARE NOT ALWAYS.

Calm & unwavering concentration needed for composing:

In order for live specific to the occasion composition you need a calm mind with unwavering concentration.

Only force in a mind (eg emotion or stirred force) can cause a mind to waver and thus wavering in concentration the person cannot pay full sustained attention to compose the speech to completion.

THE FORCE CHANGES IN STYLED SPEECH, NAMELY FORCE STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS DISRUPTS CALM AND CAUSES THAT MIND'S CONCENTRATION TO WAVER SO HOW CAN THAT SPEECH WITH ACCOMPANIED FORCE CHANGES BE COMPOSED LIVE?

YOU NEED A CALM MIND WITH UNWAVERING CONCENTRATION TO COMPOSE LIVE SPEECH AND THE STYLE PRESENT IN A SPEECH STIRS THE MIND TO DESTROY CALM AND CAUSES THE CONCENTRATION TO WAVER AND THUS RENDERS IMPOSSIBLE THAT STYLED SPEECH CAN BE RENDERED LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION.

Two insurmountable reasons style cannot be live:

Thus there are two major (insurmountable) obstacles to styled speech and actions being live:

a)   You need a calm mind with unwavering concentration to compose live speech and actions and the force changes that constitute style (force stretching syllables, changing speed and strength) stirs the mind destroying calm and stirred force and force changes causes concentration to waver and even be lost making it impossible for styled speech to be rendered live.

b)   A person can only pay attention to one thing at a time and styled speech and actions requires simultaneous attention to force changes and the substance of what is said and done that is not possible and so the simultaneous substance and style combo must be committed to memory or be recorded and then played back from recording without attention required.

'There were gasps in court, but all she did was smile'

Decision to extend Aung San Suu Kyi's house arrest meets with outrage in Burma and beyond.

People observe her smiling at the decision but they do not understand what they observe.

Gasping is to express incredulity and disappointment and this is mad because why should anything occurring stir your mental force, of what use is it to stir your mental force that harms you?

She is lying to herself and others by smiling that is totally inappropriate. Not that she should be glum or angry but to smile is to falsely say you like the decision or it may be to hide an urge for revenge.

RATHER THAN GOOD AND ADMIRABLE, HER SMILING IS A DENIAL AND LYING TO SAY SHE LIKES WHAT SHE CANNOT POSSIBLY LIKE AND IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY. SHE IS IN TROUBLE AND SHE SHOULD BE MINDFULLY AWARE OF HER PROBLEMS AND NOT SMILE BUT NOT BE ANGRY TOO.

China can’t replace US as growth driver: Singapore trade ministry

That statement is correct but it is for the wrong reason.

It is true that China or no country can replace the US as the locomotive but the reason is not that the US is so great but the reason is because the US is a great cheat having a free lunch on the world through its currency being used as reserve currency and people retaining their money in the US after receiving it.

The economic benefits of being able to print pieces of paper that the world loves to hold, of $600 billion circulating in the world and people stashing their wealth in treasury bills is an advantage no other nation can hope to emulate and so if the US is bust, the world is bust, no one can take its place.

Fed says worst of recession over:

 

This is the Fed chairman and he is not just speaking but speaking with significant emotion as depicted by his hand and face gestures and the forceful stare of his eyes.

Not only is this accompanying force and gesticulating totally unnecessary (useless), it is harmful and colours or taints the seeing and thus understanding and so such a man is not a reliable practitioner of true understanding, only fools consort with force and its proxy emotion and just as he did not predict the recent crash, he may not be predicting correctly the recovery, he may have got in wrong or he is indulging in wishful thinking.

THE VIEWS OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE NOT RELIABLE, THEY ARE FLAWED AND OFTEN EVEN FAR OUT AND SO HIS PRONOUNCEMENTS ARE TO BE TAKEN WITH CIRCUMSPECT.