Force is the drive of thinking not reason:
Emotional stylish people can stop talking but they cannot stop thinking.
The reason is because it is not reason or necessity or substance that is the basis of their ceaseless restless thinking but it is force that is the drive. They have many recorded sequences of thoughts in their mental jukeboxes that differ from person to person and their restless constantly activating mental force seizes on these pieces of recorded thoughts to activate or power them like a monkey jumping from branch to branch and this is controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable insanity the constantly thinking person does not realize.
THE PERSON WHO CAN STOP THINKING WILL ONLY THINK IF THERE IS A NEED TO THINK AND WHEN THERE IS A NEED TO THINK HE DEVOTES HIS FULL ATTENTION TO HIS THINKING, DOES NOT THINK WHILST HE IS EATING OR WALKING OR DRIVING. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THERE IS A NEED TO CONSTANTLY THINK AND CONSTANT THINKING REFLECTS SLAVERY DICTATED BY THE PERSON’S BLIND MENTAL FORCE THAT HE HAS SO WELL CONDITIONED TO ALWAYS ACTIVATE IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT HIS MENTAL FORCE CANNOT STOP AND SO WHEN HE IS IDLE THE MENTAL FORCE MUST FIND SOMETHING TO DO AND SO IT RESTLESSLY, AIMLESSLY POWERS NONSTOP THINKING.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THEN THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE TO SEEING. SEEING, YOU KNOW AND WHATEVER YOU DID NOT SEE YOU CAN NEVER KNOW BY THINKING AND SO THINKING IS NOT THE CORRECT TOOL FOR TRUE KNOWING.
Why neither liking nor disliking is higher than no thinking:
The Buddha said neither liking nor disliking is the third higher state, no thinking is the second, not the other way round, why is that so?
Just because you have stopped thinking does not mean your mental force is not and cannot be stirred attractively or repulsively by events.
If your mental force is not stirred attractively or repulsively how can it then be thinking which requires stirred mental force.
Without stirring mental force, a person cannot think and a person whose mental force is neither stirred attractively or repulsively has an inactive mental force that automatically means he can also not think and not thinking is the forebear or antecedent to neither liking nor disliking which is a higher state of the mind.
IN ORDER TO NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE YOUR MENTAL FORCE MUST BE INERT, NOT STIRRED AND THAT MEANS IT CANNOT BE THINKING OR THE PERSON IS CAPABLE OF NON THINKING. JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN STOP YOUR MENTAL FORCE STIRRING TO THINK DOES NOT MEAN YOUR MENTAL FORCE CANNOT BE STIRRED BY PROVOCATIVE EVENTS TO EITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE AND THEREFORE THE BUDDHA IS CORRECT IN SAYING NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING IS THE HIGHER MENTAL STATE COMPARED TO NO THINKING.
Why people’s mental force are constantly active:
If your mental force is constantly active and you don’t know whether it is or not or you perceive it is only sometimes active then you have false perception or you are a person who does know what he is doing and what is happening to him.
The truth is that the mental force of emotional people with style are constantly active only the intensity varies, not because it is the natural or normal unavoidable state but it is an abnormal state that will end in loss of control and torment first episodically then permanently.
THE MENTAL FORCE OF STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE IS ACTIVE ALL THE TIME AND IT IS NOT NORMAL NOR IS IT MANDATORY.
The reason why people’s mental forces are constantly active is because they are constantly falsely, unnecessarily stirring it to fashion style by prolonging, changing speed and strength and thus conditioned it has become permanently active.
WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY OR MEANINGLESS OR FOR SHOW DOES NOT REQUIRE REASON OR OCCASION TO OCCUR. WHATEVER DOES NOT REQUIRE REASON OR CAUSE OR OCCASION TO OCCUR CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME. WHATEVER CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME CAN OCCUR ALL THE TIME IF YOU KEEP WILLING IT TO OCCUR IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OR PLEASING OTHERS.
THUS BECAUSE STYLISH PEOPLE KEEP STIRRING THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO FABRICATE STYLE TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, THEIR MENTAL FORCES HAVE BEEN WELL CONDITIONED TO ALWAYS, CEASELESSLY, MEANINGLESS ACTIVATE.
THUS IT IS WRONG VIEW TO THINK IT IS NATURAL, IMMUTABLE AND BLAMELESS THAT A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVE. BECAUSE A CONSTANTLY ACTIVE MENTAL FORCE IS TORMENTING, IF YOU ACCEPT THE STATUS QUO THEN YOU ARE DOOMED, HEADED FOR TORMENT AS YOUR CEASELESSLY ACTIVE MENTAL FORCE EPISODICALLY AND FINALLY IRREVOCABLY DRIVE YOU UP THE WALL TO HOMICIDE OR SUICIDE.
Prolonging, changing speed and strength spreads like a cancer:
To say ‘aaahhh’ instead of ‘ah’ (which is itself meaningless, ‘ah’ denotes like or attracted or the attractive meaningless harmful stirring of his mental force), is to prolong the use of force to stretch the syllable pronounced.
There is a constant bombardment of the use of force to prolong in the speech and sounds made by others that tend to induce a person’s mental force to similarly prolong the use of force without any understanding or intelligence needed.
NO INTELLIGENCE OR UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED TO ‘LEARN’ TO PROLONG WITH ONE’S MENTAL FORCE, THE CONSTANT BOMBARDMENT OF PROLONGING IN THE SOUNDS MADE BY HUMANS AND ANIMALS IS AN INDUCEMENT TOO POTENT FOR MOST IF NOT ALL BEINGS HERE MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY, RESONANTLY PROLONG.
BECAUSE PROLONGING IS A LEARNT OR CONDITIONED WAY OF DOING SOMETHING, IT HAS A TENDENCY TO BECOME THE DEFAULT WAY SO THAT THIS TENDENCY TO PROLONG THE USE OF FORCE SOON SPREADS FROM AN ISOLATED EPISODE TO BECOME THE STANDARD OR DEFAULT WAY TO USE FORCE TO SEE (EG STARE ICILY), HEAR, SMELL (SNIFF OR PROLONG SMELLING WITH A SMILE WHEN HE SPIES GOOD FOOD), DO THINGS AND PRONOUNCE ALL SYLLABLES.
IN THE SAME WAY, TO CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WHEN SPEAKING, DOING THINGS, PERCEIVING (SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TOUCHING) IS A WAY OF USING FORCE THAT IS CHARACTERISTIC IN A PERSON AND DIFFERS FROM PERSON TO PERSON WHICH MEANS IT IS REPRODUCED FROM MEMORY OR A PROGRAMMING THAT HAS A TENDENCY TO SPREAD FROM ONE ISOLATED EPISODE OF CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH TO BECOMES THE DEFAULT OR STANDARD WAY OF PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS.
NOT ONLY CAN ALL BEINGS (HUMANS AND ANIMALS) HERE USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH, THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME IN AN INDIVIDUALLY DIFFERENT WAY AND NO INTELLIGENCE IS NEEDED BECAUSE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH FROM THE INCESSANT BOMBARDMENT OF OTHERS IN INTERACTION IS A POWERFUL, IRRESISTIBLE INDUCEMENT FOR THE BEING’S MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY DO SO BY ADOPTING A STYLE OF HIS OWN EITHER BY DIRECT COPY OR COBBLED FROM DIFFERENT PIECES OF STYLES FROM OTHERS THEY ADMIRE.
RATHER THAN FUN, HAVING STYLE IS A TRAP OF INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, WASTES PRODIGIOUS CUMULATIVE ENERGY AND MANDATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE IN WHICH ONE IS A PARROT.
Prolonging smelling & tasting:
When dogs (and indeed humans) sniff, they are attracted, their mental forces stirred, they sniff with accelerating speed and strength of drawing in of breath that can only occur in a prolonged act of breathing in. Thus there is constant acceleration of speed and strength through a prolonged in drawing of breath to smell for sniffing to occur.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A BUDDHA WILL SNIFF BECAUSE THAT IS DOING SOMETHING EVIL DRIVEN BY DESIRE OR GREED.
Similarly when a person spies aromatic foods cooking wafting in the air, he might smile in anticipation and draw in a deep or prolonged breath to capture as much as long of the smell as he can, again foolishly driven by greed or attraction for tasty food.
Again when people like their food, they may eat slowly, masticate with prolonging for longer periods to extract as much taste or pleasure as they can and this too is an episode of use of force to prolong that may escape their realization.
PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THEIR USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, THEY ARE DOING IT ALL THE TIME TO GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT DRIVEN BY GREED.
This too is prolonged:
Because the pope’s gesture is for show to be seen by others, he has to prolong it to allow others to see it and so this too is a form of prolonging and whoever you are, if you are training your mental force to prolong in the name of pleasing others, sadness is your reward that will descend to depression and then even suicide.
IF YOU THINK THE BUDDHA OR JESUS WILL MAKE A SIMILAR GESTURE YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED, HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN.
Speaking against the Holy Spirit:
Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the (Holy) Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
Jesus called the counselor the Holy Spirit and so there is a possibility (if not certainty) that just as Jesus and the Buddha (the Thus Come One) came, the Holy Spirit (but not God himself) will also come.
NO MATTER HOW GENTLY OR CORDIALLY (A MATTER OF STYLE NOT SUBSTANCE), IF YOU DISAGREE WITH SOMEONE YOU ARE SPEAKING AGAINST HIM AND EITHER BOTH OF YOU ARE WRONG OR ONE IS RIGHT NEVER BOTH RIGHT. THUS IF YOU SPEAK AGAINST ME AND I HAPPEN TO BE RIGHT THEN YOU ARE WRONG, NO MATTER HOW GENTLE, AND THERE IS A PRICE FOR WRONG VIEW WHICH IS HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you, and will be in you.
"These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
But when the Counselor comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. "I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear (understand) them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Blair: I may have been right
He is admitting he is not sure if he is right and so he is speaking without knowing what he said is right, a recipe for suffering in the future.
Unless you know something is true you are not entitled to say it and so you are asking for judgment and punishment sowing doubt and uncertainty in yourself and others saying what is meaningless, “I may been right” which implies you may also have been wrong, so what is the point of saying it?
BECAUSE THERE IS NO POINT IN SAYING YOU MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT WHICH IMPLIES YOU MAY ALSO BEEN WRONG, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF SHOW AND THAT IS THE RECIPE FOR FUTURE SUFFERING, NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE.
NO MAN OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL STATE HE MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT. YOU EITHER SEE YOU ARE RIGHT AND SAY YOU ARE RIGHT OR YOU WITHOLD.
What Blair may have meant:
What Blair may have meant that he did not say is that “You don’t know the truth and so I may have been right, therefore don’t condemn me prematurely”.
Did he say this? If he didn’t, he did not say what he meant.
“I may have been right” is not the same as “You don’t know the truth, it is anybody’s guess what is right or wrong and so I may be right, don’t condemn me”. Thus here as in many places people think they say what they mean and mean what they say but they don’t.
EVEN IF HE MEANT THAT, HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO SAY, "I MAY HAVE BEEN CORRECT" BECAUSE IT IMPLIES HE IS NOT SURE HIMSELF WHETHER HE IS RIGHT AND SO HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY HE MAY HAVE BEEN CORRECT.
A refutation without facts or truth:
What Blair said, “I may have been correct” is a refutation of others which implies they are wrong or cannot be sure they are right.
YOU CAN ONLY RIGHTLY REFUTE OTHERS WITH FACTS OR TRUTH, YOU CANNOT REFUTE OTHERS WITH SOMETHING YOU DO NOT KNOW IS TRUE WHICH IS IMPLIED BY THE ADMISSION YOU MAY HAVE BEEN CORRECT, NOT YOU ARE CORRECT.
THUS BLAIR IS FALSELY REFUTING OTHERS WITH SOMETHING THAT IS NOT TRUTH OR FACT AND SO HE IS SPEAKING UNRIGHTEOUSLY.
Anger leading to agitation:
He is angry even in a rage and because he cannot vent it, he has become agitated, another emotion in which his mental force is stirring in disarray.
IN ANGER OR RAGE, THE MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRING ORDERLY IN A REPULSIVE WAY BUT WHEN THE RAGE IS STIRRED TOO STRONGLY AND CANNOT BE VENTED, IT CAN LEAD TO ANOTHER EMOTION CALLED AGITATION OR CONFUSION AND IF UNCORRECTED THE FOOL IS HEADED FOR MAD EMOTION.
UNLESS HE EFFACED ALL EMOTIONS (POSSIBLE BUT UNLIKELY) HE IS HEADED FOR DOOM, TORMENT.
Pope’s great sadness for the (sexually) abused:
Sadness has no meaning, is bad for the person and others and so it reflects human delusion that they speak of the pope’s great sadness that implies sadness is meaningful and good, to be encouraged and experienced.
SADNESS WHEN GENUINE IS AN INVOLUNTARY AFFLICTION OF THE MIND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND THE PERSON AUTOMATICALLY STRUGGLES TO CONTAIN OR CONTROL OR EVEN SHAKE IT OFF. ALL SADNESS DESCENDING ON A MIND MUST BE CONTROLLED AND AT GREAT SADNESS THE PERSON IS STRUGGLING TO CONTROL OR IT REQUIRES GREAT EFFORT AND THREATENS LOSS OF CONTROL TO DESCEND INTO DEEP DARK DEPRESSION. THUS IF YOU ARE CAPABLE OOF GREAT SADNESS YOU ARE A MAN AT THE PRECIPICE IN DANGER OF FALLING INTO THE CHASM OF DEPRESSION AND THAT IS NEVER GOOD FOR YOU OR ANYBODY, SO WHAT IS THE USE OR MEANING OF TALKING ABOUT THE POPE’S GREAT SADNESS?
WHAT IS THE USE OF BEING SADNESS AND OF WHAT GOOD OR BENEFIT CAN IT BRING? WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS TO USE CALM CLEAR THINKING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS WRONG, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WRONG AND TO UNDERTAKE IF POSSIBLE MEASURES TO RECTIFY THOSE WRONGS. IF IMPOSSIBLE, ALL THE SADNESS WILL DO NOTHING.
Fools are eager to be ‘great’ leaders but they may be accruing terrible karma with everlasting suffering even for eons.
The Buddha spoke of hells of different intensities of suffering and durations and the deepest hells have life spans of many eons and it is here than many leaders like Mao, Stalin or Hitler may find themselves.
ßBhikkhu, the life span in the Paduma hell is difficult to enumerate, as it is this amount of years, or this amount of hundred years, or this amount of thousand years, or this amount o hundred thousand years.
ßVenerable sir, could a comparison be given?
ßBhikkhu, a comparison could be given. Bhikkhu, there is a man with twenty cart loads of sesame.by the Kosala measure. He throws out one seed of sesame at the end of a hundred years and throws another, at the end of another hundred years. In this manner the twenty cart loads of sesame would finish and come to an end but not the span of, one Abuda hell.
Bhikkhu, twenty of these Abuda hell spans is equal to one Nirabbuda hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Nirabbuda hell spans is equal to one Ababa hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Ababa hell spans is equal to one Atata hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Atata hell spans is equal to one Ahaha hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Ahaha hell spans is equal to one Kumudu hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Kumudu hell spans is equal to one Sogandhika hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Sogandhika hell spans is equal to one Uppalaka hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Uppalaka hell spans is equal to one Pundirika hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Pundirika hell spans is equal to one Paduma hell span. Bhikkhu, the bhikkhu Kokalika fell into the Paduma hell for developing an unpleasant mind towards Sàriputta and Moggallàna. The Blessed One further said:
ßTo man a dagger is born in the mouth, saying evil words with it,
The fool destroys himself, by praising the blameworthy,
Blaming the praiseworthy. He choses bad luck and does not feel pleasant.
A gambler losing all his wealth and himself, is nothing compared to
Developing a defiled mind towards well gone ones.
Blaming noble ones, with defiled words and thoughts causes births in,
Hundred thousand Nirabbuda hells and five sixty hundred Abbuda hells.
If the Buddha is right you are in big trouble:
Jesus said even the man who calls his brother ‘you fool’ is in danger of the fire of hell. The Buddha tells you that he can think of nothing more tormenting then hell or the animal womb and you can languish in hell for many eternities of billions of years for misdeeds.
And so if you think nothing, think you cannot languish in hell for billions of years and it turns out this is so and you have done wrong, then you are in big trouble.
Authenticating your guru, preacher, teacher:
There is a simple test you can apply to the guru, preacher or teacher you worship or look up to, to determine whether he is authentic or a fake.
The Buddha said he is the highest teacher, teacher of men & gods and no one is fit to be his teacher. At the heart of his teaching or the goal of his teaching is attainment of the higher states of the mind and it is said that when he passed away, he rose from the first to the fourth higher state, descended again to the first to then rise back to the fourth and he then passed away with rolling thunder in heaven and on earth.
Thus the sine qua non of true religious life or the litmus test of a teacher’s holiness is his attainment of the higher states of mind. No preacher ‘worth his salt’ has failed to attain any of the higher states of mind the Buddha described. There are no higher states of mind except those delineated by the Buddha, if there are others, being all seeing and knowing, he would have stated them.
If you truly understood the Buddha you would have understood that before you can attain the 2nd, 3rd or 4th higher states of mind you must first achieve and be consummate in the 1st higher state namely serenity of mind and body and that means no style or use of force to stretch, change speed and strength that gives rise to insoluble stress that renders impossible true serenity of mind and body.
Thus any religious teacher who is true must at least manifest the first higher state of mind, without the first higher state of mind he is preaching like the emperor with no clothes, disqualified himself.
THUS IF A RELIGIOUS TEACHER SPEAKS WITH CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS (SOMETHING THAT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY, INDISPUTABLY DETERMINED BY THE DISCERNING), IS EMOTIONAL AND EXPRESSES HIS LIKES AND DISLIKES, HE HAS NOT ATTAINED EVEN THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND HE HAS NOT ATTAINED ANY OF THE FRUITS OF THE TRUE RELIGIOUS LIFE, NAMELY THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND.
THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS SIMPLY SERENITY OF MIND AND BODY WITH DISCURSIVE THINKING AND THAT MEANS NO STYLE, NO USE OF FORCE TO UNNECESSARILY STRETCH SYLLABLES (EG ‘AAAAHHHH’ INSTEAD OF ‘AH’), CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS SIMPLY THE FULLY CONSCIOUS CESSATION OF THINKING LEADING TO A ONE POINTED OR UNIFIED MIND.
THE THIRD HIGHER STATE IS SIMPLY THE NON ATTRACTIVE OR REPULSIVE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE ANYTHING HAPPENING.
THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS SIMPLY THE TUNING OF HIS CONSCIOUSNESS TO ELIMINATE ALL RECEPTION OF PAIN AND PLEASURE.
THUS IF YOU HEAR YOUR RELIGIOUS TEACHER TALKING FULL OF STYLE AND YET YOU THINK HE IS AUTHENTIC, WORTHY OF YOUR WORSHIP, YOU ARE DELUDED, HAS NO DISCERNMENT.
Only a fool deals with people they know are crooks:
There are those who think they are very smart or shrewd, they think they can do business with people they know or suspect as crooks or untrustworthy without harm or losses to themselves.
It is never reason or true understanding that is the basis of people electing to do business with individuals they deem as crooks but it is greed for gain with the delusion that they can somehow eat puffer fish without being poisoned.
When someone has elected to do business or associate with someone they see as crooks, they have already overridden their good judgment in favour of material considerations and thus delivered themselves into the arms of harm and loss. It is his delusion that he can be careful and avoid being bitten by the cobra.
IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE IS UNTRUSTWORTHY OR A CROOK AND YET YOU CONSORT WITH HIM ON AN ‘IMPERSONAL’ BUSINESS LEVEL, YOU HAVE ALREADY LOST, DELIVERED YOURSELF, EVEN YOUR HEAD ON A PLATTER BECAUSE YOU HAVE OVERRIDEN YOUR GOOD JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MATERIAL GAINS, NEGATED GOOD JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF BAD JUDGMENT (CONSORTING WITH A CROOK) THAT IS A MOULD FOR FUTURE COMPROMISING YOURSELF THAT SOONER OR LATER WILL RESULT IN LOSSES AND EVEN DEATH FOR YOU.
NEVER COMPROMISE YOURSELF, IT IS THE PATH TO RUIN AND EVEN DEATH.
Musa’s last sermon at Bukit Aman:
The retiring IGP did not give a sermon but it was a speech and so anyone who perceived it as a sermon is falsifying and headed for suffering.
The motive for calling a speech a sermon is to make much of it, to mock and that is evil, driven by emotion never understanding.
HE THINKS HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH AND PEOPLE THINK THEY READ THE TRUTH BUT IT IS FAR FROM THE TRUTH, A FALSIFICATION WITH FUTURE SUFFERING DUE THE CORRUPTING OR PERVERTING FOOL.
So you see, my dear Najib:
RPK: So you see, my dear Najib, if we really want to be non-extremist then there is much we need to change.
What is wrong with what is said?
No one has the right to tell others they see, ‘so you see’ and so he is speaking falsely presumptuously that has consequences in suffering to him.
It cannot be sincere to address Najib as ‘my dear’ and so it is sarcastic or hypocritical.
IT DOES NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO DISCERN WHAT I SAY BUT IT REQUIRES TRUE UNDERSTANDING. IF YOU READ AND FEEL UNEASY OR IT STIRS EMOTION IN YOU AND YOU DO NOT KNOW WHY THEN YOU ARE A PERSON WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE READS.
FURTHER HE IS NOT TRULY TALKING TO NAJIB BUT SPEAKING AS IF HE IS TALKING TO NAJIB AND THAT IS DEADLY MAKE BELIEVE.
Chairs fly at DAP meeting:
“Chairs fly at DAP meeting” is a way of perceiving or describing an event and it is false, styled to sensationalize or stir emotion. Chairs do not fly and therefore it false. It is correct to say “chairs thrown at meeting” but to say they flew is to sensationalize it that has suffering even insanity pending for the exaggerating fool.
As the Buddha said, “So Kalamas, don't go by reports, legends, traditions or scripture. When you know for yourselves that, 'These qualities are unskillful; blameworthy; criticized by the wise; these qualities, when undertaken lead to harm & to suffering' -- then you should abandon them.”
IF YOU ARE DISCERNING, NO ATHEIST CAN CRUSH YOUR TRADITIONS. IF YOU ARE UNDISCERNING THEN IT POINTLESS TELLING YOU NOT TO LET ATHEISTS CRUSH YOUR TRADITIONS. THEN AGAIN, TRADITIONS ARE PROGRAMS THAT PEOPLE FOLLOW ROBOTICALLY WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING.
Traditions are not objects that can be crushed and it reflects a predilection for force not reason to speak of 'crushing'.
What to advise others:
Rather than preach about not letting atheists crush your traditions that stir emotions and attacks atheists, you should advise people about true virtues like not taking what is not given, not lying or talking frivolously, not taking life, not drinking or gambling.
THERE IS NOTHING INTRINSICALLY VIRTUOUS ABOUT TRADITIONS AND ANYONE WHO FOLLOWS TRADITIONS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING IS A ROBOT. IF YOU HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GO BY TRADITIONS. THUS IF YOU WANT TO GIVE ADVICE THAT CREATES MERIT FOR YOU, YOU SHOULD TALK ABOUT CULTIVATING VIRTUES AND PROVIDE OTHERS WITH INSIGHT.
What is teaching?
The Buddha said he is the highest teacher, the teacher of men and gods.
Jesus said the counsellor will teach you all things. He will dwell with you (live amongst you) and he will not speak on his own authority but whatever he hears he will speak.
So the primary if not sole mission of the counsellor is to teach.
Teaching is the imparting of knowledge that the recipient does not possess but is capable of receiving or understanding through written or spoken words.
Knowledge is no use if it is false or unessential and so meaningful teaching is about transmission of knowledge that is true, reflects reality and is important or helpful or leads a being in suffering out of suffering.
The best or supreme knowledge is useless if the recipient is unable to understand and so the second requisite for teaching is the ability of the listener to understand and then it is up to him to accept and put to practice if practice or discipline is required to exit the morass of suffering that is this world.
THE MISSION OF THE COUNSELOR AS STATED BY JESUS IS TO TEACH.
TEACHING IS THE TRANSMISSION OF KNOWLEDGE THAT IS TRUE AND USEFUL THAT THE RECIPIENT DOES NOT POSSESS (IF HE ALREADY HAS THE KNOWLEDGE THEN IT IS SENSELESS TO TALK OF TEACHING) AND IT IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF THE RECIPIENT IS CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS TAUGHT AND THENCE TO PUT THE KNOWLEDGE TO PRACTICE IF NECESSARY.
THUS IF THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED USING FORCE TO UNNECESSARILY STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT LEADS TO SELF AND OTHER STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE APART FROM GENERATING HARMFUL SADNESS, HURT & CONFUSION THAT WILL END IN TORMENT FOR THE PERSON AND YOU ARE PERPETRATING IT ALL THE TIME AND SEE NOTHING WRONG, THEN WHAT A TEACHER CAN DO IS POINT IT OUT TO YOU. THE REST IS UP TO YOU TO UNDERSTAND, TO DISCERN, TO SEE, AS THERE IS, CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND PUT TO A STOP IF YOU CAN TO EXPERIENCE AN EFFORTLESS RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
Pope apologizes for abuse:
The pope should not apologize for the abuses which were not committed by the church but individuals representing the church.
Instead if the church had been guilty of laxity in not controlling or supervising such criminal staff and was even involved in covering up and allowing such crimes to continue, the church should specifically apologize for that and ask for forgiveness and pay compensation.
IT WAS NOT THE CHURCH THAT ABUSED THESE CHILDREN AND SO THE CHURCH SHOULD NOT APOLOGIZE FOR THE ABUSES BUT IF THE CHURCH HAD BEEN NEGLIGENT AND EVEN PERMISSIVE AND COVERED UP THEN IT SHOULD ADMIT AND APOLOGIZE FOR BEING NEGLIGENT, PERMISSIVE AND COVERING UP.
A man of reason treats each piece of advice on its merit and reject or accept accordingly.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH LEE THAT HIS ADVICE IS NOT NEEDED? YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO BE PREJUDICED, TO REJECT ADVICE BY PERSON RATHER THAN BY MERIT. THE DESTINATION FOR SUCH EMOTIONAL OUTBURST IS INSANITY AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
The pope’s shame and not coming clean:
The pope is said to have expressed his deep shame at the abuses perpetrated.
You may perceive that the church has come clean but that may be wrong perception, the truth and admission has been evaded.
Shame is the hurt a person feels when a desirable or attractive image or prestige that he cultivates has been dented or destroyed. Shame is about self indulgence, it is all about self, upholding and hurt when self or its upholding has been deflated, it does nothing for the grief or wrong suffered by victims.
OK YOU ARE DEEPLY SHAMED, WHAT ARE YOU DOING OR IS BEING DONE FOR THE WRONGED?
WHAT IS REQUIRED IS TO SPELL OUT EXACTLY WHAT THE CHURCH’S ROLE WAS IN THE CRIME, WAS IT PERMISSIVE AND DID IT TAKE STEPS TO COVER UP? WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS TO SPELL OUT TO THE PUBLIC EXACTLY WHAT THE CHURCH DID WRONG, ENSURE THAT IT IS STOPPED AND TO MAKE SOME REPARATIONS TO THE VICTIMS IN THE FORM OF APOLOGY AND ASKING FOR FORGIVENESS.
If you have done another wrong, caused another hurt or even death, you will have to repay in some form of suffering even if you felt shame or remorse unless the person forgives you and then you may be discharged from having to repay in suffering for your offense.
THUS EXPRESSING SHAME ANDD SORROW IS SELF INDULGENCE AND AVOIDING TAKING RESPONSIBILITY. WHAT IS NEEDED IS TO SEE AND ADMIT EXACTLY WHAT THE CHURCH’S ROLE WAS AND ENSURE THAT WRONG IS NOT COMMITTED AGAIN IN THE FUTURE, TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS FOR WHAT WAS DONE WRONG.
Rational & emotional repentance:
There is rational repentance based on fully understanding what wrong was done and thus truly understanding, to take steps to ensure it never happens again.
There is emotional repentance based on blind force in which one is deeply sorry and ashamed without clearly seeing and admitting what wrong has happened and what steps are proposed to ensure the wrong does not happen in the future.
No matter how intense your sorrow or shame, it does not address or assuage the pain or trauma suffered by victims of child abuse perpetrated by priests under the jurisdiction of the church. Sorrow and shame is about upholding self or self centred. What is meaningful is to calmly unemotionally examine and make known to self and the public exactly what went wrong allowing such priests to abuse so extensively in different countries for so long that may even now be going on.
THE CHURCH DID NOT ABUSE THE CHILDREN, CERTAIN PRIESTS DID AND SO THE CHURCH SHOULD SPELL OUT EXACTLY ITS ROLE IN PERMITTING SUCH ABUSES TO OCCUR AND THUS SPELLING OUT PUBLICLY AND THEREFORE FULLY UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM TO TAKE STEPS TO ENSURE IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN.
IF YOU NEVER SAW AND UNDERSTOOD WHAT TRULY HAPPENED THEN NO MATTER HOW DEEPLY ASHAMED OR SORROWFUL, IT IS LIKELY THE CRIME WILL OCCUR AGAIN BECAUSE HOW CAN YOU CORRECT WHAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND?
IT TAKES A TRUE MAN TO ADMIT EXACTLY WHAT HE DID WRONG RATHER THAN SWEEP IT UNDER THE CARPET OF SHAME AND SORROW REFUSING TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE WRONG WHICH MEANS THE FIRE CAN RISE FROM THE AMBERS AGAIN.
NO MATTER HOW DEEP YOUR PAIN AND SHAME, IT DOES NOT COMPARE AND DOES NOTHING TO ASSUAGE THE TRAUMA OF VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES AND SO YOUR DUTY IS TO ENSURE IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN RATHER THAN BEAT YOUR CHEST. THEREAFTER YOU CAN ASK FOR FORGIVENESS AND INTITUTE MATERIAL COMPENSATION IF DEMANDED.
YOU SEE THE CHURCH COMING CLEAN, I SEE OBFUSCATION, EVASION.
I must be a genius:
Unless you perceive what I say as worthless, if you think they are uncommonly insightful, I must be a genius if I fabricated them entirely by myself or I must have access to some form of divine inspiration that appears to be denied others. If there are I things I hear in my mind that others do not, then I must be of some nobility to hear them where others do not. If I fabricated all I said myself which accords with what the Buddha who says he is the highest teacher said, then I must be a genius of truth.
Badawi should speak for himself than Malaysia:
If it is true Badawi said, “Malaysia does not need Lee’s advice” then he is foolishly putting his head on the chopping board speaking for Malaysia. No one authorized him to speak for Malaysia and so he is arrogant to speak thus. A man of true reason treats each Lee advice on a case by case basis and rejects accordingly, he does not blanket reject Lee’s advice which is a sign of a bigot. Badawi has proven himself as a bigot not just here but always, whatever tolerance he speaks is hypocritical. If things are in favour of him, the hypocritical man is all tolerant, when it is disadvantageous, he turns bigot.
Again RPK was false to say, “My dear Najib”. Najib is not his and if he is his, he has self identity views.
EVEN YOUR WIFE MAY NOT BE TRULY YOURS BECAUSE SHE IS AN INDEPENDENT PERSON AND MAY HAVE OTHER LIASONS AND SO IT IS A FOOL WHO WILL GO AROUND TELLING OTHERS OF HIS THIS AND THAT.
The hazards of speaking for Malaysia:
As an elected official, the PM has a right to speak for Malaysia but the weight of responsibility is far greater than the ‘privilege’ perceived by the fool. As an elected representative for Malaysia you can speak for Malaysia but if what you say is reckless or false, goes beyond your right then you are asking for judgment whose punishment may be far worse than whatever glory you enjoy speaking thus.
Clever cars mean safer driving:
COMPUTERS ARE RIGID AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING AT ALL AND IT IS DANGEROUS EVEN FATAL TO RELY ON COMPUTERS. A FEW TIMES MY GARMIN NAVIGATOR LED ME THROUGH VIRTUALLY IMPASSABLE KAMPUNG AND ESTATE ROADS (BECAUSE IT IS THERE AND SHORTER) WHEN IT IS SANER TO TAKE A MAIN ROAD AND REPEATEDLY IT DIRECTED ME TO USE THE TRAFFIC LIGHT CONTROLLED JUNCTIONS WHEN THE OVERHEAD BYPASS THOUGH FRACTIONALLY LONGER IS FASTER.
THUS ANYONE WHO TOUTS CLEVER CARS MEANS SAFER DRIVING IS A FOOL. I PREFER TO TRUST MY JUDGMENT THAT CAN BE FLEXIBLE TO FIT THE OCCASION.
Once I was locked out of my clever car:
For some reason, my car activated the auto lock when I got down to open the gate. Luckily I was at home with a spare key nearby, imagine the disaster if I was outstation with no spare key. Till this day, I remember to keep the door ajar if the engine is running in case the car or its computers decides to play tricks on me.
Again, for no apparent reason, many times the wipers automatically activated even indoors.
AND SO IT MAY BE THAT COMPUTERIZED CARS ARE NOT WITHOUT DANGERS AND ANYONE SINGING THEIR PRAISES EITHER DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SPEAKS OR IS DELUDED.
Clever plane means you die:
What may have happened with the French Airbus crash is that because one of the pitot speed censor tube was blocked by ice, it signalled the plane was stalling and this caused the computers to lower the flaps to maximum to increase lift and boosted engine power to increase thrust.
BECAUSE THE PLANE WAS NOT STALLING BUT FLYING AT GREAT SPEED THE COMBINATION OF LOWERED FLAPS AND MAXIMAL ENGINE POWER MAY PROVE FATAL, THE FLAPS COULD NOT STAND THE STRESS AND THUS BROKE LEAVING THE PLANE UNFLYABLE.
IF THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, YOU CAN SEE ‘CLEVER PLANES MEANS YOU DIE NOT SAFER FLYING’.
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF DARING OR NOT DARING TO SACK HIM BUT WHETHER HE HAS DONE WRONG OR INFRINGE PARTY REGULATIONS AND SO TO CHALLENGE SOMEONE TO SACK YOU IF THEY DARE IS TO CHALLENGE AS IF YOU ARE SO GREAT OR UNSACKABLE. THUS WHATEVER THE MATTER, HE IS FOOLISHLY COURTING PAINFUL KARMA.
How come no one speaks like me?
It should not be beyond the ability of reasonably intelligent people to say that it is not a matter of daring or not daring to sack someone but what is relevant is whether he has committed an offense that renders him at risk of being sacked. Because daring is not applicable, is a false reason for sacking anyone, anyone who dares another to sack him is practicing controlled insanity that will end in insanity. When you dare someone you are challenging him to do something or intimidating him. Because daring is a wrong reason to sack you, you are challenging him to sack you for wrong reasons that will end in his insanity and so you have karma asking others to do things for wrong reasons.
DARING SOMEONE TO DO SOMETHING IS NEVER BORNE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS DRIVEN BY FORCE TO CHALLENGE OR INTIMIDATE. BECAUSE IT IS A FALSE REASON, THE PERSON WILL GO MAD AND BECAUSE HE ENCOURAGES OTHERS TO ACT FOR FALSE REASONS, HE HAS KARMA.
IS WHAT I SAY SO DIFFICULT OR HARD TO PERCEIVE OR SUBLIME THAT IT IS BEYOND THE CAPABILITY OF ANYONE TO THINK OF IT?
Sack you just because you dare him?
By asking (challenging) someone to sack you if they dare, you are asking someone to do something just because they are challenged or intimidated and that is not a rational cause for action and therefore you are asking others to act for irrational reasons that will end in their insanity and that is karma.
IF YOU DON'T WANT SOMEONE TO SACK YOU BECAUSE YOU DARED HIM, WHY DO YOU DARE HIM?
The stone that builders have discarded:
What I say may be false or trivial or it may be as Jesus said, the stone that you the builder discarded and this discarded stone has become the top of the corner stone (a very important or paramount stone) and when it falls on them it will crush them and when they trip on this stone they will be shattered to pieces.
THIS VERY STONE (TRUTH & GOODNESS) THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DISCARDED WILL CRUSH THEM WHEN IT FALLS ON THEM AND THEY WILL BE SHATTERED WHEN THEY TRIP AND FALL ON THIS STONE.
Why people cannot say what I say:
There are two reasons why people can never say what I say as can be objectively determined; no one says the things I say.
First and foremost it is proof they are all complete robots. A robot can never say or do things it is not programmed to say even when it is possible to say or do it. For instance, if Microsoft computers were not programmed to say ‘welcome’ it will not say ‘welcome’ even when it is possible to say so but if it has been programmed to say ‘welcome’ it will always say so even when it is possible not to say so.
There is a vast pool of programming of what to think and thus say but it never includes the things I say and because people are not programmed to say the things I say and they are through and through robots, they can never say what I say even when it is possible to say so.
Secondly, you require true wisdom to say what I say and people lack true wisdom because they lack true concentration.
According to the Buddha, without true virtue (not telling lies, taking what is not given, gossiping, divisive speech, taking life) you cannot have great concentration and without great concentration you cannot have great wisdom.
And so it starts with paucity of true virtue leading to paucity of concentration that precludes great wisdom which is necessary to say the things I say.
The Buddha:
"Such and such (cannot be disputed, is objective) is virtue; such and such is concentration and wisdom. Great becomes the fruit, great is the gain of concentration when fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes the fruit& gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration. Utterly freed from lust, becoming, and ignorance is the mind that is fully developed in wisdom."
WITHOUT GENUINE VIRTUE YOU CANNOT HAVE GREAT CONCENTRATION, WITHOUT GREAT CONCENTRATION YOU CANNOT HAVE GREAT WISDOM.
IF YOU THINK THERE IS A NEED OR ESSENTIAL TO INFORM OTHERS YOU ARE AN UNBELIEVER IN IPAD WHEN IT IS DRIVEN BY MOTIVE (INTENTION IS KARMA THE BUDDHA SAID), THEN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS.
IT IS AN ADMISSION OF PREJUDICE; THAT YOU CAN DISMISS A PRODUCT BEFORE EVEN TRYING IT AND ON TRYING YOU WERE WON OVER.
THE PURPOSE IS TO EXAGGERATE HOW MARVELLOUS IPAD IS BUT WHAT IT SAYS IS THAT THE PERSON IS NOT AN OPEN MINDED PERSON BUT AFFLICTED BY PREJUDICES.
What has belief and disbelief got to do with iPad?
You either, having used or examined it carefully, see and know iPad to be good, extremely good or bad, why should anyone believe or unbelieve in iPad?
TO BELIEVE IS TO USE FORCE TO ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE WHILST TO DISBELIEVE IS TO USE FORCE TO NOT ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE, SINCE YOU CAN SEE AND KNOW WHAT THE IPAD IS BY TRYING IT OUT, WHY SHOULD ANYONE DISBELIEVE OR BELIEVE IN THE IPAD?
BECAUSE IT IS SILLY TO BELIEVE OR DISBELIEVE WHAT YOU CAN KNOW BY TRYING THE IPAD YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.
THERE IS NO NEED TO BELIEVE OR DISBELIEVE THE IPAD, JUST TRY IT OUT.
Teaching is the highest miracle:
According to the Buddha (and therefore it must be true), teaching is not only a miracle but it is the highest miracle and it reflects your wrong view here as everywhere that you think little or nothing of teaching.
Supernatural powers like flying through the air, walking on water and through walls, the ability to create bread out of nothing and make things disappear, to see into the future and past are miracles but according to the Buddha, teaching is the highest miracle as it is of benefit to others.
Supernatural powers are a person’s possession and do not directly benefit others but teaching when successfully benefit others.
TEACHING IS A MIRACLE, SO SAYS THE BUDDHA AND IT IS THE HIGHEST MIRACLE. THE FACT THAT YOU DON’T THINK TEACHING IS A MIRACLE OR YOU RATE OTHER MIRACLES (EG COMPUTERS) FAR HIGHER REFLECTS YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION HERE AS EVERYWHERE YOU THINK YOUR PERCEPTION IS TRUE, REFLECTS REALITY.
Why teaching is the highest miracle:
Jesus can heal the sick, make the blind see and bring the dead alive. He can create unlimited bread to feed a crowd. These are miracles but it is a power that belongs to Jesus and not others and whilst it can benefit others, it is restricted to the infirm and dead that he helped and so long as these people do not repent, their actions are going to lead them to future suffering and death.
Because ordinary people are suffering even to tormenting levels and headed for insanity and even another eternity of perdition, if you can teach the person and he succeeds in understanding so that he is able to walk the path to safety then, according to the Buddha, supernatural powers will become his possession in due course, he will be able to fly in the air, walk on water, walk through a wall, touch the sun and moon, know the past and the future are in the nature of things the possessions of those who are noble and so teaching is the highest miracle in the sense that it converts a suffering ignorant doomed being into a non suffering knowing being headed for safety for whom all the other supernatural powers or miracles will automatically become his possession in the nature of things.
I CAN BRING YOU, THE DEAD, ALIVE BY A MIRACULOUS POWER BUT SO LONG AS YOU REMAIN A SINNER AND IGNORANT YOU ARE GOING TO DIE NOT JUST ONCE BUT EVEN FOR COUNTLESS TIMES. BUT SHOULD I TEACH YOU AND YOU UNDERSTAND, YOU CAN HEAD FOR THE DEATHLESS, FOR HEAVEN AND EVEN THE PERMANENT DEATHLESS DESTINATION, NIBBANA.
IT IS NOT WITHOUT REASON OR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE BUDDHA SAID TEACHING IS THE HIGHEST MIRACLE BUT IT IS WITH REASON AND UNDERSTANDING.
In a nutshell:
Whatever supernatural powers or miracles there are will automatically be your possession once you have been successfully converted by the miracle of teaching from an ignorant, sinning, deluded, stressed, tormented being destined even for insanity and thence an eternity of weeping and gnashing of teeth to a knowing, sin free, discerning unstressed being destined for safety even for many eternities in heaven.
Without the miracle of teaching you can only marvel vicariously second hand at the supernatural powers and bliss of others.
Not teaching but programming:
WHAT PEOPLE CALL TEACHING IS NOT TEACHING BUT PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAMMING MUST NOT BE MISTAKEN FOR TEACHING.
An important reason why people here are blasé or think humdrum about teaching is because what they call teaching, what teaching they experience here is not teaching at all but programming.
Programming is laborious indoctrinating, memorizing and rehashing from memorizing indoctrinated programs that is not teaching.
Those bible study sessions are not teaching sessions but programming sessions. When people go for job training they are not going for true teaching but programming.
IN PROGRAMMING THERE ARE INSTRUCTIONS OR PROGRAMMING THAT YOU MUST MEMORIZE BY REPETITION AND ONCE PROGRAMMED YOU RETRIEVE AS NEEDED TO APPLY TO SITUATIONS. THIS IS NOT TEACHING BUT PROGRAMMING.
IN TRUE TEACHING, KNOWLEDGE IS IMPARTED AND YOU DISCERN THUS KNOW.
THUS IF IT IS TRUE THERE IS CONSTANT PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF OTHERS THEN IF YOU HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TAUGHT, YOU ARE CONVERTED FROM A PERSON WHO DID NOT SEE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE PAST TO A PERSON WHO NOW SEES AND UNDERSTANDS AND THEREFORE CAN PUT TO A STOP TO IT AND EXPERIENCE RELEASE FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE.
WHAT PEOPLE CALL TEACHING IS NOT TEACHING BUT PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAMMING MUST NOT BE MISTAKEN FOR TEACHING.
Jesus says you can move a mountain:
Jesus said that if you have faith as little as a mustard seed you can tell a mountain to move and it shall be done.
Thus whatever supernatural powers and miracles may be yours to perform if you are a sinless master of yourself and so if you were incapable of transforming yourself from sinner to sinless and I were to teach you so then teaching is the highest miracle because it leads the way to obtaining all the other miracles by yourself.
Faked delight:
He is doing a lot of work with his facial muscles and showing his teeth but it is for show to impress (not please) others that he is delighted or liking it. Such delight is always faked and a person who can fake is not to be trusted.
EVEN IF DELIGHT IS GENUINE IT IS MEANINGLESS STRESSFUL ENERGY WASTING ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE. PEOPLE CAN FAKE INTEREST TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS AND WHAT HE IS DOING IS FAKED, NOT ONCE BUT MANY TIMES IN THE PAST AND SUCH A PERSON IS A DANGEROUS MAN TO TRUST.
Calculating is the way to suffering:
The Buddha had spoken about being calculating as the way to woe not heaven.
Calculating requires self identity views, someone (self or family) to benefit materially as opposed to others and it is a robotic plan that is conditioning so that increasingly the person becomes addicted to being calculating that will end in torment, loss of control and mad calculating.
CALCULATING IS NEVER A VIRTUE BUT A VICE THAT IS TORMENTING, ADDICTIVE SO THAT IT BECOMES MADDER AND MADDER AND WILL END IN TORMENT AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN. CALCULATING IS A RULE THAT IN ANY SITUATION YOU ACT IN A WAY THAT FAVORS YOU MATERIALLY IN MINIMIZING LOSSES AND MAXIMIZING GAINS.
THE actual figure of the US' national debt is much higher than the official sum of $US13.4 trillion ($14.3 trillion) given by the Congressional Budget Office, according to analysts cited on Sunday by the New York Post.
"The Government is lying about the amount of debt. It is engaging in Enron accounting," said Laurence Kotlikoff, an economist at Boston University and co-author of The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future.
"The problem is we're seeing an explosion in spending," added Andrew Moylan, director of government affairs for the National Taxpayers Union.
In 1980, the debt - the accumulated red ink incurred by the Federal Government - was $US909 billion.
This represented some 33 per cent of gross domestic product, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
Thirty years later, based on this year's second-quarter numbers, the CBO said the debt was $US13.4 trillion, or 92 per cent of GDP.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
The CBO estimates the debt will be at $US16.5 trillion in two years, or 100.6 per cent of GDP.
But these numbers are incomplete.
They do not count off-budget obligations such as required spending for Social Security and Medicare, whose programs represent a balloon payment for the Government as more Americans retire and collect benefits.
In the case of Social Security, beginning in 2016, the US Government will be paying out more than it is collecting in taxes.
Without basic measures - such as payment cuts or higher payroll taxes - the system could be on the road to bankruptcy, according to officials.
"Without changes," wrote Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue, "by 2037 the Social Security Trust Fund will be exhausted. There will be enough money only to pay about $US0.76 for each dollar of benefits."
Mr Kotlikoff and Mr Moylan agree US national debt is much more than the official $US13.4 trillion number, but they disagree over how to add up the exact number.
Mr Kotlikoff says the debt is actually $US200 trillion.
Mr Moylan says the number is likely about $US60 trillion.
That is close to the figure quoted by David Walker, the US Comptroller General from 1998 to 2008. He launched a campaign to convince Americans that the federal spending and debt is a greater threat than terrorism.
But whichever figure is accurate, all three agree that the problem has worsened in the last few years.
They say it is because Congress and the Administration, whether Republican or Democrat, consistently overspend.
Not stirred:
I was watching TV on my computer and I was aware how steady my mind is that it is not stirred by the images and activities flickering on screen and how wonderfully peaceful and free of suffering it is compared to the past when my mind was stirred and disturbed by what I saw.
IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING TO HAVE YOUR MENTAL FORCE STIRRED BY WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR TO LIKE OR DISLIKE OR BE DISTURBED, IT IS WONDERFULLY PEACEFUL AND FREE OF SUFFERING TO BE NOT STIRRED BY WHATEVER IS HAPPENING.
PEOPLE CANNOT HELP BEING STIRRED BY WHAT THEY SEE BECAUSE THEY HAVE WELL CONDITIONED THEMSELVES TO BE STIRRED AND WITHOUT CONCERTED EFFORT TO TRAIN THEMSELVES NOT BE STIRRED THEY WILL NOT ESCAPE THE MIRE OF BEING STIRRED AND DISTURBED BY THINGS.
The wind parted the Red Sea?
The fact that the story that computer simulations suggest the wind could have parted the Red Sea for Jewish slaves to cross received widespread coverage on major news sites including BBC & Reuters indicate the extent of human delusion.
Since you were not there to witness, you either believe the biblical miracle or you do not, to postulate that the wind scientifically did it is impossible or very nearly so.
If the wind did it, it must be a freak occurrence and for it to occur at the opportune time to enable to Jews to cross but drown the pursuing Egyptians is itself miraculous notwithstanding that a parting by the wind would likely leave pools and puddles that will impede if not render impossible any physical crossing by a mass of people. On the other hand if God parted the sea it is likely to be dry as normal land.
It is unlikely if the wind could part the sea and part it for long enough for a mass of people to cross at a time when they needed to cross.
Have you tried crossing a mud bed?
Notwithstanding that the wind would be very strong or howling that would make it difficult to cross, a natural parting would produce a wet if not mud strewn surface which would make any crossing a struggle apart from pools of water.
THE FACT THEY WOULD DO COMPUTER SIMULATIONS AND THE STORY IS TAKEN UP BY SO MANY NEWSITES REFLECTS THE EXTENT OF HUMAN DELUSION AND GULLIBILITY.
I don’t understand:
When people say they don’t understand something said to them they are speaking falsely and those who perceive what is said is true has false perception.
Firstly it implies the person has understanding and it is what or how you say that fails their understanding when in truth what they have is not understanding, they do not have true understanding but what they have is programming and by “I don’t understand” they mean what you said does not ring a bell, does not correspond with programming they have that can be rehashed to explain what you are conveying or they are unable to cobble together a programming from what you are saying.
WHAT PEOPLE HAVE IS NOT UNDERSTANDING BUT PROGRAMMING AND SO WHEN THEY SAY THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND, THEY MEAN WHAT IS SAID OR PRESENTED DOES NOT RING A BELL, DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO REHASHABLE PRE-RECORDED EXPLANATIONS IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES OR THEY ARE UNABLE TO SYNTHESIZE FROM WHAT IS SAID TO THEM INTO A VIEW THAT IS IN LINE WITH THEIR FALSE WORLD VIEW OF WHAT THINGS SHOULD BE.
Secondly, it is not that they don’t understand but they were not paying attention or paying attention fitfully or distracted and so they did not get partially or totally get what is said to them; not they don’t understand.
WHEN PEOPLE SAY THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THEY ARE SPEAKING FALSELY BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT PAYING ATTENTION NOT DON’T UNDERSTAND.
The Buddha or Jesus never uttered, “I don’t understand what you are trying to get at” because everything that is said to them, whether true, false or nonsense can be fully understood by them as true, false or nonsense and therefore they always understand whatever is said to them.
IF YOU ARE ATTENTIVE AS YOU SHOULD IF SOMEONE IS SPEAKING TO YOU AND YOU HAVE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS TRUE (LIVE, SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION) THEN YOU WILL ALWAYS UNDERSTAND WHATEVER IS SAID TO YOU AS IT IS, TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE (MAKES NO SENSE).
Emotional stylish people can stop talking but they cannot stop thinking.
The reason is because it is not reason or necessity or substance that is the basis of their ceaseless restless thinking but it is force that is the drive. They have many recorded sequences of thoughts in their mental jukeboxes that differ from person to person and their restless constantly activating mental force seizes on these pieces of recorded thoughts to activate or power them like a monkey jumping from branch to branch and this is controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable insanity the constantly thinking person does not realize.
THE PERSON WHO CAN STOP THINKING WILL ONLY THINK IF THERE IS A NEED TO THINK AND WHEN THERE IS A NEED TO THINK HE DEVOTES HIS FULL ATTENTION TO HIS THINKING, DOES NOT THINK WHILST HE IS EATING OR WALKING OR DRIVING. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THERE IS A NEED TO CONSTANTLY THINK AND CONSTANT THINKING REFLECTS SLAVERY DICTATED BY THE PERSON’S BLIND MENTAL FORCE THAT HE HAS SO WELL CONDITIONED TO ALWAYS ACTIVATE IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT HIS MENTAL FORCE CANNOT STOP AND SO WHEN HE IS IDLE THE MENTAL FORCE MUST FIND SOMETHING TO DO AND SO IT RESTLESSLY, AIMLESSLY POWERS NONSTOP THINKING.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THEN THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE TO SEEING. SEEING, YOU KNOW AND WHATEVER YOU DID NOT SEE YOU CAN NEVER KNOW BY THINKING AND SO THINKING IS NOT THE CORRECT TOOL FOR TRUE KNOWING.
Why neither liking nor disliking is higher than no thinking:
The Buddha said neither liking nor disliking is the third higher state, no thinking is the second, not the other way round, why is that so?
Just because you have stopped thinking does not mean your mental force is not and cannot be stirred attractively or repulsively by events.
If your mental force is not stirred attractively or repulsively how can it then be thinking which requires stirred mental force.
Without stirring mental force, a person cannot think and a person whose mental force is neither stirred attractively or repulsively has an inactive mental force that automatically means he can also not think and not thinking is the forebear or antecedent to neither liking nor disliking which is a higher state of the mind.
IN ORDER TO NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE YOUR MENTAL FORCE MUST BE INERT, NOT STIRRED AND THAT MEANS IT CANNOT BE THINKING OR THE PERSON IS CAPABLE OF NON THINKING. JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN STOP YOUR MENTAL FORCE STIRRING TO THINK DOES NOT MEAN YOUR MENTAL FORCE CANNOT BE STIRRED BY PROVOCATIVE EVENTS TO EITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE AND THEREFORE THE BUDDHA IS CORRECT IN SAYING NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING IS THE HIGHER MENTAL STATE COMPARED TO NO THINKING.
Why people’s mental force are constantly active:
If your mental force is constantly active and you don’t know whether it is or not or you perceive it is only sometimes active then you have false perception or you are a person who does know what he is doing and what is happening to him.
The truth is that the mental force of emotional people with style are constantly active only the intensity varies, not because it is the natural or normal unavoidable state but it is an abnormal state that will end in loss of control and torment first episodically then permanently.
THE MENTAL FORCE OF STYLISH EMOTIONAL PEOPLE IS ACTIVE ALL THE TIME AND IT IS NOT NORMAL NOR IS IT MANDATORY.
The reason why people’s mental forces are constantly active is because they are constantly falsely, unnecessarily stirring it to fashion style by prolonging, changing speed and strength and thus conditioned it has become permanently active.
WHATEVER IS UNNECESSARY OR MEANINGLESS OR FOR SHOW DOES NOT REQUIRE REASON OR OCCASION TO OCCUR. WHATEVER DOES NOT REQUIRE REASON OR CAUSE OR OCCASION TO OCCUR CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME. WHATEVER CAN OCCUR AT ANY TIME CAN OCCUR ALL THE TIME IF YOU KEEP WILLING IT TO OCCUR IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OR PLEASING OTHERS.
THUS BECAUSE STYLISH PEOPLE KEEP STIRRING THEIR MENTAL FORCES TO FABRICATE STYLE TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS OTHERS, THEIR MENTAL FORCES HAVE BEEN WELL CONDITIONED TO ALWAYS, CEASELESSLY, MEANINGLESS ACTIVATE.
THUS IT IS WRONG VIEW TO THINK IT IS NATURAL, IMMUTABLE AND BLAMELESS THAT A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS CONSTANTLY ACTIVE. BECAUSE A CONSTANTLY ACTIVE MENTAL FORCE IS TORMENTING, IF YOU ACCEPT THE STATUS QUO THEN YOU ARE DOOMED, HEADED FOR TORMENT AS YOUR CEASELESSLY ACTIVE MENTAL FORCE EPISODICALLY AND FINALLY IRREVOCABLY DRIVE YOU UP THE WALL TO HOMICIDE OR SUICIDE.
Prolonging, changing speed and strength spreads like a cancer:
To say ‘aaahhh’ instead of ‘ah’ (which is itself meaningless, ‘ah’ denotes like or attracted or the attractive meaningless harmful stirring of his mental force), is to prolong the use of force to stretch the syllable pronounced.
There is a constant bombardment of the use of force to prolong in the speech and sounds made by others that tend to induce a person’s mental force to similarly prolong the use of force without any understanding or intelligence needed.
NO INTELLIGENCE OR UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED TO ‘LEARN’ TO PROLONG WITH ONE’S MENTAL FORCE, THE CONSTANT BOMBARDMENT OF PROLONGING IN THE SOUNDS MADE BY HUMANS AND ANIMALS IS AN INDUCEMENT TOO POTENT FOR MOST IF NOT ALL BEINGS HERE MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY, RESONANTLY PROLONG.
BECAUSE PROLONGING IS A LEARNT OR CONDITIONED WAY OF DOING SOMETHING, IT HAS A TENDENCY TO BECOME THE DEFAULT WAY SO THAT THIS TENDENCY TO PROLONG THE USE OF FORCE SOON SPREADS FROM AN ISOLATED EPISODE TO BECOME THE STANDARD OR DEFAULT WAY TO USE FORCE TO SEE (EG STARE ICILY), HEAR, SMELL (SNIFF OR PROLONG SMELLING WITH A SMILE WHEN HE SPIES GOOD FOOD), DO THINGS AND PRONOUNCE ALL SYLLABLES.
IN THE SAME WAY, TO CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE WHEN SPEAKING, DOING THINGS, PERCEIVING (SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TOUCHING) IS A WAY OF USING FORCE THAT IS CHARACTERISTIC IN A PERSON AND DIFFERS FROM PERSON TO PERSON WHICH MEANS IT IS REPRODUCED FROM MEMORY OR A PROGRAMMING THAT HAS A TENDENCY TO SPREAD FROM ONE ISOLATED EPISODE OF CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH TO BECOMES THE DEFAULT OR STANDARD WAY OF PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS.
NOT ONLY CAN ALL BEINGS (HUMANS AND ANIMALS) HERE USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH, THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME IN AN INDIVIDUALLY DIFFERENT WAY AND NO INTELLIGENCE IS NEEDED BECAUSE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH FROM THE INCESSANT BOMBARDMENT OF OTHERS IN INTERACTION IS A POWERFUL, IRRESISTIBLE INDUCEMENT FOR THE BEING’S MENTAL FORCE TO SIMILARLY DO SO BY ADOPTING A STYLE OF HIS OWN EITHER BY DIRECT COPY OR COBBLED FROM DIFFERENT PIECES OF STYLES FROM OTHERS THEY ADMIRE.
RATHER THAN FUN, HAVING STYLE IS A TRAP OF INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, WASTES PRODIGIOUS CUMULATIVE ENERGY AND MANDATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE IN WHICH ONE IS A PARROT.
Prolonging smelling & tasting:
When dogs (and indeed humans) sniff, they are attracted, their mental forces stirred, they sniff with accelerating speed and strength of drawing in of breath that can only occur in a prolonged act of breathing in. Thus there is constant acceleration of speed and strength through a prolonged in drawing of breath to smell for sniffing to occur.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE A BUDDHA WILL SNIFF BECAUSE THAT IS DOING SOMETHING EVIL DRIVEN BY DESIRE OR GREED.
Similarly when a person spies aromatic foods cooking wafting in the air, he might smile in anticipation and draw in a deep or prolonged breath to capture as much as long of the smell as he can, again foolishly driven by greed or attraction for tasty food.
Again when people like their food, they may eat slowly, masticate with prolonging for longer periods to extract as much taste or pleasure as they can and this too is an episode of use of force to prolong that may escape their realization.
PEOPLE SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THEIR USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, THEY ARE DOING IT ALL THE TIME TO GREATER OR LESSER EXTENT DRIVEN BY GREED.
This too is prolonged:
Because the pope’s gesture is for show to be seen by others, he has to prolong it to allow others to see it and so this too is a form of prolonging and whoever you are, if you are training your mental force to prolong in the name of pleasing others, sadness is your reward that will descend to depression and then even suicide.
IF YOU THINK THE BUDDHA OR JESUS WILL MAKE A SIMILAR GESTURE YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR DELUDED, HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN.
Speaking against the Holy Spirit:
Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the (Holy) Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
Jesus called the counselor the Holy Spirit and so there is a possibility (if not certainty) that just as Jesus and the Buddha (the Thus Come One) came, the Holy Spirit (but not God himself) will also come.
NO MATTER HOW GENTLY OR CORDIALLY (A MATTER OF STYLE NOT SUBSTANCE), IF YOU DISAGREE WITH SOMEONE YOU ARE SPEAKING AGAINST HIM AND EITHER BOTH OF YOU ARE WRONG OR ONE IS RIGHT NEVER BOTH RIGHT. THUS IF YOU SPEAK AGAINST ME AND I HAPPEN TO BE RIGHT THEN YOU ARE WRONG, NO MATTER HOW GENTLE, AND THERE IS A PRICE FOR WRONG VIEW WHICH IS HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you, and will be in you.
"These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
But when the Counselor comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. "I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear (understand) them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
Blair: I may have been right
He is admitting he is not sure if he is right and so he is speaking without knowing what he said is right, a recipe for suffering in the future.
Unless you know something is true you are not entitled to say it and so you are asking for judgment and punishment sowing doubt and uncertainty in yourself and others saying what is meaningless, “I may been right” which implies you may also have been wrong, so what is the point of saying it?
BECAUSE THERE IS NO POINT IN SAYING YOU MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT WHICH IMPLIES YOU MAY ALSO BEEN WRONG, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF SHOW AND THAT IS THE RECIPE FOR FUTURE SUFFERING, NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE.
NO MAN OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL STATE HE MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT. YOU EITHER SEE YOU ARE RIGHT AND SAY YOU ARE RIGHT OR YOU WITHOLD.
What Blair may have meant:
What Blair may have meant that he did not say is that “You don’t know the truth and so I may have been right, therefore don’t condemn me prematurely”.
Did he say this? If he didn’t, he did not say what he meant.
“I may have been right” is not the same as “You don’t know the truth, it is anybody’s guess what is right or wrong and so I may be right, don’t condemn me”. Thus here as in many places people think they say what they mean and mean what they say but they don’t.
EVEN IF HE MEANT THAT, HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO SAY, "I MAY HAVE BEEN CORRECT" BECAUSE IT IMPLIES HE IS NOT SURE HIMSELF WHETHER HE IS RIGHT AND SO HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY HE MAY HAVE BEEN CORRECT.
A refutation without facts or truth:
What Blair said, “I may have been correct” is a refutation of others which implies they are wrong or cannot be sure they are right.
YOU CAN ONLY RIGHTLY REFUTE OTHERS WITH FACTS OR TRUTH, YOU CANNOT REFUTE OTHERS WITH SOMETHING YOU DO NOT KNOW IS TRUE WHICH IS IMPLIED BY THE ADMISSION YOU MAY HAVE BEEN CORRECT, NOT YOU ARE CORRECT.
THUS BLAIR IS FALSELY REFUTING OTHERS WITH SOMETHING THAT IS NOT TRUTH OR FACT AND SO HE IS SPEAKING UNRIGHTEOUSLY.
Anger leading to agitation:
He is angry even in a rage and because he cannot vent it, he has become agitated, another emotion in which his mental force is stirring in disarray.
IN ANGER OR RAGE, THE MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRING ORDERLY IN A REPULSIVE WAY BUT WHEN THE RAGE IS STIRRED TOO STRONGLY AND CANNOT BE VENTED, IT CAN LEAD TO ANOTHER EMOTION CALLED AGITATION OR CONFUSION AND IF UNCORRECTED THE FOOL IS HEADED FOR MAD EMOTION.
UNLESS HE EFFACED ALL EMOTIONS (POSSIBLE BUT UNLIKELY) HE IS HEADED FOR DOOM, TORMENT.
Pope’s great sadness for the (sexually) abused:
Sadness has no meaning, is bad for the person and others and so it reflects human delusion that they speak of the pope’s great sadness that implies sadness is meaningful and good, to be encouraged and experienced.
SADNESS WHEN GENUINE IS AN INVOLUNTARY AFFLICTION OF THE MIND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND THE PERSON AUTOMATICALLY STRUGGLES TO CONTAIN OR CONTROL OR EVEN SHAKE IT OFF. ALL SADNESS DESCENDING ON A MIND MUST BE CONTROLLED AND AT GREAT SADNESS THE PERSON IS STRUGGLING TO CONTROL OR IT REQUIRES GREAT EFFORT AND THREATENS LOSS OF CONTROL TO DESCEND INTO DEEP DARK DEPRESSION. THUS IF YOU ARE CAPABLE OOF GREAT SADNESS YOU ARE A MAN AT THE PRECIPICE IN DANGER OF FALLING INTO THE CHASM OF DEPRESSION AND THAT IS NEVER GOOD FOR YOU OR ANYBODY, SO WHAT IS THE USE OR MEANING OF TALKING ABOUT THE POPE’S GREAT SADNESS?
WHAT IS THE USE OF BEING SADNESS AND OF WHAT GOOD OR BENEFIT CAN IT BRING? WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS TO USE CALM CLEAR THINKING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS WRONG, WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WRONG AND TO UNDERTAKE IF POSSIBLE MEASURES TO RECTIFY THOSE WRONGS. IF IMPOSSIBLE, ALL THE SADNESS WILL DO NOTHING.
Mao's Great Leap Forward 'killed 45 million in four years'
Arifa Akbar: Founder of People's Republic of China, qualifies as greatest mass murderer in world history, says expert with unprecedented access to official Communist Party archivesFools are eager to be ‘great’ leaders but they may be accruing terrible karma with everlasting suffering even for eons.
The Buddha spoke of hells of different intensities of suffering and durations and the deepest hells have life spans of many eons and it is here than many leaders like Mao, Stalin or Hitler may find themselves.
ßBhikkhu, the life span in the Paduma hell is difficult to enumerate, as it is this amount of years, or this amount of hundred years, or this amount of thousand years, or this amount o hundred thousand years.
ßVenerable sir, could a comparison be given?
ßBhikkhu, a comparison could be given. Bhikkhu, there is a man with twenty cart loads of sesame.by the Kosala measure. He throws out one seed of sesame at the end of a hundred years and throws another, at the end of another hundred years. In this manner the twenty cart loads of sesame would finish and come to an end but not the span of, one Abuda hell.
Bhikkhu, twenty of these Abuda hell spans is equal to one Nirabbuda hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Nirabbuda hell spans is equal to one Ababa hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Ababa hell spans is equal to one Atata hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Atata hell spans is equal to one Ahaha hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Ahaha hell spans is equal to one Kumudu hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Kumudu hell spans is equal to one Sogandhika hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Sogandhika hell spans is equal to one Uppalaka hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Uppalaka hell spans is equal to one Pundirika hell span. Bhikkhu, twenty of these Pundirika hell spans is equal to one Paduma hell span. Bhikkhu, the bhikkhu Kokalika fell into the Paduma hell for developing an unpleasant mind towards Sàriputta and Moggallàna. The Blessed One further said:
ßTo man a dagger is born in the mouth, saying evil words with it,
The fool destroys himself, by praising the blameworthy,
Blaming the praiseworthy. He choses bad luck and does not feel pleasant.
A gambler losing all his wealth and himself, is nothing compared to
Developing a defiled mind towards well gone ones.
Blaming noble ones, with defiled words and thoughts causes births in,
Hundred thousand Nirabbuda hells and five sixty hundred Abbuda hells.
If the Buddha is right you are in big trouble:
Jesus said even the man who calls his brother ‘you fool’ is in danger of the fire of hell. The Buddha tells you that he can think of nothing more tormenting then hell or the animal womb and you can languish in hell for many eternities of billions of years for misdeeds.
And so if you think nothing, think you cannot languish in hell for billions of years and it turns out this is so and you have done wrong, then you are in big trouble.
Authenticating your guru, preacher, teacher:
There is a simple test you can apply to the guru, preacher or teacher you worship or look up to, to determine whether he is authentic or a fake.
The Buddha said he is the highest teacher, teacher of men & gods and no one is fit to be his teacher. At the heart of his teaching or the goal of his teaching is attainment of the higher states of the mind and it is said that when he passed away, he rose from the first to the fourth higher state, descended again to the first to then rise back to the fourth and he then passed away with rolling thunder in heaven and on earth.
Thus the sine qua non of true religious life or the litmus test of a teacher’s holiness is his attainment of the higher states of mind. No preacher ‘worth his salt’ has failed to attain any of the higher states of mind the Buddha described. There are no higher states of mind except those delineated by the Buddha, if there are others, being all seeing and knowing, he would have stated them.
If you truly understood the Buddha you would have understood that before you can attain the 2nd, 3rd or 4th higher states of mind you must first achieve and be consummate in the 1st higher state namely serenity of mind and body and that means no style or use of force to stretch, change speed and strength that gives rise to insoluble stress that renders impossible true serenity of mind and body.
Thus any religious teacher who is true must at least manifest the first higher state of mind, without the first higher state of mind he is preaching like the emperor with no clothes, disqualified himself.
THUS IF A RELIGIOUS TEACHER SPEAKS WITH CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS (SOMETHING THAT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY, INDISPUTABLY DETERMINED BY THE DISCERNING), IS EMOTIONAL AND EXPRESSES HIS LIKES AND DISLIKES, HE HAS NOT ATTAINED EVEN THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND HE HAS NOT ATTAINED ANY OF THE FRUITS OF THE TRUE RELIGIOUS LIFE, NAMELY THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND.
THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS SIMPLY SERENITY OF MIND AND BODY WITH DISCURSIVE THINKING AND THAT MEANS NO STYLE, NO USE OF FORCE TO UNNECESSARILY STRETCH SYLLABLES (EG ‘AAAAHHHH’ INSTEAD OF ‘AH’), CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS SIMPLY THE FULLY CONSCIOUS CESSATION OF THINKING LEADING TO A ONE POINTED OR UNIFIED MIND.
THE THIRD HIGHER STATE IS SIMPLY THE NON ATTRACTIVE OR REPULSIVE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE ANYTHING HAPPENING.
THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS SIMPLY THE TUNING OF HIS CONSCIOUSNESS TO ELIMINATE ALL RECEPTION OF PAIN AND PLEASURE.
THUS IF YOU HEAR YOUR RELIGIOUS TEACHER TALKING FULL OF STYLE AND YET YOU THINK HE IS AUTHENTIC, WORTHY OF YOUR WORSHIP, YOU ARE DELUDED, HAS NO DISCERNMENT.
Only a fool deals with people they know are crooks:
There are those who think they are very smart or shrewd, they think they can do business with people they know or suspect as crooks or untrustworthy without harm or losses to themselves.
It is never reason or true understanding that is the basis of people electing to do business with individuals they deem as crooks but it is greed for gain with the delusion that they can somehow eat puffer fish without being poisoned.
When someone has elected to do business or associate with someone they see as crooks, they have already overridden their good judgment in favour of material considerations and thus delivered themselves into the arms of harm and loss. It is his delusion that he can be careful and avoid being bitten by the cobra.
IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE IS UNTRUSTWORTHY OR A CROOK AND YET YOU CONSORT WITH HIM ON AN ‘IMPERSONAL’ BUSINESS LEVEL, YOU HAVE ALREADY LOST, DELIVERED YOURSELF, EVEN YOUR HEAD ON A PLATTER BECAUSE YOU HAVE OVERRIDEN YOUR GOOD JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MATERIAL GAINS, NEGATED GOOD JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF BAD JUDGMENT (CONSORTING WITH A CROOK) THAT IS A MOULD FOR FUTURE COMPROMISING YOURSELF THAT SOONER OR LATER WILL RESULT IN LOSSES AND EVEN DEATH FOR YOU.
NEVER COMPROMISE YOURSELF, IT IS THE PATH TO RUIN AND EVEN DEATH.
Musa’s last sermon at Bukit Aman:
The retiring IGP did not give a sermon but it was a speech and so anyone who perceived it as a sermon is falsifying and headed for suffering.
The motive for calling a speech a sermon is to make much of it, to mock and that is evil, driven by emotion never understanding.
HE THINKS HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH AND PEOPLE THINK THEY READ THE TRUTH BUT IT IS FAR FROM THE TRUTH, A FALSIFICATION WITH FUTURE SUFFERING DUE THE CORRUPTING OR PERVERTING FOOL.
So you see, my dear Najib:
RPK: So you see, my dear Najib, if we really want to be non-extremist then there is much we need to change.
What is wrong with what is said?
No one has the right to tell others they see, ‘so you see’ and so he is speaking falsely presumptuously that has consequences in suffering to him.
It cannot be sincere to address Najib as ‘my dear’ and so it is sarcastic or hypocritical.
IT DOES NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO DISCERN WHAT I SAY BUT IT REQUIRES TRUE UNDERSTANDING. IF YOU READ AND FEEL UNEASY OR IT STIRS EMOTION IN YOU AND YOU DO NOT KNOW WHY THEN YOU ARE A PERSON WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE READS.
FURTHER HE IS NOT TRULY TALKING TO NAJIB BUT SPEAKING AS IF HE IS TALKING TO NAJIB AND THAT IS DEADLY MAKE BELIEVE.
Chairs fly at DAP meeting:
“Chairs fly at DAP meeting” is a way of perceiving or describing an event and it is false, styled to sensationalize or stir emotion. Chairs do not fly and therefore it false. It is correct to say “chairs thrown at meeting” but to say they flew is to sensationalize it that has suffering even insanity pending for the exaggerating fool.
Pope's battle to save Christmas: Don't let atheists crush your traditions, Benedict tells Britain
Traditions are plans of what to do and how to do it and they are passed on from generation to generation. Thus if a person follows traditions, sticks to traditions, he becomes a robot of that tradition and that is suffering never true happiness.As the Buddha said, “So Kalamas, don't go by reports, legends, traditions or scripture. When you know for yourselves that, 'These qualities are unskillful; blameworthy; criticized by the wise; these qualities, when undertaken lead to harm & to suffering' -- then you should abandon them.”
IF YOU ARE DISCERNING, NO ATHEIST CAN CRUSH YOUR TRADITIONS. IF YOU ARE UNDISCERNING THEN IT POINTLESS TELLING YOU NOT TO LET ATHEISTS CRUSH YOUR TRADITIONS. THEN AGAIN, TRADITIONS ARE PROGRAMS THAT PEOPLE FOLLOW ROBOTICALLY WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING.
Traditions are not objects that can be crushed and it reflects a predilection for force not reason to speak of 'crushing'.
What to advise others:
Rather than preach about not letting atheists crush your traditions that stir emotions and attacks atheists, you should advise people about true virtues like not taking what is not given, not lying or talking frivolously, not taking life, not drinking or gambling.
THERE IS NOTHING INTRINSICALLY VIRTUOUS ABOUT TRADITIONS AND ANYONE WHO FOLLOWS TRADITIONS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING IS A ROBOT. IF YOU HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GO BY TRADITIONS. THUS IF YOU WANT TO GIVE ADVICE THAT CREATES MERIT FOR YOU, YOU SHOULD TALK ABOUT CULTIVATING VIRTUES AND PROVIDE OTHERS WITH INSIGHT.
What is teaching?
The Buddha said he is the highest teacher, the teacher of men and gods.
Jesus said the counsellor will teach you all things. He will dwell with you (live amongst you) and he will not speak on his own authority but whatever he hears he will speak.
So the primary if not sole mission of the counsellor is to teach.
Teaching is the imparting of knowledge that the recipient does not possess but is capable of receiving or understanding through written or spoken words.
Knowledge is no use if it is false or unessential and so meaningful teaching is about transmission of knowledge that is true, reflects reality and is important or helpful or leads a being in suffering out of suffering.
The best or supreme knowledge is useless if the recipient is unable to understand and so the second requisite for teaching is the ability of the listener to understand and then it is up to him to accept and put to practice if practice or discipline is required to exit the morass of suffering that is this world.
THE MISSION OF THE COUNSELOR AS STATED BY JESUS IS TO TEACH.
TEACHING IS THE TRANSMISSION OF KNOWLEDGE THAT IS TRUE AND USEFUL THAT THE RECIPIENT DOES NOT POSSESS (IF HE ALREADY HAS THE KNOWLEDGE THEN IT IS SENSELESS TO TALK OF TEACHING) AND IT IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF THE RECIPIENT IS CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS TAUGHT AND THENCE TO PUT THE KNOWLEDGE TO PRACTICE IF NECESSARY.
THUS IF THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED USING FORCE TO UNNECESSARILY STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT LEADS TO SELF AND OTHER STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE APART FROM GENERATING HARMFUL SADNESS, HURT & CONFUSION THAT WILL END IN TORMENT FOR THE PERSON AND YOU ARE PERPETRATING IT ALL THE TIME AND SEE NOTHING WRONG, THEN WHAT A TEACHER CAN DO IS POINT IT OUT TO YOU. THE REST IS UP TO YOU TO UNDERSTAND, TO DISCERN, TO SEE, AS THERE IS, CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND PUT TO A STOP IF YOU CAN TO EXPERIENCE AN EFFORTLESS RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
Pope apologizes for abuse:
The pope should not apologize for the abuses which were not committed by the church but individuals representing the church.
Instead if the church had been guilty of laxity in not controlling or supervising such criminal staff and was even involved in covering up and allowing such crimes to continue, the church should specifically apologize for that and ask for forgiveness and pay compensation.
IT WAS NOT THE CHURCH THAT ABUSED THESE CHILDREN AND SO THE CHURCH SHOULD NOT APOLOGIZE FOR THE ABUSES BUT IF THE CHURCH HAD BEEN NEGLIGENT AND EVEN PERMISSIVE AND COVERED UP THEN IT SHOULD ADMIT AND APOLOGIZE FOR BEING NEGLIGENT, PERMISSIVE AND COVERING UP.
Pak Lah: M’sia does not need advice from Lee
Genuine unemotional understanding will never guide a person to make such a across board rejection of advice from Lee but it is blind emotion or hostility that is the drive.A man of reason treats each piece of advice on its merit and reject or accept accordingly.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH LEE THAT HIS ADVICE IS NOT NEEDED? YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO BE PREJUDICED, TO REJECT ADVICE BY PERSON RATHER THAN BY MERIT. THE DESTINATION FOR SUCH EMOTIONAL OUTBURST IS INSANITY AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
The pope’s shame and not coming clean:
The pope is said to have expressed his deep shame at the abuses perpetrated.
You may perceive that the church has come clean but that may be wrong perception, the truth and admission has been evaded.
Shame is the hurt a person feels when a desirable or attractive image or prestige that he cultivates has been dented or destroyed. Shame is about self indulgence, it is all about self, upholding and hurt when self or its upholding has been deflated, it does nothing for the grief or wrong suffered by victims.
OK YOU ARE DEEPLY SHAMED, WHAT ARE YOU DOING OR IS BEING DONE FOR THE WRONGED?
WHAT IS REQUIRED IS TO SPELL OUT EXACTLY WHAT THE CHURCH’S ROLE WAS IN THE CRIME, WAS IT PERMISSIVE AND DID IT TAKE STEPS TO COVER UP? WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS TO SPELL OUT TO THE PUBLIC EXACTLY WHAT THE CHURCH DID WRONG, ENSURE THAT IT IS STOPPED AND TO MAKE SOME REPARATIONS TO THE VICTIMS IN THE FORM OF APOLOGY AND ASKING FOR FORGIVENESS.
If you have done another wrong, caused another hurt or even death, you will have to repay in some form of suffering even if you felt shame or remorse unless the person forgives you and then you may be discharged from having to repay in suffering for your offense.
THUS EXPRESSING SHAME ANDD SORROW IS SELF INDULGENCE AND AVOIDING TAKING RESPONSIBILITY. WHAT IS NEEDED IS TO SEE AND ADMIT EXACTLY WHAT THE CHURCH’S ROLE WAS AND ENSURE THAT WRONG IS NOT COMMITTED AGAIN IN THE FUTURE, TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS FOR WHAT WAS DONE WRONG.
Rational & emotional repentance:
There is rational repentance based on fully understanding what wrong was done and thus truly understanding, to take steps to ensure it never happens again.
There is emotional repentance based on blind force in which one is deeply sorry and ashamed without clearly seeing and admitting what wrong has happened and what steps are proposed to ensure the wrong does not happen in the future.
No matter how intense your sorrow or shame, it does not address or assuage the pain or trauma suffered by victims of child abuse perpetrated by priests under the jurisdiction of the church. Sorrow and shame is about upholding self or self centred. What is meaningful is to calmly unemotionally examine and make known to self and the public exactly what went wrong allowing such priests to abuse so extensively in different countries for so long that may even now be going on.
THE CHURCH DID NOT ABUSE THE CHILDREN, CERTAIN PRIESTS DID AND SO THE CHURCH SHOULD SPELL OUT EXACTLY ITS ROLE IN PERMITTING SUCH ABUSES TO OCCUR AND THUS SPELLING OUT PUBLICLY AND THEREFORE FULLY UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM TO TAKE STEPS TO ENSURE IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN.
IF YOU NEVER SAW AND UNDERSTOOD WHAT TRULY HAPPENED THEN NO MATTER HOW DEEPLY ASHAMED OR SORROWFUL, IT IS LIKELY THE CRIME WILL OCCUR AGAIN BECAUSE HOW CAN YOU CORRECT WHAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND?
IT TAKES A TRUE MAN TO ADMIT EXACTLY WHAT HE DID WRONG RATHER THAN SWEEP IT UNDER THE CARPET OF SHAME AND SORROW REFUSING TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE WRONG WHICH MEANS THE FIRE CAN RISE FROM THE AMBERS AGAIN.
NO MATTER HOW DEEP YOUR PAIN AND SHAME, IT DOES NOT COMPARE AND DOES NOTHING TO ASSUAGE THE TRAUMA OF VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES AND SO YOUR DUTY IS TO ENSURE IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN RATHER THAN BEAT YOUR CHEST. THEREAFTER YOU CAN ASK FOR FORGIVENESS AND INTITUTE MATERIAL COMPENSATION IF DEMANDED.
YOU SEE THE CHURCH COMING CLEAN, I SEE OBFUSCATION, EVASION.
I must be a genius:
Unless you perceive what I say as worthless, if you think they are uncommonly insightful, I must be a genius if I fabricated them entirely by myself or I must have access to some form of divine inspiration that appears to be denied others. If there are I things I hear in my mind that others do not, then I must be of some nobility to hear them where others do not. If I fabricated all I said myself which accords with what the Buddha who says he is the highest teacher said, then I must be a genius of truth.
Badawi should speak for himself than Malaysia:
If it is true Badawi said, “Malaysia does not need Lee’s advice” then he is foolishly putting his head on the chopping board speaking for Malaysia. No one authorized him to speak for Malaysia and so he is arrogant to speak thus. A man of true reason treats each Lee advice on a case by case basis and rejects accordingly, he does not blanket reject Lee’s advice which is a sign of a bigot. Badawi has proven himself as a bigot not just here but always, whatever tolerance he speaks is hypocritical. If things are in favour of him, the hypocritical man is all tolerant, when it is disadvantageous, he turns bigot.
Again RPK was false to say, “My dear Najib”. Najib is not his and if he is his, he has self identity views.
EVEN YOUR WIFE MAY NOT BE TRULY YOURS BECAUSE SHE IS AN INDEPENDENT PERSON AND MAY HAVE OTHER LIASONS AND SO IT IS A FOOL WHO WILL GO AROUND TELLING OTHERS OF HIS THIS AND THAT.
The hazards of speaking for Malaysia:
As an elected official, the PM has a right to speak for Malaysia but the weight of responsibility is far greater than the ‘privilege’ perceived by the fool. As an elected representative for Malaysia you can speak for Malaysia but if what you say is reckless or false, goes beyond your right then you are asking for judgment whose punishment may be far worse than whatever glory you enjoy speaking thus.
Clever cars mean safer driving:
COMPUTERS ARE RIGID AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING AT ALL AND IT IS DANGEROUS EVEN FATAL TO RELY ON COMPUTERS. A FEW TIMES MY GARMIN NAVIGATOR LED ME THROUGH VIRTUALLY IMPASSABLE KAMPUNG AND ESTATE ROADS (BECAUSE IT IS THERE AND SHORTER) WHEN IT IS SANER TO TAKE A MAIN ROAD AND REPEATEDLY IT DIRECTED ME TO USE THE TRAFFIC LIGHT CONTROLLED JUNCTIONS WHEN THE OVERHEAD BYPASS THOUGH FRACTIONALLY LONGER IS FASTER.
THUS ANYONE WHO TOUTS CLEVER CARS MEANS SAFER DRIVING IS A FOOL. I PREFER TO TRUST MY JUDGMENT THAT CAN BE FLEXIBLE TO FIT THE OCCASION.
Once I was locked out of my clever car:
For some reason, my car activated the auto lock when I got down to open the gate. Luckily I was at home with a spare key nearby, imagine the disaster if I was outstation with no spare key. Till this day, I remember to keep the door ajar if the engine is running in case the car or its computers decides to play tricks on me.
Again, for no apparent reason, many times the wipers automatically activated even indoors.
AND SO IT MAY BE THAT COMPUTERIZED CARS ARE NOT WITHOUT DANGERS AND ANYONE SINGING THEIR PRAISES EITHER DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SPEAKS OR IS DELUDED.
Clever plane means you die:
What may have happened with the French Airbus crash is that because one of the pitot speed censor tube was blocked by ice, it signalled the plane was stalling and this caused the computers to lower the flaps to maximum to increase lift and boosted engine power to increase thrust.
BECAUSE THE PLANE WAS NOT STALLING BUT FLYING AT GREAT SPEED THE COMBINATION OF LOWERED FLAPS AND MAXIMAL ENGINE POWER MAY PROVE FATAL, THE FLAPS COULD NOT STAND THE STRESS AND THUS BROKE LEAVING THE PLANE UNFLYABLE.
IF THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED, YOU CAN SEE ‘CLEVER PLANES MEANS YOU DIE NOT SAFER FLYING’.
Sack me if you dare, says Shen
This is a fool talking heaping karma on himself.IT IS NOT A MATTER OF DARING OR NOT DARING TO SACK HIM BUT WHETHER HE HAS DONE WRONG OR INFRINGE PARTY REGULATIONS AND SO TO CHALLENGE SOMEONE TO SACK YOU IF THEY DARE IS TO CHALLENGE AS IF YOU ARE SO GREAT OR UNSACKABLE. THUS WHATEVER THE MATTER, HE IS FOOLISHLY COURTING PAINFUL KARMA.
How come no one speaks like me?
It should not be beyond the ability of reasonably intelligent people to say that it is not a matter of daring or not daring to sack someone but what is relevant is whether he has committed an offense that renders him at risk of being sacked. Because daring is not applicable, is a false reason for sacking anyone, anyone who dares another to sack him is practicing controlled insanity that will end in insanity. When you dare someone you are challenging him to do something or intimidating him. Because daring is a wrong reason to sack you, you are challenging him to sack you for wrong reasons that will end in his insanity and so you have karma asking others to do things for wrong reasons.
DARING SOMEONE TO DO SOMETHING IS NEVER BORNE OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS DRIVEN BY FORCE TO CHALLENGE OR INTIMIDATE. BECAUSE IT IS A FALSE REASON, THE PERSON WILL GO MAD AND BECAUSE HE ENCOURAGES OTHERS TO ACT FOR FALSE REASONS, HE HAS KARMA.
IS WHAT I SAY SO DIFFICULT OR HARD TO PERCEIVE OR SUBLIME THAT IT IS BEYOND THE CAPABILITY OF ANYONE TO THINK OF IT?
Sack you just because you dare him?
By asking (challenging) someone to sack you if they dare, you are asking someone to do something just because they are challenged or intimidated and that is not a rational cause for action and therefore you are asking others to act for irrational reasons that will end in their insanity and that is karma.
IF YOU DON'T WANT SOMEONE TO SACK YOU BECAUSE YOU DARED HIM, WHY DO YOU DARE HIM?
The stone that builders have discarded:
What I say may be false or trivial or it may be as Jesus said, the stone that you the builder discarded and this discarded stone has become the top of the corner stone (a very important or paramount stone) and when it falls on them it will crush them and when they trip on this stone they will be shattered to pieces.
THIS VERY STONE (TRUTH & GOODNESS) THAT PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DISCARDED WILL CRUSH THEM WHEN IT FALLS ON THEM AND THEY WILL BE SHATTERED WHEN THEY TRIP AND FALL ON THIS STONE.
Why people cannot say what I say:
There are two reasons why people can never say what I say as can be objectively determined; no one says the things I say.
First and foremost it is proof they are all complete robots. A robot can never say or do things it is not programmed to say even when it is possible to say or do it. For instance, if Microsoft computers were not programmed to say ‘welcome’ it will not say ‘welcome’ even when it is possible to say so but if it has been programmed to say ‘welcome’ it will always say so even when it is possible not to say so.
There is a vast pool of programming of what to think and thus say but it never includes the things I say and because people are not programmed to say the things I say and they are through and through robots, they can never say what I say even when it is possible to say so.
Secondly, you require true wisdom to say what I say and people lack true wisdom because they lack true concentration.
According to the Buddha, without true virtue (not telling lies, taking what is not given, gossiping, divisive speech, taking life) you cannot have great concentration and without great concentration you cannot have great wisdom.
And so it starts with paucity of true virtue leading to paucity of concentration that precludes great wisdom which is necessary to say the things I say.
The Buddha:
"Such and such (cannot be disputed, is objective) is virtue; such and such is concentration and wisdom. Great becomes the fruit, great is the gain of concentration when fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes the fruit& gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration. Utterly freed from lust, becoming, and ignorance is the mind that is fully developed in wisdom."
WITHOUT GENUINE VIRTUE YOU CANNOT HAVE GREAT CONCENTRATION, WITHOUT GREAT CONCENTRATION YOU CANNOT HAVE GREAT WISDOM.
How the iPad won over an unbeliever
There is no need to tell others you are an unbeliever but it said with motive which is to exaggerate how marvellous the iPad is, possibly for financial gains.IF YOU THINK THERE IS A NEED OR ESSENTIAL TO INFORM OTHERS YOU ARE AN UNBELIEVER IN IPAD WHEN IT IS DRIVEN BY MOTIVE (INTENTION IS KARMA THE BUDDHA SAID), THEN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS.
IT IS AN ADMISSION OF PREJUDICE; THAT YOU CAN DISMISS A PRODUCT BEFORE EVEN TRYING IT AND ON TRYING YOU WERE WON OVER.
THE PURPOSE IS TO EXAGGERATE HOW MARVELLOUS IPAD IS BUT WHAT IT SAYS IS THAT THE PERSON IS NOT AN OPEN MINDED PERSON BUT AFFLICTED BY PREJUDICES.
What has belief and disbelief got to do with iPad?
You either, having used or examined it carefully, see and know iPad to be good, extremely good or bad, why should anyone believe or unbelieve in iPad?
TO BELIEVE IS TO USE FORCE TO ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE WHILST TO DISBELIEVE IS TO USE FORCE TO NOT ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE, SINCE YOU CAN SEE AND KNOW WHAT THE IPAD IS BY TRYING IT OUT, WHY SHOULD ANYONE DISBELIEVE OR BELIEVE IN THE IPAD?
BECAUSE IT IS SILLY TO BELIEVE OR DISBELIEVE WHAT YOU CAN KNOW BY TRYING THE IPAD YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN INSANITY.
THERE IS NO NEED TO BELIEVE OR DISBELIEVE THE IPAD, JUST TRY IT OUT.
Teaching is the highest miracle:
According to the Buddha (and therefore it must be true), teaching is not only a miracle but it is the highest miracle and it reflects your wrong view here as everywhere that you think little or nothing of teaching.
Supernatural powers like flying through the air, walking on water and through walls, the ability to create bread out of nothing and make things disappear, to see into the future and past are miracles but according to the Buddha, teaching is the highest miracle as it is of benefit to others.
Supernatural powers are a person’s possession and do not directly benefit others but teaching when successfully benefit others.
TEACHING IS A MIRACLE, SO SAYS THE BUDDHA AND IT IS THE HIGHEST MIRACLE. THE FACT THAT YOU DON’T THINK TEACHING IS A MIRACLE OR YOU RATE OTHER MIRACLES (EG COMPUTERS) FAR HIGHER REFLECTS YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION HERE AS EVERYWHERE YOU THINK YOUR PERCEPTION IS TRUE, REFLECTS REALITY.
Why teaching is the highest miracle:
Jesus can heal the sick, make the blind see and bring the dead alive. He can create unlimited bread to feed a crowd. These are miracles but it is a power that belongs to Jesus and not others and whilst it can benefit others, it is restricted to the infirm and dead that he helped and so long as these people do not repent, their actions are going to lead them to future suffering and death.
Because ordinary people are suffering even to tormenting levels and headed for insanity and even another eternity of perdition, if you can teach the person and he succeeds in understanding so that he is able to walk the path to safety then, according to the Buddha, supernatural powers will become his possession in due course, he will be able to fly in the air, walk on water, walk through a wall, touch the sun and moon, know the past and the future are in the nature of things the possessions of those who are noble and so teaching is the highest miracle in the sense that it converts a suffering ignorant doomed being into a non suffering knowing being headed for safety for whom all the other supernatural powers or miracles will automatically become his possession in the nature of things.
I CAN BRING YOU, THE DEAD, ALIVE BY A MIRACULOUS POWER BUT SO LONG AS YOU REMAIN A SINNER AND IGNORANT YOU ARE GOING TO DIE NOT JUST ONCE BUT EVEN FOR COUNTLESS TIMES. BUT SHOULD I TEACH YOU AND YOU UNDERSTAND, YOU CAN HEAD FOR THE DEATHLESS, FOR HEAVEN AND EVEN THE PERMANENT DEATHLESS DESTINATION, NIBBANA.
IT IS NOT WITHOUT REASON OR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE BUDDHA SAID TEACHING IS THE HIGHEST MIRACLE BUT IT IS WITH REASON AND UNDERSTANDING.
In a nutshell:
Whatever supernatural powers or miracles there are will automatically be your possession once you have been successfully converted by the miracle of teaching from an ignorant, sinning, deluded, stressed, tormented being destined even for insanity and thence an eternity of weeping and gnashing of teeth to a knowing, sin free, discerning unstressed being destined for safety even for many eternities in heaven.
Without the miracle of teaching you can only marvel vicariously second hand at the supernatural powers and bliss of others.
Not teaching but programming:
WHAT PEOPLE CALL TEACHING IS NOT TEACHING BUT PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAMMING MUST NOT BE MISTAKEN FOR TEACHING.
An important reason why people here are blasé or think humdrum about teaching is because what they call teaching, what teaching they experience here is not teaching at all but programming.
Programming is laborious indoctrinating, memorizing and rehashing from memorizing indoctrinated programs that is not teaching.
Those bible study sessions are not teaching sessions but programming sessions. When people go for job training they are not going for true teaching but programming.
IN PROGRAMMING THERE ARE INSTRUCTIONS OR PROGRAMMING THAT YOU MUST MEMORIZE BY REPETITION AND ONCE PROGRAMMED YOU RETRIEVE AS NEEDED TO APPLY TO SITUATIONS. THIS IS NOT TEACHING BUT PROGRAMMING.
IN TRUE TEACHING, KNOWLEDGE IS IMPARTED AND YOU DISCERN THUS KNOW.
THUS IF IT IS TRUE THERE IS CONSTANT PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF OTHERS THEN IF YOU HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY TAUGHT, YOU ARE CONVERTED FROM A PERSON WHO DID NOT SEE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE PAST TO A PERSON WHO NOW SEES AND UNDERSTANDS AND THEREFORE CAN PUT TO A STOP TO IT AND EXPERIENCE RELEASE FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE.
WHAT PEOPLE CALL TEACHING IS NOT TEACHING BUT PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAMMING MUST NOT BE MISTAKEN FOR TEACHING.
Jesus says you can move a mountain:
Jesus said that if you have faith as little as a mustard seed you can tell a mountain to move and it shall be done.
Thus whatever supernatural powers and miracles may be yours to perform if you are a sinless master of yourself and so if you were incapable of transforming yourself from sinner to sinless and I were to teach you so then teaching is the highest miracle because it leads the way to obtaining all the other miracles by yourself.
Faked delight:
He is doing a lot of work with his facial muscles and showing his teeth but it is for show to impress (not please) others that he is delighted or liking it. Such delight is always faked and a person who can fake is not to be trusted.
EVEN IF DELIGHT IS GENUINE IT IS MEANINGLESS STRESSFUL ENERGY WASTING ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE. PEOPLE CAN FAKE INTEREST TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OTHERS AND WHAT HE IS DOING IS FAKED, NOT ONCE BUT MANY TIMES IN THE PAST AND SUCH A PERSON IS A DANGEROUS MAN TO TRUST.
Calculating is the way to suffering:
The Buddha had spoken about being calculating as the way to woe not heaven.
Calculating requires self identity views, someone (self or family) to benefit materially as opposed to others and it is a robotic plan that is conditioning so that increasingly the person becomes addicted to being calculating that will end in torment, loss of control and mad calculating.
CALCULATING IS NEVER A VIRTUE BUT A VICE THAT IS TORMENTING, ADDICTIVE SO THAT IT BECOMES MADDER AND MADDER AND WILL END IN TORMENT AND THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO HEAVEN. CALCULATING IS A RULE THAT IN ANY SITUATION YOU ACT IN A WAY THAT FAVORS YOU MATERIALLY IN MINIMIZING LOSSES AND MAXIMIZING GAINS.
US Government 'hiding true amount of debt'
- By Gregory Bresiger
- From: NewsCore
- September 20, 2010 9:09AM
THE actual figure of the US' national debt is much higher than the official sum of $US13.4 trillion ($14.3 trillion) given by the Congressional Budget Office, according to analysts cited on Sunday by the New York Post.
"The Government is lying about the amount of debt. It is engaging in Enron accounting," said Laurence Kotlikoff, an economist at Boston University and co-author of The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future.
"The problem is we're seeing an explosion in spending," added Andrew Moylan, director of government affairs for the National Taxpayers Union.
In 1980, the debt - the accumulated red ink incurred by the Federal Government - was $US909 billion.
This represented some 33 per cent of gross domestic product, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
Thirty years later, based on this year's second-quarter numbers, the CBO said the debt was $US13.4 trillion, or 92 per cent of GDP.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Related Coverage
- Gloom weighs on fragile US recovery The Australian, 19 Aug 2010
- Sun could set suddenly on US as debt bites The Australian, 28 Jul 2010
- Historic change for US health care Adelaide Now, 22 Mar 2010
- China to cut lending to avoid bubbles The Australian, 5 Mar 2010
- US debt may spark next crisis: Fed The Australian, 16 Feb 2010
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
The CBO estimates the debt will be at $US16.5 trillion in two years, or 100.6 per cent of GDP.
But these numbers are incomplete.
They do not count off-budget obligations such as required spending for Social Security and Medicare, whose programs represent a balloon payment for the Government as more Americans retire and collect benefits.
In the case of Social Security, beginning in 2016, the US Government will be paying out more than it is collecting in taxes.
Without basic measures - such as payment cuts or higher payroll taxes - the system could be on the road to bankruptcy, according to officials.
"Without changes," wrote Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue, "by 2037 the Social Security Trust Fund will be exhausted. There will be enough money only to pay about $US0.76 for each dollar of benefits."
Mr Kotlikoff and Mr Moylan agree US national debt is much more than the official $US13.4 trillion number, but they disagree over how to add up the exact number.
Mr Kotlikoff says the debt is actually $US200 trillion.
Mr Moylan says the number is likely about $US60 trillion.
That is close to the figure quoted by David Walker, the US Comptroller General from 1998 to 2008. He launched a campaign to convince Americans that the federal spending and debt is a greater threat than terrorism.
But whichever figure is accurate, all three agree that the problem has worsened in the last few years.
They say it is because Congress and the Administration, whether Republican or Democrat, consistently overspend.
Not stirred:
I was watching TV on my computer and I was aware how steady my mind is that it is not stirred by the images and activities flickering on screen and how wonderfully peaceful and free of suffering it is compared to the past when my mind was stirred and disturbed by what I saw.
IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING TO HAVE YOUR MENTAL FORCE STIRRED BY WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR TO LIKE OR DISLIKE OR BE DISTURBED, IT IS WONDERFULLY PEACEFUL AND FREE OF SUFFERING TO BE NOT STIRRED BY WHATEVER IS HAPPENING.
PEOPLE CANNOT HELP BEING STIRRED BY WHAT THEY SEE BECAUSE THEY HAVE WELL CONDITIONED THEMSELVES TO BE STIRRED AND WITHOUT CONCERTED EFFORT TO TRAIN THEMSELVES NOT BE STIRRED THEY WILL NOT ESCAPE THE MIRE OF BEING STIRRED AND DISTURBED BY THINGS.
The wind parted the Red Sea?
The fact that the story that computer simulations suggest the wind could have parted the Red Sea for Jewish slaves to cross received widespread coverage on major news sites including BBC & Reuters indicate the extent of human delusion.
Since you were not there to witness, you either believe the biblical miracle or you do not, to postulate that the wind scientifically did it is impossible or very nearly so.
If the wind did it, it must be a freak occurrence and for it to occur at the opportune time to enable to Jews to cross but drown the pursuing Egyptians is itself miraculous notwithstanding that a parting by the wind would likely leave pools and puddles that will impede if not render impossible any physical crossing by a mass of people. On the other hand if God parted the sea it is likely to be dry as normal land.
It is unlikely if the wind could part the sea and part it for long enough for a mass of people to cross at a time when they needed to cross.
Have you tried crossing a mud bed?
Notwithstanding that the wind would be very strong or howling that would make it difficult to cross, a natural parting would produce a wet if not mud strewn surface which would make any crossing a struggle apart from pools of water.
THE FACT THEY WOULD DO COMPUTER SIMULATIONS AND THE STORY IS TAKEN UP BY SO MANY NEWSITES REFLECTS THE EXTENT OF HUMAN DELUSION AND GULLIBILITY.
I don’t understand:
When people say they don’t understand something said to them they are speaking falsely and those who perceive what is said is true has false perception.
Firstly it implies the person has understanding and it is what or how you say that fails their understanding when in truth what they have is not understanding, they do not have true understanding but what they have is programming and by “I don’t understand” they mean what you said does not ring a bell, does not correspond with programming they have that can be rehashed to explain what you are conveying or they are unable to cobble together a programming from what you are saying.
WHAT PEOPLE HAVE IS NOT UNDERSTANDING BUT PROGRAMMING AND SO WHEN THEY SAY THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND, THEY MEAN WHAT IS SAID OR PRESENTED DOES NOT RING A BELL, DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO REHASHABLE PRE-RECORDED EXPLANATIONS IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES OR THEY ARE UNABLE TO SYNTHESIZE FROM WHAT IS SAID TO THEM INTO A VIEW THAT IS IN LINE WITH THEIR FALSE WORLD VIEW OF WHAT THINGS SHOULD BE.
Secondly, it is not that they don’t understand but they were not paying attention or paying attention fitfully or distracted and so they did not get partially or totally get what is said to them; not they don’t understand.
WHEN PEOPLE SAY THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THEY ARE SPEAKING FALSELY BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT PAYING ATTENTION NOT DON’T UNDERSTAND.
The Buddha or Jesus never uttered, “I don’t understand what you are trying to get at” because everything that is said to them, whether true, false or nonsense can be fully understood by them as true, false or nonsense and therefore they always understand whatever is said to them.
IF YOU ARE ATTENTIVE AS YOU SHOULD IF SOMEONE IS SPEAKING TO YOU AND YOU HAVE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS TRUE (LIVE, SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION) THEN YOU WILL ALWAYS UNDERSTAND WHATEVER IS SAID TO YOU AS IT IS, TRUE, FALSE OR NONSENSE (MAKES NO SENSE).
No comments:
Post a Comment