The lesson of the WTC tower collapse

The lesson of the WTC tower collapse:

The World Trade Centre twin towers in NY did not collapse all at once but progressively.

After the plane crashed into one of the intermediate floors, the fire started to melt the supporting concrete & steel columns so that they finally gave way and all the floors above deprived of support collapsed like a hammer blow onto the floors below causing the floor immediately below to give way and this added to the load or stress on lower floors which one by one gave way in an accelerating collapsing domino like collapse.

Today’s economic condition can be compared to the WTC after the plane crashed. The floor is burning, melting the supporting columns. Later these columns will give way and the whole accelerating domino collapse will ensue.

The spirit of truth:

The Buddha said he is the perfect one, perfect in every way. He said he is the highest, amongst all beings with no legs, many legs, two legs, formed and formless he is foremost.
Of his enlightened peers, his deputy Moggalana was said to be the highest in supernatural powers after the Buddha, Sariputta was the highest in wisdom after the Buddha and Kassapa the highest in restraint or control.

Thus different beings have different qualities, tendencies, strengths and weaknesses and the scale or range of each attribute may be extreme.

Thus the Father has powers over everyone else and no one else has powers over Him. He sees and knows all, there is nothing He does not see or know.

The Buddha said the truth which he called the highest of savours or tastes or experiences, is not easily seen and ordinary emotional stylish people do not see and know the truth. Thus there may be a hierarchy of the ability to see the truth that ranges from the absolute top to blind bottom.

Jesus called the counsellor the spirit of truth, if everyone can see the truth just as the counsellor can then it is a meaningless assignation, why call him the spirit of truth? Thus the fact that Jesus called the counsellor the spirit of truth indicates he has a particular ability to see the truth that is superior to others in the way that the Buddha and Kassapa were foremost in restraint or denying themselves, Mongallana and the Buddha are foremost in supernatural powers.

THUS BECAUSE JESUS CALLED THE COUNSELLOR THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH HE MUST HAVE AN ABILITY TO SEE THE TRUTH THAT IS SUPERIOR TO OTHERS.

Seven days in June:

Maureen Dowd: Seven days in June.

She and those reading see nothing wrong, even think it is the truth when it is controlled insanity to impress that is not harmless but has deadly consequences.

There is nothing special or unusual or remarkable about seven days in June but what happened in those seven days and so you think you are smart and abstract speaking of seven days in June when you are speaking about what happened in those seven days.

IT IS NOT SEVEN DAYS IN JUNE THAT IS REMARKABLE OR THE SUBJECT OF ATTENTION BUT WHAT HAPPENED IN THOSE SEVEN DAYS AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY CONDITIONING OTHERS TO FALSITY MISCHIEVOUSLY TO TALK ABOUT SEVEN DAYS IN JUNE WHEN YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED IN JUNE. WHAT HAPPENED IN THOSE SEVEN DAYS IN JUNE COULD HAVE HAPPENED IN ANOTHER MONTH AND SO THERE IS NOTHING SPECIAL ABOUT JUNE OR THOSE SEVEN DAYS.

You think you can appear before God and tell Him about seven days in June instead of going into the substance of the matter or what happened in those seven days and He will applaud you? He may say, how did you get here? Bind him and cast him into the outer darkness.

World cannot depend so much on US anymore:

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has told the BBC that the world "cannot depend as much on the US as it did in the past".

Exactly what the situation is cannot be disputed, if you are a malefactor and parasite and you think you are a benefactor then that is delusion that is the way to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.

The US may have taken the world on an extended ride, paying for goods with pieces of paper that it cannot back up with assets, the world run the risk of exporting to the US for free if the US default and Geithner has the ‘gall’ to tell the world it cannot depend on the US so much now. This is his view and it is likely he actually perceives it as true like so many Americans proud of their country’s status. He may be right or totally deluded, America is like a big fat uncle at the dinner table gobbling a lion share of the food there without paying or with pieces of paper that it may now struggle to honour. It is this reckless heedless buying on credit that has led the world to this morass it is in.

The sky is the limit for blade runner:

What has sky got to do with assessing the limits or potential of something? Is it because it is supposed to be limitless, the sky stretches into space and infinity? If that is the case you should say limitless rather than the sky is the limit. It is never true that it is limitless for the blade runner and so that statement is issued out of falsity with karma and insanity attached. He was not the first to use ‘the sky is the limit’ nor was this the first time he used it and so he is rehashing to apply to the situation and is a robot.

The agnostic’s dilemma:

This is a headline in the NYT. Dilemma means conflict. A person who sees and knows does not harbour dilemmas, it is only a person who commits himself to a certain position without seeing and knowing who can experience dilemmas. Thus without seeing and knowing the agnostic position is true you should not embrace it and whence the dilemma?

Being an agnostic is a self identity view (that the Buddha said is a fetter to future woe) and it is false. Is it necessary to wear the T shirt of agnosticism when you cannot see that you are correct to do so?

When people talk about the agnostic’s dilemma they think it is meaningful, to be appreciated by others when in truth it is a lot of nonsense and you want others to appreciate nonsense and self inflicted suffering (dilemma is always suffering).

DILEMMA HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MEANING BECAUSE IT IS THE MENTAL STATE EXPERIENCED WHEN THERE IS CONFLICT OR THE CLASH OF MENTAL FORCES IN THE MIND TRIGGERED BY AN ISSUE OR MATTER.

HENCE IT AGAIN REFLECTS UNCONSCIOUS DELUSION BY MANKIND WHEN PEOPLE AND THE NYT DEEM IT FIT TO DWELL ON ‘THE AGNOSTIC’S DILEMMA’.

Guess who is coming for dinner?

If the person knows who is coming for dinner he would not need to guess and if he does not know and you want him to make a commitment to what he does not know you are not meritorious but incurring karma to be experienced as suffering by asking the question. There is no big deal just tell him who is coming for dinner. It is to stir suspense or excitement asking that and that is about stirring force that is suffering with karma attached not merit as you imagine delusionally.

Something for every woman:

That is always a false statement (with karma attached) because it is impossible that there is something for every woman, eg no matter how big a store eg Harrods is, it never has something for every woman.

This statement is copied from others and rehashed robotically without understanding its falsity, the purpose is to falsely exaggerate how marvellous something is.

Let’s not forget history?

History is not an event that can be forgotten. You can say with some sense, let’s not forget World War II, but history is not a particular event that can be forgotten and the person is a fool talking nonsense heading for nonsense.

Let others decide what they want to do, don’t tell others not to forget history, it is none of your business and you are practicing controlled insanity in the name of impressing others that will end in tears for you.

Money cannot buy you happiness:

That is true but not in the way the person intended. Happiness is not a commodity that can be bought and sold and in that sense it is self evident money can never buy happiness, so isn’t it silly to tell others that?

If you mean that money cannot give you happiness then that is false because for many people at least for some of time, money can give them happiness but their happiness is based on a stressful stirring of their mental forces that is never everlasting and leads to hangovers.

MONEY CANNOT BUY YOU HAPPINESS IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND REHASHED AND THE PERSON IS A ROBOT. TECHNICALLY IT IS A TRUE STATEMENT BUT NOT IN THE WAY THE PERSON INTENDED WHICH IS MONEY CANNOT GIVE YOU HAPPINESS. MONEY CAN GIVE A PERSON HAPPINESS BUT IT IS BASED ON STIRRED EMOTION, NOT EVERLASTING AND LEAD TO HANGOVERS.

The five strands of sensuality:

If by ‘money cannot buy you happiness’ you mean money cannot give you happiness then you did not say what you meant and that is false because money can give a person happiness. The Buddha said there are the five strands of sensuality and they give a person pleasure but he would not concede they are the highest happiness because there is more higher happiness than sensate pleasures.

"There are five strands of sense desire. Forms cognizable by the eye that are desirable, bound up with sensual desire. Sounds cognizable by the ear...odors...flavors... tangibles cognizable by the body. The pleasure arising dependent on these five strands is called sensual pleasure.

"Now, if someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another which surpasses and is more sublime. Here, quite secluded from sensual desires, unwholesome states of mind, a monk enters upon the first meditative absorption (jhana), which is accompanied by thought conception and discursive thinking and has in it joy born of seclusion. This is the pleasure which surpasses and is more sublime.

"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another which surpasses. Here, with the stilling of thought conception and discursive thinking...a monk enters upon the second meditative absorption...in the sphere of the infinity of space... consciousness ... no-thingness...of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.

"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another which surpasses. Here, by completely surmounting the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, a monk enters upon the cessation of perception and feeling. This is the other pleasure which surpasses and is more sublime.

"It may happen, that others will say: 'The recluse Gotama speaks of the Cessation of Perception and Feeling and describes it as pleasure. What is this (pleasure) and how is this (a pleasure)?'

"Those should be told: 'The Blessed One describes as pleasure not only the feeling of pleasure but whenever and whereinsoever it is obtained.'"

His limit is limitless:

When a person says the sky is the limit he is actually saying his limit is limitless instead of just saying his potential is ‘limitless’. Why say someone’s potential limit is limitless when it suffices to say it is limitless? This is not harmless but because it is silly or does not make sense, it is practicing silliness in the name of impressing others that will end in madness.

THE SKY IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT THE LIMITLESS AND SO THE PERSON IS SAYING THE LIMIT OF THE BLADE RUNNER’S POTENTIAL IS LIMITLESS INSTEAD OF SAYING IT IS LIMITLESS. IT IS STIRRING CONFLICT IN SELF AND OTHERS TO SPEAK OF LIMIT OF A PERSON AND THEN SAY IT IS LIMITLESS.

WHATEVER THE POTENTIAL OF A BLADE RUNNER IT HAS LIMITS AND SO IT IS FALSE TO SAY IT IS LIMITLESS.

Smarter Than You Think: Computers Learn to Listen, and Some Talk Back

Firstly how does the person know the computer is smarter than I think? He or she is being presumptuous or jumping to unwarranted conclusion, a dangerous defilement of the mind that can kill you one day.

The statement implies that people have false perception which is why computers are smarter than they think.

If there is no smartness in computers, no life in computers, it is all mechanical then you are deluded to think there is smartness or intelligence in computers.

Just because computers can now listen does not mean they are smart, nor is learning involved. Computers can now listen not because they have learnt but they now have more powerful processors and have software that enables them to ‘listen’.

The most difficult part in order for a computer to recognize spoken speech is the complex and disparate variations with which words are pronounced, even humans can be caught out by exotic pronunciations of words they are familiar with. In order to unravel the disparate ways different people can pronounce the same ways, computers need software that can match in their libraries that pronunciations a, b, c, d, e all means or equal this common word say ‘apple’ and the computer has been programmed to ‘know’ or decipher ‘apple’ means a certain fruit. Having deciphered from the jungle of different (eg Irish, American, Indian, Aussie pronunciation of the same word) pronunciations (by matching to a big library of how the same word can be pronounced) it is relatively simple for the computer to seek from its recorded library an appropriate response.

THERE IS NOTHING MARVELLOUS ABOUT COMPUTERS BEING ABLE TO LISTEN AND SPEAK TO YOU, IT IS A MATTER OF INCREASING THE POWER AND SPEED OF COMPUTER PROCESSING AND PROGRAMMING TO ENABLE IT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE QUITE DIFFERENT WAYS A WORD CAN BE PRONOUNCED TO EQUAL THIS WORD SPOKEN AND FROM THERE IT IS RELATIVELY SIMPLE TO JOIN UP ALL THE WORDS SPOKEN TO MEAN THIS MESSAGE AND THEN TO SEARCH ITS HUGE RECORDED LIBRARY WHICH OF THE RECORDED RESPONSES ARE APPROPRIATE.

IT IS NEVER REASON BUT EMOTION, EXCITEMENT THAT DRIVES THE PERSON TO TELL OTHERS ‘SMARTER THAN YOU THINK’ WITH THE PURPOSE OF STIRRING READERS’ EMOTIONS TO BE ‘WOWED’ AND WHAT IS SAID IS FALSE IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE. THERE IS NEVER SMARTNESS IN COMPUTERS, WHAT HAS CHANGED IS THAT PROCESSORS ARE NOW MORE POWERFUL AND COMPUTERS HAVE BIGGER LIBRARIES OF WORDS AND BETTER PROGRAMMING THAT ENABLES THEM TO RECOGNIZE EVEN QUITE EXOTIC PRONUNCIATIONS AS INDICATING A CERTAIN WORD AND THUS HAVING SUCCESSFUL DECODED THE WORDS SPOKEN INTO WHAT THEY SIGNIFY IT IS RELATIVELY EASY TO FIND AN APPROPRIATE SPOKEN RESPONSE TO WHAT WAS SPOKEN TO THE COMPUTER. NO INTELLIGENCE OR UNDERSTANDING WAS INVOLVED, IF YOU THINK COMPUTERS ARE GETTING SMARTER AND YOU ARE THRILLED, YOU ARE DELUDED OR HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION.

Farewell, l'hitraot, wa masalaam

Heavenly olive oil and other tales in Tim Franks' final diary after three years as correspondent in Jerusalem

The person does not say what he means and he means to boast apart from whatever motives accompany.

He is writing in English, suffice to say farewell to Jerusalem but the ‘l'hitraot, wa masalaam’ is to boast or impress others with his command of the local language and customs. He does not need to say that, it is said for show and so it is controlled madness that ends in uncontrollable madness. If his intention is to express his fondness then he did not mean what he said because ‘l'hitraot, wa masalaam’ does not mean I am fond of Jerusalem.

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO INTERVIEW A PERSON TO KNOW HIS MOTIVE, OFTEN EVEN HE HIMSELF DOES NOT REALIZE OR MAY DENY BUT THERE IS NO REASON TO SPRINKLE YOUR SPEECH WITH WORDS FROM AN ALIEN LANGUAGE EXCEPT TO SHOW OFF, STIR EMOTION, AS IF IT IS THAT WONDERFUL.

What is the use of saying something I don’t understand?

I don’t understand what ‘l'hitraot, wa masalaam’ stands for and many English readers will not understand what it means, so what is the use of saying something that many readers will not understand except for the purpose of impressing or boasting.

IF WHAT YOU SAY IS NOT UNDERSTANDABLE BY YOUR TARGETTED AUDIENCE THEN YOU ARE DOING WHAT IS USELESS THAT IS NOT WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE BUT HAS INSANITY AS ITS PRIZE.

If your purpose is to be understood:

If your purpose is to be understood then you should stick to the English language which is your selected language of communication.

If your purpose is not to be understood but to impress with your knowledge or command of the foreign language then it does not matter if readers don’t understand what you mean, what is important is that they are impressed and thus you say ‘l'hitraot, wa masalaam’.

The octopus who predicted England’s loss:

Apparently there is a pet octopus that had a 100% record of predicting results of world cup matches by selecting to enter the plastic container with the victor’s flag.

The octopus is a being that according to the Buddha is as valid as you and me and it may possess the supernatural power of being able to predict future events.

The Buddha and his deputy Moggalana are reputed to be the highest in supernatural powers and so it may be that different beings have different properties, strengths and weaknesses.

Ah, the Sun! The Surf! The Glow of Electrons!: Rich Jaroslovsky

The ‘Ah’ signifies the person’s mental force is stirred attractively to like and it is a totally meaningless blind stirring of mental force that wastes energy creating mental and bodily stress and yet this world perceives it as meaningful and good.

Whoever you are, if your wellbeing or happiness depends on the sun, surf or whatever, you are a dependent slave not free master. Only a person whose happiness does not depend on anything is freed. Not that you should not find the sun or surf pleasant but so long as your mental force is stirred attractively or repulsively, you must suffer and head for torment.

IT IS BECAUSE THIS WORLD PERCEIVES AND UNDERSTANDS FALSELY THAT BEING ATTRACTED OR THE MENTAL FORCE STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY IS MEANINGFUL AND BENEFICIAL THAT IT APPRECIATES SUCH STATEMENTS 'AH' THIS AND THAT. A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS TRULY UNDERSTANDS THIS AS FALSE, MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL.

Why is Star so concerned for PKR?

Fallout from Khalid’s ouster

By handing over the Selangor PKR leader’s post to Azmin, Anwar has set a bad precedent and has prolonged internal feuding, not end it.

The only true reason you criticize someone is because what they do is bad and you have concern for them and the public good.

Why should the commentator be so concerned Anwar is setting a bad precedent when the Star and him have never shown any concern for Anwar and PKR elsewhere.

INSTEAD THE MOTIVE IS IN THE GUISE OR GOOD CRITICISM TO USE THE OCCASION TO STICK THE KNIFE INTO ANWAR AND PKR. THE FOOLISH MAY FALL FOR THE TRICK BUT THE DISCERNING KNOWS THAT SUCH CRITICISMS ARE NEVER GENUINE AND UNRELIABLE.

IF YOU AGREE THE STAR IS NOT FRIENDLY TO ANWAR AND PKR THEN ITS CRITICISM CANNOT BE FRIENDLY BUT HYPOCRITICAL TO HIGHLIGHT AND PAINT ANWAR AND PKR IN BAD LIGHT. THERE IS GRAVE KARMA FOR THOSE INVOLVED.

Upgrading oneself at KDU:

This is not harmless talk or a choice of words but fraught with karma. It is treating oneself like a software or computer to be upgraded and in truth humans with style and emotion are robots and what they call self improvement is reprogramming to be better robots to suit the taste of society.

IT IS NOT PROPER TO SPEAK OF UPGRADING YOURSELF AS IF YOU ARE A PIECE OF SOFTWARE THAT ENCOURAGES OTHERS TO SIMILARLY PERCEIVE WITH KARMA ATTACHED. YOU THINK IT IS FUNNY BUT WHEN YOUR HEAD IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD IT WON’T BE VERY FUNNY. YET THAT IS WHAT AMBITIOUS STYLISH PEOPLE ARE DOING, UPGRADING THEMSELVES SEEKING THAT COMPETITIVE EDGE.

A mind’s concentration:

All minds have concentration that is not constant but varies from moment to moment and differs in range from person to person far greater than ordinary people realize.

Ordinary emotional people’s minds are permanently scattered and sometimes they use force to force themselves to concentrate for brief periods eg during exams or putting a golf ball.

A Buddha’s concentration at his lowest still far exceeds the best concentration of ordinary people, it is concentration of the mind that the Buddha said enables the person to see his way even to heaven or so that heaven appears before him.

THUS A BEING’S CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATES AND THE HIGHER REACHES OF CONCENTRATION ARE COMPLETELY UNKNOWN TO STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE.

It is virtue that leads to concentration and it is concentration that leads to great wisdom. Without true virtue (never lying, stealing, gossiping, killing, harming, being sensuous) one cannot attain great concentration.

DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF CONCENTRATION THEY ARE CAPABLE OF ATTAINING AND THE BUDDHA HAS ACHIEVED THE ACME OF CONCENTRATION OR PERFECT CONCENTRATION THAT IS COMPLETELY UNKNOWN TO ORDINARY PEOPLE WHO DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE. CONCENTRATION OR UNIFICATION OF THE MIND IS NEVER SUFFERING, SCATTERING AND BEING UNABLE TO GATHER ONE’S MIND ALWAYS IS SUFFERING.

HERETO IS AN ATTRIBUTE, CONCENTRATION LIKE SUPERNATURAL POWERS, WISDOM, RESTRAIN, GOODWILL THAT DIFFERENTIATES AND DISTINGUISHES BEINGS.

Moggallana’s supernatural powers & Sariputta’s concentration:

With his supernatural powers, Moggallana saw a passing Yakka deliver a massive blow on Sariputta’s head and with his super concentration, Sariputta felt just a mild headache as a result of the blow.

You may belittle the worth of concentration but as the Buddha said, there is no suffering for one who has developed great concentration.

Juñha Sutta:Moonlit

Ven. Sariputta and Ven. Maha Moggallana were staying in Pigeon Cave. Then, on a moonlit night, Ven. Sariputta -- his head newly shaven -- was sitting in the open air, having attained a certain level of concentration.

Two yakkhas who were companions were flying from north to south on some business. They saw Ven. Sariputta -- his head newly shaven -- sitting in the open air. The first yakkha said, "I'm inspired to give this contemplative a blow on the head."

The second yakkha said, "Enough of that. Don't lay a hand on the contemplative. He's outstanding, of great power and might."

A second time, the first yakkha said, "I'm inspired to give a blow on the head."

A second time, the second yakkha admonished.

A third time, the first yakkha said.

A third time, the second yakkha admonished."

Then the first yakkha gave Ven. Sariputta a blow on the head. And with that blow he might have knocked over an elephant seven or eight cubits tall, or split a rocky crag. But right there the yakkha -- yelling, "I'm burning!" -- fell into the Great Hell.

Now, Ven. Moggallana -- with his divine eye -- saw the yakkha give Ven. Sariputta a blow on the head. He went to Ven. Sariputta and said, "I hope you are well, friend Sariputta. I hope you are feeling no pain."

"I am well, friend Moggallana. But I do have a slight headache."

"How amazing, friend Sariputta! How great your power and might! Just now a yakkha gave you a blow on the head. So great was that blow. But all you say is this: 'I am well. But I do have a slight headache'!"

"How amazing, friend Moggallana! How great your power and might! Where you saw a yakkha just now, I didn't even see a dust devil!"

The Blessed One -- with his divine ear -- heard those two great beings speak in praise of one another. He on that occasion exclaimed:

Whose mind is like rock, steady, unmoved,
dispassionate for things that spark passion,
unangered by things that spark anger:
When one's mind is developed like this,
from where can there come suffering & stress?

Want to lose weight? Try sex and shopping:

This is an Independent headline. It is mad advice with deadly karma for the person involved.

The true reason to shop is if you have something you need to buy not lose weight, ditto sex and thus anyone who would try sex or shopping to lose weight is practicing controlled insanity that will end in insanity.

EVEN IF HAVING SEX AND SHOPPING LOSES WEIGHT (NEVER GUARANTEED) IT IS A BIZARRE CONSIDERATION TO HAVE SEX OR SHOP TO LOSE WEIGHT, ANYONE WHO COUNTENANCE IT AS SUCH IS DELUDED AND HEADED FOR TORMENT.

Economists who cannot add one plus one:

Shares slumped yesterday because of concerns European banks are insolvent. The European Central Bank (ECB) will offer funds on Wednesday to banks looking to repay 442bn euros worth of loans later this week. Last summer, the ECB offered European banks cheap 12-month loans to help them through the financial crisis. This was a longer repayment term than the usual three to six months. But the ECB has said it will not offer 12-month loans this time around, raising fears that European banks may again face funding difficulties.

EUROPEAN BANKS ARE UNABLE TO MEET THEIR DEBT REPAYMENTS AND HAVE TO BE BAILED OUT WITH CHEAP LOANS BY THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK WHICH IS NOW LIMITING THE TENURE TO 3 MONTHS RAISING CONCERNS IT IS POSTPONING THE CRUNCH.

IT SEEMS MANY EMINENT ECONOMISTS INCLUDING KRUGMAN DON’T UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATIONS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING, THEY STILL TALK OF SURPLUS COUNTRIES LIKE GERMANY AND CHINA SPENDING TO PULL THE WORLD OUT OF RECESSION. THE SAVINGS OF CHINA AND GERMANY MAY BE MORE IN THEORY THAN PRACTICE, THE MONEY HAS BEEN LENT OUT AND BORROWERS ARE NOW DEFAULTING AND SO EVERYONE INCLUDING GERMANY AND CHINA HAVE EMPTY POCKETS.

Dead men tell no tales:

Quote: “My sixth sense told me that these MACC officers are not sent to London to interview Bala but could be on a mission to silence Bala and his lawyers in London. These are the so-called "Death Squad" sent by Najib. They are prepared for any eventuality, even to the extent of spending time in the London jail. The stakes are much too high for Najib to ignore. Dead man tells No Tale! This is what Najib wants!”

This is not the first time this phrase has been used and it is never true. It is rehashed, copied from others without understanding what it actually means because it sounds attractive to use.

Dead men can tell tales if they have taken precautions to expose evidence in the event they are killed. Who needs to be told dead men tell no tales? It is obvious the dead cannot speak but even the circumstances of their death and evidence carelessly left at the scene can reveal who murdered the person.

THUS IT IS A FALSE ROTE STATEMENT DISHED OUT BY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE TO STIR EMOTION IN OTHERS.

The purpose is to champion killing as a solution:

When people rehash, ‘dead men tell no tales’ their intention is not to plainly state that but their intention is to champion murder or the elimination of someone as a solution as if it is final or perfect.

IF WHAT YOU MEAN BY ‘DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES’ IS TO CHAMPION KILLING AS A SOLUTION, THAT IT IS AN ULTIMATE SOLUTION YOU DID NOT MEAN THAT BY SAYING ‘DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES’. IF YOU PERCEIVE DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES IS THE SAME AS MURDER IS THE FINAL, ABSOLUTE PERFECT SOLUTION THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION. THUS THE PERSON DID NOT SAY WHAT HE MEANT AND IS SPEAKING FALSELY WITH KARMA ATTACHED. IF HE SAID KILLING SOMEONE IS THE IDEAL OR BEST SOLUTION THEN HE WILL HAVE SPOKEN WHAT HE MEANT.

The path to sadness and depression:

People never just smile but they prolong their smiles as she is doing in order to give others the chance of viewing their marvellous friendly smile.

WHOEVER YOU ARE, SO LONG AS YOU USE YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO AUTOMATICALLY PROLONG AND WHEN IT PROLONGS BY ITSELF, YOU CANNOT SHAKE OFF THAT PROLONGING THEN YOU ARE EXPERIENCING SADNESS THAT CAN DESCEND INTO DEPRESSION.

THERE IS NEVER ANY NEED TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG AND IT IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS. SMILES ARE ALWAYS ROBOTIC, REHASHED FROM MEMORY AND SO ANYONE WHO SMILES IS A MINDLESS REHASHING ROBOT AND BECAUSE THEY ALSO PROLONG THEIR SMILES, THEY ARE CONDITIONING THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO PROLONG THAT ENDS IN SADNESS THENCE DEPRESSION.

Dead men tell no tales is an understanding and it is false:

“Dead men tell no tales” is a general understanding or view and it is always wrong because sometimes dead men tell no tales, sometimes they do. For example semen found on a raped woman’s body can incriminate the person who murdered under the belief that ‘dead women tell no tales”.

Emotional people understand falsely a situation and they commit it to memory to be rehashed in future occasions not realizing the conclusion or understanding is flawed, may not hold in some situations.

“Dead men tell no tales” is a programming that the subscriber programs or accepts in his mind to be applied to future events or occasions. A person who truly understands forms no such rules, he understands each situation that happens as it is and so he understands truly that sometimes dead men are silenced but at other times dead men still tell incriminating tales.