"I Know, I Know"

Quote: I know, I know, I'm a sucker for technology.

Comment: What is said above is always emotional and it is not harmless but the person is headed for suffering.

The person who lets his yes be yes only says, "I am a sucker for technology".

His 'I know, I know" is to express anger at himself for being unable to resist trying the new Vista and that brought him headaches of installation.

'I know' is meaningless and only meant to express emotion and he SENSELESSLY said it twice.
People think I am too much but far from harmless, what he said, "I know, I know" has no meaning except to express annoyance, he is repeating himself unnecessary (twice) and he is conditioning himself and others to accept what is meaningless as meaningful. The fact that he and the rest see nothing wrong reflect they already have advanced false logic and perception.
Why It Is Deadly:
Is "I know. I know" the same as "I am annoyed with myself for being a sucker for technology"?

If it is not the same and you obviously think it is the same by saying thus, you have false logic and perception that will end in mad logic and perception that "I know. I know" is the same as "I am annoyed with myself for being a sucker for technology".

He may be merely putting on a show, joking or making a fuss at being annoyed to please readers.

IF YOU THINK 'I KNOW, I KNOW' IS SYNONYMOUS WITH 'I AM ANGRY' YOU HAVE MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION; THUS HE DOES NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS.

IF YOU THINK 'I KNOW, I KNOW' IS NECESSARY WHEN IT IS UNNECESSARY, CONVEYS NOTHING MEANINGFUL EXCEPT EMOTION THAT HAS NO MEANING BUT IS MERELY FORCE, YOU HAVE MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION.

I AM A SUCKER FOR TECHNOLOGY TOO IS ALWAYS EMOTIONAL. I HAVE A WEAKNESS FOR TECHNOLOGY OR I CANNOT RESIST TECHNOLOGY WOULD BE MORE PROPER. AGAIN IT IS EXPRESSING EMOTION.

Make Up Your Mind & Don’t Make Believe:
If you want to reprimand yourself for being a sucker for technology then you should not be a sucker for technology, if you want to be a sucker for technology then you should not reprimand yourself for being a sucker. Apart from being useless and indulging in something meaningless by reprimanding yourself whilst you still want to be a sucker for technology, you are generating conflict that leads to doubt and uncertainty that according to the Buddha is one of three lower fetters to future states of woe.
WHAT HE IS DOING IS ESSENTIALLY EXPRESSING HIS DISLIKE FOR HIS LIKE. IF THIS IS NOT (CONTROLLED) MADNESS, WHAT IS? HE IS EXPRESSING DISLIKE BY SAYING I KNOW, I KNOW FOR HIS IRRATIONAL OR FOOLISH LIKE (I AM A SUCKER) FOR TECHNOLOGY.
The fact that you see nothing wrong, you think it is funny reprimanding yourself when you still remain a sucker reflects perverted logic and perception.
He is speaking presumptuously and fantasizing as if someone virtual is reprimanding him and he is replying he knows, he knows and this too is not harmless but nurturing make believe.
BY SAYING ‘I KNOW, I KNOW’ TO AN IMAGINARY PERSON UPBRAIDING YOU, YOU ARE CULTIVATING MAKE BELIEVE THAT WILL END WITH LOSS OF CONTROL TO MAD PERCEPTIONS OR HALLUCINATION.
IT IS USELESS DISLIKING (BY EXPRESSING ANNOYANCE) YOUR LIKING (BY BEING A SUCKER) FOR TECHNOLOGY BECAUSE NOTHING IS ACHIEVED IN GENERATING EMOTIONAL CONFLICT APART FROM SUFFERING AND CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO NEEDLESS EMOTIONAL CONFLICT THAT WILL END IN INSANITY BUT WHAT IS REQUIRED IS THAT YOU PAY ATTENTION TO ABOLISH ALL FORCE IN YOU BY NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT WILL THEN DEPRIVE YOUR IRRATIONAL LIKING FOR TECHNOLOGY OF THE MENTAL FORCE IT NEEDS TO POWER IT AND THEREBY YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DISLIKE (BEING ANNOYED) YOUR IRRATIONAL LIKING FOR TECHNOLOGY.
High Standing Nonsense:
Henry Paulson has been touted by Newsweek as America’s best Treasury Secretary since Robert Rubin and most readers will get intimidated by reputation to blame themselves for not quite grasping what he is trying to get at when he may be at fault uttering gibberish and concealing his own inadequacies.
Quote: (on ethanol being a viable alternative to petrol) When you really look (you mean it is possible to not really look at something?) at the price of ethanol, you need to look at it with technology the way it is today and with technology the way it will be in 5-10 years. Even with our policy (does that policy mean non intervention, not to increase taxes on petrol and gas guzzlers to encourage conservation that will not be popular with Republican favoring oil & car companies and voters?), the price of oil is high enough (that) the price of ethanol will rise and so what we designed under the president’s direction (if the president did not direct, but his underlings did, he is misleading others saying so) was a series of circuit breakers or safety valves in terms of this big alternative fuel mandate (sounds impressive all this jazz about circuit breakers and alternative mandates but if you read carefully it does not quite make sense).
Comment: He is essentially justifying or excusing Bush’s not raising petrol prices or taxes on gas guzzlers that may not be popular with big oil and car businesses by saying that current high prices will mean that ethanol will be competitive in price. There are experts who say that ethanol can never substitute for petrol in any meaningful quantity and it diverts a lot of vital food stock in a world that may be heading for famine towards to conversion for fuel. Because he did not say what I say above, he does not mean what he said.
On global warming: Go back and research what the president said about global warming being a serious problem, carbon emission being a serious problem. He sees a need to process globally. One of the things he has encouraged me to do is get a strategic working dialogue with China to work with them on energy efficiency and environmental issues. A big part of this is clean coal. Look at what is happening – one new coal plant coming up every week in China, The president is quite interested in that.
Comment: He is telling you that you are wrong to think Bush is not concerned or indifferent about global warming issues. If that is not true, Bush is hiring renegade scientists to sow doubt about the human role in global warming, tried to get American government scientists to dampen down their conclusions and is sabotaging efforts to redress it, he has karma. What he is saying is that Bush’s effort at mitigating carbon emission involves pointing the fingers at others and telling them to reform rather than looking at your own follies and seeing what you can do about it. It is easy and requires little work to tell China that it is polluting and so tidy itself up but what is Bush doing about global warming himself? How about raising taxes on fuel and gas guzzlers?
Defiance & Stubbornness Are Essentially Dislike:
There is nothing mysterious, wondrous, profound or indefinable about defiance, stubbornness, arrogance, sarcasm or humor or trying to see the funny side of thing; they are essentially forms of likes or dislikes.
Defiance and stubbornness are related or the same. Defiance and stubbornness are always aggressive & more specifically anger (a form of dislike) at being brought to knowledge by self or others that what one said or did was untrue or harmful. Thus defiance and stubbornness are essentially dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for the occasion at hand.
Sarcasm is faked liking to conceal the dislike attending what you say falsely that is the opposite of what you truly meant.
Trying to see the funny side of things, treating everything happening as funny is faking liking for whatever happens to you or whatever you say or do when it is not funny or you do not like it and even dislike or hate it.
Arrogance is essentially an attitude of the mind and behavior in speech and action that ensues from that attitude that reflects a like for self allied to a dislike for others.
Many people including those who think they are genuinely religious do not love themselves or others but they like themselves and like others (as opposed to arrogance when they like themselves and dislike others) and because like is applying force on their minds causing stress, they must harbor dislike or hate for themselves and others that they struggle in vain to conceal but in unguarded moments or when they are tired or overwhelmed by situational overload, they bare their concealed fangs or dislike for others and self. Only a person who neither likes nor dislikes, who harbors no mental force but is completely a man of reason can truly love himself and others because he has no urge to harm himself or others, to hurt himself or others.
THUS, ALTHOUGH ORDINARY PEOPLE LIKE TO THINK HOW EXALTED AND COMPLEX THEIR LIVES ARE, THEY BOIL DOWN TO AN ENDLESS LITANY OF LIKES AND DISLIKES IN WHICH REASON IS OFTEN ABSENT OR POORLY DEVELOPED AND PLAYING A SECONDARY ROLE IN THE BACKGROUND. THE TRUTH MAY BE THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS REACTING WITH LIKE OR DISLIKE TO WHATEVER HAPPENS TO THEM OR WHAT THEY COME INTO CONTACT WITH AND AFTERWARDS THEY RATIONALIZE OR CLOTH THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES WITH EXPLANATIONS THAT CAN BE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE EXCUSES, NOT TRUE REASONS WHY THEY LIKED OR DISLIKED.
ANIMALS ALSO LIKE AND DISLIKE ALL THE TIME AND IF YOUR LIFE IN TRUTH IS ESSENTIALLY AN ENDLESS LITANY OF LIKES AND DISLIKES, ALTHOUGH YOU DISLIKE IT, YOU CAN EXIST JUST AS WELL AS ANIMALS TO SATISFY YOUR LIKES AND DISLIKES AND THERE YOU CAN DO LESS HARM TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE EARTH CAN COPE WITH YOU.
Always Two Simultaneous Messages:
Whenever people in this world speaks, regardless of whether what they say is true or false, padded up (beating around the bush) or plain, they at the same time want to convey to you their like or dislike for what they say or you.
This divides your attention and that fool’s attention which is why after lifelong practice, they are easily distracted, they cannot concentrate on a matter at hand. It is insane trying to convey two things at once, what you want to say and your like or dislike and because this is physically impossible to be performed lived, what they say accompanied by their likes or dislikes are prerecorded and regurgitated and they are headed for final loss of control and mad jukebox behavior or speech (saying inappropriate things or saying things for no reason).
WHENEVER PEOPLE SPEAK, THEY ALSO WANT TO CONVEY THEIR TRUE OR FAKED LIKE OR DISLIKE FOR YOU OR WHAT THEY WANT TO SAY. BECAUSE THEY ARE TELLING YOU THEY LIKE WHAT THEY SAY OR THEY LIKE YOU, THEY ARE EXERTING PRESSURE ON YOU TO SIMILARLY LIKE WHAT THEY SAY OR LIKE THEM AND THEREFORE ACCEDE TO WHAT THEY WANT FROM YOU.
BECAUSE THE LIKE AND DISLIKE FOR YOU OR WHAT THEY ARE SAYING THAT PEOPLE ALWAYS CONVEY WHEN THEY SPEAK IS MEANINGLESS, IS ESSENTIALLY A STIRRING OF THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE MEANT FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, PLEASE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE, ORDINARY PEOPLE ALWAYS CONVEY SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS, MERELY A STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCES MEANT FOR SHOW THAT BECAUSE THEY FORCEFULLY BELIEVE IS MEANINGFUL, THEY ARE HEADED FOR FINAL INSANITY.
(Whenever a singer sings with great sadness, he or she wants you to appreciate or like her abilities as a singer and her expression of sadness which is essentially her mournful dislike for her loss of her likes or inability to access her likes.)
Love & Like Are Two Different Kettles Of Fish:
Like is merely the genuine or faked controlled stirring in speed and strength of your mental force of going against self on seeing someone or something. Like is often produced stereotyped or standardized by rote for the occasion at hand. In other words, like is merely the forceful attraction for another.
Love never has stirring of one’s mental force but it is the reasoned, always genuine, live specific for the occasion concern for the wellbeing and happiness of the person loved. With love you do or say things to the other person that makes that person happy, will not hurt him without expectation of reward or obligations and just to see the other person happy is itself reward.
Because people themselves dish out like as love, accept like as love, they are taken in by others’ ways of speaking that convey like for them or what is said to them to be conned. A person who sees clearly what is like and what is love knows what is conveyed is like that is always false and harmful and he is therefore never taken in.
Accelerating Acceleration:
People are not just constantly changing speed and loudness in their speech and motion but often it is changing with accelerating acceleration.
The reason why the way some people talk or stretch their syllables in particular, why the roaring sounds they make on taking off in their motorbikes or cars is particularly harsh or they make a menacing whoosh when they swing their golf clubs is because there is not only strong changes in speed and loudness but accelerating increases in speed and loudness.
You can move and speak at constant speed eg 30m per sec.
You can move and speak with speed that is accelerating at a constant say 30 meters per sec per sec.
You can also move and speak with speed that is accelerating at an increasing rate eg 30 meters per sec per sec in the first second, 40 meters per sec per sec in the second and so forth.
Compared to moving or speaking at constant acceleration, moving or speaking with accelerating acceleration consumes even more energy and is even more stressful and restless both to produce and listen or see and harder for the perpetrator to exit because it signifies advanced expertise in mindless meaningless constant change.
If you observe carefully how people speak, they usually end the sentence at a faster speed than when they started to express their eagerness or reflect their impatience. Sometimes it is stop start meaning the speed of delivery of words rises and falls regularly in a way the person thinks is stylish or it reflects his restlessness.
You increase your speed during a stretched syllable (eg ‘oooo’) by exhaling with speed that is rising during the stretched syllable and this is audible as a rising pitch or the syllable becoming shriller.
IF IT IS TRUE PEOPLE NOT JUST CHANGE SPEED CONSTANTLY WHEN THEY SPEAK BUT THEY EVEN CHANGE SPEED WITH ACCELERATING ACCELERATION AND THIS IS THE SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY MUST EXPERIENCE WHILST THEY PERSECUTE OTHERS IN CONTACT WITH THEM AND IT IS POSSIBLE TO CIRCUMVENT THIS BY PAYING ATTENTION TO DETECT AND LEARN NOT TO CHANGE SPEED WHILST SPEAKING THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO SAY THIS TO BE TO YOUR ADVANTAGE AND TEACH YOU ALL THINGS. IF I HAVE DONE SO, I WILL HAVE PROVEN JESUS WRONG THAT ONLY THE COUNSELOR CAN DO SO. I SAY WITH CONFIDENCE THAT NOBODY IN THE PAST OR PRESENT HAS EVER SAID WHAT I SAY ABOVE.
Words Per Minute:
You can speak the first word of your sentence at a rate of 30 words per minute and the next word at the rate of 40 words per minute and the third word at 50 words per minute and that would be a constant acceleration in speed.

You can also speak your first word at 30 words per minute, the second word at 40 words per minute and the third word at 60 words per minute and that would be an accelerating acceleration in your word production.

THEREFORE ACCELERATED ACCELERATION SPEECH IS NOT A FIGMENT OF MY IMAGINATION BUT EXIST AND IS RAMPANT IN THIS WORLD.

WHEN PEOPLE ROAR OFF IN THEIR MOTORBIKES OR CARS IN AN ANNOYING MANNER IT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN AN ACCELERATED MANNER, NOT CONSTANT MANNER.

“Yeow”
When someone or something cold touches them unexpectedly at the back some people jump and even involuntary yell “yeow!!!”
What this actually signifies is that he is an owner of mental force that can be provoked by even minor unexpected stimulus to rise explosively in speed and strength.
It is impossible that a Buddha will yell ‘yeow’ whatever the provocation and what it signifies is the person’s ownership of a strong mental force that is beyond his control that can rise rapidly in speed and strength and unless he takes steps to destroy his mental force by calming himself, he is doomed to future suffering.
(Sometimes when people yell ‘yeow’ it is faked to manipulate others but even so it is conditioning that person’s mental force to rapidly accelerate in speed and strength of his mental force that will end in agony)
How People Calm Themselves Down:
As soon as a person starts (using mental force) to stretch his syllables, change speed or loudness, his stress, restlessness and distraction starts to build up and it is his force of self preservation that is using force to suppress the rising stress, restlessness and distraction that permits him to carry on with apparent (not real) comfort.
But soon enough the stress, restlessness and distraction gets too intense to ignore (it gets too hot in the kitchen even for tough and wicked people bent on manipulating others) and the person’s force of self preservation becomes increasingly more assertive to force the person to disengage (eg break off an animated conversation) and exert more force to peg back the rampant and increasingly unruly force of going against self such that with seclusion and forceful opposition, the force of going against self in time subsides in strength and speed and that person experiences a relative measure of calm.
But because the force of self preservation too exert force on the mind (but in the opposite direction of the force of going against self) it too stresses and harms the mind.
Just as no amount of intervention will make an agitated beaker of turbid water settle down faster but instead make it worse (counter productive), what is required is to cease all agitation and allow the churning and turbidity to settle passively on their own, in the same way, the wise way is to seclude oneself by meditation from further provocation and allow the unsettled mind to calm down passively.
PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE AND THE WISE PERSON WILL LEARN TO PAY ATTENTION TO IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS ALL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN HIS SPEECH AND MOTION SO THAT HIS MIND DOES NOT BECOME AGITATED TO A LEVEL THAT WILL MAKE IT HARD TO SHAKE OFF. IF HE DOES BECOME MILDLY AGITATED, HE SECLUDES HIMSELF AND MEDITATES TO ALLOW THE AGITATION TO SETTLE DOWN PASSIVELY.
BY CONTRAST, THE FOOL USES HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO SUPPRESS HIS RISING AGITATION SO THAT HE CAN CONTINUE TO PUT ON A SHOW AND THEN HE FOOLISHLY USES HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO AGAIN FOOLISHLY TRY TO GAIN INSTANT RELIEF. ONCE HIS AGITATION IS ALLEVIATED BY SUPPRESSION (THAT BECOMES INCREASINGLY HARDER & UNCERTAIN WITH AGE) OR SLEEP, HE FOOLISHLY RETURNS FOR MORE SELF AND OTHER PUNISHMENT BY SPEAKING AND MOVING WITH CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.
USING YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO PUSH BACK YOUR FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IN ORDER TO CALM YOURSELF IS A STOP GAP MEASURE THAT WILL ONLY PROVIDE TEMPORARY (NOT PERMANENT) RELATIVE (NOT ABSOLUTE) RELIEF THAT WILL BECOME INCREASINGLY UNRELIABLE AND DIFFICULT WITH LIFELONG CONDITIONING OF YOUR MIND TO AGITATION. THE ONLY REAL SOLUTION IS TO NEVER INCITE YOUR MIND AGAIN BY FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH AND FORCE AND USE MEDITATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW ARISEN AGITATION TO SETTLE PASSIVELY.
NO MATTER HOW TOUGH OR EVIL YOU ARE, YOU MUST SOONER OR LATER STRIVE TO CALM DOWN YOUR AGITATED MIND BECAUSE AGITATION IS TORMENTING AND HARMFUL (CONDITIONING THE FOOLISH MIND TO AGITATION & DEGRADING IT). A MIND IS AGITATED ONLY BECAUSE THERE IS STRONG FORCE THAT IS CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ROILING IT AND A MIND IS CALM ONLY BECAUSE THERE IS NO OR MINIMAL FORCE ROILING IT.
A mind that is not calm (agitated, excited, stressed) is only so because it is seized by significantly strong force that is constantly changing rapidly in speed and strength.
Force has no reason and does not or cannot listen to reason which is why an agitated mind never calms down instantly but it always takes time to calm down.
IT IS NEVER A PERSON’S REASON (BECAUSE REASON HAS NO FORCE) THAT CAUSES HIS MIND TO BECOME AGITATED OR STRESSED BUT IT IS ALWAYS HIS MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT IS THE CULPRIT BY HEEDLESSLY APPLYING FORCE THAT IS CONSTANTLY OFTEN RAPIDLY CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH EVEN TO INTENSE LEVELS.
BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND, DOES NOT HAVE REASON, IT CANNOT LISTEN TO REASON & CAN ONLY COME TO AN END IF IT HAS EXPENDED ITSELF OR ANOTHER COUNTER FORCE (THE FORCE OF SELF PRESVATION) IS SUMMONED TO COUNTER IT SO THAT RELATIVE CALM CAN BE RESTORED MORE RAPIDLY. THE ONLY ROLE REASON PLAYS IS SECONDARY IN ADVICING SECLUSION OR DISENGAGEMENT FROM FURTHER EXTRINSIC PROVOCATION OR APPLICATION OF FORCE BY EXTERNAL SOURCES LIKE LOUD MUSIC. CONTINUED INTERNAL PROVOCATION (EG RECURRENT EMOTIONAL THINKING) IS HARDER TO QUELL OR ESCAPE FROM AND WHAT IS LEFT IS FOR THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO WRESTLE AND HOPEFULLY FINALLY SUBDUE OR BRING UNDER CONTROL THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF (FOR THE TIME BEING UNTIL THE FOOLISH PERSON NEXT SUBJECTS HIS MIND TO FORCE AGAIN).
IT IS NEVER REASON DIRECTLY BUT APART FROM STOPPING FURTHER INCITEMENT TO ALLOW ARISEN FORCE TO EXPEND ITSELF, IT IS THE MOBILIZATION OF ANOTHER OPPOSING FORCE THAT DIRECTLY CALMS AN AGITATED MIND DOWN JUST AS IT IS NEVER REASON BUT EMOTION OR FORCE, THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT DIRECTLY AGITATES THE MIND. REASON’S ROLE IN CALMING A MIND DOWN IS SECONDARY OR INDIRECT, IF THE PERSON IS WISE ENOUGH TO THINK ABOUT IT AND THEN HEED REASON’S ADVICE TO DISENGAGE HIMSELF FROM EXTERNAL INCITEMENTS.