Looking at the bright side:
Reality check: Archbishop (of Canterbury) looks on bright side of economic crisis
When people look at the bright side of something it is usually a form of denial or not accepting what has happened or trying to see good in what is bad or trying to console oneself and others that is never good but cultivating controlled insanity that will end in future insanity.
It is a person who is self centred, always trying to see advantage and disadvantage in a situation, what is there in this for me who tries to see the bright side of things to see if there is anything in there for me or salvageable.
If you speak of ‘reality check’ you are admitting without knowing that you are living in make believe in the past, your previous economic life was a delusion or false and now this is a reality check.
UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO MAD, YOU SHOULD NOT TRY TO SEE THE BRIGHT OR DARK SIDES OF THINGS BUT LET THINGS BE, SEE AND KNOW WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND NOT TRY TO GLEAN ADVANTAGE OR DISADVANTAGE FROM IT.
THERE IS NOTHING BRIGHT IN THIS CRISIS BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU MUST DESPAIR.
Ferrari would not swap Massa for Hamilton:
This is always a false statement of emotion to deprecate, never a statement of truth.
If you read it and you do not know if it is true or false or you think it is true, you are a person who does not know what he reads.
Hamilton is the youngest world champion and so his driving credentials cannot be clearly inferior to Massa’s.
It is always false to compare one good driver with another because you cannot know who is better and to imply that Massa is just as good or better than Hamilton so that you will not swap them is not based on genuine reason, not based on true seeing or knowing but based on emotion, ‘sour grapes’ or stubbornness or scorn.
IT IS A USELESS STATEMENT TO MAKE BECAUSE YOU CANNOT DETERMINE OBJECTIVELY WHO THE BETTER DRIVER IS AND SO THE STATEMENT IS NEVER BASED ON TRUTH BUT DRIVEN BY EMOTION, SCORN OR SOUR GRAPES.
Are your fears well founded?
IF YOU DESIRE TO DESCEND INTO FUTURE CERTAIN INTENSE MAD FEAR THEN YOU SHOULD CONSIDER YOUR FEAR WELL FOUNDED. IF YOU DO NOT, THEN NO FEAR IS EVER WELL FOUNDED.
The question implies that fear is meaningful or beneficial and it may be justified or unjustified and it reflects delusion.
Fear is merely the stirring in speed and strength of a person’s mental force of self preservation with a sudden collapse in speed and strength of his force of going against self that is meaningless, harmful and stressful without doing anything to resolve the problem or danger at hand. Rather than raising fear what is needed is calm clear genuine reason to assess what the real danger and problem is and thus determined, to undertake precise specific to that occasion solution. The fearful mind becomes irrational and may resort to inappropriate action whilst missing a clearly viable action.
The Buddha said the enlightened ones are like a mountain, unshaken by anything happening and do not quake so fear is not mandatory, compulsory. With the cessation of the use of mental force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness the person is depriving his mind of mental force that is required to experience fear and so he is fearless. Without abandoning style you will never see an end to fear that is conditioning so that it becomes more intense and chaotic with age and you are doomed to descend into mad fear, so you are a fool to ask whether one’s fear is well or not well founded.
IF YOU DESIRE TO DESCEND INTO CERTAIN INTENSE MAD FEAR THEN YOU SHOULD CONSIDER YOUR FEAR WELL FOUNDED. IF YOU DO NOT, THEN NO FEAR IS EVER WELL FOUNDED.
Who says you need understanding to survive in this world?
No understanding and knowing the truth is needed to survive in this world but in fact, although it is flirting with danger and death, knowing and understanding falsity is vital to doing well in this world because falsity and harmfulness disguised as goodness is the language and currency of this world.
It may be that the Iraqi journalist was beaten up on the behest or demand of US security personnel as revenge for humiliating Bush and so it is that if you want long life, you must bottle the insults and falsity or hypocrisy dished to you, act as if grateful instead of throwing your shoe at Bush that can cause you even your life (beaten to death) or imprisonment.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO KNOW AND SEE THE TRUTH TO SURVIVE EVEN SURVIVE WELL IN THIS WORLD. JUST COPY WHAT OTHERS ARE DOING AND BECAUSE WHAT THEY DO RESULT IN THEIR SURVIVAL IN THIS WORLD YOU TOO WILL SURVIVE LONG SO LONG AS YOU DO NOT MEET SOME UNFORTUNATE INCIDENT OR THE INABILITY TO SEE AND KNOW THE TRUTH DOES NOT PROVE PREMATURELY FATAL. WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT IS YOU ARE CONVERSANT WITH FALSITY AND DECEIT, THE WAY OF THIS WORLD, THE CAPACITY TO PUT ON A SHOW TO GET ALONG, TO SMILE WHEN YOU ARE BEING DISHED SHIT.
Iraqi shoe-thrower 'was beaten'
By Caroline Wyatt |
The investigating judge in the case of the Iraqi reporter who threw his shoes at US President George W Bush says the man shows signs of having been beaten.
The judge, who saw Muntader al-Zaidi this week, said the journalist had bruises on his face and about his eyes.
It never was there:
AUSTRALIANS have lost about $200bn this year from their super as the share market carnage hit.
Such a person is speaking falsely because Australians did not lose $200 bn, the money was never there in the first place it was just paper gains that have been wiped off.
It reflects serious false perception and logic of people that they believe they are worth so much based on current share prices when it is an illusion, you cannot extrapolate like this unless you are a fool and because humans do so, they are fools, how can fools know the truth?
Gays more threat than rainforest destruction:
A lot of people like to think of themselves as quite selfless not realizing that what they say expose them as self centred.
Recently the pope raised the ire of gays when he said gays are as much a threat to civilization as the destruction of rainforest.
From the earth’s view, gays are no threat at all but the destruction of rainforests is definitely serious.
Thus the pope is showing no concern for the earth and it is there only to support mankind. Civilization includes him and you and because he is addressing a human population he may be pandering to the audience again in putting them, humans first.
The reason why rainforests is a threat to many people is because it threatens to trigger calamitous changes that are a threat to their survival and so they may think they are concerned about the earth but they are concerned with their wellbeing here.
Madoff responsible for suicide:
Whilst Madoff is not completely responsible for this swindled imvestor’s suicide the suffering due him for his part is far worse than he and you imagine. Madoff’s has a lot of blood and suffering on his hands even if the people he swindled are not innocent themselves and there is horrendous prolonged suffering due Madoff for his part in this scam.
Madoff investor commits suicide
A French investment manager who put $1.4bn (£1bn) into Bernard Madoff's fraud-hit scheme has killed himself in his New York office, police said.
Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, 65, was found sitting at his desk with both wrists slashed, New York police spokesman Paul Browne said.
A bottle of pills was found near him, but there was no suicide note.
Mr Madoff is accused of running a $50bn (£34bn) Ponzi scheme that wiped out investors around the world.
Big funds like Mr Villehuchet's were especially hard hit.
Paris newspaper La Tribune said he spent the past week trying "day and night to find a way to recoup his investors' money".
Mr Villehuchet, who was married without children, was co-founder of money manager Access International.
Legal case
Mr Madoff's fraud has ensnared Wall Street investors and charities around the world, although the full extent of the losses is as yet unknown.
He is under house arrest in his Manhattan apartment, and his assets have been frozen.
Another investor who gave Mr Madoff $2m (£1.35m) to manage has taken legal action against US financial regulators.
Phyllis Molchatsky, a 61-year-old retiree from New York, is seeking $1.7m in damages from the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
It is believed to be the first attempt by an investor to recover losses from the SEC.
Honest priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
Truth never ruins anything but it is falsity that ruins. To say truth ruins Christmas for kids is to imply that sometimes it is better to keep up with pretense and that is false.
To believe and imagine Santa exists when he does not is suffering, flirting with mad perception that will be fulfilled. Just because you know Santa is a myth does not mean you cannot ‘enjoy’ it as when you falsely thought he existed.
When you speak of ruining you are speaking of children becoming disappointed, disliking and sad as a result of the news and this is all about emotion or stirring of mental force that is not only meaningless but suffering by stressing the mind.
Make belief is always suffering. It is impossible the children see and know Father Christmas exists but they force themselves to believe or imagine he exists and that is fabrication and cultivating falsity or fantasy that is training them in false perception that will end in mad perception.
Thus anyone who says honest priest has ruined children’s Christmas has wrong view that is the way to hell or the animal womb, truth never hurt anybody and it is a person’s falsity or pretense that is maintained by force that is hurt by truth.
By David Willey |
Dozens of parents complained after the priest let out the Santa secret |
A Catholic priest has been criticised by parents in a city in northern Italy for telling their children that Father Christmas does not really exist.
Father Dino Bottino, the parish priest of the Sacred Heart Catholic Church in Novara, let out the secret at a children's mass earlier this month.
A local paper published complaints from dozens of parents. "You've ruined my children's Christmas," said one mother.
But an unrepentant Fr Bottino called it his duty to set the record straight.
"I told the children that Father Christmas was an invention that had nothing to do with the Christian Christmas story," he said.
"And I would repeat it again, if I had the chance," he added.
But Father Dino could not have imagined the scorn that would be heaped upon him after he told children at mass that neither Father Christmas - nor the kindly witch called the Befana who provides presents at New Year to Italian children - really exist.
The priest said he had never intended to hurt anyone, but it was his duty to distinguish the reality of Jesus from the story of Father Christmas which was a fable just like Cinderella or Snow White.
Why the pope speaks falsely:
Unless you see and know that gays are as much a threat to civilization as rainforest destruction you should not speak so not only because it is speaking carelessly with judgment due but it is conditioning yourself to perceive as true what you did not see and know that will end in mad perception.
Homosexuality has existed not just in humans but animals and throughout civilization and it is not a cause of destruction to civilization, sexual debauchery that is not necessarily homosexual can bring about decay but heterosexuals are just as bad as homosexuals in their actions.
How many of the top bankers and company CEOs that are responsible for the financial mess that threaten social instability homosexuals? Is Hitler, Stalin, Mao, corrupt leaders like Mugabe overtly homosexual? Heterosexuals are just as bad in their evil and criminal deeds that threaten civilizations and just because a person is heterosexual do not mean he is clean or morally upright.
The Buddha said that one should refrain from all sexual activity and it is an obstacle to brahma faring or the heavenly realms and so per se heterosexuality too is not wholesome.
Exiting gracefully:
There is no such thing as exiting gracefully and if you perceive there is you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
A certain faction in MCA has called for Dr Chua who is tainted by a sexual scandal to exit gracefully.
When you want someone to exit gracefully you want them to exit ‘with dignity’ or pride or with a smile or as if happy or grateful. This is false and hypocritical. If Dr Chua is tainted and you disliked him you cannot mean for him to exit graceful but the truth is you want him to exit in shame.
A person who lets his yes be yes only (as Jesus exhorted) says ‘exit’ anything more, ‘gracefully’ is false, hypocritical and comes from evil.
Exit gracefully is always hypocritical:
If a person desires to exit he would have done so without your prompting and so you are asking a person to go against his natural intention to exit.
If you are pleased with what he is doing you would not ask him to exit and so it is that you must be displeased or disliked with what he is doing that you ask him to exit.
If you are displeased and you ask him to exit gracefully, you are being hypocritically polite, never genuinely polite and you want the person to do something (exit) against his wish with grace or composure or liking or happiness and that is asking for the person to pretend or generate conflict in himself with karmic debt for you.
Thus you just call for someone’s exit, you are a hypocrite who will yourself be punished by hypocritically asking another to ‘swallow his pride’, pretend and exit ‘gracefully’.
It is objective never subjective:
It is never because I say that ‘exiting gracefully’ is false and hypocritical, wanting others to do the impossible, exit on your demand and also do it gracefully or ‘charmingly’ that it is so and you or anyone can refute it or say it is a worthless truth or semantics.
Because it is objective, if what I say is true then to speak of graceful exit is sinful and false, with demerit not merit as foolish ordinary people even insist (they think they are praiseworthy asking others in such a civilized way, ‘exit gracefully’). How many if any ordinary person is able to discern what I said is true.
They get emotional when they ask others to exit gracefully, they become agitated if others ask them to exit gracefully but they do not see and understand they are emotionally disturbed because what is said is false or hypocritical, never meritorious as they are brainwashed to perceive but sinful or evil.
THUS IF YOU SAY YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR, WHY DID YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS WICKED TO ASK SOMEONE TO EXIT GRACEFULLY? PERHAPS YOU HEAR BUT DO NOT HEAR, YOU DO NOT GENUINELY UNDERSTAND BUT YOU UNDERSTAND BY ROTE OR PROGRAMMED COMPUTER LOGIC.
No comments:
Post a Comment