Clumsy and slick are styles of speech:

Clumsy and slick are styles of speech:

Some people are good public speakers, others are bad and it is a matter

entirely of style not substance. There are those who are clumsy, hesitant, disjointed and these are perceived as bad whilst others have well honed their deliveries to appear confident, slick and authoritative even when they are bullshitting, do not know what they are talking about. These are considered good speakers and prized and it is a matter of style not substance.

There is further style in the substance of ordinary people’s speeches, they may use bombastic or flowery words to impress, add unnecessary for show things to say to please and impress and bond with their audiences.

THAT A PERSON’S SPEECH IS SLICK OR CLUMSY IS EVIDENCE OF ACCOMPANYING STYLE, THEY ARE STYLES OF SPEECH. PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK TO STATE THE TRUTH BUT THEY SPEAK TO PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS, THEY SPEAK TO ENTERTAIN (AND THAT IS ALWAYS A FALSE AND MAD REASON TO SPEAK), THEY HAVE HONED THEIR DELIVERIES TO APPEAR CONFIDENT, AUTHORITATIVE, SLICK AND THEY ADD SPICE TO THE SUBSTANCE OF THEIR SPEECH MAKING IT FLOWERY, FULL OF ADORNMENTS DESIGNED TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS AND BOND WITH THE AUDIENCE. NO MATTER HOW CONFIDENT THEY PROJECT, BECAUSE THEY ARE PRACTICING DECEPTION, THEY MUST SPEAK WITH RAISED SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEAD TO STRESS, THEY MUST SUBDUE RESTLESSNESS AND THE TENDENCY TO LAPSE INTO DAZES, WHAT AND HOW THEY SAID MUST BE REHASHED ACCORDING TO PLANS EVEN MANY TIMES BEFORE AND THEY HAVE WEDDED THEMSELVES TO A ROBOTIC REHASHING TORMENTING EXISTENCE.

A PERSON OF TRUTH CANNOT BE CLUMSY OR SLICK IN HIS SPEECH, HIS SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION NECESSARY SPEECH HAS NOT STYLE, NO PADDING TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE.

A man of truth is neither a good nor bad speaker, only effortless:

A man of truth who understands the situation, understands what he says is neither a good nor bad speaker, because there is no raised self-resistance, there is no retrieving to rehash, his speech is effortless, smooth with pauses and hesitations.

GOOD AND BAD SPEAKERS ARE MATTERS OF STYLE NEVER TRUTH OR SUBSTANCE. A PERSON WHO IS WITHOUT STYLE IS NEITHER A GOOD OR BAD SPEAKER, HE SPEAKS WHAT IS NECESSARY RELEVANT TO THE TOPIC AND IT IS EFFORTLESS BECAUSE THERE IS NO ACCOMPANYING SELF-RESISTANCE, NO REHASHING THAT CAN DISRUPT THE FLOW.

43 M'sians were on ill-fated MAS Flight MH17

Without knowing fate had anything to do with the crash you are speaking wrongly to say so that misleads others and that incurs debt. Suffice to say it was downed, which is a fact. It is not an accident that the statement referred to Malaysians which is a subconscious display of partisanship that is never due to reason but by programming and it leads to woe.

IF YOU THINK THE STATEMENT IS A REASONABLE STATEMENT OF TRUTH YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND.

THAT THE PLANE WAS DOWNED OR CRASHED IS FACT, THAT IT WAS ILL-FATED IS NOT AND YOU SHOULD BE CAREFUL NOT TO PRESUME.

IT REFLECTS PARTISANSHIP THAT MALAYSIANS ARE OF SPECIFIC CONCERN TO YOU. THIS IS PROGRAMMED AND THE PERSON IS A ROBOT WITH PROGRAMMED FALSE PERCEPTION. ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE SELF SERVING AND THAT IS PROGRAMMED, WHENEVER SOMETHING HAPPENS THEY AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDER ITS IMPLICATIONS TO SELF AND THOSE THEY INDENTIFY WITH.

MH17 just 1000 feet above no fly zone:

Many airlines including Air France, Qantas, Lufthansa had rerouted from the area and it seemed it was no fly zone below 32,000 feet and MH17 was flying at 33,000 feet.

And so it may be totally unfortunate or there may be elements of a cavalier, indifferent attitude to safety.

The Boeing 777 downed in Ukraine with the loss of 295 passengers was flying just 1,000 feet above a “no-fly” zone covering the troubled region, The Independent has learned.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was on a routine flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur when it crashed, apparently after being hit by a missile.

The jet was travelling east across Ukraine along an airway designated A87. Eurocontrol, the co-ordination centre for air-traffic control in Europe, said: “This route had been closed by the Ukrainian authorities from ground to flight level 320 [32,000 feet] but was open at the level at which the aircraft was flying.” The plane was flying at the lowest permitted altitude over the area, flight level 330 [33,000 feet], when it disappeared from the radar.

MH17 trying to save fuel?

European agency had warned airlines to avoid in April.

Was MH17 flying through warzone to save fuel? Other planes shown steering well clear of disupted area

• European Aviation and Safety Agency warned pilots to avoid Ukraine in April
• British, European and U.S. aircraft banned from overflying the warzone
• Airspace 'was not subject to restrictions' according to airline industry group
• Boeing 77 was just 300 metres above minimum
• Crash investigators will probe the aircraft's flight plan following the disaster 
• Aviation experts fear the jet entered the warzone to save burning fuel  

Was Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 shot down too?

THE downing of a Malaysia ­Airlines jet over Ukraine has led to speculation that the same carrier’s missing flight MH370 may also have been blown out of the sky by a missile.

This is an article written in a major newspaper and it reflects delusion that anyone can entertain this possibility.

The circumstances showed MH370 continued flying for hours after it disappeared, was tracked on radar to have turned towards the Indian Ocean and it was in hourly contact with Inmarsat’s Indian Ocean satellite and so you must be illogical to entertain the possibility.

SUCH STORIES SERVE TO CONFUSE OTHERS, BEFORE YOU SUGGEST SUCH SCENARIOS YOU SHOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH MH370’S DISAPPEARANCE. IF THE PLANE WAS SHOT DOWN, HOW COME IT FLEW FOR HOURS AND KEPT HOURLY CONTACTS WITH INMARSAT’S INDIAN OCEAN SATELLITE?

SO MH370 WAS SHOT AND THEN IT FLEW FOR HOURS LIKE A ZOMBIE TO END IN THE MIDDLE OF THE INDIAN OCEAN?

MAS’ slippery slide to ruin?

It is impossible if MAS had been well managed financially that it would be in such dire financial state today and because of its financial troubles it had to cut costs and corners like carrying as little reserve fuel as possible and taking short cuts through war zones.

This is foolhardy, by trying to save pennies you end up losing millions and so it is the road to hell for humans as well as companies, is slippery and downhill.

IF MAS WAS WELL MANAGED IT WOULD NOT BE IN FINANCIAL DIRE STRAITS WHERE IT NEEDS TO DANGEROUSLY COST CUT AND CUT CORNERS THAT CAN BACKFIRE AND MAKE WORSE ITS ALREADY PRECARIOUS POSITION.

The Buddha on the dangers of sin:

Can you speak unbroken, lucidly, thoroughly as the Buddha below? And you think he is a fake?

Ina Sutta: Debt

"Monks, for one who partakes of sensuality, poverty is suffering in the world."

"Yes, lord."

"And a poor, destitute, penniless person gets into debt. For one who partakes of sensuality, getting into debt is suffering in the world."

"Yes, lord."

"And a poor, destitute, penniless person, having gotten into debt, owes interest payments. For one who partakes of sensuality, interest payment is suffering in the world."

"Yes, lord."

"And when a poor, destitute, penniless person owing interest payments does not pay interest on time, they serve him notice. For one who partakes of sensuality, being served notice is suffering in the world."

"Yes, lord."

"And when a poor, destitute, penniless person, being served notice, does not pay, they hound him. For one who partakes of sensuality, being hounded is suffering in the world."

"Yes, lord."

"And when a poor, destitute, penniless person, being hounded, does not pay, he is put into bondage. For one who partakes of sensuality, bondage is suffering in the world."

"Yes, lord."

"Thus, monks, poverty is suffering in the world for one who partakes of sensuality. Getting into debt is suffering in the world for one who partakes of sensuality. Interest payment is suffering in the world for one who partakes of sensuality. Being served notice is suffering in the world for one who partakes of sensuality. Being hounded is suffering in the world for one who partakes of sensuality. Bondage is suffering in the world for one who partakes of sensuality.

"In the same way, monks, whoever has no conviction with regard to skillful mental qualities, no sense of conscience with regard to skillful mental qualities, no sense of concern with regard to skillful mental qualities, no persistence with regard to skillful mental qualities, no discernment with regard to skillful mental qualities is, in the discipline of a noble one, said to be poor, destitute, & penniless.

"He -- poor, destitute, & penniless, having no conviction with regard to skillful mental qualities, no sense of conscience...no sense of concern...no persistence...no discernment with regard to skillful mental qualities -- engages in misconduct by way of the body, misconduct by way of speech, misconduct by way of the mind. For him, I tell you, this is getting into debt.

"For the purpose of concealing his bodily misconduct, he formulates evil desires: He desires, 'May they not know about me.' He resolves, 'May they not know about me.' He speaks, [thinking,] 'May they not know about me.' He makes an effort with his body, [thinking,] 'May they not know about me.' For the purpose of concealing his verbal misconduct...For the purpose of concealing his mental misconduct, he formulates evil desires: He desires, 'May they not know about me.' He resolves, 'May they not know about me.' He speaks, [thinking,] 'May they not know about me.' He makes an effort with his body, [thinking,] 'May they not know about me.' For him, I tell you, this is interest payment.

"And then his well-behaved companions in the holy life say about him, 'This venerable one acts in this way, behaves in this way.' For him, I tell you, this is being served notice.

"And then, when he has gone to the wilderness, to the foot of a tree, or to an empty dwelling, he is beset with evil, unskillful thoughts accompanied by remorse. For him, I tell you, this is being hounded.

"He -- poor, destitute, & penniless, having engaged in misconduct by way of the body, misconduct by way of speech, & misconduct by way of the mind -- on the break-up of the body, after death, is bound by the bond of hell or the bond of the animal womb. And I can imagine no one other bond so tormenting, so painful, so obstructive to the unexcelled rest from bondage, as the bond of hell or the bond of the animal womb."

Poverty is called suffering in the world;
so, too, is getting into debt.
A poor person, in debt,
partaking of sensuality, suffers hardship.
Then they hound him and put him into bondage:
the painful bond for one longing to gain
sensual pleasures.

Now, anyone with no conviction
in the discipline of a noble one
-- no sense of conscience, no sense of concern --
contemplating evil actions,
doing wrong by way of body,
wrong by way of speech,
& wrong by way of the mind,
wants: 'May they not know about me.'
He creeps along in body, speech, or mind,
piling up evil actions, here & there,
again & again.
He, with evil actions, his wisdom weak,
knowing his own wrong-doing, is
a poor person, in debt.
Partaking of sensuality, he suffers hardship.

Then they hound him --
painful mental resolves born of remorse --
at home or in the wilderness.
He, with evil actions, his wisdom weak,
knowing his own wrong-doing,
goes to an animal womb or is bound in hell:
the painful bond from which the enlightened are freed.

But one with confidence, living at home,
making gifts of his belongings,
righteously-gained, wins both goals:
advantage in the here-&-now,
& happiness in the world beyond.
The liberality of this householder piles up merit.

Now, anyone with conviction firmly established
in the discipline of a noble one --
with a sense of conscience, a sense of concern,
discerning & restrained by virtue --
is, in the discipline of a noble one,
said to be living in ease.

Gaining a pleasure not of the flesh,
he determines on equanimity:
abandoning the five hindrances
-- persistence constantly aroused --
entering the jhanas:
unified, mindful, & wise.

Knowing this as it actually is
in the total ending of all fetters,
through everywhere not-clinging,
his mind is rightly released.

In him, Such, rightly released,
there is the knowledge, in the total ending
of the fetters of becoming:
'My release is unshakable.'

That is the highest knowledge that, the happiness unexcelled. Sorrowless, dustless, at rest,
that is release from debt."

Malaysia plane deviated from typical path before going down

WASHINGTON -- Before Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 went down in Ukraine, it was following a flight path from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur that its pilots should have been familiar with.
In the last two weeks, the plane flew roughly the same path 14 times, traversing the diagonal length of Ukraine to the Sea of Azov close to Crimea. But Thursday's route deviated slightly. The Boeing 777 went farther north than typical (towards danger zone). It's unclear why.

MH17 purely misfortune and accident? Not a chance

The Buddha said you must be on guard, alert and Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say.

The relevant European body had warned in April to avoid the area and many carriers have re-routed to avoid the area and so you are lackadaisical, heedless to continue overflying the area and you may have flown heedlessly too near the 32,000 feet no fly zone and strayed too far north into danger territory.

IT IS NOT AS IF EUROPEAN FLIGHT CONTROL BODY HAD NOT ISSUED WARNINGS AND NO OTHER AIRLINES HAVE RE-ROUTED THEIR FLIGHTS AND SO YOU IGNORED ADVICE AND UNDERTOOK RISKS OVERFLYING EVEN WHEN THERE WERE QUITE A NUMBER OF PLANES AND HELICOPTERS DOWNED IN RECENT MONTHS.

Don’t you think it is bad taste to politicize?

Quote: But don’t you think it is in bad taste that he used the plane tragedies and the loss of 537 lives as political ammunition for his ‘oust Najib’ campaign? And what is Anwar going to tell his party tonight — that the MH370 and MH17 tragedies are God’s retribution for the sin of not ousting Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim in favour of his wife, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail?
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin

Politicizing any matter is never good but always evil and so anyone who thinks it is sometimes bad or sometimes good taste politicizing certain matters is deluded, heading for suffering.

WHATEVER HAPPENS IS RIGHT (CORRECT) OR WRONG (INCORRECT), BLAMEWORTHY OR BLAMELESS, TRUE OR FALSE, TO POLITICIZE IS TO EXPLOIT AN ISSUE FOR PERSONAL POPULARITY GAINS AND THAT IS NEVER IN GOOD TASTE NOR IS IT A MATTER OF BAD TASTE BUT IT IS EVIL, WRONG, MAD.

AND SO HERE AS EVERYWHERE RPK IS DELUDED NOT THE WISE PERSON HE AND FELLOW DELUDED PEOPLE LIKE TO PERCEIVE.

To politicize is to exploit and that is controlled insanity:

Politicizing is about exploiting an arisen matter that is of interest to potential voters with the hope of gaining political advantage over one’s adversaries in terms of gaining popularity and favor of voters.

POLITICIZING, PLAYING POLITICS ARE ALWAYS WRONG, EVIL, THE INCORRECT MOTIVE OF ANY ACTION AND LEADS TO INSANITY AND PUNISHMENT.

IT IS NEVER IN GOOD TASTE TO POLITICISE ANY ISSUE, NOR IS IT BAD TASTE BUT IT IS WRONG TO POLITICIZE ANY ISSUE.

How come they don’t understand what they say?

People talk about politicizing and playing politics and they insist they are able to understand and they know what is true and false, what is good and bad yet how come they do not know that when they talk about politicizing they are talking about exploiting an issue, being divisive to gain political advantage and that is always unrighteous, evil rather than in bad taste or sometimes good taste, sometimes bad taste?

WHEN I READ WHAT IS STATED, IMMEDIATELY I SENSE IT IS WRONG, MAD, DELUDED.

Why did MAS not divert as other airlines did?

It is blameworthy not blameless if danger warnings have been issued by relevant authorities and other airlines have diverted their flights to avoid potential danger.

Why did MAS not divert?

If it was effortless, no trouble and did not cost more money to divert, surely MAS would have diverted. It is because it took effort and MAS was lackadaisical, complacent, indifferent in its duties and responsibilities, it costs more in money (and time) and effort to divert that MAS chose to carry on as usual.

AND SO THE WORLD MAY NOT REALIZE IT BUT MAS IS CULPABLE EVEN THOUGH THE INSURGENTS ARE CRIMINAL.

IF YOU KNEW AN AREA WAS GANGSTER INFESTED AND YOU COULD BYPASS THE AREA, WOULD YOU NOT WISELY CHOOSE TO BYPASS THE GANGSTER AREA?

What do you understand by politics?

People are confronted by politics and politicians regularly yet do they truly understand politics, they may be cynical about politics but that is not a true understanding, merely a matter of stirred force to disdain and scoff.

POLITICS IS ENTIRELY EVIL, IT IS ABOUT FIGHTING TO GAIN POWER OR BE ELECTED ON THE FACE OF IT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE BUT IN TRUTH FOR SELF GAIN BY PROPER OR CORRUPT MEANS. POLITICS IS ABOUT POWER, GAINING POWER OR CONTROL AND THEN EXPLOITING THAT CONTROL FOR PERSONAL GAINS. TOWARDS THIS END, THE TRUTH AND GOODNESS IS ALWAYS DISCARDED IN FAVOUR OF PARTISANSHIP, CHAMPIONING POSITIONS AND SOLUTIONS THAT WOULD MATERIALLY BENEFIT A PARTICULAR MAJOR FACTION WHOSE VOTING CLOUT WOULD PROPEL THESE POLITICIANS TO POWER AND CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY.

WHEN THERE ARE NO ISSUES TO RAISE SENTIMENTS OR EMOTIONS SO THAT THE MAJORITY WILL SUPPORT YOU, POLITICIANS EVEN FABRICATE OR ENGINEER ISSUES LIKE RACE AND RELIGION TO POLARIZE THE POPULACE WHERE THERE WAS NONE ACTUALLY.

IF A COMMUNITY WAS WISE, DISCERNING, HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR POLITICIANS AND POLITICS TO EXIST LET ALONE THRIVE, IT IS BECAUSE THE POPULATION HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, ARE FOOLISH, HAVE VESTED INTERESTS THAT THEY SEEK TO PREVAIL TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF OTHERS THAT THEY ARE EXPLOITED BY WICKED POLITICIANS.

POLITICS IS NEVER ABOUT TRUTH AND GOODNESS BUT IT IS ABOUT PUSHING ASIDE TRUTH AND GOODNESS IN PREFERENCE FOR MATERIAL ADVANTAGE OF THE MAJORITY OVER THE MINORITY, IT IS ABOUT EXPLOITATION EVEN INVENTION OF ISSUES BY EVIL POLITICIANS WHO SUPERFICIALLY WANT TO SERVE YOU BUT ARE OUT FOR SELF GLORY AND GAIN.

PLAYING POLITICS BEING BAD OR GOOD TASTE IN VARIOUS ISSUES IS ABOUT LIKE AND DISLIKE, THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL. THUS IF YOU SAY POLITICIZING IN THIS ISSUE IS BAD TASTE, IT MEANS YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED TO DISLIKE POLITICIZING IN THIS CASE.

BECAUSE POLITICS IN TRUTH IS ABOUT USING ISSUES TO EXPLOIT TO GAIN POWER OR CONTROL, NO ONE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL INVOLVE HIMSELF IN POLITICS AND ALL POLITICIANS HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH INSANITY THAT THEY WELL DESERVE.

Hope for the best or be complacent, nothing will happen, expect the worse:

‘Hope for the best’ and complacency are never based on understanding or reason but they are forms of programming that those programmed rehash to meet a situation as it arises and they are always false, dangerous and can lead to disaster as has happened with MH17.

Thus when faced with advice about risks overlying the region, the foolish person can activate ‘hope for the best’ or be complacent, ‘nothing will happen’ when he cannot be sure nothing will happen.

ONLY ROBOTS HOPE FOR THE BEST AND ASSUME, THESE ARE FORMS OF PROGRAMMING, PROGRAMMED ACTIONS THAT ROBOTS POSSESS. THEY ARE LAZY AND INDIFFERENT AND SO WHENEVER DEMANDS ARE MADE ON THEM TO ACT, THEY ‘HOPE FOR THE BEST’ OR ASSUME NOTHING WILL HAPPEN WHICH OCCASIONALLY PROVES FATAL.

Never leave things to chance and expect the worse are also rules, programming that guide people who are robots’ actions.

THOSE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SUBSCRIBE TO NO RULES, THEY HAVE NO PROGRAMMINGS TO TELL THEM FALSELY ‘HOPE FOR THE BEST’, ‘NOTHING WILL HAPPEN’, ‘TAKE NO CHANCES’, ‘EXPECT THE WORSE’.

RATHER THAN HOPE FOR THE BEST OR EXPECT THE WORSE, YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE GRAVITY OF A SITUATION AND UNDERTAKE THE WISE COURSE OF ACTION FOR THAT SITUATION.

Malaysia Airlines' future in doubt

Shares in Malaysia Airlines closed down 11% following the crash of flight MH17 on route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, raising questions about the airline's future.

It is dangerous to jump to conclusions and presume. Unless you understand Malaysian conditions you are foolish to jump to conclusions that MAS is doomed. It may be a matter of hubris and if the government wants it can keep MAS alive in one form or another so it is misleading with karma attached to speak of doubt to its future.

Lagarde warns of market optimism

IMF head Christine Lagarde warns that financial markets maybe a little too upbeat given high levels of unemployment and debt in European economies.

Financial markets today may be ruled by mindless programmed trading and if this is so then she is addressing computer trading that cannot understand.

It may not be so much optimism but those who run the markets possess no true understanding and they are blinded, dominated by greed and fear and they act according to rules and the rules dictate they push up prices perhaps based on past performances.

UPBEAT IS A FUNCTION OF STIRRED FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING AND SO SHE IS ADDRESSING WHAT IS INSENSIBLE, WHAT SHE SHOULD SAY IS THAT MARKET RISES (NOT OPTIMISM) IS NOT JUSTIFIED, WRONG AND THUS DANGEROUS.

WHAT IS THE POINT OF TALKING ABOUT THE MARKETS BEING A LITTLE TOO UPBEAT? WHAT MATTERS IS IF IT IS CORRECT OR WRONG, IF IT IS WRONG YOU SHOULD SAY IT IS WRONG.

Aids researchers on crashed plane

I say flying to an Aids conference is not a valid or necessary reason for flying and should you perish as a result, you asked for it travelling for an invalid reason. Aids is not something essential (to the happiness of a person here and afterwards, it is about self-glory or making money, a job) or blameless and so if you perish in transit you are not blameless even if fellow deluded people think otherwise.

IN TRUTH THERE ARE VERY FEW TRUE OR NECESSARY REASONS TO BE TRAVELLING BY PLANE AND IF YOU TRAVEL FOR FRIVOLOUS OR IRRATIONAL REASONS, CUMULATIVELY EXACTING A SEVERE TOLL ON THE EARTH TO SUPPORT YOUR EXCESSES YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS AND THOSE WHO ARE BLAMEWORTHY DESERVE TO DIE AND ANY DAY IS A VALID DAY TO DIE AS THE BUDDHA ADMONISHED, ANY DAY CAN BE YOUR LAST DAY.

Dying and suffering is what all ordinary people deserve:

Many do not realize that suffering and death are not natural or inevitable, they deserve to die and suffer as a result of their heedless abusive conduct towards themselves, others and the earth.

WHEN A PERSON DIES EVEN SUDDENLY, UNEXPECTEDLY, EARLY, BLOWN TO BITS, BURNT TO CHARCOAL, IT CAN BE DETERMINED WHETHER HE DESERVED OR DID NOT DESERVE TO DIE SO AND FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE WHOM THE BUDDHA SAID HAVE SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN AND ARE HEADED FOR ENDLESS DEATHS WHEN THERE IS ETERNAL LIFE IN HEAVEN, THEY CANNOT BE SAID TO HAVE DIED UNDESERVEDLY. THE HEEDLESS ARE ALREADY LIKE THE DEAD THE BUDDHA SAID AND ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE HEEDLESS, THEY WILL NOT BE DENIED (THEIR PLEASURES AND ACQUISITIONS).

Aids research is about fighting Aids:

Aids research is about fighting Aids and that is always stressful and endless. First you use a knife to kill the target and the target develop defenses to your knife and you then deploy a gun that it develops a bullet proof vest, you can go on in an escalating battle or arms race and it is never about reason but fighting.

FIGHTING DOES NOT END BY FIGHTING ALONE, FIGHTING IS NOT THE ANSWER TO SUFFERING, YOU ARE TO BLAME IF YOU CONTRACTED AIDS AND MOST AIDS RESEARCHERS ARE IN FOR THE MONEY, FOR THE FAME OR EGOTISTIC MOTIVES.

AIDS RESEARCH IS ABOUT USING FORCE ACCORDING TO PLANS OR DRUGS TO FIGHT AIDS AND THE VIRUS DEVELOPING COUNTER RESISTANCE IN A CAT AND MOUSE GAME THAT CAN BE ENDLESS.

MH17 Crash: Shuba remembered as being a woman full of life

This is said intended as praise and if it is false, wrong, deluded there is karma not merit, suffering due in repayment.

You cannot say the Buddha or Jesus was full of life and this world is not so wonder that one should be full of life except one is deluded or putting on a show.

Whatever it is, full of life is not about reason or meaningful but full of activity, interest and these are functions of stirred force that is blind and harmful not good.

ONLY A PROGRAMMED ROBOT NOT A TRUE PERSON CAN BE FULL OF LIFE AND THIS WORLD IS NOT SO WONDER AS ONE CAN BE TRULY FULL OF LIFE, OFTEN IT IS A SHOW PEOPLE PUT ON TO SHOW THEY ARE ENJOYING LIFE TO THE HILT, HAVING A GOOD TIME. EVEN IF IT IS TRUE, THERE IS A PAINFUL PRICE TO PAY FOR YOUR ENJOYMENT OR EXCITEMENT.

MH17 crash: China calls for ‘fair and objective’ probe

This is a totally unwarranted call and it is issued in defense of guilty parties. China is aligned with insurgents and their Russian patrons and there is never a true reason to issue this statement except in defense of the indefensible and this has karma to those responsible.

WHAT CHINA IS DOING IS DEFENDING, STANDING FOR THE ‘RIGHTS’ OF THOSE WHO ARE CULPRITS AND THIS HAS KARMA.

Is this the end of MAS?

This was a question posed at an Australian newspaper.

It is nobody’s business whether the downing of MH17 spells the end of MAS nor can those who pose the question or those who read answer the question truthfully and so it is a silly question that leads to insanity.

ANYONE WHO ASKS SILLY QUESTIONS IS COURTING INSANITY.

IT IS NONE OF ANYBODY’S BUSINESS WHETHER MH17 SPELLS THE END OF MAS, NEITHER THE POSER NOR HIS AUDIENCE CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION IN TRUTH AND SO IT IS AN EXERCISE IN FRIVOLITY THAT HAS KARMA AND INSANITY AS ITS FRUIT.

THE QUESTION IS NEVER BASED ON TRUE REASON OR NEED BUT IT IS THE RESULTED OF AIMLESS STIRRED MENTAL FORCE POSING SILLY QUESTIONS NOW HERE NOW THERE.

MH17 missile launcher secretly transported out to Russia:

The missile was fired from a mobile platform not a handheld device and there is a video clip showing a covered missile launcher being carried by truck towards the Russian border after the shooting.

RUSSIA MAY BE SECRETLY SUPPLYING POTENT SURFACE TO AIR MISSILES TO THE REBELS TO SHOOT DOWN UKRANIAN GOVERNMENT PLANES AND ONCE THE MH17 SHOOTING OCCURRED RUSSIA MAY BE TRYING TO COVER ITS TRACKS BY TAKING OUT THE LAUNCHER TO RUSSIA.

Some MAS crew refused to fly route:

If what is reported is accurate, MAS is more culpable for event than apparent. If some cabin crew had been reluctant to fly it means MAS deliberately persisted in flying over zone where other airlines have rerouted.

Two cabin crew refused to fly on doomed plane over war zone safety fears: Senior pilots and cabin crew flagged concerns about flight path weeks before tragedy

• Airline staff refused to fly over airspace deeming it too dangerous 
• Two Ukrainian planes, a fighter jet and a transport aircraft, shot down by rebels on the flight path
• BA, all US airlines, Lufthansa, Air France and Qantas already avoid war zone in Ukraine
• Two cabin crew swapped shifts so they would not be on the doomed Malaysian airliner downed by a missile in eastern Ukraine, after raising concerns about the safety of flying over the war zone.
• Other senior pilots and cabin crew had flagged up fears about the flightpath in the weeks leading up to the tragedy, although Malaysia Airlines last night denied ignoring crew concerns.
• Some staff are reported to have refused to fly over the airspace where the passenger airliner was downed because they deemed it to be too volatile and dangerous, especially after two Ukrainian planes, a fighter jet and a transport aircraft, were shot down by rebels.

Politics is about exploiting masses’ selfishness ignoring truth and common good to gain power:

Politics is about gaining power and all its trappings (fame, glory, money grabbing, gaining material favors from patrons) appealing to and exploiting the foolish masses selfish consideration in total disregard for truth and common goodness and so politics is evil, sinful and all those involved in politics either as leaders or supporters are partaking in evil heading for eternal woes and death.

Selfishness and truth, goodness are incompatible and so you cannot pander to people’s selfishness and still be faithful to truth and goodness and so politics is about self serving, being selfish, playing on the selfishness, fears and greed of the masses so that they will support you and you gain office, ostensibly to serve but in truth to grab and plunder and abuse your powers.

THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED POLITICS AND IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AND YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND IT, THING IT IS TOO COMPLEX AND MARVELLOUS TO BE UNDERSTOOD, YOU ARE DELUDED.

POLITICS IS ABOUT TARGETTING THE PEOPLE’S SELFISHNESS, GREED AND FEARS TO GAIN POWER OSTENSIBLY TO SERVE BUT IN TRUTH TO GRAB, PLUNDER AND ABUSE POWER AND JUST AS SHIT ATTRACT A LOT OF FLIES, POLITICS ATTRACT A LOT OF HANGERS ON LOOKING FOR CRUMBS DROPPED BY THE BIG FISHES THEY FOLLOW.

Falsity is dangerous, deadly but it is the key to success here:

Falsity in terms of lying, faking it, putting on a show, acting is dangerous, flirting with insanity and is deadly (and ultimately kills self and others) but it is the system of this world and it is impossible for a person to be (materially) successful in this world without embracing, submitting to falsity, lying, faking, acting, putting on a show.

TO TELL ONESELF (AND OTHERS) WHAT IS NOT TRUE (EG YOU ARE NOT GAY) WHEN IT IS TRUE (YOU ARE GAY) STIRS CONFLICT THAT LEAD TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND SCATTERED CONCENTRATION, MANDATES YOU MUST ACT OR FAKE AND THAT MEANS REHASHING OR BEING A ROBOT MECHANICALLY REPLAYING FROM A SCRIPT.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FALSITY THAT IS FUN, HAPPY, SANE, HARMLESS. NO MATTER HOW TOUGH AND DETERMINED YOU ARE, ANYONE WHO EMBRACES FALSITY EMBRACES TORMENT, COURTS INSANITY AND IS HEADING FOR DEEPENING SUFFERING, DESTRUCTION OF HIS MIND AND BODY AND BECAUSE THERE IS LIFE AFTER DEATH, HE IS HEADING FOR ETERNAL TORMENT EVEN IF HE THINKS HE IS GOD’S FAVOURITE SON.

MANY CANNOT EVEN SEE THEIR FALSITY, THEY ARE BLINDED AND DELUDED, THEY SEE THEIR FALSITY AS THEIR TRUTH AND AS LONG AS THEY REMAIN THUS THEY ARE DOOMED, TO THE DEVIL’S DELIGHT.

THIS WORLD IS DOMINATED BY THE DEVIL AND HE DOES NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO LEAVE EASILY AND MOST ARE TRAPPED, MESMERIZED BY THE ALLURES OF MATERIAL SUCCESS BUT IN ORDER TO BE A SUCCESS HERE YOU MUST BE GOOD AT FAKING, PUTTING ON A SHOW, TELLING LIES AND NOT SHOWING IT.

20 families gone in one shot

PETALING JAYA: The passenger manifest of MH17 tells a grim tale. More than 20 families were wiped out when the Malaysia Airlines jetliner was shot down in Ukraine.

If you think this is a statement of truth, you are deluded and do not truly understand.

What is said is not the truth but the programmed perception is false and intended to stir emotions and has karma.

The truth is X number of people were killed not 20 families gone in one shot which is what he deduced from the data to stir emotion how terrible and sad it is.

THERE IS NOTHING GRIM ABOUT THE TALE, BAD THINGS CAN HAPPEN IN THIS WORLD AND IN HELL AND IF YOU WISH TO AVOID THEM YOU BETTER TRAIN YOURSELF IN TRUTH AND GOODNESS.

20 FAMILES GONE IN ONE SHOT IS HIS CONCLUSION AND IT IS PROGRAMMED AND A FALSE UNDERSTANDING. IT IS NOT FAMILIES THAT ARE ‘WIPED OUT’ BUT IT IS INDIVIDUALS THAT WERE KILLED AND WHAT IS SAID IS A FABRICATION TO MAKE MORE THAN THERE IS, HOW SAD IT IS.

PEOPLE SEE DIFFERENT THINGS IN THE SAME PICTURE AND WHAT THEY SEE IS NOT NATURAL BUT ACCORDING TO HOW THEY HAVE PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES FOR EXAMPLE THE CALCULATING PERSON IS ALWAYS THINKING ‘WHAT IS THERE IN IT FOR ME TO WIN OR LOSE?’ THERE ARE FAR MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO CONCLUDE THAN 20 FAMILIES GONE.

IT WAS NOT FAMILIES THAT WERE KILLED BUT INDIVIDUALS WHO PERISHED.

IF YOU WANT TO MAKE OTHERS SAID, YOU WANT TO STIR EMOTIONS OR FORCE THAT IS EVIL AND SO YOU HAVE DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING.

On The Beat

Wong Chun Wai

Let's stand together, Malaysia

This is always a nicety, impossible to achieve and not necessarily good.

If you stand together championing what is evil or meaningless or false, for show then it is not good, notwithstanding it is a worthless statement because it is impossible that Malaysia can stand together except it will fall on deaf ears or lip service. The leaders may want Malaysia to unite behind them but if it is under Anwar, it would be over their dead bodies and so the unity has serious evil caveats.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR BEINGS HERE TO UNITE IN TRUTH AND GOODNESS AND SO IT IS UNITY IN SHOW, HYPOCRISY, PRETENSE, EVIL, EXPEDIENCY, LIP SERVICE AND THAT IS POINTLESS. IF YOU THINK IT IS NEVERTHELESS USEFUL THEN THAT IS WRONG VIEW AND THE BUDDHA SAID WRONG VIEW IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.

Unity of convenience or truth?

It is not just in adversity that you should unite, that is the unity of convenience and expediency but always you should be united in truth and goodness.

CALLS FOR UNITY IN ADVERSITY ARE HOLLOW, HYPOCRITICAL, WHEN TIMES ARE BAD YOU UNITE WHEN TIMES ARE GOOD, IT IS BYE, BYE. YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG BUT THAT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE DELUDED BECAUSE IT HAS DEADLY PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR ITS PRACTITIONERS BECAUSE IT LEADS TO ETERNAL SUFFERING.

MH17: Malaysia demands unrestricted access to crash site

It is foolish and wrong to demand because it risks provoking antagonism. What is meaningful is to request full access.

There are those who would curry favor by asking in a fawning or appeasing way and that is wrong and mad too.

IT IS WRONG AND MAD TO DEMAND OR BE SUPPLICATING BUT ONE REQUESTS ACCESS AND IT IS UP TO THE OTHER TO ACCEDE. DEMANDING HAS ACCOMPANYING FORCE OR THREAT AND RISK PROVOKING ANTAGONISM. AND SO YOU ARE FURTHER INFLAMMING THE SITUATION WITH KARMA NOT MERIT ATTACHED.

Perth’s new stadium will be better than Adelaide’s Oval:

Only a deluded man will say this and only deluded people will see nothing wrong.

The purpose of Perth’s new stadium is never to be better than Adelaide’s but to be functional, because it is necessary or meaningful to be what it is, if this is so, why are you making comparisons it will be better except you are mad, do not truly understand.

THE PURPOSE OF PERTH’S NEW STADIUM (IF INDEED IT IS NECESSARY OR MEANINGFUL, NOT EXTRAVAGANT) IS NEVER TO BE BETTER THAN ADELAIDE’S OVAL SO ARE YOU MAD TO MAKE COMPARISONS LIKE MY BREAST IS BIGGER THAN YOUR BREAST? IT IS ABOUT ONE UPMANSHIP WHICH IS NOT BASED ON REASON BUT PROGRAMMING TO STIR MENTAL FORCE.

SO WHAT IT IS BETTER? BETTER IN WHAT? IF IT IS BETTER IN WHAT IS SENSELESS, PROFLIGATE, WHAT IS THE POINT EXCEPT YOU ARE A FOOL?

WHAT IS SAID IS TO STIR ENVY AND JEALOUSY.

Just as an aside or curiosity?

People may counter that they say Perth’s new stadium is better just as an aside or out of curiosity or interest and they think they are correct when it is controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.

YOU NEVER SAY SOMETHING OR THINK ABOUT SOMETHING EG PERTH’S STADIUM BETTER THAN ADELAIDE JUST IN THE PASSING, AS AN ASIDE OR OUT OF CURIOSITY, THEY ARE NOT VALID REASONS AND CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT IS PROGRAMMED AND YOU ARE A ROBOT HEADING FOR DISASTER.

By the way? It is a lie:

When people say ‘by the way’, it is deceitful, they are guilty of falsity with karma attached.

What is said by the way is always motivated, intended in a obtuse manner, ‘by the way’ is a programmed rehashed style in the substance of the speech to disguise the intentions of the deceitful person that incurs karma never merit.

Woods: I just made too many mistakes

Can you imagine the Buddha or Jesus saying ‘I made too many mistakes’? They do not say that not because they make mistakes but are too proud to admit but they never make mistakes, it is impossible the Buddha or Jesus can make mistakes.

You are not right but you are wrong to make mistakes and whatever has wrong has suffering due later in repayment.

The reason you made mistakes is because you gambled, you acted or did without knowing or by gambling and when it failed it is called a mistake.

The person who resides in truth does not say or do things he does not understand or know is true and so he cannot make mistakes and if you acknowledge you make mistakes you are acknowledging your falsity or risk taking or doing things without knowing that not only leads to painful recrimination but leads to woe not safety and happiness.

The Buddha: One mistake and you are dead

The Buddha said if you spilt just one drop of oil from a pot brimful of oil on your head that you carry through a crowd excited by the singing dancing queen, your head will be chopped off by a man following behind.

EVEN IF SOMEONE PUSHED YOU AND YOU SPILT ONE DROP OF OIL BALANCED IN A POTFUL ON YOUR HEAD, YOU LOSE YOUR HEAD ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA. SO THE WISE MAN WILL PAY FULL ATTENTION TO THE POT AND IF YOU ARE PAYING FULL ATTENTION TO THE POT YOU CANNOT BE EYING THE PRETTY GIRL OR HANDSOME MAN OR VOLUPTUOUS FOOD.

Affirmation of my understanding about USD reserve currency:

I am not even a student of economics but even long ago I correctly perceived the gross unrighteous advantages to the US of wielding the world’s reserve currency and currency of trade. What he says reflects what I said longer ago.

The dollar's 70-year dominance is coming to an end

Within a decade, greenback's could be replaced as the world's reserve currency

By Liam Halligan

5:30PM BST 19 Jul 2014

128 Comments

In early July 1944, delegates from 44 countries gathered at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. A three-week summit took place, at which a new system was agreed to regulate the international monetary and financial order after the Second World War.

The US was already the world’s commercial powerhouse, having eclipsed the British Empire several decades earlier. America was also on course to be among the victors of “Europe’s conflict”, even though its economy was largely unscathed by war. As such, Bretton Woods was US-dominated and produced a settlement largely on US terms.

Seventy years ago this week, that fateful summit ended. Its close marked the moment the dollar’s unquestionable supremacy was secured. Since then, global commerce has been conducted largely in dollars and leading economies have held the greenback as their primary reserve currency.

The same system remains intact today, with the lion’s share of commercial settlements worldwide still clearing the US banking system – even if the parties involved have nothing to do with the States.

The dollar’s hegemony continues to be cemented, meanwhile, by the operations of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Founded at Bretton Woods, they’re both Washington based, of course, and controlled by America, despite some Francophone window-dressing.

The advantages this system bestows on the US are enormous. “Reserve currency status” generates huge demand for dollars from governments and companies around the world, as they’re needed for reserves and trade. This has allowed successive American administrations to spend far more, year-in year-out, than is raised in tax and export revenue.

By the early Seventies, US economic dominance was so assured that even after President Nixon reneged on the dollar’s previously unshakeable convertibility into gold, amounting to a massive default, dollar demand kept growing.

So America doesn’t worry about balance of payments crises, as it can pay for imports in dollars the Federal Reserve can just print. And Washington keeps spending willy-nilly, as the world buys ever more Treasuries on the strength of regulatory imperative and the vast liquidity and size of the market for US sovereign debt.

It is this “exorbitant privilege” – as French statesman Valéry Giscard d’Estaing once sourly observed – that has been the bedrock of America’s post-war hegemony. It is the status of the dollar, above all, that’s allowed Washington to get its way, putting the financial squeeze on recalcitrant countries via the IMF while funding foreign wars. To understand politics and power it pays to follow the money. And for the past 70 years, the dollar has ruled the roost.

This won’t change anytime soon. Something just took place, though, which illustrates that dollar reserve currency status won’t last forever and could be seriously diluted. Last week, seven decades on from Bretton Woods, the governments of Brazil, Russia, India and China led a conference in the Brazilian city of Fortaleza to mark the establishment of a new development bank that, whatever diplomatic niceties are put on it, is intent on competing with the IMF and World Bank.

It’s long been obvious the BRICs are coming. The total annual output of these four economies has spiralled in recent years, to an astonishing $29.6  trillion (£17.3 trillion) last year on a PPP-basis adjusted for living costs. That’s within spitting distance of the $34.2 trillion generated by the US and European Union combined.

America’s GDP, incidentally, was $16.8 trillion on World Bank numbers, and China’s was $16.2 trillion – within a whisker of knocking the US off its perch. The balance of global economic power is on a knife-edge. Tomorrow is almost today.

Consider also that the BRICs collectively hold sway over 50pc of global currency reserves, rising to almost three-quarters if you take the emerging markets as a whole. The G7 nations between them control only 20pc – and less than 8pc if you exclude Japan.

Based on such balance sheets, we’re now seeing institutional change. The new BRICs Development Bank, modelled on the IMF, will have a $100bn currency reserve available to lend around the world, giving distressed debtor nations an alternative to the “Washington consensus”.

For a long time, the BRICs have been paying in to the IMF, yet been denied additional influence over what happens to the money. Belgium has more votes than Brazil, Canada more than China.

The institutions governing the global economy have failed to keep pace with reality. Modest reforms giving the large emerging markets more power, agreed with much fanfare in 2007 and again in 2010, have been stalled by Washington lawmakers. The BRICs have now called time, setting up their own, rival institution based in Shanghai.

The key to the dollar’s future is petrocurrency status – whether it’s used for trading oil and other leading commodities. Here, too, change is afoot. China’s voracious energy appetite and America’s increased focus on domestic production mean the days of dollar-priced energy look numbered.

Beijing has struck numerous agreements with Brazil and India that bypass the dollar. China and Russia have also set up rouble-yuan swaps pushing America’s currency out of the picture. But if Beijing and Moscow – the word’s largest energy importer and producer respectively – drop dollar energy pricing, America’s reserve currency status could unravel.

That would undermine the US Treasury market and seriously complicate Washington’s ability to finance its vast and still fast-growing $17.5  trillion of dollar-denominated debt.

In May, Beijing and Moscow signed a huge multi-decade gas supply contract, to sit alongside a similar oil deal agreed in 2009. No one knows what share of this energy trade will be on a yuan-rouble basis – and the two governments aren’t saying. This question, seemingly inane, is among the most important diplomatic issues of our time.

At the moment, although Russia’s export partners do sometimes settle in roubles, most Sino-Russian trade is still in dollars. But the combination of this new gas deal, and western sanctions on Russia – has seen Moscow and Beijing step up bilateral efforts to facilitate large-scale non-dollar settlement.

With western anti-Russia sanctions likely to be tightened again after the tragic shooting of a Malaysian passenger plane over Ukrainian airspace, Beijing’s response will be closely scrutinised. I, for one, expect the Chinese to say little until it’s clearly established who grounded the plane and why.

Although the dollar’s reserve status won’t end overnight, the global payments system is now moving inexorably towards that outcome. The US currency accounted for just 33pc of all foreign exchange holdings in 2013, on IMF numbers, down from 55pc in 2001.

Within a decade or so, a “reserve currency basket” may emerge, with central banks storing wealth in a mix of dollars, yuan, rupee, reals and roubles, as well as precious metals. Perhaps some kind of synthetic bundle of the world’s leading currencies will be developed, with emphasis placed, after years of western money-printing, on assets backed by commodities and other tangibles.

I also believe central banks may include cyber-currencies (such as bitcoin) in their reserves. If you think that’s mad, consider that mankind has long sought scarcity – be it with shells, stones or metallic elements – to store wealth. Now the money-printing taboo has been broken by yet another generation, it makes sense to use complex computer algorithms to ensure that only a certain amount of a particular currency unit can ever exist.

The dollar’s status is a big question. Judging the outcome is more akin to star-gazing than scientific economics. But the establishment of this BRIC Development bank, timed to coincide with the anniversary of Bretton Woods, is an audacious and significant move. The world’s emerging giants now have thumbscrews on the West.

The USD hegemony is whopping perpetual free lunch for USA:

Because many nations, criminals stash their wealth in USD, the USD is the currency of settlement for all trade even if it does not involve the US, it is a whopping perpetual interest free lunch for the USA and should you take away this free lunch, Uncle Sam will be much thinner, hungrier and the world will be realistically much poorer than it pretends to be with USD hegemony.

US FINANCIAL HEGEMONY WITH THE USD ALLOWS THE US AND THE WORLD TO LIVE WAY BEYOND ITS MEANS (AND THE EARTH TO SUPPORT), IF IT WAS TAKEN AWAY, IT WOULD BE LIKE PULLING A RUG FROM BENEATH THE US (AND THE WORLD).

Rather than merit, giving in this world bears karma:

Unless the gift is essential, sustains the life of the person here or leads/assists him out of this world to safety and happiness, if your gift is unessential, in surfeit (excess), designed to bond him to you (manipulative) and bonds the receiver to this world and acquisitiveness then the giving even has karma to be experienced as suffering rather than merit to be experienced as happiness later.

Thus only if the recipient is poverty stricken in danger of starvation is your gift of food meritorious, if the recipient is well nourished, your gift of food hamper, chocolates, Brands’ essence of chicken is unessential, will not save him from famine but rather it maintains him in a deceitful manipulative relationship with you, conditions him to greed (want gifts) and attachment to material objects.

THUS ONLY IF A GIFT OF FOOD, SHELTER (EG GIVE HOUSE TO YOUR SON VS GIVE HOUSE TO DESTITUTE), MONEY, APPARELS (FASHION T SHIRT FOR FRIEND VERSUS SHIRT FOR BEGGAR), GADGETS (CARS, TABLETS, SMARTPHONES) ARE ESSENTIAL TO SUSTAIN A PERSON’S LIFE HERE IS IT MERITORIOUS, IF THE GIFT IS NOT NEEDED, DOES NOT SAVE HIM FROM FAMINE BUT RATHER IS TO BOND HIM TO YOU AND ENCOURAGE HIM TO BE ACQUISITIVE AND ATTACHED TO THIS WORLD, IT IS EVEN KARMA INCURRING.

SIMILARLY ASSISTANCE IN WORLDLY MATTERS EG TO PASS EXAMS, HOW TO COURT GIRLS, HOW TO COOK CURRY IS KARMA INCURRING, ONLY ASSISTANCE TO RESULTS IN TRUE HAPPINESS HERE AND HELPS THE PERSON ESCAPE THIS WORLD AFTER DEATH IS MERITORIOUS.

THE BUDDHA SAID A GIFT TO AN EVIL MAN CAN HAVE SERIOUS NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU. NOT ALL GIVING OR ASSISTING IS AUTOMATICALLY MERITORIOUS. IT IS NOT HOW MUCH OR EXPENSIVE YOU GIVE BUT WHETHER THE GIFT IS ESSENTIAL IN SUSTAINING THE PERSON HERE (HE IS IN NEED OF THE GIFT) OR ASSIST HIM TO DEPART THIS WORLD TO HEAVEN AND BEYOND.

THE BUDDHA DESCRIBED SIX CONDITIONS THAT MARK THE HIGHEST GIVING AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE VALUE OR MILLIONS OF THE GIFT. IF THE GIVER IS DELIGHTED WITHOUT REGRET BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER GIVING AND THE RECIPIENT IS NOT DELUDED, GREEDY OR HAS ILL WILL, THIS IS THE HIGHEST GIVING WITH THE HIGHEST MERIT.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF GIVING SEEN IN THIS WORLD IS UNESSENTIAL, THE RECIPIENT IS NOT IN NEED OF THE GIFT, IT IS FOR SHOW, TO BOND AND MANIPULATE AND LEADS THE RECIPIENT TO COVETOUSNESS AND ATTACHMENT TO THIS WORLD.

The supreme gift vs highest giving:

The two are not synonymous to those who understand.

The Buddha said of the two, a material gift and a gift of the dharma, the gift of the dharma is supreme.

A material gift will sustain you for a while here and then you suffer and die. A gift of the dharma (which by yourself you will never discover) if understood and put into practice leads to the Deathless (heaven and beyond) and out of suffering and death that is as vast as an ocean and long as eternities.

BY THEMSELVES BEINGS ARE HOPELESSLY TRAPPED HERE HEADING FOR ENDLESS SUFFERING AND DEATH AND A GIFT OF THE DHARMA THAT IS SUPREME ENABLES HIM TO ESCAPE THIS ENDLESS TORMENT AND DEATH TO SAFETY AND THEREFORE IT IS SUPREME COMPARED TO ANY MATERIAL GIFT (ALTHOUGH YOU MAY PREFER A FERRARI OR MANSION).

IN CONTRAST THE HIGHEST GIVING IS WHEN SIX CONDITIONS ARE FULFILLED, THE GIVER IS GLAD BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER GIVING AND THE RECIPIENT IS WITHOUT DELUSION, ILL WILL OR GREED.

IF THE RECIPIENT IS WELL ENDOWED, NOT IN NEED OF MATERIAL THINGS THEN THE GIVING IS HYPOCRITICAL, FOR SHOW, MANIPULATIVE AND SERVES TO BOND THE RECIPIENT TO THIS WORLD AND INCURS KARMA THAN MERIT.

WHAT IS GIVEN TO THE BUDDHA GIVES THE HIGHEST MERIT.

THE BUDDHA SAID THERE ARE TWO MEALS GIVEN TO HIM THAT GIVES THE HIGHEST MERIT, THE LAST ONE GIVEN TO THE BUDDHA BEFORE HIS ENLIGHTENMENT AND THE ONE GIVEN BEFORE HE PASSED AWAY.

15 years in power - 10 blunders by Putin

Only a deluded man can say that and only those without understanding will accept the statement.

Blunders do not exist, they are delusions. If what Putin did was good it would not be called a blunder, it is because it is bad and he ‘shot himself in the foot’ that it is called a blunder. Does that mean that if it was successful but bad it is not a blunder?

SOMETHING DONE IS EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, NEVER A BLUNDER WHICH IMPLIES SOMETHING BAD THAT FAILED WITH NEGATIVE FALLOUT FOR THE PERPETRATOR.

THUS THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING IS 10 WRONGS BY PUTIN NEVER BLUNDERS. YOU MEAN IF HE GOT AWAY WITH IT, IT IS NOT A BLUNDER, IT IS GOOD OR CORRECT?

THE TRUTH OR REALITY IS NOT ABOUT BLUNDERS BUT RIGHT OR WRONG, TRUE OR FALSE.

THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS OF BLUNDERS HAS A WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY AND THIS IS NEVER OK BUT IT LEADS TO SUFFERING.

BLUNDERS DON’T EXIST, THEY ARE PRODUCTS OF THE FALSE PERCEPTION OF DELUDED PEOPLE.

Blunder is wrong view:

The person who subscribes to blunders has wrong view, to him, there is no good or bad or good and bad does not matter, what matters is if something succeeds or it fails (disastrously).

THE PERSON WHO SUBSCRIBES TO BLUNDERS IS NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THE GOOD OR BAD, TRUTH OR FALSITY OF SOMETHING, WHAT MATTERS IS IF IT SUCCEEDS OR IT IS A DISASTER (BLUNDER) FOR THE PERPETRATOR.

BLUNDER IS WRONG VIEW AND WRONG VIEW HAS TWO DESTINATIONS, HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA. WHAT MATTERS IS THE CORRECTNESS OF THE DEED, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT SUCCEEDS OR FAILS.

Hitler’s brilliance and blunders?

By a combination of luck, surprise and ruthless, Hitler’s blitzkrieg through the Ardennes forest is considered a feat of genius, it does not matter if it was evil and the disasters Hitler brought upon himself in the Russian invasion were termed blunders.

THUS BLUNDERS BETRAYS A PERSON COLOR BLIND TO THE GOOD AND BAD OF ACTIONS, WHAT MATTERS TO HIM IF IT WAS A STROKE OF GENIUS IN THAT IT WAS BRILLIANTLY SUCCESSFUL OR IT BROUGHT DISASTER UPON SELF AND IS THEN CALLED A BLUNDER.

Malaysia Airlines seeks 'to rebuild trust'

It is always wrong and deceitful to seek to rebuild trust but what you should do is to conduct yourself scrupulously, to have the welfare of passengers foremost in your mind, rebuilding trust is something you must do and it is always for show to impress the public of your wholesomeness that is not genuine.

IF YOUR WHOLESOMENESS IS GENUINE YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO THINGS TO APPEAR WHOLESOME, IF YOU HAVE TO REBUILD TRUST, TO CREATE AN IMAGE OF WHOLESOME THEN THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE, DECEITFUL AND YOU BAD RATHER THAN GOOD THAT YOU SEEK TO IMPRESS OTHERS.

YOU NEVER SEEK TO REBUILD TRUST BUT YOU CONDUCT YOURSELF RESPONSIBLY WITH THE WELFARE OF PASSENGERS AT HEART.

Have central banks been breaking the law?

                                                                 

Quantitative easing has had a reverse Robin Hood-type effect by robbing from the poor and giving to the rich

In the name of staving off economic collapse, central bankers have been printing money furiously to buy bonds owned by the rich that would otherwise be worthless thereby bailing them out, returning to them money they otherwise would have lost and making the system assume those potentially worthless bonds. Now the rich gratefully collect their returned money and promptly seek higher returns by lending insured with derivatives to emerging markets potentially causing even worse debt crises down the line.

WHAT KIND OF UNDERSTANDING WORLD DOES THIS KIND OF THING?

Blair lies about his fortune:

In a rare comment on his personal finances, Mr Blair suggested he was worth less than £20million, despite the family owning property worth at least £30million.

Maybe Blair thinks he can pull wool over the eyes of the public but his false statement exposes he may a hardcore liar or going mad.

UNLESS HE IS GOING MAD OR HE IS A STRAIGHT FACED LIAR (LIKELY A MIXTURE OF BOTH), SURELY HE KNOWS HIS FORTUNE IS CLOSER THE £100million ALLEGED THAN £20million HE CONTENDS.

Life is not about successes and failures (disappointments) but correctness:

There is such a thing called what is correct and what is wrong and you seldom hear people being concerned about them but they talk with pride about their (material) successes/achievements and their failures, regrets, disappointments or blunders and that is a wrong understanding of what life is about that has consequences in terms of future suffering.

SUCCESSES, ACHIEVEMENTS ARE FRUITS THAT PERISH AND CORECTNESS, TRUTH AND GOODNESS ARE FRUITS THAT DO NOT PERISH.

PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR SUCCESSES AND ACHIEVEMENTS, LAMENT THEIR FAILURES, DISAPPOINTMENTS AND BLUNDERS AND THIS IS AN INCORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE PURPOSE OR AIMS OR GOALS OF LIFE THAT LEADS TO MORE SUFFERING AFTER DEATH.

Success is acquisition, blunder is loss:

Success is about acquisition and blunder is about loss, failed acquisition and the Buddha taught whoever makes an acquisition in this world is heading for woe.

When a person pursues success he is pursuing acquisition that the Buddha says leads to suffering not happiness and failure or disappointment or blunder is the unsuccessful acquisition or loss and that too is suffering and leads to suffering.

Therefore what I says accords with what the Buddha taught, seeking success and suffering blunders or setbacks are delusional and lead to woe.

Whatever Putin did was never a blunder but wrong and a disaster:

Whatever Putin did that was termed a blunder or mistake or miscalculation is wrong and liable to bring disaster to himself and others and so anyone who perceived what Putin did as a blunder or mistake or miscalculation has a false perception and understanding of reality.

If what Putin intended to do was true, good, wholesome it cannot result in disaster for himself and others and it is only if what he did was evil, wrong, covetous that it could turn into a blunder, mistake or miscalculation, instead of the glory or acquisition he envisioned, it has backfired as disaster for himself and others.

A blunder or mistake or miscalculation does not take into consideration the wrong or harm of the action, it is all about objectives, plans to achieve those objectives that turned out faulty, a mistake or miscalculations, it is even an excuse to shift the blame from the person to mistakes, miscalculations.

THERE IS EVIL AND THERE IS RIGHT AND WRONG BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A BLUNDER, IT IS A (CONDITIONED OR PROGRAMMED) CONCOCTION OR FABRICATION OF DELUDED REHASHING MINDS TO EXPLAIN THINGS THEY SEE AND BECAUSE THEY ARE A FALSE PERCEPTION, THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE TO BLUNDERS ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY AND WOE.

THIS WORLD ACCEPTS BLUNDERS, MISTAKES, MISCALCULATIONS AS VALID, TRUE NOT BECAUSE IT IS TRUE BUT BECAUSE IT IS A MUTUALLY SHARED CONDITIONED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT SERVES TO TRAP ALL THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE TO FUTURE WOE AND ENDLESS DEATHS.

'Large gene find in schizophrenia'

If you can see how severely sick society is, how sick doctors and psychiatrists themselves are and you can see that those with schizophrenia may be unable to cope with the controlled conflicting insanity, pretense or hypocrisy that society imposes on all its denizens, you won’t be looking to genes as the cause and cure for schizophrenia.

It is because scientists are grossly deluded, blind to their own shit, to society’s shit that they look to scapegoats to explain schizophrenia and they announce with great delusion and ‘excitement’ a ‘breakthrough’, large gene found when it is barking up the wrong tree and will end in madness even schizophrenia as punishment for these very same scientists.

Tarnishing Putin’s image:

Damaged goods?

Whether MH17 disaster can tarnish Putin's reputation

An image is never the truth about a person but it is a recorded fixed but modifiable picture of the person (eg clever, evil, debonair, charming, resourceful, witty) in the minds of those who are rehashing robots that is always wrong and dangerous.

If something is a fixed, rigid impression of a person, it is not an image but the truth and if it is an image it is false and why would anyone who is not deluded bother with whether Putin’s (false) image is tarnished or untarnished? What is the point of an untarnished image that is false or incorrect of Putin’s?

THE PERSON OF TRUTH WHO UNDERSTANDS DOES NOT SUBSCRIBE TO REPUTATIONS, IT IS THE TRUTH OR FALSITY, GOOD OR BAD OF WHAT A PERSON DOES AND SAYS THAT MATTERS. HE DOES NOT BOTHER TO STORE IMAGES OF OTHERS IN HIS MIND WHICH IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND INSANE NOR DOES HE BOTHER TO REMEMBER THE REPUTATIONS OF OTHERS WHICH AGAIN INVOLVES WORK AND IS SUFFERING.

THUS ANYONE WHO IS CONCERNED ABOUT REPUTATIONS AND IMAGES IS DELUDED AND REFLECTING HIS SICKNESS HE IS BOTHERED WITH TARNISHED AND UNTARNISHED REPUTATIONS OR FALSITIES.

IT IS POINTLESS HARBOURING UNTARNISHED REPUTATIONS OR IMAGES OF PUTIN, WHAT MATTERS IS SEEING AND UNDERSTANDING HIM CORRECTLY AS HE ACTUALLY IS AND IT IS ACTUALLY POSSIBLE TO DO.

Only those who are putting on a show are conscious of images:

If a person is true, is not putting on a show, there is no image of himself that he is projecting and he cannot be concerned about images of himself or reputations to safeguard.

It is only a person who is not true, is putting on a show to deceive others how clever, trustworthy or authoritative he is, who would bother about his image and reputation that he seeks to preserve and cultivate in others.

What is the point of an untarnished falsity?

Reputations and images of a person are false, never the truth about the person so what is the point of having an untarnished reputation or image of the person except that you are deluded, do not truly understand?

PUTIN CAN BE SEEN TRULY AS GOOD OR EVIL AND IF WHAT YOU SEE IS TRUE THAT TRUTH CANNOT BE TARNISHED. IT IS IF WHAT YOU SEE OF PUTIN IS NOT TRUE AND IT IS THEN FIXED OR RECORDED IN YOUR MIND AND REPEATEDLY REHASHED THAT SOMETHING NEW HAPPENING CAN TARNISH IT.

IF WHAT YOU SEE OF PUTIN IS THE TRUTH, ACCURATE IT CANNOT BE TARNISHED, IT IS IF WHAT YOU SEE OF PUTIN IS FALSE, UNREALISTIC, RECORDED AND FIXED IN YOUR MIND THAT IT CAN BE TARNISHED.

Joko Widodo wins Indonesia poll

Jakarta Governor Joko Widodo has been declared the winner of Indonesia's hotly-contested presidential election.

Ex-general Prabowo Subianto looks like a brute and Widodo is the better choice of the two. Looks like elections are freer in Indonesia than some ASEAN countries who like to pretend they are more sophisticated or developed. In Thailand the judiciary can dismiss a ruling government.

Israelis as evil as Russians:

There is a video showing a Palestinian youth with phone to head surveying the wreck of his house for his family and suddenly he falls and dies after succumbing to an Israeli sniper.

MANY LIKE TO PRETEND THEY ARE MORE CIVILIZED AND STAND FOR GOOD BUT THE SO CALLED GOOD GUYS ARE FAR FROM GOOD AND MANKIND IS JUST A MASS OF ROTTEN GOATS AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS AND MANY INCLUDING THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE QUITE GOOD AND PIOUS DO NOT REALIZE THEY HAVE AGONY TO FACE AFTER THEY DEPART.

MH17 shootdown may have been a 'mistake': US intel official

Even if this is true it does not make it more understandable or excusable, the culprits including those Russians who supplied the rebels with missiles are culpable and if MAS did not reroute their flights when they should have, when crew have expressed concern are liable too.

All this condemning the shooting down and minute silence are wrong, for show and lead to suffering for those outraged and paying silence.

There is no such thing as mistakes, there is right and wrong:

There is no such thing as a mistake but if you shot down the plane you have done wrong and there are reparations to be made.

You may be asking for more punishment deflecting responsibility by claiming mistake.

YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY WHAT MORE MISTAKES THAT COSTS OTHERS DEATH AND GRIEF SO YOU ARE DELUDED AND MAD TO CONSIDER IT A MISTAKE.

WHETHER IT WAS A MISTAKE OR NOT DOES NOT MATTER, IF YOU THINK IT IS RELEVANT AND IT IS NOT THEN YOU ARE DELUDED, DO NOT CORRECTLY UNDERSTAND THAT HAS CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE SUFFERING.

You are firing deadly missile not toy pistol so what mistake are you talking about?

You are firing a deadly missile at a target that can kill many people so you very well better make sure you know what you are firing at, if you don’t you will pay dearly for your recklessness.

EVEN AIMING A TOY PISTOL PLAYFULLY AT SOMEONE HAS DEADLY KARMA MORE THAN YOU REALIZE.

I WOULD NOT HOLD A PISTOL TO GET A FEEL, TO HOLD A WEAPON IS ITSELF KARMA INCURRING.

A MISSILE CAN HAVE DEADLY DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES SO YOU HAVE TO EXERCISE GREAT CAUTION BEFORE YOU FIRE AND IF YOU DON’T THE PUNISHMENT IS JUST AS SEVERE AS INTENTIONALLY BRINGING DOWN AN AIRLINE.