Why do people crouch when walking against
strong winds?
In countries where there are strong winds eg Japan
and HK, you see people crouched forward as they walk. What is the rationale?
The crouched position reduces exposure and leverage to the strong winds that would otherwise
topple them.
A tall or upright man is more likely to be toppled
by the wind because he provides greater leverage on the fulcrum of the feet,
the forward crouched position reduces the leverage the wind can employ.
Walking with the wind behind is little problem, the
push of the wind does not topple you but will make walking faster, easier.
IN THE SAME WAY PUTTING A PLANE ON A CLIMB EXPOSES
THE PLANE MORE TO GRIP BY THE STRONG WIND THAT BECAUSE THE FRONT WINGS ARE MUCH
BIGGER THAN THE REAR, TEND TO TURN THE PLANE SO THAT IT BECOMES UPRIGHT AND
THUS LOSE ALL LIFT AND PLUNGE LIKE A STONE.
It does not matter whether you or think what he
says makes sense or not, it is rubbish and this must stress whoever who
receives.
It is never that UK must keep looking outwards or
inwards or both, you do not tell others what to do especially if it is false if
you do not want suffering in repayment but UK must be correct, be true and good
if it wants wellbeing, happiness. UK will never be true or good and so it is
rubbish telling UK what to do and because you think it makes sense you are
deluded and heading for suffering.
Air Asia plane upside down on seabed:
If the plane fell vertically tail first then it is
a tossup between resting upside down and the other way, if it was a
conventional crash it would be less likely upside down.
Jumbo jets are 70 degrees from disaster:
Next time you are cocooned in ‘security’ in flight
on your jumbo jet remind yourself disaster and death may be just degrees even
70 degrees away because if for some reason the plane should be tilted above
that from the horizontal, it loses lift and will slide rapidly down to its
doom.
IF FOR SOME REASON (EG STRONG HEADWIND PUSHING NOSE
UPWARDS) YOUR JUMBO JET IS TILTED SAY 70 DEGREES FROM THE HORIZON, IT MAY LOSE
CRITICAL LIFT AND WITHOUT LIFT IT WILL PLUNGE LIKE A STONE TO DESTRUCTION. THIS
MAY BE WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE AIR ASIA AND AIR FRANCE DISASTERS.
You see jet fighters climbing sharply but they are
different, they are light and their engines powerful so that even without lift
(eg in near vertical climbs) their engine thrust is able to keep them airborne
even fly upwards like a rocket and when gravity finally terminate their climb
and they start to fall, fighters are much more nimble and can make a quick roll
to correct their fall.
POWERFUL AS JUMBO JET ENGINES ARE, THEY CANNOT
ALONE SUSTAIN THE JUMBO IN THE AIR, THEY NEED CONSIDERABLE ASSISTANCE FROM LIFT
SUPPLIED BY AIR. IN NEAR VERTICAL CLIMBS A JUMBO JET ENGINE CANNOT SUSTAIN THE
PLANE WITHOUT LIFT AND SO IT IS DISASTER IF A JUMBO WAS INCLINED SHARPLY TO THE
HORIZONTAL. A JET FIGHTER ENGINE, TOGETHER WITH LIGHT BODY CAN ALONE SUSTAIN
THE JET WITHOUT LIFT IN VERTICAL CLIMBS AND WHEN IT STARTS TO FALL IT IS NIMBLE
ENOUGH TO CORRECT THE FALL BY GOING INTO A ROLL LIKE A FALLING CAT CORRECTS
ITSELF SWIFTLY. THIS THE CLUMSY JUMBO JET CANNOT DO.
THUS IF FOR ANY REASON YOUR JUMBO SHOULD TILT MORE
THAN 70 DEGREES FROM HORIZON, IT WILL SLIDE DOWN RAPIDLY OUT OF CONTROL TO DOOM
JUST AS A POORLY POWERED CAR WILL SLIDE DOWN A STEEP SLOPE IT CANNOT CLIMB.
THE REASON WHY STRONG HEADWINDS WILL TILT THE PLANE
TO THE VERTICAL IS BECAUSE OF THE GROSS DISPARITY IN SIZES OF THE FRONT AND
REAR WINGS, ESPECIALLY IF THE TAIL IS HEAVY WITH PASSENGERS OR CARGO. BECAUSE
THE FRONT WINGS ARE MUCH BIGGER THE WIND WILL PUSH IT MORE STRONGLY UPRIGHT
THAN THE TAIL, ESPECIALLY IF THE TAIL IS HEAVY AND FRONT LIGHT AND THIS CAUSE
THE PLANE TO BECOME NEAR VERTICAL, LOSE ITS LIFT AND PLUNGE.
THIS MECHANISM IN MILDER FORM IS THE BASIS OF TAKE
OFFS. THE RUSHING WIND CATCHES THE FRONT WINGS OF THE JUMBO JET, LIFTS IT
MODERATELY AND ENABLES THE AIR LIFT AUGMENTED BY MAXIMAL THRUST OF ENGINES TO
LAUNCH THE PLANE INTO THE AIR.
AIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN THE PAST HAD TO TURN INTO THE
WIND TO LAUNCH THEIR PLANES BECAUSE THE PLANES WERE NOT POWERFUL ENOUGH TO GET
AIRBORNE ON SHORT RUNWAYS AND NEED TO LAUNCH INTO THE HEADWIND THAT WILL LIFT
THE PLANES INTO THE AIR, SIMILARLY HEAVY BIRDS (EG VULTURES) HAVE TO LAUNCH
THEMSELVES INTO THE WIND FROM CLIFFS IN ORDER TO GET AIRBORNE.
THE VERY HEADWINDS THAT ENABLE THE JUMBO TO GET
AIRBORNE IF TOO STRONG CAN EXCESSIVELY LIFT THE NOSE CAUSING IT TO LOSE ALL
LIFT AND PLUNGE TO DOOM.
Headwinds have good and bad because it is
not truly good:
Whatever is truly good has no drawbacks, no bad,
whatever has bad is never truly good.
Winds are a product of force and force, whether
mild or strong are harmful.
And so it is, mild to moderate headwinds enable
carrier aircraft to take off from short runways, enable heavy birds like
albatross and vultures to take off but strong headwinds as in a violent storm
can tilt a jumbo jet upright causing it to lose all lift and crash.
Whatever is truly good has no drawbacks, it is
purely good.
ABSENCE OF STYLE IS TRULY GOOD, HAS NO DRAWBACKS,
YOU SAVE A LOT OF ENERGY NOT PROLONGING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED, CHANGING
LOUDNESS, IT IS RELEASES YOU FROM INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND
DISTRACTION, RELEASE FROM A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE, DOES NOT DESTROY YOUR
MEMORY SYSTEM FROM CONSTANT ABUSE AND USE TO REHASH.
HEADWINDS HAVE GOOD AND BAD BECAUSE IT IS NOT TRULY
GOOD BUT BAD.
PLEASURE IS NOT TRULY GOOD BECAUSE IT IS MILD FORCE
THAT HARMS THAT IS THE INGREDIENT OF PLEASURE AND SO AFTER WHATEVER PLEASURE,
EG SEX, THERE IS ALWAYS A DISTASTE BECAUSE YOU HAVE TASTED DEATH.
The Buddha has no teacher, no one is fit
to be his teacher:
This was said by the Buddha, he has no teacher and
no one is fit to be his teacher, if he was to share equal or look up to anyone,
his head would split because that would not be true. Even his deputies called
the Buddha ‘Lord’.
Upon his awakening, the Buddha had penetrated
through all phenomena and gone beyond where no being has gone before. No one
who knows, is enlightened desire any existence anymore. Like a delicious meal
previously eaten and vomited out, he will not go back to existence again.
You are far from perfect and so you need a teacher,
there are those who are fit to be your teacher.
IF YOU THINK NO ONE IS SO GREAT THAT NO ONE IS FIT
TO BE HIS TEACHER, YOU HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING HERE AS EVERYWHERE YOU THINK
YOU UNDERSTAND BUT DON’T, THE BUDDHA MAY BE RIGHT, HE ALONE IS THE HIGHEST, HE
HAS NO TEACHER, NO ONE IS FIT TO BE HIS TEACHER.
The front of a jumbo jet is pushed by
wind much more than its tail:
Because of its much larger front wing area, the
front of a jumbo jet (if foolishly exposed by the pilot) is pushed much more by
strong headwinds than the tail causing the plane to rear head up losing all its
lift and fall like a stone.
NORMALLY WINDS ARE NOT STRONG ENOUGH TO PUSH THE
NOSE OF A JUMBO TO THE VERTICAL BUT IN A SEVERE STORM, PERHAPS COUPLED BY A HEAVY
TAIL BECAUSE OF CARGO OR PASSENGER DISTRIBUTION, THE PLANE IS (EASILY) PUSHED
UPRIGHT BECAUSE OF THE MUCH LARGER FRONT WING SURFACE AREA AND THIS IS FATAL
FOR A JUMBO JET WHICH CANNOT ROLL TO CORRECT ITSELF.
Always fill the front of a plane first:
Bearing in mind the dangers to a jumbo jet, the
wise person will ensure the plane is filled with passengers and cargo to the
front first before the back.
A PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS CAN AVERT MANY
UNNECESSARY DANGERS.
KNOWING THE DANGERS OF A TAIL HEAVY JUMBO, THE
PERSON WOULD ENSURE PASSENGERS AND CARGO FILL THE FRONT FIRST BEFORE THE BACK
AND ALL HEAVY CARGO IS LOADED TO THE FRONT THAN BACK.
Always shield belly of plane and make U
turn in severe storms:
Knowing the dangers of strong headwinds, the person
who understands will shield the belly of his plane from headwinds by travelling
with slight dip of his nose and if
conditions are very bad, NEVER CLIMB but make a careful U turn making sure the
wings are not exposed to the wind and once U turn is completed the plane is
safe.
A STRONG FOLLOWING WIND IS NOT DANGEROUS TO THE
PLANE ONLY MAKES FLYING FASTER AND CHEAPER. IT IS A STRONG HEADWIND THAT IS A
DANGEROUS ADVERSARY.
Obama is mocking or laughing at Putin and that is
not wise because a noose hangs around his own neck so Obama is no smarter.
IT IS NEVER ABOUT WHETHER PUTIN IS SMART OR STUPID
BUT WHAT IS ACTION IS RIGHT OR WRONG, GOOD OR BAD AND SO IT IS WRONG
UNDERSTANDING TO SEE IN TERMS OF PERSONAL STUPIDITY. OBAMA UNDERSTANDS WRONGLY
AND THAT CAN ONLY COME ABOUT IF HE HAS NO UNDERSTANDING. IF HE HAS
UNDERSTANDING HE WOULD NEVER SAY THAT.
The Bushes are ambitious and that is a nice word
for greedy, and even when it was said they were sending feelers, it is
deception, nicety, he had decided much earlier to run.
THE PATRIACH PRESCOTT BUSH BUILT UP MUCH POWER AND
WEALTH (HE MARRIED A WEALTHY GENTRY) AND WAS A SENATOR WHO BEHIND THE SCENES
(WHILE ACTING FOR THE NAZIS), HELD STRINGS CONTROLLING IKE WHOM HE URGED TO RUN
FOR PRESIDENT, NIXON WAS A BUSH PROTÉGÉ AND LATER HIS SONS TRIED A HAND AND NOW
JEB LOOKS TO FURTHER THE SAGA.
That is nonsense and only a deluded person with no
understanding can say that, what kind of experts are these?
Based on facts, the plane was found within 10 km of
last radar position, the plane must have plunged sharply into the sea not
landed on water and then overcome by high seas.
The plane plunged sharply into the sea but if it
landed tail first, it is like a diver landing and the plane may remain intact
and there may be survivors.
THE PLANE COULD NOT LAND ON WATER AND OVERCOME BY
HIGH SEAS BECAUSE IT WAS CLOSE TO ITS LAST KNOWN POSITION AND IT MUST HAVE
FALLEN LIKE A STONE AND THAT IS NEVER A LANDING.
HOWEVER IF IT FELL TAIL FIRST, IT IS LIKE A DIVER
ENTERING WATER AND THERE MAY BE SURVIVORS IN THE FORWARD SECTION.
IF YOU UNDERSTOOD THE TRAJECTORY THE PLANE MUST
TAKE IT CANNOT LAND ON WATER BUT IT PLUNGED INTO WATER.
A near vertical down trajectory cannot be
a landing but a plunge but there may be survivors:
The trajectory of the plane down is nearly vertical
and that can never be a landing but a crash but nevertheless if the plane
entered water like a diver’s feet, those at the forward section may be spared
of impact and survive.
Whoever misleads others, confuses others
incurs debt:
People in this world are liberal with their advice
and opinions not realizing that if what they mislead or confuse others, they
are liable for punishment that may extend to an ocean and eternity because if
you are punished you cannot go to heaven.
If you say may have landed in water and overcome by
seas and you have not verified to see if that fits with facts you are
speculating and that has blame (even if you guessed right) to be repaid by
suffering.
IF THE PLANE ENDED IN THE SEA CLOSE TO ITS LAST
RADAR LOCATION IT MUST HAVE PLUNGED LIKE A STONE OR DIVER AND THAT IS NEVER A
LANDING.
STIRRED BY EMOTIONS, PEOPLE ARE EAGER TO OPEN THEIR
MOUTHS AND SPECULATE WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION TO FACTS NOT REALIZING THEY ARE
SETTING THEMSELVES FOR FUTURE SUFFERING.
Jimmy Carter
Whatever is a double edged sword is false, harmful
and so you are foolish to want to discuss what is false. Sanctions are not the
answer, it is about fighting and whatever is fighting is evil and so you never
hear me speak about sanctions.
SANCTIONS ARE NEVER THE ANSWER SO WHY SPEAK OF WHAT
IS NEVER THE ANSWER? THEY MAY REFUSE TO GIVE IN AND SO WHAT IF THEY GIVE IN, IT
IS NOT BECAUSE THEY UNDERSTAND OR ARE GOOD BUT THEY ARE INTIMIDATED OR THEY ARE
PRETENDING TO TOE THE LINE TO AVERT REPERCUSSIONS.
I was correct according to Indonesian
investigator:
Some may have survived the crash because if the
engines are active they would partially retard descent and those towards the
front may survive.
Indonesian aviation analyst Gerry Soejatman believes the aircraft rose up as fast as a fighter jet and then
dropped back into the ocean almost vertically into the water.And the extreme weather which Airbus 320-200 encountered meant the pilots were helpless to save the passengers and crew on-board, Soejatman told Fairfax media after he examined figures leaked from the official air crash investigation team.
He said “It’s really hard to comprehend [the plane acted in a way] bordering on the edge of logic,” as it plunged into the water “‘like a piece of metal being thrown down.”
Mr Soejatman believes the crash occurred because the aircraft was caught in a severe updraft, followed by an equally severe ground draft, with the leaked figures showing that it climbed at a staggering rate of 6000ft to 9000ft per minute.
The aircraft then fell at 11,000ft a minute, with bursts of up to 24,000ft – in marked contrast to regular circumstances, when a plane would climb between 1000ft to 1500ft on a sustained basis, gaining 3000ft in a burst.
Air Asia flew without permission:
One must not take the law into your own hands and
if you are not entitled to fly the route on Sundays and you do so and it meets
with disaster, there is blame.
Flying without permission is taking without given
or stealing and this is serious.
MANY COMPANIES ARE MONEY MINDED, THEY WILL NOT
DIVERT BECAUSE OF EXTRA FUEL COSTS LET ALONE CANCEL FLIGHTS AND IT TURNS OUT
AIR ASIA WAS NOT PERMITTED TO FLY SUNDAYS AND IT MEETS WITH DISASTER AND SO AIR
ASIA IS MORE CULPABLE THAN PEOPLE THINK.
Taking what is not given has serious
consequences:
Not just stealing, the Buddha taught, do not take
what is not given. Thus if you see a $50 note on the road, it is not given to
you and you are wise not to take it.
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY RELIGION DOES NOT WORK IF
YOU HAVE NOT CARRIED OUT WHAT RELIGION TELLS YOU TO DO, NAMELY DO NOT TELL LIES
OR WHAT YOU DO NOT KNOW IS TRUE, DO NOT TAKE WHAT IS NOT GIVEN, DO NOT HARM OR
KILL.
IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE NEVER PRACTICED WHAT IS
NOBLE THAT THEY CONTINUE TO SUFFER GRAVELY AND THEY THEN BLAME OTHERS, THE
WORLD AND GOD FOR THE BAD THAT HAPPENS.
Impossible to pretend without being a
robot:
In order to pretend you must become a robot and I
can see people pretending all the time (they look away pretending they did not
see).
PRETENDING IS SOMETHING A PERSON MUST TELL HIMSELF
TO DO AND HE MUST HAVE A PLAN COPIED FROM OTHERS OR FASHIONED BY HIMSELF HOW TO
PRETEND AND HE IS OBEYING A COMMAND TO PRETEND AND HOW TO PRETEND THAT MANDATES
HE IS A ROBOT AND ALL PRETENDING IS CONDITIONED TO BECOME EVEN COMPELLING AND
IT IS SUFFERING BEING A ROBOT AND HE IS HEADING FOR INSANITY AND ETERNAL
TORMENT.
Sanctions punish the country for the actions of its
leaders who actually don’t care for their countries and they have means to
circumvent sanctions and they don’t suffer but the masses do.
IF YOU THINK SANCTIONS WORK WHEN THEY DON’T AND ARE
WRONG, THERE IS SUFFERING DUE LATER IN REPAYMENT.
FURTHER EVEN IF SANCTIONS WORK, IF THEY ARE WRONG
AND BAD YOU ARE LIABLE FOR REPAYMENT.
IT IS NEVER A MATTER OF WHETHER SOMETHING
(SANCTIONS, BRIBERY) WORKS OR NOT BUT IS IT RIGHT OR WRONG, GOOD OR EVIL. IF IT
IS EVIL (BRIBERY), EVEN IF IT WORKS YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING.
32 GB does not cost too much nowadays and Apple is
a scrooge and wicked to give its customers only 16 GB disc space especially
when updates may render the existing space inadequate.
IT MAKES NO SENSE FOR A RESPONSIBLE MERCHANT TO
SUPPLY PRODUCTS THAT ARE VERY LIKELY TO BE INADEQUATE WHEN THE COSTS OF
INCREASING STORAGE IS ACTUALLY QUITE CHEAP. CHARGE A BIT MORE AND GIVE THEM
AMPLE SPACE OR IS APPLE TRYING TO PROMOTE ICLOUD?
The complaint has been filed in California by Miami residents Paul Orshan
and Christopher Endara who say that iOS 8 can occupy up to 23.1% of the memory
available on some Apple devices. In addition, upgrading devices from the earlier iOS 7 to 8 can cause people to lose up to 1.3 gigabytes of memory, said papers filed in support of the legal action.
The amount of memory taken up by iOS 8 can mean users run out of storage and, the pair allege, this is helping Apple force people to sign up for its fee-based iCloud storage system.
Apple: either 16 or 64 GB:
APPLE ONLY THINKS ABOUT ITSELF NOT ITS LOYAL
CUSTOMERS. IF IT IS COSTLY TO APPLE TO SUPPLY A 32 GB OPTION WHY DOES IT NOT
THINK ABOUT THE COSTS TO CUSTOMERS WHO FIND OUT THEY LACK DISK SPACE?
Apple may argue it is too costly in terms of
inventory to have another option 32 GB and so you either get 16GB or you pay
through your nose for 64GB.
If Apple can think about the costs to itself of
offering a 32 GB option, why does Apple not think the costs to customers who
are likely to run out of space and cannot have a SD card inserted.
APPLE DOES NOT PROVIDE EXPANDABLE SD CARD SLOTS AND
IT IS WICKED TO MAKE CUSTOMERS CHOOSE BETWEEN A PALTRY EVEN UNACCEPTABLE 16GB
OR EXPENSIVE 64 GB.
Apple’s meanness is never isolated:
Apple is not alone, there are many similar
companies (like Microsoft) and meanness is never based on reason but rehashed
by programming and so if Apple is mean in the amount of space it provides
customer (bare bone 16BG instead of generous 32 GB or expensive 64 GB) it is a
corporate trait and so it is there are many (disguised) actions that are mean,
out to milk customers like new (expensive) lightning connectors with built in
chip to prevent cloning.
Parts of the tail and passengers sitting
in a row:
Apparently parts recovered came from the tail and
there was an instance of passengers in a row strapped to their seats.
This would be in keeping with a tail first landing
that would smash the tail and the opened rear end may permit bodies strapped in
seats to emerge and float to the surface.
AND SO, PARTS OF TAIL AND PASSENGERS STRAPPED TO
SEATS IN A ROW IS CONSISTENT WITH A TAIL FIRST CRASH SMASHING THE TAIL THAT
ALLOWED THOSE SEATED IN THE REAR TO RISE TO THE SURFACE.
Why tornado, wind shear unlikely to cause
the crash:
A tornado at high altitude may cause the crash,
suck the plane up and then release it to fall but is unlikely.
Tornadoes usually rip apart, tear to pieces things
caught in its spout and it would be sheer coincidence if it were to release the
plane at such an attitude as to fall like a stone.
THE AIR ASIA FLIGHT FELL VERTICALLY LIKE A STONE
AND A PLANE IS AERODYNAMIC EXCEPT IF IT FELL TAIL FIRST, IF IT FELL HEAD FIRST,
THE PILOT CAN CONTROL THE PLANE.
AND SO UNLESS IT IS A CASE OF STRONG WINDS TILTING
THE PLANE UPRIGHT WITH TAIL DOWN TO FALL TAIL FIRST INTO THE OCEAN IT WOULD BE
SHEER COINCIDENCE THAT ANY OTHER STORM PHENOMENON WOULD NOT RIP THE PLANE APART
BUT CAST THE PLANE DOWN IN THE TAIL FIRST PLUNGE NECESSARY FOR A VERTICAL PLUNGE.
THE ONLY WAY AN INTACT PLANE CAN PLUNGE VERTICALLY
IS IF IT IS VERTICAL WITH TAIL LOWER DOWN NOT IF THE PLANE IS HORIZONTAL AND IT
WOULD BE A SHEER COINCIDENCE IF ANY STORM CONDITION OTHER THAN HEADWINDS
PUSHING A CLIMBING PLANE UPRIGHT THAT RESULTS IN AN INTACT PLANE PLUNGING
VERTICALLY TAIL FIRST DOWN.
Only one explanation for a sudden tail
first vertical plunge:
It appears the Air Asia flight suddenly rapidly
plunged vertically into the ocean below its last radar location.
A plane is usually aerodynamic and the only way a
plane can do this is if it was somehow upended so that it is upright with tail
down when it loses all aerodynamic properties and become like a knife slicing
through the air tail first.
A PLANE CAN ONLY PLUNGE VERTICALLY IF IT LOST ALL LIFT,
IT WAS NOT AERODYNAMIC AND THIS CAN ONLY COME ABOUT IF IT BECAME VERTICAL WITH
TAIL DOWN, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH STRONG HEADWINDS PUSHING A CLIMBING PLANE
UPRIGHT TO PLUNGE DOWN LIKE A STONE.
STORMS ARE LIKELY TO RIP APART THE PLANE AND IT
WOULD BE SHEER COINCIDENCE A STORM (EG TORNADO, WIND SHEAR) COULD ARRANGE THE
PLANE IN A VERTICAL TAIL DOWN POSTURE.
Plane falling vertically tail first falls
stably like a dart:
Plane cannot fall vertically sideways or nose first.
Only tail first
can a plane fall vertically like a stone because the
weight is preponderantly in the shaft or fuselage and the wings
merely act as stabilizers as it plunges like a dart or arrow.
A
PLANE FALLING VERTICALLY TAIL FIRST BEHAVES LIKE A DART OR ARROW.
A PLANE FALLING VERTICALLY SIDEWAYS IS LIKE AN
ARROW FALLING SIDEWAYS, UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE.
A sideways one main wing leading, it is not
sustainable but the plane will rotate because the mass of the plane is not
aligned with the line of fall. The weight of the transverse fuselage will tend
to twist the plane to correct its vertical fall if it fell sideways with one
front wing first.
ONLY A VERTICAL TAIL FIRST FALL CAN EXPLAIN THE
PLANE’S FALL LIKE A STONE BECAUSE THE PLANE BECOMES LIKE AN ARROW OR DART WITH
THE MASS OF THE PLANE ENTIRELY BEHIND THE LEADING END OR TAIL.
IF IT FELL VERTICALLY SIDEWAYS WITH ONE FRONT WING
LEADING, THE WEIGHT IS NOT BEHIND THE FALL AND WILL TEND TO TWIST THE FALLING
PLANE SO THAT IT SOON CORRECTS ITSELF.
A NOSE FIRST DIVE IS EASILY CORRECTIBLE BY THE
PILOTS.
Do you realize your jumbo jet can be
converted into a dart?
Do you realize, are you aware the plane you so
comfortably travel in is actually a dart, can become a dart should it be put in
a vertical tail first position when the fuselage becomes the stabilizing mass
concentrated shaft of the plunging dart with the wings acting as stabilizers
just like darts and arrows have fins.
ONCE A PLANE IS PUT IN THE VERTICAL TAIL DOWN
POSITION IT BECOMES ESSENTIALLY A VERY GOOD DART WITH MOST OF ITS WEIGHT CONCENTRATED
IN ITS SHAFT STABILIZING ITS FLIGHT AND THE WINGS MERELY ACTING AS GUIDES.
It is a disaster not a tragedy:
That something, the Air Asia crash is a tragedy is
a false, emotion based understanding, it is in truth a disaster, a reason based
description of what happened.
If you end up in hell it is not a tragedy but a
disaster for you.
DISASTER AND TRAGEDY ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS. DISASTERS
CAN OCCUR, TRAGEDIES ARE FALSE EMOTION OR STIRRED FORCE BASED UNDERSTANDING OR
DELUSIONS.
Why the plane should be expected to end
upside down:
Rather than random it may be expected the plane
should end up upside down in water.
I tried releasing a ballpoint pen vertically and
each time it fell vertically down as I released it and so the plane should be
continued to make the same trajectory to the sea.
The wind is likely to continue blowing on the
vertical plane as it falls down and this would tend to push the plane upside
down as it fell but the wind cannot blow the plane to be horizontal again
because the speed of the falling plane is rapid and as the plane tilts more to
the vertical, the wind loses its pushing traction on the plane and so there
will come an equilibrium point where the wind can push vertical and a bit
beyond so the plane falls upside down but the wind cannot push the plane back
to horizontal upside down again because its push reduces the more the plane is
tilted away from the wind.
THE WIND IS LIKELY TO PUSH THE PLANE MORE THAN
VERTICALLY SO THAT IT IS SLIGHTLY UPSIDE DOWN AS IT FALLS BUT THE WIND CANNOT PUSH
THE PLANE BACK TO HORIZONTAL UPSIDE DOWN BECAUSE ITS PUSH DECREASES WITH
INCREASING INCLINATION AND THE PLANE IS FALLING FAST.
Upside down crash in line with wind-blown
crash:
The strong wind will not just blow the plane
upright with tail down but beyond so that it would fall with upside slightly
bottom and so the plane would be expected to plunge slightly upside down.
A falling ball point pen will maintain its course
after release and it should be expected the falling pen will fall vertically
slightly upside down till the end.
How to explain plane’s initial sharp jet
fighter climb?
As the pilot initiated the climb, the exposure of
the wings to strong winds coupled with plane’s thrust caused the plane to rise
sharply higher but as the plane continued to rise, it became more and more
vertical causing it to lose lift and unlike a jet fighter whose engine thrust
alone can push the fighter upwards in the absence of lift, with no lift as the
plane reached vertical, the engine thrust could not sustain the jumbo and so it
fell like a dart straight down, slightly upside down because the winds have
pushed it slightly to the other side of vertical.
THE INITIAL SHARP CLIMB WAS BECAUSE THE STRONG
WINDS CAUGHT THE ASCENDING PLANE AND PUSHED IT SHARPLY HIGHER MORE THAN USUAL
BUT AS THE PLANE BECAME MORE VERTICAL IT LOST ALL LIFT AND ITS ENGINES ALONE
CANNOT SUPPORT THE PLANE SO IT PLUNGED BACK TO EARTH.
Strong wind gradually overpowered the
plane:
Like all fights to the death it is a tug of war
with the wind finally prevailing.
And so it may be as the pilot put the plane on a
climb, it was battling stronger winds that pushed it higher and higher, more
and more vertical until it reached an angle where it lost sufficient lift to
begin falling and still the relentless wind blew until it was slightly upside
down as it fell to earth.
Pilot error and strong headwinds
sufficient to explain Air Asia crash:
5 minutes before crash pilots never reported
anything unusual in their request to climb higher and within two minutes of
permission to climb their plane crashed.
UNLIKELY HOT ENGINES FROZE IN 2 MINUTES TO STALL
PLANE AND CRASH AS SOME SPECULATED AND EVEN IF THEY STALLED, IF THE PLANE WAS
HORIZONTAL IT WILL NOT PLUNGE VERTICALLY BUT GLIDE DOWN GRADUALLY.
THE PILOT’S FATAL MISTAKE WASS THAT HE DECIDED TO
CLIMB WHICH OPENED THE WINGS TO STRONG HEADWINDS THAT PREVENTED THE PLANE FROM
MOVING FORWARD BUT INSTEAD PUSHED THE PLANE HIGHER WHILST FORCING THE CLIMBING
PLANE MORE VERTICAL BECAUSE VAST DISPARITY OF BIG FRONT WINGS VERSUS SMALL TAIL
WINGS WILL CAUSE THE PLANE TO BE TILTED MORE AND MORE VERTICALLY BY THE STRONG
WIND UNTIL THE PLANE BECAME HEAD UP TAIL DOWN VERTICAL, LOSING ALL LIFT WHEN
ITS ENGINES ALONE CANNOT SUPPORT THE PLANE (UNLIKE JET FIGHTERS) AND IT PLUNGED
TAIL FIRST EVEN WITH SLIGHT UPSIDE DOWN TILT TO THE SEA WHEN THE TAIL SMASHED
TO PIECES (AND WAS FOUND ON THE SURFACE OF THE SEA) AND BODIES AND PASSENGERS
FLOATED OUT OF THE BROKEN PLANE.
THE STRONG WINDS STOPPED THE PLANE MOVING FORWARD
AND INSTEAD PUSHED IT UP RAPIDLY EXPLAINING THE INITIAL RAPID CLIMB LIKE A JET
FIGHTER PLANE. AT THE SAME TIME THE WIND CAUSED THE PLANE TO TILT VERTICALLY
WITH TAIL DOWN AND WHEN THE PLANE LOST LIFT BECAUSE OF THE TILT IT FELL
VERTICALLY LIKE A DART OR JAVELIN BECAUSE THE PLANE’S MASS IS IN THE FUSELAGE
LIKE A JAVELIN.
THE BEST THE PILOTS COULD DO WAS TO KEEP THE PLANE
HORIZONTAL OR SLIGHTLY DESCENDING TO SHIELD THE WINGS FROM WIND AND THEN U TURN
SO WIND IS SAFELY BEHIND NOT DANGEROUSLY IN FRONT.
TO BLAME STORM AND ENGINE STALL BECAUSE OF FREEZING
DOES NOT MATCH FACTS.
Plane’s vertical plunge must be
explained:
Anyone proposing a cause of the crash must explain
the plane’s vertical plunge.
UNLESS THE PLANE WAS BLOWN TO PIECES MIDAIR, THE
ONLY WAY IT CAN PLUMMET LIKE A JAVELIN IS IF IT WAS TILTED UPRIGHT (BY STRONG
WINDS) AND DESCENDED TAIL FIRST INTO THE SEA.
NOT ONLY CAN BUT A STRONG HEADWIND WILL DEFINITELY
TILT A PLANE VERTICALLY IF ITS WINGS WERE FOOLISHLY EXPOSED TO THE WIND JUST AS
A STRONG WIND WILL BLOW A WALKING MAN DOWN IF HE WALKED UPRIGHT INSTEAD OF
CROUCHED.
THUS ONLY A STRONG HEADWIND CAN EXPLAIN THE INITIAL
VERTICAL RISE OF THE PLANE (BECAUSE THE WIND WAS TOO STRONG FOR THE PLANE TO
MOVE FORWARD AND THE WIND PUSHED THE PLANE RAPIDLY HIGHER) AND WHEN THE WIND
TILTED THE PLANE TO THE VERTICAL, IT LOST ALL LIFT AND FELL LIKE A JAVELIN.
AND SO THE PILOT’S IGNORANCE AND FOOLISHNESS IS
MUCH TO BLAME.
A US lawyer
says he is planning legal action against a woman who claims she was forced to
have sex with him and Prince Andrew when she was a minor.
The law suit is wrong and evil answer, it is to
serve to intimidate.
If you are truly innocent there is nothing to hide
and you would welcome exposure of the allegation which will show your
innocence.
THE LAWSUIT IS INDICATION OF GUILT, IT IS THE WRONG
ANSWER AND AN INTIMIDATION TO SHUT UP. IF THE PRINCE WAS TRULY INNOCENT HE
WOULD NOT BE AFRAID OF EXPOSURE OF THE CASE WHICH CAN BE PROVEN TO BE WITHOUT BASIS.
THERE IS A PHOTO OF HIM PUTTING AN ARM AROUND THE
GIRL SO THERE IS SOME BASIS TO THE CASE.
Italian
police believe human traffickers made some $3m from 359 illegal migrants found
abandoned on a cargo ship in the Mediterranean.
THIS IS A CYNICAL AND HYPOCRITICAL WORLD WHERE
CRIMINALS AND COMPANIES LIKE APPLE AND RULING ELITE TRY TO MAKE MONEY OUT OF
THE SYSTEM WHEREVER THEY CAN AND ALL THIS ABUSE CANNOT BE SUSTAINED FOREVER AND
THE SYSTEM WILL COLLAPSE CRUSHING EVERYONE.
Indonesia's
weather agency says initial analysis suggests bad weather caused AirAsia flight
QZ8501 to crash, with the loss of 162 people.
Nature alone is not responsible but there is a
chain of culpability from the airline that flew illegally and despite bad
weather to make money to foolish ignorant pilots. The plane was not to blame,
although old it was functioning normally. The wind toppled the plane because
the pilots foolishly tried to climb. They should have returned to Java.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THE ACTUAL CAUSES BECAUSE
IT CAN BE REMEDIABLE TO PREVENT FUTURE RECURRENCES.
A kite launched in strong wind rises
rapidly but why does it not fall?
Those who have flown kites will know you need to
launch a kite against the wind and if there is a strong wind blowing the kite
rises rapidly, soars upwards but it does not fall unlike the Air Asia flight.
In the same way if the pilot decided to launch or
climb by exposing its wings to the wind it will soar up rapidly but unlike the
kite it will fall vertically disastrously.
THE KITE WILL NOT FALL EVEN WHEN VERTICAL BECAUSE
THERE IS A STRING TETHERED TO IT HELD BY THE OWNER THAT EXERTS COUNTER FORCE ON
THE FORCE OF THE WIND KEEPING THE KITE IN EQUILIBRIUM HOVERING IN THE SKY. IF
THE WIND IS TOO STRONG, THE STRING MIGHT SNAP AND THE KITE FLOATS AWAY AND
ULTIMATELY FALLS TO EARTH.
This is nonsense and the person is deluded heading
for punishment for misleading others.
Ice cannot cause the plane to fall vertically. An
iced engine will stall but the plane would glide down and crash rather than
fall like a stone.
A plane pushed upright with tail down will plummet
like a dart as observed.
IF WHAT YOU SAY CONFUSES AND MISLEADS OTHERS YOU
ARE LIABLE FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
A strong (enough) headwind will (not may)
always topple a plane:
If a headwind is powerful enough to overpower a
plane’s engine thrust, it WILL not MAY topple a plane because the wind will
exert more push on the front wings than tail fins causing the plane to rear up in
the air until its lift is lost and it plunges earthward like a javelin.
IF THE HEADWIND IS STRONGER THAN THE PLANE’S ENGINE
THRUST, IT WILL TOPPLE THE PLANE TO BECOME VERTICAL TAIL DOWN.
Simply a contest between engine thrust
and headwind for the plane:
Just as men fight over a pretty girl, the pretty
girl in this case is the plane and it is an unequal contest between the
powerful engines pushing a very heavy plane and a demon like wind and your
chance of winning is to minimize exposure of the plane to the wind.
IN STORM CONDITIONS, THE POWER OF THE WIND IS MUCH
STRONGER THAN THE ENGINES THAT HAVE TO PULL A HEAVY PLANE AND YOUR ONLY CHANCE
IS TO HANDICAP THE WIND BY MINIMIZING YOUR EXPOSURE OR PROFILE TO THE WIND. IF
YOU START TO CLIMB, YOU ARE EXPOSING YOUR PLANE TO THE WIND SO THAT IT CAN
EXERT ITS PUSH ON YOUR PLANE AND WHEN WIND POWER OVERPOWERS ENGINE POWER THE
PLANE CANNOT ADVANCE BUT IT IS PUSHED VERTICALLY UP BY THE WIND THAT ALSO
PUSHES THE PLANE UNRIGHT BECAUSE THE MUCH BIGGER FRONT WINGS ARE PUSHED MORE
THAN THE REAR UNTIL IT IS UPRIGHT AND THE PLANE LOSES LIFT AND BECOMES LIKE A
STONE.
THE PRIZE IS POSSESSION OF THE PLANE.
THE CONTESTANTS ARE THE (PUNY) ENGINE POWER AND
WIND POWER.
The pilot should have flown through
without climbing:
If the pilots understood the dangers of exposing
the plane to headwinds, he would have gambled flying through rather than
foolishly climbing.
THERE WOULD BE A FAR BETTER CHANCE OF SURVIVAL IF
THE PILOT HAD ELECTED TO FLY THROUGH RATHER THAN CLIMB WHICH WELCOMES THE WIND
TO ATTACK THE PLANE. BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE INTOLERANT OF DISCOMFORT, THEY
CLAMOUR TO CLIMB OUT OF TURBULENCE AND END UP DEAD INSTEAD.
WHICH DO YOU PREFER, RIDING A BUCKLING HORSE OR
BEING THROWN OFF BY WIND DEAD?
All snubbing is evil, controlled insanity and never
based on truth but stirred emotion, anger, hatred.
The person is there and he is there as a
representative and you don’t pretend he is not there which is actually
controlled insanity and there is debt to be repaid as suffering in trying to
punish and mould another’s behaviour so that he will appease you in the future.
ONLY GOATS SNUB, SHEEP DO NOT INDULGE IN CHILDISH,
PUNITIVE CONTROLLING BEHAVIOUR. IF SOMEONE PLEASES YOU, YOU SHOWER HIM WITH
ACCOLADES, SMILE AND OPEN YOUR ARMS, IF SOMEONE DOES NOT APPEASE YOU, YOU SNUB
HIM, THAT IS WICKED AND SHOWS YOU ARE NOT GOOD AS YOU PRETEND.
Air Asia pilots’ fatal mistake:
The plane’s engine thrust is no match to the might
of a full blown storm and so in order to survive the plane must expose itself
minimally to the might of the storm by flying horizontally into the storm or
slightly downward so the storm will push it down. To climb is a fatal mistake that
shows no understanding. By climbing you increase the exposure of the under
surface of the wings to the storm which makes forward progress difficult and
the wind tends to push the plane backwards and upwards and so the wind grips
the climbing plane pushing it back and up resulting in the rapid vertical
ascent. At the same time, the wind tends to topple the plane because the front
wings are much bigger than the rear fins, it will push the front of the plane
more than the back until the plane becomes vertical head up when it loses all
lift and plunges tail first like a javelin to the ground.
EVEN NOW NOBODY HAS EXPLAINED THE MECHANISM OF THE
CRASH LIKE I DESCRIBED ABOVE. IF IT IS CORRECT HOW COME THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND
THE TRUTH?
UNDERSTANDING THIS, FUTURE PILOTS SHOULD BE VERY
CAREFUL ABOUT CLIMBING IN A STORM AND SHOULD RIDE ROUGH SHOD HORIZONTALLY
THROUGH A STORM, DESCEND OR MAKE A CAREFUL WIDE U TURN SO THAT WINDS ARE
BEHIND.
Snubbing for evil or good?
You can snub someone for evil purposes or good
purposes but it is far fetched, impossible that people in this world snub for
good.
If what the police wanted the mayor to do that he
did not do that displeases them is not good then you are snubbing or punishing
him for not doing evil that you want him to do and that has punishment.
Those who are noble dissociate themselves with
those who do evil because they do not approve of evil, people in this world
snub others because they do not join in to do evil or they do not get what they
want from you.
WHATEVER YOU WANT OTHERS TO DO OR SAY CAN BE KNOWN
AS GOOD OR BAD, TRUE OR FALSE, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS. IF WHAT YOU WANT TO
DO IS BAD, FALSE, MEANINGLESS AND YOU SNUB HIM, YOU ARE PUTTING THE NOOSE
AROUND YOUR NECK.
This is the ranting of a fool with no understanding,
no worthy of attention let alone remembering.
Rape is wrong, evil that is all and shame is a
wrong understanding and applies to pretentious people. It is because people are
hypocrites, they hide unpalatable parts of themselves from others’ gaze that
when exposed they are shamed, their mental forces stirred to be anguished,
hurt.
SHAME IS NO SHAME, MERELY A STIRRING MENTAL FORCE
AND THERE IS NO TRUE CLASSIFICATION OF SIZE FOR WHAT IS FALSE.
RAPE IS NEVER THE BIGGEST SHAME EXCEPT IN YOUR
DELUSION OR FALSE PERCEPTION AND BECAUSE WHAT YOU TELL OTHERS IS INCORRECT YOU
ARE LIABLE FOR SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT. SUFFERING IS EVIL, HARMFUL TO SELF AND
OTHERS, THAT IS THE REASON BASED UNDERSTANDING.
WHEN A JAPANESE GIRL IS RAPED AND INDIA IS PUT INTO
THE SPOTLIGHT AGAIN, THEIR EMOTIONS ARE STIRRED AND DRIVE DELUDED INTO
OUTPOURING, ‘RAPE IS THE BIGGEST SHAME’ NOT REALIZING THEY ARE ASKING FOR
SUFFERING BECAUSE WHAT IS SAID IS FALSE, WRONG. RAPE IS NOT A SHAME LET ALONE A
BIGGEST SHAME BUT A WRONG, EVIL.
Shame is a product of pretence:
Without pretence there can be no shame and pretence
is always evil, suffering, false, controlled insanity.
People pretend to be what they are not, they
project a wholesome public image, they act as if they are wholesome, true and
good when they are not and when the truth is exposed, they may be overwhelmed,
their mental forces stirred in confusion, anguish and this too is senseless,
suffering and evil.
SHAME IS NOT GOOD, IF YOU THINK SHAME CAN BE GOOD
YOU ARE DELUDED. SHAME IS ALWAYS BAD AND DENOTES A BAD PRETENTIOUS PERSON. YOU
CAN ONLY PRETEND IF YOU ARE AN ACTOR, YOU HAVE IN MIND WHAT A WHOLESOME IMAGE
MIGHT BE AND YOU PROCEED TO ACT OR BEHAVE ACCORDING TO THAT IMAGE AND SO ONLY
ROBOTS CAN HAVE SHAME.
YOU NEED TO BE A ROBOT TO PROJECT A FALSE WHOLESOME
IMAGE OF YOURSELF AND WHEN YOUR PRETENCE IS EXPOSED, YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS
STIRRED TO EXPERIENCE SHAME.
Why was tail broken from the plane?
If the plane fell tail first like a javelin then
the brunt of impact is borne by the tail which naturally broke off and with it
the black boxes may be damaged or buried.
IF ICE DAMAGED THE ENGINES, WHY WOULD IT FALL TAIL
FIRST? A PLANE CRIPPLED BY ENGINE FAILURE FROM ICE SHOULD PLUNGE HEAD DOWN AND
ITS NOSE SHOULD BEAR THE BRUNT NOT TAIL.
Air Force Lt Col Johnson Supriyadi, a search and rescue official
co-ordinating the operation, said it now looked like the boxes, located in the tail of the plane, had broken away from the rest
of the wreckage."Based on the finding of pieces of debris it looks like the body of the aircraft split or cracked and was separated from its tail," he said.
Why black box may be shattered and crash
alarms did not work:
Why are black boxes placed at the rear of the
plane?
The assumption is that all crashes are frontal and
it is the front that will bear the brunt and the tail is therefore the logical
location to place black box.
DESIGNERS NEVER ENVISAGED A PLANE COULD CRASH ON
ITS BACKSIDE WITH FOCUS POINTED VIOLENCE AS THE AIR ASIA PLANE DID IF WHAT I
POSTULATE IS TRUE AND THIS VIOLENT IMPACT MAY HAVE BURIED THE BLACK BOX IN THE
SEA BED OR SHATTERED IT.
IN THE SAME WAY, CRASH
ALARMS DID NOT GO OFF BECAUSE THE VIOLENCE OF THE IMPACT DESTROYED OR
INACTIVATED THEM.
Impact inactivated black boxes and
alarms:
Perhaps the alarms too like the black boxes were
located at the back to offer them best protection in a crash and the black
boxes and alarms in the back bore the brunt of the tail first crash and were
inactivated or destroyed and so failed.
THIS IS AN UNUSUAL TAIL FIRST CRASH THAT EXPOSED
THE BLACK BOXES AND POSSIBLY CRASH ALARMS TO BRUNT OF CRASH AND SO THEY HAVE
BEEN DAMAGED, INACTIVATED AND SO DID NOT FUNCTION.
THE AREA OF CRASH IS SHALLOW AND SO BLACK BOXES
SHOULD HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY NOW. IF THE TAIL FIRST CRASH INACTIVATED THEM THEN
IT IS EXPECTED THEY HAVE STOPPED FUNCTIONING.
This is an unusual tail first crash that
inactivated black boxes:
THIS IS AN UNUSUAL TAIL FIRST CRASH THAT EXPOSED
THE BLACK BOXES AND POSSIBLY CRASH ALARMS TO BRUNT OF CRASH AND SO THEY HAVE
BEEN DAMAGED, INACTIVATED AND SO DID NOT FUNCTION.
THE AREA OF CRASH IS SHALLOW AND SO BLACK BOXES
SHOULD HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY NOW. IF THE TAIL FIRST CRASH INACTIVATED THEM THEN IT
IS EXPECTED THEY HAVE STOPPED FUNCTIONING.
Black box and crash transmissions depend
on intact connection with battery:
No need to destroy the black box, if the connection
between black box transmitter and its battery is disrupted, the black box no
longer transmits.
No matter how tough the black box, if the shock of
impact disrupted cables or its contact with the battery then the black box
survived but is dead, cannot transmit.
THE BLACK BOX MAY BE INDESTRUCTIBLE OR EXTREMELY
TOUGH BUT ITS FUNCTION DEPENDS ON INTACT CABLE OR CONTACTS BETWEEN BATTERY AND
RECORDER.
ALL IT TAKES IS DAMAGE TO CONTACTS OR CABLES
BETWEEN TRANSMITTER AND BATTERY TO RENDER BLACK BOX DEAD.
No comments by other models means Andrew
is guilty:
Silence of the Epstein women:
Former top model among several female employees of billionaire who refuse to
answer questions on Prince Andrew 'sex slave' allegations
If you have understanding you can make far more
conclusions than gullible ordinary people without understanding.
If the allegations are not true, it is a simple
matter for these girls to say it is not true, it is because the allegation is
true and they are trying to protect the powerful that they remain silent,
refuse to comment.
THEIR REFUSAL TO COMMENT IS FOR FEAR AND TO PROTECT
THE POWERFUL AND IS A TACIT INDICATION OF ANDREW’S GUILT.
Crime is not about age:
It is not because the girl was under aged that it
was a crime, whatever the age of the girl, it is still wrong, evil and subject
to punishing. It is using a woman for sexual gratification, as an object.
IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION OF ORDINARY PEOPLE THEY
CLAMOUR ABOUT AGE WHEN IT IS ABOUT THE NATURE OF WHAT OCCURRED, IT IS EVIL EVEN
IF SHE IS ABOVE THE AGE OF CONSENT.
People think such information is worth airing
because it indicates Malaysia is good when it is nonsense.
Whatever is true is true, does not depend on
popularity. Top retirement spot means it is popular not because of its
spirituality or devotion to goodness but for retirement. And so it is delusion
to place any importance or value to such popularity.
WHEN PEOPLE TALK ABOUT TOP THIS AND THAT THEY ARE
TALKING ABOUT POPULARITY NOT TRUTH OR GOODNESS AND THE ATTRIBUTES OF SUCH
TOPNESS ARE MATERIAL, FOOD THAT PERISHES AND SO ALL THOSE WHO VALUE SUCH
TOPNESS ARE DELUDED, HEADING FOR SUFFERING.
These girls should know the truth:
Because these girls were together as sex slaves (if
the allegations are true), they should know whether what is alleged did happen
and if they refuse to comment instead of denying it happened it is implicit
that what is alleged occurred.
How to break bad habits -- and form new ones
Only a deluded man will say that and only those who
do not understand will subscribe.
There are no good habits, they are all evil,
frequently performing certain actions by rote, they are always suffering
because what is habitual does not fit and may be fatal.
Only fools form and nurture ‘good’ habits, the wise
only do and say specifically to the occasion, not out of habit which can only
occur by frequent accustomed mindless rehash that is dangerous because these
habits do not truly fit.
IF HABITS ARE LOVELY WHY BREAK THEM? IT IS ONLY
BECAUSE THEY ARE A NUISANCE, EVEN TORMENTING, DANGEROUS AND YOU ARE A SLAVE NOT
MASTER OF YOUR HABITS THAT THEY NEED INSTRUCTION HOW TO BREAK BAD HABITS.
YOU NEVER TRULY BREAK BAD HABITS, AS LONG AS YOU
ARE A ROBOT AND FUNCTION BY PROGRAMMING, THE BAD HABITS REMAIN DORMANT AT BEST
AND MAY FLARE UP. IF IT IS NOT TRULY POSSIBLE TO BREAK OR DESTROY THOSE HABITS
YOU ARE GUILTY OF FALSITY AND LIABLE FOR SUFFERING.
We believe God has a plan:
“It
might sound like nonsense but we have to believe that God has a plan,” Philip Mantofa, the Mawar Sharon Church’s pastor, said as he led
prayers for the dead.
He is casting doubt on what he says which no man of
truth will do.
God does not necessary have a plan or need to have
one, only robots have plans and carry out according to plans.
FOR ONE’S OWN SAKE, NOT FOR ANYBODY ELSE’ ONE
SHOULD STICK TO THE TRUTH, TO WHAT ONE SEES AND KNOWS SO AS NOT TO SUFFER AND
CREATE DEBT. THERE IS NOT NEED TO BRING GOD IN AND SAY HE HAS A PLAN WITHOUT
KNOWING THAT IS THE CASE.
IF WHAT YOU SAY IS THE TRUE, WHY SAY IT MIGHT SOUND
LIKE NONSENSE. THE REASON FOR SAYING THAT IS BECAUSE HE IS EMOTIONALLY HURT,
CANNOT RECONCILE EVENTS AND SO HE IS FOOLISHLY TENDERING ‘GOD HAS A PLAN’.
Hollywood actresses need to
act their age, says Russell Crowe
That is a false statement and if you do not know
what to make of it or you subscribe, you don’t understand and are similarly
heading for woe.
IT IS NEVER THAT ACTRESSES NEED TO ACT THEIR AGES
BUT THAT THEY SHOULD BEHAVE PROPERLY WHICH IS OBJECTIVE. ONLY ROBOTS ACT THEIR
AGES, IT IS ABOUT PROGRAMMING, PUTTING ON AGE DEPENDENT ACTS.
WHAT IS PROPER AND IMPROPER CONDUCT IS OBJECTIVE
CANNOT BE DISPUTED AND INDEPENDENT OF AGE ONE SHOULD BEHAVE PROPERLY TO ESCAPE
SUFFERING NOW AND LATER.
How Diana could have been murdered:
A SAS member said he took part in the plot to kill
her and it was said SAS members armed with lasers ambushed the car as it
approached the tunnel and shone lasers at the driver’s eyes blinding him
momentarily so he lost control and slammed into concrete pillars.
THIS WORLD IS FAR MORE EVIL THAN MANY PERCEIVE.
MANY CONSIDERED GOOD ARE FAR FROM GOOD. DIANA COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED BY SHINING
LASERS INTO THE EYES OF THE DRIVER.
They have identified what they think is the tail which
is where the black boxes are housed and so the fact that there are no signals
indicate they are damaged or disabled. Surely the boxes are in the vicinity if
not in the tail found and any signals should have been detected and the fact
that no signals have been received indicate they are inactive and this is
because a tail end first impact damaged them sufficiently as to stop
transmission.
THE FAILURE TO DETECT FUNCTIONING WHICH SHOULD BE
NEARBY INDICATE THEY ARE INACTIVATED AND THIS IS LIKELY DUE TO TAIL FIRST CRASH
THAT SHOOK THEM UP SEVERELY AND HERE TOO IS A CONCLUSION THAT THESE EXPERTS ARE
CLUELESS.
No black boxes mean dead boxes means
likely tail end crash:
To those who do not understand, no black box means
blank.
To those who understand, the black boxes should be
nearby and the fact there is no signal indicates damage which means tail end
crash which is in line with my postulation the plane was pushed by strong winds
to be upright and fell tail first vertically.
Innovative learning through
Unitar
Whether what you say makes sense or not is not
subject to dispute and if you do not know what is presented to you is nonsense
you are deluded and heading for woe.
TRUE LEARNING IS NEVER INNOVATIVE, DOES NOT REQUIRE
INNOVATION, IT REQUIRES STATING THE TRUTH AND AN UNDERSTANDING RECIPIENT MIND
THAT IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTANDS. WHATEVER IS INNOVATIVE LEARNING IS FALSE, NOT
TRUE LEARNING, IT IS ABOUT PROGRAMMING AND IT IS INNOVATIVE PROGRAMMING RATHER
THAN LEARNING BUT BECAUSE THE PERSON AND YOU SUBSCRIBE TO INNOVATIVE LEARNING
YOU ARE DELUDED AND HEADING FOR INSANITY.
Why did both similar crashes involve
Airbuses?
Everything that happens is with cause, not without
causes and if you understand and discover the causes then action can be taken
to ameliorate or prevent.
It may not be coincident that both the Air France
and now Air Asia flights plummeted in a storm after ascending. There may be
inherent design flaws that make Airbuses vulnerable to being toppled by strong
headwinds eg position of wings, weight distribution (heavy tail).
THE AIR ASIA CRASH HAS SIMILARITIES TO THE AIR
FRANCE CRASH AND BOTH INVOLVED AIRBUSES AND THERE MAY BE SOME DESIGN FLAW THAT
RENDERS THEM VULNERABLE TO BEING TOPPLED BY STRONG HEADWINDS.
Headless chicken search after crash:
Searching for a plane down in the sea is a
formidable resource challenge and in order to save money, effort and time, you
have to employ understanding, unless you are a headless chicken.
Radar readings showed the plane climbed sharply and
then plunged sharply in the last moments and obviously an important area to be
searched first is where the plane disappeared from radar rather than the vast
expanses of sea further ahead.
Yet searchers failed to search the area where the
plane first disappeared but searched further afield and if it was not for the fortune
of a fisherman’s discovery they could still be searching in the wrong places.
YOU THINK MANKIND IS NOT THAT STUPID BUT THE
CONDUCT OF THE AIR ASIA SEARCH SHOWS GROSS INEPTITUDE, BUNGLING, STUPIDITY. AND
NOW THEY DO NOT REALIZE THAT THE FACT THE BLACK BOXES HAVE NOT BEEN DETECTED
MAY MEAN THEY WERE DAMAGED BY THE CRASH BECAUSE IT WAS A TAIL FIRST CRASH AND
THE DISCOVERY OF FRAGMENTS FROM THE TAIL ON THE SURFACE INDICATED THE TAIL
SUFFERED THE BRUNT OF THE CRASH.
Mankind is clever at talking, boasting
and putting on a show:
Mankind is clever but it is at talking, boasting
and putting on a show impressing and pleasing each other, when it comes to
understanding, they are like hollow vessels, found wanting.
EVEN IF THEY DON’T BELIEVE THEY ARE HEADING FOR
ETERNAL SUFFERING AND DEATH, ANYONE WHO IS HEADING FOR ETERNAL SUFFERING AND
DEATH CANNOT BE VERY WISE BUT THEY MUST BE QUITE EVEN EXTREMELY DUMB, EVEN
AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD, STILL THEY BEHAVE LIKE CHICKEN BUSY PECKING AT THE
GRAINS ON THE GROUND OBLIVIOUS THAT THEY WILL BE NEXT TO HAVE THEIR NECKS
CHOPPED.
Light shows,
ice horses and slides at Harbin's annual festival
Ice is nice is a senseless, frivolous statement and
because he and you think it is meaningful and accept it, you are heading for
insanity.
Ice is no more nice than white is nice, black is
nice, food is nice, sleep is nice and on and on.
Niceness is a matter of stirred mental force to
like ice, if your mental force is not stirred it is not nice even horrible if
it is stirred oppositely as in others.
ONLY A DELUDED PERSON CAN SAY ‘ICE IS NICE’ AND
ONLY THOSE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WILL ACQUIESCE.
Clever to talk is not about meaning but
programming:
Reflecting their wrong understanding they think it
is good and praise when people tell them they are clever at talking when it is
senseless, bad.
IF YOU ARE NOT TO GO MAD, TALKING MUST HAVE REASON
OR PURPOSE, IT IS THE TRUE AND GOOD PURPOSE OF TALKING THAT MATTERS NOT
CLEVERNESS AT TALKING WHICH IS ‘SKILL’, SOMETHING TRAINED AND PROGRAMMED BY
SELF AND OTHERS, DEPENDENT ON MEMORY, REHASHED FROM MEMORY WHAT IS PLEASING AND
IMPRESSES OTHERS.
IT IS NEVER THAT ANYONE SHOULD BE CLEVER AT TALKING
BUT WHAT HE SAYS MUST BE TRUE AND MEANINGFUL, USEFUL AND GOOD. THOSE WHO
WORSHIP CLEVERNESS AT TALKING ARE DELUDED.
Headless chicken programmed search:
A correct description of the search after the Air
Asia crash is that it headless chicken programmed search.
Ordinary people are robots and they can only behave
according to programming and they have protocols to activate and follow
whenever a disaster occur, if it is not frequently activated, they are hesitant
and clumsy but they have to have instructions, something to tell what to do or
they do not know what to do. For instance if they have experiences of previous
crashes, it is this experience that tells them what to do, they are merely
rehashing their experiences of past crashes.
5 January
2015
The eurozone
is both weaker and stronger than it was five years ago. How can that be so -
and why is its survival still uncertain?
If you have lived within your means and not compromised
yourself, lived way beyond your means, politics is never a risk and so it is
delusion to talk about politics being a risk, it means you are seeking false
solutions, trying to find more alcohol to fund the party rather than turn to be
conscientious.
POLITICS IS FALSE AND IF IT IS A BIG RISK IT MEANS
THE SOLUTION IS FALSE, DEPENDENT ON FALSITY, TRYING TO PROLONG PROFLIGACY THAN
CORRECT AND MATTERS MAY BE BEYOND REPAIR.
AND SO IF THE SUBJECT IS ABOUT FALSITY AND YOU ARE
INTERESTED TO FIND OUT MORE OR TALK ABOUT IT, YOU ARE DELUDED, HEADING FOR
INSANITY. NOWADAYS I WILL NOT TROUBLE MYSELF TO ‘LEARN’ MORE.
WHATEVER IS A FALSE MATTER IS NOT WORTH FINDING
OUT, NOT WORTH KNOWING UNLESS YOU ARE DELUDED, WILL GO MAD.
Whatever is true and good have no risks:
Whatever us true and good have no risks, if what
you are engaged in has risks you are engaged in falsity and evil and even if
you should triumph or escape danger you are party to falsity and evil and that
always has blame with future suffering due.
Thus if you say politics (something that is false
and evil never good) is the big risk to the euro then you are talking about a
matter that is false and evil not true and good and if you think it is true and
good or you do not know what to make of it then you are a fool heading for
suffering, uncertainty, death.
WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT RISKS YOU ARE TALKING
ABOUT SOMETHING FALSE AND EVIL THAT SHOULD BE AVOIDED RATHER THAN DELVE INTO OR
YOU WILL BE SUCKED INTO SUFFERING AND DEATH.
Tail found but no one wonders why black
box not signalling:
JAKARTA: Indonesia said
Wednesday (Jan 7) it had found the tail of AirAsia flight QZ8501, potentially
marking a major step towards locating the plane's black boxes and helping shed
light on what caused it to crash into the sea.
IT IS AGAIN AN INDICATION OF MANKIND’S
CLUELESSNESS. THEY SAY THEY HAVE FOUND THE TAIL BUT THEY DO NOT REALIZE SURELY
THE BLACK BOX IS EITHER IN THERE OR SHOULD NOT BE FAR AWAY SO WHY IS IT NOT
SIGNALLING AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
Tail photographed upside down:
Photos show tail upside down with ‘A’ inverted.
This makes it more likely plane landed tail first
wherein it could tip either way, if it landed belly first, it is less likely to
be upside down.
A TAIL UPSIDE DOWN MAKES A VERTICAL TAIL FIRST
DESCENT MORE LIKELY AND WHAT CAN CAUSE A PLANE TO DESCEND TAIL FIRST
VERTICALLY? IF THE WINDS PUSHED THE PLANE UPRIGHT SO IT LOST ALL LIFT THEN THIS
IS EXPECTED.
42 churchgoers may have contributed to
crash:
If the churchgoers had requested block seating to
the rear of the plane and there was also heavy cargo at the back then it would
significantly tip the balance of the plane to be tail heavy predisposing to
being toppled by strong winds.
There is no necessity for people to sit together,
it is misguided and sometimes this that people think nothing even good can be
even costly.
IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO GO TO SINGAPORE FOR NEW YEAR
HOLIDAY, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO SIT AS A BLOC IN THE BACK AND IF THIS
CONTRIBUTED TO THE CRASH IT WOULD BE MISGUIDED FOLLY THNAT HAS BLAME, NOT
BLAMELESS.
No comments:
Post a Comment