Meaning & Purpose:
Meaning must be distinguished from purpose. Something can have both meaning and purpose and something can have purpose but no meaning.
Style has purposes and it is to either singularly or multi-purposely deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others but it never has meaning.
What meaning can there be in style if it is always present and always intended to either singularly or multiply not specifically deceive, impress, intimidate and dominate and is repeated endlessly often mindlessly without awareness and satiation with the same thing said or done (eg keep speaking about his car to boast) and many other different things said and done (eg speaking about his car, wife, children and house to boast)? For something to have true meaning it must be specific and not transferrable to other things, otherwise you are flirting with confusion and insanity with the loss of control of the confusion over the meaning of your style and deeds.
What meaning can there be in something (style) that is merely the products of the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness? Such changes in force cannot have any meaning, cannot convey specific meaning, it is merely a display of force that is not everlasting but ends with the display and is merely intended to stir the speed and strength of the mental force of the recipient so that he is similarly deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated and dominated as the perpetrator himself must experience a share.
No one can mean his style because you cannot mean the constant prolonging, changing of speed and loudness in your speech and they never tell you that the purpose of their accompanying style in a particular occasion is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate you. Because they never declare the purpose of their accompanying style and never declare the true purpose of the substance of what they say or do that may be not what it is at face value but to similarly also deceive (tell a lie), impress (tell you about their Mercedes), please (to flatter you), intimidate (make you fearful) or dominate (make you submit), they are hypocrites who never mean what they say or do and never say or do what they mean.
If the intention of the style you say or do things and even the substance of what you say or do is actually to deceive or impress or please or intimidate or dominate and you never state this to your recipient, aren’t you a hypocrite? If you are not ashamed of your purpose to say things falsely impress or please others, why don’t you acknowledge it, declare it?
The presence of style in any person’s poses, speech and motion cannot be denied and it is an objective diagnosis.
As long as there is a presence of the (artificial, unnecessary) use of force to prolong, change direction (twisted posture or motion), speed and strength of force that can be known by God and those who discern even if you deny or cannot see present in you and others, there is style.
THEREFORE STYLE THAT IS ALWAYS PRESENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE IN THIS WORLD AND CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DIAGNOSED AND IS MERELY THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE IN MOTION), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE HAS PURPOSE AND IT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE BUT IT (STYLE) NEVER HAS MEANING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT IS ALL ABOUT THE USE OF FORCE TARGETTED AT THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE INTENDING TO MAKE IT RESONATE SYMPATHETICALLY. OFTEN EVEN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO HAS NO MEANING BUT IS INTENDED WITHOUT STATING TO ALSO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE. ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE (WHEN YOU SPEAK ANGRILY, THE ANGRY WAY YOU SPEAK IS THE STYLE) IS A HYPOCRITE WHO DOES NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS OR SAYS WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE HE NEVER TELLS YOU HE WANTS TO INTIMIDATE YOU AS THE OCCASION MAY BE.
When you speak or do things angrily, sadly, humorously, gently, eagerly or excitedly, that angry, sad, humorous, gentle, eager or excited way you say or do it is your style for that occasion that although it has similarities, differs from others and it is not just then that you have style but always there is style in you and all beings in this world that is often subconsciously intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate and is so well denied that they now accept their style and cannot see there is style that is not free but requires energy and force to fabricate.
If you are constantly using force to prolong, change speed and loudness and you are totally unaware you do so, aren’t you a great fool who does not know what he is doing (prolonging, changing speed and loudness) especially when this is the infallible source to your stress, restlessness and distraction?
Because style is constant in the postures, motion and speech of all ordinary people and it is the inalienable source of insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction they must suffer from, style is intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate, anyone who is not conscious he has style and he intends to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate is a great fool who does not know what he is saying or doing and does not know he is setting himself up for mad perception, mad logic, mad emotions, mad rote behavior, mad violence, mad stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in everlasting perdition not heaven.
Not worthy of Jesus:
Jesus spoke about people being worthy of him.
Anyone who has style that constantly unnecessarily stresses, make restless and distracts himself and all others who come into contact with him cannot be worthy of Jesus except in his delusion that he nevertheless is.
If you are not worthy of Jesus you must wander alone in your stylish ‘individual’ way even for another eternity.
Defining Meaning & Purpose:
All words have meaning.
Words like ‘must’, ‘the’, ‘sure’, ‘never’, etc have specific meaning that can be understood and be used to convey specific messages to others.
Purpose is merely the intention of whatever you say or do and that can include your style of your speech or action or your pose.
Even though you are often unaware (so well denied or accustomed is it), there must be some purpose in your appreciable style otherwise you are mad. The purpose of their style which they never state or declare to themselves and others is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
DO YOU EVER DECLARE TO OTHERS THAT THE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY IS TO IMPRESS YOU OR PLEASE YOU WHICHEVER THE CASE MAY BE. IF YOU ARE INTENDING TO IMPRESS AND YOU DID NOT DECLARE IT, AREN’T YOU A HYPOCRITE WHO NEVER SAY WHAT HE MEANS, NEVER SAYS “I MEAN TO IMPRESS WITH HOW AND EVEN WHAT I SAY”.
Even the president has to please others:
Meaning must be distinguished from purpose. Something can have both meaning and purpose and something can have purpose but no meaning.
Style has purposes and it is to either singularly or multi-purposely deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others but it never has meaning.
What meaning can there be in style if it is always present and always intended to either singularly or multiply not specifically deceive, impress, intimidate and dominate and is repeated endlessly often mindlessly without awareness and satiation with the same thing said or done (eg keep speaking about his car to boast) and many other different things said and done (eg speaking about his car, wife, children and house to boast)? For something to have true meaning it must be specific and not transferrable to other things, otherwise you are flirting with confusion and insanity with the loss of control of the confusion over the meaning of your style and deeds.
What meaning can there be in something (style) that is merely the products of the use of force to prolong, change speed and loudness? Such changes in force cannot have any meaning, cannot convey specific meaning, it is merely a display of force that is not everlasting but ends with the display and is merely intended to stir the speed and strength of the mental force of the recipient so that he is similarly deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated and dominated as the perpetrator himself must experience a share.
No one can mean his style because you cannot mean the constant prolonging, changing of speed and loudness in your speech and they never tell you that the purpose of their accompanying style in a particular occasion is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate you. Because they never declare the purpose of their accompanying style and never declare the true purpose of the substance of what they say or do that may be not what it is at face value but to similarly also deceive (tell a lie), impress (tell you about their Mercedes), please (to flatter you), intimidate (make you fearful) or dominate (make you submit), they are hypocrites who never mean what they say or do and never say or do what they mean.
If the intention of the style you say or do things and even the substance of what you say or do is actually to deceive or impress or please or intimidate or dominate and you never state this to your recipient, aren’t you a hypocrite? If you are not ashamed of your purpose to say things falsely impress or please others, why don’t you acknowledge it, declare it?
The presence of style in any person’s poses, speech and motion cannot be denied and it is an objective diagnosis.
As long as there is a presence of the (artificial, unnecessary) use of force to prolong, change direction (twisted posture or motion), speed and strength of force that can be known by God and those who discern even if you deny or cannot see present in you and others, there is style.
THEREFORE STYLE THAT IS ALWAYS PRESENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE IN THIS WORLD AND CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DIAGNOSED AND IS MERELY THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE IN MOTION), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE HAS PURPOSE AND IT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE BUT IT (STYLE) NEVER HAS MEANING THAT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT IS ALL ABOUT THE USE OF FORCE TARGETTED AT THE RECIPIENT’S MENTAL FORCE INTENDING TO MAKE IT RESONATE SYMPATHETICALLY. OFTEN EVEN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO HAS NO MEANING BUT IS INTENDED WITHOUT STATING TO ALSO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE. ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE (WHEN YOU SPEAK ANGRILY, THE ANGRY WAY YOU SPEAK IS THE STYLE) IS A HYPOCRITE WHO DOES NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS OR SAYS WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE HE NEVER TELLS YOU HE WANTS TO INTIMIDATE YOU AS THE OCCASION MAY BE.
When you speak or do things angrily, sadly, humorously, gently, eagerly or excitedly, that angry, sad, humorous, gentle, eager or excited way you say or do it is your style for that occasion that although it has similarities, differs from others and it is not just then that you have style but always there is style in you and all beings in this world that is often subconsciously intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate and is so well denied that they now accept their style and cannot see there is style that is not free but requires energy and force to fabricate.
If you are constantly using force to prolong, change speed and loudness and you are totally unaware you do so, aren’t you a great fool who does not know what he is doing (prolonging, changing speed and loudness) especially when this is the infallible source to your stress, restlessness and distraction?
Because style is constant in the postures, motion and speech of all ordinary people and it is the inalienable source of insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction they must suffer from, style is intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate, anyone who is not conscious he has style and he intends to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate is a great fool who does not know what he is saying or doing and does not know he is setting himself up for mad perception, mad logic, mad emotions, mad rote behavior, mad violence, mad stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in everlasting perdition not heaven.
Not worthy of Jesus:
Jesus spoke about people being worthy of him.
Anyone who has style that constantly unnecessarily stresses, make restless and distracts himself and all others who come into contact with him cannot be worthy of Jesus except in his delusion that he nevertheless is.
If you are not worthy of Jesus you must wander alone in your stylish ‘individual’ way even for another eternity.
Defining Meaning & Purpose:
All words have meaning.
Words like ‘must’, ‘the’, ‘sure’, ‘never’, etc have specific meaning that can be understood and be used to convey specific messages to others.
Purpose is merely the intention of whatever you say or do and that can include your style of your speech or action or your pose.
Even though you are often unaware (so well denied or accustomed is it), there must be some purpose in your appreciable style otherwise you are mad. The purpose of their style which they never state or declare to themselves and others is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
DO YOU EVER DECLARE TO OTHERS THAT THE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY IS TO IMPRESS YOU OR PLEASE YOU WHICHEVER THE CASE MAY BE. IF YOU ARE INTENDING TO IMPRESS AND YOU DID NOT DECLARE IT, AREN’T YOU A HYPOCRITE WHO NEVER SAY WHAT HE MEANS, NEVER SAYS “I MEAN TO IMPRESS WITH HOW AND EVEN WHAT I SAY”.
Even the president has to please others:
Whoever you are it cannot be that you enjoy having to turn around to smile and wave to say goodbye before you board the plane but it is all orchestrated as he and his wife has done so many times before in remarkably similar fashion and it is intended to please others.
You can deny that you are not pleasing others, you are genuinely wishing others goodbye but the truth if you are forcing yourself can be objectively known. The fact that you cannot see that you are pleasing others, you think you are genuine reflects how false your perception that will end in mad perception will be.
It is always a urge and a ritual to turn around to wave and say goodbye that becomes increasingly maddening with frequent forcing and will end in mad urge to wave, smile and say goodbye.
Does Bush tell you “I intend to please you by turning around to smile and wave?” or does he believe with emotion that he really means to wave and say goodbye?
Increasingly Human Like Robots:
You can deny that you are not pleasing others, you are genuinely wishing others goodbye but the truth if you are forcing yourself can be objectively known. The fact that you cannot see that you are pleasing others, you think you are genuine reflects how false your perception that will end in mad perception will be.
It is always a urge and a ritual to turn around to wave and say goodbye that becomes increasingly maddening with frequent forcing and will end in mad urge to wave, smile and say goodbye.
Does Bush tell you “I intend to please you by turning around to smile and wave?” or does he believe with emotion that he really means to wave and say goodbye?
Increasingly Human Like Robots:
Recently I saw a robot clad in the form of a boy rolling about restlessly on a mat just like little boys do. The above is a picture of a robot that seems to express surprise or being ‘stunned’.
It is not possible that a robot knows what it is doing but it is merely expressing what it has been programmed to express that may appear to be appropriate to the situation at hand so that it appears alive but there is no life nor consciousness in it, it is all a fake or deception.
RATHER THAN INDICATING THAT LIFE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COLLECTION OF BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES THAT A MERE ROBOT WITH SOPHISTICATED COMPUTING POWER AND ACTUATORS CAN MIMICK AND THEREFORE LIFE HAS NO EVERLASTING MEANING OR CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND LIFE AFTER DEATH WHAT SUCH INCREASINGLY LIFE-LIKE ROBOTS ARE TELLING US IS THAT HUMANS ARE NO MORE THAN SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS WHOSE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF SPEECH CAN BE PRODUCED WITHOUT NEED FOR CONSCIOUSNESS OR AWARENESS BY MINDLESS REGURGITATION FROM A FAR MORE SOPHISTICATED MENTAL JUKEBOX WITH THE DIFFERENCE THAT IN HUMANS THERE IS CONSCIOUSNESS THAT MERELY ACTS AS AN OBSERVER, EXPERIENCER AND INSTRUCTOR WHO NEVER CARRIES OUT LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION SPEECH OR ACTION. IN OTHER WORDS, SUCH ‘WONDROUS’ ROBOTS SHOW THAT YOU NEED NOT BE A HUMAN TO DO WHAT MOST PEOPLE USUALLY OR ALWAYS DO OR SAY, A PREPROGRAMMED ROBOT THAT HAS A CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE IN SIGHT AND SOUND RELEVANT DATA (EG PRESENCE OF OBSTRUCTIONS) AND HAVE PROGRAMS THAT TELL IT WHAT TO DO OR SAY WHEN THEY DETECT CERTAIN PATTERNS OF CUES CAN ACTIVATE ACTUATORS THAT CARRY OUT THE INSTRUCTIONS IN A WAY THAT DECEIVE OBSERVERS TO THINK IT IS A LIVE INTELLIGENT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION RESPONSE WHEN IT IS A STANDARD MINDLESS LIFELESS INFLEXIBLE RESPONSE.
True and false logic:
It is false logic (that will end in mad logic) if you think because robots can imitate the actions of humans, there is no everlasting meaning to life, there is no life after death and life is just the result entirely of biochemical processes because you are not justified to conclude thus because there is a critical difference between humans and robots in that humans have consciousness, robots never have consciousness.
It is true logic to instead conclude that the increasingly ‘uncannily’ human like robots indicate that the origin or source of the substance and style speech, motion and postures of humans can be similarly preprogrammed or reproduced from memory to fit the current situation, humans are faking it, faking they are behaving specific to the occasion when they are rehashing stale from memory the same old things they say or do to meet demands of the situations and they feel stumped or flustered when they meet a situation they have not met before like a girl who has learnt only how to flirt but not to perform in bed and she cannot perform in bed if there is no program in her mind to tell her how to do so. Rather than the person’s consciousness being the mindful perceiver and initiator of speech and actions specific to the occasion, in ordinary people their consciousness is merely an observer, a conniver that approves of what is going on and it merely acts as the disc jockey as to what track to play for the occasion.
Can robots experience pain?
If I chop your hand off, do you experience excruciating pain that may cause you to become hysterical and faint?
If you chop off a robot’s hand, does it experience pain?
You can program a robot to imitate but can a robot truly experience pain?
You can program a robot to fake it is experiencing anger, hate, disgust, lust or greed but can you program it to experience anger, hate, lust or greed as you can?
Therefore there may be crucial differences between beings and robots and you are not justified to say because robots behave increasing like humans, life is nothing more than the result of biochemistry.
However, you are entitled to conclude that humans may be behaving like robots because robots can do the same things human do.
The right & wrong conclusions:
Although robots with increasingly sophisticated sensors, programs of what it should activate when it detects certain patterns in its sensors and actuators that can carry out sophisticated tasks that are remarkably human like, it is false logic to conclude that it means that existence as a being can be explained entirely by scientific laws. The reason is because beings have awareness that robots never have, beings can feel pain and emotions where robots cannot.
What you can conclude in the face of increasingly sophisticated robots is that it does not take human beings to say or do the things in the same styles ordinary people usually do, a robot can do the same thing with the same style and therefore all the people you see around may be merely overrated disc jockeys who are faking they are present and instead they are constantly rehashing the substance and style of what they want to say or do that is prerecorded standard and passed on deceitfully as live specific to the occasion.
BECAUSE ROBOTS CAN INCREASINGLY DO THE THINGS HUMANS DO AND ROBOTS HAVE NO CONSCIOUSNESS, IT SUGGESTS THAT ‘MARVELLOUS’ HUMAN SPEECH AND ACTION MAY ALSO BE SIMILARLY ROBOTIC, REACTIVATIONS OF OLD RECORDINGS THAT ARE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO THE SITUATION AT HAND BUT OTHERS MAY FIND WANTING. UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES THIS CLEVER REHASHED FAKES MAY ESCAPE DETECTION BUT IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS WHEN THE ROBOTIC PERSON IS TIRED, STRESSED OR DISTRACTED, HE MAY CUE IN SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE CLEARLY ODD BUT ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO ARE THEMSELVES ROBOTS NEVER REALIZE IS BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE’S SPEECH AND ACTIONS ARE ALWAYS CLEVER FAKES, CLEVER REHASHES OF STANDARD RECORDINGS OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO.
All About Force:
Style which is universally present constantly in beings in this world is all about force and nothing to do with reason; style is nothing more than the audible or visible results of using force to stretch or prolong, change direction, speed and strength of force and the purpose of style (to impress, please, dominate and intimidate) are similarly all about stirring the mental force of the target.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to you as a result of what you say or do, he likes you or is impressed by you.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to what you say or did that flatters him, he is pleased or likes what you say or do to him.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the (angry) way you say or did it that makes him fearful, he is intimidated by your style.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the forceful way you say or did it that makes him submissive, he is dominated by your style.
THUS STYLE THAT IS EVIDENT IN THE POSTURES, MOTION AND SPEECH IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE AUDIO AND VISUAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE USE OF FORCE BY THAT PERSON AND THIS CAN BE DEFINED AS THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND THE INTENTION OF STYLE THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS TOO ARE SIMILARLY NOTHING MORE THAN A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN THE RECIPIENT TO LIKE, DISLIKE OR BE FEARFUL THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING.
WHETHER A PERSON HAS STYLE OR NOT IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE BUT AN OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSIS. AS LONG AS THERE IS PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE POSES, MOTION AND SPEECH OF THAT PERSON, HE HAS STYLE AND MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE, BY REHASH FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRODUCE HIS BRAND OF STYLE SO CONSISTENTLY EACH TIME IF IT WAS FRESHLY COMPOSED ANEW EACH TIME.
THE FACT THAT YOU ARE UNSURE IF THERE IS STYLE IN YOU AND OTHERS OR YOU CANNOT SEE STYLE IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS WHEN IT IS PRESENT REFLECTS A LACK OF DISCERNMENT OR ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ARE ACTUALLY PRESENT AND IT IS MORE AGONIZING TO BEHAVE IN A WAY WITH STYLE THAT CAUSES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND BE UNABLE TO SEE YOURSELF DOING SO AND THEREFORE NOT SEE A WAY OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM SUFFERING IF YOU CANNOT SEE HOW YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE, WHETHER HE CAN SEE OR NOT, MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE AS A ROBOT FAKING LIVE OR GENUINE BEHAVIOR AND HE IS IN DANGER OF MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD EMOTIONS & MAD VIOLENCE THAT CAN ARISE SUDDENLY OUT OF PROPORTION TO PROVOCATION.
For one who sees rightly, all ordinary people have styles and they are therefore functioning as robots faking live speech and motion when their speech and motion are all regurgitated from memory from a mental jukebox that is far superior to any robot humans can device at the moment.
If you are a man of style you are a man of force that has nothing to do with reason and therefore you are not a man of reason but an irrational man of force suffering now, ever conditioning yourself to suffering that will end in loss of control and the weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Courting Insanity:
It is not possible that a robot knows what it is doing but it is merely expressing what it has been programmed to express that may appear to be appropriate to the situation at hand so that it appears alive but there is no life nor consciousness in it, it is all a fake or deception.
RATHER THAN INDICATING THAT LIFE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COLLECTION OF BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES THAT A MERE ROBOT WITH SOPHISTICATED COMPUTING POWER AND ACTUATORS CAN MIMICK AND THEREFORE LIFE HAS NO EVERLASTING MEANING OR CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND LIFE AFTER DEATH WHAT SUCH INCREASINGLY LIFE-LIKE ROBOTS ARE TELLING US IS THAT HUMANS ARE NO MORE THAN SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS WHOSE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE OF SPEECH CAN BE PRODUCED WITHOUT NEED FOR CONSCIOUSNESS OR AWARENESS BY MINDLESS REGURGITATION FROM A FAR MORE SOPHISTICATED MENTAL JUKEBOX WITH THE DIFFERENCE THAT IN HUMANS THERE IS CONSCIOUSNESS THAT MERELY ACTS AS AN OBSERVER, EXPERIENCER AND INSTRUCTOR WHO NEVER CARRIES OUT LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION SPEECH OR ACTION. IN OTHER WORDS, SUCH ‘WONDROUS’ ROBOTS SHOW THAT YOU NEED NOT BE A HUMAN TO DO WHAT MOST PEOPLE USUALLY OR ALWAYS DO OR SAY, A PREPROGRAMMED ROBOT THAT HAS A CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE IN SIGHT AND SOUND RELEVANT DATA (EG PRESENCE OF OBSTRUCTIONS) AND HAVE PROGRAMS THAT TELL IT WHAT TO DO OR SAY WHEN THEY DETECT CERTAIN PATTERNS OF CUES CAN ACTIVATE ACTUATORS THAT CARRY OUT THE INSTRUCTIONS IN A WAY THAT DECEIVE OBSERVERS TO THINK IT IS A LIVE INTELLIGENT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION RESPONSE WHEN IT IS A STANDARD MINDLESS LIFELESS INFLEXIBLE RESPONSE.
True and false logic:
It is false logic (that will end in mad logic) if you think because robots can imitate the actions of humans, there is no everlasting meaning to life, there is no life after death and life is just the result entirely of biochemical processes because you are not justified to conclude thus because there is a critical difference between humans and robots in that humans have consciousness, robots never have consciousness.
It is true logic to instead conclude that the increasingly ‘uncannily’ human like robots indicate that the origin or source of the substance and style speech, motion and postures of humans can be similarly preprogrammed or reproduced from memory to fit the current situation, humans are faking it, faking they are behaving specific to the occasion when they are rehashing stale from memory the same old things they say or do to meet demands of the situations and they feel stumped or flustered when they meet a situation they have not met before like a girl who has learnt only how to flirt but not to perform in bed and she cannot perform in bed if there is no program in her mind to tell her how to do so. Rather than the person’s consciousness being the mindful perceiver and initiator of speech and actions specific to the occasion, in ordinary people their consciousness is merely an observer, a conniver that approves of what is going on and it merely acts as the disc jockey as to what track to play for the occasion.
Can robots experience pain?
If I chop your hand off, do you experience excruciating pain that may cause you to become hysterical and faint?
If you chop off a robot’s hand, does it experience pain?
You can program a robot to imitate but can a robot truly experience pain?
You can program a robot to fake it is experiencing anger, hate, disgust, lust or greed but can you program it to experience anger, hate, lust or greed as you can?
Therefore there may be crucial differences between beings and robots and you are not justified to say because robots behave increasing like humans, life is nothing more than the result of biochemistry.
However, you are entitled to conclude that humans may be behaving like robots because robots can do the same things human do.
The right & wrong conclusions:
Although robots with increasingly sophisticated sensors, programs of what it should activate when it detects certain patterns in its sensors and actuators that can carry out sophisticated tasks that are remarkably human like, it is false logic to conclude that it means that existence as a being can be explained entirely by scientific laws. The reason is because beings have awareness that robots never have, beings can feel pain and emotions where robots cannot.
What you can conclude in the face of increasingly sophisticated robots is that it does not take human beings to say or do the things in the same styles ordinary people usually do, a robot can do the same thing with the same style and therefore all the people you see around may be merely overrated disc jockeys who are faking they are present and instead they are constantly rehashing the substance and style of what they want to say or do that is prerecorded standard and passed on deceitfully as live specific to the occasion.
BECAUSE ROBOTS CAN INCREASINGLY DO THE THINGS HUMANS DO AND ROBOTS HAVE NO CONSCIOUSNESS, IT SUGGESTS THAT ‘MARVELLOUS’ HUMAN SPEECH AND ACTION MAY ALSO BE SIMILARLY ROBOTIC, REACTIVATIONS OF OLD RECORDINGS THAT ARE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO THE SITUATION AT HAND BUT OTHERS MAY FIND WANTING. UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES THIS CLEVER REHASHED FAKES MAY ESCAPE DETECTION BUT IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS WHEN THE ROBOTIC PERSON IS TIRED, STRESSED OR DISTRACTED, HE MAY CUE IN SPEECH AND ACTIONS THAT ARE CLEARLY ODD BUT ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO ARE THEMSELVES ROBOTS NEVER REALIZE IS BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE’S SPEECH AND ACTIONS ARE ALWAYS CLEVER FAKES, CLEVER REHASHES OF STANDARD RECORDINGS OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO.
All About Force:
Style which is universally present constantly in beings in this world is all about force and nothing to do with reason; style is nothing more than the audible or visible results of using force to stretch or prolong, change direction, speed and strength of force and the purpose of style (to impress, please, dominate and intimidate) are similarly all about stirring the mental force of the target.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to you as a result of what you say or do, he likes you or is impressed by you.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in speed and strength in way that makes him attracted to what you say or did that flatters him, he is pleased or likes what you say or do to him.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the (angry) way you say or did it that makes him fearful, he is intimidated by your style.
When the mental force of the recipient is stirred in a way by the forceful way you say or did it that makes him submissive, he is dominated by your style.
THUS STYLE THAT IS EVIDENT IN THE POSTURES, MOTION AND SPEECH IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE AUDIO AND VISUAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE USE OF FORCE BY THAT PERSON AND THIS CAN BE DEFINED AS THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE DIRECTION (WHERE POSSIBLE), SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND THE INTENTION OF STYLE THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS TOO ARE SIMILARLY NOTHING MORE THAN A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN THE RECIPIENT TO LIKE, DISLIKE OR BE FEARFUL THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING.
WHETHER A PERSON HAS STYLE OR NOT IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE BUT AN OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSIS. AS LONG AS THERE IS PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE POSES, MOTION AND SPEECH OF THAT PERSON, HE HAS STYLE AND MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE, BY REHASH FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PRODUCE HIS BRAND OF STYLE SO CONSISTENTLY EACH TIME IF IT WAS FRESHLY COMPOSED ANEW EACH TIME.
THE FACT THAT YOU ARE UNSURE IF THERE IS STYLE IN YOU AND OTHERS OR YOU CANNOT SEE STYLE IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS WHEN IT IS PRESENT REFLECTS A LACK OF DISCERNMENT OR ABILITY TO SEE THINGS AS THEY ARE ACTUALLY PRESENT AND IT IS MORE AGONIZING TO BEHAVE IN A WAY WITH STYLE THAT CAUSES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND BE UNABLE TO SEE YOURSELF DOING SO AND THEREFORE NOT SEE A WAY OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM SUFFERING IF YOU CANNOT SEE HOW YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO HAS STYLE, WHETHER HE CAN SEE OR NOT, MUST BE BEHAVING BY ROTE AS A ROBOT FAKING LIVE OR GENUINE BEHAVIOR AND HE IS IN DANGER OF MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS, MAD DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD EMOTIONS & MAD VIOLENCE THAT CAN ARISE SUDDENLY OUT OF PROPORTION TO PROVOCATION.
For one who sees rightly, all ordinary people have styles and they are therefore functioning as robots faking live speech and motion when their speech and motion are all regurgitated from memory from a mental jukebox that is far superior to any robot humans can device at the moment.
If you are a man of style you are a man of force that has nothing to do with reason and therefore you are not a man of reason but an irrational man of force suffering now, ever conditioning yourself to suffering that will end in loss of control and the weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Courting Insanity:
Whether you are putting on a show to please and impress others is never something I accuse someone and he can refute but it can be objectively determined.
I say that even though he may not be aware, the Dalai Lama is forcing himself to do the things he is doing (smiling and acting interested or friendly) in the name of pleasing others and the others in the picture too are forcing themselves to act friendly, never genuinely friendly.
If you insist they are being themselves, being genuine then you may be right or you have no eye for the truth and if that means suffering now and later, then this is your lot.
The Dalai Lama is using force to force himself to smile and be nice generating conflict in himself that can only be controlled but becomes increasingly malignant with age (mental degradation from abuse) and will lapse into insanity of some form just as Mother Theresa too had bouts of insanity in her latter years for which she was subject to exorcism.
WHOEVER YOU ARE, THIS IS AN UNIVERSAL LAW, IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLE (AS ALL ABOVE MANIFEST), YOU MUST EXIST AS A ROBOT DISHING OUT FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX THAN A LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERSON, YOU MUST BE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT YOU CAN NOW STILL PUSH BACK BUT WILL LATER ENGULF YOU BEYOND YOUR CAPACITY TO SHRUG OFF TO BECOME MAD WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD EMOTIONS AND MAD VIOLENCE.
(What the Dalai Lama is doing is called lying to himself and others that is neither good for himself or others and the fact that he and you cannot see it makes it even worse.)
Everyone will get what he wants:
Everyone will get what he wants. The problem is that people think they want happiness and peace but in truth they want forcefulness, like and dislike, emotions and style that is a surefire recipe for stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate in themselves and their victims, those who interact with them.
THUS IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY WILLING YOURSELF TO BE STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED BY THE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN DIRECTION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN YOUR PERCEPTIONS, THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND MOTION THEN YOUR DESIRE WILL BE GRANTED AND YOU WILL GET ALL THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOUR HEART DESIRES FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHOSE CONDUCT INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THOSE WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM, EVEN IF HE DENIES IT OR INSIST IT IS GOOD FOR HIM AND OTHERS TO GO TO HEAVEN THAT WILL NOT BE HEAVEN IF IT IS FULL OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AS IT IS HERE?
YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT:
Quote Headline: I owe it to good diet, says senior“You are what you eat. I only eat when I am hungry and stop before I am full.Comment: If you attribute your good health or longevity to your good diet when there may be other factors, you are presumptuous and flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception. A wise person only makes conclusions that he is certain. How can he be certain his good health or longevity is due to his good diet? What is a good diet to one expert is a bad diet to another and by preoccupying with your diet you are not heeding Jesus in not caring what you shall eat. By speaking publicly he is encouraging others to follow suit and if it leads them astray he is creating karma for himself.
You are certainly not what you eat, which is a sweeping statement to exaggerate the importance of food but what you eat will affect you mental and physical health. More important than food, what you will, say and do, the style (eg aggressive way) you do them determines your suffering now, when you age and pass away.
IF WHAT AND HOW YOU POSE, SAY AND DO THINGS ARE MORE IMPORTANT DETERMINANTS OF YOUR BODILY AND MENTAL HEALTH AND FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING AND YOU TELL OTHERS WHAT YOU EAT IS PARAMOUNT, IS THE ANSWER TO GOOD HEALTH THEN YOU ARE LEADING OTHERS ASTRAY. CAN AN EVIL MAN WHO IS ALWAYS ANGRY AND HATEFUL ASSURE LONG LIFE AND FREEDOM FROM DISEASE BY FASTIDIOUSLY WATCHING HIS DIET?
HOW DO YOU DETERMINE OBJECTIVELY WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND WHEN TO STOP EATING BEFORE YOU ARE FULL?
ONLY EATING WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND TO STOP EATING BEFORE FULL IS A FORM OF FAITH IN PRECEPTS AND RITUALS THAT HE IS FOOLISHLY ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO IMITATE (COPY) NOT EMULATE.
How I only make statements that I am certain of:
I say with certainty that stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness is the cause of the stress, restlessness and distraction that regularly beset all ordinary people (and will lead to insanity apart from poor health) because I can detect their presences in the speech of all ordinary people and I effortlessly experience freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction when I conscientiously practice not using force to stretch, change speed and loudness. If I were to imitate the ways people stretch, change speed and loudness I experience rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
Therefore I am certain that stretching, changing speed and loudness leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.
In his case, how can he prove that his good diet is responsible for his good health and longevity?
(If you think you do not stretch syllables, change speed and loudness but you suffer from regular stress, restlessness and distraction or cannot concentrate, let me demonstrate the presence of constant not frequent stretching, changes of speed and loudness in your speech.)
Dalai Lama Warns Tibetan Culture Will Be Wiped Out:
It is unlikely if not impossible that the Dalai Lama does not experience emotional stirring when he speaks on the subject and therefore he has identity views with the Tibetan cause that may be partly because of his nationality and perhaps partly to please others because as the leader of Tibetans in exile he must be seen to be saying certain things.
Tibetan culture may perish but then this world too will perish as the dinosaurs did in the past, and far sooner than people concede, as described by Jesus and most people will perish too when they die, so what is the fuss about Tibetans perishing?
IT IS A VERIFIABLE CERTAINTY THAT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS PRESENT IN THE SPEECH OF ALL PEOPLE HERE (INCLUDING THE DALAI LAMA AND POPE) IS THE CAUSE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT BESET THEM THAT DRIVES THEM TO IRRATIONAL AND DESTRUCTIVE ACTS. SO WHY HAVEN’T ANY OF THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS AWAKEN TO THEIR OWN FOLLIES AND POINT IT OUT TO OTHERS THE CAUSE OF THEIR SUFFERING THAT WILL MEANINGFULLY REDUCE THE ENDEMIC GLOBAL STRESS THAT WILL THEN TRANSLATE TO LESS VIOLENCE AND MORE TOLERANCE?
I say that even though he may not be aware, the Dalai Lama is forcing himself to do the things he is doing (smiling and acting interested or friendly) in the name of pleasing others and the others in the picture too are forcing themselves to act friendly, never genuinely friendly.
If you insist they are being themselves, being genuine then you may be right or you have no eye for the truth and if that means suffering now and later, then this is your lot.
The Dalai Lama is using force to force himself to smile and be nice generating conflict in himself that can only be controlled but becomes increasingly malignant with age (mental degradation from abuse) and will lapse into insanity of some form just as Mother Theresa too had bouts of insanity in her latter years for which she was subject to exorcism.
WHOEVER YOU ARE, THIS IS AN UNIVERSAL LAW, IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLE (AS ALL ABOVE MANIFEST), YOU MUST EXIST AS A ROBOT DISHING OUT FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX THAN A LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERSON, YOU MUST BE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) THAT YOU CAN NOW STILL PUSH BACK BUT WILL LATER ENGULF YOU BEYOND YOUR CAPACITY TO SHRUG OFF TO BECOME MAD WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION, MAD PERCEPTION, MAD LOGIC, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD EMOTIONS AND MAD VIOLENCE.
(What the Dalai Lama is doing is called lying to himself and others that is neither good for himself or others and the fact that he and you cannot see it makes it even worse.)
Everyone will get what he wants:
Everyone will get what he wants. The problem is that people think they want happiness and peace but in truth they want forcefulness, like and dislike, emotions and style that is a surefire recipe for stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate in themselves and their victims, those who interact with them.
THUS IF YOU ARE CONSTANTLY WILLING YOURSELF TO BE STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED BY THE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN DIRECTION, SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN YOUR PERCEPTIONS, THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND MOTION THEN YOUR DESIRE WILL BE GRANTED AND YOU WILL GET ALL THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOUR HEART DESIRES FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHOSE CONDUCT INDUCES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THOSE WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH HIM, EVEN IF HE DENIES IT OR INSIST IT IS GOOD FOR HIM AND OTHERS TO GO TO HEAVEN THAT WILL NOT BE HEAVEN IF IT IS FULL OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AS IT IS HERE?
YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT:
Quote Headline: I owe it to good diet, says senior“You are what you eat. I only eat when I am hungry and stop before I am full.Comment: If you attribute your good health or longevity to your good diet when there may be other factors, you are presumptuous and flirting with false perception that will end in mad perception. A wise person only makes conclusions that he is certain. How can he be certain his good health or longevity is due to his good diet? What is a good diet to one expert is a bad diet to another and by preoccupying with your diet you are not heeding Jesus in not caring what you shall eat. By speaking publicly he is encouraging others to follow suit and if it leads them astray he is creating karma for himself.
You are certainly not what you eat, which is a sweeping statement to exaggerate the importance of food but what you eat will affect you mental and physical health. More important than food, what you will, say and do, the style (eg aggressive way) you do them determines your suffering now, when you age and pass away.
IF WHAT AND HOW YOU POSE, SAY AND DO THINGS ARE MORE IMPORTANT DETERMINANTS OF YOUR BODILY AND MENTAL HEALTH AND FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING AND YOU TELL OTHERS WHAT YOU EAT IS PARAMOUNT, IS THE ANSWER TO GOOD HEALTH THEN YOU ARE LEADING OTHERS ASTRAY. CAN AN EVIL MAN WHO IS ALWAYS ANGRY AND HATEFUL ASSURE LONG LIFE AND FREEDOM FROM DISEASE BY FASTIDIOUSLY WATCHING HIS DIET?
HOW DO YOU DETERMINE OBJECTIVELY WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND WHEN TO STOP EATING BEFORE YOU ARE FULL?
ONLY EATING WHEN YOU ARE HUNGRY AND TO STOP EATING BEFORE FULL IS A FORM OF FAITH IN PRECEPTS AND RITUALS THAT HE IS FOOLISHLY ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO IMITATE (COPY) NOT EMULATE.
How I only make statements that I am certain of:
I say with certainty that stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness is the cause of the stress, restlessness and distraction that regularly beset all ordinary people (and will lead to insanity apart from poor health) because I can detect their presences in the speech of all ordinary people and I effortlessly experience freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction when I conscientiously practice not using force to stretch, change speed and loudness. If I were to imitate the ways people stretch, change speed and loudness I experience rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
Therefore I am certain that stretching, changing speed and loudness leads to stress, restlessness and distraction.
In his case, how can he prove that his good diet is responsible for his good health and longevity?
(If you think you do not stretch syllables, change speed and loudness but you suffer from regular stress, restlessness and distraction or cannot concentrate, let me demonstrate the presence of constant not frequent stretching, changes of speed and loudness in your speech.)
Dalai Lama Warns Tibetan Culture Will Be Wiped Out:
It is unlikely if not impossible that the Dalai Lama does not experience emotional stirring when he speaks on the subject and therefore he has identity views with the Tibetan cause that may be partly because of his nationality and perhaps partly to please others because as the leader of Tibetans in exile he must be seen to be saying certain things.
Tibetan culture may perish but then this world too will perish as the dinosaurs did in the past, and far sooner than people concede, as described by Jesus and most people will perish too when they die, so what is the fuss about Tibetans perishing?
IT IS A VERIFIABLE CERTAINTY THAT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS PRESENT IN THE SPEECH OF ALL PEOPLE HERE (INCLUDING THE DALAI LAMA AND POPE) IS THE CAUSE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT BESET THEM THAT DRIVES THEM TO IRRATIONAL AND DESTRUCTIVE ACTS. SO WHY HAVEN’T ANY OF THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS AWAKEN TO THEIR OWN FOLLIES AND POINT IT OUT TO OTHERS THE CAUSE OF THEIR SUFFERING THAT WILL MEANINGFULLY REDUCE THE ENDEMIC GLOBAL STRESS THAT WILL THEN TRANSLATE TO LESS VIOLENCE AND MORE TOLERANCE?
No comments:
Post a Comment