You have to be good at no thinking an...

You have to be good at no thinking and abide much in it:

According to the Buddha, in order to attain two eons (each eon is billions of years) of heavenly bliss you must be good at attaining no thinking and abide much in no thinking.

If the person is entangled in affairs of this world and greedy for gains he needs to think much and think quickly and it is impossible that he should be good at no thinking and abide much in it.

In order to obtain four eons in heaven you have to be good at attaining and abide much in not liking nor disliking.

THERE IS NOTHING FAR FETCHED ABOUT THE HIGHER MENTAL STATES THAT THE BUDDHA DESCRIBED, THEY ARE MERELY THE STEP BY STEP HIGHER NEGATION OF THE USUAL MENTAL STATES OF BEINGS TRAPPED IN TORMENT HERE.

THUS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN ONE ETERNITY OR BILLIONS OF YEARS IN HEAVEN YOU MUST BE ABLE TO EFFORTLESSLY ACCESS A FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND THAT MEANS YOU MUST BE SKILLFUL AT NOT USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.

IN ORDER TO OBTAIN TWO EONS IN HEAVEN YOU MUST BE SKILLFUL AT ACHIEVING NO THINKING AND ABIDE MUCH IN NO THINKING.

IN ORDER TO OBTAIN FOUR EONS IN HEAVEN YOU MUST BE GOOD AT AND RESIDE MUCH IN NEITHER STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED OR REPULSED.

DITTO EXPERIENCING NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE IF YOU WANT 500 EONS IN HEAVEN.

The Buddha says I am the best of great men:

Bhikkhus, who is the best of Great Men?

Here, bhikkhus, a certain person does not destroy the life of living things and does not incite others to destroy the life of living things, does not take the not given and does not incite others to take the not given, does not misbehave in sexual conduct and does not incite others to misbehave in sexual conduct, does not tell lies and does not incite others to tell lies, does not slander and does not incite others to slander, does not talk roughly and does not incite others to talk roughly, does not talk frivolously and does not incite others to talk frivolously, does not covet and does not incite others to covet, is not with angry mind and does not incite others to be with angry mind, with right view, incites others to straighten their view.

Bhikkhus, this is the best of Great Men

Because I do not do evil and do not incite others to commit evil I am the best of great men.

A great man is one who does no evil but does not exhort others to similarly not do so.

Thinking has stopped:

When thinking has stopped it is like the boiler or great printing press making a horrendous din next door has stopped and what remains is blissful silence and calm clear seeing and immediate understanding without need for thinking.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO SEE AND DIRECTLY UNDERSTAND AS IT IS WHAT YOU SEE BUT THINKING RENDERS IT DIFFICULT.

NOWADAYS WHENEVER I MEDITATE I ACHIEVE A SERENITY OF MIND AND BODY VERY QUICKLY BUT IT TAKES AWHILE BEFORE THINKING STOPS AND WHEN IT DOES, IT IS LOVELY, AN INCOMPARABLE STATE COMPARED TO CONSTANT SLAVERY TO THOUGHT.

WHAT STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE WHO ARE SLAVES RATHER THAN MASTERS OF THEIR THINKING DO NOT REALIZE, HAVE NOT TASTED IS THAT THERE IS A STATE OF THE MIND WHEREIN ALL THINKING HAS STOPPED AND IT IS LIKE THE STOPPING OF THE MACHINERY IN THE MIND MAKING A BIG DIN AND THAT IS WONDERFUL LOVELY BLISS NEVER SUFFERING AND IS THE WAY TO TWO ETERNITIES (BILLIONS OF YEARS) IN HEAVEN.

GSK Knew Avandia's Risks for Years

Drug Maker GlaxoSmithKline Knew of Controversial Diabetes Medication's Risks Years Before They Were Public, Senate Finds

A new Senate report blames the diabetes drug Avandia for thousands of heart attacks. As Kimberly Dozier reports, calls to remove the deadly drug from the market have gone unheeded.

Avandia is not cheap but much more expensive than usual diabetic medicine and yet it causes heart attacks.

It seems you pay expensively to harm yourself and get yourself killed.

ANYONE WHO HAS FAITH IN MEDICINE IS DELUDED BECAUSE MEDICINE WHETHER IN MEDICINES, SURGERY OR RADIOTHERAPY IS ABOUT USING FORCE TO FIGHT FORCE AND THAT AT MINIMUM COLLATERALLY DAMAGES THE BODY AND SO AT BEST MEDICINE CAN ACHIEVE A TRANSIENT RELATIVE VICTORY OVER THE AGENTS OF DISEASE BE IT GERMS OR CANCER.

The basis of medicine is chemical reactions that are favourable to the patient and chemical reactions are force reactions and whatever is force fighting force produces stress and damage to the body it is supposed to treat and so medicine is ultimately fatal although it may transiently be victorious.

Similarly all surgery is about using knife to cut and that is using force to cure and whatever that is using force to excise and modify can only be relatively never absolutely curative and surgery itself may harm the body contributing to future suffering and early death.

THUS ANYONE WHO HAS FAITH IN MEDICINE TO CURE AND MAKE THEM HEALTHY AND HAPPY IS DELUDED.

THE INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR WAY TO HEALTH AND HAPPINESS IS TO NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT RESULTS IN AN EFFORTLESS FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT GOES MUCH FURTHER TO PREVENT PHYSICAL AND MENTAL DISEASE.

The Attorney General’s Perverted Logic:

In fact, argued the AG, since Azizan kept changing his story so many times and was very inconsistent, this proves he was telling the truth. If there was any attempt to fabricate charges against Anwar and Sukma, then there would not be any inconsistencies at all.

Before defending anyone, you should first know whether he is telling the truth or not, if you do not know and yet you support him, you are putting your head on the chopping board supporting someone as speaking the truth when you do not know.

What the attorney general is admitting is that he too finds Azizan’s testimony inconsistent but he comes to the wrong conclusion that it is true.

Why is the attorney general’s argument false logic that will end in his insanity?

Something can only happen in one way and so if Azizan was sodomized, he must remember it as it happened and so he must be CONSISTENT.

If Azizan’s memory is poor, for some reason he does not remember things as it happened then he should have forfeited his right to accuse someone of a crime that can cause him much grief.

IF AZIZAN CANNOT RECALL EVENTS PROPERLY SO THAT HE HAS TO KEEP CHANGING HIS STORY, HE HAS FORFEITED HIS RIGHT TO ACCUSE ANWAR OF A CRIME THAT CAN CAUSE ANWAR A LOT OF GRIEF.

IF HIS MEMORY IS NOT DEFECTIVE THEN THE INCONSISTENCIES ARE CLEAR EVIDENCE HE IS LYING AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL EITHER HAS DEFECTIVE LOGIC OR HE IS SPEAKING FALSELY TO SUPPORT HIS CASE NOT REALIZING HIS HEAD IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD OF INSANITY.

Why should the Attorney General Defend Azizan?

Even though it is the AG who is prosecuting the case based on a crime committed on Azizan, it is not his duty to defend the veracity of Azizan’s testimony and the fact that the AG has deemed fit to wade in to defend Azizan is objective proof he has vested interest and it is not a prosecution based on objective facts and the complaint of the plaintiff (Azizan) but the AG wants to convict.

EVEN THOUGH THE AG IS PROSECUTING, HE IS DOING SO BASED ON THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE AGGRIEVED, AZIZAN, HE SHOULD BE NEUTRAL, NEITHER INTERESTED IN THE CONVICTION OR ACQUITTAL OF ANWAR. THE FACT HE HAS DEFENDED AZIZAN’S TESTIMONY IS OBJECTIVE PROOF HE IS PARTISAN, HE WANTS ANWAR TO BE CONVICTED AND HE WILL DO ANYTHING BY HOOK OR CROOK TO GET THE CONVICTION.

IF YOU ARE PURELY PROSECUTING, YOU ARE NEUTRAL, YOU PRESENT ALL THE OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT IS AVAILABLE AND LEAVE THE COURT TO DECIDE, YOU DO NOT DEFEND THE INCONSISTENCIES OF YOUR WITNESS AS EVIDENCE IT IS GENUINE. BY DEFENDING THE INCONSISTENCE OF THE WITNESS IT EXPOSES YOUR PARTISANSHIP, YOU WANT A CONVICTION AT ALL COSTS.

Hear the horse speak:

Reflecting that emotional people do not TRULY understand (nor do they care), the AG does not understand he is incriminating himself as a conspirator when he said the inconsistencies in Azizan’s testimony actually indicated it is not fabricated, the defence lawyers failed to understand the AG is incriminating himself in a conspiracy, reporters fail to understand and the public at large failed to grasp or understand that what the AG said is clear proof Anwar’s sodomy charge is fabricated.

NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES AZIZAN SWEARS TO THE AG HIS SODOMY ALLEGATION IS TRUE, THE AG CANNOT KNOW IT IS TRUE AND SO HE SHOULD NOT DEFEND THE INCONSISTENCIES AS TRUE UNLESS HE HAS VESTED INTEREST TO SEE ANWAR CONVICTED NO MATTER WHAT. IT IS AZIZAN HIMSELF WHO SHOULD DEFEND HIS INCONSISTENCIES, THE AG IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE DISINTERESTED PARTY CHARGING ANWAR OUT OF PUBLIC INTEREST BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEGATION OF CRIMINALITY BY AZIZAN AGAINST ANWAR.

THE AG IS TELLING THE COURT THAT THE INCONSISTENCIES IN AZIZAN’S TESTIMONY PROVES IT IS NOT A FABRICATION AND THEREFORE IT IS TRUE AND IF IT IS TRUE ANWAR MUST BE FOUND GUILTY AND SO HE IS EXPOSING HIMSELF AS BIASED NOT IMPARTIAL AS HE SHOULD BE.

AZIZAN SWORE IN COURT THREE TIMES ANWAR DID NOT SODOMISE HIM AND THIS IS EVIDENCE IT WAS FAKED.

DR M ADMITTED IT WAS A CONSPIRACY WHEN HE LATER REMARKED THAT THE CURRENT ALLEGATION OF SODOMY MUST BE TRUE BECAUSE IT IS UNLIKELY THEY WOULD CONSPIRE IN THE SAME WAY AS BEFORE, TACITLY ADMITTING BY HIS FOOLISHNESS THAT THE FIRST WAS A CONSPIRACY. CONTRARY TO DR M’S PERVERTED LOGIC, IT IS BECAUSE THE FIRST WAS A CONSPIRACY THAT THE CURRENT ALLEGATION IS ALSO LIKELY TO BE A CONSPIRACY BUILDING ON THE FIRST ONE AND BECAUSE SODOMY IS ABOUT THE WORST CHARGE THAT CAN BE LAID UPON A POLITICIAN TO DESTROY HIM IN A PRUDISH SOCIETY LIKE MALAYSIA.

ONE INCONSISTENCY IN AZIZAN’S TESTIMONY WAS THAT THE DATE WAS WRONG BECAUSE THE TIVOLI TOWERS HAD NOT BEEN BUILT YET SO HOW COULD ANWAR SODOMIZE HIM THERE. THUS THIS INCONSISTENCY IS THE RESULT OF SHODDY FABRICATION, NOT BECAUSE IT WAS NOT FABRICATED AND SO IF YOU CAN EXAMINE THE INCONSISTENCIES AND FIND IT DUE TO SHODDY FABRICATING THAT CAN BE PROVEN OBJECTIVELY FALSE, IT IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS GENUINE THAT IT IS INCONSISTENT BUT IT IS BECAUSE IT IS SHODDY FABRICATION THAT IT IS INCONSISTENT.

ANYONE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHEN THE AG SPOKE IN DEFENCE OF AZIZAN’S INCONSISTENCIES MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THE AG IS UNWITTINGLY ADMITTING HE IS NOT IMPARTIAL BUT HE IS MOTIVATED TO SECURE A CONVICTION AT ALL COSTS.

Why sodomy?

In a prudish country like Malaysia where the people can be brainwashed, there is no better charge, sexual misconduct like adultery is not so good, as to fill the public with revulsion at the politician plus you can lock him up and he is deprived of public office for an extended period after release.

If you were to fabricate murder charges you have to find a willing body to charge Anwar with and it may not stick.

If you were to charge Anwar with corruption, it would be much harder to do so if there is no clear proof he was taking money.

THUS SODOMY IS THE CRIMINAL CHARGE PAR EXCELLENCE WITH WHICH TO USE TO RUIN A POLITICIAN’S IMAGE IN A PRUDISH COUNTRY LIKE MALAYSIA (BUT NOT US), IT IS RELATIVELY EASY TO CONCOCT, ALL YOU NEED IS A PAID ACCUSER, SOME CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, MAYBE SOME PLANTED DNA AND ‘WAH LAU’ YOU HAVE ANWAR PERMANENTLY SMEARED AND LOCKED IN PRISON.

RATHER THAN IT BEING UNLIKELY CONSPIRATORS WOULD USE THE SAME CONSPIRACY TO SMEAR ANWAR, THERE IS LITTLE CHOICE AND SODOMY IS THE CHARGE PAR EXCELLENCE IN MALAYSIA WITH WHICH TO RUIN A POLITICIAN.

Proof Anwar is not corrupt:

Anwar was jailed for six years for corruption on the basis he influenced the police to suppress allegations of his homosexuality.

If there are more tangible cases of corruption as that is likely to surround many politicians up to the highest levels surely they would have known it and charged him with it and lock him up for good.

THERE WERE ATTEMPTS TO CHARGE ANWAR WITH FINANCIAL CORRUPTION BUT THOSE DISSIPATED OR WERE FOUND WANTING AND SO HE WAS CHARGED WITH SODOMY (DROPPED LATER) AND THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION FOR WHICH HE SPENT SIX YEARS IN PRISON WAS THAT HE EXERCISED INFLUENCE CORRUPTLY TO SUPPRESS ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT.

IF ANWAR HAS GENUINE SERIOUS CORRUPTION THEY WOULD HAVE FOUND IT AND NAILED HIM WITH IT RATHER THAN THE FANCIFUL CURRUPT USE OF HIS POWERS AND SO THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE IS THAT ANWAR IS NOT CORRUPT.

Corruption is not hard to prove:

Anyone who thinks that corruption is hard to prove has wrong view that is not harmless but the way to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.

There are never perfect crimes and those who are corrupt litter their trials with shit that point to them and it is the corruption of politicians and the law officers that is the reason why there are few if any meaningful charges of corruption at the highest levels.

Apparently they were going to charge Rafidah Aziz with corrupt influences for presiding a meeting that approved APs to her son in law but Dr M refused to approve. Najib was said to have been caught red handed by the former NS MB having an illegal sexual contact but Dr M covered it up for him.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY CORRUPT WITHOUT LEAVING A FINANCIAL TRIAL TO YOUR DOORSTEP AND IT DOES NOT REFLECT DIFFICULTY IN PROVING BUT CONNIVANCE AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS THAT FEW CASES ARE PROSECUTED AND THE FACT THAT THEY HAD TO CHARGE ANWAR WITH THE ‘PATHETIC’ CHARGE OF CORRUPTLY INFLUENCING POLICE TO SUPPRESS ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT INDICATE ANWAR MUST BE QUITE CLEAN.

Depression’s Upside:

The person responsible for this NYT headline is trying to be too clever or say something that is outrageous.

There are no upsides to depressions and if you think there are upsides wait until karma arranges a depression for you to experience the upside.

If he is talking about the economic depression it has not been confirmed as a depression yet and he should say ‘the depression’s upside’ rather than mischievously ‘depression’s upside’.

Google strangles competition - Microsoft

Look who is talking. It is hypocrisy and if Microsoft wants to speak the truth it should say Google strangles competition just like us.

What is the duty of the AG?

When there is a criminal case, the police conduct investigations and once completed the case is passed to the Attorney General’s office and he may or may not decide to prosecute the case. If he prosecutes the case or person charged, he prepares the case with all its evidences and witnesses to the court and it is for the court or judge to decide if he person is guilty or not. He is merely a conduit and presenter of the evidence. He cannot know if the allegations of sodomy are true or not because he did not witness the act so how can he stand surety for the evidence or that the accuser is speaking the truth?

THUS IN STATING THAT THE INCONSISTENCIES IN AZIZAN’S TESTIMONY PROVES IT IS NOT A FABRICATION WHICH WOULD BE CONSISTENT BUT IT IS THE TRUTH, THE AG HAS BETRAYED HE HAS VESTED INTEREST IN OBTAINING A CONVICTION WHEN HE SHOULD BE NEUTRAL, PERFORM HIS DUTY WHICH IS TO PRESENT ALL THE EVIDENCE GATHERED AS SUCH AND SUCH, NOT TO GO FURTHER AND SAY THEY ARE NOT FABRICATED.

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES THAT A CASE IS GENUINE, ANWAR DID SODOMIZE AZIZAN WHEN THE AG IS OVERSTEPPING HIS AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN A CONVICTION? ALMOST ZERO.

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES THAT A CASE IS FABRICATED, ANWAR DID NOT SODOMIZE AZIZAN WHEN THE AG IS OVERSTEPPING HIS AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN A CONVICTION? VERY LIKELY AND THERE IS MUCH EVIDENCE TO PROVE THIS IS THE CASE AS AZIZAN SWORE IN COURT ANWAR NEVER SODOMIZED HIM AND DR M HIMSELF IMPLIED IT WAS A CONSPIRACY WHEN HE SAID RECENTLY THAT SURELY THEY WOULD NOT HAVE CONSPIRED TO DESTROY ANWAR WITH THE SAME FABRICATION.

HERE IS OBJECTIVE PROOF PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND, EVEN PROFESSIONALS DO NOT UNDERSTAND. THE AG DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HE IS INCRIMINATING HIMSELF RATHER THAN RIGHT TO VOUCH FOR AZIZAN’S TESTIMONY, THE DEFENCE FAILED TO GRASP IT, THE PUBLIC DID NOT GRASP IT.

What do you see?

If you do not know the meaning of what you see or you think it is full of meaning, you see false.

They are doing a lot of work but it is just for show because nothing constructive is achieved and so what they are doing is meaningless and will end in their insanity. Further what they do are rehearsed and so they are rehashing and therefore being robots to reproduce this group pose and robotry is about enslavement and will end in insanity for them.

They are also lying by smiling as if it is fun or pleasurable when it is actually stressful, restlessness and daze inducing and therefore they are lying to tell others what is suffering is enjoyment.

IT IS OBJECTIVE, ANYONE WHO SEES TRULY MUST SEE WHAT THEY DO IS MEANINGLESS, REQUIRES REHASHING AND THEY ARE ROBOTS AND THEY ARE LYING THAT WHAT IS SUFFERING IS ENJOYMENT.

WHAT I SAID ACCORDS WITH WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT THAT DANCING IS INSANITY.

IF YOU SEE IT AS WONDERFUL & MEANINGFUL THEN YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.

Italian principles:

This is a headline at the BBC site.

In order for the principles to be Italian it must be consistent and differ from say the Indian or British or Japanese principles.

In order to have Italian principles you must formulate and know what they are, memorize them and keep applying or practicing according to those principles and rather than being good you are just a robot of those principles that cannot be true because otherwise it would the same as British or Malaysian principles so why call them Italian principles?

Principles are rules and once formulated or revised they are the programming in which the person who subscribes to those principles follow like a slave or robot.

The person who is not a robot does not need Italian or whatever principles to guide his behaviour, he sees and understands the specific meaning of each situation and act accordingly so where the need for principles to apply?

THUS THE HEADLINE IS AN UNWITTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MANKIND ARE ROBOTS WHO OBEY PRINCIPLES.

What are principles?

Principles are rules or commands that tell the person what to do.

Principles may be limited to an individual, race or nation.

Principles can be written or verbalized or unspoken or unverbalized, often the person is unaware he is acting according to unspoken principles.

In many situations, principles are automatically applied without the person being aware he is actually behaving according to principles or programming. In some situations where is more uncertainty, the person has to consult his library of principles to find the best principle to apply and even then he may get it wrong, applying the wrong principle and get cheated or even lose his life.

It is the principles that are the rigid blind masters of the person and he is merely a botnik of those principles rehashing and acting according to those principles on every occasion.

I have principles:

You often hear people proudly proclaim to others they have principles (whereas others don’t).

What they mean is that they are good because they have principles. This not what they say and so what they say is false.

Only the blind need a walking stick, those who are not blind do not need walking sticks or principles to guide them. Thus they are deluded to perceive they are good because they have principles.

WHAT IS THE USE OF PRINCIPLES IF YOU DO NOT OBEY THEM? IF YOU OBEY THEM THEN YOU ARE A SLAVE OF THAT PRINCIPLE.

YOU MEAN YOU NEED THE PRINCIPLE ‘THOU SHALL NOT KILL’ TO NOT KILL AND OF WHAT USE IS IT IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY YOU SHOULD NOT KILL OR STEAL? A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS DOES NOT NEED COMMANDS NOT TO KILL OR STEAL, HE HAS NO URGE TO KILL OR STEAL.

NO MATTER HOW GOOD YOUR PRINCIPLES, IT IS CONSTRAINING AND THERE IS STILL THE URGE TO STEAL OR KILL. A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS THE EVIL NATURE OF STEALING OR KILLING DOES NOT NEED A PRINCIPLE, HE HAS NO URGE TO STEAL OR KILL.

Buddhists unite to help Haitians

It is not Buddhists unite to help Haitians but it is joint Buddhist effort to help Haitians.

People speak in rigid rehashed way and what is said does not fit into reality. The Buddhists are not uniting but there is a joint or united effort to help Haitians. You mean Buddhists are divided and they unite to help Haitians?

Warren Buffett 'feels good' about Goldman Sachs

Warren Buffett has thrown his weight behind Goldman Sachs and its chairman Lloyd Blankfein, arguing the bank has a "place in the universe"

Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to go to heaven and Buffett is one of the richest men on earth and so if you think he is a wholesome capitalist who donated his fortune to charity after his death you are deluded.

He made a lot of money putting money in Goldman Sachs during this crisis and he may be feeling cock a hoop or boastful about it.

If the truth is that there is no place for Goldman Sachs in this world, its leaders are guilty of serious even horrendous financial crimes or fraud and should therefore be jailed, Goldman Sachs should have been allowed to collapse and then taken over and its businesses wound down, then Buffett has wrong view that the Buddha said is the path to hell or the animal womb.

Feeling is about emotion and so it is meaningless or nothing understandable to feel good or have your mental force stirred attractively about Goldman Sachs. Because feeling good is an inappropriate meaningless and stressful response, he is headed for madness or torment.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF FEELING GOOD OR STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY AT GOLDMAN SACHS? THE IMPORTANT OR RELEVANT RESPONSE IS ‘ARE GOLDMAN SACHS’ ACTIONS AND CREEDS APPROVABLE OR TO BE CENSURED’?

WARREN BUFFETT MAY BE VERY RICH AND A SHREWD INVESTOR (SO FAR) BUT HE IS DELUDED MAN AND DELUSION IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN. SHREWDNESS IS NOT GOOD BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT CUNNING AND CUNNING IS EVIL.

What is cunningness?

There are some who are more cunning than others and Buffett may be one of those.

What is cunningness and why is it evil, nothing to do with reason or understanding?

In order to be shrewd or cunning you must be on the lookout for opportunities for gain and you become very good at it and it is addictive. Whatever you cast your eyes on, you ask what is it in it for me, what opportunities for making money is there and so you are a slave or addict of opportunities for making money.

The difference between a cunning or shrewd investor like Buffett and a fool is that the shrewd person detects opportunities or ploys to make money in a situation that works and so he makes money. He usually remembers well those opportunities so that he can apply to future situations that have similarities.

DO NOT SPEAK TOO SOON BECAUSE IF FINANCIAL CRISES OF THE PAST ARE LIKE FLUS WITH RECOVERY, PEOPLE LIKE BUFFETT USUALLY COME UP TOPS BUT IF THIS IS A CANCER THEN BY GOING IN NOW HE MAY FALL FLAT ON HIS FACE LATER. SHREWDNESS IS A PROGRAMMING OR REHASHED PLOYS THAT WORKED MANY TIMES IN THE PAST BUT IN SOME SITUATIONS THEY MAY BE FOUND OUT OR WANTING.

IF YOU THINK CUNNING IS ABOUT WISDOM YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR A FOOL. CUNNINGNESS IS ABOUT FORCE, GREED DRIVING THE PERSON TO ALWAYS LOOK FOR GAINS WHEREVER HE CASTS HIS EYES ON AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CUNNING MAN AND THE FOOL IS THAT THE OPPORTUNITIES HE SPIES AND PLOYS HE USES USUALLY WORK AND SO HE BECOMES VERY RICH. BUT BECAUSE IT IS PROGRAMMED BEHAVIOR HE CAN AND WILL BE FOUND WANTING SOMETIMES.

The difference between the shrewd and the fool:

Where the fool says ‘buy’, the shrewd person says ‘sell’. Where the fool says ‘sell’, the shrewd say ‘buy’. Toss the coin and you may get it right half the time.

The difference between the shrewd investor and the fool is that he reads information differently, he may have better market or insider information and he is pessimistic (an emotion) and sells where the fool is optimistic (another emotion) and buys.

THUS IT IS EITHER EMOTION (OPTIMISM) OR PESSIMISM OR PROGRAMMED REHASHED TO BE APPLIED RULES LOGIC THAT GOVERNS THE CUNNING PERSON’S DECISIONS THAT USUALLY HAS THE MIDAS TOUCH.

How to be cunning:

In order to be cunning you must first be interested in money or material gains, without being interested in money you cannot be cunning.

When you are interested in money then you start looking for opportunities to make money and so whatever comes to your attention is assessed in terms of whether there are opportunities for making money and what they are.

The difference between the shrewd and the fool, assuming a level playing field, he does not have insider information is that he usually reads the situation correctly and the fool reads it wrongly. The shrewd person is more calculating, he may do his homework meticulously before he commits himself and he does not take big risks whilst the fool is more emotional.

Jesus is describing a black hole:

At the close of the Age, which may be far sooner than you think, Jesus said the sun and moon will refuse to shine, stars will fall from the skies and if God did not speed up time the chosen ones will not survive.

When a black hole forms it sucks in everything and so the stars will fall from the skies and time will speed up. There may be no forms of life in nearby stars and so all these stars will be sucked in whilst distant parts of the universe will continue as they are which would fit with the Buddha description of remote world systems independent of each other each with a presiding Brahma or Father.

Science postulates that in certain situations black holes and mini black holes may form on earth and thus it may not be farfetched that a black hole will spell the close of the Age.

As he sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the close of the age?" 4 And Jesus answered them, "Take heed that no one leads you astray. 5*  For many will come in my name, saying, 'I am the Christ,' and they will lead many astray. 6*  And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars; see that you are not alarmed; for this must take place, but the end is not yet. 7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places: 8 all this is but the beginning of the birth-pangs.

 

9*    "Then they will deliver you up to tribulation, and put you to death; and you will be hated by all nations for my name's sake. 10 And then many will fall away, * and betray one another, and hate one another. 11 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. 12 And because wickedness is multiplied, most men's love will grow cold. 13*  But he who endures to the end will be saved. (the Buddha said he who does not lose his loving kindness at death will be born in heaven)14*  And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, as a testimony to all nations; and then the end will come.

 

15*    "So when you see the desolating sacrilege spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains; 17*  let him who is on the housetop not go down to take what is in his house; 18 and let him who is in the field not turn back to take his mantle. 19*  And alas for those who are with child and for those who give suck in those days! 20 Pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a sabbath. 21*  For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. 22 And if those days had not been shortened, no human being would be saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. 23 Then if any one says to you, 'Lo, here is the Christ!' or 'There he is!' do not believe it. 24 For false Christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. 25 Lo, I have told you beforehand. 26*  So, if they say to you, 'Lo, he is in the wilderness,' do not go out; if they say, 'Lo, he is in the inner rooms,' do not believe it. 27 For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of man. 28*  Wherever the body is, there the eagles * will be gathered together.

 

29*    "Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken; 30*  then will appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory; 31*  and he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

 

32        "From the fig tree learn its lesson: as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves, you know that summer is near (there are signs of the close of the Age coming but fools fail to notice). 33 So also, when you see all these things, you know that he is near, at the very gates. 34*  Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away till all these things take place. 35*  Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

 

 

Then he left the crowds and went into the house. And his disciples came to him, saying, "Explain to us the parable of the weeds of the field." 37 He answered, "He who sows the good seed is the Son of man; 38*  the field is the world, and the good seed means the sons of the kingdom; the weeds are the sons of the evil one, 39 and the enemy who sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the close of the age, and the reapers are angels. 40 Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the close of the age. 41*  The Son of man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all evildoers, 42*  and throw them into the furnace of fire; there men will weep and gnash their teeth. 43 Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears, let him hear.

The Holy Spirit will also come:

In Christianity there is the Holy Trinity, the Father, the Son (Jesus) and the Holy Spirit. Because the Father is the Father of all, whether you like it or not, Jesus spoke of the sons of light (angels) and sons of darkness (beings here), the Holy Spirit too must be a son.

The Buddha said of all beings with no legs, two or four or many legs, formed or without form, he is foremost, the highest and so even miniscule beings like dust devils are valid beings.

Jesus said if he did not (physically) go, the counsellor whom he stated was the Holy Spirit, will not come (physically) and when He comes it will be time for mankind to be judged and the Age to close.

Elsewhere Jesus said whoever speaks against Jesus will be forgiven, whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven implying the Holy Spirit too will speak to men and whoever disagrees will not be forgiven.

Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (the world will not recognize or welcome him), because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you (he will live amongst you when he comes), and will be in you.
"These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (the counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
But when the Counselor comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning.
But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (Jesus did not die, he went away and just as he physically went away the counselor will physically come and it is to your advantage that he comes because what he will do or say will benefit you. There was an unimaginable suffering alleviating consciousness change after 1977 that benefitted everyone and yet no one has acknowledged it, let alone they are grateful)
And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world (man) is judged. (When the counselor comes it will be judgment time)
"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now (Only an alleviating or releasing consciousness change which I triggered in 1977 can make you bear what you could not bear previously). When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth (the Buddha too is a source of truth); for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.


Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every sin (stealing, killing) and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
The Buddha called God the powerful one and below he implies the Father has two sons (Jesus is Isa in Arab, Yeshau is Aramaic):
Subrahma and Paramatta Brahma,
together with sons of the Powerful One (The Father),
Sanankumara and Tissa:
They too have come to the forest meeting.
Great Brahma (the Father), who stands over 1,000 Brahma worlds,
who arose there spontaneously, effulgent:
Prestigious is he, with a terrifying body.
And ten brahma sovereigns, each the lord of his own realm --
and in their midst has come
Harita Brahma surrounded by his retinue."

The important thing is nonsense:

Dan Johnson, chief spokesman for the Premier League told the debate - held at the Soccerex event - that "the important thing is preventing things from going wrong".

What he is saying is meaningless, a nonspecific rehashed answer that can be applied to many situations. Who does not know the important thing is preventing things from going wrong but how do you do so is the important thing.

THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE WITH REHEARSED ANSWERS THAT MAKE THEM APPEAR KNOWLEDGEABLE BUT THE ANSWER SAYS NOTHING, MAY APPEAR IMPRESSIVE BUT IS EVASIVE AND VAGUE.

What he means is that the current unsatisfactory status quo is OK or we should condone or close one eye to it, the important thing is preventing things from going wrong.

THIS IS WRONG VIEW, IF THE CURRENT SITUATION IS IMMORAL, WRONG OR DANGEROUS THEN IT SHOULD BE CORRECTED RATHER THAN THE IMPORTANT THING IS PREVENTING THINGS FROM GOING WRONG AS HE STATED.

OK to be drunk, important thing not to get into accident:

The person who says ‘the important thing is preventing things from going wrong” is like the man who says it is OK to get drunk but the important thing is not to drive or get into an accident. This is wrong view.

The right view is that it is not OK to drink let alone get drunk so that there is no possibility of an accident when drunk.

OK to gamble, important thing not to lose shirt:

Again the man who says the important thing is preventing things from going wrong is like the man who says it is OK to gamble so long as you don’t lose your shirt.

Social welfare a burden and cause of crisis?

Most of the western economies have a form of social welfare in terms of support for the unemployed, retired or elderly and medical aid or assistance for the poor.

There are commentators who are not outright rightwing who are alluding to such social welfare programs and support as a burden on the economies, even a cause of the crisis and the world cannot afford them and so they should be scraped.

This is delusion.

IT IS NOT SOCIAL WELFARE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF TODAY’S ECONOMIC AND FIANANCIAL CRISIS, NOR IS SOCIAL WELFARE UNAFFORDABLE. IT IS CORRUPTION, THE SIPHONING OF MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC POOL BY A PRIVILEGED FEW, RECKLESS LIVING BEYOND MEANS IN WASTEFUL CONSUMERISM THAT IS THE CAUSE. THE WORLD CAN AFFORD WELFARE PROGRAMS FOR ITS AGED, UNEMPLOYED AND SICK IF ONLY THE PROFLIGACY AND PLUNDER HAD BEEN STAMPED OUT OR KEPT IN CHECK. AS A RESULT OF THE BANKRUPTING OF THE SYSTEM BY POLITICIANS, NOW WE FACE HAVING NO MONEY TO SUPPORT THE AGE, UNEMPLOYED AND SICK.

Truly unimaginable:

There are things that are truly unimaginable and there are things that are falsely unimaginable. When emotional people speak about something being unimaginable or out of this world they are speaking falsely to exaggerate but nevertheless there are things that are unimaginable before it happened.

The 1977 consciousness change (that I triggered) was truly unimaginable, it was a clear improvement or liberation of the consciousness state with which to exist with that was unknown and unimaginable before it occurred.

There have been progressive further consciousness changes visible in the demeanour of people today that would also be unimaginable before they happened.

There is an unimaginable effortless freedom from stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate, sadness and hurt to be experienced if a person successfully accomplished the destruction of style or not using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness when talking.

ONLY WHEN SOMETHING IS TRULY UNIMAGINABLE BEFORE IT HAPPENED IS IT CALLED UNIMAGINABLE. THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND THE SUFFERING RELIEF IT BROUGHT AND RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES ARE TRULY UNIMAGINABLE, THEY CANNOT BE IMAGINED BEFORE IT HAPPENED.

CAN YOU HONESTLY SAY YOU CAN IMAGINE THE CONSCIOUSNESS STATE YOU ARE EXISTING NOW COMPARED WITH 5 OR 10 YEARS AGO?

Why it should end in a black hole:

Scientists discovered evidence the world began with a big bang about 14 billion years ago and this accords with what the Buddha said that from a inconstruable moment comes transmigration.

Scientists have also discovered many black holes in the universe, there is a huge powerful black hole at the centre of all galaxies including ours that is sucking matter and stars that fall too near into its fatal embrace. Nothing escapes from the powerful gravity of a black hole, not even light and everything that comes within the threshold of its pull is sucked in.

IT IS BEFITTING THAT SOMETHING THAT BEGAN WITH A BIG BANG, PRODIGIOUS EXPANSION FROM NOTHING SHOULD END IN A BLACK HOLE, PRODIGIOUS SUCTION THAT VACUUMS ALL MATTER IN ITS EMBRACE SO THAT NOTHING REMAINS WHERE THERE WAS SOMETHING OR MANY THINGS BEFORE.

Assu Sutta:Tears

The Blessed One said: "From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on.

What do you think, monks: Which is greater, the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, separated from what is pleasing -- or the water in the four great oceans?"

"As we understand the Dhamma, this is the greater: the tears we have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- not the water in the four great oceans."

"Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father... a brother... a sister... a son... a daughter...a relatives... wealth... disease. The tears you have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing -- are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

" Long have you thus experienced stress, pain, loss, swelling the cemeteries -- enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released."

Why Jesus was speaking of a consciousness change:

BECAUSE A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AND NOTHING ELSE ENABLED ME TO BEAR WHAT I COULD NOT BEAR PREVIOUSLY IT MUST BE A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT JESUS WAS REFERRING TO WHEN HE SAID YOU WILL BEAR IT IN THE FUTURE.

 

Jesus: "I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak and he will declare to you the things that are to come.

What Jesus said was that there were many things he did not say because you could not understand it then but in the future you can understand and then the spirit of truth will guide you into all the truth.

Why is it that Jesus was speaking of a future consciousness change and nothing else?

The reason Jesus was speaking of a future consciousness change is because without the consciousness change the invisible consciousness constraints together with the overwhelming miasma of stress, restlessness and distraction present in all minds trapped in this lower realm made it is impossible for them to understand beyond a rudimentary level.

IT WAS A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS AND THE SIGNIFICANT AMELIORATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY STIFLING UNREMITTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND NOTHING ELSE THAT ENABLED ME TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND BEFORE AND UNLESS I AM UNIQUE, THE SAME MUST HOLD FOR OTHERS AND SO IT WAS A FUTURE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT JESUS WAS PRESAGING WHEN HE SAID THERE ARE MANY THINGS HE HAS YET TO SAY BUT YOU CANNOT BEAR IT THEN.

I WAS THE PERSON WHO TRIGGERED THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN 1977 THAT REVERBERATED AROUND THE WORLD THAT WAS UNIMAGINABLE BEFORE AND ALLEVIATED MY CONSCIOUSNESS SUFFERING AND I WAS AGAIN THE TRIGGER OF CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS BY STEADFASTLY REFUSING TO USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT RESULTED IN AN UNIMAGINABLE LIFTING OF STRESS, SADNESS AND HURT.

Understanding is a condition of the mind:

Whether a person understands or not is a condition of the mind and nothing else eg external world or his body.

It is only the mind that understands or does not understand and so what makes a mind understand now that it could not understand in the past?

A change is what makes a mind understand now that it could not understand before and that change must be universal, affects everyone in order to fulfil the criteria Jesus spoke of not understanding then but understanding later.

AND SO SOMETHING MUST HAPPEN TO UNIVERSALLY CHANGE THE MINDS OF ALL PEOPLE TO ENABLE THEM TO BEAR OR UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY COULD BEAR OR UNDERSTAND THEN AND THIS WILL COINCIDE WITH THE COMING OF THE COUNSELOR.

IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT A PERSON DOES TO HIS CONSCIOUSNESS THAT MADE HIM ABLE TO BEAR WHAT HE COULD NOT BEAR PREVIOUSLY BUT IT MUST BE SOMETHING UNIVERSAL OR HAPPENS TO EVERYONE’S MINDS THAT WILL MAKE THEM BEAR WHAT THEY COULD NOT BEAR BEFORE AND THIS CAN ONLY BE A MANDATORY OR COMPULSORY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT AFFECTS EVERYONE LIKE THE OPENING OF EYES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY CLOSED OR PEOPLE DID NOT REALIZED EXISTED.

What can cause a mind to bear what it could not bear before?

If Jesus said you cannot understand something then but you will understand it later, then something must happen, a change must occur not just to some people’s minds but to everyone’s mind to make them bear what they could not bear before.

UNLESS YOU BELIEVE IN MAGIC, SOMETHING HAPPENING WITHOUT CAUSE, IT MUST BE A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN NOT JUST SOME BUT ALL PEOPLE’S MINDS THAT WILL ENABLE THEM TO BEAR WHAT THEY COULD NOT BEAR BEFORE.

WITHOUT A CHANGE IN THE MIND OR CONSCIOUSNESS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON CAN BEAR WHAT HE DEFINITELY COULD NOT BEAR IN THE PAST.

IF IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR SOME TO BEAR IN THE PAST, JESUS IS SPEAKING FALSELY TO SAY YOU CANNOT BEAR IT AND SO IT MUST BE DEFINITELY BEYOND PEOPLE’S CAPACITY TO UNDERSTAND THEN THAT JESUS SPOKE TRULY WHEN HE SAID YOU CANNOT BEAR IT THEN.

AND THE ONLY WAY IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BEAR IT LATER IS IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE MIND THAT IS POSSIBLE AND WILL HAPPEN THAT WILL MAKE YOU BEAR WHAT YOU COULD NOT BEAR LATER.

SUPPOSE YOU ARE BLIND THEN BUT IT IS POSSIBLE TO CURE YOUR BLINDNESS THEN YOU COULD NOT UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU WERE BLIND BUT WHEN YOUR BLINDNESS IS CURED, YOU WILL BEAR OR SEE.

THUS ONLY A FUNDAMENTAL UNIVERSAL CHANGE OF THE MIND OR CONSCIOUSNESS WILL MAKE PEOPLE BEAR WHAT THEY COULD NOT BEAR THEN AND SO JESUS WAS SPEAKING OF A FUTURE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AND THERE WAS A CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND IT WAS ME WHO TRIGGERED IT.