Thursday, February 10, 2011

Not oil but the price of oil:

Not oil but the price of oil:
It is not oil but the price of oil that has the potential (not power) to shock. It is a robot with no true understanding of what he is speaking and robots who do not truly understand what he hears who will accept the vague false approximation ‘oil has the power to shock’ when it is a case of ‘the price of oil has the potential to disrupt’.
Oil has no price, it is men who set and keep revising the price of oil driving it now to insane levels.
The costs of producing and transporting oil are actually quite low and stable and it is opportunism by all involved in the oil trade, producers, middlemen, speculators and retailers who through greed for gains have pushed up prices to abominable level that cripple the world economy because oil is an essential commodity.
OIL IS AN ESSENTIAL COMMODITY VITAL TO THE WELLBEING OF THE WORLD ECONOMY AND THE REASON PRICES HAVE RISEN TO SUCH ABSURD HEIGHTS IS BECAUSE THE MARKET IS INFESTED BY SPECULATORS WHO HAVE RAMPED UP PRICES EVEN CORNERED THE MARKET, HELD IT TO RANSOM IN THE NAME OF PROFIT, GOVERNMENTS ARE CLUELESS AS TO HOW TO ACT AND IN COHORT WITH MAJOR SPECULATORS LIKE GOLDMAN SACHS. A SIMPLE BANNING OF SPECULATORS WITH NO BUSINESS TO BUY OIL AND WITHOLDING MARGIN FINANCE WILL CRIPPLE SPECULATORS.
IF IT IS NOT OIL PER SE BUT THE PRICE OF OIL THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO WREAK HAVOC ON THE GLOBAL ECONOMY AND YOU SPEAK OF OIL HAVING THE POWER TO SHOCK, AREN’T YOU A MAN OF MUDDLED THINKING AND SPEECH? OIL HAS NO PRICE, IT IS MEN WHO FIX AND KEEP RAISING OIL PRICES GREEDILY.
Mubarak Fears Chaos If He Quits:
This is always an excuse, never the truth and if you do not understand why then you have no true understanding. He may be delaying exit to protect himself or his cronies, not with Egypt’s interest at heart.
If he truly loved Egypt and had ruled Egypt for the benefit of the people, it is IMPOSSIBLE that Egypt could have thus descended into chaos. It is because of corruption (and that means he did not have Egypt’s interest all this while) that this has come to pass and for him to say he fears chaos if he quits sounds and is hypocritical.
IF MUBARAK HAS EGYPT’S INTEREST AT HEART, THIS WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO PASS AND NOW THAT IT HAS COME TO PASS, IT IS DISINGENUOUS TO SAY HE FEARS CHAOS IF HE QUITS.
Why people feel lonely:
Loneliness is never natural nor blameless but loneliness is a false state of the mind that has causes, is always suffering and drives people to do things that they may regret. If what you say or do is driven by loneliness, it is false, loneliness is never a true reason for doing (eg going out or roaming the streets) or saying something.
It is because people have cravings, are suffering and feel inadequate (have dependency needs) that they are smitten occasionally by pangs of loneliness that drives them to seek relief like visit pubs or drink or play music, etc.
A PERSON WHO IS NOT SUFFERING, AT EASE WITH HIMSELF AND THE WORLD, DOES NOT FEEL INADEQUATE, HAS NOTHING TO PROVE TO HIMSELF OR OTHERS, HIS MIND FREED FROM THE SHACKLES OF GREED, HATE AND DELUSION DOES NOT SUFFERING FROM LONELINESS, FOR HIM SECLUSION IS BLISS, ENTANGLING WITH OTHERS ALWAYS FRUITLESS SUFFERING.
THUS IF YOU ARE CAPABLE OF FEELING LONELY, IT IS AGAIN A SIGN OF DANGER, OF VULNERABILITY TO FUTURE SUFFERING EVEN TO AN ETERNITY.
Shell profits double to $18.6bn
The oil giant Shell has reported profits of $18.6bn (£11.5bn) for 2010 thanks to rising oil prices and higher production
Here is object evidence that there is price gouging, Shell admitted its profits doubled because of rising oil prices which means to say the price rise is not justified, only contributed to the extra profits of Shell and its cohorts (oil producers, speculators) to the detriment of consumers and the world economy.
SHELL IS ONLY ONE BENEFICIARY OF OIL PRICE RISES, OTHERS INCLUDE OIL PRODUCERS LIKE SAUDI, SPECULATORS LIKE GOLDMAN SACHS AND THE HOARDS OF AMATEUR SPECULATORS, BROKERS, ETC. THUS ON SHELL’S ADMISSION, RISING PRICES TRANSLATED INTO RISING PROFITS AT THE EXPENSE OF CONSUMERS AND POTENTIALLY CRIPPLING THE WORLD ECONOMY. SO WHAT ARE GOVERNMENTS DOING? THEY ARE CLUELESS OR BLINDED BY THEIR TIES WITH BIG BUSINESS.
This is greedy not natural:
The person is actually listening not talking and yet reflecting greed (eagerness is greed), her mouth is open and this is not natural.
THIS IS LIKELY THE DEFAULT OR REHASHED STATE OF THE MOUTH THAT WHEN THE PERSON LISTENS, THE MOUTH IS OPEN IN ANTICIPATION.
IT IS NEVER RESTING BUT IT TAKES WORK TO KEEP THE MOUTH OPEN OR AGAPE AND IT IS DRIVEN BY GREED OR EAGERNESS TO SPEW REHASHED WORDS. IF A NOBLE PERSON IS NOT TALKING, HIS MOUTH IS CLOSED AS THIS THE MOST NEUTRAL STATE AND HIS MOUTH IS ONLY OPEN WHEN FORMING WORDS HE IS SPEAKING.
Speech born of true understanding always precise:
If what a person says is the product of true specific to the occasion understanding it must be precise never approximate. It is only because the person is speaking by rehash (rehash does not require understanding) that it never truly fits the occasion because it is meant for a variety of similar occasions and he does not truly specifically understand a situation that he is guilty of speech that if examined is found wanting or inappropriate.
Thus if a person truly understood the situation and what he wants to say, he must say precisely, ‘rising oil price has the potential to damage the world economy’. ‘power to shock’ is a nonspecific recorded phrase that can be rehashed to fit a variety of situations, and so driven by emotion, the person rehashed, ‘oil (oil can be substituted by other entities and it is also rehashed wrongly because it is not oil but oil price) has the power to shock’.
What is specific and nonspecific:
To speak of oil is nonspecific whilst to say ‘price of oil’ is specific.
To speak of shock is nonspecific, to speak of disrupting the world economy is specific.
Thus to speak of oil having to power to shock is nonspecific, how or what of oil has the power to shock what, shock people’s sense of morality or what?
It cannot be disputed or misconstrued what ‘rising oil prices has the potential to disrupt the world economy’ means.
The sin of being attractive:
Being attractive is desired by this world and seen as blameless and natural when attractiveness may be substantially artificial, cultivated to attract others with deadly consequences (evil people attracted may stalk and kill you) and karma due.
This woman who was late pregnant was stabbed and her body burnt in a house fire to camouflage the evil deed. Many would deem her attractive, see her murder as dastardly but in truth she is not blameless in two ways.
  1. If you dress yourself and behave (eg smile charmingly and cavort femininely or seductively) in a way that consciously or unconsciously want to attract others you are sinning not meritorious because you want to stir others’ mental force attractively which is suffering and bondage to you who attracts. Further if the person you attracted is evil, he is tempted to rape you then even though he is sinning in raping and killing you, if you intend to attract you are sinning.
  2. If you are an emotional stylish person, as she is, then you are guilty of radiating force at others and therefore not innocent but blameworthy and so you are owner of karma to be discharged as suffering and thus your rape and murder may be just a part of the karma that may be as vast as an ocean as the Buddha said ordinary people own.

SHE IS SMILING WITH AN EXPRESSION OF EAGERNESS THAT IS DESIGNED TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS AND IF YOU CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY DESIRE TO ATTRACT, YOU ARE INCURRING KARMA AND SHOULD THE PERSON YOU ATTRACTED BE EVIL, HE MAY BE TEMPTED TO PLAY FOUL, EVEN MURDER.
ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE AND IS EMOTIONAL IS GUILTY OF PLYING OTHERS WITH FORCE THAT HARMS OTHERS AND HE MAY SUFFERING DUE THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND SO HER MURDER HOWEVER TRAGIC IS JUST ONE SMALL PART OF REPAYMENT THAT MAY EXTEND AS VAST AS AN OCEAN ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA THAT YOU DISMISS TO YOUR CHAGRIN IF IT TURNS OUT HE IS RIGHT.
IT IS NOT BLAMELESS TO WANT TO ATTRACT, IT IS SINNING AND ACCRUING DEBT.
Prince Charming
From the pit to the palace, Australia is getting rave reviews
By prince charming, he is likely referring to Prince Charles but he did not say that and so he is sowing doubt and uncertainty in himself and others.
PRINCE CHARLES IS PRINCE CHARLES NOT PRINCE CHARMING AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY AND SOWING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS BY REFERRING TO PRINCE CHARLES AS PRINCE CHARMING. JUST BECAUSE HE GAVE RAVE REPORTS ABOUT AUSTRALIA DOES NOT MAKE HIM PRINCE CHARMING AND IF HIS PRAISE FOR AUSTRALIA IS TO CHARM AUSTRALIA THEN HE IS SPEAKING DEVIOUSLY TO CHARM NOT THE TRUTH. JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SINGS THE PRAISES OF AUSTRALIA DOES NOT MAKE HIM CHARMING AND SO YOU ARE GULLIBLE AND VULNERABLE TO FLATTERY IF YOU ARE TAKEN IN TO PERCEIVE HIM AS CHARMING JUST BECAUSE HE PRAISED AUSTRALIA.
RAVING IS ABOUT STIRRING MENTAL FORCE, WITHOUT STIRRING SOMEONE’S MENTAL FORCE EXCITEDLY IT CANNOT BE RAVING AND SO WHEN YOU SPEAK OF RAVE REVIEWS YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT REVIEWS THAT STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE EXCITEDLY THAT IS MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL AND SO YOU ARE INCURRING DEBT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING SPEAKING AND RECOMMENDING RAVE REPORTS. FAVOURABLE OR GOOD REPORTS ARE ABOUT MEANING AND SUBSTANCE, RAVE REPORTS ARE ABOUT STIRRING EMOTION.
A force not meaning transaction:
If what Prince Charles said about Australia stirred you to perceive him as prince charming, then you are acknowledging (unwittingly) it is the stirred force or emotion of what he said that drove you to view him as prince charming, it is nothing about the substance or truth or meaning of what Prince Charles said but it is the stirring of emotion or force of what he said, the rave or excitement stirring review of Australia that he gave that stirred your mental force that drove you to call him prince charming.
IT SHOULD BE THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT PRINCE CHARLES SAID THAT IS MEANINGFUL AND THAT CAN NEVER STIR EMOTION BUT RATHER THAN FOCUSING ON THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT PRINCE CHARLES SAID, BEFITTING HIS PREPONDERANCE FOR THE ASSOCIATED FORCE IN THE TRANSACTION, THE PERSON PERCEIVED WHAT PRINCE CHARLES SAID AS RAVING (STIRRING HIS MENTAL FORCE EXCITEDLY) AND AS A RESULT HE IS MOVED TO CALL HIM PRINCE CHARMING, HE ADMITS THE PRINCE IS CHARMING OR PLEASING WHICH IS ABOUT STIRRING FORCE NOT SUBSTANCE OR TRUTH OR MEANING.
THUS HERE AS EVERYWHERE ELSE, PEOPLE THINK IT IS THE TRUTH AND SUBSTANCE OF THE OCCASION OR EVENT THAT THEY ARE RESPONDING BUT THEY ARE DELUDED, EVERY OCCASION IS AN EXCUSE TO STIR FORCE OR EMOTION IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS AND IT IS THE STIRRED FORCE OR EMOTION OF THE OCCASION AND EVENT THAT THEY FIND MEANINGFUL OR THEY MISTAKE AS THEIR UNDERSTANDING, THUS IN THIS CASE, THEY MISTAKE THEIR PERCEPTION OF PRINCE CHARLES AS CHARMING AND THE REVIEW THE PRINCE GAVE OF AUSTRALIA AS MEANING OR SUBSTANCE WHEN IT IS ALL ABOUT FORCE, RAVING AND CHARMING IS ABOUT THE STIRRED FORCES OF THE OCCASION.
You understand or have a false perception of popularity?
Ordinary people think they understand truly what is meant by ‘popularity’ but they may be deluded, what they have is not true understanding of popularity but they have a perception that is approximate and wrong about what ‘popularity’ is.
WHEN PEOPLE SPEAK OF POPULARITY THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE OR SOMETHING THAT IS WELL LIKED BY MANY PEOPLE AND LIKE IS ABOUT ATTRACTION, THE ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF FORCE THAT IS NOT ONLY BLIND AND MEANINGLESS, CONSUMES ENERGY TO CAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE APART FROM DEGRADING THE MIND. THIS IS THE EXACT NATURE OF POPULARITY AND IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THUS (WHICH ORDINARY PEOPLE NEVER) YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT POPULARITY IS AND WHAT THEY CALL THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS THEIR PERCEPTION SHARED BY OTHERS, THEY MAY DESCRIBE POPULARITY AS BEING LIKED BY MANY BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS ‘LIKE’ IS AND THUS IT IS NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT EXPLAINING WHAT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND, ‘POPULARITY’ WITH ANOTHER ENTITY ‘LIKE’ THAT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
Thus when you say a certain food eg meat pie is popular you mean it is well liked by many. If you say a person is popular, you are not talking about substance or truth but about someone who is well liked by many, someone who stirs the mental forces of many to be attracted to him.
If what you say or do is the truth, meant as it actually is, it is not meant to be popular to stir others’ liking, if what you say or do is to make you popular it is never truly meant or true but is intended to court popularity.
POPULARITY IS NEVER ABOUT TRUTH OR TRUE MEANING, IT IS ALWAYS THE FALSE DENIED HIDDEN PURPOSE FOR DOING OR SAYING SOMETHING. THUS POLITICIANS CUT TAX TO MAKE THEMSELVES POPULAR. IF CUTTING TAX IS MEANINGFUL, IT IS NOT TO MAKE YOU OR YOUR PARTY POPULAR. EXACTLY WHY YOU CUT TAX CAN BE KNOWN, IF IT IS TO GAIN POPULARITY THEN YOU ARE CUTTING TAX FALSELY, DEVIOUSLY TO GAIN POPULARITY OR FAVOUR.
POLITICIANS CAN DO MANY THINGS TO GAIN POPULARITY LIKE CUT TAXES, ANNOUNCE NEW FACILITIES TO BE BUILT, ETC. IF POPULARITY IS ABOUT TRUTH, YOU CANNOT DO MANY THINGS TO GAIN POPULARITY. IT IS BECAUSE POPULARITY IS NOT A TRUE REASON FOR DOING OR SAYING THINGS THAT YOU CAN SAY OR DO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS TO GAIN POPULARITY.
IF POPULARITY IS A TRUE REASON FOR DOING OR SAYING THINGS, YOU CANNOT DO OR SAY MANY DIFFERENT THINGS FOR THE SAME PURPOSE OF GAINING POPULARITY. IT IS BECAUSE POPULARITY IS A FALSE REASON FOR DOING THINGS THAT YOU CAN SAY OR DO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS FOR THE SAME (FALSE, DEVIOUS) PURPOSE OF GAINING OR COURTING POPULARITY.
BECAUSE PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND POPULARITY AS I ELUCIDATED, THEY DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND POPULARITY OR EXACTLY WHAT IS THE NATURE OF POPULARITY AND SO IT IS PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING POPULAR, THEY THINK IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE AND GOOD WHEN IT IS MEANINGLESS AND EVIL.
Explaining A in terms of B:
More often than they realize, people explain A in terms of B and think or satisfy themselves that they have understood but because they do not understand B, they are only kidding themselves and others they understand A and passing the buck of explanation. Only when the person understands B does he truly understand A that they explained in terms of B.
Thus when asked what is popularity, one common answer is something that is well liked or many liked and he may satisfy himself he understood what popularity is but unless he knows what liking is, he has not truly explained and understood popularity. It is only when a person truly understands what ‘liked by many’ is that he truly understand popularity by saying popularity is about being liked by many.
MORE OFTEN THAN PEOPLE CONCEDE, THEY EXPLAIN A IN TERMS OF B WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING B BUT BECAUSE THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND TRULY THE NATURE OF B, THEY ARE SHIFTING THE IGNORANCE AND KIDDING THEMSELVES THEY UNDERSTAND AND SO THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND A LOT OF THINGS AND MANY NOD AND TELL THEM THEY DO BUT THEY ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES.
This cannot bring good fortune:
If you think participating in this ritual can or may bring good fortune then you are deluded because it is impossible that it can bring good fortune. If you do not believe it but you nevertheless do it to appease others or ‘just for fun’ then you are a fool because it is controlled insanity doing something meaningless that you do not understand with insanity your price or doing or saying things you do not see as true.
This is a ritual people join in not because they see it is true but because of social pressures and they ape the motions of others. It is never harmless because unless you see something you do is meaningful you must not do it unless you want to go mad later.
So what can bring you good fortune that you may crave?
  1. Doing acts of merit, doing good deeds can bring you wealth and prosperity in this and future lives.
  2. Hard work mixed with intelligence or shrewdness or cunning, even ruthlessness, cheating and corruption.

WHAT CAN BRING YOU GOOD FORTUNE IS HARDWORK, INTELLIGENCE, RUTHLESSNESS AND PANDERING TO RICH PEOPLE, GOOD KARMA FROM PAST GOOD DEEDS, IF YOU THINK SUCH RITUALS CAN BRING FORTUNE YOU ARE DELUDED LIKE THE MAN WHO BATHES IN THE GANGES TO CLEANSE HIS SINS.
Wealth is suffering not happiness:
It is only because a person is poor but he pines for or covets material goods that he suffers. A person like the Buddha who has truly given up all acquisitiveness, does not desire any possessions is truly happy TO THE HIGHEST DEGREE, EVEN HIGHER THAN HEAVENLY HAPPINESS.
As the Buddha said, giving up everything, he gains everything, he gains release from the heavy yoke of existence, entirely freed from all physical and mental suffering.
IT IS AGAIN THE FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF PEOPLE THAT THEY DESIRE WEALTH, THEY EQUATE WEALTH WITH HAPPINESS WHEN IT IS THE SOURCE OF A WHOLE MASS OF SUFFERING THAT WILL FINALLY CRUSH AND OVERWHELMS THE FOOL. THIS WAS SAID BY THE BUDDHA; WHOSEVER MAKES AN ACQUISITION IN THIS WORLD, THAT FOOL IS HEADED FOR SUFFERING.
Eagerness and rushing indicate serious greed:
Eagerness and rushing are manifestations of serious greed.
Anyone who rushes whatever he says or does or is eager or express eagerness whether for show or genuine has serious greed compared to the person who is not rushed or eager who is headed for heavenly bliss.
Rushing and eagerness have nothing to do with substance, they are functions of force.
Eagerness and rushing is in relation to something said or done and they indicate you are greedy or hungry or desirous to do or say it.
THUS RUSHING AND EXPRESSING EAGERNESS ARE FORMS OF GREED WHICH TOGETHER WITH HATE AND DELUSION ARE THE TRIFACTORS THE BUDDHA SAID KEPT MEN IN THIS WORLD OF TORMENT.
THE MAN WHO IS NOT EAGER, DOES NOT RUSH IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS GREEDY THAN THE MAN WHO RUSHES AND IS EAGER.
EAGERNESS AND RUSHING ARE CONDITIONED AND PEOPLE CANNOT HELP THEIR EAGERNESS AND RUSHING THAT ARE AUTOMATIC, THERE IS GREAT URGE THAT IS HARD TO RESIST FOR THEM BUT UNLESS THEY WEED OUT ALL RUSHING AND EAGERNESS THEY ARE A WALKING TIMEBOMB WAITING FOR EXIT TO PERDITION.
Without force changes you cannot be greedy:
Without accelerating speed and strength of force doing or saying something you cannot be greedy.
You need to accelerate in speed and strength doing or saying something in order to sound and appear eager or rushed which are trademarks of greed.
THUS THE PERSON WHO HAS NO STYLE, WHO NEVER CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHILST SPEAKING, CANNOT BE AS GREEDY AS THE STYLISH PERSON WHO IS CONSTANTLY CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHILST SPEAKING, OFTEN ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH ALL HIS STRETCHED SYLLABLES.
A PERSON SOUNDS RUSHED OR EAGER BECAUSE HE IS ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH HIS STRETCHED SYLLABLES AND SO IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHO DOES NOT CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO BE EAGER OR RUSHED AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS NOT TO BE RUSHED OR EAGER AND THESE ARE SYMBOLS OF GREED THAT IS AN OBSTRUCTION TO GOING TO HEAVEN.
This too is karma to be experienced as suffering:
It has occurred many times that when this household went on holidays their house alarms may go off but there is nobody to attend to it and so it keeps wailing nonstop very loudly day and night to the annoyance of the neighbourhood. The owner may have been informed or he does not bother to return earlier or get or assigned someone to turn the alarm off.
WHAT IS THE USE OF AN ALARM THAT YOU DO NOT ATTEND TO WHEN IT GOES OFF? IT IS ONLY FOR SHOW THEN.
BECAUSE THE BLARING ALARM CAUSES DISTRESS TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD THAT FOOL IS CREATING KARMA FOR HIMSELF TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING AND HE IS BLITHELY IGNORANT.
THUS PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THEIR KARMA TO BE DISCHARGED AS SUFFERING LATER.
WHOEVER CAUSES SUFFERING TO OTHERS EITHER BY NEGLIGENCE EG NOT ASSIGNING SOMEONE TO RESPOND TO HIS ALARM IN CASE IT GOES OFF IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING LATER IN REPAYMENT.
The substance and style of greed:
Whatever that exists or is true can be clearly defined as such and such and so if there is such a thing called greed, it can be clearly defined as such and such.
Greed has two components.
There is the style of greed and it is how a person accelerates in speed and strength of force when doing or saying something. Thus the greedy person’s speech sounds rushed and eager, his movements are greedily accelerating in speed and strength of force.
There is the substance of greed which comprises whatever he says and does driven by want. The person who wants is greedy, the person who does not want is not greedy. Thus the Buddha does not want anything, he has given up all possessions, even his livelihood is dependent truly and totally on the charity of others and so whoever keeps the Buddha alive by providing a meal, clothes and shelter is creating great merit for himself.
Thus if you raise prices when your costs are the same or you raise in excess of your cost increases this is a greedy action, if you ask a person what car he drives to assess his wealth so that you can treat him accordingly, this is an action driven by greed, the substance of greed. If you want a computer whether essential or not this is greed compared with the person who does not want a computer.
BECAUSE GREED IS BASED ON FORCE IT HAS INTENSITY THAT VARIES FROM PERSON TO PERSON AND THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS AND DOES WITH ACCELERATING SPEED AND STRENGTH IS ALWAYS MORE GREEDY THAT ONE WHO DOES NOT. RUSHING AND EAGERNESS IS THE STYLE OF GREED.
THE SUBSTANCE OF GREED IS SIMPLY WANTING, DESIRING. THE PERSON WHO WANTS ANYTHING, WIFE, CHILD, FRIENDS, ETC IS GREEDY. IF YOU RAISE PRICES ABOVE COST RISES, THAT IS DRIVEN BY GREED AND IT IS THE SUBSTANCE OF GREED.
GREED HAS INTENSITY THAT VARIES AND IT COMPRISES SUBSTANCE AND STYLE.
Greed in a nutshell:
Greed is desire or want or acquisitiveness and it is based on blind, meaningless stirring of force at contact with objects eg pretty girl, nice house, nice handphone, watch, etc. It is this greed that drives people to accelerate in speed and strength of force in their speech and actions and to undertake actions or speech that have the primary purpose of acquiring either righteously (hard work) or unrighteously (cheating).
THUS GREED IS SIMPLY DESIRE OR WANT AND THIS DESIRE OR WANT DRIVES PEOPLE TO ACQUIRE EITHER FAIRLY OR UNFAIRLY AND IN PEOPLE WITH SERIOUSLY STRONG GREED, THEIR ACTIONS AND SPEECH ARE CHARACTERIZED BY ACCELERATING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE TO APPEAR EAGER OR RUSHED.
BECAUSE GREED IS BASED ON FORCE, IT IS BLIND OR IRRATIONAL, MAY APPEAR RATIONAL BUT IT IS IRRATIONAL, GETS MORE INTENSE AND IRRATIONAL WITH CONDITIONING, IT IS ALWAYS TORMENTING AND ENDS IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS. BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON FORCE IT IS BLIND DRIVES THE PERSON TO TAKE RISKS OR GAMBLE THAT MAY END IN DISASTER EVEN DEATH.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID, THERE IS NO SATISFACTION IN WHATEVER IS THE OBJECTS OF GREED, IT IS MEANINGLESS AND ENDLESS EG YOUR SEX GREED OR APPETITE MAY BE SATED AFTER EACH ACT BUT THEN THE HUNGER COMES AGAIN EXPOSING THE FOOL TO RISKS.
You cannot play with fire and not get burnt:
The fool’s logic and delusion is that whilst others will get burnt by greed, he is different or smart, he can play with fire, play with greed, consort with greed and not get burnt.
IF YOU MUST PLAY WITH FIRE, SOONER OR LATER YOU WILL GET BURNT, TO GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT. IT IS THE ABIDING FOLLY OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE THAT THEY THINK THEY WILL SURVIVE, NOT BE BURNT BY GREED EVEN AS THEY INDULGE OR PANDER TO GREED.
THE PERSON WITH RIGHT VIEW PERCEIVES GREED AS A FIRE THAT WILL BURN EVERYONE COMING INTO CONTACT AND HE EXTINGUISHES, DISSOCIATES HIMSELF FROM GREED AS YOU WILL DISSOCIATE FROM A VIPER.
The pathogenesis of greed:
Greed is simply the conditioning conditioned attractive stirring (it is therefore an incarnation of like or attraction) of a person’s mental force on contact through the senses (sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, intellect) that drives the person to acquire when well developed with actions and speech that have accelerating speed and strength of force the object of one’s greed through fair and foul (corrupt) means. Once well-conditioned, greed can be stirred in a person even when the object is absent eg the person think or fantasize greedily about making money or having sex with all the voluptuous girls of his dreams.
Greed can be transferred from one object of desire to another and different people have different objects of greed and different intensities of greed. The more well-conditioned the person is to greed, the easier it is to arouse and harder to shake off and it is compelling for the person to act to satisfy his greed often disregarding great risks in loss and even death.
Jams due to PLUS incompetence:
I was caught in a massive jam all centred on congestions around rest and recreation areas of the NSHW from Taiping to KL such that I only arrived in KL at midnight having started at 3 pm.
PLUS itself had announced that jams stretched from the Sg Perak rest area and even a cursory examination told me the reason was because of impeding of passing traffic by people queuing to enter the full rest areas and the obvious answer is to stop the jamming.
One could expand the rest area with more car parks, build more portable toilets, ask people with public announcements to move on as soon as possible, station police at entrances to chase away even book people who hang around the entry trying to get in.
THE PRIMARY CAUSE IS BECAUSE THE HIGHWAY IS ONLY TWO LANE IN PERAK AND WHEN PEOPLE SLOW DOWN AND HANG AROUND ENTRY POINTS THEY IMPEDE TRAFFIC THAT THEN BUILD UP RAPIDLY INTO MONSTER JAMS.
IT IS EMINENTLY REMEDIABLE BY SETTING UP MORE TOILETS, PARKING BAYS, ASKING PEOPLE TO LEAVE AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE AND STATION POLICE TO STOP LOITERING ONCE THE AREA IS FULL.
ONCE THE REST AREA IS PASSED, TRAFFIC RAPIDLY BECAME NORMAL.
JAMS ARE NOT BECAUSE TRAFFIC IS TOO HEAVY BUT THE CAUSE IS IRRESPONSIBLE JAMMING AROUND REST AREAS AND PLUS’ INCOMPETENCE IS NOT FINDING SOLUTIONS THAT ARE EMINENTLY IMPLEMENTABLE.
A vicious circle:
The longer people are trapped in a jam the more they need to ease themselves and pump petrol and this causes increased demand for rest areas and exacerbates the jam.
Further many have the perverse logic that because there is a bad jam out there, they better stay longer and wait for the jams to ease when their waiting exacerbates the jam because others cannot get in.
WHEN TRAFFIC IS HEAVY, EVEN A SLIGHT IMPEDIMENT CAN RAPIDLY BUILD UP INTO A MONSTER JAM AND A VICIOUS CIRCLE MAY DEVELOP WHERE THE GREATER THE JAM THE GREATER THE NEED FOR USING THE REST AREAS THAT ACCENTUATES THE CONGESTION CAUSING MORE JAM.
IN THE SAME WAY, A VICIOUS CIRCLE MAY BE DEVELOPING IN THE WORLD ECONOMY AND FINANCES THAT MAY STRANGLE THE WORLD ECONOMY.
How about issuing parking tickets?
To discourage loitering, cars should be issued with parking tickets at entry points and if they exit more than 15 minutes later they should be made to pay a considerable fee. This would be a great incentive for people to get out as soon as possible.
Einstein was right - honey bee collapse threatens global food security

He and you see nothing wrong with the statement but it reflects false logic that ends in tears.
Whether bee collapse threatens the global food security or not has nothing to do with Einstein being correct or not, it is besides the point and beating Einstein’s drum unnecessarily to lend weight to your argument that may be false.
If you see it is true that honey bee collapse threatens the global food industry you say so, why bring Einstein except to bolster your argument with Einstein’s apparent aura.
BECAUSE IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY TO BRING EINSTEIN INTO THE PICTURE, IT IS ONLY NECESSARY TO USE HIS APPARENT (NOT TRUE) PRESTIGE HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY AND ANYONE WHO SEES NOTHING WRONG, THINKS HE IS RIGHT HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING.
TELL US WHY HONEY BEE COLLAPSE THREATENS GLOBAL FOOD INDUSTRY, NOT EINSTEIN IS CORRECT AND WE SHOULD ALL ACCEPT IT AS FAIT ACCOMPLI. IS EINSTEIN THE INDISPUTABLE ARBITER OF TRUTH ALWAYS?
It does not matter whether Einstein was correct or not:
It does not matter whether Einstein was correct or not (because he is not an infallible oracle of truth) but what matters is whether it is true or not that honey bee collapse threatens global food security and so there is no true reason or need for mentioning Einstein except to falsely bolster your claim. If what you say is true there is no need to bolster your claim with Einstein except that you are inadequate or not sure of yourself, you are speaking without knowing as true what you said.
TRUTH DOES NOT DEPEND ON ANYONE, NOT EVEN THE BUDDHA, TRUTH IS TRUTH AND THE BUDDHA IS MERELY THE HIGHEST EXPONENT OF TRUTH. IT IS NOT BECAUSE THE BUDDHA OR GOD SAID IT THAT IT IS THE TRUE BUT IT IS BECAUSE IT IS TRUE THAT IT IS THE TRUTH.
Issuing an open advertisement to burgle his house:
Not only is the house owner foolishly creating karma for himself by allowing his unattended alarm to disturb the neighbourhood peace, he is actually issuing an invitation for thieves to burgle his house because potential thieves will realize the house owner is not in.
The alarm was still blaring away when I returned home this evening and I saw an Indonesian man riding a motorbike casually approaching the house and looking at it briefly before making an U turn and leaving and it may be he is alerted that the house is not occupied and planning to break in.
THUS THE FOOL THINKS HE IS SMART ALLOWING HIS ALARM TO GO OFF UNATTENDED BUT IT IS EVEN MORE DANGEROUS BECAUSE PASSING THIEVES WILL SOON REALIZE THE HOUSE IS UNOCCUPIED AND AN OPEN INVITATION TO BURGLE.
RATHER THAN WISE, A BLARING ALARM IS SIGNAL TO BURGLARS THE HOUSE IS EMPTY AND IDEAL FOR BREAK IN AND SO EVEN IF THE FOOL DOES NOT CARE ABOUT OTHERS, HE SHOULD REALIZE IT IS HAZARDOUS FOR HIMSELF. BUT THEN HE IS A FOOL.
Proof that people are big idiots:
If his house wasn’t precious he would not have installed alarms and after installing alarms to protect himself, he does not realize that it is even more dangerous than no alarms to have the alarm blaring unattended whilst he enjoys himself on an extended holiday.
PEOPLE ARE INDIFFERENT, DO NOT REALIZE THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF HAVING YOUR ALARM GOING OFF INCESSANTLY. IT IS AN ALERT FOR BURGLARS THAT THE HOUSE IS UNOCCUPIED AND RIPE FOR BURGLARY.
MANY THINK THEY ARE SMART BUT THEY MAKE FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES THAT NOT ONLY CREATE KARMA FOR THEMSELVES BY CAUSING A NUISANCE ALLOWING THEIR ALARMS TO BLARE INCESSANTLY, IT IS INVITING THIEFS TO BURGLE.
If what you do is insensible you will go mad:
This is the universal law: whatever that you say or do that does not make sense, is absurd will end in your insanity finally.
The scrupulous sane man will only do things he truly understands and therefore it is impossible he can be guilty of saying or doing anything insensible or irrational. Whatever he does not understand he does not say or do.
It is only the unscrupulous man or emotional man who mistakes what is for show as substance, who is eager to please and impress others with what he says or does who can be guilty of doing or saying things that are insensible or irrational.
Thus the person and all who design this type of alarm that blares excessively loud are headed for insanity for designing something that is insensible or insane.
There are two purposes for an alarm. It is to detect and alert the owner of an intruder and you do not need to make the alarm blare so loudly to inform the owner. The second purpose is to ‘frighten off or inform the intruder that he has been detected and you do not need to make the alarm blare so loudly to do so, the thief is not deaf. If you make it so loud as to alert neighbours to come to your aid, then it is foolish because you better depend on yourself than others to save your own skin.
Further it is insane to design an alarm that is nonstop once triggered because it will alert burglars that there is no one at home. Better to design an alarm that stops after awhile to reactivate if triggered again later.
THUS THE PERSON WHO DESIGNED THE ALARM THAT IS EXCESSIVELY LOUD ANNOYING NEIGHBOURS AND IS INCESSANT HAS DESIGNED SOMETHING THAT MAKES NO SENSE AND AS A RESULT HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY. THERE IS NO REASON FOR ALARMS TO BE SO LOUD AND TO BLARE NONSTOP WHEN TRIGGERED, IT IS ACTUALLY BAD BECAUSE IT ALERTS BURGLARS THE OWNER IS NOT IN.
MANY ARE ‘CLEVER’ TO TAKE LONG HOLIDAYS, 2 WEEKS IN EUROPE, THEY ARE ‘CLEVER’ TO PROTECT THEMSELVES WITH ALARMS BUT THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT DISTURBING OTHERS NOT REALIZING THEY WILL HAVE A TASTE OF THEIR OWN MEDICINE LATER ARRANGED BY KARMA AND THEY ARE ACTUALLY PROMOTING THEIR HOUSES FOR BURGLARY BY LETTING THE ALARM BLARE INCESSANTLY.
Laybys are seldom essential:
Rarely are highway laybys for rest, food, refuelling essential and so if the highway cannot cope, the wisest thing to do is close these laybys if they are causing horrendous jams.
Those who truly need to refuel or ease themselves can be told to exit the highway and return after they have done so for the sake of the majority using the highway. It is surely possible to set up temporary portable toilets along the way for people who need to ease themselves and then move on. A few hours without food or drink will not kill you and so in jams people should forgo food or get out of the highway to eat or drink. Similarly you can refuel outside and return.
THE PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS THAT HIGHWAY JAMS ARE DUE TO PUBLIC HOLIDAYS AND INCREASED TRAFFIC HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING, IT IS NOT SO, IT IS IRRESPONSIBLE HOGGING OF REST AREAS, PARKING BY THE ROADSIDE AND PLUS’ INCOMPETENCE IN NOT ADDRESSING THIS PROBLEM THAT IS THE EASILY REMEDIABLE CAUSE.
You have no right to alert neighbours:
If you say the purpose for designing your alarm to be so loud is to alert neighbours then you are presumptuous and unrighteous and so this is a false reason for designing it so loud considering that it can also disturb others.
The burglary does not involve your neighbours; you have no right to insist they become involved to assist you by making your alarm so loud as to alert them.
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE THE ALARM SO LOUD SO THAT NEIGHBOURS CAN RUSH TO YOUR AID BUT IF YOU HAVE NO RIGHT, YOU ARE PRESUMPTUOUS AND CONCERNED FOR YOUR OWN SKIN, THEN THERE IS DEBT AND SUFFERING LATER FOR DISTURBING THE PEACE.
You must ask permission first:
If you want to install an alarm that is so loud that it can annoy others so that you can alert them to come to your aid, you must first ask permission and if they say ‘OK’ then you are covered. Without asking permission you are unrighteous and presumptuous to install an alarm that is so loud and does not switch itself off once triggered and so you may be ‘enjoying your long holiday’ but there is suffering due later for your negligence and indifference.
Julia's tears
The prime minister gives in to her emotions in parliament
This shedding of tears is meaningless, for show and it is because people falsely perceive it as meaningful or ‘touching’ that they dwell on it.
ALL HER TEARS CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO ALLEVIATE THE SUFFERINGS OF FLOOD VICTIMS (AND THERE MAY BE NO PALATABLE SOLUTIONS) BUT IT IS WHAT SHE DOES THAT WILL TRULY HELP THAT IS IMPORTANT. DO YOU THINK THE TEARS WILL AUGMENT WHATEVER STEPS SHE TAKES TO ASSIST VICTIMS? IF YOU AGREE THE TEARS ARE ENTIRELY UNHELPFUL, WILL NOT ADD TO THE STEPS SHE CAN TAKE THEN IT IS SENSELESS. THE TEARS ARE FOR SHOW, INTENDED CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY TO STIR EMOTION IN OTHERS OR IT IS INVOLUNTARY, SHE IS A SLAVE OF MENTAL FORCE WHO HAS TEMPORARILY LOSS CONTROL OF HER EMOTIONS OR MENTAL FORCE HEADING FOR UNCONTROLLABLE FUTURE LOSS OF HER EMOTIONS AND INSANITY.
Never real, all for show:
This is what all ordinary people do all the time, expressing themselves with their face muscles, they are smiling and laughing.
No useful work is being done by the facial muscles that are doing considerable work expending great energy, the expressions are for show to convey they like, are excited or thrilled, often it is faked, they are not actually liking but faking it to please others and even if it is genuine, liking is a meaningless useless attractive stirring of mental force.
THUS THEY ARE ALL PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF PLEASING AND IMPRESSING OTHERS, SUBJECTING THEIR MINDS NEEDLESSLY TO HARMFUL MENTAL FORCE THAT PROGRESSIVELY DEGRADES THEIR MINDS AND EXERCISING THEIR FACIAL MUSCLES FOR NO USEFUL EXCEPT FOR SHOW PURPOSES THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
Interest is simply greed:
When a person is interested, he is greedy. When you are talking about interest you are talking about greed. If you have interest in money, property, music, philosophy or girls, you are talking about greed or attraction for money, property, etc.
The Buddha is not interested in anything; not greedy for anything and through lack of interest or greed he is released from the heavy yoke or burden of existence.
WHEN PEOPLE TALK OF ABOUT ‘INTEREST’ THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT THE ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES IN RELATION TO A PARTICULAR SUBJECT AND THAT IS AN UNWITTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF GREED THAT IS EVIL, SUFFERING AND PATH TO WOE. IF PEOPLE ARE NOT GREEDY, THEY ARE DISGUST OR REPULSED OR HATEFUL AND THIS TRIAD, GREED, HATE AND DELUSION ARE THE CAUSES WHY PEOPLE ARE DETAINED IN EVERLASTING TORMENT HERE RUNNING AROUND IN CIRCLES TIED TO A POLE LIKE A DOG.
The substance and style of greed:
The substance of greed is simply the attractive stirring of a person’s mental force in relation to an object or subject and the style of greed is the accelerating speed and strength of force of what the person says and does in relation to that subject or object, to obtain or acquire the object or subject.
It is impossible that a person who is greedy should not speak or do without accelerating speed and strength of force.

No comments: