Fast & furious:

 

Fast & furious:

Quote: In the last 10 years developments have been fast and furious: stamped metal separators, aromatic membranes and higher temperatures and pressures. Sir William wouldn't recognise the modern solid-state fuel cell, particularly Honda's latest.

Developments can be fast or slow or fitful but it cannot be furious except in your false perception that will end in mad perception.

Why do people say ‘fast and furious’? It is impossible they see it is true but it is emotionally to exaggerate.

Fast & furious, thick and fast:

There are many hackneyed two word combinations in the English language like fast & furious, thick and fast, prim and proper, spick and span. Because the two words are separate the chances that freshly specifically composed for an occasion one should adopt the same words and so these two word combinations must be memorized, copied from others to be rehashed because it is deemed stylish or stirs mental force attractively.

If you are rehashing (instead of composing specifically for the occasion) you are counterfeiting, cheating and a fake. Just as they are unaware they are rehashing when they speak falsely of ‘fast and furious’ (only beings can be furious, not developments, just because something eg a rapidly revving engine is fast does not mean it is furious), they are similarly unaware they are always rehashing because there is always a consistent style in whatever they say or do that can only come about via rehashing.

Microsoft’s blunders on simple matters:

MICROSOFT’S DIALOGUE BOX ASKING YOU IF YOU WANT TO REPLACE DESTINATION FILES WITH NEWER AND BIGGER FILES IS MISLEADING BECAUSE IF SOME OF THE FILES IN THE DESTINATION ARE NEWER AND BIGGER THEY TOO GOT REPLACED TOGETHER WITH OLDER FILES.

When you select a batch of files to copy to a destination, on XP you asked in a simple small box whether you want to replace all the files and usually you click ‘yes all’.

On the Vista, there is a big box but it is not only no progress but potentially misleading. You are told about ‘7 conflicts, replace the files with newer and bigger files’?

That means unless the files are newer and bigger they should not be replaced.

Recently I tested Microsoft by marking a few files that were actually older and smaller than the ones in the destination folder and yet these were replaced by older smaller files when the alert asked if you wanted to replace with newer and bigger files.

Don’t copy, no files will be changed:

If you don’t copy then it is obvious that no files will be changed and so the Windows dialogue box message is silly. Don’t copy suffices.

Because newer and bigger files are also replaced, the dialogue that replace older and smaller file is misleading.

It would less confusing if Windows had kept the old XP dialogues or phrased it such:

1)   Replace only older (and smaller) files.

2)   Replace all files.

3)   Cancel.

IT SEEMS OBVIOUS TO ME THAT WINDOWS HAVE COMMITTED A VERY BASIC ERROR IN PHRASING ITS DIALOGUE BOXES THAT BELIES ITS STATUS AS’ CUTTING EDGE’ PROGRESS.

What conflicts?

What conflicts is Microsoft talking about in its dialogue boxes? Those are not conflicts but differences. There is no need to bring high sounding conflicts into the picture, just ask simply, ‘you want to replace only older and smaller files or all the files or cancel’?

WHAT HAS ‘CONFLICT’ GOT TO DO WITH IT? JUST BECAUSE TWO VERSIONS OF A FILE EXIST DOES NOT MEAN IT IS A CONFLICT, IT MEANS THEY ARE DIFFERENT THAT IS ALL.

The purpose of style is to stir force in self and others:

There is style in how people in this world say or do things and it can be described as how they distinctively use force to stretch syllables/units of motion, change speed and loudness/strength of force.

The purpose of this style whether deliberately or otherwise, is to stir mental forces in themselves and others.

THUS NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE, IF THERE ARE CHANGES IN SPEED, LOUDNESS AND STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, YOU MUST STIR FORCE OR EMOTIONS (PROXIES OF FORCE) IN YOUR MIND AND BECAUSE THIS CONSTANTLY STIRRED FORCE IS NOT DOING ANY MEANINGFUL WORK, IT IS FOR SHOW JUST TO BE EXPERIENCED OR TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS, IT IS CONTROLLED MADNESS BECAUSE STIRRING FORCE IN ONE’S MIND THAT DOES NOT DO ANY MEANINGFUL WORK IS MADNESS, JUST FOR SHOW OR EXPERIENCE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, ETC.

FURTHER THIS STIRRING OF FORCE THAT DOES NO MEANINGFUL WORK CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT DRIVES THAT FOOL LIKE A SLAVE TO KEEP MANUFACTURING STYLE THAT WILL ULTIMATELY END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND FULL BLOWN INSANITY.

I think it is very impressive:

"We have not been able to do everything we wanted because of HiFi, of course; but what we have released today and put on the [Esa website] for instance, you can judge for yourself. I think it is very impressive."

This not your average country bumpkin talking but an intellectual or schooled top scientist and what he said is meaningless or does not make sense.

He is not sure of himself, he thinks it is impressive. It is not the thing that is impressive but his stirred attractive mental force at perceiving the thing that makes it impressive.

Although he speaks of being impressive a lot of the time it is unlikely he knows what this ‘impressive’ is that he experiences.

What is the point or use or meaning of stirring your mental force attractively or having your mental force stirred by some things happening and not other things? Attractively stirred mental force does not last, is meaningless because force is blind, of no use if it does no useful work and it is the inappropriate response or receptionist to events happening, what is important is you calmly clearly understand what is happening, not impressed.

BECAUSE BEING IMPRESSED OR HAVING ONE’S MENTAL FORCE STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY BY AN EVENT IS THE INCORRECT, ABSURD TOOL TO RECEIVE AN EVENT, CALM CLEAR UNDERSTANDING IS THE CORRECT TOOL OR RECEPTIONIST, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO SUMMONS THE WRONG TOOL (FORCE) CAN BE TRULY UNDERSTANDING AND SO HIS PERCEPTIONS AND REASONING MUST BE SUSPECT.

PEOPLE NOT ONLY HAVE THE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT THINGS ARE IMPRESSIVE WHEN IT IS THEIR STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT MAY NOT BE SHARED BY OTHERS THAT MAKES IT IMPRESSIVE, BEING IMPRESSED IS THE WRONG RECEPTIONIST OR TOOL TO USE TO GREET SOMETHING, WHAT IS REQUIRED IS CALM CLEAR UNDERSTANDING, NOT BEING IMPRESSED.

It is very impressive:

By saying “I think it is very impressive” he is saying it is not his mental force that is stirred that is the cause of the experienced impressiveness but that thing is intrinsically impressively.

IF THERE IS NOTHING INTRINSICALLY IMPRESSIVE OR UNIMPRESSIVE ABOUT ANYTHING AND IT IS A PERSON’S ATTRACTIVELY STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT MAKES IT SO, HE HAS BEEN FOOLED BY HIS SENSES, HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE EXPERIENCES AND HE IS A FOOL NOT JUST HERE BUT ELSEWHERE, HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.

HE HAS SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT SOMETHING IS IMPRESSIVE.

Forgotten by time and termites:

It is never time but people who forget and so the person is speaking falsely not without purpose but to falsely stir emotion in himself and others.

If every hair is accounted for as Jesus said and there is a photographic memory of everything that happened not just in this Age or eon but in all the countless eons as the Buddha said, then you are speaking falsely that time has forgotten.

WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, TIME FORGETS, YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY AND DICING WITH INSANITY.

Fresh smell of new books?

DESPITE the advent of digital print, the fresh smell of new books still manages to lure ardent readers.

If it is the fresh smell that draws you to new books then you are admitting that it is not reason or understanding but force, blind attraction that is the cause of you reading new books.

IT IS NOT THE FRESH SMELL BUT THE CONTENT OR SUBSTANCE OF A BOOK THAT SHOULD BE THE REASON WHY YOU READ, IF IT IS TRUE THAT IT IS THE FRESH SMELL THAT LURES YOU, YOU ARE ADMITTING THAT YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH BOOKS IS BUILT ON IRRATIONAL BLIND FORCE, ON SENSUALITY.

The person is a sensual person dedicated to impressing others, he or she uses high sounding words like ‘advent’, ‘ardent’ unnecessarily to be impressive and what is said is not worth paying attention to.

IT SHOULD NOT BE THE FRESH SMELL OF NEW BOOKS THAT DRAW ANYONE TO NEW BOOKS BUT WHAT IS THE CONTENTS OF BOOKS AND SO A PERSON WHO WILL DRAW ATTENTION TO SUCH FRIVOLOUS ASPECTS OF READING IS A FOOL.

Tkl

The smart money is still saying that Dubai is a sideshow

The above is a false styled statement with the purpose of impressing others how ‘in’ the person is, not a statement of truth.

Shrewd investors still say Dubai is unimportant. It is not smart money but shrewd investors that are saying Dubai is a sideshow and they may be wrong because shrewdness is not about wisdom or understanding a situation as it is truly is but it is about greed to maximize gains and minimizing losses according to plans that are rehashed that have worked in the past to maximize gains and minimize losses but because these plans are not specific to the occasion they may be found wanting occasionally so that they may be burnt after a long run of successes.

THE PERSON IS SPEAKING FALSELY IN REFERRING TO SHREWD INVESTORS OR MARKET PLAYERS AS SMART MONEY THAT IS NOT WITHOUT CONSEQENCE BECAUSE IS CULTIVATING FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION THAT SHREWD INVESTORS EQUALS SMART MONEY.

SMART MONEY IMPLIES THAT THESE OPERATORS ARE WISE, TO BE FOLLOWED BUT SMARTNESS OR SHREWDNESS IS ABOUT GREED FOR GAINS AND AVOIDANCE OF LOSS ACCORDING TO RULES THAT EVEN IF THEY ARE SUPERIOR TO ‘DUMB MONEY’ ARE NOT BASED ON TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF A SPECIFIC SITUATION BUT APPLICATION OF PREVIOUSLY HATCHED PLANS THAT CAN AND WILL BE FOUND WANTING SOMETIMES NO MATTER HOW SHREWD OR SMART YOU THINK HE IS.

Many world systems according to the Buddha:

According to the translation of what was purported to be said by the Buddha, there are many world systems that are independent of each other (astronomers observe many galaxies and stars that are born and die), our world system will one day die as it was one day born but remote world systems may not die at the same time and those beings who are below the 17^th plane and cannot be born in heaven will perish to be born in other remote world systems. Later the world system reforms and a Brahma or Father appears in this world system to be followed by many beings later.

 

Maha Brahma

The stories of a Buddha going to teach a brahma take place on the plane of Maha Brahma, the third of the fine-material planes (No. 14). Many people worship Maha Brahma as the supreme and eternal creator God, but for the Buddha he is merely a powerful deity still caught within the cycle of repeated existence. In point of fact, "Maha Brahma" is a role or office filled by different individuals at different periods.

The Buddha has directly seen the origins of Maha Brahma and understands what it requires to be reborn in his world. In the Brahmajala Sutta (DN 1) the Buddha describes how a supposed Creator God came to believe himself omnipotent and how others came to rely on his sovereignty. His description was based, not on speculation or hearsay, but on his own direct knowledge. The Buddha explains that when our world system disintegrates, as it regularly does after extremely long periods of time, the lower sixteen planes are all destroyed. Beings disappear from all planes below the seventeenth, the plane of the Abhassara gods. Whatever beings cannot be born on the seventeenth or a higher brahma plane then must take birth on the lower planes in other remote world systems.

Eventually the world starts to re-form (new Age begins). Then a solitary being passes away from the Abhassara plane and takes rebirth on the plane of Maha Brahma. A palace created by his kamma awaits him there: "There he dwells, mind-made, feeding on rapture, self-luminous, moving through the air, abiding in glory. And he continues thus for a long, long time." After ages pass, he becomes lonely and longs for other beings to join him. It just so happens that shortly after the brahma starts craving for company, other beings from the Abhassara plane, who have exhausted their lifespans there, pass away and are reborn in the palace of Brahma, in companionship with him.

Because these beings seemed to arise in accordance with the first brahma's wish, he becomes convinced that he is the almighty God: "I am the Great Brahma, the Vanquisher... the Lord, the Maker and Creator, the Supreme Being." The other brahmas, seeing that he was already present when they took birth in his world, accept his claim and revere him as their creator.

Eventually this misconception of a Creator God spreads to the human plane. One of the other brahmas passes away and is reborn here. He develops concentration and learns to recollect his previous life with Maha Brahma, but none of his lives before that. Recollecting that existence he recalls that Maha Brahma was considered the "father of all that are and are to be... permanent, stable, eternal." As he is unable to remember further back, he believes this to be absolute truth and propounds a theistic doctrine of an omnipotent Creator God (Net 69-70, 155-66).

The Venerable Ledi Sayadaw, a highly renowned Myanmar scholar-monk of the first part of this century, gave a careful analysis of the powers of Maha Brahma in his Niyama Dipani (MB pp. 138-39). He states that although Maha Brahma can perform all sorts of transformations, he cannot actually create independent creatures, change the kammic law of cause and effect, or keep anyone from growing old or dying. Brahma can use his special powers to transport a man to the brahma plane for a short visit, but he cannot ensure that someone will be reborn there.

The Buddha goes to heaven to teach his mother:

The Buddha Goes to Teach Deities

In several episodes the Buddha travels to higher planes to teach the beings dwelling there. While he generally visited the lower brahma planes for this purpose, his most important course of instruction to the gods took place on the Tavatimsa deva plane (No. 7 on the chart). The Pali commentaries report that during the seventh rains retreat after his Enlightenment, the Buddha spent three months in the Tavatimsa heaven teaching the entire Abhidhamma to his mother along with numerous other devas and brahmas. They had gathered there from the various deva planes of ten thousand world systems in order to listen to his exposition of this extremely precise philosophical psychology.[9]

Only higher beings could have remained sitting in a single posture this long, and continuity of attention is essential for properly grasping the Abhidhamma. "Infinite and immeasurable was the discourse, which went on ceaselessly for three months with the velocity of a waterfall" (Expos 19). But as the Buddha was a human being, his body required normal food. Thus everyday, in the terrestrial forenoon, he created an image of himself to continue preaching in Tavatimsa, while in his natural body he came to earth to collect almsfood and partake of a meal. Venerable Sariputta met him daily at the Anotatta Lake, and there the Buddha summarized for him what he had taught the deities the previous day. Sariputta gradually passed all this material on to his own group of five hundred bhikkhu pupils, elaborating and organizing it to make it easier to comprehend.

The Buddha gave this profound teaching in a higher plane as it demanded super-human attentiveness. His chief student there was his mother, who had died a few days after his birth and was reborn in the Tusita deva-world. By teaching her the most subtle aspects of the Dhamma, the seven sections of the Abhidhamma Pitaka, the Buddha expressed his gratitude to his mother for having carried him in her womb and bringing him into this world.

Disasters 'caused by immorality'

A government minister blames Indonesia's recent string of natural disasters on people's immorality.

Why is it that what is said false or deluded?

The person who says that has an idea of what is moral that he believes if followed will lead to the absence of disasters.

His idea of what is moral and immoral is likely (if not certainly) to be deluded and so if people were to behave in accordance to what he perceives as moral, still they will be subject to disasters.

Certainly mankind’s immorality is linked to natural disasters, but not in the way this minister’s perceives and what he is saying is just scolding, the kettle calling the pot black.

What the Buddha says accords with science:
The Buddha spoke of a ten thousand fold world system and if what is interpreted as said by the Buddha is correct, He says that our world system will one day collapse but remote world systems remain and beings who cannot be born in the higher reaches of heaven will perish to be born in remote world system.

Our solar system is for all practical proposes isolated from all the other stars of our galaxy, let alone other island galaxies. It is impossible for mankind to travel to nearby stars and it is likely if not certainly that before mankind can develop means to do so (eg rocket ships), his civilization will have perished through his feckless abuse.

THUS UNLESS ASTRONOMY IS DECEIVING US, IF WHAT WE SEE ARE TRUE, THERE MUST BE MANY ISLAND WORLDS COMPLETELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER NOT JUST IN OTHER GALAXIES BUT EVEN WITHIN OUR MILKY WAY GALAXY. OUR EARTH IS JUST ONE SUCH SYSTEM AND IT’S AGE MAY BE COMING TO AN END SHORTLY AFTER A PERIOD OF FOUR BILLION YEARS (AGE OF SUN) AND WHEN THE AGE COMES TO A CLOSE, THE EARTH IS DESTROYED BUT DISTANT STARS AND GALAXIES ARE NOT DESTROYED ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA AND BEINGS WHO CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN WILL PERISH TO REAPPEAR IN REMOTE WORLD SYSTEMS THAT ARE SISTERS OF OUR EARTH SYSTEM.

67,000 years by rocket to nearest star:

The nearest star (proxima centauri) is about three to four light years away or it will take light travelling at 670,616,629 mph from earth 4 years to reach it and even then it may not have life. Human rockets travelling at a maximum of

40,000 mph will take 67,000 years to reach the star, assuming it has broken down in the meantime. Therefore for all practical purposes, our earth is an isolated system amongst so many isolated star systems not just in our galaxy but countless galaxies, unless you believe our eyes are playing tricks on us. As astronomers say, there are more stars in the sky than grains of sand on all the beaches of the world.

THEREFORE WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID MAY BE TRUE THAT THERE ARE COUNTLESS WORLD SYSTEMS IN THE UNIVERSE EACH FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES PHYSICALLY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER, THERE IS NO PHYSICAL POSSIBILITY FOR TRAVEL IN SPACE TO REACH ANOTHER WORLD SYSTEM AND EACH SYSTEM MAY PERISH (AS IN NOVA AND SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS) THAT DESTROYS ALL LIFE IN THAT SYSTEM BUT SYSTEMS ELSEWHERE ARE UNAFFECTED AND IT IS TO THESE SYSTEMS THAT BEINGS WHO CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN WILL GRAVITATE.

Selfish, not good:

A resident of BU was noted to have said that traffic flow was much better with the closure of the feeding road as if the closure is such a wonderful thing, good for everyone.

A deluded person will conclude that because traffic flow is much better the closure is good but it is selfishness not goodness that is the basis of the action.

AS A RESIDENT WHO BENEFITED FROM THE EASE OF TRAFFIC FLOW YOU MAY PERCEIVE THE MOVE AS GOOD BUT IT IS DRIVEN OUT OF SELFISHNESS WITHOUT CONSIDERATION FOR OTHERS. IF YOU CONSIDER THE TROUBLES THOSE DEPRIVED OF ACCESS ARE, THE CLOSURE OF THE ROAD IS NOT GOOD.

THUS MANY PEOPLE ARE DELUDED THEY ARE GOOD WHEN THEY ARE SELFISH, HAVE NO CONCERN FOR OTHERS AND THEY DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE HEADED FOR WOE EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.

Attacked not condemned:

Quote: Swiss minaret ban condemned.

There is such a word called ‘condemned’ and it can be clearly defined and not for anyone to pervert its meaning with mad perception the fruit.

When a person is guilty of a crime eg stealing or killing someone then he is said to be condemned to have his hand cut or executed.

It is not ‘condemned’ that is involved but those whose anger (repulsive blind stirring of their mental forces) has been raised are ATTACKING not CONDEMNING the action.

IF YOU PERCEIVE ‘ATTACKING’ AND ‘CONDEMNING’ ARE INTERCHANGEABLE THEN YOU MAY BE CULTIVATING FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION. THUS HERE AS IN MANY PLACES PEOPLE THINK THEY SPEAK THE TRUTH, THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY SAY BUT THEY SPEAK FALSELY AND UNDERSTAND FALSELY.

AND WHAT IS THE POINT OF ATTACKING THE ACTION? SUFFICE TO SAY WITH REASON IT IS A WRONG DECISION TO BAN BUILDING MINARETS LET ALONE ATTACK LET ALONE CONDEMN.

Condemned to die not attacked to die:

Just as you would not say a person is attacked to die but you say a person is be condemned to die you should not say minaret ban condemned but you correctly say ‘minaret decision attacked’.

IT REFLECTS MUDDLED THINKING THAT IS THE WAY TO TORMENT TO SPEAK OF CONDEMNATION WHEN IT IS ATTACKING.

Men and women may respond differently to danger, brain scans suggest

People reading this may be thrilled or fascinated (their mental forces stirred attractively) and they may identify with their sexes to think there is something uniquely different or special about being male or female.

What this actually means is that males and females are programmed differently and it is because they are mindless robots programmed by themselves and society that they respond differently to danger.

THE DELUDED PERSON THINKS THERE IS SOMETHING SPECIAL OR UNIQUE THAT MALES AND FEMALES RESPOND DIFFERENTLY TO DANGER, IT IS PART OF THEIR SELF IDENTITY VIEW THAT LEADS TO FUTURE WOE THE BUDDHA SAID. INSTEAD THE REASON WHY MEN AND WOMEN REACT DIFFERENTLY MAY BE BECAUSE THEY ARE MINDLESS MECHANICAL ROBOTS RATHER THAN EXALTED SPECIAL SUPERIOR MALE AND FEMALE BEINGS.

Raising eyebrows:

Quote: Dating younger men no longer seem to raise that many eyebrows

If a person truly understands the above statement he must understand it makes no sense.

Only force can raise eyebrows and driven by dislike or the repulsive stirring of a person’s mental force on perceiving women dating younger men, the person pretentiously helplessly expresses her dislike by ‘raising eyebrow’.

What meaning and purpose is stirring dislike and using force to raise eyebrows in expression of dislike?

What matters is whether you see and understand it is right or wrong or does it matter if women date younger men, it is none of your business what others do and you are trying to impose your tastes on others by frowning.

What useful working is raising eyebrows doing?

If you agree raising eyebrows does not achieve any useful fruit as cutting vegetables or sweeping the floor then the purpose of using force to raise eyebrows is for show, to express your dislike and because it is meaningless, it is practicing controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity whoever you are.

BECAUSE RAISING EYEBROWS IS USELESS, DOES NOT DO ANYTHING USEFUL, IT IS CONTROLLED MADNESS IN THE NAME OF EXPRESSING DISLIKE AND THAT IS CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE MADNESS, WHOEVER YOU ARE.

Drenching rain but Victorian reservoirs near record lows:

What this indicates is that mankind is stretching nature and the earth to its limits. Despite drenching rain, Victoria’s reservoirs remain at record lows, one may celebrate and think Australia’s draught has broken when it is not the case.

IN CLIMATIC DRAUGHTS AND IN FINANCIAL DRAUGHTS, MANKIND MAY BE FACING DEVASTATION THAT ARE THE FRUITS OF ITS OWN FOLLIES.

Victoria's dams near record lows

December 2, 2009 - 11:24AM

Drenching spring rain has failed to to ease crisis, with dams at their second lowest level ever going into summer.

For the first time in 12 years Melbourne has received above average rainfall in spring but dams are still only 38 per cent full.

The only time they have been lower was last year when dams started the summer at 34 per cent capacity.

Water Minister Tim Holding said 173 billion litres of water flowed into Melbourne's water storages from September to November, equating to 112 per cent of the spring average.

"They're good inflows but we need to recognise that that 173 billion litres of water represents less than 10 per cent of our storage holding capacity and of course our storage as of today are at the second lowest that they've ever been for this time of the year," he told reporters today.

"So anyone who's rushing out to say 'well that's it, the drought's over' it's way too early to make that declaration."

The Minister said Victoria was set for another hot, dry summer, with storages expected to drop by .4 per cent each week.

Stage 3a water restrictions will remain in place until at least March 31 and Mr Holding is urging households to remain vigilant with their water use.

Stage 3a water restrictions mean plants can only be watered in the morning on specified watering days. Even numbered properties can water plants on Saturday and Tuesday within specified watering times. There is no evening watering.

Cars may not be washed at home with drinking water but a bucket, filled directly from a tap can be used to clean vehicle windows, mirrors and lights.

Report: US stimulus created 1.6 Million jobs:

It may be an exaggeration for political motives; no one can see it truly creating jobs.

If it is accurate, it is actually an indication of how bad it is and things to come.

Unless the government is going to artificially stimulate in perpetuity or the economy recovers on its own soon, these 1.6 million created jobs may join the jobless because they were due to artificial stimuli.

THEREFORE RATHER THAN FOR GLOATING, IT IS AN INDICATION THAT A WITHDRAWAL OF STIMULUS MAY CAUSE FURTHER DETERIORATION OF THE JOB MARKET. THE GOVERNMENT IS BUYING TIME BUT IS ‘LONE RANGER RIDING TO THE RESCUE’?