Coming To The Truth

IF EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD SUFFERS FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY HAVE NO ANSWERS TO BUT MERELY TRY TO MANAGE, THAT WILL UNFAILINGLY INTENSIFY WITH AGE AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR CERTAIN RUIN AND MADNESS, WHAT GREATER ADVANTAGE CAN THERE BE THAN IF SOMEONE WAS TO COME ALONG TO ALTER THE CONSCIOUSNESS STATUS QUO IN A WAY THAT AUTOMATICALLY ALLEVIATE THEIR SUFFERING AND IN ADDITION HE MIRACULOUSLY TELLS THEM THAT THERE IS A SIMPLE ANSWER TO THEIR NAMELY TO PAY ATTENTION TO DETECT AND MAKE EFFORT TO ELIMINATE THE UNNECESSARY CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS PRESENT IN THEIR SPEECH AND MOTION?
I WAS DEFINITELY THE TRIGGER OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 AND UNLESS THERE ARE CO-TRIGGERS FOR THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS I MUST ALSO BE THE ORIGINAL TRIGGER OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS BECAUSE I DID NOT COPY OTHERS WHEN I SET OUT TO CHANGE MYSELF AFTER 1997 (COINCIDING WITH THE EAST ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS) BY REFUSING TO SMILE OR SAY THINGS TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS LEADING TO THE GRADUAL AWARENESS AND STEADFAST PUTTING TO A STOP TO ALL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO EXPERIENCE A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE EFFORTLESS FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION LONG BEFORE I WAS AWARE THAT EVERYONE THROUGHOUT THE WORLD WERE AGAIN CHANGING AS VISIBLE FROM THEIR DEMEANOR.
EVEN IF I WANTED TO COPY OTHERS FOR MY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS THERE IS NO ONE IN THIS WORLD TO SERVE AS TEMPLATE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO MODELS IN THIS WORLD FOR NOT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT ARE THE REQUISITES THAT WHEN SUSTAINED (NOT IMMEDIATELY RESULTED IN), LED MY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AND THEREFORE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT I COPIED OTHERS. BECAUSE THERE IS STRONG FORCEFUL HABIT TO REVERT TO THE RUT OF MINDLESS STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, ONLY A SUSTAINED PERSISTENCE IN NOT STRETCHING, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WILL LEAD TO A RELENTING OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT STOOD IN THE WAY TO RELEASE TO EXPERIENCE EFFORTLESS UNIFIED CALM CLARITY OF THE MIND.
BECAUSE FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IS THE ENDPOINT OR GOAL OF CURRENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES AND THE CESSATION OF ALL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE THE ONLY PATHWAY TO THIS GOAL AND NOBODY ELSE I DISCERN HAS ACHIEVED THE CESSATION OF STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHERE I ALONE HAVE DONE SO, I AM FOREMOST IN THE RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES AND IT STANDS TO REASON THAT THE PERSON WHO IS FOREMOST IN NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THAT IS PREREQUISITE IN ACHIEVING FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT ARE THE GOALS OF THIS RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES MUST BE TO ORIGINAL TRIGGER OF RECENT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES.
IT MAY BE THE TRUTH THAT FOR ANY GIVEN CONTAGION OR MUTATION THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF THE CONTAGION OR MUTATION BECAUSE IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR TWO INDIVIDUALS TO SPONTANEOUSLY TRIGGER AT THE SAME TIME A CHANGE THAT IS SO RARE IT HAS NEVER HAPPENED IN THE PAST. IF THAT IS THE CASE, BECAUSE I DID NOT IMITATE OTHERS, I MUST AGAIN BE THE SOURCE IN RECENT YEARS.
IT IS INDEED REMARKABLE THAT THE PERSON WHO TRIGGERED THE CHANGES IN 1977 NOT JUST AGAIN TRIGGERED UNPRECEDENTED CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS BUT HE ALSO SPEAKS WITH A PERSPICACITY NOT JUST ON SOME BUT MANY DIFFERENT TOPICS AND INTERPRETED WHAT THE BUDDHA AND JESUS SAID IN A SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT WAY THAT NO MAN IN THE PAST OR PRESENT HAS DONE.
Unless there is additional information hidden in the New Testament or elsewhere, it must be possible for a reader to identify the counselor based on the description Jesus gave otherwise he will be indulging in a fruitless enterprise describing a counselor that nobody can come to know.
Just as it is possible for some but not all participants of a treasure hunt to find the treasure based on the instructions given, it must be similarly possible for some but not all readers to know the counselor based on the information Jesus gave.
It must be possible to know the counselor because Jesus said that even though the world cannot receive him because it neither sees nor knows him, you know him for he dwells with you.
It is unlikely if not impossible that there is additional information in the New Testament because you can now use the computer to do various word searches and there are no other mentions of the counselor except in the end of John’s Gospel in separated passages as if to make it less obvious.
It is unlikely if not impossible for the counselor to be a mental entity because what Jesus said in many places makes it unlikely if not impossible to be so. For instance it is to your advantage that Jesus goes or he will not come indicates it is a physical coming just like Jesus’ coming was physical. “But when he comes” indicates he will not come immediately but at a later date.
“I have yet many things to say to you, more than you can now bear” suggests that there will be a consciousness change in the future that will make you able to bear that will coincide with the coming of the counselor.
If the counselor comes in the minds of Christians and teaches them all things, bringing them remembrance what Jesus said and Jesus still has to tell you he dwells with you, he must be a hard to see or false counselor in your mind (apart from the fact that nobody has spoken of hearing the same voice in their minds teaching them all things and bringing them remembrance what Jesus said.
Because it is impossible for anyone other than the counselor to fulfill the criteria Jesus described (otherwise what Jesus said is false or unwarranted), whoever fulfills the criteria described by Jesus must be the counselor. Whoever convinces the world of sin, righteousness and judgment must be the counselor. If you are now convinced of sin, righteousness and judgment where previously you were not, the counselor would look foolish if he was to now try to convince you. Whoever takes from what is Jesus’ and makes it known to you, who brings you remembrance what Jesus said to you must be the counselor, especially if nobody in the past or present has done so in the way the counselor does.
No Mystery Why Everyone Changed:
(Reflecting their pretentiousness, no one has acknowledged the occurrence of consciousness changes that were blatant, cannot be mistaken after 1977 and in recent years, let alone try to explain why they have occurred)
The reason why consciousness changes spread to affect everyone is because it is a process of contagion that like all processes of contagion requires nothing of its victims; no action is required by its victims in order to achieve contagion except that they must be receptive to the agent of contagion (eg a virus) and be capable of passing it on.
No intelligence or discernment is required in the process but what is required for people’s consciousness to change by contagion is a capacity (that is universal) to sense force and force changes transmitted in the WAY people speak or move. If there are unique changes in a reduction of forceful stretching, changes in speed and loudness in one changed person’s speech, all beings here are able to sense the reduction in stress, restlessness and distraction impacting on them so that they are forcefully or emotionally stirred to also modify their behavior to reduce as much as possible their own endemic suffering but only as far as their continued urge to defile themselves and others will permit.
IT IS NO MYSTERY BUT ENTIRELY TO BE EXPECTED WHY UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES HAS OCCURRED NOT ONCE BUT TWICE IN RECENT YEARS. THE REASON IS BECAUSE IT IS THE IMPACT OF FORCE ON A BEING’S CONSCIOUSNESS THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON, THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE REASONING BY THAT BEING, BOTH INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY GENERATED THAT GOVERNS OR DETERMINES A PERSON’S WOEFUL CONSCIOUSNESS STATE. ALL BEINGS HERE IRRESPECTIVE OF INTELLIGENCE OR REASONING ARE CONVERSANT IN TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING FORCE THAT IS THE INSTRUMENT OR AGENT OF DETERMINING THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS STATE. SHOULD A BEING COME ALONG WHO TRANSMITTED LESS FORCE AND FORCE CHANGES IN HIS APPEARANCE, SPEECH AND MOTION, ALL BEINGS IN THIS WORLD ARE CAPABLE OF SENSING THE UNIQUE FORCE CHANGES WHERE THERE WERE NONE IN THE PAST AND THE IMPACT OF THIS NOVEL REDUCTION OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION TRANSMITTED BY THIS PERSON’S BEHAVIOR AUTOMATICALLY ALLEVIATED THE EXTERNAL APPLICATION OF FORCE ON THEIR MINDS THAT SERVE TO PROVIDE A TEMPLATE FOR THEM TO SIMILARLY CHANGE INTERNALLY TO EMULATE THOSE CHANGES BECAUSE NO BEING NO MATTER HOW SELFISH, WANTS TO SUFFER ANYMORE THAN HE HAS TO, TO GET WHAT HE WANTS FROM HIS MANIPULATION OF OTHERS.
BECAUSE IT IS A COMBINATION OF INTRINSIC & EXTRINSIC FORCE IMPACTING ON A BEING’S CONSCIOUSNESS THROUGH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT DETERMINES HIS CONSCIOUSNESS STATE, ANY GENUINE EVEN BRIEF REDUCTION IN EXTERNALLY GENERATED STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (WHERE THERE NEVER WAS IN THE PAST) ON INTERACTION WITH A PERSON WHO HAS CHANGED & SO DOES NOT TRANSMIT AS MUCH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AS OTHERS WILL AUTOMATICALLY CAUSE THAT BEING’S CONSCIOUSNESS STATE TO CHANGE MERELY BY THE REDUCTION OF EXTERNALLY SOURCED STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION EXERTED ON HIS CONSCIOUSNESS.
WHETHER A BEING LIKES IT OR NOT, IS STUPID OR SMART, IS AN ANIMAL OR HUMAN, HE HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO CHANGE CONSCIOUSLY BECAUSE HIS WOEFUL CONSCIOUSNESS STATE IS NOT HIS ALONE BUT ALSO DEPENDENT ON THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION GENERATED BY OTHERS THAT IMPACT ON HIM AND SO, SHOULD THERE BE AN UNPRECEDENTED CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE IN ONE PERSON SUCH THAT HE GENERATES LESS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN ALL OTHERS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM, HE WILL AUTOMATICALLY SET IN MOTION CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN ALL WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM SIMPLY BY REDUCING THEIR EXTERNALLY GENERATED STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IMPACTING ON THEIR CONSCIOUSNESS.
THE REASON WHY THERE HAS NEVER BEEN CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN THE PAST IS BECAUSE EVERYONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT DETERMINES A PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS STATE. NO ONE HAS EVER BEHAVED IN APPEARANCE, SPEECH AND MOTION IN A WAY THAT TRANSMITTED LESS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION ON OTHERS’ CONSCIOUSNESS. AND SO IF SOMEONE WAS TO COME ALONG WHOSE APPEARANCE, SPEECH AND MOTION INDUCED LESS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN ALL OTHERS COMING INTO CONTACT WITH HIM, THIS REDUCTION IN EXTRINSICALLY GENERATED STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AUTOMATICALLY CAUSES HIS CONSCIOUSNESS STATE TO CHANGE BECAUSE HE HAS EXPERIENCED AN EXTERNALLY GENERATED REDUCTION IN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION HE NEVER IMAGINED WAS POSSIBLE OR HAD EXPERIENCED BEFORE AND BECAUSE ALL BEINGS HAVE MEMORY, THIS NOVEL EXPERIENCE WILL SERVE AS A TEMPLATE FOR HIM TO ALSO CHANGE IN HIS OWN WAY TO REDUCE HIS OWN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION BUT ONLY AS FAR AS HIS CONTINUED URGE TO DEFILE HIMSELF AND OTHERS WILL PERMIT.
On the other hand, consciousness changes do not yield so easily otherwise they would have occurred frequently long ago. When I started out to grapple with the stress, restlessness and distraction that beset me some time after 1997, I never imagined I would achieve the stress-free, restless-free and distraction-free state I enjoy today. It was only after painstaking application of myself despite and against great social pressures to put into practice insights that progressively came to me eg initially not smiling or saying things to impress or please others progressing to not stretching syllables progressing to the insight of speed and loudness changes that I became increasingly aware were not frequent but constant and occurring in everyone and making painstaking effort to eliminate them in my speech.
THUS CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES DO NOT COME WITH A PRIOR PROMISE THAT THEY WILL OCCUR IF YOU KEEP DOING SUCH AND SUCH BUT THEY ONLY YIELD AFTER MUCH EFFORT AND PROLONGED APPLICATION TO IDENTIFY CONDUCT THAT CAUSES STRESS THAT GOVERNS THE CONSCIOUSNESS STATE AND ELIMINATING THEM PROGRESSIVELY NEVER INSTANTLY. NEVERTHELESS, THE REDUCTION OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION OF THE BEHAVIOR OF OTHERS (WHERE IT HAS NEVER OCCURRED IN THE PAST) AUTOMATICALLY CAUSES THAT BEINGS CONSCIOUSNESS TO CHANGE WITHOUT HIM DOING ANYTHING SIMPLY BECAUSE THE LOAD OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION GOVERNING HIS CONSCIOUSNESS HAS BEEN REDUCED BY THE CHANGE IN OTHERS.
No One To Copy From Even If I wanted:
EVEN IF I WANTED TO COPY OTHERS FOR MY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IN RECENT YEARS THERE IS NO ONE IN THIS WORLD TO SERVE AS TEMPLATE BECAUSE THERE ARE NO MODELS IN THIS WORLD FOR NOT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT ARE THE REQUISITES THAT WHEN SUSTAINED (NOT IMMEDIATELY RESULTED IN), LED TO MY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AND THEREFORE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT I COPIED OTHERS. BECAUSE THERE IS STRONG FORCEFUL HABIT TO REVERT TO THE RUT OF MINDLESS STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, ONLY A SUSTAINED PERSISTENCE IN NOT STRETCHING, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WILL LEAD TO A RELENTING OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT STOOD IN THE WAY TO RELEASE TO EXPERIENCE EFFORTLESS UNIFIED CALM CLARITY OF THE MIND.
How can all ordinary people who are still stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness (and therefore stylish) be the triggers of the recent consciousness changes that make it possible for them to permanently exit stretching, changes in speed and loudness where it was impossible in the past? It must take a person who can and have stopped stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness to trigger a consciousness change that permits it to occur.
My Claims To Exclusivity:
(All ordinary people harbor intense dislikes and they may react swiftly with revulsion or dislike beyond their control when they read about my claim to exclusivity such that they may not be able to bear to examine what I will say subsequently and instead they will blame me with more karma due for upsetting their pretentious ‘modesty’ by blowing my trumpet. If you did not harbor intense irrational dislike, why should my claim to exclusivity irk you so much you cannot bear to read it? A person without intense dislike will read what I say calmly and clearly thinking according to its merits.)
My claims to exclusivity are these:
No one in the past or present has made this fundamental discovery and declaration that the only reason why all ordinary people in this world are assailed by stress, restlessness and distraction is because there is constant unnecessary forceful stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in their speech that is intended for show (to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate) and these forceful changes have their equivalents in their motions, thinking and perceiving (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting and touching).
No one in the past or present has ever said that there is a SIMPLE permanent cure to stress, restlessness and distraction if the person were to pay persistent attention to detect and persistent effort to stop all stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness. (If you think you are capable of speaking without stretching syllables, changes in speed and loudness, ask me and I will show you how there are incontrovertible objective stretching, changes in speed and loudness that you may never have realized STILL exists in your speech.)
No one in the past or present has made this declaration that like and dislike are the only two possible alternative reactions that always automatically occur in all ordinary people on contact with whatever happens to them and like and dislike are essentially the alternative controlled (liking) or control lost (disliking) stirring in strength and speed of their mental force of going against self. All their emotions like greed, lust, pride, excitement, envy, jealousy, anger, hate, sadness and shame are essentially like and dislike in fancy clothes.
No one in the past or present has ever triggered or set in motion consciousness changes that spread to affect every being on earth not once but twice after 1977 and in recent years as I have done.
What I say above is not boasting motivated by pride because what I say is factual and not accompanied by emotion.
The Buddha said beings in the higher, pure realms are detained by five higher fetters namely conceit, ignorance (not delusion), attachment to forms and the formless and restlessness (desire for meaningful passive changes as opposed to meaningless forceful change here).
Thus my claim to exclusivity may emanate from my conceit that is based on reality, not my boasting based on delusion and pride.
The Buddha said he is the highest teacher and the highest not because he is conceited but because it is the truth that he knows things beyond even Brahma and he can make Brahma not seeing him whilst Brahma cannot do anything to him.
No One Has Ever Said This:
I have said many things that I can claim no one in the past or present has ever said eg:
The reason why you can make an imitation of the way another speaks is because there are stable or consistent unique characteristics in the way he speaks and what he usually speaks and the unique way he usually speaks is essentially the way he always stretches his syllables, changes speed and loudness. Because it is impossible by chance for him to render the same unique characteristics in how and what he speaks each time he speaks, his speech must be produced from memory or by regurgitation like a tape recording and therefore he never speaks live specific for that occasion but he is always rehashing approximately by regurgitation from the past to meet the requirements of the present situation and therefore he is a robot, only a very sophisticated robot with a much more sophisticated library to recall from and he is a hypocrite because no one who is constantly saying or doing things by stale, impersonal, approximate rehash from the past can be sincere or genuine anymore than programmed speech produced by pressing a button from a recorder can be genuine.
The implication of what I am saying that I know is correct is that all ordinary people who speak with a stable imitable style are constantly speaking and behaving by memory to meet the demands of the situation and they are therefore essentially overrated disk jockeys who only select what recordings to play from their mental jukeboxes or they are de facto robots and hypocrites because their speech and behavior is never specifically intended for an occasion but rehashed to fool others that it is specific for the occasion.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHO SPEAKS LIVE FOR EACH OCCASION TO SAY THE SAME OLD THINGS THE SAME OLD WAY BUT IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT A ROBOT WILL SAY AND DO THE SAME OLD THINGS THE SAME OLD WAYS AS IT IS PROGRAMMED TO DO SO BECAUSE IT CANNOT BEHAVE IN ANY WAY THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN PROGRAMMED TO DO. NO ROBOT THAT NEEDS TO BE PROGRAMMED CAN SAY OR DO ANYTHING THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN PROGRAMMED TO AND THUS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A ROBOT TO SAY OR DO THINGS IN A WAY IT HAS NEVER BEEN PROGRAMMED TO.
Why do people painstakingly practice reciting passages of Shakespeare or how to swing a golf club if they are not relentlessly committing to as faithful memory as possible what they want to say or do in the future when the situation demands and therefore they are unwittingly and willingly conditioning themselves to become robots (by memorizing what they should say or do to impress others)?
Why there is no greater advantage:
The Buddha: ' His heart thus knowing thus seeing is released from the fermentation of sensuality, becoming & ignorance. With release there is the knowledge, 'Released.' He discerns that 'Birth is ended, the task done. Just as if there were a pool -- clear, limpid -- where a man could see shells, gravel, pebbles and also shoals of fish swimming about and resting, in the same way he discerns, as it is actually present, that 'This is stress, this is origination of stress, the cessation and way leading to the cessation of stress.
The Buddha said that through dispassion he is released indicating that in the Buddha’s mind, all beings are bonded to existence and suffering and enlightenment is the final permanent release from suffering.
THUS IF IT IS TRUE THAT ALL BEINGS HERE EXIST UNDER CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS THAT ARE TORMENTING THAT THEY ARE NOT AWARE EXIST AND CAN BE REMOVED, THEY ARE ALL SUFFERING FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE CAN BE CURED BY NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS (THEY ARE NOT EVEN AWARE HOW EXTENSIVE THE STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS IN THEIR SPEECH), THEN EVEN IF THEY DESIRE MATERIAL AND SENSATE PLEASURES, THERE CAN BE NO GREATER ADVANTAGE THAN IF SOMEBODY WAS TO CAUSE THE CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS TO BE REMOVED AND POINT OUT HOW THEY ARE STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. IF I HAVE DONE THAT THEN I WILL HAVE SUPERSEDED THE COUNSELOR IN BEING AN ADVANTAGE TO YOU.
The Difference Between Excitement & Anxiety:
Excitement is essentially the intense or strong, rapidly changing stirring in speed and strength of a person's force of going against self that is still under the control of his force of self preservation on contact with a situation that arouses it eg the nude body of an attractive girl.

THEREFORE EXCITEMENT IS INTENSE LIKING. EXCITEMENT CAN BE FAKED OR GENUINE BUT EVEN IF IT IS GENUINE, DON'T CONGRATULATE YOURSELF AS GENUINE BECAUSE IT IS SUFFERING HEADING FOR FUTURE LOSS OF CONTROL AND INSANITY.
Nowhere is reason or truth involved and it is merely a controlled force reaction of the excited person's mind.

Anxiety or nervousness or panic is essentially an intense, rapidly changing stirring in speed and strength of the person's force of going against self OUT OF CONTROL of the person's force of self preservation or disliking on contact with a situation provoking it eg a man pointing a gun menacingly at you.
THEREFORE ANXIETY IS INTENSE DISLIKING.
Nowhere is reason involved in anxiety or nervousness.
At its extreme levels, excitement totters on the brink of loss of control and the excited person (actually his force of self preservation) struggles to control his excitement and he may recurrently lapse into loss of control to experience anxiety or nervousness.

This is the case if you observe people who are very excited or you reflect on occasions when you became very excited that you are walking a tightrope fearing loss of control when you may become even manic or irrationally or indiscriminately violent.

HOWEVER YOU MIGHT ADULATE EXCITEMENT, WHETHER IT BE FAKED OR GENUINE, EXCITEMENT IS CONDITIONING SUCH THAT WITH EACH EPISODE OF EXCITEMENT YOU ARE INEXORABLY CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO AROUSE EXCITEMENT MORE EASILY TO MORE INTENSE LEVELS THAT BECOME HARDER TO SHED AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR THE CLIFF, UNCONTROLLABLE EXCITEMENT.
How To Learn Not To Dislike:
Whenever anyone says (however softly with a smile), “Those bloody bird calls are a pain in the neck” they are expressing dislike that has nothing to do with reason or the situation at hand but everything to do with the optional or unnecessary arousal of their mental force in a manner with unabated acceleration in speed and strength in reaction (not response) to the calls of the birds.
If you learn to mindfully say, “The calls of the birds are harsh” you are merely expressing a reasoned statement based on reality that the calls of the birds are indeed or in truth harsh (to everyone) because they have violent stretching of notes, violent changes in speed and loudness in a mindlessly repeated cycles of a handful of notes.
“Those bloody bird calls are a pain in the neck” is an expression of dislike that creates additional stress in self and arouses similar dislike in the listener. Dislike has nothing to do with reason, is not necessary and merely worsens the suffering of a situation for self and others.
Often people say softly with a smile “Those bloody bird calls are a pain in the neck” to falsely impress that they are tolerant when they are piling up their agony because they are faking or expressing like for what they disliked.
“The calls of the birds are harsh” is merely a statement of reality that is universal for everyone that the birds’ calls are harsh that has nothing to do with dislike or emotions.
THE NEXT TIME YOU BECOME AWARE YOU HAVE JUST SAID WITHOUT THINKING “I LIKE THIS OR I DON’T LIKE THIS’, REMIND YOURSELF THAT YOU HAVE NOT MADE A STATEMENT OF REASON BUT MADE A STATEMENT OF FORCE OR EMOTION BECAUSE YOU HAVE MERELY SAID YOUR MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF (INVOLUNTARILY) UNDULATED UP AND DOWN IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOMETHING OR IT ROSE UNABATED IN SPEED AND STRENGTH (DISLIKED) WHEN SOMETHING HAPPENED. IF YOU THINKING THAT WHAT YOU SAID IS REASONABLE, YOU HAVE ADVANCED FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION.
THE MAN OF REASON WHO NEITHER LIKES NOR DISLIKES MERELY SAYS WHAT HAPPENED WAS PLEASANT (AGREEABLE) OR UNPLEASANT (DISAGREEABLE).
Seeing things clearly right there, right there:
It may be the truth that ordinary people in many ways never practice what the Buddha taught that ‘whatever quality is present (at the moment) one clearly sees right there right there’.
Driven by strong likes and dislikes they selectively see in a situation at hand what they like and avoid things they dislike. If you observe people’s eyes, they often flicker rapidly sideways or upwards as they speak because they are (involuntarily) struggling to avoid seeing some things (eg their dishonesty). When people close their eyes they are avoiding seeing a matter at hand. Often they are seeing but their minds are elsewhere daydreaming or concocting what they can do to exploit the situation at hand.
People only want to see in the situation what they like to see and avoid seeing what they don’t like to see (eg the ugly side of life, pretense and falsity perpetrated by self and others), they see with a style that can be added force and prolonged gaze (a stare that others find offensive or provocative), their eyes dart restlessly sideways or upwards (because they are uneasy with what they see), they turn their eyes and even face away from what they are uncomfortable seeing. As a result they never see clearly whatever quality is present right there right there and they form faulty conclusions and become deluded.
Simple But Not Easy:
Quitting alcoholism is simply a matter of stopping drinking but it is easier said than done as most alcoholics will attest. The reason is that it is not reason that is behind their drinking but it is forceful emotion or like or urge that disregards the hangovers, the debilitation of their minds and bodies that is the mindless or blind drive to continued drinking.
Thus even though letting yes be yes only is blissful sanity now, later in old age and thereafter, it is the hardest thing for beings here because they are seized and driven by blind mental force to always say and do more with a style that comes from evil not good.
IT IS THE FORCE AND THE CONDITIONING OF THE MIND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH MINDLESS ROTE BEHAVIOR THAT MAKES ALL SINFUL CONDUCT LIKE NOT LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY VERY DIFFICULT TO EXIT. BECAUSE THERE IS NEVER FORCE IN REASON, IT IS VERY EASY TO CHANGE, BASED ON NEW BETTER INFORMATION FROM ONE VIEW TO ANOTHER VIEW THAT IS NOT HELD WITH EMOTION AND FALSE SELF IDENTITY.
All the sins are forms of likes and dislikes:
All the sins are nothing more than likes or dislikes.
Greed is nothing more than like or the controlled (by the force of self preservation) stirring of the speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self on seeing money or material goods (cars, watches, jewels).
Lust is nothing more than like or the controlled (by the force of self preservation) stirring of the speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self on perceiving sexual objects.
Envy is nothing more than like or the controlled (by the force of self preservation) stirring of the speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self on perceiving someone’s wealth, possessions, fame or status.
Pride that Jesus said is a sin but Christians see nothing wrong is nothing more than like or the controlled (by the force of self preservation) stirring of the speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self on being praised or like associated with oneself or one’s possessions (house, children, wife).
Boasting is nothing more than an irrational urge to make much and advertise (beating one’s own drum) as far more exalted than it really is driven, by a liking for objects and attributes that one identifies with as self.
Anger is nothing more than diffuse or ill directed dislike or the uncontrolled (by the force of self preservation) stirring of the speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self on the occurrence of matters that threaten one’s interests.
Hatred is nothing more than focused dislike or the uncontrolled (by the force of self preservation) stirring of the speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self targets on a person or groups of people.
Jealousy is nothing more than dislike for another person as a result of his possessions (eg his car, his pretty girl friend, wealth).
Shame is nothing more than dislike for self together with the deflation of one’s resident pride as a result of the coming to light of information that is embarrassing.
Sadness is nothing more than dislike for the losses of one’s likes that with regular experiences to intense levels becomes increasingly easy to experience to more intense levels that are harder to shake off and may descend into suicidal depressions.
Fear is the only emotion that is driven by the force of one’s self preservation. Whenever a situation arises that threatens, one’s force of going against self that is usually the drive behind an actor’s speech and deeds rapidly reduces in speed and strength to permit the force of self preservation to rise rapidly in speed and strength unopposed to pull the person away from the target of fear.
It is impossible for a person who has destroyed all mental force to be fearful and therefore a Buddha is passively, effortlessly, truly fearless.
THUS IF SOMEONE HAS GIVEN UP ALL LIKES AND DISLIKES, HIS MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IS NEVER STIRRED IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN A CONTROLLED OR UNCONTROLLED WAY BY ALL EVENTS HAPPENING, HE HAS COME TO AN END OF ALL SIN.
A PERSON WHO HAS NOT GIVEN UP HIS LIKES AND DISLIKES IS A HYPOCRITE AND A FOOL INDULGING IN FRUITLESS VEXATIONS IF HE WAS TO STRIVE TO ELIMINATE HIS GREED, LUST, ENVY, JEALOUSY, ANGER AND HATE WITHOUT ELIMINATING HIS LIKE AND DISLIKE.
JESUS SPOKE OF DENYING YOURSELF, CARRYING YOUR CROSS TO GO WITH HIM. THIS IS A WORLD WHERE EVERYONE LIKES AND DISLIKES AND DEMAND YOU DO SO. THUS A PERSON WHO TRULY DENIES HIMSELF MUST DENY HIS LIKES AND DISLIKES AND WILL THUS DISTINGUISH HIMSELF FROM THE REST WHO WILL NOT BE PLEASED AND HE WILL THUS BE PERSECUTED & THUS HAVE TO CARRY HIS CROSS TO GO WITH JESUS.
Quote: Experts doubt Clovis were the first people of America.
Comment: Why doubt that the Clovis were the first people of America? If you are certain the Clovis are not the first people, simply state they are not the first and provide your reasons why they are not. If you cannot be sure, say “The Clovis may not be the first people of America’.
By saying you doubt, you are questioning or forcefully not accepting what others say and that will foster an attitude of refusal to accept in yourself and others who read whose final destiny is mad doubt that cannot be assuaged.
LEARN TO SPEAK WITHOUT EXPRESSING DOUBT, SAY WHAT YOU THINK IT IS OR MAY BE BUT DON’T DOUBT.
Quote:

I don't think Mr Blair can devise an exit strategy which can save Iraqis, Americans and Britons

Imtiyaz, Riyadh
Comment: If you say it IS not possible or it MAY not be possible for Mr Blair to device an exit strategy, you are merely expressing your view right or wrong, not challenging or questioning anyone.

Questioning or doubting others have nothing to do with reality but is fostering in you and others an attitude of antagonism, of not accepting what others say or do that will end in mad doubt and uncertainty. If you doubt that the food before you is food, that is mad doubt that you think is impossible to afflict you but you may be a fool because with each time you forcefully doubt, your doubt becomes more intense and harder to shake off.

If you are always doubting yourself and others and you are not even aware of it, aren't you a robot operating by rote from memory?

THERE IS AN EXIT STRATEGY THAT BENEFITS EVERYONE. THE AMERICANS SHOULD HAND OVER IRAQ TO THE ARABS EG EGYPTIANS, SAUDIS & LIBYANS AND LET THEM SORT IT OUT. IT IS THE ANIMOSITY BY MUSLIMS TO THE AMERICANS THAT IS FUELING THE VIOLENCE. WHY IS AMERICA SO KEEN TO STAY WHEN RESIDENTS HATE THEM?
Why 'I Don't Think' Is Doubting:
When you say "I don't think" it is with reference to others who think and therefore it is setting yourself up against others or doubting.

When you say ‘Blair cannot or may not be able to device an exit strategy’ you are merely stating your view not 'don't think' where others think.

DON'T SAY YOU THINK OR DON'T THINK, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO DO SO AND NOT LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY.
IF YOU THINK IT IS NECESSARY FOR YOU TO SAY YOU THINK OR DON'T THINK WHEN IT IS MEANINGLESS, MEANT TO PAD UP OR FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, THEN YOU HAVE FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS UNNECESSARY IS NECESSARY.
Have you read Jesus saying, "I think this will come to pass" or "I don't think this will come to pass"? To say you think or don't think reflects hesitancy or uncertainty, is a form of doubting or setting yourself against others who think otherwise or it is for show to impress.

Except in exceptional circumstances like inebrition or insanity, how can anyone speak without thinking and therefore it is frivolous or unnecessary to say you think what you say.

Instead one should say it is MY VIEW that Blair cannot device an exit strategy which is not the same as I don't think Blair can device an exit strategy.

How can one not think when one speaks? One always thinks when one speaks.

Therefore it is false to say you do not (did not) think Blair can device an exit strategy because it is impossible for anyone to not think Blair can device an exit strategy. It is again a very different proposition to say it is my view that Blair cannot device an exit strategy.

IT IS POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO SAY I THINK IT IS SO AND SO ALTHOUGH IT IS REDUNDANT TOSAY 'YOU THINK' BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SAY SOMETHING WITHOUT THINKING BEFOREHAND. IT IS UNDERSTOOD YOU THINK WHAT YOU SAID.

IT IS PREPOSTEROUS OR IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO SAY SOMETHING THAT HE SAYS HE DID NOT THINK OF AS IS IMPLIED BY HIS SAYING I DO NOT THINK IT IS SO AND SO. WHAT HE IMPLIES THEREFORE IS NOT THAT HE DID NOT THINK BEFORE HE SAID IT BUT HIS VIEW IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT OTHERS EXPRESS AND THEREFORE HE IS ANTAGONIZING OR DOUBTING.
NOT MEANING WHAT YOU SAY:
WHEN YOU SAY YOU DO NOT THINK BLAIR CAN DEVICE A GOOD EXIT STRATEGY YOU (LITERALLY) MEAN YOU DID NOT THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU SAID WHICH IS NOT PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE AND THEREFORE YOU CANNOT HAVE MEANT WHAT YOU SAID BUT INSTEAD WHAT YOU MEANT TO SAY WAS THAT YOU DISAGREED WITH OR IS QUESTIONING THOSE WHO THINK THAT BLAIR CAN DEVICE A GOOD EXIT STRATEGY.

NOT ONLY ARE YOU DOUBTING OR QUESTIONING OTHERS ON THE MATTER BUT YOU ARE UNCONSCIOUSNESSLY NOT SAYING WHAT YOU MEAN (THAT YOU ARE DISAGREEING OR DOUBTING) AND NOT MEANING WHAT YOU SAY (YOU CANNOT HAVE NOT THOUGHT WHAT YOU SAID).

THEREFORE THE OCCASIONS WHEN PEOPLE ARE AWARE THEY DO NOT MEAN WHAT THEY SAY OR SAY WHAT THEY MEAN MAY LIKE THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG COMPARED TO ALL THE OCCASIONS THEY IN TRUTH DO SO.

Letting Your Yes Be Yes Only Applies To All Aspects Of Your Life:
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in WHAT you see, hear, smell, taste and touch.
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in HOW you see, hear, smell, taste and touch. This means there must be no style, no stretching, changes in speed and strength in how you see, hear, smell, taste and touch.
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in WHAT you say. This means you must not pad your speech (eg yes instead of yes, yes, yes or beat around the bush, you mean what you say and say what you mean)
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in HOW you say. This means no style or no stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness.
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in WHAT you think. This means you must not pad your thinking (eg fantasize, think repetitively on a subject, keep on visiting your proud moments)
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in HOW you think. This means no style or no stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in your thoughts.
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in WHAT you do. This means no accessory or unnecessary movements that are for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
You must learn and strive (by a process of effacement or scrubbing off) to let your yes be yes only in HOW you do things. This means no style or no linear or curved stretching of movements, no changes in speed and strength of force in your movements.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE IMPORTANCE AND SCOPE FOR APPLICATION OF LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY BECAUSE IT CAN BE AND MUST BE APPLIED TO ALL ASPECTS OF YOUR LIFE. UNLESS YOU WANT TO SUFFER NOW AND LATER, YOU MUST ENDEAVOR TO ALWAYS LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY BECAUSE ANYTHING MORE IS FALSE AND COME FROM EVIL NEVER GOOD.
The Evil & Danger Of Sadness:
Sadness is what people like to generate (falsely) to impress others (eg they speak or sing in a sad way to impress others with their capacity to feel or how moving or touching people they are), what society encourages to experience and express because they tell you it is harmless and meritorious and it is also something that involuntarily seize ordinary people when they are deprived of their wants and increasingly for no apparent reason (mad sadness) because of loss of control.
SADNESS WHATEVER THE FORM, GENUINE OR FAKED TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS IS EVIL AND HARMFUL BECAUSE IT IS PAINFUL AND CONDITIONS THE MIND SO THAT SADNESS BECOMES INCREASINGLY EASY TO AROUSE TO INTENSE LEVELS THAT GET HARDER AND HARDER TO SHAKE OFF AND ANYONE WHO DOES NOT PAY ATTENTION TO DETECT AND DRIVE OUT SADNESS WHEN IT ARISES IS HEADED FOR MAD SADNESS IN AN ACUTE CRISIS OR IN OLD AGE DEGENERATION.
Unwitting Admission Of Sin:
Because the various forms of sin namely greed, lust, anger, hate, envy, jealousy & pride are nothing more than like and dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for the occasion, anyone who routinely says he likes this or that, he does not like this or that is unwittingly or de facto acknowledging he is a sinner.
Have you read anywhere that Jesus or the Buddha said they liked this or that, disliked this or that?
If you say that your like and dislike is different from greed, lust, anger, hate, envy, jealousy & pride, you can like and dislike and nevertheless not harbor greed, lust, anger, hate, envy, jealousy & pride, that may be true or it is rooted on false logic and perception in which case the destination is mad logic and perception. If what you perceive and believe is wrong then you have wrong view and the destination for wrong view is hell or the animal womb.
Even if you do not believe in sin, because like and dislike is nothing more than the stirring in speed and strength of one’s mental force of going against self controlled by the force of self preservation in like and out of control by the force of self preservation in dislike, it is applying force on your mind that can be transmitted to those receiving your like and dislike to create stress, restlessness and distraction that not only is harming yourself and others but it is conditioning or warping your mind to like and dislike, to become more easily stressed, restless and distraction and you are headed for doom.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE POSSESS TWO MENTAL FORCES, THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT IS THE DRIVE BEHIND ALL ACTIVITIES OF THE MIND (PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING) AND THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION THAT ALWAYS OPPOSES AND STRUGGLE TO CONTROL THIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO LIMIT ITS POTENCY AND BRING ITS ACTIVITIES TO A HALT WHEN IT BECOMES TOO STRESSFUL.
THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CAN ACT DIRECTLY AS IN NAKED AGGRESSION OR VIOLENCE OR IT CAN ACT INDIRECTLY THROUGH LIKE AND DISLIKE OR ITS DERIVATIVES LIKE GREED, LUST, ANGER, HATE, ENVY, HATRED, PRIDE AND SHAME.
(Doesn’t what I say that the sins are nothing more than like and dislike and like and dislike has nothing to do with reason but it is all about the stirring in speed and strength of the person’s mental force that all ordinary people see nothing wrong, applaud and routinely admit to experiencing convince you of sin? If what I say is true then whoever is the counselor must also say that to convince you of sin, righteousness and judgment and if I have done so, I will have superseded him and rendered what Jesus said as false.)
Why Has No One Consulted Me?
It is true that all beings (not just humans) in this world suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction (inability to concentrate) that often rise to unbearable levels and this is only because there is constant forceful stretching, changes in speed and strength of force in their perceiving, thinking, speaking and motion that they cannot be aware of because if someone is aware of these changes he will put them to a stop to experience the incomparable difference, namely effortless freedom from the suffering of stress, restlessness and distraction.
I have declared a permanent cure for stress, restlessness and distraction, namely to pay attention to detect and to make persistent effort to stop stretching your syllables, change speed and loudness when speaking.
Since stress, restlessness and distraction are disagreeable, how come no one has voluntarily approached me (let alone stampede to my doorstep) to demonstrate to them what stretching, changing of speed and loudness sounds like?
SPEECH (OR MUSIC) WITHOUT STRETCHED SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS VERY DISTINCT FROM ITS COUNTERPART THAT HAVE CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE NEVER HEARD THE DIFFERENCE BECAUSE EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD IS DISHING OUT CONSTANT STRETCHING, CONSTANT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
THUS IF YOU ARE SUFFERING FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND I HAVE DECLARED A CURE, WHY ARE YOU BASHFUL TO SEEK HELP? INSTEAD MANY ARE ANNOYED WHEN I CALMLY POINT TO THEM HOW THEY HAVE JUST STRETCHED THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND AFTERWARDS THEY CONTINUE TO DO SO AS IF THEY CANNOT HELP STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AS IF THEY ARE PROGRAMED ROBOTS.
THE REASON THEY DO NOT APPROACH ME FOR A DEMONSTRATION OF NOT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS BECAUSE THEY ARE IRRATIONAL (IF THEY ARE BEINGS OF REASON THEN THEY WOULD APPROACH SOMEONE WHO PROFESSES A CURE FOR THEIR WOES) AND INSTEAD (BLINDLY) EMOTIONAL (TOO PROUD, TOO PRETENTIOUS OR REFUSING TO CONFRONT THEIR PROBLEMS).
BY THEMSELVES, ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE (NAMELY THOSE WHO SPEAK WITH STYLE OR CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS) MAY NEVER CHANGE THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WORLD NOT JUST AFTER 1977 BUT IN RECENT YEARS, MAY NEVER HAVE DISCOVERED THAT THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING OF THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THESE ARE THE UNALIENABLE ROOTS TO THEIR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION BECAUSE EVEN THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD AND INTELLIGENT ARE RECALCITRANT, RELUCTANT TO CHANGE EVEN WHEN IT IS POINTED TO THEM, WHAT MORE THAT THEY SHOULD STUMBLE ON IT SPONTANEOUSLY AND WORK WITH PERSISTENCE THAT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO FINALLY SCRUB OFF ALL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO THEREBY JOYOUSLY EXIT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
THEREFORE, EVEN IF YOU MAY BE UNAPPRECIATIVE, IS IT NOT TO YOUR ADVANTAGE THAT I EXIST IN THIS WORLD TO CHANGE THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WORLD AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS, I WAS THE STEADFAST, RESOLUTE PIONEER OF NOT STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS INDISPENSABLE IN THE FINAL EXIT FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION?
Window Media Player’s & The Vistas’ Cosmetic Changes:
The revamped Window Media Player now comes in ‘snazzy’ black, the bar on the top appears to bulge (to give an illusion of being more real) and glow and the title of the film being played and time lapsed glow.
But all these are cosmetic changes to make the player more attractive or impressive or for show and do not add anything to its performance.
The new window Vista has some meaningful improvements but a large part of its improvement too is cosmetic and I would say I prefer the old version in some aspects.