How can you mean what you don’t under...

 

How can you mean what you don’t understand?

In order to mean what you say you must understand what you say and people don’t understand or falsely understand what they say and so not understanding what they say, they CANNOT MEAN what they say.

For instance the person who says, “I smile because I like someone” is saying that what he says is true and good when he is admitting he is a mindless robot.

What he is actually saying is that he activates his facial muscles to fabricate a smile because his mental force is stirred attractively at the sight of someone, in other words it is a knee jerk stimulus action event in which reason or understanding is not involved.

A person who understands what he is saying will understand how silly or foolish it is what he is saying that he smiles or activates his facial muscles according to a rehashed plan because his mental force is stirred attractively (likes) by someone.

It is because a person does not understand how silly it is to smile (like an idiot) at someone that he says it and because he does not understand or understands WRONGLY what he is ACTUALLY saying, he cannot mean it.

How to say what you don’t understand:

The only way to say or do what you don’t understand is to do it by rote, copying what others say or do without understanding it and therefore if a person does not understand something he says and he says it, he is a robot.

Thus the person who says it is unthinkable that a tainted man can lead MCA is saying it without understanding because someone who understand will understand it is thinkable not unthinkable. It may be unacceptable to him but never unthinkable.

People do not understand what they say or do far more than they concede and the only way this is possible is that they are copycats who copy what others say falsely without understanding or understanding falsely.

Obama exposes his stupidity & lack of understanding:

Mr. Obama, in an interview with Bloomberg News, questioned the case for limiting financial-sector pay: “Why is it,” he asked, “that we’re going to cap executive compensation for Wall Street bankers but not Silicon Valley entrepreneurs or N.F.L. football players?”

Only a stupid man will ask a stupid question, it is impossible for a wise man to ask a stupid question. If you think so, you may be right or have wrong view, you think what is impossible is possible.

There is considerable political pressure, maybe even threats of death should he take action against bankers who have connections to politicians and gangsters (eg Mafia) and with no stomach for taking action he may be trying to justify his inaction.

As Krugman pointed out, bankers are a special case, they are dealing with people’s money deposited in banks (not just shareholder’s money) and the outrageously huge rewards for fat immediate profits they generate for their banks means they don’t care if later the bank collapses as a result of the risks they take, so long as they can produce fat immediate profits to qualify for bonuses that is what matters and even after the collapse they still reward themselves with fat bonuses.

Although Silicon Valley executives are rewarded fabulously for their ‘exertions’, if they destroy their companies, it does not destroy the financial system, similarly football players may have obscene pay but their demise does not affect the world financial system or other people’s money.

THUS IT IS NOT A MOMENTARY LAPSE BUT EXPOSURE OF HIS STUPIDITY AND LACK OF UNDERSTANDING (PERHAPS ABETTED BY HIS RELUCTANCE TO TAKE ACTION BECAUSE OF INTIMIDATION) THAT HE SHOULD POSE A STUPID QUESTION THAT JUST BECAUSE SILICON VALLEY TYPES AND FOOTBALLERS GET UNFETTERED REWARDS, THE SAME SHOULD HOLD FOR BANKERS WHO ARE GUARDIANS OF WEALTH DEPOSITED IN THEIR BANKS.

A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT ALWAYS UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE IS SAYING OR HE REFRAINS FROM SPEAKING AND IT IS A ROBOT WHO SPEAKS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHAT HE SAYS BY ROTE WHO THEN FORGETS THE MEANING OF WHAT HE SAID WHO WILL THEN SUBSEQUENTLY CONTRADICT HIMSELF.

A PERSON WHO MEANS EVERYTHING HE SAYS UNDERSTANDS EVERYTHING HE SAYS AND THUS UNDERSTANDING HE REMEMBERS NOT FORCEFULLY BY ROTE THAT IS PRONE TO FORGETTING BUT HE REMEMBERS FORCE ‘FREELY’ BY SEEING AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE WILL CONTRADICT HIMSELF.

Bank lelong, bank buy:

A Public bank officer involved in bank auctions of repossessed properties just told me that the response is so bad banks end up buying the properties they put up for auction to be subsequently disposed off likely at a greater loss.

Thus a lot of dirt is swept under the carpet, the system may be under more severe distress, even terminal cancerous decline than it appears to the public.

Bank lelong bank buy Part II

‘Bank lelong, bank buy’ has a style in it that is designed to attract and stir emotions. People always put what they want to say in a certain way that sounds attractive, funny or witty to impress others.

The style free way of saying it is ‘banks buy back properties they auction’.

IF YOU PERCEIVE THAT ‘BANK LELONG BANK BUYS’ HAS NO STYLE, IS A MATTER OF FACT STATEMENT THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT MEANS YOU SEE BUT YOU SEE FALSELY AND THEREFORE DON’T SEE AND DON’T UNDERSTAND.

Obama demonstrating his rote rules logic:

It is a robotic rules logic that if Silicon Valley types and NFL footballers are entitled to unfettered rewards, so should bankers that because it is nonspecific will be found wanting or lead to disaster in some events.

You cannot apply this rule with bankers because they are custodian to the financial system’s wealth and if they are rewarded in an unfettered way without accountability for the ruin they wreak on their banks, then it would bring disaster on the economy.

THUS OBAMA IS UNWITTINGLY ACKNOWLEDGING HE IS AN UNTHINKING ROBOT APPLYING A RULE THAT CANNOT BE APPLIED IN THIS CASE. ALL RULES WILL BE FOUND WANTING, THEY ARE NOT TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION LOGIC BUT FAKED GENERALIZED REHASHED LOGIC THAT WILL BE FOUND WANTING AND BE EVEN DISASTROUS IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

The truth may be that emotional stylish people do not possess true logic, they only possess and subscribe to rules logic or generalizations that they memorize and try to apply to situations occurring. When they think they are trying to retrieve and fit a rules logic that best explains a situation or provide the best course of action. What they never do is understand the relevant strands of the situation and what they say in combination and based on that understanding to compose a response SPECIFICALLY TAILORED FOR THAT OCCASION.

Why compare bankers with footballers and silicon valley CEOs?

It actually reflects crazy logic, is a detraction that has nothing to do with the situation at hand to compare bankers with Silicon valley CEOs and footballers.

Bankers are bankers and you have a problem in banking and so you should focus your attention here rather than look elsewhere for answers to apply here which means you are rehashing, trying to apply rules from elsewhere.

IT IS ACTUALLY MAD, ABSURD TO DIVERT YOUR ATTENTION TO COMPARE WITH SILICON VALLEY CEOS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PROBLEM AT HAND WITH THE BANKING SYSTEM. RATHER THAN DIVERTING HIS ATTENTION ELSEWHERE ‘FOR GUIDANCE OR INSTRUCTION OR PROGRAMMING’, HE SHOULD FOCUS HIS ATTENTION ON THE VARIOUS STRANDS OF THE BANKING PROBLEM, UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE AND THEN COMPOSE THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE.

WHAT HE IS TRYING TO DO IS APPLY SILICON VALLEY RULES ON BANKERS AND THAT IS REHASHING AND HE IS A ROBOT.

Truth never contradicts truth:

Why is it that a person of truth can never contradict himself subsequently?

If what you say now is the truth, and what you say one year later or whatever is also the truth then because truth can never contradict truth but truth always dovetails into truth, what you said one year later cannot contradict what you said before because both are true and truth never contradicts truth, only falsity can contradict falsity.

What Obama says that bankers should not have reward caps because Silicon Valley types do not have caps contradicts what he says all along and the only that is possible is because what he said either before or now or both are false.

IF WHAT YOU SAID 10 YEARS AGO IS TRUE, THEN THERE IS NO FEAR THAT WHAT YOU SAY NOW THAT IS ALSO TRUE CAN CONTRADICT IT BECAUSE TRUTH NEVER CONTRADICTS TRUTH BUT TRUTH ALWAYS COMPLEMENTS.

Truth is simply whatever that has happened:

Whatever that has happened is the truth, whatever did not happen but is said to have happened is false.

Thus if what you said in the past is the truth, it has happened the way you said it did, then what you say now that is also the truth, is what has happened now, how can it contradict with what also did happen in the past?

THEREFORE TRUTH CAN NEVER CONTRADICT TRUTH ONLY FALSITY CAN AND WILL CONTRADICT FALSITY OR PREVIOUS TRUTH AND THE PERSON WHO CONTRADICTS HIMSELF IS NOT A MAN OF TRUTH BUT FALSITY HEADED FOR INSANITY BECAUSE EVEN IF YOU ARE UNAWARE OF THE CONTRADICTION, CONTRADICTION IS FORCEFUL AND DISTURBS THE MIND. IF YOU ARE CONTRADICTING YOURSELF AND YOU CANNOT SEE IT, YOU ARE EVEN WORSE THAN THE MAN WHO IS AWARE OF HIS CONTRADICTIONS.

Is what I say above not the truth? How come no one speaks like me but instead they are hostile, they hate what I say? Am I thus not the spirit of Truth that this world cannot receive?

I do not roll over, says Brown:

This statement is based on force, stubbornness or defiance not reason or understanding.

A person of reason will assess the situation at hand and then make a decision to continue or resign instead of defiantly saying he will not rollover. So the man of reason will calmly say, “I am not resigning”.

Money figures show there's trouble ahead

Private credit is contracting on both sides of the Atlantic. The M3 money data is flashing early warning signals of a deflation crisis next year in nearly half the world economy. Emergency schemes that have propped up spending are being withdrawn, gently or otherwise.

 

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Published: 8:48PM BST 26 Sep 2009

Comments 76 | Comment on this article

Unemployment benefits have masked social hardship unto now but these are starting to expire with cliff-edge effects.The jobless army in Spain will be reduced to €100 a week; in Estonia to €15.

Whoever wins today's elections in Germany will face the reckoning so deftly dodged before. Kurzarbeit, that subsidises firms not to fire workers, is running out. The cash-for-clunkers scheme ended this month. It certainly "worked".

Car sales were up 28pc in August, but only by stealing from the future. The Center for Automotive Research says sales will fall by a million next year: "It will be the largest downturn ever suffered by the German car industry."

Fiat's Sergio Marchionne warns of "disaster" for Italy unless Rome renews its car scrappage subsidies. Chrysler too will see some "harsh reality" following the expiry of America's scheme this month. Some expect US car sales to slump 40pc in September.

Weaker US data is starting to trickle in. Shipments of capital goods fell by 1.9pc in August. New house sales are stuck near 430,000 – down 70pc from their peak – despite an $8,000 tax credit for first-time buyers. It expires in November.

We are moving into a phase when most OECD states must retrench to head off debt-compound traps.

Britain faces the broad sword; Spain has told ministries to slash 8pc of discretionary spending; the IMF says Japan risks a funding crisis.

If you look at the sheer scale of global stimulus this year, what shocks is how little has been achieved. China's exports were down 23pc in August; Japan's were down 36pc; industrial production has dropped by 23pc in Japan, 18pc in Italy, 17pc in Germany, 13pc in France and Russia and 11pc in the US.

Call this a "V-shaped" recovery if you want. Markets are pricing in economic growth that is not occurring.

The overwhelming fact is that private spending has slumped in the deficit countries of the Anglosphere, Club Med, and East Europe but has not risen enough in the surplus countries (East Asia and Germany) to compensate. Excess capacity remains near post-war highs across the world.

Yet hawks are already stamping feet at key central banks.

Are they about to repeat the errors made in early 2007, and then again in the summer of 2008, when they tightened – or made hawkish noises – even as the underlying credit system fell apart?

Fed chairman Ben Bernanke spoke in April 2008 of "a return to growth in the second half of this year", and again in July 2008 that growth would "pick up gradually over the next two years".

He could only have thought such a thing if he was ignoring the money data. Key aggregates had been in free-fall for months.

I cited monetarists in July 2008 warning that the lifeblood of the Western credit was "draining away". For whatever reason (the lockhold of New Keynesian ideology?) the Fed missed the signal.

So did the European Central Bank when it raised rates weeks before the Lehman collapse, blathering about a "1970s inflation spiral."

Yes, the money entrails can mislead. The gurus squabble like Trotskyists. But you ignore the data at your peril.

Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research says that US bank loans have been falling at an annual pace of almost 14pc since early Summer: "There has been nothing like this in the USA since the 1930s."

M3 money has been falling at a 5pc rate; M2 fell by 12pc in August; the Commercial Paper market has shrunk from $1.6 trillion to $1.2 trillion since late May; the Monetary Multiplier at the St Louis Fed is below zero (0.925). In Europe, M3 money has been contracting at a 1pc rate since April.

Private loans have fallen by €111bn since January. Whether you see a credit crunch in Euroland depends where you sit. It is already garrotting Spain. Germany's Mittelstand says it is "a reality", even if not for big companies that issue bonds. The Economy Ministry is drawing up plans for €250bn in state credit, knowing firms will be unable to roll over debts.

Bundesbank chief Axel Weber sees no crunch now, yet fears a second pulse of the crisis this winter. "We are threatened by stress from our domestic credit industry through the rise in the insolvency of firms and households," he says.

Draw your own conclusion. Western central banks will have to "monetize" deficits on a huge scale to stave off debt deflation. The longer they think otherwise, the worse it will be.

Not responsible and force more important:

People who are emotional and stylish are not responsible for their speeches (and actions), it is their mental jukeboxes with templates of whatever they say or do that is responsible and all they do is to experience the substance and style of whatever they render in speech and actions and in all circumstances, it is the force changes of what they say or do that is just as important if not more important than the substance of what they say or do that may be true, false or makes no sense (eg dancing, hitting a golf ball).

OFTEN IT IS THE FORCE CHANGES (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH) THAT IS THE MOTIVATION OF WHAT PEOPLE SAY OR DO (SOUNDS NICE OR LOOKS GOOD), THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS JUST AN EXCUSE TO EXERCISE THEIR MENTAL AND PHYSICAL FORCES. OFTEN PEOPLE DON’T EVEN UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND FALSELY WHAT THEY SAY OR DO, SO HOW CAN SUBSTANCE BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN STYLE TO THEM?

IT IS SELF DECEPTION THAT THEY ARE THE ISSUERS OF THEIR SPEECH AND ACTIONS. THE TRUTH IS THERE IS AN IMPERSONAL MENTAL JUKEBOX FULL OF RECORDINGS OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO THAT IS THE PARROT OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO, THEY ONLY SOMETIMES ACT AS DISC JOCKEYS, OFTEN THE JUKEBOX EVEN AUTOMATICALLY CUES FOR THEM.

Rosmah’s movements when Altanturya died:

 

Another case under the OSA for the IGP to NFA

 

Posted by admin

Monday, 28 September 2009 02:39

This means these two army officers were in the home of the then Deputy Prime Minister for about eight hours during the time Altantuya was supposed to have been murdered. Why they were there during those eight hours and who these two army officers are has not been revealed. NO HOLDS BARRED Raja Petra Kamarudin The Malaysian government says Altantuya Shaariibuu was murdered between 10.00pm on October 19th and 1.00am on October 20th, 2006. That was the charge against Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar and that was what they were pronounced guilty of. At 10.01pm on 19th October 2006, two unnamed army officers went to Najib Tun Razak’s house, according to log entry 6494 in the police guard book. (See log 1a and log 2a below). These same two unnamed army officers left Najib’s house at 6.05am on 20th October 2006, according to log entry 6498. (See log 1b and log 2b below). The purpose of the visit was never clarified. This means these two army officers were in the home of the then Deputy Prime Minister for about eight hours during the time Altantuya was supposed to have been murdered. Why they were there during those eight hours and who these two army officers are has not been revealed. From 10.01pm the night Altantuya was murdered until 6.05am the following morning, two army officers visited the Deputy Prime Minister and/or his wife. This is certainly a most odd time to visit a Deputy Prime Minister and/or his wife in their home. And what does one do for eight hours in someone’s home during the time most people would be fast sleep? According to Fauzi, a driver, Rosmah Mansor left the official residence of the Deputy Prime Minister in Putrajaya at 6.48am on 19th October 2006 using car registration number WLQ 11 to return to her private home in Taman Duta. The car odometer reading was 86,197. That same evening, Rosmah attended a function near the Tabung Haji building in Jalan Tun Razak in Kuala Lumpur She did not return home until 11.20pm later that night, according to Fauzi. The next day, 20th October 2006, Rosmah left her official residence in Putrajaya at 6.32am using the same car bearing registration number WLQ 11 to, again, return to Taman Duta. She also ran a few errands and did not return to Putrajaya until 1.01am the following morning. The odometer reading was 86,315. On the third day, Rosmah repeated the itinerary. She left Putrajaya at 6.40am to return to her Taman Duta home and to run some errands and did not go back to Putrajaya until 9.34pm that night. The odometer reading was 86,550. Over three days, Rosmah travelled more than 350 kilometres to shuttle from Putrajajaya to Taman Duta, plus to some other places in between, according to the records. I suggest the IGP investigate how these 'officials secrets' managed to leak out and whether the Official Secrets Act (OSA) has been breached. Or maybe the IGP would rather bury the whole issue and file it under No Further Action (NFA) to save the Prime Minister and his wife from having to answer some very embarrassing questions. Hmm...I wonder who these two unnamed army officers are and whether they were really at the Deputy Prime Minister's house those entire eight hours or whether they sneaked out and in again without any 'official record'. Ooh, I just love the OSA that protects the wrongdoer and instead sends the whistleblower to jail.

Army officers may have assisted in Altanturya’s murder:

According to RPK the army officers, possibly C4 experts, arrived at Najib’s house after 10pm, probably when they were summoned because Altanturya had fallen into their trap then or was in police custody.

RPK suggested that the army officers secretly departed Najib’s house that night.

The army officers arrived at Najib’s house at 10.01 pm whilst Rosmah returned at 11.20 pm whilst the murder was estimated to have been committed between 10 pm 19 Oct and 10am 20^th Oct.

Obama to woo IOC over Chicago bid:

If it is true Obama is wooing IOC, it is sinning.

If you have a proposal to another you just propose it and it is up to the other party to agree or not.

To woo is to provide inducements, to use your prestige and exert pressures on someone to accede to your proposal that is unfair for other parties and coerces the wooed party.

HENCE THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION, ALL WOOING IS SINFUL, UNFAIR. IF YOU HAVE A CASE YOU STATE IT BUT YOU DON’T WOO OR PROVIDE INDUCEMENTS OR KICKBACKS TO MAKE THE PERSON AGREE.

Stylish people must have false perception:

Stylish people do not have mad perception (yet) except in isolated areas and incidences but that is their final destination in the normal course of events.

Why is it that stylish people must have significant and widespread false perception?

It must be so because they perceive stretched syllables, changing speed and loudness as meaningful, impressive and pleasing when they are meaningless, a prodigious waste of energy to produce insoluble stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate that is tormenting apart from conditioning or addicting and degrading their minds inexorably to end in final degenerated minds.

ANYONE WHO CAN PERCEIVE HIS AND OTHERS’ STRETCHED SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AS MEANINGFUL, IMPRESSIVE AND PLEASING WHEN THEY ARE IN TRUTH MEANINGLESS, REQUIRES THE INCESSANT UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE THAT IS STRESSFUL, RESTLESS AND DISTRACTING, ADDICTIVE LIKE ALCOHOL AND DEGRADES HIS MIND HAS SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END INFALLIBLY IN MAD PERCEPTION. YOU HAVE NOT GONE MAD YET, HAVE NOT HAD YOUR HEAD CHOPPED OFF YET, HAVE NOT BEEN ROASTED IN HELL YET SO DON’T BE TOO SURE YOU WON’T MIND IT. YET I TELL YOU, IF YOU CAN DETECT STRETCHING IN YOUR SYLLABLES (EG ‘AAARRRGGGGHHHH’ INSTEAD OF ‘ARG’, ‘PPPLLLLLEEEEASSSSEEE’ INSTEAD OF ‘PLEASE’), THERE IS INSANITY IN THE FUTURE FOR YOU.

BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD CAN BE OBJECTIVELY HEARD TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THEY MUST HAVE SIGNIFICANT FALSE PERCEPTION AND IT IS NOT A SURPRISE BUT TO BE EXPECTED THAT THEY WILL ALSO SHOW FALSE PERCEPTION IN MANY SPECIFIC INSTANCES THAT I HAVE IN THE PAST POINTED OUT.

IN GENERAL AND IN SPECIFIC STYLISH PEOPLE MUST HAVE SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR MAD PERCEPTION. WHEN YOU SEE TERRIBLE DEMONS ASSAILING YOU OR THE ALCOHOLIC SEES PINK ELEPHANTS WHEN THERE ARE NONE, THEN THAT IS FALSE PERCEPTION. LIKE THAT?

A whole mass of suffering:

There is suffering in general and suffering in specific.

What is suffering in specific?

When you get robbed, booked by a policeman, stabbed, stub a toe or spurned by a lover; that is suffering in specific.

What is suffering in general?

To constantly use force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness that leads to insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction is suffering in general.

To be constantly bombarded by the same from others who stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness is suffering in general.

To constantly think with force prolonging, changing speed and strength is suffering compared with a blissful cessation of thinking when there is no need for thinking.

To constantly stir your mental force to be attracted (like) and repulsed (dislike) is suffering in general.

To stir your mental force to be sad, hurt, agitated and fearful is suffering in general.

To experience pain and pleasure, to seek pleasure (eg good food, perfumes, aromas, ‘great’ sights) and avoid (even seek) pain is actually also suffering in general. Seeking pleasure whatever it is, sexual gratification, good hawker fare, aromas, great holiday destinations or sights is actually seeking force in mild to moderate amounts and force always leads to pain and suffering ultimately.

THUS IT IS THAT EVEN DISCOUNTING SPECIFIC INSTANCES OF SUFFERING (TROUBLE IN THE FAMILY, WORK, ETC), LIFE IS A WHOLE MASS OF SUFFERING IN GENERAL BECAUSE OF THE FORCE BOMBARDMENT OF THEIR OWN STYLES, OTHERS’ STYLES, INCESSANT MADDENING THINKING, LIKING, DISLIKING, EMOTIONS (SADNESS, HURT, FEAR) AND EVEN SEEKING AND EXPERIENCING PLEASURE IS ACTUALLY SUFFERING.

AND IF YOU DON’T TURN BACK, YOU WILL PERISH AND HEAD FOR ETERNAL WEEPING AND GNASHING OF YOUR TEETH.

THE BUDDHA SAID THAT WHAT HE TAUGHT IS FOR THE PERMANENT ENDING OF ALL UNPLEASANTNESS. IF YOU ARE ASSAILED BY UNPLEASANTNESS, YOU ARE HEADED FOR FUTURE UNPLEASANTNESS.

Next to godliness:

Quote: the village where cleanliness is next to godliness.

Cleanliness next to godliness is a falsification to exaggerate how valued cleanliness is to the villagers that may be far from the truth. It is copied from others and therefore rehashed by rote because it sounds impressive, ‘next to godliness’.

How do you know cleanliness is next to godliness? What if some of the villagers do not believe in god or they obsessively value cleanliness above anything else? Therefore it is totally unnecessarily to say except to exaggerate and impress others.

It suffices to say, "Village where cleanliness is much valued" and even that may be in danger of falsity if some of the villagers do not subscribe to cleanliness or it is enforced on them.

Cleanliness is a rule that leads to rituals:

Cleanliness is never based on reason or understanding but it is driven by force (fear and obsession) according to rules formulated by the person who embraces cleanliness that leads to various rituals to consummate that cleanliness.

The person of reason does not subscribe to cleanliness but he sees each occasion on a case by case basis wherein sometimes measures to ensure cleanliness is necessary or rational and sometimes it is unnecessary.

To emotional stylish people, cleanliness becomes an overriding irrational pursuit, a rule that they impose on all occasions by carrying out rigidly memorized rituals that they perceive will result in cleanliness.

 

What may have happened night Altanturya murdered:

According to court testimony, Altanturya died between 10pm 19 Sept and 10 am Sept 20.

It is likely the act was committed way after midnight to avoid passing eye witnesses because the junction leading to the site is on a main road.

RPK said two army officers arrived at Najib’s house at 10.05 pm that night, 19^th Sept and Rosmah returned from a function at Tab Haji in town at 11.30 pm.

These two army officers may be carrying the C4 and are needed for their detonation and the reason for meeting is because Altanturya has been captured, to bring along the C4 and for all vested parties to assemble before proceeding to the site to rendezvous with the other party holding Altanturya.

Why army officers left at 6 am:

RPK suggested that the army officers sneaked out after they arrived and officially they left the premises at 6am which suggests that if they had anything to do with Altanturya, the execution must be closer to 6am than 10 pm when they arrived.

Social isolation 'worsens cancer'

Social isolation may trigger biological changes that make cancer more deadly, US research on mice suggests.

This is a nonsense conclusion by deluded people.

If the people you are exposed to are toxic, stressful to live with then it is better you are isolated than in communion.

Thus if companionship can be nasty or pleasant then it is false to say indiscriminately that socialization is good for cancer.

It is the emotional dependency of people who are inadequate that renders their isolation adverse. For a person who is virtuous, isolation from the stressful corrupt influences of others is desirable and more blissful (as taught by the Buddha).

IF A PERSON IS STYLE FREE, UNEMOTIONAL THEN SECLUSION IS TO BE PREFERRED BY HIM COMPARED TO CONVIVIALITY.

TO THOSE WHO ARE EMOTIONALLY DEPENDENT ON OTHERS THEN IT IS NOT A CASE OF SOCIAL CONTACT IMPROVING BUT IF SOCIAL CONTACT IS DESTRUCTIVE (EG WITH MOB OF THUGS) THEN IT IS WORSE THAN SOCIAL ISOLATION AND SO THE CONCLUSION IS DELUDED.

It is not social contact but the quality of contact that matters:

Did the researchers compare survival rates between exposure to caring peers and exposure to morose or hostile peers constantly snapping at the cancer mice?

Without doing so, how you can you say it is social contact that is the reason.

It may not be social contact per se but the quality of social contact that matters and thus these researchers have demonstrated themselves to be fools not to think of that.

Can BN stave off Pakatan?

Why is this person deluded and headed for madness?

He is asking a question that it is impossible he knows the answer and there may not be an answer to this foolish question.

Supposed the government throw all Pakatan leaders into jail for ISA offences or increase its cheating at elections like Mugabe or Iran’s president, then the question of staving off Pakatan will not arise.

IN AN IDEAL WORLD WHERE BN PLAY BY THE RULES THEN YOU MAY ENTERTAIN THIS QUESTION BUT IN A WORLD WHERE THE RULING PARTY CAN KEEP SHIFTING THE GOAL POSTS YOU ARE A FOOL TO PONDER THIS USELESS QUESTION. OBVIOUSLY HE THINKS IT IS FULL OF MEANING AND SO HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY.

Common sense not studies:

You don’t need karma creating studies subjecting mice to cancer to know that it is the quality of social contact that influences cancer survival not social isolation itself and if you have no common sense then after all the meticulous studies you conduct you can still come to deluded conclusions.

Which would you prefer?

No neighbours or neighbours who blast punk music day and night nonstop?

Common sense will tell you social isolation is preferable to social contact with raucous people.

Experiencing and seeking force:

When a person is experiencing pleasure he is experiencing force, without force there can be no pleasure.

When a person seeks pleasure he is seeking force. And because all beings here even animals seek pleasure be it in food, smells, touch, sounds or sights, they are seeking force that is blind, meaningless and harmful and so they are slaves detained in suffering not masters in charge on themselves.

Only the person who has tuned his mind not to experience pleasures, who ignores and does not seek pleasure does not seek force and thus not seeking force he is released, escapes from pain that is the inevitable shadow of pleasure to a realm wherein there is neither pain nor pleasure nor death for even 60,000 eons.

CALL IT WHAT YOU MAY BUT IF IT IS PLEASURE YOU ARE EXPERIENCING, IT IS FORCE YOU ARE EXPERIENCING. IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU ARE EXPERIENCING AS PLEASURE, YOU DON'T KNOW IT IS FORCE, YOU ARE A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE EXPERIENCES.

An universal law:

It does not matter who you are, how pious, smart or otherwise you think you are, so long as you are interested in pleasure, you are interested in force and you are trapped in a realm wherein there is pain, even to intense levels.

People speak of intense pleasure but that is partly false perception, partly an acknowledgement that pleasure is based on force because only force has intensity, reason and meaning has no intensity except in your advanced false perception that it is so.

As soon as a person has no interest in pleasure, he is released from the world of force to access a force free world of neither pain nor pleasure and that is never suffering or woe.