The Buddha Discovered The Big Bang

The Buddha discovered the Big Bang:

Modern cosmology postulates from various evidences like an expanding universe that in the beginning there was no matter, time and space but from an inconstruable or indefinable moment, there was an explosion that created the universe that we see today. In the infinitesimal fractions of the first second, the universe expanded prodigiously separating energy from matter and time was born. By calculation the universe we know is about 15 billion years old. It is postulated that there may be many parallel universes. Again there is conjecture that the universe may reverse the Big Bang and have a Big Crunch where everything will contract back together.

All this fits with what the Buddha spoke of much earlier that is lost on mankind.

He said: Whenever the aeon was contracting, I went to the realm of Streaming Radiance. Whenever the aeon was expanding, I reappeared in an empty Brahma-abode. There I was the Great Brahman, the Unconquered Conqueror, All-seeing, & Wielder of Power.

What the Buddha is saying is that this world is not permanent, it is made up of separate world cycles or eons or Ages as Jesus described and there are periods of expansion and contraction that may correspond to what science postulates as the Big Bang and Big Crunch. Jesus said at the close of the Age to sun will refuse to shine, the stars will fall from the sky and time will be speeded up for the sake of the chosen ones.

Assu Sutta:Tears

The Blessed One said: "From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on.

What do you think, monks: Which is greater, the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, separated from what is pleasing -- or the water in the four great oceans?"

"As we understand the Dhamma, this is the greater: the tears we have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- not the water in the four great oceans."

"Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father... a brother... a sister... a son... a daughter...a relatives... wealth... disease. The tears you have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing -- are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

" Long have you thus experienced stress, pain, loss, swelling the cemeteries -- enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released."

This inconstruable moment that the Buddha described above again may correspond to scientific postulation of the Big Bang, suddenly ‘out of nowhere’ there was a big bang and prodigious expansion of time and space.

The Buddha said that an eon is a very long time, enough for you to build a pile of skeletons as high as a mountain transmigrating and science has ascertained that the universe is at least 12 billion years old.

NO OTHER HUMAN SEER HAS DESCRIBED COSMOLOGY AS CLEARLY AND ACCURATELY AS VERIFIED BY SCIENCE AS THE BUDDHA HAS. THE BUDDHA MAY BE LUCKY OR IT MAY BE AS HE SAID THAT HE IS ALL SEEING AND ALL KNOWING AND HAS GONE BEYOND ALL EXISTENCE TO FINAL INCOMPARABLE REST, NIRVANA.

The four great oceans:

The Buddha: "Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father... a brother... a sister... a son... a daughter...a relatives... wealth... disease. The tears you have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing -- are greater than the water in the four great oceans.

The Buddha lived in landlocked Northern India/Nepal so how did he know there were oceans let alone four great oceans as there are?

There are only four great oceans, the Antarctic is not a true ocean because it is made of the tail ends of the Indian, Pacific and Atlantic oceans and the fourth ocean is the Arctic ocean. All the oceans are defined by the land masses or continents that enclose them.

All madness can be traced to rehashing:

Whatever the madness that afflict humans may be are the results of rehashing, are impossible without the person being a rehasher or robot reproducing the substance and style of whatever he perceives, thinks, speaks and does from a copy in his mental jukebox.

My definition of madness: Madness is the uncontrollable inappropriate or bizarre rehash of whatever behaviour the person has repeated performed and for which a record exists in his mind or mental jukebox driven by urge which is a proxy of mental force to do it.

WITHOUT AN INDEPENDENT PLAN OF THE MAD ACT OR SPEECH OR PERCEPTION AND MENTAL FORCE TO ACTIVATE THAT PLAN, THERE CANNOT BE MADNESS. THUS ANYONE WHO REHASHES RATHER THAN COMPOSE SPEECH AND ACTIONS FRESH SPECIFIC FOR EACH OCCASION HAS AN APPOINTMENT WITH INSANITY IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHO DOES NOT REHASH OR POSSESS STRONG MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME MAD. GENUINE REASON WHICH IS DEFICIENT EVEN ABSENT IN HUMANS HERE CAN NEVER MAKE YOU MAD, A PERSON WITH GENUINE REASON WHO SEES TRUTH AS TRUTH AND FALSITY AS FALSITY CANNOT GO MAD. IT IS PEOPLE WHO FORCE THEMSELVES TO ACCEPT FALSE AS TRUE AND TRUE AS FALSE IN THE NAME OF UNRIGHTEOUS GAINS THAT CAN AND WILL GO MAD.

Thus when a gunman goes amok and runs around shooting everyone he sees, it is not the first time he has done it, he has entertained the thought of going around shooting everyone on sight many times even with great emotion and force and he may even have enacted his fantasy many times by wearing his attire (eg black leather clothes), pointing and firing his gun privately either at dummies or without loading. Because he has frequently entertained the plan of going around to shoot everyone because of paranoia or being victimized by others, he is seized by this plan that becomes so compelling because of the intense mental force he has invested in it that in time he is seized to carry out beyond his ability to control.

WHATEVER THAT IS CARRIED OUT IN A MAD ACT IS NEVER FRESH BUT A REHASH OF WHAT THE PERSON HAS DONE MANY TIMES BEFORE EITHER IN HIS MIND OR PHYSICALLY SO THAT HE BECOMES A ROBOT OF THE PLAN THAT IS DICTATING TO HIM WHAT TO DO AND THIS PLAN HAS AUTOMISM TO ACTIVATE ITSELF THAT BECOMES INCREASINGLY HARD TO RESIST AND WHEN RESISTANCE IS FINALLY BROKEN, THE PERSON IS SEIZED TO CARRY OUT WHAT HIS MENTAL PLAN COMMANDS EVEN WHEN IT IS INAPPROPRIATE.

THUS IF YOU ARE A REHASHER, NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY DENY OR BE UNABLE TO SEE (THOSE WHO DISCERN CAN SEE A REHASHER WITHOUT FAIL), YOU HAVE AN APPOINTMENT WITH INSANITY BECAUSE YOU ARE A ROBOT AND IT IS THE MANY PLANS IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX THAT IS THE BOSS.

Ferguson: Defeat has made us stronger

What he is saying is controlled insanity that what is bad is good.

The purpose of saying that, which is totally unnecessary, is to thumb the nose of his adversaries who are gloating at his team losses and hoping that Manchester United will be shaken to lose further and fail in its championship quest.

WHAT HE SAID IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, IT IS TO BE DEFIANT. WHAT HE AND OTHERS DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT IT IS CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO DENY AND TO SAY WHAT IS BAD IS GOOD THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.

Hamilton: I am not a liar

That is a false statement even if it is true Hamilton did not deliberately lie to gain points but he was misled by his manager as claimed.

It is impossible that a person like him does not lie and so his statement that he is not a liar is false. Only if he never told a lie is what he said that he is not a liar true and because what he said is not true, whether he is aware or not, he is lying when he said he is not a liar.

UNLESS HE NEVER TOLD A LIE IN HIS LIFE, HAMILTON IS SPEAKING FALSELY OR LYING WHEN HE SAYS HE IS NOT A LIAR AND SO EVEN IF HE DID NOT LIE TO GAIN POINTS, HE WAS MISLED BY HIS MANAGER AS CLAIMED, HE IS LYING IN SAYING FALSELY HE IS NOT A LIAR.

Mr Hypocrite:

All these revelations do not surprise me because I know beneath his urbane slick manner he is a nasty person.

What he does not realize is that he is headed for final uncontrollable intense rage and that is insanity and afterwards he is headed for eternal perdition not heaven.

Whether you are genuine or a hypocrite can be seen and known by those who are discerning and in the end you will pay the very painful price of deceit, namely insanity and even an eternity of weeping and gnashing your teeth.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's short fuse trigger exodus of personal staff

PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd's short fuse and unreasonable demands have triggered an exodus of personal staff and a backlash from public servants.

His staff turnover is about to reach 16, or one a month since winning office, with the latest casualty being $78,000-a-year ex-butler John Fisher, dubbed "Jeeves" by the Opposition, The Daily Telegraph reports.

"Jeeves" will join a range of advisers, secretaries and assistants to leave the turbulent PM's office.

Mr Rudd's bully-boy style has come under close scrutiny after it was revealed he had reduced a young RAAF cabin attendant to tears during a VIP flight when she was unable to produce the right meal.

Labor staffers - even those who have left the PM's office - are reluctant to speak out about their boss.

Keven, people around the world are admiring you. However look after your own staff or they wont look after you. Golden rule there.

(Read More)

Keithette of Sydney

But some are privately critical of Mr Rudd's management style.

"He never gives positive feedback and gets angry very easily," said one.

A former senior Rudd staffer described his old boss as intolerant and socially dysfunctional.

He said Mr Rudd was unable to deal with situations such as catering and usually left those matters for others to handle.

Senior public servants have also become frustrated at the unrelenting demands of the workaholic PM, who thinks nothing of calling them at night.

Mr Fisher, whose role as butler caused embarrassment to the PM, is expected to leave after Easter. He has moved on from his role as travelling assistant, where his job was to lay out Mr Rudd's suits.

Other staff to recently depart include Virginia Dale, a long-term Labor adviser, and Gary Quinlan, who will soon become our new ambassador to the UN.

Mr Rudd's spin doctor Lachlan Harris also has been criticised from Labor MPs who say they've received sprays.

Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull turned up the heat after revelations Mr Harris had tried to cover up the jet incident.

"You get the feeling with the Rudd Government that they only tell you the truth when they've been found out," he said.

 

Enjoy Life?

I received an Email from a regular recipient of my Emails titled “Enjoy Life” with numerous cartoons intended to be humorous and verses or dictums that is intended to preach or moralize.

If the person did not find it meritorious or for the benefit of others he would not have sent it and the fact that he is conveying reflects his delusion because far from good it creates bad karma for him and those who share his philosophy or view of things.

It is impossible to meaningfully tell someone to enjoy life anymore than you can meaningfully tell someone not to worry because nobody is a master of his worry but he is the suffering helpless slave to worry and so the advice ‘not to worry’ is a nicety that nice people indulge in thinking they have done good when it is bad because the person cannot stop worrying just because you say so and it even creates conflict in him that he cannot stop worry as you advised. In the same way, you cannot meaningfully tell someone to enjoy life, it is his sins that is the cause of his suffering here, nobody in this world truly enjoys himself (all the smiling and laughter you see are wickedly faked enjoyment, NEVER genuine) because everyone here is bombarded by force from others and created by himself, it is impossible for emotional stylish people who constant use force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness to enjoy themselves because they are creating insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that renders true happiness an impossibility no matter how rich or endowed with sensate pleasures they are.

Further, what is meant by enjoying yourself here is to stir your mental force to be attracted or attached to life here and that is never what the Buddha or Jesus preached. Jesus said you should deny (not enjoy) yourself, carry your cross of persecution by those who enjoy themselves here and go with him. The Buddha said you should be alert, on guard all the time and see danger in the slightest fault and that is never enjoying life except in your perverted perception.

You may not realize what this enjoy life that you recommend but it may be a stirring of your mental force to be attracted or like things here and if that is the case and the stirring of force harms and slowly destroys your mind, you are advocating harm not good with karma not merit due to you.

‘ENJOY LIFE’ IS AN ORDER OR INSTRUCTION AND YOU ARE TRYING TO PROGRAM OTHERS ROBOTICALLY BE AWARE AND CONSCIOUSLY ‘ENJOY LIFE’ WHERE PREVIOUSLY THEY MAY NOT ENTERTAIN THAT THOUGHT OR INSTRUCTION. IF HE WERE TO REMEMBER AND FOLLOW YOUR ADVICE HE WILL BECOME A ROBOT CARRYING OUT THE PROGRAM OR INSTRUCTION, ‘ENJOY LIFE’ AND RATHER THAN A PLEASURE, IT IS TORMENTING BEING A ROBOT OBEYING RULES THAT INCLUDE ‘ENJOY LIFE’

IT REFLECTS THAT THIS PERSON AND MANY OTHERS WHO RECEIVE MY MESSAGES DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN AND SO IT IS THAT IF YOU AND HE THINKS HE UNDERSTANDS, WHY DID HE NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN SO AS NOT TO RECOMMEND SUCH MESSAGES TO OTHERS?

Are you free? Let’s have a cup of tea:

Being free is not a reason to have a drink but the only reason for drinking is if you are thirsty. People oblige (please) others, or for want of something to do, suggest a drink or snack but unless you want to go mad, you should only drink or eat when there is a need, you are hungry or thirsty.

Because you force yourself to drink or eat to please others, you develop an urge to eat or drink without true reason and that is the path to mad eating and drinking, an urge to eat or drink just because of an urge, not need.

People in this world are so used to eating or drinking not for need but to please or oblige others or as a distraction because they are idle and restless and need something (eat or drink coffee) to occupy them or because they are stressed, not realizing they are practicing controlled madness that will end in madness.

If you have nothing to say or do, you remain silent or inactive, not find something to say or do to break the ‘uncomfortable’ silence. If you find something to say or do not because it is meaningful but to break the uncomfortable silence, you are headed for madness because it is forced and what is forced has an urge to activate that becomes increasingly intense with repetition.

PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DRINK FOR ALL SORTS OF REASONS LIKE TO OBLIGE OR ENTERTAIN OTHERS, FOR FUN, ETC BUT UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO MAD, THE ONLY TRUE REASON FOR DRINKING IS IF YOU ARE THIRSTY, YOUR BODY LACKS WATER. IF YOU ARE NOT THIRSTY, YOU ARE MERELY FORCING YOURSELF TO DRINK EG TO PLEASE OTHERS AND WHAT IS FORCED IS CONDITIONING AND ADDICTIVE AND WILL END IN MAD URGE TO DRINK. THUS YOU SHOULD NOT DRINK JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE FREE.

Wow! Leaves fall: There is nothing amazing or un-amazing about leaves falling. ‘Wow!’ is meaningless, indicates a mad stirring of mental force to like something.

IF YOU GENUINELY WONDER AT THE SIGHT OF LEAVES FALLING IT MEANS YOU MUST BE LOST IN A PRIVATE WORLD ALL THIS WHILE, SEEING BUT NOT SEEING, IF YOUR WONDER IS NOT GENUINE THEN IT IS FOR SHOW AND YOU ARE LYING. WHAT IS THERE TO WOW ABOUT FALLING LEAVES AND OF WHAT USE IS STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE IN ATTRACTION THAT HARMS IT TO BE WOWED?

Happiness is in your tail:

Quote: One day, the young lion asked his mom: "Mom, where is the happiness?"
Mom replied: "It's on your tail."
So the young lion keeps on chasing after his tail. But after a whole day of trying, he failed to get the happiness that was on his tail.
Then he told his mom about this, his mom smiled and said: "Son, you don't really need to chase after your happiness, as long as you keep going and moving forward, your happiness will always be with you."
Wish everyone of you find your happiness.

There is deception that is sin in the story. People in this world enjoy deceiving and tricking others and the structure of this story is to deceive, you think he is talking about something (the happiness is in your tail) but he is talking about something else. He actually wants you to think you are talking about his tail, that happiness is in your tail but he is talking about something else, about not chasing after your tail.

IT IS FALSE OR MISLEADDING TO TELL SOMEONE YOUR HAPPINESS IS ON YOUR TAIL WHEN YOU MEAN YOUR WOE IS IN CONSTANTLY CHASING AROUND YOUR TAIL THAT KEEPS MOVING BEYOND YOUR REACH AND THAT IS DECEPTION AND THIS DECEPTIVE PERSON CANNOT HIMSELF BE HAPPY AND SO HE HAS NO RIGHT TO PREACH OR MORALIZE TO OTHERS.

For every meal you have you should think it is not easy to get. Do appreciate blessing.

A PERSON WHO HAS NO INTEREST IN FOOD, WHOSE INTAKE OF FOOD IS AS THE BUDDHA TAUGHT TO SUSTAIN HIS LIFE HERE, NOT FOR PLEASURE OR GREED, HAS NOT NEED OF ANYONE TO TELL TO COUNT HIS BLESSINGS.

 FOR A PERSON WHO HAS INTEREST IN FOOD, WHOSE INTAKE IS FOR PLEASURE AND GREED, IT IS NO USE TO TELL HIM TO COUNT HIS BLESSING OR FOOD IS NOT EASY TO GET, HE IS LIKELY TO PAY LIP SERVICE AND SO YOUR ADVICE THAT YOU THINK IS GOOD IS NICE AND MEANINGLESS.

This is rule or precept bound or programmed instructions and anyone who obeys becomes a robot of this command. You can follow what is said faithfully with every meal you take and it does not make you a better man but a mechanical robot mentally counting his blessings meaningless.

If you are interested in food, greedy or lusting for food, no matter how many times you tell yourself to count your blessings, it is lip service. A person who has risen above, who is no longer interested in food and for which food is as the Buddha taught, not for pleasure but just to sustain your life here does not take anything or food for granted, he neither appreciates nor is disrespectful about food.

A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS WHAT I HAVE SAID ALL ALONG WILL NOT APPRECIATE SUCH MESSAGES AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IT REFLECTS THAT MANY EVEN THOSE WHO ARE WELL EDUCATED AND HAVE ASPIRATIONS OF BEING GOOD DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY NOR DO THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE TRUE BUDDHA AND JESUS TAUGHT. IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEN YOU MUST SUFFER AND HEAD FOR MORE SUFFERING.

Why is it didactic or robotic?

Quote: For every meal you have you should think it is not easy to get. Do appreciate blessing.

Do you understand the meaning of what is said?

He said that for every meal, or every time you eat you should remind yourself it is not easy to get. That means you must do it every time like a ritual or lip service.

The Buddha’s advice is very different, he said you should not eat for adornment but you should eat to sustain your life here. A person who listens to the Buddha and understands no longer eats for adornment but just to sustain, he does not remind himself every time he eats that food is not easy to get.

THE BUDDHA’S ADVICE IS NOT RITUALISTIC WHILST THE ADVICE QUOTED IS RITUALISTIC OR DIDACTIC, HE WANTS YOU TO THINK SO EVERY TIME YOU EAT.

In times of plenty, food can be or is easy to get and it is not because food is not easy to get that you should appreciate your blessing. There is no need to fabricate to count your blessing but you should always eat respectfully just to keep your life going.

FOOD CAN OFTEN BE EASY TO GET AND SO IT IS FALSE AND MAD TO REMIND YOURSELF INDISCRIMINATELY THAT FOOD IS NOT EASY TO GET. FOOD CAN BE NOT EASY TO GET BUT IT IS OFTEN EASY TO GET AND IT IS NOT BECAUSE OF THIS THAT YOU SHOULD COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS.

It is mad and you perceive it as good advice:

Why should anyone remind himself every time he eats that food is hard to get? Food is often easy to get so why should he falsely remind himself it is hard to get?

What has food being hard to get got to do with restraint in eating, can you not restrain yourself in eating if food is easy to get? If it is possible for a person to exercise restraint in eating even if food is easy to get, it means whether food is easy or hard to get is not related to restraint.

‘FOOD IS HARD TO GET’ IS A FALSE REASON FOR RESTRAINT IN EATING. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RESTRAINT IN EATING. SEEING UNRESTRAINT EATING AS AN ADDICTION THAT HARMS THE BODY & MIND AND DETAINS ONE IN THIS WORLD, SEEING GREEDY EATING AS A FORM OF SENSUALITY THAT MUST BE RELINQUISHED IN ORDER TO ESCAPE FROM THIS WORLD IS A TRUE REASON FOR RESTRAINT.

IF YOU PERCEIVE ‘FOOD IS HARD TO GET’ IS A TRUE REASON FOR RESTRAINT IN EATING THEN SURELY WHEN FOOD IS EASY TO GET, THERE IS NO NEED FOR RESTRAINT.

Is this what you call playing fair?

Apparently all three by elections will take place on a working day Tuesday instead of a more reasonable weekend.

The reason is likely because the BN want to discourage voters turning out so that they can vote for those who did not turn up.

Again it was unfair for RTM to show footage of a youthful Anwar as deputy PM defending the government and accusing him of double talk now. RTM should refrain from broadcasting rehashes that are negative for one side whilst not broadcasting negative items for the ruling party and whoever is responsible has deadly karma due.

What is the motive?

What is the motive for releasing the ISA detainees?

Is it because the government believes it is morally wrong to detain them or is it to bribe voters bearing in mind three looming by-elections or to score points politically?

EXACTLY WHAT THE MOTIVES ARE BEHIND THE ISA RELEASES MAY BE KNOWN, IF THEY ARE RELEASED TO SCORE POINTS, TO SWING THE BYELECTIONS THEN THESE ARE FALSE AND MAD REASONS FOR THE RELEASES AND THOSE WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE WILL GO MAD. ONLY IF YOU RELEASE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE WRONGLY DETAINED WILL IT BE TRUE AND YOU WON’T GO MAD.

AS THE BUDDHA SAID, INTENTION IS KARMA. YOUR INTENTION IN RELEASING THE DETAINEES IS YOUR KARMA.

It is impossible for anyone to truly enjoy his life here:

I say it is impossible for anyone to enjoy his life here because his constant use of force to fabricate style (stretched syllables, speed and loudness changes) that necessitates a woeful robotic existence creates incessant insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction apart from agitation (confusion), hurt and sadness that must be contained, mandates that he must suffer even suffer to levels that threaten homicide and suicide and if it is impossible for anyone to enjoy his life as it is not just possible but certain a being will enjoy his life in heaven, you are deluded in advising others to ‘enjoy life’.

IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE, NO MATTER HOW RICH, FAMOUS AND ENDOWED WITH SENSATE PLEASURES TO ENJOY HIS LIFE HERE AND YOU THINK IT IS POSSIBLE AND YOU WANT OTHERS TO ‘ENJOY LIFE’ AREN’T YOU A FOOL WHO IS TALKING NONSENSE.

ALL THE ENJOYMENT YOU SEE HERE IS FAKED ENJOYMENT THAT WICKEDLY DECEIVES OTHERS THAT THE PERSON IS ENJOYING LIFE WHILST YOU ARE SUFFERING. THE LAUGHTER AND SMILES LEAD TO SUFFERING AND INSANITY, SO HOW CAN THEY BE EXPRESSIONS OF HAPPINESS?

Did the Buddha say this?

Did the Buddha say that you should show restraint in eating because food is hard to get? What he said is that you should show restraint in eating or train yourself to eat in moderation, one meal a day and not eat at night.

Did Jesus say, do not go after food that perishes because it is hard to get or did he say do not go after food that perishes, regardless of whether it is easy or hard to get?

You can argue perversely that because food is hard to get, you should grab whatever that comes along and eat as much as you can whilst it is still easy to get.

Thus the person is right in advocating moderation but he is right for the wrong reason that food is hard to get and for one who understands, being right for the wrong reason is still wrong just as the government is right in releasing the ISA detainees for the wrong reason, to bribe voters to vote BN in coming elections.

JUST AS THE BN IS RIGHT TO RELEASE ISA DETAINEES FOR THE WRONG REASON, TO INFLUENCE VOTERS IN THE COMING ELECTION, A PERSON WHO RESTRAINS IN EATING IS DOING THE RIGHT THING (THAT IS IF ANYONE ACTUALLY FOLLOWS WHAT IS SAID) FOR THE WRONG REASON THAT FOOD IS HARD TO GET.

ALWAYS YOU MUST EXERCISE RESTRAINT IN EATING, EAT ONE MEAL A DAY, NOT EAT AT NIGHT IF YOU WANT TO PRACTICE RIGHTLY AND ESCAPE FROM THIS EARTH THAT IS NOT A PARADISE BUT A MIRE OF TORMENT ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.

Is it not silly?

Don’t you think it is silly that every time you eat you should think ‘food is hard to get’ as he tells you to do?

Don’t you think it is rather tiresome and mechanical even maddening to think that each time you eat and if that is so, is it not such advice ridiculous, impractical rather than wise?

IF YOU DON’T WANT OTHERS TO THINK FOOD IS HARD TO GET EACH TIME HE EATS, WHY DO YOU SAY SO? IF YOU HAVE NO INTENTION THAT OTHERS SHOULD THINK FOOD IS HARD TO GET EACH TIME THEY EAT, WHY DO YOU SAY IT?

Do you know this?

The Buddha may be wrong or he may be referring to others, not you (who thinks he is consummate in view) but he said that ordinary people have suffering due to them that is far greater than a huge pond full of water 150 miles deep compared to a few drops that remain in those who are consummate in view and even that few drops is up to 7 more lives of suffering not pleasure.

Pokkharani Sutta: The Pond

"Suppose, monks, that there was a huge (he did not specify how huge) pond fifty leagues deep (1 league is 3 miles), filled to overflowing with water. Which would be greater: the water drawn out with the tip of the blade of grass or the water in the pond?"

"The water in the pond would be far greater, lord."

"In the same way, monks, for a noble disciple who is consummate in view, an individual who has broken through [to stream-entry], the suffering & stress that is totally ended is far greater. That which remains in the state of having at most seven remaining lifetimes is next to nothing: it's not a hundredth, a thousandth, a one hundred-thousandth, when compared with the previous mass of suffering. "

IF WHAT THE BUDDHA SAYS IS TRUE YOU HAVE SUFFERING THAT IS LIKE AN OCEAN, YOU HAVE SHED YOUR BLOOD GREATER THAN THE FOUR GREAT OCEANS FROM HAVING YOUR OWN HEAD CUT IN MANY PAST LIVES, SO HOW CAN YOU, AS SUCH A MAN, TRULY ENJOY HIMSELF, FIND LIFE HERE ENJOYABLE?

If existence especially in the lower realms is essentially if not totally false or meaningless, even the sensate pleasures are in truth suffering (the Buddha said what ordinary people call happiness that the noble ones have found is suffering), how can anyone enjoy his life here?

How can a world that is a mirage, empty and suffering be a source of happiness?

 

Phena Sutta: Foam

"Monks, suppose that a large glob of foam were floating down this Ganges River, and a man with good eyesight were to see it. To him it would appear without substance. In the same way, a monk appropriately examines any form that is past, future, or present; internal or external. To him it would appear empty, without substance.

"Now suppose that in the autumn -- when it's raining heavy drops -- a bubble appears & disappears on the water, and a man were to see it. To him -- seeing it it would appear empty. In the same way, a monk sees, examines any feeling that is past, future, or present. To him it would appear empty, void.

"Now suppose in the hot season a mirage were shimmering, and a man were to see it. To him it would appear empty. In the same way, a monk appropriately examines any perception. To him it would appear empty.

"Now suppose that a man desiring heartwood, would see a large banana tree: having chopped off the top, he would peel away the outer skin. Peeling away the outer skin, he wouldn't even find sapwood what more heartwood. Then a man would appropriately examine it. To him it would appear empty. In the same way, a monk sees any fabrications. To him they would appear empty.

"In the same way, a monk sees any consciousness. To him appropriately examining it -- it would appear empty.

"Seeing thus, the noble disciple grows disenchanted with form, feeling, perception, fabrications, consciousness. Disenchanted, he grows dispassionate. Through dispassion, he's released. With release there's the knowledge, 'Released.'

the Teacher, said further:

Form is like a glob of foam;
feeling, a bubble; perception, a mirage;
fabrications, a banana tree;
consciousness, a magic trick --
this has been taught by the Kinsman of the Sun.
However you observe them, appropriately examine them, they're empty, void to whoever sees them
appropriately.

Beginning with the body as taught by the One
with profound discernment:
when abandoned by three things
-- life, warmth & consciousness --
form is rejected, cast aside.
When bereft of these it lies thrown away,
senseless, a meal for others.
That's the way it goes:
it's a magic trick, an idiot's babbling.
It's said to be a murderer.
No substance here is found.

Thus a monk, persistence aroused,
should view the aggregates
by day & by night, mindful, alert;
should discard all fetters;
should make himself his own refuge;
should live as if his head were on fire --
in hopes of the state with no falling away.

Mariana Trench Only 11 km deep:

The Mariana Trench is the deepest part of the earth’s oceans and it is only 11 km deep.

One league is 5 km and so the 50 league pond the Buddha spoke of is 250 km deep, far deeper than the deepest part of the earth’s oceans.

THE HUGE POND THE BUDDHA DESCRIBED IS 250 KM DEEP COMPARED TO THE 11 KM THAT IS THE MARIANA TRENCH, THE DEEPEST PART OF THE OCEAN.

JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY AND MEN SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE CARELESSNESS OF WHAT THEY SAY. EVEN THE MAN WHO CALLS HIS BROTHER ‘YOU FOOL’ IS IN DANGER OF THE FIRE OF HELL.

THE BUDDHA SAID YOU SHOULD LIVE AS IF YOUR HEAD IS ON FIRE, SO HOW CAN YOU ENJOY YOURSELF WITH YOUR HEAD ON FIRE?

Why you must think every time:

The fact that it is said, ‘Every time you eat, you should think food is hard to get’ is an unwitting acknowledgement that ordinary people are robots who only respond to programming.

Thus each time you think, “Food is hard to get” when you eat, you are programming or indoctrinating yourself to the doctrine or instruction or command, “food is hard to get” until after many cycles of indoctrination it sticks or you are finally successfully programmed to the new program “food is hard to get”.

IF YOU ARE TRULY AN UNDERSTANDING PERSON, IT SUFFICES TO SAY OR BE AWARE ONCE THAT FOOD IS HARD TO GET AND BEING UNDERSTOOD, THERE IS NO NEED TO TELL YOURSELF EVERY TIME YOU EAT THAT FOOD IS HARD TO GET. ON THE OTHER HAND IF YOU ARE A ROBOT WHO NEEDS TO BE PROGRAMMED THEN YOU HAVE TO REMIND YOURSELF OR THINK EACH TIME YOU EAT THAT ‘FOOD IS HARD TO GET’ UNTIL YOU ARE SUCCESSFUL PROGRAMMED OR INDOCTRINATED TO BEHAVE MECHANICALLY AS DESIRED.

Earthquake town was warned:

Apparently radon, a rare gas is released by earth pressure changes and its rise presages an earthquake.

Italian scientists detect such changes recently and they even went round town with loud hailers telling people to evacuate but they were charged by the mayor for scare mongering.

SO IT IS THAT MOST HUMANS ARE HEEDLESS AND DO NOT LIKE TO BE TOLD, ONLY WHEN THE AXE FALLS ON THEIR HEADS WILL THEY REALIZE TOO LATE THEY ARE FOOLS, NOT THE SMART ALECS THEY THINK THEY ARE.

Paper money: Such a statement is deliberately intended to deceive because it will fool readers to think you are discussing something else when the topic is about money in the newspaper business.

The wonderful singers of Sungai Chua is another deliberately deceptive headline. You think he is talking about human singers but he is talking about the singing merboks or birds.

THE PERSONS INVOLVED MAY NOT BE EVEN AWARE THEY ARE PERPETRATING FALSITIES OR BEING DECEPTIVE, THEY THINK IT IS FUNNY OR FUN OR PLEASURABLE, CUTE OR THEY ARE WITTY AND IMPRESSIVE NOT REALIZING THEY HAVE SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION, IT IS WICKED AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR SUFFERING THAT MAY STRETCH FOR EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY.

TO DECEIVE OTHERS IS EVIL ENOUGH. TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS DECEPTIVE IS FUN, CUTE AND IMPRESSIVE COMPOUNDS YOUR PUNISHMENT.

What the Buddha says about enjoying yourself:

If you perceive the man balancing a pot brimful of oil through a milling excited crowd whose head would be immediately cut off by a man following with a sword if he spilt one drop, as enjoying himself then you should think nothing about enjoying yourself.

If you think what Jesus spoke of denying yourself is enjoying yourself then you should go ahead and enjoy yourself.

The Buddha called the Devil kinsman of the heedless, and so if you are heedless, you would like to enjoy yourself then the Buddha is not your kinsman but according to the Buddha, the devil is your kinsman.

Sedaka Sutta : At Sedaka
(2: The Beauty Queen)

And suppose that the beauty queen is highly accomplished at singing & dancing, so that an even greater crowd comes thronging, saying, 'The beauty queen is singing! 'Then a man comes along, desiring life & desiring pleasure. They say to him, ' You must take this bowl filled to the brim with oil and carry it on your head in between the great crowd & the beauty queen. A man with a raised sword will follow, and if you spill even a drop, right there will he cut off your head.' Now what do you think, monks: Will that man, not paying attention to the bowl of oil, let himself get distracted outside?"

"No, lord."

"The bowl filled to the brim with oil stands for mindfulness immersed in the body. Thus you should train yourselves: 'We will develop mindfulness immersed in the body. We will pursue it, and undertake it well.' "

Nirvana is the only state of no falling away:

The Buddha spoke of Nirvana as the state of no falling away. Even the highest states in heaven there is falling away because once you have exhausted a lifespan even 60,000 eons long, you fall away and depending on what you have done previously, you may even descend to hell.

The deceit of 12 candidates for Bkt Gantang:

Surely most of the independent candidates should know they are not viable candidates in danger of losing their deposits so why do they waste their time, energy and expense pursuing an unviable cause?

The answer is sabotage and it cannot be the PKR who does it but it is BN with the financial resources and the advantage to field so many candidates.

Because BN is the underdog, if voters get confused by so many different symbols to choose from they may mark at random or the wrong symbol and the beneficiary is BN because it will dissipate the opposition’s vote. By contrast the BN logo is more familiar and may entice some foolish voters to mark it.

THE OPPOSITION NEITHER HAS THE MONEY OR MOTIVE TO FIELD SO MANY CANDIDATES, THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES WILL BE GREAT FOOLS IF THEY THINK THEY STAND ANY CHANCE AND SO IT MUST BE BN WHO STAND TO GAIN IF ILLITERATE OR CONFUSED VOTERS SHOULD FRITTER THEIR VOTES IN THE MINEFIELD OF LOGOS OR CHOOSE THE FAMILIARITY OF THE BN LOGO. HERE AGAIN IS EVIDENCE OF THE EVIL OR UNFAIRNESS OF BN.

Tiny rock excites astro-chemists:

If it is true then astrochemists’ mental forces were stirred attractively by the discovery of a tiny rock.

What is the use of stirring your mental force attractively by a discovery? You mean without stirring your mental force attractively you cannot approach or study the rock properly? On the contrary, the stirring of mental force is inimical to calm clear thinking that is a requisite to good examination and deductions. Further the stirring of mental force is harmful to self and meaningless, because force is blind and harmful.

PEOPLE TALK OF THEIR EXCITEMENT AT A DISCOVERY AS IF IT IS MEANINGFUL WHEN IT IS MEANINGLESS, INAPPROPRIATE, MAD BECAUSE WHY SHOULD ANYONE’S MENTAL FORCE BE STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY BY ANYTHING THAT IS ACTUALLY INIMICAL TO PROPER EXAMINATION AND COMING TO A TRUE CONCLUSION BECAUSE FORCE STIRS THE MIND AND IS BLIND. YOU SHOULD SUMMON CALM CLEAR GENUINE REASON NOT GET EXCITED OR STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY AT A DISCOVERY AND IT REFLECTS WHAT FOOLS NOT SAGES SCIENTISTS ARE THAT THEY GET EXCITED INSTEAD OF CALMLY UNEMOTIONALLY ANALYZING THE ROCK.

Whatever happens is an occasion for stirring mental force:

I have said before that whatever happens to emotional stylish people is an occasion or excuse for stirring mental force, whatever they say or do is attended by emotion and not only is emotion stirred, it is the basis or motive of what they say or do rather than genuine reason which may be totally absent and what they call their genuine reason is their rehashed rules or instructional generalized nonspecific designed for many occasions robotic reason.

THUS THE DISCOVERY OF A TINY ROCK IS AN OCCASION OR EXCUSE FOR SCIENTISTS TO STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO BE EXCITED.

NOT ONLY DO PEOPLE STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES AT WHATEVER IS HAPPENING, LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, FEAR AND AGITATION WHICH ARE ALL PROXIES OF FORCE ARE THE BASES FOR WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO, NOT GENUINE REASON AS THEY LIKE (ATTRACTED) TO THINK IT IS.

Many candidates favour one who stuffs ballot box:

If you are stuffing the ballot box with illegal votes then it does not matter if your candidate also suffers from the dissipation of donkey or confused votes which averages out, but if your candidate is an underdog then the deprivation of votes will favour you, because your stuffed votes that will always go to you is more valuable, will be less cancelled by genuine votes that will otherwise be cast against you if there weren’t so many confusing independent candidate.

Hence the presence of so many independent candidates is an indication the ballot box may be stuffed by phantom votes whose effectiveness was being enhanced by the presence of many candidates to reduce further the number of legitimate votes, apart from calling elections on a working day that discourages voting.

WHOEVER THE STRATEGIST BEHIND ALL THIS CHEATING MAY THINK HE IS SMART BUT HE HAS A VERY PAINFUL NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK.

Consumers slashed credit card spending in Feb:

This is a way of stating what was in truth, a big reduction in credit card spending in Feb.

Can you or anyone see consumers slashing credit card spending?

If nobody can see consumers slashing credit card spending then you are dicing with mad perception that what did not happen, ‘consumers slashed credit card spending’ as what happened.

THE WAY YOU SAY SOMETHING IS NOT UNIMPORTANT OR ACCORDING TO YOUR WHIM, IT IS DEADLY, EVEN IF NO ONE PUNISHES YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE WILLING YOURSELF TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS FALSE, CONSUMERS SLASHING AS TRUE.

The German scrap car scheme:

In the name of boosting demand to support a collapsing economy the German government is ARTIFICIALLY not naturally stimulating demand by offering cash (2500 euros) for each old car in return for buying a car less than 1 year old.

THIS IS CALLED SPENDING FOR THE SAKE OF SPENDING IN ORDER TO PROP UP THE ECONOMY AND IT IS FRAUGHT WITH DANGER AND FOLLY, SERVES TO POSTPONE AND EVEN AGGRAVATE THE COMPANY LIKE DELAYING DEALING WITH A CANCER INSTEAD OF SWIFT INCISIVE ACTION.

YOUR HOPE IS THAT YOU ARE BUYING TIME AND THINGS WILL RECOVER. BUT WILL IT? THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE THIS IS A FATUOUS OR FANCIFUL HOPE.

THE PREVIOUSLY HOT GLOBAL ECONOMY WAS NOT BASED ON PRODUCTIVITY BUT BASED ON EXCESSIVE USELESS CONSUMPTION BY PEOPLE LULLED BY THE SENSE THEY HAVE MORE WEALTH THAN THEY ACTUALLY HAVE AS A RESULT OF MANIPULATED EXCESSIVE ASSET VALUE RISES, PLUNDERING OF THE SAVINGS OF PEOPLE BY RECKLESS BANKERS AND CEOS.

BECAUSE THE BOOM OF THE PAST WAS BASED ON EXCESSES AND THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IS NOW BANKRUPTED, NO AMOUNT OF BUYING TIME WILL LEAD TO RECOVERY BECAUSE YOU CANNOT RECOVER TO THE CHEATING AND STEALING OF THE PAST, THERE IS NO MORE MONEY ANYWAY.

DOES THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT REALLY HAVE THIS MONEY TO GIVE TO CAR BUYERS OR IS IT PRINTING MONEY AND THEREFORE DILUTING THE VALUE OF MONEY.

YOU COULD SAY THE LAYMAN CAN BE FOOLISH BUT SURELY PROFESSIONALS SHOULD KNOW THE FOLLY OF SPENDING MONEY YOU DON’T HAVE BY PRINTING MORE AND ARTIFICIALLY BOOSTING DEMAND IN THE HOPE THE ECONOMY WILL RECOVER WHEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A RECOVERY BACK TO THE ‘GOOD OLD DAYS’ OF DEBAUCHERY BECAUSE THE DECEIT OF DERIVATIVES HAVE NOW BEEN FOUND OUT, NO ONE TRUSTS IT ANYMORE AND THE BANKS ARE NOW BANKRUPTED.

THIS IS CALLED MUDDLED THINKING AND DENIAL, REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND COME CLEAN WITH THE PUBLIC WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING, IT AGAIN A DEMONSTRATION THAT EVEN MANKIND’S TOP MINDS ARE FOOLS AND DELUDED.