Bush wipes hand on Clinton

Bush wipes hand on Clinton’s shirt:

After shaking hands with Haitians, Bush was shown on video to secretly wiped his hand on Clinton’s shirt reflecting his hypocritical self centred nature. It must trouble him to shake the sweaty grimy hands of refugees and he could not resist wiping himself clean as quickly as possible and Clinton’s nearby shirt was handy.

This is a man with a lot of karma and it is completely in keeping with his nature, his trip is probably to fulfil expectations rather desired.

Roger Bootle’s delusion & capitalism is a dead end

Roger Bootle is a columnist with the Daily Telegraph probably with a rightwing bent. If I am right then he does not understand truly the economic crisis facing mankind.

He sees the UK economy in deep crisis and his answer is not to raise but lower taxes to stimulate the economy, so as to provide incentive for people primarily entrepreneurs to make money and in the process pull the economy up by its shoestrings. Raising taxes would cause an exodus that would make worse UK’s plight. Not surprisingly, he appears to favour trimming UK’s bloated public sector as an answer to the government’s overspending. It is true the UK government like governments all over the world is living beyond its means financed by borrowing but if they were to cut their expenditures, it will add to the already serious unemployment out there.

The current economic and financial situation in the world may be like a cancer with no cure and if you perceive there is a cure and it does not work you are deluded and it is not harmless because people perceive their delusions as true and so they will end up mad.

If the previous robust economy was due to excesses, abuses, cheating (eg Northern Rock & Lehmann borrowing short term to lend long term & AIG insuring without backup), plundering the system, living borrowing heedlessly from the future then once the party has ended, there is no hope or it is impossible to return to the bubbling past and that means woe now and later because you have spent your future and have mountainous debts to repay.

Rather than lower taxes encouraging businessmen to invest and make money that benefits the economy and prevents the flight of capital, it will encourage unscrupulous bankers and industrialists to game or exploit the system to make more money transferring more common wealth to the hands of the few to aggravate the situation of the few with so much money they cannot spend enough to stimulate the economy and the many with dwindling money they cannot spend and the economy dies.

Take Microsoft, it may provide a boost to the economy in providing employment and ‘productivity tools’ but it overcharges (compared with free software) and so what Microsoft puts into the system in employment and productivity may be far offset by what it takes out of the system (in terms of share appreciation making Bill Gates filthily rich and the exorbitant profits it makes) and this is unsustainable because inexorably the few (Microsoft) becomes filthily rich draining or milking wealth out of the system.

Another example is Cliff Richards who wants his song copyright extended in perpetuity. Each time you play his songs you must pay him royalty and he has already made so much from his recordings of the past. Supermarkets and public places have to pay royalty if his songs are played. The effect of copyright is like a tax that milks money from the system and passes it into the hands of the few who keep getting richer and cannot spend enough to stimulate the economy whilst wealth is drained steadily from the system.

THUS CAPITALISM MAY BE INTRINSICALLY UNSUSTAINABLE BECAUSE WHATEVE BENEFITS CAPITALISTS SUPPLY IN INCOME AND EMPLOYMENT TO THE MASSES IS FAR OFFSET BY THE MONEY THEY MILK OUT OF THE SYSTEM (THE EMPLOYMENT AND WEALTH CONTRIBUTED BY FORD IS OFFSET BY THE MONEY HE DRAINS OUT THE SYSTEM AS PROFITS WHOSE TAXING BOOTLE AND RIGHTWINGERS AS IN AMERICA HAS BEEN CLAMOURING TO REDUCE). THE NET EFFECT OF CAPITALISM OVER TIME IS TO TRANSFER COMMON WEALTH FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW UNTIL IT BECOMES UNBALANCED AND COLLAPSES. CAPITALISTS WILL BY HOOK AND CROOK, HAVING INFLUENCES WITH POLITICIANS TO MOULD THE SYSTEM IN THEIR FAVOUR AND SO THE RICH GET RICHER AND THE POOR POORER NOT WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE A TIME WILL COME AND MAY HAVE COME WHEN IT IS HOPELESSLY LOPSIDED.

TAXING CAPITALISTS RETURN A MEASURE OF THE ILL GOTTEN WEALTH TO THE SYSTEM.

ALREADY A CRITICAL AMOUNT OF WEALTH MAY BE IN THE HANDS OF A FEW AND NOT SATISFIED THESE FEW ENTRUST THEIR WEALTH TO HEDGE FUNDS THAT FURTHER MAGNIFY THEIR BETS BY MARGIN FINANCE TO PLUNDER FROM THE MARKETS (CURRENCY, OIL, COMMODITY SPECULATION) CAUSING EVEN GREATER HARM TO THE SYSTEM.

Exactly what is the state of the economy can be known. If the boom of the past was not so much productive as abusive and spending from the future and now that the future is spent and the abuses cannot be sustained any longer, there is no way to return to the past and that means a bleak future. If you think we can return to the past by providing capitalists with incentives (lower taxes) you may be right or deluded. Taxes (and interest rates) have been lowered for many years not just in America but all over the world including Malaysia, and that hasn’t stopped this crisis from occurring and so lowering taxes as lowering interest rates is not the answer.

THE BUDDHA CAN LIVE WITH ONE MEAL A DAY AND NO SHELTER OVER HIS HEAD. IF HE CAN LIVE THUS YOU TOO CAN LIVE THUS, ANYTHING MORE IS LUXURY AND SO IF YOU HAVE MESSED UP EVERYTHING SO BADLY THEN IT MAY BE YOUR LOT TO LIVE WITH ONE MEAL A DAY AND NO SHELTER AND YOU SHOULD GET USE TO IT RATHER THAN YEARN WISHFULLY FOR A RETURN TO THE EXCESSES OF THE PAST.

The delusion of lower taxes:

They have been lowering taxes around the world aping the US and this has not stopped this crisis from happening so how can lowering taxes cure this crisis?

Instead lower taxes disproportionately affect higher income earners and it is not a surprise that the wealthy are clamouring for lower taxes.

You think lower taxes will provide incentive for the rich to work harder and provide the stimulus for job creation but that may be a delusion because it may encourage the rich to game or exploit the system to earn even more (eg by financial engineering) that is now more tax free in the process transferring even more wealth from the common pool to the few.

LOWER TAXES AND LOWER INTEREST RATES ARE TWO DELUSIONS OF PEOPLE WHO FALSELY UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS OR WANT TO EXPLOIT THE SYSTEM MORE FOR SELF GAIN. IT BENEFITS THE RICH MORE THAN THE POOR.

I AM NOT SAYING THAT HIGHER TAXES AND INTEREST RATES IS THE ANSWER, THERE MAY BE NO ANSWER FOR THE BIG HOLE MANKIND HAS DUG HIMSELF.

The basis and outcome of capitalism:

It is postulated that in the beginning the solar system was a roughly uniform amorphous cloud of gas and matter and randomly matter began to accrete or gather in various locations and the bigger these gathered masses the more they attracted by gravity free dust and matter in the vicinity such that the big get bigger and swallowed the smaller ones (the earth’s gravity pulled straying asteroids so that they crash into and were incorporated into the earth. Thus with time as a result of the big getting bigger by bullying or gravity, what remained was the massive sun or boss with lesser centres in the various planets and Jupiter was a stillborn star and after most of the matter is mopped up by the big fish there is hardly anything left in space.

Capitalism is similarly a free for all with everyone free to make and lose money and fortunes are made and lost. (It is not quite a free for all because the dice is loaded, the rich has political connections and indulge in insider trading and whatever unfair practices they can dream of).

Thus there are three possible outcomes with time, the system is stable (the distribution of wealth remains even), the rich get richer or the rich gets poorer.

JUST AS WITH TIME THE MATTER IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM BECAME ACCRETED IN VARIOUS POWER CENTERS LIKE THE SUN AND PLANETS AND SPACE BECAME EVEN MORE EMPTY, IN THE SAME WAY WITH TIME IN A CAPITALIST SYSTEM, IT IS LIKELY THAT WEALTH WILL ACCRUE TO THE FEW AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MAJORITY AND THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THE IMBALANCE WILL REACH AN UNSTABLE LEVEL THAT THE WHOLE CAPITALISTIC SYSTEM TOPPLES OR SOCIAL ANARCHY ENSUES.

THE EFFECT OF TAX IS TO CONTROL OR SLOW THE TRANSFER OF COMMON WEALTH TO THE RICH BUT IT ONLY DELAYS RATHER THAN PREVENT THE ULTIMATE TRANSFER OF TOO MUCH WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM TO THE FEW. AND SO IT MAY BE THAT WE MAY NOW BE REACHING THE STAGE WHERE TOO MUCH WEALTH IS IN THE HANDS OF TOO FEW WHO CANNOT SPEND ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY AND TOO LITTLE WEALTH BUT TOO MUCH DEBT IS IN THE HANDS OF THE MANY WHO CANNOT NOW SPEND.

The game of capitalism is to find new products (shares, houses, household goods, widgets, software) to sell at fat profits so that the few can accumulate wealth at the expense of the system.

WHO DOES MICROSOFT, APPLE & ALL THEIR ILK MAKE MONEY FROM? IF NOT FROM THE MASSES, THEN WHOM? ONCE MONEY IS COLLECTED BY THEM AND TAXES PAID, THE REST BELONGS TO THEM AND IF THEY KEEP MAKING MONEY THE PILE UNDER THEIR CONTROL GETS BIGGER AND BIGGER WHILST THE PILE AVAILABLE TO THE MASSES SHRINKS.

Capitalism an hourglass not perpetual motion watch:

Capitalism is akin to an hourglass once set upright the sand trickles down and when all the sand has passed to the lower chamber, time is up rather than a perpetual motion wrist watch.

If you think capitalism is like a perpetual wrist watch capable of keeping going forever or indefinitely you may understand and perceive falsely.

Not only is capitalism an hourglass but the combined onslaught of mankind throughout the world is so relentless and intense that it runs out far faster than you think.

Jesus too was homeless:

If you read accounts in the New Testament and understood truly you would have understood that Jesus too was homeless like the Buddha was homeless. His homelessness was by choice and without resentment whereas with ordinary people it is enforced with resentment.

Just as Jesus can survive homeless you too can survive homeless and if you are not careful, you may find yourself homeless.

It’s terribly lonely to be single

People reading it and the person responsible does not realise he or she is guilty of falsity with karma attached.

Did the Buddha and Jesus complained that it is terrible to be single?

THUS JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE LONELY TO BE SINGLE DOES NOT MEAN IT HOLDS TRUE FOR EVERYONE AND YOU ARE SPEAKING CARELESSLY WITH JUDGMENT BECAUSE SOME FOOLISH PEOPLE WILL BE DRIVEN TO MARRY JUST TO AVOID TERRIBLE LONELINESS.

IT IS NOT BEING SINGLE THAT IS PER SE TERRIBLE BUT DEPENDENCY ON OTHERS, FEAR AND PERHAPS EVEN SOCIAL STIGMA THAT MAKES IT SO AND SO IT IS FALSE OR DELUDED TO PERCEIVE BEING SINGLE AS TERRIBLE. IT CAN BE TERRIBLE BEING MARRIED TO A TYRANT SO WOULD YOU SAY IT IS TERRIBLE BEING MARRIED?

Lodge report, Karpal urges Zul

KUALA LUMPUR: Independent MP Zulkifli Noordin should lodge a police report to allow the authorities to bring to book those who had allegedly directed him to implicate the Prime Minister and his wife in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribu

Karpal did not mean what he said and he has ulterior motive telling Zul to lodge a police report, namely to get him into trouble by having to substantiate his claims that if unsubstantiated will discredit him.

ZUL DOES NOT NEED KARPAL TO TELL HIM WHAT TO DO AND KARPAL IS NOT OFFERING THE ADVICE AT FACE VALUE BUT WITH MOTIVE TO UNDERMINE ZUL’S CREDIBILITY. THIS IS DECEIT AND BEING INSINCERE IN YOUR ADVICE AND THERE IS KARMA.

Look at how much Tiger Woods Earn:

What footballers and Tiger Woods earn today is ‘mindboggling’ to their predecessors in the past. The sex scandals of Woods and England captain cost them millions.

All these are not without repercussions to the system because it is the system that pays them these ridiculous amounts and sponsorships by entities like Nike are ultimately borne by the public and tickets for spectators have to be increased heftily to pay for their wages.

Bankers on Wall Street make big bets to reap oversized immediate profits and reward themselves with multimillion bonuses plus shares that can be cashed and all this must come from the system and transfers money (big time) from the many to the few.

AND THUS IT IS THAT IN RECENT YEARS THE TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM HAS NOT JUST INCREASED BUT ACCELERATED TO EVEN TURBO CHARGED LEVEL AND NOBODY GIVES A DAMN NOT REALIZING IT PUSHES THE SYSTEM CLOSER TO THE PRECIPICE.

REFLECTING PEOPLE’S NO OR FALSE UNDERSTANDING THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH ALL THIS PLUNDERINGS OF THE SYSTEM BY THE PRIVILEGED FEWS WHEN IT IS ACCELERATING THE APPROACH TO A CRITICAL SYSTEM CRIPPLING IMBALANCE BETWEEN THE RICH FEW AND MANY POOR.

CAPITALISM IS EVIL (WHICH IS NOT TO SAY COMMUNISM IS GOOD) AND LIKE ALL EVIL, IT ENDS IN DISASTER FOR EVERYONE CAUGHT IN ITS MESH.

Most of the money may be gone:

Most of the money in the system may be gone, transferred from the hands of the majority to the minority and that is why there is a liquidity crisis.

People still think they have so much money saved in banks and whatever repositories of wealth like pension funds, shares and properties but their savings have been lent out pocketed by the shrewd minority and will not return unless borrowers repay their loans. They think they are worth so much on the basis of the exaggerated values of their shares and properties but they are worth much less. The shrewd ones are the rich minority who have sold overpriced shares and property to the majority suckers who are happy to hold and delude themselves they are rich because of their hyped shares and properties.

THUS A LOT OF THE MONEY SAVERS HAVE IN BANKS MAY ALREADY BE GONE (WHICH IS WHY GOVERNMENTS HAD TO PRINT MONEY TO COVER), LENT RECKLESSLY AND POCKETED BY THE MINORITY WHO ARE USING THIS MONEY AUGMENTED BY BORROWING OR MARGIN FINANCE TO GAME THE SYSTEM VIA HEDGE FUND CURRENCY AND COMMODITY SPECULATING FURTHER UNDERMINING THE SYSTEM TO HASTEN ITS COLLAPSE. WHAT OTHER WEALTH THE MAJORITY HAVE IN OVERRATED SHARES AND PROPERTY ARE VIRTUAL NOT GENUINE WEALTH, LIABLE TO VANISH INTO THIN AIR.

POLITICIANS ARE ATTEMPTING TO PAPER THINGS OVER AND MAKE MAKESHIFT REPAIRS BUT IT IS ONLY DELAYING THE INEVITABLE COLLAPSE. EITHER POLITICIANS ARE AWARE AND TRYING TO COVER UP (LIKELY) HOPING THE SYSTEM WILL SOMEHOW RECOVER OR THEY ARE CLUELESS LIKE THE REST.

Look at the scale of corruption in Malaysia:

Daim is reputed to be worth $40 billion and there are many more grimy hands laid on the money in the system in Malaysia.

Lim Kit Siang said the sterling speculation cost Bank Negara 16 billion maybe much more, nowadays corruption comes in tens even hundreds of millions not occasionally but regularly. DAP’s Hee was said to be paid $15 million.

Think of the amount of money banks lent to finance property and all this money is now in the hands of the few, developers.

YOU MAY THINK THE TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM TO THE FEW IN MALAYSIA VIA CORRUPTION, PROPERTY AND CREDIT CARD CONSUMPTION IS SUSTAINABLE, MANAGEABLE BY THE SYSTEM BUT IT MAY BE UNSUSTAINABLE, THE PLUNDER IS GREATER THAN THE SYSTEM CAN ABSORB AND SO SOONER OR LATER IT WILL DRY UP, NO MONEY IN THE SYSTEM.

MALAYSIA MAY NOT BE AN EXCEPTION BUT THE RULE AS TO WHAT IS HAPPENING ALL OVER THE WORLD, ONLY IN WESTERN COUNTRIES THEY TAKE CARE TO COVER IT.

IT MAY BE TRUE CAPITALISM CAN SUSTAIN THE RELENTLESS EVEN ACCELERATED TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM TO THE FEW OR IT MAY BE A TIME BOMB WAITING TO BLOW UP. IF YOU THINK IT SUSTAINABLE WHEN IT IS DOOMED, YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.

This time the earth will not come to mankind’s rescue:

It may not be as farfetched as you think that it is not mankind but the earth that bails mankind out each time he digs himself into a hole with his capitalism.

This time the earth has been plundered to near collapse, polluted, forestry, fishery, minerals (oil) and agriculture depleting and the earth warming that may ruin agriculture.

WHEN THE EARTH WARMS, FORESTS MAY CATCH FIRE AND SUCH FIRES MAY RAISE TEMPERATURE FURTHER AND AIRBORNE AMBERS MAY SPREAD FOREST FIRES SO THAT THERE MAY BE MAYHEM WITH MANY FIRES BURNING OUT OF CONTROL GLOBALLY.

THIS TIME THE EARTH MAY NOT COME TO MANKIND’S RESCUE BUT IT MAY TURN THE HEAT ON RECKLESS ABUSIVE MANKIND.

Krugman’s fun:

I admit it: I had fun watching right-wingers go wild as health reform finally became law. But a few days later, it doesn’t seem quite as entertaining — and not just because of the wave of vandalism and threats aimed at Democratic lawmakers. For if you care about America’s future, you can’t be happy as extremists take full control of one of our two great political parties.

Here is a partisan man and his mental force is stirred attractively (I had fun) watching right wingers go wild (seething with anger) at their defeat in healthcare reforms.

ANYONE WHO ENJOYS SEEING OTHERS SUFFER, HAVE FUN SEEING RIGHT WINGERS GOING WILD IS DELUDED, WHAT HE CALLS FUN IS ACTUALLY ALSO SUFFERING THAT LEADS TO MORE SUFFERING AND SO KRUGMAN AS HE IS, IS HEADED FOR WOE NOT SAFETY.

Krugman is a fool:

Only a fool will enjoy seeing others suffering because it is a meaningless, stressful, conditioning stirring of his mental force.

WHAT KRUGMAN IS SAYING UNWITTINGLY IS THAT HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY AT THE SIGHT OF RIGHT WINGERS BEING AGITATED AND HURT.

WHOEVER MUST STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY OR REPULSIVELY MUST HARM HIS MIND AND ONLY A FOOL WILL HARM HIMSELF. FURTHER IT IS TOTALLY MEANINGLESS TO STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE IF NO WORK IS BEING DONE.

THUS KRUGMAN IS A FOOL AND HE CANNOT BE WISE OR DISCERNING ANYWHERE ELSE BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A DISCERNING MAN TO BE A FOOL.

The inevitable price for foolishness:

The inset is a picture of the man accused of murdering the driver of the Mercedes who is supposed to be an analyst and son of Penang’s badminton star Eddy Choong.

One look will tell the discerning he is a murderous or dangerous person and one should steer clear of him and it reflects blindness and greed that the person tangled with him and paid for his folly with his life.

MANY THINK THEY ARE NOT THAT STUPID BUT THEY ARE DELUDING THEMSELVES, THEY ARE STUPID OR GREEDY IN OTHER WAYS AND WILL PAY THE PRICE IN SUFFERING AND DEATH IN OTHER WAYS.

The sin of petitioning:

All protests and demonstrations are unrighteous with karma attached.

If you disapprove of an adulterous president then you express that in your vote. If others have a similar view, they too will express it in their vote and by demonstrating you are trying to impose your views, trying to tell others that they must also act as you act and that is sin.

YOU DON’T NEED TO WEAR SUCH HATS AND MASKS, THEY ARE GIMMICKS TO DRAMATIZE AND BECAUSE THEY ARE MEANINGLESS, THEY ARE ALL PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS THAT WILL END IN MADNESS FOR THEM.

IF OTHERS DISAPPROVE OF ADULTEROUS PRESIDENTS THEY DO NOT NEED YOU TO WASTE YOUR TIME TO PROTEST AND SO YOUR DEMONSTRATION IS TO IMPOSE YOUR WILL ON THOSE WHO WOULD NOT VOTE LIKE YOU AND SO YOU ARE USING FORCE TO COERCE.

LIKELY THEY ARE PAWNS OF ONE POLITICAL FACTION OUT TO SMEAR AND GAIN POLITICAL ADVANTAGE AND WHOEVER IS THE ORGANIZER HAS GRAVE KARMA.

Tkl

Greenspan shows himself a non-understanding rote logician:

“There are significant bubbles in Shanghai and along the coastal provinces, but there’s some of that going back into the hinterlands as well,” Greenspan said. “Remember that the bursting of the bubble by itself is not a big catastrophe. We had a dot-com bubble, it burst, and the economy barely moved.”

Greenspan is showing his reasoning and to one who understands truly, he is demonstrating he does not truly understand but he is merely rehashing rules logic to ‘sort of’ vaguely explain or understand new events that fellow fools accept as wisdom.

WHAT GREENSPAN IS SAYING IS THAT THE BURSTING OF A BUBBLE IS ITSELF IS NOT A BIG CATASTROPHE AND THE ‘REASON’ HE SAYS THIS IS BECAUSE OF PAST EXPERIENCE (NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY) THAT THE ECONOMY DID NOT REACT AFTER THE DOT.COM CRASH, NOT BECAUSE HE SEES AND UNDERSTANDS SPECIFICALLY THIS PRESENT CHINA SITUATION.

THIS IS DANGEROUS RULES LOGIC THAT DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND. JUST BECAUSE THE US ECONOMY WAS UNSHAKEN BY THE DOT.COM CRASH DOES NOT MEAN THE SAME WILL HOLD FOR A CHINA BUBBLE CRASH, SO WHY SPEAK OF SOMETHING THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE TRUE? ISN’T HE WASTING HIS AND OTHERS’ TIME?

IF THE US ECONOMY WAS NOT SHAKEN BY THE DOT.COM CRASH, THERE MUST BE REASONS FOR IT BUT GREENSPAN DOES NOT TELL YOU THAT MAY BE BECAUSE HE DOES NOT KNOW. ARE THE REASONS THAT CAUSED THE US ECONOMY NOT TO BE SHAKEN AFTER THE DOT.COM CRASH APPLICABLE TO THE PRESENT CHINA SITUATION?

Greenspan says don’t worry about China bubbles collapsing:

What Greenspan is implying is that even if there are bubbles in China, they and their collapse are not necessarily dangerous or bad and the reason he is saying this is not because he understands why this is so but because from past experience, the Dot Com Crash barely hurt the US economy.

Greenspan: Don’t worry but I don’t know why

De facto, Greenspan is saying, “Don’t worry about China bubbles but I don’t know why except that past experience in the Dot.Com Crash indicates no effect on the economy.

WITHOUT SEEING WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY SO AND YOU ARE COURTING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY EVEN IF YOU ARE PROVEN RIGHT BY EVENTS. ‘BECAUSE DOT.COM CRASH DID NOT HURT US ECONOMY IS NOT A TRUE REASON OR UNDERSTANDING WHY BURSTING BUBBLES MAY NOT HURT ECONOMIES.

An exception than a rule:

Even though the Dot.Com Crash did not shake the US economy, it may be an exception than the rule because severe economic declines have historically occurred with the bursting of bubbles like the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the housing bubble crash of recent years.

Why did the dot.com crash not shake the economy?

Perhaps it is because as hyper-inflated as valuations were, there were few players (just an isolated part of the economy) and little money was exchanged at those absurd valuations and so its bursting was less painful possibly abetted by Fed policies of lowering interest rates and China shipping tons of goods to keep the US economy humming for pieces of intrinsically worthless paper.

A housing bubble may involved more people with more money at risk should it crash and so will impact on the economy.

DON’T YOU THINK IT IS FOOLISH AND DANGEROUS TO PICK ON AN EXCEPTION THAN THE RULE TO JUSTIFY A CONDONING VIEW ABOUT BUBBLES?

Not even rules let alone exceptions:

You must not follow rules let alone follow or use exceptions as guide as Greenspan implicitly is doing. Perhaps he did not say what he meant which was to exonerate himself that because there was not economic downturn after dot.com crash therefore downturns do not always follow burst bubbles and he is not to blame for this crisis.

It is foolish to use rules to guide your decisions and you are then without understanding of the current situation and using rules to guide your path in this situation.

ANYONE WHO USES RULES IS A ROBOT OF THAT RULE AND HERE AS ELSEWHERE HE IS A ROBOT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING, MERELY FOLLOWING PROGRAMS OR RULES.

It is even more foolish to use exceptions to guide your decisions as Greenspan appear to suggest that because dot.com crash did not cause downturn, Chinese bubble crash may not too.

The discerning person who truly understands does not use rules to explain and guide him but he sees all the relevant facts of the current Chinese bubble situations and though he may remember past outcomes of such bubbles, he uses them to understand and therefore predict the specific to the occasion likely outcome for Chinese bubbles. He does not follow the rule bubble crash equals downturn but he sees and understands the specific current Chinese situation and forms specific to the situation conclusion.

CHINA TOO IS NOT AS WONDERFUL AS IT IS MADE UP TO, THERE IS A BIG BUBBLE WITH FOREIGN MONEY HELPING TO STOKE IT AND THERE WILL BE A CRASH TOO. FIRST JAPAN WAS BURNT BY HUBRIS THEN THE US AND LATER CHINA.

Losing the faith

Are Germany's Catholics turning away from church?

This matter reflects no true understanding.

What is relevant is whether the actions or behaviour of the church is true or false, good or bad. Just because the church has conducted itself badly does not mean the religion itself is the same.

IT IS NOT A MATTER OF HAVING FAITH OR LOSING FAITH IN THE CHURCH AND ONLY PEOPLE WHO DO NOT SEE AND UNDERSTAND OR ARE IN DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE CHURCH, WHICH IS ACTUALLY THERE FOR ANYONE TO SEE, NEED TO REAFFIRM OR DISAVOW THEIR FAITH BUT NO MATTER HOW TIMES OR HOW INTENSE THEY AVOW OR DISAVOW THEIR FAITH, IT IS MEANINGLESS, HAS NO UNDERSTANDING. TO ONE WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS, THE ACTIONS OF THE CHURCH EXPOSED CAN BE OBJECTIVELY SEEN AS EITHER GOOD OR BAD, TO BE PRAISED OR CENSURED AND UNTIL TRULY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TAKEN IT REMAINS THE SAME. THE CHURCH AND THE RELIGION ARE TWO DIFFERENT THOUGH RELATED ENTITIES AND IT REFLECTS EMOTIONALITY TO CONDEMN THE RELIGION AS A RESULT OF THE ACTIONS OF THE CHURCH.

Distraction & daze:

FORCE IS A POWERFUL DISTRACTOR AND BECAUSE THE PERSON’S STYLE IS A FUNCTION OF FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, IT IS A POWERFUL DRAWER OF ATTENTION FROM THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID AND BECAUSE HIS ATTENTION IS POWERULLY DRAINED AWAY FROM THE SUBSTANCE, HE DOES NOT RECEIVE OR POORLY RECEIVE THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID AND THEREFORE FAILS TO UNDERSTAND.

IN OTHER WORDS, IF THERE IS FORCE CHANGING OF STYLE AND WORDS CHANGING OF SUBSTANCE OR WHAT IS SPOKEN AT THE SAME TIME THEN THE FORCE CHANGES OF THE STYLE IS A POTENT ATTRACTOR OF ATTENTION SO THAT SUBSTANCE OR MEANING IS IGNORED IN FAVOR OF STYLE AND IT IS NO SURPRISE THE PERSON DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.

The two (distraction and daze) are different but related entities. Chronic distraction or drawing of attention from the subject requiring attention results in an attention or focus that is blurred, has difficult focusing sharply on an event or inability to focus at all on matters requiring attention and that is a daze.

You need force to distract and cause a daze, without force acting there can never be distraction and dazes.

Distractions can be intrinsic or extrinsic.

Thus when you are trying to study and someone has set the radio or TV blaring in the background that is an EXTRINSIC distraction to you concentrating on your studies. Again there may thoughts occupying your minds or worries that impair and even prevent you from concentration on important matters at hand.

If there is simultaneous force and substance changing of what is said then it divides your attention and that is intrinsic distraction. If you are paying full attention to the force changing in a stylish speech you cannot be paying full attention to the changing words being spoken. Only when there are no force changes in your speech and the speech of others can you pay full attention to the changing substances or pronounced words and the meaning they convey. Because there are simultaneous force changes and word changes in the speech of everyone here, people are forced to pay intermittent alternating attention to both and fill in the missed gaps with presumption or they often switch off, refuse to pay attention and fake they are paying attention.

INTRINSIC DISTRACTION IS WHEN THERE IS A SIMULTANEOUS OR AT THE SAME TIME BLEND OF FORCE CHANGES (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) AND SUBSTANCES CHANGES (CHANGING WORDS HEARD) WHICH FORCES THE LISTENER TO KEEP SWITCHING ATTENTION BETWEEN THE TWO TO STRUGGLE CATCH ATTENTION OF EACH.

THE NET RESULT OF THIS EVEN RAPIDLY OSCILLATING ATTENTION BETWEEN THE FORCE CHANGES BEING HEARD AND THE CHANGING SYLLABLES OF WORDS BEING HEARD IS TO BE UNABLE TO PAY ATTENTION FOR EXTENDED PERIODS. THUS HEARING SPEECH WITH A BLEND OF SUBSTANCE AND STYLE TRAINS OR CONDITIONS THE LISTENER TO DIVIDE HIS ATTENTION OR TO BE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN OR SUSTAIN HIS ATTENTION ON ONE OBJECT FOR LONG SO THAT INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE FOR LONG BECOMES THE DEFAULT STATE AND THAT IS A DAZE, INABILITY TO PAY ATTENTION.

IF YOU CANNOT PAY ATTENTION FOR LONG TO A SUBJECT, YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND.

A DAZE IS A FORCE INDUCED STATE OF THE MIND AS A RESULT OF REPETITIVE EVEN VIOLENT DISTRACTING OF THE PERSON’S ATTENTION FROM MATTERS AT HAND WHEREIN THE PERSON’S ATTENTION IS SIGNIFICANTLY BLURRED, UNABLE TO FOCUS ON MATTERS AT HAND SO THAT HE LOSES TOUCH WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING OR SAID TO HIM.

FORCE IS A POWERFUL DISTRACTOR AND BECAUSE THE PERSON’S STYLE IS A FUNCTION OF FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, IT IS A POWERFUL DRAWER OF ATTENTION FROM THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID AND BECAUSE HIS ATTENTION IS POWERULLY DRAINED AWAY FROM THE SUBSTANCE, HE DOES NOT RECEIVE OR POORLY RECEIVE THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID AND THEREFORE FAILS TO UNDERSTAND.

Five reasons why people cannot understand:

Firstly the universal simultaneous combo of substance and style of what is said and do divides people’s attention between paying attention to the force changes and the substance or word or syllable or units of action changes so that with chronic conditioning the person’s attention cannot remain with one matter for long and he cannot focus sharply but at best approximately focused and thus not sharply focused he cannot understand completely or truly.

Secondly the constant self and other force bombardment on the person’s mind creates a painful seizure of force of the mind and body called stress and this painful distracting seizure of stress that is never completely relinquishes prevents the person concentrating fully and therefore understanding fully.

STRESS SEIZES THE MIND PAINFULLY AND THE PAINFULLY SEIZED MIND CANNOT CONCENTRATE AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON.

Thirdly, the constant self and other bombardment force changes as in changing speed and strength on the person’s mind creates insoluble renewing restlessness that prevents the person from fully concentrating and understanding.

Thirdly the simultaneous combo of substance (changing words of what is said) and style (changing force of what is said) divides the person’s attention. In this simultaneous combo of style and substance style or force changes is ascendant, draw the lion’s portion of attention because force is a powerful attractor of attention and thus his attention preponderantly captured by style he fails or poorly understands the substance of what is said to him.

Fourthly, because whatever people say or do is rehashed that requires no understanding, just selection and reproducing from a mental plan, they have trained themselves to function without understanding so that whatever understanding they may initially have become atrophied with time.

Fifthly, emotions or stirring of mental force undermines attention and understanding. The more emotional (angry, excited, sadness, hurt, agitated or fearful) a person, the more his understanding is impaired.

WHEN A PERSON IS EXPERIENCING EMOTIONS HIS MENTAL FORCES ARE STIRRING IN SPECIFIC WAYS AND THIS FORCE STIRRING PREVENTS UNDERSTANDING.

Styled speech demands attention for two things:

Styled speech or speech with force prolonging, changing speed and loudness demands you pay attention to two things at the same time and that is physically impossible.

BECAUSE THERE ARE CONSTANT CHANGES IN THE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THE CHANGING MEANING OR SUBSTANCE OF WORDS SPOKEN, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO FULLY PAY ATTENTION TO BOTH AT THE SAME TIME AND SO HE MUST RAPIDLY ALTERNATE ATTENTION TO TRACK BOTH. IF HE DOES THIS HE IS TRAINING HIMSELF NOT TO BE ABLE TO MAINTAIN ATTENTION ON A MATTER AT HAND OR BE DISTRACTED, HIS ATTENTION SWTICHED AWAY FROM THE MATTER AT HAND.

FURTHER BECAUSE STYLE IS ABOUT FORCE, IS A PRODUCT OF FORCE AND FORCE IS A POTENT DISTRACTER, STYLE HAS THE TENDENCY TO DRAW ATTENTION FROM THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID AND NOT PAYING ATTENTION TO THE SUBSTANCE IT IS NOT A SURPRISE YOU THEN DO NOT UNDERSTAND.

THUS IF WHAT YOU SAY IS INSINCERE, YOU WANT TO DECEIVE OTHERS WITH WHAT YOU SAY, IT WOULD HELP IF YOU ACCOMPANY WHAT YOU SAY WITH FORCE CHANGES OR STYLE THAT IS A POTENT ATTRACTOR OF ATTENTION FROM THE FALSITY OR LACK OF CREDIBILITY OF WHAT YOU SAY.

THUS THE PURPOSE OF STYLE IS TO DECEIVE, TO PROVIDE A POTENT DECOY FROM THE FALSE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID DECEPTIVELY.

Force is a powerful tool for deception:

If what you say or do is not true or fabricated and you want to sell to your victim then you don’t want him to pay full undivided calm attention to what you falsely said but it is desirable you accompany what you falsely say with style or force prolonging, changing speed and loudness that is a powerful tool or aid to deception because this accompanying force not only draws attention from what is falsely said so that his attention on the false substance is diminished but this force accompanying is a superior attractor of attention compared to the false substance of what is said.

STYLE OR FORCE CHANGES IS AN INDISPENSABLE TOOL FOR ANYONE WHO WANTS TO DECEIVE OTHERS WITH WHAT THEY SAY BECAUSE FORCE CHANGES IS A STRONGER ATTRACTOR OF ATTENTION SO THAT HIS ATTENTION ON THE FALSE SUBSTANCE IS IMPAIRED AND HE IS MORE EASILY CONNED AND AGREEABLE.

Thus a weeping hysterical (force changes) girl is likely to sell what she is falsely saying to the sucker than if she was to say it without hysteria (no force changes).

THUS THE PRESENCE OF STYLE IS NOT A SIGN OF VIRTUE BUT SIGN OF DECEPTION OR EVIL.

Flaws more obvious with full attention:

If what is said has flaws or inconsistencies because it is fabricated then a full attention focused on it is likely to expose them, if you divide or strongly pull the person’s attention from it then he is much more likely to be tricked to accept.

THUS BECAUSE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS A POWERFUL ATTRACTOR OF ATTENTION COMPARED TO THE FALSE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID, IT IS LIKELY TO REDUCE THE PERSON’S ATTENTION SO THAT HE IS EASILY TRICKED.

IF ANYTHING IS FLAWED FULL ATTENTION IS LIKELY TO EXPOSE IT THAN PARTIAL OR NO ATTENTION.

Bootle may be pursuing a mirage:

Quote: Germany and China's national economic policies have become a source of global concern

Tensions over German economic policy are rising to a new pitch, which even the proposed bail-out for Greece will not relieve. As I argued here five weeks ago, the effects of high German saving on the world economy are similar to those of high Chinese saving. Interestingly, the German response to international criticism is similar to the Chinese defence. A new economic entity has sprung up: what Martin Wolf has called "Chermany".

 

You may think you have $400,000 in the bank but that $400,000 may no longer be there because it has been lent out and the borrower has defaulted and so your money is in the hands of the lender.

In the same way, a lot of the money or savings China and Germany are supposed to have saved may exist only in theory, because it is held in US treasuries and these may go kaput if the US goes broke then China actually does not have that much savings as touted.

CHINA SAID IT WAS WORRIED ABOUT ITS ASSETS IN THE US AND THOSE ASSETS MAY BE WORTHLESS IF THE US IS UNABLE TO FULFILL ITS OBLIGATIONS AND SO ALL THIS SO CALLED CHINESE AND GERMAN SURPLUSES MAY BE A MYTH.

Steep learning curve?

The revelation at the Australian Grand Prix that the fuel tank in the new Virgin team's car is not big enough to get them to the end of a race was an embarrassing reminder of just how steep Formula 1's learning curve is.

Driven by force or emotion, not guided by understanding of what she writes she and others do not realise the words used are inappropriate and therefore reflects she writes without understanding what she says.

It is impossible for someone who truly understands what she says to write something that is odd.

It is not how steep the learning curve is but how silly or bungling a new team can be.

DOES THE DESIGN OF A FUEL TANK THAT IS TOO SMALL TO LAST A RACE REFLECT HOW STEEP THE F1 LEARNING CURVE IS OR DOES IT REFLECT HOW BUNGLING THE NEW TEAMS ARE? STEEP LEARNING CURVE MEANS YOU MUST LEARN VERY QUICKLY, DESIGNING A TOO SMALL TANK IS ABOUT FAUX PAS, A FUNDAMENTAL BLUNDER.

IF SHE UNDERSTOOD TRULY WHAT SHE IS WRITING HOW CAN SHE BLURT OUT SUCH NONSENSE? APING OTHERS IN USING THE IMPRESSIVE ‘STEEP LEARNING CURVE’, SHE IS DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO IMPRESS TO WOW NOT REALIZING SHE CUED IN THE WRONG STYLISH PHRASE.

Why bubbles always crash:

Bubbles always crash in time and most but not all of its participants always get burnt but depending on the scale of the bubble (how high prices have been driven and how widespread society’s participation) the general economy may or may not crash. Thus there are two crashes, crash of the bubble and crash of the economy if the scale of losses is severe and too many people have participated and been burnt.

There have already been many bubbles in the past and reflecting mankind’s absence of true understanding and therefore they never learn, they are still in doubt and uncertainty as to whether there is a bubble when there is and they think bubbles can go on forever.

A bubble always has one or several commodities like stock market, property market, oil, tin, even tulip flowers on which it is based and it is the relentless rises in price in time orchestrated formally or informally unfairly by vested goats who have or bought cheap and have an even limitless supply to sell and keep pushing up prices which increasingly draws the greedy foolish masses who throw caution to the wind in pursuit of seemingly easy certain gains without any work such that there is momentum with more and more foolish ordinary people drawn in to chase and push prices higher and higher in the process sucking in money transferred from these buyers themselves or from savings of the system lent by banks recklessly to these foolish bubble chasing borrowers.

Thus the net effect of a bubble is the relentless transfer of vast sums of money from the hands of ordinary people including savings of non participants in banks lent by reckless bankers to borrowers pursuing the commodity (eg shares or houses) such that with time the money in the system is seriously depleted and this lack of further fuel or money to finance and push up prices further is the cause of its crash through panic as small time speculators caught by the prices dropping unload their previously coveted commodity.

BUBBLES ALWAYS TAKE TIME TO BUILD AS MORE AND MORE FOOLISH PEOPLE GET SUCKED IN TO BUY AND PUSH PRICES HIGHER AND HIGHER IN THE PROCESS TRANSFERRING THEIR WEALTH PLUS BORROWED WEALTH FROM SAVINGS OF NON PARTICIPANTS DEPOSITED IN BANKS TO THE HANDS OF A FEW SHREWD PRIVILEGED GOATS WHO BOUGHT CHEAP TO SELL HIGH AND MAY REPLENISH STOCKS TO SELL EG BY BUILDING NEW HOUSES OR CALLING FOR RIGHTS ISSUES FOR SHARES. BECAUSE THERE IS A FINITE AMOUNT OF MONEY IN THE SYSTEM, IN TIME THE MONEY OF FOOLISH PEOPLE SUCKED IN AND THE SAVINGS IN THE SYSTEM IS SERIOUSLY DEPLETED AND NOW IN THE HANDS OF SHREWD GOATS WHO PROFITTED FROM THE BUBBLE SUCH THAT THERE IS A DROUGHT OF MONEY AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THE BUBBLE FURTHER AND SO PRICES START TO DROP WHICH TRIGGER PANIC DUMPING THAT CAUSES A ‘SPECTACULAR’ CRASH THAT BURNS MANY SMALL TIMERS BUT THE SHREWD BIG PROFITEERS ARE SITTING PRETTY.

DEPENDING ON THE SCALE OF THE BUBBLE, HOW MUCH SAVINGS IN THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN DEPLETED AND TRANSFERRED TO THE HANDS OF THE FEW WHO MADE PROFITS AND HOW MANY PEOPLE HAD BEEN BURNT BY THE CRASH, THE SYSTEM OR ECONOMY BECOMES SICK OR EVEN NEAR DEATH (DEPRESSION).

Unless the cost of building or making a commodity eg house has risen drastically (unlikely if not impossible) then surging or relentless price increases of houses is an indication of speculation and a bubble building and so understanding bubbles and the terrible dangers to society, prudent governments will move to nip the bubble in the bud by restricting lending and making sure those who need a house can buy. But politicians are in cohort with their cronies in house developers and so they keep a blind eye whilst pocketing kickbacks.

THE WORLD STOCK MARKETS HAVEN’T CRASHED YET AND THEY MAY IN THE FUTURE WITH MORE SEVERE IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE MASSES. BECAUSE THE PROPERTY BUBBLE WORLD WIDE IS VERY GREAT AND IS NOW IN THE PROCESS OF CRASHING (NOT YET COMPLETE) THE BURSTING OF THIS PROPERTY BUBBLE IS IN ITSELF A SEVERE SYSTEMIC BLOW AND INDICATES THE DRYING OF CREDIT OR FUEL TO SUSTAIN THE BUBBLE IN THE SYSTEM AND SO THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM MAY BE BANKRUPT, TOO MUCH MONEY IN THE HANDS OF THE FEW WHO PROFITED FROM THE BUBBLE AND TOO LITTLE LEFT IN THE SYSTEM. THUS YOU CAN EXPECT WOES THAT ARE EXTENDED OR PROLONGED COMING UP.

THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE BUT RELATED CRASHES. BUBBLES ALWAYS CRASH WHEN FUEL OR MONEY TO PROP IT IS EXHAUSTED, THE ECONOMY MAY OR MAY NOT CRASH AS A RESULT OF THE BUBBLE CRASH DEPENDING ON THE SCALE OF THE BUBBLE.

BUBBLES ARE VERY SIMPLE AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND AND RECOGNIZE AND IT IS PROOF OF MANKIND’S LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT IT HAS REPEATED THE ‘MISTAKE’ SO MANY TIMES IN HISTORY AND YET STRUGGLE TO RECOGNIZE BUBBLES AND THE DANGERS THEY POSE AND THE CORRECT STEPS AVAILABLE TO NIP BUBBLES IN THE BUD. WEED OUT SPECULATORS FROM THE OIL MARKET AND PRICES WILL DROP AND THIS WILL STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FAR MORE THAN SPENDING BILLIONS OF PRINTED MONEY WITHOUT BACKING.

Non-understanding of convenience:

Although it is true that mankind lack true understanding of bubbles and their dangers to the common good, part of the failure to understand is convenient, because there is quick fabulous money to made from others by hocking overpriced assets that foolish others need and desire, why not close one eye, participate and grab as much as you can.

Politicians should step in to nip bubbles in the bud but they themselves may reap direct and indirect profits (eg ministers may be holding and selling shares at big profit based on rumours of big gains so how do you expect the minister to clamp down on speculation) and so the lack of understanding and recognition of bubbles in some may be convenient, they are reaping big gains without work so how do you expect them to clamp down? Instead they will deny claims of bubble and insist the price rises are justified.

A vehicle for the transfer of wealth:

The commodity for a bubble can be something ridiculous like tulips or south sea shells or something desired by many like houses but what it essentially acts as is as vehicle whose value can be raised to ridiculous value so that money or wealth can be transferred from the buyer and indirectly the system to the few who sold high at a profit.

ESSENTIALLY THE COMMODITY THAT IS THE BASIS OF THE BUBBLE ACTS AS THE VEHICLE FOR THE TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM TO THE FEW DEPLETING THE SYSTEM AND CONCENTRATING WEALTH IN THE FEW SO THAT IT BECOMES IMBALANCED AND COLLAPSES.

US Treasury plans Citi share sale

The US government is preparing to sell its 27% stake in Citigroup, in what would be one of the largest share sales in history.

The US treasury is taking a leaf from the markets or aping or copying thinking it is a smart way to recoup even profit on the shares it got in return for propping Citigroup with money but it may be foolish.

Now many investors in the market may be badly hit so they have no money to buy and the money available are in the hands of shrewd fund holders who may not be so easily suckered to pay a high price for a poor asset. If the shares are priced cheaply shrewd investors like Buffet or Soros may be interested.

THE FOOLISH MONEY ROILING THE SYSTEM MAY BE DRIED AND WHAT REMAINS IS PLENTY OF MONEY BUT IN THE HANDS OF BIG SHREWD INVESTORS LOOKING FOR BARGAINS AND SO THE TREASURY MAY STRUGGLE TO SELL THE SHARES AT A PREMIUM.

The folly of the Citibank share sale:

IF THE TREASURY ISSUED PHANTOM OR PRINTED MONEY THAT DOES NOT EXIST TO BUY CITIBANK, DOES IT EXPECT TO RECEIVE GENUINE MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC FOR ITS PURCHASE?

IF THIS IS UNLIKELY THEN THE ONLY VIABLE SOURCE OF MONEY OUT THERE WHO CAN AFFORD TO BUY THE CITIBANK SHARES ARE FROM THE PRIVILEGED WEALTHY FEW WHO HAVE HOARDED THE MONEY AND THIS IS THE SHREWD MONEY THAT WILL WANT THE SHARES CHEAP AND IT IS UNLIKELY THE TREASURY WOULD HAVE GOT IT CHEAP FROM CITIBANK.

Can science explain heaven?

Only beings can explain and science is not a being and so it cannot explain heaven and anyone who asks that question does not know what he is talking about.

THE CORRECT ANSWER IS THAT SCIENCE OR SCIENTISTS CANNOT EXPLAIN HEAVEN AND IT IS A USELESS AND MEANINGLESS QUESTION AND SO THE PERSON IS DELUDED AND THE QUESTION ENSUES FROM HIS DELUSION PROBABLY DRIVEN BY A NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT ARE DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE FOR OTHERS TO ANSWER BECAUSE OF A DESIRE TO TROUBLE OTHERS.

Why is it science or scientists cannot explain heaven?

The only way to know something that includes heaven is to see it, seeing something, you know it. It is only when someone one does not see it that those who have seen it need to explain it to those who have not and cannot see and no matter how it is explained to them if they still have not seen it or cannot see it, they still cannot know it.

NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES OTHERS INCLUDING SCIENTISTS EXPLAIN HEAVEN, IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN HEAVEN, CANNOT SEE HEAVEN, YOU CANNOT KNOW HEAVEN SO IT IS FUTILE EXPLAINING HEAVEN AND SO NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN HEAVEN. ONCE YOU HAVE SEEN HEAVEN YOU DO NOT NEED ANY EXPLAINATION BY SELF OR OTHERS BECAUSE YOU KNOW HEAVEN.

THUS THE QUESTION WHETHER SCIENCE CAN EXPLAIN HEAVEN IS DELUDED, REFLECTS SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE.

WHETHER SCIENCE CAN EXPLAIN HEAVEN IS A USELESS QUESTION, SERVES NO USEFUL PURPOSE. IF YOU CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN WHAT IS THE POINT OF EXPLAINING HEAVEN TO YOU?

FURTHER IT IS A FALSE QUESTION, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO EXPLAIN HEAVEN BECAUSE NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HEAVEN IS EXPLAINED, IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IT, YOU CANNOT KNOW IT AND THEREFORE WHATEVER THE EXPLANATION OF HEAVEN IS IN VAIN AND THAT MEANS HEAVEN CANNOT BE EXPLAINED. IF YOU HAVE SEEN HEAVEN WITH YOUR OWN EYES, WHAT IS THE POINT OF EXPLAINING WHAT YOU SEE?

Can explain heaven but cannot know heaven:

Anyone can explain heaven and it may be reasonably accurate or preposterous but no one through explanation can know or see heaven.

IF NO MATTER HOW HEAVEN IS EXPLAINED TO YOU, YOU CANNOT SEE AND KNOW HEAVEN, WHAT IS THE POINT OF EXPLAINING HEAVEN?

BECAUSE NO ONE CAN SEE AND KNOW HEAVEN NO MATTER HOW MUCH AND WELL HEAVEN IS EXPLAINED TO HIM, THIS IS A FRIVOLOUS QUESTION AND THE PURPOSE FOR ASKING THIS QUESTION IS TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW CLEVER YOU ARE, TO SCOFF OR TO ASK TOUGH QUESTIONS IN ORDER TO TROUBLE OTHERS.

A stupid question:

Often people think they are very clever asking a very clever question when it is stupid.

Of course anyone can, with varying success, explain heaven and so what is the point of asking whether scientists can explain heaven? The answer is obviously yes.

It may not be ‘explaining’ that he means but he means can scientists prove heaven or prove that heaven exists in which case, he did not say what he meant.

IF HE MEANS CAN SCIENTIST PROVE OR DISPROVE HEAVEN THEN HE IS TALKING OF SOMETHING FRIVOLOUS BECAUSE NO MATTER HOW SOMEONE STRIVES TO PROVE AND DISPROVE HE CANNOT SEE AND KNOW IF THERE IS A HEAVEN. ONLY THE PERSON WHO SEES THERE IS HEAVEN CAN SAY THERE IS HEAVEN.

A bizarre question:

One possibility is that the person posing the question accepts as fact heaven exists and he is asking or challenges science or scientists to explain heaven.

But it is impossible that he sees and knows heaven exists so how can he ask if science or scientists can explain something he has not seen and does not know exist?

IF YOUR QUESTION IS BIZARRE YOU ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY BECAUSE IT REFLECTS A BIZARRE MIND.

Evicted not kicked out:

You cannot view and therefore understand and describe an event as you like it but you must view an event truly as it is unless you want to court painful karma and go mad.

What happened in truth was that the family was evicted, there was no kicking involved and what is said is false, emotional and inflammatory and therefore there is karma for him and also he is training himself and others to perceive falsely ‘kicked out’ when it was in truth ‘evicted’ that will end in mad perception plus karma for inciting false perception in others.

Kicked out of their room

By EMBUN MAJID

 

embun@thestar.com.my

ALOR SETAR: Two hours after a poor family received a visit from the Kedah Umno deputy chairman, they were given 24 hours to vacate the rented makeshift room in a motorcycle workshop in Jalan Alor Mengkudu here.

Government’s US$420 million contract to Apco:

If the documents tendered below by RPK are genuine, it means there are agreements with APCO to the value of US420 million to essentially provide public relations work for the government.

Why accuse, accuse, deny, deny? Just show the documents and let Malaysians see for themselves how their tax money is being spent. Malaysians are not as stupid as you may think they are. They can read and understand the implications of what is going on. And the bottom line is all their tax money is being wrongly spent.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Things must be bad, government lost and seeks Apco help:

If such contracts exist, it means things are quite desperate and the government is at tenterhooks or befuddled as to what to do to salvage itself and the nation and it has to pay US$420 million to people it thinks are experts who will guide BN and the nation to prosperity.

THINGS MUST BE SERIOUSLY UNWELL.

THE GOVERNMENT IS AT LOSS AS TO WHAT TO DO.

APCO IS THE PERCEIVED SAVIOR AND US$420 MILLION IS THE DEMANDED FEE.

What Apco contract means:

Whether Apco is linked to Israel or not is irrelevant, but if it is true Apco was responsible for One Israel as for One Malaysia then it signifies the hypocrisy of leaders who either sleeps with its avowed enemies or is blind or inept enough not to realize the company it is dealing with is linked to Israel, its sworn enemies.

US$420 million is a lot of public money to spend without notifying the public or parliamentary discussion or announcement and if it is spent on such propaganda like One Malaysia then it represents delusion that such projects work and such entities like Apco are experts who will deliver the country out of its malaise.

IF APCO’S MISSION IS FOR THINGS LIKE ONE MALAYSIA THEN IT REPRESENTS A TWO FOLD WASTE OF MONEY, WASTE OF MONEY PAID TO APCO AND WASTE OF MONEY IMPLEMENTING SUCH POLICIES AS ONE MALAYSIA.

THAT SUCH SPENDING OF SIGNIFICANT MONEY IS NOT DISCUSSED IN PARLIAMENT OR INFORMED TO THE PUBLIC REFLECTS GROSS DERELICTION OF DUTY.

IF MALAYSIA HAS TO SEEK EXTERNAL HELP TO CONJURE UP SUCH PROJECTS IT REFLECTS INEPTITUDE.

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER APCO IS LINKED TO ISRAEL AT ALL BUT IF IT IS, THEN EITHER THE GOVERNMENT IS HYPOCRITICAL OR BUNGLING IN NOT REALIZING THE ISRAELI CONNECTION.