Eastwood film pulled from Japan:
Whenever you speak you are converting reality into words and so your words must be as accurate as possible in depicting what has happened.
It is impossible anyone can see the film being pulled from Japan because it did not happen. It sounds dramatic but that is not an accurate or true depiction of what happened.
Eastwood film stopped or cancelled in Japan more accurately describes what happened. It is not inconsequential to say pulled when reality is stopped because it trains you to perceive falsely that ends in insanity.
Right for the wrong reason is still wrong:
Zaid was reprimanded by the judge and Karpal Singh because his call for Anwar to give DNA was in contempt of court.
NOT CALLING FOR ANWAR TO GIVE DNA BECAUSE IT IS CONTEMPT OF COURT IS THE WRONG REASON FOR NOT SAYING SO, BUT NOT SAYING SO BECAUSE IT IS FALSE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT GIVING DNA MAY CLEAR ANWAR’S NAME IS THE CORRECT REASON FOR NOT SPEAKING.
IF YOU ARE CORRECT FOR THE WRONG REASON, YOU ARE STILL WRONG AND SO IT IS THAT THIS IS A WORLD THAT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND FALSELY AND THE ONLY WAY THAT ONE CAN UNDERSTAND FALSELY IN A CONSISTENT FASHION IS BECAUSE THAT UNDERSTANDING IS MEMORIZED AND REHASHED OR ROTE UNDERSTANDING.
DAP national chairman Karpal Singh, who is Anwar’s defence counsel, said: “As a lawyer, Zaid should know the bounds and parameters of the law of contempt.
“He should not fish in troubled waters. It is a deadly risk and the consequences can be equally deadly.
“There is no question of Anwar refusing to provide DNA samples. In 1998, it is on record that Anwar’s DNA profiling was abused by the police,” Karpal said in a statement yesterday.
Being a lawyer has nothing to do with it but makes it worse:
Karpal is exhibiting false logic in saying as a lawyer Zaid should know.
Being a lawyer has nothing to do with whether you should say or not say something. But being a lawyer makes Zaid indiscretion even worse.
As a righteous man or a man who truly understands, Zaid should know that what he said is false that giving DNA may absolve Anwar.
BEING A LAWYER HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER BECAUSE IRREGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE IS A LAWYER HE SHOULD KNOW THAT HE IS WRONG TO SAY SO.
HOWEVER BECAUSE ZAID IS A LAWYER WHOSE SENSE OF JUSTICE SHOULD BE KEENER THAN MOST, HIS SIN IS EVEN GREATER.
Being a lawyer makes it worse, not he should know:
The person who correctly understands the matter at hand says that being a lawyer makes Zaid’s comment worse, not being a lawyer he should know which is not a specific response to the situation.
Karpal is rehashing his answer to fit the situation and it does not fit the situation.
There is a copied common rules understanding that goes like this, “Being a … you should know eg being a father, husband, wife, doctor you should know. This rules understanding is rehashed to fit the occasion and to one who is discerning, it is found wanting, inappropriate.
PEOPLE ARE REHASHING THEIR UNDERSTANDINGS OF THINGS HAPPENING WITHOUT KNOWING. BEING A LAWYER ZAID SHOULD KNOW FALLS UNDER THE AMBIT OF A NONSPECIFIC RULES UNDERSTANDING OF BEING A (FATHER, HUSBAND, DOCTOR, TEACHER) YOU SHOULD KNOW. IN THIS CASE IT IS NOT BEING A LAWYER ZAID SHOULD KNOW BUT BEING A LAWYER MAKES ZAID’S INDISCRETION EVEN WORSE.
Why wasn’t DNA collection videotaped?
To allay any questions as to the authenticity of DNA evidence, the DNA collection from Saiful should have been conducted under full videotape, collected samples deposited in labelled sealed containers which are then sent for analysis in independent overseas laboratories or opened in the presence of Anwar’s lawyers and examined jointly in the presence of medical experts nominated by Anwar.
Here is a case of one man’s uncorroborated word (Saiful) against another (Anwar) in what the prosecution had labelled as consensual sex where what is at stake if convicted is the ruining of Anwar’s reputation, a jail sentence and destruction of his important career. And so it behoves on the prosecution and judiciary system to ensure to the public and Anwar that no mistakes or injustices have been carried out and this means if a conviction is based on DNA, incontrovertible or very plausible evidence should be shown that no tampering of the convicting DNA evidence is possible.
EITHER THE PROSECUTION HAS SHOWN GROSS INCOMPETENCE IN THE HANDLING OF EVIDENCE BY NOT VIDEOTAPING THE COLLECTION PROCESS AND THE DEPOSITION OF EVIDENCE IN LABELLED SEALED TAMPER PROOF CONTAINERS TO BE OPENED AND ANALYSED IN THE PRESENCE OF MEDICAL EXPERTS NOMINATED BY ANWAR AND THEREFORE SHOULD RELENT IN ITS PROSECUTION OF ANWAR OR IT HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE, THIS IS ALL A FRAME UP OF ANWAR.
IF THE GOVERNMENT WAS SERIOUS ABOUT ALLAYING PUBLIC CONCERNS ABOUT A FAIR PROSECUTION OF ANWAR AND IT WANTED TO CONVICT ANWAR FAIRLY, IN ORDER TO BE FAIR TO ANWAR,
DNA COLLECTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN VIDEOTAPED AND SPECIMENS SEALED IN TAMPER PROOF CONTAINERS TO BE OPENED IN THE PRESENCE OF ANWAR’S REPRESENTATIVES.
The right thing to do:
If you want to convict Anwar on the basis of DNA evidence you must ensure that there can be no dispute as to the authenticity of the evidence tendered and that means you must supply objective evidence (videotaping and sealing of specimens and opening under the supervision of neutral observers) that the DNA samples are valid.
If you have not done so either by incompetence or dereliction of duty then the right thing to do is to give Anwar the benefit of the doubt and forgo prosecution, make sure you do your homework better the next time.
If you nevertheless proceed to convict Anwar it only indicates this is an unrighteous prosecution, it is a sham trial.
AS MUCH AS YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONVICT ANWAR, IF YOU HAVE NOT SHOWN THAT THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF DNA IS ABOVE BOARD, INCONTROVERTIBLE, YOU MUST RELENT AND GIVE ANWAR THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. MAKE SURE YOU DO YOUR HOMEWORK THE NEXT TIME.
Why so shy?
Especially when the IGP had been tipped off beforehand and knowing Saiful had just been sodomized you should be confident to find Anwar’s DNA in Saiful so why would you be shy not to videotape proceedings so that everything will be above board and you cannot be accused of planting evidence? Instead it is acknowledged Saiful only presented himself for examination 3 days later and authorities lackadaisically failed to document the examination so that it is irrefutable. The reason he presented three days later may be because nothing happened, they were trying to get a better fit and retrospectively decide the earlier date was the best they could get.
Impossible Anwar sodomy happened:
If you think after all the evidence available in the public domain that it is nevertheless possible sodomy did happen, you do not understand or have mad doubt and uncertainty that is the way to future woe according to the Buddha.
All the evidence points to the sodomy charge being plain fraud just as the conduct of the case is clearly unrighteous or unfair to Anwar. There are many inexplicable lapses by the prosecution and police in their handling of the case that is not because of incompetence but because it is fabricated, did not occur and it is not easy if not impossible to fabricate as if genuine a sodomy case even if the plotters are very shrewd.
What evidence is there that the case is fraud?
Even if refuted police report still has to be tendered:
Even if Anwar can successfully refute what is in the police report it still has to be tendered and the defence has a right to see what Anwar is accused of to prepare for his defence.
Whatever happened can only happen in one way as it happened and it is a simple matter of putting to pen as detailed as possible exactly what happened and if Saiful was sodomized as described it is impossible to refute what actually took place.
THUS POLICE IS EITHER ACTING FOOLISHLY UNNECESSARILY TO WITHHOLD THE POLICE REPORT OR THERE NEVER WAS A POLICE REPORT, IT IS SUBJECT TO FACTUAL REVISION (FABRICATION) OR PENDING WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECORDED FROM THE ONSET FOR POLICE TO ACT ON THE CASE.
A POLICE REPORT IS THE BASIS FOR POLICE ACTION AND SO THE REPORT SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE FROM THE ONSET AND ONCE MADE IT IS FIXED, NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ALTERATION AND IF SODOMY HAPPENED AS DESCRIBED THERE SHOULD BE NO FEAR TO GIVE ANWAR A COPY. IN THE END THE POLICE REPORT MUST SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY AND IF IT HAS BEEN MADE BEFORE POLICE TOOK ACTION AND CANNOT BE ALTERED, WHY REFUSE TO GIVE ANWAR THE REPORT EXCEPT THROUGH UNRIGHTEOUS BEHAVIOR OR THE REPORT HAS NOT BEEN FINALIZED OR DID NOT EXIST.
The Buddha describes what happens in hell:
Jesus said the man who calls his brother you fool (scolds) is in danger of the fire of hell and so one must bear in mind the painful consequences of one’s actions.
Then the warders of hell give him the fivefold punishment. They fix a burning iron peg to each of his hands, and two others to each of his feet and another piercing his chest. On account of it he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell lead him and cut him with a knife and he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die, until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell hang him head downwards and work on him with a hatchet, he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell tie him to a cart and make him run to and fro on a ground that is ablaze with fire, he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell make him climb up and come down a lofty rock which is blazing with fire, he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
The warders of hell then take him by his feet and throw him to a boiling molten pot. He gets boiled in its foam, while getting boiled he sometimes dives into it and comes out of it, swims across it. On account of it he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
The warders of hell then put him in the great hell. It is thus:
It has four doors in the four cornered squares, divided and subdivided.
All round is an iron wall and an iron roof on top
Its iron floor is burning all the time
It spread for seven hundred miles and stands there all the time.
Why Anwar’s trial is definitely fraudulent:
It is because people do not truly understand what Anwar’s trial is about that they are uncertain as to whether it is fraudulent or not.
Anwar’s trial is not about establishing whether Anwar sodomized Saiful or not, it is impossible for anyone to know except God, Saiful and Anwar or any potential witnesses. Instead the trial is about convicting Anwar fairly based on evidence adduced.
BECAUSE THE COURT CAN NEVER KNOW IN TRUTH WHETHER ANWAR WAS GUILTY OR NOT, IT HAS TO BE FAIR TO ANWAR BECAUSE HE CAN BE JAILED AND HIS REPUTATION AND CAREER DESTROYED AND THIS CASE ONLY COMES ABOUT BECAUSE A LITIGANT, SAIFUL IS SEEKING JUDICIAL REDRESS FOR AN ALLEGED WRONG COMMITTED ON HIM AND BASED ON EVIDENCE ADDUCED BY POLICE, THE COURT OR JUDGE HAS TO DECIDE TO PUNISH OR ACQUIT ANWAR.
THUS EVEN IF ANWAR DID IT, IF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY POLICE IS INADEQUATE OR COMPROMISED OR TAINTED, THE COURT HAS A DUTY TO ACQUIT ANWAR. THUS IF POLICE DID NOT TAKE MEASURES TO ENSURE AND PROVE THAT ANWAR’S DNA ALLEGEDLY EXTRACTED FROM SAIFUL WAS NOT PLANTED, IT CANNOT CONVICT ANWAR BASED ON POLICE OR FORENSIC TESTIMONY.
DNA EVIDENCE IS NOT VALID TO CONVICT ANWAR BECAUSE POLICE HAD NOT TAKEN STEPS TO ENSURE THAT THE DNA WAS NOT PLANTED BY SOMEONE. WITHOUT PROVING ANWAR’S DNA WAS NOT PLANTED INTO SAIFUL’S ANUS, POLICE CANNOT USE DNA TO CONVICT ANWAR.
Why no police report and evidence report?
Not only should there be a police report but it must be written at the onset of police investigations into the sodomy not after they have launched an investigation. In fact the IGP should have directed Saiful to make a police report after discussing with Saiful about his alleged trysts well before the last act.
EVEN IF THERE WAS A POLICE REPORT AND IT WAS WRITTEN AFTER POLICE LAUNCHED INVESTIGATIONS, IT IS FRAUDULENT AND REFLECTS SPECIAL AND PARTISAN POLICE TREATMENT OF SAIFUL EITHER BECAUSE OF INTERVENTION BY POLITICAL MASTERS OR BECAUSE ANWAR IS A SPECIAL TARGET. POLICE PROTOCOL REQUIRES A POLICE REPORT TO BE LODGED BEFORE THEY CAN TAKE ACTION AND SO IF NO POLICE REPORT WAS LODGED AT THE OUTSET, IT INDICATES HANKY PANKY, SPECIAL INTEREST THAT PREJUDICES THE CASE.
The only rational reason for police to prosecute Anwar is if they have investigated the case, adduced evidences and based on these evidences they think they have a reasonable case to prosecute Anwar.
WITHOUT HAVING FIRST COLLECTED THE EVIDENCE AND DETERMINING THEY ARE SUFFICIENT TO PROSECUTE ANWAR, POLICE WILL BE MAD OR INCOMPETENT TO RUSH TO PROSECUTE ANWAR AND SO IT MUST HAVE AN EVIDENCE AND WITNESS SHEET AND SO RIGHTEOUSLY IT HAS TO PRODUCE BOTH THE POLICE REPORT AND EVIDENCE SHEETS FOR ANWAR’S LAWYERS TO INSPECT BECAUSE A LOT IS AT STAKE FOR ANWAR AND HE HAS A RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF AGAINST EVIDENCE AMASSED BY POLICE.
IT IS NOT THE POLICE’S RIGHT OR WHIM AND FANCY TO WITHOLD THE POLICE REPORT OR EVIDENCE SHEET EVEN IF THEY HAVE IT TO HANDICAP OR CAUSE TROUBLE TO ANWAR’S LAWYERS BUT IT IS THEIR DUTY TO PROVIDE AND IF THEY REFUSE, THEY SHOULD BE CENSURED AND THE CASE EVEN DISMISSED.
POLICE IS ACTING ARROGANTLY, ABUSING THE LAW AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED IN WITHOLDING THE POLICE REPORT AND EVIDENCE LIST (IF THEY EXISTED) AND EVEN THIS RENDERS THE CASE DEFUNCT. HOW CAN THE POLICE PROCEED THIS FAR WITH THE CASE WITHOUT A POLICE REPORT AND EVIDENCE SHEET THAT JUSTIFIES BRINGING ANWAR TO TRIAL? IF THEY HAVE AND THEY REFUSE TO TENDER IT IN DEFIANCE OF ANWAR’S RIGHT THEIR CASE SHOULD BE DISMISSED.
THIS IS NOT A CASE OF ESTABLISHING WHETHER ANWAR DID OR DID NOT SODOMIZE SAIFUL BECAUSE THE COURT CAN NEVER KNOW THAT. INSTEAD IT IS ABOUT FAIRLY (BEARING IN MIND THE POTENTIAL LOSSES TO ANWAR) CONVICTING OR NOT CONVICTING ANWAR BASED ON EVIDENCE AVAILABLE BECAUSE SOMEONE, SAIFUL IS SEEKING JUDICIAL REDRESS. EVEN IF ANWAR DID IT, IF THE COURT CANNOT PROVE BASED ON EVIDENCE PRESENTED OR THE EVIDENCE MAY BE FRAUDULENT OR IS NOT RELIABLE, IT HAS A DUTY TO ACQUIT ANWAR. UNCORROBORATED DNA EVIDENCE CANNOT BE USED TO CONVICT ANWAR AND SO EVEN IF IT IS GENUINE, IF POLICE HAD NOT TAKEN MEASURES TO PREVENT POSSIBILITY IT WAS PLANTED, DNA EVIDENCE HAS TO BE DISMISSED BY A FAIR COURT.
If police bungled case Anwar has to be acquitted:
Even if Anwar did it, if police bungled the case, the court has a duty to acquit Anwar.
Why is that so?
Because the court can never know whether Anwar did or did not do it.
God does not need a trial to know whether Anwar did or did not do it. And without thus knowing like God, if police bungled the case, since a lot is at stake for Anwar, he should be given the benefit of the doubt and acquitted especially when it is a case where only Saiful’s modesty and anus was harmed and it may even have been consensual.
Case is about fairly convicting or acquitting Anwar:
Fairness is not an option but mandatory because what is at stake is a man’s liberty, reputation and career.
Because it is impossible for the court to know whether Anwar did or did not do it, only Anwar, Saiful, God and witnesses if there was an act can know, it has a duty based on evidence presented that have to be scrutinized for reliability or potential fraud to decide if on balance Anwar is likely to be guilty or not.
Thus even if Anwar is guilty if the court cannot establish his guilt because eg of police bungling, suspect evidence, unreliable witness (contradicting) it must acquit Anwar.
THUS BECAUSE FAIRNESS IS CLEARLY OBJECTIVELY ABSENT IN SERIOUS FASHION IN PROCEEDINGS SO FAR, THE TRIAL HAS CONDEMNED ITSELF TO BE FRAUDULENT.
Meaningless insane one minute silence:
Not only is what he is doing meaningless, it is deadly, leads to insanity and even an eternity of suffering and so anyone who is moved, thinks what is done is full of meaning is deluded, has false understanding.
No useful work is being done standing there, it is never reason but stirred emotion that moves a person to do so and so it is motivated by blind harmful force not reason.
IT IS CONDITIONED MUTUAL SHARED DELUSION AND STIRRED MENTAL FORCE GIVING RISE TO SADNESS AND HURT THAT GIVES SUCH RITUALISTIC SILENT STILLNESS MEANING THAT IS FALSE, DOES NOT WORK, ACHIEVES NOTHING. IF YOU FIND IT MEANIGFUL, TRUE AND WORKS YOU ARE DELUDED, HEADED FOR TORMENT.
Singapore too will squander its citizens’ wealth:
Even years ago I said that like Malaysia but in a different way Singapore too will squander its citizens’ wealth.
Singapore manically saves its citizens’ wealth but driven by greed it invests in overseas assets that are actually overpriced and with collapses overseas, its savings may be wiped out.
Insomnia for state investors
Insight Down South
By Seah Chiang Nee
Singapore’s ambitious overseas investments have been hit by a series of crises – from the 9/11 attacks in 2001 to the 2007 global financial crisis and recession and now the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and Middle East upheavals.
AS Singaporeans’ concern mount over the safety of millions of Japanese, a small group of state investors are probably burning the midnight oil in Singapore.
These people, who manage the two sovereign state funds with assets and investments worth in excess of US$200bil (RM610bil), are likely to be poring over possible future options.
They are not only keeping watch on the nuclear drama unfolding in Japan, but also on the spreading violent upheavals in the Middle East, where the republic has high stakes.
Recently, Foreign Minister George Yeo told Parliament that Singapore had to “adjust to changes” taking place there.
In 1999, the government began a strategy of investing heavily in overseas markets to get a higher return for the state funds.
Calling it “a second external pair of wings,” the city pushed massive investments abroad.
It was a good concept that was soon adopted by other countries.
The two sovereign funds are Temasek Holdings, which operates a portfolio of US$142bil (RM432,72bil), and GIC, or Government Investment Corp, which manages foreign reserves of well over US$100bil (RM305bil).
With the local market too small for such a huge amount of funds, and competition rising from countries like China and India, the leaders turned to the outside world to find new income sources.
Besides, the world was in good shape, and emerging Asia was offering terrific new growth opportunities.
However, the foreign foray has been pushed back now and then by bad luck and a few bad investment decisions.
In the past decade, these investment wings have flapped from one air pocket to another.
The latest – a devastated Japan – is probably the worst.
Its nuclear crisis is spewing serious fallouts towards Singapore’s recovering economy.
It had been one crisis after another for Singapore, from the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America in 2001 to the 2007 global financial crisis and recession and now the Middle East upheavals.
All these have wreaked various degrees of damage on Singapore’s ambitious overseas investments.
People are hoping Saudi Arabia – the most important country in the Middle East – remains safe.
During the financial crisis, Temasek Holdings reported that its assets had plunged by S$55bil (RM168bil). Only in July last year had it recovered 40% of that.
Even discounting a nuclear nightmare, Japan – which is the world’s third biggest economy and one of Singapore’s top trading partners – faces years of economic struggle.
It will have to divert hundreds of billions of dollars to rebuilding shattered infrastructure by using its reserves, selling bonds or by reducing overseas spending.
“Knowing their nationalistic fervour, it will not be a surprise if Japanese corporations worldwide start soon to divert funds back home,” said a stock researcher.
The Japanese will likely buy or invest less in Singapore and the number of tourists will likely drop.
Japan ranks as one of the five economic pillars that sustain Singa-pore’s prosperity, next to the United States, Europe, China and South-East Asia.
According to statistics, it is the republic’s sixth largest trading partner in 2009 with total trade amounting to S$44bil (RM105bil), and the third largest investor with S$51bil (RM122bil).
All these crises serve a lesson for Singapore.
The sanguine environment which existed before, favouring smooth foreign profits, may no longer be around.
Recent history has shown that it now calls for more than just business acumen and investment timing.
There must also be the ability to analyse international affairs.
From 1999, Singapore’s billions of state funds began travelling around the world.
It went into buying local companies, which makes the government the biggest single shareholder of a long list of major companies.
After the turn of the century, the foreign investments grew in number and size.
The buzzword then was “global strategic investments”.
This often involved banks, telcos, airlines and companies that were considered crown jewels by the host countries.
Singapore wanted them for long-term global tie-ups.
“Big-time investment calls for big bucks and bullet-biting because it can be very risky,” an experienced market researcher said.
“Even the most experienced would need luck.
“People pray that after putting their money in, there will be no sudden political upheaval or natural calamity that could blow away their investments.”
Other worries include terrorist attacks, currency changes, market turmoil, unpredictable policy changes – any one of which can overturn a billion-dollar investment.
The Singapore Government’s large-scale investments – and recent losses abroad – have run into public criticism on two grounds.
Firstly, many Singaporeans believe that the investment money comes from indirect taxes and a high imposition of fees “squeezed” from the citizenry. All these seem to be rising.
Secondly, a persistent economic gap between rich and poor that seems to be widening, and fast becoming a source of public unhappiness.
It is popularly felt that a portion of the billions should be used to provide a safety net for the poor, the aged and the unemployed.
With so many needy people around, it makes no sense losing billions, by investing in a risky world, that could be put to better use helping the poorer class.
Another popular viewpoint is that the sovereign wealth funds may not have the best people to handle so big a task.
Their performance has so far not been brilliant.
Morgan Stanley said in a report that their investment decisions were poor.
“The sheer domination of the government in the external economy means that responsibility for the poor returns must lie with the government to a large degree,” it added.
Anwar charged without prior DNA confirmation:
There are two possible reasons why police secretly stole Anwar’s DNA (on toothbrush) whilst he was locked up, either they want to use it to frame Anwar or they need a profile (presumably but not necessarily belonging to Anwar) to match with DNA obtained from Saiful.
It appears that the crux of Anwar’s conviction will be based on DNA.
If this is the case it indicates that police unrighteously arrested (subjecting him to abuse commando style treatment and inhumane treatment in a lockup) without first having confirmed DNA from Saiful matched Anwar’s.
WHY ASK ANWAR FOR DNA AND SECRETLY TAKE HIS DNA FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH IF POLICE DID NOT HAVE ANWAR’S DNA?
WITHOUT FIRST CONFIRMING DNA EXTRACTED FROM SAIFUL BELONGED TO ANWAR, POLICE IS HIGH HANDED TO ARREST AND CHARGE ANWAR BASED ON WHAT IS HEARSAY FROM SAIFUL THAT MAY NOT BE TRUSTWORTHY OR IS THIS ALL A FRAME UP?
It does not make sense to ask Anwar for DNA now. It means they extracted DNA from Saiful that they are pretty sure (without testing) is Anwar’s and based on that they have come to this advanced state of prosecution and now retrospectively they want confirmation by getting Anwar to give a sample to match.
IF THE BASIS OF POLICE’S CASE IS DNA EVIDENCE, POLICE SHOULD NOT HAVE PROSECUTED THIS CASE WITHOUT FIRST HAVING CONFIRMED A DNA MATCH. IF THEY HAVE CONFIRMED A DNA MATCH, WHY ASK ANWAR FOR DNA NOW AND WHY STEAL DNA FROM ANWAR’S TOOTHBRUSH?
They want to convict without proof:
In order to accept Anwar’s conviction as valid you have to trust that police is beyond reproach, can be trusted not to have tampered or planted DNA to incriminate.
Because the handling and testing of specimen were not done properly with Anwar’s representatives present and independent observers supervising, to convict Anwar based on DNA in such a case is tantamount to convicting Anwar without objective incontrovertible proof even when it may be a consensual homosexual act and there are serious losses at stake for Anwar.
UNAUTHENTICATED DNA IS NOT OBJECTIVE PROOF AND SO IF ANWAR IS CONVICTED BASED ON DNA IT IS AN INJUSTICE AND SO THERE IS A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.
DNA is your basis and you have not confirmed it?
The absurdity is lost on people without genuine understanding.
The prosecution is going to convict Anwar based on DNA and yet at this advanced stage of the trial after much expenditure of time, effort and money it declares it has not confirmed DNA detected in Saiful belonged to Anwar, it needs a sample from Anwar to confirm.
IF YOU NEED A SAMPLE NOW FROM ANWAR IT MEANS YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS TO COME THIS FAR IN PROSECUTING ANWAR, YOU SHOULD HAVE COMPLETED YOUR INVESTIGATIONS, CONFIRMED THE DNA BELONGED TO ANWAR BEFORE COMING THIS FAR THAT SUBJECT TO NEGATIVE PUBLICITY, SUFFERING AND POTENTIAL FUTURE DAMAGES.
IT GOES TO SHOW THIS IS AN ABSURD WORLD WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING.
It just does not add up:
Before they stole Anwar’s DNA from his toothbrush, how did police know the DNA extracted from Saiful will match Anwar’s?
If police say they know because they know Saiful had sex with Anwar, how do they know Saiful is telling the truth? Najib said he was at first sceptical about Saiful’s story so how can police be so certain Saiful is not fabricating? So either it is all a lie (police are in cohort) or police incredibly (truly cannot be believed) trusts Saiful so much to the extent that they have no fears they will make a fool of themselves in arresting Anwar dramatically commando style and subject him to abusive detention and steal his DNA and charge Anwar before they have obtained confirmation by matching a verified Anwar sample with samples found on Saiful.
IT IS VERY DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO FABRICATE WHAT DID NOT HAPPEN THAT CANNOT BE DEBUNKED BY THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING, WHO UNDERSTAND TRULY WHAT IS PROPOSED AND WHAT IS POSSIBLE.
AND SO YOU DO NOT NEED TO HEAR IT FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH, THE GLARING DISCREPANCIES RENDER SAIFUL’S ALLEGATIONS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE HAPPENED.
IF POLICE ARE NOT IN COHORT WITH SAIFUL, IT MEANS THEY HAD SUPREME CONFIDENCE IN SAIFUL’S ACCOUNT THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO LAUNCH A COMMANDO ARREST OF ANWAR AND SUBJECT HIM TO ABUSIVE DETENTION WITHOUT FEAR THEY WILL HAVE MUD IN THEIR FACESM THEY WILL BE PROVEN WRONG, CENSURED AND LIABLE FOR DAMAGES. ANY SENSIBLE PERSON FEARING POTENTIAL DISASTROUS REPERCUSSIONS AND WITH RESPECT TO DAMAGE THAT MAY BE DONE TO ANWAR, MAKE SURE THAT DNA EXTRACTED FROM SAIFUL MATCHED ANWAR BEFORE THEY PROCEEDED SO FAR.
First wave of allied assault on
Libyan air defenses
U.S. and British ships and submarines have launched the first phase of a missile assault on Libyan air defenses, firing 112 Tomahawk cruise missiles at more than 20 coastal targets to clear the way for air patrols to ground Libya's air force.
The purpose for launching a pre-emptive strike to cripple Libyan air defence is to protect Nato airmen from harm and this is unrighteous and karma incurring because such strikes are at the expense of Libyans to protect Nato forces.
EVEN IF NO ONE IS KILLED, SUCH STRIKES CAUSE HARM AND THERE IS KARMA FOR THOSE INVOLVED AND IT IS SELFISH, MOTIVATED TO MAKE THE ENEMIES INSTEAD OF YOU DIE EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE NOT ATTACKED YOU.
Calling the prosecution’s bluff:
If Anwar never had sex with Saiful then it is impossible for prosecution to supply samples of a quality that irrefutably incriminates Anwar and so a deal should be made in which Anwar will supply DNA to an independent international laboratory and the prosecution will hand over its samples for matching.
By refusing to give DNA, it might give the court an excuse to presume Anwar’s guilt.
Then it can be independently, fairly verified whether DNA matching Anwar’s is present in those samples and exactly what is the nature and quality of those samples the prosecution possessed.
The prosecution may not be able to produce samples and if they can it is impossible those samples can irrefutably incriminate Anwar if they are not genuine.
IF ANWAR DID NOT SODOMISE SAIFUL IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE PROSECUTION CAN POSSESS IRREFUTABLY INCRIMINATING DNA SAMPLES (EG ANWAR’S SEMEN) AND SO IF IT WAS MADE TO PRESENT SAMPLES IT WOULD REVEAL HOW SUBSTANTIAL OR INSUBSTANTIAL THOSE SPECIMENS ARE AND AN INTERNATIONAL LAB WITH DETERMINE WHETHER THOSE DNA MATCH ANWAR’S.
Benefits of an independent lab:
By giving to an independent lab Anwar shows he has nothing to hide and it means samples he gives cannot be used to frame him and it exerts pressure on the prosecution to produce samples if it has and the quality of its samples can be known.
Even if there is a positive match it still does not exclude the DNA was planted.
Wait until you get shocked and rocked:
Sex video shocker
The release of a video recording of a man resembling an opposition party leader having sex with a foreign prostitute has shocked the nation in the latest scandal to rock the country. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, speaking at a press conference at 5.30pm – some four hours after news of the recording’s existence first got out – denied that he was the man and dismissed the whole thing as a political ploy.
It is impossible the nation is shocked and rocked but the writer can be shocked and rocked and when he gets shocked and rocked he will weep no matter how tough he is.
MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY WILL GET A TASTE OF THEIR LIES AND IT WILL BE TERRIBLE.
There is a difference between Anwar bringing up Altanturya case because there is murder involved. This is mud slinging and if many mainstream politicians have sexual affairs then it is hypocrisy to bring up such matters.
Datuk T is obviously acting as proxy and his story of how he came to get the video is implausible. If the tape was genuine the attack would be more direct rather than through proxies so that if exposed as fraud politicians are not to be blamed.
Anwar sex video another fraud:
If the sex video was genuine, whoever produced it would know it and you can be certain that BN would exploit it directly and to the hilt if they had such a video.
THUS THE FACT THAT THEY NEVER NAMED THE POLITICIAN BUT IMPLIED AND IT IS HANDLED THROUGH PROXIES INDICATES IT IS ANOTHER SCURRILOUS ATTEMPT TO SMEAR. THE EXPLANATION HOW DATUK T GOT THE TAPES TOO IS IMPLAUSIBLE.
THE PERSON WHO IS DISCERNING CAN TELL THIS IS A FRAUD INTENDED TO SMEAR. IT IS ILLEGAL AND HOTELS DO NOT TAPE SEXUAL TRYSTS AND SO WHOEVER TAPED MUST KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS AND IF IT WAS ANWAR, THE WHOLE ROOM WILL BE RINGED WITH CAMERAS AND THEY MIGHT INTERRUPT THE ACT WITH FLASH SHOTS.
ADD ALL IN AND THE SODOMY TRIAL CANNOT BE GENUINE.
Why datuk T so uncertain and certain?
It is farfetched that Datuk K accidental discovered the surveillance tape looking for his watch in a room that happened to be occupied by Anwar previously.
IF DTK T ACCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED THE TAPE AS HE CLAIMED (POSSIBLE TO DISTANCE HIMSELF FROM TAPE IF FOUND OUT), HOW CAN HE BE CERTAIN IT IS ANWAR AND NOT SOMEONE WHO LOOKED LIKE ANWAR AND DEMAND ANWAR AND WIFE STEP DOWN OR HE WOULD EXPOSE THEM?
THE PERSON WHO TAPED IT MUST KNOW WHO IT WAS AND IF IT WAS ANWAR HIS ENEMIES WOULD NOT BE SO COY AS NOT TO DIRECTLY NAME HIM. DTK T CONTRADICTS HIMSELF BY CLAIMING HE STUMBLED ON THE TAPE AND YET HE IS DEAD CERTAIN IT IS ANWAR AND DEMAND HIS RETIREMENT FROM POLITICS. IF IT WAS ANWAR HE IS SO HIGH PROFILE HIS PRESENCE AT A HOTEL WOULD BE NOTICED AND HIS ENEMIES SHOULD HAVE HOTEL SECURITY CAMERA FOOTAGES TO BACK UP THEIR ALLEGATIONS.
Anwar sex video definitely a fraud:
A person with true understanding can arrive at the conclusion it is a fraud even on the scant evidence on show.
Whoever made the tape must know who was being captured in the tape. Datuk T denied he was the source, he happened to find it and yet he is dead sure it is Anwar.
IF IT IS TRUE THAT THE AUTHOR OF THE TAPE IS UNKNOWN, HOW CAN IT BE CERTAIN IT IS ANWAR?
THE PERSON IS WHO PRODUCED THE TAPE MUST KNOW WHO THE ACTOR IS AND IF HE KNOWS THEN ANWAR’S ENEMIES WOULD ALSO KNOW AND IF THEY KNOW IT IS DEFINITELY ANWAR, THEY WILL NOT BE SO HESITANT BUT WOULD USE TO TEAR ANWAR TO SHREDS SINCE THEY HAVE GENUINE EVIDENCE. SINCE WHEN HAS THE BN COALITION BEEN DEFERENTIAL AND HESITANT TO TEAR THEIR OPPONENTS TO SHREDS WHEN THEY HAVE GENUINE EVIDENCE?
THE AFFAIR ONLY SHOWS THE POOR TASTE AND INCOMPETENCE OF THOSE INVOLVED AND THE NATION IS IN DANGEROUS RECKLESS INEPT HANDS.
Why so considerate to Anwar?
If they knew that the person in the videotape was Anwar, why would they be so coy, deferential and generous to Anwar in not pointing the finger directly at him when the tape is genuine proof of Anwar’s guilt and they have the courts and law enforcement agency on their sides to cover any libel eventualities?
It is only because they know the tape is a fraud, to cover themselves against fallout that they have to use a proxy and the proxy would have to feign innocent accidental discovery and yet expose himself as vested in demanding Anwar’s resignation.
IF ANWAR IS GUILTY OF SEXUAL DEBAUCHERY, HE WOULD BE A LIABILITY FOR THE OPPOSITION AND DATUK K SHOULD RECOMMEND ANWAR STAY ON RATHER THAN LEAVE. IT IS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DESTROY ANWAR THAT HE IS EXPOSING HIS MOTIVE BY ASKING ANWAR TO LEAVE.
IF HE IS NOT ALIGNED TO THE OPPOSITION WHY SHOULD HE CARE TO DEMAND ANWAR’S DEPARTURE?
Anwar can be charged with fellatio:
If it is true Anwar was having oral sex performed on him there may be a case for jailing him for unnatural sex and so the full weight of the law would be on him rather than the police saying they will not be involved unless a police report is made.
FELLATIO IS ILLEGAL IN MALAYSIA AND SO IF THE TAPE IS GENUINE POLICE IS SHOWING DERELICTION IN THE PROSECUTION OF SEXUAL DEVIANT ANWAR IN FEINING DISINTEREST UNLESS REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE.
Name the hotel and find the girl:
If the tape is genuine a good way of more negative publicity for Anwar is to publicly name the hotel and it should not be difficult knowing the hotel to then find the girl and pay her to implicate Anwar and then Anwar would be truly ‘finished’.
Should this be not forthcoming then it shows the depths of deceit that this country is willing to descend to.
Datuk T so sure tape authentic proves it is faked:
WHOEVER MADE THE TAPE IF GENUINE MUST KNOW IT IS VALUABLE EVEN ‘PRICELESS’ AS TO NOT CARELESSLY LEAVE IT IN A HOTEL ROOM FOR DATUK T TO DISCOVER. SO IT IS A FARFETCHED IF NOT IMPLAUSIBLE TALE THAT DATUK T ACCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED IT AND IF HE DISCOVERED IT, HOW CAN HE BE SO SURE IT IS AUTHENTIC SUCH THAT HE IS WILLING TO LAUNCH SUCH A HIGH PROFILE ATTACK AND CALL FOR ANWAR’S RESIGNATION WITHOUT FEAR OF CONSEQUENCES? THE REASON HE IS SO COCK SURE IS BECAUSE IT IS A FAKE AND HE MUST BE COCK SURE TO CONVINCE THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC.
If you accidentally discovered the tape in a hotel room, would you be so sure about its authenticity that you launch such a high profile exhibition of the tape in parliament and a top hotel and demand Anwar’s resignation?
The only reason Datuk T is so confident the tape is genuine is because it is a fake intended to discredit Anwar and he has to act confident as if he is definitely sure it is genuine in order to sell it to a gullible public.
THE FACT THAT THIS EPISODE HAS BEEN MADE IN SUCH A HOO HAH WITH PRESS SWARMING OVER THE PLACE AND POLITICIANS DRAWN IN REFLECTS PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING. IF IT IS TRUE AS DATUK T ALLEGED THAT HE ACCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED THE TAPE IN A HOTEL ROOM (HE MUST BE A VERY LUCKY MAN AND THE TAPE IF GENUINE MUST BE VERY VALUABLE TO THE PRODUCER FOR HIM TO CARELESSLY LEAVE IN A HOTEL ROOM) HE CANNOT BE SO SURE AS TO LAUNCH SUCH A PUBLICIZED ATTACK ON ANWAR WITHOUT FEAR OF EMBARRASSMENT AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE THIS THING IS CONCOCTED TO SMEAR ANWAR THAT HE MUST ACT ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENT TO SELL THE FAKE TO THE PUBLIC.
Confidence is sign of fakery not genuineness:
Confidence is always false, an act, a way of doing or saying something that is false, for show and so whatever that has confidence accompanying is always false never genuine and the confidence is to convince gullible people with false perception that what is false is true.
ACCOMPANYING CONFIDENCE IN WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IS ACTUALLY TO CONVINCE GULLIBLE PEOPLE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE. MANY HAVE LEARNT HOW ACT OR FAKE CONFIDENTLY IN ORDER TO SELL THE CON TO OTHERS.
IT REFLECTS PEOPLE’S FALSE PERCEPTION THAT EXPOSES THEM TO DECEPTION THAT THEY PERCEIVE THAT SOMETHING IS GENUINE IF IT IS ACCOMPANIED BY CONFIDENCE. ON THE CONTRARY, IF SOMETHING IS ACCOMPANIED BY CONFIDENCE OR VERVE, ONE SHOULD BE WARY IT IS A CONMAN’S JOB.
IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TRUE YOU DON’T NEED TO BE CONFIDENT. IT IS ONLY IF WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE THAT YOU NEED TO ACT CONFIDENT.
What is confidence?
Confidence is what and how you say or do something THAT IS FALSE that has the intention of FALSELY UNRIGHTEOUSLY convincing others of your genuineness or expertise so that they may trust you.
Thus people speak confidently by adding extra force in what they say and this extra force is in the smooth or slick force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that comes from memorizing and repeated rehashing.
The substance comes from saying things you have no right to say to act as if you are pretty sure of yourself. Thus Datuk T should not be certain the tape is genuine because he discovered it in a hotel room and yet he is so certain it is Anwar and demands his resignation. If he taped Anwar himself he can be certain but since the source of the tape is unknown, how can he be so sure?
ANYONE WHO ACTS AND SPEAKS WITH CONFIDENCE AND VERVE IS SINNING AND HEADED FOR SUFFERING EVEN TORMENT AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN. CONFIDENCE IS WHAT AND HOW YOU SAY SOMETHING THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE, FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS SO THAT THEY MAY TRUST AND DELIVER THEMSELVES TO YOU AND THAT IS EVIL AND EVIL HAS A PRICE IN SUFFERING.
Confidence is controlled insanity:
Confidence is faking it and the person has no right or truth or reality to act as if he is so confident and so that is controlled insanity for the sake of unrighteous gains that is the path to certain insanity and so the confident man, the confidence trickster is headed for insanity.
WHETHER A PERSON IS ACTING CONFIDENT OR NOT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED AND CLEARLY EVIDENT TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING AND WHOEVER YOU ARE, CONFIDENCE ENDS IN INSANITY BECAUSE YOU ARE ACTING AS IF TRUE WHAT IS NOT TRUE.
Have your say:
This is a headline on BBC site and on who understands truly understands it as false, promoting evil with grave karma for the person.
Whatever happening can be clearly defined as such and such and once defined that is nothing apart from that to be said.
HAVE YOUR SAY IS SOLICITING OPINIONS THAT DIFFER AND THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE. EVERYTHING HAS A RIGHT VIEW AND THERE IS NOTHING TO SAY APART FROM THAT RIGHT VIEW AND SO ASKING PEOPLE TO HAVE THEIR SAY IS TO PROMOTE DIFFERENCE THAT IS FALSE. FURTHER IT ENCOURAGES SELF IDENTITY VIEWS TO BECOME ATTACHED TO YOUR DIFFERENT FALSE VIEWS. SELF IDENTITY VIEW IS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE AND SO IT IS NOT MERITORIOUS BUT DEADLY SIN TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO HAVE THEIR SAY.
Judge shifts the goalposts:
In reversing his earlier decision to reject illegally obtained DNA from Anwar, the judge is shifting the goalposts ostensibly to get a conviction in the face of Anwar’s recalcitrance in refusing to give a DNA sample.
Thus the court does not have to satisfy anyone or Anwar that justice has been done but you have to take it on faith that there is no hanky panky and the DNA evidence is genuine not planted.
It appears that DNA will be crucial if not the only basis of convicting Anwar with no corroborating witness even tendered.
BECAUSE DNA CAN BE PLANTED AND THE PROCEDURE IN EXAMING SAIFUL WAS NOT DONE PROFESSIONALLY TO SHOW THAT EVERYTHING WAS DONE FAIRLY, YOU WILL HAVE TO TAKE IT ON FAITH THAT WHAT THE PROSECUTION SAY IS TRUE AND THEREFORE ANWAR IS GUILTY. THIS IS THE STATE OF THE ART (NOT SCIENCE) JUSTICE.
Malaysia’s state of the art judiciary:
It is not a compliment to say something is state of the art because art is about falsity, subjectivity, style and so it is no sarcasm to say Malaysia’s judiciary is state of the art, not science.
It appears that in this case as in Sodomy I, conviction is based on the uncorroborated accusation of one man, first Azizan now Saiful whose words are like gold to the court, even when Azizan said in court three times Anwar did not sodomize him.
And now again conviction will be clinched by DNA evidence and the public and Anwar will have to take it on faith that no shenanigans were involved in arriving at such DNA based conclusion.
IT IS NOT A COMPLIMENT TO SAY SOMETHING IS STATE OF THE ART BECAUSE ART IS ABOUT STYLE, FALSITY AND SO PEOPLE HAVE A WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT STATE OF THE ART MEANS ‘WOW’.
Why are they overkilling Anwar?
Anwar looks like being convicted of sodomy so why all this trouble of further mudslinging?
The reason is they are going for overkill, to finish Anwar for good by heaping so much shit on him that hopefully he will be thoroughly discredited amongst voters.
THE CURRENT SEX TAPE IMBROGLIO IS EVIDENCE THE SODOMY TRIAL IS DESIGNED TO PUT ANWAR AWAY. BY FURTHER CASTING INNUENDOS ON ANWAR’S INTEGRITY THEY HOPE TO TOTALLY DISCREDIT ANWAR IN THE EYES OF VOTERS WITH VIEW OF COMING ELECTIONS.
Sex videotape proves there is a plot:
Without political or ruling elite backup those involved in the current sex videotape accusation against Anwar would not be so brazen or daring without fear of repercussions.
If it is true that Anwar has committed a crime sodomizing Saiful and there is no vendetta against him or conspiracy to eliminate him then it suffices to convict him and extract punishment in imprisonment.
If on the other it is not true Anwar sodomized Saiful, then in order to thoroughly discredit Anwar in the eyes of voters, it is desirable to smear his reputation even further by concocting this scandal.
Why Datuk T & high profile politician?
No person of honor or true reputation would conceal his identity preferring to be referred to as Dtk T nor make indirect allegations against Anwar.
IF YOU KNOW YOUR TAPE IS GENUINE AND YOU ARE REFERRING TO ANWAR, THERE IS KARMA TO BE REPAID IN SUFFERING FOR CASTING ASPERSIONS WITHOUT NAMING WHO YOUR TARGET IS. FURTHER NO MAN OF INTEGRITY NEEDS TO HIDE HIS IDENTITY IN THE FORM OF DATUK T AND WEAR SUNGLASSES. HERE AGAIN KARMA CONCEALING IDENTITY AND WEARING SUNGLASSES.
Why Datuk T is heading for woe:
According to what the Buddha taught, Datuk K is heading for woe even if his allegations against Anwar are true, if they are false, slanderous then even worse woe awaits him.
The reason is because what Anwar does is none of his business, if Anwar is guilty of wrong he cannot escape karma and by exposing Anwar you cause him suffering and whoever causes another suffering is himself headed for suffering. If his motive in exposing is malice then that makes it worse. Further he is attempting to divide Anwar from voters and divisive speech and actions can send a person even to hell.
WHOEVER CAUSES SUFFERING AND LOSS TO OTHERS IS HIMSELF HEADED FOR WOE, SO SAYS THE BUDDHA. IN TRUTH WHAT ANWAR DID IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS AND SO HE IS UNNECESSARY HEAPING SUFFERING FOR HIMSELF FOR MATERIAL GAIN AND TO CAUSE A SCHISM BETWEEN ANWAR AND VOTERS AND THAT TOO IS A SOURCE OF SUFFERING IN THE FUTURE.
People here are guilty of deadly sin ignored at their own peril:
All beings here are guilty of serious deadly sin that they ignore at their own even eternal peril.
What deadly serious sin are they guilty of?
They are guilty of plying or subjecting others to constant force prolonging, changing speed and strength that not only causes insoluble stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate but maintains others in a trap of automatic force prolonging, changing speed and strength of force (loudness).
THE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS EVERPRESENT IN THE SPEECH AND ACTIONS OF PEOPLE HERE NOT ONLY CAUSES SUFFERING BUT MAINTAINS OTHERS WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH THEM IN SIMILAR TORMENTING PRISONS OF CONSTANT MAD FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND SO ALL BEINGS ARE GUILTY OF MAINTAINING EACH OTHER IN A WORLD OF TORMENT. FURTHER SUCH AN EXISTENCE WITH CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE THAT IS ITSELF TORMENTING. IT IS NEVER A PLEASURE BUT TORMENTING TO BE A REHASHING ROBOT.
WHATEVER GOOD THEY MAY DO (EG GIVE MONEY OR FOOD OR HELP OTHERS) IS DWARFED BY THIS CONSTANT SINFUL, EVIL PLYING OF OTHERS WITH DEADLY FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
GOOD DEEDS ARE MINOR MERITS THAT HAVE REWARDS BUT IT DOES NOT COMPARE WITH SHEDDING ONE’S CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT PERSECUTES OTHERS AND MAINTAIN THEM IN A SIMILAR TORMENTING ROBOTIC CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS PRISON.
IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF TORMENTING OTHERS YOU ARE HEADED FOR ETERNAL PUNISHMENT BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETON OVER AN ETERNITY OR AGE THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN.
You exert pressure on others to activate force:
Whenever a person changes speed or loudness they exert pressure that is hard to resist on the listener to similarly change speed and loudness and if everywhere the person turns to he is bombarded by people speaking to him with constant force changing speed and loudness, he is soon inducted into the totally unnecessary and mad for show force changing speed and loudness and being conditioning, he becomes conditioned or programmed to automatically change speed and loudness.
JUST LIKE A RAPIST IMPOSING HIMSELF ON A GIRL, ANYONE WITH STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS GUILTY OF IMPOSING HIMSELF ON HIS LISTENER INDUCTING THEM INTO A REALM OF SIMILAR CONSTANT AUTOMATIC, USELESS, MAD FOR SHOW PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS ADDICTIVE SO THAT HE IS TRAPPED, DOOMED TO SUFFERING, DEATH AND EVEN ETERNAL TORMENT AND SO ANYONE WITH STYLE IS GUILTY OF TERRIBLE SIN.
You have no right to have style:
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO HAVE STYLE JUST AS YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO OWN LET ALONE FIRE A GUN BECAUSE IT IS EVIL AND HARMFUL. IF YOU THINK IT IS YOUR RIGHT THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF SIN THEN GOD WHO HAS POWERS OVER YOU HAS A RIGHT TO PUNISH YOU EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.
Because you live in a community in which force you radiate impact on others causing suffering and ultimately death of others, you have no right to radiate force on others, no right to use force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness. If you do, you insist on having style then you are guilty of harming others and if it is possible to extract repayment from you then eternal punishment awaits you.
Jesus said you must be perfect, as your Father in heaven is perfect. You are deluded if you think you are perfect when you are constantly radiating totally unnecessary harmful forces on others causing mayhem in stress, restlessness and distraction in yourself and others.
AND SO THE FIRST FUNDAMENTAL STEP AND HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS THE ABOLITION OF STYLE, THE TOTAL NEGATION OF ALL USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND IT GIVES ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVENLY BLISS. THE NEXT FUNDAMENTAL STEP IS THE FULLY CONSCIOUS CESSATION OF ALL THINKING THAT GIVES TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA. IF YOU CAN STOP STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY TO LIKE, REPULSIVELY TO DISLIKE (HATE OR BE ANGRY) THAT IS THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY IF YOU STOP EXPERIENCING FORCE TO ACHIEVE THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND OF NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE THAT IS 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS WITHOUT DEATH, DISEASE, AGING, SUFFERING.
Whenever you speak you are converting reality into words and so your words must be as accurate as possible in depicting what has happened.
It is impossible anyone can see the film being pulled from Japan because it did not happen. It sounds dramatic but that is not an accurate or true depiction of what happened.
Eastwood film stopped or cancelled in Japan more accurately describes what happened. It is not inconsequential to say pulled when reality is stopped because it trains you to perceive falsely that ends in insanity.
Right for the wrong reason is still wrong:
Zaid was reprimanded by the judge and Karpal Singh because his call for Anwar to give DNA was in contempt of court.
NOT CALLING FOR ANWAR TO GIVE DNA BECAUSE IT IS CONTEMPT OF COURT IS THE WRONG REASON FOR NOT SAYING SO, BUT NOT SAYING SO BECAUSE IT IS FALSE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT GIVING DNA MAY CLEAR ANWAR’S NAME IS THE CORRECT REASON FOR NOT SPEAKING.
IF YOU ARE CORRECT FOR THE WRONG REASON, YOU ARE STILL WRONG AND SO IT IS THAT THIS IS A WORLD THAT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND FALSELY AND THE ONLY WAY THAT ONE CAN UNDERSTAND FALSELY IN A CONSISTENT FASHION IS BECAUSE THAT UNDERSTANDING IS MEMORIZED AND REHASHED OR ROTE UNDERSTANDING.
DAP national chairman Karpal Singh, who is Anwar’s defence counsel, said: “As a lawyer, Zaid should know the bounds and parameters of the law of contempt.
“He should not fish in troubled waters. It is a deadly risk and the consequences can be equally deadly.
“There is no question of Anwar refusing to provide DNA samples. In 1998, it is on record that Anwar’s DNA profiling was abused by the police,” Karpal said in a statement yesterday.
Being a lawyer has nothing to do with it but makes it worse:
Karpal is exhibiting false logic in saying as a lawyer Zaid should know.
Being a lawyer has nothing to do with whether you should say or not say something. But being a lawyer makes Zaid indiscretion even worse.
As a righteous man or a man who truly understands, Zaid should know that what he said is false that giving DNA may absolve Anwar.
BEING A LAWYER HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER BECAUSE IRREGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE IS A LAWYER HE SHOULD KNOW THAT HE IS WRONG TO SAY SO.
HOWEVER BECAUSE ZAID IS A LAWYER WHOSE SENSE OF JUSTICE SHOULD BE KEENER THAN MOST, HIS SIN IS EVEN GREATER.
Being a lawyer makes it worse, not he should know:
The person who correctly understands the matter at hand says that being a lawyer makes Zaid’s comment worse, not being a lawyer he should know which is not a specific response to the situation.
Karpal is rehashing his answer to fit the situation and it does not fit the situation.
There is a copied common rules understanding that goes like this, “Being a … you should know eg being a father, husband, wife, doctor you should know. This rules understanding is rehashed to fit the occasion and to one who is discerning, it is found wanting, inappropriate.
PEOPLE ARE REHASHING THEIR UNDERSTANDINGS OF THINGS HAPPENING WITHOUT KNOWING. BEING A LAWYER ZAID SHOULD KNOW FALLS UNDER THE AMBIT OF A NONSPECIFIC RULES UNDERSTANDING OF BEING A (FATHER, HUSBAND, DOCTOR, TEACHER) YOU SHOULD KNOW. IN THIS CASE IT IS NOT BEING A LAWYER ZAID SHOULD KNOW BUT BEING A LAWYER MAKES ZAID’S INDISCRETION EVEN WORSE.
Why wasn’t DNA collection videotaped?
To allay any questions as to the authenticity of DNA evidence, the DNA collection from Saiful should have been conducted under full videotape, collected samples deposited in labelled sealed containers which are then sent for analysis in independent overseas laboratories or opened in the presence of Anwar’s lawyers and examined jointly in the presence of medical experts nominated by Anwar.
Here is a case of one man’s uncorroborated word (Saiful) against another (Anwar) in what the prosecution had labelled as consensual sex where what is at stake if convicted is the ruining of Anwar’s reputation, a jail sentence and destruction of his important career. And so it behoves on the prosecution and judiciary system to ensure to the public and Anwar that no mistakes or injustices have been carried out and this means if a conviction is based on DNA, incontrovertible or very plausible evidence should be shown that no tampering of the convicting DNA evidence is possible.
EITHER THE PROSECUTION HAS SHOWN GROSS INCOMPETENCE IN THE HANDLING OF EVIDENCE BY NOT VIDEOTAPING THE COLLECTION PROCESS AND THE DEPOSITION OF EVIDENCE IN LABELLED SEALED TAMPER PROOF CONTAINERS TO BE OPENED AND ANALYSED IN THE PRESENCE OF MEDICAL EXPERTS NOMINATED BY ANWAR AND THEREFORE SHOULD RELENT IN ITS PROSECUTION OF ANWAR OR IT HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE, THIS IS ALL A FRAME UP OF ANWAR.
IF THE GOVERNMENT WAS SERIOUS ABOUT ALLAYING PUBLIC CONCERNS ABOUT A FAIR PROSECUTION OF ANWAR AND IT WANTED TO CONVICT ANWAR FAIRLY, IN ORDER TO BE FAIR TO ANWAR,
DNA COLLECTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN VIDEOTAPED AND SPECIMENS SEALED IN TAMPER PROOF CONTAINERS TO BE OPENED IN THE PRESENCE OF ANWAR’S REPRESENTATIVES.
The right thing to do:
If you want to convict Anwar on the basis of DNA evidence you must ensure that there can be no dispute as to the authenticity of the evidence tendered and that means you must supply objective evidence (videotaping and sealing of specimens and opening under the supervision of neutral observers) that the DNA samples are valid.
If you have not done so either by incompetence or dereliction of duty then the right thing to do is to give Anwar the benefit of the doubt and forgo prosecution, make sure you do your homework better the next time.
If you nevertheless proceed to convict Anwar it only indicates this is an unrighteous prosecution, it is a sham trial.
AS MUCH AS YOU WOULD LIKE TO CONVICT ANWAR, IF YOU HAVE NOT SHOWN THAT THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF DNA IS ABOVE BOARD, INCONTROVERTIBLE, YOU MUST RELENT AND GIVE ANWAR THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. MAKE SURE YOU DO YOUR HOMEWORK THE NEXT TIME.
Why so shy?
Especially when the IGP had been tipped off beforehand and knowing Saiful had just been sodomized you should be confident to find Anwar’s DNA in Saiful so why would you be shy not to videotape proceedings so that everything will be above board and you cannot be accused of planting evidence? Instead it is acknowledged Saiful only presented himself for examination 3 days later and authorities lackadaisically failed to document the examination so that it is irrefutable. The reason he presented three days later may be because nothing happened, they were trying to get a better fit and retrospectively decide the earlier date was the best they could get.
Impossible Anwar sodomy happened:
If you think after all the evidence available in the public domain that it is nevertheless possible sodomy did happen, you do not understand or have mad doubt and uncertainty that is the way to future woe according to the Buddha.
All the evidence points to the sodomy charge being plain fraud just as the conduct of the case is clearly unrighteous or unfair to Anwar. There are many inexplicable lapses by the prosecution and police in their handling of the case that is not because of incompetence but because it is fabricated, did not occur and it is not easy if not impossible to fabricate as if genuine a sodomy case even if the plotters are very shrewd.
What evidence is there that the case is fraud?
- Police refusal to present the police report and what evidence and witnesses it has of the alleged sodomy. If sodomy actually occurred it is a simple matter of putting into words what actually happened and it is impossible for Anwar to debunk what actually happened. For instance he may tender false alibis but just because he has alibis to support him does not exonerate or clear him. There is no way anyone can irrefutably prove to others what actually happened did not happen and so if sodomy actually took place, Saiful and police need not fear their version of events can be refuted and so why so reluctant to tender the police report? IT IS ONLY IF SODOMY DID NOT OCCUR AND THE REPORTS AND LIST OF EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES ARE NOT FINALIZED THAT POLICE WOULD BE RELUCTANT TO RELEASE.
- It is clear Anwar’s adversaries would destroy him or his reputation if they get an opportunity. Police were tipped off before the final act and it is either gross incompetence or it is fraud that they did set a trap to videotape proceedings so that there is irrefutable proof just like the Lingam and Chua Soi Lek cases that will permanently ruin Anwar’s reputation and they can safely put him in jail and no one can accuse them of conspiracy. If Anwar was a closet homosexual, it should be quite easy for police to stalk him and obtain incriminating evidence eg by secretly filming premises he and his partners frequents. Even indirect videos would be damaging.
- If there was actually semen deposition in Saiful it is mad that Saiful and the police waited three days before he presented himself for DNA extraction.
Even if refuted police report still has to be tendered:
Even if Anwar can successfully refute what is in the police report it still has to be tendered and the defence has a right to see what Anwar is accused of to prepare for his defence.
Whatever happened can only happen in one way as it happened and it is a simple matter of putting to pen as detailed as possible exactly what happened and if Saiful was sodomized as described it is impossible to refute what actually took place.
THUS POLICE IS EITHER ACTING FOOLISHLY UNNECESSARILY TO WITHHOLD THE POLICE REPORT OR THERE NEVER WAS A POLICE REPORT, IT IS SUBJECT TO FACTUAL REVISION (FABRICATION) OR PENDING WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECORDED FROM THE ONSET FOR POLICE TO ACT ON THE CASE.
A POLICE REPORT IS THE BASIS FOR POLICE ACTION AND SO THE REPORT SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE FROM THE ONSET AND ONCE MADE IT IS FIXED, NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ALTERATION AND IF SODOMY HAPPENED AS DESCRIBED THERE SHOULD BE NO FEAR TO GIVE ANWAR A COPY. IN THE END THE POLICE REPORT MUST SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY AND IF IT HAS BEEN MADE BEFORE POLICE TOOK ACTION AND CANNOT BE ALTERED, WHY REFUSE TO GIVE ANWAR THE REPORT EXCEPT THROUGH UNRIGHTEOUS BEHAVIOR OR THE REPORT HAS NOT BEEN FINALIZED OR DID NOT EXIST.
The Buddha describes what happens in hell:
Jesus said the man who calls his brother you fool (scolds) is in danger of the fire of hell and so one must bear in mind the painful consequences of one’s actions.
Then the warders of hell give him the fivefold punishment. They fix a burning iron peg to each of his hands, and two others to each of his feet and another piercing his chest. On account of it he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell lead him and cut him with a knife and he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die, until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell hang him head downwards and work on him with a hatchet, he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell tie him to a cart and make him run to and fro on a ground that is ablaze with fire, he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
Then the warders of hell make him climb up and come down a lofty rock which is blazing with fire, he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
The warders of hell then take him by his feet and throw him to a boiling molten pot. He gets boiled in its foam, while getting boiled he sometimes dives into it and comes out of it, swims across it. On account of it he feels sharp, rough unpleasant feelings, but does not die until the results of that evil action gets exhausted.
The warders of hell then put him in the great hell. It is thus:
It has four doors in the four cornered squares, divided and subdivided.
All round is an iron wall and an iron roof on top
Its iron floor is burning all the time
It spread for seven hundred miles and stands there all the time.
Why Anwar’s trial is definitely fraudulent:
It is because people do not truly understand what Anwar’s trial is about that they are uncertain as to whether it is fraudulent or not.
Anwar’s trial is not about establishing whether Anwar sodomized Saiful or not, it is impossible for anyone to know except God, Saiful and Anwar or any potential witnesses. Instead the trial is about convicting Anwar fairly based on evidence adduced.
BECAUSE THE COURT CAN NEVER KNOW IN TRUTH WHETHER ANWAR WAS GUILTY OR NOT, IT HAS TO BE FAIR TO ANWAR BECAUSE HE CAN BE JAILED AND HIS REPUTATION AND CAREER DESTROYED AND THIS CASE ONLY COMES ABOUT BECAUSE A LITIGANT, SAIFUL IS SEEKING JUDICIAL REDRESS FOR AN ALLEGED WRONG COMMITTED ON HIM AND BASED ON EVIDENCE ADDUCED BY POLICE, THE COURT OR JUDGE HAS TO DECIDE TO PUNISH OR ACQUIT ANWAR.
THUS EVEN IF ANWAR DID IT, IF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY POLICE IS INADEQUATE OR COMPROMISED OR TAINTED, THE COURT HAS A DUTY TO ACQUIT ANWAR. THUS IF POLICE DID NOT TAKE MEASURES TO ENSURE AND PROVE THAT ANWAR’S DNA ALLEGEDLY EXTRACTED FROM SAIFUL WAS NOT PLANTED, IT CANNOT CONVICT ANWAR BASED ON POLICE OR FORENSIC TESTIMONY.
DNA EVIDENCE IS NOT VALID TO CONVICT ANWAR BECAUSE POLICE HAD NOT TAKEN STEPS TO ENSURE THAT THE DNA WAS NOT PLANTED BY SOMEONE. WITHOUT PROVING ANWAR’S DNA WAS NOT PLANTED INTO SAIFUL’S ANUS, POLICE CANNOT USE DNA TO CONVICT ANWAR.
Why no police report and evidence report?
Not only should there be a police report but it must be written at the onset of police investigations into the sodomy not after they have launched an investigation. In fact the IGP should have directed Saiful to make a police report after discussing with Saiful about his alleged trysts well before the last act.
EVEN IF THERE WAS A POLICE REPORT AND IT WAS WRITTEN AFTER POLICE LAUNCHED INVESTIGATIONS, IT IS FRAUDULENT AND REFLECTS SPECIAL AND PARTISAN POLICE TREATMENT OF SAIFUL EITHER BECAUSE OF INTERVENTION BY POLITICAL MASTERS OR BECAUSE ANWAR IS A SPECIAL TARGET. POLICE PROTOCOL REQUIRES A POLICE REPORT TO BE LODGED BEFORE THEY CAN TAKE ACTION AND SO IF NO POLICE REPORT WAS LODGED AT THE OUTSET, IT INDICATES HANKY PANKY, SPECIAL INTEREST THAT PREJUDICES THE CASE.
The only rational reason for police to prosecute Anwar is if they have investigated the case, adduced evidences and based on these evidences they think they have a reasonable case to prosecute Anwar.
WITHOUT HAVING FIRST COLLECTED THE EVIDENCE AND DETERMINING THEY ARE SUFFICIENT TO PROSECUTE ANWAR, POLICE WILL BE MAD OR INCOMPETENT TO RUSH TO PROSECUTE ANWAR AND SO IT MUST HAVE AN EVIDENCE AND WITNESS SHEET AND SO RIGHTEOUSLY IT HAS TO PRODUCE BOTH THE POLICE REPORT AND EVIDENCE SHEETS FOR ANWAR’S LAWYERS TO INSPECT BECAUSE A LOT IS AT STAKE FOR ANWAR AND HE HAS A RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF AGAINST EVIDENCE AMASSED BY POLICE.
IT IS NOT THE POLICE’S RIGHT OR WHIM AND FANCY TO WITHOLD THE POLICE REPORT OR EVIDENCE SHEET EVEN IF THEY HAVE IT TO HANDICAP OR CAUSE TROUBLE TO ANWAR’S LAWYERS BUT IT IS THEIR DUTY TO PROVIDE AND IF THEY REFUSE, THEY SHOULD BE CENSURED AND THE CASE EVEN DISMISSED.
POLICE IS ACTING ARROGANTLY, ABUSING THE LAW AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED IN WITHOLDING THE POLICE REPORT AND EVIDENCE LIST (IF THEY EXISTED) AND EVEN THIS RENDERS THE CASE DEFUNCT. HOW CAN THE POLICE PROCEED THIS FAR WITH THE CASE WITHOUT A POLICE REPORT AND EVIDENCE SHEET THAT JUSTIFIES BRINGING ANWAR TO TRIAL? IF THEY HAVE AND THEY REFUSE TO TENDER IT IN DEFIANCE OF ANWAR’S RIGHT THEIR CASE SHOULD BE DISMISSED.
THIS IS NOT A CASE OF ESTABLISHING WHETHER ANWAR DID OR DID NOT SODOMIZE SAIFUL BECAUSE THE COURT CAN NEVER KNOW THAT. INSTEAD IT IS ABOUT FAIRLY (BEARING IN MIND THE POTENTIAL LOSSES TO ANWAR) CONVICTING OR NOT CONVICTING ANWAR BASED ON EVIDENCE AVAILABLE BECAUSE SOMEONE, SAIFUL IS SEEKING JUDICIAL REDRESS. EVEN IF ANWAR DID IT, IF THE COURT CANNOT PROVE BASED ON EVIDENCE PRESENTED OR THE EVIDENCE MAY BE FRAUDULENT OR IS NOT RELIABLE, IT HAS A DUTY TO ACQUIT ANWAR. UNCORROBORATED DNA EVIDENCE CANNOT BE USED TO CONVICT ANWAR AND SO EVEN IF IT IS GENUINE, IF POLICE HAD NOT TAKEN MEASURES TO PREVENT POSSIBILITY IT WAS PLANTED, DNA EVIDENCE HAS TO BE DISMISSED BY A FAIR COURT.
If police bungled case Anwar has to be acquitted:
Even if Anwar did it, if police bungled the case, the court has a duty to acquit Anwar.
Why is that so?
Because the court can never know whether Anwar did or did not do it.
God does not need a trial to know whether Anwar did or did not do it. And without thus knowing like God, if police bungled the case, since a lot is at stake for Anwar, he should be given the benefit of the doubt and acquitted especially when it is a case where only Saiful’s modesty and anus was harmed and it may even have been consensual.
Case is about fairly convicting or acquitting Anwar:
Fairness is not an option but mandatory because what is at stake is a man’s liberty, reputation and career.
Because it is impossible for the court to know whether Anwar did or did not do it, only Anwar, Saiful, God and witnesses if there was an act can know, it has a duty based on evidence presented that have to be scrutinized for reliability or potential fraud to decide if on balance Anwar is likely to be guilty or not.
Thus even if Anwar is guilty if the court cannot establish his guilt because eg of police bungling, suspect evidence, unreliable witness (contradicting) it must acquit Anwar.
THUS BECAUSE FAIRNESS IS CLEARLY OBJECTIVELY ABSENT IN SERIOUS FASHION IN PROCEEDINGS SO FAR, THE TRIAL HAS CONDEMNED ITSELF TO BE FRAUDULENT.
Meaningless insane one minute silence:
Not only is what he is doing meaningless, it is deadly, leads to insanity and even an eternity of suffering and so anyone who is moved, thinks what is done is full of meaning is deluded, has false understanding.
No useful work is being done standing there, it is never reason but stirred emotion that moves a person to do so and so it is motivated by blind harmful force not reason.
IT IS CONDITIONED MUTUAL SHARED DELUSION AND STIRRED MENTAL FORCE GIVING RISE TO SADNESS AND HURT THAT GIVES SUCH RITUALISTIC SILENT STILLNESS MEANING THAT IS FALSE, DOES NOT WORK, ACHIEVES NOTHING. IF YOU FIND IT MEANIGFUL, TRUE AND WORKS YOU ARE DELUDED, HEADED FOR TORMENT.
Singapore too will squander its citizens’ wealth:
Even years ago I said that like Malaysia but in a different way Singapore too will squander its citizens’ wealth.
Singapore manically saves its citizens’ wealth but driven by greed it invests in overseas assets that are actually overpriced and with collapses overseas, its savings may be wiped out.
Insomnia for state investors
Insight Down South
By Seah Chiang Nee
Singapore’s ambitious overseas investments have been hit by a series of crises – from the 9/11 attacks in 2001 to the 2007 global financial crisis and recession and now the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and Middle East upheavals.
AS Singaporeans’ concern mount over the safety of millions of Japanese, a small group of state investors are probably burning the midnight oil in Singapore.
These people, who manage the two sovereign state funds with assets and investments worth in excess of US$200bil (RM610bil), are likely to be poring over possible future options.
They are not only keeping watch on the nuclear drama unfolding in Japan, but also on the spreading violent upheavals in the Middle East, where the republic has high stakes.
Recently, Foreign Minister George Yeo told Parliament that Singapore had to “adjust to changes” taking place there.
In 1999, the government began a strategy of investing heavily in overseas markets to get a higher return for the state funds.
Calling it “a second external pair of wings,” the city pushed massive investments abroad.
It was a good concept that was soon adopted by other countries.
The two sovereign funds are Temasek Holdings, which operates a portfolio of US$142bil (RM432,72bil), and GIC, or Government Investment Corp, which manages foreign reserves of well over US$100bil (RM305bil).
With the local market too small for such a huge amount of funds, and competition rising from countries like China and India, the leaders turned to the outside world to find new income sources.
Besides, the world was in good shape, and emerging Asia was offering terrific new growth opportunities.
However, the foreign foray has been pushed back now and then by bad luck and a few bad investment decisions.
In the past decade, these investment wings have flapped from one air pocket to another.
The latest – a devastated Japan – is probably the worst.
Its nuclear crisis is spewing serious fallouts towards Singapore’s recovering economy.
It had been one crisis after another for Singapore, from the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America in 2001 to the 2007 global financial crisis and recession and now the Middle East upheavals.
All these have wreaked various degrees of damage on Singapore’s ambitious overseas investments.
People are hoping Saudi Arabia – the most important country in the Middle East – remains safe.
During the financial crisis, Temasek Holdings reported that its assets had plunged by S$55bil (RM168bil). Only in July last year had it recovered 40% of that.
Even discounting a nuclear nightmare, Japan – which is the world’s third biggest economy and one of Singapore’s top trading partners – faces years of economic struggle.
It will have to divert hundreds of billions of dollars to rebuilding shattered infrastructure by using its reserves, selling bonds or by reducing overseas spending.
“Knowing their nationalistic fervour, it will not be a surprise if Japanese corporations worldwide start soon to divert funds back home,” said a stock researcher.
The Japanese will likely buy or invest less in Singapore and the number of tourists will likely drop.
Japan ranks as one of the five economic pillars that sustain Singa-pore’s prosperity, next to the United States, Europe, China and South-East Asia.
According to statistics, it is the republic’s sixth largest trading partner in 2009 with total trade amounting to S$44bil (RM105bil), and the third largest investor with S$51bil (RM122bil).
All these crises serve a lesson for Singapore.
The sanguine environment which existed before, favouring smooth foreign profits, may no longer be around.
Recent history has shown that it now calls for more than just business acumen and investment timing.
There must also be the ability to analyse international affairs.
From 1999, Singapore’s billions of state funds began travelling around the world.
It went into buying local companies, which makes the government the biggest single shareholder of a long list of major companies.
After the turn of the century, the foreign investments grew in number and size.
The buzzword then was “global strategic investments”.
This often involved banks, telcos, airlines and companies that were considered crown jewels by the host countries.
Singapore wanted them for long-term global tie-ups.
“Big-time investment calls for big bucks and bullet-biting because it can be very risky,” an experienced market researcher said.
“Even the most experienced would need luck.
“People pray that after putting their money in, there will be no sudden political upheaval or natural calamity that could blow away their investments.”
Other worries include terrorist attacks, currency changes, market turmoil, unpredictable policy changes – any one of which can overturn a billion-dollar investment.
The Singapore Government’s large-scale investments – and recent losses abroad – have run into public criticism on two grounds.
Firstly, many Singaporeans believe that the investment money comes from indirect taxes and a high imposition of fees “squeezed” from the citizenry. All these seem to be rising.
Secondly, a persistent economic gap between rich and poor that seems to be widening, and fast becoming a source of public unhappiness.
It is popularly felt that a portion of the billions should be used to provide a safety net for the poor, the aged and the unemployed.
With so many needy people around, it makes no sense losing billions, by investing in a risky world, that could be put to better use helping the poorer class.
Another popular viewpoint is that the sovereign wealth funds may not have the best people to handle so big a task.
Their performance has so far not been brilliant.
Morgan Stanley said in a report that their investment decisions were poor.
“The sheer domination of the government in the external economy means that responsibility for the poor returns must lie with the government to a large degree,” it added.
Anwar charged without prior DNA confirmation:
There are two possible reasons why police secretly stole Anwar’s DNA (on toothbrush) whilst he was locked up, either they want to use it to frame Anwar or they need a profile (presumably but not necessarily belonging to Anwar) to match with DNA obtained from Saiful.
It appears that the crux of Anwar’s conviction will be based on DNA.
If this is the case it indicates that police unrighteously arrested (subjecting him to abuse commando style treatment and inhumane treatment in a lockup) without first having confirmed DNA from Saiful matched Anwar’s.
WHY ASK ANWAR FOR DNA AND SECRETLY TAKE HIS DNA FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH IF POLICE DID NOT HAVE ANWAR’S DNA?
WITHOUT FIRST CONFIRMING DNA EXTRACTED FROM SAIFUL BELONGED TO ANWAR, POLICE IS HIGH HANDED TO ARREST AND CHARGE ANWAR BASED ON WHAT IS HEARSAY FROM SAIFUL THAT MAY NOT BE TRUSTWORTHY OR IS THIS ALL A FRAME UP?
It does not make sense to ask Anwar for DNA now. It means they extracted DNA from Saiful that they are pretty sure (without testing) is Anwar’s and based on that they have come to this advanced state of prosecution and now retrospectively they want confirmation by getting Anwar to give a sample to match.
IF THE BASIS OF POLICE’S CASE IS DNA EVIDENCE, POLICE SHOULD NOT HAVE PROSECUTED THIS CASE WITHOUT FIRST HAVING CONFIRMED A DNA MATCH. IF THEY HAVE CONFIRMED A DNA MATCH, WHY ASK ANWAR FOR DNA NOW AND WHY STEAL DNA FROM ANWAR’S TOOTHBRUSH?
They want to convict without proof:
In order to accept Anwar’s conviction as valid you have to trust that police is beyond reproach, can be trusted not to have tampered or planted DNA to incriminate.
Because the handling and testing of specimen were not done properly with Anwar’s representatives present and independent observers supervising, to convict Anwar based on DNA in such a case is tantamount to convicting Anwar without objective incontrovertible proof even when it may be a consensual homosexual act and there are serious losses at stake for Anwar.
UNAUTHENTICATED DNA IS NOT OBJECTIVE PROOF AND SO IF ANWAR IS CONVICTED BASED ON DNA IT IS AN INJUSTICE AND SO THERE IS A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE.
DNA is your basis and you have not confirmed it?
The absurdity is lost on people without genuine understanding.
The prosecution is going to convict Anwar based on DNA and yet at this advanced stage of the trial after much expenditure of time, effort and money it declares it has not confirmed DNA detected in Saiful belonged to Anwar, it needs a sample from Anwar to confirm.
IF YOU NEED A SAMPLE NOW FROM ANWAR IT MEANS YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS TO COME THIS FAR IN PROSECUTING ANWAR, YOU SHOULD HAVE COMPLETED YOUR INVESTIGATIONS, CONFIRMED THE DNA BELONGED TO ANWAR BEFORE COMING THIS FAR THAT SUBJECT TO NEGATIVE PUBLICITY, SUFFERING AND POTENTIAL FUTURE DAMAGES.
IT GOES TO SHOW THIS IS AN ABSURD WORLD WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING.
It just does not add up:
Before they stole Anwar’s DNA from his toothbrush, how did police know the DNA extracted from Saiful will match Anwar’s?
If police say they know because they know Saiful had sex with Anwar, how do they know Saiful is telling the truth? Najib said he was at first sceptical about Saiful’s story so how can police be so certain Saiful is not fabricating? So either it is all a lie (police are in cohort) or police incredibly (truly cannot be believed) trusts Saiful so much to the extent that they have no fears they will make a fool of themselves in arresting Anwar dramatically commando style and subject him to abusive detention and steal his DNA and charge Anwar before they have obtained confirmation by matching a verified Anwar sample with samples found on Saiful.
IT IS VERY DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO FABRICATE WHAT DID NOT HAPPEN THAT CANNOT BE DEBUNKED BY THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING, WHO UNDERSTAND TRULY WHAT IS PROPOSED AND WHAT IS POSSIBLE.
AND SO YOU DO NOT NEED TO HEAR IT FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH, THE GLARING DISCREPANCIES RENDER SAIFUL’S ALLEGATIONS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE HAPPENED.
IF POLICE ARE NOT IN COHORT WITH SAIFUL, IT MEANS THEY HAD SUPREME CONFIDENCE IN SAIFUL’S ACCOUNT THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO LAUNCH A COMMANDO ARREST OF ANWAR AND SUBJECT HIM TO ABUSIVE DETENTION WITHOUT FEAR THEY WILL HAVE MUD IN THEIR FACESM THEY WILL BE PROVEN WRONG, CENSURED AND LIABLE FOR DAMAGES. ANY SENSIBLE PERSON FEARING POTENTIAL DISASTROUS REPERCUSSIONS AND WITH RESPECT TO DAMAGE THAT MAY BE DONE TO ANWAR, MAKE SURE THAT DNA EXTRACTED FROM SAIFUL MATCHED ANWAR BEFORE THEY PROCEEDED SO FAR.
First wave of allied assault on
Libyan air defenses
U.S. and British ships and submarines have launched the first phase of a missile assault on Libyan air defenses, firing 112 Tomahawk cruise missiles at more than 20 coastal targets to clear the way for air patrols to ground Libya's air force.
The purpose for launching a pre-emptive strike to cripple Libyan air defence is to protect Nato airmen from harm and this is unrighteous and karma incurring because such strikes are at the expense of Libyans to protect Nato forces.
EVEN IF NO ONE IS KILLED, SUCH STRIKES CAUSE HARM AND THERE IS KARMA FOR THOSE INVOLVED AND IT IS SELFISH, MOTIVATED TO MAKE THE ENEMIES INSTEAD OF YOU DIE EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE NOT ATTACKED YOU.
Calling the prosecution’s bluff:
If Anwar never had sex with Saiful then it is impossible for prosecution to supply samples of a quality that irrefutably incriminates Anwar and so a deal should be made in which Anwar will supply DNA to an independent international laboratory and the prosecution will hand over its samples for matching.
By refusing to give DNA, it might give the court an excuse to presume Anwar’s guilt.
Then it can be independently, fairly verified whether DNA matching Anwar’s is present in those samples and exactly what is the nature and quality of those samples the prosecution possessed.
The prosecution may not be able to produce samples and if they can it is impossible those samples can irrefutably incriminate Anwar if they are not genuine.
IF ANWAR DID NOT SODOMISE SAIFUL IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE PROSECUTION CAN POSSESS IRREFUTABLY INCRIMINATING DNA SAMPLES (EG ANWAR’S SEMEN) AND SO IF IT WAS MADE TO PRESENT SAMPLES IT WOULD REVEAL HOW SUBSTANTIAL OR INSUBSTANTIAL THOSE SPECIMENS ARE AND AN INTERNATIONAL LAB WITH DETERMINE WHETHER THOSE DNA MATCH ANWAR’S.
Benefits of an independent lab:
By giving to an independent lab Anwar shows he has nothing to hide and it means samples he gives cannot be used to frame him and it exerts pressure on the prosecution to produce samples if it has and the quality of its samples can be known.
Even if there is a positive match it still does not exclude the DNA was planted.
Wait until you get shocked and rocked:
Sex video shocker
The release of a video recording of a man resembling an opposition party leader having sex with a foreign prostitute has shocked the nation in the latest scandal to rock the country. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, speaking at a press conference at 5.30pm – some four hours after news of the recording’s existence first got out – denied that he was the man and dismissed the whole thing as a political ploy.
It is impossible the nation is shocked and rocked but the writer can be shocked and rocked and when he gets shocked and rocked he will weep no matter how tough he is.
MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY WILL GET A TASTE OF THEIR LIES AND IT WILL BE TERRIBLE.
There is a difference between Anwar bringing up Altanturya case because there is murder involved. This is mud slinging and if many mainstream politicians have sexual affairs then it is hypocrisy to bring up such matters.
Datuk T is obviously acting as proxy and his story of how he came to get the video is implausible. If the tape was genuine the attack would be more direct rather than through proxies so that if exposed as fraud politicians are not to be blamed.
Anwar sex video another fraud:
If the sex video was genuine, whoever produced it would know it and you can be certain that BN would exploit it directly and to the hilt if they had such a video.
THUS THE FACT THAT THEY NEVER NAMED THE POLITICIAN BUT IMPLIED AND IT IS HANDLED THROUGH PROXIES INDICATES IT IS ANOTHER SCURRILOUS ATTEMPT TO SMEAR. THE EXPLANATION HOW DATUK T GOT THE TAPES TOO IS IMPLAUSIBLE.
THE PERSON WHO IS DISCERNING CAN TELL THIS IS A FRAUD INTENDED TO SMEAR. IT IS ILLEGAL AND HOTELS DO NOT TAPE SEXUAL TRYSTS AND SO WHOEVER TAPED MUST KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS AND IF IT WAS ANWAR, THE WHOLE ROOM WILL BE RINGED WITH CAMERAS AND THEY MIGHT INTERRUPT THE ACT WITH FLASH SHOTS.
ADD ALL IN AND THE SODOMY TRIAL CANNOT BE GENUINE.
Why datuk T so uncertain and certain?
It is farfetched that Datuk K accidental discovered the surveillance tape looking for his watch in a room that happened to be occupied by Anwar previously.
IF DTK T ACCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED THE TAPE AS HE CLAIMED (POSSIBLE TO DISTANCE HIMSELF FROM TAPE IF FOUND OUT), HOW CAN HE BE CERTAIN IT IS ANWAR AND NOT SOMEONE WHO LOOKED LIKE ANWAR AND DEMAND ANWAR AND WIFE STEP DOWN OR HE WOULD EXPOSE THEM?
THE PERSON WHO TAPED IT MUST KNOW WHO IT WAS AND IF IT WAS ANWAR HIS ENEMIES WOULD NOT BE SO COY AS NOT TO DIRECTLY NAME HIM. DTK T CONTRADICTS HIMSELF BY CLAIMING HE STUMBLED ON THE TAPE AND YET HE IS DEAD CERTAIN IT IS ANWAR AND DEMAND HIS RETIREMENT FROM POLITICS. IF IT WAS ANWAR HE IS SO HIGH PROFILE HIS PRESENCE AT A HOTEL WOULD BE NOTICED AND HIS ENEMIES SHOULD HAVE HOTEL SECURITY CAMERA FOOTAGES TO BACK UP THEIR ALLEGATIONS.
Anwar sex video definitely a fraud:
A person with true understanding can arrive at the conclusion it is a fraud even on the scant evidence on show.
Whoever made the tape must know who was being captured in the tape. Datuk T denied he was the source, he happened to find it and yet he is dead sure it is Anwar.
IF IT IS TRUE THAT THE AUTHOR OF THE TAPE IS UNKNOWN, HOW CAN IT BE CERTAIN IT IS ANWAR?
THE PERSON IS WHO PRODUCED THE TAPE MUST KNOW WHO THE ACTOR IS AND IF HE KNOWS THEN ANWAR’S ENEMIES WOULD ALSO KNOW AND IF THEY KNOW IT IS DEFINITELY ANWAR, THEY WILL NOT BE SO HESITANT BUT WOULD USE TO TEAR ANWAR TO SHREDS SINCE THEY HAVE GENUINE EVIDENCE. SINCE WHEN HAS THE BN COALITION BEEN DEFERENTIAL AND HESITANT TO TEAR THEIR OPPONENTS TO SHREDS WHEN THEY HAVE GENUINE EVIDENCE?
THE AFFAIR ONLY SHOWS THE POOR TASTE AND INCOMPETENCE OF THOSE INVOLVED AND THE NATION IS IN DANGEROUS RECKLESS INEPT HANDS.
Why so considerate to Anwar?
If they knew that the person in the videotape was Anwar, why would they be so coy, deferential and generous to Anwar in not pointing the finger directly at him when the tape is genuine proof of Anwar’s guilt and they have the courts and law enforcement agency on their sides to cover any libel eventualities?
It is only because they know the tape is a fraud, to cover themselves against fallout that they have to use a proxy and the proxy would have to feign innocent accidental discovery and yet expose himself as vested in demanding Anwar’s resignation.
IF ANWAR IS GUILTY OF SEXUAL DEBAUCHERY, HE WOULD BE A LIABILITY FOR THE OPPOSITION AND DATUK K SHOULD RECOMMEND ANWAR STAY ON RATHER THAN LEAVE. IT IS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO DESTROY ANWAR THAT HE IS EXPOSING HIS MOTIVE BY ASKING ANWAR TO LEAVE.
IF HE IS NOT ALIGNED TO THE OPPOSITION WHY SHOULD HE CARE TO DEMAND ANWAR’S DEPARTURE?
Anwar can be charged with fellatio:
If it is true Anwar was having oral sex performed on him there may be a case for jailing him for unnatural sex and so the full weight of the law would be on him rather than the police saying they will not be involved unless a police report is made.
FELLATIO IS ILLEGAL IN MALAYSIA AND SO IF THE TAPE IS GENUINE POLICE IS SHOWING DERELICTION IN THE PROSECUTION OF SEXUAL DEVIANT ANWAR IN FEINING DISINTEREST UNLESS REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE.
Name the hotel and find the girl:
If the tape is genuine a good way of more negative publicity for Anwar is to publicly name the hotel and it should not be difficult knowing the hotel to then find the girl and pay her to implicate Anwar and then Anwar would be truly ‘finished’.
Should this be not forthcoming then it shows the depths of deceit that this country is willing to descend to.
Datuk T so sure tape authentic proves it is faked:
WHOEVER MADE THE TAPE IF GENUINE MUST KNOW IT IS VALUABLE EVEN ‘PRICELESS’ AS TO NOT CARELESSLY LEAVE IT IN A HOTEL ROOM FOR DATUK T TO DISCOVER. SO IT IS A FARFETCHED IF NOT IMPLAUSIBLE TALE THAT DATUK T ACCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED IT AND IF HE DISCOVERED IT, HOW CAN HE BE SO SURE IT IS AUTHENTIC SUCH THAT HE IS WILLING TO LAUNCH SUCH A HIGH PROFILE ATTACK AND CALL FOR ANWAR’S RESIGNATION WITHOUT FEAR OF CONSEQUENCES? THE REASON HE IS SO COCK SURE IS BECAUSE IT IS A FAKE AND HE MUST BE COCK SURE TO CONVINCE THE GULLIBLE PUBLIC.
If you accidentally discovered the tape in a hotel room, would you be so sure about its authenticity that you launch such a high profile exhibition of the tape in parliament and a top hotel and demand Anwar’s resignation?
The only reason Datuk T is so confident the tape is genuine is because it is a fake intended to discredit Anwar and he has to act confident as if he is definitely sure it is genuine in order to sell it to a gullible public.
THE FACT THAT THIS EPISODE HAS BEEN MADE IN SUCH A HOO HAH WITH PRESS SWARMING OVER THE PLACE AND POLITICIANS DRAWN IN REFLECTS PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING. IF IT IS TRUE AS DATUK T ALLEGED THAT HE ACCIDENTALLY DISCOVERED THE TAPE IN A HOTEL ROOM (HE MUST BE A VERY LUCKY MAN AND THE TAPE IF GENUINE MUST BE VERY VALUABLE TO THE PRODUCER FOR HIM TO CARELESSLY LEAVE IN A HOTEL ROOM) HE CANNOT BE SO SURE AS TO LAUNCH SUCH A PUBLICIZED ATTACK ON ANWAR WITHOUT FEAR OF EMBARRASSMENT AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE THIS THING IS CONCOCTED TO SMEAR ANWAR THAT HE MUST ACT ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENT TO SELL THE FAKE TO THE PUBLIC.
Confidence is sign of fakery not genuineness:
Confidence is always false, an act, a way of doing or saying something that is false, for show and so whatever that has confidence accompanying is always false never genuine and the confidence is to convince gullible people with false perception that what is false is true.
ACCOMPANYING CONFIDENCE IN WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IS ACTUALLY TO CONVINCE GULLIBLE PEOPLE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE. MANY HAVE LEARNT HOW ACT OR FAKE CONFIDENTLY IN ORDER TO SELL THE CON TO OTHERS.
IT REFLECTS PEOPLE’S FALSE PERCEPTION THAT EXPOSES THEM TO DECEPTION THAT THEY PERCEIVE THAT SOMETHING IS GENUINE IF IT IS ACCOMPANIED BY CONFIDENCE. ON THE CONTRARY, IF SOMETHING IS ACCOMPANIED BY CONFIDENCE OR VERVE, ONE SHOULD BE WARY IT IS A CONMAN’S JOB.
IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TRUE YOU DON’T NEED TO BE CONFIDENT. IT IS ONLY IF WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE THAT YOU NEED TO ACT CONFIDENT.
What is confidence?
Confidence is what and how you say or do something THAT IS FALSE that has the intention of FALSELY UNRIGHTEOUSLY convincing others of your genuineness or expertise so that they may trust you.
Thus people speak confidently by adding extra force in what they say and this extra force is in the smooth or slick force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that comes from memorizing and repeated rehashing.
The substance comes from saying things you have no right to say to act as if you are pretty sure of yourself. Thus Datuk T should not be certain the tape is genuine because he discovered it in a hotel room and yet he is so certain it is Anwar and demands his resignation. If he taped Anwar himself he can be certain but since the source of the tape is unknown, how can he be so sure?
ANYONE WHO ACTS AND SPEAKS WITH CONFIDENCE AND VERVE IS SINNING AND HEADED FOR SUFFERING EVEN TORMENT AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN. CONFIDENCE IS WHAT AND HOW YOU SAY SOMETHING THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE, FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS SO THAT THEY MAY TRUST AND DELIVER THEMSELVES TO YOU AND THAT IS EVIL AND EVIL HAS A PRICE IN SUFFERING.
Confidence is controlled insanity:
Confidence is faking it and the person has no right or truth or reality to act as if he is so confident and so that is controlled insanity for the sake of unrighteous gains that is the path to certain insanity and so the confident man, the confidence trickster is headed for insanity.
WHETHER A PERSON IS ACTING CONFIDENT OR NOT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED AND CLEARLY EVIDENT TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING AND WHOEVER YOU ARE, CONFIDENCE ENDS IN INSANITY BECAUSE YOU ARE ACTING AS IF TRUE WHAT IS NOT TRUE.
Have your say:
This is a headline on BBC site and on who understands truly understands it as false, promoting evil with grave karma for the person.
Whatever happening can be clearly defined as such and such and once defined that is nothing apart from that to be said.
HAVE YOUR SAY IS SOLICITING OPINIONS THAT DIFFER AND THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE. EVERYTHING HAS A RIGHT VIEW AND THERE IS NOTHING TO SAY APART FROM THAT RIGHT VIEW AND SO ASKING PEOPLE TO HAVE THEIR SAY IS TO PROMOTE DIFFERENCE THAT IS FALSE. FURTHER IT ENCOURAGES SELF IDENTITY VIEWS TO BECOME ATTACHED TO YOUR DIFFERENT FALSE VIEWS. SELF IDENTITY VIEW IS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE AND SO IT IS NOT MERITORIOUS BUT DEADLY SIN TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO HAVE THEIR SAY.
Judge shifts the goalposts:
In reversing his earlier decision to reject illegally obtained DNA from Anwar, the judge is shifting the goalposts ostensibly to get a conviction in the face of Anwar’s recalcitrance in refusing to give a DNA sample.
Thus the court does not have to satisfy anyone or Anwar that justice has been done but you have to take it on faith that there is no hanky panky and the DNA evidence is genuine not planted.
It appears that DNA will be crucial if not the only basis of convicting Anwar with no corroborating witness even tendered.
BECAUSE DNA CAN BE PLANTED AND THE PROCEDURE IN EXAMING SAIFUL WAS NOT DONE PROFESSIONALLY TO SHOW THAT EVERYTHING WAS DONE FAIRLY, YOU WILL HAVE TO TAKE IT ON FAITH THAT WHAT THE PROSECUTION SAY IS TRUE AND THEREFORE ANWAR IS GUILTY. THIS IS THE STATE OF THE ART (NOT SCIENCE) JUSTICE.
Malaysia’s state of the art judiciary:
It is not a compliment to say something is state of the art because art is about falsity, subjectivity, style and so it is no sarcasm to say Malaysia’s judiciary is state of the art, not science.
It appears that in this case as in Sodomy I, conviction is based on the uncorroborated accusation of one man, first Azizan now Saiful whose words are like gold to the court, even when Azizan said in court three times Anwar did not sodomize him.
And now again conviction will be clinched by DNA evidence and the public and Anwar will have to take it on faith that no shenanigans were involved in arriving at such DNA based conclusion.
IT IS NOT A COMPLIMENT TO SAY SOMETHING IS STATE OF THE ART BECAUSE ART IS ABOUT STYLE, FALSITY AND SO PEOPLE HAVE A WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT STATE OF THE ART MEANS ‘WOW’.
Why are they overkilling Anwar?
Anwar looks like being convicted of sodomy so why all this trouble of further mudslinging?
The reason is they are going for overkill, to finish Anwar for good by heaping so much shit on him that hopefully he will be thoroughly discredited amongst voters.
THE CURRENT SEX TAPE IMBROGLIO IS EVIDENCE THE SODOMY TRIAL IS DESIGNED TO PUT ANWAR AWAY. BY FURTHER CASTING INNUENDOS ON ANWAR’S INTEGRITY THEY HOPE TO TOTALLY DISCREDIT ANWAR IN THE EYES OF VOTERS WITH VIEW OF COMING ELECTIONS.
Sex videotape proves there is a plot:
Without political or ruling elite backup those involved in the current sex videotape accusation against Anwar would not be so brazen or daring without fear of repercussions.
If it is true that Anwar has committed a crime sodomizing Saiful and there is no vendetta against him or conspiracy to eliminate him then it suffices to convict him and extract punishment in imprisonment.
If on the other it is not true Anwar sodomized Saiful, then in order to thoroughly discredit Anwar in the eyes of voters, it is desirable to smear his reputation even further by concocting this scandal.
Why Datuk T & high profile politician?
No person of honor or true reputation would conceal his identity preferring to be referred to as Dtk T nor make indirect allegations against Anwar.
IF YOU KNOW YOUR TAPE IS GENUINE AND YOU ARE REFERRING TO ANWAR, THERE IS KARMA TO BE REPAID IN SUFFERING FOR CASTING ASPERSIONS WITHOUT NAMING WHO YOUR TARGET IS. FURTHER NO MAN OF INTEGRITY NEEDS TO HIDE HIS IDENTITY IN THE FORM OF DATUK T AND WEAR SUNGLASSES. HERE AGAIN KARMA CONCEALING IDENTITY AND WEARING SUNGLASSES.
Why Datuk T is heading for woe:
According to what the Buddha taught, Datuk K is heading for woe even if his allegations against Anwar are true, if they are false, slanderous then even worse woe awaits him.
The reason is because what Anwar does is none of his business, if Anwar is guilty of wrong he cannot escape karma and by exposing Anwar you cause him suffering and whoever causes another suffering is himself headed for suffering. If his motive in exposing is malice then that makes it worse. Further he is attempting to divide Anwar from voters and divisive speech and actions can send a person even to hell.
WHOEVER CAUSES SUFFERING AND LOSS TO OTHERS IS HIMSELF HEADED FOR WOE, SO SAYS THE BUDDHA. IN TRUTH WHAT ANWAR DID IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS AND SO HE IS UNNECESSARY HEAPING SUFFERING FOR HIMSELF FOR MATERIAL GAIN AND TO CAUSE A SCHISM BETWEEN ANWAR AND VOTERS AND THAT TOO IS A SOURCE OF SUFFERING IN THE FUTURE.
People here are guilty of deadly sin ignored at their own peril:
All beings here are guilty of serious deadly sin that they ignore at their own even eternal peril.
What deadly serious sin are they guilty of?
They are guilty of plying or subjecting others to constant force prolonging, changing speed and strength that not only causes insoluble stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate but maintains others in a trap of automatic force prolonging, changing speed and strength of force (loudness).
THE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS EVERPRESENT IN THE SPEECH AND ACTIONS OF PEOPLE HERE NOT ONLY CAUSES SUFFERING BUT MAINTAINS OTHERS WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH THEM IN SIMILAR TORMENTING PRISONS OF CONSTANT MAD FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND SO ALL BEINGS ARE GUILTY OF MAINTAINING EACH OTHER IN A WORLD OF TORMENT. FURTHER SUCH AN EXISTENCE WITH CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE THAT IS ITSELF TORMENTING. IT IS NEVER A PLEASURE BUT TORMENTING TO BE A REHASHING ROBOT.
WHATEVER GOOD THEY MAY DO (EG GIVE MONEY OR FOOD OR HELP OTHERS) IS DWARFED BY THIS CONSTANT SINFUL, EVIL PLYING OF OTHERS WITH DEADLY FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
GOOD DEEDS ARE MINOR MERITS THAT HAVE REWARDS BUT IT DOES NOT COMPARE WITH SHEDDING ONE’S CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT PERSECUTES OTHERS AND MAINTAIN THEM IN A SIMILAR TORMENTING ROBOTIC CONSTANT FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS PRISON.
IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF TORMENTING OTHERS YOU ARE HEADED FOR ETERNAL PUNISHMENT BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETON OVER AN ETERNITY OR AGE THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN.
You exert pressure on others to activate force:
Whenever a person changes speed or loudness they exert pressure that is hard to resist on the listener to similarly change speed and loudness and if everywhere the person turns to he is bombarded by people speaking to him with constant force changing speed and loudness, he is soon inducted into the totally unnecessary and mad for show force changing speed and loudness and being conditioning, he becomes conditioned or programmed to automatically change speed and loudness.
JUST LIKE A RAPIST IMPOSING HIMSELF ON A GIRL, ANYONE WITH STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS GUILTY OF IMPOSING HIMSELF ON HIS LISTENER INDUCTING THEM INTO A REALM OF SIMILAR CONSTANT AUTOMATIC, USELESS, MAD FOR SHOW PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS ADDICTIVE SO THAT HE IS TRAPPED, DOOMED TO SUFFERING, DEATH AND EVEN ETERNAL TORMENT AND SO ANYONE WITH STYLE IS GUILTY OF TERRIBLE SIN.
You have no right to have style:
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO HAVE STYLE JUST AS YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO OWN LET ALONE FIRE A GUN BECAUSE IT IS EVIL AND HARMFUL. IF YOU THINK IT IS YOUR RIGHT THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF SIN THEN GOD WHO HAS POWERS OVER YOU HAS A RIGHT TO PUNISH YOU EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.
Because you live in a community in which force you radiate impact on others causing suffering and ultimately death of others, you have no right to radiate force on others, no right to use force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness. If you do, you insist on having style then you are guilty of harming others and if it is possible to extract repayment from you then eternal punishment awaits you.
Jesus said you must be perfect, as your Father in heaven is perfect. You are deluded if you think you are perfect when you are constantly radiating totally unnecessary harmful forces on others causing mayhem in stress, restlessness and distraction in yourself and others.
AND SO THE FIRST FUNDAMENTAL STEP AND HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS THE ABOLITION OF STYLE, THE TOTAL NEGATION OF ALL USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND IT GIVES ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVENLY BLISS. THE NEXT FUNDAMENTAL STEP IS THE FULLY CONSCIOUS CESSATION OF ALL THINKING THAT GIVES TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA. IF YOU CAN STOP STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY TO LIKE, REPULSIVELY TO DISLIKE (HATE OR BE ANGRY) THAT IS THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY IF YOU STOP EXPERIENCING FORCE TO ACHIEVE THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND OF NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE THAT IS 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS WITHOUT DEATH, DISEASE, AGING, SUFFERING.
No comments:
Post a Comment