Truth cannot emanate from motive:
It is not a motive to speak the truth or do what is
true or genuine except in your delusion or wrong understanding.
Motive or intention is about saying or doing
something with a motive that can be known but may sometimes even escape the
person speaking with motive.
All motive is evil, unwholesome and if a person
speak or does with motive what results cannot be the truth, un-fabricated or
good but it is false, fabricated and harmful to self and others.
WHENEVER A PERSON SPEAKS OR DOES WITH MOTIVE OR
DESIGN INSTEAD OF SPEAKING OR DOING THE TRUE AND GOOD, WHAT HE DOES OR SAYS
MUST BE FABRICATED, DESIGNED AND PRODUCED ROBOTICALLY FROM DESIGN AND IT IS
ALWAYS FALSE AND EVIL TO SELF AND OTHERS.
THE PERSON WHO LIVES IN TRUTH AND GOODNESS DOES NOT
HARBOUR MOTIVE, HE HAS NO MOTIVE AND WHAT HE SPEAKS AND DOES IS THE RESULT OF
TRUTH AND GOODNESS. IF THERE IS MOTIVE BEHIND A SPEECH OR ACTION WHICH CAN BE
KNOWN EVEN IF YOU ARE UNAWARE, THE SPEECH OR ACTION CANNOT BE TRUE, GENUINE OR
GOOD.
TRUTH NEVER NEEDS MOTIVE TO BE SPOKEN AND WHAT IS
SPOKEN WITH ACCOMPANYING MOTIVE IS NEVER THE TRUTH.
THE BUDDHA SAID INTENTION (MOTIVE) IS KARMA,
INTENDING, ONE DOES AND SPEAK WRONG RESULTING IN KARMA.
Speaking to please and impress is motive:
If one speaks the truth it is not to please or
impress others, if one speaks intending to please and impress others, what is
said or done cannot be the truth or good but it is false, fabricated (thought)
and rehashed robotically from thought and evil or harmful.
MOTIVE IF PRESENT IS NEVER MEANINGFUL OR SPECIFIC
BUT IT IS GENERALISED. THUS TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS
ARE MOTIVES AND THEY ARE NON-SPECIFIC BUT GENERALIZED, YOU CAN SAY DIFFERENT
THINGS TO FOR THE COMMON MOTIVE TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE AND IT IS ALWAYS FALSE AND
EVIL.
Ill will is a motive, greed is a motive,
wanting to cheat is a motive:
Wanting to harm others, attack them or hurt them
(ill will) is a motive, greed or lust is a motive and wanting to cheat others
too is a motive.
MOTIVE IS ALWAYS UNWHOLESOME, REQUIRES FORETHOUGHT
AND REHASHED ACTION RESULTING FROM FORETHOUGHT AND MOTIVE OR INTENTION RESULTS
IN KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS SUFFERING.
Emotion, boredom is a motive:
People do or say things driven by emotions (anger,
hate, excitement, sadness, hurt, confusion) or boredom. For example, angered,
he lashed out. People go for walks because they are bored and so boredom is the
source and motive of going for a walk.
MOTIVES ARE FALSE, FORCE BASED SOURCES OF SPEECH
AND ACTIONS AND THEY ARE ALWAYS FALSE, MEANINGLESS, EVIL AND HARMFUL TO SELF
AND OTHERS.
THUS STIRRED FORCE (EMOTIONS), RESTLESSNESS,
BOREDOM, MISCHIEF, ILL WILL, GREED AND DELUSIONS ARE MOTIVES OR BASIS FOR EVIL
ACTIONS BY ORDINARY FOOLISH PEOPLE.
EMOTIONS, LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION
ARE THE MOTIVES FOR PEOPLE’S ACTIONS AND SPEECH MORE THAN THEY REALIZE.
Foolishness or delusion is a motive:
Foolishness drives people to do or say wrong
things, foolishness is a form of delusion and delusion too is a motive or basis
for wrong evil actions and speech.
Apple’s tacit admission it does not know
best:
Apple’s belated jumping on the bandwagon of larger
smartphone screens is a tacit admission it is not the supreme arbiter of
correct design, if the former iPhone screen size was perfect, why is Apple
backtracking and increasing size?
APPLE LIKES TO PRESENT AN AURA OF INVINCIBILITY AS
IF IT IS THE ARBITER OF PERFECT TECH KNOW HOW BUT BY BELATEDLY JUMPING ON THE
LARGER SCREEN BANDWAGON IT IS ACKNOWLEDGING IT DOES NOT ALWAYS KNOW BEST.
Football incest:
Big clubs like Chelsea and Manchester United have
so many expensive top players that they have to loan them out often to teams in
the same league and so these clubs who borrow their players are obliged to be
grateful and so matches between them might be thrown to favour the big club
which potentially influences the outcome of the league championship and these
major clubs are already at advantage even before they kick a ball.
THE WAY THE FOOTBALL GAME IS RUN MAKES A MOCKERY OF
FAIRNESS. YOU THINK RESULTS ARE REAL? THEY MAY BE QUIETLY FIXED AND IT IS ABOUT
ARM TWISTING, DOING FAVOURS AND WINNING AT ALL COSTS.
Apple as likely a copycat as trendsetter:
Apple likes to think it is the trendsetter supreme
but its record is not that good, it was forced to come up with iPad mini in
response to popularity of smaller tablets and now it is coming out with bigger
phones and the smartwatch is less an innovation as copycat.
Even Apple’s name is likely copied from Apple
record, a Beatles company. Why didn’t Apple call itself Apricot?
Where did Apple get its ‘i’ in iPad,
iPhone from?
Apple was not the first to use ‘i’ in its products,
BMW’s ‘iconic’ cars sported the 320i, 520i designation long before Apple
adopted (copied) it not without reason but BMW is associated with class and the
attachment of ‘i’ is a shrewd or cunning appeal to people who are
narcissistically attached to themselves.
Did Apple invent the ‘i’ in its products without
borrowing from other products and was it shrewdly or cunningly attached to
appeal to self centred consumers?
Apple is a cynical mercenary masquerading
as a sheep:
Apple likes to think highly of itself, it sues the
pants of its rivals and take others to court even over petty things. It is not
as if Microsoft or Google or Samsung are angels but Apple has the arrogance to
present a hypocritical image of benevolence when it is a cynical mercenary, milking
dry suckers who fall under its spell, a wolf that fits poorly into its coat of
sheepskin.
This verdict is absurd or nonsense and the trial is
a circus, money and celebrity driven, unnecessary except for show and beneath
it, there may be foul play eg corruption.
He does not deny shooting her but said it was an
accident, he fired repeatedly in the toilet thinking it was an intruder when he
should know his girlfriend was with him and he should have determined first if
the intruder in the toilet was her before firing.
The bullets may be illegal (causing extensive
damage on impact) and he had been known to fire recklessly in a restaurant and
car (and then asking companions to falsely take the blame) and neighbours heard
violent arguments before the shooting and what does the court need to dismiss
his version and convict him of cold blooded murder driven by rage?
HUMAN JUSTICE IS A TRAVESTY AND CIRCUS, EVEN
CLEARCUT CASES ARE SUBJECT TO MUCH DISPUTE AND WRONG VERDICT. THOSE INVOLVED
INCLUDING THE JUDGE HAVE THE NOOSE AROUND THEIR NECKS AND PISTORIUS FOR HIS
PART WILL GET EVEN MUCH PAIN FOR KILLING ANOTHER DEFENCELESS BEING AND THEN
LYING BLATANTLY TO SAVE HIS OWN SKIN.
Human justice wrong, arbitrary, corrupt
and incompetent:
If evolution was true and mankind has evolved how
come human justice is still in the stone age?
Evolution is a myth, mankind is not progressing
just going around in circles like a dog around a peg it is tied to.
Human justice is wrong in that it thinks
manslaughter is a lesser crime when homicide and manslaughter are the same, you
can go to hell for that.
Human justice is incompetent in that the administrators
are incapable, fail to discharge their duties as stipulated, don’t understand
the law.
Human justice is corrupt in the sense it can be
bribed or influences exerted, evidence and witnesses tampered to influence the
result.
Scotland is
on the "cusp of making history" by voting for independence, the
country's first minister has predicted as he addressed the international media.
That is a wrong understanding and reflects
delusion. Whatever the result of the referendum, it is no big deal and much ado
about material things at stake, food that perishes and all those who are drawn
and mesmerized are heading for doom.
IT IS NOT SUBJECT TO DISPUTE THAT THE MATTER IS
NONSENSE DRIVEN BY SELFISH MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND ALL THOSE WHO SEE IT AS
A CUSP OF MAKING HISTORY HAVE WRONG PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING, ARE DELUDED
AND HEADING FOR ETERNAL WOE.
So what is the essence of human progress?
What mankind lacked, always, is true understanding
and so even in modern clothes, he is still devoid of understanding, what he has
is programming.
And so what has evolved, progressed? It is
programming and that has nothing to do with understanding and is blind and
often wrongheaded.
Mankind today is like Windows 8 compared to Windows
1, it is now very slick, sophisticated, faster, more powerful, can do much more
things but still like all robots, computers and Windows is devoid of
understanding, does not understand a thing.
MANKIND NEVER HAD UNDERSTANDING AND NEVER WILL
UNDERSTAND. WHAT HAS EVOLVED IS PROGRAMMING, LIKE WINDOWS 1 COMPARED TO WINDOWS
8, IT IS MUCH MORE POWERFUL AND SOPHISTICATED BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
UNDERSTANDING, YOU DON’T NEED UNDERSTANDING TO GO FROM WINDOWS 1 TO 8.
IT IS UNDERSTANDING THAT MATTERS NOT PROGRAMMING
SOPHISTRY AND SO MANKIND IS HEADING FOR THE SCRAP HEAP.
Memory based programming is the
substitute for understanding:
Programming is never an adequate substitute for
true understanding but for those who lack understanding, they like the blind
who need walking sticks, must depend on memory.
PROGRAMMING IS ENTIRELY ABOUT MEMORY, REMEMBERING
THINGS THAT HAPPEN WHETHER THEY LED TO SURVIVAL OR DEATH, REMEMBERING WHAT AND
HOW YOU DID AND REPRODUCING FROM MEMORY WHAT AND HOW YOU DID.
WHILST UNDERSTANDING IS INDISPENSABLE FOR A TRULY
SAFE AND SANE EXISTENCE, IF YOU DO NOT POSSESS UNDERSTANDING THEN PROGRAMMING
WHICH IS BASED ON MEMORIZING AND REHASHING FROM MEMORIZING WHAT WORKS AND DOES
NOT WORK SUFFICES TO GET MOST THROUGH LIFE INTACT, ENABLES THEM TO SURVIVE EVEN
VERY WELL.
BY MEMORIZING ENTIRELY WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOES NOT
WORK, BORROWING FROM TRADITIONS AND HAND DOWNS BY SOCIETY AND PARENTS, ONE CAN
SURVIVE VERY WELL IN A WORLD WHEN FALSITY AND THE ABILITY TO PUT ON A SHOW IS
IMPORTANT FOR GETTING ALONG WITH FELLOW GOATS ALTHOUGH INSANITY AND DEMENTIA IS
THE ULTIMATE ENDPOINT.
WHO SAYS UNDERSTANDING IS NECESSARY TO SURVIVE AND
DO WELL?
UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED FOR A SAFE AND SANE
EXISTENCE BUT YOU CAN GET BY, MUDDLE THROUGH, DODGING BULLETS ALONG THE WAY
DEPENDING ENTIRELY ON YOUR MEMORY, REHASHING FROM MEMORY WHAT WORKS AND DOES
NOT WORK.
Understanding has nothing to do with
memory, memory has nothing to do with understanding:
Memory is a mechanical process of recording what
has happened and searching for and retrieving for playback what was recorded or
remembered. Understanding is not required or involved.
Understanding requires you see what is happening
truly as it actually is, if it is possible for a being not to see truly, to see
wrongly instead then this precludes the possibility he can understand truly.
IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND YOU MUST SEE CORRECTLY
SOMETHING, IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A BEING TO SEE INCORRECTLY AND HE IS
PROGRAMMED OR TRAINED OR CONDITIONED BY SELF AND OTHERS TO SEE WRONGLY, IT IS
NOT A POSSIBILITY HE CAN UNDERSTAND AND NOT UNDERSTANDING, HE MUST FALL BACK ON
HIS MEMORY TO TELL HIM WHAT IT IS ABOUT AND WHAT TO DO AND NOT TO DO.
IF A PERSON SEES WHAT IS HAPPENING TRULY, HE
UNDERSTANDS TRULY AND HE DOES NOT HAVE TO REFER TO HIS MEMORY TO TELL HIM WHAT
TO DO BECAUSE UNDERSTANDING TRULY THE CORRECT ACTION IS OBVIOUS,
STRAIGHTFORWARD.
So, do you see greed and lust correctly?
Like everything that occurs in existence, greed and
lust has a nature that can be seen and understood. Do you see and understand
greed and lust?
It cannot be disputed that greed and lust are
purely the stirring of mental force to be attracted to, to be acquisitive and
it is harmful, suffering to self and others, it is blind and meaningless and
exposes the fool to danger.
If you do not know what is greed or lust, you don’t
even know you are now gripped by greed and lust, how can you understand greed
and lust?
Seized and driven by greed and lust you do all
sorts of irrational things that expose you to danger but that does not mean you
cannot survive even quite well without understanding greed and lust.
PEOPLE TALK ABOUT STYLE AS IF THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT
STYLE IS, YET THEY CANNOT DEFINE WHAT STYLE IS, AS IT IS ACTUALLY POSSIBLE TO.
THEY TALK ABOUT LIKING THIS AND THAT YET DO THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE NATURE OF
THE LIKE THEY TALK ABOUT IS?
What is the difference between Windows 1
and 8?
Compared to Windows 1, the programming or memory
pool of Windows 8 is much bigger, complicated but this has nothing to do with
understanding and does not require understanding. Compared with Windows 1, the
Intel chips today are far more complicated and powerful but again this is
purely mechanical, has nothing to do with understanding which is absent.
The kind of man Pistorius is:
Oscar
Pistorius’s former girlfriend has spoken of her terrifying relationship with
the “angry and possessive” Paralympian.
Samantha
Taylor said she feared he would kill her and revealed she once hid his gun after
he flew into a rage at her.
Samantha
said she was left with bruises and scars after the
Blade Runner bit and pinched her, but she was also tortured mentally by him
during the 18-month relationship.
She said:
“Oscar used to lock me in his house and then go out. I had no food, I couldn’t
get out. It was dangerous.
“He often
went out saying he will just be an hour or so and ended up out all day or
night. I wouldn’t hear from him all night and his phone would be off.
“He would
say he’s going out for an hour and the next day, three in the morning, he would
drive home.”
She also
described how he once left her paralysed with fear when he used his beloved
Porsche as a weapon, driving her at up to 200mph to “punish” her.
Speaking of
one ordeal, she said: “He gets so mad, so angry he can’t even speak.
“He was
trying to string his words together, spitting, shouting, grabbing. It was
horrible. He used to bite me a lot, pinch me in anger and in fun. I had bruises
and scars. It was painful.”
Another time
the couple rowed when he accused her of sticking up for one of her
ex-boyfriends.
She said: “I
was really scared. He made me stand on the stairs and shouted at me. It was
like I was on the naughty step.”
But one
night, things got so bad she thought he was going to shoot her at his home in
Pretoria, South Africa, with the gun he would later turn on
Reeva.
Samantha
said: “I had to hide his gun, I was so scared of him.
“We had
friends over for dinner, at his house and we’d all had a little to drink but I
think he was going for one that night.
“He was on
the hard liquor. He moved all the couches and set the floor on fire and danced
around it.
"It was
a marble floor and he used alcohol to light it on fire. He slipped and he
chipped his tooth.
“But because
he was so drunk he thought I’d beaten him up. He started screaming at me.
"He was
looking for his gun. He was saying I was a bitch because I beat him up. ‘What
kind of person are you? You bitch.’
"I felt
threatened. Both of us went upstairs to bed and I was walking a bit in front of
him."
She
continued: “When I got to the room I hid his gun, because I really did think
he’d use it.
“I hid it
under the bed knowing he wouldn’t look there. He kept that gun, the one used on
Reeva, on his table or by his prosthetic legs on the floor.
"He
slept on the right near the windows and he never kept that gun under the bed,
like he claimed in his statement.
“He kept
telling me I was a bitch because his lip was cut, but I think he realised
things had gone too far.” The next day the couple went to a wedding.
She said:
“We rushed and he didn’t realise he had left his gun at home and he said to me
‘Oh my word, where’s my gun?’ I told him why I had hidden it.
“He didn’t
apologise but didn’t want to acknowledge what had happened.”
Pistorius
would vanish for nights of boozing, partying and chatting up impressionable
women.
But when the
couple were apart for longer periods, like when Oscar had athletics events abroad,
his jealousy erupted.
Samantha
said: “His jealousy was very tough. He’d phone my mum and dad 10 times a day to
find out where I was. In one month I received around 700 calls.
“It was
excessive. If I hadn’t replied to messages within 30 seconds I was doing
something wrong.”
“He’s a very insecure man. He’d call at all
hours. I was scared of him at times because he had very bad anger issues. He
was so possessive, he would look through my phone and find a photo from long
ago or look on my Facebook, and often get quite angry.
“It was
horrible, when you are in a relationship you want someone to trust you. He
never allowed me to wear make-up and would make me take my belly ring out.
"If we
were going out he would just give me a few minutes so I would not have time to
get ready.
“He didn’t
like me dressing up and other men looking at me.”
Samantha
said everywhere Pistorius went his gun went with him – tucked in his “pants”.
She also
struggled to keep up with his rapidly changing personality – switching from sweet
and charming to sobbing and suicidal.
She said:
“He would arrive at my house at 5am drunk and wake everyone up. He had a
temper. Everyone has a switch inside of them, but when his went off he couldn’t
control it. You just have to be calm with him. Not react to it.
“He shouted
at me for random stuff, like if his coffee wasn’t made. He would get angry
about weird things that shouldn’t really get to someone.
“He screamed
and shouted at me a lot. He’s got quite a foul mouth.”
Pistorius
judge’s head is on the chopping board:
Many relish being a judge but if it was an incorrect decision for whatever reason (eg bribery or incompetence or delusion) the judge has much to answer for in suffering in repayment.
Many relish being a judge but if it was an incorrect decision for whatever reason (eg bribery or incompetence or delusion) the judge has much to answer for in suffering in repayment.
WHETHER PISTORIUS SHOULD BE ACQUITTED OR NOT BASED ON THE AVAILABLE
EVIDENCE IS OBJECTIVE AND IF THE DECISION WAS INCORRECT FOR WHATEVER REASON,
THE JUDGE HAS MUCH TO ACCOUNT FOR.
Pistorius girlfriend account not needed
to discern him:
Those who understand do not need accounts like
Pistorius previous girlfriend to help them make their minds about him, just his
appearance, his manipulative showman behaviour and speech is enough to know his
nature.
EXACTLY WHO A PERSON IS, IS EVIDENT FROM HIS MANNER
AND APPEARANCE, YOU DO NOT NEED TO REFER TO MEMORY EITHER OWN OR OTHERS TO TELL
YOU HOW TO UNDERSTAND HIM AND THIS IS A SICK, MANIPULATIVE, WICKED DANGEROUS
MAN WHO WOULD DO ANYTHING TO SAY HIS OWN SKIN.
You don’t need memory to know anything:
You don’t need memory to know a matter at hand, the
matter can be known by correctly seeing it as it actually is, it is because
people do not see correctly, cannot see correctly because their seeing is
programmed (telling them what to see and what not to see), hasty in snapshots
and they jump to presumptions that they have to fall back on their memory,
their recorded stereotyped understandings to explain the current situation.
Even after depending on accounts by Pistorius’
former girlfriend which is a form of memorized understanding, albeit in this
case borrowed from another, still many fail to understand what kind of man
Pistorius is because they cannot understand, do not have understanding.
Without referring to recorded understandings,
either borrowed from others, in this case Pistorius’ former girlfriend or his
own, a person with true understanding can see and know what kind of man
Pistorius is.
YOU DON’T NEED MEMORY EITHER BORROWED FROM OTHERS
OR YOUR OWN MENTAL JUKEBOX TO KNOW OTHERS, KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING, YOU DON’T
NEED RECORDED RULES TO GUIDE YOUR ACTIONS, YOU DON’T NEED REPLAY PRECISELY
RECORDINGS TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING.
THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING REMEMBERS MANY
THINGS EVEN BETTER THAN THOSE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS ONLY A REFERENCE
LIBRARY NOT THE PLANS FOR ACTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED TO THE LETTER OR APPROXIMATELY.
WITHOUT MEMORY ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE LOST, DO NOT
KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF THINGS THEY SEE. IT IS THEIR MEMORY THAT IS THEIR GUIDING
STICK, NOT UNDERSTANDING.
Seeing selectively and in snapshots
disables understanding:
You can only consistently see selectively if you
see by programming, there is programming telling you what to see (and even how
it is to be seen) in which you are a robot and if you see hurriedly in
snapshots, it is impossible for you to make sense of what you see except by
presumption, by invoking recorded understanding that makes you forever seeing
in terms of standardized recorded understanding.
IT IS THEIR GREED AND DELUSION THAT ARE THE DRIVES
TO WHAT PEOPLE SEE SELECTIVELY AND THEY THEN SEE IN SNAPSHOTS TO INVOKE
RECORDED STANDARDIZED EXPLANATIONS THAT NEVER TRULY EXPLAIN WHAT IS HAPPENING
WHICH RENDER THEM UNABLE TO DIRECTLY KNOW SPECIFICALLY THINGS HAPPENING BEFORE
THEM.
YOU CANNOT KNOW TRULY IF YOUR SEEING IS SELECTIVE
AND IN SNAPSHOTS.
Judge’s wrong verdict:
Culpable or unintended homicide is a wrong verdict.
There were multiple witnesses reports of violent rowing before the shooting
even right up to the shooting and this would indicate it is likely if not
certainly passion fuelled intended homicide. Was the blood stained bat used to
clobber her?
THIS IS CERTAINLY A VERY GENEROUS OR CHARITABLE
VERDICT ON THE PART OF THE JUDGE AND IF IT IS UNWARRANTED SHE IS ASKING FOR
KARMA.
You mean the neighbours were all
hallucinating?
I think multiple neighbours reported violent rowing
even up to the point of the shots, were they all hallucinating or after the
row, Pistorius forgot his girlfriend was with him and thought there was an
intruder in the bathroom and shot her through the door?
Why laxity and injustice should be
censured:
Pistorius was allowed bail when under detention for
possible murder and this is against the norm.
If this is a wrong verdict allowing Pistorius to
get away with homicide it would set a wrong precedent and encourage criminals
to commit crimes seemingly with impunity and so if the judge is guilty of
laxity, incompetence or even corruption, it is a serious matter subject to
severe divine censure.
MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE IS A SERIOUS BLAMEWORTHY
OFFENCE AND THUS A CULPABLE JUDGE IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT.
Judge corrupt, unlikely that inept or
deluded:
Pistorius is a rich man, made a lot of money with
sponsorship and he may have offered to secretly share some of his wealth with
the judge.
If I remember correctly there was a blood stained
cricket bat and the victim’s skull was cracked or smashed in and so how can you
explain her injuries and the bloodstained bat on the basis of Pistorius account
he fired shots into the toilet? If he assaulted her skull with the bat then
surely it is homicide.
YOU HAVE TO BE VERY INEPT OR DELUDED TO IGNORE THE
EVIDENCES OF THE CASE, PARTICULARLY WITNESS ACCOUNTS OF A PRECEDING ROW AND THE
BLOOD STAINED CRICKET BAT AND CRACKED SKULL THAT SUGGEST HOMICIDAL ASSAULT
APART FROM THE SHOTS FIRED. THE SIMPLER EXPLANATION FOR THE VERDICT IS
CORRUPTION WITH INCOMPETENCE AND DELUSION PLAYING LESSER ROLES.
The motive (not reason) for saying that may be to
deflect blame.
You mean you cannot do anything without standards;
you follow standards and need standards?
Only robots need standards and follow standards,
those who are not robots and truly understand do not require standards to do
what is right and good and they would not permit themselves to follow standards
which means subjugating themselves to standards.
Reason versus motive:
Only something true is a reason, whatever is false
should not be called a reason but motive or intention. Reflecting their muddled
thinking and lack of true understanding people speak of reason when they should
correctly speak of motive.
REASON WHICH IS TRUE AND UNDERSTANDABLE OR RATIONAL
IS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH MOTIVE WHICH IS FALSE AND IRRATIONAL.
The Buddha:
"Intention (Motive), I tell
you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, &
intellect. "And what is the cause by which kamma comes into play? Contact is the cause by which kamma comes into play.
"And what is the diversity in kamma? There is kamma to be experienced in hell, kamma to be experienced in the realm of common animals, kamma to be experienced in the realm of the hungry shades (ghost), kamma to be experienced in the human world, kamma to be experienced in the world of the devas (heaven). This is called the diversity in kamma.
"And what is the result of kamma? The result of kamma is of three sorts, I tell you: that which arises right here & now, that which arises later [in this lifetime], and that which arises following that. This is called the result of kamma.
"And what is the cessation of kamma? From the cessation of contact is the cessation of kamma; and just this noble eightfold path -- right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration -- is the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma.
Bullets don’t crack or depress skulls:
The pattern of head injury she sustained will tell
the discerning whether she was assaulted on the head with a bat or a gun.
Even without expertise, I know normal bullets cause
clean entry and exit wounds, if it was a high velocity (rifle) special bullet
as was used in JFK’s assassination (to make sure he will die) then it may
splatter the brain and tear off a big piece of skull at exit point.
AND SO THE PATTERN OF INJURY ON HER SKULL WILL TELL
WHETHER IT WAS A BULLET THAT CAUSED IT OR ASSAULT WITH A BAT.
IF PISTORIUS’ VERSION IS TRUE, THEN THE SKULL
INJURY MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH A DISTANT GUNSHOT WOUND.
A very straightforward indefensible case:
For those who understand, even without going into
the nitty gritty of the case, the verdict of homicide is very clear,
unavoidable, it is virtually impossible to defend him and yet the verdict of
accidental death is reached, the likely if not certain reason is judge
corruption.
Her head injury should clinch homicide:
There was record of a blood stained cricket bat and
this is likely used to assault her, clobber her on the head.
If she was hit in the head with the bat, the
pattern of injury eg local skull depression, cracked skull cannot be confused
with a bullet wound and would clinch the diagnosis of homicide.
IF SHE WAS ATTACKED ON THE HEAD WITH A BAT, A
PATTERN OF INJURY DISTINCT FROM BULLET WOUND, THEN IT MUST BE HOMICIDE.
CAN THE JUDGE BE SO INCOMPETENT? CORRUPTION IS MORE
LIKELY.
What we do know:
She sustained horrific head or skull injuries
because when photos were shown to court it brought gasps of horror and so the
cause of her death must be some form of head injury. If she was shot blindly
through the door of the toilet, and there were four shots, then you will be
lucky if one shot hit her head.
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES A BLIND SHOT FROM A PISTOL
FROM A DISTANCE CAUSING SEVERE MANGLING INJURIES TO HER HEAD? FAR MORE LIKELY A
BAT AND THOSE WHO ARE EXPERT SHOULD BE ABLE TO TELL IF ASSAULT WITH A BAT
INFLICTED THOSE INJURIES AND IF A BAT WAS USED, PISTORIUS IS LYING AND IT IS
HOMICIDE.
No way a bullet through a door can cause
horrific head injury:
It seems there were four bullets fired and you have
to be quite lucky for one bullet to NOT JUST HIT THE HEAD BUT FATALLY AND CAUSE
EXTENSIVE DAMAGE.
YOU WILL BE QUITE LUCKY FIRING FOUR SHOTS THROUGH
THE DOOR TO GET ONE BULLET HITTING THE HEAD LET ALONE IT SHOULD BE FATAL AND
ALMOST INCREDIBLE IT WOULD MANGLE HER HEAD. ASSAULT WITH A BAT CERTAINLY WOULD
MANGLE HER HEAD AND IF THAT WAS THE CASE, PISTORIUS IS LYING AND IT IS
HOMICIDE. DID PROSECUTION LAWYERS RAISE THAT?
Picture of Reeva’s head:
I saw a purported picture of Reeva’s head, it was
not very clearly but there appears a bullet hole around the temple region with
some possible untidy injuries elsewhere.
I DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO PICTURES OR DETAILS OF HER
HEAD INJURIES BUT THERE APPEAR A TEMPLE (ENTRY) BULLET WOUND. SHE WOULD HAVE
BEEN QUITE UNLUCKY TO RECEIVE A SHOT HERE OUT OF FOUR BLIND SHOTS THROUGH THE
DOOR.
Tim Cook says Apple could have
made a bigger iPhone 'years ago'
If that is the case, why the hesitancy that is
obviously wrong because Apple has now ‘taken the plunge’?
To say Apple was being cautious or meticulous
taking so long is irrational.
Apple is in the business to make money and the fact
that it has belatedly made a big phone shows indecisiveness, uncertainty and
poor judgment.
IF APPLE COULD HAVE MADE A BIGGER PHONE LONG AGO
AND ONLY TOOK A PLUNGE RECENTLY, IT SHOWS INDECISIVENESS & POOR JUDGMENT TO
HAVE TAKEN SO LONG AND SO IT IS NOT GOOD AS COOK THINKS BUT BAD THAT APPLE TOOK
SO LONG.
If what you say does not make sense, it
leads to insanity:
Whether it is necessary or unnecessary, serves any
(true) purpose or not, silly or full of sense to say, Apple could have made
bigger iPhone years ago is objective and if it is unnecessary, does not serve
any true purpose, shows indecisiveness and poor judgment rather than might or
ability of Apple (it is a hollow boast) then you are courting insanity saying
so.
THE FACT THAT YOU DO NOT REALIZE WHAT YOU SAY
SERVES NO TRUE PURPOSE, IS UNNECESSARY, SILLY, REFLECTS NEGATIVELY RATHER THAN
POSITIVELY MAKES IT WORSE BUT IT IS THE PRACTICE THAT LEADS TO INANITY AND THAT
IS MADNESS. IF WHAT YOU SAY IS SILLY, YOU ARE HEADED FOR SILLINESS AND THAT IS
MAD.
Whilst you can indeed throw the bums out but that
is not what she meant and not what happens in reality or truth.
What she meant was ‘expel the bums’, throw and
expel are not synonymous and if you cherish your sanity you better speak
carefully and speak correctly.
Driven by emotion and rehashing without
understanding from recordings copied from others the person dramatically shouts
‘throw the bums out’ and she thinks she understands and is correct to say so.
YOU MAY SEE NOTHING WRONG AND ACCEPT IT AS VALID
BUT IF YOU MEAN EXPEL THE BUMS THEN THROW THE BUMS OUT IS INCORRECT AND YOU ARE
TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE PERCEPTION THAT IS SUFFERING AND YOU HAVE
DEBT (TO BE REPAID BY SUFFERING) FOSTERING FALSE PERCEPTION IN OTHERS.
STRICKEN BY SUFFERING PEOPLE IMPLORE, ‘WHAT HAVE I
DONE TO DESERVE THIS’. IF YOU HAVE SPOKEN FALSELY ‘THROW’ WHEN YOU MEAN ‘EXPEL’
YOU HAVE HARMED OTHERS AND DESERVE TO SUFFER.
That Pistorius can tell you the truth is
impossible:
The Buddha said there are things that are possible
and things that are impossible.
And so if something is impossible and you think it
is possible then you are deluded and that is not the way to safety and heaven.
If it is impossible Pistorius can tell the truth
and you think he might be telling you the truth then you are deluded and gullible.
It is impossible Pistorius told the truth about
what happened that night and so what happened must be other than what he said
and the motive he said that is to save his own skin and so he must be involved
with her death more culpably that he admitted.
EVEN IF YOU ACCIDENTALLY KILLED A PERSON BY
SHOOTING THROUGH A DOOR THINKING IT IS A ROBBER, YOU ARE LIABLE FOR SERIOUS
PUNISHMENT IN REPAYMENT IN DIVINE TERMS AND SO MANKIND IS DELUDED THAT IT IS
MANSLAUGHTER AND HE MAY EVEN GET AWAY WITH A JAIL TERM.
ONE THING YOU CAN, PISTORIUS’ STORY WAS NOT THE
TRUTH, HE WAS MORE GUILTY THAT HE ADMITTED.
Did Pistorius confess to a row?
Neighbours had testified to a violent row erupting
before the shooting, aid Pistorius admit that or did he conveniently ignored
it?
And so the neighbours are likely to be telling the
truth.
If there was a bullet hole through the temple, it
would take very exceptional circumstances for a shot fired blindly through a
door to score a ‘bulls eye’ hit on the temple.
Big spender is not a specific person but it is a
faceless subjective false category and so only a supercilious impersonal could
talk thus and this is blameworthy not blameless and you are headed for woe not
safety.
YOU NEVER ADDRESS SOMEONE ‘HEY BIG SPENDER’ BECAUSE
IT IS IMPROPER, FALSE AND REHASHED GENERALIZED TO FLATTER NOT SPEAK THE TRUTH
AND HAS BLAME TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING.
BIG SPENDER IS A (ARBITRARY) CATEGORY, NOT A PERSON
AND SO YOU ARE ADDRESSING A CATEGORY NOT A PERSON, ALL YOU ARE CONCERNED IS HIS
SPENDING CAPACITY.
There are things worth achieving and things not
worth achieving.
Few things in this world are worth achieving.
It is possible to quit style and therefore quit
stress, restlessness and distraction and a rehashing robotic existence.
There is an escape from endless death and suffering
and it is worth achieving.
Virtually the entirety of things achievable in this
world is the ways to ruin, suffering and endless death and only those who are
deluded will be preoccupied with.
WITHOUT BEING DELUDED, NO MAN CAN SPEAK OF CLEAR
ACHIEVABLE OBJECTIVES IN IRAQ.
THERE IS ONLY ONE THING POSSIBLE AND WORTH
ACHIEVING IN THIS WORLD, AN END TO ENDLESS TERRIBLE USELESS SUFFERING AND
ENDLESS DEATHS.
Scotland’s referendum, the right view:
Whatever the objectives of secession are material,
perceived true or delusional material advantages to be obtained by independence
that comes with a lot of risks. It is never free, but a lot of trouble, work,
disruption that affects a lot of people is involved in breaking free and this
is always evil compared with letting things be and so the correct answer is ‘No’.
THOSE CLAMOURING FOR INDEPENDENCE HAVE A LOT OF
KARMA ON THEIR HANDS, THEY ARE CAUSING A LOT OF REAL AND POTENTIAL TROUBLE AND
DISRUPTION FOR MANY ALL FOR NARROW MATERIAL CONCERNS.
Style is the only way to death and
suffering:
Whether a person is heading for eternal life free
of suffering or eternal death full of suffering is a PRIVATE matter, is a
matter of whether he possesses style or not. Those with style, prolonging of
syllables, changing speed and loudness are guilty of harming themselves and
others no matter how true and good they think they are, and are setting
themselves up for eternal death and suffering.
WHETHER A PERSON IS HEADING FOR HEAVEN OR ETERNAL
DEATHS AND SUFFERING IS DETERMINED BY WHETHER HE POSSESSES STYLE (PROLONGING OF
SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) OR NOT. THOSE WITH STYLE ARE NEVER
INNOCENT NOR GOOD AND ARE HEADED FOR ETERNAL TORMENT AND DEATH AND THEY DESERVE
IT.
He is alluding (falsely) to the white smoke
associated with the successful selection of a new pope.
This is totally unnecessary and it is evidence that
people have recorded understandings that they search and retrieve from their mental
jukeboxes to apply to a current situation for the false purpose of impressing
others how clever they are.
Not the whole world waits for Fed decision making
and so it is false to say the world, only greedy investors and their ilk do so.
‘White smoke’ is a recorded understanding stored in the memory of people who
are robots available for rehash for the purpose of demonstrating how witty and
versatile they are.
THE PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT DOES NOT REHASH FROM
A LIBRARY OF RECORDING UNDERSTANDINGS, AND THE ONLY WAY HE CAN SAY THIS IS
BECAUSE HE IS REHASHING FROM HIS PAST RECORDINGS TO APPLY TO THE CURRENT
SITUATION.
Seeing A in terms of B:
It is totally unnecessary work and wrong to see A
in terms of B but one should stick to the matter at hand, see A as A as it is
possible to.
Thus it is totally unnecessary to see Fed decision
or announcement in terms of white smoke, it is a complication necessary to
impress others.
IT IS MAD AND UNNECESSARY WORK, A COMPLICATION TO
SEE ‘A’ IN TERMS OF ‘B’ SOMETHING RECORDED TO BE REHASHED TO APPLY TO A CURRENT
SITUATION. SEE ‘A’ AS ‘A’ NOT IN TERMS OF ‘B’.
French Chic:
French chic has a nature that can be understood and
if you do not know its true nature or you wrongly understand its nature it must
lead to conflict or resistance that leads to stress no matter how committed you
are to chic.
Chic means style and style is about show never
substance or truth or meaning. If something is true it is not French or any
nationality and so the fact that the chic is French is indication it is false.
If something is false and you nevertheless pursue it, you subscribe to French
chic, you are deluded or do not understand and you are courting suffering and
insanity.
CHIC IS A FANCY WORD THAT MEANS STYLE. WHATEVER IS
ASSOCIATED WITH ONE NATIONALITY AND NOT OTHERS IS FALSE NEVER TRUE EXCEPT IN
YOUR DELUSION, BECAUSE STYLE IS FALSE, IT IS A FABRICATION, THERE IS THE CASE
THAT THERE IS FRENCH CHIC, MALAY CHIC, AMERICAN CHIC AND THIS IS DELUSION THAT
ENDS IN INSANITY FOR ITS DISCIPLES.
WHAT IS STYLE OR CHIC IS DONE FOR SHOW, TO IMPRESS
IN YOUR DIFFERENT ‘SIGNATURE’ WAYS. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE IRRESISTIBLY HOOKED ON
STYLE, ON CHIC, THEY ARE DELUDED AND HEADED FOR WOE.
Only what is true matter; delving into
falsity leads to woe:
Few are the things in this world that are true and
matter or are important, the vast majority is false, chaff, useless and should
a person be unable to discern their falsity or inanity or they are interested
in matters that turn out to be false, harmful or worthless, it is unnecessary
suffering, leads to insanity and more suffering even endlessly after death.
THE BUDDHA SAID IT IS OF INCALCULABLE BENEFIT FOR
THE PERSON TO DEVELOP AN EYE FOR THE DHARMA, AN EYE FOR WHAT IS TRUE AND
IMPORTANT AND REJECT WHAT IS FALSE, UNIMPORTANT OR HARMFUL, IT WOULD SAVE MUCH
UNNECESSARY SUFFERING NOW, LATER AND AFTER DEATH.
MANY OF THE THINGS EG FRENCH CHIC, I IMMEDIATELY
KNOW IS FALSE AND NONSENSE, I DO NOT WASTE MY TIME, EFFORT AND STIRRED
RESISTANCE DELVING INTO THEM AND I FOCUS ONLY ON MATTERS THAT ARE TRUE,
IMPORTANT AND BENEFICIAL.
Impossible to partake of falsity, inanity
and harmfulness without suffering:
Vast and immense is the variety of falsity, inanity
(useless, silly) and harmfulness presented to, bombarding beings trapped here,
few it is that is true, important and truly beneficial and so if a person does
not (truly) understand, cannot distinguish what is false, worthless and
harmful, he will willingly or reluctantly be drawn in to partake what is false,
useless and harmful and it is impossible to do so without suffering and this
suffering blinds him and he becomes submissive, a robot partaker of falsity,
what is useless and harmful leading for even eternal suffering and death.
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has the
best display as per DisplayMate
Ameoled screens are technologically or
fundamentally different from LED or backlit screens. I have used quite a few
screens and I think the ameoled screen is the best despite scornful detractors.
DisplayMate, a renowned
company specializing in display tests, has praised the Galaxy Note 4's
AMOLED in a detailed review. The 5.7" 2560 x 1440 pixel display of the
Note 4 packs a pixel density of 518ppi, but that's not its only feature as
Samsung has also worked a lot on evolving the quality of its OLEDs.
The review is based on
quite a lot of technically-oriented tests and its verdict is that the Note 4's
display is currently the best in the market. It is better than the AMOLED on
the Galaxy S5 and Galaxy Tab S.
Finally, the Galaxy Note
4's screen was found to be 14% more power efficient than its predecessor's and
is as much as 40% less power hungry than 1080p panels used by the HTC One and
Sony Xperia Z2.
Everything must go through the memory
process:
Just like you have bureaucracy where everything
must be submitted to a laborious, stressful process, according to the rules, in
the same way whatever a person who is a rehashing robot can say or do with his
mouth, body, mind, indeed even eyes and ears must first be submitted for
memorizing and then reproduced from memory, they cannot say or do anything
unless it is via the memory process. This may be or is the truth of the process
of action in people with style. They can only say or do things instructed by
their memory system, everything they say or do is precisely or approximately
according to what their memory system tells them.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAY OR DO THINGS WITHOUT
TROUBLING, USING OR ACCORDING TO WHAT YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM TELLS YOU BUT THIS IS
NEVER THE WAY PEOPLE WITH STYLE DO OR SAY THINGS, EVERYTHING THEY SAY OR DO
MUST FIRST BE SUBJECT TO MEMORIZATION AND THEN REPRODUCED FIRST FALTERINGLY AND THEN INCREASINGLY SLICKLY
ACCORDING TO MEMORY.
IT IS NEVER FREE BUT CONSIDERABLE WORK AND STRESS
ON YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM MUST OCCUR BEFORE ONE CAN SAY OR DO THINGS BY
REPRODUCTION, YOU HAVE TO SEARCH, RETRIEVE AND REPLAY THAT RECORDING AND IF
LIFELONG YOU USE OR ABUSE YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM, IT WILL INEVITABLY WEAR DOWN AND
ONCE IT BECOMES FAULTY AND FINALLY FAIL, YOU CANNOT DO OR SAY ANYTHING BECAUSE
WITHOUT YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM YOU ARE STUCK, STUMPED.
THUS A LOT OF OLD PEOPLE WITH FAVOURITE PASTIMES
AND OBSESSIONS BECOME DISINTERESTED APATHETIC ZOMBIES ONCE THEIR MEMORY SYSTEM
COLLAPSES, THEY DON’T KNOW HOW TO DO OR SAY EVEN SIMPLE THINGS BECAUSE THEIR
MEMORY SYSTEM IS SHATTERED AND DESERVEDLY SO.
A DAY WILL COME TO ROBOT WHEN THEIR MEMORY SYSTEM
FAILS AND THEN THEY ARE STUCK, WHAT USED TO INTEREST THEM OBSESSIVELY, WHAT ARE
SO IMPORTANT TO THEM, THEIR LOVED ONES, THEIR HOUSES, CARS AND HOBBIES NOW
BECOME ALIEN, UNRECOGNIZABLE AND THEY CANNOT DO OR SAY EVEN SIMPLE THINGS THEY
USED TO REHASH WITH APLOMB IN THE PAST.
AND SO THE WISE PERSON WILL TRAIN TO STOP REHASHING
AND TO DO SO HE MUST STOP PROLONGING SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHOSE
CONSISTENCY CAN ONLY BE PRODUCED BY REHASH.
This is a BBC headline. A plane lands but a
meteorite cannot land but it can fall or crash.
The reason people can say so is because they are
rehashing and they are not mindful of what they say or do, sometimes,
distracted or rushing they rehash wrongly and they fail to check.
WHATEVER IS REHASHED IS NEVER GENUINE BUT A FAKE
INSERTED AS IF GENUINE, SOMETIMES MORE CONVINCING THAN OTHER TIMES. WHEN IT IS
REHASHED WITH SOME CARE TO FIT THE OCCASION WELL IT MAY PASS AS GENUINE BY
FELLOW ROBOTS BUT WHEN IT IS REHASHED WITHOUT CHECKING THEN IT SOUNDS ODD AND
MAY EXPOSE THE GAME OF FAKERY TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING.
Not that they have reformed, their memory
system has failed them:
It is not that elderly obsessive and greedy people
have become reformed, no longer attached to their loved ones, houses and cars
and whatnots, it is their memory system has ‘cruelly’ abandoned them and like a
boat without a rudder it is drifting aimlessly, lost.
IF YOU FEAR DEMENTIA, FEAR LOSING YOUR MEMORY
SYSTEM WITHOUT WHICH YOU ARE LOST, CANNOT RECOGNIZE EVEN FAMILIAR LOVED ONES
AND THINGS, CANNOT DO OR SAY THINGS YOU HAVE SAID AND DONE MANY TIMES IN THE
PAST THEN YOU MUST PRESERVE YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM BY QUIT REHASHING, LEARN TO SAY
OR DO THINGS WITHOUT USING YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM AND THAT MEANS YOU MUST QUIT YOUR
STYLE OR PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT MANDATES
REPRODUCED SPEECH AND ACTION.
A national survey:
AUSTRALIA, we thought you
were better than this. A national survey of 17,500 people has revealed some
shocking statistics about our attitudes.
IT IS NEVER THE OPINIONS OF PEOPLE AND WHAT IS
POPULAR THAT MATTERS BUT WHAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS,
BENEFICIAL OR HARMFUL AND YOU NEVER HAVE TO WASTE TIME, EFFORT, MONEY TO
CONDUCT STUDIES TO DETERMINE THAT BUT YOU NEED TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO SEE AND
KNOW WHAT IS CORRECT, MEANINGFUL AND BENEFICIAL.
ONLY THE DELUDED WILL WASTE HIS AND OTHERS’ TIME
AND EFFORT CONDUCTING SURVEYS WHICH ARE NEVER TRUE OR GOOD BUT REFLECTS LACK OF
UNDERSTANDING OF TRUTH.
IF SOMETHING IS THE TRUTH IT IS NOT AN OPINION, NOT
YOUR OR ANYBODY’S OPINION OR VIEW, IF IT IS AN OPINION IT IS NOT THE TRUTH AND
YOU ARE DELUDED TO SEEK WHAT IS NOT THE TRUTH.
To be cynical is never a correct but also wrong
force based understanding. You do not have to be cynical but you are gullible
if you want to find out and think it may be true.
Often a lot of happy marriages or beautiful
marriages are cruel hoaxes of people who like to think they are happy married
and like to preach and boast to others and they proceed to tell others the
secrets to their lovely marriages.
If the two persons are robots, have style, they
must bombard each other with stress, restlessness, distraction and it is never
truly happy cohabitating with another robot (no matter what a voluptuous body
and personality she has), it is more like getting along and tolerating and that
cannot be happy and so it is definitely a lie to say couples can be happy.
Further there are strains from within the marriages and strains outside the
marriage (including in laws, work) that affect the marriage.
A HAPPY MARRIAGE IS A PIE IN THE SKY, DELUSION FOR
ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO ARE ALL ROBOTS WITH STYLE AND NO MATTER HOW VOLUPTUOUS THE
PARTNER, IT IS NEVER HAPPY COEXISTING WITH ANOTHER ROBOT AND ALL PEOPLE HERE
ARE ROBOTS.
Happy marriage is a scam perpetrated by
many with punishment due:
Many people put on a show of how happily married
they are, as visible in a certain PM whose wife is always hovering around him.
CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY, ELABORATELY OR
AMATEURISHLY, MANY COUPLES PUT ON A SHOW OF BEING HAPPILY MARRIED WHEN
PRIVATELY THEY WANT TO TEAR EACH OTHER TO PIECES, CUT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS AND
SUCH DECEPTION, FOR WHATEVER PURPOSES HAVE DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING FOR
MISLEADING OTHERS.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR TWO EMOTIONAL PEOPLE WITH
STYLE TO BE TRULY HAPPY WITH EACH OTHER, THIS WORLD DOES NOT PERMIT ANYONE TO
BE HAPPY TO ANY SIGNIFICANT OR EXTENDED LEVELS.
HAPPINESS EXISTS TO EVEN VERY HIGH LEVELS BUT IS
NEVER DEPENDENT ON MARRIAGES, DEPENDENT ON OTHERS, ON A PARTNER. AS THE BUDDHA
SAID, WHOEVER HAS A DEPENDENCY (ON YOUR WIFE) HAS A WAVERING, WHOEVER HAS NO
DEPENDENCY (YOUR HAPPINESS IS INDEPENDENT ON ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD) HAS NO
WAVERING, NO SUFFERING.
All he has will be taken away and he will
have nothing:
In the Bible it is said, all he has will be taken
away and he will have nothing.
Now you know your wife belongs to you, the house
belongs to you but when you lose your memory, you no longer know your house and
wife belong to you, what you were so proud of and even fought for is now a
total stranger and so effectively all will be taken from you.
WHEN A PERSON’S MEMORY SYSTEM FAILS, EFFECTIVELY
EVERYTHING HE HAS WILL BE TAKEN FROM HIM, EVEN HIS MEMORIES AND HE SHALL HAVE
NOTHING AND HE DIES AND WANDERS OBLIVIOUS OF HIS PAST, EVEN HIS MEMORIES ARE
GONE.
AND SO IT IS POSSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING TO BE TAKEN
FROM YOU, IF YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM IS WIPED OUT, YOU HAVE LOST EVERYTHING.
To say or do something with style you
must remember it:
Before and in order to say or do something with
style you must remember it, reproduce it from memory. Without committing it to
memory and saying or doing it according to memory you cannot say or do it with
a consistent style that impresses you and you want to impress others with.
If a person does not want to say or do anything
with style, he does not need to remember it, does not need to reproduce it from
memory and so his memory is not activated, is preserved for useful occasions.
YOU DON’T NEED TO TROUBLE YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM OR USE
YOUR MEMORY TO SAY OR DO THINGS WITHOUT STYLE, IT IS ONLY WHEN YOU WANT TO SAY
OR DO THINGS WITH STYLE (THAT YOU THINK IS IMPRESSIVE OR PLEASING) THAT YOU
NEED TO ACTIVATE AND USE YOUR MEMORY AND THIS MAKES YOU A ROBOT REHASHING WHAT
YOU SAID OR DID.
WITHOUT MEMORY, REHASHING FROM MEMORY YOU CANNOT
SAY OR DO THINGS WITH A CONSISTENT STYLE.
No comments:
Post a Comment