Thursday, July 04, 2013

Breathing greedily:



Breathing greedily:
Greed is a function of stirred mental force never true reason and it becomes programmed or automatic and so everything the greedy person does is afflicted by greed including his breathing, eating.
Thus the greedy person breathes greedily, he is rushed, drawing rapid deep frequent breaths and because there is pollution and toxins in the air, he also draws in more of them and suffer more.
GREED IS ALWAYS BLAMEWORTHY NEVER BLAMELESS AND NO ONE IS A MASTER OF GREED BUT HE IS SLAVE DRIVEN BY GREED TO DO EVERYTHING WITH GREED. HE SPEAKS GREEDILY, ACTS GREEDILY AND THUS HIS BREATHING TOO IS AFFLICTED BY GREED AND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS MADE OUT TO BE.
There is nothing fancy about what is being talked about. He is referring to the possibility that asset prices will collapse eg your $1 million house will be worth (realistically) $300,000 now that the Fed has given up trying to shore up prices by money printing.
This is supposed to be a free market and so prices should be allowed to adjust or fall rather than artificially dangerous propped up by Fed tampering.
The wealth in the system cannot support houses that are now worth $1 million when it was worth $150,000 in the past and rather than suicidal propping they should be allowed to return to earth.
A lot of fanciful jobs are actually useless and a luxury eg financial advisers and thus if you eliminate these high paying high status jobs, many people will be jobless and the money saved can be diverted to employ people who are doing useful jobs.
MANY JOBS ARE INVENTED IN THIS MODERN DAY AND PAID HIGHLY WHEN IT IS NOT CERTAIN THEY ARE USEFUL, SHOULD THEY BE FIRED THEN A LOT OF MONEY CAN BE DIVERTED TO TRULY USEFUL JOBS.
High paying useless jobs have reached cancerous proportions:
It is objective not subjective whether a job is useful or useless, for show or meaningful and the amount of money gone to pay high paying useless jobs have reached cancerous proportions in modern society and will kill off the system.
What is said is not spoken in truth but falsity to impress others how clever the person is and it is a false unnecessary association.
If your purpose is to discuss who watches over the police or is their watchdog, there is no need to associate it with ‘police watches over us’.
The police watches over us in the sense that they protect us but those who watch the police are watchdogs, to ensure they do not commit criminal acts.
IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY TO BRING IN THE MATTER THE POLICE WATCHES OVER US, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER WHO WATCHES OVER THE POLICE AND BECAUSE YOU THINK THERE IS A RELEVANT CONNECTION WHEN THERE ISN’T, YOU WILL GO MAD. FURTHER THE POLICE WATCHES OVER US IN THE SENSE THAT THEY LOOK AFTER OUR SECURITY OR PROTECT US BUT THE WATCHDOG WATCHES OVER THE POLICE IN A DIFFERENT SENSE, TO ENSURE THEY DO NOT COMMIT WRONG, NOT TO PROTECT THEM.
THUS IF ANYONE ACCEPTS WHAT IS SAID AS REASONABLE OR HE DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO UNDERSTAND IT, HE MUST DO SO WITH RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS TO RESISTANCE.
It is senseless and you think it makes sense?
‘The police watches over us. Who watches over the police?’ does not make sense, it is a spurious connection and you think it makes sense or is appropriate. That is the path to future insanity.
INSTEAD OF GOING TO THE HEART OF A MATTER, STYLISH PEOPLE MUST FABRICATE, ADD TO WHAT THEY WANT TO SAY TO SPICE UP, APPEAR CLEVER AND SO THEY SAY, THE POLICE WATCHES OVER US WHEN IT HAS NOTHING TO DO AND IT IS ALSO A WRONG COMPARISON.
IF SOMEONE IS PROFFERING SHIT TO YOU AND YOU THINK IT IS FOOD OR YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT, YOU MUST SUFFER AND YOU ARE IN DANGER OF BEING DUPED.
Why the haze improved:
The biggest reason the haze improved may be because fortunately heavy rain fell in Sumatra to douse off the burning peat. Stronger winds and wind swifts may also be responsible.
What exactly is the cause of the haze?
The haze that afflicted the region can be fully understood as to its causes.
This is how I understand the haze:
It is not slash and burn that is the cause of the haze but slash and burn that has gone out of control to raze even extensively the valuable crops of natives. The reason they have burnt out of control is because the soil is rich in peat that has become exposed and dry and once the peat has been ignited by slash and burn they are difficult if not impossible to douse off short of drenching rain and so they spread and spread producing billowing smoke but little fire and because the areas under crops also have peat the crops too are burnt.
The reason why the peat is burning is because wide areas of land with peat have now become exposed to the sun and drained of moisture by irrigation through conversion of forests to oil palm estates. Oil palm estates can never replace forests which prevent the sun shining on the soil directly and they retain moisture in the soil even in the dry season. With oil palm estates, the spaced out palms permit the sun to shine on the ground and dry it whilst irrigation channels constructed further drain the soil rather than retain moisture.
IT IS NOT SLASH AND BURN THAT CAUSED THE HAZE.
IT IS OUT OF CONTROL SLASH AND BURN THAT CAUSES HAZES.
SLASH AND BURN NOW (EASILY) RUNS OUT OF CONTROL BECAUSE THE PEAT IN THE SOIL THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY TOTALLY COVERED BY JUNGLE AND REMAINS WATERLOGGED EVEN IN THE DRY SEASON IS NOW EXPOSED TO THE DRYING SUN AND PURPOSELY DRAINED AS OIL PALM ESTATES.
Dried peat is the cause of the haze:
Even if Sumatra had lots of peat, as long as it remains wet, it would not cause the haze even if natives lit lots of slash and burn fires. It is only when massive areas of peat have become dried that in conjunction with the previously relatively harmless slash and burn that it becomes a regional haze hazard. And the reason why large areas of peat have become dried is because they have been denuded of jungle and converted to oil palm estates that drain the soil off water and permit the sun to shine on the ground directly.
IT IS THE REPLACEMENT OF VAST TRACTS OF JUNGLE THAT USED TO SHIELD THE GROUND FROM THE SUN AND RETAIN MOISTURE EVEN IN THE DRY SEASON WITH OIL PALM ESTATES WHOSE WIDELY SPACED TREES ALLOW THE SUN TO SHINE ON THE GROUND PLUS DRAINAGE OF THE GROUND THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DRYING THE PEAT THAT MAKES SLASH AND BURN SUICIDAL OR LETHAL WHERE PREVIOUSLY IT WAS MANAGEABLE.
Why is the haze so bad this year?
Even though the peat is now exposed and dried, it may need to reach a certain dryness that was not reached in previous years before it becomes potential mass tinder.
In the wet seasons the peat absorbs moisture and if the dry season is not particularly dry, the moisture in the peat does not fall below a threshold then slash and burn by locals may not cause an inferno and it is this that may deceive the locals.
IN PREVIOUS YEARS THE EXPOSED PEAT MAY NOT HAVE REACHED A THRESHOLD DRYNESS IN THE DRY SEASON AND SO SLASH AND BURN DOES NOT SPARK UNCONTROLLABLE BLAZES BUT WHEN THE PEAT REACHES A CRITICAL DRYNESS AS IN THIS YEAR THEN IT BECOMES DEADLY, FIRES LIT SPREAD AND BURN WHATEVER CROPS PLANTED ON THE PEAT SOIL.

Turin giants' fans are angry new boy has been given the No.10 shirt previously worn by legends Del Piero, Baggio and Platini
If there is trouble Tevez is not to be blamed, he did not give himself the 10 shirt and so you are speaking falsely blaming him for the trouble, it slanders him and you are guilty of misleading others with debt to be repaid as suffering.
The Buddha spoke of heightened virtue and the person with heightened virtue does not speak carelessly, sensationally to spice up a topic.
IT IS WRONG TO SAY TEVEZ IS CAUSING TROUBLE AT JUVENTUS AND YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING SPEAKING SO.

Singaporeans to receive letters next month on benefits from Budget 2013
Two million adult Singaporeans will receive letters from the government in the first week of July, informing them of the benefits they and their households will receive as part of Budget 2013.
It is the modern disease, to make a fuss of everything for self-advantage that adds to costs.
It costs money to draft and send letters and so this is a waste of resources. The purpose is calculated, it is likely to be propaganda than plain fact, to show the government cares and to support or justify government actions, if what you explain is good is actually not good then you are incurring debt not merit.

Who benefits, PAP or government?
The government is one thing, PAP is another.
Does the public need to be educated indiscriminately, entirely as to what the government is doing, does it serve any true purpose. PAP is elected to run the government and so it should run the country without exploiting its resources to promote PAP.
DOES THE LETTER PROMOTE THE GOVERNMENT OR PAP?
DOES THE ELECTORATE NEED TO BE EXPLAINED TO WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES?
Would God explain why He is sending you to hell?
Would God write a letter to you personally explaining why He is sending you to hell? There is no explaining to do and it is unnecessary.
China looks fishy:
50% of China’s GDP is investment, building infrastructure, buildings, facilities and this is financed by borrowing and it is dangerous because many of the structures whilst ‘prestigious’, impressive, may not return the investments with borrowed money and should investment expenditure drop significantly it will impact seriously on the economy.
The Chinese are notorious as big gamblers, the Chinese economy may be one big fool’s gamble.
Quote: Investment in China has been equivalent to around half of GDP, 50% greater than it was in Japan just before that economy went pop almost a quarter of a century ago.
Of course the modernisation of China requires the roads, and railway lines, and airports and gleaming towers and shopping malls and homes that have been built.
Outstanding Chinese loans 200% GDP:
Quote: According to a recent and influential report by Fitch, outstanding loans by Chinese banks and shadow financial institutions were equivalent to 200% of GDP at the end of 2012, up from around 125% of GDP in 2008.
This is a serious amount of debt and there has been sharp acceleration from 2008 like an alcoholic of debt running out of control.
Creative ways of making money in China:
A major steel company in China says it loses money if it was to use the borrowed money to produce steel so what it does is borrow cheaply at 6% from major banks and lend it out via shadow bank it creates to property speculators at double the rate and make profits because of creative rather than industrial means.
LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES IN CHINA ARE NO LONGER PROFITABLE AND SO STEEL COMPANIES MAKE PROFITS NOT BY MAKING STEEL BUT BORROWING CHEAP FROM CENTRAL BANKS TO LEND IN SHADOW BANKING SYSTEM AT DOUBLE THE RATE FOR OTHER BORROWERS TO SPECULATE ON THE PROPERTY MARKET.
CHINA IS AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN JUST LIKE THE US WAS.
Only people who are robots with wrong understanding speak of bold steps and see nothing wrong.
If your step is based on understanding and correct, there is nothing bold about it, it is only if your step is without knowing it is correct, a gamble with risks and it is a radical departure from what you usually do (which means you are a rehashing robot) that it becomes a bold step.
ONLY ROBOTS WHO ARE REPEATING WHAT THEY DO WHO THEN DEPART FROM WHAT THEY USE TO REHASH WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS CORRECT, WITH ACCOMPANYING RISKS, CAN TAKE BOLD STEPS, THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND AND TAKE ACTIONS THAT ARE CORRECT CANNOT BE BOLD BUT CORRECT IN THEIR ACTIONS OR STEPS.
A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS DWELLS ON THE CORRECT STEP FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY NOT A BOLD STEP WHICH IS ABOUT STIRRED FORCE, ACTION ACCORDING TO A PLAN DRIVEN BY FORCE OR EMOTION OR DRIVE.
A bold step must stir resistance:
Whenever someone speaks of a bold step for science, he and his audience must stir resistance even if they perceive it as valid or do not know what to make of it because it is always false or nonsense and this leads to stress and conditions him to resist whatever is presented to him.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO PERCEIVE ‘A BOLD STEP’ AS MEANINGFUL BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS OR NONSENSE AND SO ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES IT AS TRUE OR DOES NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT MUST STIR RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS HIM TO RESIST WHAT HE PERCEIVES.
The media has certain functions or duties and it is simple, it is to gather what is news or the truth and present it to the public. It is not the job of the media to give views or entertain.
Only robots have roles, those who are not robots do not subscribe to roles but they perform certain functions.
Thus Indra or Sakka is the ruler of the gods, it does not mean he performs a role or certain roles, he rules over the gods but he has no roles, he is not a robot or computer programmed to do certain things or functions.
If you speak of the role of the media and what you say is wrong (because you are deluded) there is karma not merit.
THE DUTY OF THE MEDIA IS VERY SIMPLE, IT IS NOT TO ENTERTAIN OR GIVE OPINIONS BUT TO GATHER THE TRUTH ABOUT THINGS HAPPENING AND PRESENT IT FREE OF BIAS OR OPINIONS. IF IT DEPARTS FROM THIS DUTY IT HAS FAILED AND THERE IS KARMA FOR MISLEADING AND INFLUENCING THE PEOPLE.
A ROLE IS AN ACT, DUTIES ARE WHAT YOU MUST DO TO FULFILL YOUR OBLIGATIONS, IT IS NOT ROLES THAT THE MEDIA MUST PLAY BUT IT IS DUTIES IT MUST FULFILL OR FACE PUNISHMENT.
ATTACKED for betraying the 'sisterhood', Labor minister Penny Wong reveals why she switched her support to Kevin Rudd in Wednesday's ballot. Senator Wong: "I'd been weighing up my two loyalties."
There are never any true or correct reasons for betraying anyone and if you have pledged your loyalty and then reneged there is deadly karma to be repaid as suffering for going back on your words.
IF YOU HAVE NOT PLEDGED YOURSELF TO ANOTHER THERE IS NO QUESTION OF BETRAYAL BUT IF YOU HAVE PLEDGED YOURSELF TO BE LOYAL TO SOMEONE AND THEN YOU RENEGE THERE ARE NEVER ANY CORRECT REASONS FOR DOING SO AND YOU WILL REPAY WITH SUFFERING WHAT YOU DID.
You don’t need a knife to stab another in the back:
Betrayal is stabbing someone in the back and you do not need a knife to do so and anyone who does that is asking for karma that is deadly. If you have told someone you are on her side and then you abandon her then that is betrayal and it has deadly implications for you.
BETRAYAL IS A FORM OF ATTACKING OTHERS OR ILL WILL AND THAT IS NOT LOVING KINDNESS AND IT MEANS NO HEAVEN FOR YOU AND THAT MEANS ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST BE SKILFUL TO AVOID SUFFERING AND THE WISE PERSON WILL NOT PROFFER HIS LOYALTY SO EASILY NOR WOULD HE STAB SOMEONE IN THE BACK.
PEOPLE PROFFER LOYALTY TO GAIN MATERIALLY FROM THE PERSON HE IS LOYAL TO AND THEN THEY DO NOT HESITATE TO STAB WHEN CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE.
Decision and indecision:
Decision is about deciding what to do or say and it is always stressful even difficult if whatever you decide is actually false and harmful, based on what is recorded and rehashed and deciding is a key function of stylish people who are robots, whatever they say or do is fixed, rehashed and what they do is select or decide which recording to play and then supply greater or lesser force to power what they say or do.
If a person sees truly and understands truly what he faces then the answer or what to do or say is obvious, there is little or no need to deliberate as to what to say or do.
It is only if a person does not see truly, does not understand truly what is happening and he is a robot who can only select and replay from a variety of recordings in his mind none of which are true or without harm to self that he struggles to decide what to say or do, even with agonizing indecision that suspends him in inaction when quick action is needed.
ONLY ACTIONS OR SPEECH THAT ARE TRUE, OUT OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION IS FREE OF HARM AND IT IS STRAIGHT FORWARD, DOES NOT REQUIRE DECISION LET ALONE INDECISION.
IT IS ONLY ACTIONS THAT ARE REHASHED WHERE THERE IS A VARIETY OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS TO CHOOSE FROM, NONE OF WHICH CAN BE TRUE OR WITHOUT HARM TO SELF, IS DESIGNED FOR FALSE PURPOSES LIKE PLEASING, IMPRESSING AND DECEIVING OTHERS THAT THE PERSON HAS TO PAUSE TO DECIDE AND OFTEN HE IS RACKED BY INDECISION.
INDECISION IS HABITUATING, PROGRAMMING SO THAT THE PERSON BECOMES INCREASINGLY INDECISIVE EVEN OVER SIMPLE MATTERS LIKE WHAT TO EAT OR WEAR, TO GO OUT OR NOT AND IT ENDS IN INSANITY.
DO NOT TREAT INDECISION LIGHTLY, IT IS A WARNING OF SIN, FALSITY AND DANGER, IT IS ADDICTIVE AND BECOMES MORE AND MORE BIZARRE AND WILL TORMENT THE FOOL.
(What I say may be crap but how come no one bullshits like me? It may be the truth that you ignore to your own chagrin when you become mad, tormented by indecision)
A true person seldom has to decide:
A person who dwells in truth seldom have to decide, he does not even contemplate trying to falsely impress, please or deceive others and because he sees correctly and understands truly what is happening, the answer as to what to say or do is clear to him.
It is only if you do not truly understand what is happening and you want to say or do things that falsely impresses, pleases and deceives others that you must decide.
EVERY TIME YOU MAKE A DECISION YOU ARE CONDITIONING OR PROGRAMMING YOURSELF TO DECIDE THAT IS NEVER A PLEASURE BUT A PRISON OF TORMENT. DECISION AND INDECISION ARE SOMETHING A PERSON HAS TO DO AND IT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND CONDITIONING SO THAT THE FOOL’S LIFE REVOLVES AROUND DECISIONS AND INDECISION.
Indecision is a cancer of robots:
Unless an action is knee jerk, an automatic reflex (eg ‘good morning’), the major function of a robot is to decide which of many recordings to replay.
Just as there are many cancers, there are many cancers of a robot and indecision is one of them and just as cancer cause suffering and can kill the person, indecision troubles robots and can kill the person directly or indirectly.
The fact that you accept indecision as normal, without alarm does not reflect true understanding but you have false perception and understanding because in truth deciding and indecision are unnatural, conditioned in the person and deciding always is troubling and it will turn malignant and torment the deciding fool.
THERE IS NO GOOD AND BAD DECIDING, ALL DECIDING IS EVIL, BASED ON CONDITIONING AND NECESSARY ONLY BECAUSE FOOLISH EVIL PEOPLE SEEK TO IMPRESS, PLEASE AND DECEIVE OTHERS WITH WHAT THEY SAY OR DO. THE PERSON WHO DWELLS IN TRUTH IS FREE FROM HAVING TO DECIDE AND THAT IS A WONDERFUL RELEASE FROM SUFFERING NEVER A DEPRIVATION.
Low interest rates creates disasters:
In their desperate measure to prop up the economy, governments all over the world have lowered interest rates even to zero to promote borrowing and lower the burden of those in debt. This has serious negative connotations because foolish savers large and small looking for better returns deposit or invest their money in risky high yield accounts.
Thus Chinese savers in search of better returns for their money foolishly deposit their money with shadow banks who pay higher interests not realizing they risk losing all their money. Again pension funds and people in the west invest in high yield bonds that are more dangerous, can lead to losses in their search for higher yields for their savings.
IT IS CRIMINAL, IRRESPONSIBLE OF GOVERNMENTS TO LOWER INTEREST RATES TO PROMOTE BORROWING AND REDUCE DEBTORS’ BURDENS BECAUSE IT DRIVES FOOLISH SAVERS TO DEPOSIT THEIR MONEY WITH CROOKS WHO OFFER HIGHER YIELD AND THEY MAY LOSE EVERYTHING.
Is it OK if I put a bug in your bedroom to hear what goes on in your bedroom?
The US’ NSA said EU, an ally is a target and EU offices in the US were tapped.
This is clearly not for security but to secretly listen in to obtain information that has unfair advantages.
WHAT THE US DID IS CRIMINAL, BEYOND THE BOUNDS OF SECURITY AND SO IT IS CRIMINAL TO PERSECUTE SNOWDEN FOR EXPOSING WRONGDOING.
Payday loans warn of future debt disaster:
One million UK families are being forced to take out payday loans every month as they struggle to meet the rising cost of living, new research reveals today.
It seems borrowers have little chance of repaying loans because of high interest rates and fees.
This means many are struggling to make ends meet or cannot make ends meets without payday loans to tide them over to payday.
BENEATH THE SURFACE MANY FAMILIES CANNOT MAKE ENDS MEET AND NEED PAYDAY LOANS TO BRIDGE AND THIS IS INDICATION OF DISASTER SHOULD THE ECONOMY DETERIORATE FURTHER.
Indecision leads to doubt and uncertainty:
It is indecision that leads to doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe.
It is a person who is always wracked by decisions, who is always making decisions who is subject to indecision, no matter how decisive he puts on a show and wills himself to be. Indecision is doubt and uncertainty that leads to future woe.
The person who does not decide, he sees the truth and lives in truth that does not require decisions and so he is not subject to indecision and doubt and uncertainty.
Before you decide you need proposals:
Before a person decides he needs to fashion a plan or proposal of what to say or do and carry out what he thought first and so he must become a robot of the plan or he must summon up all possible alternative courses of actions registered in his mind and decide amongst those he can recall which to carry out in which he is again a robot.
IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO PERFORM DECISIONS AND IN DOING SO YOU MUST BECOME A ROBOT OF THE DECISION.
YOU NEED TO PRECONCEIVE A PROPOSAL BEFORE DECIDING AND CARRYING OUT THAT PROPOSAL IN WHICH YOU BECOME THE APPROXIMATE OR PRECISE ROBOT OF THAT PROPOSAL OR YOU NEED TO RETRIEVE FROM YOUR MIND ALL THE POSSIBLE COURSES OF ACTIONS AND THEN DECIDE WHICH AMONGST THEM TO CARRY OUT AND CARRY IT OUT IN WHICH YOU ARE AGAIN A ROBOT.
A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT FULLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS GOING ON BEFORE HIM AND THUS UNDERSTANDING THE ONLY TRUE OR CORRECT ACTION OR SPEECH DOES NOT REQUIRE DECISION, IT IS A MATTER OF COURSE.
Shining lasers at others:
It is very common nowadays for people to shine lasers at others eg in football matches, at pilots of landing planes and in demonstrators and the purpose is to temporarily blind them for selfish gains eg footballer misses shot.
This is a form of ill will, attacking others and wishing to harm others and it is never isolated, the person has ill will that is the opposite of loving kindness and as a result he cannot go to heaven and that means eternal suffering.
JUST TO HOLD A GUN EVEN OUT OF INTEREST OR NOVELTY IS SINISTER, TO POINT A GUN AT ANOTHER EVEN IN JEST HAS DEADLY CONNOTATIONS FOR THE FOOL WHO DOES REALIZE A NOOSE HANGS OVER HIS NECK.
NOWADAYS I WOULD NOT TOUCH A GUN, NOT OUT OF RESTRAINT BUT I AM NOT INTERESTED IN GUNS, NOT INTERESTED IN EVEN HAVING A FEEL OF A GUN.
US President Barack Obama says he is "humbled" to visit Robben Island jail, where Nelson Mandela was held, as the ex-leader remains critically ill
No man with true understanding, who truly understands will speak about being humbled or proud which is a senseless matter of stirred force.
When your mental force is stirred to be inflating, you feel proud, when your mental force is stirred to be deflated it is ‘humbled’ which is merely a force transaction devoid of meaning and suffering in itself.
Now you are humbled, as soon as you leave your mental force is inflated again to be proud and so it is hypocrisy, food that does not lasts.
EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING WHEN YOU ARE HUMBLED CAN BE KNOWN, IF IT MEANS YOU ARE OVERWHELMED IT MEANS A STRONG FORCE HAS SMOTHERED YOU OR YOUR PRIDE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY DEFLATED. IT IS MEANINGLESS AND ONLY DELUDED PEOPLE WOULD SPEAK OF BEING HUMBLED AND IF YOU ACCEPT WHAT IS SAID AS MEANINGFUL OR YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT, YOU MUST STIR RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND CONDITIONS YOU TO RESIST EVERYTHING PRESENTED TO YOU.
How can a prison cell humble anyone?
A prison cell cannot humble anyone except if he has serious false perception. No matter how spartan or decrepit a cell it is such and it is only the false perception allied to a stirred mental force to be overwhelmed that makes the scene or cell ‘humbling’.
IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PRISON CELL TO HUMBLE OR OVERWHELM ANYONE TRULY, IT OVERWHELMS BECAUSE HE PERCEIVES FALSELY AND HIS EMOTIONS STIRRED MEANINGLESSLY, MADLY.
Charmer Obama wins over audiences:
Charm is never about substance or meaning but it is how you appear (dress), speaks and does things that pleases and impresses others and when they like you, their mental forces are stirred to be attracted to you they are charmed.
IF YOU CAN BE CHARMED BY OTHERS YOU ARE GULLIBLE, IN DANGER OF BEING CONNED BECAUSE IT MEANS YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS VULNERABLE TO BEING STIRRED BY WHAT OTHERS DO OR SAY THAT MAKES YOU IMPRESSED TO LIKE THEM.
I DO NOT LIKE ANYONE, IT IS MY STIRRING MENTAL THAT IS SENSELESS AND SUFFERING, LEADS TO SUFFERING LATER SO NOTHING AND NOBODY CAN CHARM ME, MY HAPPINESS IS NOT DEPENDENT ON ANYBODY OR ANYTHING.
The present or (Post war) boomer generation is criminal and done a lot of harm to future generations, they have not only spent all the money, they have saddled the future generations with debts they cannot repay and with no jobs or means to earn to repay.
NOT ONLY HAS THE FUTURE GENERALIZATION NO JOBS, THEY HAVE BEEN LEFT WITH MOUNTAINOUS DEBTS BY THEIR (CRIMINAL DELUDED, RECKLESS) PARENTS TO REPAY WITH NO JOBS TO EARN THE MONEY. THIS IS THE LEGACY OF THE ADULT GENERATION.
Whatever is truly good never has bad or drawbacks and whatever good that has bad is never truly good. What is called the good part when examined and in truth is also bad.
Thus pleasure and pain are not the good and bad of feelings but even pleasure itself is actually mild pain that leads to pain when prolonged and so it is bad and bad of feeling not the good (pleasure) and bad (pain) of feeling.
Whatever is truly good never has drawbacks except in your delusion. Thus no style, not stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness never has any drawbacks or bad, it is all good whilst style is ALL BAD, the cessation of thinking never has bad, it is all good and thinking (not to be mistaken for INSIGHT) is all bad. Neither liking or disliking never has bad, it is all good whilst liking and disliking is all bad never good and bad.
THUS IF YOU DALLY IN ANYTHING THAT HAS GOOD AND BAD YOU ARE DALLYING WITH SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE AND EVIL AND WILL GET POISONED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. WHATEVER IS TRULY GOOD IS TOTALLY PURELY GOOD, HAS NO BAD.
There is nothing bad about heaven, nothing good about hell:
There is nothing bad about heaven, if there was it would not be heaven.
There is nothing good about hell, if there was it would not be hell.
Even life here is bad, even close friends and dear ones are poisoning each other, feeding each other even as they swear undying, unimaginable, unsurpassable love for their loved one.
People perceive this as good news and act upon it and it is delusion.
If you are talking about mood you are talking about an extended emotional state to be bullish or liking or depressed or disliking and turning positive or negative are about force never reason.
Thus it is not a matter of Japan’s business seeing as it actually is, an upturn but their previously glum mood is being replaced by a greedy, liking mood.
IT IS DANGEROUS TO BASE ACTIONS ON STIRRED FORCE AND THIS WORLD MONITORS STIRRED FORCE, MOOD AS A YARDSTICK FOR ACTION.
THEY TALK ABOUT MOOD IS BECAUSE THEY SEE SIGNS, ‘GREEN SHOOTS’ BUT THEY ARE NOT SURE IT IS TRUE RECOVERY AND THEY ARE ANXIOUS TO JUMP TO GREEDY CONCLUSIONS THAT MAY BE DASHED.
Haze: Rain helps to douse raging Sumatra fires, hotspots reduced to 54
It was reported that "short bursts" of rain in Riau, Indonesia saw the number of hotspots around Pekanbaru fall from 250 on Tuesday to 54 on Wednesday.

Winds over Dumai, the report added, helped to clear the haze in the region.
We were lucky, it was rain in Sumatra (not here) and winds that cleared the haze this time.
It is exposed peat caused by widespread clearing to plant mostly oil palm that is responsible for recurrent hazes which depends on circumstances. In certain years when the exposed peat becomes too dry it can catch fire with slash and burn and spread widely causing more smoke than fire to destroy even wide swathes of land.
IT IS PEAT EXPOSED TO DRYING BY OIL PALM CULTIVATION (FOR WHICH BIG COMPANIES ARE TO BLAME) THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RECURRENT HAZES WHEN IN CERTAIN YEARS THE EXPOSED PEAT BECOMES TOO DRY SO THAT THEY CAN CATCH FIRE WHEN SLASH AND BURN IS DONE ON IT.
ON SOME YEARS SLASH AND BURN DOES NOT RESULT IN UNCONTROLLABLE BLAZES WHEN THE PEAT IS TOO MOIST TO CATCH FIRE.
Weekly meal planner:
You have to be deluded and obsessed to plan your meals which is something unessential and towards death rather than life.
Further if you follow your weekly plan you are a robot, slave of that plan rather than master. Only robots find plans appealing, those who are not robots find plans disagreeable.
ONLY SOMNOLENT ROBOTS WILL CREATE AND SUBMIT THEMSELVES TO PLANS, THE WISE PERSON STICKS TO NO PLANS. FASCINATION AND OBSESSION TO FOOD IS SUFFERING, DELUSION AND THE WAY TO FUTURE WOE. FOOD IS A BAIT TO DEATH AND SUFFERING AND BAITS ARE USUALLY TASTY OR ENTICING TO THE INTENDED VICTIMS.
The truth about derivatives:
Below is an expert’s view about derivatives which are at the heart of today’s financial crisis and may be still a HYDROGEN bomb yet to blow up and cause financial and economic chaos.
EVEN TODAY THERE IS A TICKING FINANCIAL TIMEBOMB CALLED DERIVATIVES WORTH TRILLIONS WHOSE DEFAULT WOULD TRIGGER MASS FINANCIAL DISASTER.
Wielding Derivatives as a Tool for Deceit
Derivatives are not always “financial weapons of mass destruction,” as Warren Buffett famously called them.
But they are often weapons of mass deception.
For some derivatives, a desire for deception is the only reason they exist. That deception can allow those who own derivatives to evade taxes or accounting rules. It can allow activity that might otherwise be illegal, were it not called a derivative, or that would face regulation if it were labeled what it truly is.
Sometimes, banks use derivatives they create to help their clients deceive the public. Other times, they enable the banks to deceive those clients.
The latest revelation of deception by derivative came in Italian government documents leaked this week to two European newspapers, La Repubblica and The Financial Times. The Financial Times said it appeared that Italy had used derivatives in the 1990s to allow it to make its budget deficit seem smaller, thus enabling it to qualify for admission to the euro zone. The report said it appeared those derivatives, now restructured, might be exposing Italy to a loss of 8 billion euros ($10.4 billion).
La Repubblica noted that the director general of the Italian Treasury Department at the time, Mario Draghi, is now running the European Central Bank.
Italy’s economy minister, Fabrizio Saccomanni, said it was “absolutely baseless” to say that the country used derivatives to lie its way into the euro zone. It was simply hedging against market risks. As for the current situation, he said, “There’s been no material damage to our public finances.” He drew a distinction between realized losses and those based on market values that could change.
What seems to have happened in Italy is similar to something that we already know Greece did. Rather than borrow money — which would increase the reported budget deficit — the country entered into a derivatives contract that called for the banks to make large upfront payments in return for larger payments later from the government.
And how did that differ from a loan? Functionally, not very much, in all probability. But if you call something a derivative you can often get away with keeping it off your balance sheet — or putting it on the balance sheet in a misleading way. If The Financial Times report is right, the deal made Italy’s reported budget deficit smaller just when the country needed that to join the euro zone.
There is some evidence that Europe knew what was going on and chose to ignore it. Joining the euro was seen as more of a political event than an economic one, a symbol of European unity.
The effect of the funny accounting was similar to that of a student cheating on college entrance exams. The student may get into a university where he or she cannot compete, just as Italy and Greece find themselves in a currency bloc where their economies are at a significant disadvantage.
But while uncompetitive students can drop out, or be expelled, the euro zone rules provide that no country can leave. That fact, perhaps more than anything else, accounts for the persistence of the euro zone crisis.
Such deception by derivative is hardly new. Enron was a pioneer. It used derivatives called “prepaid forward” contracts to hide debt in a way that made corporate cash flow appear better, something the company thought was necessary to impress the bond rating agencies.
Responding to claims that his bank and Citibank had made “disguised loans” to Enron, a JPMorgan Chase executive told a Senate hearing in 2002 that “the prepaid forwards were undoubtedly financing, as all contracts are that involve prepayment features, but every financing is not a loan.” He said the bank had properly accounted for them, but “the manner in which Enron accounted for them” was of no concern to the bank. It was, instead, “a matter for Enron and its management and auditors.”
That was not the way the banks saw it when they were seeking the business. “The evidence,” said Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, “revealed them to be nothing more than sham transactions designed to obtain, as one of the banks continued to tout on its Web site, ‘financial statement friendly financing.’ Like so many of the other deals at Enron, the apparent motive was to portray a false image of the company’s financial health.”
That “friendly financing” came at an extra cost, of course. In reality, the banks charged Enron a fee for enabling it to deceive. Those same banks ended up losing a lot of money when Enron collapsed. How could the banks have guessed that a customer that would pay them to aid in lying would be less than honest in dealing with them?
Calling something a derivative can help a company get around inconvenient laws and regulations. Intrade pioneered Internet gambling on everything from election results to whether an executive in trouble would be forced to resign. Gambling? Perish the thought. Those were “futures contracts.” That worked until this year, when the United States government forced Intrade out of business.
Then there are “credit default swaps,” which offer a payoff if a company or a country defaults on its obligations. If you called that insurance, a company issuing them would face requirements that it maintain reserves to pay future claims. But call it a derivative, and the rules do not apply. The American International Group was able to collect billions in premiums for such swaps without taking any reserves. When the credit crisis arrived, A.I.G. would have collapsed without a government bailout.
The current accounting rules in the United States go so far as to say that banks can hide obligations that are classified as derivatives. They do that by “netting” derivative positions that are currently profitable against positions that have losses, and show only the net value. That reduces the amount of assets on their balance sheets and thus makes them appear less leveraged than they are.
They can do that even if the two positions have nothing in common — save the identity of the counterparty on the other side of the transactions. It makes no sense at all to be able to hide a bet on, say, the Canadian dollar, by offsetting it against a bet on German stock prices. But that is legal now in the United States.
The banks have done an excellent job of persuading the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which sets the rules, not to mess with them. Rather than force the banks to put the assets and liabilities on their balance sheets, as is required in most other countries, the board has proposed additional disclosures that might make it easier to discern the reality.
And this week the board proposed new accounting standards for insurance that would force many contracts not called insurance — but being basically the same thing — to be accounted for in the same way as insurance. But credit default swaps were exempted. Why? The logic, such as it is, is that insurance is sold to people who are seeking to be reimbursed for possible losses, like an automobile accident. Because credit default swaps are sold to people who are simply speculating, they can continue to be accounted for as derivatives.
None of this is to argue that some things called derivatives cannot be useful in the right circumstances. But in many cases those things deserve to be called what they really are. Often, they are simply ways to place wagers.
A risk for banks is that calling these things gambling could prejudice courts deciding whether to enforce them. Many municipalities entered into what were called interest-rate swaps with large banks before the credit crisis arrived. “The cities,” says William J. Quirk, a law professor at the University of South Carolina who formerly worked as a lawyer for the New York City, “lost every bet.”
That may be an overstatement. But those contracts have certainly produced large profits for Wall Street, and many will continue to do so for years to come. “The funny part of the story,” Mr. Quirk wrote in the July issue of Chronicles Magazine, “is that the cities keep paying despite the fact they have a good legal defense: The bets are not enforceable because cities are not authorized to place bets with taxpayers’ money.”
Unless you want to go mad, you never cycle for any cause, good or bad because that is not a valid reason for cycling and if you do anything for an invalid reason you are courting insanity and will get it.
You cycle from London to Manchester if you need to get there, not for any cause, not because of sponsorship unless you want to go mad.
YOU SWEEP THE FLOOR BECAUSE IT IS DIRTY, NOT FOR A CAUSE OR FOR PROMOTION. DANCING IS ALWAYS MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW, INSANITY ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA AND SO IT IS THAT CYCLING FOR A GOOD CAUSE IS ALSO MAD, FOR SHOW, FOR MONEY OR WHATEVER. ONLY A DELUDED MAN WOULD GO TO SUCH TROUBLE AND DANGER FOR A GOOD CAUSE WHOSE REWARD WILL BE BITTER, SUFFERING.
Worship of noble ones brings incomparable rewards:
Noble ones are very rare, even extremely rare in this world, there is only one Buddha per eon and Jesus appears only once in this world and so those who are TRULY noble are extremely rare in this world and very few people come into contact with them and worship of them, EVEN for a moment brings great benefits whilst scoffing at them is DISASTER, you can languish in hell for that.
THE VAST MAJORITY EVEN THOSE WHO ARE VERY RELIGIOUS ARE NOT NOBLE EVEN DELUDED AND SO THOSE WHO ARE TRULY NOBLE ARE EXTREMELY RARE IN THIS WORLD, MOST PEOPLE NEVER GET TO CONTACT THEM.
106. Though month after month for a hundred years one should offer sacrifices by the thousands, yet if only for a moment one should worship those of perfected minds that honor is indeed better than a century of sacrifice.
107. Though for a hundred years one should tend the sacrificial fire in the forest, yet if only for a moment one should worship those of perfected minds, that worship is indeed better than a century of sacrifice.
108. Whatever gifts and oblations one seeking merit might offer in this world for a whole year, all that is not worth one fourth of the merit gained by revering the Upright Ones, which is truly excellent.
Faking it big time:
It cannot be disputed whether everyone in this world is true to themselves and to others or they are faking it big time, not a moment passes by when they are not faking it, putting a show to others and to themselves, even alone by themselves they cannot put down their masks permanently stuck on their faces.
This is a world of actors, showmen, not just politicians and show biz types but even ordinary people, ordinary children and consummate inveterate actors who are never true to themselves and others not are they capable even if they wanted.
What is called faking it? It is acting, rehashing one’s behaviour to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others, not saying or doing what one means and not meaning what one says and does which are rehashed even impersonally, nonchalantly, mechanically to get along and hide one’s emotions.
I SEE PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD FAKING IT BIG TIME, ALL THE TIME AND IF YOU DON’T SEE IT SO, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED, YOU SEE BUT DO NOT SEE OR SEE INCORRECTLY THAT IS THE PATH TO WOE NOT HEAVEN.
It is all faked including the oohs and aahs:
There are never genuine and faked oohs and aahs, genuine smile and laughter and faked smiles and laughter, they are all fakes intended to please and impress, sometimes to intimidate others.
Only in heaven are people true and good to each other:
Only in heaven are people shorn of any pretence, true and good to each other without any malice, conveyed or hidden.
Without true understanding there is no escape from suffering:
There is the Devil and he is the father of false understanding, force, suffering and death.
This is a world of suffering even to terrible extended levels and death for everyone no matter how successful or rich or clever he is and suffering and death always has cause and cure and it is only true understanding that permits the person to discover the cause and cure of suffering and death and so he avoids suffering here where those without true understanding plunges into suffering again and again like the man butting his head on the wall in blindness and torment.
Heaven and enlightenment is the everlasting escapes from suffering and the way to heaven and enlightenment is entirely hidden from the awareness of ordinary people here and it takes true understanding to discover the path of practice that if successfully undertaken (eg loving kindness shorn of urge to attack and harm others), leads to escape from suffering.
SUFFERING IS THE UNIVERSAL CONDITION HERE, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO YOU ARE.
SUFFERING ALWAYS HAS CAUSE AND CURE BUT BEINGS HERE BLINDED BY FORCE (HATE AND GREED), BY EMOTION CANNOT SEE THE CAUSE AND THUS CURE OF SUFFERING AND SO THEY PLUNGE THEMSELVES INTO SUFFERING ENDLESSLY TO DIE AGAIN AND AGAIN.
WITHOUT CORRECTLY SEEING AND THUS UNDERSTANDING THE SOURCES OF SUFFERING AS THERE ALWAYS ARE AND CORRECTING ONE’S BEHAVIOUR SO AS TO AVOID CAUSES OF SUFFERING, THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY THE BEING CAN ESCAPE SUFFERING IN DAILY LIFE OR ESCAPE FROM THE HELL OF EXISTENCE HERE TO HEAVENLY BLISS.
EVEN IF YOU WANT TO ESCAPE SUFFERING (AND MANY EVEN THOSE WHP PROFESS TO BE GOOD DO NOT WANT TO ESCAPE) THE DEVIL AND HIS ANGELS WILL NOT LET YOU GO EASILY, THEY WILL FIGHT TENACIOUSLY TO THE LAST TO DETAIN YOU, TO BAMBOOZLE AND CONFUSE YOU.
THUS THE PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SEES THE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIMSELF AND EVERYONE HERE AND HE SEES IT IS THE SOURCE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE AND HE PUTS A STOP TO STYLE AND ESCAPES SUFFERING HERE.
THE PERSON WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING SEES STYLE BUT HE SEES IT AS MEANINGFUL, GOOD FOR HIMSELF AND OTHERS AND BECAUSE IT IS EVIL, HE FINDS EVIL AND SUFFERING AND THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING POSSIBLE FOR HIM.
Controlled mad conflict:
All stylish people must suffer controlled even intense mad conflict that gets worse with age and endless in uncontrollable terrible conflict.
The reason is because they accelerate in speed and loudness through the syllables and words they stretch.
When you accelerate in speed and loudness you are essentially rushing.
When you stretch a syllable or word you are delaying the completion of a syllable.
And thus if you accelerate in speed and loudness through a stretched word or syllable you are in effect rushing and delaying at the same time and that is serious mad conflict.
IF YOU WANT TO RUSH (ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS), DON’T DELAY (PROLONG YOUR SYLLABLE).
IF YOU WANT TO DELAY DON’T RUSH.
IF YOU DELAY AND RUSH AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE MINDLESSLY PRACTICE INTENSE FORCEFUL CLASHING OR CONFLICT THAT CAN REACH AGONISING LEVELS AND WILL END IN UNCONTROLLABLE MAD CONFLICT.
AND SO IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU ARE THE MOST DIEHARD ADVOCATE (CHAMPION) AND PRACTITIONER OF STYLE, CONTROLLED CONFLICT IS A NOOSE AROUND YOUR NECK AND SOONER OR LATER THAT NOOSE WILL STRANGLE YOU. KEEP UP WITH YOUR STYLE!!!!!!
How do people understand such news? They think so long as there is recovery it is good.
Not too long ago I read that you can use your handgun as deposit to buy a car, any flimsy deposit will do as the flood of printed money try to find homes in being lent and desperate car dealers try to move cars out of their showrooms.
If this is a case, it is reckless and dangerous, not based on sound business or economic practice as buyers may default.
Further the vast majority of car purchases are unessential, for enjoyment, is not productive in that it will return the money invested and earn more.
THE MAJORITY OF CAR PURCHASES ARE NOT OUT OF NECESSITY BUT UNESSENTIAL, FOR PLEASURE RATHER THAN TO MAKE MONEY THAT WILL RETURN THE BORROWED MONEY AND MORE.
IF RECKLESS MONEY PRINTING AND RECKLESS LENDING IS THE BASIS OF STRONG CAR SALES THEN WHILST IT MAY BOOST THE ECONOMY NOW, IT IS STORING UP DEBT AND TROUBLE FOR THE FUTURE.
You see nothing wrong with mention of cyberspace but you have been brainwashed and it is serious rather than harmless.
There is space and there is the internet but there is no cyberspace or cloud computing.
It is deadly dicing with mad perception to talk of cyberspace and cloud computing or the cloud. There is no internet cloud or space but there is the internet which has no space or cloud.
People have come to accept cyberspace as referring to the internet and they already virtually perceive the internet as having space when there is no space in the internet.
WHOEVER INVENTED CYBERSPACE AND CLOUD COMPUTING IS DICING WITH MAD PERCEPTION AND HE HAS DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING MISLEADING OTHERS.
THE INTERNET HAS NO SPACE OR CLOUD AND TO IMPLY SO IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING AND IT REFLECTS AN ABSENCE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG.
What is the reality of the internet?
The internet is about interconnected computers, some are massive servers and others are PCs or tablets or phones and they are connected via cables, fibre optic cables and wirelessly via radio or microwaves.
THE INTERNET IS SIMPLE, IT IS A COMMUNITY OF COMPUTERS FROM HANDPHONES,DESKTOPS TO SERVERS LINKED TOGETHER VIA COPPER WIRES, FIBRE OPTICS OR RADIO/MICROWAVES. WHERE IS THERE A CLOUD OR CYBERSPACE IN IT?
IT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT DEADLY DICING WITH INSANITY TO SEE SOMETHING (CLOUD, SPACE) WHERE THERE IS NOTHING.
This is again a falsity, concoction of his ‘fertile’ imagination and those without true understanding accept ‘hook, line and sinker’.
PC viruses are not beings who can help each other survive, it is just a case that sometimes two viruses in the same computer render it more difficult to remove either of them that is not synonymous with them helping each other survive.
BEINGS CAN HELP EACH OTHER SURVIVE, COMPUTER VIRUSES CANNOT HELP EACH OTHER SURVIVE, THEIR SIMULTANEOUS PRESENCE MAY RENDER THE REMOVAL OF EITHER MORE DIFFICULT BUT THAT IS NOT HELP EXCEPT IN YOUR WILFUL FALSIFICATION THAT ENDS IN MADNESS.
If there are never true reasons why they fought, fighting is based on delusion and emotions, stirred force, greed and desire to harm others then you are mad or deluded to want to tell others why they fought.
WHY THEY FOUGHT IMPLIES THERE ARE MEANINGFUL OR IMPORTANT REASONS TO KNOW WHY THEY FOUGHT. IF THERE ARE NEVER ANY TRUE REASONS FOR FIGHTING, IT IS DRIVEN BY FORCE OR EMOTION, BY GREED OR ILL WILL AND DELUSION, THEN YOU ARE DELUDED IN ENDEAVOURING TO TELL OTHERS ‘WHY THEY FOUGHT’ AND ONLY A GULLIBLE PERSON WOULD BE INTERESTED TO READ WHAT HE HAS TO SAY.
Chinese lantern causes big blaze:

  CCTV shows object, believed to be a paper lantern, floating into plant
  Blaze at Jayplas recycling facility caused £6million worth of damage
  Fire ripped through 100,000 plastic bales which were awaiting recycling, sending a column of smoke 6,000ft into the sky
  Blaze has sparked calls for Chinese lanterns to be banned

The Buddha said you should see danger in the slightest of faults and so even if you are unaware of the havoc or harm your floating lantern or fireworks did, you are liable for the suffering that must be repaid by future suffering.
It is meaningless, totally unnecessary to set off floating lanterns or fireworks and should they cause fire you are liable for suffering it causes. I would not even think of setting off fireworks or lanterns, even for jest.
What they fought for not why they fought:
For one who truly understands there are never true reasons why they fight but it is a case of what they fought for eg independence, over a girl, over lost pride or honour.
YOU FIGHT FOR SOMETHING, FOR YOUR PRIDE, FOR A GIRL, FOR A NATION, FOR A CAUSE (INDEPENDENCE) NOT FOR A REASON BECAUSE THERE ARE NO TRUE REASONS TO FIGHT, NO MAN OF TRUE REASON WILL FIGHT FOR ANYTHING.
WHAT THEY FOUGHT FOR IS A CORRECT STATEMENT, WHY THEY FOUGHT IS SPEAKING INCORRECTLY. FIGHTS ARE OVER OBJECTS, VIRTUAL OR PHYSICAL.
How many people pay cash for cars?
Cars are largely bought on hire purchase which means it incurs debt individually and on the economy as a whole and so surging car sales is not something you should celebrate with glee unless you are a fool because it is debt driven boost and the (borrowed) money is mostly squandered and due for repayment or the economy will be saddled with more insoluble debt whose reckoning is not immediate but later.
Why they fight:
When people are threatened, fearful, they feel their existence is threatened, they fight and that means it is force, stirred fear that is the basis of their fighting.
When people suffer and their tolerance to suffering is pushed to the brink they lash out or fight and that means it is force that triggers their fighting.
When people are angry, they are stirred to be repulsed by things happening they may fight and here again stirred force, anger is the basis of their fighting.
When they are hateful, their mental forces are stirred to want to attack, harm and kill others, they get into fights mental or verbal and here again force is the basis of their fighting.
Programming is a basis of fighting, there are individuals who are like pit bulls, raring for a fight, their mental forces programmed to attack others at the slightest or no provocations.
Delusion too is a basis for fighting and delusions are programmed falsities or beliefs never true reason. Thus Islamic fanatics become suicide bombers because of the delusion they will be admitted to heaven.
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER IT IS VERBAL OR PHYSICAL FIGHTING, FIGHTING WITH SELF OR OTHER, YOU NEED TO STIR FORCE TO FIGHT.
ONLY FORCE CAN STIR FORCE, TRUE REASON NEVER HAS FORCE CAPABLE OF STIRRING ONE’S MENTAL FORCE TO FIGHT.
AND SO ALL BASES OR SOURCES OF FIGHTING ARE BASED ON FORCE, FEAR, SUFFERING, ANGER OR HATE, PROGRAMMING OR DELUSION.
THUS IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHY PEOPLE FIGHT YOU ARE DELUDED OR SPEAKING FALSELY IF YOU DO NOT DWELL ON THE ABOVE REASONS.
Fighting is based on programming and stirred mental force:
Without being programmed to fight and one’s mental force being stirred or provoked the person cannot fight.
Ordinary people are all robots and they cannot do anything including fight without being programmed they cannot fight and so when provoked they rehash the substance and style of their verbal or physical fighting in their individually stereotyped way. There are those who are not programmed to fight or some who are programmed to only verbally fight and these are incapable of fighting or physical fighting that they are not programmed.
In order for them to fight their mental forces must be stirred or provoked to attack or resist and if it is provoked very strongly beyond their control they may become uncontrollable, insane, throw all inhibitions to the wind and risk getting themselves killed or killing someone.
Thus even a very timid man if he has been programmed to fight, he is passively aggressive and harbours programs of attacking others, if sufficiently provoked he may lose all control and even murder someone.
WITHOUT HARBOURING PROGRAMS TO FIGHT AND REHASHING FIGHTING, A PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT CANNOT DO IT, CANNOT FIGHT. IN ORDER TO FIGHT THEY MUST BE PROVOKED BY FORCE (EG THINGS SAID THAT HURT HIS FEELINGS OR THE FORCE CHANGES OF OTHERS STIRRING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO BE PROVOKED).
NO REASON OR MEANING IS INVOLVED IN FIGHTING, IT IS BASED ENTIRELY ON FORCE AND PROGRAMMING.
Everything must be right to escape suffering and death:
Jesus said you must be perfect just as God is perfect and the noble eightfold path the Buddha declared means everything must be perfect or right, right view (correctly seeing everything as they actually are), right resolve (towards renunciation, relinquishment, giving up, disentanglement), right mindfulness (paying attention to the right things, ignoring the wrong or unessential or false things) right persistence or effort (to relentlessly pursue despite setbacks the deathless, the state without suffering here and thereafter), right conduct, right speech, right livelihood, right concentration (the 4 higher states of mind namely no style, no thinking, no like and dislike, no pain or pleasure.)
"And what is the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma? Just this noble eightfold path: right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration. This is called the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma.
The Blessed One said, "I will teach & analyse for you the Noble Eightfold Path. Listen & pay close attention. I will speak."
"As you say, lord," the monks responded to him.
The Blessed One said, "Now what, monks, is the Noble Eightfold Path? Right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration.
"And what, monks, is right view? Knowledge with regard to stress (suffering), knowledge with regard to the origination of stress(suffering), knowledge with regard to the stopping of stress, knowledge with regard to the way of practice leading to the stopping of stress: This, monks, is called right view.
"And what is right resolve? Being resolved on renunciation, on freedom from ill will, on harmlessness: This is called right resolve.
"And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, abstaining from divisive speech, abstaining from abusive speech, abstaining from idle chatter: This, monks, is called right speech.
"And what, monks, is right action? Abstaining from taking life, abstaining from stealing, abstaining from sexual intercourse: This, monks, is called right action.
"And what, monks, is right livelihood? There is the case where a noble disciple, having abandoned dishonest livelihood, keeps his life going with right livelihood: This, monks, is called right livelihood.
"And what, monks, is right effort? (i) There is the case where a monk generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the sake of the non-arising of evil, unskillful qualities that have not yet arisen. (ii) He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the sake of the abandonment of evil, unskillful qualities that have arisen. (iii) He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the sake of the arising of skillful qualities that have not yet arisen. (iv) He generates desire, endeavors, activates persistence, upholds & exerts his intent for the maintenance, non-confusion, increase, plenitude, development, & culmination of skillful qualities that have arisen: This, monks, is called right effort.
"And what, monks, is right mindfulness? (i) There is the case where a monk remains focused on the body in & of itself -- ardent, aware, & mindful -- putting away greed & distress with reference to the world. (ii) He remains focused on feelings in & of themselves -- ardent, aware, & mindful -- putting away greed & distress with reference to the world. (iii) He remains focused on the mind in & of itself -- ardent, aware, & mindful -- putting away greed & distress with reference to the world. (iv) He remains focused on mental qualities in & of themselves -- ardent, aware, & mindful -- putting away greed & distress with reference to the world. This, monks, is called right mindfulness.
"And what, monks, is right concentration? (i) There is the case where a monk -- quite withdrawn from sensual pleasures, withdrawn from unskillful (mental) qualities -- enters & remains in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation (thinking is still present). (ii) With the stilling of directed thought & evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of concentration, one-pointedness of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation -- internal assurance (thinking has stopped). (iii) With the fading of rapture, he remains in equanimity (neither stirred to like or dislike), mindful & fully aware, and physically sensitive of pleasure (once your mental force has stopped stirring, it does not obscure the reception of force that is the source of pleasure). He enters & remains in the third jhana, of which the Noble Ones declare, 'Equanimous & mindful, he has a pleasurable abiding.' (iv) With the abandoning of pleasure & pain (you need to receive force through your senses to experience pain and pleasure)-- as with the earlier disappearance of elation & distress -- he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor pain. This, monks, is called right concentration."
WHO AMONGST BUDDHISTS HAS EXPOSED OR ELUCIDATED WHAT THE ACTUAL BUDDHA TAUGHT AS I HAVE?

No comments: