“I don’t believe anything in the papers”
This statement that the person does not believe anything in the papers is never said in truth, is false and said to reflect dislike or disgust.
It is impossible for someone to not believe in at least some things in the papers eg the prices of goods quoted and therefore it is a lie to summarily dismiss.
It is a person with strong self identity views that will make such opinionated statements and self identity plus ill will (dislike is forceful) and telling lies (the statement is false) means he is headed for future states of woe according to the Buddha.
Heather Mills says tapes will 'ruin' Paul McCartney:
To ordinary people, Heather Mills may be just stating the truth but whether she is saying the truth that the tapes she possess will ruin Paul McCartney, she is expressing ill will, she sees nothing wrong in possessing and exposing tapes that will ruin another and therefore she has exposed herself as a woman of ill will who delight in hurting others.
Whether what she says is to threaten or she is just stating the fact that the tapes will ruin someone, what she says reveals that she sees nothing wrong with possessing and threatening the publishing of tapes that are ruinous of others and she must be a wicked person irregardless of Paul McCartney’s nature.
It is true that in common with the other Beatles, Paul McCartney did many wicked things that bequeathed him grave even deadly karma, he is stingy, domineering, capable of great cruelty and has a warped mind or demons in his mind that is sometimes beyond his control, it is karma that he ended up with his nemesis Heather Miller that he admitted caused him great suffering but by her words she has confirmed herself as a liar and evil person with deadly karma due to her.
Heather Mills in new TV rant: Why I taped McCartney
Heather Mills last night told how she has recorded all her conversations with Sir Paul McCartney so she can reveal the truth about their bitter split.
In another round of TV tirades, the 39-year-old claimed the former Beatle promised to admit he was responsible for the collapse of their five-year marriage but backed down - and said taping the chat was the only way anyone would believe her. (It is impossible that only Paul was responsible for the breakdown and so it is convenient on her part to blame everything on him. It is a bit far fetched to imagine Paul could have promised to admit his fault and so it may be a blatant lie)
Heather also laid into Sir Paul's daughter Stella, blaming her for the break-up, while claiming another reason was his refusal to donate more of his £825million to charity. (it is easy to talk about others miserliness but watch out if you yourself is not generous)
In one astonish outburst on US TV show Today, the tearful mum-of-one declared: "Why do you think I've had to record every single conversation? Because nobody will believe me. (surely she is aware that the tapes can make her a lot of money and if this is an even overriding reason, she is lying to say it is to prove her case)
"When we split I said to Paul, 'I'm going to be crucified. I'll have a modern day stoning. You know why we split, you know the truth. You need to stand up and say, 'I am responsible for the break-up of this marriage'. (if you think this is being crucified and stoning, wait until you really get crucified and stoned)
"I said, 'If you say that, I'll walk away with nothing and we'll do a gentle and quick divorce'. And he promised he'd do that and I have evidence of that. And he did nothing. He knows I was at a suicide point, and still nothing was done."
And she told ABC's Good Morning America: "If I wanted to put pressure on Paul I would expose the whole truth."
In another rant, on the show Extra, Heather accused Stella of being "evil". She said: "Every single week Stella tried to break up our marriage. She was so jealous. She's done some evil, evil things. She scraped my face out of a photo when they were in psychiatric session together."
Bitter Heather also told how she and Sir Paul, who split in May last year, rowed constantly over his refusal to give more cash to good causes. She said: "How could anybody have that kind of money and not to do more for charity? That is what we argued about all the time."
She added: "He was a broken man when I met him. He wouldn't perform. I was a huge support for Paul." (boasting or beating her own drum that if exaggerated, is a form of lying)
OFTEN THE PERSON DOES NOT KNOW WHETHER WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES IS TRUE OR FALSE OR EVEN BELIEVE IT IS TRUE BECAUSE WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES IS COPIED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT KNOWING WHY OR HE IS DELUDED BUT EVEN SO A DISCERNING PERSON DOES NOT NEED TO GUESS BUT HE CAN SEE OR KNOW WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IS FALSE, CONTRADICTORY OR MAKES NO SENSE.
Contradicting herself:
All well and good, but going on tour with four young children in tow must have been quite a strain at times.
The ‘all well and good’ is not only totally unnecessary but belies or contradicts what is subsequently said and is therefore false and the truth should be ‘it was not very well and good, going on tour with four young children must have been quite a strain at a time. Not only is she generating conflict in herself but she is generating it in readers who have to contend with the opposites that it is all well and good and at the same time going on tour with four young children must have been quite a strain at a time.
Thus people like to think they are capable of speaking the truth but they are contradicting themselves often without realization.
A painful distraction:
Quote: "This sort of stuff just serves as a painful distraction from what they feel everyone should be concentrating on, and that's finding Madeleine."
Because nobody physically poked or harmed the person, the pain she is speaking of must be mental hurt that occurs on every occasion the person’s mental force of going against self is actively stirring in speed and strength unaccompanied or shielded by the force of self preservation to impact on that person’s consciousness as hurt.
Quote: "Kate and Gerry have absolutely nothing to hide. Anything the police may have found can be explained in wholly innocent terms."
It is speaking foolishly absolutely vouching for another. How would the person know that the couple have absolutely nothing to hide? Instead the motive is to forcefully not with reason convince listeners to trust him that the couple is innocent. Why is the person so anxious to convince others the couple is innocent that he will risk falsity by speaking for others?
Life is not meaningless but the way they behave is meaningless:
What people do or say is often false or nonsense (makes no sense) or contradictory and even when they make some sense, it is never live specific for the occasion but regurgitated from their mental jukeboxes approximately appropriate for the situation at hand (if you know the person, you may realized he has said or done the thing many times in the past that can only come about by rehash) but through it all, there is one constancy: the invariable simultaneous transmission of force through his style or how he forcefully stretches (syllables & units of motion), changes speed, strength of force and direction that rather than being an inconsequential accompaniment is the principal ingredient of their speech and actions.
Stylish people are kidding themselves if they think they do not have style or they do not admire style in themselves and others because they all practice style constantly often without awareness and style in themselves and others mean a lot to them, even to the extent that it does not matter what they and others say or do but HOW they say or do is more important in their eyes.
It does not matter if what they say or do is relatively true (never absolutely true because it is always accompanied by style that fatally taints it), makes no sense or is false but it is the force that is always transacted that impacts on themselves and others as stress, restlessness and distraction that is the most important result of what they say or do.
All this transmission of force in the accompanying style is in the name of deceiving, pleasing, impressing, intimidating and dominating others and gives them some emotional sustenance but is ultimately unsatisfactory which is why goats often remark that life is meaningless. It is not that existence is meaningless but it is the WAY they exist with constant forceful style, constant unnecessary use of force that stresses, make restless and distracted just to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others that is meaningless.
THUS ANYONE WHO SAYS LIFE IS MEANINGLESS IS SPEAKING FALSELY, HAS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MADNESS BECAUSE LIFE CAN BE VERY MEANINGFUL IF IT IS SHORN OF STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTION STYLE. IT IS THE WAY THEY BEHAVE THAT IS MEANINGLESS, DON’T BLAME LIFE OR EXISTENCE. THUS THE PERSON WHO SAYS LIFE IS MEANINGLESS IS SPEAKING CARELESSLY AND WILL BE JUDGED.
Why it contradicts:
When you say “All well and good” you mean everything is well and good so how can you immediately turn around and say, “but going on tour with four young children in tow must have been quite a strain at times”?
Perhaps you should say that all is mostly well and good except blah, blah, blah but even then unless you have factored in everything you risk falsity.
There is no need to say “all is well and good” but it is said to be dishonest as if you are agreeable when you are not.
Programmed Logic:
Robots & computers too have logic or reasoning but it is programmed logic or reasoning. Apart from what they have been programmed to conclude, they cannot conclude or make sense. If ask the computer or robot to explain something it has not been programmed to do, it is stumped and may protest "Question not valid".
Whilst programmed logic may be correct and appear appropriate for a situation at hand, it is not a specific solution or reasoning for the occasion but a nonspecific generalized solution or reasoning applied to the situation at hand and reapplied numerously to other situations at hand that may not be appropriate or as correct. So long as that reasoning is not caught out, found wanting, it may lull the person and observers that it is live specific for the occasion reasoning.
For instance people never work out specifically that 6x6 is 36 but they memorize that it is 36 and because it is the correct answer in this case, it may not be able to tell whether the person reasoned it out for the occasion or he just pulled it out of his jukebox of reasoning and so you might be impressed he has such powerful instantaneous reasoning to come up with the answer straight away.
What people call their reasoning is their rules of what to say or do in certain situations arising, what to conclude when certain things happen that they mostly copied from others or society but sometimes synthesize on their own.
These worked out reasoning or logic may or may not be correct (eg 6x6 is 36 is correct but smiling is true, based on reason not blind force and good for self and others is incorrect) and once accepted and incorporated in their mental library of explanations or conclusions is retrieved and applied to all situations that may arise without questioning the discrepancies or conflict that is sometimes observed.
By contrast the person of genuine or specific logic does not fall back on pre recorded conclusions or ways of explaining things but he examines what has happened to gather all relevant details and dismissing or not admitting as certain details that may be false and based on what are facts, what may be facts and what cannot be facts, he arrives at the probable or certain conclusion of what happened where rote logicians may say cannot be determined or comes to a very different conclusion.
Whilst I am not suggesting that everyone should work out that 6x6 is 36 every time, it may be the truth that when something out of the ordinary happens that demands explaining people search their mental dictionaries to find a possible explanation or they search externally for an explanation fabricated by another that may not be true.
It may be true that they sometimes try to work out what is the truth of occasion or it may be the truth that even then they are searching their jukeboxes for a combination of explanations plus ‘googling’ sources outside for explanations rather than placing all the facts on the table and adding them up to get a picture.
THUS IT MAY BE OR IS THAT THERE IS LOGIC OR REASONING IN ORDINARY PEOPLE AND IT VARIES IN EXTENT FROM NEAR ZERO IN SOME TO QUITE SOPHISTICATED BUT IN COMMON WITH ALL THE PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THAT IS NEVER LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION IT IS PRE-RECORDED AND RETRIEVED TO BE APPLIED (APPROXIMATELY) TO THE SITUATION AT HAND THAT MAY BE APPROPRIATE OR INAPPROPRIATE OR BIZARRE. A PARTICULAR PRE-RECORDED PIECE OF LOGIC OR REASONING OR BELIEF MAY BE EXAMINED TO BE FOUND TO BE TRUE (EG 6X6=36) OR FALSE (I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEONE).
Speaking recklessly:
"The golden boy (Tutankhamen) has magic and mystery and therefore every person all over the world will see what Egypt is doing to preserve the golden boy, and all of them I am sure will come to see the golden boy," Egypt's antiquities chief Zahi Hawass told reporters before the body was moved.
How can anyone who is responsible and devoted to truth say every person all over the world will see and all of them he is sure will come to see the golden boy?
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO BE SURE EVERYONE WILL COME TO SEE THE GOLDEN BOY BECAUSE ONLY A MERE FEW OF ALL WILL COME AND WHAT HE SAYS IS DEFINITELY FALSE, DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO HYPE.
The basis of computer logic is rules:
The basis of computer logic is rules that are rigid (once set cannot be altered except by reprogramming) by which it organizes and classifies data. The computer has to be told or instructed or given rules to recognize the presence of certain data and how to interpret it and subsequently it will look for the presence or absence of those data and interpret it only in the way it has been told to do so. If the computer is well programmed you may be fooled to think it is very wise or clever when it is just mechanically rehashing.
In the same way the basis of logic in ordinary people is largely if not entirely rules that are rigid by which he organizes and classifies data. The person or society has told him to recognize the presence of certain data and ignore certain data that may be present (eg there is a spiritual side to life), how to interpret them in a certain way and subsequently the person or robot will look for the presence or absence of those data and interpret them only in the way he or the programmed logic in his head tells him to do. If the human robot is well programmed you may be fooled to think he is very wise or clever when he is just mechanically rehashing.
Making sense within the rules:
The computer can only make sense of anything happening to it within the rules with which it has been programmed with. It cannot make sense of anything outside the rules with which it has been programmed with.
Similarly, rule bound humans have different rules binding their minds and they can only make sense or interpret whatever is happening to them according to the rules set in their minds.
However not everything fit the rules that have set for themselves, the rules themselves may be wrong and reality is not set to rules but rules are always artificially created to try to rationalize what is happening.
The person who does not have robotic reasoning attends to whatever is happening by perceiving them as they are, not as he likes or dislikes them and based on what he perceives and the truth of the many different components of what he perceives, he combines them to get a meaning or understanding that is specific to the event, not a general meaning that approximately fits many different events that appear to have similarities.
No meaning just a show:
If you think what she is doing is meaningful, conveys meaning and it turns out that it is meaningless, only for show and harms observers as well as herself then you have wrong view that is not the way to heaven but the animal womb or hell according to the Buddha.
She is gyrating her body within a hoop, apparently enjoying herself not because she invented it or learnt it but copied without need for thinking or understanding why from others. But how enjoyable is it yourself if you were to do what she is doing?
What meaning is there in repetitive not just gyrating but gyrating with accelerating and decelerating speed and force for one who is discerning? What is achieved at the end of all the gyrations? Does she get a meal to eat or a tidied room? If it is in truth meaningless, only intended to impress others that she is happy, enjoying herself or attractive, she wants to stir your attraction for her then it is for false meaning or force meaning, for stirring force in her mind and those of observers.
If it is in truth meaningless, only for show, far from happy but stressful, restless and distracting then by keep practicing this you are controlling the insanity, stress, restlessness and distraction generated that will one day go out of control so that you will be mad.
Terrible isn’t it:
Quote: ALMOST every day we read or hear about horror stories of snatch thefts, rapes, robberies and physical assaults. Some-times, such crimes even resulted in the death of the victims.
Terrible, isn’t it? It surely is frightening, to say the least.
It is suffering and conditioning to experience ‘terribleness’ and fright so leave others to decide for themselves whether something is terrible or not, frightening or not.
By asking others thus you are asking them to feel terrible with karma not merit. By saying something is surely frightening, you expect them to be frightened which again is not only suffering but conditions them to fright.
The person thinks she is good but she is a nice person heaping deadly karma on herself not merit. This is acted or for show friendliness, not genuine friendliness.
Being calculating is based on force not reason:
Being calculating which is what afflicts all stylish people or those with self identity, is never based on reason but on force, emotion and an urge that is blind and irrational.
When you are calculating you try to say or do everything that is designed to be to your advantage not in terms of freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction but in terms of material or sensory gain often with disregard to the stress, restlessness and distraction generated.
Rather than rational, being calculating is irrational. Whilst initially you have to force yourself to be calculating because it is stressful, as being calculating matures, it becomes a compelling across board obsession that dictates your responses in everything you undertake.
Thus the person who says that surely I am calculating because I am reasoning and my calculating is based on reason to advantage myself has false perception and logic.
A person who is truly rationally self-preserving will not harm himself by subjecting his mind to force, by using unnecessary force to stretch, change speed and loudness in his perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing.
Being calculating is essentially based on greed and greed is an emotion, an attraction for and desire for possession of material objects. Driven by greed, lust (a form of liking), the foolish emotional or forceful person is calculating, trying to maximize his material advantage often with serious disregard to the stress that is killing him.
YOU DON’T PROTECT YOURSELF BY BEING CALCULATING BUT YOU TRULY PROTECT YOURSELF BY NEVER HARMING YOURSELF BY USING EXCESSIVE UNNECESSARY FORCE IN THE NAME OF STYLE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS. BEING CALCULATING IS ITSELF TROUBLESOME, IS A MADDENING DRIVE THAT BECOMES ACROSS BOARD AND YOU BECOME ITS SLAVE RATHER THAN MASTER AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR MADNESS OR LOSS OF CONTROL OF YOUR CALCULATING.
THUS IF YOU PERCEIVE BEING CALCULATING IS REASONABLE, IS BASED ON REASON, YOU HAVE BEEN DUPED (WRONG VIEW) AND WHAT YOU CALL YOUR REASON IN THIS INSTANCE, NAMELY YOUR CALCULATEDNESS IS NOT YOUR REASON BUT YOUR GREED OR EMOTION THAT IS BASED ON FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUE REASON THAT WILL NOT ADVOCATE BEING CALCULATING THAT CHURNS UP INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT CONDITIONING AND WILL KILL YOU AND DRIVE YOU MAD.
(Being calculating is aimed at enjoying and preserving your life here and Jesus said those who find their lives here will lose it. It is because you do not believe there is life after death, there is a higher more blissful life above material and sensory considerations that you are attached to your life here.
If people examine themselves carefully they will surely detect their being calculating that they often try to conceal from others or disguise with acts of generosity or faked indifference and because they have practiced being calculating for so long often to great intensities of force and they are in truth not very good, they find it difficult if not impossible to eradicate their being calculating, not realizing that they are headed for even another eternity of suffering far graver than they imagine possible)
Respect is based on force not reason:
Respect, in particular in stylish people is not based on calm reason that although possible is seldom seen in this world but it is emotional based on force. There is always significant emotion present in the respect shown by beings in this world.
Stylish people respect people that impress them either in appearance, status, their accomplishments, wealth, skills, etc.
Being impressed has nothing to do with reason but it is merely the stirring in speed and strength of the person’s mental force of going against self under the control of his force of self preservation shielding his consciousness from force induced pain at the perception of an object.
Thus human respect that is based on being impressed is all about stirring of mental force and not based on reason. Because ordinary people perceive their respect for others is based on reason, here again as elsewhere they are fooled that they are reasoning when they are respecting someone when they are showing force or emotion or like when they respect someone.
IF YOU PERCEIVE YOUR RESPECT FOR SOMEONE IS BASED ON REASON YOU HAVE DECEIVED YOURSELF BECAUSE YOUR RESPECT IS A STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE IMPRESSED AND BECOME SERVILE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON.
A person of like and dislike cannot reason well:
Just as people like certain foods and dislike certain foods and as a result they will not only strive to eat certain foods only but they even go to certain favourite stalls for their food and they shun food they dislike and certain stalls, in the same way people who like and dislike do not objectively perceive everything but they see (read) and hear as far as they can things they like to see and hear and shun things they do not want to see and hear and as a result they get a lopsided view of things that reinforce their world views of how things should be. As a result of feeding their reasoning process with lopsided data favouring what they like and handicapping what they dislike, his reasoning process inevitably churns out faulty or false conclusions that they increasingly perceive as correct until they become unshakeable, they are adamant the way they perceive, reason and the products of their reasoning are correct or describes the world correctly.
IF YOU LIKE AND DISLIKE YOU WILL PRESENT YOUR MIND WITH LOPSIDED DATA FAVORING THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOUR REASONING PROCESS WILL SIMILARLY FAVOR ACCEPTING DATA THAT YOU LIKE AND REJECTING DATA YOU DISLIKE. BECAUSE LIKING AND DISLIKING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON, IT IS MERELY A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED OR REPULSED BY SOMETHING, IT IS COMING TO A DECISION ABOUT WHAT SOMETHING IS ABOUT BASED ON ATTRACTION AND REPULSION AND IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT THE PRODUCTS OF SUCH REASONING BASED ON LIKE AND DISLIKE FED BY DATA BASED ON LIKE AND DISLIKE IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED AND WRONG.
Prolonging:
So you think it is impossible to prolong what you do?
If there is any meaning in twirling the hoop around your abdomen one or two twirls suffices to get the point across but people who do so do it many times and that is prolonging your twirling it around in the name of impressing others with your skill or deceiving them how pleasurable it is when it is not.
When you keep your smile longer on your face than is necessary (to give others greater chance to see it) you are prolonging your smile that requires the prolonged use of force and it is this prolonging that is the basis of sadness. When a person experiences sadness his force of going against self is cyclically prolonging with little change in speed and strength to then die off and regenerate.
BY TWIRLING THE HOOP AROUND HER TORSO MANY TIMES THE GIRL IS PROLONGING HER TWIRLING FOR NO TRUE MEANING EXCEPT TO IMPRESS OTHERS OR DECEIVE THEM IT IS ENJOYABLE. IF IT IS TRULY PLEASURABLE THEN EVERYONE SHOULD BE DOING WHAT SHE IS DOING EEVRY DAY LIKE THEY EAT AND SLEEP EVERYDAY.
MOST PEOPLE DON’T REALIZE THEY ARE PROLONGING WHEN THEY DO SO JUST AS THEY SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE CHANGES IN THEIR SPEECH AND MOTION. YOU DON’T NEED REASON TO PROLONG AND IN FACT REASON WILL TELL YOU IT IS INSANE AND SUFFERING TO PROLONG BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROLONG WITHOUT USING FORCE. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS RECORD THE SEQUENCE OF MOTION YOU WANT IN YOUR JUKEBOX AND SUPPLY CONTINUOUS FORCE AND IT WILL PROLONG AND KEEP REPEATING UNTIL YOU FALL DOWN EXHAUSTED.
Ping, ping, ping, drrrrrrrm:
When the pianist goes into a final frenzy of repeated ping, ping, ping to end in a flourish of drrrrrrrrrmmmm he is prolonging. The repeated pings is prolonging of the ping and the drrrrrrrmmm is achieved by dragging or prolonging his fingers over the keyboard.
Not meaningful but it is their liking and false perception:
There will be those who will argue that without the repetition like ‘ping, ping, ping, ping, ping, drrrmmmmm’ the music will lose its ‘meaning’ or bite or taste.
You have not heard music without mad repetition, prolonging, constantly changing speed and loudness so how do you know that it is lifeless or meaningless?
On the contrary music without unnecessary repetition, prolonging, changing speed and loudness is incomparably peaceful and pleasant to the ear without stress, restlessness and distraction afterwards.
It is their liking for unnecessary meaningless repetition, prolonging, changing in speed and loudness in common with their appreciation of the same elsewhere that makes them meaningful and they have advanced false perception that meaningless repetition, prolonging, change speed and loudness is meaningful. They do not realize or believe they will end with mad perception.
Meaningless hackneyed nice talk:
Quote: Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysia’s fallen son, is attempting the greatest political comeback in Malaysian history. Traitor or saviour with a ‘New Agenda’? Trapped between the Charybdis of his political past and the Scylla of political obscurity, Anwar Ibrahim attempts the seemingly impossible. Face to Face examines the undeniable ‘Anwar Factor’ in this exclusive interview.
If you have read articles on Anwar you will have heard repeatedly to reference to him being Malaysia’s fallen son and the fact that he says it cannot be because he invented the description nor he coincidentally reinvented the description but it is reproduced by rote because Malaysia’s fallen son is deemed to be impressive, arouse readers’ emotions not reason. Talking about Charybdis & Scylla too is unnecessarily trying to impress readers with his breath of knowledge. Not everyone knows what those two words mean and do you think he cares? He is more concerned for his own ego than that you know what he is talking about. That you should trust what such a person says is foolish. He has his own agenda and you should read what he writes carefully.
It is force that detains & reason that liberates:
When you boil down the five fetters (ill will, sensuality, self identity views, faith in rites and rules and doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha said detained beings in the lower realms and even consign them to states of woe (self identity views, faith in rites and rules and doubt and uncertainty) you will always find mental force present but never true reason.
It is force that is the basis and drive of ill will and sensuality that the Buddha said are two lower fetters that detain men in the lower realms (human, animal, ghost & hell) and it is again force that is the drive through the three additional fetters namely self identity views, faith in rites and rules and doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha said led to future states of woe or deprivation (eg blind, crippled, diseased) in addition to the lower realms.
THUS IT IS FORCE (CONSTANTLY) WIELDED BY ONE’S OWN MIND AND FORCE (CONSTANTLY) IMPACTING ON HIS MIND FROM THE FABRICATIONS OF OTHERS THAT IS HIS CURSE AND EVIL AND THE BASIS OF HIS ILL WILL AND SENSUALITY THAT DETAINS HIM IN THE LOWER REALMS AND IT IS THE FREEDOM FROM FORCE THAT REQUIRES THE ACQUISITION OF REASON AND DISCERNMENT (SEEING THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE THAT THERE IS CONSTANT UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND PUTTING A STOP TO THEM) THAT IS ESSENTIAL TO EXIT FROM THE LOWER REALMS AND ITS UNIVERSAL TORMENT AND HEART BREAK. THE INCESSANT BOMBARDMENT OF FORCE AND DELUSIONS ENFORCED BY FORCE FROM EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING ANIMALS MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO DISCERN THE TRUTH AND PRACTICE TRUE GOODWILL OR THE ABSENCE OF FORCE THAT WILL RELEASE THEM FROM THIS WORLD OF ENDLESS TORMENT.
Sensuality is nothing more than a liking or the stirring of mental force in that sensual person’s mind to become attracted on perception of objects of the five senses namely sight, sound, smell, taste and touch and as a result of being attracted, the person embarks on elaborate fabrications in thinking, speech and motion devoted to prolonging the enjoyment and nurturing that sensuality. For instance a being who is sensual for food or sex overindulges in them, tries to prolong his eating or sexual experiences and goes about in an elaborate way with unnecessary accessory movements and objects (eg decorate his food with flowers, paper umbrellas floating on his cocktail, use sex toys).
Sensuality has nothing to do with true reason and in fact the absence of true reason is essential because true reason will tell you there is no satisfaction in sensuality, it increasingly enslaves you (eg drinking, gambling, womanizing) and will lead to ruin or insanity one way or another. It is force that is the drive for attraction for sensual objects and it is force that is the drive for the prolonging, changing speed, strength and even direction in perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing that go to constitute the person’s sensuality for that object.
ILL WILL IS THE COUNTERPART OF SENSUALITY (THE USE OF UNNECESSARY FORCE IN HIS PERCEPTIONS) IN THE PERSON’S THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS AND IT IS ESSENTIALLY THE USE OF EXCESSIVE UNNECESSARY FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS BRAND OF STYLE THAT IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH OF FORCE AND EVEN DIRECTION IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING, PLEASING, IMPRESSING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS. APART THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS STYLE THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACTS HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS IT IS THE SAME FORCE BEHIND ILL WILL THAT DRIVES HIM TO THINK, SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, NONSENSE (MAKES NO SENSE EG YABADABADOO) OR CONTRADICTORY (‘WELL’ OR ‘GOOD’ WHEN HE MEANS NOT WELL OR BAD) AND ATTACKS OR CHALLENGES OTHERS TO VERBAL OR PHYSICAL FIGHTS (EG PROVOKE SOMEONE ‘WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE?’).
IT IS NEVER TRUE REASON BUT FALSE REASON DRIVEN BY FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE BASIS OF PEOPLE SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT ARE FALSE (TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS), MAKES NO SENSE OR CONTRADICTORY AND IT IS AGAIN FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE BEHIND HIS FABRICATING A STYLE OR CONSTANTLY FORCEFULLY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS.
THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAS EQUIVALENTS IN MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTION IS THE BIG BROTHER IN COMPRISING A PERSON’S ILL WILL BECAUSE IT IS CONSTANT WHILST THE USE OF FORCE TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, NONSENSICAL OR CONTRADICTORY, ATTACKING OR CHALLENGING IS ACTUALLY THE SMALLER BROTHER THAT OCCURS INTERMITTENTLY.
JUST AS THE PERSON’S STYLE IS THE BIG BROTHER THAT IS CONSTANT IN HIS ILL WILL COMPARED TO WHAT HE INTERMITTENTLY SAYS OR DOES THAT IS FALSE, NONSENSICAL, CONTRADICTORY, ATTACKING OR CHALLENGING, IN THE SAME WAY A PERSON’S STYLE OF PERCEPTION (SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TASTING, TOUCHING) IS THE CONSTANT BIG BROTHER OF HIS SENSUALITY COMPARED TO WHAT HE INTERMITTENTLY SAYS OR DOES IN THE NAME OF CONDUCTING HIS SENSUALITY.
IN ADDITION TO ILL WILL AND SENSUALITY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINS THE BEING IN THE LOWER REALMS AND THENCE TORMENT EVEN TO MADDENING PROPORTIONS, THERE ARE THE THREE ADDITION FETTERS THAT LEAD TO FUTURE STATES OF WOE (EVEN WORSE, DEPRIVED OR AFFLICTED STATES IN ADDITION TO BEING IN THE LOWER REALMS) NAMELY SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, FAITH IN RITES AND RULES AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY.
It is never true reason that is the guide to self identity views but it is attraction or liking for a self based on one’s body and mental attributes (intelligence, ‘knowledge’ or delusions) and the use of force to do or say things that will materially advantage him at the even great expense in stress, restlessness and distraction. Thus it is irrational, insatiable mental force that is the drive to a being’s self identity views or possessiveness.
Self identity views is essentially a person’s possessiveness reflected in thoughts of ‘my body’, my life, my God, my children, my house, my career, my money, etc. And possessiveness is never based on true reason but driven by force to possess or acquire and fortified by false reasons or rationalization and delusions.
(Did God tell you that He likes to be possessed by you? Thus you are presumptuous, a defilement of the mind according to the Buddha that is an impediment to acquiring truth if you think you are meritorious to refer to God as yours)
IT IS FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR POSSESSIVENESS THAT IS THE BASIS OF SELF IDENTITY VIEWS THAT IS A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
True reason will never guide a being to have faith in rituals and rules which are all artificial, constraining or restrictive and meaningless. A man of truth who can see what is true or false, what is good or harmful does not need rules to guide him and often if examined the rules actually are harmful rather than benefit as imagined. Rituals are meaningless things people do (eg yoga, tai chi, dancing) that are purported to have certain benefits like send you to heaven or good health and you do not need reason to do yoga or tai chi but you watch and copy others using force fortified by delusions about their efficacies.
THUS IT IS FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE BEHIND THE ACQUISITION AND PRACTICE OF RITUALS AND RULES IN WHICH TRUE REASON NEVER PLAYS A PART.
There are two parts of doubt and uncertainty. Doubt and uncertainty is an emotional or disturbed state of the mind and only emotion or force that is ill or ill will resident in that person’s mind can cause doubt and uncertainty.
The other part of doubt and uncertain is what beings in this world purposely or unwittingly do to sow doubt and uncertainty in others. They ask others are you sure you want to buy that pair of shoes, they question others unnecessarily (if what you say is enlightening why do you correct it?). Often people heard what you say but they pretend they did not hear to force you to repeat thus sowing doubt that what you said was too soft or incoherent when it was coherent and loud enough.
Because beings in this world appreciate falsity and they do or say things that harm themselves with stress, restlessness and distraction, even if they cannot see what they say or do is false and hurts them with stress, restlessness and distraction they must entertain doubt and uncertainty in themselves and others who are actually harming them even though they are their close friends or dear ones.
THUS IT IS FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS ILL OR ILL WILL IN THE MINDS OF BEINGS HERE THAT DETAINS THEM IN THIS WORLD AND THIS FORCE IS MANIFEST IN ALL THE FIVE FETTERS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINED BEINGS IN THE LOWER REALMS.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE ILL WILL IN THE FORCEFUL STYLE ALWAYS PRESENT IN WHAT A PERSON THINKS, SAYS OR DOES AND IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE ILL WILL THAT CAUSES HIM TO IN ADDITION SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, MAKES NO SENSE OR CONTRADICTS, TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE OTHERS TO A FIGHT IN WORDS OR ACTION.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE ATTRACTION FOR SENSORY OBJECTS THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF SENSUALITY AND IT IS FORCE THAT IS AGAIN THE DRIVE FOR THE THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND DEEDS THAT THE PERSON UNDERTAKE TO FULFILL HIS SENSUALITY (EG USE SEX TOYS, INDULGE IN INCREASINGLY UNNATURAL SEX ACTS TO KEEP HIS LUST BURNING).
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR A LIKING FOR SELF AND DISLIKING FOR OTHERS AND POSSESSIVENESS AND ACTS TO FULFILL THAT POSESSIVENESS THAT IS AT THE CORE OF SELF IDENTITY VIEWS.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR PRACTICING RITUALS THAT DO NOT ACHIEVE THEIR AIMS AND FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE TO BLIND OBEDIENCE OF MENTAL OR PHYSICAL RULES.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE NECESSARY DRIVE FOR THE EMOTIONAL STATES OF DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY. IT IS BECAUSE BEINGS FORCEFULLY BELIEVE WHAT IS FALSE, CANNOT SEE THAT THEIR ACTIONS HARM THEM AND THEIR FRIENDS AND DEAR ONES ARE HARMING THEM WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY MUST ENTERTAIN FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AND IN ADDITION THEY PERSECUTE OTHERS BY DELIBERATELY OR UNWITTINGLY SOWING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IN OTHERS.
THUS IT IS CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT THAT A BEING WHO WISH TO EXIT SUFFERING THAT MAY LAST EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY TO PAY ATTENTION TO DETECT AND ELIMINATE FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE FIRE THAT KEEPS HIS MENTAL FORCE BURNING TO POWER HIS ILL WILL IN SAYING AND DOING FALSE OR NONSENSICAL OR CONTRADICTORY THINGS, ATTACKS OR CHALLENGES OTHERS IN VERBAL OR PHYSICAL FIGHTS, POWERS HIS SENSUALITY AND POWERS HIS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, FAITH IN RITES AND RULES, POWERS HIS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY.
FORCE IS ALWAYS BLIND AND UNDISCRIMINATING, ONCE TRIGGERED FORCE CAN ONLY BE STOPPED BY OPPOSITE FORCE OR IT WILL POWER UNTIL EXPENDED WHATEVER IT SEIZES OR IS PERMITTED TO DRIVE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL, USEFUL OR USELESS. NO MATTER WHETHER YOU CAN SEE IF YOU ARE FORCEFUL OR NOT, BENEFITING OTHERS WITH YOUR STYLE OR HARMING THEM, IF THERE IS EXCESSIVE UUNECCESSARY FORCE IN HOW YOU SAY OR DO THINGS, THIS BLIND FORCE IS THE DEVIL THAT WILL ONE DAY KILL YOU OR DRIVE YOU MAD.
IF THERE IS FORCEFULNESS IN YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND YOU CANNOT SEE IT, YOU ARE BLIND AND A MAN OF THIS WORLD AND NOTHING CAN BE DONE FOR YOU IF YOU ARE HEADED FOR TORMENT.
IF YOU CAN SEE FORCEFULNESS IN YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG, YOU LIKE IT AND THINK IT BENEFITS YOU AND OTHERS, THEN YOU WILL GO TO THE WORLD OF FORCE AND EMOTIONS AND IF THAT MEANS THIS WORLD EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY THEN THAT IS WHAT YOU LIKED.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID YOU HAVE ALREADY SHED YOUR OWN BLOOD GREATER THAN THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS FROM HAVING YOUR NECK CUT AS ANIMALS AND HUMANS, SO WHAT IS ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING BUILDING ANOTHER PILE OF SKELETONS THAT IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN?
In addition to the many things I have said apart from what I say above that no one has said before and is (in truth) enlightening, I have caused the consciousness of beings in this world to change both after 1977 and in recent years and even at the moment, the demeanours of people show that they are all changing although still acting or using force to prolong, change speed and loudness.
If what I say is true and beneficial, gives insight and no one else has said it before, my causing the consciousness of all beings to change benefits them, then whoever the counsellor Jesus was describing must also do what I am doing and if I have done so, I will have superseded him, which is impossible because it will render what Jesus said is false because someone other than the counsellor can do what he will do.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (like Jesus was a counselor, a person who came), to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (if the great majority of people are good and therefore truthful they would have received truth or perhaps this is a world of falsity where people are all acting and being poisonously nice, not good to each other), because it (the world or the great majority) neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you (not in you as a counselor of the mind will be), and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (The counselor must bring you advantage as no man has done)And when he comes, he will convince the world (if what I say convinces you of sin, righteousness and judgment then the counselor will look foolish trying to convince) concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Only an alleviating consciousness change that has now occurred can enable people to bear) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority (only if the counselor is someone who dwells with you and speaks as if on his own will need such clarification), but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything as the Buddha knows and sees everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (if the church and Christians have glorified Jesus, there would be no need for a counselor to do so. If what the counselor speaks is similar to the Church or a reiteration, there would be no need for a counselor to speak). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Has Howard done his dash?
Not everyone knows what done his dash means and it is said to impress others with your command of a language that you know it means is Howard finished or done with.
This is not letting your yes be yes only but more that comes from evil in the name of impressing others.
What is your intention in writing? Is it to communicate a meaningful idea or to pamper your ego to impress others with your prowess and knowledge of terms?
If part of your intention is to impress others with your credentials and you do not state it, you do not say what you mean and you are a hypocrite.
Your mates:
This statement that the person does not believe anything in the papers is never said in truth, is false and said to reflect dislike or disgust.
It is impossible for someone to not believe in at least some things in the papers eg the prices of goods quoted and therefore it is a lie to summarily dismiss.
It is a person with strong self identity views that will make such opinionated statements and self identity plus ill will (dislike is forceful) and telling lies (the statement is false) means he is headed for future states of woe according to the Buddha.
Heather Mills says tapes will 'ruin' Paul McCartney:
To ordinary people, Heather Mills may be just stating the truth but whether she is saying the truth that the tapes she possess will ruin Paul McCartney, she is expressing ill will, she sees nothing wrong in possessing and exposing tapes that will ruin another and therefore she has exposed herself as a woman of ill will who delight in hurting others.
Whether what she says is to threaten or she is just stating the fact that the tapes will ruin someone, what she says reveals that she sees nothing wrong with possessing and threatening the publishing of tapes that are ruinous of others and she must be a wicked person irregardless of Paul McCartney’s nature.
It is true that in common with the other Beatles, Paul McCartney did many wicked things that bequeathed him grave even deadly karma, he is stingy, domineering, capable of great cruelty and has a warped mind or demons in his mind that is sometimes beyond his control, it is karma that he ended up with his nemesis Heather Miller that he admitted caused him great suffering but by her words she has confirmed herself as a liar and evil person with deadly karma due to her.
Heather Mills in new TV rant: Why I taped McCartney
Heather Mills last night told how she has recorded all her conversations with Sir Paul McCartney so she can reveal the truth about their bitter split.
In another round of TV tirades, the 39-year-old claimed the former Beatle promised to admit he was responsible for the collapse of their five-year marriage but backed down - and said taping the chat was the only way anyone would believe her. (It is impossible that only Paul was responsible for the breakdown and so it is convenient on her part to blame everything on him. It is a bit far fetched to imagine Paul could have promised to admit his fault and so it may be a blatant lie)
Heather also laid into Sir Paul's daughter Stella, blaming her for the break-up, while claiming another reason was his refusal to donate more of his £825million to charity. (it is easy to talk about others miserliness but watch out if you yourself is not generous)
In one astonish outburst on US TV show Today, the tearful mum-of-one declared: "Why do you think I've had to record every single conversation? Because nobody will believe me. (surely she is aware that the tapes can make her a lot of money and if this is an even overriding reason, she is lying to say it is to prove her case)
"When we split I said to Paul, 'I'm going to be crucified. I'll have a modern day stoning. You know why we split, you know the truth. You need to stand up and say, 'I am responsible for the break-up of this marriage'. (if you think this is being crucified and stoning, wait until you really get crucified and stoned)
"I said, 'If you say that, I'll walk away with nothing and we'll do a gentle and quick divorce'. And he promised he'd do that and I have evidence of that. And he did nothing. He knows I was at a suicide point, and still nothing was done."
And she told ABC's Good Morning America: "If I wanted to put pressure on Paul I would expose the whole truth."
In another rant, on the show Extra, Heather accused Stella of being "evil". She said: "Every single week Stella tried to break up our marriage. She was so jealous. She's done some evil, evil things. She scraped my face out of a photo when they were in psychiatric session together."
Bitter Heather also told how she and Sir Paul, who split in May last year, rowed constantly over his refusal to give more cash to good causes. She said: "How could anybody have that kind of money and not to do more for charity? That is what we argued about all the time."
She added: "He was a broken man when I met him. He wouldn't perform. I was a huge support for Paul." (boasting or beating her own drum that if exaggerated, is a form of lying)
OFTEN THE PERSON DOES NOT KNOW WHETHER WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES IS TRUE OR FALSE OR EVEN BELIEVE IT IS TRUE BECAUSE WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES IS COPIED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT KNOWING WHY OR HE IS DELUDED BUT EVEN SO A DISCERNING PERSON DOES NOT NEED TO GUESS BUT HE CAN SEE OR KNOW WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IS FALSE, CONTRADICTORY OR MAKES NO SENSE.
Contradicting herself:
All well and good, but going on tour with four young children in tow must have been quite a strain at times.
The ‘all well and good’ is not only totally unnecessary but belies or contradicts what is subsequently said and is therefore false and the truth should be ‘it was not very well and good, going on tour with four young children must have been quite a strain at a time. Not only is she generating conflict in herself but she is generating it in readers who have to contend with the opposites that it is all well and good and at the same time going on tour with four young children must have been quite a strain at a time.
Thus people like to think they are capable of speaking the truth but they are contradicting themselves often without realization.
A painful distraction:
Quote: "This sort of stuff just serves as a painful distraction from what they feel everyone should be concentrating on, and that's finding Madeleine."
Because nobody physically poked or harmed the person, the pain she is speaking of must be mental hurt that occurs on every occasion the person’s mental force of going against self is actively stirring in speed and strength unaccompanied or shielded by the force of self preservation to impact on that person’s consciousness as hurt.
Quote: "Kate and Gerry have absolutely nothing to hide. Anything the police may have found can be explained in wholly innocent terms."
It is speaking foolishly absolutely vouching for another. How would the person know that the couple have absolutely nothing to hide? Instead the motive is to forcefully not with reason convince listeners to trust him that the couple is innocent. Why is the person so anxious to convince others the couple is innocent that he will risk falsity by speaking for others?
Life is not meaningless but the way they behave is meaningless:
What people do or say is often false or nonsense (makes no sense) or contradictory and even when they make some sense, it is never live specific for the occasion but regurgitated from their mental jukeboxes approximately appropriate for the situation at hand (if you know the person, you may realized he has said or done the thing many times in the past that can only come about by rehash) but through it all, there is one constancy: the invariable simultaneous transmission of force through his style or how he forcefully stretches (syllables & units of motion), changes speed, strength of force and direction that rather than being an inconsequential accompaniment is the principal ingredient of their speech and actions.
Stylish people are kidding themselves if they think they do not have style or they do not admire style in themselves and others because they all practice style constantly often without awareness and style in themselves and others mean a lot to them, even to the extent that it does not matter what they and others say or do but HOW they say or do is more important in their eyes.
It does not matter if what they say or do is relatively true (never absolutely true because it is always accompanied by style that fatally taints it), makes no sense or is false but it is the force that is always transacted that impacts on themselves and others as stress, restlessness and distraction that is the most important result of what they say or do.
All this transmission of force in the accompanying style is in the name of deceiving, pleasing, impressing, intimidating and dominating others and gives them some emotional sustenance but is ultimately unsatisfactory which is why goats often remark that life is meaningless. It is not that existence is meaningless but it is the WAY they exist with constant forceful style, constant unnecessary use of force that stresses, make restless and distracted just to impress, please, intimidate and dominate others that is meaningless.
THUS ANYONE WHO SAYS LIFE IS MEANINGLESS IS SPEAKING FALSELY, HAS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MADNESS BECAUSE LIFE CAN BE VERY MEANINGFUL IF IT IS SHORN OF STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTION STYLE. IT IS THE WAY THEY BEHAVE THAT IS MEANINGLESS, DON’T BLAME LIFE OR EXISTENCE. THUS THE PERSON WHO SAYS LIFE IS MEANINGLESS IS SPEAKING CARELESSLY AND WILL BE JUDGED.
Why it contradicts:
When you say “All well and good” you mean everything is well and good so how can you immediately turn around and say, “but going on tour with four young children in tow must have been quite a strain at times”?
Perhaps you should say that all is mostly well and good except blah, blah, blah but even then unless you have factored in everything you risk falsity.
There is no need to say “all is well and good” but it is said to be dishonest as if you are agreeable when you are not.
Programmed Logic:
Robots & computers too have logic or reasoning but it is programmed logic or reasoning. Apart from what they have been programmed to conclude, they cannot conclude or make sense. If ask the computer or robot to explain something it has not been programmed to do, it is stumped and may protest "Question not valid".
Whilst programmed logic may be correct and appear appropriate for a situation at hand, it is not a specific solution or reasoning for the occasion but a nonspecific generalized solution or reasoning applied to the situation at hand and reapplied numerously to other situations at hand that may not be appropriate or as correct. So long as that reasoning is not caught out, found wanting, it may lull the person and observers that it is live specific for the occasion reasoning.
For instance people never work out specifically that 6x6 is 36 but they memorize that it is 36 and because it is the correct answer in this case, it may not be able to tell whether the person reasoned it out for the occasion or he just pulled it out of his jukebox of reasoning and so you might be impressed he has such powerful instantaneous reasoning to come up with the answer straight away.
What people call their reasoning is their rules of what to say or do in certain situations arising, what to conclude when certain things happen that they mostly copied from others or society but sometimes synthesize on their own.
These worked out reasoning or logic may or may not be correct (eg 6x6 is 36 is correct but smiling is true, based on reason not blind force and good for self and others is incorrect) and once accepted and incorporated in their mental library of explanations or conclusions is retrieved and applied to all situations that may arise without questioning the discrepancies or conflict that is sometimes observed.
By contrast the person of genuine or specific logic does not fall back on pre recorded conclusions or ways of explaining things but he examines what has happened to gather all relevant details and dismissing or not admitting as certain details that may be false and based on what are facts, what may be facts and what cannot be facts, he arrives at the probable or certain conclusion of what happened where rote logicians may say cannot be determined or comes to a very different conclusion.
Whilst I am not suggesting that everyone should work out that 6x6 is 36 every time, it may be the truth that when something out of the ordinary happens that demands explaining people search their mental dictionaries to find a possible explanation or they search externally for an explanation fabricated by another that may not be true.
It may be true that they sometimes try to work out what is the truth of occasion or it may be the truth that even then they are searching their jukeboxes for a combination of explanations plus ‘googling’ sources outside for explanations rather than placing all the facts on the table and adding them up to get a picture.
THUS IT MAY BE OR IS THAT THERE IS LOGIC OR REASONING IN ORDINARY PEOPLE AND IT VARIES IN EXTENT FROM NEAR ZERO IN SOME TO QUITE SOPHISTICATED BUT IN COMMON WITH ALL THE PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THAT IS NEVER LIVE SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION IT IS PRE-RECORDED AND RETRIEVED TO BE APPLIED (APPROXIMATELY) TO THE SITUATION AT HAND THAT MAY BE APPROPRIATE OR INAPPROPRIATE OR BIZARRE. A PARTICULAR PRE-RECORDED PIECE OF LOGIC OR REASONING OR BELIEF MAY BE EXAMINED TO BE FOUND TO BE TRUE (EG 6X6=36) OR FALSE (I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEONE).
Speaking recklessly:
"The golden boy (Tutankhamen) has magic and mystery and therefore every person all over the world will see what Egypt is doing to preserve the golden boy, and all of them I am sure will come to see the golden boy," Egypt's antiquities chief Zahi Hawass told reporters before the body was moved.
How can anyone who is responsible and devoted to truth say every person all over the world will see and all of them he is sure will come to see the golden boy?
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO BE SURE EVERYONE WILL COME TO SEE THE GOLDEN BOY BECAUSE ONLY A MERE FEW OF ALL WILL COME AND WHAT HE SAYS IS DEFINITELY FALSE, DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO HYPE.
The basis of computer logic is rules:
The basis of computer logic is rules that are rigid (once set cannot be altered except by reprogramming) by which it organizes and classifies data. The computer has to be told or instructed or given rules to recognize the presence of certain data and how to interpret it and subsequently it will look for the presence or absence of those data and interpret it only in the way it has been told to do so. If the computer is well programmed you may be fooled to think it is very wise or clever when it is just mechanically rehashing.
In the same way the basis of logic in ordinary people is largely if not entirely rules that are rigid by which he organizes and classifies data. The person or society has told him to recognize the presence of certain data and ignore certain data that may be present (eg there is a spiritual side to life), how to interpret them in a certain way and subsequently the person or robot will look for the presence or absence of those data and interpret them only in the way he or the programmed logic in his head tells him to do. If the human robot is well programmed you may be fooled to think he is very wise or clever when he is just mechanically rehashing.
Making sense within the rules:
The computer can only make sense of anything happening to it within the rules with which it has been programmed with. It cannot make sense of anything outside the rules with which it has been programmed with.
Similarly, rule bound humans have different rules binding their minds and they can only make sense or interpret whatever is happening to them according to the rules set in their minds.
However not everything fit the rules that have set for themselves, the rules themselves may be wrong and reality is not set to rules but rules are always artificially created to try to rationalize what is happening.
The person who does not have robotic reasoning attends to whatever is happening by perceiving them as they are, not as he likes or dislikes them and based on what he perceives and the truth of the many different components of what he perceives, he combines them to get a meaning or understanding that is specific to the event, not a general meaning that approximately fits many different events that appear to have similarities.
No meaning just a show:
If you think what she is doing is meaningful, conveys meaning and it turns out that it is meaningless, only for show and harms observers as well as herself then you have wrong view that is not the way to heaven but the animal womb or hell according to the Buddha.
She is gyrating her body within a hoop, apparently enjoying herself not because she invented it or learnt it but copied without need for thinking or understanding why from others. But how enjoyable is it yourself if you were to do what she is doing?
What meaning is there in repetitive not just gyrating but gyrating with accelerating and decelerating speed and force for one who is discerning? What is achieved at the end of all the gyrations? Does she get a meal to eat or a tidied room? If it is in truth meaningless, only intended to impress others that she is happy, enjoying herself or attractive, she wants to stir your attraction for her then it is for false meaning or force meaning, for stirring force in her mind and those of observers.
If it is in truth meaningless, only for show, far from happy but stressful, restless and distracting then by keep practicing this you are controlling the insanity, stress, restlessness and distraction generated that will one day go out of control so that you will be mad.
Terrible isn’t it:
Quote: ALMOST every day we read or hear about horror stories of snatch thefts, rapes, robberies and physical assaults. Some-times, such crimes even resulted in the death of the victims.
Terrible, isn’t it? It surely is frightening, to say the least.
It is suffering and conditioning to experience ‘terribleness’ and fright so leave others to decide for themselves whether something is terrible or not, frightening or not.
By asking others thus you are asking them to feel terrible with karma not merit. By saying something is surely frightening, you expect them to be frightened which again is not only suffering but conditions them to fright.
The person thinks she is good but she is a nice person heaping deadly karma on herself not merit. This is acted or for show friendliness, not genuine friendliness.
Being calculating is based on force not reason:
Being calculating which is what afflicts all stylish people or those with self identity, is never based on reason but on force, emotion and an urge that is blind and irrational.
When you are calculating you try to say or do everything that is designed to be to your advantage not in terms of freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction but in terms of material or sensory gain often with disregard to the stress, restlessness and distraction generated.
Rather than rational, being calculating is irrational. Whilst initially you have to force yourself to be calculating because it is stressful, as being calculating matures, it becomes a compelling across board obsession that dictates your responses in everything you undertake.
Thus the person who says that surely I am calculating because I am reasoning and my calculating is based on reason to advantage myself has false perception and logic.
A person who is truly rationally self-preserving will not harm himself by subjecting his mind to force, by using unnecessary force to stretch, change speed and loudness in his perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing.
Being calculating is essentially based on greed and greed is an emotion, an attraction for and desire for possession of material objects. Driven by greed, lust (a form of liking), the foolish emotional or forceful person is calculating, trying to maximize his material advantage often with serious disregard to the stress that is killing him.
YOU DON’T PROTECT YOURSELF BY BEING CALCULATING BUT YOU TRULY PROTECT YOURSELF BY NEVER HARMING YOURSELF BY USING EXCESSIVE UNNECESSARY FORCE IN THE NAME OF STYLE TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS. BEING CALCULATING IS ITSELF TROUBLESOME, IS A MADDENING DRIVE THAT BECOMES ACROSS BOARD AND YOU BECOME ITS SLAVE RATHER THAN MASTER AND YOU ARE HEADED FOR MADNESS OR LOSS OF CONTROL OF YOUR CALCULATING.
THUS IF YOU PERCEIVE BEING CALCULATING IS REASONABLE, IS BASED ON REASON, YOU HAVE BEEN DUPED (WRONG VIEW) AND WHAT YOU CALL YOUR REASON IN THIS INSTANCE, NAMELY YOUR CALCULATEDNESS IS NOT YOUR REASON BUT YOUR GREED OR EMOTION THAT IS BASED ON FORCE AND NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUE REASON THAT WILL NOT ADVOCATE BEING CALCULATING THAT CHURNS UP INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT CONDITIONING AND WILL KILL YOU AND DRIVE YOU MAD.
(Being calculating is aimed at enjoying and preserving your life here and Jesus said those who find their lives here will lose it. It is because you do not believe there is life after death, there is a higher more blissful life above material and sensory considerations that you are attached to your life here.
If people examine themselves carefully they will surely detect their being calculating that they often try to conceal from others or disguise with acts of generosity or faked indifference and because they have practiced being calculating for so long often to great intensities of force and they are in truth not very good, they find it difficult if not impossible to eradicate their being calculating, not realizing that they are headed for even another eternity of suffering far graver than they imagine possible)
Respect is based on force not reason:
Respect, in particular in stylish people is not based on calm reason that although possible is seldom seen in this world but it is emotional based on force. There is always significant emotion present in the respect shown by beings in this world.
Stylish people respect people that impress them either in appearance, status, their accomplishments, wealth, skills, etc.
Being impressed has nothing to do with reason but it is merely the stirring in speed and strength of the person’s mental force of going against self under the control of his force of self preservation shielding his consciousness from force induced pain at the perception of an object.
Thus human respect that is based on being impressed is all about stirring of mental force and not based on reason. Because ordinary people perceive their respect for others is based on reason, here again as elsewhere they are fooled that they are reasoning when they are respecting someone when they are showing force or emotion or like when they respect someone.
IF YOU PERCEIVE YOUR RESPECT FOR SOMEONE IS BASED ON REASON YOU HAVE DECEIVED YOURSELF BECAUSE YOUR RESPECT IS A STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE IMPRESSED AND BECOME SERVILE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON.
A person of like and dislike cannot reason well:
Just as people like certain foods and dislike certain foods and as a result they will not only strive to eat certain foods only but they even go to certain favourite stalls for their food and they shun food they dislike and certain stalls, in the same way people who like and dislike do not objectively perceive everything but they see (read) and hear as far as they can things they like to see and hear and shun things they do not want to see and hear and as a result they get a lopsided view of things that reinforce their world views of how things should be. As a result of feeding their reasoning process with lopsided data favouring what they like and handicapping what they dislike, his reasoning process inevitably churns out faulty or false conclusions that they increasingly perceive as correct until they become unshakeable, they are adamant the way they perceive, reason and the products of their reasoning are correct or describes the world correctly.
IF YOU LIKE AND DISLIKE YOU WILL PRESENT YOUR MIND WITH LOPSIDED DATA FAVORING THINGS THAT YOU LIKE AND YOUR REASONING PROCESS WILL SIMILARLY FAVOR ACCEPTING DATA THAT YOU LIKE AND REJECTING DATA YOU DISLIKE. BECAUSE LIKING AND DISLIKING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON, IT IS MERELY A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED OR REPULSED BY SOMETHING, IT IS COMING TO A DECISION ABOUT WHAT SOMETHING IS ABOUT BASED ON ATTRACTION AND REPULSION AND IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT THE PRODUCTS OF SUCH REASONING BASED ON LIKE AND DISLIKE FED BY DATA BASED ON LIKE AND DISLIKE IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED AND WRONG.
Prolonging:
So you think it is impossible to prolong what you do?
If there is any meaning in twirling the hoop around your abdomen one or two twirls suffices to get the point across but people who do so do it many times and that is prolonging your twirling it around in the name of impressing others with your skill or deceiving them how pleasurable it is when it is not.
When you keep your smile longer on your face than is necessary (to give others greater chance to see it) you are prolonging your smile that requires the prolonged use of force and it is this prolonging that is the basis of sadness. When a person experiences sadness his force of going against self is cyclically prolonging with little change in speed and strength to then die off and regenerate.
BY TWIRLING THE HOOP AROUND HER TORSO MANY TIMES THE GIRL IS PROLONGING HER TWIRLING FOR NO TRUE MEANING EXCEPT TO IMPRESS OTHERS OR DECEIVE THEM IT IS ENJOYABLE. IF IT IS TRULY PLEASURABLE THEN EVERYONE SHOULD BE DOING WHAT SHE IS DOING EEVRY DAY LIKE THEY EAT AND SLEEP EVERYDAY.
MOST PEOPLE DON’T REALIZE THEY ARE PROLONGING WHEN THEY DO SO JUST AS THEY SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE CHANGES IN THEIR SPEECH AND MOTION. YOU DON’T NEED REASON TO PROLONG AND IN FACT REASON WILL TELL YOU IT IS INSANE AND SUFFERING TO PROLONG BUT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROLONG WITHOUT USING FORCE. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS RECORD THE SEQUENCE OF MOTION YOU WANT IN YOUR JUKEBOX AND SUPPLY CONTINUOUS FORCE AND IT WILL PROLONG AND KEEP REPEATING UNTIL YOU FALL DOWN EXHAUSTED.
Ping, ping, ping, drrrrrrrm:
When the pianist goes into a final frenzy of repeated ping, ping, ping to end in a flourish of drrrrrrrrrmmmm he is prolonging. The repeated pings is prolonging of the ping and the drrrrrrrmmm is achieved by dragging or prolonging his fingers over the keyboard.
Not meaningful but it is their liking and false perception:
There will be those who will argue that without the repetition like ‘ping, ping, ping, ping, ping, drrrmmmmm’ the music will lose its ‘meaning’ or bite or taste.
You have not heard music without mad repetition, prolonging, constantly changing speed and loudness so how do you know that it is lifeless or meaningless?
On the contrary music without unnecessary repetition, prolonging, changing speed and loudness is incomparably peaceful and pleasant to the ear without stress, restlessness and distraction afterwards.
It is their liking for unnecessary meaningless repetition, prolonging, changing in speed and loudness in common with their appreciation of the same elsewhere that makes them meaningful and they have advanced false perception that meaningless repetition, prolonging, change speed and loudness is meaningful. They do not realize or believe they will end with mad perception.
Meaningless hackneyed nice talk:
Quote: Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysia’s fallen son, is attempting the greatest political comeback in Malaysian history. Traitor or saviour with a ‘New Agenda’? Trapped between the Charybdis of his political past and the Scylla of political obscurity, Anwar Ibrahim attempts the seemingly impossible. Face to Face examines the undeniable ‘Anwar Factor’ in this exclusive interview.
If you have read articles on Anwar you will have heard repeatedly to reference to him being Malaysia’s fallen son and the fact that he says it cannot be because he invented the description nor he coincidentally reinvented the description but it is reproduced by rote because Malaysia’s fallen son is deemed to be impressive, arouse readers’ emotions not reason. Talking about Charybdis & Scylla too is unnecessarily trying to impress readers with his breath of knowledge. Not everyone knows what those two words mean and do you think he cares? He is more concerned for his own ego than that you know what he is talking about. That you should trust what such a person says is foolish. He has his own agenda and you should read what he writes carefully.
It is force that detains & reason that liberates:
When you boil down the five fetters (ill will, sensuality, self identity views, faith in rites and rules and doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha said detained beings in the lower realms and even consign them to states of woe (self identity views, faith in rites and rules and doubt and uncertainty) you will always find mental force present but never true reason.
It is force that is the basis and drive of ill will and sensuality that the Buddha said are two lower fetters that detain men in the lower realms (human, animal, ghost & hell) and it is again force that is the drive through the three additional fetters namely self identity views, faith in rites and rules and doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha said led to future states of woe or deprivation (eg blind, crippled, diseased) in addition to the lower realms.
THUS IT IS FORCE (CONSTANTLY) WIELDED BY ONE’S OWN MIND AND FORCE (CONSTANTLY) IMPACTING ON HIS MIND FROM THE FABRICATIONS OF OTHERS THAT IS HIS CURSE AND EVIL AND THE BASIS OF HIS ILL WILL AND SENSUALITY THAT DETAINS HIM IN THE LOWER REALMS AND IT IS THE FREEDOM FROM FORCE THAT REQUIRES THE ACQUISITION OF REASON AND DISCERNMENT (SEEING THINGS CLEARLY AS THEY ARE THAT THERE IS CONSTANT UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND PUTTING A STOP TO THEM) THAT IS ESSENTIAL TO EXIT FROM THE LOWER REALMS AND ITS UNIVERSAL TORMENT AND HEART BREAK. THE INCESSANT BOMBARDMENT OF FORCE AND DELUSIONS ENFORCED BY FORCE FROM EVERYONE ELSE INCLUDING ANIMALS MAKE IT VERY DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO DISCERN THE TRUTH AND PRACTICE TRUE GOODWILL OR THE ABSENCE OF FORCE THAT WILL RELEASE THEM FROM THIS WORLD OF ENDLESS TORMENT.
Sensuality is nothing more than a liking or the stirring of mental force in that sensual person’s mind to become attracted on perception of objects of the five senses namely sight, sound, smell, taste and touch and as a result of being attracted, the person embarks on elaborate fabrications in thinking, speech and motion devoted to prolonging the enjoyment and nurturing that sensuality. For instance a being who is sensual for food or sex overindulges in them, tries to prolong his eating or sexual experiences and goes about in an elaborate way with unnecessary accessory movements and objects (eg decorate his food with flowers, paper umbrellas floating on his cocktail, use sex toys).
Sensuality has nothing to do with true reason and in fact the absence of true reason is essential because true reason will tell you there is no satisfaction in sensuality, it increasingly enslaves you (eg drinking, gambling, womanizing) and will lead to ruin or insanity one way or another. It is force that is the drive for attraction for sensual objects and it is force that is the drive for the prolonging, changing speed, strength and even direction in perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing that go to constitute the person’s sensuality for that object.
ILL WILL IS THE COUNTERPART OF SENSUALITY (THE USE OF UNNECESSARY FORCE IN HIS PERCEPTIONS) IN THE PERSON’S THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS AND IT IS ESSENTIALLY THE USE OF EXCESSIVE UNNECESSARY FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS BRAND OF STYLE THAT IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED, STRENGTH OF FORCE AND EVEN DIRECTION IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING, PLEASING, IMPRESSING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS. APART THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE HIS STYLE THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACTS HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS IT IS THE SAME FORCE BEHIND ILL WILL THAT DRIVES HIM TO THINK, SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, NONSENSE (MAKES NO SENSE EG YABADABADOO) OR CONTRADICTORY (‘WELL’ OR ‘GOOD’ WHEN HE MEANS NOT WELL OR BAD) AND ATTACKS OR CHALLENGES OTHERS TO VERBAL OR PHYSICAL FIGHTS (EG PROVOKE SOMEONE ‘WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE?’).
IT IS NEVER TRUE REASON BUT FALSE REASON DRIVEN BY FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE BASIS OF PEOPLE SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT ARE FALSE (TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS), MAKES NO SENSE OR CONTRADICTORY AND IT IS AGAIN FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE BEHIND HIS FABRICATING A STYLE OR CONSTANTLY FORCEFULLY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS.
THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAS EQUIVALENTS IN MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTION IS THE BIG BROTHER IN COMPRISING A PERSON’S ILL WILL BECAUSE IT IS CONSTANT WHILST THE USE OF FORCE TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, NONSENSICAL OR CONTRADICTORY, ATTACKING OR CHALLENGING IS ACTUALLY THE SMALLER BROTHER THAT OCCURS INTERMITTENTLY.
JUST AS THE PERSON’S STYLE IS THE BIG BROTHER THAT IS CONSTANT IN HIS ILL WILL COMPARED TO WHAT HE INTERMITTENTLY SAYS OR DOES THAT IS FALSE, NONSENSICAL, CONTRADICTORY, ATTACKING OR CHALLENGING, IN THE SAME WAY A PERSON’S STYLE OF PERCEPTION (SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TASTING, TOUCHING) IS THE CONSTANT BIG BROTHER OF HIS SENSUALITY COMPARED TO WHAT HE INTERMITTENTLY SAYS OR DOES IN THE NAME OF CONDUCTING HIS SENSUALITY.
IN ADDITION TO ILL WILL AND SENSUALITY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINS THE BEING IN THE LOWER REALMS AND THENCE TORMENT EVEN TO MADDENING PROPORTIONS, THERE ARE THE THREE ADDITION FETTERS THAT LEAD TO FUTURE STATES OF WOE (EVEN WORSE, DEPRIVED OR AFFLICTED STATES IN ADDITION TO BEING IN THE LOWER REALMS) NAMELY SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, FAITH IN RITES AND RULES AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY.
It is never true reason that is the guide to self identity views but it is attraction or liking for a self based on one’s body and mental attributes (intelligence, ‘knowledge’ or delusions) and the use of force to do or say things that will materially advantage him at the even great expense in stress, restlessness and distraction. Thus it is irrational, insatiable mental force that is the drive to a being’s self identity views or possessiveness.
Self identity views is essentially a person’s possessiveness reflected in thoughts of ‘my body’, my life, my God, my children, my house, my career, my money, etc. And possessiveness is never based on true reason but driven by force to possess or acquire and fortified by false reasons or rationalization and delusions.
(Did God tell you that He likes to be possessed by you? Thus you are presumptuous, a defilement of the mind according to the Buddha that is an impediment to acquiring truth if you think you are meritorious to refer to God as yours)
IT IS FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR POSSESSIVENESS THAT IS THE BASIS OF SELF IDENTITY VIEWS THAT IS A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
True reason will never guide a being to have faith in rituals and rules which are all artificial, constraining or restrictive and meaningless. A man of truth who can see what is true or false, what is good or harmful does not need rules to guide him and often if examined the rules actually are harmful rather than benefit as imagined. Rituals are meaningless things people do (eg yoga, tai chi, dancing) that are purported to have certain benefits like send you to heaven or good health and you do not need reason to do yoga or tai chi but you watch and copy others using force fortified by delusions about their efficacies.
THUS IT IS FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT IS THE DRIVE BEHIND THE ACQUISITION AND PRACTICE OF RITUALS AND RULES IN WHICH TRUE REASON NEVER PLAYS A PART.
There are two parts of doubt and uncertainty. Doubt and uncertainty is an emotional or disturbed state of the mind and only emotion or force that is ill or ill will resident in that person’s mind can cause doubt and uncertainty.
The other part of doubt and uncertain is what beings in this world purposely or unwittingly do to sow doubt and uncertainty in others. They ask others are you sure you want to buy that pair of shoes, they question others unnecessarily (if what you say is enlightening why do you correct it?). Often people heard what you say but they pretend they did not hear to force you to repeat thus sowing doubt that what you said was too soft or incoherent when it was coherent and loud enough.
Because beings in this world appreciate falsity and they do or say things that harm themselves with stress, restlessness and distraction, even if they cannot see what they say or do is false and hurts them with stress, restlessness and distraction they must entertain doubt and uncertainty in themselves and others who are actually harming them even though they are their close friends or dear ones.
THUS IT IS FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS ILL OR ILL WILL IN THE MINDS OF BEINGS HERE THAT DETAINS THEM IN THIS WORLD AND THIS FORCE IS MANIFEST IN ALL THE FIVE FETTERS THAT THE BUDDHA SAID DETAINED BEINGS IN THE LOWER REALMS.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE ILL WILL IN THE FORCEFUL STYLE ALWAYS PRESENT IN WHAT A PERSON THINKS, SAYS OR DOES AND IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE ILL WILL THAT CAUSES HIM TO IN ADDITION SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE, MAKES NO SENSE OR CONTRADICTS, TO ATTACK OR CHALLENGE OTHERS TO A FIGHT IN WORDS OR ACTION.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE OF THE ATTRACTION FOR SENSORY OBJECTS THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF SENSUALITY AND IT IS FORCE THAT IS AGAIN THE DRIVE FOR THE THOUGHTS, SPEECH AND DEEDS THAT THE PERSON UNDERTAKE TO FULFILL HIS SENSUALITY (EG USE SEX TOYS, INDULGE IN INCREASINGLY UNNATURAL SEX ACTS TO KEEP HIS LUST BURNING).
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR A LIKING FOR SELF AND DISLIKING FOR OTHERS AND POSSESSIVENESS AND ACTS TO FULFILL THAT POSESSIVENESS THAT IS AT THE CORE OF SELF IDENTITY VIEWS.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR PRACTICING RITUALS THAT DO NOT ACHIEVE THEIR AIMS AND FORCE THAT IS THE DRIVE TO BLIND OBEDIENCE OF MENTAL OR PHYSICAL RULES.
IT IS FORCE THAT IS THE NECESSARY DRIVE FOR THE EMOTIONAL STATES OF DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY. IT IS BECAUSE BEINGS FORCEFULLY BELIEVE WHAT IS FALSE, CANNOT SEE THAT THEIR ACTIONS HARM THEM AND THEIR FRIENDS AND DEAR ONES ARE HARMING THEM WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY MUST ENTERTAIN FORCEFUL OR EMOTIONAL DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AND IN ADDITION THEY PERSECUTE OTHERS BY DELIBERATELY OR UNWITTINGLY SOWING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IN OTHERS.
THUS IT IS CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT THAT A BEING WHO WISH TO EXIT SUFFERING THAT MAY LAST EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY TO PAY ATTENTION TO DETECT AND ELIMINATE FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE FIRE THAT KEEPS HIS MENTAL FORCE BURNING TO POWER HIS ILL WILL IN SAYING AND DOING FALSE OR NONSENSICAL OR CONTRADICTORY THINGS, ATTACKS OR CHALLENGES OTHERS IN VERBAL OR PHYSICAL FIGHTS, POWERS HIS SENSUALITY AND POWERS HIS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, FAITH IN RITES AND RULES, POWERS HIS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY.
FORCE IS ALWAYS BLIND AND UNDISCRIMINATING, ONCE TRIGGERED FORCE CAN ONLY BE STOPPED BY OPPOSITE FORCE OR IT WILL POWER UNTIL EXPENDED WHATEVER IT SEIZES OR IS PERMITTED TO DRIVE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL, USEFUL OR USELESS. NO MATTER WHETHER YOU CAN SEE IF YOU ARE FORCEFUL OR NOT, BENEFITING OTHERS WITH YOUR STYLE OR HARMING THEM, IF THERE IS EXCESSIVE UUNECCESSARY FORCE IN HOW YOU SAY OR DO THINGS, THIS BLIND FORCE IS THE DEVIL THAT WILL ONE DAY KILL YOU OR DRIVE YOU MAD.
IF THERE IS FORCEFULNESS IN YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND YOU CANNOT SEE IT, YOU ARE BLIND AND A MAN OF THIS WORLD AND NOTHING CAN BE DONE FOR YOU IF YOU ARE HEADED FOR TORMENT.
IF YOU CAN SEE FORCEFULNESS IN YOUR SPEECH AND ACTIONS AND YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG, YOU LIKE IT AND THINK IT BENEFITS YOU AND OTHERS, THEN YOU WILL GO TO THE WORLD OF FORCE AND EMOTIONS AND IF THAT MEANS THIS WORLD EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY THEN THAT IS WHAT YOU LIKED.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID YOU HAVE ALREADY SHED YOUR OWN BLOOD GREATER THAN THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS FROM HAVING YOUR NECK CUT AS ANIMALS AND HUMANS, SO WHAT IS ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING BUILDING ANOTHER PILE OF SKELETONS THAT IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN?
In addition to the many things I have said apart from what I say above that no one has said before and is (in truth) enlightening, I have caused the consciousness of beings in this world to change both after 1977 and in recent years and even at the moment, the demeanours of people show that they are all changing although still acting or using force to prolong, change speed and loudness.
If what I say is true and beneficial, gives insight and no one else has said it before, my causing the consciousness of all beings to change benefits them, then whoever the counsellor Jesus was describing must also do what I am doing and if I have done so, I will have superseded him, which is impossible because it will render what Jesus said is false because someone other than the counsellor can do what he will do.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (like Jesus was a counselor, a person who came), to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (if the great majority of people are good and therefore truthful they would have received truth or perhaps this is a world of falsity where people are all acting and being poisonously nice, not good to each other), because it (the world or the great majority) neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you (not in you as a counselor of the mind will be), and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (The counselor must bring you advantage as no man has done)And when he comes, he will convince the world (if what I say convinces you of sin, righteousness and judgment then the counselor will look foolish trying to convince) concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Only an alleviating consciousness change that has now occurred can enable people to bear) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority (only if the counselor is someone who dwells with you and speaks as if on his own will need such clarification), but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything as the Buddha knows and sees everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (if the church and Christians have glorified Jesus, there would be no need for a counselor to do so. If what the counselor speaks is similar to the Church or a reiteration, there would be no need for a counselor to speak). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Has Howard done his dash?
Not everyone knows what done his dash means and it is said to impress others with your command of a language that you know it means is Howard finished or done with.
This is not letting your yes be yes only but more that comes from evil in the name of impressing others.
What is your intention in writing? Is it to communicate a meaningful idea or to pamper your ego to impress others with your prowess and knowledge of terms?
If part of your intention is to impress others with your credentials and you do not state it, you do not say what you mean and you are a hypocrite.
Your mates:
You think they are merely animals for you to rear and slaughter as you wished to supply dinner but they may be just as valid beings as you and suffering (the Buddha said he cannot think of anything more tormenting than hell or the animal womb so don’t think it is wonderful to be animals).
Look at the three heads here and you may see expressions of perplexity or wondering what is happening and mild anxiety, the one in the middle looks a bit lost.
Faith is always based on force:
If you know or can see something is true then you do not need to have faith or belief and it is only when you do not know or see that something is true that you must have faith or belief that is always based on force because you do not know and cannot see.
However there is correct and misplaced faith.
There is correct faith if you have faith that the Buddha is fully self awakened and what he taught is the way out of suffering or that there is heaven, a Father or Jesus is the son of God and what he commanded is the way to heaven.
There is misguided faith as when you use force never reason to have faith in rituals (verbal and bodily) and rules.
Rules are enforced with force never reason and you use force never reason to obey rules.
If you know something done or said is true then it is not a ritual and it is only when you do not know or see something and yet do or say it is it a ritual and without knowing or seeing it is true you use force to practice the ritual.
Sadness is caused by prolonging and feeling hurt by changing speed and loudness:
Sadness is a dull lingering mental (not bodily) pain that is caused by the loss of control in the use of force to prolong in fabricating a person’s style. There may be or no other causes of sadness.
Feeling hurt is a sharp virtual (mental) pain that is caused by the loss of control in a being that constantly uses force to change speed and strength of force to fabricate his style. There may be or no other causes of feeling hurt.
Thus if you find sadness disagreeable and depression terrible, then you should uproot sadness and depression by paying attention to detect and make persistent effort to eliminate all unnecessary for show stretching of syllables or units of motion in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others. If you find feeling hurt disagreeable then you should uproot feeling hurt by paying attention to detect and make persistent effort to eliminate all unnecessary for show changes of speed and strength of force of syllables or units of motion in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others.
If I were to ask most reasonably intelligent actors or people with style to sing a particular song first in a sad way and then in a ‘happy’ or delighted (liking) way, they would be able to oblige by singing in a way that universally conveys sadness or liking without knowing how they do so or the secret of making a song they sing sad or ‘happy’. And if you are a person who can do something without knowing how or what you did, you must be a robot who is rehashing from memory and what you did was copied from others without knowing what it is.
A person can learn (actually copy) changing speed within and between his syllables from listening to others without knowing what he is doing merely by experiencing the force changes transmitted by the speed changes in the speech of the person he heard and then making a facsimile copy of it using his own mental force to mimic those changes.
Normally when the person is enthusiastically fabricating his style to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others by using force to prolong, change speed and strength of force he does not experience sadness or feeling hurt because his force of self preservation is working actively and competently to shield his consciousness from the application of force on it.
Sadness is the result of using force to prolong and feeling hurt is the result of using force to change speed and strength only when control is lost, when the force of self preservation is tired or listless or gives up exposing the person’s consciousness to the unprotected brunt of his force of going against self prolonging, changing speed and strength of force.
THE FACT THAT A PERSON CAN FABRICATE EXPRESSED SADNESS THAT OTHERS CAN APPRECIATE INDICATES THAT SADNESS IS NOT MYSTERIOUS BUT HAS A DEFINABLE CAUSE THAT BY TRIGGERING THE CAUSE YOU GET SADNESS AND BY ELIMINATING THE CAUSE YOU GET THE ABSENCE OF SADNESS. PEOPLE OFTEN INTENTIONALLY FAKE SADNESS TO MANIPULATE OTHERS AND THE SECRET OF GENERATING SADNESS IS TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG THE DURATION OF ONE’S SYLLABLES AND UNITS OF MOTION OFTEN IN A SLOW WAY WITHOUT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.
BY CONTRAST, FEELING HURT WHICH IS A SHARP VIRTUAL PAIN IS THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF THE USE OF FORCE TO MOSTLY CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OFTEN WITH GREAT ACCELERATIONS WITH THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION WORKING VIGOROUSLY TO SHIELD THE CONSCIOUSNESS FROM THE VIOLENT CHANGES AND AS A RESULT OF THE INEVITABLE UNINTENDED LOSS OF SHIELDING, THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCES SHARP PAINFUL HURT. THERE IS NO PHYSICAL FORCE TRANSMISSION AS IN A PUNCH OR SLAP WHEN ONE FEELS HURT AT HEARING WHAT SOMEONE ELSE SAID AND SO THAT HURT MUST BE GENERATED BY THE EXPOSURE OF THE PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS TO NAKED OR UNSHEILDED FORCE IN THAT PERSON’S OWN MIND THAT IS CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH EVEN WITH VIOLENT ACCELERATION IN INVOLUNTARY REACTION TO WHAT IS SAID.
ANYONE WHO MUST LIKE MUST GET HURT BECAUSE LIKING IS THE STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE PERSON’S FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF SHIELDED B Y HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION THAT MUST ON OCCASION FAIL TO SHIELD EXPOSING HIS CONSCIOUSNESS TO THE FULL BRUNT OF FORCE THAT IS EVEN VIOLENTLY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF THE HURT.
SADNESS IS MERELY THE LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING THAT ACTORS UTILIZE TO FABRICATE THEIR STYLE & A COMPONENT OF THEIR SENSUALITY. SENSUAL PEOPLE TRY TO PROLONG ALL THE SENSORY EXPERIENCES LIKE PROLONGING THEIR EATING OR SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND SADNESS IS THE RESULT OF THIS FORCEFUL PROLONGING.
Why I am right:
You may refute that sadness is due to forceful prolonging and feeling hurt is the inevitable unintended consequence of using force to like and instead say they are blameless part and parcel of existence due to hormonal changes but if what I say is true and sadness and feeling hurt is tormenting, by refusing to correct them by stopping forceful prolonging, changing speed and loudness in the way you speak, you are headed for doom.
I know I am right because by stopping the stylish stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in my speech and not stirring my mental force to like things, I have experienced a previously unimaginable effortless freedom from sadness and feeling hurt apart from a freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction.
Ordinary emotional and stylish people cannot help experiencing sadness and feeling hurt that can now arise rapidly for little apparent cause as a result of lifelong conditioning and they only strive to hide it from others by faking they are not hurt or sad.
In the past it is unimaginable that a permanent way of sadness and feeling hurt is possible and it is free, merely by stopping the use of force to prolong and not liking or disliking things.
IF YOU HAVE NOT STOPPED STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES, NOT STOPPED FORCEFULLY STIRRING YOUR MIND TO LIKE THINGS, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO REFUTE WHAT I SAY THAT NO ONE HAS EVER SAID BEFORE AND IS THE ONLY KEY TO THE PREVIOUS UNIMAGINABLE FREEDOM FROM SADNESS AND FEELING HURT THAT IS NEVER PLEASURABLE BUT TORMENTING.
IF YOU NEVER LIKED ANYTHING YOU CANNOT GET HURT AND IF YOU MUST LIKE THINGS YOU MUST GET HURT.
IF YOU MUST USE FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH YOU MUST EXPERIENCE SADNESS THAT WILL GROW VIRULENT AND CONSUME YOU AS DEEP DARK DEPRESSION. IF YOU NEVER PROLONGED IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE SAD.
If you are stretching, changing speed and loudness all the time and you cannot show me precisely ‘this is how I stretch, this is how I change speed and loudness’ you are a man who does not know what he is doing and a man who does not know what he is doing and yet does it is a fool and a robot who is not headed for safety but woe.
If what I say is true that using force to stretch, change speed and loudness is the only cause of stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and feeling hurt then no amount of meditation, compassion, yoga or tai chi or health foods or exercise will deliver you from stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and feeling hurt. Only paying attention to stop stretching, changing speed and loudness will and because all stylish, emotional people stretch, change speed and loudness, they are barking up the wrong tree seeking relief from their suffering.
Like a cushion:
The force of self preservation is like a cushion protecting the person’s consciousness from the impact of force.
When the cushion is taken away then the impact of the person’s forceful prolonging in the name of style is sadness, the impact of the person’s forceful changes in speed and strength of force in experiencing and expressing liking is hurt.
Because a person’s force of self preservation has limits, can be exhausted and become listless, whoever must use mental force of going against self to prolong in the name of style must experience sadness and whoever must use his mental force of going against self to experience and express like must experience hurt.
Sadness and feeling hurt is the inevitable results of periodic failure of the force of self preservation to shield the person’s consciousness just like you must get sunburnt if you must go out into the sun even if you carry an umbrella.
Keris is a refuge to all:
An UMNO leader was quoted as saying that the keris (rather than being a threat) is a refuge to all.
This is wrong view and a delusion because a dagger is not a refuge to the wielder himself, can get him killed or he can turn it on himself.
A dagger is an offensive weapon, a danger to everyone and to brandish it and say it is a refuge and protector is a delusion that encourages others to adopt a similar view with deadly karma to the person who thus utters.
The Buddha, the sangha and the dharma is truly a refuge for everyone and it is right view to say so.
A Statement Of Style & False Substance:
Quote advertisement: He drew out the most delicious thin watch that Breguet had ever made. Fancy, it is eleven o’clock, I was up early. (Honore de Balzac, “Eugene Grandet” 1833)
Whatever statement (or situation) that faces one can be examined and its substance and whatever style if present determined objectively.
Most people when confronted by the statement above will be attracted by like or repulsed by dislike or distracted, stressed & restless they read but ignore or do not understand its exact nature.
What is the meaning or substance conveyed by the above statement?
The substance is that this person Honore de Balzac in a novel Eugene Grandet in 1833 pulled out his Breguet watch to look at the time and found that he had awoken a bit early at 11 o’clock.
Is there any importance in him saying that and the advertisement writer quoting that?
In truth there is nothing important to convey for the person who said it to say it but it is an excuse to reflect the writer’s fascination with or attraction or liking for his watch. If something said is an excuse to something else, then it is false and thus the substance in this case is not minor but false. The important thing here is to talk about his watch. There is nothing important for the advertiser to quote this extract except to boast or impress about the antiquity of the brand (1833), its fame (mentioned in a novel) & the watch’s ability to fascinate its owner.
Did the advertiser state he meant to impress you with the antiquity of the watch, its fame in being mentioned in a novel and its ability to attract liking by its owner? If he did not say that he did not say what he meant and he is a hypocrite.
Perhaps the Breguet was already a desirable watch then and the writer is using the occasion of pulling out his watch to advertise his possession of the watch and reflect his infatuation with it. He did not take out his watch but he drew out (drew out is a fancy way or stylish way of saying take out) the most delicious thin watch (it is very graphic reflecting sensuality. It is false perception that will end in mad perception to perceive a watch can be delicious) that Breguet had ever made.
It is totally unnecessary to say ‘the most delicious thin watch that Breguet had ever made’ but it suffices to say “He drew out his Breguet watch” but the intention is to boast or impress about the watch. If you think it is necessary to say ‘the most delicious thin watch that Breguet had ever made’ in order to say you drew out your Breguet watch, you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
When you say ‘fancy it is eleven o’clock’ you mean it is likeable or unbelievable that it is eleven o’clock. What is there to like or dislike or unbelievable that it is eleven o’clock except that the person has already advanced false perception that the discovery that it is eleven o’clock can arouse his fancy or liking or disbelief.
If it is frivolous or unnecessary to tell others you were up early, how you drew out your watch, it is meaningless small or meandering talk or babble or merely an excuse to boast about or express your infatuation with your Breguet, you are headed for insanity.
THUS THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS PRINCIPALLY A STATEMENT OF STYLE, AN EXCUSE TO EXPRESS INFATUATION WITH HIS BREGUET IN WHICH THE SUBSTANCE IS OF LITTLE OR NO IMPORTANCE EXCEPT TO ACT AS AN EXCUSE TO TALK ABOUT HIS WATCH.
IF HE SAID WHAT HE MEANT, HE MIGHT HAVE SAID ‘I WANT YOU TO KNOW I OWN A HIGH CLASS WATCH CALLED BREGUET AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW I AM INFATUATED WITH IT’.
THE ABILITY OF EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE TO SAY WHAT THEY MEAN AND MEAN WHAT THEY SAY MAY BE APPARENT (APPEARS TO BE) THAN TRUE.
It is because people including those who are intellectual appreciate style far more than they realize, confuse style with meaning, cannot tell exactly what is the substance of what they are witnessing and whether it is frivolous or essential that they read such statement and do not exactly what to make of it.
The substance of the message is frivolous and even false that he pulled out his watch and liked or cannot believe that he had woken up a bit early. If it is an excuse to convey that he has a Breguet and it is most delicious then the substance of what is said is false because what he wants you to know is that he has a Breguet and it is most delicious.
Art is playing with images & form:
Just as poetry is playing with words, art is playing with images and form that is not letting your yes be yes only.
If you think you are letting your yes be yes only when you play with words in poetry or play with images or forms in art, trying to see more in words or images and forms than in truth there is, you may be right or deluding yourself.
Thus it may be or is the truth that a person who lets his yes be yes only as Jesus commanded cannot be a poet or artist, he just leave words, images and forms as they are. If you are an artist or poet, rather than heading for heaven you may be headed for madness.
If playing with something is the truth it will not be called playing with something but the truth about something. Thus if you think playing with words, images and forms when expressing something is conveying the truth rather than distorting or perverting the truth you may be right or a fool.
The Buddha: "Then, Bahiya, you should train yourself thus: In reference to the seen, there will be only the seen. In reference to the heard, only the heard. In reference to the sensed, only the sensed. In reference to the cognized, only the cognized. That is how you should train yourself. Then, Bahiya, you will not be 'thereby.' When you are not thereby, you will not be 'therein.' When you are not therein, you will be neither 'here' nor 'there' nor between the two. This, just this, is the end of stress."
A painting & a picture:
If a painting faithfully reflects reality it would not be called a painting or art but a picture. It is because an artist seeks to modify the image of what he sees to present his personal touches or what he likes it to be that can be quite a bizarre departure from reality (eg Picasso’s cubism) that it is called art.
Thus unless the painting tries to faithfully capture what is seen, if it tries to modify it like making a sunset scene more ‘romantic’ than it actually is, it is playing with or perverting reality and not letting your yes be yes only as Jesus commanded and courting mad perception.
Art cannot be understood:
There is nothing to understand, it either appeals (attracts) or repulses (dislike) you. If you think art has meaning, something you can learn and understand you may be right or close to madness.
The experience of mystery or the indefinable that is stirred in the appreciative person is not about stirred reason but stirred mental force. Only something that is false or forceful is indefinable and mysterious because force has no meaning only action.
Art stirs the person’s emotions and therefore it addresses the person’s mental force not reason and because it stirs emotions, it is a form of style and therefore art is pure style and no substance.
Look at the three heads here and you may see expressions of perplexity or wondering what is happening and mild anxiety, the one in the middle looks a bit lost.
Faith is always based on force:
If you know or can see something is true then you do not need to have faith or belief and it is only when you do not know or see that something is true that you must have faith or belief that is always based on force because you do not know and cannot see.
However there is correct and misplaced faith.
There is correct faith if you have faith that the Buddha is fully self awakened and what he taught is the way out of suffering or that there is heaven, a Father or Jesus is the son of God and what he commanded is the way to heaven.
There is misguided faith as when you use force never reason to have faith in rituals (verbal and bodily) and rules.
Rules are enforced with force never reason and you use force never reason to obey rules.
If you know something done or said is true then it is not a ritual and it is only when you do not know or see something and yet do or say it is it a ritual and without knowing or seeing it is true you use force to practice the ritual.
Sadness is caused by prolonging and feeling hurt by changing speed and loudness:
Sadness is a dull lingering mental (not bodily) pain that is caused by the loss of control in the use of force to prolong in fabricating a person’s style. There may be or no other causes of sadness.
Feeling hurt is a sharp virtual (mental) pain that is caused by the loss of control in a being that constantly uses force to change speed and strength of force to fabricate his style. There may be or no other causes of feeling hurt.
Thus if you find sadness disagreeable and depression terrible, then you should uproot sadness and depression by paying attention to detect and make persistent effort to eliminate all unnecessary for show stretching of syllables or units of motion in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others. If you find feeling hurt disagreeable then you should uproot feeling hurt by paying attention to detect and make persistent effort to eliminate all unnecessary for show changes of speed and strength of force of syllables or units of motion in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others.
If I were to ask most reasonably intelligent actors or people with style to sing a particular song first in a sad way and then in a ‘happy’ or delighted (liking) way, they would be able to oblige by singing in a way that universally conveys sadness or liking without knowing how they do so or the secret of making a song they sing sad or ‘happy’. And if you are a person who can do something without knowing how or what you did, you must be a robot who is rehashing from memory and what you did was copied from others without knowing what it is.
A person can learn (actually copy) changing speed within and between his syllables from listening to others without knowing what he is doing merely by experiencing the force changes transmitted by the speed changes in the speech of the person he heard and then making a facsimile copy of it using his own mental force to mimic those changes.
Normally when the person is enthusiastically fabricating his style to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others by using force to prolong, change speed and strength of force he does not experience sadness or feeling hurt because his force of self preservation is working actively and competently to shield his consciousness from the application of force on it.
Sadness is the result of using force to prolong and feeling hurt is the result of using force to change speed and strength only when control is lost, when the force of self preservation is tired or listless or gives up exposing the person’s consciousness to the unprotected brunt of his force of going against self prolonging, changing speed and strength of force.
THE FACT THAT A PERSON CAN FABRICATE EXPRESSED SADNESS THAT OTHERS CAN APPRECIATE INDICATES THAT SADNESS IS NOT MYSTERIOUS BUT HAS A DEFINABLE CAUSE THAT BY TRIGGERING THE CAUSE YOU GET SADNESS AND BY ELIMINATING THE CAUSE YOU GET THE ABSENCE OF SADNESS. PEOPLE OFTEN INTENTIONALLY FAKE SADNESS TO MANIPULATE OTHERS AND THE SECRET OF GENERATING SADNESS IS TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG THE DURATION OF ONE’S SYLLABLES AND UNITS OF MOTION OFTEN IN A SLOW WAY WITHOUT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.
BY CONTRAST, FEELING HURT WHICH IS A SHARP VIRTUAL PAIN IS THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF THE USE OF FORCE TO MOSTLY CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OFTEN WITH GREAT ACCELERATIONS WITH THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION WORKING VIGOROUSLY TO SHIELD THE CONSCIOUSNESS FROM THE VIOLENT CHANGES AND AS A RESULT OF THE INEVITABLE UNINTENDED LOSS OF SHIELDING, THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCES SHARP PAINFUL HURT. THERE IS NO PHYSICAL FORCE TRANSMISSION AS IN A PUNCH OR SLAP WHEN ONE FEELS HURT AT HEARING WHAT SOMEONE ELSE SAID AND SO THAT HURT MUST BE GENERATED BY THE EXPOSURE OF THE PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS TO NAKED OR UNSHEILDED FORCE IN THAT PERSON’S OWN MIND THAT IS CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH EVEN WITH VIOLENT ACCELERATION IN INVOLUNTARY REACTION TO WHAT IS SAID.
ANYONE WHO MUST LIKE MUST GET HURT BECAUSE LIKING IS THE STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE PERSON’S FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF SHIELDED B Y HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION THAT MUST ON OCCASION FAIL TO SHIELD EXPOSING HIS CONSCIOUSNESS TO THE FULL BRUNT OF FORCE THAT IS EVEN VIOLENTLY CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF THE HURT.
SADNESS IS MERELY THE LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING THAT ACTORS UTILIZE TO FABRICATE THEIR STYLE & A COMPONENT OF THEIR SENSUALITY. SENSUAL PEOPLE TRY TO PROLONG ALL THE SENSORY EXPERIENCES LIKE PROLONGING THEIR EATING OR SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND SADNESS IS THE RESULT OF THIS FORCEFUL PROLONGING.
Why I am right:
You may refute that sadness is due to forceful prolonging and feeling hurt is the inevitable unintended consequence of using force to like and instead say they are blameless part and parcel of existence due to hormonal changes but if what I say is true and sadness and feeling hurt is tormenting, by refusing to correct them by stopping forceful prolonging, changing speed and loudness in the way you speak, you are headed for doom.
I know I am right because by stopping the stylish stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in my speech and not stirring my mental force to like things, I have experienced a previously unimaginable effortless freedom from sadness and feeling hurt apart from a freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction.
Ordinary emotional and stylish people cannot help experiencing sadness and feeling hurt that can now arise rapidly for little apparent cause as a result of lifelong conditioning and they only strive to hide it from others by faking they are not hurt or sad.
In the past it is unimaginable that a permanent way of sadness and feeling hurt is possible and it is free, merely by stopping the use of force to prolong and not liking or disliking things.
IF YOU HAVE NOT STOPPED STRETCHING YOUR SYLLABLES, NOT STOPPED FORCEFULLY STIRRING YOUR MIND TO LIKE THINGS, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO REFUTE WHAT I SAY THAT NO ONE HAS EVER SAID BEFORE AND IS THE ONLY KEY TO THE PREVIOUS UNIMAGINABLE FREEDOM FROM SADNESS AND FEELING HURT THAT IS NEVER PLEASURABLE BUT TORMENTING.
IF YOU NEVER LIKED ANYTHING YOU CANNOT GET HURT AND IF YOU MUST LIKE THINGS YOU MUST GET HURT.
IF YOU MUST USE FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH YOU MUST EXPERIENCE SADNESS THAT WILL GROW VIRULENT AND CONSUME YOU AS DEEP DARK DEPRESSION. IF YOU NEVER PROLONGED IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE SAD.
If you are stretching, changing speed and loudness all the time and you cannot show me precisely ‘this is how I stretch, this is how I change speed and loudness’ you are a man who does not know what he is doing and a man who does not know what he is doing and yet does it is a fool and a robot who is not headed for safety but woe.
If what I say is true that using force to stretch, change speed and loudness is the only cause of stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and feeling hurt then no amount of meditation, compassion, yoga or tai chi or health foods or exercise will deliver you from stress, restlessness, distraction, sadness and feeling hurt. Only paying attention to stop stretching, changing speed and loudness will and because all stylish, emotional people stretch, change speed and loudness, they are barking up the wrong tree seeking relief from their suffering.
Like a cushion:
The force of self preservation is like a cushion protecting the person’s consciousness from the impact of force.
When the cushion is taken away then the impact of the person’s forceful prolonging in the name of style is sadness, the impact of the person’s forceful changes in speed and strength of force in experiencing and expressing liking is hurt.
Because a person’s force of self preservation has limits, can be exhausted and become listless, whoever must use mental force of going against self to prolong in the name of style must experience sadness and whoever must use his mental force of going against self to experience and express like must experience hurt.
Sadness and feeling hurt is the inevitable results of periodic failure of the force of self preservation to shield the person’s consciousness just like you must get sunburnt if you must go out into the sun even if you carry an umbrella.
Keris is a refuge to all:
An UMNO leader was quoted as saying that the keris (rather than being a threat) is a refuge to all.
This is wrong view and a delusion because a dagger is not a refuge to the wielder himself, can get him killed or he can turn it on himself.
A dagger is an offensive weapon, a danger to everyone and to brandish it and say it is a refuge and protector is a delusion that encourages others to adopt a similar view with deadly karma to the person who thus utters.
The Buddha, the sangha and the dharma is truly a refuge for everyone and it is right view to say so.
A Statement Of Style & False Substance:
Quote advertisement: He drew out the most delicious thin watch that Breguet had ever made. Fancy, it is eleven o’clock, I was up early. (Honore de Balzac, “Eugene Grandet” 1833)
Whatever statement (or situation) that faces one can be examined and its substance and whatever style if present determined objectively.
Most people when confronted by the statement above will be attracted by like or repulsed by dislike or distracted, stressed & restless they read but ignore or do not understand its exact nature.
What is the meaning or substance conveyed by the above statement?
The substance is that this person Honore de Balzac in a novel Eugene Grandet in 1833 pulled out his Breguet watch to look at the time and found that he had awoken a bit early at 11 o’clock.
Is there any importance in him saying that and the advertisement writer quoting that?
In truth there is nothing important to convey for the person who said it to say it but it is an excuse to reflect the writer’s fascination with or attraction or liking for his watch. If something said is an excuse to something else, then it is false and thus the substance in this case is not minor but false. The important thing here is to talk about his watch. There is nothing important for the advertiser to quote this extract except to boast or impress about the antiquity of the brand (1833), its fame (mentioned in a novel) & the watch’s ability to fascinate its owner.
Did the advertiser state he meant to impress you with the antiquity of the watch, its fame in being mentioned in a novel and its ability to attract liking by its owner? If he did not say that he did not say what he meant and he is a hypocrite.
Perhaps the Breguet was already a desirable watch then and the writer is using the occasion of pulling out his watch to advertise his possession of the watch and reflect his infatuation with it. He did not take out his watch but he drew out (drew out is a fancy way or stylish way of saying take out) the most delicious thin watch (it is very graphic reflecting sensuality. It is false perception that will end in mad perception to perceive a watch can be delicious) that Breguet had ever made.
It is totally unnecessary to say ‘the most delicious thin watch that Breguet had ever made’ but it suffices to say “He drew out his Breguet watch” but the intention is to boast or impress about the watch. If you think it is necessary to say ‘the most delicious thin watch that Breguet had ever made’ in order to say you drew out your Breguet watch, you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
When you say ‘fancy it is eleven o’clock’ you mean it is likeable or unbelievable that it is eleven o’clock. What is there to like or dislike or unbelievable that it is eleven o’clock except that the person has already advanced false perception that the discovery that it is eleven o’clock can arouse his fancy or liking or disbelief.
If it is frivolous or unnecessary to tell others you were up early, how you drew out your watch, it is meaningless small or meandering talk or babble or merely an excuse to boast about or express your infatuation with your Breguet, you are headed for insanity.
THUS THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS PRINCIPALLY A STATEMENT OF STYLE, AN EXCUSE TO EXPRESS INFATUATION WITH HIS BREGUET IN WHICH THE SUBSTANCE IS OF LITTLE OR NO IMPORTANCE EXCEPT TO ACT AS AN EXCUSE TO TALK ABOUT HIS WATCH.
IF HE SAID WHAT HE MEANT, HE MIGHT HAVE SAID ‘I WANT YOU TO KNOW I OWN A HIGH CLASS WATCH CALLED BREGUET AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW I AM INFATUATED WITH IT’.
THE ABILITY OF EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE TO SAY WHAT THEY MEAN AND MEAN WHAT THEY SAY MAY BE APPARENT (APPEARS TO BE) THAN TRUE.
It is because people including those who are intellectual appreciate style far more than they realize, confuse style with meaning, cannot tell exactly what is the substance of what they are witnessing and whether it is frivolous or essential that they read such statement and do not exactly what to make of it.
The substance of the message is frivolous and even false that he pulled out his watch and liked or cannot believe that he had woken up a bit early. If it is an excuse to convey that he has a Breguet and it is most delicious then the substance of what is said is false because what he wants you to know is that he has a Breguet and it is most delicious.
Art is playing with images & form:
Just as poetry is playing with words, art is playing with images and form that is not letting your yes be yes only.
If you think you are letting your yes be yes only when you play with words in poetry or play with images or forms in art, trying to see more in words or images and forms than in truth there is, you may be right or deluding yourself.
Thus it may be or is the truth that a person who lets his yes be yes only as Jesus commanded cannot be a poet or artist, he just leave words, images and forms as they are. If you are an artist or poet, rather than heading for heaven you may be headed for madness.
If playing with something is the truth it will not be called playing with something but the truth about something. Thus if you think playing with words, images and forms when expressing something is conveying the truth rather than distorting or perverting the truth you may be right or a fool.
The Buddha: "Then, Bahiya, you should train yourself thus: In reference to the seen, there will be only the seen. In reference to the heard, only the heard. In reference to the sensed, only the sensed. In reference to the cognized, only the cognized. That is how you should train yourself. Then, Bahiya, you will not be 'thereby.' When you are not thereby, you will not be 'therein.' When you are not therein, you will be neither 'here' nor 'there' nor between the two. This, just this, is the end of stress."
A painting & a picture:
If a painting faithfully reflects reality it would not be called a painting or art but a picture. It is because an artist seeks to modify the image of what he sees to present his personal touches or what he likes it to be that can be quite a bizarre departure from reality (eg Picasso’s cubism) that it is called art.
Thus unless the painting tries to faithfully capture what is seen, if it tries to modify it like making a sunset scene more ‘romantic’ than it actually is, it is playing with or perverting reality and not letting your yes be yes only as Jesus commanded and courting mad perception.
Art cannot be understood:
There is nothing to understand, it either appeals (attracts) or repulses (dislike) you. If you think art has meaning, something you can learn and understand you may be right or close to madness.
The experience of mystery or the indefinable that is stirred in the appreciative person is not about stirred reason but stirred mental force. Only something that is false or forceful is indefinable and mysterious because force has no meaning only action.
Art stirs the person’s emotions and therefore it addresses the person’s mental force not reason and because it stirs emotions, it is a form of style and therefore art is pure style and no substance.
No comments:
Post a Comment