Neither perceiving nor not perceiving

Neither perceiving nor not perceiving:

The Buddha taught that there is a state of existence that is far superior in terms of bliss than perceiving and not perceiving and it accords the being who can achieve that state even many Ages in bliss.

As to what that state is, you have no idea because you have not experienced it and so you have to take it on faith in the Buddha that the state exists and it is a higher, more blissful state of the mind.

Because the Buddha knows that state and can at will attain that state and you cannot, he is higher than you and because he has taught that when no one else has taught that, he is the highest teacher as far as you are concerned. Because the Buddha said he can encompass in his mind the minds of all beings in existence and he surmise he is the highest, it may be true as he says he is the highest teacher, teacher of men and gods.

Perceiving (the little that his consciousness is attending to) and at the same time not perceiving (the infinitude like what is happening outside the room, in the streets, in the town he is, the country and the whole earth) is what all beings trapped here are doing, what they have never done, have never experienced is what the Buddha described, the state of neither perceiving nor not perceiving.

Because we are not truly separate beings but part of the universal infinitude of consciousness, everything that is happening at the same time is potentially perceivable but the selfish act of perceiving the little that we are greedily attached to and refuse to relinquish means that all else that is happening around that may extend even to the entire cosmos is not perceived. If you did not greedily perceived the little you will also not pay the heavy price of not perceiving the infinitude that is simultaneously happening that is excluded by your narrow perceiving.

Thus a person who has overcome the constraints of perceiving, he also does not ‘not perceive’, a state the Buddha says exist that is unimaginable to beings who only know perceiving the little and simultaneous not perceiving the infinitude that is happening at the same time.

For the little perception of what is on the computer screen in front of you, you must pay the very heavy price of not perceiving what else is in the room, let alone your town, let alone your country, let alone other countries and the world at this same very moment.

Just as people are unaware of the possible state of neither liking nor disliking if their mental forces are neither stirred attractively or repulsively by what is happening, they are unaware of a possible state of existence the Buddha described as higher, neither perceiving nor not perceiving.

IMF: This crisis may be worse than Great Depression:

The IMF said the US is at the epicentre of this crisis just as it was in the Depression, setting the two episodes apart from normal downturns. However, the risks are greater this time. "While the credit boom in the 1920s was largely spec­ific to the US, the boom during 2004-2007 was global, with increased leverage and risk-taking in advanced economies and many emerging economies. Levels of integration are now much higher than during the inter-war period, so US financial shocks have a larger impact," it said.

The IMF said the global financial system is still under acute stress, with output tumbling and inflation falling towards zero in key nations. "The risks of debt deflation have increased," it said.

Pause in 1930s plunge:

According to Krugman there was a pause in the 1930s plunge just like there is a slowdown in decline at the present.

Quote: Even in the Great Depression, things didn’t head straight down. There was a pause in the plunge about a year and a half in — roughly where we are now. But then came a series of bank failures on both sides of the Atlantic, combined with some disastrous policy moves as countries tried to defend the dying gold standard, and the world economy fell off another cliff.

The pace of decline may be slowing down as reported in only 5 out of 12 districts. Future sources of trouble including commercial property distress, credit card and trouble in Japan and Eastern Europe.

 

Krugman’s views about the economy today:

Here are four reasons to be cautious about the economic outlook.

1. Things are still getting worse. Industrial production just hit a 10-year low. Housing starts remain incredibly weak. Foreclosures are surging again.

The most you can say is that there are scattered signs that things are getting worse more slowly. And I do mean scattered: the latest edition of the Beige Book, the Fed’s periodic survey of business conditions, reports that “five of the twelve Districts noted a moderation in the pace of decline.” Whoopee.

2. Some of the good news isn’t convincing. The biggest positive news in recent days has come from banks, which have been announcing surprisingly good earnings. But some of those earnings reports look a little ... funny (suspicious).

Wells Fargo announced its best quarterly earnings ever. But a bank’s reported earnings depend a lot on the amount the bank sets aside to cover expected future losses on its loans. Some analysts expressed considerable doubt about Wells Fargo’s assumptions, as well as other accounting issues.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs announced a huge jump in profits from fourth-quarter 2008 to first-quarter 2009. But as analysts quickly noticed, Goldman changed its definition of “quarter”, so that — I kid you not — the month of December, a bad one for the bank, disappeared from this comparison.

Maybe the banks really have swung from deep losses to hefty profits in record time. But skepticism comes naturally in this age of Madoff.

Oh, and for those expecting the Treasury Department’s “stress tests” to make everything clear: the White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, says that “you will see in a systematic and coordinated way the transparency of determining and showing to all involved some of the results of these stress tests.” No, I don’t know what that means, either.

3. There may be other shoes yet to drop. Even in the Great Depression, things didn’t head straight down. There was, in particular, a pause in the plunge about a year and a half in — roughly where we are now. But then came a series of bank failures on both sides of the Atlantic, combined with some disastrous policy moves as countries tried to defend the dying gold standard, and the world economy fell off another cliff.

Can this happen again? Well, commercial (as opposed to residential) real estate is coming apart at the seams, credit card losses are surging and nobody knows yet just how bad things will get in Japan or Eastern Europe. We probably won’t repeat the disaster of 1931, but it’s far from certain that the worst is over.

4. Even when it’s over, it won’t be over. The 2001 recession officially lasted only eight months, ending in November of that year. But unemployment kept rising for another year and a half. The same thing happened after the 1990-91 recession. And there’s every reason to believe that it will happen this time too. Don’t be surprised if unemployment keeps rising right through 2010. (even after recovery unemployment keep rising so that those unemployed may default on their mortgages)

Why? “V-shaped” recoveries, in which employment comes roaring back, take place only when there’s a lot of pent-up demand. In 1982, for example, housing was crushed by high interest rates, so when the Fed eased up, home sales surged. That’s not what’s going on this time: today, the economy is depressed, loosely speaking, because we ran up too much debt and built too many shopping malls, and nobody is in the mood for a new burst of spending.

Employment will eventually recover — it always does. But it probably won’t happen fast.

thus the Great Ascetic proclaimed.

Jesus healed without seeing & touching:

Without entering the centurion’s house to see and touching the terminally ill slave, Jesus healed him.

If seeing and touching is essential, is a requisite then it would not be possible for Jesus to do that. This suggests that seeing and touching are optional, it is the Father’s will that you shall be healed and it can be done instantly without the intervention of any procedure. As Jesus said, Thy will be done, on earth as in heaven.

Thus Christian copycats are deluded to place much if not complete faith in touching and emotional catharsis in ritualized acts of healing that may not be effective or whatever healing is psychological, make believe.

To one who understands, this is so, healing or bringing back another person back to life has nothing to do with any procedure but it is by the Will of the Father and anyone who thinks Jesus must see the person, there is something special in the touch, you must touch in a certain way to heal is deluded. Because emotional stylish people are robots, they have faith in rituals and they perceive that a ritual must be carried out to heal another person.

Sariputta understood immediately:

Sariputta one of the Buddha’s two deputies (notice the Holy Trinity with the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit) was seeking the truth and one day he saw a monk going about for alms and perceived he had the serene look of one who has found the deathless, followed him and when the time was appropriate, asked him what was the secret of his composure.

The monk said his teacher was the Buddha and when asked to explain the Buddha’s teaching, he said he was new and cannot explain fully.

Sariputta implored him to say a few words and the monk uttered these words upon which immediate understanding arose in Sariputta’s mind:

The Perfect One has told the cause
of causally arisen things
And what brings their cessation, too:
Such is the doctrine taught by the Great Monk

No effort is needed to understand, what is required is an ability to see and thus seeing you understand. People think they see but they see falsely, they see with force, with style (force changes) and substance (see what they like and refuse to see what they disliked) and because they cannot see, they cannot understand.

What the monk is saying is that things are causally arisen, is not without cause arisen and the Buddha has discovered the cause and also what brings an end to the cause.

UNDERSTANDING HAS NOTHING TO DO FORCE WHICH IS IN ANY CASE BLIND AND FAR FROM ASSISTING, THE ENTRY OF FORCE RENDERS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IMPOSSIBLE. THUS NO EFFORT IS EVER NEEDED TO UNDERSTAND, ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS TO SEE TRULY AND THUS TRULY SEEING TO UNDERSTAND. THUS IF YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING, IT MEANS YOU ARE USING FORCE THAT IS BLIND TO UNDERSTAND AND THAT RENDERS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IMPOSSIBLE. ONLY WHEN FORCE DISAPPEARS FROM THE PICTURE IS UNDERSTANDING POSSIBLE AND BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE UNDER THE GRASP OF FORCE, THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.

What the Buddha said may sound ho hum to you but it may not be what is said that is ho hum but your inability to understand or false understanding that makes it ho hum.

What he is saying is that there are casually arisen and non-casually arisen things, everything and every being in this world of existence is casually arisen, not without cause and that cause can be known and brought to a halt.

There is another world that is not casually arisen and that is Nibbana, the unchanging from which this world of constant deceptive change ensues and to which a being must return if he is to escape suffering.

Forgive and forget:

Headline of NYT article: Forgive and forget

It sounds nice but it is false and the person who said (in regard to Eliot Spitzer) is guilty of falsity whether she knows or not.

You do not need reason to forget but you use force to forget and forgetting is denying reality, trying to suppress reality. Whilst you should make no effort to wilfully remember, no one should be told to forget because it is distorting reality so that you selectively remember certain things and forget certain things.

IT IS MEANINGLESS AND WRONG TO ASK OTHERS TO FORGET, WHETHER SOMEONE WANTS TO FORGET IS UP TO HIM, NOT FOR YOU TO TELL AND FOR FORGETTING TO BE ACHIEVED, FORCE MUST BE USED TO WILFULLY REFUSE TO REMEMBER SOMETHING AND THAT IS HARMFUL, NEVER GOOD AS IT IS TOUTED TO BE.

IT REFLECTS PEOPLE EVEN THOSE WHO TOUT THEMSELVES AS INTELLECTUALLY SOPHISTICATED DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT, TALK NONSENSE THAT THEY TELL OTHERS TO FORGET. PEOPLE ARE NOT MASTERS OF THEIR FORGETTING, THEY CANNOT FORGET AT WILL AND SO YOUR ADVICE IS FRIVOLOUS AND IF THEY DO TRY TO FORGET AS YOU ADVICE, THEY MUST USE FORCE NEVER GENUINE REASON TO FORCEFULLY FALSELY DRIVE THE MEMORY FROM HIS MIND.

Three types of forgetting:

Jesus said every hair on your head is accounted for and the Buddha says every life you had in every eon can be recollected and so what people call forgetting is an illusion or myth.

It is true you may forget to recall something eg to switch off the lights but that is not something that has happened that you have no memory of but something you failed to do.

In this case, forgetting is something they should have done but they forgot because of distractions on their minds or force stirring in their mind (they were rushing) as a result of which they forgot to do what they should do.

There is another type of forgetting and that is something you knew in the past but has now forgotten eg you remembered the code to your safe but now you have forgotten, cannot recall the number, usually from disuse, lack of use and the fading of the memory that may be temporary (it may return) or permanent, you totally cannot the sequence anymore.

There is yet another type of forgetting in which a person wilfully suppresses memory of some usually traumatic event eg you committed some social faux pas like telling a girl you loved her and she laughed and made fool of you in the eyes of those present and you forcibly, repetitively try to drive that memory out of your mind. No matter how hard, how much force you use to forget such embarrassments, they are never forgotten but will spring up often in unguarded moments or socially inappropriate moments to haunt you.

EVEN IF YOU FORGET THE COMBINATIONS OF YOUR SAFE, IT MAY STILL LURK SOMEWHERE IN THE RECESSES OF YOUR CLUTTERED FORCE ROILED MIND AND NEVER LOST BUT THERE FOREVER IN THE UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS.

FORGETTING TO DO SOMETHING IS NOT TRUE FORGETTING, IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST THAT YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN BUT SOMETHING YOU SHOULD DO BUT FAILED TO DO AS A RESULT OF DISTRACTIONS OR FORCE STIRRING IN THEIR MINDS.

IF PEOPLE WERE CALM AND CLEAR THINKING, DO NOT PERMIT FORCE TO USE THEIR MINDS AS PLAYGROUNDS BY FASHIONING STYLE AND BEING EMOTIONAL, THEIR FORGETFULNESS MAY BE CONSIDERABLE LESS, THEY WILL REMEMBER FAR MORE THAN THEY NOW DO.

THEN THERE IS THE WILFULLY REFUSAL TO REMEMBER SOMETHING THAT IS EMBARRASSING OR TRAUMATIC AND YOU NEED FORCE TO DO THIS AND IT IS FUTILE BECAUSE THE MORE YOU TRY TO FORGET IT THE MORE IT WILL SPRING BACK TO HOUND YOU AND IT IS NEVER TOTALLY FORGOTTEN. IT IS THIS FORGETTING THAT IS REFERRED TO IN ‘FORGIVE AND FORGET’ WHICH DOES NOT HAVE THE INTENSITY OF DETERMINATION TO FORGET AS IN A TRAUMATIC OR EMBARRASSING EVENT BUT IS THE SAME FALSE ILLUSORY FORGETTING.

Natural & unnatural forgetting:

Forgetting to switch off the lights and forgetting the combinations to your safe is natural, involuntary genuine forgetting, to forget an embarrassing event or what someone did that you know is unnatural, false or contrived forgetting that is never genuine but make believe because no matter how you use force and strive to forget the memory is still there and perversely your use of force to wilfully suppress only engraves the memory more but in a repressed form.

Forgetting is a form of denial:

How can you deny what has happened? By wanting to forget something, you want to deny to yourself what has happened did not happened and that is denial and lying to yourself that will end in insanity.

If you keep trying to forget things, you are conditioning yourself to be good at forgetting that may one day prove even fatal or subject yourself to loss.

Understanding did you understand?

Being an understanding being did you understand that it is fallacious and meaningless advice to tell others to forget like it is meaningless to tell others ‘don’t worry’?

For forgetting to be genuine, it is involuntary.

The act of trying to forget something, wilfully refusing to remember something only serves to recall to mind what you strive to forget and that is self defeating or serves to reinforce the memory you try to forget.

UNLESS YOU DO NOT MEAN WHAT TO SAY TO OTHERS TO FORGET, IT IS FRIVOLOUS FOR SHOW HOLLOW ADVICE, YOU ARE TELLING OTHERS TO DO WHAT IS IMPOSSIBLE, FORGET SOMETHING THEY REMEMBER AND SO RATHER THAN TRUE AND GOOD, YOU ARE CREATING KARMA TELLING OTHERS TO DO SOMETHING THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE, TO ACTIVELY FORGET SOMETHING.

HERE AS IN MORE PLACES THAN THEY REALIZE, THEY THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY READ BUT THEY DO NOT.

Leave it alone, not forget it:

People often speak carelessly, what they meant is not ‘forget it’ but leave it alone or take no action.

For instance, their hub cap has fallen off and they think of retracing the route to find the hubcap but their friends tell him, ‘forget it’.

THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS THUS ‘FORGET IT’ IS SPEAKING CARELESSLY, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS SAYING, HE SHOULD SAY, ‘LEAVE IT ALONE’ OR ‘DO NOT PURSUE IT’ WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM FORGET IT. IT IS NOT A MATTER OF FORGETTING IT BUT NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT SOMETHING.

Hillsborough will never be forgotten:

This was said in relation to the commemoration of the stadium disaster in which many Liverpool fans lost their lives in the melee.

It is not possible that genuine reason will guide anyone to make such a statement but instead emotion, a proxy of force is the drive behind such a statement that is intended to falsely hype how painful or terrible the occasion is.

Because emotion is the drive behind such statements and force is blind, it is likely if not certain to be false and it is false.

WHATEVER CAN BE FORGOTTEN SHOULD NEVER BE RULED OUT AS NEVER FORGOTTEN. JUST AS YOU CAN FORGET THE COMBINATIONS TO YOUR SAFE FROM DISUSE, YOU CAN FORGET MEMORIES OF THE DISASTER. EVEN AMONGST LIVERPOOL FANS, THERE WILL BE THOSE WHO HAVE FORGOTTEN.

THERE IS NO GENUINE REASON TO MAKE THE PROMISE THAT HILLSBOROUGH WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN, IT IS STIRRED EMOTION THAT MAKES ONE FOOLISHLY MAKE THE VOW THAT IT WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN. WHEN A PERSON BECOMES DEMENTED, HE FORGETS MANY THINGS AND SO IF THE PERSON WHO SPOKE IS OVERTAKEN BY DEMENTIA, HE MAY FORGET, RENDERING HIS VOW ‘NEVER FORGOTTEN’ FALSE.

What has forgetting got to do with rehabilitating someone?

Do you need to forget what someone has done to rehabilitate him, assuming it is possible to do so like you can turn off the light by pressing the switch?

Do you need to forget what Spitzer did, use high class call girls and breaking federal laws to rehabilitate him?

Forgetting in this case is pretence; it is pretending that Spitzer did not do what he did. Whoever advocates pretence, closing one eye to another’s deceit is advocating sin with karma attached.

Because forgetting what someone has done has nothing to do with rehabilitating someone and by implication she perceives it has, she has false perception, false understanding and so she may think she perceives truly but she perceives falsely.

It is likely she is rehashing mindlessly, she has heard others use ‘forgive and forget’, find it attractive, memorized it and recalled it to apply in the current situation unaware what she says is ridiculous, makes no sense.

Impossible I am a copycat:

Because no one speaks like me, it is impossible that what I say is copied, not at least from this world and so I cannot be a robot like the rest in this world whose every word and action have precedents and potentially copied to be rehashed, often without understanding the true meanings of what they say.

Forgetting as an active process:

Forgetting can be passive as when one forgets to switch off the lights or forgets the combinations of one’s safe but there is active forgetting that emotional stylish people indulge in often without awareness.

Because they say and do many things against their own wishes to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others, they have said and done many silly things or things that harm others, they are haunted by many thoughts and memories that stir hurt and shame and these painful thoughts cause them to use force to try to repel or forget and after many cycles, forgetting becomes an active, rehashed rote activity.

FORGETTING CAN BE AN ACTIVE PROCESS IN WHICH THE PERSON STIR EVEN VERY STRONG MENTAL FORCE TO TRY AND EXPEL OR SUPPRESS THOUGHTS OR EVENTS THAT ARE TOO PAINFUL OR EMBARRASSING FOR THE PERSON AND ONE IMPORTANT SIDE EFFECT OF SUCH FORCEFUL FORGETTING IS THAT THE PERSON BECOME QUITE GOOD AT FORGETTING, HE FORGETS MANY THINGS AND THIS CAN POSE DANGERS TO HIM APART FROM DISTORTION HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH REALITY.

Nowadays I do not actively forget because there are few things that I say or do which cause me shame, embarrassment or guilt that I would want to emotionally or violent expel or forget.

EVEN THE PERSON’S FORGETFULNESS, FAILURE TO REMEMBER TO TURN OFF THE LIGHTS AND HIS INABILITY TO REMEMBER THE COMBINATION OF HIS SAFE MAY NOT BE NATURAL BUT THE RESULT OF DISTRACTION, EMOTIONS ROILING HIS MIND AND THE FRUIT OF HIS FECKLESS ACTIVE PRACTICE OF FORGETTING SHAMEFUL OR SILLY THINGS THAT HAPPENED TO HIM.

Why people forget:

The Buddha and Jesus never complained of nor spoke of temporarily or permanently forgetting about things that happened in the past and so, unless they are being deceitful, conveniently omitting admission of the frailties of their memories, it suggests that forgetting is not blameless, is not without cause.

There are various causes of why people forget and they are all blameworthy. It is impossible that a mind that is not a playground of force can forget but it is to be expected that any mind that is a playground of force is forgetful because forgetting has nothing to do with reason but only force can cause a person to forget. Forgetting is a fruit of force.

There can be two sources of forgetfulness, either the registering of an event was faulty or the retrieval of that registered event is temporarily or permanent faulty or failed.

Why might registering an event be faulty or failed?

When people are significantly inebriated by stress, restlessness and distraction or their minds are roiled by strong emotions (eg excitement, anger or agitation), they may fail to register or register events faultily and what has not registered or registered faultily is expected to be not remembered.

The simultaneous substance and style combo in their speech and actions and that of everyone else around them divides their attention and a divided attention is not conducive to full registering of events that happen and thus failing to register they don’t remember.

Ordinary people never view an event in toto, they just take snapshots of whatever is happening whilst their minds are in a private world of make belief, dreaming and scheming. It is to be expected that events only viewed as snapshots instead of in totality will not register properly and is vulnerable to failure to recall.

Why might recall be faulty?

Recall might be faulty because people will or use force to suppress what they viewed for selfish, sinful reasons.

Thus because they are hurt by shameful or harmful things they have said and done and they use even intense force to repel or suppress those thoughts each time they recur and as a result of countless practices, they become good at repelling memories and an important price for that deceit or perversion of reality, selective deletion of reality, is forgetfulness, the inability to recall certain events, either temporarily due to a mental blockage or permanently.

Every time a person tells a lie he must use force to suppress the realization that it is a lie and this is a form of training yourself to forget. Initially you are aware, uncomfortably aware that what you say is not quite true and you use force to keep training yourself to forget it is not true until many cycles later you forget what you said is not quite true.

There are occasions when a person remembers something but he says he has forgotten, he failed to do something but he gives the excuse he forgot. Asked in court about his recall of an incident (as Dr M was asked about his involvement in the VK Lingam affair), he says he does not remember when he remembers. As a result of using force to insist you did not remember when you remembered, you are conditioning yourself to forget and whilst it may have temporary material advantage there is a heavy price in future suffering when you truly cannot remember or your memory is seriously impaired.

The Buddha never became demented, if you watch a person who has become demented, who has forgotten his past, who does not know what Chinese New Year is when previously she used to celebrate eagerly, then you may realize the price for forgetting is heavy even tormenting.

FORGETTING MAY NOT BE NATURAL OR TO BE EXPECTED AS PEOPLE WRONGLY BELIEVE BUT FORGETTING HAS CAUSES AND ONLY FORCE CAN CAUSE A PERSON TO FORGET. FORGETFULNESS IS SUFFERING AND SINFUL AND IS THE RESULT OF SINFUL CONDUCT. THUS ANYONE WHO ADVICES OTHERS TO FORGET IS ADVOCATING SIN AND SUFFERING AND HEAPING KARMA ON HERSELF NOT MERIT. IF YOU TELL OTHERS ‘FORGIVE AND FORGET’ YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT SHE SPEAKS AND HEAPING KARMA ON YOURSELF NOT MERIT. TO FORGET IS TO PERVERT OR SUBVERT REALITY, YOU MUST NOT ACTIVELY FORGET AND IN ANY CASE, FORGETTING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REHABILITATING SOMEONE AND YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION TO THINK IT IS CONNECTED.

To forget is to subvert reality:

If you actively try to forget something eg because it was embarrassing, you are subverting reality and thus subverted, your perception of reality becomes distorted and you are facing future insanity apart from total forgetfulness or amnesia.

ONLY FORCE CAN CAUSE YOU TO FORGET.

IT IS FORCE THAT DIVIDES YOUR ATTENTION, ROILS YOUR MIND WITH EMOTIONS, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IMPAIRS ITS ATTENTION OF AN EVENT AND THENCE FAILURE TO REGISTER.

IT IS FORCE THAT IS USED BY PEOPLE TO REPEL OR SUPPRESS WHATEVER MEMORIES THAT ARE PAINFUL AND TO REFUSE TO SEE OR FORGET WHAT THEY SAY IS NOT QUITE HONEST OR LIES.

Emotional people have many things to forget:

Emotional stylish people who say things dishonestly just to get along or for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate others have many things to forget or want to forget.

It is not just when intensely arousing memories rouse their mental force to repel or forget but frequently even constantly, the engine of forgetting is idling or waxing and waning as they seek to forget or blot out the many forgettable things they have said and done.

Suppose you celebrate Chinese New Year or Christmas every year and it is an occasion that brings cheer to you. How would you feel if in senility, you totally forget the meaning of Chinese New Year or Christmas, it does not ring a bell in you? This is the ultimate price of forgetfulness that people do not realize they are not occasionally but frequently willing themselves.

FORGETTING IS NOT SOMETHING SOME PEOPLE DO OCCASIONALLY BUT WHAT ALL STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE DO FREQUENTLY IF NOT CONSTANTLY. IT IS NOT JUST ON THE OCCASIONS THAT PAINFUL MEMORIES REAR UP IN THEIR MINDS THAT THEY SUMMON FORCE TO DISPEL OR FORGET BUT FAR MORE FREQUENTLY THEY ARE USING FORCE OFTEN WITHOUT REALIZATION TO SUPPRESS OR FORGET THE MANY ‘FORGETTABLE’ OR DISHONEST THINGS THEY HAVE SAID AND DONE TO PLEASE, IMPRESS AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS.

BY FORGETTING THEY ARE TRYING TO BURY THEIR FACES IN THE SAND LIKE THE PROVERBIAL OSTRICH.

Forgetting is an urge:

Forgetting is an urge in emotional people, a desire to obscure and erase that is driven by force and according to a plan that is rehashed repetitively and so the forgetting person is a robot.

People think nothing of forgetting, think it is wonderful when it is like poison and a cancer that is slowly spreading to consume the fool until total amnesia is the final product and that is never a pleasure but thus amnesic you are not going to heaven but eternal punishment.

Drowning their sorrows:

People often speak of drowning their sorrows eg by drinking heavily until they are drunk.

What are they essentially trying to do by ‘drowning their sorrows’?

They are trying to use chemical things, in this case, alcohol, to drown or forget their sorrows and hereto is an occasion they are unaware that they try to tamper with reality using alcohol or trying to forget which is sinful, futile and dangerous.

People with family problems at home eg nagging wife try to drown their sorrows in hobbies, in work, in the cinema, in holidays and in extreme cases as in a fugue, they forget themselves, go elsewhere to start anew and cannot remember their pasts.

Thus forgetting is not something emotional people do sometimes but frequently often without realization and it is conditioning or addictive because it is an urge that will result in a badly shot up memory.

PEOPLE WONDER WHY IT IS THEY ARE SO FORGETFUL, THEY GET MORE FORGETFUL AS THEY AGE BUT IT IS NO SURPRISE BUT TO BE EXPECTED, BECAUSE FORGETTING IS WHAT THEY FREQUENTLY DO, THEY HAVE DONE MANY FORGETFUL THINGS, PAINFUL THINGS HAVE HAPPENED TO THEM THAT THEY CANNOT RECONCILE AND WANT TO FORGET.

Forgiving is not forgetting:

Foolish people have this false perception that unless you forget an incident, you cannot have totally forgiven the other person, in order to totally forgive another person you must forget what he did. This is false perception and another example of perception they think is true but is false.

And the forgiven person may like you to forget so that he can get chummy with you again and repeat or do worse things to you.

If forgetting is part of forgiving, then why speak of forgetting that is redundant?

You forgive the person but you do not forget but remember what he has done so that unless he has truly reformed, you are wary not to fall to his wiles again.

IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE DROWN THEIR SORROWS, FORCIBLY DRIVE OUT PAINFUL EXPERIENCES FROM THEIR MEMORIES THAT THEY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT THE SAME MISTAKES AGAIN AND AGAIN. A PERSON WHO REMEMBERS CLEARLY THE PAINFUL RESULTS OF HIS SINS (EG THE NEAR FATAL LOSSES HE SUSTAINED GAMBLING) WILL NOT RETURN TO THE GAMBLING TABLE.

THUS REMEMBERING IS MERITORIOUS AND FORGETING IS SINFUL AND FROUGHT WITH FUTURE DANGER.

Downplaying is step to forgetting:

Emotional people have a tendency to up-play or hype things they like and downplay things they dislike or is hurtful or shameful or sad to them.

Downplaying is a form of dismissing and the next step to dismissing and downplaying is forgetting and if you keep forcefully forgetting things you downplay, is it any surprise you are forgetful, your memories become poorer and poorer?

Try to forget and not to remember:

You hear people speak of trying to forget something or try not to remember something. Unless they are mad, they must be speaking of an activity of their minds that is the basis of trying to forget or not remember.

Here they are acknowledging without awareness that they actively use force to erase or banish from memory should a memory arise.

Only force can make a person forget, without exerting mental force you cannot forget and forgetting has nothing to do with genuine reason.

Each time you try to forget or not remember, you are training yourself to forget and people try not to remember or forget far more than they realize and as is the result of such frequently abusing willing not to remember or forgetting they become very good at forgetting not realizing that they are headed for a cliff of insanity of a memory that becomes dishevelled with many blank patches as a result of wilful deletions.

PEOPLE THINK NOTHING OF FORGETING, THINK IT IS GOOD TO FORGET BUT FORGETING IS A FORCE DRIVEN ADDICTION OR URGE THAT IS LIKE A CANCER OR ALCOHOLISM THAT WILL KILL THE PERSON.

THE PERSON WHO FORGETS HAS TO DO MENTAL WORK TO FORGET AND TRY TO REMEMBER. THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT TRY TO FORGET DOES NOT HAVE TO DO MENTAL WORK TO FORGET AND WORK TO STRIVE TO REMEMBER WHAT HE FORGOT.

Forgetting is simply using force to avoid seeing:

Forgetting is simply the wilful use of force to not see, refuse to see what you in truth saw or exists so that as time goes by or repetitive refusal, the person finally cannot see or does see something that happened in the past or exists.

Thus whenever you tell a lie or do something dishonest to please or impress others, in the beginning you will see it is dishonest or lying to say or do it and few people if any enjoying seeing their dishonesty or lying, it is far more comfortable to lie and not see you are lying and in any case, a lie or false act is far more convincing if you act as realistically as possible that it is true and to do that you must will yourself not to see what you say is false, a lie.

THUS THE ULTIMATE ROOT OF FORGETTING IS LYING IN SPEECH AND DEED, ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OR DOES FALSELY FOR SELFISH ENDS, TO PLEASE AND INTIMIDATE OTHERS MUST WILL HIMSELF NOT SEE WHAT HE DID OR SAID IS FALSE BUT INSTEAD WILL HIMSELF TO SEE WHAT HE SAID AND DID IS TRUE IN ORDER TO CONVINCE THE COUNTER PARTY WHAT HE SAID OR DID IS TRUE AND TO MAKE HIS LIE MORE COMFORTABLE.

IT IS THIS WILFUL REFUSAL TO SEE THAT IS BASED ON FORCE AND BECOMES AN URGE THAT CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER SITUATIONS THAT MATURES TO BECOME FORGETFULNESS, SOMETIMES HE FORGETS THINGS INVOLUNTARILY AS A RESULT OF THIS FORGETING OF HIS DECEIT BEING TRANSFERRED UNDESIRABLY TO OTHER SITUATIONS THAT HE DOES NOT WANT TO FORGET.

FORGETFULNESS IS ESSENTIALLY REFUSAL TO SEE WHAT IS TRUE, WHAT HAS HAPPENED. WHEN PEOPLE TELL A LIE THEY NOT ONLY TELL A LIE BUT THEY REFUSE TO SEE IT IS A LIE AND SLOWLY THEY FORGET IT IS A LIE AND THEY HAVE UNWITTINGLY INITIATED THEMSELVES INTO THE WEB OF FORGETFULNESS THAT DETAINS THEM AND WILL SLOWLY KILL THEM.

If you say or do something that you do not know or see is true, because someone told you to say or do it, because your professor or guru tells you it is true, not because you saw and knew it as true, you have to use force to not see that you did not see or know it is true, but you use force to accept what you heard is true and that too is the route to forgetfulness.

UNLESS YOU SEE AND KNOW SOMETHING SOMEONE TELLS YOU IS TRUE, IF YOU DON’T AND ACCEPT IT OR BELIEVE IT, YOU MUST USE FORCE TO REFUSE TO SEE YOU DID NOT SEE OR KNOW IT AS TRUE AND THAT IS ALSO ANOTHER SOURCE OF FORGETFULNESS.

A LOT OF THE THINGS PEOPLE ACCEPT AS FACTS ARE ACTUALLY BELIEFS, INFORMATION THEY ACCEPTED FROM OTHERS AS TRUE WHEN THEY DID NOT SEE AS TRUE AND NOT ONLY THAT THEY REFUSE TO SEE THAT THEY DID NOT SEE IT AS TRUE AND THAT IS A FORM OF TRAINING THEMSELVES TO FORGET.

MANY PEOPLE HAVE FORGOTTEN (ALSO KNOWN AS REFUSED TO SEE) THAT A LOT OF THINGS THEY HOLD DEAR TO THEIR HEARTS ARE NOT TRUTHS OR FACTS BUT BELIEFS THEY ACCEPTED FROM OTHERS WITHOUT SEEING. THUS REFUSING TO SEE, THEY HAVE CONDITIONED THEMSELVES TO FORGET THAT CAN SPREAD LIKE A CANCER TO PERMEATE OTHER AREAS.

LYING IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF FORGETFULNESS:

EVERY TIME A PERSON TELLS A LIE, NO MATTER HOW HARDCORE A LIAR HE IS, HE MUST REFUSE TO SEE WHAT HE SAID IS A LIE OTHERWISE OTHERS CAN SEE HE SEES HE IS LYING THROUGH HIS NERVOUSNESS/FIDGETTING OR DARTING EYES AND HE MUST REFUSE TO SEE IT IS A LIE TO FACILITATE HIS DELIVERY OR MAKE IT MORE CONVINCING.

WHEN YOU DO SOMETHING, TELL A LIE IN THIS CASE AND REFUSE TO SEE IT IS A LIE YOU ARE USING FORCE TO NOT SEE WHAT YOU SAW AND THAT IS FORGETING AND SO EACH TIME A PERSON TELLS A LIE OR PERPETUATE A FALSITY NOT JUST IN SPEECH BUT ACTION, HE MUST CONDITION HIMSELF NOT TO SEE AND THAT IS FORGETFULNESS.

FORGETFULNESS IS THE INEVITABLE RESULT OF LYING AND BECAUSE PEOPLE CANNOT STOP TELLING LIES, THEY NEED TO TELL LIES TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS AND OBTAIN UNRIGHTEOUS GAINS, THEY MUST SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO FORGETFULNESS THAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS LIKE A CANCER THAT WILL SPREAD AND BECOME TERMINAL. IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT PEOPLE WHO CANNOT GIVE UP LYING AND THEREFORE HAVE TO LIVE WITH FORGETFULNESS WILL SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH FORGETFULNESS AND RECOMMEND IT TO OTHERS.

Lying & forgetting all the time:

People who think they lie only some of the time are kidding themselves. Even if they are unaware they have style, because all emotional people have a constant style in their poses, motions and speech and style is false and harmful, they are perpetuating either consciously or unconsciously falsity namely their styles CONSTANTLY. The fact that you are unaware that you have style or that it is false and harmful does not absolve you but reflects the depth of your self-deceit or inability to see or forgetting.

It is impossible that anyone can see the truth of their own and other people’s styles but they forcibly falsely refuse to see their styles and others’ styles as true. And refuse to see is the act of forgetting.

Because there is style in everyone here, not occasionally, not even frequently but constantly and style is never true or meaningful or good but style is always false or meaningless and harmful (because it is all about using force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness, and force is blind, meaningless and harmful) and people cannot or refuse to see style as harmful and false, they are somnolently practicing refusal to see or forgetfulness.

THUS BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE CONSTANT STYLE IN HOW THEY SPEAK AND DO THINGS AND STYLE IS FALSE, ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE, THEY ARE LYING ALL THE TIME AND BECAUSE THEY CANNOT OR REFUSE TO SEE THEY ARE LYING ALL THE TIME, THEY ARE FORGETTING OR WILLING THEMSELVES NOT TO SEE ALL THE TIME, NOT SOME TIMES.

THE PERSON WHO PERCEIVES STYLE AS CHARMING, BENEFICIAL TO SELF AND OTHERS SEES FALSELY OR REFUSES OR IS UNABLE TO SEE THE TRUTH OR FORGETS OR REFUSE THE TRUTH ABOUT STYLE.

THE PERSON WHO PERCEIVES STYLE AS MEANINGLESS FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT HARMFUL BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND AND HARMS SEES TRULY AND DOES NOT FORGET.

Because style is about using force to stretch, change speed and loudness that is totally unnecessary except for show, nobody will knowing harm himself and he must do so without seeing or knowing he is harming himself or wilfully refusing to see that he is harming himself and that wilful refusal to see is forgetting.

PEOPLE ARE CONSTANTLY HARMING THEMSELVES BY USING FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. RATHER THAN SEEING IT, THEY SEE THEIR STYLE FALSELY AS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD AND THAT IS FALSE SEEING AND INABILITY OR REFUSAL TO SEE THEY ARE HARMING THEMSELVES AND IT IS THIS REFUSAL OR INABILITY TO SEE THEY ARE HARMING THEMSELVES THAT IS THE BASIS OF THEIR FORGETFULNESS.

World well prepared for flu pandemic:

There is no necessity to say we are well prepared but it is said falsely, without seeing or knowing to reassure the public.

If the world is as well prepared to meet the flu epidemic as it was touted to be well prepared to meet any financial crisis, then we are in for a torrid time dealing with a full blown pandemic should it come to pass.

First refuse then cannot see:

Whenever you commit a falsity or harm to self or others, you must refuse to see (deny) or be defiant by insisting to yourself that what you said or did that was false or harmful is not so and gradually more and more you cannot see it until you totally cannot see it. When you totally cannot see the falsity, you have forgotten the falsity. Because forgetting is an urge it can be transferred to other areas such that you begin to forget things you do not wish to forget and you become a forgetful person who may one day pay dearly for his forgetfulness in loss and even death.

Cats also are subject to karma:

I saw this aging nasty neighbourhood dominant male cat in serious distress this morning, it was wobbly, shaking, could barely drag himself along the five footway of my shophouse.

In the past he would demand and copulate with all the female cats he found, he had been party to ferocious fights and pursuits with other male cats, once I saw he had a deep gash in the neck that I thought would be fatal but he survived. He had the nasty habit of urinating on food and water that people left for the cats after he had partaken himself and whenever I shooed him off my premise he would urinate before he left.

His payback time may finally be coming, that he should have a pleasurable life here is not possible but as a result of his evil acts, he is facing his end maker with torment, he is visibly in distress, suffering, not in control of his faculties as I saw today.

EXACTLY HOW GOOD YOU ARE CAN BE KNOWN, IF YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF THAT YOU ARE GOOD WHEN YOU HAVE CONCEALED FANGS, YOU WILL NEVER ESCAPE TORMENT. WHAT SUFFERING YOU HAVE NOW IS JUST THE FIRST INSTALMENT, A WARNING OF WORST TO COME THAT YOU IGNORE AT YOUR OWN PERIL WHEN UNCONTROLLABLE TORMENT FINALLY ENGULFS YOU.

Boosting army just to boost postal vote:

It seems that with the objective of increasing the number of postal votes from 250,000 to 1 million to better ensure BN’s survival, the new defence minister plans to set up army camps in every constituency so that they can boost the number of postal votes.

If true, this is a totally reckless self serving move without concern to cost for the nation.

Why flu deaths all in Mexico:

There was an article in CBS site regarding the above but a brief scan showed no information regarding the question.

If may be that Mexicans have a genetic defect that renders them fatally vulnerable but this is unlikely.

The reason why the deaths are in Mexico is because it is the centre of the outbreak and the number of foreigners in the country is likely to be low compared to the local populace.

BECAUSE THE OUTBREAK IS IN ITS EARLY PHASE, COMPARED TO THE LOCAL POPULATION RELATIVELY FEW FOREIGNERS HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND OF THOSE FOREIGNERS INFECTED, IF THEY WERE SERIOUSLY ILL THEY WOULD HAVE DIED IN MEXICO OR BEEN UNABLE TO TRAVEL AND SO THOSE WHO TRAVELLED BACK ARE THOSE WHO HAVE SHOWN SOME RESISTANCE BUT NEVERTHELESS CAPABLE OF TRANSMITTING THE VIRUS TO THE POPULACE IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES, SOME OF WHOM MAY BECOME FATALLY INFECTED AND SO DEATHS IN OVERSEAS COUNTRIES MAY OCCUR LATER IF CONTAINMENT FAILS AND MORE PEOPLE IN OTHER COUNTRIES ARE INFECTED.

EVEN IF THE VIRUS IS 1% FATAL, OUT OF 1 MILLION PEOPLE INFECTED, 10,000 WILL DIE. IN ORDER TO SPREAD WIDELY AND KILL MANY, THE VIRUS MUST NOT BE TOO VIRULENT AND SO IF ONLY 0.1% DIE, 1,000 PER I MILLION WILL DIE.

THUS A POSSIBLE EXPLANATION WHY ALL THE DEATHS ARE IN MEXICO IS THAT IT IS IN THE EARLY STAGES OF SPREAD WITH VERY FEW FOREIGNERS INFECTED AND IF THE PERSON INFECTED WAS ABLE TO TRAVEL HOME, HE IS LIKELY TO HAVE SOME RESISTANCE AND THEREFORE RECOVER. HOWEVER IF THEY MANAGE TO SPREAD TO MANY OTHERS AT HOME, THESE MAY NOT BE SO LUCKY AND THEY MAY DIE ENMASSE.

Pretending is forgetting:

People pretend they did not see you when they saw you, they pretend by smiling that they are delighted to hear what you say when they are hurt.

By pretending you are using force to fake you did not see, did not feel what you saw or felt and that is trying to forget what happened.

People pretend they are very rich when they are very poor.

Thus every time you pretend you are training yourself to forget what you actually are and people pretend far more often than they are aware, partly because they deny to themselves they pretend.

IT IS NOT A SURPRISE PEOPLE FORGET, ARE FORGETFUL AND IT GETS WORSE WITH AGE, FORGETTING IS WHAT THEY ARE WILLING THEMSELVES FREQUENTLY.

FORGETTING IS NOT NATURAL OR BLAMELESS BUT IT IS THE PRODUCT OF SIN OR PRETENDING AND SO IF YOU PERCEIVE FORGETTING AS NATURAL OR BLAMELESS YOU PERCEIVE WRONGLY AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR YOUR UNDERSTANDING IS FALSE. HERE AS IN OTHER PLACES, YOU THINK YOU UNDERSTAND BUT YOU UNDERSTAND FALSELY THAT IS AS BAD AS NOT UNDERSTANDING.

Highway robbers in KL suburbs:

This person almost lost his life & sustained multiple fractures when his motorbike hit a lorry as he tried to evade a gang of Indian roadside robbers who were routinely stopping passing bikes and cars to rob them for petty cash.

I think there was a similar case with rape of a woman in Cheras reported in the news.

THUS IT APPEARS THAT BECAUSE OF HARD TIMES THERE ARE NOW HIGHWAYMEN ON THE ROADS OF KL WHO ARE STOPPING PEOPLE EARLY IN THE MORNING TO ROB THEM.

There he goes again:

You have heard people complain in dislike or mock liking, “There he goes again” when they hear someone ranting or do something odd that he has done many times before.

What they do not realize is that the only way a person can ‘go again’ is to rehash and if a person rehashes he is a robot.

THUS PEOPLE CAN HEAR & SEE OTHERS SAYING AND DOING THE SAME OLD THINGS AGAIN AND AGAIN BUT THEY DO NOT SEE THAT THIS CAN ONLY COME ABOUT BECAUSE THE PERSON IS REHASHING AND THAT MEANS HE IS A ROBOT. NOT JUST HERE BUT ALWAYS THAT PERSON IS A ROBOT.

AND SO IT IS THAT PEOPLE PERCEIVE BUT THEY PERCEIVE WRONGLY, THEY PERCEIVE PEOPLE REPEATING THEMSELVES IN HACKNEYED WAYS BUT THEY DO NOT PERCEIVE THAT IS PROOF THE PERSON IS A ROBOT NOT JUST THERE BUT ALWAYS.

You have understanding but it is false and rote:

Emotional stylish people have understanding but it can be examined and found to be false and rote.

The soft or gentle ways with which people speak or do things is a matter of style not substance, it is a matter of how the person uses his force of self preservation to modulate his force of going against self to fashion a way of speaking with significant stretching of syllables, speed and loudness changes that are designed to stir the recipient’s mental force to like himself or like the ‘gentle’ person.

PEOPLE PERCEIVE THE GENTLE WAYS THEY AND OTHERS SPEAK IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL WHEN IT IS BAD (THERE IS TRANSMITTED FORCE CHANGES THAT HARMS THE RECIPIENT) AND MEANINGLESS (IT IS JUST A BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE). THUS THEY PERCEIVE AND THUS UNDERSTAND BUT THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY (WHAT IS BAD AND MEANINGLESS IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL) AND THAT PERCEPTION THAT IS FALSE IS NOT SPECIFIC, COMPOSED FOR THE MOMENT BUT MINDLESSLY REHASHED FROM A RECORDING IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX.

THERE IS A RECORDED PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING IN ORDINARY PEOPLE’S MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT IS EVEN VERY ENTRENCHED AND IMMUTABLE THAT ARE TRIGGERED OR REHASHED WHENEVER THEY HEAR SOFT AND GENTLE SPEECH THAT IT IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL. THEY DO NOT PERCEIVE FRESH SPECIFIC TO EACH OCCASION THEY HEAR SOFT GENTLE SPEECH THAT IT IS GOOD AND MEANINGFUL.

IT IS TRUE THAT PEOPLE HAVE UNDERSTANDING BUT THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS FALSE, MORE OFTEN THAN THEY REALIZE.

WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THAT IS TRUE, EG 12 TIMES 12 IS 144 IS NOT FRESH BUT REGURGITATED FROM A COPY IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOX AND WHATEVER IS REGURGITATED IS NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING BUT FALSE ROBOTIC UNDERSTANDING.

Fairness Malaysian Style:

Do you notice the Malaysian government never bothered to contest Razak Baginda’s acquittal for abetting Altanturya’s murder even though he is the boyfriend (and therefore has motive to kill her) and brought the policemen into the picture whilst they dogged pursued Raja Petra Kamaruddin, they appealed against his acquittal by the courts for unlawful detention with relation to his debatable wrongdoing of defamation regarding who murdered Altanturya?

MALAYSIA’S RULING POLITICIANS MUST HAVE VERY THICK SKINS OR CATARACTS AS BIG AS THEIR EYES IF THEY THINK THEY ARE CREDIBLE AND THE PUBLIC BIG SUCKERS TO FALL FOR PLEDGES OF JUSTICE AND RULE OF THE LAW.

THE VERY DIFFERENT TREATMENTS ACCORDED RAZAK BAGINDA AS COMPARED TO RPK MAKES A MOCKERY OF ANY PRETENSE OF RULE OF THE LAW, IT IS JUST LIP SERVICE AND IF YOU CANNOT SEE THAT THOSE IN POWER ARE HYPOCRITES, YOU MUST BE A BIG FOOL.

WHATEVER IS STYLE IS FALSE AND SO IT IS THAT FAIRNESS MALAYSIAN STYLE IS ALL FOR SHOW, FALSE, EMPTY AND THOSE WHO PRACTICE IT AND THOSE WHO ACCEPT IT ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY.

Malaysian justice not inconsistent but consistently false:

Anyone who thinks Malaysian justice is inconsistent perceives falsely because it is CONSISTENT, only consistently FALSE.

IT IS FALSE WHEN IT ACQUITTED RAZAK BAGINDA OF ABETTING.

IT IS AGAIN FALSE IN PURSUING RPK REGARDING DEFAMATION AND HIS ACQUITTAL.

WHO SAYS MALAYSIAN JUSTICE IS INCONSISTENT? IT IS CONSISTENT EVEN VERY CONSISTENT LOADED FOR THOSE ALIGNED TO THE RULING ELITE AND AGAINST THOSE WHO OPPOSE.

Don’t bother to look for us, hubby told:

Many will read it and not understand that whatever is said is not sincere or based on reason but driven by emotion to spite at the opposite party.

You do not tell others to do, what others want to do is their business even if it infringes on the rights of others that will incur karma. For instance, if someone wants to stalk you, they will incur karma and you do not tell them, ‘don’t bother to stalk me’.

If a person has unemotionally clearly thinking made up her mind to end a relationship, she can say, “I do not want to see him again”.

You are stating your position “I don’t want to see you again” but by telling him not to bother, you are telling him off, trying to rub salt into the wound.

Make sure you truly do not want to be found, you are not running away to hurt him and you want to hurt him further by telling him off, ‘don’t bother to look for me’ otherwise you yourself are headed for torment and insanity for lying and wanting to hurt someone.

THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘I DO NOT WISH TO SEE YOU ANYMORE’ AND ‘DON’T BOTHER TO LOOK FOR ME’ WHICH IS USUALLY DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO HURT THE OTHER PERSON. WHEN PEOPLE HEAR THAT, THEY MAY EXPERIENCE HURT BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHY THEY ARE HURT, WHETHER IT IS THEIR FAULT OR THE OTHER PERSON’S FAULT. THE TRUTH IS THAT IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE OTHER PERSON TO HURT YOU BY SCOFFING AT YOUR ATTEMPT TO LOOK FOR HER.

Why it was driven out of spite:

If her disappearance was amicable, she would not have departed suddenly without leaving a forwarding address.

If the disappearance was hostile, then her resurfacing to say ‘don’t bother to look for us’ cannot be driven out of concern for him, if she had concern for him she would not have disappeared to cause him grief.

So she is either a very mixed up lady heading for mad conflict if she still harboured good and bad feelings for her husband or if she is driven by ill will, she cannot mean or is hypocritical in telling him not to bother to look for her.

NO ONE OF GENUINE REASON WILL DEPART FROM ANOTHER IN A HUFF, SUDDENLY COMPLETELY WITHOUT WARNING. IF YOU WANT TO TERMINATE A FRIENDSHIP YOU AMICABLY CALMLY TELL THE OTHER PERSON YOU WANT TO LEAVE. JUST BECAUSE YOU SEPARATE DOES NOT MEAN YOU CANNOT STILL OCCASIONALLY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER, THERE MAY BE OUTSTANDING MATTERS THAT REQUIRE COMMUNICATION AND SO IT REFLECTS IRRATIONAL EMOTION AND A DESIRE TO PUNISH OR HURT THAT A PERSON CHILDISHLY DISAPPEAR WITHOUT TRACE TO MAKE THE OTHER PERSON WORRY. WHAT THIS PERSON DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT SHE HERSELF IS HEADED FOR TORMENT.

Who is the sultan attacking?

Quote: These groups are allowing the end to justify the means by condoning such acts. These groups and individuals feel they are faultless and immune from any action, to the extent of disregarding the law for the sake of attaining power”.

These are very strong words but when did those (who presumably attacked him) say they are faultless and immune from any action? If they have not said so then it is false perception to perceive so that is not without consequences. It sounds impressive but it makes no sense.

The sultan did not specify who he is targeting but exactly who he has in mind can be known by those who are discerning and God and he himself should know who he is targeting.

To those who have muddled thinking they may say one cannot be sure, the sultan may not be targeting anybody specifically, he is criticizing both sides or even BN not the opposition.

To one with calm clear thinking, it can be reasoned with a good degree of certainty if not certainty who he is targeting and it is the opposition.

Why is that so?

He has recently come under attack not by the ruling coalition but those aligned to the opposition and so angered, he is hitting back at his detractors, not the ruling coalition. Further the ruling coalition is already in power and so it does not apply that they disregard the law for the sake of attaining power. If he felt UMNO was wrong, he would not have agreed to dismiss the previous MB to hand over the reins to the UMNO nominated MB.

The record of the ruling coalition in terms of fairness and obeying the law is clearly known for all to see and so is the record of the opposition. If you perceive the opposition as non law abiding and dastardly and the ruling coalition as responsible, you may be right or asking for judgment for wrong view.

WHAT IS SAID IS HIGH SOUNDING, WILL IMPRESS SOME BUT WHATEVER THE FAULTS OF THE OPPOSITION, I DO NOT THINK THEY MERIT BEING ACCUSED OF ARROGANCE, THE BN IS (OBJECTIVELY) FAR MORE ARROGANT AND PLAYS VERY DIRTY IN ELECTIONS.

Doubt and uncertainty the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe and so whoever creates doubt and uncertainty in self and others by deliberately not specifying who he is targeting and what his intent is, is fettering himself to doubt and uncertainty.

IT IS THE BN WHO HAS PATENTLY, IN MANY SITUATIONS SHOWN THAT THE END JUSTIFIES WHATEVER THE MEANS (EG ARREST UNDER ISA EVEN OF REPORTERS AND THE ALTANTURYA TRIAL WHERE NO ONE IS INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT WHO OFFERED SIRUL MONEY TO KILL AND DELETED IMMIGRATION RECORDS) AND TO ACCUSE THE OPPOSITION OF THE SAME IS ASKING FOR JUDGMENT.

The sultan is siding with BN:

Malaysia is supposed to be a constitutional monarchy and the rulers are supposed to be above the partisanship.

By speaking thus, he is painting the opposition as bad and by inference the ruling coalition as responsible.

What he should have done befitting his role as above politics is to say that the opposition is wrong to criticize him, he has done everything according to the law and they are unfair to criticize him.

By saying the opposition will use whatever means to achieve their ends, they feel they are faultless and immune from any action, to the extent of disregarding the law for the sake of attaining power, he is painting a negative picture of the opposition that if unwarranted, has divine consequences for him.

‘Attack’ the deed not person:

If someone has done you wrong, point out where he has gone wrong, do not attack his person.

Whether the sultan realized or not, he is implying that those who criticized him are unscrupulous, will do anything to usurp power and that is attacking their persons not attacking whatever they have done wrong to him.

THE FAIR MINDED PERSON DOES NOT TRADE BODY BLOWS, HE ADDRESSES WHATEVER IS WRONG. THE WAY AND WHAT THE SULTAN SAID IS A BROADSIDE AIMED AT THE INTEGRITY OF HIS DETRACTORS AND THAT IS UNJUSTIFIED AND ASKING FOR JUDGMENT.

By your words you will be condemned:

Jesus said “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter; for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."

The sultan was wrong to deprecate his detractors as unprincipled or ruthless, he should have restricted himself to pointing out exactly where he has been wronged and it is for others to judge for themselves whether the opposition are unprincipled scoundrels or it is their detractors who are.

WITHOUT REALIZING, HE HAS COMMITTED WRONG TO DEPRECATE HIS DETRACTORS AND HE HAS NOT FULFILLED HIS ROLE AS ABOVE PARTISANSHIP.

BN never PR fits sultan’s bill:

The sultan (wrongfully) did not specify who he was referring to but rightfully only BN, in this case and many other places, fits the sultan’s description perfectly and it is farfetched if not impossible PR can be accused of the misdeeds the sultan alludes to.

And so if the sultan has in mind BN, then he is right to say so but if he was attacking BN then why did he accede to their demand to dismiss the former MB and install a BN MB that contradicts his avowed distaste for unscrupulousness?

If the sultan has PR in mind when he launched the attack, then it is not just stretching the imagination but impossible that PR could be accused of power grabbing in this and any situation you can name.

The defectors (who have grave karma far worse than they ever dreamt) had a legal contract to resign if they defected but they refused and the election commissioner conveniently ruled their signed agreement null and void. They have never declared what important matters of principle or disagreement prompted their defection and so it is likely if not certainly that their defection was engineered by foul means, corrupt inducements.

On what basis can anyone accuse PR of power grabbing when they wanted fresh elections in which the people will be the choosers, they may lose the election?

Does the engineering of defections that may be corrupt and refusal to subject yourself to the electorate’s judgment appear more like power grabbing than calling for fresh elections?

On what basis did the sultan determine that the ruling party has lost the support of the assembly? There was never a vote that confirmed the loss of support.

FACED WITH THE LIKELY POSSIBILITY THAT THE DEFECTIONS WERE ENGINEERED THROUGH FOUL MEANS AND THE EXISTENCE OF AGREEMENTS TO RESIGN THAT THE DEFECTORS RENEGED, THEN SOMEONE WHO HAS AN AVOWED DISTASTE FOR UNSCRUPULOUSNESS SHOULD OPT FOR THE MOST FAIR CHOICE, DISSOLVE THE ASSEMBLY AND ASK THE PEOPLE TO DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHO SHOULD RULE.

The litany of power and judicial abuses by the ruling coalition is extensive. Name me one instance where the opposition has abused power and the judiciary?

Nothing is being done in the VK Lingam affair when it clearly shows judges & judgments can be bought and judiciary appointments of the highest levels tampered with. There are many incidences of definite abuse of power and the judiciary system by the ruling coalition and so it is mad for anyone to accuse the opposition of the same.

Flu virus a survivor?

Quote: The flu virus is a survivor. It must continually evolve in order to evade its biggest threat - the immune system.

It is totally unnecessary to state that the flu virus is a survivor, it is said driven by emotion not reason in the name of hyping or making much or to impress.

Whether it is a survivor or not cannot be determined and it is irrelevant to the discussion and the reason the person said it is to boast, to make much of the virus which is the topic of his article.

EXACTLY WHETHER IT IS NECESSARY TO STATE THE FLU VIRUS IS A SURVIVOR IS OBJECTIVE, IF IT IS UNNECESSARY AND YOU THE WRITER OR READER SEES NOTHING WRONG, SEES IT AS NECESSARY, THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.

HERE AGAIN, PEOPLE PERCEIVE BUT THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY THAT ‘THE FLU VIRUS IS A SURVIVOR’ IS RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION WHEN IT IS NOT. BECAUSE THEY PERCEIVE FALSELY THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND AND WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING THEY HAVE IS FALSE OR REHASHED MECHANICAL UNDERSTANDING.

What is the point of telling me or anyone that the flu virus is a survivor except that you want to stir my mental force to be impressed?