Thursday, April 04, 2013

Will strengthening banks weaken the economy?



11 hours ago
Is it good for the British economy that banks are being forced to strengthen themselves by raising more capital, to absorb potential losses?
If this is silly consideration and you think it is worthy of consideration then you are deluded.
If the banks are in a bad shape then they need to be corrected and if your economy is dependent on bad banks to thrive it means it is dependent on badness to thrive and this will lead to disaster further down the line.
IF AN ECONOMY IS DEPENDENT ON BAD BANKS TO THRIVE IT MEANS IT IS DEPENDENT ON COMPROMISE, EXCESSES AND BADNESS TO THRIVE AND THAT IS NEVER JUSTIFIABLE AND CANNOT BE SUSTAINED FOREVER BUT WILL LEAD TO DISASTER. IT IS DELUSION THAT FOR THE SAKE OF EXPEDIENCY WE SHOULD LET BANKS FESTER AND LATER WHEN THE ECONOMY IS STRONGER WE WILL DEAL WITH THE BANKS’ BADNESS. THIS NEVER WORKS AND IF REFLECTS FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT THEY THINK IT IS FEASIBLE.
IT IS NEVER TRUE REASON BUT AN EXCUSE NOT TO STRENGTHEN BANKS BASED ON THE PREMISE IT WILL WEAKEN THE ECONOMY. THUS ANYONE WHO SUBSCRIBES TO SUCH AN ARGUMENT HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
All arguments are false, wrong:
“Will strengthening banks weaken the economy” is an invitation to argue, debate, to take sides that are always false and wrong, based on emotion (proxy of force) than true reason.
There is never any need to argue or take sides which are always wrong. Every situation has a truth that can be seen and is objective, applies to everyone. Thus the truth of the situation is that weakened banks are bad and dangerous and need to be redressed urgently, you are silly to tie it to weakening the economy. A strong economy that is dependent on and requires a weak banking system is a false artificially not truly strong economy and so you are storing up trouble propping up an artificially strong economy with a weak banking system.
IF A STRONG ECONOMY IS DEPENDENT ON CANCER IN THE BANKS TO THRIVE THEN ITS STRENGTH IS ILLUSORY NOT TRUE AND BETTER TO BRING IT DOWN TO EARTH THAN LET IT INFLATE FURTHER.
ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE PROGRAMMED TO TAKE ISSUE, TO THINK TO FIND FAULT OR EXCUSES NOT TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT.
Forgetfulness may not be dementia:
Even if it is not dementia, forgetfulness is always blameworthy (the person is somehow responsible for his forgetfulness) and it is dangerous to self and others.
BECAUSE FORGETFULNESS IS NEVER BLAMELESS AND IT IS DANGEROUS, IF YOU NOTICE YOU ARE GETTING FORGETFUL IT IS A WARNING SIGN OF EVEN WORSE SUFFERING TO COME AND YOU BETTER TAKE STEPS TO REDRESS BEFORE IT GETS WORSE. A PERSON WHO REHASHES EVERYTHING HE SAYS AND DOES IS CONSTANTLY ABUSIVELY USING HIS MEMORY PROCESS AND IF HE KEEPS DISTRACTING HIMSELF BY DOING MANY THINGS AT THE SAME TIME HE IS HEADING INTO THE ABYSS OF FORGETFULNESS.
Frank Sinatra’s extreme dislike:
Like and dislike can be conditioned to become intense and rather than happiness it can lead to much suffering and actions that incur karma to be repaid as suffering.
It seems Sinatra developed intense dislike for certain things that drove him to do extreme things.
A certain girl caught his fancy and he had her flown to his city (Vegas?) and his handlers took her on shopping sprees but when she met Sinatra, he started sniffing (like a dog) and took extreme offence at the smell of the girl’s perfume and ordered to get her out of his sight.
THERE ARE MANY EVEN ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO HAVE DEVELOPED INTENSE DISLIKE (AND LIKE) FOR CERTAIN THINGS AND THIS CAN CAUSE THEM TO TAKE ACTIONS THAT INCUR KARMA. LIKE AND DISLIKE IS MAD, IT IS JUST A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED OR REPULSED AND IF A PERSON DOES NOT ERADICATE HIS LIKE AND DISLIKE THEY WILL CAUSE HIM MUCH SUFFERING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY AS KARMA.
Do you understand psychology & psychiatry?
Liverpool's club psychiatrist Steve Peters says the pressure of finishing in the top four is too much and players will perform better if they set themselves realistic ambitions.
Psychology and psychiatry are based on delusion and only apply to people who are deluded & false, who are robots driven by emotions.
If a person has true understanding, is not deluded and conducts himself in truth and therefore has no style, does not rehash and is not riven by emotions, psychology and psychiatry do not apply, have no basis and so psychology and psychiatry is controlled insanity that ends in insanity for those who believe in them, practice them and are treated by them.
Psychology and psychiatry are fabrications, do not truly exist and so those who are paid highly to be their high priests are doing useless work that drains wealth from the system that can otherwise be fruitfully used elsewhere.
If Liverpool players are not good enough then they will not finish top four not because of the pressure of unrealistic targets but because they are not good enough. There is no need to set realistic or unrealistic targets, if you are really good as a team then unless your luck is stacked against you, you will finish well because you are good.
It is delusion that you need to set targets and without targets you are lost.
IT DOES NOT REFLECT REALITY BUT IT REFLECTS INTENSE DELUSION AND LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT PEOPLE THINK THERE IS NEVERTHELESS A CASE FOR PSYCHOLOGY IN SPORTS OR EVEN STUDYING FOR EXAMS OR CAREERS WHEN IT IS DANGEROUS FATAL FLIRTATION WITH MAKE BELIEF.
IT IS OBJECTIVE AND CANNOT BE DISPUTED, EITHER PSYCHLOGY IS VALID OR HAS BASIS OR IT IS HOCUS POCUS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS RIVEN BY INSECURITY NEEDING DIRECTION OR SOMEONE TO BRAINWASH THEM TO BOLSTER THEIR ROBOTIC EXISTENCES AND VENTURES.
ANYONE WHO IS NOT SURE OR THINK THERE IS A CASE FOR PSYCHOLOGY/PSYCHIATRY HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, DOES NOT DISCERN AS IT ACTUALLY IS AND IS HEADED FOR EVEN ETERNAL TORMENT, WHAT MORE THEIR HIGH PRIESTS.
Psychology and psychiatry are crap:
When ordinary people say something is crap it is not because they see and know it is true but it is driven by emotion, hate or dislike to denigrate. If a person who is unemotional and has true understanding says psychology and psychiatry are crap it may accurately describe them. And crap is poisonous, can harm even kill you apart from being unpalatable, whoever mistakes crap for food is making a big mistake.
Society fucks you up and you turn to psychiatry to be fucked more:
The person who is fucked up is not blameless but society fucks its members up badly and those who are desperate and amenable turn to psychiatry or psychology to be fucked up again with delusions and deadly chemical or drug concoctions.
NOT JUST PSYCHOLOGY, IF A PERSON IS TROUBLED IN THIS WORLD, SUICIDAL EVERYWHERE HE TURNS TO, EVEN HIS BEST FRIEND OR FAMILY OR FAVOURITE GURU ARE EFFETE AND DELUDED. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY ARE NEVER THE ANSWER BECAUSE THEY WILL FUCK YOU UP MORE.
AND YET THERE IS A SIMPLE AND ONLY ESCAPE FROM TORMENT, PAY ATTENTION TO WIPE OUT YOUR STYLE, WIPE OUT ALL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
It is possible for a mind to be truly happy, free of suffering and stress and it is impossible for a truly happy mind to coexist with an obese body and what is the use of treating an obese body when the mind continues to be sick?
BETTER TO HAVE A HAPPY STRESS FREE MIND (EVEN IF THE BODY IS OBESE) THAN A THIN BODY WITH UNHAPPY MIND AND IF A MIND IS TRULY HAPPY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE IT CAN COEXIST WITH A FAT BODY.
AND IN ORDER TO HAVE A TRULY HAPPY MIND YOU MUST SHED YOUR STYLE; YOU MUST STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS. DO YOU NEED A MICROCHIP FOR THIS?
A robot’s existence is always tormenting:
A robot’s existence (someone who rehashes from memory whatever he says or does) is always tormenting even every now and then to suicidal homicidal levels. It is impossible for a robot to be truly happy and free from serious insanity and conflicts.
Even if you are not a robot it is impossible to totally avoid suffering in this world that can reach serious levels.
It is because people are deluded, they see what is maddening (this world and a robotic existence) as acceptable, they are driven by greed and hate that they cling on to this world not realizing they will not just perish but perish painfully, not just once even for another eternity ahead.
EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT A ROBOT THIS WORLD IS SERIOUS SUFFERING AND IF YOU ARE A ROBOT (AS ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HERE ARE) THE SUFFERING CAN REACH SUICIDAL HOMICIDAL LEVELS.
THE ORDINARY AND NOBLE PERSON:
The Buddha spoke of run of the mill people and noble ones.
THE PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT, WHO HAS STYLE, WHO STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS AN ORDINARY OR RUN OF THE MILL PERSON.
THE PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT, DOES NOT HAVE STYLE IS A NOBLE PERSON.
Men do not desire sex with best friends' wives
A new US study finds that men may have a natural aversion to the idea of having sex with their best friends' wives.
A University of Missouri study has found that adult males' testosterone levels dropped when they were interacting with the marital partner of a close friend. Prior studies have already shown suggested that men's testosterone levels influence competition among males trying to attract females.
What is stated is nonsense and you do not need studies to arrive at nonsense.
“Thou shall not commit adultery” implies men desire to have sex with other people’s wives and so the study says God is wrong.
If his best friend’s wife looks like a pig then he may not lust after her not because he has no desire for sex with his friend’s wife but because she looks like a pig.
Just because a person does not have sex with his best friend’s wife does not mean he has no desire, it may be fear of damaging the friendship that is restraining him.
THAT STATEMENT IS NONSENSE AND YOU DO NOT NEED TO WASTE MONEY DOING A STUDY TO ARRIVE AT IT.
Desire is never based on reason:
Desire as in desire to have sex with your friend’s wife, is never based on reason, is never a matter of rationality but it is based on involuntarily stirred blind harmful force that once stirred is difficult to resist, leads to temptation.
A PERSON IS NOT AT LIBERTY TO DECIDE WHETHER HIS DESIRE FOR HIS FRIEND’S WIFE IS STIRRED OR NOT BUT THE SIGHT OF A SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE WOMAN ESPECIALLY ONE WHO BEHAVES SEDUCTIVELY IS ENOUGH TO STIR HIS DESIRE THAT ONCE STIRRED IS BLIND AND HARD TO PLACATE.
Even London or NY is not a safe place to visit, no one can guarantee your safety and so it is never with knowing that she says that but it is foolishly without knowing to falsely reassure others that has karma attached. A wise person would never say something for which he can be judged.
Wanting people to visit Sabah is not a true reason:
Wanting people to visit Sabah is never a true reason to say Sabah is safe to visit but it is when you see it is truly safe that you say so and if you cannot truly see, you are wise to refrain.
WANTING PEOPLE TO VISIT SABAH IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO SAY SABAH IS SAFE TO VISIT AND IF THIS IS YOUR PREMISE FOR SAYING IT, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY.
She must stress herself and others:
If you say ‘Sabah is safe to visit’ without knowing what you say is true or for the false reason of wanting people to visit Sabah, you must stir self resistance to what you say that leads to stress and conditions you to say or do with accompanying self resistance and you are guilty of misleading others with karma attached.
If you hear ‘Sabah is safe to visit’ and you do not know what to make of it or you think she is right, Sabah is safe to visit then you too must stir self resistance that leads to stress because it is possible to discern that what is said is said falsely to want others to visit Sabah.
Art, philosophy and poetry are delusions:
It takes delusion to partake and appreciate art, philosophy and poetry. The appreciation and partaking of them ends in insanity, torment.
If you perceive art, philosophy and poetry as meaningful, meritorious you are deluded, you see and understand falsely that must stir self resistance that leads to stress.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO APPRECIATE ART, PHILOSOPHY AND POETRY WITHOUT ACCOMPANYING SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS TO STRESS. IF YOU THINK IT IS POSSIBLE YOU ARE DELUDED.
The more you stop the less you suffer, now and forever:
Whatever is a doing (saying, thinking, perceiving are doings) is suffering because you have to use force according to a plan and you risk creating karma with what you do that leads to suffering in repayment, whatever good you can achieve by doing is always relative never absolute.
Stealing is a doing that is always suffering (must be done concealed with fear of being caught and punished) and leads to suffering (even if you escape being caught there is karmic debt to be repaid as suffering), not to steal is not doing that is never suffering and does not lead to suffering in repayment.
In the same way telling lies, harming, killing even insects is a doing that is suffering and leads to suffering in repayment, not to tell lies, harm, kill is not suffering and does not lead to karma to be repaid as suffering.
Style or the use of force to stretch syllables, accelerate in speed and loudness is a doing that is always totally unnecessary suffering that leads to suffering in repayment because it harms others with force bombardment.
To think is a doing and it is suffering and leads to suffering, not to think is not doing that is never suffering and does not lead to karma.
To stir one’s mental force to like and dislike is a doing even if it is conditioned and automatic and it is always suffering and lead to suffering in repayment whilst not to like or dislike is not doing that is never suffering and does not lead to suffering in repayment.
THE BUDDHA SAID ‘GOOD IS CESSATION, GOOD IS WHEN THEY FOREVER CEASE’ AND THAT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE AND APPLIES TO EVERYONE THAT YOU IGNORE TO YOUR EVEN EVERLASTING PERIL. THE WISE LEARN TO SEEK INACTIVITY, TO UNENTANGLE THEMSELVES FROM THE MORASS OF THIS WORLD.
BY DOING YOU CAN SAVE ANOTHER’S LIFE BUT IF HE IS A FOOL HE WILL SUBSEQUENTLY FALL INTO THE ARMS OF DEATH EVEN AGAIN AND AGAIN. ONLY THE PERSON CAN TRULY SAVE HIMSELF FROM ENDLESS DEATH AND SUFFERING AND IF HE REFUSES TO DO SO, NO ONE CAN DO ANYTHING FOR HIM.
THE WISE PRAISE CESSATION, DISENGAGEMENT, FOOLS PRAISE ACTION, PARTICIPATION.
Clouds of uncertainty:
There is uncertainty and there are clouds but there is no such thing as clouds of uncertainty that is a falsity that has serious implications for the perpetrator.
You are fostering in yourself and others (with karma attached) that clouds can be uncertain and uncertainty is like clouds when it is a figment of imagination or fabricated perception.
CLOUDS OF UNCERTAINTY ARE ALWAYS FALSE AND IF YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG YOU ARE GULLIBLE AND HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
The sin of interrupting others:
People in this world are used to interrupting others and see nothing wrong when it has karma to be experienced as future suffering. If you want to avoid karma you should be careful not to interrupt others.
Here again people think they understand (interrupting others is OK) when they don’t.
It is because foolish people want to consort with fools who tend to beat around the bush, talk nonsense and digress that they are forced to interrupt others in the process causing them to commit wrong that also conditions them to interrupt others.
A wise person minimizes his interactions with others, avoids contact with verbose fools and thus has little need for interrupting others and they speak to the point averting the need of others to interrupt them.
It was said that Sariputta, the Buddha’s future deputy, having seen a serene Buddhist monk was interested to enquire about his master, patiently followed the monk discreetly as he went about alms collection and then he followed the monk to his eating place, patiently waited for him to finish eating and even poured water for him before enquiring about his master who was responsible for his serene deathless demeanour.
WHEN THE BUDDHA SPEAKS OR EATS, YOU DO NOT INTERRUPT HIM UNLESS YOU WANT KARMA. WAIT UNTIL HE HAS STOPPED TALKING AND THEN QUESTION HIM. IN THE SAME WAY, ONE MUST BE CAREFUL NOT TO INTERRUPT OTHERS, IT IS A BAD, KARMA CREATING HABIT THAT LEADS TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
Not rude but wrong:
Interrupting others is not about rudeness but it is wrong and so you may practice not interrupting others because you think it is rude when that is wrong, it is wrong.
Rudeness is about behaviour that is frowned upon, disliked and is based on programming and stirred force.
IT IS WRONG, NOT RUDE TO INTERRUPT OTHERS. RUDENESS IS ABOUT BLIND PROGRAMMING AND STIRRED FORCE OR DISLIKE FOR CERTAIN OF BEHAVIOUR. ONLY OBEDIENT ROBOTS SUBSCRIBE TO RUDENESS.
This is a discrete lesser act of merit that cannot compare with the merit of achieving the higher states of the mind.
You can be rewarded with hundreds of thousands of years in the lower heavens but discrete acts of merit cannot compare with the merit of attaining the first higher state where there is no style, no rehashing, no self resistance, no stress.
Jesus said he has not come to bring peace on earth but with a sword. Do you think if it was possible for peace to be brought to earth and since it is such a desirable commodity that Jesus would refuse to do so?
Peace is impossible on earth so long as beings are without true understanding driven by ill will, greed and delusion and so such pleas will fall on deaf ears.
There are those who desire peace but only on their terms which they think is fair and good when it is self centred to their material advantage and they are desirous of their lives here. Those who have found their lives here and want to live them out ‘in peace’ will lose it.
THERE IS TRUE PEACE BUT IT DOES NOT AND CANNOT EXIST ON EARTH AND SO THE PEACE YOU DESIRE ON EARTH IS A CONSTRAINED FALSE PEACE THAT CANNOT LAST LONG.
How can a person truly love another when he is constantly bombarding others with force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that stresses, make restless and distract all others?
There is love that is true and love that is false and what is the use of love that is false?
Before a person can truly love another he must stop constantly radiating others with force that harms them with stress, restlessness and distraction and that means a person with style cannot truly love except in his delusion.
Before a person can truly love he must first stop being a robot and become a true person. Whatever love a robot has is mechanical, rehashed.
BEFORE YOU CAN TRULY LOVE OTHERS YOU MUST STOP HARMING OTHERS WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND THAT MEANS YOU MUST STOP BOMBARDING OTHERS WITH STYLE WITH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND BECAUSE ALL BEINGS HERE CONTINUE TO HAVE STYLE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY CAN TRULY LOVE OTHERS.
BEFORE YOU CAN TRULY LOVE OTHERS YOU MUST NOT BE A ROBOT REHASHING EVERYTHING YOU SAY OR DO MECHANICALLY ACCORDING TO PLANS. UNTIL A PERSON CEASES BEING A ROBOT HE CANNOT TRULY LOVE OTHERS AND THIS IS A WORLD OF REHASHING ROBOTS.
Before you love stop harming others:
It may be true you can truly love others even though you sometimes quarrel and hurt the other with words and deeds or it may be delusion, before you can truly love another you must stop totally harming others and that can only come about if you are born again without your style, you don’t constantly indiscriminately radiate others with force in your prolonging of syllables, changing speed and loudness that creates stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate in others.
WHATEVER RELATIONSHIP THAT HAS ARGUMENTS, HURT THROUGH DEEDS AND WORDS, WISHES TO STIR OTHERS EMOTIONALLY IS NEVER TRUE LOVE EXCEPT IN DELUSION.
BEFORE YOU CAN TRULY LOVE OTHERS YOU MUST STOP HARMING OTHERS TOTALLY AND THAT MEANS YOU CANNOT HAVE STYLE, CANNOT MECHANICALLY REHASH AND YOU CANNOT CAUSE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN OTHERS BY PLYING THEM WITH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
With style love is impossible, without style love is automatic:
I say with style (use of force to prolong syllables, change speed and loudness) love is impossible, without style love is automatic.
ANYONE WITH STYLE MUST HATE HIMSELF AND OTHERS, HE IS CONSTANTLY HARMING HIMSELF AND OTHERS TOTALLY UNNECESSARILY WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE CAUSED BY HIM AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN TRULY LOVE HIMSELF LET ALONE ANYONE ELSE.
Internet does not exist for most North Koreans:
What is said is false to exaggerate, it is not that internet does not exist for most North Koreans but it is ‘no internet access’. Even if most North Koreans do not have internet access, internet exists for North Koreans as it exists for people in the rest of the world.
JUST BECAUSE MOST NORTH KOREANS HAVE NO INTERNET ACCESS DOES NOT MEAN INTERNET DOES NOT EXIST FOR THEM. WHAT IS SAID IS FALSE WITH THE PURPOSE OF HYPING THE MATTER.
Whoever stirs another is asking for suffering:
Whoever stirs another, whether consciously or not is asking for trouble, for suffering in repayment.
If you intend to stir another and you do not realize then you are a fool who does not know what he does and that is a recipe for doom.
How do people stir others?
1)  By saying or doing things that are false or meaningless or nonsense that must stir others’ mental force to agitated or confused because they are intended to be true and meaningful and it is impossible for the recipient to see it as true or meaningful. Dancing, smiling, laughing and joking or meaningless and so you are guilty of plying others with falsity.
2)  Anyone who plies others with force changes in what he does or says is guilty of trying to stir others’ mental forces to similarly prolong, change speed and strength for no good reason.
3)  Anyone who rehashes what he says or does is guilty of plying others with counterfeit speech and actions that must stir their mental force even if they accept it as genuine.
YOU MAY NOT GIVE A DAMN IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO OR EVEN YOUR LOOKS STIR OTHERS, YOU THINK IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS SHOULD OTHERS GET STIRRED, IT IS NOT YOUR FAULT BUT IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF STIRRING OTHERS, SOMETHING THAT IS OBJECTIVE NOT SUBJECTIVE, YOU ARE LIABLE FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT. THUS IF YOU MAKE ANOTHER ANGRY, FRIGHTENED, SAD, HURT, CONFUSED, EXCITED YOU HAVE CREATED DEBT COMPARED THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT.
‘Shun’ is a forceful style of rejection and without ascertaining that it was such you are lapsing into falsity stirring self resistance that leads to stress to say so and you have karma misleading others it is thus.
The substance of the event is Pope Francis declines grand Vatican residence, ‘shun’ is a forceful style of declination that may be entirely a fabrication of the foolish person.
Pleasing & impressing others is always stressful:
The purpose of style is to please and impress others and a major if not entire purpose of what emotional people say or do, is to please or impress others in the context of the situation.
IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, HOW YOU SAY OR DO IT IS TO CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS, IT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY STIRRED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS YOU TO SAY OR DO WITH AUTOMATICALLY RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT TRAPS YOU IN AGONIZING STRESS.
WHY IS THAT SO?
PLEASING OR IMPRESSING OTHERS WITH WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS NEVER A GENUINE OR MEANINGFUL REASON TO SAY OR DO SOMETHING, IT ENSLAVES OR BEHOLDENS YOU TO OTHERS AND THAT MEANS IT IS SELF HARMING NO MATTER HOW YOU CANNOT SEE AND SWEAR IT IS FULL OF MEANING AND GENUINE AND THAT MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND TRAINS YOU TO SPEAK AND DO WITH AUTOMATIC SELF RESISTANCE.
WHEN YOU WANT TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS YOU WANT TO STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE IMPRESSED WITH YOU OR WHAT YOU SAY, TO BE PLEASED OR LIKE THEMSELVES BECAUSE OF YOUR FAWNING ATTITUDE AND THAT IS ALWAYS A FALSE AND MEANINGLESS PURPOSE OF SAYING AND DOING THAT MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
THE BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE POSSIBLE AND THINGS THAT ARE IMPOSSIBLE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS WITHOUT STIRRING SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS TO SELF RESISTANCE. A MAJOR PURPOSE OF STYLE (STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) IS BECAUSE IT IS FALSELY PERCEIVED AS PLEASING AND IMPRESSIVE.
The purpose of style is to stir:
No matter how tender it is said or done the only purpose of style is to stir others to be pleased, impressed, intimidated or dominated.
By style is meant the use of force to stretch syllables, change (accelerate) speed and loudness and they are totally unnecessary in order to speak and the purpose of doing so is for sound effects that are falsely conditioned to be perceived as pleasing, impressive, intimidating or dominant.
The purpose of style is to stir emotions in others, primarily like (excitement, lust, greed, marvel, attraction) and dislike (hate, anger, upset, disgust, annoyance) and secondarily fear, sadness, hurt and confusion/agitation.
STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS NEVER HAS ANY TRUE PURPOSE OR MEANING.
THE PURPOSE OF STYLE IS TO SOUND PLEASING, IMPRESSIVE, INTIMIDATING OR DOMINANT TO OTHERS, IT IS TO STIR EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, FEAR AND AGITATION) IN OTHERS. THESE ARE ALL FALSE AND HARMFUL REASONS AND STYLE MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
There is never a need to announce your intention, you just prepare yourself and defend yourself when the time comes and so the purpose of saying that is always false eg to posture or ‘frighten off’ the adversary. Whether it is an effective deterrent or not is subjective not objective, despite all the posturing Hitler nevertheless attacked his neighbours and Russia.
THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO ANNOUNCE IT, WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS BE PREPARED AND DEFEND YOURSELF WHEN ATTACKED. TO DETER IS A FALSE SUBJECTIVE REASON TO SPEAK THAT ENDS IN INSANITY. IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION OF THIS WORLD THAT IT FINDS SUCH POSTURING EFFICACIOUS, COMFORTING (STIRS FORCE TO BE COMFORTED) AND DETERRING.
What has fascism got to do with football?
Paolo Di Canio who has fascist tendencies has been appointed manager of troubled Sunderland football club. Supporters and many have cried foul and want him dismissed on the basis of his fascism.
FOOTBALL IS NEVER A BASTION OF NOBILITY, IT IS CRASS COMMERCIALISM AND A DOG EAT DOG WORLD AND SINCE WHEN HAS FOOTBALL TAKEN A MANTLE OF VIRTUE THAT A FASCIST IS NOT ALLOWED TO BE MANAGER?
IT REFLECTS THE INSANITY OF THIS WORLD, THEY ARE FULL OF SHIT AND THEY EXPECT OTHERS TO BE IMPECCABLE.
IF FOOTBALL IS IMPECCABLY VIRTUOUS THEN IT MAY HAVE A CASE TAKING ISSUE WITH DI CANIO’S FASCISM BUT FOOTBALL IS ITSELF A CESSPIT OF GREED AND SELF SERVING SO WHAT CAUSE HAS IT TO OBJECT TO HIS FASCISM?
New orders at US factories rose in February from January mainly due to a jump in demand for commercial aircraft.
The reason why mankind has fashioned a bunch of indicators to monitor the economy is not because mankind is clever and understands what it is doing, understands economy but it is blind, does not understand, refuse to see the truth which is why it needs to depend on such indicators which are never true indicators of economic direction but false.
Suppose the US economy is in deep trouble and it is dependent on massive money printing and the folly of countries like China supplying it with goods for pieces of printed paper to remain relatively strong then even if there is a sharp rise in factory orders, it is not because the economy is healthy or recovering but it is because of deceit, money printing and supply of free goods by the world.
JUST BECAUSE FACTORY ORDERS ARE RISING SHARPLY DOES NOT MEAN GOOD TIMES ARE COMING AGAIN, THE US ECONOMY MAY BE ARTIFICIALLY DECEITFULLY PROPPED UP BY MONEY PRINTING AND PAYING FOR GOODS WITH PIECES OF PAPER THE US PRINTS NOT EARNS.
The Fed spends billions each month buying mortgages:
I read that the US Fed spends billions each month buying mortgages not because it has plenty of savings but by printing worthless paper money to buy non performing mortgages that frees up credit lines enabling the economy to continue where it might otherwise collapse.
If this is true then it is a far more important sign towards a true understanding of the outcome of the economy than factory orders.
You are not allowed to speak as you wish or fabricate if you want to escape insanity and punishment.
Success has no quality or sound let alone sweet sound of quality success and so you are flirting with mad perception saying so and you have debt for misleading others.
THAT SUCH A PERSON HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE IF HE HAD HE WOULD KNOW WHAT HE SAYS HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF INSANITY AND SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
WHEN PEOPLE SAY SUCH THINGS THEY SMILE OR LAUGH BECAUSE THEIR MENTAL FORCE ARE STIRRED TO LIKE IT (FUNNY MEANS LIKED) AND THEY THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL WHEN IT IS A BLIND MEANINGLESS STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES.
It is a result of false perception that a person says thus and by saying so he is reinforcing his and others’ false perception that has karma to be repaid as suffering and insanity waiting.
Freedom is not an entity (eg atom, person) that can lose one. The reason why people think they sound ‘cute’ or clever speaking thus is precisely because it is false but seemingly correct to them. They are clever in falsity or delusion not in truth or reality.
You've gone too far, UN chief tells North Korea
What North Korea does is either bad/evil or good and no bad is tolerable or OK so gone too far reflects tolerance for evil that is evil.
NO EVIL IS ACCEPTABLE IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO SUFFER SO HOW CAN NORTH KOREA HAVE GONE TOO FAR AND NOT FAR ENOUGH IN THE PAST EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION YOU THINK IS RIGHT VIEW.
PM Lee warns miscalculations in Asia can set back region
Whatever peace or stability that is maintained by calculating is never true or everlasting and there is no evidence that it is the result of your calculations and so if you are driven or obsessed by calculations and avoiding miscalculations (what is calculation eg appeasement by you may be miscalculation by another who prefer confrontation).
NOT BY CALCULATION DO YOU OBTAIN TRUE PEACE AND PROSPERITY. CALCULATED APPEASEMENT OR CONFRONTATION CAN BOTH LEAD TO DISASTER, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE EITHER IS SUPERIOR OR WORKS AND SO YOUR CALCULATIONS MAY BE MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
YOU CAN CALCULATE AND CALCULATE AND STILL END IN STRIFE.
Provocative avaricious risk taking not miscalculations:
It is not miscalculations but provocative avaricious risk taking and actions based on stirred emotions that can lead to regional conflagrations.
People seldom if ever deliberately miscalculate but they meticulously calculate thinking they can get what they want at the expense of others whom they think they can push to give way without causing a disaster.
Calculating is a programming, never based on true understanding and because it is a programming and carrying out according to planned it is false and dangerous, liable to miscalculation.
IN ORDER TO AVOID MISCALCULATIONS YOU MUST AVOID CALCULATIONS AND SEEK TO UNDERSTAND A SITUATION AS IT TRULY IS AND ACT ACCORDINGLY UNEMOTIONALLY RIGHTEOUSLY FOR THE BENEFIT OF EVERYONE.
NEVER BY CALCULATING WHICH IS NEVER BASED ON TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS A PROGRAMMING RULED BY MAXIMIZING SELF GAIN AND MINIMIZING SELF LOSS DO YOU AVOID MISCALCULATIONS THAT LEAD TO DISASTER BUT YOU AVOID MISCALCULATIONS BY NOT CALCULATING AND REPLACING IT WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Not by calculating do you avert miscalculation:
Never by calculating does anyone avert miscalculations that lead to disaster but by not calculating, replacing calculating with calm understanding of a matter and acting for the common good of all those involved.
IT IS SILLY TO WARN OF MISCALCULATIONS LEADING TO SETBACKS WHEN CALCULATION ITSELF IS BLIND, BASED ON PROGRAMMING AND THE FATHER OF MISCALCULATIONS.
Brinksmanship more than miscalculation is a threat:
Confrontational unnecessary brinksmanship more than miscalculation, is a threat to security in this world.

No comments: