Lashing out, denying & bearing it

All people with emotion and style, no matter how tough, even strapping hunks, must experience emotional hurt every now and then that gets easier to arouse, more intense and irrational or unpredictable as they grow old because they are constantly forcefully changing speed and strength of force to fabricate their styles and to experience like and dislike that is usually shielded by the force of self preservation and just as the best and largest well wielded umbrella in the world cannot always block out the sun and rain, every now and then you must get pelted and burnt, in the same way every now and then the force of self preservation will fail to shield to expose the person to hurt or the full brunt of the sharp forceful changes in speed and strength of his force of going against self.
When faced with hurt, goats have three options.
They may choose to lash out, mobilizing the force of going against self to lash out at the hurt and lash out at others or objects in the way in the process not only further bonding themselves to force but because they use greater force to lash out, they are intensifying the strength and speed of their force of going against self that will increasingly seize them with a tightening grip that will end in a mental hell of being seized by intense force capable of intense accelerations of speed and strength that will torment and then kill them. Lashing out is foolish, self defeating and makes it worse because by mobilizing greater force, you are bonding yourself ever stronger to force that will end in mental hell. It is because most ordinary people have practiced lashing out when provoked in the past they are already seriously seized or enslaved by mental force that they have identified as their friend and because it is too hard to reform themselves and they are proud they refuse to embark on change not realize they are a walking time bomb.
(You hear people screaming off in their cars and bikes, revving their bikes or cars needlessly, this is a form of lashing out because they are hurt and want to shake off their hurt by lashing out or want to hurt others too like the crazed man spitting up the sky only for the spittle to descend on himself)
When faced with hurt they may choose to deny. Most ordinary people automatically smile to deny their hurt, when they see or hear something hurtful, they smile or sing a song or act as if they are enjoying it when they are hurt. This is using force to fake enjoyment instead of hurt and because it is using force to oppose the force causing hurt, it generates conflict or a clash of force in that fool’s mind. Thus denial is similarly foolish because it is practicing forceful conflict that becomes more intense, easy to arouse and chaotic as you grow old and that denying person too is headed for agony.
(There are many who wear near permanent smiles on their faces who will smile no matter what insults are hurled at them. It is not that they are immune to hurt but they are denying partly to get back at you, partly because their pride will not permit them to show hurt)
The third option that is less exercised is to not deny or lash out but use force to bear or oppose the hurt searing through his mind. This is limiting damage and again using force to resist force that damages the mind and conditions it to force.
What foolish stylish emotional people do not discern is that their hurt is caused by their constant use of force to change speed and strength of force to express their style and to experience like and dislike and by erasing their use of force to express style, by learning to not like or dislike, they will finally kill off their force of going against self changing speed and strength that is the only requisite to experience hurt and thus not hurt he does not need to lash out, deny or bear.
FEELING HURT IS THE RESULT OF ALLOWING YOUR MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO CONSTANTLY CHANGE (ACCELERATE IN) SPEED AND STRENGTH SHIELDED BY YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IN ORDER TO FABRICATE YOUR DISTINCTIVE STYLE AND IN ORDER TO EXPERIENCE LIKE AND DISLIKE (OF WHICH ALL THE EMOTIONS EXCEPT FEAR IS MADE FROM). WHENEVER THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION BECOMES OVERTAXED OR LISTLESS AND FAILS TO SHIELD THE CONSCIOUSNESS THE FULL BRUNT OF THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE CHANGES OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IMPACTS ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS CAUSING SHARP SEARING HURT.
THUS NO MATTER HOW TOUGH OR MACHO OR WISE OR GOOD YOU THINK YOU ARE, SO LONG AS YOU HAVE STYLE, YOU LIKE AND DISLIKE, YOU MUST SUFFER FROM REGULAR HURT THAT GETS EASIER TO AROUSE TO MORE INTENSE LEVELS, MORE CHAOTIC AND WILL END IN INSANITY AND YOU ARE NOT BLAMELESS BECAUSE YOU PERSECUTE OTHERS WITH YOUR ROTE INSINCERE STYLE AND YOUR LIKES AND DISLIKES (HATE AND ANGER IS DISLIKE).
BECAUSE IT IS FOOLISH AND SUICIDAL TO HAVE STYLE AND LIKE AND DISLIKE IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT WHEN FACED WITH HURT, STYLISH LIKING AND DISLIKING PEOPLE WILL ALSO LASH OUT, DENY OR ENDURE RATHER THAN MAKE A RETREAT FROM THE USE OF FORCE, IN THE PROCESS COMPOUNDING THEIR SUFFERING AND INTENSIFYING THEIR BONDAGE TO FORCE, HURT & CONFLICT THAT WILL END IN TORMENT THAT MAY BE UNIMAGINABLE.
Looking for a challenge:
The man who is looking for a challenge is bonded to this world and headed for woe not safety.
There are many who think nothing, who think they are good and admirable when they say they are looking for a challenge by switching jobs, seeking fresh pastures, going overseas, climbing a mountain etc.
They challenge others, eg I challenge you to say it in front of a girl.
You never challenge yourself with reason but you challenge yourself with force and in the process of challenging yourself or anyone you are bonding yourself to force.
If you are doing something because of a challenge you cannot mean it, cannot want to do it for its own sake but you are forcing yourself to do it to meet the challenge you set yourself and therefore you are a hypocrite.
You do or say something because you want to or it serves some purpose not to prove you can do it.
CHALLENGING IS ALL ABOUT FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON AND IF YOU BELEIVE IN CHALLENGES YOU BELIEVE IN FORCE. IF YOU PERCEIVE CHALLENGES ARE BASED ON REASON YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
THE SUBSTANCE OF ANY CHALLENGE (SAY IT BEFORE A GIRL) IS MERELY A CONVENIENT EXCUSE OR VEHICLE FOR WHICH TO APPLY FORCE TO FULFILL THAT EXCUSE OR VEHICLE.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE NEVER REASON THAT IS THE GUIDE FOR LIES, NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTIONS:
(If you think true reason is present and needed to tell lies, speak falsely, nonsensically, contradictorily, to attack or challenge someone, you may be right or have false perception. True reason is never present and what you need is mental force or ill will to tell lies, speak falsely, nonsensically, contradictorily or attack or challenge others. What reason present is not true reason but programmed rote logic or mental ‘tit for tat’ rules. Thus telling lies, speaking falsely, nonsensically, contradictorily, attacking and challenging verbally is all about using force or ill will, nothing to do with true reason as opposed to programmed rules reasoning. In addition it is their likes and dislikes that is based on force that is the basis for what people say that is false, nonsensical, contradictory, attacking or challenging and because they confuse liking and disliking with meaning and reason, they think their falsity, silliness, contradictoriness, attacking and challenging is based on reason when it is based on a stirring of their mental forces to what has happened or is said to them)
WORDS AND SPOKEN IDEAS WHETHER TRUE, FALSE, NONSENSE (MAKES NO SENSE), CONTRADICTORY (THE ‘WELL’ CONTRADICTS WITH THE SUBSEQUENT ‘I WILL HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT’) CAN BE MERELY VEHICLES OR EXCUSES TO TRANSMIT FORCE TO THE RECIPIENT.
WHENEVER SOMEONE SAYS SOMETHING HE KNOWS IS FALSE (TELL A LIE) HE MUST SUSPEND HIS REASON, PRESS THE PAUSE BUTTON ON HIS REASON AND APPLY FORCE TO WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY TO RAM IT THROUGH. THEREFORE IT IS FORCE AND NOT REASON THAT IS THE BASIS OF A LIE.
IF THE PERSON DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SAYS IS A LIE OR FALSE, THEN IT IS EITHER BECAUSE HE COPIED WITHOUT THINKING FROM OTHERS OR HE HAS TOLD THAT LIE SO OFTEN THAT HE HAS COME TO (FORCEFULLY) PERCEIVE IT AS TRUE. EVEN IN THESE TWO SCENARIOS IT IS FORCE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE MEANING OR FALSITY OF WHAT HE SAYS THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR THE FALSITY NOT REASON WHICH MUST BE SUSPENDED.
SIMILARLY WHEN SOMEONE WANTS TO SAY SOMETHING TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE SOMEONE TO A VERBAL FIGHT (ARGUMENT) IT IS NOT REASON THAT IS THE GUIDE BUT HIS MENTAL FORCE HAS ALREADY BEEN STIRRED TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE THE OTHER PERSON AND THE WORDS OR SUBJECTS HE CHOOSES ARE MERELY CONVENIENT VEHICLES TO MOUNT HIS ATTACK.
THE ILL WILL THAT IS A FETTER THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINS BEINGS IN THE LOWER REALMS IS ESSENTIALLY FORCEFULNESS.
ILL WILL IS JUST FORCEFULNESS AND THE PRIMARY MANIFESTATION OF HIS ILL WILL OR FORCEFULNESS IS HIS CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FORCEFULLY STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH AND SECONDARILY HIS USE OF FORCE TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, NONSENSE, CONTRADICTORY OR TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE OTHERS.
YOU HAVE TO SUSPEND REASON AND USE FORCE TO TELL A LIE. IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU SAY IS A LIE THEN YOU MUST HAVE COPIED IT WITHOUT REASON FROM OTHERS OR YOU MUST HAVE TOLD THAT LIE SO OFTEN THAT YOUR REASON IS PERMANENTLY SUSPENDED AND YOU FORCEFULLY PERCEIVE IT AS TRUE (ALSO CALLED DELUSION) IN WHICH CASE YOU STILL USE FORCE TO TELL IT WITH REASON ABSENT BECAUSE IF REASON WAS PRESENT HOW COME YOU DO NOT KNOW IT IS FALSE?
IF REASON IS PRESENT YOU WILL KNOW WHAT YOU SAY IS NONSENSE OR CONTRADICTORY AND IT IS ONLY BECAUSE WHAT YOU SAY IS BY ROTE AND COPIED WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING FROM OTHERS OR YOU HAVE FORCEFULLY ACCEPTED WHAT NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTION YOU SAY IS TRUE, THAT YOU SAY WITH FORCE AND WITHOUT REASON WHAT IS NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTORY.
WHENEVER SOMEONE ATTACKS ANOTHER WITH WORDS OR CHALLENGES HIM TO AN ARGUMENT, IT IS HIS HOSTILITY THAT IS AROUSED FIRST AND THEN HE SCOUTS AROUND FOR SUITABLE WORDS OR SUBJECTS WITH WHICH TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE HIM AND THUS IT IS NOT REASON BUT FORCE THAT IS AGAIN THE DRIVE OF WHAT IS SAID TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE.
A PERSON’S ILL WILL THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF FIVE FETTERS THAT DETAIN HIM IN THE LOWER REALMS IS ESSENTIALLY OR ENTIRELY HIS FORCEFULNESS THAT DRIVES HIM TO FABRICATE A STYLE THAT IS NOTHING MORE THAN FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACT HIMSELF AND OTHERS AND IN ADDITION DRIVES HIM TO TELL CONSCIOUS AND UNCONSCIOUS LIES, SPEAK NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTORILY. IN ADDITION IT IS HIS FORCEFULNESS THAT CAUSES HIM TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE OTHERS IN WHICH THE SUBJECT OR WORDS HE CHOOSES ARE CONVENIENT VEHICLES TO TRANSMIT HIS FORCE. TRUE REASON IS NEVER PRESENT THROUGHOUT BECAUSE IF TRUE REASON IS PRESENT IT WILL TELL HIM WHAT HE SAID OR DID IS FALSE (A LIE), NONSENSICAL OR CONTRADICTORY, IS MERELY AN EXCUSE TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE.
FORCEFULNESS IS ILL WILL AND ALL EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS FORCEFUL, ALWAYS USE UNNECESSARY FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHATEVER THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO, THEY USE FORCE TO TELL LIES, SPEAK NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTIONS, TO ATTACK OTHERS IN WORDS AND DEED.
TRUE REASON IS NEVER PRESENT WHEN A PERSON SPEAK FALSELY (EG TELL LIES), NONSENSICALLY OR CONTRADICTORY OR USES WORDS TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE ANOTHER BUT FORCE IS ALWAYS THE DRIVE PRESENT. WHAT REASON PRESENT IS FALSE ROTE OR RECORDED RULES LOGIC. JUST AS YOU CAN PROGRAM RULES THAT GUIDE COMPUTERS WHAT TO DO OR SAY, IT IS RIGID PROGRAMMED LOGIC, THE LOGIC PRESENT WHEN PEOPLE TELL LIES, SPEAK NONSENSE, CONTRADICT, ATTACK AND CHALLENGE IS PROGRAMMED FALSE LOGIC THAT MAY DECEIVE THEM THEY HAVE TRUE LOGIC. FURTHER BECAUSE THEY MISTAKE THEIR LIKING AND DISLIKING WHICH IS NOTHING MORE THAN A STIRRING OF FORCE AS MEANINGFUL, THEY THINK THEIR DISLIKE FOR YOU OR WHAT YOU SAY IS PERFECT JUSTIFIED REASON TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE YOU.
Whether something you say (or do) is true or false, nonsensical, contradictory is objective never subjective. It may be determined if not by you then by those who discern and by God.
If you say or do something that is false, nonsensical or contradictory and you do not know it then you must be a fool who does not know what he is saying or doing. The only way for this to happen is that you copied it by rote without reasoning or understanding what you copied from others or you are deluded, you perceive what is false, nonsensical or contradictory as perfectly true, understandable or meaningful or you mistake the stirring in speed and strength of your mental force (also known as your liking or disliking) as the meaningful basis of what you said that is false, nonsensical or contradictory. If you like a lie you told to flatter someone then you may perceive that because your liking is meaningful, your lie must be meaningful or true.
WORDS ARE MEANT TO CONVEY MEANING BUT THEY CAN BE HIJACKED BY FORCE TO CONVEY FALSITY, NONSENSE AND CONTRADICTION AND THIS IS THE CASE WITH HUMANS WHEN THEY USE FORCE ATTENDED BY FALSE PROGRAMMED RULE BOUND REASON, THEIR LIKE AND DISLIKE TO HIJACK WORDS TO CONVEY FALSITY, NONSENSE, CONTRADICTION AND TO ATTACK AND CHALLENGE OTHERS.
WHAT MATTERS IN LIES, NONSENSE & CONTRADICTION, ATTACKING AND CHALLENGING OTHERS WITH WORDS IS FORCE NOT REASON AND THAT FORCE IS CALLED ILL WILL AND IS THE SAME FORCE THAT DRIVES STYLE OR STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE NAME OF PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS.
TRUE, FORCE FREE REASON IS NEVER INVOLVED IN TELLING LIES, FALSITY, NONSENSE, CONTRADICTIONS, ATTACKING AND CHALLENGING OTHERS.
WHAT IS PRESENT IS LIKE AND DISLIKE, PROGRAMMED RULE BOUND REHASHED LOGIC AND THE FALSE PERCEPTION OR DELUSION THAT WHAT IS FALSE, NONSENSE, CONTRADICTORY, ATTACKING OR CHALLENGING IS TRUE AND BASED ON GENUINE REASON. APART FROM LIKE AND DISLIKE AND PROGRAMMED LOGIC WHAT IS PRESENT IS IMPLACABLE FORCE THAT POWERS WHAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS NEVER LIVE SPECIFIC TO THAT OCCASION BUT REHASHED STANDARDIZED FROM HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX.
(If people who attack another verbally examined their mental state when they attacked another, they will realize that they were initially angered by what is said that may not be provocative but they have false perception it is or they are sensitive and thus driven on by their anger they search for something that they usually if not always have said in the past before to say to attack the person. Often they cannot help attacking because their anger that they have practiced for so long so well rises sharply beyond their control that they must attack and they are headed for madness if they did not correct themselves)
False reasons:
If you liked what you say that is false, nonsensical and contradictory, attacking or challenging then because you liked what you said you may perceive it as meaningful when it is false, nonsense, contradictory, attacking or challenging. Because liking is merely a controlled stirring in speed and strength of your mental force your liking for what you said is false reason. You have been deceived by force to think your liking for what you said falsely, nonsensically, contradictorily, attackingly and in challenge is based on reason.
Because what you said that was false, nonsense, contradictory, attacking or challenging is backed up by programmed false rules logic (eg I smile because I like someone and because liking is good, smiling also must be good), what you said that is false, nonsense, contradicts, attacks and challenges must be based on reason not emotional.
Because what you said that was false, nonsense, contradictory, attacking or challenging is backed up by programmed false rules logic gets you what you want eg cons a girl to like you or makes you money, you might falsely perceive it as meaningful and reasonable, perfectly understandable because it gets you what you want.
WHEN PEOPLE VERBALLY ATTACK OR CHALLENGE ANOTHER, THEY USE EXCESSIVE FORCE TO EVEN VIOLENTLY STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES WITH ACCELERATING ACCELERATION IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND IT IS THIS WHICH IS THE STYLE OF WHAT THEY SAID THAT IS THE WARHEAD OF THEIR ATTACK AND THE SUBJECT THEY CHOSE IS JUST THE ROCKET THAT DELIVERS THE PAYLOAD OR WARHEAD.
How can you resolve what you deny?
If you deny your hurt but insist by smiling and singing a song (humming) that you are happy, how can you end your hurt? Since you tell yourself and others that you enjoy what hurts you, then you should continue to hurt and not see why you should be hurt.
It is only when you can admit and face your hurt, examine why is it that you are hurt that a way out of your hurt is possible.
It is because have denied so well so long, they don’t want to show their hurt because it is perceived as loss of face that it near impossible for them to face their hurt.
A person who denies his hurt must experience excruciating conflict and tension that he does not understand why is occurring in his mind and body. He has a pathological or insane drive to deny or refuse to see such that he may already be blind and proudly so.
As they say, big boys (and girls) don’t cry. As Thatcher said, this lady is not for turning.
Jesus spoke of turning so that he may heal you; big boys don’t turn and refuse to be healed.
False logic:
Quote minister: 32 heads (cabinet ministers) is better than three (appointed to adjudicate over whistle blowing video clip).
It is false logic that more heads are better than one, the more people are involved in something the better the chances of a solutions. If all the cabinet ministers have vested interests and the matter of the video clip is actually self evident without need to ascertain its veracity, then it is an excuse and lie that 32 heads will be better than 3 heads. A thousand fools are no better than three fools. If you refuse to acknowledge the truth no amount of heads is better.
It is not the number of heads that is important but the quality in terms of discernment and reasoning (wisdom) that is important and better. One wise man is better than a million fools.
If more heads are better how come throughout the history of mankind and even today not one has discovered that there is constant forceful stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in the speech of everyone in this world and this is the only cause of stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and hurt in people?
THUS IF YOU SUBSCRIBE TO SUCH FALSE PROGRAMMED LOGIC YOU MAY BELIEVE AND PERCEIVE WHAT YOU SAY THAT IS FALSE, NONSENSICAL, CONTRADICTORY, ATTACKING OR CHALLENGING TO BE TRUE AND UNDERSTANDABLE.
When does numerical superiority counts?
Only in matters where numerical superiority counts does it matter that more people are involved. Eg if you want to build the Great Wall of China or the pyramids or you want to crunch numbers then 32 people are better than three, otherwise it is foolish to extrapolate that (a rule that more is better) to deliberating over a matter. If you do not want to arrive at the truth, it does not matter how heads are involved.
The fallacy of rules:
Faith in rules and rites is according to the Buddha a fetter to future woe.
32 heads is better than three heads is an expression of the rule of the superiority of numbers or two is better than one.
If you want to fight with another then two is better than one but this is not necessarily so because a Mike Tyson can fight with four puny men and still win.
This is a rule coined by humans and not absolutely true, it is sometimes true and sometimes false or there are exceptions. What is the point of having something when there are exceptions that render that rule false? Why not approach each situation on a case by case basis depending on its merit?
Thus rules are artificial impositions by men who then treat them as sacrosanct and impose it on everyone. For instance, in the rule that there should be no correction allowed on cheques, even a minute correction detected might make an overzealous employee reject that cheque when it is not a sign of tampering with much trouble to others.
THUS IF YOU HAVE FAITH OR ACCEPT AS TRUE THAT THIS WORLD CONFORM TO RULES THAT YOU MUST CONSCIENTIOUSLY IDENTIFY AND SEEK TO APPLY WITHOUT FAIL WHEN THEY MAY BE FALSE OR EVEN OBVIATED (EG BREAD CAN BE CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR AND A DEAD PERSON BROUGHT BACK TO LIFE), THEN YOU MAY BE HEADED FOR FUTURE WOE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
The reason why the person said 32 ministers is better than three heads is because he wants to falsely impress you that the government is serious in resolving this matter of the videotape when little or no deliberation is necessary because it is self evident and the government is not serious about getting to the bottom of the matter.
The thing about goats is that they will seek to apply rules without exemptions on you but they will not apply the rules on themselves.
Rites & rules are inseparable:
Rites and rituals may be like the two sides of a coin that cannot occur separate from each other.
Because the Buddha said he is all knowing & seeing, if that is true then the fact that he spoke about rites and rules together being one of three fetters to future woe must (not may) mean they are somehow connected to each other or intimately linked.
What might be or is the relationship between rules & rituals?
A ritual needs a plan of action of what to say or do and how to say or do it, that plan which is rigid, prefixed set of rules of how and what to say and do and thus when someone performs a ritual he is de facto acting according to a plan or set of rules of how and what to say or do. Without a plan or set of rules of what to say or do, how to say or do it, you cannot have a ritual and thus when a person carries out a ritual he is de facto obeying a set of rules of what and how to say or do certain things and he is therefore rule bound.
True reason will never tell you to do something false, meaningless, harmful and stressful and therefore will never guide you to activate a particular rehashed speech or action because true reason sees and knows it is not a genuine response but it is a faked as if specific but impersonal general repetitive response to a situation and so the person will have to resort to the only alternative, false or mechanical or rote reason and that is fixed rules that when certain criteria stated in that rule is fulfilled you activate that ritual or pre-orchestrated conduct.
(The only alternative to true reason or understanding why in guiding any action is mechanical reason or rules and thus if reason will not do it, rules must be do it)
Rules are meant to be obeyed and you do not obey rules with reason because that needs understanding why you do or say so but you obey rules with blind unquestioning force and act according to the protocol or plan or letter of a particular rule and that de facto is a ritual. All obedience of rules are ritualistic, act or saying according to the rule and never based on true reason why you should act and say certain things.
Thus rules and rituals are inseparable, one cannot exist without the other and the Buddha is correct and all knowing in linking them together as a fetter not just to the lower realms but to future woe. A ritual is nothing more than a pre-rehearsed plan or set of rules of what and how to say or do that true reason will never guide to say or do and so the person must resort to false or mechanical reason or rules to instruct him when to initiate the particular ritual.
A RITUAL IS NOTHING MORE THAN A PLAN OF ACTION OR SET OF RULES OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO, HOW TO SAY OR DO IT THAT IS TO BE CARRIED OUT OR OBEYED AND IT NEED RULES TO INSTRUCT THE PERSON AS TO WHEN TO ACTIVATE THE RITUAL BECAUSE THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE, TRUE REASON WILL NEVER GUIDE SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE AND HARMFUL.
The fact that you do not know or see that what and how you and your cohorts here say is rehashed according to plan or you are a robot does not necessarily mean that you are not a robot but it may mean you are undiscerning, cannot see things clearly as they are, you are distracted, restless and stressed to see clearly.
The practice of yoga or tai chi is a ritual does not confer good mental or physical health or calm as promised because so long as you continue to have style, to forcefully stretch syllables, change speed and loudness there is no peace for you and you must be hounded by stress, restlessness and distraction that you can only seek to control with decreasing efficacy by tai chi or yoga. The diversion of yoga or tai chi or exercises may break your engrossment with affairs of this world and therefore afford you a measure of calm and reduction of stress but it will never cure you of stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and feeling hurt. Tai chi has a plan of what and how to pose and move your body parts and you must obey that plan or set of rules otherwise you will not or cannot practice tai chi. Reason will not advice you to practice tai chi and so you must have rules that vary between people eg the rule of practicing early in the morning without fail or in the evening that must be obeyed or the robot feels something is amiss.
Fairly sophisticated humanoid robots or robots that mimic humans like Asimo the Honda robot who can run on stage, stop, bow, wave, clap hands and take a tray with a cup from you to hand it over to another human recipient gives a discerning observer a clear insight into the intimate relationship between rules and rituals.
A robot like Asimo has no consciousness and it is composed of sensors that tell its central processors not everything that is going on around it but only particular features of what is going on that it has been instructed to detect in order for its central processors to determine by the rules that it has been programmed with to activate pre-rehearsed sequences of what the robot should say or do in those circumstances.
Whatever Asimo has not been programmed to perceive it cannot perceive, even if they are present but you can reprogram it to perceive new things if you want provided it is within the capacity of its CPU to perceive.
Asimo has no genuine reasoning, only a set of rules programmed into him of what it should activate when its sensors detect certain things.
Whatever Asimo has not been programmed to do it cannot do but you can reprogram Asimo or his rules so that he can do new things.
Because whatever Asimo can do is not live specific to the occasion but it was pre-recorded and replayed on cue as faked not genuine specific action for the occasion, whatever Asimo can do is ritualistic or standard and fixed according to a plan.
Thus as marvellous as you might think Asimo is, there is nothing in him than a set of many rules that govern what rituals it will initiate and there are no actions in him apart from rituals or programmed courses of actions according to a plan or set of rules.
EVERYTHING ASIMO DOES IS RITUALISTIC OR HE ONLY PERFORMS RITUALS OR PRE-REHEARSED AND REGURGITATED STEREOTYPED ACTIONS, HE CANNOT DO ANYTHING THAT IS NOT PRE-ORCHESTRATED THAT HIS CPU HAS NOT BEEN PROGRAMMED TO DO AND THE ONLY WAY IT CAN DECIDE WHICH RITUAL AMONGST THE MANY HE HAS BEEN PROGRAMMED TO CARRY OUT TO ACTIVATE IS NOT THROUGH TRUE OR GENUINE REASONING BUT THROUGH RULES THAT TELLS HIM WHICH RITUAL TO PERFORM AND HE MUST OBEY WITHOUT FAIL. ALTHOUGH IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO PERFORM RITUAL A IN SITUATION C, IT CANNOT DO SO BUT IT ALWAYS PERFORMS RITUAL A IN SITUATION A BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT IT HAS BEEN TOLD TO DO BY ITS RULES AND IT CANNOT ACT WITHOUT ITS RULES. YOU CAN REPROGRAM ASIMO TO PERFORM RITUAL A IN SITUATION C AND THEN IT WILL ALWAYS PERFORM RITUAL A IN SITUATION WITH NO QUESTIONS ASKED.
It is not surprising but to be expected that all ordinary people who are in truth biological robots not part time but in everything they perceive, think, speak and do that means they must obey rules that are inherent in robotic rehashed behaviour and require rules to guide their rendition because true reason will not do so should in addition have unfaltering faith in specifically definable rituals and rules.
PEOPLE ARE FULL TIME ROBOTS RENDERING RITUALIZED REHEARSED SPEECH AND MOTION ACCORDING TO RULES PROGRAMMED BY THEMSELVES OR BY SOCIETY AND THOSE RITUALS ARE ACCORDING TO RULES OF WHAT AND HOW TO SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS AND THUS IT IS NOT A SURPRISE BUT IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT THEY SHOULD ALL HAVE FAITH IN RULES AND RITUALS.
Not only is everything they think, say and do robotic or rehashed rituals but even what they perceive and how they perceive are rehashed or robotic or ritualistic. For instance each person sees with a particular brand of style of how he prolongs his gaze, how much force he applies in his stare, the speed and strength of force changes as he shifts his gaze restlessly between objects. What he sees too is selective according to what he likes or dislikes. For example a lustful man will be on the look out for women or sexual objects to lay his gaze on and so he does not see everything but only what he wants to see, namely sexual objects.
A RITUAL IS AN INDEPENDENT OR STANDALONE SEQUENCE OF SPEECH AND MOTION THAT MAY HAVE PURPORTED PURPOSES OR BENEFITS THAT ARE FALSE, IT (RITUAL) IS REPEATED MANY TIMES DEPENDING ON THE OCCURENCE OF CERTAIN CRITERIA OR RULES.
FOR SOMETHING TO BE A RITUAL IT MUST HAVE A PLAN OF WHAT AND HOW TO SAY OR DO AND THAT PLAN IS ITSELF A SET OF RULES OR RULES THAT MUST BE OBEYED ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR SAKE OF DOING SOMETHING MEANINGFUL BUT JUST IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT THAT RITUAL AND THEREFORE A MAN WHO HAS FAITH IN RITUAL TO PRACTICE RITUAL MUST ALSO HAVE FAITH IN RULES THAT GOVERN A RITUAL.
TRUE REASON WILL NEVER GUIDE A PERSON TO PERFORM A RITUAL WHICH IS REPETITIVE AND REHASHED NOT SPECIFIC TO AN OCCASION AND IS THEREFORE FALSE AND FABRICATED AND BECAUSE TRUE REASON WILL NOT GUIDE THE PERSON MUST RESORT TO FALSE OR MECHANICAL REASON AND THAT IS RULES THAT WHEN CERTAIN FIXED RIGID CRITERIA ARE FULFILLED YOU MUST ACTIVATE THAT RITUAL WITHOUT FAIL.
THUS RULES ARE NEEDED TO INSTRUCT THE PERSON WHO HAS FAITH IN RITUALS WHEN TO INITIATE A PARTICULAR PRE-REHEARSED RITUAL AND RITUALS ITSELF ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A SET OF RULES OF WHAT AND HOW TO SAY OR DO THAT MUST BE OBEYED ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT QUESTIONS WHY OR IT WILL NO LONGER BE A RITUAL.
IN OTHER WORDS RULES IS THE FRAMEWORK OR PLAN OF A RITUAL AND RULES ARE NEEDED TO INITIATE A RITUAL AT A PARTICULAR TIME BECAUSE TRUE REASON WILL NOT DO IT SO FALSE REASON OR RULES MUST DO IT.
Robotic or jukebox behaviour is very deceptive. It will deceive the unwary and distracted who are themselves robots that it is a real live person speaking or doing specifically before them but in truth it is a mindless robot or automaton rehashing what is in truth standardized, rigid & pre-orchestrated as if it is genuine specific for the occasion.
The Buddha is not the highest because he says so but it can be objectively proven that he is by what he said that can be verified true and not said by anyone else before and even since.
He said no one has powers over him, God could not make him disappear but he can make himself invisible to God and everyone else. Unless you can see or know this not the case, that is, the Buddha is lying you have no right to say it is false. You can say you do not know but you cannot say it is false because you do not know or see.
The difference between a parrot and a live person:
Superficially a parrot or robot may deceive another that he is a live specific to the occasion person but there are things a parrot or robot cannot do.
A parrot or robot cannot perceive, think, say or do things that it has not been programmed to perceive, think, say or do even though it is possible to perceive, think, say or do a certain thing.
Thus it may reflect that all ordinary people with style are parrots or robots that they never perceive, think, say or do the things I do that no man has done before even though it is possible for them to do so (unless you think I am a truly remarkable man that only I and not them can perceive, think, say or do the things I do that they cannot.
A robot who has not programmed himself to detect stretched syllables, changing speed and loudness will not detect them even though it is possible to detect them and they are present all the time in his speech and that of others.
In order for a person who is a robot to do or say new things you must reprogram him laboriously to do so and then he will do or say that new thing by rote or faithful facsimile.
THUS BECAUSE HUMAN ROBOTS ARE MUCH MORE SOPHISTICATED, THEY HAVE A VASTLY SUPERIOR REPERTOIRE OF RESPONSES TO A SITUATION, THEY CAN SWAP TRACKS MIDSTREAM, THEY CAN FOOL THEMSELVES AND OTHERS THEY ARE LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION PERFORMERS BUT IF YOU ARE ASTUTE YOU WILL REALIZE HE ALWAYS SPEAK AND BEHAVE IN A CERTAIN WAY THAT MUST BE FROM MEMORY OR ROTE AND THE THINGS HE SAY OR DOES HAS BEEN SAID IN THE PAST BEFORE THAT CANNOT BE AN ACCIDENT BUT IT IS ROTE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR MARILYN MONROE TO SPEAK LIKE ELIZABETH TAYLOR WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO AND YOU CAN LABORIOUSLY TRAIN HER TO DO SO BECAUSE MARILYN NEEDS TO BE PROGRAMMED IN ORDER TO SPEAK LIKE LIZ TAYLOR.
Thus a person who has been trained by himself and others to greet another ‘g’day’ or ‘hi. mate’ will always say that but never ‘good day’ or ‘hello mate’ even when it is possible for him to do so because it is rendered by rehash impersonally and he is a hypocrite.
Either reason or rules:
If you don’t use live specific to the occasion reason to say or do something you must use rules to determine whether you say or do.
Apart from reason or rules can you nominate any other agency to determine what you say or do?
If you neither use reason nor resort to rules then what you say or do will be mad, out of no reason or rule.
THUS ONLY LIVE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION REASON OR STANDARD FIXED RULES CAN GOVERN OR DETERMINE WHAT A PERSON SAYS OR DOES.
EITHER YOU SPEAK ACCORDING TO REASON OR YOU SPEAK ACCORDING TO RULES WHICH ARE INFLEXIBLE AND PREDETERMINED.
Ras Adiba :I am the one PM had in mind
Former newscaster Ras Adiba Radzi is pretty sure she is the woman in wheelchair Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi mentioned as “capable and presentable” but unable to get permanent employment.She is probably think nothing and think it funny or pleasurable what she said.
It is presumptuous and unless Badawi specifically mentioned her, you should not jump to conclusion that he is talking about you as it is fantasy and flirting with future madness that is not without harm to others because they too may imagine what may not be true that Badawi is referring to her.
When you say pretty sure it means you use force to be sure because you cannot use reason because reason will tell you that you cannot be sure and you are pretty sure with force that conditions such that increasingly you become forced to perceive what is imagined is true.
It is because she is conceited and has self identity views that she is pretty sure he is talking about her.
Rituals are the products of rules:
Rituals are the product of rules so how can they be separate?
It is because a being foolishly desire to behave or speak a certain thing in a certain way repetitively because it is seen as impressive, will impress others that he MUST resort to rules that will govern or determine that what and how he says or do will faithfully conform to what he desires.
And because what he says or does is not specific to the occasion but what he desires to be repeated, he must have a set of rules of when to render it because it is not specific to the situation and need cues or rules as to when to initiate it.
Rules is theory & ritual is practice:
Rules is the theory behind rituals and rituals is the putting into practice of rules.
There is false reasoning or understanding but never true reasoning or true understanding behind a ritual and apart from rules or mechanical generalizations or standardizations, there is nothing or no other basis behind rituals.
There are two kinds of rules. Rules that can be put into practice in word or deed and when they are put into practice they become rituals and there are rules that cannot be put into practice.
Rules that can be put into practice are for example ‘always greet or smile at someone you meet’ or ‘wash your hands before you eat’.
There are many people who do not always greet others or wash their hands before they eat and nothing untoward always happen to them as a result of their actions and so these rules are rigid and false.
Thus obeying these rules a person practice the ritual of always saying standardized, “Gee dai mate” (his corruption of ‘good day mate’) or he unfailing washes his hands obsessively before he eats.
Because not everyone always greet others and not everyone always washes his hands these rules and the rituals that ensue from their practice are false although the foolish man will rationalize to justify his actions eg he washes his hands because he does not want to catch germs eating and he greets others because he is so good.
Rules that cannot be put into practice are like ‘two heads are better than one’ that can be used to influence one’s actions but cannot be put into practice. You cannot practice ‘two heads is better than one’ in speech and actions but you can use this rule to govern your action eg you expand the numerical strength of your army or staff instead of improving the quality of your army or staff in the mistaken rule that more is better when Alexander the Great’s smaller better organized army has defeated much bigger armies in battles.
Rules are involved in two ways in rituals. Apart from the ritual being the embodiment or putting into practice of rules, it is always rules that determine if a ritual is activated. Rituals are never activated by specific to the occasion true reason or understanding why you should do so but rituals are always executed by rules eg eating time means wash your hands not I wash my hands this time before I eat because I had worked on potentially poisonous or infective stuff.
BECAUSE RULES ARE THE THEORY BEHIND RITUALS AND ARE ALWAYS REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE A RITUAL, RULES AND RITUALS MUST BE INSEPARABLE, THERE CANNOT BE RITUALS IN SPEECH AND ACTION WITHOUT RULES AND THERE CANNOT BE RULES WITHOUT RITUALS. THUS THE BUDDHA HAS PENETRATIVE WISDOM OR INSIGHT IN GROUPING FAITH IN RITUALS AND RULES AS A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE.
Why people resort to rules:
An important reason why people resort to rules to run their lives is because they cannot reason very well or reason at all partly because of their lowly or undiscerning nature, their inability to examine things unemotionally and decide. Just like a blind man needs a walking stick, a person who cannot reason very well need rules no matter how poor to guide them.
Thus the rule two is better than one often serves them well but there are situations when they will be caught out.
If you are a robot you cannot function without rules because robots need rules to tell them what to do and so if you are a devoted robot, you accept your robotic existence without question, are satisfied with it then you need rules and are lost without rules to tell you what to do in each situation.
Why people are poorly or non reasoning:
True reason, that is reason not backed by force or ruled reasoning, has no force to fight force and in any confrontation with force it must lose and force is intolerant and it will drive true reason out. Thus anyone who is tolerant of force, who nurtures force in his mind has no true reason because true reason cannot compete with force and force will drive true reason out of his mind and thus blind and needing to survive he must resort to second best namely rules to instruct him what to do or say in various situations where he must decide what to do or say.
Anyone who is emotional, who acknowledges he likes or dislikes whether he knows or not know the nature of what he is talking about regarding like or dislike, anyone who is stylish and therefore constantly uses force that is unnecessary to stretch, change speed and strength must be poorly or absent in true reason and strong or completely dependent on rules to instruct him what to say or do.
Because all ordinary people including those who think very highly in terms of goodness and intelligence can be demonstrated to be emotional, to like and dislike, to have style, they must all be deficient or even absent in true reason and what they call their reasoning is their mental rules of explaining, instructing them what to say or do.
Anyone who is driven by force as manifest in his style, emotion, like and dislike is deficient or absent in reason and strong in force, he is a closed and dead system unto himself and is the man Jesus described as seeing but seeing, hearing but not hearing.
The possible sources of a person’s actions:
Whatever action in speech and deed must have a source or basis. It is impossible that there can be no basis.
The possible sources of a person’s actions are a) seeing and knowing b) reasoning c) rules d) copying and e) automatism.
Everything that happens or exists in the world of existence has a nature that is objective, applies to everyone and may be determined precisely such and such is the nature of for example love, such and such is the nature of lust or liking.
Thus if you see and know the nature of something then you not need to resort to reason or rules with regard to action concerning that subject. If you see and know as the Buddha can that all beings even insects are valid beings like you, experience suffering when you harm them and you are accountable for killing them (Jesus said do not kill or you will be judged) then you will wisely avoid all killing or harming of all living creatures.
If you cannot see or know the nature of something then you have to resort to either reasoning or rules to guide your actions regarding that subject.
Because everything has a nature that applies to everyone then if you reasoning or thinking process determined correctly the nature of that object or subject then it is true reasoning. Reasoning is the process specific to an occasion that is based on what you can see or know is true to work out the nature of what you cannot see or know. That your reasoning is correct can be objectively proven by evidence. For instance you can prove that the stretching of syllables, changing in speed and loudness is the cause of stress, restlessness and distraction by comparing the difference between practicing and not practicing them. If I were to experience stress, restlessness and distraction by deliberately stretching, changing speed and loudness then I must be correct in my reasoning.
By contrast, rules are observations you or others made from past experiences that you adopt without question to apply to situations that occur to try to explain them and be the basis of your actions. You accept the mental rules as true and obey them without question and often if not always the rules are found wanting or even seriously wrong.
Another way of behaving is to copy what others do without understanding why. For instance you see others sporting Elvis hairstyles and you like it and you too wear an Elvis hairstyle. The basis is copying is a model for what is to be copied, the person’s liking or disliking or coercion by others to copy.
The last way of behaving is by automatism. When you have trained your mental parrot so well to say or do a certain thing in a certain way, it will automatically render it for you when a similar situation arises and you have been bypassed from the loop or superfluous. Most if not all the greetings by others eg ‘good morning’ is automatic by rote which is why sometimes the person makes a slip and say good morning when it is evening.
Knowing & seeing and reasoning as the sources for behaviour is precluded for ordinary stylish or emotional people (much as they like to be indignant) and so they have to resort to copying based on liking and coercion, rules and automatism as the basis for their behaviour and interpreting things.
A person who is emotional, liking and disliking and finds them meaningful when they are meaningless stirring of force, who appreciates falsity (style, smiling, jokes are falsity) cannot see or know the truth, cannot work out from what he knows or sees the truth of things he does not know or see except in his delusion that he can and does.
NO PERSON WHO CAN SEE OR KNOW THE TRUTH, OR CAN WORK OUT THE TRUTH OF WHAT HE DOES NOT SEE OR KNOW BASED ON WHAT HE KNOWS OR SEES WILL ACCEPT OR APPRECIATE FALSITY BECAUSE HE KNOWS FALSITY IS FORCEFUL, STRESSFUL AND ENDS IN MADNESS AND BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE APPRECIATE AND ACCEPT FALSITY (THEY SEE LIKING & STYLE AS MEANINGFUL, JOKES AS MEANINGFUL, THEY CANNOT SEE THAT DEAFENING SILENCE IS FALSE OR SURE CANNOT PRETTY AS WHEN THEY HEAR ‘PRETTY SURE’, THEY PERCEIVE A SOUND CAN BE ‘FUNNY) THEY CANNOT SEE OR KNOW THE TRUTH AND CANNOT REASON OUT THE TRUTH.
A PERSON WHO CAN REASON WILL NOT USE FORCE BECAUSE THE IMPACT OF FORCE ON HIS MIND IS PAINFUL, CONDITIONS HIM EVERMORE TO FORCE AND WILL END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND INSANITY. BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE CONSTANTLY SUBJECT THEIR MINDS TO FORCE IN THEIR USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE OR CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, TO LIKE OR DISLIKE, TO BE EMOTIONAL THEY CANNOT BE TRUE BEINGS OF REASON BUT THEIR REASON IS APPARENT NOT REAL.
IT IS FORCE AND NEVER REASON THAT IS BASIS BEHIND COPYING AND BEHAVING ACCORDING TO RULES IN WHICH THE RULES AND MODELS FOR COPYING ARE MERELY TEMPLATES OR MOULDS FOR THE APPLICATION OF FORCE TO CARRY THE RULES OR COPYING OUT. THUS WHEN A PERSON BEHAVE ACCORDING TO RULES OR COPYING, HE IS BEHAVING ACCORDING TO FORCE NOT REASON.
THUS A PERSON OF FORCE WHO IS ALWAYS A PERSON OF STYLE AND LIKE AND DISLIKE CAN ONLY BEHAVE IN THREE WAYS:
HE MAY COPY WITHOUT QUESTION THE BEHAVIOR OF OTHERS BECAUSE HE LIKES IT OR HE IS COERCED TO DO SO IN WHICH NO REASON IS INVOLVED BUT THE BEHAVIOR TO BE COPIED IS A TEMPLATE OR MOULD FOR HIM TO PERCEIVE AND THEN APPLY FORCE TO MAKE A COPY IN HIS OWN MIND.
HE MAY BEHAVE ACCORDING TO RULES THAT MAY BE COPIED FROM OTHERS OR FABRICATED BY HIMSELF IN WHICH THE RULES ARE MERELY MOULDS OR TEMPLATES FOR HIM TO APPLY FORCE TO BEHAVE ACCORDING TO WHAT THE RULES SPECIFY.
HE MAY BEHAVE BY AUTOMATISM IN WHICH WELL PRACTICED SEQUENCES OF BEHAVIOR AUTOMATICALLY ACTIVATE THEMSELVES IN THE PRESENCE OF THE STIMULI THEY WERE INTENDED TO REACT TO.
SEEING AND KNOWING THE TRUTH IS RESERVED FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT ROBOTS, WHO EXIST SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION WITHOUT RESORTING TO REHASHING, WHO DO NOT LIKE OR DISLIKE BUT SEE EVERYTHING AS IT IS NOT AS THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE IT.
REASONING OUT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION THE NATURE OF SOMETHING HE DOES NOT KNOW OR SEE INITIALLY IS RESERVED FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN SEE AND KNOW THE TRUTH SO THAT BASED ON WHAT HE ALREADY SEES AND KNOWS HE CAN WORK OUT THINGS HE HAS NOT SEEN OR KNOWN AND WHAT IS REASONED OUT IS VERIFIABLE BECAUSE IT IS TRUE.
There may be those who are indignant and think I am derisive to say they cannot reason, cannot work out the truth. If you can reason or work out the truth why do you see nothing wrong with statements like ‘deafening’ silence, ‘pretty’ sure, that ‘well’ or ‘fine’ contradicts the subsequent statement ‘I will have to think about it’, how come you cannot work out that there style in everyone and it is all about stretching, changing speed and loudness that is the only source of the insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that you must suffer from and persecute others? If you can reason or work out the truth, why can’t you see yourself liking and disliking all the time and how this is unnecessary and applies force on your mind that harms it, conditions it and will end in madness? Examine your reason carefully and you may realize it is rules, liking and disliking that you mistake for your reasoning.
Why rules and rituals must be false:
Even if you cannot see or know that rules and rituals are false and harmful, if you have faith that the Buddha is all seeing and knowing then they must be false and harmful because it is impossible for something that is true and beneficial to lead to future states of woe.
Whatever you do repetitively with your body or speech that has no obvious physical objectives is a ritual.
Thus tai chi, yoga or exercises (jogging, gym work or playing games) are all rituals in which keeping fit, curing stress are all excuses because they are not true cures for stress, restless or distraction but merely props.
They fact that you do not accept them as rituals but you insist they are meaningful may not reflect you are right but may reflect your inability to see the truth. As Jesus might have said, who amongst you can extend your life even one day by practicing yoga, tai chi or exercises. Without stopping stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you will not see an end to stress, restlessness and distraction that will kill you in agony and send you to perdition.
Fengshui is part rules part rituals:
Fengshui is part rules and part rituals, so are superstitions.
If you believe there is basis or truth in them and you practice them, you have faith in rules and rites that is the fetter to future woe.
Just because you insist they are not rules or rituals does not mean you are right or there is a special case for you that you will not end in perdition whereas others will.
Does fengshui guarantee you to become prosperous?
If not everyone who practices fengshui is endowed with prosperity and good luck and those who do not practice can have prosperity and good luck, even those who unwittingly practice bad fengshui also enjoy prosperity, on what basis or truth do you perceive fengshui as true?
If fengshui is true and no hocus pocus then everyone who practices according to fengshui must become prosperous and everyone who fails to practice must become destitute.
Thus you have no right to believe what you cannot see and know as true, if you do you are presumptuous, a defilement of the mind according to Buddha. A defiled mind cannot see the truth.
Kidman really, really scared by paparazzo:
Is it possible for someone to be really scared, let alone really, really scared instead just scared? If it is not possible for anyone to be anything more than scared by something, then this ‘really, really’ is false.
Is it possible for someone to be not really scared? It is possible to be not scared by something but it is impossible for someone to be not really scared. What you mean in a false way when you say he is not really scared is that he is faking he is scared.
Is Kidman not faking she is scared or she was extremely scared the same as Kidman really, really scared?
If you agree there are differences then the person spoke falsely when he said she was really, really scared.
If he or you can reason out or work out the truth, how come this statement does not arouse your disapproval?
It is the force never reason that makes delusions hard to shake off:
There are those who believe and practice fengshui and those who do not and it is not the reason behind their belief but the force and fear (another force) of loss if they did not obey that makes it hard for people to shed their beliefs (delusions) about fengshui.
True reason is understanding and once understood if there is no force, the belief is instantly relinquished.
It is the force behind the belief in fengshui through repeated conditioning practice even to great mental strength and the fear of bad consequences if they did not obey the dictates of fengshui (because they are attached to their lives here and will lose it) that makes it hard if not impossible for people who have faith in rituals and rules to shed their beliefs.
Many people have false perception that because their belief eg in fengshui is hard to shake off, it keeps recurring in them automatically, it is true when the fact that it is hard to shake off is because it is held in place by force and force is false.
THE FACT THAT A BELIEF IS HARD TO SHAKE OFF IS NOT A SIGN OF IT BEING TRUE BUT A SIGN THAT IT IS BACKED BY FORCE WHICH IS ALWAYS FALSE AND HARMFUL AND THEREFORE FALSE OR A DELUSION.
In the same way all sinful and stressful behaviour like practicing style (forceful stretching, changing speed and strength), likes and dislikes, emotions (anger, hate), addictions or vices (gambling), urge to attack or challenge others are hard to shed because they are backed by force that is conditioning and detaining that makes it hard or impossible for people hooked on them to shake off.
I cannot imagine my mother’s anxieties:
If you can reason or work out the truth you should be able to work out that this statement is false because how intense her anxieties can be imagined and therefore it is false to say it is unimaginable which was said falsely to exaggerate how great the mother’s anxiety.
If you keep telling yourself you cannot imagine things that you can imagine in time to come you will truly be unable to imagine things that you should be able to imagine or it is possible for God to fulfil your desire to be able to not imagine things that are imaginable and that is insanity.
BECAUSE YOU ARE ALWAYS SAYING YOU CANNOT IMAGINE THIS AND THAT AND IN TRUTH YOU CAN BUT YOU ARE FAKING TO EXAGGERATE HOW GREAT SOMETHING IS, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE BY GOD TO CREATE A STATE FOR YOU WHEREIN YOU CANNOT IMAGINE THINGS THAT ARE IN TRUTH IMAGINABLE AND RATHER THAN A PLEASURE, THAT MAY BE TORMENTING AND MAD.
Completely inappropriate behaviour:
Quote: Kate McCann screamed in 'anger and disgust' when she was offered a two-year jail sentence if she confessed to killing Madeleine, relatives have revealed. She repeatedly shouted out 'No, no, no' when she learned of the alleged police 'deal'.
Comment: Ordinary people see nothing wrong and think she is justified with this ‘grandstanding’ emotional behaviour when it is false, for show, inappropriate and lead to insanity for her even if it turns out she had nothing to do with her daughter’s disappearance.
Nothing is served to be outraged by the police’s offer of plea bargaining except to suffer yourself by getting upset and conditioning yourself yet again to intense mental force that will end in insanity whilst subjecting the police however dastardly to abuse that will also condition them to suffering for which you have karma not merit.
And what might be the intent or motive for her emotional display?
The motive might be to impress the gullible she is innocent. The McCanns used money donated to them to help find their child to pay off their mortgages and that is unrighteous behaviour and reflects on them.
The purpose of reasoning is to know:
The purpose of reasoning is not for adornment, to make money or establish rules for future (rote) behaviour, but it is to know what you did not know and see previously that it is important for you to know. If you reason about something useless or frivolous you are practicing nonsense that will end in madness.
If you see and know you do not need to reason. For instance if you secretly saw the policemen kill Altanturya, you secretly heard Razak instructing them, you do not need to reason to work out who killed her because you saw and know who killed her.
A person of truth who did not see what happened and cannot reason out what happened will just leave matters as it is and will not jump to conclusions or speculate or fantasize what it might have been thereby conditioning himself to false perceptions that the foolish person does not realize become increasingly compelling until he cannot separate fact from fantasy and become confused.
If you cannot see and did not know and you cannot reason then you must resort to copying, rules and automatism that are always false, dangerous and harmful to cope with your not seeing and knowing what happened in order to make some sense of what is happening or fake as if you are competent or knowledgeable to impress others.
There is nothing mysterious or indefinable or supernatural about knowing and it is just a process of arriving at knowing what you previously did not know separating facts from fiction and piecing together what you know as facts to then know what happened.
Ordinary people are poorly seeing and knowing that are crucial requisites for reasoning and therefore by extension they must also be poorly reasoning.
The reason why they are poorly or never seeing or knowing is because they never see with reason but they see with force, with liking and disliking selectively in a forcefully prejudiced way and they have already advanced false perception. For instance they perceive that silence can be deafening, a sound can be funny, they are pretty sure (meaning sure can be pretty) and speak of unimaginable suffering that surely they can imagine however imperfectly and probably quite perfectly.
As a result of poorly or never seeing they become poorly or never knowing, their minds are cluttered if not filled with delusions implanted like viruses by others or themselves that like weeds choke their ability to reason and thus unseeing, not knowing and unable to reason they have to cover up their deficiencies and resort to copying from others, rules and automatism to survive in this world.
In lieu of reason or the capacity to work out live specific for each occasion what is the truth, you have to resort to fixed rules or pre-recorded explanations what things mean but reality never conform to rules which always have exceptions and therefore it is foolish to resort to and live by rules. Apart from rules, the person who cannot reason learns to copy speech and behaviour he does not understand from others that appear appropriate to the common occasions he finds himself in and in time his trained mental parrot begin to dish out his copied speech and actions automatically on cue even without his approval or paying attention.
Unimaginable:
If you keep saying you cannot imagine what you can imagine, however imperfectly and probably even quite perfectly, thereby misleading others, it may be possible for you to exist in a world where you cannot perceive what in truth can be perceived.
It is possible for you to be born blind or deaf and thus though it is possible to see or hear, you cannot see and hear. If you think that is a pleasure, then you should keep on saying “I cannot imagine how he could have done it”. What has happened or can happen can be imagined.
A Scientist Speaking Nonsense:
Quote scientist: "Perhaps we might start to understand a little more about the common ancestor of African great apes and humans and whether it lived in Africa or Eurasia."
Comment: Science is supposed to be at the forefront of mankind’s quest for truth or facts about this world and so you would expect scientists to display reasoning and thoughts that are more orderly and rational than common people but this scientist may not be atypical but reflect that even scientists talk nonsense too or in a muddled or unnecessarily complicating & thus confusing fashion.
The ‘perhaps’ and ‘might start’ in the above sentence make no sense and are totally unnecessary, do not add any meaning but serve to confuse the reader. Whether deliberate or involuntary, it reflects hesitancy or doubt and uncertainty that must exist in his mind. Even over a simple matter like this he is hesitant as expressed in his ‘perhaps’.
If we have already started to understand in the past then what he said is false. If it is silly, there is no need to talk about ‘starting to’ understand but to just talk about ‘understanding’ he is ponderous or mechanical and has false perception that will end in mad perception. Such ponderous speech comes from the urge to say more and have style in one’s speech to impress others falsely with one’s authoritativeness such that in time the person cannot go straight to the point but must always beat around the bush. You will be foolish to accept the words of such a person as gospel.
If you yourself have a tendency and liking to speak in a verbose way like him then you might side with him and say I am nitpicking. However if it is never a pleasure to speak like him and you are suffering then by defending him you are defending suffering and shall head for suffering in the future.
It suffices to say, “We might understand a little more about the common ancestor of African great apes and humans and whether it lived in Africa or Eurasia"
This is not a matter of untidy language but reflects seriously muddled thinking that will influence the way he studies his subjects and arrive at conclusions.
The fact that he phrased himself thus is not an accident but reflects he sees nothing wrong; he has a vacillating mentality of not letting his yes be yes only and how he said it is much ado about nothing.
The way he said it is unnecessarily complicating and not the hallmark of clearly reasoning mind. What he says may sound impressive to the gullible and may be subconsciously intended to be impressive but it is all a matter of style and saying things that are superfluous or hollow.
NOT ONLY IS ‘PERHAPS’ AND ‘START TO’ TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, THEY ARE DISTRACTING TO THE SPEAKER AND LISTENERS AND A PERSON WHO SPEAKS THUS HAS KARMA NOT MERIT.
IF YOU CAN SEE AND KNOW THE TRUTH, DID YOU SEE AND KNOW THE WAY THE SCIENTIST EXPRESSED HIMSELF IS RIDICULOUS? IF YOU DID NOT SEE OR KNOW, MIGHT IT MEAN YOUR ABILITY TO SEE AND KNOW AND TO REASON WHAT YOU DID NOT KNOW MIGHT BE SERIOUSLY MORE DEFICIENT THAN YOU MAY CONCEDE?
ANYONE WHO IS STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED CANNOT THINK STRAIGHT AND BECAUSE ALL SCIENTISTS HAVE MANIFEST STYLE (FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS) & EMOTIONS, THEY MUST BE STRESSED, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTED AND THEREFORE CANNOT THINK STRAIGHT AND THEREFORE THE PRODUCTS OF THEIR MINDS MUST BE SUSPECT OR SKEWED.
Rules control rituals:
All conduct in speech or actions that are memorized with the intention for replay in the future are not intended for replay on all occasions but on selected occasions and there must be rules determining when and where these selected occasions have arrived so that the memorized speech or action can be commenced.
Thus without rules governing when to start or stop a recorded behaviour that recorded behaviour is useless. Without programmed rules as to when to initiate which particular pre-recorded motion, all the programmes of pre-recorded motion in the humanoid robot Asimo however impressive are useless. Apart from fixed rules there is nothing else that can serve as the reliable guide for Asimo as to what to do in the situations he might be faced with.
Without telling Asimo through fixed programmed instructions how to dance or run or clap hands it would not be able to do so. These fixed programmed instructions on which Asimo depend on to act or perform its various rituals are the rules that enable Asimo to carry the various rituals and so rules are again essential to perform rituals, there can be no rituals without rules defining the ritual or providing the theory of the ritual in addition to rules that tell the ritualistic person when to start and stop each ritual.
Because all stylish people can be shown objectively to render everything they think, say or do from a mental jukebox, even what and how they perceive (eg see, hear) is rehashed according to a program, they are full time or constant practitioners of rituals and it is not surprising but to be expected that they should have faith in what they are doing all the time, namely obeying rules and practicing rituals.
Not entirely to blame:
People are not entirely to blame themselves for liking and disliking and finding it hard to shake off even when they are both false and suffering leading to greater suffering.
People and indeed animals everywhere bombard them with audiovisual inputs that induce their mental forces to stir attractively or repulsively and because liking and disliking are forceful, they are conditioning or addictive that becomes increasingly strong with continued practice such that all beings here, even those who think they are quite good have liking and disliking that are very strong and because there are hard to resist and arise strongly they identify with their likings and disliking not realizing they are headed for torment.
When someone smiles at you he or she is inviting you to like them and once you have been stirred to like it conditions you to like and can be transferred to other targets.
This world neither sees nor knows the truth:
The Buddha said the truth is not easily seen and the truth he is speaking is not something exotic or merely related to spiritual matters but it is the truth everywhere in everything you perceive (see, hear, smell, taste and touch) that the Buddha implies beings in this world cannot see.
Jesus implied the same when he spoke of the spirit of truth whom the world neither sees nor knows; if this world can see, know or reason out the truth then it will not need another counsellor who is the spirit not of supernatural powers or great strength but of truth, and he will not need to teach all things.
And what is the truth that is everywhere that people cannot see?
The truth everywhere that people cannot see is the constant forceful stretching of syllables or units of motion, changing of speed and strength of force that is for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate that is the only source of the stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and feeling hurt they must all suffer even to suicidal and homicidal levels, the objective falsity, nonsensicality, contradiction, attacking and challenging nature of what people say or do.
It is the stress, restlessness and distraction engendered by their enslavement to force that renders them unable to see, know and reason out the truth and keep them enslaved in torment headed for even greater and everlasting torment.
THUS BY IMPLICATION OF WHAT THE BUDDHA AND JESUS SAID, THIS WORLD CANNOT SEE AND KNOW THE TRUTH AND BECAUSE OF THIS THEY CANNOT ALSO REASON OR WORK OUT THE TRUTH AND WHAT IS LEFT IS FOR THEM TO RUN THEIR LIVES ACCORDING TO RULES, COPYING WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING AND AUTOMATIC REHASHED RENDERING. IN ORDER TO ESCAPE TORMENT, THEY MUST DEVELOP SEEING AND KNOWING PARLY BY WEANING THEIR MINDS OFF FORCE.
No stylish behaviour means no rules needed:
If your speech and behaviour is not stylish that needs memorizing and rehashing then you need not have rules to govern when which piece of memorized speech or action is desirable and you are free to speak and behave accordingly depending on the situation at hand.
But if you desire to be stylish in what you say or do you must somehow commit to memory the stylish way you said different things and must have some sort of rules to determine when you should render this or that sequence and you must be rule bound.
THUS IF YOU MUST HAVE STYLISH BEHAVIOR THAT NEED TO BE MEMORIZED AND REPRODUCED YOU MUST PRACTICE RULES AND HAVE FAITH IN RULES THAT THE BUDDHA SAID LED TO FUTURE STATES OF WOE.
Shed solace:
As I have said, the only cause to sadness that leads to depression is the constant use of force to prolong, eg stretch syllables and motion and unless you stop using force to prolong you will never see an end to sadness and whatever else you may do are diversions to either deny or hopefully ameliorate but never cure the sadness.
It is a form of practice of ritual and faith in rules to believe in and participate in the shed therapy described below which may only coincidentally work.
I know I am right because by stopping stretching, I have experienced a permanent end to sadness that was unthinkable in the past. If you have not stopped stretching your syllables yourself you have no right to say I am wrong or how do I know unless you want to create karma for yourself.
Australian men find solace in a shed
By Phil Mercer BBC News, Sydney
Australia has come up with a novel weapon in the fight against high rates of male suicide and depression - a variation on the humble shed.
The Men's Shed movement is booming in disused warehouses and other suburban buildings, which are being transformed into havens for mostly older men to socialise.
At the last count there were 216 of them around the country and more are on the way.
Perched in between native bushland and a busy railway line is the North Sydney shed.
The former scouts' hall is a fully equipped workshop. It hums with activity and a fair dose of cheeky Aussie humour.
"We talk about all sorts of things - from cake recipes to sex - so we cover a wide field," said supervisor John Marlin, a kind-hearted bear of a man who is in his early 70s.
Supporters have insisted the workshops are a breakthrough in men's health as the informal atmosphere is encouraging them to talk more about their problems - such as depression and loneliness.
Postponing the inevitable:
Shed therapy may postpone the inevitable by providing company that prevents you from sinking too deep into depression to become suicidal, it provides diversions that merely stave off the inevitable final sinking into depression either later or after you depart.
Privacy please:
Have you ever heard Jesus say ‘Can we have some privacy or quiet please?’, ‘read the bible, please’, ‘think of your Father in heaven, please’, please do not be upset that I am going or I am pleased to announce that the Father will give you another counselor?
Have you heard the Buddha say, ‘be virtuous, please’ or ‘please do not kill?’
The please is a form of nicety that is unnecessary but necessary to exert pressure or force on the other person to obey and that is always sinful not meritorious. Please can have various meaning, it can be threatening or as if begging or to convey appreciation (eg ‘yes please’ to the waiter’s offer of another serving).
PLEASE IS AN UNNECESSARY PLEASANTRY OR NICETY THAT NICE PEOPLE ARE ATTRACTED TO WITH FORCE NOT REASON TO USE AND IF IT IS FOR SHOW, NOT NECESSARY YOU ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY FOR SEEING WHAT IS MEANINGLESS OR HARMFUL AS MEANINGFUL AND BENEFICIAL FOR YOU.
What do people mean by ‘please’?
You hear people frequently say ‘please’ and you yourself probably has a penchant to use ‘please’.
So what is meant by ‘please’? If you are frequently using ‘please’ and frequently hearing ‘please’ and you do not know what it means precisely then you are a person who does not know what he is speaking or hearing and that is an indication of somnolent rote speech imitating others without understanding.
When people say ‘please’ they mean ‘please me’, they want others to do or say things to please them.
Because all ordinary people are stylish emotional people they cannot mean ‘make me happy’ but by pleasing them they mean ‘make me like myself’ and because liking has nothing to do with reason but the stirring of mental force, you are asking others to make you stir your mental force attractive to yourself or asking them to make you sin.
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO ASK OTHERS TO PLEASE YOU BUT IT IS UP TO OTHERS WHETHER THEY WANT TO PLEASE YOU OR YOU. IF YOU ASK OTHERS TO PLEASE YOU, YOU ARE ASKING THEM TO GO AGAINST THEMSELVES TO PLEASE YOU AND THAT IS ASKING THEM TO ACT OR PUT ON A SHOW. IN REALITY WHENEVER PEOPLE TRY TO PLEASE ANOTHER THEY MUST BEHAVE IN A SUBSERVIANT OR OBESIANT WAY AND THAT IS ASKING PEOPLE TO ENSLAVE THEM TO YOU.
You may disagree but you may have false perception that you are meritorious to reply ‘yes, please’ to a waiter’s enquiry of a top up. It suffices to say, “yes” without rudeness or haughtiness.
Whenever people use ‘please’ they may have different intentions. The common intention is to exert (unrighteous) pressure on you to do what they want you to do. Other intentions are to threaten (please stop that) or to beg you, please help me or it may be faked just to impress others that they are polite and friendly.
‘PLEASE’ IS A SHORTENED FORM OF ‘PLEASE ME’ BUT THE PERSON MAY NOT MEAN WHAT HE SAYS & WHAT HE MEANT BY USING ‘PLEASE’ IS TO SOUND POLITE OR FRIENDLY OR USING ‘PLEASE’ AS A GENERAL FOR SHOW RULE OF SPEECH (ALWAYS MINDLESSLY USE ‘PLEASE’ WHEN REQUESTING FAVORS FROM OTHERS). WHATEVER THE INTENTION IT IS NOT MERITORIOUS TO USE ‘PLEASE’ BUT CREATES KARMA THAT YOU MAY REFUTE NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
Examples of poor reasoning and rules faking as reasoning:
A glaring example that mankind is poorly reasoning and people are passing off rules as reasoning is the conviction of the lone gunman in the disappearance of Tony Falconio in the Australian outback.
It is impossible for a lone gunman to commit the crime because the couple’s van was found some kilometres from the crime scene and no lone gunman can drive his own 4WD and the couple’s van at the same time to abandon it so far away from the scene.
It is a rule that any lone gunman can commit a crime but in this case the rule is found wanting because the gunman would have to do the impossible, drive two vehicles at the same time. Thus because the police and the judiciary operate by rules thinking they failed to realize this glaring faux pas.
Again the McCanns were quick to accuse the police of framing them regarding the finding of DNA evidence of their child in their hired car when it is physically impossible for the police to frame them because the child has disappeared so where can police get material from her to frame them?
The rule is that police can frame people but in the context of this case, it is not possible for police to frame.
THUS WHAT PEOPLE CALL THEIR REASONING MAY BE THEIR APPLYING OF RULES TO A SITUATION WITHOUT REALIZING AND IT IS ONLY WHEN THEY COMMIT SOME FAUX PAS THAT THE TRUE NATURE OF THEIR ‘REASONING’ IS EVIDENT.
THUS PEOPLE MAY BE DELUDING THEMSELVES WHEN THEY THINK THEY ARE REASONING BECAUSE THEY MAY BE APPLYING RULES OR GENERALIZATIONS WITHOUT REALIZING, A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING.
Wanting a favour you cannot refuse:
Whenever people add ‘please’ to their requests, they want to sound polite or friendly not because they are genuinely so polite or friendly but they want to exert (unfair) psychological pressure on the other person to accede to their request.
Because they never state that they want to impress you with their politeness and friendliness so that you have greater incentive to do what they want from you, they are hypocritical.
This is the common hypocritical motive but there are other motives like threatening or demanding.
If you mean what you say then by saying ‘please’ you mean the other person should please you. It is preposterous that the other person can please himself by carrying out your request and so the ‘please’ must imply ‘please me’ by carrying out my request.
However in the usual course of events, when people say ‘please’ they do not mean what they say but they want to put on a show of being polite or friendly because they need something from you.
Genuine & to be heard friendliness:
There is false friendliness that is to be heard or seen and there is genuine friendliness.
What is false cheap friendliness that is to be heard or seen?
Saying ‘please’ when one wants something done by another is polite or to be heard false cheap friendship whilst smiling whilst speaking or doing is to be seen false friendship.
What is genuine friendship?
It is speaking and doing things that does not harm the other person but benefits him.
Not harming the other person means speaking without style or forceful stretching, changing speed and loudness that stresses, make restless and distracted, not telling lies, not speaking nonsense or contradictory messages, not attacking directly or indirectly (sarcastically or poking fun), not attacking or challenging or arguing. Benefiting another means saying things that are helpful or insightful or alleviates his suffering or problems.
If your spoken ‘please’ has style or forceful stretching, changes in speed and loudness then it is stressful rather than soothing to the person addressed. If it exerts pressure on the recipient to accede to your demands then it persecutes him rather than benefit him.
Saying please is what some people learnt to force themselves to say by copying without understanding from others and although initially they may be self conscious that they are forcing themselves to do so to get what they want, increasingly they begin to perceive their pleases are genuine, from the bottom of their hearts, good for themselves and others and because the urge to say ‘please’ is very strong, they automatically say ‘please’ even without awareness, they identify with their pleases not believing they are hypocrites practicing the rule of always saying please headed for future woe according to the Buddha.
THUS THE ‘PLEASE’ THAT ACCOMPANIES REQUESTS IS NOT GENUINE FRIENDLINESS BUT FALSE TO BE HEARD FRIENDLINESS THAT HAS MOTIVE IN EXERTING PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE ON THE OTHER PERSON TO ACCEDE TO YOUR DEMANDS AND YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK YOU ARE GOOD WHEN YOU ARE UNRIGHTEOUS.
Connotations:
Many words have taken additional meanings or connotation through the abuse of frequent usage by many people such that they may have many meanings that are quite different and so ‘please’ has many different meanings when used.
In the usual sense when you say ‘please help me’ you mean ‘please me by helping me’ or make me happy or make me like myself by helping me which is a demand. In this case you have no right to ask others make you happy or like yourself by acceding to your demand.
But through the corruption of usage, the use of please when requesting help has degenerated into a form of even impersonal courtesy or politeness or to convey false for show friendliness. Because I said ‘please’ you should oblige me or I am good.
Another connotation of please is that I am distressed or weak so ‘please’ or ‘I beg you’ help me and because I am begging you, you must oblige. Exactly how distressed you are that others must please you by helping you can be known if not by you then by God and if your distress is exaggerated or even non existent and your imploring please is to manipulate others you are headed for woe.
Prolonging:
It only takes a certain amount of time to get on stage, get your diploma and leave but you can prolong the duration because you perceive it is an occasion to display yourself by taking longer than necessary to walk to the dispenser of your diploma, to turn to the audience and wave, to smile and engage him in small talk with view to prolonging the duration of your receipt of your diploma and to again wave before you ‘sign off’ with a smile and prolonging your walk down the stairs.
Thus not only is it possible to prolong any physical act (eg prolong your golf swing by adding stylish multiple curves to its path) but people are prolonging all the time, they prolong their sex act or feeding to extract ‘maximal’ pleasure or reflect their grasping at it.
You use and need force to prolong, never reason and because it is forceful it is conditioning or addictive such that in time it is automatic and constant to prolong and rather than being an adulterated pleasure it is tormenting to prolong and is the only cause of sadness that leads to depression.
Distress is a sign of genuineness is a rule:
People do not realize they are subscribing to a rule when they automatically associate genuine distress which is always an act no matter how genuine as a sign the person is not faking but what he said happened is genuine.
Thus in the case of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance many foolish observers were saying how can the mother be faking when her anguish at the discovery was so genuine. She may be genuinely anguished but not necessarily because her child was kidnapped but because she has suddenly lost her child permanently in an accident.
Again many including the police were taken in by the girl’s visible distress to accept what she said has happened to be true when she may have other causes of distress because she did spend a night alone in the pitch darkness and wild fearing snakes and predators and she may be anxious for fear of discovery of her faked disappearance of her boyfriend.
Again it was remarked that no professional actress could have acted like Kate McCann did that night and therefore what she said must be true that a kidnapper took her child. This is again rules thinking that fails to take into account that no true tragedies occur on the screen and the son who died is not the actress’ real son and the death is not a real death whereas in this case even if the kidnap is not genuine, she did suffer an accidental death of her daughter.
Thus a person who is always applying rules to ‘solve’ problems may be deceived he has genuine reason and treating each case on its merits but he is a fool who can be tricked by others and overrating his reasoning capability.
ALL EXPRESSIONS ARE FABRICATED AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH FORCE AND WHEN WELL PRACTICED THE PERSON IS FORCED TO EXPRESS RATHER FORCING HIMSELF TO EXPRESS AND BECAUSE THE EXPRESSION IS INVOLUNTARY, FOOLS PERCEIVE THE EXPRESSION IS GENUINE WHEN IT IS FAKING THAT HAS GONE OUT OF CONTROL. THE FOOL’S RULE IS THAT THE MORE DRAMATIC OR FLORID AN EXPRESSION, THE MORE GENUINE IT IS.
Applying rules not reasoning:
Quote: I've always been of the opinion that once you've qualified as a team - as Croatia have - the pressure and intensity just isn't there.
Yes, they will want to win at Wembley, but when 50-50 tackles are flying in, there's only one team who will be willing to put their bodies on the line and that's England.
He is not reasoning to know but applying rules to predict an outcome of a match that he does not have sufficient facts to predict. A wise person will not even venture to predict a result because it is dicing with falsity that leads to doubt and uncertainty. For instance it was widely predicted that Russia will beat Israel but the opposite happened. A superior team may attack a hundred times and fail to score and the weaker team may score with its only attempt. If unknown to you, a team has been bribed to lose or the referee is biased, then you are a fool to try to predict the result.
Once you have qualified as a team, the pressure and intensity just isn't there is a rule or generalization that may not apply in this case (A Russian magnate has offered Croatia four Mercedes to beat England). “When 50-50 tackles are flying in, there's only one team who will be willing to put their bodies on the line and that's England” too is not an instance of reasoning but a rule or generalization he is attempting to fit into this situation that may not apply.
A REASONING PERSON ASSESSES EACH SITUATION ON ITS MERIT AND IN THIS CASE HE REALIZES HE CANNOT TELL WHAT WILL BE THE OUTCOME OF THE MATCH AND HE REFRAINS FROM MAKING PREDICTIONS. THE FOOL PLUNGES AND MAKE BETS BASED ON RULES.
ROBOTS CANNOT REASON BUT THEY OPERATE BY INFLEXIBLE RULES PROGRAMMED INTO THEM AND IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE ROBOTS YOU MUST REPROGRAM OR CHANGE THE RULES THEY ARE PROGRAMMED WITH. BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO HAVE STYLE OPERATE FROM A JUKEBOX IN WHATEVER AND HOWEVER THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO, THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS ENDOWED WITH CONSCIOUSNESS THAT MERELY ACTS AS VOYEUR AND DIRECTOR OR DISK JOCKEY AND IT MAY BE OR IS THE TRUTH THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT REASON BUT THEY OPERATE BY RULES THEY AND SOCIETY PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES WITH.
It is force that is ill that is behind lies:
True reason never plays any part in the fabricating and execution of lies, nonsense and speech that is conflicting, attacks or challenges another to an argument. If you think genuine reason must play a part then you have wrong perception or you may have mistaken rules thinking as the true reason involved in all falsity or verbal aggressiveness.
A person does or says something false, nonsensical, conflicting or attacking not without reason but with motive to harm or hurt the other person or un-righteously get what he wants (eg someone’s money, property or love).
A lie or falsity is essentially a series of words that although they (the words) each have true meaning, have been conveniently hijacked by force to be strung together to fashion a falsity that gives the impression of truth but it is an even clever fake in which depending how skilful a liar the person is, the series of words strung together merely provide the framework through which the person can apply force to drive the falsity he desires to transmit and wants others to accept as true.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS BEHIND THE RULES THINKING (NOT TRUE REASONING) THAT ENABLES THE LIAR TO FORMULATE THE LIE OR NONSENSE OR CONTRADICTORY OR ATTACKING WORDS IN A WAY THAT IS AS CREDIBLE AS POSSIBLE IN THE CONTEXT AT HAND TO CHEAT OTHERS.
IT IS AGAIN FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT WILL THEN SEIZE THE THUS FABRICATED LIE AND DRIVE ITS RENDITION USUALLY WITH EXCESSIVE FORCE THAT IS MANIFEST IN THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITH A DESIRE OR WILL THAT THE OTHER PERSON SHOULD ACCEPT IT AS TRUE.
THROUGHOUT THE FABRICATING AND RENDERING OF FALSITY, RATHER THAN NECESSARY, IT IS PREFERABLE THAT TRUE REASON BE BANISHED BECAUSE THE PERSON WILL BE SELF CONSCIOUS IF TRUE REASON WAS PRESENT IN THE CONCEPTION AND EXECUTION OF THE LIE.
WHAT THE FOOLISH PERSON WHO TELLS LIES DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT BECAUSE THE FABRICATION AND EXECUTION OF HIS LIE OR ATTACKING SPEECH IS DRIVEN BY FORCE BACKED BY FALSE RULES THINKING IN WHICH HE MUST BANISH TRUE REASON AND HE WILLS HIMSELF TO BELIEVE HIS LIE OR ATTACKING SPEECH IS TRUE SO AS TO MAKE IT AS CREDIBLE AS POSSIBLE TO OTHERS, HE IS WALKING A TIGHTROPE OF REALITY TESTING AND INCREASINGLY HE BELIEVES WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE AND HE IS HEADED FOR AN INEVITABLE FALL FROM HIS TIGHTROPE OF CHICANERY TO DESCEND INTO INSANITY.
THUS A PERSON’S ILL WILL WHICH THE BUDDHA SAID IS A FETTER TO THE LOWER REALMS IS ESSENTIALLY HIS FORCEFULNESS THAT IS CONSTANTLY BEHIND HIS USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS STYLE IN WHATEVER AND HOWEVER HE PERCEIVES, THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES THINGS OR HOW HE USES FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH AND DIRECTION WHERE POSSIBLE AND IT IS AGAIN JUST FORCE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY THROUGH RULES THINKING THAT IS BEHIND HIS FARBICATING AND EXECUTION OF LIES, NONSENSE, CONTRADICTIONS AND ATTACKING WORDS THAT INCREASINGLY CONDITIONS HIM TO THE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WHAT IS FALSE AND HARMFUL IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL AND HE IS HEADED FOR CERTAIN MADNESS.
Rules are instructions or orders:
Rules are just instructions or orders and a person who has faith in rules need instructions or orders to function or carry his activities that can only be what and how he perceives, thinks, speaks and does. He cannot operate or function without orders or instructions. Thus those in the military or are of a military bent have special predilection for or devotion to rules.
A computer functions entirely by rules or orders or instructions. Without instructions or orders a computer is crippled, does not know what to do.
In the same way a robot depends entirely on rules or orders or instructions. It cannot do things without orders. You must order it or supply it with pre-orchestrated instructions before it can do anything.
It is ridiculous and false that a true being needs orders or instructions before it can do anything or must be told before he can do or say anything and a stylish person who operates by rehash from a jukebox is such a person, he must have orders or instructions incorporated into his CPU or central processing unit or brain before he can do or say anything, whatever he says or does is what his CPU has been ordered or instructed to do.
Thus a person who is a genuine person does not need rules or orders or instructions either internalized in his own mind or externally by others in order to do or say anything or reason (work with facts to know) for himself but he can examine each situation he is faced with, ascertain the facts of the case and by joining them together come to a true conclusion of what everything is about.
When faced with a situation, a stylish person who is constantly rehashing or faking live falls back on instructions or orders in his mind, cannot help falling back on rules or instructions in his mind to interpret and take actions regarding the situation. If there are no orders or instructions pertinent to the situation he cannot do or say anything and needs fresh instructions from others in order to render him competent in this novel situation.
So long as he has ready answers to a situation at hand that appears (but not necessarily is truly) appropriate or accepted by society or co-robots as appropriate or true, then he will not be found out to be a fake, he will be successful in his fakery, deceiving himself and others he is a live specific to the occasion performer, he is s genuine currency not a clever counterfeit currency. But as soon as there occur situations where he has no outstanding instructions or orders of what to do or say, he is lost, don’t know what to say or do or make of it. Thus the robot exist in anxiety in camouflage of his true nature, he is afraid to expose his shameful inability to perform live and furtive need for rules, instructions or orders in order to function in any way.
ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO HAVE STYLE, LIKES AND DISLIKES OR EMOTIONS MAY SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE PRESENCE OF SPOKEN AND UNSPOKEN RULES OR ORDERS OR INSTRUCTIONS IN THEIR MINDS OR FROM OTHERS THEY ASSOCIATE WITH, THEY MISTAKE THEIR OPERATING BY RULES OR INSTRUCTIONS AS THEIR REASONING AND THUS THEY HAVE AN OVERRATED BELIEF IN THEIR ABILITY TO REASON WHICH MAY BE INFANTILE AND NON EXISTENT IN MANY.
Just as counterfeit currencies come in different grades of sophistry in the same way, people who operate blindly depending secretly on rules or instructions without which they are lost come in different grades of sophistry such that the less sophisticated ones are easily found out by fellow counterfeiters as when they complain of others being too rigid or didactic or rule bound but at the higher or sophisticated levels of counterfeiting, only those who are not counterfeiters can identify them. Only a person who is himself not a counterfeit and therefore knows what is not a counterfeit can unfailing tell what is counterfeited and what is not counterfeited and a person who is himself a counterfeiter amidst everyone who is also counterfeiting can only hesitantly poorly tell apart sophisticated counterfeiters from non counterfeiters because he has only a vague idea of what is genuine as he himself is not genuine.
Tai chi is not a live specific to an occasion series of multiple simultaneous bodily motions but it is a ritual that is intended to be rehashed repeatedly for certain desired purposes for which it may or may not be efficacious.
Thus in order to have tai chi, a ritual with a series of complex simultaneous bodily motion that are to be repeated both for an occasion and to be retrieved and repeated for subsequent occasions, you must have rules or instructions that are the basis of tai chi that you must follow and instruct others and because it is not a specific response to a situation you need rules or instructions as when and where in the future it should be repeated.
THUS RULES OR INSTRUCTIONS OR ORDERS IS ESSENTIAL TO ALL RITUALS, THERE CANNOT BE RITUALS WITHOUT RULES THAT FORM THE THEORY OF THE RITUAL AND YOU IN ADDITION NEED RULES TO INSTRUCT THE PRACTITIONER OF THE RITUAL WHEN AND WHERE TO REPEAT THIS CHOREOGRAPHED RITUAL.
THUS THE BUDDHA IS NOT A MADMAN, HE IS WISE TO GROUP TOGETHER FAITH IN PRECEPTS (RULES OR INSTRUCTIONS) & RITUALS AS A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE BECAUSE SUCH A PERSON IS A DEAD AUTOMATON.
Why in theory people are without reason:
Whenever a person tells a lie, he must temporarily suspend true reason to then be driven by like or attractive force (greed for gains that can be derived from lying is like) or dislike or repulsive force (hate for someone you want to deceive by telling a lie) to fashion a lie by plucking words with true meanings to be cobbled together to present a scenario that appears to be a plausible fit to an existing situation but did not happen and thus fabricated the lie must be executed by excessive force that is needed to overcome forceful self resistance to saying something that is harmful to self (you want yourself to accept what did not happen did happen and that is conflicting even mad) and also fashion the simultaneous style that is needed to distract or divert the other person’s concentration so that he does pay undivided attention to your lie and therefore more likely expose it.
Thus if you keep telling lies you keep suspending your true reason in order to allow falsity to prevail until a time arrives not long after when your true reason is permanently suspended and acceptance of falsity or the perception of what is false is true becomes permanent.
The fact that people cannot see or severely underestimate the presence of falsity, nonsense (what does not make sense), contradiction, sarcasms (meaning the opposite of what they say or lying), excuses, speech that is not intended to convey meaning but act as missiles to attack others or antagonise or argue with them (verbal combat), they cannot see their likes and dislikes, smiles, facial expressions and styles that are always present are false, are all about using force that has nothing to do with reason and are harmful not beneficial as they perceive, they struggle to and even fail to grasp that this is so even after I repeatedly point out to them reflects that they do not possess genuine reason but what reason they have is actually mistaken applying rules to things occurring to them.
If people have true reason or ability to see and work out the truth they would know that what they say and do and others say and do to them are false. It is because they have serious deficiency in the ability to reason and see the truth that they are unable to see or reason out what is pervasive falsity perpetrated by themselves and others.
TRUE REASON CANNOT FIGHT WITH FORCE BECAUSE TRUE REASON NEVER HAS ANY FORCE THAT CAN FIGHT WITH FORCE AND THUS IN ANY ENCOUTER WITH FORCE, REASON WILL BE DRIVEN OUT TO BE REPLACED BY FALSE REASON OR EXCUSES OR JUSTIFICATIONS FOR WHAT THEY SAY OR DO THAT NOTHING MORE THAN WORDS WITH REASON HIJACKED BY THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO OFFER A PLAUSIBLE BUT ALWAYS DECEPTIVE EXPLANATION TO WHAT THEY SAY OR DO.
TRUE REASON MUST ALWAYS KNOW WHAT IS TRUE OR DID HAPPEN AND THEREFORE TRUE REASON MUST BE BANISHED IN ORDER TO FABRICATE FALSITY IN SPEECH OR ACTION (EG SMILE) AND THUS BANISHED FORCE OR LIKE OR DISLIKE OR EMOTIONS HAVE A FREE REIN TO HIJACK TRUE WORDS OR ACTIONS TO FABRICATE A SEEMINGLY PLAUSIBLE ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO TO WHAT ACTUALLY DID HAPPEN WHOSE REALISM DEPENDS ON THE CUNNING OF THAT LIAR AND THEN APPLY EXCESSIVE FORCE TO EXECUTE THE LIE AND PROVIDE DIVERSIONS TO MAKE THE LIE MORE LIKELY TO SUCCEED.
BECAUSE LYING IS FORCEFUL IT IS CONDITIONING OR ADDICTIVE AND AN URGE TO LIE THAT BECOMES INCREASINGLY IRRESISTIBLE AND CHAOTIC SOON DEVELOPS AND IF YOU KEEP LYING YOU KEEP SUSPENDING TRUE REASON THAT SOON YOU BECOME PERMANENTLY WITHOUT TRUE REASON AND MUST DEPEND ON RULES OR INSTRUCTIONS IN ORDER FOR YOU TO FUNCTION.
PEOPLE NEVER JUST TELL LIES BUT THEY FORCEFULLY DENY TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS WHEN CONFRONTED THAT THEY TOLD LIES AND BECAUSE THIS DENIAL IS BASED ON FORCE, THEY ARE WILLING THEMSELVES TO PERCEIVE THEIR LIES ARE TRUE SO THAT IN TIME THEY TOTALLY BELIEVE AND EVEN PERCEIVE THEIR LIES ARE TRUE.
PEOPLE NEVER TELL LIES BUT THEY FORCEFULLY WANT OTHERS TO BELIEVE THEIR LIES ARE TRUE. BECAUSE YOU FORCEFULLY WANT OTHERS TO BELIEVE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE, YOU MUST ALSO WANT YOURSELF TO BELIEVE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE SUCH THAT IN TIME YOU CANNOT HELP BELIEVING AND PERCEIVING YOUR LIES ARE TRUE.
THE IMPORTANCE OF ALL THIS THAT THE FOOLISH LIAR IS UNAWARE IS THAT WITH FREQUENT SUSPENSION OF TRUE REASON TO EMBRACE OF FALSE REASON OR EXCUSES TO TELL LIES, HIS SUSPENSION OF TRUE REASON BECOMES INCREASINGLY PERMANENT AND WIDESPREAD SO THAT HE STRUGGLES TO DIFFERENTIATE WHAT IS FALSE AND WHAT IS TRUE, HIS DENIAL OF LYING AND WANTING OTHERS TO BELIEVE HIS LIES MAKES HIM INCREASINGLY PERCEIVE HIS LIES ARE TRUE, HE IS ONLY FORCEFULLY CONTROLLING HIS INSANITY OF PRACTICING FALSITY AS TRUTH AND HE IS HEADED FOR A CERTAIN FINAL LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS.
ANYONE WHO TELLS LIES HAS A CERTAIN APPOINTMENT WITH FUTURE MADNESS AND THE FACT THAT YOU CANNOT TELL YOU ARE TELLING LIES, YOU BELIEVE YOUR LIES ARE TRUE MAKES IT WORSE BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE THE WAY OUT OF YOUR PREDICAMENT, NAMELY TELLING THE TRUTH.
AND WHAT MAINTAINS A PERSON IN THIS MAD CAROUSEL OF LIES THAT WILL END IN TRAGEDY?
IT IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE NAME OF STYLE THAT KEEPS THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IN GOOD NICK AND CHURNS UP REGULAR INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT KEEPS HIM ENSLAVED AND DRIVES HIM HELPLESSLY TO FURTHER STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH.
THUS DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE IMPORTANCE OF PAYING ATTENTION TO MAKE EFFORT TO PERSISTENTLY ERADICATE ANY STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE WHAT IS AT STAKE IS YOUR SANITY AND EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY IN WEEPING AND GNASHING YOUR TEETH.
THE BUDDHA SAID TELLING LIES CAN SEND ONE TO HELL AND IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT I SAID THAT A LIAR FACES CERTAIN NOT POSSIBLE MADNESS EVEN IF HE DOES NOT GO TO HELL WITH THE BURNING, WHIPPING AND POKING HE WILL GET THERE AND YOU CAN EVEN SEE YOURSELF TELLING LIES EVEN IRRESISTIBLY, THEN THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO KILL YOUR MENTAL FORCE THAT IS THE SOURCE OF LIES BY KILLING YOUR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
IT IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE OR FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT KEEPS THE FIRE OF FORCE BURNING THAT DRIVES LIKE & DISLIKE, EMOTIONS, FEAR, SADNESS, FEELING HURT AND THE URGE TO TELL LIES, SPEAK NONSENSE OR CONTRADICTIONS, ATTACK AND ARGUE WITH OTHERS.
Whatever is unnecessary is false:
The Buddha said that you should see danger in the slightest fault.
Whatever you say or do that can be determined objectively is unnecessary is false and so if you practice falsity you are headed for insanity.
Thus if you leg shaking or finger drumming serves no purpose but because you are restless or you scratching your head is not because of itch but puzzlement or habit, then you are practicing falsity or controlled insanity.
All your sighs and grunts, wells and buts and “I say” and hmms and mmms and ‘.....’ may be purposeless or false and you are somnolently headed for madness.
England supporters will get hurt:
Supporters or fans are people who like that which they support, they are attracted to what they support and thus they must get hurt when they found that England unexpectedly lost to Croatia at home.
I was formerly an emotional or liking supporter of England in football and still hold vestigial sentiment but when I discovered they lost this morning I was not hurt at all nor did I deny hurt by smiling as if I liked the news and this is an unimaginable situation in the past where I would be lying if I said I was not hurt. Thus even if the world has not changed, I have changed towards the absence of suffering in a way that would be unimaginable just a few years ago let alone before the 1977 consciousness change which I triggered.
For one who sees, everyone is still changing as visible by their demeanour although they are all still acting and suffering for it.
LIKING AND DISLIKING ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND ALWAYS SUFFERING. WHATEVER HAPPENS CAN ONLY BE PLEASANT, VERY PLEASANT, NEITHER PLEASANT NOR UNPLEASANT, UNPLEASANT OR VERY UNPLEASANT SO WHAT IS THERE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE OR STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED OR REPULSED?