Recessions do not necessarily have to follow booms:
People
talk about boom and bust cycles and there have been many such cycles in recent
history.
Busts
only follow booms if these booms are not built on true productivity but
overconsumption especially driven by borrowing of savers’ money. If a boom
(unheard of in this world of reckless goats without true understanding) is
built on economic growth that is of a productive or improving nature rather
than crass consumption based on borrowed money then when that boom is exhausted
it returns to a mature stable state without severe downturns and it is only
when the booms are artificial, built on unsustainable consumptive excesses
(property speculation, credit card borrowings) that there will be a certain
severe whiplash or recession.
THUS
THE FACT THAT THE PAST BOOM WAS SO LONG AND REACHED SUCH GREAT HEIGHTS IS AN
INDICATION THAT THE BACKLASH OR RECESSION WILL BE PAINFUL AND PROLONGED AND IT
MAY BE EVEN TERMINAL, BEYOND MANKIND AND THE EARTH’S CAPACITY TO REGENERATE.
The recipe for a bust:
This
is the recipe for a certain bust following a boom: Economic growth based on
excessive consumption using borrowed money and scams that increasingly transfer
money from the many to the few until a point is reached when there are a few
with so much money they cannot spend enough to stimulate the economy or keep it
humming and many with too little money or too much debt they cannot spend to
keep the economy alive let alone boom.
THUS
THERE ARE TWO ASPECTS THAT LEAD TO BUST, ECONOMIC GROWTH BASED ON UNPRODUCTIVE
CONSUMPTION USING BORROWED MONEY AND SCAMS THAT INEXORABLY TRANSFER MONEY FROM
THE MANY TO THE FEW SUCH THAT THERE IS AN UNSTABLE IMBALANCE WITH TOO FEW WITH
TOO MUCH MONEY AND TOO MANY WITH TOO LITTLE MONEY.
I don’t think:
Quote:
"I don't think that portends
a new downturn in the economy, but it does serve as a warning that the recovery
is going to take some time to put in place here," commented Chris Rupkey,
chief financial economist at the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi in New York.
What
he is saying is that he did not see or know, he is guessing or reasoning so.
He
and you see nothing wrong but it is committing oneself without seeing and that
is dangerous and will lead to all kinds of difficulties in the future. It is
addictive, each time you take up positions without seeing or knowing you are
conditioning yourself to take up positions blindly, by guessing and that is a
recipe for entrapment and getting it wrong with costly even fatal consequences
if not in this case then in some other cases.
THE
WISE PERSON WHO IS NOT GREEDY OR CONCEITED, IN LOVE WITH THINKING STICKS ONLY
TO THINGS HE SEES AND KNOWS, HE DOES NOT GUESS, ACT AS IF HE KNOWS WHAT HE DOES
NOT BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON FORCE NOT GENUINE REASON AND THEREFORE IT IS
CONDITIONING OR ADDICTIVE LIKE SMOKING OR DRINKING THAT WILL END IN A FUTURE
GUESS THAT IS WRONG THAT HAS COSTLY EVEN FATAL RESULTS.
If he had true understanding:
A PERSON OF TRUTH MAY
SAY THE DECEMBER RETAIL SALES DIP MAY OR MAY NOT
PORTEND A NEW DOWNTURN, HE DOES NOT SAY AS IF HE KNOWS, I DON’T THINK IT PORTENDS A DOWNTURN. HOW DOES HE
KNOW?
If
you have true understanding it will immediately tell you that you do not see
and know the dip in retail sales for December is not a portend of a new
downturn and therefore you should not speak on something you did not see and
therefore know.
After
lifelong conditioning emotional stylish people have an automatic, irresistible
urge to jump to conclusions, to speak as if it is what they did not see and it
is never true understanding that is the source but it is mental force and
automatism to delve, to make hunches, to try to impress others with your
prowess at guessing the future.
THE
FACT THAT ORDINARY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE WILL JUMP IN TO TAKE UP POSITIONS IN
MATTERS THEY DID NOT SEE AND KNOW WITHOUT HESITATION IS AN INDICATION HOW
INNURED THEIR URGE TO FALSIFY IS. EVEN IF YOU GUESSED RIGHT, IT IS STILL
GUESSING OR GAMBLING AND DELVING IN FALSITY. IT IS AN INDICATION THEY DO NOT
HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHICH WILL IMMEDIATELY TELL THEM THEY DO NOT KNOW THE
TRUTH OF THE MATTER AND THEREFORE THEY ARE COMMITTING THEMSELVES TO FALSITY BY
SPEAKING AS IF THEY KNOW.
THUS
A PERSON WHO COMMITS HIMSELF OR TAKE UP POSITIONS ON MATTERS HE DID NOT SEE
DOES NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND IF HE DOES NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE
IS LIKELY TO GET IT WRONG AND SO YOU WILL BE A FOOL TO LISTEN TO HIS COMMENTS
LET ALONE ACCEPT THEM.
Absurd Microsoft:
I
just downloaded some updates for my XP and many times Windows had proceeded to
countdown to restarting the computer when I have things to do and do not want
to restart now. Surely it would have occurred to Microsoft that people may not
want to restart straightaway and give them the option, don’t restart, I will do
it myself.
At
least 6 times I had to cancel the restart.
Worthless advice with attached karma:
The
statement I don’t think the sales dip portend a new downturn is intended to
reassure and influence others who trust him to view or understand events like
him.
Why
it worthless advice?
If
he saw or knew what he was saying he would have said, “This sales dip is not a
portent of a new downturn”. By saying he doesn’t think, he is admitting he is
speaking without knowing, taking at best an ‘educated’ guess. What is the worth
of advice based on educated guesses? It is risky and you are a fool to take
much note of that. If it turns out false you will be racked by doubt and
uncertainty that what you believed is true turned out false. If it turns out
true, you are thrilled you can guess the future and you will be encouraged to
do so again and again.
Only
advice based on facts is worthy, advice based on guessing no matter how
educated is worthless even dangerous.
Why
is there karma attached?
You
are trying to falsely assure others that reality is such and such (not a
portent of a new downturn) when you don’t know, trying to make others view
events in a make believe way and that has karma due to you not merit.
SUCH
ADVICES MAY BE HARMLESS, EVEN GOOD AS HE AND YOU MAY PERCEIVE OR THEY MAY BE
NOT JUST WORTHLESS BUT HAVE DEADLY KARMIC CONSEQUENCES TO HIM AND ANYONE WHO
LISTENS TO IT IS GULLIBLE.
How force is the source of his statement:
Understanding,
especially true understanding is not necessarily the basis of emotional
people’s actions it is likely if not certainly that force usually indirectly as
like and dislike that is the basis.
Thus
in this case, his mental force stirred to dislike the prospect of the retail
sales dip portending a new downturn, he is moved or driven to say
un-righteously that he thinks it is not so.
BECAUSE
IT IS HIS DISLIKE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF HIS STATEMENT THAT THE DIP IN RETAIL
SALES IS NOT A PORTENT OF A NEW DOWNTURN AND DISLIKE IS STIRRED MENTAL FORCE,
IT IS FORCE NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS THE SOURCE OF HIS STATEMENT.
IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE TRUE UNDERSTANDING CAN BE THE BASIS OF THAT STATEMENT BECAUSE IF
HE HAD TRUE UNDERSTANDING HE WILL KNOW HE HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY THAT BECAUSE HE
DID NOT SEE WHAT HE SAID IS TRUE.
IN
MANY PLACES THAN PEOPLE REALIZE, THEY THINK THE BASIS OF PEOPLE’S ACTIONS AND
SPEECH IS UNDERSTANDING BUT THEY ARE DECEIVED BECAUSE EVEN AMONGST THE HIGHLY
INTELLECTUAL, IT IS NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS EMOTIONS, AGGRESSION,
LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION AND FEAR THAT ARE THE BASIS OR DRIVE OF
WHAT THEY SAY OR DO THAT IS NOT SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION BUT REHASHED FROM
MENTAL JUKEBOXES IN WHICH NO UNDERSTANDING IS REQUIRED BECAUSE WHAT IS SAID OR
DONE HAS ALREADY BEEN PREDETERMINED.
THUS
IF WHAT IS SAID IS REHASHED, NO UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED TO SAY IT AND IF IT IS
SELECTED BY EMOTION, LIKE OR DISLIKE, IT IS FORCE NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT
IS THE DRIVE OR SOURCE OF THAT ACTION.
True understanding has no difficulties:
True
understanding is something a person either has or does not have and if he has
true understanding it is always with him and so he never has difficulty
understanding some matters and easily understanding other matters. Thus if a
person has difficulty understanding some things it is evidence his
understanding elsewhere is not true.
Difficulty
implies struggle and means the person is using force to grapple with
understanding the matter and force is the wrong tool to use to understand
because it is blind and never understands.
TRUE
UNDERSTANDING IS NEITHER EASY NOR DIFFICULT BECAUSE IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
FORCE THAT CAN ONLY MAKE THINGS EASY OR DIFFICULT. TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS A
MATTER OF SEEING TRULY SEEING AND THEREFORE UNDERSTANDING TRULY, IF YOU SEE
WITH FORCE, SEE WITH STYLE (FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH)
ACCORDING TO A PROGRAM, SEE WITH LIKE OR DISLIKE, YOU ARE SEEING WITH ADDED
BLIND FORCE, FALSELY AND IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT YOUR UNDERSTANDING TOO MUST
BE FALSE. ONLY UNDERSTANDING THAT IS FALSE HAS DIFFICULTY TO FORGE IF NEW AND
BE EASY WHEN IT HAS BEEN REHASHED MANY TIMES.
TRUE
UNDERSTANDING IS A MATTER OF SEEING TRULY, AS IT IS, WHAT IS HAPPENING OR
PROPOSED TO YOU. WHAT IS SO EASY OR DIFFICULT ABOUT THAT? FALSE OR NO
UNDERSTANDING IS ABOUT NOT SEEING OR FALSELY SEEING SOMETHING AND IT TAKES
EFFORT AND FORCE TO SEE SOMETHING FALSELY OR NOT SEE. ONLY FORCE CAN MAKE A
PERSON NOT SEE WHAT IS THERE TO BE SEEN OR SEE FALSELY SOMETHING. ONCE
SOMETHING IS SEEN FALSELY MANY TIMES AND COMMITTED TO MEMORY THEN THE PERSON
UNDERSTANDS IT FALSELY EASILY WHEN IT IS RECURS IN THE FUTURE. IF SOMETHING
PROPOSED IS NEW, DOES NOT QUITE MATCH UNDERSTANDINGS RECORDED IN HIS MENTAL
LIBRARY, HE STRUGGLES OR HAS DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING IT.
Only rote understanding has difficulty:
Whatever
understanding that is by rote rehashed from memory to be applied to a situation
is false, a fake or counterfeit.
Thus
a person has difficulty understanding a matter if he has difficulty locating
the recorded understanding he has stashed away amongst so many in his jukebox
to be applied to the situation or he has rehashed several understandings but
they were found wanting or did not fit well. When he quickly located the right
understanding from his mental jukebox he satisfies himself that he has easily
understood or he has true understanding.
Another
avenue of difficulty understanding is if he has no recordings to be retrieved
to explain the situation and he must cobble or fashion a new understanding,
painstakingly memorizing it so that he can recall it. Then he struggles and
might admit to difficulty understanding.
If
something proposed to him is new and complicated (only falsity is complicated)
even more so he will struggle or have difficulty memorizing the convoluted many
faceted plan of the false understanding that he must record into his mental
library.
WITHOUT
COMMITTING YOUR UNDERSTANDING TO A RIGID PLAN TO BE MEMORIZED AND NEEDING TO BE
SEARCHED AND RETRIEVED TO BE APPLIED TO A PRESENT SITUATION YOU CANNOT HAVE
DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING.
IT
IS BECAUSE PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING IS ALWAYS ROTE, THEY MIGHT HAVE DIFFICULTY
SEARCHING AMONGST THE MYRIAD RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS, THEY SOMETIME FAIL TO
LOCATE THE ‘CORRECT’ ONE OR THEY REPEATEDLY LOCATE UNDERSTANDINGS THAT WERE
SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND WANTING THAT THEY RUN INTO DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING.
FURTHER
IF THE SITUATION OR PROPOSAL IS NEW, THEN THEY MUST LABORIOUSLY RECORD A NEW
UNDERSTANDING AND IF THE PROPOSAL IS FALSE AND COMPLICATED, IT IS TO BE
EXPECTED THAT THEY WILL STRUGGLE AND THEREFORE HAVE DIFFICULTY ‘UNDERSTANDING’
OR MEMORIZING FOR FUTURE RECALL THIS NEW SITUATION (AS WHEN A MEDICAL STUDENT IS
BOMBARDED BY NEW INFORMATION AS HIS CLINICIAN DEMONSTRATED HOW TO APPROACH AND
EXAMINE PATIENTS, HE STRUGGLES TO JOT AND MENTALLY NOTE THE MANY FALSE
SUBSTANCE AND STYLE THINGS NEW HIS TUTOR IS DEMONSTRATING).
Why people have difficulty understanding:
The
only reason people have difficulty understanding that implies that their
understanding is ‘full of effort’ or a struggle, is that they use force (not
seeing truly) to understand.
The
only way a person can use force to understand is if his understanding is a
recording in his mental jukebox and force is needed to search, retrieve and
replay that understanding for the occasion. On occasions he fails to locate the
understanding or retrieved understandings that do not quite fit, he is said to
have difficulty understanding.
REASON
IS NEVER REQUIRED OR INVOLVED IN SEARCHING FOR, MATCHING AND RETRIEVING FOR
REPLAY RECORDED UNDERSTANDING. INSTEAD FORCE IS CRUCIAL TO SEARCH, RETRIEVE AND
REPLAY A RECORDED UNDERSTANDING AND ANY MECHANICAL COMPUTER CAN DO THAT (EG GOOGLE
SEARCH). THUS IT IS BECAUSE THEIR UNDERSTANDINGS ARE REHASHED AND FORCE IS
NEEDED TO SEARCH AND RETRIEVE THAT UNDERSTANDING THAT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE
SOMETIMES RUN INTO DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE THEY CANNOT LOCATE THE
UNDERSTANDING THEY WANT OR THEY LOCATE THE WRONG UNDERSTANDING.
IN
ADDITION IF THERE IS NO PRE-EXISTENT UNDERSTANDING RECORDED THEN THEY NEED TO
MAKE EFFORT WITH ATTENDANT DIFFICULTY TO RECORD A NEW UNDERSTANDING.
Why people think they have understanding:
Emotional
people may think they are ‘very understanding people’ because they are deceived
that understanding is involved in the many things they say and do when it is
actually not involved nor is it required.
For
instance the primary function of language written or spoken has nothing to do
with understanding nor is understanding required. What language requires is
successful programming of that person in that language so that he can
proficiently to greater or lesser extent encode and decode words that signify
particular objects and actions.
Language
is essentially a communicating tool that permits the programmed person to hear
or see certain words and decode them into objects and actions so that he can
carry out what those words convey. Conversely the person with programmed
language is able to convert actions and objects into words so that he can
communicate with another.
LANGUAGE
IS ACTUALLY A MECHANICAL PROCESS OF CODING AND DECODING JUST AS YOU CONVERT
MUSIC INTO A MAGNETIC RECORD IN A CASSETTE TAPE AND REPLAY THAT TAPE IN A
PLAYER AND GET THE MUSIC BACK AGAIN.
JUST
AS NO UNDERSTANDING IS INVOLVED IN AN
AUDI SPORTSCAR CHARGING UP A CHALLENGING RACE COURSE TO PIKE’S PEAK, IT IS ALL
ABOUT MECHANICAL PROGRAMMING, IT MAY BE A DECEPTION THAT UNDERSTANDING IS
INVOLVED IN THE DAILY LIVES OF EVEN SOPHISTICATED PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD.
Wall Street bankers: Mistakes were made
By
admitting mistakes were made, these bankers (at a Congressional hearing) are
admitting that their previous understandings were false (mistakes) and as a
result of these false understandings they undertook actions that brought about
this catastrophe.
WHEN
YOU ADMIT THAT MISTAKES WERE MADE, YOU ARE IN EFFECT ADMITTING THAT YOUR
UNDERSTANDING IN THAT INSTANCE WAS FALSE AND BASED ON THAT FALSE UNDERSTANDING
YOU UNDERTOOK FALSE ACTIONS THAT LEAD TO DISASTER.
The
truth may be that their actions were wilful, reckless without conscience
calculated for maximal self profit and so it is a lie to say mistakes were
made.
THUS
ANYONE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING READING WILL KNOW THAT THESE BANKERS ARE TELLING
LIES, FINDING EXCUSES TO SAY MISTAKES WERE MADE. IF YOU ARE IN DOUBT AND
UNCERTAINTY, YOU THINK MAYBE THEY ARE SPEAKING THE TRUTH YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE
UNDERSTANDING.
British anxiety over influence in Europe after crisis
What
is being discussed is nonsense, makes no sense and the fact that people see
nothing wrong, think it is meaningful reflects they do not understand.
The
crux or meaning of the situation is that UK has been proven wrong eg in its
financial policies. Being humbled is about being shamed and that is about
emotion that is blind and meaningless apart from being harmful.
IT
IS MEANINGLESS TO TALK ABOUT THE UK BEING HUMBLED. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT THE UK
HAS BEEN PROVEN WRONG OR DELUDED. WHAT HAS THAT GOT TO DO WITH BEING HUMBLED?
THE
FACT THAT HE PERCEIVES THE UK IS HUMBLED BECAUSE IT WAS PROVEN WRONG REFLECTS
FALSE PERCEPTION, HE PERCEIVES THINGS AS BEING EMOTIONAL AND HE IS HEADED FOR
MAD PERCEPTION.
Iran
warns opposition on e-mails
Iran warns opposition supporters that they will be found and
prosecuted if they use e-mail to organise rallies.
Emotional
people reading this may perceive it as wrong but they may not understand why it
is wrong, abuse of power to wrongly persecute people in order to maintain their
power.
Whether
this action is undertaken with the public safety in mind or to quell popular
dissent that may bring about your downfall can be determined. Thus if the
purpose of threatening prosecution is to deter people organizing rallies that
are to your detriment rather than public welfare, you are abusing your powers
threatening others not to do something with deadly karma to you.
PEOPLE
THINK AUTHORITIES HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO ISSUE SUCH WARNINGS AND EVEN CARRY IT OUT
BUT IT IS AN ABUSE OF POWER WITH DEADLY KARMA TO THESE FOOLS WHO ISSUE SUCH
THREATS AND CARRY THEM OUT, IRANIAN OR MALAYSIAN.
Moderate earthquake rattles Venezuela:
This
is not a true statement but a styled false statement.
Do
you see an earthquake rattling the whole of Venezuela? It is false even to say
earthquake hits Venezuela because not the whole of Venezuela was hit but a
small part.
The
un-sensational unstyled statement is ‘moderate earthquake in Venezuela’.
Why emotional people never have true understanding:
BECAUSE THERE IS
SUBSTANCE AND STYLE IN EVERYTHING EMOTIONAL PEOPLE SAY OR WRITE AND IT HAS
ACCOMPANYING EMOTIONS (EG LIKE OR DISLIKE), THERE IS IN ADDITION STYLE IN THE
SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID OR WRITTEN AND THERE IS MOTIVE TO STIR EMOTION, THE
PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID AND WRITTEN MUST NOT ONLY SEE ALL
THESE IN THE SPEECH AND WRITITNGS OF OTHERS BUT SEE THESE ACCOMPANYING STYLE,
EMOTIONS AS MEANINGLESS HARMFUL ADDITIONS OF FORCE.
BECAUSE ORDINARY
PEOPLE NEVER ACCOMPLISH WHAT IS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN WHATEVER THEY HEAR OR READ,
THEY NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND WHATEVER IS SAID TO THEM OR READ.
IN ADDITION, IN ORDER
TO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHATEVER IS SAID OR WRITTEN YOU MUST HEAR AND READ IT IN
ITS ENTIRETY, NOT TAKE SNAPSHOTS AND BECAUSE PEOPLE ALWAYS HEAR OR READ IN
SNAPSHOTS TO REFER TO THEIR MENTAL LIBRARIES OF MEANING, THEY CAN NEVER TRULY
UNDERSTAND ANYTHING SAID TO THEM OR READ BY THEM.
It
may be true ordinary emotional people have true understanding in some matters,
false understanding and no understanding in other matters or this may again be
another instance of their false understanding; the truth is that it is
impossible for emotional ordinary people to have true understanding anywhere.
Truly
understanding what is happening, said or written or done is simply a matter of
seeing or hearing truly the entirety of what is happening and thus seeing truly
entirely to understand truly.
Sounds
simple but it is an order too tall for ordinary people to fulfil.
Because
there is a simultaneous substance (what is said that may also contain nonsense)
and style (force prolonging, changing speed and loudness) and it is said or
written with accompanying emotion and the person wants to stir the listener’s
emotions, a person who understands truly must perceive the entirety of
substance and style communicated, the emotions accompanying and the intention
to stir emotion. Because style is just a meaningless, harmful stirring of
force, he must see the accompanying style as meaningless and harmful
(stressful).
Because
ordinary people perceive the accompanying style of what they read or hear as
charming, meaningful and benevolent, they have false perception and therefore
they never truly understand what they hear or read. Further what is said may be
false, makes no sense and have added style that they fail to see as so but see
as even the opposite, true, sensible and benevolent and therefore they
understand falsely.
In
order to understand truly what is said or read, you must hear and read it in
its entirely but people never do that, they always hear and read in snapshots
to then refer to their mental libraries of meanings or assumptions and this
hearing in snapshots and rehashing recorded meanings is never truly
understanding it but presuming it.
It
is not that you should not remember the meaning of past events but you should
not record the meaning or understanding of it and rehash that recorded meaning
wholesale to explain a current situation without hearing every word of it, how
it is said, the force and emotions accompanying and the emotions it is intended
to stir eg someone may say something with the intention of making you laugh not
for the meaning or truth of it.
BECAUSE
THERE IS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE IN EVERYTHING EMOTIONAL PEOPLE SAY OR WRITE AND IT
IS ACCOMPANIED BY EMOTIONS (EG LIKE OR DISLIKE), THERE IS IN ADDITION STYLE IN
THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID OR WRITTEN AND THERE IS MOTIVE TO STIR EMOTION,
THE PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND MUST NOT ONLY SEE ALL THESE IN THE SPEECH AND
WRITITNGS OF OTHERS BUT SEE THESE ACCOMPANYING STYLE, EMOTIONS AS MEANINGLESS
HARMFUL ADDITIONS OF FORCE.
BECAUSE
ORDINARY PEOPLE NEVER ACCOMPLISH WHAT IS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN WHATEVER THEY HEAR
OR READ, THEY NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND WHATEVER IS SAID TO THEM OR READ.
IN
ADDITION, IN ORDER TO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHATEVER IS SAID OR WRITTEN YOU MUST
HEAR AND READ IT IN ITS ENTIRETY, NOT TAKE SNAPSHOTS AND BECAUSE PEOPLE ALWAYS
HEAR OR READ IN SNAPSHOTS TO REFER TO THEIR MENTAL LIBRARIES OF MEANING, THEY
CAN NEVER TRULY UNDERSTAND ANYTHING SAID TO THEM OR READ BY THEM.
Did you hear this, understand this?
Did
you hear the constant force prolonging syllables, changing speed and loudness
within and between syllables that is building up stress for you as you keep
hearing what is said to you?
Did
you hear the accompanying emotion (thrill, eagerness, sadness, dislike, anger,
anxiety) that is intended to stir similar emotions in you?
Did
you hear these force changes and accompanying emotions as false, meaningless
activations of force that are harmful or did you hear them as meaningful, good
for yourself and others? If you hear them as meaningful and good then you have
false understanding.
Did
you see the style or jazz in what is said to you, see what is false is false or
did you see the style as substance, see what is clearly false as true? If you
saw style in the substance and what is false as true then you understood
falsely.
ONLY
THE PERSON WHO HEARS THE CONSTANT FORCE CHANGES IN THE SPEECH OF OTHERS AND
HEAR THEM AS HARMFUL AND MEANINGLESS UNNECESSARY FORCE CHANGES TRULY
UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS SAID TO HIM. EMOTIONAL PEOPLE HEAR THE SOUND EFFECTS OF
FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND PERCEIVE THEM AS CHARMING,
PLEASANT AND MEANINGFUL THEY DON’T HEAR TRULY AS IT IS, FORCE PROLONGING,
CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND HOW THIS IS STRESSFUL, TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND
MEANINGLESS EVEN MAD.
IF
YOU DID NOT HEAR THE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN THERE
IS, EVEN TO BLATANT LEVELS, HOW CAN YOU SAY YOU TRULY UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU
HEARD?
IF
YOU HEARD THE SOUND EFFECTS OF STYLE, YOU HEARD THE EMOTIONS ACCOMPANYING WHAT
IS SAID AND YOU PERCEIVE THEM AS WONDERFUL, MEANINGFUL AND NECESSARY WHEN THEY
ARE STRESSFUL, LEAD TO STRESS, MEANINGLESS AND TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, HOW CAN YOU
SAY YOU TRULY UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU HEARD?
Did you hear it as rehashed?
Whether
what you heard is rehashed from a mental recording or freshly specific to the
occasion composed can be known and heard.
So,
if you truly understand what is spoken to you, you must understand that it is
rehashed if it is rehashed, it is freshly composed if it is freshly composed.
IF
YOU CANNOT TELL WHAT YOU HEAR IS REHASHED WHEN IT IS, YOU THINK IT IS FRESHLY
COMPOSED WHEN IT IS REHASHED, YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND THEREFORE
UNDERSTANDING.
Political analysis
and a British perspective on life in the US
There
is a true perspective of life in the US but it is not British nor European nor
Japanese nor anything.
Thus
to say your perspective is British is to say it is conditioned and false,
according to the British way of looking at things and what things should be.
If
the British perspective is subjective, a matter of taste or liking, then what
is the point of discussing and knowing something that is subjective and false?
Thus it reflects silliness and lack of understanding that people will dwell in
such matters as the British or Japanese or European perspective of life in
America. If you are interested in nonsense, it fascinates you then you should
read and be further deluded.
TO
SPEAK OF ‘A PERSPECTIVE OF LIFE IN AMERICA’ MAY BE MEANINGFUL, BUT TO SPEAK OF
A BRITISH PERSPECTIVE IS TO TALK NONSENSE.
Why British perspective is false:
Even
though you are British, the perspective is yours and it is not necessarily
British because the British is not one view but there may be a diverse number
of views by people who are British.
SUFFICE
TO SAY IT IS YOUR VIEW AND IT IS TRYING TO MAKE TOO MUCH OF IT THAT IS COURTING
MAD PERCEPTION TO THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE BRITISH AND YOU THINK YOU
KNOW WHAT THE BRITISH POINT OF VIEW IS, YOU THINK WHAT YOU WRITE AND THE WAY
YOU VIEW AMERICAN LIFE IS THE BRITISH PERSPECTIVE WHEN IN TRUTH IT IS JUST
YOURS AND YOU HAPPEN TO BE BRITISH. YOU THINK NOTHING BUT YOU MAY UNDERSTAND
WRONGLY BECAUSE YOU ARE COURTING MAD PERCEPTION.
IN
ORDER TO HAVE A BRITISH PERSPECTIVE OF AMERICAN LIFE YOU MUST HAVE A LIST OF
FEATURES OF AMERICAN LIFE THAT YOU WANT A BRITISH PERSPECTIVE OF AND
SUBMIT THEM TO A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF BRITISH PEOPLE, GET THEIR OPINIONS
WHICH MAY BE DIVERSE AND WRITE BASED ON THAT.
TKL
Fooled by Microsoft:
I
finally worked out why I kept depositing files outside the intended folder.
It
is all about the deception that Microsoft perceives is impressive that when
your pointer touches the line containing the folder, the entire line lights up
or is highlighted but you have not
selected the folder yet. Unless you first left clicked to pick the folder, if
you right clicked without first left clicking and chose ‘paste’ the files would
be deposited in the folder that contained your desired folder.
Although
it does not look so impressive, Microsoft should not permit the folder to light
up on touch but only if it is selected by a left click or it should not permit
file transfer until a specified folder has been picked. It seems if you are in
a window showing contents of one folder, files selected will be pasted to that
folder. This should not be allowed.
IT
LOOKS MORE IMPRESSIVE FOR THE ENTIRE LINE OF A FOLDER TO LIGHT UP UPON POINTING
WITH A MOUSE BUT IT MAY FOOL USERS THAT THE FOLDER HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY
SELECTED WHEN IT ISN’T BECAUSE YOU NEED TO LEFT CLICK TO SELECT IT. THUS IF YOU
RIGHT CLICKED TO PASTE, YOUR FILES WILL BE DEPOSITED IN THE FOLDER CONTAINING
THE FOLDER YOU WANTED THEM DEPOSITED IN.
Style is more important to Microsoft than function:
People
outside and within Microsoft do not realize that to Microsoft, style or what is
impressive is more important than what is functional.
In
older versions of the Excel, if you marked a range of cells, you can clearly
tell which cell is currently active because it looks different.
In
recent versions because of the obsession with pastel colours and subtle shades,
it is difficult if not impossible to tell which cell you are in a marked range
and that led to mistakes many times. Microsoft has partially corrected this
problem in that the current version of Excel is again easier to tell but not
clear which cell you are in.
IT
SHOULD BE OBVIOUS FOR SOMEONE DEVOTED TO FUNCTIONALITY THAT THE CURRENTLY
ACTIVE CELL SHOULD STAND OUT AND YET FOR THE SAKE OF FANCY APPEARANCES
MICROSOFT MADE ALL THE MARKED CELLS LOOKED THE SAME. THIS TELLS YOU A LOT ABOUT
MICROSOFT THAT IT IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE AND NOT AS ‘TECH SAVVY’ AS IT
WANTS OTHERS TO THINK.
A person’s liking is his understanding:
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE
THE EVILS OR HARMS OF LIKING AND DISLIKING WHAT YOU PERCEIVE. NOT ONLY IS
LIKING OR DISLIKING A PERSON’S FALSE UNDERSTANDING
OF WHAT HE PERCEIVED, BUT BECAUSE LIKING AND DISLIKING ARE ABOUT ACTIVATING
FORCE IN THAT MIND AND FORCE IS DOMINEERING, INTOLERANT, IT (LIKE AND DISLIKE) DRIVES OUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING
THAT NEVER HAS FORCE TO COUNTER SO THAT THE MIND DRUNK WITH LIKE OR DISLIKE BECOMES
DEVOID OF GENUINE UNDERSTANDING AND TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON FORCE (LIKING AND
DISLIKING) AND FORCE DRIVEN FALSE PROGRAMMED REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS.
A
person’s liking or disliking of something perceived is his understanding of
that perceived thing and because it is a blind meaningless, harmful, unnecessary
stirring of force, it is a false understanding and therefore anyone who likes
or dislikes whatever he perceives has no true understanding, only false programmed
recorded to be rehashed excuse understandings.
There
is nothing mysterious or indefinable about understanding, understanding is just
perceiving; perceive truly then understand truly, perceive falsely then
understand falsely.
Perceive
with force (force prolonging, changing speed and strength or style) then
understand with force (your mental force stirred attractively or repulsively by
what you see) or liking and disliking what you perceived with added force.
A
PERSON’S LIKING OR DISLIKING OF SOMETHING PERCEIVED IS HIS PERCEPTION AND
THEREFORE UNDERSTANDING OF THAT THING AND BECAUSE IT IS A BLIND, MEANINGLESS,
HARMFUL STIRRING OF FORCE, IT IS A FALSE OR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS PERCEIVED.
BECAUSE THIS LIKING IS BASED ON FORCE AND FORCE SEIZES THAT MIND, SUBSEQUENTLY
HE IS RENDERED UNABLE TO TRULY UNDERSTAND AND MUST RESORT TO FALSE, PROGRAMMED
RECORDED TO BE REHASHED UNDERSTANDING.
Force seizes and drives a mind:
Should
a mind permit force to act on it or wilfully stir up force, force always seizes
that mind and drives it to do things according to pre-recorded rehashed plans
in which the person becomes a robot not master of that force he foolishly
permitted to act or wilfully stirred.
Force
is domineering whilst true understanding has no force to counter force and
therefore once force is allowed to occupy a mind (eg by stirring like or
dislike) it drives out true seeing and understanding and that person no longer
has true seeing and thence understanding.
THUS
A MIND THAT IS STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE SOMETHING PERCEIVED IS SEIZED BY
FORCE THAT PUSHES OUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT NEVER HAS FORCE OUT OF THE MIND
SO THAT IT (FORCE) BECOMES THE DRIVER OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO OF THAT MIND.
WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THAT LIKING OR DISLIKING MIND HAS IS NOT TRUE BUT PROGRAMMED
MEMORIZED TO BE REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS THAT ARE EXCUSES AND JUSTIFICATIONS.
NOT
ONLY IS LIKING OR DISLIKING A PERSON’S FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HE
PERCEIVED, BUT BECAUSE LIKING AND DISLIKING ARE ABOUT ACTIVATING FORCE AND
FORCE IS DOMINEERING, IT DRIVES OUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT NEVER HAS FORCE TO
COUNTER SO THAT THE LIKING OR DISLIKING MIND BECOMES DEVOID OF GENUINE
UNDERSTANDING AND TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON FORCE (LIKING AND DISLIKING) AND FORCE
DRIVEN FALSE PROGRAMMED REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS.
Perceive with force, understand with force:
Suppose
there is constantly added unnecessary force in your perceptions (seeing,
hearing, smelling, tasting and touching) in the sense that your mental force is
prolonging, changing speed and strength as you perceives.
It
is not a surprise but to be expected that if there is added unnecessary force
to your perceiving it will also lead to a stirring of your mental force that
can only be attractive or repulsive to what you used unnecessary meaningless
excessive force to perceive, in other words you understand with force, with
like and dislike what you used unnecessary excessive force to perceive.
Whether
you like it or not, it is dangerous to understand with force, to like or
dislike what you perceive because it is blind and whatever understanding is
false or make believe and it is courting certain disaster even fatality to self
and others understanding with force, with like and dislike.
THEREFORE
DO NOT PERCEIVE WITH FORCE, UNDERSTAND WITHOUT FORCE OR UNDERSTAND TRULY. ONLY
A PERSON WHO NEITHER LIKES NOR DISLIKES WHAT HE PERCEIVES CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND
AND IN ORDER TO NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE YOU MUST NOT PERCEIVE WITH STYLE OR
ADDED FORCE.
BUT
BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE NOT MASTERS BUT SLAVES OF FORCE, WITHOUT PERSISTENT
EFFORT TO EFFACE THEIR AUTOMATIC UNCONSCIOUS USE OF FORCE, THEY ARE TRAPPED,
DOOMED TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
So
you think you don’t use force to see? When the person stares, he is using force
to prolong his gaze and whilst he is starring his mental force is not just
prolonging, but waxing and waning in strength and speed. When the person’s eyes
are oscillating back and forth or up and down, it is changing in force and
speed.
Have
you seen people pop out their eyes to express amazement or being stunned? If that
is not using force that is totally unnecessary to see, what is it?
How will Japan Airlines fare under its zen monk boss?
A
lot of people including those who think they are very sophisticated do not
realize they have absurd logic and perception.
It
reflects absurd logic to pick on the fact that the new boss was a Zen monk to
as a yardstick to assess how JAL will perform under him.
WHETHER
A PERSON IS A ZEN MONK OR NOT MAY HAVE LITTLE OR NO BEARING ON HIS PERFORMANCE
AS BOSS OF JAL JUST AS WHETHER HE IS MALE OR FEMALE, RICH OR POOR, BLACK OR
WHITE.
WOULD
YOU ASK HOW WILL JAPAN AIRLINES FARE UNDER A FEMALE OR BLACK OR POOR MAN? IF
YOU WON’T, YOU THINK IT HAS LITTLE OR NO RELEVANCE, WHY WOULD IT MATTER IF HE
WAS A ZEN MONK?
A
POSSIBLE REASON IS TO POKE FUN, TO BE FRIVOLOUS NOT REALIZING YOU ARE COURTING
INSANITY.
Apparent not true contradiction:
It
is an apparent not true contradiction that in such a severe recession Tesco
reported record turnover.
In
normal recessions most of the retailers are still operating and so they take
business from each other and they therefore all suffer downturns in turnover.
In
this recession many competitors including small stores have closed and business
that would otherwise have gone to them is now absorbed by survivors like Tesco
causing their turnover to rise even to record levels.
THUS
THE PERSON WITH KNEE JERK REHASHED RULES LOGIC IS PUZZLED TO QUESTION WHAT KIND
OF RECESSION IT IS WHEN TESCO REPORTS RECORD TURNOVER BUT THE PERSON WITH TRUE
SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION LOGIC SEES AND UNDERSTANDS THE PRESENT SITUATION IS
DIFFERENT, THE LOSS OF COMPETITORS MAKE TESCO THE PASSIVE BENEFICIARY OF
BUSINESS THAT WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE GONE TO COLLAPSED COMPETITORS.
Never too young to bear a kavadi:
The
above is a rule or command to be applied
indiscriminately without consideration to special circumstances and it is
always false and confer even deadly karma to its advocates. Rules do not
require any understanding just encoding,
memorizing, rehash to be carried out according to the plan of the rule.
All
rules convert their adherents into mindless robots or slaves carrying out the
rule. Faith in rules according to the Buddha is one of three lower fetters to
future woe.
Would
not a child who cannot make an informed choice to bear or a baby be too young?
If you forced a child or baby to bear a kavadi against its wishes, would you
not be incurring karma on yourself for inflicting suffering on others without
permission?
WHAT
THE PERSON IMPLIES WHICH HE DID NOT SAY IS THAT BEARING THE KAVADI IS SO GOOD
IT IS NEVER TOO YOUNG TO DO SO. SUPPOSED IT IS JUST A RITUAL AND THE FAITH AND
PRACTICE OF RITUALS IS A LOWER FETTER TO FUTURE WOE THEN THE PERSON IS
INCURRING KARMA RECOMMENDING RITUALS TO OTHERS.
FURTHER
JUST BECAUSE THE PERSON IN QUESTION IS VERY YOUNG DOES NOT WARRANT THE
CONCLUSION THAT IT IS NEVER TOO YOUNG TO BEAR A KAVADI.
NEWSMAKER
- Chile billionaire means business with presidency
SANTIAGO (Reuters) - Chile's president-elect, billionaire Sebastian Pinera,
wants to apply his Midas touch for business to Latin America's most stable
economy and the world's No. 1 copper producer.
Just
because he is a very successful businessman does not mean he will be good for
the country because if he is successful because of wheeling and dealing, he may
abuse his powers to benefit himself with only trickle down paltry benefits to
the country.
Just
because Takshin is a billionaire does not mean he made in with good business
acumen and that the country can ride on his coat tails to immense wealth like
him. It may be precisely because of crookedness that they are billionaires and
it is disastrous handing the country to crooked billionaires like Takshin &
Berlesconi.
Jumping to conclusions:
Many
people do not realize that driven by emotions or an urge to be too clever or to
impress others, they are jumping to unwarranted conclusions that are
conditioning themselves to false logic that will end in torment for them.
Thus
when they are reporting about an instance of a child bearing the kavadi they
jump to the conclusion, ‘never too young to bear a kavadi’.
JUST
BECAUSE YOU HAVE COME ACROSS A CASE WHERE A VERY YOUNG PERSON IS BEARING A
KAVADI DOES NOT WARRANT THE ‘LOGICAL’ CONCLUSION, ‘NEVER TOO YOUNG TO BEAR A
KAVADI’. IF YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG, YOU SEE IT IS FUN OR CORRECT YOU MAY BE
RIGHT OR PUTTING A NOOSE OF INSANITY AROUND YOUR NECK. YOU ARE NOT MAD YET BUT
WHEN YOU DO, YOU WILL WEEP.
You need force to jump:
In
order to jump you need force, reason has no force that can cause anyone to jump
to conclusions.
And
so it is that it is never true understanding that causes people to jump to
conclusion but it is haste, eagerness, conditioning, emotion and an urge to
impress others with their wittiness that cause people to jump to conclusion, to
hastily eagerly fashion a half baked conclusion.
Here
as in many places people think it is true understanding that is the basis of
their actions but it is force that is their basis of jumping to conclusions.
Views are recorded understandings:
Emotional
opinionated people have many views on different subjects eg sex, marriage,
parenting, hygiene, etc.
These
views are actually stereotyped or fixed and inflexible, memorized and
reproduced whenever the occasion demands it.
THUS
THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MANY VIEWS ON DIFFERENT SUBJECTS IS EVIDENCE THEIR
UNDERSTANDINGS ARE MEMORIZED AND REHASHED AGAIN AND AGAIN TO APPLY TO
SITUATIONS LATER.
JUST
BECAUSE I UNDERSTOOD A SITUATION TRULY DOES NOT MEAN I MUST MEMORIZED IT IN A
FIXED INFLEXIBLE WAY AND REGURGITATE IT EN MASSE WHENEVER A FUTURE SITUATION
REMINDS ME OF THAT SITUATION.
YOU
MAY BE RIGHT THAT I OR THE BUDDHA HAS FIXED VIEWS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS THAT HE
MEMORIZE AND REHASH AS FAITHFULLY AS POSSIBLE OR YOU MAY BE WRONG, HE
UNDERSTANDS EACH SITUATION AS IT OCCURS AND ALTHOUGH HE MAY REMEMBER HIS
UNDERSTANDINGS OF PAST EVENTS, HE DOES NOT REHASH IN EN BLOC TO EXPLAIN CURRENT
EVENTS.
Views means you are a robot:
If
you have fixed even inflexible views about various matters that you rehash
again and again to explain events and argue with others, it means you are a
robot and rather than being a master of those marvellous views, you are a
deluded slave of those views.
RATHER
THAN A PLEASURE TO COLLECT SO MANY VIEWS ON SO MANY SUBJECTS THE FOOL IS A
SLAVE OF THOSE VIEWS WHOSE WEIGHT THREATENS TO CRUSH HIM AND DRIVE HIM TO
INSANITY. THE WISE PERSON HAS NO VIEWS, HE TREAT EACH OCCASION ON ITS MERIT, HE
MAY REMEMBER WHAT HE UNDERSTOOD OF PAST EVENTS BUT HE DOES NOT MEMORIZE THOSE
UNDERSTANDINGS TO IMPOSE ON CURRENT EVENTS.
Sharapova slumps to a shock defeat:
The
substance or truth of the matter is ‘Sharapova loses’, slumping and shock are
fabrications or falsification intended to stir emotion in others.
If
BBC likes to present an image of being prim and proper, accurate or devotion to
truth, then such language betrays its hypocrisy.
LEAVE
OTHERS TO DECIDE WHETHER IT IS A SLUMP OR SHOCK, JUST PRESENT THE TRUTH OR
SUBSTANCE OF WHAT HAPPENED WHICH IS THAT SHE LOST.
Manchester Utd desperate financial troubles sign of times:
It
is an indication times have changed and the scale of the financial crisis
afflicting the world and still to come that Manchester Utd is trying to borrow
£500 million and even tried to recruit its staff to invest in the bond.
I
think MU’s American owners bought MU by subjecting it to a lot of debt, MU
borrowed heavily to finance the takeover and now times are desperate and it
needs to find investors willing to lend it £500 million and this include junior
staff at MU who have been asked to invest.
IT
SOUNDS CRAZY THAT THE BUYER IS ALLOWED BY AUTHORITIES TO USE MU TO BORROW TO
FINANCE THE TAKEOVER AND NOW IT APPEARS THAT THE SKY HAS LIMITS AND WHAT GOES
UP MUST COME DOWN AND MAN UTD MAY BE FACING INSOLVENCY.
THE Glazer family
have gone cap in hand to Manchester United's players - effectively asking them
for a multi-million pound loan!
United stars were stunned by the handout request when they
arrived back last week from their Qatar training camp.
Players were handed a prospectus, as owner Malcolm Glazer
attempts to raise a staggering £500million through a bond issue to refinance
huge debts.
And SunSport understands even the lower paid Old Trafford
staff have been offered the 'opportunity' to invest in the club by the American
owners.
A United insider said: "The players don't know what to
make of it, really.
"Most are bemused that the people who pay their wages are
basically trying to find out if they can have some back.
"A few of the lads know a good investment when they see
one, but not too many seem prepared to put their money where their mouths
are!"
United are believed to be offering investors an annual return
of seven per cent on the bonds, which start at £50,000 a block.
But City experts say returns are dependent on continued
success on the field in the years ahead.
The insider added: "There have been people working at Old
Trafford for many years, on low salaries, worried about their futures.
"Yet now they are being offered the chance to stretch
themselves even further. It's a joke!"
Why Manchester Utd in serious trouble and desperate:
Even
behind the denial and pretence, a discerning observer can conclude that
Manchester United who were vying with Real Madrid as the richest club in the
world is in serious financial trouble, cannot pay its debts and desperate.
If
Manchester United was not in serious even potentially fatal financial trouble
it would not have to seek a £500 million new loan to retire old loans that are
either due or too expensive to bear.
If
Manchester United was not desperate, it is difficult getting lenders willing to
lend it the money it would not have desperately sought its staff to subscribe
to the loan.
Manchester
United accrued a lot of karma by cheating, intimidating and buying its way into
ascendancy and just like most people they think it will go on forever, go from
strength to strength but the noose of karma may be waiting around the corner
and when it tightens even the toughest goat will weep.
"Love
means never having to say you're sorry"
This
is the tagline or ‘immortalized’ line from Love Story whose author Erich Segal
has just died after a long battle with Parkinson’s disease.
It
sounds moving or emotional but the line is meaningless and false.
It
is if you never committed a wrong or hurt on another that you never have to say
you’re sorry, not love. Even if there is love if you have hurt or harm someone
you still have to apologize and ask for forgiveness.
THIS
IS THE UNIVERSAL LAW, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER YOU HAVE LOVE OR NOT, IF YOU
HAVE COMMITTED A WRONG ON ANOTHER, IT IS TO BE CONFESSED OR ADMITTED,
APOLOGIZED AND FORGIVENESS ASKED. ONCE YOU ARE FORGIVEN THE MATTER IS TRULY
SETTLED.
SORRY
IS ACTUALLY JUST A MEANINGLESS STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT MAY BE GENUINE OR
FAKED TO EXPERIENCE PAIN OR SADNESS. WHAT IS MEANINGFUL IS IF YOU UNDERSTAND
TRULY WHAT YOU DID WAS WRONG OR FALSE, CONFESS AND ASK FOR FORGIVENESS.
THUS
IF YOU NEVER DID ANOTHER WRONG YOU NEVER HAVE TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. LOVE HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SITUATION AND IT REFLECTS FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE
LINE IS COINED AND DELUDED PEOPLE GET STIRRED TO ACCEPT IT AS TRUE.
It is a rule:
"Love means never having to
say you're sorry" is a
rule and no understanding is needed to remember and follow it. It is a rule
because it tells you what to do or accept and you just obey or accept.
What
are rules?
Rules
are programming, programs the computer or person who is a robot to do or say
certain things and no understanding is needed nor involved just as the computer
does not require understanding to be programmed and carry out its programs or
instructions or rules.
Not
only is understanding not required to successfully adopt and obey rules, the
absence of true understanding is often essential in the successful adoption and
obedience of rules.
Rules
do not have to be written or spoken, they can be successfully programmed by
visual copying as when animals copy what their parents do, copy how to hunt or
wrestle with each other.
This is never a rule, it is information:
This
statement is never a rule: that there are constant use of force to stretch
syllables, change speed and loudness within and between syllables in the speech
all people here including animals and this totally unnecessary constant use
force is the source of the stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate
that must beset them and lead to emotions like like, dislike, hurt, sadness,
confusion and fear.
Because
it is not a rule that can attract them, that they can perceive and follow
mindlessly but require their true understanding by seeing as it is there are
constant use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness, people just shrug
it off or read but do not understand.
BECAUSE
THE THINGS I SAY ARE NOT RULES, ARE NOT FOR PROGRAMMING, PEOPLE FIND WHAT I SAY
DISTASTEFUL OR DISAGREEABLE, THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY SEEING WHAT I SAY AS TRUE AND
SO THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
Why people like others to talk rules to them:
Because
emotional stylish people are robots, even though they may not realize what is
dished out to them are rules and false, they have a predilection to hear rules
spoken to them because no understanding is required from them, if they like
what they heard, they just memorize it to regurgitate on later occasions again
without understanding required or present and if they are really impressed they
may actually sometimes follow or carry out those rules they liked and
remembered. If they dislike the rules they heard, they just shrug them off or
scoff, again without understanding required.
THUS
RULES FIT INTO THE LIFESTYLE OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS, RULES IS THE FOOD OF
ROBOTS AND SO IT IS NOT A SURPRISE BUT TO BE EXPECTED THEY WOULD LIKE TO HEAR
RULES SPOKEN TO THEM THAT WILL EITHER IMPRESS OR REPULSE THEM AND IF THEY ARE
IMPRESSED THEY WILL MEMORIZE THOSE RULES AND EVEN CARRY OUT THOSE RULES AT
TIMES. THAT IS WHAT LIVES ARE ABOUT PROGRAMMING, CHANGING AND DELETING
PROGRAMS, LOOKING FOR NEW PROGRAMS WITH NO UNDERSTANDING PRESENT NOR REQUIRED.
Why property values will crash more:
US
Banks have repossessed property that they have not put on the market to the
estimate of 7 million. When these are put for sale they will depress house
prices even further and so if you think the worst is over you may be deluded.
Quote: Banks have half a
million houses on their books yet to be put on the market, RealtyTrac said.
There's another million properties in foreclosure and 5.5 million delinquent
loans.
"The doomsday
prognostications say that gives you 7 million
properties that are all going to go back to the banks, that are all going to
hit the market at the same time and we're going to have a smoking
crater where there used to be a real estate market," Sharga said. "We
just don't see that as being realistic."
Love means love and nothing else:
If
there is such a thing called love, it can be clearly defined and love cannot
mean anything other than love, it certainly does not mean never having to say
you are sorry unless you want to court false logic that will end in mad logic.
A
MEANS A AND ANYONE WHO SAYS A MEAN B IS COURTING MADNESS. YOU CAN SAY WITH LOVE
YOU DON’T HAVE TO SAY SORRY BUT TO SAY LOVE MEAN NEVER HAVING TO SAY YOU ARE
SORRY IS TO FALSELY SAY A MEANS B.
How come no one understood the Buddha?
The
Buddha had referred to and described clearly right concentration or the higher
states of the mind in many places yet no one today and in the past after he
departed has pointed out precisely what the Buddha meant. The reason is because
they never truly understood what the Buddha was teaching.
Below
is one of the many instances in which the Buddha described the four higher
states of mind always in the same order.
"
There is the case where a monk, making it his object to let go, attains
concentration, singleness of mind. Quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful
mental qualities, he enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture &
pleasure born from withdrawal. With the stilling of directed thought &
evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure
born of composure, unification of awareness -- internal assurance. With the fading
of rapture he remains in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically
sensitive of pleasure. He enters & remains in the third jhana, 'Equanimous
& mindful.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain -- he enters &
remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither
pleasure nor pain. This is called the faculty of concentration.
The
first higher state of mind is rapture and pleasure born from withdrawal from
sensuality and unskilful mental qualities with a singleness of mind.
With the stilling of directed thought &
evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana means that with the
cessation of thinking he enters the second higher state of mind. In other words
the cessation of all thought processes denotes the second higher state of mind.
The Buddha described the third higher state
as equanimous and mindful. Equanimity means neither liking nor disliking and
this is the hallmark of the third higher state.
By abandoning pain and pleasure you enter
the fourth higher state of mind which the Buddha described as purity of
equanimity & mindfulness (part of third higher state), neither pleasure nor pain (hallmark of the fourth
state).
IN
MANY PLACES THE BUDDHA SPELT OUT THE FOUR HIGHER STATES OF THE MIND THAT ARE
THE ONLY REFUGE AND ESCAPE FROM THE TORMENT OF EXISTENCE IN THIS WORLD AND YET
NOBODY APPEAR TO UNDERSTAND WHAT HE WAS TELLING THEM BECAUSE NO ONE HAS POINTED
OUT, AS I HAVE DONE, WHAT HE CLEARLY MEANT AND CAN BE ACHIEVED BY ANYONE IF HE
SO DESIRED.
No comments:
Post a Comment