Jesus:
He who endures till the end will be saved
The Buddha said if the person develops and remains in loving kindness
and he does not lose it at the end he is born in heaven amongst the gods of a
High Divinity.
Jesus said he who endures till the end will be saved.
So how can one lose it, how does one endure till the end?
Under severe provocation, a person may again pick up his dagger or knife
to defend himself or even attack others and when he does this, he has lost his
loving kindness and he does not endure till the end and HE WILL NOT BE SAVED.
AND SO YOU MAY DEVELOP ‘PERFECT’ LOVING KINDNESS BUT IF IN THE END YOU
JOIN IN AND FIGHT TO ATTACK OR DEFEND, IT IS ALL WASTED, YOU WILL PERISH.
I
harmed you to save you:
The head
of the US electronic spying agency says newly revealed telephone and internet
surveillance programmes have disrupted dozens of terror plots.
This is a form of false logic that people in this world are accustomed
to accepting.
As head of US electronic spying, what do you expect him to say?
If what is being done is not detrimental to people he would not have to
justify it by saying it disrupted terror plots.
Even if it disrupted terror plots, if what is done is detrimental, evil
he and those involved are incurring karma to be repaid as suffering and
disrupting terror plots is no justification to do what is wrong or detrimental.
You don’t do wrong to disrupt wrong unless you want to incur debt.
I HARMED YOU TO SAVE YOU IS A FORM OF FALSE RULES LOGIC THAT IS FAR MORE
RAMPANT THAN PEOPLE REALIZE AND BECAUSE IT IS FALSE IT IS DANGEROUS AND KILLS.
Countering
wrong is no justification to commit wrong yourself:
Countering wrong is no true justification to commit wrong but you
countering wrong with what is right.
If you are spying on people you should do it openly, tell the people
exactly what you are doing so that terrorists will refrain from these channels
of communication.
IT WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE DISRUPTING TERRORISTS IF YOU TELL THEM YOU
ARE MONITORING THEIR INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS SO THAT THEY REFRAIN FROM USING
IT.
16 hours
ago
As South
Africa's former President Nelson Mandela fights for his life in hospital, the
BBC's Andrew Harding reports on efforts of those close to him to protect his
privacy.
People think they are good or meritorious to speak thus but they are on
the side of falsity incurring karma to be repaid as suffering.
Rather than defending Mandela’s dignity one should see the truth of his
suffering and the causes of this suffering as there are causes and that is not
defending his dignity except in your delusion or muddled thinking. Thus
defending his dignity is about cover-up, hiding the truth, pretence and that is
always evil, debt incurring.
MANDELA IS FACING HIS ENDMAKER AND HIS SUFFERING IS NOT RANDOM BUT A
REFLECTION OF WHAT HE HAS DONE IN HIS LIFE AND RATHER THAN DEFEND HIS DIGNITY,
A CALL FOR PRETENCE, ONE SHOULD SEE CLEARLY AS IT ACTUALLY IS WHAT HIS
SUFFERING IS AND WHAT THEIR CAUSES ARE.
What
else did you do apart from foiling terrorists?
People won’t tell you the evils that they did but they will tell you the
good parts. Did you secretly spy on China or other countries to steal
information from them?
IF THE PROGRAM IS TO FOIL TERRORISTS, THERE IS NO REASON TO KEEP IT
SECRET BUT IF IT WAS TO UNRIGHTEOUSLY STEAL INFORMATION FROM UNSUSPECTING
PEOPLE LIKE FOREIGN NATIONS THEN YOU MUST KEEP IT SECRET SO THAT THEY DO REALIZE
THEY ARE BEING SPIED ON.
Style
is packaged inclusive indiscriminate constant ill will:
Because style or the use of force to prolong syllables, change speed and
loudness is constant, relentless in every word and action undertaken and it
radiates unnecessary force indiscriminately at all recipients it is de facto
packaged inclusive ill will, packaged inclusive harming of all others and so
without destroying his style a person cannot have true love, true goodwill.
STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND
LOUDNESS IS A FORM OF PROGRAMMED PACKAGED INCLUSIVE CONSTANT INDISCRIMINATE
BOMBARDMENT OF OTHERS WITH FORCE OR ILL WILL.
‘After all’ has nothing to do with what happened and it is said to
falsely convey emotion eg laugh or mock and that is evil and incurs karma. It
is a form of ill will that precludes love and that means eternal punishment.
YOU WILL GO MAD IF YOU THINK ‘AFTER ALL’ IS RELEVANT. IT IS SAID TO STIR
EMOTION, TO MOCK OR TEASE OR LAUGH AND YOUR HEAD IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD AND
IF YOU DO NOT REMOVE YOUR HEAD IN DUE COURSE IT WILL BE CHOPPED EVEN ENDLESSLY.
The
boycott hullaballoo:
If the opposition went back on their word to boycott perhaps of threats
to exclude them, then there is karma for going back on their boycott.
If the ruling party countered the boycott by threatening them with
actions they are not entitled to take, then that would be karma for them.
YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO AS YOU PLEASE EG BAN MPs FOR NOT ATTENDING AND
IF YOU DO SO THAT IS ABUSE OF POSITION WITH KARMA. IF THE OPPOSITION WENT BACK
ON THEIR WORDS BASED ON FEAR THEN AS THE BUDDHA SAID, THAT TOO HAS KARMA.
THE GREATER KARMA IS ON OFFICIALS WHO ABUSED THEIR POWERS TO INTIMIDATE
OTHERS CAUSING THEM TO BREAK THEIR WORD.
Two
wrongs versus one wrong:
Abusing your powers is one wrong, using your powers to force others to
do wrong, reneging on their pledge to boycott is another and so you are guilty
of two offenses with commensurate debt and punishment.
The opposition has committed one wrong, reneging on their pledge to
boycott based on fear.
This means that the current affluence of countries like Brazil and India
is not genuine but dependent to some extent on the presence of foreign money,
on debt and if the money borrowed has been spent wastefully on consumption and
celebration (eg hosting world cups and Olympics) it is likely to offer
sufficient returns and so there will be disaster down the line.
It seems virtually all the nations are in trouble or will be in trouble
having borrowed massive amounts of money from markets or individuals and
companies with much accumulated wealth. You can prolong the sham by massive
infusions of printed money but this cannot go on forever.
The
difference between hate and anger:
Hate is ill will, the stirring of mental force to want to harm or
destroy someone or something.
Anger is dislike, the stirring of mental force to be repulsed by
something, to be disliked by something.
Thus hate or ill will is a will or urge to harm others either mentally
or physically if expressed in actions and speech, anger is merely a senseless,
harmful stirring of mental force to be repulsed, disliking.
ANGER AND HATE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS THAT MUST NOT BE CONFUSED ONE
FOR ANOTHER. ANGER IS A FORM OF DISLIKE, STIRRED REPULSION BY SOMETHING, HATE
IS STIRRED DESIRE TO HARM OR ATTACK OTHERS, IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF LOVE WHICH IS
THE DEFAULT STATE IN A MIND VOID OF HATE OR ILL WILL.
The Buddha spoke of three lower fetters that bind beings to the lower
realm, namely greed (the programmed strong urge to acquire or possess), ill
will or hate (urge to harm or destroy) and delusion (harbouring falsities that
are perceived as true). Like and dislike is something else and though they are
not wholesome, they do not harm others unless expressed and so like although
like and dislike is personal senseless suffering rather than pleasure it may be
made up to be, it is not a bar to heaven but its abrogation results in the third
higher mental state and happiness and gives 4 eternities in heaven.
Greed,
ill will and delusion are based on force never reason:
The three lower fetters, greed, ill will and delusion are based on
force, ruled by force, products of force, never due to true reason and only a
being without true reason and therefore a robot dictated by his mental force
can be slaves of greed, ill will and delusion.
GREED IS A PROGRAMMED IRRATIONAL INVOLUNTARY HARD TO RESIST HARMFUL
DANGEROUS URGE TO ACQUIRE, TO POSSESS, TO OWN WHAT ARE ALL PERISHABLE OBJECTS
THAT CAUSE SUFFERING RATHER THAN HAPPINESS.
ILL WILL OR HATE IS A PROGRAMMED IRRATIONAL INVOLUNTARY HARD TO RESIST
URGE TO HARM OR DESTROY OR ATTACK OTHERS. THE ELIMINATION OR ABSENCE OF HATE OR
ILL WILL GIVES GENUINE GOODWILL OR LOVE WHICH IS THE QUALITY THAT QUALIFIES THE
PERSON TO ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN.
A DELUSION IS A PLAN THAT IS RECORDED AND REHASHED REPEATEDLY THAT IS
FALSE AND THUS ALWAYS HARMFUL ENDING IN INSANITY THAT IS GOVERNED BY FORCE. YOU
NEED FORCE TO RECORD, YOU NEED FORCE TO REPLAY THE RECORDING AND CARRY OUT THE
INSTRUCTIONS OF THAT DELUSION. A PERSON WHO IS NOT DELUDED HARBOUR NO PLANS,
ACCEPTS NO PLANS EITHER GENERATED BY SELF OR OTHERS, HE MERELY SEES THINGS AS
THEY ACTUALLY ARE, REMEMBER THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE, HE DOES NOT FABRICATE
DELUSIONS OR ACCEPT DELUSIONS FOR IMPLANTING BY OTHERS.
THUS BEINGS IN THE LOWER REALMS ARE SLAVES, ROBOTS OF FORCE THAT IS
BLIND, HARMFUL AND MEANINGLESS AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR ENDLESS SUFFERING AND
DEATH BECAUSE THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND, THEY CALL EVIL SUFFERING AND DEATH
CAUSING FORCE THEIR FRIEND AND PROTECTOR.
Play a
guessing game with Steve Martin.
It is never meritorious but incurring karma to be repaid as suffering
inviting others to guess, to take up a position on something they do not know.
It is an invitation to gamble, to lapse into falsity that should never be
contemplated and it reflects well conditioned mutually shared delusion that
people see nothing wrong.
The Buddha spoke of heightened virtue and discernment as part of three
urgent tasks for any being who cherishes his future happiness. It is heightened
not ordinary virtue not to invite others to guess and it is heightened
discernment to see asking others to guess as evil not good.
THE BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE THREE URGENT TASKS, ACHIEVING HEIGHTENED
VIRTUE, CONCENTRATION AND DISCERNMENT.
IT IS HEIGHTENED NOT ORDINARY VIRTUE NOT TO ASK OTHERS TO MAKE GUESSES.
IT IS HEIGHTENED NOT ORDINARY DISCERNMENT TO SEE ASKING OTHERS TO GUESS
AS EVIL NOT GOOD.
THERE IS NO NEED TO INVITE OTHERS TO GUESS, IT IS MAKING A FUSS OUT OF A
MOLEHILL AND AN INVITATION TO TAKE UP A POSITION WITHOUT KNOWING THAT STIRS
RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
It is not meritorious but delusional and karma incurring to pose the
question as if it is such a terrible or incredible thing that this man who
should been in jail was allowed freedom to commit a fatal rape.
The answer is very simple, ‘negligence’ is the reason why he was
permitted to roam free to commit a fatal rape.
THERE IS NO NEED TO SEARCH YOUR SOUL AND YOUR COUNTRY’S SOUL HOW HE
HAPPENED, THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE COMMON ‘NEGLIGENCE’ WHICH HAS KARMA FOR THOSE
RESPONSIBLE.
It takes a deluded man to say that and don’t talk too soon before the
edifice comes crashing down on your head.
It does not take any crisis to prove capitalism works and the fact that
this crisis has happened proves capitalism does not work otherwise this crisis
would not have happened. Capitalism can be clearly defined and understood
correctly as it actually is and for those who understand, capitalism never
works, is not indefinitely sustainable, even without abuses, corruption and
negligence, it leads to an unstable accumulation of wealth in the hands of the
few at the expense of the masses. That capitalism should be free of corruption
is impossible and corruption is like a cancer that ultimately destroys the
system.
CAPITALISM NEVER WORKS, IT ONLY WORKS WHEN WEALTH IS BEING TRANSFERRED
FROM THE MASSES TO THE FEW AND THEREAFTER IT COLLAPSES IN DEBT. IF YOU THINK IT
MAY WORK OR YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO THINK THEN YOU ARE A FOOL.
What
would it take to prove capitalism does not work?
There have been many devastating capitalistic crashes throughout history
and today America and much of the world including UK, Japan, Euro are in a
severe slump that would have been worst without massive cheating, massive money
printing and the ability of America to falsely stoke global demand by buying
with worthless pieces of paper it prints that the world covets.
IF CAPITALISM WORKS THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE IN THIS SOCIALLY
DESTABILIZING CRISIS WE ARE IN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH WORSE IF GOVERNMENTS
HAD NOT RESORTED TO CHEATING, PRINTING MONEY AND THE US HAD BEEN FORCED TO PAY
WITH MONEY IT EARNS RATHER THAN PRINTS AND HERE YOU HAVE A DELUDED FOOL WHO
SAYS THE CRISIS PROVES CAPITALISM WORKS.
If
he was penniless on the street he might not be so sanguine:
If the author and self touted expert was penniless and on the street, a
victim of capitalism he might not be so bullish about capitalism and so you
don’t care for the downtrodden, as long as you are well fed and housed, have a
cushy job writing nonsense dressed as wisdom, capitalism works? Not for long,
this is not the end of the story so don’t pronounce judgment so soon.
Rage:
Anger mixed with hate:
Anger and hate can come together such that the undiscerning is confused,
think they are the same.
Thus something someone said may anger you, you are stirred to even
strongly dislike what he said (anger) and swiftly even immediately you want to
attack him, beat him up and that is stirred hate, stirred ill will.
RAGE IS THE CONCURRENCE OF ANGER AND HATE. WHEN SOMEONE SAYS OR DOES
SOMETHING, YOU DON’T HATE IT BUT YOU MAY BE ENRAGED BY IT, YOUR DISLIKE
STRONGLY AROUSED BY IT AND THIS MAY SWIFTLY BE ACCOMPANIED BY HATE, STIRRED ILL
WILL TO WANT TO ASSAULT HIM.
Record high for house
prices
HOUSE prices rose to their highest level on record
last month.
costs
£233,061 – £6,125 more than a year ago.
That
represents an increase of £510 every month.
The
figure is a record for England and Wales, topping the previous peak reached in
February 2008 at the height of the last housing boom.
Sales are
also up by 19 per cent, proving the market has bounced back despite the economic
downturn.
David
Newnes, director of LSL Property Services, owners of Your Move and Reeds Rains
estate agents, said: “Even taking inflation into account, the record high price
is symbolic of the significant improvement in the housing market over the past
year.
Your Move’s Mr Newnes warned that it was not all good news,
however. “Take London out of the equation and the
average house price falls dramatically,” he said.
“The red hot London market is giving the whole property
market a deceptively healthy glow. London still leads the way in terms of house
price rises.
STATISTICS CAN BE DANGEROUS AND SO WHAT APPEARS TO BE A ROBUST PROPERTY
RECOVERY MAY BE A FLASH IN THE PAN CAUSED BY RED HOT LONDON THAT MAY BE
UNDERPINNED BY FOREIGN INTERESTS ATTRACTED BY CHEAP UK POUND.
THERE IS A FALSE LOGICAL LINK BETWEEN PROPERTY MARKET HEALTH AND
ECONOMIC HEALTH WHICH SUGGESTS ECONOMIC HEALTH IS DEPENDENT ON PROPERTY VALUES
WHICH IS NEVER A TRUE INDICATOR OF WEALTH AND HEALTH, JUST BECAUSE PROPERTY IS
BEING TRANSACTED AT A CERTAIN PRICE DOES NOT MEAN ALL THE PROPERTY IS WORTH SO
MUCH OR THE ECONOMY IS RICHER BY SO MUCH, IT IS AN ILLUSORY, DANGEROUS AND
UNWARRANTED EXTRAPOLATION OF WEALTH.
THE HEADLINE NEWS SOUND EXCITING AND MANY ARE READY TO JUMP IN AND
TRUMPET BUT IF WHAT OTHERS SAY IS TRUE, IT IS DECEPTIVE, RESTRICTED TO LONDON
ONLY WHILST THE REST OF THE NATION IS FLOUNDERING.
How
HSBC recklessly generates big profits?
Thailand was at the forefront of the economic crisis in 1997 when its
banks collapsed under speculative currency attack after racking up oversized
foreign debts.
Two major Chinese Thai companies driven by greed have paid high prices
(billions) for Makro Siam & Singapore’s F&N in deals one of which was
HSBC who acted as adviser for both buyer and seller. It seems credit markets
are flushed with money from western government printing and within a week the
bank had no trouble arranging billions in finance to more than finance the
deals.
The Thai buyers may be blinded by greed to pay above odds, HSBC may not
care except form fees and greedy rich people with money may be desperate to find
a home for their money to put it to work but there are those expressing concern
that such highly leveraged deals (backed up by overvalued shares and earnings)
may end in disaster again.
THE CURRENT FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS IS NOT AN ACCIDENT AND IT SEEMS
MANKIND NEVER LEARNS WHICH IS NOT SURPRISING BECAUSE NO MATTER HOW
SOPHISTICATED HUMAN ROBOTS NEVER HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
The
take home message:
Rather than isolated, such abusive risky ill-advised bids using
overpriced stock and clout or connection as collateral may be rampant and
financial advisers and brokers like HSBC would not be making fat profits which
may turn to massive losses for the system later should buyers default and so
the economic system is not as robust or wealthy as it seems but it is on
steroids.
IF RISKY ILL ADVISED DEALS DID NOT GO THROUGH, AS THEY SHOULDN’T THEN
BROKERS LIKE HSBC WILL EARN MUCH LESS AND SO THE SYSTEM IS ACTUALLY NOT AS
WEALTHY AS IT APPEARS AND THIS IS A RECIPE FOR FUTURE CRASH.
Only
robots can be deluded and anyone with delusion is a robot:
Without being a robot a person cannot be deluded.
Delusions have no physical or reality or truth basis and so in order for
a person to harbour delusions that are consistent in him and differ from others
he must have adopted the delusions from others or fabricated himself, committed
them to memory and rehashed them as needed.
IF SOMETHING IS TRUE OR HAS BASIS IT IS NOT CALLED A DELUSION, IT IS
ONLY WHEN A VIEW OR EXPLANATION IS FALSE THAT IT IS CLASSED AS DELUSION AND IN
ORDER FOR A PERSON TO CONSISTENTLY ESPOUSE A DELUSION IT MUST BE PLANTED OR
PROGRAMMED IN HIM BY SELF OR ADOPTED FROM OTHERS AND REHASHED REGULARLY AND SO
ONLY ROBOTS CAN BE DELUDED AND ANYONE WHO IS DELUDED MUST BE A ROBOT.
DELUSIONS TOGETHER WITH ILL WILL (WISHING TO HARM OTHERS) AND GREED ARE
THE TRIAD THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINED BEINGS IN THE LOWER REALMS AND SO ALL BEINGS
HERE MUST BE ROBOTS NEVER GENUINE BEINGS.
Playful
aggression is still deadly ill will:
When animals particularly young ones like kittens and puppies play
amongst themselves and with humans they playfully bite and claw that can
sometimes get carried away and turn serious and this too is a form of ill will
or desire to hurt even those they consider friends that further reinforces and
maintains them in ill will that is a fetter to future even eternal woe.
Jokes whether practical or verbal are often a playful attacking at
others and so they too are expressions of ill will, desire to attack or harm
others.
BEINGS DETAINED HERE INCLUDING ANIMALS ARE IMBUED WITH ILL WILL, THE
DESIRE OR URGE TO HARM OR ATTACK OTHERS AND PLAYFUL AGGRESSION, TEASING, JOKING
ARE ALL ‘DISGUISED’ FORMS OF EXPRESSING ILL WILL THAT REINFORCES AND MAINTAINS
THE PERSON IN ILL WILL AND DETENTION IN THE LOWER REALMS.
SPORTS IS ABOUT ILL WILL, AGGRESSIVELY FIGHTING AND BEATING OTHERS
WITHIN THE ORGANIZED RITUALIZED FORMAT OF A GAME EITHER DIRECTLY (EG FOOTBALL,
TENNIS) OR INDIRECTLY (GOLF).
Malaysian
author Tan Twan Eng wins the £25,000 Walter Scott Prize for historical Fiction
for his second novel The Garden of Evening Mists.
There is no good fiction, all fiction even if based on reality is false
and so anyone who delves in fiction is not good but evil and headed for evil
and suffering.
IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION OF MANKIND THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH FICTION
AND GIVE AWARDS FOR THE BEST FICTION WHEN FICTION IS DICING WITH FUTURE
INSANITY AND SUFFERING AS ITS REWARD.
A PERSON FIRMLY GROUNDED IN TRUTH NEVER DELVES IN FICTION OR
FALSIFICATION.
You
must submit yourself to be a robot to write fiction:
The newsreader thinks he is the master of what he reads but he is
deluded, it is the piece of paper that tells him precisely or approximately
what to say.
In the same way you might think you are the master of the fiction you
write but the fiction you write must be fabricated in your mind and put onto
paper by pen and once conceived you are a slave to the falsity or fiction rather
than master of the fiction you perceive in delusion.
ONCE CONCEIVED A FICTION BECOMES THE PLAN THAT RULES YOU RATHER THAN YOU
RULE THE PLAN.
People see nothing wrong with such statements when they are false, unwarranted,
an exercise in futility or silly.
There is no need for being reassured or not. Unless Clegg can see for
himself (not possible) exactly what Prism does, he cannot know for himself
whether what Prism does is wholesome or not, just because others brief you even
comprehensively about what Prism does, does not mean it is the truth and so it
is dicing with falsity, doubt and uncertainty to say you are assured.
EVEN IF THE MOST CONSCIENTIOUS EXPERTS IN PRISM INFORMS YOU ABOUT WHAT
PRISM IS DOING, YOU CANNOT BE TRULY ASSURED ABOUT PRISM. ONLY IF YOU SEE FOR
YOURSELF EVERYTHING THAT PRISM DOES CAN YOU KNOW OR BE SURE IT IS WHOLESOME AND
SO IT IS MEANINGLESS AND DELVING IN FALSITY TO SAY YOU ARE ASSURED, YOU HAVE NO
RIGHT TO BE ASSURED AND YOU ARE ASKING FOR INSANITY AND KARMA MISLEADING OTHERS
TO SAY YOU ARE ASSURED.
YOU CAN SAY CLEGG HAS BEEN BRIEFED ABOUT PRISM, THAT HE IS REASSURED IS
THE MORE THAT COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD.
Reassured
is a position and only fools adopt positions:
The Buddha said he has abandoned all positions which are false and lead
to suffering.
Reassured is a position a being adopts, not reassured is another
position a being can adopt and they are totally unnecessary, there is no need
for anyone to be assured or not assured except that he is vested, has vested
interests which is often if not always unwholesome eg Clegg wants to tell you
he is reassured so that you in turn will be reassured and let matters rest.
IT SUFFICES YOU KNOW WHAT PRISM DOES, THERE IS NO NEED TO BE REASSURED
OR NOT WHICH ARE POSITIONS FOOLISHLY ADOPTED BY THE PERSON USUALLY FOR VESTED
REASONS EG HE WANTS YOU TO BE REASSURED IN TURN, TRUST HIM.
Friday, 14 June 2013
|
Malaysia cannot depend on just one source of income -- Petronas. But
then even Malaysians (Chinese in particular, but Indians and Malays as well)
are moving their money to other countries (and not all is ‘dirty’ money but
are legitimate investments). Some are even coming to the UK and billions are
being invested here (some of them are my personal friends). How long can this
go on before something breaks?
|
Anyone who subscribes to the views of RPK is deluded.
It is not an accident or chance that he homes in on quality of life but
he has his priorities all mixed up.
If you are talking about back to basics then the first consideration to
deal with is not quality of life which is secondary, not important but it is
dealing with evil, corruption & abuse of power.
THE FIRST CORRECT CONSIDERATION IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BACK TO BASICS
IS NOT QUALITY OF LIFE BUT DEALING WITH CORRUPTION AND ABUSES OF POWER. IF I AM
CORRECT ANYONE WITH OTHER VIEWS IS WRONG AND WRONG VIEW THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE
WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB NOT HEAVEN. IF YOU DON’T KNOW THEN YOU SHOULD
SHUT UP RATHER THAN MISLEAD OTHERS WITH KARMA ATTACHED. FEED YOUR SOUL BEFORE
YOU FEED YOUR BODY, BETTER TO DIE FROM POOR QUALITY OF LIFE AND GO TO HEAVEN
THEN HAVE QUALITY OF LIFE AND THEN PERISH.
The
quality of life in heaven far exceeds here:
The Buddha said kingship over men is meagre compared with heavenly bliss
and so the quality of life in heaven far exceeds whatever may be gotten here
and unless you clean up yourself, shed yourself of corruption and abuses of
others God will not give you the quality of life of heaven.
IF YOU WANT QUALITY OF LIFE THEN THE BUDDHA SAID IT IS FAR BETTER IN
HEAVEN THAN BEING A KING HERE AND WHAT STOPS YOU FROM GETTING THAT QUALITY OF
LIFE IS YOUR LACK OF CLEANLINESS. UNLESS YOU CLEAN UP YOURSELF GOD IS NOT
LETTING YOU INTO HEAVEN EVEN IF YOU SUFFER ENDLESSLY HERE.
Why
reassurance is wrong and evil:
You never reassure another unless you want your head on the chopping
board. Suffice you brief someone about the facts of a matter, to reassure is to
lapse into unrighteousness for ulterior motives that will end with your head on
the block.
You can brief someone on Prism but you don’t reassure him, it is up to
him to accept or not what you briefed which may be true or false, accurate or
inaccurate.
You can say you are briefed about Prism but you never say you are
reassured about Prism in which case you are foolishly putting your head on the
chopping board to say you stand by, vouch for Prism.
REASSURANCE IS SOMETHING UNNECESSARY AND FALSE AND ONLY NECESSARY FOR
DEVIOUS REASONS IN A WORLD OF DECEPTION TO FALSELY WANT OTHERS TO ACCEPT WHAT
THEY CANNOT KNOW IS TRUE AS TRUE.
Even
if what you say is true you don’t reassure anyone:
Even if what you say is true, you do not reassure another, it is up to
him to accept what you say and it is his fault if he cannot see the truth.
Whether someone tells you is true or not can be known by those who are
discerning and it is a reflection of your lack of discernment, your doubt and
uncertainty that you fail to see and it is not your fault he disbelieves and
you do not seek to reassure him nor is there any use because he would then be
using blind force to accept as a plan what you say is true rather than he
seeing it as true.
IF YOU LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY YOU STATE THE TRUTH, ANYTHING MORE,
REASSURANCE COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD (JESUS SAID).
US Open
venue Merion might be small but she packs a punch, writes BBC Sport's Rob
Hodgetts
It is possible to correctly understand what is presented and if you
incorrectly understood or you do not know what to make of it then you must stir
resistance that leads to stress.
What is presented is false, a fabrication that is flirting with insanity
and has debt to be repaid as suffering for the originator.
The course cannot lay a trap, it may be tricky or difficult to play for
golfing robots but it is taking liberty with truth that has serious
consequences to say the course is a SHE and she packs a punch and lays an US
Open trap. You will laugh your way to hell and then it would be replaced by
terror and anguish.
MANY DO NOT REALIZE THEY HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH SERIOUS SUFFERING AND
THEY DESERVE IT. IT IS THEIR DELUSION THAT THEY ARE GOOD WHEN THEY ARE BAD.
SO WHAT IF EVEN PESSIMISTS FEEL
OPTIMISTIC OVER THE ECONOMY? THEY ARE BOTH NOT CREATURES OF CALM CLEAR REASON
BUT STIRRED BLIND DANGEROUS EMOTIONS.
Only deluded people will issue such statements and only deluded people
will subscribe to it.
This is an example of false logic that if even the pessimists are optimistic, things must be really heading for a boom when it is totally unwarranted because pessimism and optimism are not based on reason or facts but stirred mental force.
This is an example of false logic that if even the pessimists are optimistic, things must be really heading for a boom when it is totally unwarranted because pessimism and optimism are not based on reason or facts but stirred mental force.
A PERSON OF TRUE REASON EXAMINES THE ECONOMIC DATA AND SAYS THEY LOOK
GOOD OR BAD, HE DOES NOT STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME OPTIMISTIC OR
PESSIMISTIC WHICH IS SENSELESS AND HARMFUL TO SELF.
AND SO THE FACT THAT YOU WOULD BECOME PESSIMISTIC OR OPTIMISTIC AND YOU
CHOOSE TO DWELL ON THEM REFLECTS YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND SO YOUR
OPTIMISM IS NOT RELIABLE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT A RELIABLE PERSON PRONE TO EMOTION
RATHER THAN CALM CLEAR REASON.
IT IS DANGEROUS TO TRUST A PERSON WHO PREFERS EMOTION TO REASON AND BY
PREFERRING TO SPEAK OF YOUR OPTIMISM RATHER SAY DATA LOOK GOOD YOU ARE
FOOLISHLY ACKNOWLEDGING YOUR INCOMPETENCE IN TERMS OF REASON.
SO WHAT IF EVEN PESSIMISTS FEEL OPTIMISTIC OVER THE ECONOMY? THEY ARE
BOTH NOT CREATURES OF CALM CLEAR REASON BUT STIRRED BLIND DANGEROUS EMOTIONS.
Beating
a drum over something uncertain:
If you knew things are looking good, you don’t need the chorus of
pessimists added to optimists and even after the pessimists feel optimistic you
still do not know if it is good.
ONLY A FOOL DWELLS ON HOPE INSTEAD OF FOCUSSING ON REALITY, WHAT YOU CAN
SEE. EVEN IF PESSIMISTS FEEL OPTIMISTIC YOU STILL DO NOT KNOW IT IS GOOD SO YOU
GET YOUR HOPES RAISED THAT MAY BE DASHED. HOPE IS ABOUT STIRRED MENTAL FORCE TO
LIKE AND IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND SUFFERING RATHER THAN HAPPINESS TO HOPE,
ONE MOMENT HOPE SWINGS HIGHER ANOTHER MOMENT IT DROOPS LOWER.
Taxing
the rich even more 'won't change society', says Blair as he defends rise of the
super wealthy
He is expressing false logic that ends in mad logic. Taxing the rich
more is not a matter of changing society and it is a matter of whether the
super rich gained the wealth rightly or by crook (cheating) or hook (force) or
both and if they deserve to be taxed more especially if they had amassed their
wealth through wrong means.
Tony Blair is never a good man but he is a bad man and his view is not
based on true reason but partisanship, he himself may be very wealth and his
friends are the rich and famous not ordinary people.
HIS LOGIC IS THAT SINCE IT WON’T CHANGE SOCIETY, IT IS NO USE TAXING THE
RICH MORE.
Bill
Gates, Soros, Buffet did not gain their wealth righteously:
Soros gained his wealth by plundering the system, by speculating or
shorting that plundered money off the system.
Oil speculators like Goldman Sachs push oil prices from $25 to $100 plus
today that is at the expense of the people, it is the people who have to pay
high prices.
Bill Gates became the richest man by his unrighteous bullying tactics,
buying over companies (Internet Explorer, Office), by twisting computer makers’
arms to install his system in preference over others (monopolistic methods). If
you examine the history of Microsoft objectively you will find he amassed
wealth and dominated the market through bullying and unfair means.
FEW ARE THE SUPERICH WHO GAINED THEIR WEALTH THROUGH RIGHTEOUS MEANS,
THEIR WEALTH WAS GAINED AT THE EXPENSE OF SOCIETY AND TAXING THEM IS A MEANS TO
REDRESS THE INJUSTICE AND SO BLAIR HAS WRONG VIEW THAT LEADS TO HELL OR TH
ANIMAL WOMB TO SAY TAXING WON’T CHANGE THINGS.
Warren
Buffett is not that clean:
Buffett shrewdly invested in Goldman Sachs after the crisis and was
rewarded handsomely. Goldman Sachs only survived because of massive infusions
of government money, a change in status from investment bank to commercial bank
that allowed it to be infused with government money.
GOLDMAN SACHS MAKES ITS MONEY BY EVIL MEANS AND SO BUFFETT THROUGH
INVESTING IN GOLDMAN SACHS ALSO MAKES HIS MONEY BY EVIL MEANS AND BUFFETT IS
SHREWD TO KNOW GOLDMAN SACHS IS CONNECTED AND WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO FALL.
China apparently has a shadow banking system that provides credit or
money to businesses for them to start and run businesses. This is dangerous
because if they run into trouble they will be unable to repay debts causing a
financial crisis.
IF WHAT IS STATED IS ACCURATE THEN CHINA’S BUSINESS MODEL IS NOT BASED
ON SECURITY BUT RISK OR DANGER, SUPPLYING LOANS TO COMPANIES TO FUEL RAPID
EXPANSION THAT CAN BE DISASTROUS WHEN EXPORT AND DOMESTIC DEMAND COLLAPSES AND
THESE COMPANIES ARE UNABLE TO SERVICE THEIR DEBTS TRIGGERING A FINANCIAL
CRISIS.
Chinese
companies carry debts making them vulnerable:
If it is true China’s growth is credit driven it means Chinese companies
carry debt that make them vulnerable to downturns and if there is a shadow
banking system it means the debt in the system exceeds the official levels.
Without
debt many companies will collapse:
Even many world famous companies need continued infusion of credit to
survive, if they were denied credit they would collapse and with them many
companies who are otherwise healthy.
FEW ARE THE COMPANIES IN THIS WORLD WHO ARE FREE OF CREDIT FINANCING, IT
IS SAID GLOBALLY TRILLIONS IN REFINANCING ARE DUE THIS YEAR AND IN A TIGHT
CREDIT MARKET EVEN WITH GOVERNMENTS PRINTING MONEY FURIOUSLY, THEY MIGHT
STRUGGLE TO REFINANCE TO ENABLE THEM TO KEEP THEIR HEADS ABOVE WATER, NOT
DROWN.
FIRST GOVERNMENTS RUN INTO TROUBLE WITH DEBT, NEXT MAY THE COMPANIES,
THE PEOPLE ARE ALREADY BANKRUPT OR UNEMPLOYED, SUCH IS THE WICKED GAME OF
CAPITALISM.
This
is a world founded on debt not wealth:
This is a world founded on debt, whose foundation is debt not wealth and
if you do not know what to make of it or you think this is a solid world,
founded on wealth then you are deluded and must stir resistance that leads to
stress holding those views.
The debt in the system may far exceed the actually wealth and this
illusion is not indefinitely sustainable but must end in a terrible crash that
devastates the social fabric and the knives will be out at each others’ throats.
Debt
is addictive:
Debt like gambling (or sex or anything evil) is addictive.
You may borrow money to start a business that is successful to repay all
your debts but you become greedy to get rich quicker and you borrow more to
expand or branch off into other businesses that lead to greater debts that may
backfire so that you end up losing everything.
DEBT IS ADDICTIVE AND SO LULLED BY INITIAL SUCCESS WITH BORROWED MONEY
YOU MAY BORROW AND END UP WITH A NOOSE THAT STRANGLES YOU AND EVERYONE
DEPENDENT ON YOUR BUSINESSES.
Style
is the only engine of ill will:
Style is the constant, mindless, indiscriminate engine of ill will that
precludes the being from having goodwill or loving kindness that the Buddha
said is the key to eternal life in heavenly bliss that far exceeds the
pleasures of a king here.
Style constantly indiscriminately radiates, bombards everyone with force
in the prolonging, changing speed and strength that leads to stress,
restlessness and inability to concentrate, induces others to similarly prolong,
change speed and strength that traps them in a robotic tormenting existence.
Tormented by stress, restlessness and distraction that is the result of
style and leading a tormenting robotic rehashing existence the being is driven
to in addition lash out at others, to wish to harm and cause trouble for
others.
A PERSON’S STYLE INDISCRIMINATELY CONSTANTLY RADIATES FORCE IN THE
PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT HARMS OTHERS WITH STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND ALSO EXERTS PRESSURE ON OTHERS TO
SIMILARLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH.
STYLE CAUSES THE BEING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION
AND NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE THAT TORMENTS THE PERSON SO THAT
HE IS DRIVEN IN ADDITION TO WISH TO HARM OTHERS.
SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS IN STYLE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE CAN TRULY
SHED HIS ILL WILL, HIS STYLE CONSTANTLY HARMS OTHERS AND CAUSES HIM TORMENTING
SUFFERING THAT DRIVES HIM TO ATTACK OTHERS SPECIFICALLY.
A PERSON WITHOUT STYLE HAS AUTOMATICALLY STOPPED CONSTANTLY PERSECUTING
OTHERS, HE HAS NO ILL WILL, NO DESIRE TO HARM OTHERS.
IT IS NO GREAT MYSTERY WHY ALL BEINGS HERE ARE IMBUED WITH ILL WILL,
THEY ARE BLINDED BY DELUSION AND IGNORANCE AND PROGRAMMED TO AUTOMATICALLY
PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH WHICH IS THE ENGINE BEHIND THEIR ILL WILL
(THEY THINK IS THEIR GOODWILL) THAT KEEPS THEM TRAPPED IN ETERNAL SUFFERING.
BEINGS HERE ARE ROBOTS, DUMB WITLESS SLAVES OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES WHICH HAVE
BEEN PROGRAMMED TO AUTOMATICALLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT THEY
SEE NOTHING WRONG, SEE AS THEIR GOODNESS AND THINK IS THEIR PROTECTOR WHEN IT
IS THEIR NEMESIS, TORMENTOR AND WILL KILL THEM PAINFULLY.
Apple came out triumphant at WWDC, but who won E3's
console war?
If a person does not truly understand the nature of the question he must
be disturbed, his resistance stirred and stress results. Whoever stresses
another creates karma to be repaid as suffering.
The true purpose of the question is not because he does not know the
answer and wants to know or to tell you the answer but to challenge you and
that is evil.
If he knows the answer and you don’t know the answer then he should
avoid the rigmarole of asking a frivolous question and instead tell you eg Play
Station won the console war. If you do not know the answer what is the point of
asking a question others do not know but you know?
HE IS MAKING A MOUNTAIN OUT OF A MOLEHILL FOR SELF IMPORTANCE PURPOSE,
IT IS POINTLESS ASKING OTHERS THE QUESTION WHICH IS NOT SINCERE BUT TO
CHALLENGE OTHERS TO FIND OUT.
FURTHER APPLE BEING TRIUMPHANT IS UNRELATED TO THE MATTER AT HAND, IT IS
SAID ACCORDING TO A RULES FORMAT LIKE ‘SO YOU KNOW APPLE WON X, DO YOU KNOW WHO
WON Y?’, A FORM PROGRAMMED RULES SPEECH THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW WHAT
TO MAKE OF.
All
questions trouble others:
Whenever you ask others questions, remind yourself that it troubles
others to answer and so if your question is frivolous, you have ill will, is
troubling others and creating debt to be repaid as suffering, not merit as you
perceive in delusion.
A WISE PERSON WOULD ONLY POSE RELEVANT, ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS TO OTHERS,
MINDFUL OF THE FACT QUESTIONS TROUBLE OTHERS TO ANSWER AND WHOEVER TROUBLES
OTHERS IS ASKING FOR KARMA.
Be
civil and take your turn:
Rather than good, such demands are evil with debt.
It is not to be civil that a person should take his turn but it is to
not un-righteously deprive others of their places that you do so.
YOU DON’ TELL OTHERS TO DO THIS OR THAT IN WHICH CASE THEY BECOME A
SENSELESS ROBOT OF WHAT YOU TELL THEM.
YOU TELL THEM IT IS WRONG TO JUMP THE QUEUE WHICH DEPRIVES OTHERS OF
THEIR PLACES AND IT IS UP TO OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND AND CARRY OUT IF THEY WISHED.
HENCE IT IS DEMERITORIOUS RATHER THAN GOOD TO TELL OTHERS TO BE CIVIL
WHICH IS THE WRONG REASON FOR TAKING YOUR TURN.
Summits are totally unnecessary and useless, you never need expensive
lavish summits to do the right thing. What is happening in Syria can be truly
understood by those with discernment and the correct action is never in dispute
and if you have true understanding you do not need summits to come to an
agreement, if you do not have true understanding and are partisan,
antagonistic, all the summits in the world is just for show and wasteful
uselessness.
THE RIGHT THING TO DO WITH SYRIA IS NOT INDETERMINATE, ASSAD IS AN EVIL RUTHLESS
MAN WHO HAS CAUSED MUCH SUFFERING AND DEATH AMONGST HIS PEOPLE AND SHOULD BE
REMOVED FOR THE SAKE OF THE PEOPLE AND ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS ASSAD WHEN HE IS
HARMFUL TO OTHERS IS ASKING FOR KARMA. IF YOU HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND
YOU ARE ANTAGONISTIC, PARTISAN THEN ALL THE SUMMITS IN THE WORLD IS AN
EXPENSIVE WASTE OF TIME AND BREATH.
The
correct reason and action regarding Assad:
You do not maintain Assad in the name of maintaining the balance of
power in the Middle East with disregard for the murder of his people or remove
him because he is aligned against you.
He should be removed with minimal suffering if he is harming his people
and the cause of unnecessary strife, if his popularity is not true but
organized, the people don’t want him and he is brutalizing them. He should not
be removed if he is benevolent to his people and they love him.
People read such news and they do not know what to make of it or think
it is about truth and goodness when it is not and so they must stir resistance
that leads to stress and conditions them to resist.
Trade that is truly essential or benevolent and free is not subject to
deals or agreements, it is only trade that is false, artificial, contrived,
excessive than needed, fuelled by greed, not free as touted that is subject to
deals, bargaining, give and take and it becomes an obsession to strike deals,
give and take.
WHATEVER TRADE BETWEEN TWO PARTIES THAT IS SUBJECT TO DEALS IS
UNNATURAL, EVIL. TRADE SHOULD NEVER BE A PREOCCUPATION EXCEPT AMONGST THOSE WHO
ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THE NECESSITY OF THE TRADE BUT GAINS TO BE MADE, THEY ARE
IN IT FOR THE MONEY. THE OBSESSION WITH TRADE IS UNHEALTHY, UNNATURAL, LEADS TO
EXCESSES, ABUSES, OVERCONSUMPTION. TRADE SHOULD BE IN THE BACKGROUND OF
SECONDARY OR NO CONSIDERATION RATHER THAN A PREOCCUPATION, A PRIMARY CONCERN OR
OBSESSION.
DEALS, DEALS, DEALS, MORE DEALS AFTER DEAL, IT IS INSANE REPEATING
REHASHED BEHAVIOUR AND LEADS TO DISASTER AND YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG.
Trade
deals are about programming:
Trade deals and agreements are usually the result of bargaining or
negotiations by two sides who then come to an agreement that is binding to both
parties and they must carry out actions or fulfil obligations according to the
agreement which has also restrictions and so the nations become robots of the
deal or agreement and only robots would accede to that and find nothing wrong.
This is unnatural and harmful, not free trade which is free of all encumbrances,
and leads to excesses and mindless obedience of agreements without regard to
changing reality.
TRUE FREE TRADE HAVE NO PRE-AGREEMENTS, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS
AND OBLIGATIONS BUT RISES AND FALLS, FLOWS FREELY AS NEEDED.
You see our great PM rushing here and there on trade missions to China,
US, Japan, EU, Mozambique as if he is such a great businessman but it is all
insanity and harmful than good.
TRADE DEALS ARE ABOUT TRADE ACCORDING TO PROGRAMMING THAT IS RIGID AND
DANGEROUS AND IT ONLY APPEALS TO ROBOTS WHO LIKE TO REHASH ACCORDING TO
PROGRAMMED.
Deals
wrongfully exclude others:
One purpose of deals is to covetously secure future trade for oneself to
the exclusion of others and that is bad not good.
China's credit bubble is
unprecedented: Fitch
China is
touted as economic saviour to the world and yet if what is stated is accurate China
is a deadly debt time bomb waiting to blow up everyone.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
China's
shadow banking system is out of control and under mounting stress as borrowers
struggle to roll over short-term debts, Fitch Ratings has warned.
The
agency said the scale of credit was so extreme that the country would find it
very hard to grow its way out of the excesses as in past episodes, implying
tougher times ahead.
The
debt snowball is getting bigger and bigger, without contributing to real
activity.
Wei Yao, Societe Generale
"The
credit-driven growth model is clearly falling apart. This could feed into a
massive over-capacity problem, and potentially into a Japanese-style
deflation," said Charlene Chu, the agency's senior director in Beijing.
"There
is no transparency in the shadow banking system, and systemic risk is rising.
We have no idea who the borrowers are, who the lenders are, and what the
quality of assets is, and this undermines signalling," she told the
Telegraph.
Advertisement
While the
non-performing loan rate of the banks may look benign at just 1pc, this has
become irrelevant as trusts, wealth-management funds, offshore vehicles and
other forms of irregular lending make up over half of all new credit. "It
means nothing if you can off-load any bad asset you want. A lot of the banking
exposure to property is not booked as property," she said.
Concerns
are rising after a string of upsets in Quingdao, Ordos, Jilin and elsewhere, in
so-called trust products, a $US1.4 trillion ($1.47 trillion) segment of the
shadow banking system.
Bank
Everbright defaulted on an interbank loan 10 days ago amid wild spikes in
short-term "Shibor" borrowing rates, a sign that liquidity has
suddenly dried up.
"Typically
stress starts in the periphery and moves to the core, and that is what we are
already seeing with defaults in trust products," she said.
Fitch
warned that wealth products worth $US2 trillion of lending are in reality a
"hidden second balance sheet" for banks, allowing them to circumvent
loan curbs and dodge efforts by regulators to halt the excesses.
This
niche is the epicentre of risk. Half the loans must be rolled over every three
months, and another 25 per cent in less than six months. This has echoes of
Northern Rock, Lehman Brothers and others that came to grief in the West on
short-term liabilities when the wholesale capital markets froze.
Mrs Chu
said the banks had been forced to park over $US3 trillion in reserves at the
central bank, giving them a "massive savings account that can be drawn
down" in a crisis, but this may not be enough to avert trouble given the
sheer scale of the lending boom.
Overall
credit has jumped from $US9 trillion to $US23 trillion since the Lehman crisis.
"They have replicated the entire US commercial banking system in five
years," she said.
The ratio
of credit to GDP has jumped by 75 percentage points to 200 per cent of GDP,
compared to roughly 40 points in the US over five years leading up to the
subprime bubble, or in Japan before the Nikkei bubble burst in 1990. "This
is beyond anything we have ever seen before in a large economy. We don't know
how this will play out. The next six months will be crucial," she said.
The
agency downgraded China's long-term currency rating to AA- debt in April but
still thinks the government can handle any banking crisis, however bad.
"The
Chinese state has a lot of firepower. It is very able and very willing to
support the banking sector. The real question is what this means for growth,
and therefore for social and political risk," said Mrs Chu.
"There
is no way they can grow out of their asset problems as they did in the past. We
think this will be very different from the banking crisis in the late 1990s.
With credit at 200 per cent of GDP, the numerator is growing twice as fast as
the denominator. You can't grow out of that."
The
authorities have been trying to manage a soft-landing, deploying loan curbs and
a high reserve ratio requirement (RRR) for banks to halt property speculation.
The home price to income ratio has reached 16 to 18 in many cities, shutting
workers out of the market. Shadow banking has plugged the gap for much of the
last two years.
However,
a new problem has emerged as the economic efficiency of credit collapses. The
extra GDP growth generated by each extra yuan of loans has dropped from 0.85 to
0.15 over the last four years, a sign of exhaustion.
Wei Yao from
Societe Generale says the debt service ratio of Chinese companies has reached
30 per cent of GDP – the typical threshold for financial crises - and many will
not be able to pay interest or repay principal.
She
warned that the country could be on the verge of a "Minsky Moment",
when the debt pyramid collapses under its own weight. "The debt snowball
is getting bigger and bigger, without contributing to real activity," she
said.
The
latest twist is sudden stress in the overnight lending markets. "We believe
the series of policy tightening measures in the past three months have reached
critical mass, such that deleveraging in the banking sector is happening.
Liquidity tightening can be very damaging to a highly leveraged economy,"
said Zhiwei Zhang from Nomura.
"There
is room to cut interest rates and the reserve ratio in the second half,"
wrote a front-page editorial today in China Securities Journal on Friday. The
article is the first sign that the authorities are preparing to change tack,
shifting to a looser stance after a drizzle of bad data over recent weeks.
The
journal said total credit in China's financial system may be as high as 221 per
cent of GDP, jumping almost eightfold over the last decade, and warned that
companies will have to fork out $US1 trillion in interest payments alone this
year. "Chinese corporate debt burdens are much higher than those of other
economies. Much of the liquidity is being used to repay debt and not to finance
output," it said.
It also
flagged worries over an exodus of hot money once the US Federal Reserve starts
tightening. "China will face large-scale capital outflows if there is an
exit from quantitative easing and the dollar strengthens," it wrote.
The
journal said foreign withdrawals from Chinese equity funds were the highest
since early 2008 in the week up to June 5, and withdrawals from Hong Kong funds
were the most in a decade.
The
Telegraph, London
It is not a matter of opposing or supporting arming the Syrian rebels
but is it the right thing to do.
WHENEVER THERE IS AN ISSUE TO BE DELIBERATED IT IS NEVER A MATTER FOR
OPPOSING OR SUPPORTING WHICH IS ABOUT THE STIRRING OF BLIND FORCE THAT IS THE
WRONG ANSWER AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE ISSUE BUT IT IS WHETHER IT IS CORRECT OR
WRONG. HEREIN IS UNWITTING DEMONSTRATION PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD HAVE NO TRUE
UNDERSTANDING, THEY STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO LIKE OR DISLIKE THINGS
HAPPENING AND SUBSEQUENTLY THEY ARE DRIVEN TO OPPOSE OR SUPPORT ACTIONS.
I would have sex with other
women...if partner let me
Says Larry Lamb
Sex with other women is not referring to a particular woman but in
general. A person with true understanding does not speak in general but on a
case by case basis and it is not if your partner let or do not let you that you
have sex with another woman but it is whether it is right or wrong, meaningful
or meaningless.
Thus what is said reflects a person who does not truly understand in
which sex is a mechanical act that he would perform with other women, not with
a woman in particular on permission of his wife and so he is a robot of his
wife.
Because it does not make true sense, it is controlled insanity that ends
in uncontrolled insanity.
Never
a matter of I would but should you?
It is never a matter of ‘I would’ but ‘should you’ do anything. Only an
unthinking no questions asked person would do things without questions. ‘Should
I’ implies forethought as to right or wrong, true or false, meaningful or
meaningless.
ONLY A SUPERCILIOUS PERSON WITHOUT QUALMS WOULD DO THINGS WITHOUT ASKING
‘I WOULD’, THOSE WITH CONSCIENCE OR UNDERSTANDING CONSIDER ‘SHOULD I’ BEFORE
DOING ANYTHING.
Will
(force) versus reason (should):
The person who says I would kill if necessary is a person of will which
is a proxy for force, give him a plan of action or speech and he would do it
(if the price is right). It is about challenge and mechanically accepting and
carrying out.
The person of true reason never speaks of will but he speaks of should,
reason, need or meaningful, good or harm of an action of speech.
A PERSON WHO SPEAKS OF ‘I WOULD’ DENOTES HIMSELF AS A MAN OF WILL, OF
FORCE, GIVE ME A PLAN OF ACTION OR CHALLENGE AND I WILL OR WILL NOT DO IT.
Robots
are merely suppliers of force, often but not always disc jockeys:
All people with style are robots in the sense that whatever they say or
do are recorded and rehashed from a mental jukebox.
For those who are robots what they say or do are already fixed, they may
re-tape again and again their recordings; but they are merely mechanically
rendering what is recorded or fixed.
Often but not always the robot acts as disc jockey, he decides which
amongst his various recording to replay but in everyday situations many things
are done automatically by knee jerk reflex of ‘see this, do that’ obviating
even his role as disc jockey.
The prime and indispensable role of a robot is to supply force, to vary
the force supplied depending on the situation to successfully undertake the
task or action or speech.
Thus it is not surprising but to be expected that people who are robots
would speak of “I will” rather than ‘should I’ because by and large that is
their function in life, to supply and modulate force.
IT IS NOT A SURPRISE BUT TO BE EXPECTED THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS WILL
SPEAK OF ‘I WOULD’ RATHER THAN ‘SHOULD I’ BECAUSE THEIR KEY AND CONSTANT ROLE
IN LIFE IS TO SUPPLY FORCE AND MODULATE THE FORCE THEY SUPPLY, OFTEN BUT NOT
ALWAYS THEY ACT AS DISC JOCKEYS DECIDING ON WHICH TRACKS TO PLAYBACK, THEY HAVE
NO SAY IN WHAT THEY SAY OR DO AFTER IT HAS BEEN REGISTERED IN THEIR JUKEBOXES.
Singapore and Malaysian owned big oil palm companies in Sumatra are also
involved with slash and burn that upset Singaporeans and Malaysians.
MALAYSIANS AND SINGAPOREANS ARE UPSET BY THE HAZE BECAUSE THEIR DEAR
LIVES OR PETTY HEALTH IS AT STAKE, THEY ARE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE WIDESPREAD
ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION IN THE NAME OF CULTIVATING OIL PALM WHEN THIS IS EVEN
MORE CRUCIAL TO THE LONGTERM SURVIVAL.
By Alister Bull
WASHINGTON
- Federal Reserve policymakers will likely announce on Wednesday that they will
keep buying bonds at a monthly pace of $85 billion, while keeping their options
open to scale back the program later this year if the U.S. labor market
continues to improve.
What does the item above tell the discerning reader?
The Fed is in two minds, does not know what to do, it is trying to
soothe the markets whilst it is uncertain about what is happening to the
economy or will happen and depending on what is happening it will maintain or
reduce bond buying.
The fate of the economy should not depend on whether the Fed buys or not
buy bonds and the fact that it has come to this point reflects gross
incompetence, mismanagement so that the economy is fragile, dependent on
cheating, bond purchases or pumping money or printing paper into the system. If
the Fed truly understands the economy, what is happening it would not be in two
minds but already know what the right thing to do is and so the Fed is lost,
clueless, fumbling at the steering wheel and the world economy is in dangerous
hands, in the hands of fools.
Impossible
the Buddha would ever be unsure what to do:
The Fed is unsure what to do, depending on circumstances it may do this
or that.
It is impossible for those who see things truly as they actually are to
be unsure, in two minds as to what to do. Immediately they see and
understand what is happening and what the right thing to do is. It is only
those who are blind and groping who are hesitant and it is never blameless but
blameworthy to be blind.
Doubt
and uncertainty is always suffering and blameworthy:
Doubt and uncertainty is never happiness but it is suffering even
tormenting and conditioning, detaining and conditioning the fool so that it
becomes intense and consigns him even to eternal woe (the Buddha said doubt and
uncertainty together with self identity views and faith in rites and rules lead
to future woe).
DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IS BLAMEWORTHY, IS SUFFERING AND ONE OF THREE
LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE.
Why
the Fed is hesitant:
If what you are doing is wrong, it does not matter if you perceive in
delusion it is correct, efficacious, you must be wracked with hesitancy.
Thus if the economy is like the alcoholic running out of alcohol and
rather than enduring the pain by sending him to a purgatory, you elect to take the
easy way out, supplying him with more alcohol so that his condition is getting
worse, you must experience hesitancy each time you hand or do not hand him
alcohol.
The
correct action when your mind is distressed:
The only correct action when your mind and body is distressed is to
disengage, desist from what you are doing to devote full attention to
recovering the calm clearly thinking state. If you ignore the distress in
favour of getting on then you are willing yourself to keep suffering that is
conditioning and the suffering intensifies until it becomes difficult to
dispel.
EACH TIME YOU ELECT TO CONTINUE WHEN YOUR MIND OR BODY IS DISTRESSED YOU
ARE WILLING YOURSELF TO SUFFER RATHER TOWARDS EASE AND THIS IS CONDITIONING
SUCH THAT YOU BECOME MORE AND MORE TOLERANT, INDIFFERENT TO SUFFERING THAT
BINDS YOU AND CONSIGNS YOU TO ETERNAL SUFFERING.
THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST DWELL MUCH IN LOVING KINDNESS AND YOU CANNOT BE
VERY LOVING KIND TO YOURSELF AND OTHERS IF YOUR MIND IS DISTRESSED AND SO YOU
ARE WISE TO DISENGAGE AND RECOVER CALM AS SOON AS YOU BECOME DISTRESSED.
The
Fed should be selling not buying bonds:
The US government is trying to raise its debt ceiling to allow it to
borrow more and so why is the Fed buying bonds with money it does not have
instead of selling bonds to raise money from the market?
The Fed sells bonds to mop up liquidity from the market and to borrow
money that the market has, to spend, as the US has been profligately doing for
a long, long time.
As so in times of need when the Fed should be selling bonds to raise
money it needs from the market that has it, why is the Fed doing the opposite?
The reason is because there is a credit crunch, there are no buyers for
certain bonds which are rotten or have defaulted and the Fed has wrongfully come
in, not with money it has but with printed money that has no wealth backing to bail
out bond holders who would otherwise have been bankrupted. This supplies
liquidity to the financial system that would otherwise be jammed. In the
meantime the Fed also prints money without backing for the government to spend
to stimulate and sustain the economy and jobs.
THE ECONOMY AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM IS IN A BIG MESS AND SHORED UP BY
DESPERATE FED MONEY PRINTING TO BUY UP BONDS THAT ARE ROTTEN AND WOULD
OTHERWISE DEFAULT AND PRINT MONEY TO ALLOW THE FED GOVERNMENT TO SPEND TO
STIMULATE AND SUSTAIN THE US ECONOMY. THE FED CANNOT ISSUE BONDS TO BORROW FROM
THE MARKET WHICH IS IN A CREDIT CRUNCH.
THE MORAL OF THE STORY IS THAT THE FED AND US GOVERNMENT SHOULD ALWAYS
LIVE WITH ITS MEANS RATHER THAN BORROW MONEY BY SELLING BONDS AND NOW IT IS IN
SUCH DEBT MESS IT HAS TO PRINT MONEY TO DESPERATELY BUY BONDS TO KEEP THE
SYSTEM LIQUID AND PRINT MONEY TO ALLOW THE US GOVERNMENT TO SPEND.
No comments:
Post a Comment