Discredit the evidence not the person:
Quote: Abdul Razak accused Dr Pornthip of taking sides and questioned her credibility, qualifications and experience.
He also claimed that the MACC’s expert witness Prof Dr Peter Vanezis was far more qualified than Dr Pornthip as he had graduated from Bristol University. Abdul Razak also told Dr Pornthip that Mahidol University, from where she graduated, was not recognised in Malaysia.
MACC’s counsel is demonstrating false logic that is the way to mad logic which can and will be fatal or he is being too emotional that betrays he is partisan and defending the MACC at all costs not because it is true MACC is innocent.
It is standard practice for lawyers to discredit witnesses by questioning their qualifications and character etc but this is mad logic. It is not the character or qualifications that is pertinent but his evidence or deductions. Prove her deductions wrong, don’t question her person. If you do so you are hitting under the belt, practicing mad logic, wanting foolish observers to similarly subscribe to false logic and you have karma to be experienced as future suffering.
IT REFLECTS THE COMMON FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH COUNSELS QUESTIONING WITNESSES’ QUALIFICATIONS AND CHARACTER. IT IS NOT THE PERSON’S QUALIFICATIONS OR CHARACTER THAT MAKES WHAT SHE SAID FALSE, IT IS PROVING WHAT SHE SAID IS FALSE THAT MAKES IT FALSE.
THIS IS FALSE LOGIC THAT BECAUSE A PERSON IS POORLY QUALIFIED OR OF BAD CHARACTER, HER EVIDENCE SHOULD BE DISMISSED.
EVEN IF PORNTHIP IS TAKING SIDES, SO LONG AS HER EVIDENCE IS TRUE, IT IS STILL TRUE.
YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS BUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE MATTER AT HAND TO SAY WHAT I SAY ABOVE BUT HOW MANY AMONGST MEN CAN REASON THUS? IS NOT WHAT I SAY TRUE?
You must be fair:
If you cannot discredit or prove false a witness’ testimony then you should let matters rest and allow the judge or jury to decide.
By questioning her qualifications and character, you are unfairly influencing the judge and jury to reject her evidence just because of her person or qualifications and that is unrighteous and thus as it stands MACC’s counsel has put a noose around his neck that will strangle him in the future.
HE IS DEMONSTRATING INCOMPETENCE AS A LAWYER BY BEHAVING THUS AND IT REFLECTS MANKIND’S LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG.
Do you want to establish the truth?
The inquest into Teoh Beng Huat’s death is supposed to establish the truth about his death and if you want to establish the truth then everyone including defence and plaintiff should cut out emotions that are not conducive even inimical to establishing the truth. Thus MACC’s attorney in casting derogatory remarks about the Thai pathologist is stirring up emotions that make him deliberately or unwittingly opposed to finding out the truth.
You don’t need to be a pathology expert to understand what can or cannot have happened.
Did Pornthip rule out suicide and if she did, on what basis did she say so? Those bases with which she ruled out can be subject to reality testing to prove if she is right to say so.
If she did not rule out suicide then if there is a possibility of foul play causing the injuries found then she has every right to point it out.
As an expert in this field, she is likely to have seen many cases of suicide falls to be able to say better than most what is and is not consistent with a fall such as this. If the defence disagrees they can request a second opinion or considering there must be a considerable archive of photos of injuries of falls from height, produce photo evidence of similar injuries as sustained by Teoh in falls from height.
The two areas that are contentious from what I glimpse are neck injuries (Pornthip says pressure more than strangulation was applied) and the anal or pelvic area. If the injuries can be clearly defined then it is a matter of whether it is possible for a fall to have produced them. If it is possible for a fall to produce those injuries, under what circumstances would they occur and what evidence are there those circumstances prevailed?
THUS WITHOUT BEING AN EXPERT, A DISCERNING OBSERVER COMMITTED TO ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH CAN ASK PERTINENT QUESTIONS THAT OFTEN CAN ESTABLISH EVEN IRREFUTABLY THAT ALL THE INJURIES WERE DUE TO THE FALL OR THERE WERE OTHER SOURCES OF INJURY. IF THE EVIDENCE IS INCONCLUSIVE THEN IT SHOULD BE LEFT AT THAT, WHENCE THE NEED TO BESMIRCH HER?
THE INQUEST IS ACTUALLY A CIRCUS, EVEN WITHOUT FORENSIC EVIDENCE, THE CIRCUMSTANCES & THE ADMISSIONS OF THE MACC AS TO WHAT HAPPENED RENDER THEIR DEFENCE UNTENABLE, IT IS UNBELIEVABLE TO ANYONE WHO IS DISCERNING THAT WHAT HAPPENED IS AS CONTENDED BY MACC.
BBC apologizes for weatherman’s rude gesture:
There is nothing rude or polite about any gesture, it is the collective or shared delusion or false perception that the gesture is rude that makes it so and all those who perceive a gesture as rude are headed for mad perception and they see nothing wrong.
A weatherman pointed his middle finger up and that is perceived as not acceptable on TV. It has come to be known as a rude gesture that stirs repulsion in those initiated into the symbolism of that gesture.
Because the gesture is meaningless, its purpose is to express hostility, the perpetrator is practicing something that is meaningless that will end in his insanity.
ALL GESTURES TO EXPRESS EMOTIONS ARE MEANINGLESS, DO NO USEFUL WORK EXCEPT TO CONVEY EMOTIONS LIKE EXCITEMENT, ANGER (EG CLENCHED RAISED FIST), SADNESS OR FEAR. BECAUSE THEY DO NO USEFUL WORK ANYONE WHO GESTURES AND SEES IT FULL OF MEANING IS HEADED FOR INSANITY.
IT IS THE COLLECTIVE DELUSION THAT MAKES PEOPLE PERCEIVE A GESTURE AS RUDE OR GOOD (EG POPE RAISING HIS HANDS TO AUDIENCE).
Can you imagine the Buddha waving to the crowd?
Can you imagine the Buddha waving to the crowd to say ‘hello’ or to calm them down? If you can you are deluded.
If an audience is unruly, the Buddha remains silent. Until the audience is quiet, He does not speak. If the audience will not quieten down, He will not speak.
This is the way of those who are truly noble, not showmen.
YOU WANT TO HEAR THE BUDDHA SPEAK YOU SHOULD REMAIN SILENT. IF YOU WANT TO COMPETE WITH THE BUDDHA BY MURMURING, THE BUDDHA REMAINS SILENT. THE BUDDHA DOES NOT NEED TO SPEAK TO THE CROWD, UNLIKELY YOU HE HAS NO URGE OR EMOTION TO VENT HIMSELF.
She is a pleaser:
This is a forced smile and it is intended to please others not impress them. It is always suffering and from the look of her eyes, her mind is subject to much force and she is a helpless slave of force not blissful master of self.
AFTER MUCH LIFELONG CONDITIONING, SHE IS WONT TO SMILE THUS TO PLEASE OTHERS, NOT ONLY WILL SHE SMILE TO PLEASE OTHERS, SHE WILL DO MANY THINGS AGAINST HER TRUE WISHES TO PLEASE OTHERS AND THAT IS TORMENTING. THIS SMILE IS PROGRAMMED AND REHASHED AND SO SHE IS A ROBOT.
She is an impressor:
This is the smile of the person who wants to impress, wants others to stir their mental forces attractively at her and want to show the world falsely that she is confident and happy. Rather than happy it is tormenting.
Style is the root and key:
Style is the root or source of ALL NOT SOME evil and suffering, there is no evil or suffering without style and without recognizing and eliminating all style in a person there is no escape from suffering.
IF A PERSON WAS TRULY WITHOUT STYLE OR NEVER USES FORCE TO STRETCH (EG SYLLABLES LIKE ‘AAAAHHH’ INSTEAD OF ‘AH’), CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IN WHATEVER HE SAID OR DID, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO COMMIT ANY EVIL AGAINST OTHERS AND WITHOUT ELIMINATING STYLE THE PERSON CANNOT EXIT EVIL AND SUFFERING.
The constant use of force to stretch, change speed and strength to fashion style creates insoluble stress, restlessness (that must be controlled) and inability to concentrate that are personal suffering and bombards others with force that causes the same.
When you are constantly use force to stretch, change speed and strength to fashion style you are training your mental force to be very good at stretching, changing speed and strength such that it can be triggered to do so by events, things seen, heard, touched, smelt and taste (eg smell evoked emotion or stirring of mental force) and this is the basis of all emotions. Because all emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear) are stirrings in prolonging, changing speed and strength of mental force triggered by stimuli, all emotions that are suffering not the pleasure touted are because the person has foolishly trained his mental force to stretch, change speed and strength to fashion style.
WHEN A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE STIRS IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ATTRACTIVELY OR REPULSIVELY AT EVENTS OCCURING THE PERSON EXPERIENCES LIKE OR DISLIKE. WHEN HIS MENTAL FORCE IS TRIGGERED TO PROLONG BY EVENTS, HE IS SAD. WHEN HIS MENTA FORCE IS TRIGGERED TO ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH HE IS HURT, WHEN HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN A DISORGANIZED WAY HE IS CONFUSED OR AGITATED. WHEN HIS MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF PLUNGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH LEADING TO A RAPID RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE UNOPPOSED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION, THERE IS FEAR.
Because the consistent (not inconsistent) substance and style combo must be based on rehash of a memorization, style mandates a robotic rehashing existence that is in truth tormenting, the person is not in charge but mental force and his mental jukebox are in charge and threaten to act autonomously or madly inappropriately at times.
All crimes are premeditated, comes from plans hashed in a person’s head or copied from others or on the orders of others (eg your officer order you to shoot to kill) and the styled existence in which one is a robot rehashing based on plans is the primer for committing all sorts of evil robotically, mindlessly, doing according to plans or commands.
THUS STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE THAT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IS AT THE HEART AND ONLY SOURCE OF SUFFERING AND SIN FOR THE PERSON AND OTHERS AND WITHOUT RECOGNIZING AND ELIMINATING STYLE THERE CAN BE NO TRUE EXIT FROM SIN AND SUFFERING.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE GRAVITY AND IMPORTANCE OF STYLE IN THE COMMISSION OF SIN AND SOURCE OF SUFFERING. ELIMINATE STYLE AND YOU ARE WELL ON THE WAY TO EXITING SIN AND SUFFERING TOWARDS SAFETY.
NO ONE IN THE PAST AND EVEN TODAY HAS EVER SAID THIS AND THEREFORE I AM TRULY OUT OF THIS WORLD.
All about style not function:
Great lengths were gone into to design the white roof that flowed down the back pillars to extend forward and end in front wheels that are also white.
This has nothing to do with substance, it does not improve the performance of the car but it is deemed to be attractive, it stirs emotional people’s mental forces to perceive it as desirable and therefore want to buy to show and impress others.
GREAT EFFORT AND EXPENSES ARE MADE TO FASHION A CAR WITH AN APPEARANCE THAT IS DEDICATED TO STYLE NOT FUNCTION, IN FACT IT MAY TURN OUT DANGEROUS BECAUSE FUNCTION WILL BE NEGLECTED IN THE NAME OF STYLE. IF YOU DESIGN A CAR SOLELY ON FUNCTION IT IS FAR LESS LIKELY THAT YOU WILL NEGLECT SAFETY.
The impresser is more hardcore than pleaser:
Every smile can be examined and classified as to impress or please.
Some people smile mostly to impress and only occasionally to please, others smile mostly to please, only sometimes to impress.
It takes a hardcore goat driven by much determination and delusion to smile to impress others (most tinsel town smiles eg Marilyn Monroe’s are to impress) and so it is harder even impossible for people who habitually smile to impress to be reformed or turn so that Jesus may heal them. They are too in love with themselves and this world to be touched.
IF A PERSON HABITUALLY SMILES TO IMPRESS OTHERS (AS TO HOW CHARMING OR CONFIDENT OR KNOWLEDGEABLE HE IS), THEN HE IS A HARDCORE CASE AND YOU MIGHT AS WELL TRY TO CONVERT A WALL).
Not one force change is necessary:
Not one force prolonging, changing (accelerating, decelerating) speed and strength when speaking and doing is necessary or meaningful but it is just for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
When you keep or maintain the pressure on the gas pedal to maintain the speed of a car that is not prolonging but you specifically usefully want to maintain a desired speed of the car. When people prolong a syllable, there is no use except for show. It is a delusion and excuse to say you prolong to emphasize so that others will hear what you say because seldom is that the true intention and further did the listener complain he has difficulty hearing you that you must presumptuously prolong for his ‘benefit’?
MAINTAINING THE PRESSURE ON A GAS PEDAL TO KEEP A CAR AT A DESIRED SPEED IS NOT PROLONGING BUT IF MINDFULLY DONE, IT SERVES A USEFUL PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING THE CAR AT A CERTAIN DESIRED OR INTENDED SPEED.
USING FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES SERVES NO USEFUL PURPOSE, IS NOT NEEDED BUT ITS PURPOSE IS FOR SHOW, FOOLS LIKE THE SOUND EFFECTS OF THIS PROLONGING THAT IS INTENDED TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS.
In the same way you change speed (accelerate or brake) or strength of force (change gear up and down) when driving a car when there is danger or need to, you increase force by changing gears to drive uphill but the constant significant even extreme accelerating decelerating in speed and strength that accompanies all speech is totally unnecessary except for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate.
IF YOU NEVER CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY TRAIN OR MOBILIZE YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH SYLLABLES IN THE NAME OF FASHIONING STYLE, HOW IS IT THAT YOUR MENTAL FORCE CAN BE EASILY TRIGGERED TO PROLONG ON ITS ON WITHOUT DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION WITH THE RESULTANT EXPERIENCE OF SADNESS?
IT IS BECAUSE FECKLESS STYLISH PEOPLE CONSTANTLY ABUSE THEMSELVES BY CAUSING THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO STRETCH SYLLABLES AND UNITS OF MOTION IN THE NAME OF STYLE THAT THEIR MENTAL FORCE HAS A STRONG AUTOMATISM TO PROLONG THAT WHEN TRIGGERED BY SITUATIONS HIS MENTAL FORCE CAN PROLONG ON ITS OWN DECOUPLED FROM DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION.
IN THE SAME WAY IF YOU NEVER CONSTANTLY TRAINED YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO ACCCELERATE AND DECELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE NAME OF STYLE, HOW IS IT THAT YOUR MENTAL FORCE CAN BE EASILY TRIGGERED BY EVENTS TO ACCELERATE AND DECELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH DECOUPLED (FREE GEAR) FROM DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION SO THAT YOU EXPERIENCE LIKE (EXCITEMENT), DISLIKE (HATE), HURT AND AGITATION OR CONFUSION?
She is prolonging:
What she is doing is probably unconscious, she or her mental force is prolonging so that she is staring ‘deep in thought’ detached from reality rather than staying with reality. No person of truth will indulge in what she is doing and she is conditioning herself to prolong and fall into dazes that will seize her as sadness, depression and a permanently scattered mind.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG BUT WHAT SHE IS DOING HAS DEADLY TORMENTING CONSEQUENCES FOR HER.
This BBC article reflects delusion.
Fighting fear is self defeating, the fighting itself generates anxiety.
Anxiety is not in your genes that implies there is no escape.
If you never go against yourself you cannot have fear.
People are constantly going against themselves without being aware by constantly using force that is unnecessary to prolong, change speed and strength that heaps stress, restlessness and distraction that is ultimately fatal.
If you are a robot rehashing you are not in charge of yourself but you are a slave of the mental jukebox that is dangerously entrusting yourself to programs instead of fully understanding undertaking your actions. Because it is potentially and ultimately fatal entrusting your actions to a mental jukebox, a robot must be fearful.
If you speak and do things without truly understanding or falsely understanding what you say or do, fear must lurk in the background.
The slave and the enslaver:
The person who speaks and does things in a way that consistently strives or is intended to please others is a person who enslaves himself and often suffers from negative self esteem. He is conditioned by others eg parents or authority figures and peers to do so.
The person who speaks and does things in a way that consistently strives or is intended to impress others so that they like him is a person who wants others to enslave themselves to him and often suffers from a big ego.
The unemotional person of truth who neither strives to please or impress others does not have a high or low esteem of himself, esteem is a delusion, a false rehashed image of oneself as either negative or worthless or positive or great.
Pleasing others is always suffering rising often to tormenting levels, it is mad and insatiable.
Impressing others too is suffering and the person who wants others to be impressed with him has great karma wanting others to a slave to him, impressed by him.
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO PLEASE OTHERS IS A SLAVE TO OTHERS WHILST ANYONE WHO WANTS TO IMPRESS OTHERS, WHO WANTS OTHERS TO BE IMPRESSED WITH HIM IS AN ENSLAVER WITH GREAT KARMA DUE HIM.
PLEASING OTHERS AND WANTING OTHERS TO BE IMPRESSED ARE INCOMPATIBLE AND SO STYLISH PEOPLE FALL INTO EITHER CATEGORY, PLEASER OR IMPRESSOR, NEVER TWO IN GREAT STRENGTH. THE IMPRESSOR MAY OCCASIONALLY RELUCTANTLY PLEASE ANOTHER WHO HAS HIGHER POWER AND THINGS (RICHES) THAT HE CAN OBTAIN BY PLEASING HIM BUT HIS GENERAL ATTITUDE IS BEATING HIS OWN DRUM.
Shun vices to gain respect, Shafie tells Malays:
If you truly understand what is said you must understand he is deluded and practicing false logic that will end in mad logic.
You do not shun vices to gain respect but you shun vices because it is suffering and the way to ruin even to your family. You must understand truly the nature of the vices (gambling, drinking, womanizing) and seeing it as the road to ruin, you shun it.
Further respect is meaningless, wanting others to stir their mental force attractively at the sight of you and that is meaningless blind stirring of force. I find respect meaningless, I do not work towards or desire respect by others. What is the point of respect or disrespecting me which are about an attractive and repulsive stirring of blind harmful mental force?
Shun vices to impress others:
What he is saying is do something (shun vices) for show to impress others or so that they will be impressed by you. Therefore he is impresser and wants you to be an impresser too. Thus his advice is not worth listening to.
YOU DO NOT SHUN VICES SO THAT OTHERS WILL BE IMPRESSED BY YOU BUT YOU SHUN VICES BECAUSE THEY ARE HARMFUL AND IT IS MEANINGFUL TO SHUN VICES.
There are two kinds of impressers, one is the inadequate personality needing others to reassure him that he is impressive. The other is the superego with a strong urge to beat his drum ‘bong, bong, bong’ because he truly believes he is great and everyone should see and know that.
Not everyone will respect you for shunning vices:
If you shun vices so that others will respect you, you are engaging in an uncertain enterprise. Whilst there will be some who will respect you for that, there will be others who will despise you and so he is giving bad advice because he says you will be respected when that is not guaranteed.
However if you shun vices because they are evil, you are guaranteed of peace of mind and avoidance of suffering.
Do the right thing for the right reasons:
It is not enough that you do the right thing but you must do it for the right or true reasons, if you do the right thing for the wrong reasons, that is still controlled insanity and its merit much diminished.
Thus you refrain from vices because it is harmful to self and others, if you refrain to gain respect that is for the wrong reason.
Maul to celebrate:
Newcastle did not specifically maul Villa to celebrate or as a celebration of their return to the Premier League. Just because they beat Villa by a big margin does not mean it is a celebration of their return and so he is training himself to adopt false perception and logic that will end in torment.
Proof of no understanding:
That a person is capable of doing or saying something for the wrong reason is proof he does not understand what he says or does.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO EVER DO OR SAY SOMETHING (RIGHT) FOR THE WRONG REASONS BUT TRULY UNDERSTANDING HE ALWAYS SAYS AND DOES THE RIGHT THING FOR THE RIGHT REASON.
THUS IF ANYONE SHOULD BE FOUND TO SAY OR DO SOMETHING FOR THE WRONG REASONS, IT IS PROOF HE HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE DOES AND SAYS THINGS WITHOUT TRULY UNDERSTANDING NOT JUST THERE BUT EVERYWHERE ELSE. THE REASON IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAY AND DO THINGS WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO PROGRAM SOMEONE TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING AND ALSO PROGRAM THEM WITH THE WRONG REASONS FOR SAYING OR DOING IT.
Figures suggest:
Sales of existing homes in the US plunged 27% in July to their lowest level in more than 10 years, figures suggest.
Emotional people tend to approximately pull out words to apply to a situation based on preference (eg he likes ‘suggest’ or it is more impressive than ‘show’) and think nothing wrong, it will do when it is deadly.
IF FIGURES ‘SHOW’ AND YOU SPEAK OF ‘SUGGEST’ WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT, YOU ARE COURTING MAD PERCEPTION. FIGURES NEVER SUGGEST BUT THEY SHOW, EXTRAPOLATIONS FROM FIGURES MAY SUGGEST BUT EXTRAPOLATIONS ARE NOT FIGURES AND SO FIGURES DO NOT SUGGEST. IT MAY REFLECT THEIR ADVANCE DOUBTING OR NOT ACCEPTING FACTS THAT THEY SPEAK VAGUELY AS IF UNCERTAN AND DOUBTING TO SAY FIGURES ‘SUGGESTS’ WHEN FIGURES ‘SHOW’. BY THUS SPEAKING YOU ARE CULTIVATING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT WHAT IS FACT IS UNCERTAIN THAT IS ONE OF THREE FETTERS (TOGETHER WITH FAITH IN RITUALS AND RULES & SELF IDENTITY VIEWS) TO FUTURE WOE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Setting herself for painful karma:
This woman passing by made a move to pet the cat but instead took it and dropped it into a dust bin.
Possibly she is suffering and hateful and could not stand the sight of a cat and so driven by emotion (stirred force not understanding) she undertook an action that has grave consequences in future suffering for her.
WHAT SHE DID WAS DECEPTION (ACTING AS IF FRIENDLY TO APPROACH THE CAT) AND THEN ILL WILL, WISHING TO HARM ANOTHER. SHE DOES NOT REALIZE SHE WOULD HAVE CHANCES IN THE FUTURE TO TASTE BEING SIMILARLY TREATED AND THEN NO ONE WILL RESCUE HER.
IT IS ILL WILL (WISHING TO HARM OTHERS), GREED AND DELUSION THAT BINDS BEINGS TO THIS WORLD AND THIS WOMAN HAS ALL OF THEM.
WHAT SHE DID IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, IT IS NONE OF HER BUSINESS TO TAMPER WITH A CAT AND SO SHE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS FOOLISHLY HEAPING UNNECESSARY FUTURE SUFFERING FOR HERSELF AND SO SHE IS DELUDED.
JESUS SAID WHAT YOU DID TO THE LEAST OF ME YOU DID IT TO ME AND SO SHE WILL BE PUNISHED.
For show togetherness:
What she is doing is commonly seen in many societies. She is clinging to her man, expressing togetherness and liking that is for show, to show others their closeness and happiness together.
NO MATTER HOW CLOSE OR HAPPY YOU ARE TOGETHER, THERE IS NO NEED TO EXPRESS IT, TO SHOW IT TO OTHERS. BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS AND FOR SHOW, IT IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN WOE.
As the Buddha said, whoever has a dependency has a wavering (you need stirred mental force to waver), whoever is independent has no wavering. Wavering is always suffering, the unwavering is always not suffering and so even if your dependency is genuine you are conditioning yourself to suffering.
TO BE DEPENDENT ON OTHERS IS SUFFERING, TO EXPRESS OR PUT ON A SHOW OF BEING DEPENDENT OR ATTACHED IS FURTHER SUFFERING.
Till death do us part:
This is a well worn phrase and is memorized and rehashed driven by emotion to impress never by genuine reason.
Can you be sure you will not part until death? If you cannot be sure you are speaking of something you cannot be sure you will deliver and should you fail, there is penalty for making a false promise.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO SANE REASON TO MAKE THIS PROMISE TO ANOTHER BUT IT IS EMOTION THAT STIR FOOLS TO MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT THAT IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND REHASHED NOT REALIZING THAT IF THEY PART FOR SOME REASON BEFORE DEATH, THEN THEY HAVE BROKEN THAT PROMISE.
‘TILL DEATH DO US PART’ IS A STYLED WAY OF SAYING ‘WE WILL PART AT DEATH’. IT IS NEVER AN ACCIDENT THAT SO MANY HAVE UTTERED THE SAME STATEMENT BUT IT MUST BE COPIED AND REHASHED BECAUSE IT SOUNDS NICE OR ATTRACTIVE OR STIRRING.
News desk?
In order to be a suitable platform for reading the news, even a humble school desk will suffice but if you pay attention, today’s new desks are ornate designed to outdo each other and keep changing reflecting whims and fancies about what is latest or the most attractive.
People think they can tell what is meaning and substance and what is for show but they may be severely underestimating the things they perceive as meaningful that are for show, style and for attraction.
A SIMPLE DESK SUFFICES TO READ THE NEWS BUT THE FRILLS THAT ACCOMPANY NEWSREADING TODAY REFLECTS THE MONSTROSITY AND IMPORTANCE OF STYLE IN THE LIVES OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE HERE.
WHATEVER THAT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT IS DONE IS STYLE NOT SUBSTANCE AND SO WHATEVER PARAPHERNALIA ASSOCIATED WITH A MODERN NEWS DESK THAT IS NOT NECESSARY TO DISPENSE THE NEWS IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR ATTRACT.
Tiger Woods: It’s a sad time in our lives:
He is accepting sadness as part and parcel of existence, sees nothing wrong when sadness is not to be dallied with, is to be expunged because it is like opium, addictive becoming more intense and easily aroused, harder to shake off that will end in death and torment. Here as everywhere else, he and emotional people have a wrong understanding or no understanding about the true nature of sadness.
SADNESS IS TO BE RECOGNIZED EVEN IN ITS MILD FORM AND TREATED AS A DEADLY AFFLICTION THAT IF ALLOWED TO FESTER WILL TURN MALIGNANT WITH TORMENTING CONSEQUENCES.
PEOPLE USE FORCE TO SUPPRESS AND ATTEMPT TO PUSH SADNESS OUT OF THEIR MINDS OR THEY FIND SOME DIVERSION LIKE SPORTS OR HOBBIES OR SEEK SOLACE IN ALCOHOLTO DIVERT THEIR ATTENTION BUT THAT IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE.
THE CORRECT APPROACH IS NEVER TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG YOUR SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION (TAI CHI IS ABOUT SLOW MOTION PROLONGATION OF ALL MOTIONS, A CURVED MOTION IS A PROLONGED VERSION OF A STRAIGHT MOTION). IF YOU NEVER TRAINED YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG AS IN STRETCHING SYLLABLES AND CURVING YOUR MOTIONS, PROLONGING YOUR GAZE OR STANCES WHEN THERE IS NO NEED, YOU CANNOT BE SAD. IT IS BECAUSE OF LIFELONG TRAINING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG THAT IT HAS AN AUTOMATIC URGE TO PROLONG THAT IT CAN BE TRIGGERED TO PROLONG IN FREE GEAR NOT DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION TO RESULT IN SADNESS THAT WILL DESCEND INTO DEPRESSION.
THE MAN WHO TREATS SADNESS AS A COBRA ON HIS BED IS THE WISE MAN WHO SEES TRULY.
Quote: Abdul Razak accused Dr Pornthip of taking sides and questioned her credibility, qualifications and experience.
He also claimed that the MACC’s expert witness Prof Dr Peter Vanezis was far more qualified than Dr Pornthip as he had graduated from Bristol University. Abdul Razak also told Dr Pornthip that Mahidol University, from where she graduated, was not recognised in Malaysia.
MACC’s counsel is demonstrating false logic that is the way to mad logic which can and will be fatal or he is being too emotional that betrays he is partisan and defending the MACC at all costs not because it is true MACC is innocent.
It is standard practice for lawyers to discredit witnesses by questioning their qualifications and character etc but this is mad logic. It is not the character or qualifications that is pertinent but his evidence or deductions. Prove her deductions wrong, don’t question her person. If you do so you are hitting under the belt, practicing mad logic, wanting foolish observers to similarly subscribe to false logic and you have karma to be experienced as future suffering.
IT REFLECTS THE COMMON FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH COUNSELS QUESTIONING WITNESSES’ QUALIFICATIONS AND CHARACTER. IT IS NOT THE PERSON’S QUALIFICATIONS OR CHARACTER THAT MAKES WHAT SHE SAID FALSE, IT IS PROVING WHAT SHE SAID IS FALSE THAT MAKES IT FALSE.
THIS IS FALSE LOGIC THAT BECAUSE A PERSON IS POORLY QUALIFIED OR OF BAD CHARACTER, HER EVIDENCE SHOULD BE DISMISSED.
EVEN IF PORNTHIP IS TAKING SIDES, SO LONG AS HER EVIDENCE IS TRUE, IT IS STILL TRUE.
YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS BUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF THE MATTER AT HAND TO SAY WHAT I SAY ABOVE BUT HOW MANY AMONGST MEN CAN REASON THUS? IS NOT WHAT I SAY TRUE?
You must be fair:
If you cannot discredit or prove false a witness’ testimony then you should let matters rest and allow the judge or jury to decide.
By questioning her qualifications and character, you are unfairly influencing the judge and jury to reject her evidence just because of her person or qualifications and that is unrighteous and thus as it stands MACC’s counsel has put a noose around his neck that will strangle him in the future.
HE IS DEMONSTRATING INCOMPETENCE AS A LAWYER BY BEHAVING THUS AND IT REFLECTS MANKIND’S LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG.
Do you want to establish the truth?
The inquest into Teoh Beng Huat’s death is supposed to establish the truth about his death and if you want to establish the truth then everyone including defence and plaintiff should cut out emotions that are not conducive even inimical to establishing the truth. Thus MACC’s attorney in casting derogatory remarks about the Thai pathologist is stirring up emotions that make him deliberately or unwittingly opposed to finding out the truth.
You don’t need to be a pathology expert to understand what can or cannot have happened.
Did Pornthip rule out suicide and if she did, on what basis did she say so? Those bases with which she ruled out can be subject to reality testing to prove if she is right to say so.
If she did not rule out suicide then if there is a possibility of foul play causing the injuries found then she has every right to point it out.
As an expert in this field, she is likely to have seen many cases of suicide falls to be able to say better than most what is and is not consistent with a fall such as this. If the defence disagrees they can request a second opinion or considering there must be a considerable archive of photos of injuries of falls from height, produce photo evidence of similar injuries as sustained by Teoh in falls from height.
The two areas that are contentious from what I glimpse are neck injuries (Pornthip says pressure more than strangulation was applied) and the anal or pelvic area. If the injuries can be clearly defined then it is a matter of whether it is possible for a fall to have produced them. If it is possible for a fall to produce those injuries, under what circumstances would they occur and what evidence are there those circumstances prevailed?
THUS WITHOUT BEING AN EXPERT, A DISCERNING OBSERVER COMMITTED TO ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH CAN ASK PERTINENT QUESTIONS THAT OFTEN CAN ESTABLISH EVEN IRREFUTABLY THAT ALL THE INJURIES WERE DUE TO THE FALL OR THERE WERE OTHER SOURCES OF INJURY. IF THE EVIDENCE IS INCONCLUSIVE THEN IT SHOULD BE LEFT AT THAT, WHENCE THE NEED TO BESMIRCH HER?
THE INQUEST IS ACTUALLY A CIRCUS, EVEN WITHOUT FORENSIC EVIDENCE, THE CIRCUMSTANCES & THE ADMISSIONS OF THE MACC AS TO WHAT HAPPENED RENDER THEIR DEFENCE UNTENABLE, IT IS UNBELIEVABLE TO ANYONE WHO IS DISCERNING THAT WHAT HAPPENED IS AS CONTENDED BY MACC.
BBC apologizes for weatherman’s rude gesture:
There is nothing rude or polite about any gesture, it is the collective or shared delusion or false perception that the gesture is rude that makes it so and all those who perceive a gesture as rude are headed for mad perception and they see nothing wrong.
A weatherman pointed his middle finger up and that is perceived as not acceptable on TV. It has come to be known as a rude gesture that stirs repulsion in those initiated into the symbolism of that gesture.
Because the gesture is meaningless, its purpose is to express hostility, the perpetrator is practicing something that is meaningless that will end in his insanity.
ALL GESTURES TO EXPRESS EMOTIONS ARE MEANINGLESS, DO NO USEFUL WORK EXCEPT TO CONVEY EMOTIONS LIKE EXCITEMENT, ANGER (EG CLENCHED RAISED FIST), SADNESS OR FEAR. BECAUSE THEY DO NO USEFUL WORK ANYONE WHO GESTURES AND SEES IT FULL OF MEANING IS HEADED FOR INSANITY.
IT IS THE COLLECTIVE DELUSION THAT MAKES PEOPLE PERCEIVE A GESTURE AS RUDE OR GOOD (EG POPE RAISING HIS HANDS TO AUDIENCE).
Can you imagine the Buddha waving to the crowd?
Can you imagine the Buddha waving to the crowd to say ‘hello’ or to calm them down? If you can you are deluded.
If an audience is unruly, the Buddha remains silent. Until the audience is quiet, He does not speak. If the audience will not quieten down, He will not speak.
This is the way of those who are truly noble, not showmen.
YOU WANT TO HEAR THE BUDDHA SPEAK YOU SHOULD REMAIN SILENT. IF YOU WANT TO COMPETE WITH THE BUDDHA BY MURMURING, THE BUDDHA REMAINS SILENT. THE BUDDHA DOES NOT NEED TO SPEAK TO THE CROWD, UNLIKELY YOU HE HAS NO URGE OR EMOTION TO VENT HIMSELF.
She is a pleaser:
This is a forced smile and it is intended to please others not impress them. It is always suffering and from the look of her eyes, her mind is subject to much force and she is a helpless slave of force not blissful master of self.
AFTER MUCH LIFELONG CONDITIONING, SHE IS WONT TO SMILE THUS TO PLEASE OTHERS, NOT ONLY WILL SHE SMILE TO PLEASE OTHERS, SHE WILL DO MANY THINGS AGAINST HER TRUE WISHES TO PLEASE OTHERS AND THAT IS TORMENTING. THIS SMILE IS PROGRAMMED AND REHASHED AND SO SHE IS A ROBOT.
She is an impressor:
This is the smile of the person who wants to impress, wants others to stir their mental forces attractively at her and want to show the world falsely that she is confident and happy. Rather than happy it is tormenting.
Style is the root and key:
Style is the root or source of ALL NOT SOME evil and suffering, there is no evil or suffering without style and without recognizing and eliminating all style in a person there is no escape from suffering.
IF A PERSON WAS TRULY WITHOUT STYLE OR NEVER USES FORCE TO STRETCH (EG SYLLABLES LIKE ‘AAAAHHH’ INSTEAD OF ‘AH’), CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IN WHATEVER HE SAID OR DID, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO COMMIT ANY EVIL AGAINST OTHERS AND WITHOUT ELIMINATING STYLE THE PERSON CANNOT EXIT EVIL AND SUFFERING.
The constant use of force to stretch, change speed and strength to fashion style creates insoluble stress, restlessness (that must be controlled) and inability to concentrate that are personal suffering and bombards others with force that causes the same.
When you are constantly use force to stretch, change speed and strength to fashion style you are training your mental force to be very good at stretching, changing speed and strength such that it can be triggered to do so by events, things seen, heard, touched, smelt and taste (eg smell evoked emotion or stirring of mental force) and this is the basis of all emotions. Because all emotions (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation and fear) are stirrings in prolonging, changing speed and strength of mental force triggered by stimuli, all emotions that are suffering not the pleasure touted are because the person has foolishly trained his mental force to stretch, change speed and strength to fashion style.
WHEN A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE STIRS IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ATTRACTIVELY OR REPULSIVELY AT EVENTS OCCURING THE PERSON EXPERIENCES LIKE OR DISLIKE. WHEN HIS MENTAL FORCE IS TRIGGERED TO PROLONG BY EVENTS, HE IS SAD. WHEN HIS MENTA FORCE IS TRIGGERED TO ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH HE IS HURT, WHEN HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN A DISORGANIZED WAY HE IS CONFUSED OR AGITATED. WHEN HIS MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF PLUNGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH LEADING TO A RAPID RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE UNOPPOSED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION, THERE IS FEAR.
Because the consistent (not inconsistent) substance and style combo must be based on rehash of a memorization, style mandates a robotic rehashing existence that is in truth tormenting, the person is not in charge but mental force and his mental jukebox are in charge and threaten to act autonomously or madly inappropriately at times.
All crimes are premeditated, comes from plans hashed in a person’s head or copied from others or on the orders of others (eg your officer order you to shoot to kill) and the styled existence in which one is a robot rehashing based on plans is the primer for committing all sorts of evil robotically, mindlessly, doing according to plans or commands.
THUS STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE THAT IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY ONLY FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IS AT THE HEART AND ONLY SOURCE OF SUFFERING AND SIN FOR THE PERSON AND OTHERS AND WITHOUT RECOGNIZING AND ELIMINATING STYLE THERE CAN BE NO TRUE EXIT FROM SIN AND SUFFERING.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE GRAVITY AND IMPORTANCE OF STYLE IN THE COMMISSION OF SIN AND SOURCE OF SUFFERING. ELIMINATE STYLE AND YOU ARE WELL ON THE WAY TO EXITING SIN AND SUFFERING TOWARDS SAFETY.
NO ONE IN THE PAST AND EVEN TODAY HAS EVER SAID THIS AND THEREFORE I AM TRULY OUT OF THIS WORLD.
All about style not function:
Great lengths were gone into to design the white roof that flowed down the back pillars to extend forward and end in front wheels that are also white.
This has nothing to do with substance, it does not improve the performance of the car but it is deemed to be attractive, it stirs emotional people’s mental forces to perceive it as desirable and therefore want to buy to show and impress others.
GREAT EFFORT AND EXPENSES ARE MADE TO FASHION A CAR WITH AN APPEARANCE THAT IS DEDICATED TO STYLE NOT FUNCTION, IN FACT IT MAY TURN OUT DANGEROUS BECAUSE FUNCTION WILL BE NEGLECTED IN THE NAME OF STYLE. IF YOU DESIGN A CAR SOLELY ON FUNCTION IT IS FAR LESS LIKELY THAT YOU WILL NEGLECT SAFETY.
The impresser is more hardcore than pleaser:
Every smile can be examined and classified as to impress or please.
Some people smile mostly to impress and only occasionally to please, others smile mostly to please, only sometimes to impress.
It takes a hardcore goat driven by much determination and delusion to smile to impress others (most tinsel town smiles eg Marilyn Monroe’s are to impress) and so it is harder even impossible for people who habitually smile to impress to be reformed or turn so that Jesus may heal them. They are too in love with themselves and this world to be touched.
IF A PERSON HABITUALLY SMILES TO IMPRESS OTHERS (AS TO HOW CHARMING OR CONFIDENT OR KNOWLEDGEABLE HE IS), THEN HE IS A HARDCORE CASE AND YOU MIGHT AS WELL TRY TO CONVERT A WALL).
Not one force change is necessary:
Not one force prolonging, changing (accelerating, decelerating) speed and strength when speaking and doing is necessary or meaningful but it is just for show to impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
When you keep or maintain the pressure on the gas pedal to maintain the speed of a car that is not prolonging but you specifically usefully want to maintain a desired speed of the car. When people prolong a syllable, there is no use except for show. It is a delusion and excuse to say you prolong to emphasize so that others will hear what you say because seldom is that the true intention and further did the listener complain he has difficulty hearing you that you must presumptuously prolong for his ‘benefit’?
MAINTAINING THE PRESSURE ON A GAS PEDAL TO KEEP A CAR AT A DESIRED SPEED IS NOT PROLONGING BUT IF MINDFULLY DONE, IT SERVES A USEFUL PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING THE CAR AT A CERTAIN DESIRED OR INTENDED SPEED.
USING FORCE TO PROLONG SYLLABLES SERVES NO USEFUL PURPOSE, IS NOT NEEDED BUT ITS PURPOSE IS FOR SHOW, FOOLS LIKE THE SOUND EFFECTS OF THIS PROLONGING THAT IS INTENDED TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS.
In the same way you change speed (accelerate or brake) or strength of force (change gear up and down) when driving a car when there is danger or need to, you increase force by changing gears to drive uphill but the constant significant even extreme accelerating decelerating in speed and strength that accompanies all speech is totally unnecessary except for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate.
IF YOU NEVER CONSTANTLY UNNECESSARILY TRAIN OR MOBILIZE YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG OR STRETCH SYLLABLES IN THE NAME OF FASHIONING STYLE, HOW IS IT THAT YOUR MENTAL FORCE CAN BE EASILY TRIGGERED TO PROLONG ON ITS ON WITHOUT DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION WITH THE RESULTANT EXPERIENCE OF SADNESS?
IT IS BECAUSE FECKLESS STYLISH PEOPLE CONSTANTLY ABUSE THEMSELVES BY CAUSING THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO STRETCH SYLLABLES AND UNITS OF MOTION IN THE NAME OF STYLE THAT THEIR MENTAL FORCE HAS A STRONG AUTOMATISM TO PROLONG THAT WHEN TRIGGERED BY SITUATIONS HIS MENTAL FORCE CAN PROLONG ON ITS OWN DECOUPLED FROM DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION.
IN THE SAME WAY IF YOU NEVER CONSTANTLY TRAINED YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO ACCCELERATE AND DECELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE NAME OF STYLE, HOW IS IT THAT YOUR MENTAL FORCE CAN BE EASILY TRIGGERED BY EVENTS TO ACCELERATE AND DECELERATE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH DECOUPLED (FREE GEAR) FROM DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION SO THAT YOU EXPERIENCE LIKE (EXCITEMENT), DISLIKE (HATE), HURT AND AGITATION OR CONFUSION?
She is prolonging:
What she is doing is probably unconscious, she or her mental force is prolonging so that she is staring ‘deep in thought’ detached from reality rather than staying with reality. No person of truth will indulge in what she is doing and she is conditioning herself to prolong and fall into dazes that will seize her as sadness, depression and a permanently scattered mind.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG BUT WHAT SHE IS DOING HAS DEADLY TORMENTING CONSEQUENCES FOR HER.
Is anxiety in your genes?
How to fight the fearThis BBC article reflects delusion.
Fighting fear is self defeating, the fighting itself generates anxiety.
Anxiety is not in your genes that implies there is no escape.
If you never go against yourself you cannot have fear.
People are constantly going against themselves without being aware by constantly using force that is unnecessary to prolong, change speed and strength that heaps stress, restlessness and distraction that is ultimately fatal.
If you are a robot rehashing you are not in charge of yourself but you are a slave of the mental jukebox that is dangerously entrusting yourself to programs instead of fully understanding undertaking your actions. Because it is potentially and ultimately fatal entrusting your actions to a mental jukebox, a robot must be fearful.
If you speak and do things without truly understanding or falsely understanding what you say or do, fear must lurk in the background.
The slave and the enslaver:
The person who speaks and does things in a way that consistently strives or is intended to please others is a person who enslaves himself and often suffers from negative self esteem. He is conditioned by others eg parents or authority figures and peers to do so.
The person who speaks and does things in a way that consistently strives or is intended to impress others so that they like him is a person who wants others to enslave themselves to him and often suffers from a big ego.
The unemotional person of truth who neither strives to please or impress others does not have a high or low esteem of himself, esteem is a delusion, a false rehashed image of oneself as either negative or worthless or positive or great.
Pleasing others is always suffering rising often to tormenting levels, it is mad and insatiable.
Impressing others too is suffering and the person who wants others to be impressed with him has great karma wanting others to a slave to him, impressed by him.
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO PLEASE OTHERS IS A SLAVE TO OTHERS WHILST ANYONE WHO WANTS TO IMPRESS OTHERS, WHO WANTS OTHERS TO BE IMPRESSED WITH HIM IS AN ENSLAVER WITH GREAT KARMA DUE HIM.
PLEASING OTHERS AND WANTING OTHERS TO BE IMPRESSED ARE INCOMPATIBLE AND SO STYLISH PEOPLE FALL INTO EITHER CATEGORY, PLEASER OR IMPRESSOR, NEVER TWO IN GREAT STRENGTH. THE IMPRESSOR MAY OCCASIONALLY RELUCTANTLY PLEASE ANOTHER WHO HAS HIGHER POWER AND THINGS (RICHES) THAT HE CAN OBTAIN BY PLEASING HIM BUT HIS GENERAL ATTITUDE IS BEATING HIS OWN DRUM.
Shun vices to gain respect, Shafie tells Malays:
If you truly understand what is said you must understand he is deluded and practicing false logic that will end in mad logic.
You do not shun vices to gain respect but you shun vices because it is suffering and the way to ruin even to your family. You must understand truly the nature of the vices (gambling, drinking, womanizing) and seeing it as the road to ruin, you shun it.
Further respect is meaningless, wanting others to stir their mental force attractively at the sight of you and that is meaningless blind stirring of force. I find respect meaningless, I do not work towards or desire respect by others. What is the point of respect or disrespecting me which are about an attractive and repulsive stirring of blind harmful mental force?
Shun vices to impress others:
What he is saying is do something (shun vices) for show to impress others or so that they will be impressed by you. Therefore he is impresser and wants you to be an impresser too. Thus his advice is not worth listening to.
YOU DO NOT SHUN VICES SO THAT OTHERS WILL BE IMPRESSED BY YOU BUT YOU SHUN VICES BECAUSE THEY ARE HARMFUL AND IT IS MEANINGFUL TO SHUN VICES.
There are two kinds of impressers, one is the inadequate personality needing others to reassure him that he is impressive. The other is the superego with a strong urge to beat his drum ‘bong, bong, bong’ because he truly believes he is great and everyone should see and know that.
Not everyone will respect you for shunning vices:
If you shun vices so that others will respect you, you are engaging in an uncertain enterprise. Whilst there will be some who will respect you for that, there will be others who will despise you and so he is giving bad advice because he says you will be respected when that is not guaranteed.
However if you shun vices because they are evil, you are guaranteed of peace of mind and avoidance of suffering.
Do the right thing for the right reasons:
It is not enough that you do the right thing but you must do it for the right or true reasons, if you do the right thing for the wrong reasons, that is still controlled insanity and its merit much diminished.
Thus you refrain from vices because it is harmful to self and others, if you refrain to gain respect that is for the wrong reason.
Maul to celebrate:
Newcastle maul hapless Villa to celebrate return to the top flight
This is a headline in the Independent Newspaper site and it conveys false logic that will end in mad logic.Newcastle did not specifically maul Villa to celebrate or as a celebration of their return to the Premier League. Just because they beat Villa by a big margin does not mean it is a celebration of their return and so he is training himself to adopt false perception and logic that will end in torment.
Proof of no understanding:
That a person is capable of doing or saying something for the wrong reason is proof he does not understand what he says or does.
IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO EVER DO OR SAY SOMETHING (RIGHT) FOR THE WRONG REASONS BUT TRULY UNDERSTANDING HE ALWAYS SAYS AND DOES THE RIGHT THING FOR THE RIGHT REASON.
THUS IF ANYONE SHOULD BE FOUND TO SAY OR DO SOMETHING FOR THE WRONG REASONS, IT IS PROOF HE HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE DOES AND SAYS THINGS WITHOUT TRULY UNDERSTANDING NOT JUST THERE BUT EVERYWHERE ELSE. THE REASON IT IS POSSIBLE TO SAY AND DO THINGS WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO PROGRAM SOMEONE TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING AND ALSO PROGRAM THEM WITH THE WRONG REASONS FOR SAYING OR DOING IT.
Figures suggest:
Sales of existing homes in the US plunged 27% in July to their lowest level in more than 10 years, figures suggest.
Emotional people tend to approximately pull out words to apply to a situation based on preference (eg he likes ‘suggest’ or it is more impressive than ‘show’) and think nothing wrong, it will do when it is deadly.
IF FIGURES ‘SHOW’ AND YOU SPEAK OF ‘SUGGEST’ WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT, YOU ARE COURTING MAD PERCEPTION. FIGURES NEVER SUGGEST BUT THEY SHOW, EXTRAPOLATIONS FROM FIGURES MAY SUGGEST BUT EXTRAPOLATIONS ARE NOT FIGURES AND SO FIGURES DO NOT SUGGEST. IT MAY REFLECT THEIR ADVANCE DOUBTING OR NOT ACCEPTING FACTS THAT THEY SPEAK VAGUELY AS IF UNCERTAN AND DOUBTING TO SAY FIGURES ‘SUGGESTS’ WHEN FIGURES ‘SHOW’. BY THUS SPEAKING YOU ARE CULTIVATING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT WHAT IS FACT IS UNCERTAIN THAT IS ONE OF THREE FETTERS (TOGETHER WITH FAITH IN RITUALS AND RULES & SELF IDENTITY VIEWS) TO FUTURE WOE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Setting herself for painful karma:
This woman passing by made a move to pet the cat but instead took it and dropped it into a dust bin.
Possibly she is suffering and hateful and could not stand the sight of a cat and so driven by emotion (stirred force not understanding) she undertook an action that has grave consequences in future suffering for her.
WHAT SHE DID WAS DECEPTION (ACTING AS IF FRIENDLY TO APPROACH THE CAT) AND THEN ILL WILL, WISHING TO HARM ANOTHER. SHE DOES NOT REALIZE SHE WOULD HAVE CHANCES IN THE FUTURE TO TASTE BEING SIMILARLY TREATED AND THEN NO ONE WILL RESCUE HER.
IT IS ILL WILL (WISHING TO HARM OTHERS), GREED AND DELUSION THAT BINDS BEINGS TO THIS WORLD AND THIS WOMAN HAS ALL OF THEM.
WHAT SHE DID IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, IT IS NONE OF HER BUSINESS TO TAMPER WITH A CAT AND SO SHE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS FOOLISHLY HEAPING UNNECESSARY FUTURE SUFFERING FOR HERSELF AND SO SHE IS DELUDED.
JESUS SAID WHAT YOU DID TO THE LEAST OF ME YOU DID IT TO ME AND SO SHE WILL BE PUNISHED.
For show togetherness:
What she is doing is commonly seen in many societies. She is clinging to her man, expressing togetherness and liking that is for show, to show others their closeness and happiness together.
NO MATTER HOW CLOSE OR HAPPY YOU ARE TOGETHER, THERE IS NO NEED TO EXPRESS IT, TO SHOW IT TO OTHERS. BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS AND FOR SHOW, IT IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN WOE.
As the Buddha said, whoever has a dependency has a wavering (you need stirred mental force to waver), whoever is independent has no wavering. Wavering is always suffering, the unwavering is always not suffering and so even if your dependency is genuine you are conditioning yourself to suffering.
TO BE DEPENDENT ON OTHERS IS SUFFERING, TO EXPRESS OR PUT ON A SHOW OF BEING DEPENDENT OR ATTACHED IS FURTHER SUFFERING.
Till death do us part:
This is a well worn phrase and is memorized and rehashed driven by emotion to impress never by genuine reason.
Can you be sure you will not part until death? If you cannot be sure you are speaking of something you cannot be sure you will deliver and should you fail, there is penalty for making a false promise.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO SANE REASON TO MAKE THIS PROMISE TO ANOTHER BUT IT IS EMOTION THAT STIR FOOLS TO MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT THAT IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND REHASHED NOT REALIZING THAT IF THEY PART FOR SOME REASON BEFORE DEATH, THEN THEY HAVE BROKEN THAT PROMISE.
‘TILL DEATH DO US PART’ IS A STYLED WAY OF SAYING ‘WE WILL PART AT DEATH’. IT IS NEVER AN ACCIDENT THAT SO MANY HAVE UTTERED THE SAME STATEMENT BUT IT MUST BE COPIED AND REHASHED BECAUSE IT SOUNDS NICE OR ATTRACTIVE OR STIRRING.
News desk?
In order to be a suitable platform for reading the news, even a humble school desk will suffice but if you pay attention, today’s new desks are ornate designed to outdo each other and keep changing reflecting whims and fancies about what is latest or the most attractive.
People think they can tell what is meaning and substance and what is for show but they may be severely underestimating the things they perceive as meaningful that are for show, style and for attraction.
A SIMPLE DESK SUFFICES TO READ THE NEWS BUT THE FRILLS THAT ACCOMPANY NEWSREADING TODAY REFLECTS THE MONSTROSITY AND IMPORTANCE OF STYLE IN THE LIVES OF EMOTIONAL PEOPLE HERE.
WHATEVER THAT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT IS DONE IS STYLE NOT SUBSTANCE AND SO WHATEVER PARAPHERNALIA ASSOCIATED WITH A MODERN NEWS DESK THAT IS NOT NECESSARY TO DISPENSE THE NEWS IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OR ATTRACT.
Tiger Woods: It’s a sad time in our lives:
He is accepting sadness as part and parcel of existence, sees nothing wrong when sadness is not to be dallied with, is to be expunged because it is like opium, addictive becoming more intense and easily aroused, harder to shake off that will end in death and torment. Here as everywhere else, he and emotional people have a wrong understanding or no understanding about the true nature of sadness.
SADNESS IS TO BE RECOGNIZED EVEN IN ITS MILD FORM AND TREATED AS A DEADLY AFFLICTION THAT IF ALLOWED TO FESTER WILL TURN MALIGNANT WITH TORMENTING CONSEQUENCES.
PEOPLE USE FORCE TO SUPPRESS AND ATTEMPT TO PUSH SADNESS OUT OF THEIR MINDS OR THEY FIND SOME DIVERSION LIKE SPORTS OR HOBBIES OR SEEK SOLACE IN ALCOHOLTO DIVERT THEIR ATTENTION BUT THAT IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE.
THE CORRECT APPROACH IS NEVER TO USE FORCE TO PROLONG YOUR SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION (TAI CHI IS ABOUT SLOW MOTION PROLONGATION OF ALL MOTIONS, A CURVED MOTION IS A PROLONGED VERSION OF A STRAIGHT MOTION). IF YOU NEVER TRAINED YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG AS IN STRETCHING SYLLABLES AND CURVING YOUR MOTIONS, PROLONGING YOUR GAZE OR STANCES WHEN THERE IS NO NEED, YOU CANNOT BE SAD. IT IS BECAUSE OF LIFELONG TRAINING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG THAT IT HAS AN AUTOMATIC URGE TO PROLONG THAT IT CAN BE TRIGGERED TO PROLONG IN FREE GEAR NOT DRIVING ANY SPEECH OR ACTION TO RESULT IN SADNESS THAT WILL DESCEND INTO DEPRESSION.
THE MAN WHO TREATS SADNESS AS A COBRA ON HIS BED IS THE WISE MAN WHO SEES TRULY.
Tiger Woods' ex-wife breaks silence
Tiger Woods' ex-wife Elin Nordegren says she went "through hell" after finding out about his affairs, in her first interview since getting divorced.
Only a person with strong self identity views that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe would experienced deep hurt, anger, agitation and sadness as a result of what happened and so she is heading for woe that may be as long as an eternity and anyone who sympathizes with her has wrong view or understanding that is not the path to heaven.
She too is an aggressive smiler who smiles to impress not please and so she is a tough aggressive lady married to a tough mean man.
No comments:
Post a Comment