There is only one version of the truth and anyone who says many versions
is deluded, has wrong understanding.
Truth is whatever happened and whatever happened can only happen in one
way. You can speak the truth in Chinese, Indian or Malay or you can use
different words that have the same meaning to transmit the truth but there
remains only version of the truth as it actually happened.
The Buddha said from an inconstruable moment comes transmigration and
beings shrouded in ignorance and fettered by desires are wandering on. He also
spoke of eons of cosmic expansion and eons of cosmic contraction.
If what he states is the truth that whatever words you choose to say it,
whatever language you choose to say it in must convey the same message or
meaning.
THINGS CAN ONLY HAPPEN IN ONE WAY NOT MANY WAYS AND SO WHATEVER WORDS OR
LANGUAGE YOU CHOOSE TO DESCRIBE IT, IT MUST ESSENTIALLY CONVEY THE SAME MESSAGE.
IF BT MANY VERSIONS, YOU MEAN IT IS UP TO A PERSON TO INTERPRETE WHAT
HAS HAPPENED, YOU MAY SAY IT IS BLACK BUT HE MAY ALSO SAY IT IS BLACK THEN YOU
ARE DELUDED AND COURTING INSANITY.
You
are mad to talk of the many versions of truth:
If the many versions of truth you speak of essentially mean the same,
convey the same message you are mad to dwell on and highlight the many versions
of the truth.
If the many versions of truth you speak of differ from each other in
substance and therefore contradict or are at variance to each other then the
person with true understanding knows this is impossible, either one or all of
the versions are false, it is impossible for more than one version of many
versions to also represent the truth.
IF THE MANY VERSIONS OF THE TRUTH YOU SPEAK ABOUT MEAN THE SAME, SAY THE
SAME THING THEN YOU ARE MAD OR SILLY TO DWELL ON THE MANY VERSIONS OF THE
TRUTH.
IF THE MANY VERSIONS OF THE TRUTH YOU SPEAK OF DIFFER IN SUBSTANCE THEN
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ALL OR A FEW OF THEM TO BE TRUE. ONLY ONE OR ALL THE
DIFFERENT VERSIONS ARE FALSE.
Money
printing delays reckoning that will be worse:
Governments all over the world have no choice but to print money because
the debt in the system far exceeds many times the wealth in the system which
has also become preponderantly in the hands of the wealthy few individuals and
multinationals that are refusing to lend to the system for fear of loss.
Without the massive continuing money printing the system would have
collapsed cataclysmically but what printing does is essentially cheating,
substituting payment by printing for those who have defaulted, unable to meet
their commitments.
But what this achieves is never a cure for the sickness but it delays
the inevitable whilst at the same time allowing it to fester and get worse
until the printing becomes ineffective at which time the collapse may be even
worse.
MONEY PRINTING WHICH IS WHAT IS GOING ON MASSIVELY IN THE WORLD IS NEVER
THE TRUE SOLUTION BUT IT CONTINUES THE CHARADE AS IF DEFAULTERS HAD NOT
DEFAULTED AND THE BANKS ARE SOLVENT WHEN THEY ARE INSOLVENT. NOTHING MEANINGFUL
HAS BEEN DONE TO RECTIFY BUT INSTEAD MANKIND HAS ASSUMED THE JOURNEY TO THE
FINANCIAL CLIFF DOWN WHICH IT WILL PLUNGE IN DUE COURSE.
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT? MANKIND HAS NEVER LIVED HONESTLY WITHIN HIS MEANS
THROUGHOUT. YOU EXPECT MANKIND TO COME CLEAN AND SWEAR HIMSELF OFF CHEATING?
WHEN IN TROUBLE, CHEAT EVEN MORE, PRINT EVEN MORE.
Truth
has no versions:
Truth has no versions let alone many versions as touted by RPK.
Truth is such and merely requires stating not versions which are personal
interpretations that reflect falsity and self identity views.
Truth is whatever happened and so it is such and such, not subject to
versions or interpretations which are all false.
RPK UNDERSTANDS BUT IT IS FALSE AND THE ONLY WAY HE CAN CONSISTENTLY
UNDERSTAND FALSELY THAT TRUTH HAS MANY VERSIONS IS IF HIS UNDERSTANDING IS
RECORDED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDING.
ONLY TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS CONSISTENT OR ALWAYS THE SAME WITHOUT BEING
REHASHED, WHATEVER FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS ALWAYS THE SAME MUST BE RECORDED
AND REPRODUCED FROM RECORDING AND SO RPK IS A ROBOT WHO IS REHASHING WHATEVER
AND HOWEVER HE PERCEIVES (SEES), THINKS, UNDERSTANDS, SPEAKS AND DOES.
In an
unexpected move, Thailand's central bank cuts interest rates in a bid to boost
domestic demand amid fears of a slowdown in its exports.
It is an absolutely wrong move to cut rates in response to economic
slowdown because you are trying to stimulate borrowing or debt to boost the
economy.
IT IS ALWAYS DANGEROUS AND FINALLY FATAL TO SUPPORT OR BOOST A FLAGGING
ECONOMY WITH RATE CUTS BECAUSE YOU ARE ENCOURAGING DEBT THAT MUST BE REPAID
LATER (IF EVER) AND THIS WILL LEAD TO FUTURE RECESSION WHEN REPAYMENT IS DUE
AND RECOVERY BOOSTED BY DEBT IS TOTALLY WRONG HEADED. NOT ONLY THAT BUT THE
BORROWING IS LIKELY SPENT ON CONSUMPTION (EG BUYING CARS, APPLIANCES AND
HOUSES) THAT WILL NOT EARN MONEY TO REPAY BORROWING.
AND SO IT IS THAT EVEN SIMPLE MATTERS, EVEN IN MATTERS DEAR TO THE
HEARTS OF CALCULATING ACQUISITIVE (GREEDY) HUMANS THEY FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THAT
CUTTING RATES TO STAVE OFF DOWNTURNS IS AN ABSOLUTE NO NO, IT POSTPONES THE
INEVITABLE COLLAPSE THAT WILL WORSE THE LONGER IT IS DELAYED.
I’m
of the opinion:
Quote: I’m of the
opinion that Formula 1 is the most underwhelming, overrated, self-aggrandising
trade fair in the world.
No man of true understanding will lapse into opinions, will speak of
opinions because all opinions are false and lapsing into difficulties,
suffering insanity.
If you know something is true, say so, don’t vent opinions which are
never good or harmless but have deadly consequences in terms of future
suffering.
IF WHAT A PERSON SAYS IS THE TRUTH IT IS NOT AN OPINION. IF IT IS AN
OPINION IT IS NOT THE TRUTH EXCEPT IN DELUSION. NO OPINIONS ARE ALLOWED UNLESS
YOU WANT EVEN ETERNAL SUFFERING.
A former
executive from Goldman Sachs fails to deliver much in his book, writes James B.
Stewart.
But stripped of its incendiary conclusions, Mr. Smith’s manifesto was
curiously short on facts.
Rather than a statement of the truth, the reviewer’s (ulterior)
intention is to falsely dismiss the allegations of the book, to side with
Goldman Sach’s.
If the accusations are incendiary, just because it is short of facts
does make his book fall short which is an unwarranted conclusion with the
effect of dismissing or casting doubt on the (serious) allegations made.
EXACTLY WHAT THE AUTHOR’S MOTIVE IS IN DISMISSING THE BOOK AS FALLING
SHORT (EG TO SIDE WITH GOLDMAN SACHS) CAN BE KNOWN EVEN IF HE BELIEVES HE IS
IMPARTIAL. A BOOK DOES NOT FALL SHORT NOR SHOULD IT BE TREATED WITH SCEPTICISM
JUST BECAUSE IT LACKS EVIDENCE.
YOU MERELY STATE HIS ALLEGATIONS AND SAY THERE IS NO SUPPORTING
EVIDENCE, THERE IS NO NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL AND DISMISS IT AS FALLING SHORT
WHICH IS NOT A VALID LOGICAL CONCLUSION NOT WITHOUT PURPOSE BUT TO SIDE WITH
GOLDMAN SACHS. IF YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE AN INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST YOU SHOULFD
HAVE NO AFFILIATION OR SENTIMENT.
It
is the evidence not book that falls short:
If it is true the book is short of evidence (but full of allegations)
then it is the EVIDENCE that falls short not the BOOK that falls short and so
either the journalist is guilty of bizarre logic (that ends in mad logic) or he
is DELIBERATELY false in logic in order to defend Goldman Sachs.
IF THE BOOK LACKS DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE THEN IT IS THE EVIDENCE THAT HAS
FALLEN SHORT AND YOU HAVE MAD LOGIC OR ARE PARTISAN TO SAY THE BOOK FALLS
SHORT.
Guilty
of other and self-deception:
If it is the evidence backing the allegations that are short, not the
book that has fallen short then you are guilty of deceiving the gullible public
(and dangerously yourself) in stating that the book has fallen short when it is
the evidence that has fallen short.
JUST BECAUSE EVIDENCE IS LACKING DOES NOT MEAN THE BOOK HAS FALLEN SHORT
BECAUSE THE ACCUSATIONS AS HE DESCRIBED IS ‘INCENDIARY’ AND THAT CANNOT BE
SHORT. IT IS MUDDLED THINKING THAT ENDS IN AN UNCONTROLLABLY CONFUSED MIND TO
SAY THE BOOK HAS FALLEN SHORT WHEN IT IS THE EVIDENCE THAT HAS FALLEN SHORT AND
IT REFLECTS PEOPLE HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY ARE RECEPTIVE TO SUCH
UNWARRANTED CONCLUSIONS.
BRONWYN
PIKE I am yet
to hear a cogent critique of the deep cultural practices and economic
structures that continually reinforce the subjugation of women in our
community.
It is impossible she is addressing a baby, no one specifically or in
general whom she is addressing is a baby and so even as she speaks about ‘truth
is’ she is guilty of falsity with the purpose of stirring emotions, to be
condescending and mischievous.
BY SAYING ‘TRUTH IS’ YOU ARE STATING YOU ARE CAPABLE OF TRUTH AND
SPEAKING OF TRUTH AT THE MOMENT AND YET YOUR ‘BABY’ THAT IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT,
HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER AT HAND, IS INTENDED TO STIR EMOTION, TO BE
MISCHIEVOUS AND CONDESCENDING AND IS FALSE BECAUSE NONE OF THOSE ADDRESSED ARE
BABIES BELIES YOUR AVOWED INTENTION TO TELL THE TRUTH.
‘TRUTH IS’ AND ‘BABY’ ARE REHASHED STYLES OF SPEECH (NOT SPECIFICALLY
INTENDED) COPIED FROM OTHERS AND SO THE PERSON IS A REHASHING ROBOT.
Windows 8
is aimed at keeping pace with rivals in mobiles and tablets
There is never a genuine need for anyone to speculate whether Windows 8
can save Microsoft and it is farfetched that Windows 8 and Microsoft is so
important.
It is idle speculation (never knowing that it is true) that is evil and
leads to suffering never goodness to speculate whether Windows 8 will save
Microsoft nor is it certain that Microsoft’s survival is at stake.
Windows 8 is no big deal, it may be a significant development of Windows
but it is mad to put so much vital importance on it and even should Microsoft
vanish, it is no big deal, someone else will take its place if there is a need
for that.
MICROSOFT IS NOT INDISPENSABLE AND SHOULD IT BECOME IRRELEVANT, SO BE IT
AND SOME OTHER ENTITY WILL SUPPLANT IT.
WINDOWS 8 MAY BE A SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT BUT IT IS NOT SUCH A BIG DEAL
THAT MICROSOFT’S SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.
IT IS TO MAKE MUCH OF IT, TO SEE THINGS THAT MAY NOT BE ACTUALLY THERE,
TO HARMFULLY STIR READERS’ IMAGINATION AND DELUSION TO POSE AND ANSWER THE
QUESTION (BY GUESSING NOT TRULY KNOWING) IN ORDER FOR YOU TO EARN A LIVING AS A
JOURNALIST.
RATHER THAN FOCUS ON TRUE OR RELEVANT ISSUES JOURNALISTS IN ORDER TO
JUSTIFY THEIR JOBS START TO DELVE INTO FANTASY, IMAGINATION AND FABRICATE
ISSUES THAT ARE MERE IDLE SPECULATION AND HAS SERIOUS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES IN
MENTAL SUFFERING AND DEBT REPAYMENT.
There
is no question of Windows vanishing:
So long as desktop remains, Windows remain relevant because it is needed
to operate desktops.
MOBILES AND TABLETS PLAY NICHE OR SPECIALIZED ROLES, AT THE MOMENT (AND
THEY MAY NEVER DO SO) THEY CANNOT REPLICATE WINDOW’S ROLE IN DESKTOPS AND SO
EVEN IF DESKTOP COMPUTING SHRINK IN ROLE, BECOME A MORE ISOLATED SPECIALIZED
ROLE, IT WILL STILL REMAIN AND WINDOWS IS STILL REQUIRED AND YOU ARE MAD
TALKING ABOUT WINDOWS 8 SAVING WINDOWS.
It
is a question of revitalizing not save Windows:
The relevant question is whether Windows 8 will revitalize Windows not
whether it will save it. Windows is not in danger of vanishing in the near
future but is in danger of diminishing role.
Still
deadly idle speculation:
Whether Windows 8 will revitalize (not save) Windows is still idle
speculation that is not healthy or harmless but is suffering now and leads to
even greater suffering later.
It may be your job as journalist to pose and answer such questions that
also stimulate readers (with karma not merit) but mental work needs to be done
posing and answering those questions and because you can never know for sure
the conclusions you arrive are correct, it must leave a stressed emotional
mental state.
IDLE SPECULATION IS NEVER FREE BECAUSE MENTAL WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE THAT
LEADS TO STRESS POSING AND ANSWERING THE QUESTION AND NO MATTER HOW ASSIDUOUS
OR SCRUPULOUS YOUR STUDY YOU CAN NEVER KNOW FOR SURE THAT WINDOWS 8 WILL OR
WILL NOT REVITALIZE WINDOWS AND SO YOU ARE ENGAGED IN A FRUITLESS, UNNECESSARY
AND MEANINGLESS ENTERPRISE TRYING TO DETERMINE THROUGH THOUGHT WHETHER WINDOWS
8 WILL SAVE OR REVITALIZE WINDOWS. WHATEVER ENTERPRISE THAT IS UNNECESSARY AND
MEANINGLESS WHEN ENGAGED CONDITIONS THAT FOOL AND ENDS IN INSANITY AND HE HAS
KARMA ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO FOLLOW SUIT.
IF YOU ARE NOT GREEDY OR VESTED, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO THINK BEFOREHAND,
JUST WAIT FOR TIME TO TELL YOU WHETHER WINDOWS 8 REVITALIZED WINDOWS.
Guessing
leads to opinions:
In order to arrive at the conclusion (opinion or view) whether Windows 8
will save Windows or not you must indulge in guessing based on the facts or
strands of information available to you.
GUESSING IS ADDICTIVE, CONDITIONING AND EACH TIME YOU GUESS YOU ARE
INDUCTING AND TRAINING YOURSELF IN SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE AND DANGEROUS THAT
BECOMES ADDICTIVE, AUTOMATIC AND IT IS DANGEROUS AND SUFFERING.
THE PRODUCT OF SUCH GUESSING ARE OPINIONS OR VIEWS THAT ARE NEVER THE
TRUTH BUT DELUSIONS, RECORDED REHASHABLE CONCLUSIONS THAT MAY LEAD TO DISASTROUS
CONSEQUENCES.
OPINIONS CUMULATIVELY CLUTTER AND CONFUSE THE MIND AND THE WISE PERSON
LEARNS TO CLOSE SHOP, SHUT DOWN THINKING RATHER THAN INDULGE IN GUESSING OR
SPECULATION AND HE DOES NOT STORE OPINIONS OR VIEWS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS, HE
STICKS TO WHAT HE SEES AND KNOWS.
Impossible
for book with incendiary allegations to fall short:
It is possible for a book with mushy, vague allegations to fall short
but it is impossible for a book the writer said contained incendiary
allegations to fall short except to expose his partisan intentions to dismiss
the book.
PEOPLE THINK THEY TALK GREAT SENSE BUT BY SAYING THE BOOK CONTAINED
INCENDIARY ALLEGATIONS YOU ARE EITHER WRONG IN SEEING THE ALLEGATIONS AS
INCENDIARY OR YOU ARE WRONG TO SAY IT FALLS SHORT. THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND WILL
UNDERSTAND FROM THE CONTRADICTION THAT THE WRITER IS VESTED NOT NEUTRAL AND
WHAT HE SAID IS PARTISAN.
Humans
are robots and worse:
If you perceive humans as not robots, they are real live fully
understanding beings, you perceive falsely, you do not perceive as it actually
is because all humans here are robots and worse.
Whereas mechanical robots can only function as they are programmed,
humans’ robotic programmed rehashed actions are driven by emotions, by stirred
force that is blind and harmful, destructive.
A mechanical robot will not act on the basis of stirred anger, hate,
dislike, lust, excitement, boredom, greed, jealousy or envy, sadness, confusion
or hurt.
The basis of human robotic actions is never true reason but stirred
mental force or emotions like anger, hate, dislike, lust, excitement, boredom,
greed, jealousy or envy, sadness, confusion or hurt and programmed rules logic.
A MECHANICAL ROBOT ONLY DOES OR SAYS AS IT IS PROGRAMMED. IT USES
PROGRAMMED FIXED RIGID RULES LOGIC TO DETERMINE ITS ACTIONS THAT ARE ACCORDING
TO PROGRAMMING.
HUMAN ROBOTS SAY AND DO DRIVEN BY STIRRED MENTAL FORCE, STIRRED EMOTION
TO LIKE (EXCITED, GREEDY, FASCINATED), DISLIKE (ANGRY, HATE), BE SAD, HURT,
CONFUSED OR FEARFUL. ON CERTAIN OCCASIONS THEY CONSULT PROGRAMMED RULES LOGIC
(JUST LIKE THEIR MECHANICAL COUNTERPARTS.
BECAUSE ROBOTIC ACTIONS BASED ON EMOTIONS ARE BLIND, FALSE AND HARMFUL,
HUMANS ARE WORSE THAN MECHANICAL ROBOTS THAT ARE UNEMOTIONAL, ONLY ACT
ACCORDING TO PROGRAMMED RULES LOGIC.
GOD CAN INSTANTLY CREATE A FERRARI MUCH BETTER THAN THE BEST FERRARI MAN
HAS CREATED AND SO IF GOD WANTED ROBOTS IN HEAVEN HE COULD CREATE FAR SUPERIOR
DOCILE LOGICAL ROBOTS THAN YOU AND SO IF YOU HAVE ANY ASPIRATIONS TO ENTER
HEAVEN YOU MUST SUCCESSFULLY EXIT BEING AN EMOTION DRIVEN ROBOT TO BE A TRUE
LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION BEING, SOMETHING JESUS ALLUDED TO WHEN HE SAY A
PERSON MUST BE BORN AGAIN IN SPIRIT TO ENTER THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN.
All right gov? Can
government do the web?
The statement is never spoken in truth but it is contradictory to
deride.
The ‘all right’ belies or contradicts the ‘can government do the web’.
He is not simply asking the question he wants to know the answer but he is
questioning, casting doubt and he is lying to say ‘all right’ when he means
‘not right’.
HE DOES NOT MEAN ‘ALL RIGHT’, HE MEANS ‘NOT RIGHT, THE GOVERNMENT CANNOT
DO THE WEB’. HE IS CASTING DOUBT AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IS ONE OF THREE LOWER
FETTERS THE BUDDHA SAID LED TO FUTURE WOE. ‘DO THE WEB’ IS IMPROPER LANGUAGE
THAT BESTOWS KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING AND SO THE WISE PERSON SPEAKS
PROPERLY EG ‘CAN GOVERNMENT RUN THE WEB’.
Singaporeans
could be kinder:
You may think what you say is good (meritorious) and meaningful but it
is hypocritical and useless then you are practicing controlled insanity that
ends in uncontrollable insanity.
Public figures feel pressure to say things that is perceived as civic
and for the good of society and so they routinely spout such statements as
Singaporeans could be kinder for want of things to say in public speech not
realizing the deadly karma not merit they are bequeathing themselves.
Kindness is not something you elect to turn up the volume or turn down
the volume unless it is for show and it is not something you tell others in
which they are merely robots doing as they are told.
If you are speaking as a wish, ‘could’ be kinder then you are deluded to
desire others to be kinder. You are not responsible nor have powers over the
behaviour of others. It is pointless and suffering wishing or desiring others
to be kinder and if they respond they are doing so not because they are truly
kinder but because they are doing as they are told by you.
PUBLIC FIGURES FIND THINGS TO SAY THAT IS ACCEPTED AS GOOD AND SO THEY
SPEAK OF THINGS THEY THINK ARE SENSIBLE AND GOOD, ‘SINGAPOREANS COULD BE
KINDER’ BUT IF YOU ARE SAYING IT TO PLEASE OTHERS THEN THAT IS HYPOCRISY THAT
HAS SUFFERING AS ITS CONSEQUENCE LATER.
YOU DO NOT TELL OTHERS HOW TO BEHAVE NOR IS IT EFFECTIVE. IF WHAT YOU
SAY WILL FALL ON DEAF EARS OR PEOPLE MERELY ROBOTICALLY OBEY IT BY TURNING DOWN
THEIR VOLUME OF HARSHNESS THEN YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING USELESS NOT USEFUL AND
TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO IN WHICH THEY ARE MERELY YOUR ROBOTS, WITH KARMA
ATTACHED.
KINDNESS IS SOMETHING ALL OR NONE, IT IS NOT SOMETHING MEANINGFUL FOR
ANYONE TO BE MORE KIND. EITHER YOU ARE TOTALLY OR FULLY KIND, WITHOUT HARMFUL
INTENTIONS ON OTHERS AND HEADED FOR ETERNAL LIFE OR YOUR KINDNESS IN DEGREE, IN
MORE KIND IS FOR SHOW, TO APPEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS.
You may think what you say ‘Singaporeans could be more kind’ is full of
goodness and meaningful and you may think what you hear ‘Singaporeans could be
more kind’ makes a lot of sense, is correct but you may be deluded, it is
meaningless and accords karma not merit.
True
kindness is unrestricted, limitless:
There is true and there is false for show kindness.
True kindness is unrestricted, not restricted by colour or race
consideration, sex considerations (kind only to sexy women not fat old men),
status considerations or just humans (kind also to animals).
If your kindness has degree, can become more or less then it is never
true kindness but fabricated for show kindness to please and impress others and
it is always suffering, enforced, programmed and reluctant leading to
suffering.
THE SINGAPOREANS COULD BE MORE KIND KINDNESS REFERRED TO IS NEVER THE
TRUE KINDNESS THAT IS UNRESTRICTED, UNLIMITED BUT IT IS THE HYPOCRITICAL FOR
SHOW MOTIVATED KINDNESS.
PHILLIP
COOREY AND JUDITH IRELAND 1:42pm The federal government has slashed spending by $4
billion to reach a forecast surplus of $1 billion this financial year.
On the surface Australia may be on a wonderful footing unlike the rest
of the world but it may be an illusion.
By slashing $4 billion in spending, many people otherwise employed by
the government will be jobless and with the private sector ‘slashing’ jobs the
unemployment will rise and negatively affect the economy.
Further revenues he expects eg tax receipts may reduce even collapse and
this may cause the expected surplus to evaporate.
This is always a recorded rehashed statement in which the person is a
rehashing robot and those who accept it as valid are without true
understanding.
Only a calculating, money conscious person or scrooge will make every
ringgit count, will subscribe to that message.
Every ringgit counts is a programmed logic that you remember and then
rehash and apply to a situation again and again. People who are not robots do
not appreciate or harbour such programs, ‘every ringgit counts’ and he makes
pertinent decisions depending on the situation and so it is meaningless for him
to state ‘every ringgit counts’.
‘EVERY RINGGIT COUNTS’ IS AN INDISCRIMINATE NON SPECIFIC GENERAL RULE TO
BE APPLIED AND SO IT IS ONLY THOSE WHO ARE ROBOTS THAT IT WILL APPEAL TO. TO
THOSE WHO ARE NOT ROBOTS IT IS MEANINGLESS, MAKES NO SENSE SO WHY SAY SO?
What
confidence is about:
Confidence only makes sense if the person is a rehashing robot.
It is because what the person says or does is by rehash subject to
failure to locate the recorded sequence, the selection of inappropriate
sequences to say or do, subject to glitches or interrupted rendition that a
person needs to be confident.
Thus the person or robot wishing to impress others will strive by
repeated practice (practice makes perfect) until he can slickly or confidently
retrieve the right thing to say or do and say or do it with such smoothness
that it appears genuine to deluded fellow rehashers.
IT IS BECAUSE WHAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO IS BY REHASH AND IT IS MORE
DIFFICULT AND VULNERABLE TO FAILURE TO LOCATE, WRONG SELECTION AND MISTAKES IN
PLAYBACK OR REPRODUCTION THAT CONFIDENCE IS IMPORTANT AND IT IS DONE BY
PRACTICING AND PRACTICING UNTIL THE DESIRED REHASHED SEQUENCE BECOMES
AUTOMATIC, SECOND NATURED.
A PERSON WHO DOES NOT REHASH, WHO FRESHLY COMPOSES FOR EACH OCCASION
DOES NOT NEED CONFIDENCE BECAUSE HE DOES NOT NEED TO SEARCH, SELECT AND ACCURATELY
RENDER WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY OR DO BY MEMORY.
THUS PEOPLE ARE UNWITTINGLY ACKNOWLEDGING AND PROVING THEMSELVES AS
ROBOTS IN APPRECIATING AND TALKING ABOUT CONFIDENCE.
Confidence
is always make belief nagged by diffidence and doubt:
Confidence is always a façade projected by people who are robots to
convince others and themselves they are wholesome and true that saps a lot of
effort and is additional suffering that is nagged by diffidence and doubt.
No matter how the rehasher might try to repress, hide and deny to
himself and others, he is sick of himself, what he says or does is mechanically
reproduced, empty, meaningless and harms himself, is pushing himself towards
insanity and pulling back at the edge.
No matter how confident, how well practiced his actions and speech,
there is innate resistance in what he says or does and this can suddenly rise
strongly to disrupt what he is rehashing so that he is left blank and loses
track of what he was about to say or do.
NO MATTER HOW CONFIDENT, GRIMLY DETERMINED A REHASHER IS, NO MATTER HOW
HE CANNOT SEE HIMSELF REHASHING, REHASHING IS DOING THINGS THE DIFFICULT WAY,
YOU MUST FIRST RECORD WELL WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY OR DO, YOU MUST SEARCH AND
RETRIEVE FROM A VAST RECORDED LIBRARY WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY OR DO, YOU MUST MAKE
SURE YOU DO NOT REHASH THE WRONG SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND YOU MUST PRACTICE WELL
TO ENSURE YOU CAN REHASH WITHOUT HESITANCY OR LOSS OF SEQUENCE AND YOU MUST
ENSURE THE ACCOMPANYING SELF RESISTANCE IS WELL OVERCOME AND NOT ALLOWED TO
DISRUPT, TO STOP AND LOSE THE SEQUENCE OF REHASH. FURTHER WHAT YOU SAY OR DO BY
MECHANICAL REHASH IS A FAKE, NEVER GENUINE, YOU ARE MERELY GOING THROUGH THE
MOTIONS TO GET WHAT YOU WANT FROM OTHERS, WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS MEANINGLESS,
FALSE, HARMS YOURSELF AS IT HARMS OTHERS AND SO YOU MUST BE SICK OF YOURSELF
AND OTHERS, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BEHAVE APART FROM WHAT IS RECORDED AND YOU
ARE BESET BY INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT
TOGETHER GNAWS AT YOUR FAÇADE OR MAKE BELIEF OF CONFIDENCE, MAKES YOU
VULNERABLE TO ATTACKS OF DIFFIDENCE, LOSS OF CONFIDENCE, SELF DOUBT AND HATE.
CONFIDENCE IS ALWAYS MAKE BELIEF, A FAÇADE NEVER GENUINE, IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO BE TRULY OR GENUINELY CONFIDENT AND EVEN THE MOST
CONFIDENT MAN MUST BE WRACKED BY DIFFIDENCE AND SELF DOUBT THAT HE TRIES TO
DROWN BY ALCOHOL AND WHATEVER MEANS.
Even if Ferrari is pre-eminent, why can’t the P1 be a challenge to the
Porsche, BMW or Aston Martin?
McLaren does not necessarily intend to challenge Ferrari or anyone but
because it has expertise in the field of designing performance cars and it is
lucrative, it wants a share of the money to be had, that is not challenging
Ferrari.
It is dangerous delusion of self and others to speak in terms of McLaren
challenging Ferrari, there is no need to delve into that and it is a product of
imagination or fabrication, making more than there is actually that is harmful.
McLaren
is not in F1 to challenge Ferrari:
The statement implies McLaren is in F1 to challenge Ferrari; that is
always delusional. McLaren is in F1 not to challenge Ferrari or anyone but to
win the races and become champions and make money for themselves.
THE STATEMENT IMPLIES MCLAREN IS CHALLENGING FERRARI IN FORMULA ONE AND
THIS CANNOT BE TRUE, MCLAREN IS IN FORMULA ONE NOT TO CHALLENGE FERRARI OR
ANYONE BUT TO WIN RACES AND TITLES FOR THEMSELVES.
Tiger
Woods stupid calling handphone users stupid:
Ramayah recalls Woods
calling a bunch of handphone users ‘stupid’
It is Tiger Woods who is stupid lashing out inappropriately that is the
path to future insanity calling irritating handphone users stupid.
HANDPHONE USERS ARE IRRITATING NOT STUPID AND IT IS TIGER WOODS WHO IS
STUPID CALLING THEM STUPID BECAUSE IT IS INAPPROPRIATE, A PRODUCT OF FALSE
LOGIC THAT ENDS IN MAD LOGIC AND ALSO INCURS KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SERIOUS
SUFFERING FOR DENIGRATING OTHERS.
Pink Ribbon month: Get your
breasts checked
This is always a curt impersonal mechanical way of conveying a message
that incurs karma that cannot be disputed and if you dispute you have false
understanding.
What has pink ribbon got to do with breast examination? Because it is a
false association you are encouraging false association. There is nothing pink
ribbon about the month, just because you are organizing a breast examination
campaign for that month does not mean it is a pink ribbon month.
PEOPLE ARE BLASÉ ABOUT WHAT AND HOW THEY SAY, THEY THINK THEY ARE VERY
SMART, WITTY NOT REALIZING THE WAY THE SPEAK IS IMPROPER AND FRAUGHT WITH FALSE
ASSOCIATIONS AND PRESUMPTIONS THAT IS THE PATH TO FUTURE WOE AND THEY HAVE
DEBTS FOR HARMFULLY INFLUENCING OTHERS TO DO LIKEWISE.
ALL ROBOTS ARE MECHANICAL, GOING THROUGH THE MOTIONS AND SO WHEN THERE
IS A BREAST EXAMINATION MONTH THEY AUTOMATICALLY JUMP TO THE IMPERSONAL
DEMEANING EPITHET, ‘PINK RIBBON MONTH’. IT IS NOT THE PINK RIBBON OR MONTH THAT
IS IMPORTANT BUT IT IS THE BREAST EXAMINATION THAT IS THE POINT.
Flavour
of the month:
To people whose existence is meaningless robotic, life is a series of
flavours of the month, this month it is breast examination month, some other
month it is keep fit month, another month it is meditation month.
If something is meaningful it is not for a month. Reflecting they are
mindless robots people seek instructions as to what to do and so the
instruction for this month is ‘breast examination’.
ROBOTS NEED INSTRUCTIONS, NEED TO BE TOLD BY THEMSELVES AND OTHERS WHAT
TO DO AND ‘PINK RIBBON MONTH’ IS AN INSTRUCTION OF WHAT TO DO THAT YOU ACCEPT
AND CARRY OUT.
Audio
CD superior to MP3:
On casual (isolated) listening on a good Hi Fi system, mp3 can sound
very good but in a high definition system side by side comparison, mp3 is no
substitute for audio CD which sounds superior, with more details and smoother.
ANYONE WHO THINKS AUDIO CD IS DEAD, LONG LIVE MP3 IS DELUDED JUST AS YOU
ARE DELUDED IF YOU THINK DESKTOPS ARE DEAD BECAUSE OF TABLETS. AN AUDIO CD ON A
GOOD DEFINITION HI FI SYSTEM STILL SOUNDS SUPERIOR TO MP3.
My relatively exotic Hi Fi system is more than 20 years old and yet the
amplifier and speaker functions normally and recently I bought a relatively Hi
Fi audio CD with USB player made by Denon and I conducted a comparison between
Audio and MP3 played on the same player and I discern that the sound production
of the audio CD is clearly superior to the mp3 even though the mp3 sounds quite
good on its own.
YOU CAN SPEND A LOT OF MONEY FOR AN EXPENSIVE HI FI SYSTEM AND YET A
CHEAPER ONE MAY SOUND BETTER. MANY DO NOT REALIZE WHAT THEY ARE MISSING IN
TERMS OF SOUND QUALITY AND DETAIL FROM THE MUSIC THEY HEAR. IN THE SAME WAY
MANY THINK THEY KNOW HAPPINESS, THEY KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE TO BE HAPPY AND NOT
SUFFER YET THEY DO NOT REALIZE THERE IS FAR SUPERIOR HAPPINESS AND ABSENCE OF
SUFFERING TO WHAT THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED.
A LOT OF MUSIC IS TOTALLY DISAGREEABLE TO ME BUT EVEN THE MORE PLEASANT
ONES ARE TAINTED WITH SERIOUS STRESS INDUCING CONSTANT PROLONGING OF NOTES,
CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS. THERE IS HEAVENLY MUSIC AND IT IS CLEARLY
SUPERIOR TO HUMAN MUSIC AND BEINGS HERE HAVE NOT A CLUE WHAT THEY ARE MISSING.
WHAT THEY CALL MUSIC IS AN ABOMINATION. ONLY HEAVENLY MUSIC DEVOID OF STYLE
DOES NOT LEAVE THE LISTENER STRESSED AND TIRED AFTERWARDS.
My
Hi Fi system is actually 30 years old:
My British speakers and amplifier system dates from 1982 and so it is 30
years old and working fine.
Partly because it is seldom used and partly because I don’t abuse them
playing loudly they have lasted 30 years and still sound superior to many
modern Hi Fi systems.
The
fly in the ointment music:
There are many kinds of music in this world, some much harsher, noisier
and unmelodic than others but no matter what the music there is a fly in the
ointment in the constant totally unnecessary prolonging of notes, multi-layered
speed/pitch and loudness changes that bombard to greater or lesser extent the
listener with force changes that leads to stress, restlessness and inability to
concentrate.
NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY SWEAR BY YOUR MUSIC, SEE NOTHING WRONG, WHOSOEVER
LISTENS TO EARTHLY MUSIC, WHATEVER ITS FORM, MUST END UP TENSED (STRESSED),
RESTLESS AND DAZED (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) BECAUSE OF THE ACCOMPANYING EVIL
TOTALLY UNNECESSARY HARMFUL NOTE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED/PITCH AND LOUDNESS.
Dynamism
versus realism:
There are two facets of music reproduction, its dynamism and its realism
and reflecting their propensity for force and force changes, it is more the
dynamism of the reproduction that appeals to emotional people. To me, I focus
on the realism, how realistic in terms of imaging as if the person or
instruments are before you and where they are on the stage. It is not dynamism
or the dramatic explosive shifts in loudness and speed/pitch that appeals to me
but rather I find them disagreeable.
THE TENSION INDUCING STYLE OR PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN
MUSIC RENDERED HERE FAR OUTWEIGH WHATEVER PLEASURE THAT MAY BE DERIVED FROM THE
MUSIC SO THAT I VERY SOON TIRE OF LISTENING.
THE SUBSTANCE OF THE REPRODUCED MUSIC IS THE REALISM, THE ABILITY TO
CREATE THE ILLUSION OF A SINGER OR INSTRUMENT PLAYING BEFORE YOU AND THIS
ABILITY VARIES CONSIDERABLY DEPENDING ON THE EQUIPMENT DESIGN.
My
Dell Desktop sounds much better on headphones:
Desktops have soundcards that produce the music stored on computers and
my Dell Desktop sounds much better on a AKG Hi Fi headphones than on the
speakers supplied by Dell and so an upgrade to better speakers will be rewarding
to those who want better music reproduction from their desktops, at least where
my Dell XPS 8500 is concerned.
Apple
trying to steal Microsoft’s thunder:
It is said Microsoft spent even 1.5 billion for the launch of Windows 8
and the early advertisements look bizarre, hyped.
It is unlikely to be coincidental that Apple is launching iPad mini
tomorrow but it is a silly attempt to steal Microsoft’s thunder driven by envy.
CORPORATIONS JOSTLE TO TRY TO STEAL EACH OTHERS’ THUNDER AND THEY SPEND
BILLIONS WASTEFULLY ON MARKETTING THAT IN THE END IS BORNE BY CONSUMERS, BY THE
SYSTEM AND THAT IS ABUSIVE, IRRESPONSIBLE WITH KARMA ATTACHED FOR THOSE
INVOLVED.
Old
Dell speakers much more pleasant:
I had a few old Dell supplied ‘Hi Fi’ speakers made by Harmon Kardon, a
speaker mfg of some repute and it sounds much more natural, less harsh than the
speakers Dell supplied.
It is not very Hi Fi but the tonal balance and naturalness is clearly
superior to the previous Dell speakers I used.
IT IS VITAL TO BE DISCERNING WHICH IS THE ONLY WAY TO PLEASANTNESS, I AM
ABLE TO APPRECIATE WHICH SOUNDS MORE PLEASANT AND SO IT IS DEFINITELY MORE
PLEASANT TO SWITCH TO MY OLD HARMON KARDON SPEAKERS WHICH ALTHOUGH NOT VERY HI
FI, SOUNDS MUCH PLEASANTER.
Minimalist
is a rule and Apple copied not invented it:
Apple or more likely Steve Jobs was renowned for the minimalist
philosophy (philosophy is a rule and minimalist is a rule never true logic)
that is reflected in Apple products but minimalist sentiments were well in
existence before Apple’s time.
British Hi Fi products are renowned for their eccentric minimalist
approach long before Apple came to the scene and so Apple did not reinvent
minimalist but copied it. Expensive British amplifiers did not have any tone
(bass, treble midrange) controls, no loudness and very limited input ports
because they are deemed to undermine audio performance. In the same way
expensive British speakers tend to have only two speakers, a tweeter and
woofer/midrange rather than the array of speakers that the Americans tended to
favour.
Minimalist ‘philosophy’ is in truth a rule that tells people who are
robots who embrace it to design gadgets with a minimal of controls and make it
as simple as possible.
MINIMALIST IS NOT ABOUT REASON, ABOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS A
BLIND ACROSS BOARD COMMAND APPROACH, IT IS A RULE. IT IS NOT THAT YOUR DESIGN
OR GADGET SHOULD BE MINIMALIST OR MAXIMALIST BUT WHATEVER FEATURE SHOULD BE
TRULY USEFUL, SHOULD NOT DETRACT OR DEGRADE THE INTENDED PERFORMANCE OF THE
GADGET, THERE IS NOTHING MINIMALIST OR MAXIMALIST ABOUT THIS EXCEPT IN YOUR
DELUSION.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO HAVE A MINIMALIST OR MAXIMALIST PHILOSOPHY BUT YOU
HAVE TO APPROACH EACH SITUATION ON A CASE BY CASE UNDERSTANDING EG DO YOU NEED
TONE OR LOUDNESS CONTROLS AND DO THEY DEGRADE THE DESIRED AUDIOPHILE
PERFORMANCE, NOT THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE A SIMPLE UNDERSTATED APPEARANCE. IT IS
NOT FOR AN UNDERSTATED APPEARANCE THAT YOU DESIGN SOMETHING BUT IT IS ITS
FUNCTIONALITY, ITS NEEDS.
PHILOSOPHY IS ABOUT USING THINKING TO DEFINE RULES OR CONCLUSIONS FROM
LIFE SITUATIONS AND IT IS TOTALLY FALSE, DELUSIONAL. YOU DON’T NEED
PHILOSOPHIES, YOU DON’T NEED TO HAVE A PHILOSOPHY. THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE
DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHIES REFLECTS THAT PHILOSOPHY IS FALSE AND DELUSIONAL BECAUSE
WHATEVER IS TRUE APPLIES TO EVERYONE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO HAVE A
DIFFERENT TRUTH AND IT IS BECAUSE PHILOSOPHY IS FALSE THAT DIFFERENT (DELUDED)
PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHIES BUT THE WISE HAVE NO PHILOSOPHIES.
Harmon
Kardon speakers clearly superior:
In the past I struggled to tell the difference between two sound systems
but now my mind made steady, calm and clearly seeing I can tell straightaway
the differences between two systems and without even A-B comparisons I can tell
that the old Harmon Kardon desktop speakers are clearly superior, more pleasant
to listen to compared to the speakers Dell supplied.
FOR ME, THE HARMON KARDON SPEAKERS THOUGH FAR FROM PERFECT IS CLEARLY,
INDISPUTABLY SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER SOUNDING THAN THE NEW DELL SPEAKERS WHICH
SOUNDED HARSH, TIRING.
Philosophy
is about falsity and programming:
People talk about philosophy and they think they understand, know what
philosophy is but do they truly or in delusion ‘understand’ philosophy?
Philosophy is something (in thought and ideas) a person adopts, it is a
way of looking at life, at conducting one’s life, it is about personal beliefs
or creeds (whatever is a belief or creed is about something you did not see as
true but use force to accept as true) adopted and put into practice to
determine one’s actions. You can invent your own philosophy eg free sex/love or
you can copy it from others.
THUS PHILOSOPHY IS NEVER ABOUT TRUTH, IT IS ABOUT ADOPTING A SET OF
BELIEFS OR CREEDS THAT ARE FABRICATED AND THEN CONDUCTING ONESELF BASED ON
THOSE CREEDS OR THEORIES IN WHICH YOU ARE A ROBOT HEADED FOR TORMENT.
YOU DON’T NEED ANY PHILOSOPHIES TO NAVIGATE LIFE BUT YOU NEED TRUE
UNDERSTANDING, TO SEE THINGS HAPPENING CLEARLY AS IT ACTUALLY IS SO THAT YOU
REJECT FALSITY AND EMBRACE TRUTH, REJECT WHAT IS HARMFUL AND EMBRACE WHAT IS
BENEVOLENT.
PEOPLE TALK ABOUT PHILOSOPHY, EXALT PHILOSOPHY BUT THEY DO NOT TRULY
UNDERSTAND PHILOSOPHY WHICH IS EVIL, THE PATH TO MADNESS AND ONLY ROBOTS HAVE
PHILOSOPHY.
Buddhism
& Christianity are not philosophies:
Buddhism and Christianity are not philosophies because they are the
truth, whatever is the truth is not a philosophy and whatever is philosophy is
not the truth.
Buddhism and Christianity are never incompatible except in your delusion
or emotional prejudice, to one who sees correctly there is no incompatibility
but Buddhism and Christianity are complimentary.
There are many versions of Buddhism but the true version of Buddhism
fits well with the Christian version. The Buddha said there is God, The Father,
Creator, Knower and Seer of All, there is the Devil, the King of Death (and he
is waiting to receive you into death and suffering).
Even
if you cannot see it, Buddhism is the truth:
Even if you and everyone here cannot see it, Buddhism is the truth, what
it actually is and those who are discerning can see that Buddhism is the truth
not a set of beliefs or a philosophy.
IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE CANNOT SEE WHAT THE BUDDHA
TAUGHT AS THE TRUTH, FACTUALLY IT IS THE TRUTH AND THOSE WHO ARE UNDERSTANDING
CAN SEE IT IS THE TRUTH AND SO WHATEVER IS THE TRUTH IS NOT A PHILOSOPHY AND
BUDDHISM IS NOT A PHILOSOPHY AND WHATEVER IS A PHILOSOPHY IS NEVER THE TRUTH
EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION.
BECAUSE PHILOSOPHY IS ABOUT FALSITY AND CREEDS AND BUDDHISM IS TRUE, IT
CAN NEVER BE A PHILOSOPHY EXCEPT TO THE MISGUIDED OR FOOLISH.
Sat-nav used before death
in flood at Headley ford
Satellite Navigation can be dangerous even fatal as I experienced myself
many times and so if you blindly obey it you may pay even with your life one
day.
Once I was on a small parallel road to the highway but the GPS thought I
was on the highway and told me to proceed until I got stuck in a very narrow
dangerous road. It is because GPS sample intermittently it can think you are on
the correct road when you are on a wrong adjacent road and then subsequently
when it discovers you are in the wrong place, it may guide you back to your
intended destination via a path it plots that may lead to unpassable even
dangerous roads that may be passable to 4WD but not your small car.
SAT NAV IS SOMETHING THAT IS DECEPTIVE, IT HAS NO UNDERSTANDING AND DOES
NOT SAMPLE YOUR POSITION ALL THE TIME AND SO IT MAY THINK YOU ARE ON ROAD A
WHEN YOU ARE ON ROAD B AND IT MAY GUIDE YOU THROUGH NARROW UNPASSABLE ROADS.
IF SAT NAV ARE A PORTENT THEN IT IS MAD TO HAVE SELF-DRIVE CARS THAT CAN
KILL YOU AND MANKIND IS MAD TO TOY WITH SELF-DRIVE CARS.
Sir Mervyn King: no
recovery until banks recapitalise
The British economy will not recover until the
banks own up to their bad debts and are
recapitalised again, the Governor of the Bank of England has warned.
This is an admission that there is financial charade going on, the banks
have decimated if not wiped out their capital and it is likely if not certain
that not only that they have decimated if not wiped out depositors’ money.
What are regulators for or are they powerless? Surely the central bank
should demand to examine and determine banks’ financial health rather than wait
for them to come clean.
IT IS NOT A MATTER THAT THE BANKS SHOULD OWN UP BUT AUTHORITIES SHOULD RAID THOSE BANKS AND DETERMINE THEIR TRUE HEALTH. NOT ONLY HAVE THEY WIPED OUT THEIR CAPITAL, THEY ARE LIKELY TO HAVE EFFECTIVELY WIPED OUT DEPOSITORS’ MONEY.
IT IS NOT A MATTER THAT THE BANKS SHOULD OWN UP BUT AUTHORITIES SHOULD RAID THOSE BANKS AND DETERMINE THEIR TRUE HEALTH. NOT ONLY HAVE THEY WIPED OUT THEIR CAPITAL, THEY ARE LIKELY TO HAVE EFFECTIVELY WIPED OUT DEPOSITORS’ MONEY.
IT MAY BE DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO RECAPITALIZE IN SUCH AN
ECONOMIC CLIMATE.
THUS THE PROGNOSIS FOR THE WORLD ECONOMICALLY IS NOT GOOD BUT EVEN DIRE.
Merv: Pain of slump to last
a generation
Why is that so?
Because we have spent, squandered money that should have been reserved
for our future generations and saddled them with big debt burdens to repay.
All these massive trillions of debt that the US is piling up by deficit
spending will have to be repaid by future generations.
The
true colours of the British Royal Family?
Model 'who had drunken fumble with Prince Harry' in Vegas hotel room
claims British Secret service had her thrown in jail for a MONTH within hours
of her giving tell-all interview
Apparently the model was immediately jailed for 1 month on a trumped up
charge of issuing bounced cheques in order to silence her and protect the
prince.
THE WHOLESOMENESS OF MANY INSTITUTIONS EG BBC, THE BRITISH ROYALTY MAY
BE MORE MYTH THAN TRUTH AND THEY WILL RESORT TO UNDERHAND TACTICS, COVERUP
MAYBE EVEN MURDER TO PROTECT THEMSELVES.
No comments:
Post a Comment