Two
things you should not discuss at a party:
RPK: There are two things you do not discuss at a party. One is
religion and the other is politics. And this is because both those subjects are
very sensitive and extremely volatile. Hence the approach you adopt for both
religion and politics is about the same. And while my story above concerns
religion, the example could easily enough be applied to politics.
Meetings may have meaningful purpose but parties are all meaningless,
false and those who partake are participating in evil and senselessness that
ends in torment and the fact that you disagree reflects delusion.
FIRST OF ALL NO PERSON IN HIS RIGHT MIND WILL ATTEND PARTIES WHICH ARE
FOR ‘FUN’, ‘SOCIALIZATION’, ‘EAT AND DRINK (ALCOHOL)’ OR SENSELESS PURPOSES AND
SO THOSE WHO RELISH PARTIES ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN
INSANITY. IF YOU DO NOT CORRECTLY ATTEND PARTIES WHAT MORE THAT THERE ARE TWO
THINGS YOU DON’T DISCUSS.
There are actually no need to discuss any matter which is a form of
taking different positions and then arguing. Discussing or debating is not
about truth but it is about taking sides that are both false in a matter and
then fighting over it. The exact nature of any matter can be exactly defined
and so not a matter for discussion except in delusion.
The person who tells others there are two things you do not discuss at a
party is arrogant and speaking falsely, the person who is careful says,
‘amongst the things you should refrain from discussing are’.
THERE ARE NEVER ANY TRUE REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD NOT DISCUSS RELIGION AND
POLITICS AND SO YOU ARE BEING HIGH HANDED AND FALSE OR DELUDED TO SAY SO.
YOU NEVER DISCUSS ANYTHING LET ALONE DO NOT DISCUSS POLITICS AND
RELIGION BECAUSE DISCUSSION IS NOT ABOUT TRUTH AND MEANING BUT IT IS ABOUT
TAKING SIDES OR POINTS OF VIEWS THAT ARE ALWAYS FALSE, IF SOMETHING IS THE
TRUTH IT IS NOT A POINT OF VIEW, IF SOMETHING IS A POINT OF VIEW IT IS NEVER
THE TRUTH EXCEPT IN YOUR ABIDING DELUSION.
THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND DO NOT ATTEND PARTIES WHICH ARE NOT FOR
MEANING OR REASON BUT FOR FALSITY AND HARMFULNESS, FOR ‘EAT AND DRINK’ AND
SOCIAL BANTER.
YOU SHOULD NOT ATTEND PARTIES, SHOULD NOT DISCUSS LET ALONE TWO THINGS
YOU SHOULD NOT DISCUSS AT PARTIES. RPK IS A DELUDED BEFUDDLED DOMINEERING FOOL.
You
speak the truth never discuss:
If you do not know the truth of a matter you do not speak unless you
want to court karma and stir self resistance that leads to stress and trains
you to speak with aroused self resistance.
Once the truth of a matter has been spoken, what is there to discuss and
so discussion is never about ascertaining the truth but it is about formulating
and presenting view-points that inevitably conflicts with other formulated
fabricated viewpoints that then end in conflict.
WHATEVER IS THE TRUTH IS NOT AMENABLE TO DISCUSSION BUT IT MERELY NEEDS
STATEMENT. ONCE STATED THERE IS NO NEED TO DISCUSS EXCEPT IF YOU ARE MAD.
DISCUSSIONS ARE AVENUES OR FORUMS FOR FORMING AND PRESENTING VIEWPOINTS
WHICH ARE ALWAYS FALSE AND SO ALL DISCUSSIONS ARE EVIL NOT GOOD. IF SOMETHING
IS TRUE IT IS NOT A VIEW, IF SOMETHING IS A VIEW IT IS NEVER THE TRUTH EXCEPT
IN DELUSION.
Truth
is for elucidating or stating never discussion:
If something is true but not immediately obvious then it needs to be
elucidated, defined clearly, if the truth is obvious then it merely requires
statement and once elucidated or stated what is there to discuss? Therefore
discussion is never about truth but falsity and evil.
The process of elucidating the truth is not a discussion except in your
muddled thinking.
WHAT IS TRUE MERELY REQUIRES ELUCIDATING OR STATEMENT, NEVER DISCUSSION.
Why
do you not discuss religion and politics at parties?
The reason you don’t discuss religion and politics (how about race,
sex?) is because these are not matters of truth but they are matters or issues
of preference ore predilection that people have formed strong identity views
that they are attached to and have difficulty tolerating dissenting views.
SELDOM IF EVER WHEN ORDINARY PEOPLE ENGAGE IN DISCUSSION ABOUT A MATTER
THEY APPROACH IT NOT KNOWING THE ANSWERS OF THE MATTER AND WANTING THE PERSON
THEY APPROACH TO ENLIGHTEN THEM BUT THEY APPROACH IT ALREADY WITH PRE-FORMED
IDEAS THAT THEY TRY TO CONVERT THE OTHER TO OR THEY WANT TO DO VERBAL BATTLE TO
DEFEAT THE OPPOSITE OR STATE THEIR CASE IN CONTRADISTINCTION TO THE OTHER. OFTEN
THE MATTER IS FRIVOLOUS OR FALSE EG ABOUT SEX OR POLITICS. IF YOUR IDEAS OR
IDEAS OF BOTH PARTIES OF THE MATTER ARE FALSE THEN THE DISCUSSION IS AN
EXERCISE IN FALSITY, IN VANITY.
WHAT IS IT ABOUT PARTIES THAT YOU DON’T DISCUSS POLITICS AND RELIGION AT
PARTIES? IS IT OK THEN TO DISCUSS POLITICS AND RELIGION ON OTHER OCCASIONS? IF
SOMETHING IS TRULY NOT OK TO DISCUSS, IT IS NOT OK TO DISCUSS ANYTIME NOT JUST
AT PARTIES AND SO RPK IS MAKING AN ABSURD ASSOCIATION THAT AT PARTIES YOU DON’T
DISCUSS POLITICS AND RELIGION.
It
is not religion that is to blame but its practitioners:
In the matter of religion as a divisive, emotive topic for discussion
(at parties, according to the opinion of RPK), it is not so much that
Christianity or Buddhism or Islam are necessarily false and at odds with each
other but the practitioners of all these religions are deluded and have
perceptions of these religions that are seriously at variance with truth and so
religion is blamed when it is their practitioners who are the culprits.
In the same way, it is not politics that are to blame when people come
to fisticuffs but it is the practitioners who are to blame.
How
might tax cuts spur growth?
Tax cuts may be a false unaffordable tool to promote growth.
If governments all over the world are in surplus they would not have to
borrow from markets and the credit markets would not be in such strife. Thus it
is not as if governments can afford to cut taxes, they do not need the extra
money taxes bring, they ‘desperately’ need money so it is mad to cut taxes.
The rationale behind tax cuts is that the money people saved from paying
taxes would be spent that stimulates or grow the economy and those in the
higher tax brackets are spurred to make more money that is tax free and their
enterprise will result in growth. But this is simplistic logic that may not be
borne out in practice but is not without proponents especially the rich who
stand to gain much with tax cuts.
Notwithstanding that many ordinary people are already severely in debt
or their savings in banks already squandered by reckless bankers, if they
actually spent the money saved by tax cuts, it is a consumption driven growth
that if spent on unproductive consumption (eg buying football tickets, drinking
at pubs and eating out) it cannot be sustained for long and ultimately this
money spent accrete in the hands of a wealthy minority to the loss of the
system.
Tax cuts may spur the elite to be innovative, do and invent more to sell
more goods and services to the masses to earn more money but the masses today
may not have the means to continue buying what these enterprising people churn
out.
The system may be impoverished, destitute and so even if capitalists are
enticed with the carrot of tax cuts, they may find a depressed market to sell
to and so the tax cuts end up benefiting the rich with the government losing in
taxes.
TAX CUTS ARE NOT THE ANSWER AND OF COURSE TAX PAYERS ESPECIALLY THE RICH
ONES ARE ALL FOR IT AND IF THEY WORK THEY WORK BY STIMULATING CONSUMPTION THAT
IS NOT SUSTAINABLE AND END IN MORE TROUBLE DOWN THE LINE BECAUSE THE
CONSUMPTION IS USUALLY WASTEFUL ON UNPRODUCTIVE ITEMS.
IT MAY BE CHECKMATE, MANKIND HAS DEVASTATED THE SYSTEM BUT IF THERE IS
AN ANSWER, TAX CUT IS NOT A TRUE ANSWER NOT WHEN GOVERNMENTS ARE FULL OF DEBTS
THEMSELVES.
There
is only one true escape from suffering:
Suffering even torment is the lot of those who exist and there is only
way to escape this suffering that does not end with death but will continue
even for eternities.
Whoever seeks other ways of escape will be defeated, fail, deceived and
suffer grievous consequences.
The true way out of all suffering mental and physical starts with
establishing the first higher state of mind and that means you must
successfully stop your mental force from constantly prolonging, changing speed
and strength which means you must shed your style and not stretch syllables,
change speed and loudness when speaking.
The next step in the only true escape is to reach the second higher
state of mind, the cessation of thinking which makes one’s mind united, one
pointed, focused, undistracted or scattered by thinking.
The next step is to reach the third higher state of mind when your
mental force is no longer stirred attractively to like or repulsively to
dislike and the fourth step is to no longer perceive force and thereby not feel
pain or pleasure.
IF MENTAL AND PHYSICAL PAIN TROUBLES YOU THEN THERE IS ONLY ONE PATH YOU
MUST SEEK AND THAT IS ACCESS TO THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND THAT BEGINS WITH NO
STYLE (NO PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH) LEADING TO NO THINKING, NO
LIKING AND DISLIKING AND ENDS WITH NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE.
ANY OTHER REFUGES YOU MAY SEEK ARE FALSE AND END IN TEARS EVEN FOR
ETERNITIES.
PETALING
JAYA: Family bonding during Chinese New Year should go beyond reunion dinners
and ang pow and should also include saying “I love you” to each other.
The person is telling others what to do in which they must be robots to
obey and carry out mechanically as instructed. Rather than merit it incurs
karma to be experienced as future suffering because his advice is futile and
leads to suffering than happiness.
True love and happiness cannot ensue merely from the act of saying ‘I
love you’ which is for show.
TRUE LOVE IS WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, HOW YOU TREAT EACH OTHER THAT DON’T
CAUSE HURT AND MAKE THE OTHER PERSON HAPPY. ‘I LOVE YOU’ IS ALWAYS FOR SHOW
SPOKEN LOVE NEVER TRUE LOVE. OFTEN PEOPLE ARE UNEASY WITH SUCH DEMONSTRATIONS
OF LOVE WHICH THEY SENSE IS SUSPECT OR THEY MAY FEEL ‘TOUCHED’, THEIR MENTAL
FORCES ARE STIRRED FALSELY AND TEMPORARILY BY SUCH TRANSIENT INTIMACY. WHAT IS
THE POINT OF SUCH DEMONSTRATIONS OF I LOVE YOU WHEN LATER YOU GO AFTER EACH
OTHERS’ THROATS?
AS LONG AS A PERSON HAS STYLE HE IS GUILTY OF DISHING OUT HARMFULNESS,
STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE TO ALL WHO CONTACT HIM
INCLUDING LOVED ONES AND WHATEVER ‘I LOVE YOU’ HE SAYS IS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS
EVIL STYLE THAT RENDERS IT TOXIC AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO TRULY
WHOLEHEARTEDLY RECEIVE SUCH CONFESSIONS OF LOVE BUT IT MUST STIR CONFLICT OR
INNER RESISTANCE.
AS LONG AS A PERSON HAS STYLE HE IS GUILTY OF PERSECUTING ALL THOSE WHO
COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM THAT BELIES AND CONTRADICTS WHATEVER CONFESSIONS OF
LOVE HE MAY MAKE WHICH ARE ALWAYS FOR SHOW NEVER TRUE.
TRUE LOVE IS NEVER WHAT YOU SAY TO ANOTHER BUT IT IS WHAT YOU DO TO
ANOTHER THAT NEVER HARMS THEM AND MAKE THEM HAPPY AND CARED FOR. IT REFLECTS
HUMANITY’S DENSE DELUSION THAT THEY NEVERTHELESS THINK SAYING I LOVE YOU IS
TOUCHING AND MEANINGFUL.
WASHINGTON:
Chronic deadlock in Congress threatens to derail the US economy, damage national
security and undermine public trust in its leaders, outgoing US Defence
Secretary Leon Panetta warned Wednesday.
A person with true understanding always understands what he says and
cannot be guilty of speaking nonsense.
Congress is not dysfunctional but it is deadlocked or partisan and so he
is speaking falsely misleading others and asking for suffering.
‘Deadlock or Partisanship’ in Congress not dysfunction puts US at risk.
Dysfunction sounds impressive but it is the wrong description.
He
loves you and yet you don’t know?
He loves you with all his heart and yet you don’t know and need the
device of a confession ‘I love you’? In that case you must be a big fool and
your foolishness will cause you far greater grief than can be offset by
another’s professed ‘love’.
Or do you mean he loves you but he usually does not show it, he bottles
it, he treats you harshly, even hurts you but nevertheless he loves you as
confessed? Such tough love are never true, the hidden love is never true love,
it is what you regularly do that abuse and hurts others that matters not the
occasional confession of love stirred by remorse and sentiment.
BETTER YOU STOP SAYING AND DOING HURTFUL THINGS THAN YOU ‘BOTTLE OR HIDE
YOUR TRUE LOVE’ AND KEEP IGNORING AND SAYING AND DOING BAD THINGS TO THE OTHER
AND THEN ‘TOUCHINGLY’ SAY ‘I LOVE YOU’ COME CNY. IF HE LOVES YOU AND YOU DON’T
KNOW AND NEED HIM TO TELL YOU THEN THE LOVE IS WASTED ON AN UNDISCERNING FOOL.
The
true purpose for saying “I love you”:
The true purpose for saying “I love you” is if the opposite party does
not know you love him or her and you truly love her and want to convey that.
If the opposite party already knows you love her then it is mad to have
to tell her or if your love for her is not true (you harbour ill will to her,
sometimes want to hurt her especially if she does not act to your wishes) then
you are guilty of deception or lying.
If your purpose of saying ‘I love you’ is to stir emotion (that cannot
be denied, can be objectively established) then you are guilty of saying ‘I
love you’ for a false and harmful purpose to stir mental force.
WHETHER YOU TRULY LOVE HER OR YOUR LOVE IS WHIMSICAL, BASED ON LUST AND
CONDITIONAL ON HER PLEASING YOU IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED AND SO IF YOU
SAY YOU LOVE HER AND YOUR LOVE IS NOT TRUE BUT BASED ON ATTRACTION AND
CONDITIONAL THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF DECEPTION WITH KARMA ATTACHED.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT EVERYONE YOU EXHORT TO SAY ‘I LOVE YOU’ WILL HAVE
GENUINE LOVE FOR THE RECIPIENT AND SO YOU ARE GUILTY OF ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO
PROFESS THEIR FALSE LOVE FOR OTHERS.
MAKE SURE YOUR LOVE FOR THE OTHER IS GENUINE BEFORE YOU PROFESS ‘I LOVE
YOU’ OTHERWISE YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSITY WITH KARMA.
IF YOUR PURPOSE FOR SAYING I LOVE YOU IS TO STIR EMOTION THEN YOU ARE
GUILTY OF SAYING I LOVE YOU FOR A FALSE HARMFUL PURPOSE THAT HAS KARMA NOT
MERIT.
It
is impossible for anyone with style to truly love:
When asked to clarify what they mean by “I love you” ordinary people may
say indignantly “I like you lah!!” which means what they call love is their
attraction for you, their mental forces are stirred to like you and this is
misperception of love.
It is impossible for ordinary people to truly love for a number of
reasons:
1) They are robots
rehashing everything they say or do which are never genuine, specifically
composed for the moment which is a requisite to truly love.
2) They are dishing out
force constantly in their prolonging, changing speed and strength that harms
whoever interacts with them, causing stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate
and that automatically disqualifies them from truly loving anyone else.
3) Ordinary people
actually harbour significant hate for themselves, they are their own worst
enemies, their ocean of suffering due that the Buddha said is caused by
themselves not others and it is impossible for someone who harbours hate for himself
to ever truly love others. If you yourself are not truly happy and secure in
yourself how can you make anyone else happy and secure?
IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF HARMING THE OTHER PERSON YOU ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM
LOVING THE OTHER PERSON AND HENCE IF YOUR STYLE HARMS OTHERS WITH STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND DIVIDES THEIR ATTENTION THEN YOU ARE DISQUALIFIED, UNFIT TO
LOVE. IN TRUE LOVE ALL YOUR ACTIONS MAKE THE OTHER PERSON HAPPY OR CARED FOR.
LOVE IS A FEELING, A PLEASANT FEELING CAUSED BY ARISEN MILD FORCE, IT IS NOT AN
EMOTION, NOT A STIRRED ATTRACTION OR LIKING OR LUST FOR THE OTHER PERSON.
I SAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE WITH STYLE TO TRULY LOVE AND BECAUSE
EVERYONE HERE HAS STYLE THEY ARE UNFIT TO LOVE. YOU MAY BE RIGHT ORDINARY
PEOPLE CAN LOVE AND THEY HAVE EXPERIENCED TRUE LOVE BUT YOU MAY BE DELUDED.
Style
divides others’ attention four ways:
A person’s style actually sinfully, wickedly divides the listener’s
attention four ways. At the same time as he hears the formed word or syllable,
the person must also contend or deal with the prolonging of the syllable, he
must also contend with the changing loudness and speed.
A DIVIDED ATTENTION CANNOT PAY FULL ATTENTION TO A SINGLE OCCURRENCE AND
SO ANYONE SPEAKING WITH STYLE IS GUILTY OF MALICIOUSLY DIVIDING THE LISTENER’S
ATTENTION FOUR NOT TWO WAYS, HE DIVIDES THE LISTENER’S ATTENTION BETWEEN THE
FORMED SYLLABLE, THE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS SUCH THAT THE
LISTENER’S ATTENTION BECOMES HOPELESSLY SCATTERED AND HE PAYS SHALLOW EASILY
DISRUPTED ATTENTION TO THINGS HAPPENING.
A
lover up to no good:
What kind of lover leaves his loved one stressed, restless and his/her
concentration scattered or blurred or dazed and his ‘actions and speeches of
love’ are rendered by rehash like he has done even many times in the past?
Even if you are unable to see it, if your lover imparts you, leaves you
with stress, restlessness and scatters your attention and what he did and said
is standardized, rehashed from recording, he is up to no good, not just
worthless but a killer.
A LOVER WHO LEAVES YOU STRESSED, RESTLESS, DAZED AND RENDERS HIS LOVE BY
REHASH IS NOT ONLY USELESS BUT HARMFUL. HE IS UP TO NO GOOD EXCEPT TO FOOLS.
A
lover who must be resisted:
No matter how you or your lover swear how lovely the love you both share,
so long as there is style, there is prolonging, changing speed and strength of
force in your interactions and speech, it must generate resistance in the
recipient that not only leads to stress but conditions you to resistance and
thereby trap you in perpetual stress.
WHAT KIND OF LOVE IS IT THAT MUST BE RECEIVED WITH RESISTANCE THAT LEADS
TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS THE RECIPIENT TO STIR RESISTANCE THAT DETAINS HIM
PERMANENTLY IN STRESS?
SO LONG AS THERE IS STYLE IN THE LOVE ACTIONS AND SPEECH OF THE LOVER,
THERE IS PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE LOVER’S ACTIONS AND
SPEECH, HE MUST GENERATE RESISTANCE IN HIS LOVER THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
Love
cannot be rehashed:
Any relationship characterized by rehashing between two parties is never
true love.
Whether what you are saying and doing to the other person and what he is
saying and doing to you is rehashed or not is objective, cannot be refuted and
if the transaction is precisely or approximately rehashed according to mental
plans then it is not love but mechanical replay for emotional and sensate
gratification.
WHATEVER IS REHASHED IS NEVER TRULY GENUINE BUT FAKED GENUINE AND CANNOT
BE TRULY LOVE AND SO IF TWO INDIVIDUALS ARE REHASHING TO EACH OTHER IT IS NOT TRUE
NON ACTED LOVE BUT MAKE BELIEVE ACTED LOVE. WHATEVER IS REHASHED IS ACTED OR
SCRIPTED AND THAT IS ALWAYS NOT GENUINE.
You
cannot love someone who causes you hurt:
It is not possible to truly love someone who causes you hurt. If
someone’s actions or words or how he speaks and does causes you suffering,
continues to cause you suffering it is not possible to truly love him. Only if
a person is a cause of happiness, his actions do not hurt you is it possible to
truly love him.
BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO TRULY LOVE ANOTHER WHOSE ACTIONS CAUSE YOU
SUFFERING AND PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD CAUSE OTHERS’ SUFFERING IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO
TRULY LOVE THEM.
You
cannot love someone who is not true to you:
You cannot love someone who is evasive, who pretends, tell lies and give
excuses.
ONLY IF SOMEONE IS TRUE TO YOU, SHORN OF ALL PRETENSE CAN HE BE TRULY
LOVED. THIS IS A WORLD WHERE PEOPLE PUT ON A FRONT, A MASK, THEY ARE TELLING
WHAT IS FALSE AND HURTFUL IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL AND SO IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO
LOVE SUCH PEOPLE.
JOHOR
BARU: Hotels and restaurants are offering various buffet and set menus as part
of their food promotions for the Chinese New Year celebrations.
There is such a thing called happiness and if it cannot be spread or if
what you are spreading is not happiness and you think it is happiness then you
must stir self resistance that leads to stress (and that is never happiness)
and you are dicing with insanity.
Only force can spread, spreading is a property of force and force is
required to spread or move or engulf and whatever is force or involves force is
never true happiness but even suffering and leads to suffering later.
WHATEVER IS TRUE HAPPINESS CANNOT BE SPREAD, IT CAN BE CULTIVATED BY AN
INDIVIDUAL, ONLY SUFFERING AND WHATEVER INVOLVES FORCE CAN SPREAD, YOU NEED
FORCE TO SPREAD AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY INCURRING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS
SUFFERING AND YOU ARE CULTIVATING FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION
THAT HAPPINESS CAN BE SPREAD, YOU CAN SPREAD HAPPINESS.
HAPPINESS CAN BE EXPERIENCED OR TASTED AND THENCE CULTIVATED BY A
PERSON, IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT CAN SPREAD LIKE A VIRUS OR VIOLENCE.
How
information is spread:
Information or news can be spread but in order for it to spread it must
be parcelled and disseminated and you need work that requires force to parcel
and disseminate news.
Happiness is not something you can parcel and disseminate like news.
Viruses are spread by force, it needs force to move and infect new places.
What they call happiness is not happiness but excitement. Speaking
correctly they should say spread the excitement rather than happiness.
You
cannot spread what you never tasted:
The Buddha said what others call happiness the wise ones have found is
suffering and so by inference, ordinary people don’t know happiness and so,
even if it is possible to spread happiness how can you spread what you have
never tasted?
Because what you call happiness is suffering according to the Buddha,
what you are saying is ‘spread the suffering not happiness’. If what you spread
is suffering not happiness you are asking for future suffering misleading
others and leading them to woe.
Only a deluded man can utter that. Not everyone loves Attenborough and
it is not possible for anyone to love him, only like him.
It cannot be refuted that Attenborough is an actor, a robot and he
radiates style and thus harmfulness to all who contact him and he is not a man
of truth to those who discern. Thus because it is impossible for anyone to
truly love someone who radiates harmfulness and is not truthful it is
impossible for anyone to truly love Attenborough much less we all love him.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO LOVE SOMEONE WHO IS HARMFUL AND NOT TRUE AND SO IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANYONE CAN LOVE ATTENBOROUGH, WHAT THEY CALL LOVE IS NOT LOVE
BUT DELUSION OF LOVE.
What
he calls love is like:
When he speaks about loving Attenborough it must conjure something in
his mind, he must have something in mind when he speaks about loving
Attenborough and this something is actually a stirring of his mental force to
like Attenborough and that is very different even the antithesis of love.
LIKING IS NOT LOVE AND IT IS EVEN THE OPPOSITE BECAUSE THE STIRRING OF
MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE IS A MAD MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL RESPONSE (EMOTION) TO AN
OBJECT WHILST LOVE IS A REASONED FEELING. LIKE IS A HARMFUL CONDITIONING
(ACTIVE) EMOTION WHILST LOVE IS A FEELING (PASSIVE). NOT EVERYONE LIKES
ATTENBOROUGH, SOME WILL HATE HIM.
Carney provides a welcome
breath of fresh air
By breath of fresh air is implied change. It is not change that should
be welcomed but what the change is, from bad to good, from false to true, from
incompetence to competence.
Breath of fresh air is a phrase that those who are robots find useful to
record because it can be rehashed for many occasions and deemed stylish or
cryptically intellectual but rather than clever it betrays the lack of true
understanding of the speaker.
IT IS NOT A BREATH OF FRESH AIR THAT YOU SHOULD WELCOME BUT IT IS WHAT
CHANGE IF ANY, WHETHER IT IS A USELESS CHANGE IN STYLE OR A CHANGE IN SUBSTANCE
FROM WRONG TO RIGHT. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE NEW BANK OF ENGLAND GOVERNOR WILL
BRING RIGHT TO REPLACE WRONG BUT IT WILL BE ANOTHER BRAND OF DELUSION FOR
ANOTHER THAT MAY BE EVEN WORSE AND SO THIS IS A FOOL TALKING.
You don’t (NEVER) marry and have children to strengthen Singapore’s core
and so if people get into strife doing so, you have karma soliciting thus.
Getting married and having children are serious matters with many
responsibilities so don’t even think of asking people to marry and have
children for Singapore’s sake, it is misguided and asking foolishly for karma
not merit.
Unconsciously the statement is intended to stir conflict or irony which
is always false never true.
There is never any conflict between Mr Carney’s good start and the mess we’re
in.
The good start is about style never substance. What could he have done
in the short time in taking over? Most likely nothing and it is the impression
he made, his talk that impressed onlooker that constituted his ‘good’ start.
THE START THAT IS ‘GOOD’ IS FALSE, ABOUT STYLE, SHOW THAN SUBSTANCE AND
SO THERE IS NO TRUE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE MESS UK STILL IS IN AND THE GOOD
START, IT IS A FALSE IRONY THAT IS INTENDED TO STIR EMOTION (CONVEY SARCASM
WHICH IS ALWAYS EVIL WITH ATTACHED KARMA).
UK’S ECONOMIC MESS MAY BE BEYOND REDEMPTION AND EVEN IF HE WANTED, THE
FORMIDABLE SYSTEM MAY NOT PERMIT THE STATUS QUO TO CHANGE.
Is
this fair?
Trial lawyers frequently talk about fairness and justice for their
clients and yet they themselves behave ruthlessly to get their clients
acquitted not realizing even hell awaits them.
Recently an accuser in UK who alleged a renowned choir master sexually
abused her committed suicide after the trial even though the choirmaster was
convicted because she was subjected to unwarranted allegations she was a liar
and fantasist implying the allegations are false and malicious to destroy the
choirmaster.
JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE A DEFENCE LAWYER DOES NOT GIVE YOU LICENCE TO
ACCUSE OTHERS OF BEING LIARS AND FANTACISTS UNLESS YOU KNOW IS TRUE. WITHOUT
KNOWING IT IS TRUE AND YOU ACCUSE OTHERS OF BEING LIARS YOU ARE STICKING YOUR
NECK OUT FOR THE CHOP BY KARMA. IN THIS CASE THE DEFENCE LAWYER IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR PUSHING THE PERSON TO SUICIDE WITH DEADLY KARMA DUE.
THE ONLY JUSTIFICATION FOR LAWYERS AND EVERYONE TO ACCUSE ANOTHER OF
BEING A LIAR IS IF YOU KNOW IT IS TRUE, IF YOU DO NOT KNOW, YOU ARE WISE TO
SHUT UP BECAUSE YOUR NECK WILL BE ON THE CHOPPING BOARD OF THE FUTURE.
LAWYERS TALK OF FAIRNESS YET THEY DO NOT ABIDE BY THEIR RULES. IT IS NOT
THAT YOU SHOULD BE FAIR BUT YOU SHOULD ABIDE BY TRUTH AND IF THE TRUTH IS THAT
YOU DO NOT KNOW THE PERSON IS LYING YOU DO NOT IMPLY SO.
A fault is to be confessed:
The
Buddha said a fault is to be confessed and if you do not you are foolishly
asking for more punishment, more suffering even insanity.
Thus in
the case of the choirmaster accused of rape, by not confessing he is causing a
lot of trouble to many people, causing them to partake of wrong eg the judge
for not censuring lawyer accusing victim of lying without proof she is a liar
and the defence lawyer has thus been made to commit serious karma accusing her
of lying and he is also responsible for her suicide.
NO ONE
CAN ESCAPE ACCOUNTABILITY AND BY NOT CONFESSING AND ALLOWING A TRIAL TO OCCUR
HE HAS CAUSED MANY PEOPLE MUCH UNNECESSARY TROUBLE ABD ALSO CAUSED THEM (JUDGE,
DEFENCE LAWYER) TO INCUR SERIOUS KARMA.
The endless rounds of existence is not
about ‘been there, done that’ but been there, understood (truly) that’.
It takes arrogance, delusion, strong self identity views and a robot to
say that ‘been there, done that’.
‘Everything’ becomes a matter of a challenge or quest for a person with
strong self identity to try, undertake or experience and ‘succeed’. That is a
view but it is wrong and deluded. Life is not about being there and doing it,
what is more important is understanding the nature of things, whether what you
do is true or false, meaningful or meaningless, harmful or benevolent.
LIFE IS NOT ABOUT BEEN THERE AND DONE IT WHICH IS MECHANICAL DEVOID OF
UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION IT INCLUDES UNDERSTANDING. IF SUFFERING
AND INSANITY IS IMPORTANT TO YOU, LIFE IS ABOUT UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS
HAPPENING, WHAT YOU ARE DOING AS TRUE OR FALSE, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, GOOD
OR BAD AND SO IT IS TO AN ARROGANT EGOTIST THAT HE WILL SAY ‘BEEN THERE, DONE
THAT’ WHEN IT IS FAR MORE IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHAT IT IS THAT YOU HAVE DONE OR
BEEN TO, WHETHER IT IS MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS, GOOD OR BAD.
THUS THE WISE PERSON SAYS, ‘BEEN THERE, UNDERSTOOD
THAT’ NOT ‘BEEN
THERE, DONE THAT’, LIFE IS NOT ABOUT DOING BUT UNDERSTANDING. YOU DON’T NEED A BEING TO
DO, MINDLESS ROBOTS WILL DO.
Done
sex many times but do you understand sex?
Yes you been to sex many times and done sex many times but yet do you
truly understand sex?
Sex has a nature that applies to all and can be understood. Day in and
day out people have done sex, yet do they truly understand what sex is about?
YOU EAT EVERYDAY YET DO YOU UNDERSTAND EATING WHICH HAS A NATURE THAT
APPLIES TO EVERYONE AND CAN BE UNDERSTOOD?
THEREFORE JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN THERE (EVEN COUNTLESS TIMES), DONE
THAT (EVEN COUNTLESS TIMES) DOES NOT MEAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN,
WHAT YOU DONE COUNTLESS TIMES AND YOU ARE A FOOL ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT BRAGGING
ABOUT YOUR ‘ACHIEVEMENTS’ THAT ARE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Died
many times but are you any wiser?
The Buddha said you have died countless times, building piles of
skeletons as high as mountains, shedding your own blood greater than the four
great oceans yet are you any wiser?
IF IT IS TRUE AS THE BUDDHA SAID YOU HAVE SUFFERED AND SHED TEARS
GREATER THAN THE 4 GREAT OCEANS, YOU COULD SAY YOU HAVE BEEN TO EXISTENCE EVEN
COUNTLESS TIMES, SUFFERED EVEN COUNTLESS TIMES YET ARE YOU ANY WISER OR ARE YOU
JUST ANOTHER OLD ARROGANT CONCEITED FOOL?
HENCE IT IS NEVER A MATTER OF BEEN THERE, DONE THAT BUT WHAT HAVE YOU
LEARNT, WHAT HAVE YOU UNDERSTOOD TRULY?
Robots
are only interested in doing, they don’t do understanding:
Robots whether mechanical (eg computers, industrial machinery or cars)
or endowed with flesh (ordinary people) do not possess understanding, they only
have programming and so it is understandable they do not understand because it is
something they never had. What they are interested is doing, anything under the
sun, tell them, show them and they will do it (no questions asked).
ROBOTS WITH FLESH ARE LIKE COMPUTERS, THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY UNDERSTANDING
EXCEPT IN YOUR INTENSE FALSE PERCEPTION IT IS POSSIBLE AND SO WHAT THEY ARE
INTERESTED IS DOING. TELL THEM, SHOW THEM, PROGRAM THEM AND THEY WILL DO IT, NO
QUESTIONS ASKED, JUST DON’T ASK THEM TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS IT THEY HAVE DONE.
You
did it or you rehashed it?
Emotional people proudly proclaim, ‘been there, done it’ not realizing
what they say is not strictly true because it should be ‘been there, rehashed
it’.
Whatever ordinary people is never freshly specific for an occasion but
rehashed approximately or even stereotypically from a plan in their heads,
without rehashing according to plans or instructions they cannot do a thing.
And whatever is rehashed is faked, mechanical and meaningless, it is the plan
or mental jukebox that is the boss that tells the biological robot what to do
and say.
Thus you may think you have been to Everest and done it, climbed it but
you may be deluded. Before people climb Everest, they must done mountaineering
before, practiced, studies plans of how to go about and so they are carrying
out according to plans approximately or precisely, before having previously had
mountaineering training or programming they could not have climbed it.
HOW YOU DO SOMETHING MATTERS EVEN MORE THAN DOING IT, THERE ARE MANY
DIFFERENT STYLES OF DOING THINGS BUT THEY SHARE THE COMMON TRAIT OF HAVING BEEN
REHASHED WHICH RENDERS THE ACT MECHANICAL, MEANINGLESS AND SUFFERING RATHER
THAN THE PLEASURE IT IS MEANT TO BE. BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN ONLY
REHASH ACCORDING TO PLANS WHATEVER THEY DO, IT IS NOT THEY BUT THEIR MENTAL
JUKEBOXES THAT DID IT MECHANICALLY.
IF YOU REHASHED IT RATHER THAN MINDFULLY SPECIFICALLY DOING IT, YOU ARE
A FOOL AND DELUDED TO BE PROUD TO HAVE DONE IT BECAUSE VERILY YOU DID IT AS A SLAVE
NOT MASTER.
Further, in order to ‘done it’ you must have a preconception of what it
is that you want or desire to do and that means what you did must be through pre-meditation
or rehashed.
IN ORDER TO ‘BEEN THERE, DONE IT’ YOU MUST HAVE AN IDEA OF WHERE YOU
WANT TO BE AND WHAT YOU WANT TO DO AND THAT MEANS YOU ARE CARRYING OUT
ACCORDING TO PLANS IN WHICH IT IS THE PLANS THAT TELL YOU APPROXIMATELY OR
PRECISELY WHAT TO DO.
The wise do not praise doing, they praise inaction. Whatever is action
is suffering, whatever is inaction is release from suffering and if you have no
self identity, there is nothing to achieve or put a name to. As the Buddha
said, to one who (truly) sees, there is nothing what more there are things to
do. The Buddha said, good is cessation, good is when they forever cease and
thus those who preach doing are deluded, headed for woe not peace and rest.
WHATEVER IS DOING REQUIRES USE OF FORCE AND IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND
HARMFUL AND THE WISE ADVOCATE INACTION, NOT DOING RATHER THAN DOING AND WHOEVER
ADVOCATES DOING IS DELUDED, ADVOCATING SUFFERING AND HEADED FOR TORMENT HE
THINKS IS HAPPINESS. NOT ONLY IS DOING SUFFERING IN ITSELF BUT YOU ARE MORE LIKELY
TO INCUR KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING COMPARED TO THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT
ACT IN THE WORLD.
The
wise speak and do only as necessary:
Those who are truly wise do not have preconceived notions of what to say
or do, they speak and act as the need or occasion requires.
FOOLS ARE PREOCCUPIED WITH SAYING AND DOING THINGS, TO THEM WHAT AND HOW
THEY SAY OR DO IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS TO IMPRESS OTHERS.
THE WISE HAVE NO CONSCIOUSNESS OF SAYING OR DOING THINGS, WHEN THE NEED ARISE
THEY SAY OR DO, NOT TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS BUT BECAUSE IT IS NECESSARY OR
PERTINENT TO THE OCCASION.
DOING SHOULD NEVER BECOME AN ACT IN ITSELF BUT MERELY A VEHICLE TO GET
THINGS DONE. TO ACTORS THE DOING ITSELF IS MORE IMPORTANT OR ALL THAT MATTERS
WHICH IS WHY THEY WORSHIP ‘DONE IT’.
You
must have a list:
If you are not lying then in order to truthfully say ‘been there, done
it’ you must have consciousness of the many things that are available for doing
for a human and then to carry out according to that list eg killing someone,
shooting with a gun, raping someone, going to India, write a novel, etc and
that means premeditation of what you are going to do and then carrying out
approximately or precisely according to plans not because there is a true need
for doing it but for the sake of doing it and that is always evil and
suffering.
UNLESS HE IS LYING, BEFORE A PERSON CAN IN TRUTH SAY ‘BEEN THERE, DONE
IT’ HE MUST HAVE A LIST OF THINGS TO DO BEFORE HE DIES AND DONE IT ACCORDING TO
THAT LIST THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE COMPREHENSIVE. HE IS NOT DOING SOMETHING
BECAUSE THERE IS A TRUE NEED TO DO IT BUT BECAUSE IT IS THERE TO BE DONE, FOR
THE SAKE OF DOING IT AND THAT IS MAD.
DOING SOMETHING JUST TO TRY IT OUT OR FOR THE HECK OF IT IS A MAD REASON
FOR DOING THINGS. BEFORE YOU CAN TRUTHFULLY SAY BEEN THERE, DONE IT, YOU MUST
HAVE A LIST OF THINGS TO DO AND CARRYING OUT ACCORDING TO THE LIST AND THAT
MEANS YOU MUST BE A ROBOT.
Running
the rule not reasoning:
Navy Seal: “He’s got a gun within reach.
He’s a threat. I need to get a head shot so he won’t have a chance to clack
himself off [blow himself up].”
What is narrated above is not his reasoning but he is quickly running
the rule to decide what he should do. He has been trained or programmed to
react in certain ways and faced with a situation, he is consulting and
retrieving to apply rules that will determine what he does (shoot at the
forehead) with no true understanding involved except in your delusion or
muddled thinking that maybe there is, he has true understanding.
Global
corporate credit crunch this year?
First the people and governments (Greece, Spain, Italy even UK, US)
suffered credit crunches as the creditors went on strike, refused to lend for
fear of default and now to complete the circle, it may be companies turn to
experience credit crunch.
It is said that trillions (?$14 trillion) are due for refinancing or
repayment this
year and it is unlikely everyone will get refinance and should big companies
collapse because they cannot get finance it will have widespread knock on
repercussions.
MANY COMPANIES NOT JUST FORD, GM BUT EVEN SONY ARE HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON
DEBT TO FINANCE AND SHOULD FINANCE BE UNAVAILABLE THEY MAY COLLAPSE CAUSING
DEPENDENT COMPANIES TO GO BUST AND ADDING TO UNEMPLOYMENT.
POSSIBLY TO STAVE OFF THE CRUNCH GOVERNMENTS HAVE AGAIN PRINTED MASSIVE
AMOUNTS OF MONEY, THE US HAS BEEN BUYING UP MORTGAGE BONDS TO FREE UP MONEY BUT
IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN WHETHER THIS CHEATING, THIS PRINTING CAN SAVE THE DAY.
IT MAY NOT BE SO MUCH THAT IN THE PAST THERE WAS SO MUCH MONEY TO LEND AND
NOW THE CREDIT HAS DRIED UP BUT IN THE PAST THE LIMITED CREDIT WAS RECYCLED
MANY TIMES, LENT MANY TIMES TO FUEL THE BOOM BUT AS THE LEVERAGE BECAME MASSIVE
IT BECAME UNSTABLE AND NOW THAT BANKS DO NOT TRUST EACH OTHER (AND THEIR COFFERS
ARE EMPTY SO HOW TO LEND) AND THE BUBBLE BECAME TOO MASSIVE TO SUPPORT, THINGS
HAVE COME TO A HEAD.
Supposed each available million supported many millions of loans which
are coming due, for repayment or refinancing and now people are fearful and that
million is withdrawn from circulation, then those many millions of debt
dependent on that million is left in the lurch and governments are desperately
printing money to give the semblance there is still plenty or credit when there
is very little.
THE PEOPLE AND NATIONS (GOVERNMENTS) AND NOW THE COMPANIES WILL BE FOUND
OUT TO BE EMPERORS WITHOUT CLOTHES, THEY ARE DEPENDENT ON DEBT NOT WEALTH TO
CONTINUE. EVEN COMPANIES WITH BIG CASH PILES LIKE APPLE, MICROSOFT MAY BE SO IN
NAME NOT REALITY BECAUSE THEIR MONEY HAS BEEN LENT IN SEARCH OF RETURN AND
BORROWERS CANNOT REPAY THAT MONEY.
Why
are companies and countries in such debt?
The reason they are in such debt crisis is because company CEOs and
heads of governments borrow huge sums recklessly on behalf of companies (eg Air
Asia borrowing to buy many new planes) and nations that they then siphon off or
spent on projects that benefit themselves and cronies and when the money dry up
they go back for more debts.
IT IS NOT A SURPRISE BUT TO BE EXPECTED THAT MANY COMPANIES ARE IN SUCH
DIRE FINANCIAL CONDITION LIKE COUNTRIES BECAUSE THEY ARE RUN BY GOATS WHO
BORROW MASSIVELY NOT ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES BUT THEIR COMPANIES AND NATIONS
THAT THEY THEN PLUNDER.
This is the speech of a person who does not understand what he speaks.
It is never that the pope should inspire or not inspire you but what
good or bad he has done or nothing.
Inspiring is about stirring others’ mental forces and that is
meaningless and evil and so if you look to the pope for inspiration you are
deluded, in danger of insanity and here you are someone whose opinion is
exalted on the pages of the NYT.
IF YOU EXPECT THE POPE TO INSPIRE YOU AND ARE DISAPPOINTED IF HE DID NOT
THEN YOU ARE A FOOL, DELUDED, NOT WORTHY OF PAYING ATTENTION TO.
Is
Dell a cheat?
Michael Dell is attempting to buy back his company paying $13 per share
but some dissenting shareholders claim the Dell is worth $20+ even if its
computer business is worthless.
AND SO IT MAY BE THAT WHEN TIMES ARE GOOD, COMPANIES LIKE DELL LIST SO
THAT ITS MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS CAN EXPLOIT THE PUBLIC, USE PUBLIC MONEY TO MAKE
MONEY QUICKER AND WHEN TIMES ARE BAD, THEY MAY TAKE BACK THEIR COMPANIES AT A
PRICE THAT ADVANTAGE THEM THAN THE PUBLIC.
Age
Has No Mercy:
Just because many beautiful actresses become decrepit with age does not
mean age has no mercy. Only a being can show mercy and age is not a being who
show mercy and so you are speaking falsely misleading others and cultivating
false perception in yourself and others that end in mad perception.
YOU CAN SPEAK OF THE RAVAGES OF AGE OR TIME BUT TO SAY AGE HAS OR HAS NO
MERCY IS TO DISPLAY AN ABSENCE OF UNDERSTANDING AND SPEAKING BY ROTE COPIED
FROM OTHERS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE VERACITY OF WHAT YOU SPEAK.
Don’t
blame age, blame your karma:
Not everyone ages badly, actors and actresses age badly because they are
all rotten and those who are noble, who do not abuse themselves and others
(drugs, alcohol, smoke, debauchery) will look considerably more graceful in old
age.
THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS OF AGE HAVING NO MERCY UNDERSTANDS WRONGLY BECAUSE
IT MAY BE NOT SO MUCH AGING ITSELF BUT KARMA THAT DECIDES HOW UGLY (AND MAD) A
PERSON BECOMES IN OLD AGE.
IF IT IS ACTUALLY KARMA AND YOU THINK IT IS OLD AGE THEN YOU ARE DELUDED
AND HAVE DEMERIT MISLEADING OTHERS.
HOW UGLY AND MAD A PERSON BECOMES IN OLD AGE IS DETERMINED MUCH MORE BY
KARMA THAN BY AGING.
No comments:
Post a Comment