The Aim Of Doing, Speaking & Writing:

THE SOLE MEANINGFUL OR SANE AIM OF DOING SOMETHING IS TO CARRY OUT A TASK THAT IS BENEFICIAL TO YOURSELF OR OTHERS.

THE SOLE AIM OF SPEAKING IS TO COMMUNICATE SOMETHING MEANINGFUL THAT BENEFITS SELF AND OTHERS.

THE SOLE AIM OF WRITING IS TO COMMUNICATE SOMETHING MEANINGFUL THAT BENEFITS SELF AND OTHERS.

IS SMILING OR EXPRESSING WITH BODY AND LIMBS AS IN GESTICULATING A FORM OF SPEAKING OR WRITING OR IS IT (ABSURDLY) DOING SOMETHING OR USING DEED TO COMMUNICATE?

WHAT TASK THAT IS BENEFICIAL TO YOURSELF AND OTHERS ARE YOU AIMING TO ACHIEVE BY SMILING OR EXPRESSING YOURSELF OR GESTICULATING OR ARE YOU AIMING TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOUR EXPRESSIONS AND SMILES?

IT IS INSANE TO DO SOMETHING (AS IN MOVING YOUR FACIAL MUSCLES TO SMILE) TO COMMUNICATE WITH ANOTHER BECAUSE DOING IS NOT DESIGNED FOR COMMUNICATING BUT FOR ACHIEVING A TASK AND YOU SHOULD STICK TO SPOKEN OR WRITTEN WORDS IF YOU WANT TO COMMUNICATE.

IF YOU DO NOT STICK TO SPOKEN OR WRITTEN WORDS TO COMMUNICATE WITH ANOTHER, YOU DESIRE TO USE EXPRESSIONS LIKE SMILING TO COMMUNICATE YOU MERELY SUCCEED IN COMMUNICATING FORCE, LIKE OR DISLIKE AND EMOTIONS AND YOU ARE DOING WHAT IS INSANE, USING ACTS TO COMMUNICATE.

Doing what they should speak and speaking what they should do:
Reflecting what perverts ordinary people are, they do (express with face and body) what they should speak and they speak (with such high mindedness) about things they should do or put into practice. They speak about virtue, not harming others but they are speaking with force, with forceful prolonging, changes of speed and loudness that induces stress, restlessness and distraction in others.
Therefore speak what you should speak and not use your body language and expressions (smile, frown, growl) or deeds to speak or communicate for you, do not speak what you should do like talk about not harming others when you should just do so.

Muscles are made for doing not saying:
Muscles are designed for doing work, for getting things done, not for communicating. At best they are very blunt unsuitable instruments for communication.
When you use your hands to sweep the floor you are using your muscles to do useful work. Again when you use your oral and respiratory muscles to speak or the muscles of your hands to write you are doing useful work. But you are stretching your imagination at the risk of future mad perception if you think or perceive that using your facial muscles directly to express or communicate is the same or close to using your vocal and writing muscles indirectly to run the speaking and writing apparatus to speak or write. How much variety or scope can you express with facial expressions and how much variety and scope can you express with written or spoken words?
What useful work are the muscles in your face doing when they are fashioning a ‘gorgeous’ smile or scowl to intimidate? What useful work are the muscles of your hands doing when you are gesticulating even violently whilst you speak?
If it is in truth meaningless to use your facial muscles to communicate, they are merely communicating emotions or force then by constantly expressing, you are constantly practicing what is not just meaningless but wasteful and stressful, at risk of mad restlessness.
If you are not doing any particular work exercising your facial muscles whilst expressing a smile or grimace then it must be to express yourself, to be seen. Isn’t speech or writing a much more succinct instrument for communicating?
What useful work are you doing in using force to prolong your syllables, change speed and loudness? What purpose or meaning does it serve to prolong syllables, change speed and loudness? Does prolonging, changing speed and loudness add an ounce of meaning to what is said?
If you have a superb instrument for communicating in your speech or writing, aren’t you a fool to use a blunt and severely limited energy wasting stress creating instrument like expressing yourself through face and limbs?
IN TRUTH WHATEVER YOU WANT TO SAY OR COMMUNICATE CAN BE DONE COMPLETELY AND PERFECTLY WITHOUT ANY ACCOMPANYING FACIAL OR HAND GESTURES, WITHOUT ANY PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHICH ARE ONLY INTENDED FOR SHOW, TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE AT GREAT COST IN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE IN SELF AND OTHERS.
Expressions always communicate force or style not meaning:
If you agree your facial muscles are not doing any useful work during any intercourse then they must be expressing or communicating in some way when they are expressing smiles or some other look.

Can your facial and hand muscles together communicate what my writing is communicating above? In other words, using just your facial and hand muscles can you tell others what I am telling you above in words?
If you agree there is no way your facial and hand muscles can alone tell others what I have told you in words above then what you are communicating with facial expressions must not be meaning or substance but it must be force directly or like or dislike secondarily or emotions specifically.
THEREFORE FACIAL AND BODILY EXPRESSIONS ARE ALL COMMUNICATIONS OF FORCE, LIKE OR DISLIKE OR EMOTIONS OR COMMUNICATIONS OF STYLE NEVER TRUE MEANING.
LOOK AT YOURSELF AND OTHERS CAREFULLY, CAN YOU SEE EXPRESSIONS (EVEN IF THEY ARE TRACE) ALL THE TIME WHEN THEY SPEAK OR DO THINGS? IF YOU CAN SEE EXPRESSIONS THEN THEY ARE EXPERIENCING AND EXPRESSING FORCE, EMOTIONS OR STYLE.
Samy Vellu’s Mad Anger:
Most if not all people would have missed what I saw yesterday on TV. Because nowadays I am calm, neither liking nor disliking and therefore more open in my perceptions of what is going on, I see what others normally do not see.
I saw at the beginning of a newsreel covering a signing ceremony overseas of Samy Vellu leaning towards the prime minister Badawi with a smile and quietly telling him a joke. Badawi looked grim as if he did not like or appreciate the joke and Samy noticed this with a dishonest side glance and even whilst the smile lingered on his face you could see him glaring and anger or dislike rapidly rising that he struggled to hide from view. I think his tongue poked involuntarily as if to lash out. Because he has got angry and lashed out even violently at many people, Samy already is owner to mad emotion or anger that can rise rapidly to levels that he finds hard to control and he is headed for final loss of control or mad anger that can rise to intense levels over minor or no provocations that he cannot control and will take a long time to subside.
You are a fool if you think it is a wonderful world of camaraderie amongst the goats, it is all about getting filthily rich and getting your heart desires unfettered with no drawbacks because in truth it is a dog eat dog world where even your intimate ones can turn around and cut your throat.
Why should you be angry if someone did not appreciate your joke? Surely it is the right of others to appreciate or not? It is because jokers expect others to like their jokes that they would not have told if they did not like. Therefore they are imposing themselves on others when they tell jokes. Thus a lot of the time people have learnt to fake to others that they like a joke by laughing or smiling when they are lying and courting future insanity by expressing like for what you disliked.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE BEING FALSELY, STRESSFULLY NICE TO EACH OTHER TO GET WHAT THEY WANT. IF YOU THINK THEY AND YOU ARE BEING TRUE AND GOOD TO EACH OTHER YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED. BENEATH THE FAÇADE OF CORDIALITY AND CONVIVIALITY SEETHES EVEN MURDEROUS IMPULSES THAT CAN BE UNLEASHED THE NEXT MOMENT ON SOMEONE THEY CALL FRIEND OR WIFE OR SON.
Mad Like & Dislike:
Anyone who likes to like and dislike is headed for certain mad like and dislike because like and dislike are forceful and increasingly conditions the mind to them whilst degrading the mind because force harms or degrades the mind.
Every time you experience like or dislike (and emotions are all derived from like and dislike) you are conditioning yourself to experience and express like or dislike that becomes increasingly easy to arouse to intense levels that gets harder and harder to shake off. In time even minor provocations causes like or dislike to be aroused to intense levels that you struggle with increasing difficulty to exit.
Excitement, eagerness, fascination, thrill, desire, delight, pride, greed, lust and envy are all forms of liking.
Anger, hatred, disgust, disappointment, dejection, sadness, grumbling, complaining, protesting are all forms of expressing or experiencing dislike.
In truth people are experiencing either like or dislike all the time and they often unaware they do so or what they say are expressing like or dislike. Stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate are always disliked and because they are always beset by stress, restlessness and distraction that they are often unaware is present in them, dislike is the dominant condition of their existence here; they are often faking not truly liking what happens to them.
Why Smiles Communicate Force Never Ideas, Meaning Or Truth:
The wonderful smile on your face that you are reluctant to shed and so want others to appreciate is not doing any productive work and so it must be expressing something that can never be ideas or specific meaning or truth but it must be expressing force, like or faked like or style which is all about using force to prolong, change speed and strength. Reason or thinking can never cause the muscles of the face to fabricate a smile nor is there reason to smile because it is in truth stressful, restless and distracting, never a pleasure it is faked to be and only mental force can and will cause the muscles of the face to fabricate a smile and it is to be expected that what is a product of force should also communicate force not reason or meaning. So if you like to smile you are deluding yourself to think you are a man of reason or truth or goodness because your smile communicates force and you are a man of force that harms yourself and others. Therefore smiling is evil not good.
Can you define such and such is my smile as you can define such and such is this word? If you cannot define such and such is my smile then it cannot convey discrete meaning or truth.

Only written or spoken words can convey meaning or ideas or concepts or truth or what actually happened.
Facial and bodily expressions like smiling can never convey meaning or ideas or concepts or truth or what actually happened but they solely convey force, like or dislike or emotions or style which is nothing more than the audiovisual products of force.
Thus if you are man of reason or truth or good, you cannot convey force in your speech and there should therefore never be any expressions on your face nor style which is nothing more than the audible products of using force to prolong syllables, change speed and loudness in your speech.
On the other hand if you are a man of force or likes and dislikes or emotions or style there must be expressions on your face, stretching of syllables and changes in speed and loudness when you speak.
Your facial muscles are not doing anything meaningful or productive when they smile or fabricate expressions and therefore they must be trying to communicate. Facial muscles can never communicate ideas, concepts or truth so what it is communicating are force, like or dislike, emotions or style.
THEREFORE YOUR WONDERFUL SMILE THAT YOU ARE SO RELUCTANT TO SHED FROM YOUR FACE CAN NEVER COMMUNICATE IDEAS OR THE TRUTH BUT INSTEAD THEY ARE COMMUNICATING FORCE, LIKE OR FAKED LIKE OR EMOTIONS OR STYLE (CHARM). IF YOU LIKE TO SMILE DO NOT CONGRATULATE YOURSELF AS A MAN OF TRUTH BUT CONGRATULATE YOURSELF AS A MAN OF STYLE, LIKE AND DISLIKE AND EMOTIONS.
Muscles are made for doing things, for applying force, they are not made for communicating and if you do make your facial muscles express or communicate, it can only be to communicate force not reason. Therefore muscles that include your facial muscles can only communicate force or emotion or like or dislike or style (which is nothing more than the audiovisual manifestations of the use of force to stretch, change speed and strength), never reason or ideas or truth.
Speech and writing is expressly made for communicating reason or thinking or ideas or truth and you should therefore stick to just writing or speech (and cut out all expressing with your face or hands) if you want to communicate with another.
What useful or productive work are your facial muscles doing when you are smiling whilst you speak? If they are not doing useful work they must be expressing, trying to communicate that is never reason, ideas or truth but emotion or force or liking or style. If you think your smile or laughter can add more meaning to what you say you have false logic and perception that will end in madness.
If you think speaking with a smile is gentle or benevolent when it is speaking with an added expression that is derived from force or liking or emotion, you are deluded, have wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.

Going to be mad lawyer:
Private eye P. Balasubramaniam was questioned repeatedly on whether the political analyst had really smiled when asked about the whereabouts of a Mongolian woman who was driven away from his house the night before.
“I put it to you that Abdul Razak would not have smiled as it was a serious matter involving a woman's life,” Wong Kian Kheong, counsel for the analyst, said to the witness.
Whether Razak smiled or did not smile when asked about the fate of Altantuya after she was taken away has no bearing on whether he ordered the killing. Do you mean to say if he smiled or laughed he could not have ordered the killing for how could a man be so cruel as to smile or laughed if he knew she was killed? If he was not so cruel he would not have ordered the killing and instead the smile or laugh may be to signify wicked satisfaction.
So is the lawyer crazy barking up the wrong tree or is he implying with mad logic that if Razak smiled, he could not have ordered the killing because how can he have smiled when asked about her whereabouts when he ordered the killing?
If this is not his intention what is he trying to get at and why pounce on the matter?
Thus it appears that even high standing people that include the judge cannot see the absurd logic in this line of questioning. If you conclude that because Razak smiled he could not have been so cruel as to order the murder therefore the cops did it on their own initiative, it is mad logic.
If what I interpret is true it is in line with the hare brained affidavit Razak produced that actually incriminates than exonerates him as intended.
Much ado about nothing:
Reflecting their collective delusion it seems the judge even clarified with the witness whether it was laughter or a smile that Razak emitted. If in truth a smile is laughter minus the ‘sound track’ then you are deluded and splitting hairs trying to ascertain if it was a smile or laughter. It reflects the judge was sucked in.
A smile is always false, it has no meaning but it is merely a force orchestrated movement of one’s facial muscles that are often willfully to lie, please, impress or even intimidate others. If the lawyer did not have the false perception that a smile is meaningful or conveying meaning or wholesome, he would not have dwelt on it.
In order to please others, to exonerate his client, the lawyer may be trying too hard so that he is seizing on every straw and seeing things where there is none so that he pounced on this matter as an indication his client is innocent.
IF YOU PERCEIVE A SMILE AS MEANINGLESS, UNRELIABLE, MAY BE FALSE OR A LIE, WOULD YOU PLACE ANY SIGNIFICANCE IN IT SO AS TO DETERMINE IF RAZAK SMILED WHEN HE WAS ASKED WHAT HAPPENED TO HER AFTER SHE WAS TAKEN AWAY?
IT IS BECAUSE YOU PERCEIVE A SMILE IS A RELIABLE INDICATOR OF WHAT IS IN THE PERSON’S MIND, THAT SMILING IS GOOD AND TRUE AND THEREFORE EVERYONE WHO SMILES IS GOOD AND TRUE THAT YOU WOULD HOME IN ON WHETHER RAZAK SMILED.
People take proceedings in the court seriously but it may be a circus of clowns who do not know what they are talking about.

The private investigator’s disclosure that he dismissed his assistant for getting too close (meaning have an affair) to one of Altantuya’s associates may be to smear her reputation. Just because she is a prostitute, she demanded money does not justify murdering her and if you think that she deserved to be murdered, if she is a prostitute, it is OK to kill her, you have false logic that will end in mad logic.
CASE NOT ABOUT WHETHER SHE DESERVED TO BE MURDERED:
WHETHER ALTANTURYA OR HER ASSOCIATES ARE PROSTITUTES OR SHE DEMANDED MONEY OR SHE MADE A NUISANCE OF HERSELF HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE WHICH IS TO DETERMINE WHO UNLAWFULLY KILLED HER NOT TO DETERMINE WHETHER SHE DESERVED TO BE MURDERED OR NOT. ANYONE WHO THINKS THAT THESE ISSUES ARE RELATED TO HER MURDER HAS FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION THAT WILL END WITH MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION.
IF SUCH ISSUES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CASE WHY IS THE DEFENCE HARPING ON SUCH ISSUES?
SLANDER CAN SEND YOU TO HELL AND A LOT OF PEOPLE CASTING ASPERSIONS DO NOT REALIZE THEY FACE HELL.
Injustice is not a peculiarly Malaysian Malady:
Injustice or the miscarriage of justice or gerrymandered justice is a worldwide phenomenon even in so called ‘advanced’ countries.
Recently the Australian high court dismissed the appeal by Falconio’s alleged murderer for a retrial when it is impossible for any lone gunner to have committed the offence because the couple’s combi van was found some km away from the crime scene and no lone gunman can drive two vehicles at a same time. He must therefore leave his 4WD and the girl at the scene, drive the couple’s van away and return in the darkness to his vehicle. If Falconio was making a getaway it will explain well why the van is driven away and why the girl is so nervous facing the press.
In Singapore the Silkair air crash was ruled not due to pilot suicide when there is overwhelming evidence that a pilot who was heavily in debt because of stock market gambling, who had just raised his insurance cover before the crash, who had pulled out flight recorders on another flight, who had flown recklessly, in a new plane and fine weather should plunge without distress with the plane set at full throttle and dive into a river that will make investigations tough and drown any survivors and the flight recorders should fail moments after the captain said he was getting up.
On a stormy night when many flights were postponed, SIA decided to press ahead using a runway its pilots were not used to and instead of paying rapt attention on a stormy night with poor visibility these world class pilots were cracking jokes about who have the first and second rights to a girl in Australia.
All Bodily Expressions Communicate Force Never Reason:
For one who discerns, who sees things clearly as it is, all bodily expressions that encompass facial expressions including your marvelous smile, regular characteristic nodding or twists of your head, hand gestures, leaning forwards or backwards, crossing leg towards and away during speech are not doing any productive work but are intended consciously or unconsciously to communicate either to be expressive (eg crossing leg towards to deceive he is friendly) or inadvertently contradict (eg leg crossed away to contradict expressed friendliness in his speech) and what these bodily expressions are communicating are never discrete understandable meaning because it is impossible (can you just using bodily expressions communicate what I am saying above?) but they are communicating force either directly as aggression or indirectly as like or dislike and their derivatives the emotions.
If you do not discern that all bodily expressions convey force never reason or truth or concepts, then it can be reasoned out by a process of true (as opposed to false) logic why this is so.

Are your facial, bodily and hand muscles doing any productive work when they are moving even with great force, great constant forceful prolonging, changing of speed and strength when you are expressing yourself?

If you agree they are not doing any useful work in particular then those movements are unproductive not intended to accomplish a mechanical task. Therefore unless you are already mad, the facial, bodily and hand muscles must have a purpose and that can only be to communicate.

What can these facial, bodily and hand movements be communicating?

It cannot be something intellectual or discrete or meaningful like ideas or concepts or truth because it is impossible for any man to communicate to another the ideas I am expressing above just using his facial, bodily and hand muscles.

If these facial, bodily and hand muscles are not communicating reason or ideas or truth they must then be communicating force or forceful changes or style (which is essentially the audiovisual effects of using force to prolong, change speed and strength), like or dislike or emotions.

THUS IF YOU ARE A MAN WHO LIKES TO EXPRESS HIMSELF WITH HIS FACE, BODY AND HANDS AND THESE INCLUDES YOUR MARVELOUS SMILE THAT YOU SO CHERISH AND RECOMMEND AS GOOD & TRUE TO OTHERS, YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY DEMONSTRATING THAT YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE COMMUNICATING FORCE NOT REASON BECAUSE FACIAL EXPRESSIONS AND SMILES CANNOT COMMUNICATE REASON OR IDEAS BUT THEY CAN ONLY COMMUNICATE FORCE THAT STIRS OR ATTRACT THE TARGET.

IT IS DELUSION AND WRONG VIEW THAT LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB TO BELIEVE YOUR EXPRESSIONS IN GENERAL AND SMILING IN PARTICULAR ARE WHOLESOME, COMMUNICATING MEANING, GOOD AND TRUE WHEN THEY ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, ALWAYS STRESSFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND COMMUNICATE FORCEFUL CHANGES THAT COERCES (WITH FORCE) ITS RECIPIENTS TO SIMILARLY FORCEFULLY CHANGE (EG RECIPIENT SMILES BECAUSE YOU SMILED TO HIM) ALL BECAUSE YOU APPLIED FORCEFUL CHANGES ON THEM WITH YOUR COMMUNICATED SMILE OR BODILY EXPRESSION.
NO ONE EVER LOVES TO EXPRESS OR SMILE BECAUSE SMILING AND EXPRESSING ARE STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING BUT THEY LIKE OR ARE IRRESISTIBLY ATTRACTED TO EXPRESSING THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY ARE HOOKED BY FORCE TO EXPRESSING (SLAVES THAN MASTERS OF EXPRESSING) OR THEY ARE PERCEIVED TO BE STYLISH TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS TO GET WHAT THEY WANT WHICH IS BASICALLY SENSORY PLEASURES.

All expressions of the body that includes your smile are composed using force and only communicate force not reason and they are not even live specific for the occasion but rehashed stale by rote from the mental jukebox because it is impossible by chance to formulate fresh that same typical smile that is your trademark.

Because all expressions that include smiling utilize force not reason and communicate force and never reason or meaning, they are false and harmful to self and others and it is an abiding delusion and false perception to think your smiles and expressions are wholesome or true or benefit others when they are useless and harmful to yourself and others.

ALL STYLE AND EXPRESSIONS ARE AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF STYLE ARE MEANT ENTIRELY AND ONLY FOR SHOW TO BE SEEN. IF STYLE AND EXPRESSIONS ARE MEANINGFUL OR TRUE OR GOOD THEY WOULD NOT BE SAID TO BE FOR SHOW, JUST TO BE SEEN. THEREFORE IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY PRACTICING STYLE AND CONSTANTLY PRACTICING EXPRESSING WITH YOUR FACE, BODY AND HANDS, YOU ARE CONSTANTLY PRACTICING WHAT IS FOR SHOW OR MEANINGLESS OR MAD THAT CONSUMES PRODIGIOUS ENERGY TO CREATE INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND IT SHOULD NOT SURPRISE YOU THAT YOU ARE HEADING FOR LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS.
LOOK AROUND, CAN YOU SEE PEOPLE CONSTANTLY EXPRESSING THEMSELVES WITH GESTURES, FACIAL MOVEMENTS AND SMILING? THEY ARE PUTTING ON A SHOW, INDULGING IN WHAT IS MEANINGLESS, STRESSFUL AND RESTLESS AND PERSECUTING NOT BENEFITING OTHERS BY COMMUNICATING FORCE, DOOMED THAN HEADED FOR SAFETY.
If all beings that include animals express themselves with their bodies and faces and what I say above is true and beneficial to you and nobody in the past or present has said that to you then whoever is the counselor Jesus described must also say what I say to be to your advantage to come and to convince you of sin, righteousness and judgment (because expressions are unnecessary, false and stressful all expressive people are headed for insanity). Anyone else who dwells on the many things I have dwelt on that are truly unique, never spoken before must look foolish because I have said it before.

(If smiling and laughing are lying with your face, meaningless and unnecessary, are merely communicating force not meaning, then the defendant lawyer and judge are trying to determine and find significance in whether Razak lied with his face or expressed force with or without soundtrack aka smiled and laughing when asked what happened to Altanturya. Aren’t they great fools barking up the wrong tree, emperors with no clothes to do so?)
False logic ends in mad logic:
Whether true or outright lies, there have been many slanderous quotations that cast Altanturya in bad light tendered by the seemingly perpetually smiling private investigator (smiling denotes lying not friendliness or truthfulness) hired by Razak. Amongst them was what Altanturya was purported as saying, “Fuck you Razak, I am going to blah, blah, blah”. If you think that this quote is relevant in proving Razak did not commit the murder when if true, it establishes he may have cause to murder her and therefore incriminates Razak, then you have false logic and perception that you cannot believe will end in torment or mad uncontrollable logic or perception. If you perceive food is shit and refuse to eat and starve to death that is mad perception that is never a pleasure.
Similarly if you think that ‘I usually delete emails from unknown sources’ is the appropriate reply to my query as to whether you received my email, you have false perception and logic that will end in tears for you if you did not correct yourself. The answer to my question is either yes or no or you intentionally deleted it. If you say you ‘accidentally’ deleted it when you intentionally did it then you are also lying.
If you like to think of yourself and present yourself as a great lawyer, judge or person of truth and you are incompetent, then you are asking for judgment misrepresenting yourself and being deluded. Thus the judge and lawyer have demonstrated themselves to be grossly incompetent, who do not know what they are talking about and are headed for torment.
Quote: Diana saint & liar.
A true saint cannot tell lies and therefore if Diana tells lies or manipulates others she cannot be a saint and you are confusing yourself and others to falsely tout her as a saint and liar, to say what is good can also be bad. You are headed for the destination of confusion and muddled thinking and that is not heaven.
How can muscular movement express anything except force?
How can the movements of your facial, bodily and hand muscles express or convey anything but force because they involve nothing but force?
In order for such facial and bodily movements to be meaningful there must be an alphabet of different movements with each assigned different meaning and these different movements can be combined together in sequence to convey an idea or meaning. This happens in sign language that the deaf use to communicate and it is a poor substitute to speech. But when you are expressing with your facial muscles you are not forming discrete visual symbols that strung together communicates a message but you are mindlessly repeating a set piece as in a smile.
If you think that smiling and facial expressions have meaning you are postulating that somehow apart from the force orchestrated visible motion there is some indefinable meaning being transmitted. This is false perception and all actors already have advanced false perception because despite much reasoning in different ways that smiling is meaningless, they think or perceive that smiling is meaningful just as they cannot perceive that there is force even in a trace smile, force must always be used whenever you smile and reason is never used and instead reason is inimical to smiling because if reason was present it will tell the person smiling is meaningless and stressful.
Mindless Coercion Of Others:
Even if people do not realize it is a prolonged use of force that they are hearing when they hear someone stretch his syllables, regardless of intelligence they can all experience the prolonged use of force transmitted that apart from stressing them also makes them mesmerized to want to similarly prolong their use of force that after lifelong bombardment becomes mindlessly conditioned in them.
Similarly, even if people do not realize it is the use of force that they are hearing when they hear someone change speed and loudness, regardless of intelligence they can all experience the use of force transmitted that apart from stressing them also makes them mesmerized to similarly want to use force to change speed and loudness that after lifelong bombardment becomes mindlessly conditioned in them.
Most if not all ordinary people cannot demonstrate how they have just changed speed and loudness but even if they do not realize they are doing so, they are expertly capable of changing speed and loudness which indicate these two major components of style, namely changing speed and loudness are mindlessly automatically fabricated without their knowing.
Even if people do not realize it is nothing but a transmission of force that they are receiving when they see facial or bodily expressions that includes smiling, regardless of intelligence they can all experience the use of force transmitted that apart from stressing them also makes them mesmerized to similarly want to use force to express or smile.
Thus style which nothing more than a use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness in speech and motion is a transmission entirely of force that all others are capable of experiencing even if they do not know the nature of what they are experiencing and experienced style coerces them to similarly want to prolong, change speed and strength of force for sake of prolonging, changing speed and strength of force not because there is reason to.
Expressions that include smiling are nothing more than the use of force to move the muscles of one’s face or body is a transmission or communication entirely of force that all others are capable of experiencing even if they do not know the nature of what they are experiencing and the received expressions coerces them to similarly want to use force to express for the sake of expressing rather than there is reason to.
THEREFORE IF YOU LIKE TO EXPRESS STYLE OR FACIAL AND BODILY EXPRESSIONS YOU LIKE TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OR MOVE THE MUSCLES OF YOUR FACE AND BODY FOR PUTTING ON A SHOW THAT CAN BE TRANSMITTED TO ALL OBSERVERS IRRESPECTIVE OF THEIR INTELLIGENCE AND EVEN IF THEY DO NOT KNOW THE NATURE OF WHAT THEY ARE RECEIVING, ARE FORCEFULLY COERCED BY THE TRANSMITTED FORCE TO SIMILARLY WANT TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH OF FORCE OR EXPRESS WITH FACIAL AND BODILY MUSCLES. YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE PERSECUTING OTHERS, MAINTAINING OTHERS IN FORCE BONDAGE, AN EVIL NOT GOOD MAN.
Proof Facial Expressions Communicate Only Force:
People speak of someone looking angry, sad, dejected, excited, delighted, jealous, envious, proud, ashamed, stunned, surprised, nervous, fearful, eager, lustful, etc. All these observations are based on expressions visible largely on the faces of people but also in the hands and body (when you are agitated by force never reason your hands may fidget or express agitation) that enable the discerning to perceive even infallibly the true emotions occupying that person's mind even despite his attempts to disguise them by faking impassivity or the opposite emotion eg smile to fake he is happy when he is sad. Looking at the expressions on a person's face, a discerning person can tell whether the expressing person is pleased (liking) or offended (dislike) or trying to fake he is not offended, happy or sad, angry or hateful. Apart from these emotions and liking or disliking, there is nothing (eg truth or ideas) that facial expressions can communicate to others and because like and dislike and all emotions including fear are proxies of force, facial and all expressions are expressions of force, convey force that are invariably faithfully transmitted to recipients as intended that discerning observers can use to know what emotions the expressing person is currently experiencing.
Using just the muscles of your face without speech, can you communicate the message “Smiling is not being true but lying with your face?” If it is impossible then facial expressions cannot communicate meaning or ideas. They only communicate force, like or dislike or emotions that include fear.
WITHOUT REALIZING PEOPLE ARE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT FACIAL EXPRESSIONS THAT INCLUDE THEIR WONDERFUL SMILES THAT THEY SO CHERISH AS FULL OF MEANING AND BENEVOLENT ARE EXPRESSIONS NOT OF MEANING OR CONCEPTS BUT THEY ARE EXPRESSIONS ONLY OF FORCE PRIMARILY AND LIKE OR DISLIKE AND THEIR DERIVATIVE EMOTIONS SECONDARILY BY SPEAKING OF PEOPLE LOOKING EXCITED, DELIGHTED, ANGRY, SAD, ANXIOUS, ETC. APART FROM THESE EMOTIONAL LOOKS, WHAT LOOKS THAT CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED TO EMOTION OR FORCE CAN YOU ASCRIBE TO FACIAL EXPRESSIONS? WHEN PEOPLE SPEAK OF A GUNMAN SHOOTING ITS VICTIM IN COLD BLOOD WITHOUT EMOTION IT IS NOT WITHOUT FORCE BUT IT IS WITH NAKED UNDISGUISED FORCE THAT IS VISIBLE ON HIS FACE THAT HE GOES AROUND SHOOTING.
HOW CAN A SMILE THAT IS PRODUCED USING FORCE BASED ON A REHASHED MENTAL JUKEBOX PLAN AND COMMUNICATING FORCE TO ONLOOKERS BE MEANINGFUL OR BENEVOLENT BUT INSTEAD IT IS INSINCERELY REHASHED STANDARDIZED THAT HARMS SELF AND OTHERS?
THEREFORE THE NEXT TIME YOU SMILE OR SEE OTHERS SMILE REMIND YOURSELF YOU ONLY NEED FORCE AND A MENTAL PLAN OF HOW TO SMILE IN YOUR STYLISH WAY IN ORDER TO CARRY IT OUT REFLEXIVELY WHEN THE TRIGGER FOR SMILING IS IN YOU THAT MAY NOT APPLY TO OTHERS IS SENSED BY YOU, IT IS ALL ABOUT COMMUNICATING FORCE TO THE ONLOOKER NOT MEANING OR IDEAS, IT IS MEANINGLESS AND INTENDED TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE AND HARMS YOURSELF AND OTHERS NEVER BENEFIT BECAUSE THE USE OF FORCE NEVER BENEFIT ANYONE EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION.
IF YOU SMILE YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE OR EMOTION & MALICE NOT REASON & BENVOLENCE.
(Not even Einstein or Plato or Descartes or anyone alive today can and will say the things I say nor did they change the world's consciousness twice after 1977 and in recent years as I have. Which is more beneficial to you, Einstein's theory of relativity or the consciousness changes and the insight what I say gives? Therefore if you are suffering even to tormenting levels not enjoying yourself as you like to make others believe and you speak against me and there are no other ways out of torment than what I describe and the consciousness changes I brought about, you may be asking to be left to your devices, a return to the previously terrible consciousness constraints before 1977 even for another eternity if not more.)
It does not necessarily mean that what I say is false or worthless that people do not understand or appreciate but it may be that they are mindless automatons of force copying their behavior from each other or aping each other without knowing why, given to sensual delights, they will not deny themselves as Jesus urged. As the Buddha said there have already been eons too many to count with each eon lasting many billions of years and the blood that you have shed from having your heads cut as animals and humans is greater than the four great oceans and the fact that you are still here must reflect how hard it is for beings to deny themselves or penetrate into the nature of their terrible and everlasting suffering that must be their lot.
Expressions Is Pure Style Without Substance:
(There are a few basic expressions that are not in themselves style eg pointing to something, waving to say come or go or say no or wait, nodding and turning the head to say yes or no. Although they may be tainted by style in the way one waves or nods, there is a substance that is purposeful here)
Expressions that include smiles are just for show, to deceive (smile that you are not hurt when you are), impress (you are attractive), please (that you like someone when you don't), intimidate and dominate, there is no substance and so expressions are purely about style which is usually part of the style of a person's speech that includes how he stretches syllables, change speed and loudness.
When a peacock unfurls its tail and strut around it is not doing any useful work but the courtship display is to attract the pea hen and so it is a form of style to impress to get what he wants which is mating. It is therefore a form of expression with its body that is just for show to impress.
In the same way, all expressions of the face (smile, frown, scowl, glare, smirk, puzzled look, sad look, dejection) and body (nodding of head, hand gesticulations) are entirely for show without substance or purpose.
All ordinary golfers swing their golf clubs with a combination of substance (to move the golf ball where he wants it) and style that is the stretching, curving (direction change) and acceleration of speed and strength of force in the swing.


BY ITSELF ALL FACIAL AND BODILY EXPRESSIONS ARE MEANINGLESS (WITHOUT SUBSTANCE), FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE AND WHEN THEY OCCUR TOGETHER WITH SPEECH THEY ARE THEN PART OF THE PERSON'S SPEAKING STYLE THAT INCLUDES HOW HE STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. WHAT HE SAYS IS THE SUBSTANCE OF HIS SPEECH THAT MAY BE TRUE OR FALSE.
FACIAL EXPRESSIONS THAT INCLUDE SMILING ARE ALL ABOUT STYLE, THERE IS NO SUBSTANCE IN EXPRESSIONS OR SMILING. IF YOU THINK THERE IS SUBSTANCE OR MEANING IN A SMILE YOU MAY HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION.

Not to have style and expressions is truly fundamentally denying yourself:
Because all beings here have style and express themselves (eg smile) in face and body and it is possible not to have style or express and style and expressions are the audiovisual products of the use of force that stresses or persecutes self and others, you truly deny yourself, not partake in sin as others do by not having style or not expressing (eg smiling).
Because style and expressions are constant and fabricated using force, the person who has achieved the end of style or expressing has achieved the true end of all using force and is imbued with true effortless goodwill, enjoys effortless freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction and headed for safety after death.
Jesus spoke of the kingdom of heaven and sheep being not of this world. You are truly not of this world if you have no style and do not express yourself, you neither like nor dislike where everyone in this world in truth have style, express and like and dislike when not to do so is possible.
THERE IS ONLY FORCE AND FORCE CHANGES IN STYLE AND EXPRESSIONS:
STYLE IS ALL ABOUT USING MENTAL FORCE TO STRETCH OR PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH OF FORCE OR DIRECTION WHERE POSSIBLE JUST FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE (EG EXPRESS ANGER) OR DOMINATE.

EXPRESSIONS OF THE FACE (SMILING) AND BODY (GESTICULATING) IS ALL ABOUT USING MENTAL FORCE TO ACTIVATE THE FACIAL AND LIMB MUSCLES.

THEREFORE IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH STYLE OR EXPRESSIONS YOU ARE A PERSON WHO LIKES TO USE FORCE THAT HAS NO MEANING EXCEPT THAT IT IS INTENDED TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE IN THE PROCESS PERSECUTING YOURSELF AND OTHERS WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (DIVISION OF CONCENTRATION AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE). IF YOU THINK YOU ARE NEVERTHELESS A PERSON OF REASON YOU MAY BE FOOLED BY YOUR PSEUDO-REASON. NO MAN OF TRUE REASON WILL CONSTANTLY DISPLAY STYLE OR EXPRESSIONS.

A Definitive Definition Of Style:
IT IS OF EVEN UTMOST IMPORTANCE TO PAY ATTENTION TO IDENTIFY AND DISSOCIATE ONESELF FROM STYLE IN ALL ITS MANY GUISES IN SELF AND OTHERS BECAUSE STYLE WHICH IS IN TRUTH PRESENT IN ALL ACTIVITIES OF ALL BEINGS HERE IS DEADLY NOW AND LATER, STYLE IS ABOUT THE UNNECESSARY CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE WHAT IS MEANINGLESS ONLY FOR SHOW THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION WITH WHICH THEY PERSECUTE THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, CONDITIONS AND WILL DESTROY THEIR MINDS & MANDATES THEY EXIST AS REHASHING ROBOTS. ALL BEINGS WITH STYLE ARE IN DANGER OF MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR (OBSESSIONS AND COMPULSIONS), MAD VIOLENCE AND EMOTIONS, MAD PERCEPTION AND LOGIC (THAT WHAT IS FALSE AND HARMFUL, STYLE IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL).

ANYTHING IN THE APPEARANCE, PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND MOTION OF A BEING THAT IS IN TRUTH UNNECESSARY, MEANINGLESS MEANT TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS STYLE. WHILST THIS IS LARGELY HOW APPEARANCE, PERCEIVING (SEEING, HEARING, TOUCHING, TASTING, SMELLING), THINKING, SPEAKING AND MOTION IS CONDUCTED AND THIS CAN ONLY BE THE INDIVIDUALLY VARIED WAY IN WHICH THE USE OF FORCE IS PROLONGED TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH OF FORCE AND DIRECTION WHERE THIS IS POSSIBLE, STYLE ALSO INCLUDES THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS PERCEIVED, THOUGHT, SPOKEN AND DONE THAT IS UNNECESSARY, MEANINGLESS ONLY INTENDED TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE. THUS A SPOKEN LIE AND ALL EXPRESSIONS WITH BODY AND FACE ARE MEANINGLESS THINGS SAID OR DONE INTENDED TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE.

There is style in appearance that includes adopted postures of the person or his body parts (eg hands or fingers when typing), speech, motion, thinking and perceptions.
Style In Form: Style in form is actually the result of how things are done. Whatever differences in appearance adopted by a person or his body parts (eg hairstyle is how hair is cut according to current fads that is meaningless intended to impress or even intimidate as in punk hairstyles) that serves no purpose except to be seen to deceive, impress, please, dominate or intimidate is style in terms of appearance. Thus the style in the clothes one wears is whatever patterns or design displayed including messages printed on it, differences in cuts (eg bell bottom pants) and whatever adornments like sequins or hanging attachments that serves no true purposes for wearing clothes which are to protect oneself from the elements or for modesty. Style in posture is how one arranges one’s body parts in relation to each other that differ from others that are unnecessary or meaningless and stressful with the aim of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others.
The style in the appearance of foods is the way it is arranged on the plate that may include inedible decorations or vegetables or fruits cut in fancy shapes and they are unnecessary and serve to impress or please others.
Style In Speech: There are three parts in speech style. There is style in what is said that is unnecessary aimed at deceiving, impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others. This include repetitions like ‘come, come, come’ that is aimed at impressing others of the person’s enthusiasm or friendliness, beating around the bush and the use of impressive words to make it more impressive. There is style in the delivery which is how the individual stretches his syllables, change speed and loudness and there is style of speech in the accompanying expressions in the face, body and upper limbs.
Thus expressions of the face and hands that include your immaculate smile are just a form of style of speech, nothing more.

Style in thinking basically mirrors style in speech because thinking is essential talking and reasoning mentally to oneself.
Style in motion: Apart from whatever changes in direction (curving, rotary, zigzagging), prolonging of the motion, changes in speed and strength of force, it includes whatever accessory motion that is unnecessary to accomplish a task.
Style in perceiving: People never just see, hear, smell, taste and touch but they do so with a style in how they use force to prolong, change speed and strength of force.
For instance staring is essentially seeing with force and prolonging one’s gaze on an object to intimidate or because of covetousness. Just as some people like to stare, others have shifty eyes with regular oscillating movements of their eyes or they blink rapidly or they like to dishonestly see through the corners of their eyes (which I do not do).
Sniffing is using additional force to inhale deeply longer or prolong and smell with force. People and animals use force to hear too as can be observed when an animal pricks its ears and screws its eyes to hear a soft intruding sound.
People talk about looking inquisitively, disapprovingly, troubled look, lust filled look and all these are unconscious styles in seeing. The person who lets his yes be yes only, neither like nor dislike but just sees without curiosity, distress, disapproval or lust. Again people speak of tasting with disgust or delight and these are styles of tasting as is slurping or using prolonging force and changes in speed and force to taste the soup.
Style Is Largely Unconscious:
Although people including those who believe they are good admire style and like to be stylish in their appearance, speech and motion, they severely underestimate the presence of style in themselves and others, what they call the naturally different ways they and others behave is actually not natural but style (eg your angry or sad or mischievous way of speaking that differs from others is also a form of style). Even though they are attracted to style they will be hard pressed to define style and at best they are vaguely or partially aware they are stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness in their speech.
Stylish people do not need to know nor are they aware they are using force to prolong, change speed and loudness in their speech or to express with their faces and hands.
If I were to ask very intelligent people, even those who have heard what I said many times whether they are aware there is constant stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in their speech and if they can speak without stretching their syllables, change speed or loudness they would be found wanting. I can demonstrate to them stretching, changes of speed and loudness they do not even realize exists in their speech.
Thus stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness and expressions occur automatically largely without the stylish person's awareness, that is they must be by rote or rehashing.
The reason why they are unaware what is the nature of their styles and expressions is because style is copied without knowing from others and hammered into them because the constant bombardment of forceful stretching, changing of speed and loudness in the speech of others automatically resonate in their minds causing their minds to similarly stretch, change speed and loudness.

PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE PRESENCE OF STYLE AND EXPRESSING IN THEIR BEHAVIOR (IT IS CONSTANT).
EVEN VERY INTELLIGENT ONES CANNOT DEFINE WHAT IS THIS STYLE THAT THEY SO ADMIRE IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
IF I WERE TO ASK EVEN THOSE WHO HAVE READ WHAT I SAID MANY TIMES TO DEMONSTRATE ALL INSTANCES IN WHICH THEY STRETCHED THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGED SPEED OR LOUDNESS THEY ARE LIKELY IF NOT CERTAIN TO FALL FAR SHORT. I WILL BE ABLE TO DEMONSTRATE STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEEED AND LOUDNESS THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS PRESENT IN THEIR SPEECH.


Razak's wife assaulted Altanturya's father in court:
According to press reports Altanturya's father has complained that Razak's wife physically abused him and even punched him in the stomach. When asked, she replied “Is that possible?”
If what is alleged is true it has deadly consequences for her in the afterlife and it reflects her and her husband's nature that she is taking justice in her own hands. There are those who sympathize with her and her husband but this is siding with evil that will end with you going with evil. It is quite clear from the conduct of Razak's counsels and those associated with him that they are unsavoury people who will do whatever it takes to exonerate him including slander. Even if they win the case, they are going to pay heavily for their slanderous conduct.


Why a smile is infectious:
The reason why someone’s smile can be infectious is not because of reason but there is conveyed force and force changes in speed and strength that is perceivable and can be powerful enough to stir the person’s mental force to similarly copy or smile even over his resistance.
Herein again is evidence smiling is all about using force to move one’s face muscles that can be transmitted to onlookers that they feel obliged to return or cannot resist to have their mental forces to be similarly stirred in sympathy to smile even against their wishes.
Therefore remind yourself that whenever you smile you are stirring force in your mind that stresses and forcing others to use their own mental forces to either please you by smiling or helplessly smile in contagion or use force to be not provoked. In other words your smile is provoking others not addressing their reason.
Examples of style in substance of speech:
Expressions like ahah, ooh, jeez, uh oh, hey, phew, hmm, ahem, oh my god, goodness gracious me, my goodness are meaningless, can be dispensed with without losing any meaning to what is said and so are examples of style in the substance of speech. Often high sounding words are used to impress readers and so this too is a form of style.
It is not possible for a person who means everything he says or does or does or says everything he means to go mad and it is not possible who does not mean what he says or does not to go mad.
If smiling and all expressions are not only meaningless but forcefully conditioning and degrading your mind rather sheer pleasure and benevolent, then by frequently smiling you are forcefully conditioning yourself to the meaningless that will end in loss of control and insanity.
Because everyone smiles and he has an irresistible urge to smile, he cannot help himself, the foolish person ignores the stress, restlessness and distraction that regularly beset him and thinks that smiling is natural and good when the reason why smiling is irresistible is that it is driven by force or urge that has become so compelling after lifelong practice like a professional tennis player can reel off his strokes automatically.
Expressing pain:
Just because you are pained does not mean you must express pain but the expression is often dramatized beyond its true severity to deceive others as when a patient wants sick leave.
Even if you think it is necessary to express pain, it is all about expressing force or emotion and therefore also communicates force or emotion to observers that is the same as in a smile. If you communicate pain to observers you intentionally or unintentionally also want them to become pained and that is karma not merit.
It is impossible that a Buddha will express pain and nowadays I often do not wince or grimace with pain even when it is quite severe but I mindfully bear it. Expressing pain is unnecessary and merely magnifies it. It is because expression has become automatic that people think it is natural to express pain. Whether your expression of pain corresponds to the pain you experience or it is exaggerated with motive can be known objectively.
The Buddha spoke of the fool being hit by two arrows. When stricken a person feels pain and this is the first arrow. The fool foolishly hits himself with the second arrow by grieving. Expressing pain is a form of grieving consciously or unconsciously intended for him and others to see that adds to the pain of the first arrow.
NO MATTER HOW SEVERE THE PAIN IT IS POSSIBLE FOR NOBLE ONES TO MINDFULLY BEAR IT WITHOUT EXPRESSING AND BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE NOT TO EXPRESS PAIN AND EXPRESSING ACCENTUATES THE PAIN RATHER THAN RELIEVE AND IS MEANT TO BE SEEN IT IS UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD CANNOT HELP EXPRESSING PAIN.
EVEN IF YOU INSIST IT IS NECESSARY TO EXPRESS PAIN, YOU ARE ALSO EXPRESSING FORCE THAT CAN BE COMMUNICATED TO OBSERVERS AND IF THEY BECOME DISTRESSED OR PAINED YOU HAVE A SHARE OF KARMA FOR PAINING THEM.
The controlled insanity of trying to impress others:
You can say or do things with a style that you imagine is impressive just to impress others. People adopt a style that differs from others in how they pose, say or do things to impress others.
You can also say or do things (substance) that you think is impressive (eg boast about your BMW or ride a bicycle without hands not because you want to do so but to show off or impress) just to impress others.
In reality it is always combined, people try to impress others with a combined substance and style of what they say or do in an exaggerated way to impress or make it as impressive as they possibly can.
(Do you think God will be impressed by your antics, God is impressible like you are impressible by others? God is not interested in how impressive you are but who you truly are. If you are devoted to impressing others you will be detained here not go to heaven where there is nobody to be impressed with you)
Therefore you can impress others with your style of doing things or with the substance or things you do or say that you think is impressive; in other words there is style that is for show also in the substance of what is said or done. If you are talking about your car not because there is a purpose but to impress, then what you said about the car is hollow, for show to impress or a form of style manifest in the substance of what you say.
You can approach the subject of saying or doing things to impress others from many perspectives but whichever perspective it is viewed from it is never meaningful or there is no valid reason to say or do things to impress others and it is controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable insanity to try to impress others. If you perceive it is meaningful to say or do things to impress others you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
When successful, impressing others is a matter of making the impressed person’s mental force stir in speed and strength in a way under the control of his force of self preservation so that he finds you attractive or likeable or impressive. Often people are faking that they are impressed with you, they are condescending and this can be discerned by those who see things as they are but the fool may be conned to think others are impressed when they are faking it. Such stirring of the mental force of the impressed person cannot persist forever and therefore you are pursuing foods that do not last in disobedience of Jesus in trying to impress others.
Wanting to stir another person’s mental force to be impressed or like you is not a meaningful way to conduct yourself and if you think that there is more to others being impressed than having their mental forces stirred or impressing others is a good and worthwhile pursuit, then you may have false logic and perception that ends in mad logic and perception.
Wanting to impress others is never based on reason that can be understood but always based on a forceful or emotional urge that is addictive so that with frequent practice it soon becomes constant. Initially you force yourself to say or do things to impress others but increasingly you are a slave of an irresistible urge like smokers to smoking to keep trying to impress others.
Whatever that is unnecessary need no reason to occur and whatever needs no reason to occur can occur at any time. Whatever can occur at any time can occur all the time. And so it is that if you keep practicing something that is not necessary eg style or smiles to impress others, it can happen anytime and soon happens all the time.
It is false logic that will end in grief to think that because you now cannot help smiling or having style it is natural, you are born like that and it is true logic that smiling is stressful and false and the reason you cannot help smiling is not because it is natural but you have conditioned yourself so well to smile that you are a mindless robot of your brand of smiling.
Again it is false logic to think you are so good that you say or do things to please others despite the stress it brings because you say or do things to please others with selfish motive as a shopkeeper flatter his customer and a boy says or does everything his lover demands to please her because he wants to possess her.
If you regularly say or do things to impress others, you soon develop a false emotional self image that you are impressive and feel compelled to live up to your imagined impressive image by striving always to pose, speak and do things with a style you consider will make you impressive, you start to feel self conscious and worry you may not be impressive enough whilst at the same harbor shame that you are a slut trying to impress others, beholden to others’ opinions of you, you become a very mixed up disturbed man.
Impressing others is never ending or mad and because it is not pleasurable but tormenting, you keep saying or doing the same things to impress others, keep saying and doing new things to impress others and it is like chasing after a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow that is never there and therefore it will end in insanity. No one ever says I have impressed others enough so I will stop impressing others but they are seized by the urge to keep impressing others that will end in tears and shame.
Anyone who says that impressing others is a pleasurable pursuit is a liar or pervert because impressing others involves prodigious energy consumption to produce unnecessary stress, restlessness and distraction and whoever keeps pursuing impressing others is pursuing stress, restlessness and distraction that is insatiable and will end in madness.
Impressing others is bonding yourself to others and this is always suffering never pleasure.
THEREFORE WHICHEVER WAY YOU LOOK AT SAYING OR DOING THINGS TO IMPRESS OTHERS, IT IS MEANINGLESS (SAYING & DOING THINGS JUST TO STIR OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES, NOT ADDRESSING THEIR REASON IS MEANINGLESS), STRESS INDUCING AND SUFFERING THAT IS ENDLESS AND WILL END IN MADNESS. IF YOU THINK IT IS NEVERTHELESS MEANINGFUL TO TRY TO IMPRESS OTHERS OR YOU CANNOT SEE YOURSELF TRYING TO IMPRESS OTHERS, SO WELL DENIED IS IT BY YOU THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO IMPRESS THEN NOTHING CAN BE DONE FOR YOU.
I MAY BE PARTISAN OR MISSED SOME OBSCURE UNDERSTANDABLE REASON FOR SAYING OR DOING THINGS WITH THE INTENTION THAT IS OFTEN DENIED TO IMPRESS, CAN YOU THINK OF ANY?
PEOPLE SERIOUSLY UNDERESTIMATE THE OCCURRENCE OF STYLE OR SPEECH AND MOTION DESIGNED TO IMPRESS OTHERS AS A RESULT OF LIFELONG REPEATED WILFUL DENIAL. THEY ARE OFTEN UNAWARE WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS UNNATURAL, INTENDED TO IMPRESS OTHERS EG THAT THEY ARE FUNNY OR EASYGOING OR CHARMING, THEY ARE UNAWARE THERE IS STYLE IN THEIR POSTURES, SPEECH AND MOTION THAT IS INTENDED TO IMPRESS.
IN THE SAME WAY, HAVING A STYLE OR SAYING OR DOING THINGS TO PLEASE OTHERS, DOMINATE AND INTIMIDATE THEM IS NEVER REASONABLE WAYS OF BEHAVING BUT MEANINGLESS, STRESSFUL, NEVER ENDING AND END IN MADNESS.
Pleasing others is merely a matter of making someone like (stirs his mental force to like) himself as a result of the way or what you say or do things to him. Dominating and intimidating others is to make them fearful and submissive to you as a result of the threatening or powerful way or what you say (I will report you) or do to them. Thus the intention to impress, please, intimidate or dominate is all about stirring the recipient’s mental force not addressing his reason or understanding. You may get what you want eg impressed or pleased or submissive or intimidated people but how everlasting or meaningful is this?
People never tell others that they intend to impress, please, intimidate or dominate you with the way or what they say or do but it is unspoken (they may even insist they mean what they say when they mean to impress, please or intimidate) and therefore they never say what they mean and are hypocrites.
In order to be not a hypocrite you must tell others your intentions thus: Part or the sole purpose of my telling you about my BMW is to make you impressed or jealous, not because I want to improve your knowledge of BMWs.
Jeering & making monkey faces:
Jeering is a form of expressing with your face as is poking your tongue out or making monkey faces and they are never to express reason that can be understood but to convey forceful emotions or hostility.
Thus apart from a few gestures like to communicate ‘come’, ‘stay’, ‘go, ‘yes’ or ‘no’ that are often tainted by style all expressions including your smile communicate force not reason or a definable purposeful message.
Vital Questions:
Whenever you see an expression on your face or others’ faces, ask yourself this:
Is it doing any useful work like making tea or sweeping the floor? If it is not then it is not productive but meant to communicate.
If it is meant to communicate, what is the expression communicating? Is it force or like or dislike or emotion that it is communicating or is it understandable discrete meaning?
If you watch others and even yourself closely when they speak, there are regularly characteristic forceful jerks or twists of their heads or the raising of eyebrows that coincide with speed and strength of force changes in the words being enunciated. If it is true I can speak without such jerks even though you now cannot help it, you are regularly practicing what is unnecessary and headed for madness because the regular practice of what is unnecessary is the path to future madness. Until everything you do in speech and motion is necessary or purposeful you are in danger of insanity. Thus every time you grunt or say something madly from your jukebox or sneeze or cough to lash out you are practicing the unnecessary that will end in madness if you do not do something to correct them.
The Holy Spirit Not A Holy Spirit:
Jesus referred to the counselor as the Holy Spirit not a holy spirit and therefore unless you think Jesus was speaking carelessly or approximately like ordinary people, whoever is the counselor is the Holy Spirit not a holy spirit. And this fits well with the warning elsewhere that whoever speaks against (disagrees with) the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, not in this age or the next. How many people even amongst Christians know about the Holy Spirit let alone that they will speak against him, so why is Jesus comparing himself with the Holy Spirit? If however the Holy Spirit is the counselor and he will come and speak as Jesus did then it is pertinent for Jesus to state that whoever speaks against or disagrees with the counselor will not be forgiven.
Altanturya May Have Been Set Up:
According to testimony by one of the women who accompanied her, Altanturya received a message on her phone to which she sent a reply and decided suddenly to return to Razak’s house alone after they had just returned to the hotel from failing to see Razak on the night of Oct 19 on which she disappeared. It appears like a set up, someone had planned something and wanted Altanturya to come alone to Razak's house so that she could be taken away without hostile witnesses to be 'disappeared' without trace.
She was foolish enough not to desist as Razak warned through his private investigators and trusted Razak to some extent although she made arrangements of whom to call if anything happened to her. Beneath the veneer of urbanity and gentleness are concealed sharp long fangs and if you are foolish enough to be taken in by others’ charms you may pay for it even with your life.
Razak has admitted he had an affair with Altanturya and does not deny the pair of unsavoury characters were private investigators under his employ and these two had made numerous visits to the hotel where the women stayed at unseemly hours, even refusing to leave, threatened to throw them out of the window and threatened that Razak will kill them if they did not leave Malaysia.
Thus there is sufficient motive and declared intention (through his private investigators) for Razak to want to kill Altanturya and it would be very convenient that she was taken away at his house after she received a phone call and went to his house alone.

It appears that Najib’s role in this case is secondary in providing the means for Razak to get rid of Altanturya and abusing his power unless Altanturya never told anyone that she was having an affair with Najib not Razak who was merely an intermediary.
It was Razak that Altanturya wanted see at least for a last time and it was Razak who hired private investigators who harassed the women at the hotel they stayed after they arrived in Malaysia on Oct 8.

WHATEVER THE OUTCOME OF THE TRIAL THERE IS ENOUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT RAZAK HAD MOTIVE AND DECLARED INTENTION TO KILL HER THROUGH PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS HE DID NOT DENY WAS EMPLOYED BY HIM.

Quote: ALTANTUYA Shaariibuu looked like she was replying to an SMS before she went alone to Abdul Razak Baginda’s house on the night she went missing.
Her friend Uuriintuya Gal-Ochir testified that she, Altantuya and the deceased's cousin Namiraa Gerelmaa had just reached the lobby of Hotel Malaya on the night of Oct 19 when Altantuya suddenly decided to return to the political analyst’s house in Damansara Heights.
“She (Altantuya) said: ‘If I go alone, Razak Baginda will see me.’ I told her not to go. If go, go together but she was typing a message on her phone. Maybe she received a message to see him alone,” said the 30-year-old housewife.
Altantuya’s cousin Namiraa Gerelmaa told the High Court that P. Balasubramaniam’s assistant K. Suras Kumar barged into the hotel room on the eighth floor where she, Altantuya and friend Uuriintuya Gal-Ochir were staying and threatened to throw them “out of the window” if they did not return to Mongolia.
She said Altantuya lodged a police report on the afternoon of Oct 19 last year out of fear of what the men would do.
“The three of us had been under pressure for a long time. Suras and Bala always threatened to kill us and throw us out of the window.
“Every night Suras would come to the hotel room and knock on our door around 3am, 4am or 5am. He hit the door forcefully to enter and said 'Razak Baginda is going to kill you',” said Namiraa
Namiraa, 23, also said that Altantuya had told her that she had come here to see her boyfriend Baginda.
She added that Suras and Balasubramaniam started making the death threats about four days after the three women arrived on Oct 8.
She said that during one of the threats Altantuya pleaded with Suras saying, “I only want to see Razak Baginda one time only.”
“Suras replied: ‘Razak Baginda is going to kill you. You cannot see him. You better go back to Mongolia. He will kill you’,” she said.
She said she and Altantuya lodged a report at a police station near Hotel Malaya, where they stayed, because of the death threats.
“That was why Bala and Suras always followed us. Razak sent his people to kill us,” she said.
“One morning around 5am, Suras Kumar knocked on our door forcefully and came in. He slept in our room on one of our beds until 10am.
“We couldn’t sleep because we were so frightened and scared. He was the only one sleeping while the three of us were just standing there,” Namiraa said of the “five-hour visit.”
Other times, she said, Suras Kumar’s visits were to pressure and threaten them.
Namiraa replied: “Every time he came he said ‘Razak Baginda sent me to kill you’. Of course they were not pleasant.”
In the afternoon, Altantuya’s friend Uuriintuya Gal-Ochir gave a similar account about Suras Kumar.

Body Language:
Whatever motions that the body makes that are without purpose (eg typing or making tea) that may be voluntary or involuntary are part of a person’s body language that expresses or reflects the mood or emotions that occupy that mind, requires only force and the emotional mental state to express through muscles and communicate only force directly or like or dislike or emotions indirectly that can be perceived and apply force on recipients. Such body language or expressions do not need and have nothing to do with reason or have understandable meaning or purpose.
Body language is the totality of expressions with one’s body that encompasses all expressions of the face, torso and limbs. Because the body parts can only express by moving and moving only involves force, all forms of body language is about communicating force or its derivatives like and dislike and the emotions.
You can never cheat everyone because your body language will betray you to those who know where to look for telltale signs of contradiction to what you are saying or expressing. For instance if you are faking friendliness, that you like a person just to get along, your body language will betray you. You look away when you smile or shake hand, there may be a smirk; you are fidgety or cross your legs away that belie your expressed friendliness.
Sometimes people do not use just their faces and upper limbs to express themselves but they use their whole bodies.
For instance a person express pride by standing and walking with chin tilted up, chest puffed up with stiff brisk or confident strides. A person overwhelmed by shame walks with head bowed, his face looks glum and he may take tentative steps.
A man express sexiness by the way he struts perhaps like a gunslinger if he perceives that as sexy whilst women copy those they perceive as sexy by gyrating their hips and propping up their chests to accentuate their endowments. This too is a form of expression that requires force to move body parts in the stylish poses and gait, is stressful and communicates force or it is provocative (provokes your lust) not meaning to onlookers.
When people smile whilst talking they may be expressing forceful attractive like for you with their faces and when they look stern or displeased they are expressing forceful dislike for you with their faces.
When people cross their legs towards another seated, they are expressing forceful liking or attraction with their legs and likewise dislike when they cross their legs away.
When people lean forward towards another in conversation they are expressing liking with their torso and when they lean away they are expressing dislike or distancing with their bodies.
Thus you can dislike and like with your face, body or legs or all combined.
A Buddha has no body language because he is not forceful and therefore does not express himself with the muscles of his body nor communicate force as forceful or emotional people must, whether he likes or not.
ALL FORCEFUL OR LIKING OR DISLIKING EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ‘SPEAK’ WITH THEIR BODIES ALL THE TIME ‘TELLING’ OTHERS HOW THEY FEEL EG TIRED, BORED, EXCITED, RESTLESS, ENVIOUS OR JEALOUS. THEY ARE SPEAKING BUT IT IS NOT MEANING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD BUT COMMUNICATING FORCE, LIKE OR DISLIKE OR EMOTIONS ONLY.
EXPRESSING YOURSELF AS OPPOSED TO VERBALLY SPEAKING WITH YOUR MOUTH INVOLVES THE WHOLE BODY NOT JUST THE FACE OR HANDS ALTHOUGH IT IS MORE PROMINENT THERE. SOME OF THE EXPRESSING IS INVOLUNTARY AS WHEN THEIR HAIRS ARE RAISED BECAUSE THEY ARE FRIGHTENED BY GHOSTLY SOUNDS.
Experiencing without need to know:
Whenever someone roars off in his motorbike or car with violent acceleration in speed and engine force (loudness), the perceived violent acceleration in speed and loudness makes all listeners want to accelerate in speed of force and strength of force when there is no reason why they should because they are not riding the bike. This is stressful and maddening which is a universal experience that many goats have learnt to use force to shut off or blank off at risk of being detached from common reality to exist in his private make believe reality where such sounds are muffled.
BECAUSE THERE IS IN TRUTH NO NEED TO RUSH OFF WITH SUCH VIOLENT ACCELERATION OF SPEED OF FORCE AND STRENGTH OF FORCE NO MATTER HOW MUCH OF A RUSH YOU ARE IN AND THERE IS NO REASON WHY OTHERS AROUND SHOULD ALSO SIMILARLY WANT TO ACCELERATE VIOLENTLY IN SPEED OF FORCE AND STRENGTH OF FORCE JUST BECAUSE THEY HEARD YOU DO SO, YOU ARE PERSECUTING OTHERS BY DOING SO AND LIABLE FOR PUNISHMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THAT YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO VIOLENT CHANGES IN SPEED OF FORCE AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WHEN YOU DO SO.
MOST ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW THAT IT IS THE VIOLENT ACCELERATION IN SPEED OF FORCE AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT THEY ARE HEARING THAT IS AUTOMATICALLY IRRITATING BUT THEY NEVERTHELESS CAN EXPERIENCE THE URGE TO SIMILARLY ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.
Ordinary people do not know and cannot see that there is constant forceful stretching, changes in speed and loudness in their speech and motion and that of everyone around them but even if they do not know and cannot see (facilitates their being maintained in or bonded to suffering), they all can experience the stress, restlessness and distraction such constant forceful stretching, changing of speed and strength of force unfailingly engenders.
No Point Forcing Yourself To Agree With Me:
There is no point forcing yourself to agree with what I say because what I say are not matters for faith but discernment or seeing things as they truly are. If you cannot see the truth in what I say or understand what I say then your agreement is meaningless and hypocritical that will end in madness for you.
Thus if what I say is the truth and only way out of suffering and you cannot see and will therefore disagree then you must go your own wrong way into suffering even for another eternity.
What kind of prosecutor is this?
You can expect the defence counsel to protest that evidence immigration records of Altanturya and her companions’ entries into Malaysia have been deleted are irrelevant but it is the chief prosecutor who believes this evidence is irrelevant and should be deleted from court records.
Such deletions indicate that there may be powers that be who wanted all records of her entry expunged so that in the event of a successful cover up of the murder no immigration record to prove she had been in Malaysia could be incriminating.
This incident is an indication the kind of prosecutor and court is conducting the case and it is circus of clowns than solemn law court in which the truth may come out on the sidelines than on the main course.
If the chief prosecutor does not ask the right questions how is the truth going to come out? The reason why such evidence is not admitted is that it would lead to embarrassing questions who ordered the records deleted and why.
DPP Tun Abd Majid stood up again, this time arguing that the matter was not relevant to the case and that it should be expunged from the trial notes.
Kamarul Hisham then said: “I agree with the DPP. If it is expunged, then there would be no need to cross.”
“Why expunge? Do you want to expunge or cross-examine?” Justice Mohd Zaki asked the lawyer.
“Expunge,” replied Kamarul Hisham.
Finally, the judge made his ruling: “No need to expunge and no need to cross.”
Why this case came into the open is a bigger question:
Why this case came into the open is a bigger question than who ordered Altanturya’s murder.
It is well within the ability of the police to hush this case up even despite diplomatic pressure from Mongolia because no hostile witnesses saw what happened after Altanturya left the hotel that night and anything could have happened that could give the police an excuse for making no progress in investigation.
Because the police is under the jurisdiction of Badawi, there may be eyes in the police force that knew what happened who have vested interest in wanting this affair out in the open for political ends.
Jumping up & down with excitement:
People including children jump up and down repeatedly with even violent movements of their hands sometimes because they are truly excited sometime faked.
If you let your yes be yes only one jump and shake of your hands will do to tell others you are excited but it is meaningless, not letting your yes be yes only and mad to repetitively jump up and down.
What useful work are you doing when you jump up and down? If there is no useful work then you are wasting prodigious energy to express or impress others with your excitement or enjoyment which cannot be so because it is stressful, restless and distracting to do so.
Such excitement is contagious and stirs observers’ mental forces so that they become aroused either to like or hate what you are doing.
THEREFORE JUMPING UP AND DOWN WITH A SMILE AND VIOLENT HAND MOVEMENTS IS A FORM OF TOTAL BODY EXPRESSION THAT IS UNNECESSARY THAT ONLY REQUIRES FORCE AND A MENTAL SOFTWARE OF HOW TO DO SO THAT DIFFERS IN DIFFERENT PERSONS THAT COMMUNICATE VIOLENT FORCE CHANGES TO OTHERS AND ENTIRELY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR DECEIVE OTHERS.
Another Gang Rape Of Country?
According to DAP’s Ronnie Lau, the investors claim (may not be true) to invest about $600 million in the smart tunnel project but tax payers paid 1.5 billion and will pay toll. This tunnel has not been tested for flood mitigation as claimed because it is not ready at both ends and further it has not be tested for the removal of silt that will be deposited not just in the lower tunnel but in the traffic tunnel after flood diversion and the drainage away from the tunnel may be woefully inadequate.
Sounds like another hare brain scheme to rip of the nation perhaps because someone has a tunnel boring machine that needs employment and it is an excuse to rip off the nation both in overinflated money spent and toll collected and it may not work just like sprinkling water from the KLCC tower will not clear KL’s haze.
Smart tunnel: They can only bluff the PM
Category: General
Posted by: Raja Petra
This must be the joke of the century!Ronnie Liu Tian KhiewYou don’t need to inspect the lowest level of the Smart system to know that MMC-Gamuda or the DID have not tested it for flood mitigation.That’s not because they have admitted so but simply because they have not found a solution for desiltation.What’s desiltation? You see, flood water being flood water, it’ s not clean. In fact, it is always full of mud (silt) and rubbish. That’s why after every flood, the biggest headache is washing the mud away (desiltation).So, if the concessionaire or the DID really test the lowest level of the Smart system for flood mitigation, the entire level will be filled with mud. They have not thought of how to clean up the tunnels.By now, you must have understood why they have not tested it earlier. And more so because both the inlet and outlet of the tunnels were not completed when Kuala Lumpur was hit with three flash floods all within two weeks in early June.The authority has just announced that the entire tunnel is now completed on 23 June 2007 ( after heavy shelling by the PM one night after his new marriage). But that’s another “bullshit”. Why do I say that?Just make a trip to Taman Desa and you would know what I mean.They could only bluff the PM, who’s now away in Italy.Two weeks ago, right before I went to inspect the Smart tunnel for the first time with other DAP MPs and engineers, I was having lunch at the restaurant next to the Danau Desa pond. At that point of time, the pond, which is part of the Smart system, was not ready for flood mitigation.Even today, the pond is far from ready. It would not be ready in another 3 months according to the experts whom I have consulted.This evening, I saw the workers were still busy widening and deepening the pond. And guess what, they have not even completed the outlet ( leaving the pond into Sg Kerayong).Out of fear of another flash flood, as a temporary measure I guess, the contractors has just fixed some 10 GI (galvanised iron) pipes of various sizes to drain the water from the pond with the help of water pumps. Guess what, the water flows from the pond to a normal monsoon drain (only 2 feet wide by 4 feet deep) parellel to the main road, before discharging the water to a U-Culvert drains some 100 meters away. This U-Culvert drain is connected to the Sg Kerayong some distance “downstream”.It appears to us that if there is another flash flood hitting KL in one of these days, the authority may really open up the lowest level of the Smart tunnel to test it out, and then relying on these pipes to drain the water to the normal monsoon drains (with the help of water pumps) and then to the U-Culvert drain before flowing into Sg Kerayong. So do not be too surprise if the entire road from Danau Desa to Old Klang Road area will be flooded ( the normal monsoon drains certainly could not cope with such influx of water from the pond).Earlier, I was talking about how difficult it would be to do desiltation for the Smart tunnel. If they really open up the second level (and even the third level), imagine what would happen to the lightings, equipments and road furniture on these two levels, not forgetting about the desiltation works after the flood.I would bet with bloggers that the authority may not have the guts to test the Smart system for water mitigation. Not even the lowest level if you asked me. Am I saying the authority may not even test the tunnnel for flood mitigation at all? You bet!Last Saturday, at a briefing in Universiti Malaya on the Smart tunnel conducted by the DID chief , he obviously was embarrased by the DAP Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai who played the video clips (showing the massive leakages ) of the tunnel in the meeting. Out of frustration, he made a “stupid” and irresponsible remark; he said that ” those who think the Smart tunnel was not safe, don’t use it.” This fler also ”bullshit” by saying that all the cost of building the Smart tunnel came from the concessionaire and “it’s ok ” to let them go bust!In fact, the concessionaire only paid about RM600 million for the tunnel; the rest of the RM 1. 5 billion came from Malaysian taxpayers! If you asked me, he ’s as arrogant as the great Samy.Tomorrow morning at 11 am, DAP Bukit Bintang MP Fong Kui Lun will move a motion to debate on ” why the ‘Smart’ tunnel is actually not very smart”!
Overkill:
It may have been unnecessary and trying to be too clever to have ordered the deletion of immigration records of Altanturya’s presence in Malaysia and in doing so it brought more people involved in the deletion into the picture who could act as whistleblowers. If you were wise you would not have undertaken this venture and it reflects bungling that they deleted the records that obviously alerted someone to make known what happened publicly.
What purpose does it serve to delete her presence in Malaysia when her disappearance does not need an explanation because there have been many famous disappearances in the past like the Thai Silk king in Malaysia’s Cameron Highlands and Robert Menzies, Australian prime minister?
Surely the court should call witnesses from the Immigration Dept to explain if it is true record of Altanturya’s visits have been deleted and who could have deleted it that may be of relevance to her disappearance and to say that it irrelevant suggests that there may be a can of worms there that the prosecutor does not want opened.