Friday, July 16, 2010

Barcelona fail to pay player wages for June

Barcelona fail to pay player wages for June

(Barcelona is one of the biggest & most successful clubs in Europe backed by powerful chairmen who could borrow at will from banks. Now just like Man Utd and many other clubs it is struggling to make ends meet. It will not be surprising if they go bankrupt from overstretching themselves in pursuit of success. This is evidence of gross debt excesses and abuses everywhere in this world that cannot be sustained)
Barcelona failed to pay their players at the end of June, club president Sandro Rosell has revealed.
Rosell, who succeeded Joan Laporta at the financially troubled Catalan outfit last week, also said a loan of about £125m had been secured to pay wages.
"We found a club in debt, with liquidity problems. At this point we have to take a loan to pay the wages of the players," he told Sport.
But Rosell said Barca can still afford Arsenal midfielder Cesc Fabregas.
Barca recently sold defender Dmitro Chygrynskiy to Shakhtar Donetsk for about £12.5m to help raise much-needed funds, even though coach Pep Guardiola had been keen to keep him.
They also sold Ivory Coast international Yaya Toure to Manchester City for about £20m.
However, Rosell has moved to reassure worried fans that Barca's problems are under control and that the process of securing a loan had already started under the previous board.
"The banks know that we have a business plan that will allow them to recover the money. The club is not bankrupt because it generates income," he added.
"The members shouldn't be afraid because it is under control. We must resolve this tension.
"It can be done in two ways: to have extra income, like selling Chygrynskiy, and/or taking a loan, which is what we have done.
"The previous board had already begun this process. We followed the same path - the same banks, the same target but with a different business plan. They [Laporta's board] also knew they needed this credit."
And Rosell even claimed that over 50m euros (about £41m) would still be available to spend on new players.
Despite their financial issues, Barcelona have been pursuing Arsenal star Fabregas for some time and recently signed Spain striker David Villa from Valencia.
Rosell intends to meet Gunners manager Arsene Wenger in South Africa shortly to discuss a deal for Fabregas, who started his career at the Nou Camp.
"It's now or never. We'll do it fast. It won't be protracted," said Rosell.
"I'll try to see Wenger in South Africa, then we'll tell you what happens.
"We would not pay the 50-60m euros that I have read about. If Arsenal do not go crazy, he might play at Barca.
"There will be 50m euros to sign more players. This is the case every year. This is our plan for the future.
"Technically, as of now we have 50m euros plus 15 for Chygrynskiy and 24 for Toure. In total, 89m euros (about £75m)."
Nothing special about her:
This is the Russian girl who was accused of spying and using her sexual assets as tools. She herself and smitten others will tell her she is someone special but in truth there is nothing special about her.
There are many girls who look and dress like, behave and speak like her and what distinguishes her is style, how she uses force to stretch eg motion and syllables, change speed and strength of force (loudness), her rehashed plans of what and how to say and do things that would make her seductive.
Because what distinguishes her is her style, how she uses force to stretch, change speed and strength, her plans of speech and actions that are memorized and rehashed, what distinguishes her is blind and meaningless and therefore there is nothing TRULY special about her, only FALSELY, DELUDEDLY special about her.
There is a case someone is truly special. It is if it is substance that distinguishes him, where others all fashion false harmful style, he does not and therefore he is truly special. Where others cannot help or stop thinking, he can skilfully stop thinking at will, where others cannot help stirring their mental force to be attracted (like) or repulsed (dislike), he can.
A PERSON IS TRULY SPECIAL IF WHAT DISTINGUISHES HIM IS HIS SUBSTANCE, WHAT HE SAYS AND DOES THAT IS MEANINGFUL WHERE OTHERS IN THIS WORLD CANNOT.
SHE IS HEADED FOR DISINTEGRATION AND TORMENT AND ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES SHE IS WONDERFUL WILL FOLLOW SUIT.
Greater scheme of things:
In the great scheme of things, the passing of Fadlallah will not change much of the political landscape of Lebanon
People think what they say or hear is full of meaning when it is nonsense.
It may be true, ‘greater scheme of things’ is necessary, relevant to what is said or it may be a memorized robotic scheme rehashed to pad or sound impressive.
The passing of Fadlallah will not change much of the political landscape of Lebanon is the substance of what is said, ‘greater scheme of things’ is totally unnecessary, rehashed and it is not harmless but will lead to insanity.
There is style:
Anyone seeing the attitude of the fingers who thinks it is natural, has no style or they cannot tell if there is style present or not does not see truly and therefore cannot understand truly.
There is style present and it is usually associated with females although some males may also adopt such characteristic postures.
THERE IS ACCOMPANYING STYLE IN THE POSE OF THE FINGERS THAT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, REQUIRES ENERGY CREATING STRESS TO FABRICATE AND THE PURPOSE IS TO ATTRACT EG SEDUCE OR TO FALSELY APPEAR CHARMING.
IF YOU CANNOT TELL IF THERE IS STYLE OR NOT THEN YOU ARE A PERSON WHO SEES BUT DOES NOT SEE TRULY AND THEREFORE CANNOT TRULY UNDERSTAND. THERE IS STYLE THAT CREATES STRESS AND TENSION IN MIND AND FINGERS IN POSING LIKE THIS.
Her own worst critic:
Kylie Minogue is her own worst critic
People think they are good and meaningful to tell others they are their own worst critic when it is a nicety for show to impress others driven by emotion not reason.
What is the point of telling others you are your own worst critic except for emotion, to impress or stir emotion.
If the ideal you criticize yourself eg not stylish or charming enough is bad then you are not good or bad to be your own worst critic.
IF WHAT YOU WANT FOR YOURSELF IS A PERFECT MODEL OF CHARM OR ACTING OR SEXINESS THEN IT IS NOT GOOD BUT BAD AND WILLING YOURSELF TO SUFFERING TO BE YOUR OWN WORST CRITIC.
By being your own worst critic people usually if not mean they are brutal, punitive or berate themselves should they fall short. Self punishment whether scolding or physical is conditioning self to suffering and it creates conflict and conditions yourself to conflict that will end in uncontrollable conflict.
PEOPLE HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT IT IS MEANINGFUL OR GOOD TO BE YOUR OWN WORST CRITIC, IT IS MEANINGLESS AND BAD. SUFFICE YOU CENSURE YOURSELF FOR BAD CONDUCT, YOU DON’T NEED TO TELL OTHERS EXCEPT THAT IT IS HYPOCRITICAL, FOR SHOW.
It is all about style not substance:
Telling others you are your worst critic is all about style not substance.
What is the point of telling others you are your own worst critic except to impress in some way eg how wonderful or impartial you are?
Instead you should tell others specifically what are the things you criticize yourself for eg drink too much, always late or lazy.
HOW DOES SHE KNOW THERE ARE NO WORST CRITIC OF HERSELF THAN HER? THEREFORE WITHOUT ASCERTAINING THAT SHE IS UNRIGHTEOUSLY PROCLAIMING HERSELF TO BE HER OWN WORST CRITIC AND THAT IS DICING WITH FUTURE INSANITY.
‘HER OWN WORST CRITIC’ IS NON SPECIFIC, SURELY SHE CANNOT BE CRITICIZING HERSELF FOR EVERYTHING AND SO IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO SPECIFIC WHAT ARE THE THINGS SHE CRITICIZES HERSELF.
WITHOUT ASCERTAINING IT IS TRUE THERE IS NO WORST CRITIC THAN YOU, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY THAT UNLESS YOU WANT TO COURT INSANITY.
Full of style:
He is not hitting the ball with pure substance without style but hitting it with a combination of substance and style that necessitates rehashing by rote and commitment to be a robot. Style is never free but requires the additional use of force to prolong, change speed and strength that wastes even prodigious energy, is useless and for show but people in this world perceive it falsely as necessary and meaningful.
IF HE COULD CHANNEL THE CONSIDERABLE ENERGY HE WASTES FABRICATING THE STYLE IN HIS STROKE INTO THE SUBSTANCE OF THE STROKE ITSELF, HE WOULD HIT A MUCH MORE SUBSTANTIAL STROKE BUT THEN IF HE COULD HIT WITHOUT STYLE HE WOULD FIND TENNIS AND PURSUING TOURNAMENT GLORY TOTALLY MEANINGLESS.
IF YOU SEE HIM AND CANNOT SEE THE STYLE IN HIS STROKE, SEE WHAT IS MEANT BY STYLE THEN YOU ARE A PERSON WHO DOES SEE TRULY AS IT IS ACTUALLY PRESENT AND THAT MEANS TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS OUT OF THE QUESTION.
HE PROBABLY FINDS THE WAY HE HITS HIS BACKHAND CHARMING AND SUPERIOR, HE SHOULD BE ADMIRED FOR HIS STYLISH AND ‘CORRECT’ STROKE WHEN IT IS SILLY, WORTHLESS, A WASTE OF ENERGY TO CREATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
STYLE IS NEVER HARMLESS OR MEANINGFUL, IT WASTES PRODIGIOUS ENERGY CREATING INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND NECESSITATES MEMORIZATION TO REHASH THAT SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO WHICH MEANS YOU MUST BE A ROBOT.
Smart phone? Stupid phone:
Anyone who has the perception that smart phones are wonderful may be deluded because they are stupid, silly and a handful to come to terms with.
I never found any need to own a hand phone since the days of the bulky Motorolas. Occasionally I do feel the need of a phone to contact others but merely for brief essential matters. I am not the type to yak on the phone. Recently I decided to get an Android phone (HTC Desire) and I regret very much getting it.
The mobile phone is not the place to surf the internet except for perverts or brief periods for essential purposes because although you can fancifully use your fingers to move the screen expand or contract, in practice it is cumbersome.
I have yet come to grips with the phone having owned it only a few days but already it has left me shaking my head how stupid and counterintuitive rather than smart as it is touted to be.
First when I tried to call a land line there was a blank so I added 603 but the Celcom recorded message told me to please dial 013 or 019 followed by the number which was wrong. Finally I asked someone who owned a handphone and she said the prefix 03 should precede the number.
Next I tried to delete these trial calls but I have yet to find a way to delete it, worse, every time I click on it, it automatically dial, this could be expensive. Surely there should be a provision to delete phone numbers?
Then there is this annoying tendency of the phone to switch off on its own even before I could do what I want. Surely the phone should leave it to the user to switch off and only after an extended period like 10 mins have passed will it switch off. Then there seems a problem communicating with my Windows 7 computer and what is the use of smartphone if you cannot download files from your computers?
My first impression of the latest smart phones is they are overhyped bloated with totally unnecessary features and rather than simple to use they are difficult and illogical. The mobile phone is not the place to surf the internet as I have found out, it is too tiresome, too small and only a masochist or deluded would persist.
If I could do it again I would have bought a cheap phone to make calls, forget about the internet on the move.
YOU THINK I AM WRONG BUT I THINK IT REFLECTS HOW PERVERTED THIS WORLD IS THAT IT (& STEVE JOBS) FINDS THE SMART PHONE FASCINATING. A SIMPLE PHONE TO CALL AND RECEIVE CALLS WILL DO ME FINE. IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY THAT I WILL BE FOND OF MY PHONE. IT IS MORE PAIN THE NECK THAN USEFUL TOOL.
Bloated unwieldy monsters:
It reflects how sick this world is not how wise it is that it has taken a contraption called the mobile phone and transformed by a process of miniaturization and more powerful processor not for any truly essential or meaningful purpose but as a lifestyle statement, for show. All this Facebook, Twitter and whatever are silly diversions.
MANKIND IS NOT HEADED FOR TECHNOLOGICAL UTOPIA BUT THE PITS, ALL THOSE WHO ARE FASCINATED BY SMART PHONES, INTERNET PERCEIVE FALSELY AND HEADED FOR SUFFERING.
Strong demand boosts Intel profit
US chipmaker Intel reports bumper profits in what it describes as its "best" quarterly results.
Intel is delighted with the results and think the public should be also and reflecting their false understanding such results is evidence of the inexorable transfer of wealth from the system to multinationals that gets bigger and bigger.
IF YOU THINK THIS IS GOOD NEWS FOR THE ECONOMY YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW BECAUSE IT REFLECTS THE DRAINING OF LIQUIDITY FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW WHO ARE LIKELY TO FURTHER CHEAT BY NOT SHARING FAIRLY WITH SHAREHOLDERS. IT IS A CANCER THAT IS GETTING TERMINAL NOT SOMETHING TO GET EXCITED ABOUT.
HOW MANY VIEW THIS NEWS LIKE I DO?
US trade deficit at 18-month high
The US trade deficit widens to its highest level in 18 months, driven by demand for imported cars, computers and clothing.
The World does not understand that the US is paying with IOUs that may not have financial backing and the longer this go on the more stinking the final cancer. The US does not need to earn the USD it uses to pay for foreign goods, it just prints and prints.
Herein is another sign of disaster in the future for the world economy. Does any of the economic experts realized this? Thus if I am right they have no understanding.
50K is yours for the taking:
This is a false statement laden with karma for the person. It speaks as if it is so easy to make the money on the forex market when it is just as easy to lose a lot of money on the market.
THUS ANYONE SAYING THIS IS ARROGANT, HAS SELF INTERESTS AND IS FOOLISHLY COMMITTING HIMSELF TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
Helicopter Bernanke:
Bernanke proves himself to have false perception and others around too have false perception when they see nothing amiss when Bernanke uttered at the time of the Lehman Crisis that America had a secret weapon, the printing press as if it is a wondrous solution and today the Fed can helicopter in loads of notes to areas where there is a shortage.
Were it that simple and sweet. Even though the government controls the USD printing presses, it is a form of cheating printing what you don’t have to meet demands and the analogy with helicopter drops is fantastical not possible in reality.
THUS BERNANKE IS MAKING A FOOL OF HIMSELF AS FED CHAIRMAN SAYING THIS AND YET HE AND HIS LISTENERS THINK HE IS MAKING GREAT SENSE, WHEN IT IS SO MUCH BRAVADO THAT COULD LEAD TO CHAOS.
Thoroughly deluded:
I am not trying to be cynical, but do not celebrate this event too soon. There are major diplomatic issues involved and sometimes things will just suddenly stagnate. European politics is more hellish than ours, and although we reach out to these big brothers to save us and help us, unfortunately the big brother may have other plans of priority in its agenda
Such comment is not worth the paper it is written. Who is accusing him of being cynical and although there may be jubilance in some people regarding French investigation into the submarine affair, it is besides the point and presumptuous. Thus it is totally unnecessary to say “I am not trying to be cynical but do not celebrate too early”. Just say there are major diplomatic issues involved. He is trying to stir emotion not exchange understanding. Whoever talked of Europeans being big brothers? If the EU is our big brother only in the figment of his imagination he is courting insanity.
Pouring cold water in a friendly way:
What he is saying is don’t get excited and so he is talking about emotion or force not substance. Then he launches in a disparaging attack on European legal processes as even more hellish then ours. Anwar would not have been convicted of Sodomy in the first case in Europe or UK or Australia and spend six years in jail and sentence conveniently starting at sentencing rather than arrest so he will miss the next election if it were a western country and so you better know your facts to speak thus.

No comments: