Many causes of global crisis:

Many causes of global crisis:

Quote Soros: These
bubbles had been caused by easy credit and highly-leveraged deals, where investors
borrow a multiple of their own money to finance an investment.

This
is one cause but there are many causes and it is not a surprise there are many
concurrent cause because the cause of the crisis is unrighteous greed and
driven by blind geed and abuse of other people’s money, the goats (politicians,
bankers, businessmen) set out in many ways to wreck the world economy.

What
are the other ways?

Outsourcing
or the taking away of employment from the consumer market to a cheaper foreign
market, the repatriation of profits made from these rich consumers to offshore
accounts to escape tax deprives the rich consumer markets of the west of
spending generating income and liquidity (profits not kept in consuming
countries) when widespread becomes fatal.

China
is said to have overtaken Germany as the world’s largest exporter. There is a
big difference between China, a surrogate exporter whose major exports are not
its own but belong to foreign multinationals using it as a cheap labour base
and Germany whose exports are mostly by German companies.

THUS
THE ASCENDANCY OF CHINA AND MANY ASIAN COUNTRIES LIKE SINGAPORE, TAIWAN AS
EXPORTERS IS AN INDICATION OF HOW SERIOUS THIS POTENTIALLY FATAL DEPRIVATION OF
EMPLOYMENT AND SIPHONING OF PROFITS AWAY FROM RICH CONSUMING MARKET HAS BECOME
AND IF THIS TREND CANNOT BE REVERSED, IT WILL PROVE EVEN FATAL.

Another
important way is the folly of America being allowed to build up mountainous
trade deficits not just with China but the world because it pays with pieces of
paper it prints and people foolishly stash their money in the US.

Yet
another way is the inexorable transfer of people’s savings in banks, pension
funds and mutual funds into the hands of a few. Your money in banks is no
longer there but in the hands of property developers who have sold houses at
exorbitant prices to foolish desirous buyers and should they default then your
money is lost, will not return, no matter how much money governments print.

THUS
THERE IS NOT ONE BUT MANY FACTORS OR STRANDS CONTRIBUTING TO TODAY’S BIG EVEN
FATAL FINANCIAL CRISIS AND THIS IS NOT A SURPRISE BUT EXPECTED BECAUSE THE
UNDERLYING CAUSE IS UNRESTRAINED RECKLESS GREED THAT DRIVES GOATS TO SET OUT IN
ALL WAYS POSSIBLE TO WRECK THE SYSTEM, GO FOR BROKE AND LET OTHERS PICK UP THE
PIECES.

How can banks be allowed to become too big to fall?

THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER FOR BANKS TO
BECOME TOO BIG TO FALL AND IF THEY HAVE BECOME SO, IT REFLECTS HUMAN LACK OF
UNDERSTANDING AND ANYONE WHO ADVOCATES CONTINUATION OF THE SITUATION HAS FALSE
LOGIC THAT WILL END IN MADNESS.

If
it is true many banks today are too big to fall, if they fall, they bring the
system to its knees then clearly this is a dangerous situation because banks
can and do fail and there can be no justification not to change the situation
with regulations that will split the banks up into smaller entities that are
accountable for their actions.

EVEN
IF THERE IS SUPERIOR ECONOMIC GROWTH IF BANKS ARE ALLOWED TO BECOME TOO BIG TO
FALL, IT IS NOT JUSTFIED TO ALLOW THIS SITUATION TO CONTINUE AS BANKS CAN AND
DO FAIL AND IT IS RISKING TOTAL COLLAPSE TO PERMIT BANKS TO BECOME TOO BIG TO
FALL AND HENCE THERE IS NO ARGUMENT AND ANYONE WHO OPPOSES SPLITTING BANKS INTO
SMALLER ENTITIES THAT CAN DIE WITHOUT AFFECTING THE SYSTEM IS A FOOL OR HAS
FALSE LOGIC.

THUS
IT REFLECTS REGULATORS’ FOLLY OR LACK OF UNDERSTANDING THAT BANKS TODAY HAVE
BECOME TOO BIG TO FALL.

Even this also want to argue:

It
should be a ‘no brainer’, you do not need to be a rocket scientist to
understand banks should never be allowed to become too big to fall and if they
have become so, to take immediate, swift actions to redress the problems but
humans are bickering and even Obama’s proposals that Soros says will still
leave banks too big to fail is resisted.

THUS
IT REFLECTS MANKIND’S FOLLY AND INABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THAT EVEN INADEQUATE
STEPS LIKE OBAMA’S PROPOSAL TO REDUCE THE SIZE OF BANKS IS GREETED WITH
NEGATIVISM.

Putting your eggs in one basket:

Mankind
is so good at coining such words of wisdom and ticking off others about not
putting all your eggs in one basket, so how come it is so foolish as to permit
banks to become too big to fall and reluctant to take corrective actions now?

IF
YOU AGREE IT IS FOOLISH AND DANGEROUS TO PUT ALL YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET, HOW COME
YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT BY THE SAME PRINCIPLE BANKS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO
BECOME TOO BIG TO FALL AND SO THEY SHOULD BE FORCED TO DIVEST, SELL SOME OF
THEIR BRANCHES OR BUSINESSES TO OTHER INVESTORS.

Economies of scale?

As
a result of mergers, banks have been shedding staff and so employment that
impacts on spending.

With
many smaller banks, there is replication of staff and more people are employed.
Now with computerization and mergers, many jobs are lost and this will impact
on the economy on the long run.

Further
the benefits from such economies of scale may not be passed on to consumers or
the potential risks from having banks too big to fall may far outweigh the
savings from mergers.

THE
RECENT TREND TO MERGE TOUTING THE ECONOMIES OF SCALE TOO IS A TREND THAT
DIMINISHES EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE THAT IN THE END REDUCES THE
CONSUMING POWER OF THE POPULATION.

FURTHER
ONE MUST BE DISCRIMINATE, THERE MAY BE SOME INDUSTRIES LIKE BANKING WHERE THE
RISK OF SYSTEMIC COLLAPSE FROM FAILURE OF A BANK TOO BIG TO FALL OUTWEIGHS THE
BENEFITS OF THE ECONOMIES OF SCALE.

ECONOMY
OF SCALE IS A RULE AND ONE MUST BE DISCERNING TO KNOW WHERE TO APPLY AND NOT
APPLY THE RULE.

Adults only:

This
is the headline of an article on NYT. Why is it always false even if it is not
to cast false aspersions that the subject is about sex?

If
by ‘adults only’ you mean ‘matured only’ then what you say is false because
there are many children who are more matured than adults and so to imply adults
equal maturity, responsibility and understanding is false. Speaking truly it
should be ‘matured only’ not ‘adults only’.

He
is not the first to use the phrase ‘adults only’ and so it is rehashed, copied
from others because it sounds nice or impressive to him.

To
perceive children as immature and irresponsible without understanding and
adults as the opposite is a view, a person’s understanding that is memorized
and rehashed and it is false, thus it is the person’s and society’s false
rehashed understanding that adults means maturity and responsibility and
children means the opposite, a form of totally unnecessary dangerous
stereotyping.

 

Chinese central banker warns of new Asian crisis

Hot money, a modern
phenomenon as a result of freeing of markets may be like releasing a pack of
hounds on a hapless deer (the global financial system), sooner or later it
would be devoured.

Now large amounts of money,
a lot of it borrowed can flow in and out of a country in pursuit of maximal
profits and this can wreak havoc with a country’s economy, even as large as
China’s.

Thus if speculators think
China will revalue they will rush in to buy the Chinese currency at the lower
rate hoping to profit when it is revalued and the money parked in China will
boost speculative consumption like property, shares and credit card
consumption. When this money exits especially all at once, it is like pulling
the carpet from under your feet.

Again there is the dollar
carry trade where speculators borrow in USD to park in Asian countries with
higher interest rates and should these also leave it will cause havoc. Whilst
they are parked in a country it gives the country a steroid boost.

THUS THE MODERN PHENOMENON
OF HOT MONEY RUSHING IN AND OUT OF CURRENCIES IN PURSUIT OF MAXIMAL RETURNS IS
A DESTABILIZING INFLUENCE THAT CAN PROVE FATAL.

China's deputy central bank chief Zhu Min warned that tighter US monetary
policy could spark a sudden outflow of capital from emerging markets, evoking
the 1990s Asian financial crisis.

 

AFP

Published: 5:15PM GMT 27 Jan 2010

A rapid withdrawal of funds would not only cause volatility in the currency
exchange markets, but could also generate currency moves similar to those
during the Asian crisis of over a decade ago.

"Capital flows - it's a real risk this year for the economy," Zhu
Min told participants at the World Economic
Forum's annual meeting in Davos.

Mr Zhu noted that investors are increasingly borrowing the cheap US dollar,
and investing the borrowed funds in emerging markets, where interest rates are
higher, and therefore generating a better return than saving in the dollars.

This phenomenon called carry trade in the US dollar is a "massive issue
today," said Mr Zhu.

"It's bigger than the Japanese yen carry trade 12 years ago," he
said.

However, if the United States were to tighten its lax monetary policy,
making borrowing more costly, funds could then flow out just as suddenly from
emerging markets, back into the US market.

This could cause a collapse in emerging markets' currencies, and spark a
repeat of the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis.

Then, the Japanese yen was cheap and investors were borrowing it and
investing in South-east Asian economies, fueling strong growth in the region.

But as exports slumped amid a global demand slowdown, speculators began
attacking the South-east Asian currencies, believing that they were overvalued.

Thailand was first to crack and it abandoned its fixed exchange rate and
float its currency against the US dollar.

Other currencies followed suit and crashed under crippling debt levels and
amid soaring interest rates.

"It's what we learnt from the Asian financial crisis. Because the yen
went back to the Tokyo market," said Mr Zhu.

"Everyone is concerned about the direction which the capital flow will
move. It's an absolute real risk for the year," he said.

He also defended China's stance on the yuan, saying that a stable yuan was
crucial.

"It's very important to have a stable yuan particularly in this very
volatile market," he said.

Beijing has been under fire for deliberately undervaluing its currency.

However, Mr Zhu said that a stable yuan was "good for China, it's also
good for the world."

Greed is the common denominator:

There
is not one key factor but there are many key factors that caused the current
potentially fatal financial and economic crisis and the common denominator of
all these factors is simply unalloyed greed that is a product of mental force
that is blind and therefore a recipe for future disaster, sooner or later.

GREED
IS BLIND, AN ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT DRIVES GREEDY MAN TO BE
ACQUISITIVE AND SOONER OR LATER IT LEADS TO FATAL MISTAKES.

It
is greed that causes the US to abuse its position as printer of the world
currency of trade to keep printing and printing worthless paper to pay for its
imports.

It
is greed that causes hot money, even borrowed
hot money to rush in vast amounts into a currency to artificially boost an
economy in search of gains from interest rate differences and exchange rate
gains and rush out suddenly pulling the carpet from those who borrowed using
the hot money.

It
is greed that causes companies to relocate to locations with cheap labour to
maximize profit, to keep their profits overseas therefore depriving the markets
they make profit from of employment and money that would otherwise be available
if the factories were located there and profits were not removed.

It
is greed that causes companies to merge so that they can reap the economies of
scale and shed redundant workers, monopolize the markets but in certain
industries like banks, their collapse threatens to bring collapse to the whole
economy.

It
is greed that causes people in powerful positions to demand higher and higher
wages (bank bonuses, professional sportsmen, actors) such that there is an
increasing mismatch of income.

It
is greed that causes banks to lend increasingly depositors money to finance
property and shares that transfer savers’ money into the hands of the few
developers and if borrowers default, the banks become insolvent.

It
is greed that causes Goldman Sachs to enter and even corner oil markets to reap
speculative profits that push up oil prices to ridiculous levels that it
strangles the economy and now oil producers refuse to sell oil at lower prices.

THUS
THERE ARE MANY IMPORTANT FACTORS IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRISIS
THAT MAY PROVE FATAL BUT BENEATH IT ALL IS THE COMMON DENOMINATOR, FOOLISH
BLIND GREED OF EVERYONE INVOLVED.

Larry Magid: The iPad is
Underwhelming

What
he and readers are not aware is that the headline is an unwitting admission
that it is not substance or meaning that is important for emotional stylish
people but it is emotion, a proxy of force that is foremost if not the only
consideration in their perceptions.

What
he is saying is that the iPad is a disappointment, he does not like it and that
is the most important if not only consideration as far as he is concerned.

A
person who is only concerned with substance, concerned about how good or bad
the iPad is, is not underwhelmed or overwhelmed, he merely perceives it as
good, extremely good, mediocre or bad.

THUS
THE FACT THAT HE VENTURED UNDERWHELMED AS HIS OPINION OR PERCEPTION OF THE NEW
IPAD IS AN UNWITTING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT HE PERCEIVES AND UNDERSTANDS WITH
FORCE THAT IS BLIND WHATEVER OBJECTS PRESENTED TO HIS SENSES. A PERSON WHO DOES
NOT UNDERSTAND WITH FORCE IS NEVER UNDERWHELMED, HE MERELY DISCERNS THE IPAD IS
GOOD, MEDIOCRE OR BAD AND HERE YOU ARE, HAVING A SO CALLED EXPERT THAT YOU
TRUST IN HIS RECOMMENDATION AND HE IS A FOOL WHO USES FORCE TO RECEIVE AND
ANALYSE OBJECTS PRESENTED TO HIS SENSES.

What you should tell me:

Don’t
tell me how the iPad failed to stir your mental force attractively but tell me
how good, mediocre or bad it is.

It
reflects how foolish and lacking in understanding he is that he homes in on
underwhelming or the lack of stirring of his mental force as the most important
or salient result of his experience with iPad.

Thus
say the iPad is mediocre not underwhelming.

Once
your mind is roiled by stirred emotion how can you appraise the object
objectively?

Ungrateful self serving Goldman Sachs:

Without
being allowed to be converted urgently into bank holding companies and thus
able to borrow heavily from Federal agencies and then using such cheap funds
and Federal guarantees to invest and trade on its own account Goldman Sachs
would not have made so much profit. And now Goldman Sachs has conveniently
forgotten the vital role the public played in its survival and is insensitively
rewarding its staff with fat bonuses. Without being allowed to be converted
into bank holding companies, borrowing Fed money and guarantees, Goldman Sachs
may be dead now.

Quote: New
proposed legislation will ensure no federally backed bank will be allowed to
use other people's money to take big risks, reap most of the rewards, and
suffer minimal consequences if the investments fail.

In the
olden days, hedge funds and investment banks generally raised money from
partners, employees, institutions, and shareholders, and borrowed money from
the capital markets. They couldn't borrow from the Federal Reserve or take
deposits that would be insured by the FDIC. After the erosion of the
Glass-Steagall Act, a few banks—notably Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of
America—united investment and commercial banking operations under one roof.
Other large investment banks—Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Lehman
Bros., and Morgan Stanley—stayed outside the system. These investment banks all
engaged in proprietary trading and ran hedge fund and private equity operations.

The
crisis that began in 2008, with the near-failure of Bear Stearns, triggered a
host of policies to shore up the investment banks. First, investment banks like
Bear and Goldman were allowed to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve's
discount window—a privilege heretofore afforded only to commercial bank holding
companies. After the failure of Lehman Bros., Goldman and Morgan Stanley
hastily transformed themselves into bank holding companies, which
allowed them to take full advantage of all the Fed's and FDIC's new programs.
First, the FDIC boosted the amount of deposits it would insure, and then it
offered to guarantee debt issued by financial institutions. Goldman was one of the
biggest users of this new subsidy.

Throughout
2009, the surviving investment banks used these very cheap, subsidized forms of
capital to lend but also to trade and invest and take positions for their own
accounts. Some did that rather well. Goldman Sachs earned $13.4 billion last year.

Goldman Sachs would have been dead let alone big profits:

Without
the cutting of red tape and immediate permission for Goldman Sachs to be
converted into bank holding company and borrowing cheaply from federal funds
and obtaining federal guarantees, Goldman Sachs may be dead, let alone make
such fat profits and here you are Goldman Sachs has conveniently forgotten its
brush with near if not certain death to announce it is doing very well, thank
you and we are duly rewarding our staff with handsome bonuses for their fine
clean honest work.

Gratefulness is rare in this world:

Goldman
Sachs turning around to reward its staff with fat bonuses reflects
ungratefulness on the part of those who run the company and it reflects that
the Buddha is true, he can truly see when he said a being who is grateful and
shows it is rare in this world.

TRUE
GRATEFULNESS IS AN EXTREMELY RARE COMMODITY IN THIS WORLD AND THE BUDDHA IS
CORRECT, HE TRULY DISCERNS WHAT HE SAID THIS.

 

Sensual Pleasures:

Just
as a man would not present his foot to a poisonous snake, he should avoid
sensual pleasures according to the Buddha. But because people in this world,
including those who think they are very good and wise cannot resist sensual
pleasures, they seek and get excited by sensual pleasures be it sex, food,
aromas, sights or sounds, they will be bitten by the snake and die. The King of
Death (Satan) wants to bind everyone here, will not let anyone leave so easily
and so it is that many beguiled by sensual pleasures are headed to death, again
and again when the deathless is possible.

The
Buddha:

Whoever avoids sensual desires as he would, with his foot, the head of a snake, goes beyond,
mindful, this attachment to the world.

A man who is greedy for fields, land, gold,

cattle, horses, servants, employees,

many sensual pleasures, is overpowered with weakness and trampled by trouble,

for pain invades him like water, a cracked boat.

So one, always mindful, should avoid sensual desires.

Letting them go, he'd cross over the flood

like one who, having bailed out the boat,

has reached the far shore.

Kamesu
Satta Sutta: Attached to Sensual Pleasures (1)

In the early
morning, a large number of monks, went into Savatthi for alms. Having gone,
after the meal, returning they went to the Blessed One and said to the Blessed
One: "Most of the people in Savatthi are excessively attached to sensual
pleasures. They live delighting in, addicted to, absorbed in sensual
pleasures."

Then
the Blessed One on that occasion exclaimed:

Clinging
to sense pleasures, to sensual ties,

seeing no blame in the fetter,

never will those tied up in the fetter

cross over the flood so great & wide.

Seeing they don’t see what?

Jesus
said seeing they do not see, hearing they do not hear.

What
is this that they see but do not see?

It
is simply the truth of what they see.

People
see, but they see the falsity, they see the like and dislike of what they see
but never the truth of what they see. Because they never see the truth of what
they see, they never truly understand and therefore they are without
understanding. What they call their understanding is their programming. When
they are programmed to see things in certain ways (deluded views) that are
shared by society, if they can say or do certain things based on what is memorized
and rehashed that society approves and similarly ‘understands’, they satisfy
themselves they understood and falsely perceive they understand or are capable
of understanding when they have been successfully programmed and are capable of
being programmed or brainwashed.

EVERYTHING
THAT CAN BE SEEN HAS A TRUTH WHETHER TRUE, FALSE, MAKES NO SENSE, HARMFUL OR
HARMLESS AND IT IS UNIVERSAL APPLIES TO EVERYONE. EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE SEE
BUT THEY NEVER SEE THINGS UNEMOTIONALLY WITHOUT STYE AS IT TRULY IS BUT THEY
SEE EMOTIONALLY WITH STYLE AS THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE IT AND THEREBY NEVER SEE THE
TRUTH OF WHATEVER THEY SEE AND THEREFORE NEVER UNDERSTAND TRULY. THEY SEE IN
SNAPSHOTS TO THEN PRESUME, FILL IN THE GAPS OF WHAT THEY DID NOT SEE BY
REHASHED UNDERSTANDINGS OF WHAT IT MIGHT BE.

Emotional
people seriously underestimate the programming of what they see or don’t
realize their seeing is programmed or instructed.

For
instance, fearful of being robbed or lurking intruders waiting to waylay them,
whenever they are in places where they might be in danger of robbery, they
automatically rehash programs to look out for possible suspicious characters or
they never see everything there is but their attention or seeing is selectively
directed to look out for possible dangers.

Again
those who are trained as bodyguards have programmed vision in which they
automatically look out for characters that may pose as hazards to those they
guard and therefore their seeing is programmed, they are on the lookout for
dangers for their masters.

A
person who sees truly has no programming, he sees whatever there is to see, not
looking out for thugs to the exclusion of other things.

Why people never see the truth:

If
emotional stylish people see the truth of what they see then they must see the
constant even blatant force prolonging in stretched syllables, speed and
loudness changes in what they say and how these causes cumulative stress,
restlessness and distraction (inability to concentrate) but they never see
that, they only hear the auditory effects of such force stretching, changing
speed and loudness as charming, wonderful or meaningful.

PEOPLE
DO HEAR STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AS THEY AND
EVERYONE HERE SPEAK BUT THEY PERCEIVE IT FALSELY AS MEANINGFUL, GOOD AND
PLEASURABLE WHEN IT ITS MEANINGLESS, HARMFUL AND LEADS TO INSOLUBLE STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. THEREFORE HERE AS EVERYWHERE ELSE, PEOPLE DO SEE
BUT THEY SEE FALSELY NOT THE TRUTH.

True understanding is not transferrable:

True
understanding is not transferrable but specific to each occasion and so even if
you have seen or heard something before, if your understanding is true, it is
your specific understanding for that occasion, never what you retrieved from
your mental library of understanding to paste on the occasion.

IN
OTHER WORDS NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU FACE THE SAME OR SIMILAR SITUATION,
YOU MUST UNDERSTAND IT SPECIFICALLY TO THAT SITUATION, NOT SEE IN SNAPSHOTS AND
THEN CONSULT AND ACTIVATE A RECORDED UNDERSTANDING.

Thus
in order to truly understand something said or see, you must pay full
(undivided) attention for the duration of what is said or seen without stirring
like or dislike and thus totally seeing without divided attention or stirring
like or dislike, you automatically truly understood.

IF
YOUR ATTENTION IS DIVIDED, YOU ARE DISTRACTED, YOU ONLY PAID ATTENTION FITFULLY
OR YOUR LIKE (THRILL) OR DISLIKE (ANGER, HATRED) IS STIRRED (INSTANTLY) BY WHAT
YOU HEARD OR SAW THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO TRULY UNDERSTAND EXCEPT IN
YOUR DELUSION YOU CAN & DID.

ANYONE
WHO SEES FITFULLY WITH DIVIDED ATTENTION AND STIRRED LIKE OR DISLIKE MUST
DEPEND ON A LIBRARY OF RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS OF WHAT IS SAID OR SEEN MIGHT BE
AND REHASH THAT MEANING AS WHAT OCCURRED AND THEREFORE BE FOREVER RELIVING OR
REPLAYING THE SAME OLD UNDERSTANDINGS AGAIN AND AGAIN. HE THINKS HE IS
EXPERIENCING REALITY OR THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS HEARD OR SEEN BUT HE IS RELIVING
THE SAME OLD EXPERIENCES OR RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS AGAIN AND AGAIN AND NO
MATTER HOW HE INSISTS THAT IT IS MEANINGFUL, IT IS MAKE BELIEVE AND NOW AND
THEN HE WILL DESPAIR THAT LIFE IS MEANINGLESS BECAUSE IT IS RELIVING THE SAME
OLD RECORDED RIGID UNDERSTANDINGS AGAIN AND AGAIN.

Forever reliving the same old meanings:

Your
library of recorded meanings or understandings may be very vast, you may add
more recordings as you go along or edit or modify old recorded understandings
but so long as you are rehashing and applying these recorded understandings to
present situations, you are forever living in the past, reliving the same old
understandings again and again rather than live specific to the occasion
tasting and understanding what is currently happening.

Because
rehashing and reliving recorded understanding is the default mode, it is
impossible a person can choose to understand truly sometimes and understand by
rehash at other times, the person is lost or do not know what to do or
understand if he cannot find a recorded understanding in his mental library to
paste on a situation.

SEARCHING,
SELECTING AND REPLAYING A RECORDED UNDERSTANDING OR MEANING OR VIEW OF A
SITUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS SEEING WITH UNDIVIDED ATTENTION FOR THE FULL
DURATION OF WHAT IS HEARD OR SEEN WITHOUT STIRRING MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY OR
REPULSIVELY TO THEN FULLY UNDERSTAND IT. TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS A INCOMPARABLY
SUPERIOR AND BLISSFUL WAY TO EXIST, TO REHASH RECORDED UNDERSTANDING IS TO BE A
ROBOT OR AUTOMATON.

Alas, poor haggis!

It
is not the substance of what is said (the haggis are poor) that is important
but the person is using the occasion to convey emotion and stir emotions.
Principally he is laughing, he may think it friendly or benign and wants to
stir others likewise but secondarily he wants others to be impressed with his
command of language (alas is stylish, meaningless, and haggis to impress he is
knowledgeable, whatever haggis might mean).

THE
SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID IS ‘THE HAGGIS ARE POOR’ BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT THE
PERSON MEANS. THERE IS STYLE AND A WAY IT IS PUT (ALAS, POOR HAGGIS) THAT IS
INTENDED TO STIR EMOTION (LAUGH AT HAGGIS) AND IMPRESS OTHERS HOW CHARMING AND
KNOWLEDGEABLE HE IS (NOT).

ANYONE
WHO UNDERSTANDS TRULY MUST UNDERSTAND THE FALSITY OR PRETENSE OF WHAT IS SAID,
IF YOU SAW NOTHING WRONG, YOU HAVE FALSE UNDERSTANDING NOT JUST HERE BUT
EVERYWHERE YOU THINK IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS SIMILARLY FALSE.

Malaysia court rejects Anwar Ibrahim evidence
appeal

A Malaysian court has rejected a bid by
opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim to be granted access to evidence against him in
a pending sodomy trial.

Comment:
Anwar’s demand to access evidence is very sensible and should be granted.

WHATEVER
EVIDENCE THE POLICE HAS IF TRUE CANNOT BE REFUTED OR ALTERED AND SO THE POLICE
HAS NO REASON TO DENY THE ACCUSED ACCESS TO THAT EVIDENCE UNLESS THE EVIDENCE
IS NOT FIXED OR DOES NOT EXIST OR IS CURRENTLY BEING REMODELLED TO BE MORE
EFFECTIVE IN ‘NAILING’ ANWAR.

IF
SODOMY HAS OCCURRED AND THE POLICE IS ACTING ON SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO CHARGE
ANWAR SURELY THE POLICE SHOULD NOT BE SO COY ABOUT REVEALING WHAT EVIDENCE THEY
HAVE.

JUST
THIS ACTION TELLS THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING WHAT THE MOTIVE BEHIND THE TRIAL
MIGHT BE. IF THE EVIDENCE IS NOT FIXED OR SUFFICIENT OR SUBJECT TO MORE WORK
THEN SURELY THE POLICE IS HASTY OR PRESUMPTUOUS TO CHARGE ANWAR. SURELY ONLY IF
THE EVIDENCE IS COMPELLING, THEY HAVE A VERY GOOD CASE SHOULD THEY PROCEED TO
CHARGE ANWAR.

For show and true promotion of racial unity:

Tens of thousands of devotees
listened to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak make his speech touching
on the importance of racial unity at Batu Caves on the eve of Thaipusam. Najib
is the first Prime Minister in 20 years to visit Batu Caves.

It
is objective, applies to everyone and cannot be disputed. Going to Petaling
Street or Batu Caves and making stirring speech are about style, for show not
the substance of promoting racial harmony.

True
promotion of racial harmony is what you say and do that truly reduce
aggravations between the races and foster understanding and goodwill between
races.

IF
YOU PERCEIVE THAT APPEARING IN PUBLIC AND MAKING STIRRING SPEECHES TRULY FOSTER
RACIAL GOODWILL THEN YOU MAY HAVE TRUE OR FALSE PERCEPTION.

IF
YOU WANT TO BE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING, YOU DO IT AMIDST A BLAZE OF
PUBLICITY AND SPEAK STIRRINGLY, IF YOU WANT TO DO SOMETHING MEANINGFUL, YOU SAY
OR DO IT WITH FULL UNDERSTANDING AWAY FROM THE LIMELIGHT.

Vital to mutually respect the
religious beliefs of one another

If
you give people advice, as the above is intended, you must want people to
follow it. If they follow it and become robots the advice is intended
unwittingly to make others robots with karma.

What
is meaningful is not whether you respect or disrespect others religious beliefs
but you see as true or false their beliefs. Just because you see the beliefs as
false does not mean you attack them or discriminate against the other person.
How can a person truly respect what he did not see as true or he saw as false?

THUS
RESPECT FOR OTHERS’ RELIGIOUS BELIEFS IS MEANINGLESS, IS ASKING FOR PRETENSE,
WHAT IS RELEVANT IS TRULY UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF OTHERS’ RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
AND JUST BECAUSE YOU SEE THEM AS FALSE DOES NOT MEAN YOU MUST ATTACK THEM. THEY
ARE JUST FALSE, ANYTHING MORE, ATTACKING THEM, COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD. AGAIN
JUST BECAUSE YOU DON’T ATTACK THEM DOES NOT MEAN YOU MUST RESPECT THEM. YOU
WILL BE LYING AND COURTING INSANITY IF YOU DID.

Respect for others’ religion a virtue?

“I want to stress here that
respecting each other’s religion is not only a key
virtue that we must defend, it is also one of the principles in Islam”

The
Buddha said such and such is virtue which means it can be clearly defined and
whatever that is not in that definition is not virtue. You are challenging the
Buddha if you say what is not in his list is also virtue.

What
did the Buddha say is virtue?

Not
stealing (taking what is not given), not telling lies (cheat), frivolous
chatter, gossip (divisive speech), not killing and harming living things, not
drinking alcohol, indulging in illicit sex.

Only
what the Buddha defined as virtue is virtue, anything else is not, let alone
key virtue.

Bill Gates promises $10 billion for vaccines

Bill
Gates is deluded. Don’t give them vaccines that benefit drug companies but what
is urgently needed is food, clothing and shelter and it reflects that Bill
Gates has his priorities all muddled up that he is barking up the wrong tree,
much reducing his merit.

FOOD,
CLOTHING AND SHELTER CAN DO FAR MORE FOR THE WELLBEING OF THE NEEDY THAN
VACCINES. OF WHAT USE IS VACCINE IF THE CHILD THEN DIES OF STARVATION OR COLD?

Defend or understand?

What
is meaningful, defending mutual religious respect or understanding mutual religious
respect?

It
reflects the force driven, force enslaved nature of emotional people’s minds
that they have a predilection to resort to force or pick force over meaning or
understanding. You need force to defend, you need reason or seeing to
understand.

Toyota drivers died because they were emotional ham fisted robots:

Anyone
who is a robot is a recipe for even fatal disaster sooner or later and it is
worse if you are a robot driven by emotions than purpose directed mechanical
programming.

There
are three factors that cost drivers their lives, firstly they were robots who
do not know what to do when there is no programming telling them what to do in
an emergency, secondly they used emotion (panic) instead of summoning calm
reason (which they never have) to deal
with the emergency and thirdly they are ham fisted drivers who routinely
floored the pedal. Without significantly flooring the gas pedal, the pedal
cannot jam in a dangerous position. When I drive, the pedal is seldom more than
a quarter down so how is my throttle going to jam in a very fast position?
Abuse the car and one day the car will abuse and even kill you.

Hence
if you are a robot and your actions are based on emotions, you are a walking
time bomb, doomed for self destruction and that is not the way to heaven.

It
seems Toyota may have lied to cover up the problem of jammed accelerators that
caused at least 18 deaths in the US. The problem was an accelerator pedal
manufactured in East Europe that other car makers also used that had a tendency
when worn to jam especially in cold weather.

It
is an elaborate self and other deception that people in this world understand
what they do. In ordinary life this deception may not prove fatal but there
will be situations when it is found out, it is not the person who is personally
doing things but he is just activating plans that then carry out his actions
and without plans telling them what to do, the person cannot do anything.
Without plans telling the person what to do if the accelerator pedal jammed the
person does not know what to do that is possible.

In
this case, the correct thing to do is either switch off the engine without
removing the key (activates steering lock) or put the transmission into neutral
to take the engine out of the loop. But because emotional people need
programming, without being told to do this they cannot do it and so they do not
switch off the engine or put the car in neutral even when it is possible.

When
faced with a crisis, the important thing is not to panic, once you panicked,
your mental force is roiling your mind so that even when there is a way out you
fail to see or think it. But because it is force or emotion never genuine
reason that is the basis for people’s actions, they automatically panic or stir
their mental forces haphazardly and that is the wrong blind tool to summon to
respond to danger.

When
I drive, I feather the gas pedal which saves a lot of petrol and I seldom go
beyond even a quarter of the pedal travel so even if my pedal is stuck, how is
it going to be stuck in a life threatening, furiously revving state?

It
is only because a driver routinely depresses his gas pedal significantly (that
is his style or programmed way of driving) that the pedal can be worn and when
it is depressed significantly becomes stuck in a violently accelerating mode.

THUS
YOU ARE A FOOL IF YOU THINK BEING A ROBOT IS OK, EFFICIENT, YOU ARE A WALKING
RECIPE FOR EVEN FATAL DISASTER FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND SOONER OR LATER YOUR
MENTAL PARROT WILL BE FOUND OUT AND FOUND WANTING AND YOU WILL PAY EVEN WITH
YOUR LIFE FOR YOUR SELF AND OTHER DECEIT THAT YOU ARE A GENUINE PERSON WHEN YOU
ARE A LIFELESS MECHANICAL ROBOT DRIVEN BY FORCE NOT PURPOSE ORIENTATED
PROGRAMMING.

(A
computer is purpose orientated, it will do what it is told to do, not because
it liked or disliked, hence it works no matter who uses it. By contrast, human
robots will refuse to serve you because they don’t like you or they get all
excited to serve you because they liked you).

It just for show:

Suppose
a prime minister visits this popular Chinese area (Chow Kit Rd), this popular
Hindu place at a festive occasion, some indigenous temple here and there making
rousing speeches about racial and religious tolerance and respect.

All
these visits may not be as intended but be according to plans concocted by
hired public relations organisations with the purpose of enhancing the image
and prestige of the prime minister in which those involved carry it out as
robots.

Ordinary
emotional people, reflecting their muddled thinking, are unable to make out
whether the action is sincere or for show, they may like or dislike it and say
it may or may not be for show when it can be objectively determined that it is
for show.

THERE
IS NO NEED TO GO TO THIS AND THAT PLACE TO MAKE PUBLIC EMOTIONAL SPEECHES ABOUT
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE, THIS IS ALWAYS FOR SHOW NOT SUBSTANCE AND IT
WILL NEVER ACHIEVE ITS CLAIMED PURPOSE.

THE
SUBSTANCE OR IF YOU TRULY MEAN TO PROMOTE RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE IS BY
YOUR ACTIONS TO CLAMP DOWN IMPARTIALLY ON ALL INFRACTIONS, TO ENSURE THAT THE GOVERNMENT
TREAT ALL RACES AND RELIGIONS FAIRLY AND EQUALLY.

IF
YOU PERCEIVE THAT GOING TO PUBLIC PLACES TO PREACH TOLERANCE MAY HAVE
SUBSTANCE, MAY NOT BE FOR SHOW, YOU MAY BE DELUDED, YOU PERCEIVE THINGS FALSELY
BECAUSE THE TRUTH MAY BE IT IS ALL FOR SHOW.

A
MAN OF TRUE SUBSTANCE WILL NOT DO ANYTHING FOR SHOW AND SO IF A PERSON WILL DO
THINGS FOR SHOW, HE IS NOT A MAN OF SUBSTANCE THAT YOU CAN DEPEND ON. THERE IS
MOTIVE FOR PUTTING ON SHOWS AND IT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE
AND DOMINATE. IF YOUR MOTIVE FOR DOING SOMETHING IS TO IMPRESS THEN YOUR STATED
OBJECTIVE (EG PROMOTE RACIAL TOLERANCE) IS FALSE.

Bill Gates trying to be too clever:

Just
like his Microsoft, Bill Gates is trying to be too clever to donate vaccines
rather than life saving simple basic food, clothes and shelter.

It
is impoverishment that renders children vulnerable to infections that Gates
seek to redress with vaccines.

I
FIND MANY GLARING FLAWS AND MANY GLITSY FOR SHOW FEATURES IN WINDOWS THAT I
WOULD FIX AND ELIMINATE IF I WAS IN CHARGE. BILL GATES’ ACTION IN PROMOTING
CHARITY MIRRORS THE SOMETIMES MONUMENTAL SILLINESS IN WINDOWS.

TRY
TO BE TOO CLEVER AND YOU END UP LOOKING VERY FOOLISH AND YOU DIMINISH YOUR
MERIT IN DONATING.

Deep in Debt, Spain Cuts Spending by $70 Billion

By ANDRÉS CALA and MATTHEW SALTMARSH

MADRID — The Spanish government outlined far-reaching
spending cuts on Friday to bring its sizable budget deficit under
control, amid forecasts that the country would remain mired in recession for
another year.

HOW
IS THE SPANISH ECONOMY GOING TO RECOVER LET ALONE BOOM IF THE GOVERNMENT IS
DRASTICALLY CUTTING ITS SPENDING BECAUSE IT IS ‘FULL OF DEBTS’ AND HAVE NO
MONEY? THEREFORE EXPECT MORE PAIN FOR SOME TIME AT LEAST.

Worse than robots:

A
robot will not assault you in anger or because it does not like you but it will
only assault you if it is told to do so and then it will assault anyone
regardless of sex or race or age.

Humans
are worse than robots, they will assault you driven by anger or because they
don’t like you.

THE
BASIS OF ROBOTS’ ACTIONS ARE INSTRUCTIONS, WHAT THEY ARE TOLD TO DO. THE BASIS
OF HUMAN ROBOTS’ ACTIONS IS FORCE DIRECTLY (AGGRESSIVENESS) OR EMOTION (LIKE,
DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION AND FEAR) AND BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND AND
MEANINGLESS, THE BASIS OF HUMAN ROBOTS’ (ANYONE WHO REHASHES IS A ROBOT)
ACTIONS IS BLIND MEANINGLESS DANGEROUS FORCE.

GOD
CAN CREATE FAR BETTER OBEDIENT ROBOTS WHO WILL ALWAYS DO AS THEY ARE TOLD THAN
YOU SO IF YOU ARE A ROBOT DRIVEN BY BLIND DANGEROUS MEANINGLESS FORCE, IT IS
FAR BETTER IF GOD CREATED OBEDIENT PROGRAMMED ROBOTS THAN HAVE YOU IN HEAVEN.

So you think you have right view?

If
you think humans are not robots you have wrong view because the truth is
everything they perceive, think, speak and do is by rehash according plans in
the mental jukeboxes and parroting is the only way they know how to exist.

If
you think that humans may be robots but they are better than robots then you
have WRONG view because humans are robots and WORSE.

ROBOTS
DON’T TELL LIES, THEY ONLY SAY WHAT THEY ARE PROGRAMMED TO SAY BUT HUMANS
WILFULLY TELL LIES AND EVEN PERCEIVE THEIR LIES AS TRUE OR GOOD FOR THEMSELVES
AND OTHERS.

IT
MAY THE TRUTH THAT ONLY THE PERSON WHO PERCEIVES ALL EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE
ARE ROBOTS AND WORSE HAS RIGHT VIEW. ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES OTHERWISE PERCEIVES
FALSELY, HAS WRONG VIEW ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.

How are they robots and worse?

People
are robots in the sense that ALWAYS whatever they say or do, including how and
what they attack you physically or with words are from recordings, (it is not
the first time she slapped you thus, she has done it before in the same
manner), what & how they lie to you are recorded in their mental jukeboxes
that they activate to knowingly lie to you.

People
are worse than robots in the sense that robots only do as they are programmed, they
are not driven by force or like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation or fear but
humans act irrationally by rehash driven by emotions (like, dislike, sadness,
hurt, agitation and fear).

Tkl

Slick Man Utd Punish Arsenal:

The
person responsible for the headline does not realize there is insanity in the
future for him.

The
truth is Manchester Utd beat Arsenal, what has punishment got to do with it
except in his advanced false perception that United was punishing Arsenal.

Because
United was not punishing Arsenal but they played and won the game well, he is
courting insanity himself and encouraging others to embrace insanity by
similarly perceiving punishment is involved.

NO
PUNISHMENT WAS INVOLVED IN UNITED BEATING ARSENAL, IF YOU PERCEIVE THERE WAS
YOU ARE COURTING MADNESS AND INCITING OTHERS (WITH KARMA ATTACHED) TO SIMILARLY
COURT MAD PERCEPTION.

Free markets is a recipe to sure fire ruin:

Communism
has been discredited (the theory was good but the practice abominable) and now
people tout capitalism and unfettered free markets as the panacea and path to
economic utopia when it is the sure fire path to ruin.

Although
people wax lyrical about free markets, it is never practiced except in their
delusion that it is because governments including US routinely intervene in the
‘free’ market to prop it up eg by lowering interest rates, selling and buying
currencies and announce stimulus like cash for clunkers.

Be
as it may that free markets although touted is never practiced, it is a sure
fire recipe for ruin.

Why
is that so?

The
creed of free markets is that markets know best but markets are about greed for
maximal gains and fear for loss and so markets are driven by emotions that are
blind and harmful, does not understand and whatever that is guided by force
(greed, fear) will end in disaster.

An
example is the outsourcing of labour to countries where it is cheap. Nike pays
Indonesian workers $1 per day rather than $10 per day in the US to make shoes
it sell for far greater profit in the US.

Everyone
wants to maximize profit like Nike and so they proceed to export their
manufacture to overseas countries and even keep their profits overseas to
escape the taxman and although initially it will be wonderful with record
company profits, in time the consumer market is deprived of income from job
losses and money drained from the system so that finally everyone dies, the
consumer economy because it has lost jobs, the company because its market has
dried up and Indonesians because they too become jobless when Nike closes shop.

THUS
FREE MARKETS NEVER WORK, IT MUST BE TEMPERED BY UNDERSTANDING AND RULES THAT
ENSURE THAT COMPANIES RETURN SOME OF THEIR PROFITS TO THE COMMUNITY IT MAKES
PROFITS FROM BY EMPLOYING THEM AND RETAIN THEIR PROFITS THERE FOR THE COMMUNITY
TO UTILIZE.

BECAUSE
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, MANY WESTERN COMPANIES HAVE OUTSOURCED MANUFACTURE TO
ASIAN COUNTRIES, THE ECONOMY IS DOOMED.

IF
YOU THINK FREE MARKETS ARE LOVELY, THE BEST SOLUTION YOU MAY HAVE WRONG VIEW
BECAUSE FREE MARKETS ARE DRIVEN BY BLIND GREED FOR MAXIMAL GAIN AND FEAR OF
LOSS AND SOONER OR LATER IT LEADS TO DISASTER.

Boosted not free markets:

Free
markets do not exist in this world but artificially even criminally boosted
markets by vested people (politicians for elections, bankers) exist and so it
reflects delusion by people when they speak falsely of ‘free’ markets.

ANYONE
WHO SPEAKS OF FREE MARKETS IS SPEAKING FALSELY AND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE
SITUATION. MARKETS ARE NOT FREE BUT BOOSTED AND MANIPULATED TOWARDS EXCESSIVE
UNSUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION, RECKLESSLY DEPLETING SAVERS’ MONEY.

The Depressing News About Antidepressants

Studies
suggest that the popular drugs are no more effective than a placebo. In fact, they may be worse.

Considering
the serious even life threatening side effects of antidepressant medications
then they are worse than placebos.

If
depression has a cause or causes then the cure of the depression is the removal
of that cause, NOTHING else can cure the depression.

THIS
IS ANOTHER MEDICAL SCANDAL, THE MASS SUBJECT OF SICK PEOPLE TO EXPENSIVE
MEDICINE THAT NOT ONLY DOES NOT WORK BUT HAS SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS.

(People
in this world don’t care but it is deadly sin to even prescribe placebos eg
sugar pills and tell sick people it will cure your depression because you are
fostering false perception or delusion in him that the sugar pill he took cured
his depression)

THUS
IF THE CONSTANT MINDLESS USE OF MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG WHATEVER IS SAID, DONE,
THOUGHT AND PERCEIVED (A STARE IS A PROLONGED GAZE) IS THE CAUSE OF SADNESS
THAT DESCENDS INTO DEPRESSION THEN, NOT THAT THEY CAN BUT THE ONLY CURE FOR
DEPRESSION IS TO MINDFULLY PERSISTENTLY WORK TO ERASE THAT AUTOMATED URGE TO
USE FORCE TO PROLONG, NOTHING ELSE WILL.

THUS
IF YOU ARE WONT TO SAY ‘AAARRGGHHH’ THEN YOU HAVE TO PAINSTAKINGLY TRAIN
YOURSELF TO SAY ‘ARG’ WITHOUT PROLONGING AND IF YOU CAN DO THAT YOU WILL SEE
HOW SILLY AND MEANINGLESS ‘ARG’ IS, STRETCHED OR NOT STRETCHED.

Freeman: I never get nervous:

This
is either a lie to brag or he is deluded.

All
stylish emotional people must experience nervousness that they use force and
grim will to hide or control but no matter how they hide, tell tale signs are
visible like tremor, tapping of fingers, clenched fists, etc.

Anyone
who is going against himself, hurting himself by using unnecessary force to
stretch, change speed and loudness in the name of deceiving, impressing,
pleasing, intimidating others must experience fear and be nervous because he is
killing himself without knowing.

IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE WHO USES FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND
LOUDNESS NOT TO SUFFER SADNESS AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE IF SOMEONE NEVER USED FORCE
TO STRETCH SYLLABLES SHOULD SUFFER SADNESS.

ALL
EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE MUST SUFFER SADNESS THAT WILL DESCEND INTO DEPRESSION.
HOW COME NOT EVEN ONE OF THEM DISCOVERED THE SIMPLE CAUSE, NAMELY THEIR
INCESSANT MINDLESS USELESS USING OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES?

The difference between falsity & nonsense:

Whatever
that is a product of force that serves no useful or understandable purpose is
nonsense or meaningless.

Whatever
that is said or done that is not true, is not what happened or cannot happen is
false.

Thus
style, emotion, rituals, smiling, dancing, words like ‘argh’, ‘yabadabadoo’ are
not false but nonsense.

The
stirring of force to stretch, change speed and strength of force to fashion
style to impress or please others is meaningless, nonsense apart from harmful.
It is nonsense because it does no useful work like using your hands to cook or
sweep.

To
stir one’s mental force to do no useful work except to be attracted (like) or
repelled (dislike) too is nonsense or makes no sense.

“Argh”
is nonsense not false. It is suppose to express dislike and dislike is a
stirring of mental force that does no useful work and so argh is nonsense.

Rituals
purported to purify you, exercise to keep fit, tai chi, yoga etc make no sense,
do not do what it is supposed to do and so is nonsense.

Dancing,
sports (football, golf) too make no sense, are for show to impress and so they
too are nonsense.

Whatever
that is said that is not true, did not happen is false.

Whatever
that is done eg smiling as you liked someone, crossing leg towards as if liking
that if not true is lying with the body or false.

THUS
NOT JUST WHAT SOMEONE SAID BUT WHAT HE DID CAN BE DETERMINED TO BE TRUE OR
FALSE.

Everything
that can be said or done can be examined by someone discerning and classified
as meaningful or meaningless (nonsense), true or false. Something can be both
meaningless and false eg smiling is meaningless and it can be false if in
addition you want to deceive someone you liked him when you don’t.

Two causes of insanity:

There
are only two causes of future certain insanity.

The
wilful repetitive use of conditioning force to practice what is meaningless or
false that must be according to plans that are memorized and rehashed lead to
certain future insanity.

Thus
if you repetitively practice according to plans dancing, smiling, rituals (tai
chi, yoga, exercise, football, golf) and you find them meaningful, you are
conditioning yourself to what is meaningless or nonsense that will lead with
loss of control to insanity.

If
you keep telling lies and doing false things to deceive others then you too are
headed for ultimate insanity.

Force
has only one useful or true purpose, to say or do something useful eg sweep the
floor, wash clothes and cook. If you use force to do things that are not
useful, have no useful products then you are practicing controlled insanity (to
please and impress others) that will end in insanity.

THUS
ANYONE WHO USES FORCE FOR MEANINGLESS OR PURPOSES THAT MAKE NO SENSE OR LIE
WITH THEIR WORDS AND ACTIONS ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY.

Killing is senseless not false:

There
is nothing true or false about killing but it is senseless or meaningless, a
harmful exercise of force that serves no useful purpose except emotional
motives and so killing or murder is practicing what is senseless or meaningless
that will end in insanity for the killer.

THERE
IS NO KILLING IN HEAVEN AND SO IF YOU FIND KILLING MEANINGFUL, YOU MUST KILL
THEN YOU SHALL REMAIN IN THIS WORLD EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY AND IT IS NEVER
BLISS BUT SUFFERING EVEN TO TORMENTING INSANE PROPORTIONS TRAPPED IN THIS
WORLD.

Scolding, anger, jealousy, greed, envy, pride are meaningless not
false:

Scolding
others, getting angry, being jealous or envious, greedy or proud are not false
but meaningless exercise of mental force for no fruitful but harmful purposes
and so because it is meaningless or nonsense and you find it meaningful you are
headed for insanity.

Three considerations:

Whatever
that a person wants to say or do can be subject to three important
considerations, whether it is true or false, meaningful or meaningless
(nonsense), harmful or beneficial. Whatever is harmful to others is
automatically harmful to self, it is impossible to harm others without harming
self.

Thus
killing is harmful to self and others and it is also meaningless.

THUS
WHATEVER ACTION YOU TAKE EG SMILE OR CROSS YOUR LEG TOWARDS A PRETTY GIRL CAN
BE EXAMINED AND DETERMINED TO BE TRUE OR FALSE, MEANINGFUL OR MEANINGLESS,
HARMFUL OR BENEFICIAL AND IF YOU PRACTICE WHAT IS FALSE, MEANINGLESS AND
HARMFUL, EVEN IF YOU ARE UNAWARE OR PERCEIVE IT AS TRUE, MEANINGFUL OR
BENEFICIAL, YOU ARE HEADED FOR TORMENT.

I only got one daughter:

THERE IS NOTHING ‘ONLY’
OR ‘NOT ONLY’ ABOUT HAVING ONE DAUGHTER AND SO UNLESS THE PERSON IS MAD, HE IS
SAYING ‘ONLY’ TO CARRY A HIDDEN OR ADDITIONAL MESSAGE.

You
regularly hear people speaking thus and you may think you truly understood what
is said but you may be deceiving yourself.

A
person who speaks truly says this and the substance of the matter is “I have
one daughter”.

“I
only have one daughter” is said falsely without saying what he meant to stir
emotion. What he meant may be my daughter is precious, because I only have one
daughter or I am disappointed, I only have one daughter, I wished I had more.

THUS
IF A PERSON TRULY UNDERSTOOD WHAT IS SAID HE MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THE PERSON
DID NOT SAY WHAT HE MEANT BUT HE MEANS HIS DAUGHTER IS SO PRECIOUS OR HE WISHED
HE HAD MORE DAUGHTERS. IF HE TRULY MEANT WHAT HE SAID, HE WOULD SAY “I HAVE ONE
DAUGHTER”, THE ONLY IS IRRELEVANT, BELIES WHAT HE SAID.

THERE
IS NOTHING ONLY OR NOT ONLY ABOUT HAVING ONE DAUGHTER AND SO UNLESS THE PERSON
IS MAD, HE IS SAYING ‘ONLY’ TO CARRY A HIDDEN OR ADDITIONAL MESSAGE. THEREFORE
THE MESSAGE IS ALWAYS FALSE, NOT SAYING WHAT YOU MEAN AND IT IS THE WAY TO
SUFFERING NOT HEAVEN.

Boom to crash, what happened?

Quote: From 1983 to 2007, the United States enjoyed possibly its greatest
prosperity in its history. The boom was triggered by
the conquest of high inflation, which had destabilized the economy
since the late 1960s. From 1979 to 1984, inflation dropped from 13 percent to 4
percent. By 2001, it was 1.6 percent. As inflation fell, interest rates
followed—and as interest rates fell, the stock market and housing prices
soared. From 1980 to 2000, the value of household stocks and mutual funds
increased from about $1 trillion to nearly $11 trillion. The median price for
existing homes rose from $62,200 in 1980 to $143,600 in 2000; by 2006, it was
$221,900.

(It is inflation that bedevilled the US economy to
bring a boom to a halt before long so how was inflation suddenly tamed as if
permanent from 1979? The answer may be that companies were beginning to source
production overseas using cheap labour ensuring there was no price pressure for
a vast range of goods. Employment in US increased during the boom but these may
be frothy employment in service industries like restaurants, recreation,
finance, housing. The lack of price pressure led to persistent low interest
rates that encouraged booming stock and property markets in search of better returns,
abetted by the emergence of fund managers who recklessly pushed up prices using
others money because they were rewarded by rising stock prices. It also helps
if the US printed money that it used to purchase goods from the world and many
investors from the world including exporting countries kept their money in the
US for reuse by Americans)

Feeling enriched by higher home values and stock portfolios, many Americans
skimped on savings or borrowed more. The personal saving rate dropped from 10
percent of disposable income in 1980 to about 2 percent 20 years later. The
parallel surge in consumer spending, housing construction, and renovation
propelled the economy and created jobs, 36 million of them from 1983 to 2001.
There were only two recessions in these years, both historically mild: those of
1990–91 and 2001.

Neither perceiving nor not perceiving:

The
Buddha said the Father sees and knows everything; there is nothing He does not
see. How might this be possible?

Contrary
to the false understanding and presumption of people, perceiving is not the
inevitable and only state for a being to exist in and not perceiving is not the
alternative state of perceiving but not perceiving is the concomitant state of
perceiving, if you must greedily perceive the little from your false personal
perspective you must concomitantly not perceive the infinitude that is
happening at the same time, if you cease to perceive then you also cease to not
perceive and so you attain a state that ordinary emotional people trapped here
have never experienced that the Buddha described as ‘neither perceiving nor not
perceiving’.

Neither
perceiving nor not perceiving is a higher state of the mind attained by
brahmas, who are formless and higher than devas or angels.

IF
YOU DON’T GREEDILY SELFISHLY PERCEIVE THAT LITTLE YOU WILL ALSO NOT PERCEIVE
THE INFINITELY MORE AND SO YOU NEITHER PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE, SOMETHING
THAT BEINGS TRAPPED HERE HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED, HAVE NO CLUE WHAT IT IS AND
HOW INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR IT IS TO PERCEIVING AND CONCOMITTANTLY NOT
PERCEIVING.

NOT
PERCEIVING IS CONCOMITTANT TO PERCEIVING AND IT IS NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT
PERCEIVING THAT IS THE HIGHER ALTERNATIVE STATE TO PERCEIVING.

Beings
in this world can sometimes stop themselves (often with difficulty) saying or
doing things, they can remain quiet or inactive for periods of time but what
they cannot stop themselves doing is thinking and perceiving.

THINKING
AND PERCEIVING ARE INVOLUNTARY AUTOMATIC PROCESSES AS FAR AS PEOPLE MESMERIZED
BY THIS WORLD ARE CONCERNED.

WHAT
THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO FULLY CONSCIOUS STOP THINKING, IT
IS ALSO POSSIBLE TO FULLY CONSCIOUS NEITHER PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE AND THEY
ARE FAR SUPERIOR STATES IN WHICH TO EXIST.

THEREFORE
THE MAN WHO CAN STOP THINKING AT WILL IS HIGHER THAN THE MAN WHO CANNOT, THE
MAN WHO CAN NEITHER PERCEIVE NOR NOT PERCEIVE IS HIGHER THAN ONE WHO CANNOT.

IF
WHAT I SAY IS TRUE, HOW COME NO ONE HAS INTERPRETED OR REALIZED WHAT THE BUDDHA
SAID ALL THIS WHILE AND EVEN TODAY WHEN THE PLAYING FIELD IS LEVEL, HOW COME NO
ONE UTTERS SUCH WORDS?

Perceiving can be stopped:

Just
as thinking can be stopped, perceiving (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting,
touching) can be stopped and the resultant state is not ‘not perceiving’ but
‘neither perceiving nor not perceiving’ a higher or superior mental state.

BEINGS
HERE ARE SLAVES NOT MASTERS OF PERCEPTION, A MASTER OF PERCEPTION CAN STOP
PERCEIVING AT WILL TO ACCESS THE HIGHER STATE, ‘NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT
PERCEIVING’.

JESUS
SPOKE OF THE SECRETS OF HEAVEN AND THIS TOO IS ONE OF THE SECRETS HIDDEN FROM
BEINGS HERE THAT THERE IS AN INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR STATE TO EXIST IN, ‘NEITHER
PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING’.

NO
ONE HAS OR WILL TEACH YOU THIS AND MANY THINGS THE BUDDHA TAUGHT AND SO IF WHAT
THE BUDDHA TAUGHT ARE TRUE, HE IS THE HIGHEST TEACHER. THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS
THE PERFECT ONE, HE ALONE IS SUMBUDDHA, THERE IS NO BEING LIKE HIM AND SO IF
YOU THINK YOUR GURU IS HIS PEER YOU ARE A FOOL, DELUDED AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY
TO HEAVEN BUT HELL OR THE ANIMAL WORLD.

Anwar denied postponement:

According to Anwar,
his lead lawyer suddenly resigned at 6 pm yesterday because of health reasons
and he was admitted to GH, and so Anwar requested from the judge a delay so
that he could reorganize his legal team but the judge refused.

THIS
TRIAL IS NOT A MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH, IS NOT URGENT AND THERE IS REASON TO
ALLOW POSTPONEMENT BECAUSE A SIGNIFICANT SETBACK HAS AFFECTED ANWAR’S DEFENCE
AND SO IT REFLECTS STRONG EVEN IMPLACABLE POLITICAL MOTIVES AND INDICATES THE
OUTCOME THAT THE REASONABLE REQUEST TO POSTPONE WAS NOT GRANTED.

WHY
IS THE JUDGE IN SUCH HASTE TO PROCEED? IT MAY BE TRUE HE HAS TRUE REASON NOT TO
POSTPONE BUT IF THERE ARE NO VALID REASONS, THAT IS COURTING INSANITY, WHOEVER
YOU ARE. EVERY ACTION YOU TAKE MUST BE BASED ON TRUE REASONS, IF THE REASONS
YOU GIVE ARE FALSE OR EXCUSES, INSANITY AWAITS YOU NO MATTER HOW HIGH YOU THINK
YOU ARE.

Touching?

This
is a picture of a young hand touching and ‘giving succour’ to the aging hand on
the left.

Emotional
people are either touched or moved by such show of empathy or they are repelled
or cynical. Either way they have false perception or understanding.

ONE
WHO PERCEIVES TRULY AND UNDERSTANDS TRULY JUST SEE A YOUNG HAND TOUCHING AN OLD
HAND, HE IS NOT MOVED OR SCOFFING ABOUT IT. TO PERCEIVE IT AS MOVING OR
TOUCHING IS TO PERCEIVE AND UNDERSTAND FALSELY. IF YOU TURN AROUND TO SAY THAT
NOT BE TOUCHED IS HEARTLESS OR IT IS MEANINGLESS TO EXIST WITHOUT BEING TOUCHED
BY TENDERNESS THEN RATHER THAN REFLECTING RIGHTEOUSLY OR BEING CORRECT, IT
REFLECTS THE DEPTH OF YOUR DELUSION OF WHAT IS BAD IS GOOD.

IF
YOU TRULY PERCEIVE THAT AGING IS SUFFERING EVEN TERRIBLE THEN THE CORRECT ANSWER
IS NOT TO TENDERLY TOUCH THE AGING HAND BUT TO NOT BEHAVE IN A WAY THAT
RADIATES FORCE ALL THE TIME THAT PROGRESSIVELY DESTROYS THE PERSON SO THAT HE
SUFFERS AND DIES OF OLD AGE.

PEOPLE
THINK THEY ARE GOOD WHEN THEY ARE STIRRED AND TOUCHED BY SUFFERING OTHERS
MANIFEST WHEN THEY AGE. IT IS HYPOCRITICAL BECAUSE ANYONE WITH EMOTION AND
STYLE HAD A PART IN PUMMELING THE AGED PERSON WITH FORCE SUCH THAT HE
DEGENERATES AND DIES OF OLD AGE.

A
PERSON WHO PERCEIVES TRULY IS NEITHER TOUCHED NOR CYNICAL, HE TRULY UNDERSTANDS
THE SUFFERING OF OLD AGE, HE DOES NOT PERSECUTE OTHERS WITH STYLE AND EMOTIONS,
DOES NOT RADIATE FORCE IN WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES AND HE DENIES HIMSELF AND
DEPARTS FROM THIS WORLD OF PLYING EACH OTHER WITH SUGAR LACED POISON, NEVER TO
RETURN.

IF
YOU FIND THE PICTURE TOUCHING THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING.
IF YOU THINK ANYONE WHO IS NOT TOUCHED IS HEARTLESS THEN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION
AND UNDERSTANDING IS DENSE AND INCURABLE.

To be moved makes no sense:

It
is not false but makes no sense to be moved by what you perceive because it is
merely a stirring of your mental force to make you agitated, sad or even hurt.

BECAUSE
BEING MOVED BY WHAT YOU PERCEIVE IS ABOUT BEING STIRRED IN MENTAL FORCE AND
MENTAL FORCE IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS, BEING MOVED IS NOT FALSE BUT MAKES NO
SENSE, IS SENSELESS AND SO YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU SAW BY BEING MOVED IS
SENSELESS, MEANINGLESS.

THE
FACT THAT YOU FIND BEING MOVED MEANINGFUL REFLECTS THE DEPTH OF YOUR FALSE
PERCEPTION OR DELUSION.

WHOEVER
IS MOVED MUST SUFFER AND HE IS CONDITIONING HIMSELF EVER STRONGER TO SUFFERING
BECAUSE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IS SUFFERING AND CONDITIONING SO THAT IT
BECOMES EASIER TO AROUSE TO MORE INTENSE LEVELS THAT GETS HARDER TO SHED.

Why being moved is the way to madness:

Of
what use is being moved, stirring your mental force to be moved by a sight?

Because
the stirred mental force is not doing any useful work (eg using force to
activate fingers to write is useful) you are practicing controlled insanity to
stir your mental force to be moved by a sight.

BECAUSE
THE STIRRED MENTAL FORCE WHEN BEING MOVED IS NOT DOING ANY USEFUL OR
UNDERSTANDABLE WORK, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY BEING MOVED AND
CONTROLLED INSANITY IS THE FATHER OF UNCONTROLLED INSANITY.

YOU
MAY THINK IT IS SO MEANINGFUL AND GOOD TO BE MOVED BUT IF I AM CORRECT, BEING
MOVED IS A MEANINGLESS EXERCISE OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY
THAT LEADS TO UNCONTROLLED INSANITY AND THAT IS NOT THE PATH TO HEAVEN BUT EVEN
ETERNAL SUFFERING.

How did police know Anwar sodomized Saiful?

To
prosecute Anwar in court implies police has reasonable if not incontrovertible
proof Anwar sodomized Saiful.

It
is impossible that police saw Anwar sodomizing Saiful so either they must
possess presentable evidence (eg video or audio recording, medical proof
Anwar’s sperm was in Saiful’s rectum or it was dangerously based on the hearsay
of Saiful that may be collaborated by others that Anwar sodomized him.

It
has not been denied Saiful met Najib before his alleged last act with Anwar
before he turned up at Pusrawi for examination and there is even allegation
Saiful met with a top inspector secretly in a hotel beforehand.

It
is not difficult to see that the police would dearly love to nail Anwar if they
can and being in this business and they do surveillance and undercover
entrapment work all the time, why did it not occur to them that they should
wire up Saiful so that sound or video recording of the act is captured?

Further,
why did police fail to realize that Saiful’s rectum must be loaded with Anwar’s
sperm after the act and so they should instruct Saiful to immediately present
at a government hospital for capturing the DNA?

And
if you fail to do so when it should be obvious then as honourable people you
should let Anwar off the hook this time and make sure you do your homework
better the next time because this is not a life threatening case and much as
anyone sympathized with Saiful, it was supposed to have been consensual and who
asked Saiful to keep going back to Anwar after he was first sodomized?

Would
police ever contemplate charging the prime minister based on allegations of
sexual misconduct even if corroborated without evidence?

IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE POLICE SAW ANWAR SODOMIZED SAIFUL AND SO THEIR PROSECUTION MUST
BE BASED ON BELIEF, TRUST IN SAIFUL’S ACCOUNT WITH OR WITHOUT RELIABLE EVIDENCE.

IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE POLICE HAS IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE SAIFUL WAS SODOMIZED BY ANWAR
OTHERWISE IT WOULD BE DISPLAYED ON THE INTERNET IF NOT ON A VCD ON PEOPLE’S
DOORSTEPS AND SO ITS PROSECUTION MUST BE BASED ON HEARSAY, TRUST IN SAIFUL’S
ACCOUNT.

IT
HAS BEEN ADMITTED SAIFUL SAW NAJIB IN HIS OFFICE BEFORE HIS LAST ACT WITH ANWAR
AND SO THE POLICE MUST BE AWARE OF THE LIASONS BEFOREHAND SO SEEING THEY ARE
‘DYING’ TO NAIL ANWAR, WHY DID THEY NOT SET UP ENTRAPMENT BY VIDEO OR AUDIO AND
FAILED TO EXTRACT ANWAR’S DNA FROM SPERM LEFT IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM AFTER THE LAST
ACT?

THEREFORE
BY TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION LOGIC, IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THERE
IS A CASE FOR ANWAR TO ANSWER.

THE
GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER SHOWN ANY ZEAL IN THE PURSUIT FOR JUSTICE AND SO WHY IS IT
SHOWING SO MUCH COMMITMENT IN UPHOLDING JUSTICE FOR SAIFUL EVEN WHEN IT WAS
SAID TO BE CONSENSUAL? THE ANSWER MAY BE IT IS SELF SERVING, THE TRIAL WILL
DRAG ANWAR’S NAME IN THE MUD AND IF THEY CAN CONVICT HIM THAT IS ONE NEMESIS
OUT OF THE WAY. WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT OBSESSED WITH PURSUING SODOMY ESPECIALLY
WHEN IT IS CONSENSUAL AND NO ONE WAS HARMED OR KILLED?

IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE POLICE SAW ANWAR SODOMIZE SAIFUL.

IT
IS IMPOSSIBLE POLICE HAS IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE OTHERWISE ANWAR WOULD HAVE BEEN
BEHIND BARS LONG AGO.

AND
SO IT’S CASE MUST BE BASED ON HEARSAY ON SAIFUL’S TESTIMONY. HOW CAN YOU CHARGE
SOMEONE BASED ON HEARSAY, ESPECIALLY IN A CRIME WHERE NOTHING OF SERIOUS PUBLIC
CONCERN HAPPENED?

Why was Anwar’s trial suddenly activated?

Why
was Anwar’s trial suddenly activated and the judge refused Anwar’s request for
postponement because of his chief lawyer’s resignation?

How
might this be linked to the prosecution’s refusal to reveal police evidence?

The
prosecution appears to have rested its case on semen stains belonging to Anwar
detected on Saiful.

Whilst
DNA evidence when genuine may be difficult to refute, it can be planted to
incriminate someone.

Perhaps
Anwar’s enemies were striving to obtain a semen specimen from him perhaps
through his servant or laundry service and finally they managed to obtain the
specimen and so they suddenly decided to proceed without further delay. Their
refusal to reveal their evidence all along may be because they had not obtained
the semen specimen yet.

If
it is true Anwar’s semen was found on Saiful it would have been found there
long ago so why did the prosecution have to wait so long to start proceedings
seeing their haste now to proceed even when Anwar had valid reason to delay?

Illogical:

The prosecution, in its opening statement, says they will prove that
semen stains taken from Mohd Saiful Bukhari’s anus belong to Datuk Seri Anwar
Ibrahim. The prosecution says they will establish the sodomy charge against
Anwar beyond reasonable doubt.

The
specimen may belong to Anwar but if they were taken from Saiful’s anus, how
come it took so long for prosecutors to act on that?

IF
THE SEMEN STAIN TAKEN FROM SAIFUL’S ANUS BELONGED TO ANWAR THEN SEEING THEIR
DESIRE TO NAIL ANWAR THEY SHOULD HAVE CHARGED HIM EVEN BEFORE THE PERMATANG
PAUH ELECTION, WHY NOT THEN BUT NOW THEY WANT TO PROVE THE STAIN BELONGED TO
ANWAR. MAYBE THEN THEY HAVE NOT GOT A SPECIMEN BUT NOW THEY MANAGE TO BORROW
ONE.

Dumbo logic:

If
the semen stain in Saiful’s anus came from Anwar why has the prosecution waited
so long to exercise proof, they could have torpedoed Anwar before he contested
the Permatang Pauh by election.

IT
MAKES NO SENSE TO A PERSON OF TRUE LOGIC BUT TO PEOPLE OF FALSE LOGIC, THE
POLICE AND THE LAYMEN, MAYBE THE PROSECUTORS HAVE A CASE WHEN IT IS UNTENABLE.

WHO
ARE THEY TRYING TO KID, KIDS? BUT THEN ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE LIKE KIDS, THEY ARE
EASILY KIDDED.

Anwar asked Saiful, Can I fuck you?

Such
four letter words are designed to cast Anwar in bad light, it is unlikely if
not impossible that Anwar would solicit sex in that foul manner.

What is the purpose of saying that?

There
is no need for the purpose of court proceedings to utter verbatim the words
Anwar used especially if it is offensive except with malicious intent, to paint
a negative picture of Anwar in the eyes of the public.

THERE
IS NO NEED FOR SAIFUL TO SAY ANWAR ASKED HIM, “CAN I FUCK YOU” FOR THE PURPOSE
OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AND SO EITHER HE IS SO STUPID OR IT IS DELIBERATE TO
DENIGRATE ANWAR.

If you truly understand Anwar:

Anwar
is no saint but if you understand a person truly, there are things it is
possible he said publicly or in private but there are certain things it is
impossible for him to have said.

When
he was assaulted by Rahim Noor Anwar was alleged to have said, “Don’t hit me”
or jangan pukul saya. That is in line with what I expect Anwar to say. It is
unlikely he would have said, “Hoi, hoi, siapa ini pukul saya.” It is unlikely
if not impossible Anwar to have uttered, “Can I fuck you”. It is possible for
certain types of characters to utter that but understanding the nature of Anwar
it is unlikely if not impossible Anwar will speak thus.

YOU
CANNOT HIDE YOUR TRUE NATURE FROM THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING AND UNDERSTANDING
EACH PERSON'S TRUE NATURE IT IS POSSIBLE TO TELL IF IT IS POSSIBLE SOMEONE
ACTUALLY SAID SOMETHING.

PEOPLE
ARE ACTUALLY ROBOTS AND WHATEVER THEY SAY ARE PROGRAMMED AND AS BEFITTING
ROBOTS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ROBOTS PROGRAMMED IN A CERTAIN WAY TO SPEAK IN
ANOTHER PROGRAMMED WAY.

NO
MATTER HOW ANWAR MIGHT TRY TO PRESENT HIMSELF AS UPRIGHT, IF HE HAS AN UNCOUTH
STREAK IT MUST BE DETECTABLE IN SLIPS EVERY NOW AND THEN.

IN
OTHER WORDS, FOR ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS, IT IS NOT IN ANWAR'S PROGRAMMING TO UTTER
THOSE KINDS OF WORDS AND SAIFUL IS UNNECESSARY EXPOSING HIMSELF AS A
FABRICATOR.

Misunderstood & taken out of context:

Quote:
Kelab Belia Graduan 1Malaysia also came to Nasir’s defence, saying his
remarks were misunderstood and taken out of context.

This
is a standard rehashed defence, when ire is aroused over an action or speech it
is claimed to have been misunderstood and taken out of context and so the
person is a robot.

Actually
understanding is not involved at all so how can it be misunderstood. What is
involved is just hearing the words spoken (by Nasir) and converting the words
into actions and objects that even mechanical robots can now do.

IT
IS OBJECTIVE EXACTLY WHAT THE WORDS SAID SIGNIFIED AND IT IS NOT FOR ANYONE WHO
SAY IT WAS TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT OR MISUNDERSTOOD. IF WHAT YOU SAY IS FALSE, IT
WAS NOT MISUNDERSTOOD OR TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT BUT YOU ARE UTTERING FALSITY BY
REHASH AS DAMAGE CONTROL YOU WILL BE JUDGED AND THE PUNISHMENT IS FAR MORE PAINFUL
THAN YOU REALIZE.

UNDERSTANDING
MAY NOT BE INVOLVED OR NEEDED, WHAT IS NEEDED IS HEARING THE WORDS AND DECODING
THEM INTO OBJECTS AND ACTIONS SO HOW CAN IT BE MISUNDERSTOOD. ACTUALLY IN CASES
WHERE PEOPLE MISUNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID TO THEM, THEY REHASHED THE FALSE
UNDERSTANDING FOR THE OCCASION, THEY DID NOT PAY SUFFICIENT ATTENTION OR WERE
DISTRACTED TO PRESUME WHAT WAS SAID THAT THEY HEARD IN SNAPSHOTS INDICATED SCENARIO
‘A’ WHEN IT INDICATED SCENARIO ‘C’.

You don’t need understanding at all:

ACCURATE HEARING OF ALL THE WORDS SPOKEN HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
UNDERSTANDING, DOES NOT REQUIRE UNDERSTANDING. ACCURATE CONVERSION OF ALL THE
WORDS SUCCESSFULLY RECEIVED INTO ACTIONS AND OBJECTS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH
UNDERSTANDING, DOES NOT REQUIRE UNDERSTANDING. SO UNDERSTANDING IS NOT INVOLVED
AND THE PERSON HAS FALSE PERCEPTION UNDERSTANDING IS INVOLVED.

 

What
is the use of understanding if it is false and therefore by understanding you
mean seeing things truly and therefore understanding truly? But emotional
people never see things truly but as they like and dislike and therefore they
can never truly understand so how can they misunderstand what they never
understood?

Instead
it is not understanding that is involved but successful complete reception of
the words spoken to them and converting or decoding those words spoken into
objects and actions.

THEREFORE
SO LONG AS AN EMOTIONAL PERSON HAS PAID SUFFICIENT ATTENTION TO ACCURATELY RECEIVE THE WORDS SPOKEN TO HIM (NO
UNDERSTANDING NEEDED) AND HE IS CONVERSANT IN ACCURATELY DECODING THOSE WORDS
HEARD INTO ACTIONS AND OBJECTS, THE SPOKEN MESSAGE HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY
TRANSMITTED TO HIM AND NO UNDERSTANDING IS INVOLVED NOR REQUIRED. YOU DON’T
NEED UNDERSTANDING TO HEAR AND PUT INTO ACTION ‘TAKE THIS THERE’, ALL YOU NEED
IS TO BE CONVERSANT (NOT UNDERSTANDING) OR PROGRAMMED IN ENGLISH, GOOD HEARING,
HEAR ALL THE WORDS SPOKEN AND THEN DECODE THOSE WORDS IN ACTIONS AND OBJECTS.
WHAT HAS THIS GOT TO DO WITH UNDERSTANDING OR SEEING THINGS TRULY?

ACCURATE
HEARING OF ALL THE WORDS HEARD HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH UNDERSTANDING, DOES NOT REQUIRE UNDERSTANDING, ACCURATE
CONVERSION OF ALL THE WORDS HEARD INTO ACTIONS AND OBJECTS HAS NOTHING TO DO
WITH UNDERSTANDING, DOES NOT REQUIRE UNDERSTANDING. SO UNDERSTANDING IS NOT
INVOLVED AND THE PERSON HAS FALSE PERCEPTION UNDERSTANDING IS INVOLVED.