Thursday, August 24, 2006

The Nature Of Consciousness Changes:

THE NATURE OF CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES:
A being’s consciousness can be compared to a sponge. If no force is acting on the sponge no change in shape of the sponge is possible. If force is applied not just to compress but deform it, then a partial lifting of force will automatically result in a partial reversion to its natural state and a complete lifting of force will result in a complete reversion to its true state free of all woeful compression and deformation. If you think the consciousness compression and deformation existing as a human is terrible, it may be even much more worse should you exist as animals or in hell. As the Buddha said, he cannot think of anything more tormenting than hell or the animal womb, and the vast majority of humans including those who think they are quite good may be destined for them.

All beings may be nothing more than individual facets or cut surfaces of a diamond that has an infinite number of facets. Looking at yourself in isolation on the surface you think you are a unique entity but look below the surface and you are just one facet of the same diamond. Thus the Buddha said that in being the One he becomes the All, in being the All he becomes the One. When you awaken to the illusory nature of existence you no longer wish to exist separately.

The possibility of and how to bring about consciousness changes that are universally alleviating and compulsorily changes every being as have happened after 1977 and in recent years cannot be known in advance by any of the beings trapped here nor can it be that there are many amongst them who are potentially capable of triggering the changes otherwise the consciousness changes would have occurred long ago. Jesus may be alluding to future consciousness changes when he said “I have yet many things to say to you but you cannot bear them now, when the counselor comes, he will guide you to all the truth”; he could have specified why you could not bear it then but he did not.

The consciousness changes in recent years have many parallels with the Buddha’s enlightenment which he described as a self awakening.
Just as the Buddha’s enlightenment is an absolute awakening from the suffering or ‘dissatisfactoriness’ of all existences, the recent consciousness changes is a relative awakening from the mind warping mad robotic substance and style acted existence here.

Just as the Buddha’s deputies and the elders were all noble beings in their last existences, who were all seeking a way out of their existential suffering but they could not do so and they had to await the Buddha’s enlightenment for him to guide them towards their own enlightenments, it may be no accident but there is reason why I triggered consciousness changes that swept around the world not once but twice. There must be a fundamental difference in my nature compared to all others to explain why despite not stretching, not changing speed and loudness being the incomparable release from stress, restlessness and distraction no one has done so except me and even those who rub shoulders with me daily, whom I have personally demonstrated what is stretching, changing speed and loudness continue to do so. The fact that I can speak of many uniquely insightful things that have never been spoken of before throughout the ages, I have exited acting not once but thrice whilst all others have never done so indicates that it is not conceit but there is a fundamental difference in my nature as compared to others. (Barely a year after I changed in 1978 and again in 1985 I experienced an effortless incapability to suffer when I noted that my speech and motion seemed effortless and this can only be because I had stopped stretching, changing speed and loudness or quit acting prematurely without knowing but then I had no time to reflect and consolidate because my visibly changed appearance and behavior immediately triggered tumultuous even life threatening reactions everywhere that made me seek desperately in vain a way to ‘turn back the clock’)

Just as the Buddha did not set out to achieve enlightenment knowing that enlightenment was ‘there for the taking’, it was not like Tiger Woods setting out in the British Open tournament knowing he can win the British Open, he was merely uncommonly disenchanted with the allures of existence, he had to struggle to, amongst many things subdue his fear by deliberately staying at night in cemeteries, by refusing to run away when he heard frightening sounds, he had to purify his mind so that it became calm, steady and pure before he achieved enlightenment, in the same way I did not set out to change my consciousness both in 1977 and in recent years but I merely set out to ameliorate my disagreeable ever present mental sufferings as far as I can, not expecting that I would achieve a previously unimaginable alleviating consciousness change, a previously inconceivable permanent release from stress, restlessness and distraction for myself let alone knowing beforehand that I would trigger consciousness changes in others by contagion that spread around the world, not once but twice.

THAT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES I EXPERIENCED IN RECENT YEARS AND AFTER 1977 DID NOT COME ABOUT INSTANTLY OR WITHOUT EFFORT NOR DID I KNOW BEFOREHAND WHEN I SET OUT TO CHANGE MYSELF THAT THE CHANGES WILL LEAD TO A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN MYSELF LET ALONE CAUSED ALL OTHERS TO CHANGE IMPLIES THAT REASON OR PURPOSE IS REQUIRED TO BRING ABOUT MY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES. THERE IS CAUSE AND EFFECT AND CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES DO NOT COME ABOUT OUT WITHOUT CAUSE OR REASON.

YET BECAUSE EVERYONE ALL OVER THE WORLD & EVEN ANIMALS HAS CHANGED, THIS CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN THEM MUST HAVE OCCURRED IN THEM WITHOUT NEED FOR REASON OTHERWISE NOT ALL WILL CHANGE. WHILST I SET OUT INTENTIONALLY TO CHANGE IT CANNOT BE THAT ALL OTHERS ALSO SET OUT INTENTIONALLY TO CHANGE.

HOW CAN THIS APPARENT PARADOX BE RECONCILED?

ALTHOUGH REASON & DISCERNMENT IS ALWAYS NEEDED FOR SOMEONE TO INITIATE A SUSTAINED COURSE OF ACTION THAT WILL LEAD TO A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE, REASON AND DISCERNMENT IS NOT NEEDED OR INVOLVED FOR OTHERS TO FOLLOW SUIT BECAUSE THE REDUCTION OF FORCE, REDUCTION IN CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT IS INTRINSIC IN ALLEVIATING CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES CAN BE EXPERIENCED BY ALL BEINGS WITHOUT NEED FOR INTELLIGENCE OR DISCERNMENT AND THUS EXPERIENCED WILL UNFAILINGLY SPUR THEM TO CHANGE AS BEST AS THEY CAN THAT THEIR NATURES, THEIR GOODNESS OR WICKEDNESS, CONCENTRATION AND DISCERNMENT WILL PERMIT TO SIMILARLY REDUCE THEIR OWN SUFFERING. NO BEING WILL SUBJECT HIMSELF TO MORE SUFFERING THAN HE HAS TO GET WHAT HE WANTS OUT OF LIFE. IT IS BECAUSE THEY WERE PREVIOUSLY UNAWARE THAT THERE IS A WAY TO EXIST WITH LESS SUFFERING THAT THEY HAVE ACCEPTED STATUS QUO SUFFERINGS MANDATED BY CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS IN PLACE. ONCE THEY HAVE SEEN IN OTHERS THAT A WAY TO EXIST WITH LESS SUFFERING IS POSSIBLE THEY ARE ALL SEIZED TO ACHIEVE AS BEST THEY CAN THIS NEW WAY OF EXISTING SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THEIR CONTINUED DESIRE TO MANIPULATE AND DECEIVE OTHERS, THEIR DISCERNMENT AND CONCENTRATION OF MIND THAT IS USUALLY RUDIMENTARY.
DISCERNMENT IS NECESSARY FOR ME OR THE INITIATOR TO SET IN MOTION SUSTAINED CHANGES IN BEHAVIOR THAT WILL LEAD TO A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN ME AND THENCE OTHERS BY FIRST SEEING THAT THERE IS STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN MY AND EVERYONE’S SPEECH AND HOW THIS IS UNNECESSARY & CAUSES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND THUS SEEING, I PUT INTO PRACTICE SUSTAINED PAYING ATTENTION NOT TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT THEN BY GRADUALLY REDUCING MY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION LEVELS RESULTED FINALLY IN A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE.
ALTHOUGH OTHERS CANNOT DISCERN EXACTLY WHAT IS THE BASIS OF MY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE, THEY CAN SEE I AM NOT DISTRESSED BUT COMPOSED, HAVE A PRESENCE OF MIND AND FREEDOM FROM STRESS & RESTLESSNESS THEY HAVE NOT SEEN BEFORE IN ANYONE, THEY CAN EXPERIENCE THE ABSENCE OF FORCE AND FORCE CHANGES IMPARTED BY MY SPEECH & MOTION AND THIS NEVER BEFORE EXPERIENCED CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCES WILL JOLT THEM (FORCEFULLY) OUT OF COMPLACENCY AND SPUR THEM TO TRY (FORCEFULLY) AS FAR AS THEIR NATURES WILL PERMIT THEM TO GRAPPLE WITH THEIR ENDOGENOUS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION WHERE PREVIOUSLY THEY WERE LACKADAISICAL EVEN INDULGENT.
ALTHOUGH ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT EXPLAIN WHAT IT IS THIS LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT THEY CONSTANTLY EXPERIENCE AND EXPRESS, THAT DOES NOT STOP THEM FROM PRACTICING AND EVEN FAKING LIKE AND DISLIKE, DOES NOT STOP THEM FROM LEARNING BY IMITATION HOW TO LIKE AND DISLIKE FROM OTHERS LIKE THEIR PARENTS. SIMILARLY JUST BECAUSE THEY CANNOT EXPLAIN WHAT IT IS THIS CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THEY EXPERIENCED AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS, IT DOES NOT STOP THEM FROM ALL CHANGING BY FORCE NOT REASON IMPARTED CONTAGION.
JUST AS PEOPLE CAN EXPERIENCE THE LIKE AND DISLIKE OTHERS EXPRESS, THEY CAN ALSO EXPERIENCE THE GENUINE NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE PERCEIVABLE IN MY APPEARANCE, SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR BECAUSE THEY CAN SENSE THERE IS NO UNDULATING OR UNABATED RISES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THEIR OWN MENTAL FORCES AS A RESULT OF INTERACTING WITH ME AND THEY EXPERIENCE NO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AFTER INTERACTING WITH ME SO THAT THEY WILL BE SPURRED TO SIMILARLY CHANGE AS BEST AS THEY CAN BECAUSE NOBODY WANTS TO SUFFER ANYMORE THAN HE HAS TO.
WHO SAY YOU MUST BE GOOD, INTELLIGENT OR DISCERNING TO WANT TO SUFFER LESS? EVEN A FOOL AND AN EVIL PERSON WILL WANT NOT TO SUFFER AND IT IS ONLY THEIR FOOLISHNESS AND WICKEDNESS TO WANT TO MAKE OTHERS SUFFER THAT WILL PREVENT THEM ACHIEVING TOTAL NON SUFFERING. SO LONG AS YOU POSSESS CONSCIOUSNESS AND MENTAL FORCE THAT YOU HAVE SOME CONTROL OVER TO INCREASE OR DECREASE ITS ACTIVITIES & THEREBY INCREASE OR DECREASE YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS SUFFERING, YOU CAN DECREASE THE ACTIVITY OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE IN IMITATION OF DECREASES IN ACTIVITY THAT YOU CAN PERCEIVE IN OTHERS TO SIMILARLY CHANGE CONSCIOUSLY.
IT IS ONLY THE FEW WHO CAN DISCERN WHAT IS THE NATURE OF RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES, WHO HAS CONCENTRATION, DISCERNMENT AND PERSISTENCE TO PUT A STOP TO THEIR OWN STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WILL ACHIEVE A PERMANENT FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND WILL NOT BE VULNERABLE TO THE DECEPTION & INTIMIDATION OF OTHERS TO RELAPSE.
IN OTHER WORDS, ALTHOUGH REASON IS REQUIRED BY ME TO EMBARK ON A SUSTAINED COURSE OF ACTION THAT PROGRESSIVELY REDUCED THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION SO THAT WHEN A THRESHOLD HAS BEEN ACHIEVED, A CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE OCCURRED IN 1977 AND AGAIN IN RECENT YEARS, NO REASON IS REQUIRED OR INVOLVED FOR OTHERS TO FOLLOW SUIT, ONLY A CAPACITY TO EXPERIENCE THE PRESENCE AND ABSENCE OF FORCE AND FORCEFUL CHANGES IN THE BEHAVIOR OF ME OR OTHERS WHO HAVE ALSO CHANGED THAT WILL JOLT THEM TO IMITATE AS BEST THEY CAN TO MINIMIZE THEIR OWN SUFFERING.
THEREFORE BOTH THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN 1977 AND RECENT YEARS WERE REASONED CHANGES BUT THE CHANGE BY CONTAGION IN ALL OTHERS IS LARGELY IF NOT ENTIRELY A BLIND FORCE CHANGE BECAUSE THEY CANNOT WORK OUT WHAT IS HAPPENING JUST AS THEY CANNOT WORK OUT WHAT IT IS THIS LIKE AND DISLIKE THEY ARE CONTINUOUSLY TALKING ABOUT, EXPERIENCING AND EXPRESSING.
IT IS NOT REASON BUT FORCE THAT DETAINS A PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS IN STABLE SUFFERING. IT WILL THEREFORE TAKE NOTHING BUT A REDUCTION IN FORCE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON THAT DOES NOT NEED REASON THAT CAN BE COPIED FROM OTHERS TO CHANGE HIS CONSCIOUSNESS STATE.
IT CANNOT BE AN ACCIDENT BUT THE REASON WHY IT WAS ME AND NOT OTHERS WHO TRIGGERED THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES NOT ONCE BUT TWICE IS BECAUSE IT WAS MY GENUINE GOODWILL & DISCERNMENT THAT WAS INCARCERATED BY CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS THAT EXISTED BEFORE 1977 WHEREAS IT WAS ALL OTHERS’ ILL WILL POSING AS FAKED GOODWILL & LACK OF DISCERNMENT THAT WAS INCARCERATED. IT REQUIRES A PERSON OF TRUE GOODWILL & CONVICTION TO GO AGAINST INTIMIDATING EXISTING NORMS IN A SUSTAINED RESOLUTE FASHION TO TRIGGER THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT I TRIGGERED BOTH IN 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS. THAT PEOPLE HAVE RECALCITRANT ILL WILL IS REFLECTED BY THE FACT THAT EVEN AFTER CHANGES UPON CHANGES THEY HAVE ALL NOT GIVEN UP THEIR FALSE STYLES THAT COMPEL THEM TO EXIST AS ROBOTS, THEY HAVE NOT GIVEN UP THEIR CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT CAN ONLY BE BORNE OF ILL WILL AND ARE THE VERY INSTRUMENTS WITH WHICH THEY PERSECUTE OTHERS AS THEMSELVES THAT THEY INSIST IS BEING GOOD TO SELF AND OTHERS.
REFLECTING THAT MY NATURE IS FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT & EVEN UNIQUE IN THIS WORLD, WHEREAS I HAVE TRIGGERED CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES TWICE, I HAVE EXITED ACTING THRICE (BUT WAS FORCED TO RETREAT BY INTIMIDATING OTHERS’ UNLEASHED NAKED WRATH IN THE PAST), I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT MANY THINGS OFTEN OF UNIQUE INSIGHT THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN SPOKEN BEFORE, NOT ONE AMONGST MANKIND HAS AS FAR AS I CAN SEE QUIT ACTING. IT WAS NO CAKEWALK BUT EVEN AT TIMES A WITHERING BAPTISM OF FIRE THAT I HAD TO ENDURE IN BEING THE PIONEER.
BECAUSE EVERYONE HAS CHANGED AND NOT EVERYONE BUT VERY FEW ARE GOING TO HEAVEN, JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE CHANGED DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE GOOD OR WISE, ONLY IF YOU HAVE SEEN AND PUT TO AN END ALL STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS HAVE YOU PUT AN END TO MENTAL FORCE, LIKES AND DISLIKES AND EMOTIONS AND ARE NOT IN DANGER OF REVERTING TO SUBSTANCE AND STYLE ACTING & SAFE FROM RETURNING HERE TO SUFFER.

WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT?

WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT THERE IS A SIMPLE CAUSE & A SIMPLE & FREE CURE FOR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IS THE BANE OF ALL BEINGS HERE, THAT OFTEN THREATEN TO DRIVE THEM UP THE WALL, NAMELY STOP STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES, STOP CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS?
ALL THE MONEY, POWER AND FAME IN THE WORLD CANNOT BUY YOU FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IF YOU ARE GUILTY OF STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND IF YOU ARE BESET BY THEM I GUARANTEE I CAN DEMONSTRATE CONSTANT STRETCHING, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES YOU NEVER IMAGINED EXISTED IN YOUR WAY OF SPEAKING BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON WHO SPEAKS WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS SHOULD EXPERIENCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
I HAVE PROVEN THAT THIS IS SO BECAUSE I HAVE EXPERIENCED A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AS A RESULT OF NOT STRETCHING MY SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND EVERY TIME I USED FORCE TO STRETCH MY SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, I RAPIDLY EXPERIENCED RISING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IF I DID NOT DESIST WILL SEIZE TO COMPEL ME TO CONTINUE HELPLESSLY STRETCHING MY SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN A SELF PERPETUATING VICIOUS CIRCLE. WHEN STRESS, RESTLESNESS AND DISTRACTION REACHES A CRITICAL MASS THE PERSON IS SEIZED TO SELF PERPETUATE MINDLESSLY HIS STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HE IS BLINDED BY THE SERIOUS DISTRACTION CREATED TO BE UNABLE TO SEE A WAY OUT OF HIS PREDICAMENT.
HOW COME THROUGHOUT THE AGES & TODAY MANKIND WITH ALL ITS GENIUSES WHO PRIDE THEMSELVES ON THEIR DISCRIMINATING NATURE HAS FAILED TO BECOME AWARE OF WHAT IS BLATANT & CONSTANT THAT THEY ALL STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THIS IS THE ONLY CAUSE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST BESET THEM? THIS MUST BE AN OVERSIGHT OF (AS THEY LIKE TO HYPE) ‘MINDBOGGLING’ STATURE OR MANKIND IS THE EMPEROR WITH NO CLOTHES.
HOW COME MANKIND INCLUDING ITS TOP SCIENTISTS AND THINKERS WHO REGULARLY TALK ABOUT THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES NEVER SPELT OUT EXACTLY WHAT IS THIS LIKE AND DISLIKE THAT THEY SO LIKE TO LET OTHERS KNOW AND PARTAKE? INSTEAD THEY ARE OFTEN UNAWARE THEY ARE EXPERIENCING AND EXPRESSING LIKE AND DISLIKE.
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT ‘LIKE’ IS MERELY THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE THAT OCCURS WHENEVER THERE IS A CONDITIONING UNDULATING RISE AND FALL IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE WHEN ONE PERCEIVES AN OBJECT OR WHEN ONE SPEAKS OR DOES SOMETHING WITH UNDULATING CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND ‘DISLIKE’ IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE EXPERIENCE BY ONE’S CONSCIOUSNESS WHEN THERE IS A CONDITIONING UNCURTAILED RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE WHEN ONE PERCEIVES SOMETHING OR WHEN ONE SPEAKS OR DOES SOMETHING WITH ACCELERATING RISES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE? THERE IS NO REASON INVOLVED IN LIKING AND DISLIKING BUT THEY ARE MERELY THE ONLY TWO POSSIBLE CONDITIONING OR ADDICTING ALTERNATIVE WAYS BY WHICH A BEING’S MENTAL FORCE CAN CHANGE THAT ALL ANIMALS ARE SIMILARLY CAPABLE OF LIKE THEIR MORE ACCOMPLISHED HUMAN COUNTERPARTS.
WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT ALL THE EMOTIONS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN LIKE AND DISLIKE DRESSED UP IN FANCY CLOTHES FOR DIFFERENT OCCASIONS? THERE IS NO REASON IN EMOTION AND IT IS ALWAYS HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS BECAUSE IT APPLIES FORCE ON THE MIND THAT CAUSES PAIN OR STRESS.
DEPENDING ON THE SITUATION, WHETHER LIKE OR DISLIKE IS TURNED INWARDS OR OUTWARDS, POINTED OR DIFFUSE, MOVING TOWARDS OR AWAY FROM THE TARGET, DIFFERENT EMOTIONS ARE EXPERIENCED OR EXPRESSED. PRIDE IS NOTHING MORE THAN LIKE DIRECTED INWARDS AT SELF AS A RESULT OF HEARING PRAISE, ANGER IS BLUNTLY DIRECTED DISLIKE WHILST HATRED IS POINTEDLY DIRECTED DISLIKE. FEAR IS DISLIKE ASSOCIATED WITH WITHDRAWAL FROM THE TARGET OF FEAR. SADNESS IS DISLIKE DIRECTED AT SELF WHILST DEPRESSION IS MERELY INTENSE SADNESS. GREED IS MERELY LIKE FOR MATERIAL POSSESSIONS OR ASSETS WHILST LUST IS LIKE FOR SEXUAL OBJECTS. ENVY IS LIKE FOR OTHERS’ ASSETS WHILST JEALOUSY IS DISLIKE FOR OTHERS’ ASSETS.
HOW COME NO PSYCHIATRIST HAS ARTICULATED ABOUT THE NATURE OF EMOTIONS WHEN THEY SHOULD BE THE EXPERTS?
WHENEVER PEOPLE STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, WHICH IS ALWAYS, THEY ALWAYS EXHALE WITH INCREASING SPEED (CAUSING A SPEED RISE OR PITCH CHANGE) AND INCREASING FORCE (CAUSING A LOUDNESS RISE). THEIR SPEED AND LOUDNESS ALSO VARY BETWEEN SYLLABLES AND BETWEEN WORDS.
THAT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS ACROSS BOARD (INDISCRIMINATE) OR CONSTANT AND PEOPLE ARE LARGELY UNAWARE THEY DO SO INDICATES THEY ARE MINDLESS, NOT GUIDED BY REASON BUT DRIVEN BLINDLY BY FORCE TO DECEIVE, PLEASE, IMPRESS, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS.
It may be that not to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness so as not to create stress, restlessness and distraction in self and others is worthless knowledge compared to scientific, technological and medical knowledge but if it is the stone that builders rejected then that very stone may become the head of the corner and whoever trips on it will be broken to pieces and when it falls on them they will be crushed.
(Jesus said the counselor will come and he will teach you all things. If what I say is true and relevant to all beings, then whoever is the counselor must also teach what I have taught. If I have already done so I would have preempted him and rendered what Jesus said as false because someone else apart from the counselor can do what he said the counselor will do)
The True Nature Of Beings Here:
Just as it is a myth that truth and falsity, emotion and reason, (forceful) like and (passive) love can coexist in a person, it may be a myth that goodwill and ill will can coexist in the same person. Until his ill will is extinguished, a person exists entirely under the spell of ill will. Different beings have ill will of different strengths, they may vary in the strength of their ill will that they express but they remain captives of their ill will until the day if ever they confront and extinguish their ill will.
ORDINARY PEOPLE’S ILL WILL CANNOT BE PART TIME BUT THEIR ILL WILL MUST BE CONSTANT WITH NO ROOM FOR TRUE GOODWILL BECAUSE THEIR FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT MUST BE DRIVEN BY ILL WILL BECAUSE IT HARMS SELF AND OTHERS IS NEVER INTERMITTENT BUT CONSTANT IN WHATEVER THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO.
As the Buddha said, ill will is one of five fetters to the lower realms and it is unlikely if not impossible that beings trapped in the lower realms that include human existence can be merely part time ill willed people but they must be fulltime ill willed people and it is their delusion that they have both good and ill will. What they call their goodwill is counterfeit or fraudulent goodwill. You are either tamed or you are not tamed.
There is such a thing as goodwill and there is such a thing as ill will and they cannot be mistaken one for another (such and such is goodwill, such and such is ill will) and it may be a myth that goodwill and ill will can both exist in a being just as it is a myth that a person can both like and love because good will and ill will are mutually exclusive; anyone who has experienced true goodwill will not tolerate ill will (because goodwill is freedom from suffering and ill will is suffering and no one who knows freedom from suffering will permit himself to suffer) and anyone who has ill-will has not known true goodwill but only make believe goodwill that is never the real thing.
You are either a goat or a sheep; you cannot be a shee-goat which is why at the close of the Age the King who knows and see will have no trouble separating the goats from the sheep. You can be a goat in sheepskin or hypocrite or deluding yourself with your goodness that is disguised evil but you cannot be a sheep in goatskin.
Viewed in isolation your acts of charity, helping others and even sacrificing your life for others that must be attended by your style that harms self and others may appear emotionally gratifying but taken in the context of the constant stretching, changes in speed and strength of force that harm others and maintain them here in suffering these acts may be like the proverbial drop of relative goodness in the ocean of harming others with your constant style.
Thus the consciousness constraints that existed before 1977 incarcerates the ill will never goodwill of beings here and these consciousness shackles may be necessary because otherwise human goats will destroy this world much sooner. And beings with shackled ill will have no inclination or capacity to unshackle themselves; they are too preoccupied getting along with the world or perpetrating their shenanigans and although under considerable mind warping strains that existing here entails, they would rather be driven by torment to kill themselves or others than change the status quo even if they could and risk ridicule or being ostracized by society.
By contrast it was my genuine goodwill that was incarcerated by the consciousness constraints that existed before 1977 and I was desperately seeking an answer where there hopelessly appear was none to my existential angst and it is therefore no surprise that when I sensed under provocation that there was something invisible in my mind that I was previously unaware that maintained me in weakness, dependency and agonizing doubt, I would seize the moment to decisively destroy it. I remember this dark force that kept me weak and dependent kept regrouping to return as if to repossess me but I kept attacking them until I subdued them. It is conceivable that if I had relented, these forces might have reasserted themselves over me. Because it was my goodwill not ill will that was released it was inevitable that I would soon exhaust my will to go against myself to behave in ways that please and impress others (unlike others, I do not substantially act to dominate or intimidate) and so it was that barely a year later in 1978 I experienced an involuntary inability to suffer when my speech and motions seemed effortless but I was forced to beat a hasty retreat by intimidating reactions from others. Again in 1985 there was a similar but milder recurrence and it is only in recent years that because everyone has changed sufficiently, my changed self is now more accepted to allow me to function socially.
The Buddha Says He Is The Highest Teacher:
The Buddha: I have no teacher; no one is equal to me; in the world of men and of gods no being is like me. I am the holy one in this world, I am the highest Teacher, I alone am the absolute Sambuddha.
These are lofty words but you are a fool to (emotionally) accuse him of blasphemy or being a bighead. If you have an eye for truth you will realize that no fake, mad or deluded man can say as the Buddha said the many insightful things that no other man has said before or since.
Just as it is not a sound that is funny but it is your false perception that you do not realize will end in mad perception that it is funny, similarly it is not what the Buddha taught that is ho hum but it is you and the rest of humanity that is ho hum and do not presume God is on your side.
The Buddha was no ordinary being because it is said he can perform many miracles. Once Brahmins could not split logs to light a sacrificial fire and they thought this was the Buddha’s doing. The Buddha asked the chief Brahmin, “Shall the logs be split” to which the Brahmin replied, “So be it” and in an instance all 500 logs split into pieces. Why should Christians doubt the Buddha’s miracles if they do not doubt Jesus’ miracles? You are asking for mad doubt in the future if you doubt the Buddha’s miracles even if you are correct because doubt is forceful and conditioning and you never forcefully doubt others or yourself but you proffer no emotional opinion to yourself or others on what you cannot know.
(Although the Buddha said he was the highest teacher, he did not say there are no other teachers or sources of truth or he alone is holy)
Just as the Buddha said that no being is like him, I am justified to say that as far as I can see, no being is like me on earth because whereas I can speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness all beings including animals here that I can hear constantly stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness. No being here is like me because no being here in the past and today can say the many things that are uniquely insightful as I have done.
What the Buddha said below is not ho hum but it is penetrative in a way never before or since said and it is not the Buddha’s fault but your fault that you failed to grasp what he said. There is no truth apart from the truth that he speaks below:
"Just as an oil lamp burns in dependence on oil & wick; and from the termination of both -- it goes out unnourished; even so, when sensing a feeling limited to the body, one discerns that 'I am sensing a feeling limited to the body.' When sensing a feeling limited to life, one discerns that 'I am sensing a feeling limited to life.' One discerns that 'With the break-up of the body, all that is sensed, not being relished, will grow cold right here.'
"Thus a monk so endowed is endowed with the highest determination for discernment, for this -- the knowledge of the passing away of all suffering & stress -- is the highest noble discernment.
"His release, being founded on truth, does not fluctuate, for whatever is deceptive is false; Unbinding -- the undeceptive -- is true. Thus a monk so endowed is endowed with the highest determination for truth, for this -- Unbinding, the undeceptive -- is the highest noble truth.
"Whereas formerly he foolishly had taken on mental acquisitions and brought them to completion, he has now abandoned them. Thus a monk so endowed is endowed with the highest determination for relinquishment, for this -- the renunciation of all mental (compared to material) acquisitions -- is the highest noble relinquishment.
"Whereas formerly he foolishly had greed -- as well as desire & infatuation -- he has now abandoned them. Whereas formerly he foolishly had malice -- as well as ill-will & hatred -- he has now abandoned them...Whereas formerly he foolishly had ignorance -- as well as delusion & confusion -- he has now abandoned them. Thus a monk so endowed is endowed with the highest determination for calm, for this -- the calming of passions, aversions (dislike) & delusions -- is the highest noble calm.
"'He has been stilled where the currents of construing do not flow. And when the currents of construing do not flow, he is said to be a sage at peace.' 'I am' is a construing. 'I am this' is a construing. 'I shall be' is a construing. 'I shall not be'...'I shall be possessed of form'...'I shall not be possessed of form'...'I shall be percipient'...'I shall not be percipient'...'I shall be neither percipient nor non-percipient' is a construing. Construing is a disease, a cancer, an arrow. By going beyond all construing, he is called a sage at peace.
"Furthermore, a sage at peace is not born, does not age or die, is unagitated, and is free from longing. He has nothing whereby he would be born.
Faked Perceiving & Lying With Your Face:









Examine her eyes carefully and you may discern that there is conflict between where her face is facing and where her eyes are pointing. She is faking looking at you because her eyes are deviated upwards and away from where her face is turned.
Just as people often dishonestly fake they are not interested or did not see but they cast a furtive glance through the corner of their eyes to see what they pretend they did not see, similarly they can fake they are seeing you, interested in you but if you looked at their eyes they are blank or deviated away.
Apart from deceiving others with her perceiving she is generating conflict in herself because what she is doing is forced, she forces her face against her wish to look at you to pretend she is engaged but the attitude of her eyes contradicts what she is forcing. There will be subconscious agonizing conflict that because she cannot see, she will be puzzled why there is tension and conflict in her. Because she is going against herself generating conflict whose source she isn’t aware, she must be suspicious of herself and others, must hate herself and others and she is driven by ill will not goodwill.
YOU THINK SHE IS LOOKING AT YOU AND PRESENT WITH YOU BUT SHE IS LOOKING BUT NOT LOOKING AT YOU AND HER MIND MAY BE ELSEWHERE, LOST IN A PRIVATE WORLD OF THOUGHT, SNEERING AT YOU.
Expressing Dislike:
Quote: The Jewish community in the Indian city of Mumbai (Bombay) is outraged by a new restaurant named after Adolf Hitler.
Comment: Whilst it is foolish or deluded to name a restaurant after Hitler, it is never reason but emotional, blind dislike together with self identity view that you are a Jew and what that means that is the motivation behind the Jewish outrage. This dislike is nothing more than the unabated acceleration in speed and strength of their mental forces when they perceived the name given to a restaurant causing them (the Jews) to protest and it is the same dislike that with repeated cycles of conditioning with incremental addition of mental force became the implacable monstrous hatred that drove Hitler to attempt to exterminate the Jews.
Having successfully shed the maddening torment that is like and dislike, I do not envy any being who delight in liking and disliking, who may delude themselves and others that they can only like without disliking anything because they may never exit like and dislike and that is suffering now, suffering that will intensify as they age and they are headed even for perdition after death.
How come no top religious people talk like me let alone anyone else?

How Deception Leads To Confusion:
Being deceived itself does not lead to confusion but it is only when you become aware of other views on the same subject that are different that you become confused.
People smile and express as if they understand when they see you are confused and they think they are meritorious and understanding when they are sinful and maintaining others in suffering. It is never meritorious but incurring karma to convey to another that you understand their confusion and it is alright to be confused.
It is delusion, wrong view and again not being able to see the truth of things to think your understanding of another’s confusion is good for yourself and others.
AND THE MOST CRUCIAL TRUTH TO SEE IS THAT THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CONSTANT CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN EVERYBODY’S SPEECH AND THAT IS THE SECRET OF THEIR FALSE CHARMS AND HOW THEY INDUCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOU BECAUSE THUS SEEING YOU WILL NO MORE FALL INTO THE ARMS OF OTHERS’ CHARMS TO BECOME DECEIVED AND CONFUSED.
If you never said or did anything that deceives others, they will not be confused. It is only because people say and do things that are false that they will inevitably meet different conflicting versions that they become confused.
Quote: Pop darling Siti Weds Today.
Comment: She may be your darling but she is not necessarily everyone’s darling and if your labeling her a darling exerts pressure on others to similarly perceive her as a darling, it stokes unhealthy interest in her and her affairs, you have karma, not merit. When you describe her as a darling, you must perceive her and her affairs with excitement and fascination and if that is emotional and false then you are conditioning yourself to falsity and promoting falsity in others that will end in agony for you.
A more objective and responsible headline might be: Popular singer Siti weds today.
IT REFLECTS SENSUALITY THAT IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS THAT BINDS ONE TO THE LOWER REALMS TO PERCEIVE OTHERS AS DARLINGS. IT IS ATTACHMENT AND INTENSE LIKING THAT IS THE BASIS OF SOMEONE BEING A DARLING.
Style Is All About Force:
Reason can never cause syllables or units of motion to stretch, speed and loudness to change but force can.
Because style in motion and speech is nothing more than the individually characteristic way of stretching, changing speed and loudness, reason is never needed and involved in the fabrication of style but force always is.
THEREFORE THE PRACTICE AND APPRECIATION OF STYLE IS ALL ABOUT THE PRACTICE AND APPRECIATION OF FORCE WITH NO REASON INVOLVED OR NEEDED.
NOT ONLY IS REASON NOT NEEDED BUT THE PRESENCE OF REASON IS INIMICAL TO THE PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE OF STYLE BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE TRUE REASON YOU WILL REALIZE THAT STYLE IS FALSE OR MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW THAT ALWAYS LEADS TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.

No comments: