Koh: Don’t dance to tune of extremists

People think they are giving great meaningful advice and some even think what they hear makes sense when it makes little sense.
“Don’t dance to tune of extremists” is a programming or rules logic that demands you either ignore or you take to heart meaning memorize and act according to its dictates. It is nonspecific to be applied to a set of situation.
Exactly who is an extremist and who is not? Is Dr M an extremist and therefore falls under the ambit of this rule? A man of true reason treats each case on a case by case basis, he doesn’t divide people into extremist and not dance to their tunes and classify others as non extremists and therefore dance to their tunes.
YOU SHOULD NOT DANCE TO THE TUNE OF ANYONE, NOT JUST EXTREMISTS BUT YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID TO YOU ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS AND ACCEPT OR REJECT ACCORDINGLY. THUS HE IS GIVING BAD ADVICE THAT MEANS VERY LITTLE AND IN FACT INCURS KARMA BECAUSE HE IS TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO, WANT OTHERS TO BE ROBOTS OBEYING HIM. HE THINKS NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT HE SAYS BUT HE FACES INSANITY AND DEBT FOR BAD ADVICE.
If what I say is true, how come no one in this world think or perceive as I do?
A platitude and rules logic:
“Don’t dance to the tunes of extremists” is a platitude and platitudes are not worth much and only for people who have no true understanding.
What is the point of telling others “Don’t dance to the tunes of extremists” if it is not to be faithfully or accurately registered in one’s mind and retrieved to be applied whenever one detects an extremist playing a tune? Because it is meant to be accurately remembered and retrieved to be applied in the future it is a programming or rules logic that you obey without understanding nor need to.
ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
OFTEN IT IS AUTOMATISM, THEY HAVE RECORDINGS OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO THAT IS AUTOMATICALLY TRIGGERED BY A SITUATION, EG SEE SOMEONE AND INSTANTLY ‘GOOD MORNING, HOW ARE YOU?’
THE NEXT BASIS OF ACTION IS FORCE, IT IS THEIR EMOTIONS, LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, AGITATION & FEAR THAT DRIVES THEM TO SAY OR DO CERTAIN THINGS.
IN MORE COMPLEX SITUATIONS THEY HAVE TO SUMMON RULES LOGIC OR PROGRAMMING LIKE ‘DON’T DANCE TO THE TUNE OF EXTREMISTS’ TO COMMAND THEM WHAT TO DO.
THE BASES OF PEOPLE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING’S ACTIONS ARE 1) REFLEX AUTOMATISM, 2) EMOTIONS & 3) RULES LOGIC.
Rehashing with grim determination:
Emotional stylish people perceive falsely if they think they are real live people who do not rehash like a robot, not only are they capable of rehashing, they are doing it all the time with whatever they perceive (see, hear, smell, taste, touch), think, say and do, rehashing is the only thing they know how to do and they have even grim determination or will power to keep rehashing or stick to and defend their robotic lifestyle despite much mind warping suffering.
NOT ONLY DO PEOPLE REHASH, THEY DO IT ALL THE TIME AND IT IS THE ONLY MODE OF BEHAVIOR THEY KNOW AND THEY GRIMLY STICK TO AND DEFEND THEIR WAY OF BEHAVIOR EVEN THOUGH THEY CANNOT SEE IT IS ROBOTIC REHASHING. NO UNDERSTANDING IS NEEDED TO REHASH BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS FIXED AND YOU ONLY NEED TO VARY THE POWER YOU SUPPLY OR SELECT THE RECORDED SEQUENCE TO BE PLAYED BACK AND SO EVEN IF THEY HAD TRUE UNDERSTANDING IN THE PAST, IT WILL DIE FROM ATROPHY.
Why it is senseless advice that leads to insanity:
There is true and there is false logic. This is true logic why the advice is senseless and because it is senseless and he and you perceive it is meaningful it is unconscious insanity that leads to uncontrollable insanity.
There are only these two possibilities regarding the given advice:
Either the listener sees and knows the rhetoric of extremists are false and harmful or dangerous or they don’t know.
If a person knows the rhetoric of extremists are false and dangerous he does not need anyone to tell him ‘don’t dance to the tunes of extremists.
If the person does not know that the rhetoric of extremists are dangerous and false they are unlikely to listen to you (so why waste your breath) or they have to follow what you say blindly without knowing why they should not dance to the tunes of extremists. How many will obey your programming and not dance to the tunes of extremists?
Thus the advice makes no sense, is silly and much ado about nothing and because you perceive it is full of meaning, is effective you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
Karma at work on Datuk Shafie:
Datuk Shafie Shahidan is a prominent wealthy lawyer who works corruptly for UMNO and is reputed to be the mastermind behind the sodomy allegations against Anwar. According to RPK he lost his second of three sons a week before this Raya in a road accident near Genting He lost another son a few Raya before.
Whatever fortune or misfortune that befalls an individual is the work of karma according to the Buddha, it is wrong view to say ‘who knows’ or it is just chance. Jesus said every hair on your head is numbered and not a sparrow will fall without the Father’s permission so how can misfortune afflicting sinners be mere random mistakes?
According to RPK, Shafie is the low key operator for UMNO whilst VK Linggam has a tendency to boast and spill beans when drunk whilst the two brothers who are charged with murdering Sosilawati are too crude. Without protection from above, these two lawyer brothers may not be so blatant.
Whatever fortune and misfortune having to an individual is the work of karma, do not get too excited about becoming very rich, it is scant reward compared to heaven according to the Buddha. Thus what has happened to Shafie is the work of karma, there is karma involved and you will be wise not to accumulate too much painful karma to be discharged.
The Buddha:
" Beings are owners of kammas, heirs of kammas, kammas as their homing-place. It is kammas that differentiate beings according to inferiority and superiority."

Unconjecturable

"There are these four unconjecturables.
"The Buddha-range of the Buddhas [i.e., the range of powers a Buddha develops as a result of becoming a Buddha]. If conjectured about, it would bring madness & vexation.
"The jhana-range of a person in jhana [i.e., the range of powers that one may obtain while absorbed in jhana]...
"The [precise working out of the] results of kamma...
"Conjecturing about [the origin, etc., of] the world would bring madness & vexation to the person.
You are telling me A is B and B is A?
A is A and never B or anything else and B is B, never A or anything else.
When a person says ‘aaahhhh’ or ‘Aalleeezzee’ he is trying to tell others that ‘aaahhhh’ is ‘ah’ and ‘Aalleeezzee’ is ‘Alice’ and that is falsification or wanting others to perceive what is B is A with debt or karma due.
You may think the added style or force stretched syllables with accelerations and decelerations in speed and loudness is harmless even charming, ‘just for fun’ or to spice things up, does not detract from or corrupt the meaning of what is said but you may be deluded because the style is evil and corrupting, wanting others to falsely perceive that ‘A’ is ‘B’ and ‘B’ is ‘A’.
When you say ‘bbooookkk!!’ instead of ‘book’ you are telling others (falsely) that ‘bbooookkk!! is ‘book’ when it isn’t and ‘book’ is ‘bbooookkk!!’
THUS WHEN A PERSON SPEAKS WITH STYLE OR FORCE STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS HE IS TELLING OTHERS WORDS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE AND HAVE NO FORCE STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS HAS STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS. HE IS TELLING OTHERS THAT WHAT IS REHASHED IMPERSONALLY STANDARDIZED IS THE SAME AS WHAT IS FRESHLY COMPOSED SPECIFIC FOR THE OCCASION.
BECAUSE THE FORCE CHANGES ACCOMPANYING ARE NOT HARMLESS BUT HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS IN STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DIVISION OF ATTENTION, IT IS A DEADLY SERIOUS DIFFERENCE THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO PASS OFF AS THE SAME OR EVEN CHARMING.
‘AAAHHH’ IS NEVER THE SAME AS ‘AH’ NOT IN AN INSIGNIFICANT WAY BUT IN A DEADLY HARMFUL WAY AND SO ANYONE WHO SAYS ‘AAHHH’ AND TRIES TO PASS IT OFF AS ‘AH’ IS COMMITTING A SERIOUS CRIME WITH PUNISHMENT NOT REWARD DUE.
The spirit of truth must be exceptionally wise and discerning:
When Jesus referred to the counsellor as the spirit of truth it is not a meaningless appellation to flatter but it must reflect reality. The Buddha said truth is not easily seen and ordinary people do not see it. And so for Jesus to refer to the counsellor as the spirit of truth, he must have an exceptional ability to see the truth (discernment) or see things as they truly are and thereby have exceptional wisdom.
Why the advice is nonsense:
If a person sees and understands that extremists’ rhetoric are false and evil, he does not need anyone to tell them ‘don’t dance to the tunes of extremists’. If he cannot see the extremists’ rhetoric are false and evil, he is unlikely to listen or take to heart or remember what you say and even if they take to heart what you say, it is without understanding or blind and they are merely mechanically robotically following what you said to not dance to the tunes of extremists. Thus your advice is not good but you (with karma) want others to blindly follow or be a robot to not dance to the tunes of extremists.
Lying all the time:
The person with style is lying to himself and others ALL THE TIME because there is style or force prolonging, changing speed and strength in whatever he perceives, says, thinks and does that is totally unnecessary and separate from what he says or does that he wants others to accept as part and parcel, even wholesome.
IF THERE ARE FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THAT YOU WANT OTHERS TO PERCEIVE IS INTEGRAL, PART AND PARCEL OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF DECEPTION, LYING ALL THE TIME TO YOURSELF AND OTHERS THAT WHAT IS UNNECESSARY, ALIEN IS INTEGRAL TO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING OR DOING. FURTHER WHAT YOU SAY IS STALE, REHASHED AND THAT TOO IS A FORM OF LYING, PRESENTING COUNTERFEIT COPIES AS THE REAL THING.
SO, YOU THINK YOU ONLY LIE OCCASIONALLY, THAT MAY BE WRONG VIEW THAT IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
No understanding is needed to rehash:
If you commit to memory what you understood and rehashed it en bloc later no understanding is needed during the rehash even if you understood it at first.
For example you can work out that 4x4 is 16 by putting together 4 lots of 4 sticks and adding all the sticks up to find 16 sticks and thus you know 4x4 is 16. But if you commit that to memory and subsequently just remember 4x4 is 16 then it becomes a blind automatic mechanical deed devoid of understanding, does not require understanding.
And so it is that whatever people want to say or do is committed to memory and they just retrieve as the occasion demands or they deem fit to dish out mechanically without understanding necessary and with time understanding atrophies and even dies and the person is just a robot or zombie going about his choreographed daily life.
No style? You are blind:
Even from the picture, the discerning person can tell there is style present or there is a manner in which the person holds the stethoscope with a certain ‘for show’ casualness mixed with exaltation of status.
He is not just holding the stethoscope but holding it with a style he finds meaningful.
Many relish or are thrilled with exercising their authority as doctors or priests, they think it is classy or stylish the white coats they wear and the way they carry themselves and speak and act as doctors or priests rather than fulfilling their duties as doctors and priests as conscientiously as they can.
IT IS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION THAT THE WAY WITH STYLE YOU POSTURE YOURSELF, TALK AND MOVE AS DOCTORS IS MEANINGFUL, IT IS ALL FOR SHOW AND A FIGMENT OF THEIR DELUSION AND IT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION. INSTEAD, EXALTING IN THEIR ROLES OR AUTHORITY THEY NEGLECT THEIR DUTIES AND WILL BE PUNISH FOR THEIR DERELICTION OF DUTY.
Is sad really so bad?
This is a fool who does not know what he is speaking.
Sadness has a nature and if you are a captive of sadness, prone to sadness and you don’t know its nature then you are a fool.
If he or she knows the nature of sadness he will not ask the question.
It is like the man with a noose around his neck and balancing on a wobbly stool that can strangle him asking “Is having a noose around my neck so bad?”
Do you know sadness?
Sadness is what people in this world experience regularly and they would say ‘yes, they know sadness’ when they are deluding themselves.
SADNESS IS WHAT PEOPLE EXPERIENCE REGULARLY WITHOUT KNOWING ITS NATURE.
IF YOU KNOW SADNESS YOU WILL KNOW THAT SADNESS IS CAUSED BY YOUR MENTAL FORCE PROLONGING WITHOUT DOING ANY WORK LIKE A REVVING ENGINE IN FREE GEAR AND IT IS LIKE A NOOSE TIGHTENING AROUND YOUR NECK REGULARLY THAT YOU CAN STILL LOOSEN TO A MORE COMFORTABLE LEVEL BUT YOU ARE BALANCED ON A WOBBLY STOOL AND CAN LOSE YOUR BALANCE FOR THE NOOSE TO HANG YOU. IF YOU KNEW THE NATURE OF SADNESS AND HOW IT CAN BE CURED BY LEARNING NOT TO USE FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES YOU WILL NOT ASK THE SILLY QUESTION, ‘IS SADNESS REALLY SO BAD?’
Knowing eyes:
Quote: With his pompadour haircut and knowing blue eyes, Tony Curtis cut a charming, good-humoured figure in Hollywood for more than half a century.
Eyes can only see or visually receive, knowing is not a function of eyes but the mind that possesses those eyes. Thus the mind behind your eyes may know or not know what it perceives or visually receive.
IT IS FLIRTING WITH MAD PERCEPTION SPEAKING OF EYES THAT KNOW IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING OTHERS THAT YOU KNOW SOMETHING THEY DON’T, THAT EYES CAN KNOW.
A fine liar:
Tony Curtis was paid tribute that he was a fine actor.
Acting is about pretending, lying with your speech and actions and so when you say someone is a fine actor you mean he is a fine liar with speech and actions.
IT AGAIN IS A REFLECTION OF PERVERSION, FALSE PERCEPTION THAT PEOPLE THINK BEING LABELLED A FINE ACTOR IS AN ACCOLADE WHEN IT MEANS YOU ARE A FINE LIAR.
Extremism & moderation are not criteria for dancing to:
First of all, you never dance to anybody’s tune, extremist or moderate, dancing to the tune is nothing to do with reason but being robots or puppets being pulled or controlled, like a cobra dancing to the snake charmer’s tune. So in speaking about dancing instead of ‘listening to’, he is deluded, implying that it is OK to dance to moderates’ tunes. It is never OK or meaningful to dance to anybody’s tunes and so in speaking about not dancing to extremists’ tunes he is deluded, does not understand what he says is meaningless.
Secondly, if by dancing he implies not listening to or not being influenced then it is again delusion to tout extremism against moderation as a criteria for listening to. It is not because you are moderate that you are good or true and you are extremist that you are bad and false, there is nothing to say that all moderates are true and good and so it is false with karma incurred to tell others not to listen to someone just because he is branded an extremist.
Jesus and the Buddha too were extremists, they advocated no compromises. Jesus’ views below can be considered extreme so do you not listen to him as Dr Koh exhorts?
Jesus: "Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's foes will be those of his own household. He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; 38 and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.
The Buddha refused to recite the Pattimokka leaving the congregation to sit in silence for the night because someone in the audience was not clean. Is this not extreme, uncompromising?
IT IS NOT BECAUSE YOU ARE OF THE SAME RACE OR MY FATHER OR MOTHER, OR MODERATE OR GOD THAT YOU ARE TRUE AND GOOD BUT IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE TRUE AND GOOD THAT YOU ARE TRUE AND GOD AND SO ANYONE WHO ADVOCATES NOT LISTENING TO SOMEONE JUST BECAUSE HE IS EXTREMIST AND LISTENING BECAUSE HE IS MODERATE IS TRAINING HIMSELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE LOGIC THAT ENDS IN MAD LOGIC. IF YOU HAVE AN IRRESISTIBLE URGE TO THROW YOURSELF INTO THE PATH OF A COMING TRAIN THAT IS MAD LOGIC.
DANCING TO THE TUNE IS ABOUT BEING EMOTIONALLY MINDLESSLY STIRRED TO ANOTHER’S INCITEMENTS AND THAT IS ALWAYS TO BE DISAPPROVED WHETHER THE SWAYER IS EXTREMIST OR MODERATE AND SO HE IS GIVING BAD ADVICE.
Windows’ meaningless lies:
This has happened in the past and it happened again today. I clicked Windows update and when the screen finally appeared it said my computer was up to date. Nevertheless to check if Windows was telling lies, I clicked ‘check for updates’ and after checking it said there were five important updates to download and install.
WHAT WINDOWS TELL YOU MAY NOT BE TRUE, MANY TIMES ON DIFFERENT COMPUTERS, IT TOLD ME THERE ARE NO UPDATES BUT WHEN I CHECKED, IT TURNED OUT THEY WERE LIES, THERE ARE UPDATES.
TKlassified:
Classified is spelt ‘classified’ not ‘klassified’ and it is serious perversion and not fun or clever to spell it a different way as is the trend today.
DO NOT THINK IT IS OK OR EVEN CLEVER OR CUTE TO CHANGE THE SPELLING OF WORDS, IT IS MISCHIEF AND TINKERING WITH TRUTH THAT IS DEADLY, HAS A PRICE IN SUFFERING IN FUTURE. THIS TOO IS A FORM OF FALSIFICATION AND DEFILING THAT HAS KARMA NOT MERIT ATTACHED.
It is emotion and false perception that drives:
Why do people have the urge to falsify or defile eg spell classified as klassified?
It is never true understanding but it is emotion and false perception that are the drives.
There are conventions how words are spelt and you should stick to those conventions.
It is their stirred emotions, their attraction to muck around, abuse, defile, to differentiate themselves by style or be clever to impress others that drive them to thus alter the spelling of words. Again they have false perceptions that the altered spellings are meaningful or desirable or cute.
Faces reflect karma:
The man in front is Tony Curtis in 2006 and he is barely recognizable from the ‘handsome’ young man and it is an accurate reflection of his karma or the sins he has perpetrated.
Acting is about being good at lying with speech and actions and so whatever their successes, they have very heavy burdens in karma to discharge.
HOW A PERSON LOOKS LIKE IS NOT AN ACCIDENT OR DUE TO GENETICS BUT IT IS THE PRODUCT OF THE PERSON'S ACTIONS AND REFLECTS KARMA. IF YOU DISAGREE IT IMPLIES YOU KNOW AND IF IT TURNS OUT WRONG THEN THAT IS WRONG VIEW AND IT IS THE WAY TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB AND THE BUDDHA SAID THERE IS NOTHING MORE TORMENTING THAN HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
What is possible and impossible:

The Impossibilities

268. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should think that any determinations are permanent. It is possible that an ordinary person should think that determinations are permanent.
269. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should think that any determinations are pleasant. It is possible that an ordinary person should think that determinations are pleasant.
270. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should think that any thoughts are his possession. It is possible that an ordinary person should think that thoughts are his possession.
271. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should destroy the life of his mother. It is possible that an ordinary person should destroy the life of his mother.
272.Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should destroy the life of his father. It is possible that an ordinary person should destroy the life of his father.
273. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should destroy the life of an arahant. It is possible that an ordinary person should destroy the life of an arahant.
274. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should cause blood to ooze from some person's body with a defiled mind. It is possible that an ordinary person should cause blood to ooze from some person's body with a defiled mind.
275. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should cause a schism in the Community. It is possible that an ordinary person should cause a schism in the Community.
276. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person come to right view should go to another teacher. It is possible that an ordinary person should go to another teacher.
277. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that two rightfully enlightened ones be born in the same world at one and the same time. It is possible that one rightfully enlightened one be born in the world at a certain time.
Dutiya vagga.
278. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that two universal monarchs be born in the world at one and the same time. It is possible that one universal monarch be born in the world at a certain time
279. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the worthy, rightfully enlightened all knowing one. It is possible that a man could be the worthy, rightfully enlightened all knowing one
280. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the universal monarch. It is possible that a man could be the universal monarch.
281. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the king of gods. It is possible that a man could be the king of gods.
282. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the king of Death (Màara). It is possible that a man could be the king of Death {Màra}
283. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a woman could be the highest divine one.{Brahmà} It is possible that a man could be the highest divine one {Brahmà)
284. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person misconducting bodily should achieve pleasant agreeable results on account of it. It is possible that a person misconducting bodily should achieve unpleasant disagreeable results on account of it
285.Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person misconducting verbally should achieve pleasant agreeable results on account of it. It is possible that a person misconducting verbally should achieve unpleasant disagreeable results on account of it
286. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person misconducting mentally should achieve pleasant agreeable results on account of it. It is possible that a person misconducting mentally should achieve unpleasant disagreeable results on account of it
Tatiyavagga.
287. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person developing bodily good conduct should achieve unpleasant disagreeable results. It is possible that a person developing bodily good conduct should achieve pleasant agreeable results.
288. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person developing verbal good conduct should achieve unpleasant disagreeable results. It is possible that a person developing verbal good conduct should achieve pleasant agreeable results.
289. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person developing mental good conduct should achieve unpleasant disagreeable results. It is possible that a person developing mental good conduct should achieve pleasant agreeable results.
290. Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person misconducting bodily, should on account of it, after death be born in increase, in a good state in heaven. It is possible that a person misconducting bodily, should on account of it, after death be born in decrease, in a bad state, in hell.
291.Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person misconducting verbally, should on account of it, after death be born in increase, in a good state in heaven. It is possible that a person misconducting verbally, should on account of it, after death be born in decrease, in a bad state, in hell.
292.Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person misconducting mentally, should on account of it, after death be born in increase, in a good state in heaven. It is possible that a person misconducting mentally, should on account of it be born in decrease, in a bad state, in hell.
293.Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person developing bodily good conduct, should on account of it, after death be born in decrease, in a bad state in hell. It is possible that a person developing bodily good conduct, should on account of it, after death be born in increase, in a good state, in heaven.
294.Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person developing verbal good conduct, should on account of it, after death be born in decrease, in a bad state in hell. It is possible that a person developing verbal good conduct, should on account of it, after death be born in increase, in a good state, in heaven.
295..Bhikkhus, it is impossible that a person developing mental good coonduct, should on account of it, after death be born in decrease, in a bad state in hell. It is possible that a person developing mental good conduct, should on account of it be born in increase, in a good state, in heaven.
A man who conceals:
There is no truth in such a man, behind his cultivated smile and clenched facial muscles is dishonesty and aggression, he is only presenting an image of himself and will not reveal his true thoughts. He is walled off and speaking behind that wall. A discerning man does not need to be cautious, he sees and knows what he says and does, does not reflect the truth.
Things to remember about karma:
You may say you are Christian and don’t believe in karma but remember there is judgment in Christianity and God has powers over you and would not hesitate to punish you and Jesus said many will call his name and He will tell them, “I don’t know you, you evil doers”.
(The man of truth does not speak of beliefs, does not harbour beliefs, it is not a matter of whether you believe or not believe in karma but whether you see karma exists or not. By saying you don’t believe in karma you are acknowledging that you are a fool who takes up a position without seeing it is true. So, say there is no karma, don’t say ‘I don’t believe in karma and if there is karma as the Buddha said and you say there is no, that is wrong view and the way to hell or the animal womb)
The important thing to remember about karma is no matter whether you see or do not see yourself doing wrong, doing is wrong is always suffering or stressful but this is only the first instalment of karma, there is a second worse instalment at old age and the instalment after death is likely to be the most painful and everlasting (Jesus said even the man who calls his brother you fool is in danger of the fire of hell).
YOU HAVE NOT REPAID IN SUFFERING FOR YOUR PAST WRONGS SO DON’T BE TOO SURE THE PAIN IS QUITE MANAGEABLE OR YOU WON’T MIND IT. THE FRUIT MAY BE FAR MORE BITTER AND EVERLASTING THAN IN YOUR WILDEST DREAMS.
HAVE YOU EXPERIENCED THE EXCRUCIATING TOOTH ACHE OR STUBBED YOUR TOE? THAT PAIN AND FAR WORSE AND EVERLASTING MAY BE WHAT YOU ARE BEQUEATHING YOURSELF IN OLD AGE AND AFTER DEATH AS A RESULT OF YOUR HEEDLESS PURSUIT OF MATERIAL GAINS AND PLEASURES THAT HARMS OTHERS.
A person of true understanding never believes anything:
If you confess or admit to beliefs then you are not a person with true understanding.
A person of true understanding never accepts or harbours beliefs, what he does not see or know as true he only classifies or labels as plausible, very probable but he never believes them as true.
WHATEVER A PERSON BELIEVES IN CAN BE REDUCED TO A PLAN WHICH IS A FORM OF PROGRAMMING AND THE PERSON MERELY FOOLISHLY USES FORCE TO ACCEPT AND PERCEIVE IT AS TRUE AND THAT IS SURRENDERING YOURSELF TO BECOME A SLAVE OR ROBOT OF THAT BELIEF. IN TRUTH A LOT OF THE THINGS PEOPLE PERCEIVE AS TRUTH OR FACTS (EG GARLIC CURES CANCER, YOGA OR TAI CHI IS GOOD FOR HEALTH) ARE BELIEFS.
A PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS NEVER BELIEVES ANYTHING BECAUSE THAT MEANS BLINDLY ACCEPTING AND FORCING ONESELF TO PERCEIVE AS TRUE WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE OR KNOW IS TRUE. IT IS EMBRACING DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY EVEN IF IT TURNS OUT WHAT YOU BELIEVED IS TRUE.
THUS THE PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS NEVER BELIEVES IN HEAVEN, HE MERELY DECIDES THAT IT IS PLAUSIBLE HEAVEN EXISTS. HE ONLY DEALS IN FACTS OR WHAT HE SEES AND WHAT IS PRESENTED THAT HE DOES NOT SEE, HE DETERMINES IF THEY ARE PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE, VERY LIKELY TRUE OR UNLIKELY TO BE TRUE, SEEING THE DANGERS OF BELIEFS, HE NEVER COMMITS HIMSELF TO ACCEPT AND PERCEIVE AS TRUE WHAT HE NEVER PERCEIVED AS TRUE.
THUS ANYONE WHO HAS BELIEFS IS NOT A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHO NEVER HARBOR ANY BELIEFS, DOES NOT DEAL WITH BELIEFS BUT FACTS.
Dependency is evil and suffering:
This is a world that practices and encourages dependency and the dependency that they are aware they practice is like the tip of the iceberg, they are dependant and demanding dependency from others far more than they realize.
THIS IS A WORLD THAT PRACTICES AND DEMANDS DEPENDENCY AND THE OCCURRENCE OF DEPENDENCY FAR EXCEEDS PEOPLE’S AWARENESS.
You need force never true reason or meaning to be dependent and dependency is based on mental force driving the dependent person to lean against or look to the depended person for support and do or say things for him or her. Not just that, dependency is a programming and the dependent person is a robot obeying the dependency program and that is always tormenting, being a robot and whoever wants or encourages others to be dependent on them (eg pretty wife you want tethered to you) has karma to be experienced as future suffering not merit.
Slavery is a manifestation of dependency, the slave becomes attached or imprisoned by you in exchange for basic sustenance and people keep pets like birds and fish trapped to be dependent on them.
Many husbands or wives are very bossy, they keep telling their spouses what to do and this has the effect of cultivating dependency, wanting others to do as you tell them and so become a slave or robot dependent on you for instructions.
True friendship is one thing, wanting to incarcerate another physically or psychologically by cultivating dependency is another thing. You can be good friends with another, enjoying each others’ company and assisting and giving advice and teaching without any dependency involved and that is the happiest true relationship.
REFLECTING PEOPLE’S WRONG UNDERSTANDING HERE AS EVERYWHERE ELSE, PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF DEPENDENCY OR THINK DEPENDENCY IS GOOD, IT IS GOOD TO DEPEND ON OTHERS AND WANT OTHERS TO DEPEND ON YOU WHEN IT IS EVIL, CREATES DEBT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING, IS NOT BASED ON MEANING BUT BLIND FORCE AND FORCES THE DEPENDENT PERSON TO BE A ROBOT OF THE DEPENDENCY PROGRAM.
As the Buddha said:

Nibbana Sutta: Total Unbinding (4)

One who is dependent has wavering. One who is independent has no wavering. There being no wavering, there is calm. There being calm, there is no desire. There being no desire, there is no coming or going. There being no coming or going, there is no passing away or arising. There being no passing away or arising, there is neither a here nor a there nor a between-the-two. This, just this, is the end of stress.

Why the counsellor must come physically:
Embedded in John’s gospel (I think John alone was taken up a mountain by Jesus) are references to the coming of the counsellor who Jesus called the Holy Spirit.
Bible scholars throughout the ages were at loss what to make of those references and some implied the Holy Spirit will come in the minds of people to teach them when it is even impossible that this is the case but just as the Buddha (the one who thus comes because no one sent him) and Jesus (sent by God) had to come to this world in order to teach even so the counsellor has to physically come.
The Buddha had to go to heaven to teach his mother and beings there and it is reported that routinely devas (angels) and even brahmas (higher) approached the Buddha for instructions and so it may not be possible for a being to teach by appearing in the minds of others.
If the Buddha and Jesus had to be born to teach the world, it is likely the counsellor too has to come physically which is supported by what Jesus said in reference to the counsellor.
As the Buddha said, there are those easy to teach, those difficult to teach and those impossible to teach and so teaching is not a ‘one off’ or instant thing except for rare exceptional beings, for the majority it is a painstaking process, even the disciples were rebuked by Jesus ‘are you still without understanding?’ when they started to grumble they had no bread on the boat because they forgot to pack bread.
BECAUSE TEACHING IS A LABORIOUS PROCESS FOR BEINGS WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING, THE COUNSELLOR MUST COME PHYSICALLY AND PAINSTAKINGLY NOT INSTANTANEOUSLY TEACH.
What Jesus said in those references are virtually certain indicators the counsellor will come physically. Why tell people of a coming counsellor and that he will not speak on his own authority if the counsellor miraculously spoke in the minds of people?
“But when he comes” is an indication that the counsellor will not come immediately but later. “If I go, I will send him to you” implies that just as Jesus will physically go, the counsellor will physically come. “He dwells with you and shall be in you” means he will live amongst you and just as Jesus is in his Father and you are in Jesus (united) the counsellor too shall be in you or those who are sheep instead of recalcitrant objecting opinionated goats.
‘I have yet many things to say to you but you cannot bear them now but when he comes,’ is an indication that there are consciousness constraints existing then that renders impossible understanding but when the counsellor comes, those consciousness restraints will be eased and you can then bear or understand.
“He will not speak on his own authority but whatever he hears, he will speak” only make sense if the counsellor is someone who appears anonymous just like everyone, speaking on his own authority, does not exhibit miraculous powers to back him up. Jesus does not need to tell anyone that a spirit speaking in the minds of people is divine.
When King Herod heard about the birth of Jesus, he had all male children born in the kingdom slaughtered and Mary had to escape to Egypt. That mention of the counsellor was restricted to only John’s gospel and it was embedded or scattered in his farewell message is an indication that the counsellor will also come and the message of his coming too must be hidden from evil eyes.
THE FACT THAT JESUS DID NOT IDENTIFY THE COUNSELLOR MEANS THE DESCRIPTION GIVEN BY JESUS SUFFICES TO IDENTIFY HIM, WHAT IS THE POINT OF DESCRIBING SOMETHING THAT READERS CANNOT IDENTIFY? THUS BASED ON THAT DESCRIPTION, THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING CAN RECOGNIZE WHO THE COUNSELLOR IS WHILST THE DELUDED ARE CLUELESS AND OBJECTING.
Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth (anyone who is spirit of truth must be exceptionally wise and discerning), whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him; you know him, for he dwells with you, and will be in you (The world will not receive the counselor so if he is received by the world he is not the counselor).
"These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (the counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning.
But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (The coming of the counselor must bring clear advantage to you eg if he alleviates suffering consciousness constraints and teaches you important things that no one else can or will teach)
And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment (whoever convinces the world of sin, righteousness and judgment is the counselor, beings of this world are not interested in whether there is sin or not let alone convince the world of sin): concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged.
"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now (something will happen, a consciousness change will occur that makes you able to bear). When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you. All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.
There are no good and bad dependencies:
There may be those who will argue that there are dependencies that are good, mutually beneficial and there are bad dependencies.
This is not the truth and reflects their delusion or false view of things.
ALL DEPENDENCIES ARE EVIL, NOT TO BE DEPENDENT IS RELEASE FROM EVIL AND BONDAGE AND SO IF YOU THINK THERE ARE GOOD AND BAD DEPENDENCIES YOU ARE A FOOL AND DELUDED, HEADED FOR SUFFERING NOT RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
THUS ANYONE WHO SAYS ‘YOU CAN DEPEND ON ME’ IS HEAPING KARMA, ASKING OTHERS TO DEPEND ON HIM. JUST MAKE SURE YOU FULFILL WHAT YOU PROMISED, YOU DON’T HAVE TO TELL OTHERS TO DEPEND ON YOU.
You shall love not depend on each other:
You shall love one another not depend on one and another.
If you think the two are the same you are deluded.
True love is free, does not depend on any pre-conditions (eg you marry me or you are my child), it is doing and saying things that do not hurt, is true (not sarcastic), doing things that benefit and bring happiness to others without expectation of self gain or rewards.
Dependency is about selfishly keeping others in orbit around you to do things for you (cook and wash your clothes, provide sex for you), it is making use of others and then discarding them when they have ceased to be useful to you.
LOVE AND DEPENDENCY ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS AND IF YOU THINK THEY ARE THE SAME OR INVOLVED TOGETHER YOU HAVE MUDDLED THINKING THAT IS THE WAY TO MUDDLED DESTINATION NOT HEAVEN.
Can a spirit in the mind dwell with you?
It is farfetched if not impossible that a spirit who comes in mind not physically can dwell with you as Jesus said and herein is another indication amongst many that the counsellor will also come physically. Jesus is telling you that the counsellor will dwell or live with or amongst you.
Has anyone heard a spirit in their minds teaching them all things and if they haven’t, has the counsellor’s time not yet come?
Jesus said the counsellor will teach you all things and convince the world of sin, righteousness and judgment.
This implies no one has taught you all the things the counsellor will teach and no one has convinced the world of sin, righteousness and judgment and so if anyone other than the counsellor has done so, it would have rendered false what Jesus said that (only) the counsellor will do so.
Why is Jesus telling you this?
IF THE COUNSELLOR WAS TO APPEAR IN THE MIND, NO ONE CAN HARM HIM AND WHAT HE WILL SPEAK WILL BE SELF EVIDENT, WILL SPEAK FOR ITSELF, SO WHY SHOULD JESUS GO INTO SUCH LENGTH TO CONCEAL HIS MESSAGE AND TELL YOU WHAT HE WILL DO? THUS FOR JESUS TO DO SO MUST MEAN THE COUNSELOR WILL COME IN PERSON AND PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW ABOUT HIM (AND NEED TO BE TOLD) AND IT IS PERTINENT JESUS DESCRIBED IN DETAIL WHAT HE WILL DO AND BASED ON THAT DESCRIPTION IT IS POSSIBLE FOR SOME (NOT ALL) TO IDENTIFY THE COUNSELOR. IF THE COUNSELOR WERE TO COME IN THE MIND, JESUS NEED ONLY TO TELL PEOPLE THAT A COUNSELOR OR VOICE WILL SPEAK IN YOUR MIND AND TEACH YOU EVERYTHING. WHO CAN HARM OR STOP HIM SPEAKING IN YOUR MIND?
THUS THE REASON FOR JESUS TO SPEAK AND CONCEAL HIS MESSAGE IS BECAUSE THE COUNSELOR WILL ALSO COME SECRETLY (AS RANSOM) AND IT IS POSSIBLE FOR PEOPLE TO IDENTIFY HIM BASED ON THE MESSAGE.
Why is Jesus seemingly taking the trouble to hide references to a counsellor scattering them in his farewell message and only in the gospel according to John?
If it is about a counsellor who will come in the mind then people have no choice, they cannot stop the counsellor coming in their minds and it is self evident, so why tell people about it?
The reason Jesus has to tell people about the counsellor is because they do not about the counsellor and his coming and Jesus wants to inform you and the fact that he did not pinpoint who the counsellor indicates that the identity of the counsellor is self evident based on his description, just as it is possible from clues provide for some (not all) treasure hunters to successfully arrive at the destination, it is possible based on the description Jesus gave for those who are discerning to know who the counsellor is.
If the counsellor comes in the mind, Jesus does not need to inform you or tell you in detail what his mission is because it would be self evident what he will teach and it is miraculous for a being to come in your mind.
Jesus also said:
Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the (Holy) Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.
OK you know the truth when you see it and you know I cannot be the Holy Spirit and you think it is offensive and outrageous that I should impute so (your mental force is stirred strongly repulsively) but if you turn out to be wrong, you will be held to account because Jesus said whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, not in this Age or the next Age or eternity which means you will have to pay back every single penny before you are let out of prison.
THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL ALSO COME AS THE SON OF MAN CAME AND HE WILL SPEAK AND WHOEVER SPEAKS AGAINST HOWEVER GENTLY WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN.
The man of style always carries a sack of bricks:
The man of style is the man who always carries a sack of bricks of considerable weight no matter what he does, even in sleep he carries his sack of bricks into and during sleep.
A sack of brick is useless for show, cannot eaten as a sack of potatoes can be eaten.
His style that requires the additional use of force to stretch, change speed and strength far in excess of what is actually needed consumes energy to produce considerable stress that is like carrying a sack of bricks on your back.
Stylish people don’t even know they are carrying a sack of bricks on their backs let alone that they can let it down.
The man without style is the man who has dropped his sack of bricks, everything he does is without that sack of bricks and so he is elated, a freed man released from his useless sack on his back.
NOT A MOMENT PASSES WHEN THE STYLISH MAN IS RID OF HIS SACK OF BRICKS ON HIS BACK. WHATEVER HE DOES AND EVEN WHEN HE SLEEPS HE CARRIES THAT SACK OF USELESS BRICKS THAT IS NOT EDIBLE, SERVES NO PURPOSE EXCEPT THAT IT IS DEMANDED AND EXTORTED BY THIS WORLD, IS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS.
The true Anwar:
Anwar is the subject of character assassination and what this reporter describes below presents a truer picture of Anwar that was evident to me long ago.

Anwar waves his magic and and thrills European audiences

GUEST COLUMNISTS

Monday, 04 October 2010 Combat By Tunku Abdul Aziz, MySinchew
I have had to come all the way to Brussels and Berlin to discover a side of Anwar Ibrahim that I was wrong about.
Reading the Barisan Nasional-owned newspapers that consistently portrayed him as a “traitor to Malaysia” who exaggerated the situation obtaining in the country given half a chance, I have, I must admit, tended to view him as a self-serving political demagogue who could not care less about the fate of his country as long as he achieved his ambition of becoming prime minister.
Anwar spoke last Monday evening (28 September 2010), on “Liberal Values in the Muslim World – Why Islam and Democracy are Destined to Coincide” to a packed hall of some of Europe’s powerful decision makers. These were men and women with wide international experience and could not be easily hoodwinked even if he had tried.
It was vintage Anwar, perfect smooth as silk delivery of a complex, serious subject to a critical audience. He knew his stuff. His was more than a speech; it was an intellectual journey mapped out by someone who knew the area traversed like the back of his hand.
There he stood, under the spotlight, his charming and quietly confident self as always, speaking without a note for a full hour. Earlier in the day, when he said to me he had to go back to his hotel room to give his speech the once over, I told him half in jest that he could make his speech standing on his head. He did just that and more. He successfully won the audience over with his argument, supported by historical antecedents and more recent examples that completely demolished the conventional wisdom in non-Muslim circles that Islam and democracy were somehow incompatible bed fellows. He challenge the unfounded belief that it was against the order of nature for Islam to embrace democracy as seriously flawed because of the underlying assumption that Muslims, unlike others, were not born free to exercise their democratic rights.
As I sat listening to the prime minister Malaysia never had, thanks to Mahathir the Maverick, and who might yet take the country by storm, Anwar, I mean, not Mahathir, I could not help thinking how utterly sad and absurd for Najib, whose articulation of his 1Malaysia slogan invariably finishes in a cul-de-sac, offering his services to Obama to help bring about greater understanding of Islam, the religion of peace, among the majority American non-Muslims. My dear fellow, charity begins at home.
The only Malaysian politician, who can, without making a fool of himself, stride the world stage with the right combination of strong intellectual credentials and honesty, is not to be found within the serried ranks of the BN, but in the person of Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysia’s iconic liberal democrat.
As I saw here in Brussels, he had the European parliamentary leadership, figuratively speaking, eating out of his hands. Many have already put the champagne on ice; they clearly see this victim of a rotten political system as the next man to lead the country.
Not possible:
If the Buddha who claims he is the highest teacher had to be born in this world to exert and attain enlightenment, he had to go to heaven to teach his mother and the gods, the gods had to come to earth to be taught by him, he could access heaven at will and so could retire to the incomparable comforts of heaven and teach from there if it was possible to teach remotely without coming to this world, if Jesus had to born in this world to teach and did not retire to heaven to teach from there, it is highly unlikely if not impossible that the counsellor described by Jesus could teach remotely from heaven without physically coming to this world.
THE BUDDHA HAD TO GO TO HEAVEN TO TEACH BEINGS THERE, ANGELS ROUTINELY VISITED THE BUDDHA AT NIGHT BATHING THE PLACE IN BRILLIANT LIGHT, THE BUDDHA CAN ACCESS HEAVEN AT WILL SO IF IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR A BEING TO TEACH REMOTELY WITHOUT REMAINING IN THIS WORLD, THE BUDDHA WOULD HAVE TAUGHT BEINGS IN HEAVEN WITHOUT GOING THERE AND HE COULD HAVE TAUGHT BEINGS HERE REMOTELY FROM HEAVEN WITHOUT REMAINING IN THIS TORMENTING WORLD.
IT IS BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO TEACH REMOTELY WITHOUT COMING TO THIS WORLD THAT THE BUDDHA AND JESUS HAD TO COME TO THIS WORLD, THE BUDDHA CALLED HIMSELF ‘TATHAGATHA’, ‘THE ONE WHO THUS COMES’.
The Buddha cannot be in two places at once:
In order to speak with Ven. Anuruddha, the Buddha had to first disappear from where he was and then appear before Ven. Anuruddha to speak to him rather than speaking remotely to him through his mind. Thus for the counsellor to speak in the minds of people he must be in many places at once or he will be a very busy and exhausted man hopping from mind to mind.

Anuruddha Sutta:To Anuruddha

In seclusion, this line of thinking arose in Ven. Anuruddha's awareness: "This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing. This Dhamma is for one who is content, not is discontent. This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled. This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not lazy. This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused. This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not uncentered. This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not whose discernment is weak."
Then the Blessed One, realizing with his awareness the line of thinking in Ven. Anuruddha's awareness disappeared from among the Bhaggas, and re-appeared right in front of Ven. Anuruddha. The Blessed One said to him, "Good, Anuruddha. It's good that you think these thoughts of a great person.' Now then, Anuruddha, think the eighth thought of a great person: 'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.'
"Anuruddha, when you think these eight thoughts, then -- whenever you want -- quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful qualities, you will enter & remain in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. When you think these eight thoughts, then -- whenever you want -- with the stilling of directed thought and evaluation, you will enter & remain in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation -- internal assurance...with the fading of rapture, you will remain in equanimity, mindful & alert, physically sensitive to pleasure. You will enter & remain in the third jhana, 'Equanimous and mindful, he has a pleasurable abiding.' When you think these eight thoughts of a great person, then -- whenever you want -- with the abandoning of pleasure & pain, you will enter & remain in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither-pleasure-nor-pain.
"Now, when you think these eight thoughts and become a person who can attain at will, these four jhanas then your robe of cast-off rags will seem just like the clothes chest of a householder, full of clothes of many colors. As you live contented, it will serve for your delight, comfortable abiding, non-agitation, & for alighting on Unbinding.
" your meal of almsfood will seem like the rice of a householder served with a variety of sauces & seasonings...your dwelling at the foot of a tree will seem like the gabled mansion of a householder, your bed on a spread of grass will seem like the couch of a householder .
Then, the Blessed One disappeared and reappeared among the Bhaggas. He sat down and addressed the monks: "Monks, I will teach you the eight thoughts of a great person. "
"'This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing.' There is the case where a monk, being modest, does not want it to be known that 'He is modest.' Being content, he does not want it to be known that 'He is content.' Being reclusive, he does not want it to be known that 'He is reclusive.' His mindfulness being established, he does not want it to be known that 'His mindfulness is established.' Being endowed with discernment, he does not want it to be known that 'He is endowed with discernment.' Enjoying non-complication, he does not want it to be known that 'He is enjoying non-complication.'
"'This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent.' There is the case where a monk is content with any old robe cloth at all, any old almsfood, any old lodging, any old medicinal requisites at all.
"'This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled.' There is the case where a monk, when living in seclusion, is visited by monks, nuns, lay men, kings. With his mind bent on seclusion, he converses with them only as much is necessary.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not is lazy.' There is the case where a monk keeps his persistence aroused for abandoning unskillful mental qualities and taking on skillful mental qualities. He is steadfast, solid in his effort.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused.' There is the case where a monk is mindful, remembering even things that were done & said long ago.
"'This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered.' There is the case where a monk, quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful mental qualities, enters & remains in the first jhana. With the stilling of directed thought & evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana. With the fading of rapture he remains in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure. He enters & remains in the third jhana.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness.
"'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' There is the case where a monk is endowed with discernment of arising & passing away -- leading to the right ending of stress.
"'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.' There is the case where a monk's mind grows confident, firm in the cessation of complication.

Why people shut their eyes when laughing:
Ordinary people perceive such laughter as an expression of happiness when it is a conditioned meaningless expression that is for show to impress others. She is not trying to please but to impress that she is enjoying herself or happy and that is false.
People usually if not always shut their eyes when they laugh thus to close their eyes to their deceit and give themselves to their deceit.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANYONE CAN TRULY UNDERSTAND WHEN THEY LAUGH. THE EYES ARE SHUT TO ASSIST IN THE DECEIT, TO GIVE THEMSELVES TOTALLY TO THEIR HARMFUL DECEIT AND REFUSE TO SEE THE MEANINGLESSNESS EVEN STRESSFULNESS OF WHAT THEY ARE DOING, NAMELY LAUGHING. THERE IS GRIM RUTHLESS DETERMINATION TO RAM THROUGH THEIR LAUGHTER THAT IS INTENDED FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS OTHERS AND TOWARDS THIS END IT IS HELPFUL TO SHUT YOUR EYES AND GIVE YOURSELF ENTIRELY TO THE FAKERY.
AS SURE AS NIGHT FOLLOWS DAY, SHE AND ANYONE LAUGHING THUS HAS WOE IN THEIR FUTURES.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD FALSELY PERCEIVE AND UNDERSTAND THAT SHE IS HAPPY AND EXPRESSING IT. THE TRUTH IS IT IS STRESSFUL, RESTLESSNESS INDUCING AND DISTRACTING (AFTERWARDS IT TAKES TIME FOR HER TO REGAIN COMPOSURE OR CONCENTRATION) AND SHE IS FAKING IT, AS SHE HAS DONE MANY TIMES BEFORE AND SO IT IS REHASHED AND SHE IS A ROBOT HEADED FOR ROBOT FAILURE AND INSANE LAUGHTER.
SO YOU THINK YOU HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU SEE BUT YOUR UNDERSTANDING MAY BE FALSE AND YOU HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT ENDS IN HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
Japan warns of China’s military:
Do you understand the implications or unrighteousness of this warning?
If Japan sees China’s military as a threat, it should take actions to counter but to warn others is to try to gang up others to take action against China and that is karma, trying to instigate others to act against China.
WHY WARN OTHERS ABOUT CHINA’S MILITARY EXCEPT TO WANT OTHERS TO GANG UP AGAINST CHINA. IF YOU PERCEIVE CHINA AS A THREAT THEN YOU UNILATERALLY TAKE ACTION, NOT WARN OTHERS. THE STATEMENT HAS DEADLY KARMA FOR THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE AND HE THINKS HE IS DOING GOOD.
I don’t need anyone:
You hear people saying in a huff, “I don’t need any friends or anyone”. It is never reason or truth that is the source of what they say but it is anger to attack the other person and so it is here as in many places people think it is reason that is the source of their actions but it is blind force, they don’t mean what they say, it is not true they don’t need friends but they are speaking falsely to attack.
What they do not realize is that they can be put to the test, born in a desolate place shorn of any contacts not for one or two years but even thousands of years.
IF YOU SAY YOU DON’T NEED FRIENDS YOUR WISH MAY BE GRANTED, YOU CAN BE BORN IN DESOLATE LOCATIONS DEVOID OF CONTACT FROM OTHERS. IT IS NOT TRUTH BUT FORCE OR EMOTION THAT IS DRIVE FOR PEOPLE TO RASHLY UTTER SUCH NONSENSE TO SPITE OTHERS NOT REALIZING THEY ARE HEAPING SUFFERING FOR THEMSELVES.
IT IS EMOTION THAT IS A PROXY OF BLIND MENTAL FORCE THAT DRIVES PEOPLE TO SAY AND DO SILLY THINGS THAT AFTERWARDS THEY MAY REGRET AND THENCE HAVE TO PAY DEARLY IN SUFFERING.
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WHO HAS DESTROYED ALL EMOTION TO BE DRIVEN TO SAY OR DO SILLY THINGS?
Berlusconi laughs off criticisms:
Criticisms are either correct or false and so a rational address of criticisms would be to refute or acknowledge. Laughter is an inappropriate response and so it is controlled insanity that will end in insanity.
Do you understand what he is doing?
What he is expressing by laughing is that he likes what he dislikes or detest and therefore he is lying (that stirs conflict in himself and others) and doing something that is meaningless. What is the meaning of expressing that your mental force is stirred attractively (liking) at what you disliked (stirred repulsively)?
THE MEANING OF THE LAUGHTER IS TO EXPRESS FALSELY THAT STIRS CONFLICT IN HIM AND OTHERS THAT HE LIKED (HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY) BY WHAT ACTUALLY STIRRED HIS MENTAL FORCE REPULSIVELY (DISLIKE). THUS HE IS TRAINING HIMSELF TO BE CONFLICTED THAT WILL END IN AGONY AND HE HAS DEBTS WANTING OTHERS TO BE CONFLICTED.
Mrs Lee was a tower of strength for MM Lee, says SM Jayakumar
It is never the truth but a fabrication that A is a tower of strength for B not without purpose but to make much of a situation, to not let your yes be yes only.
It is impossible for anyone to see that A is a tower of strength for B and so it is speaking without knowing or knowing what you say is fabricated that will end in torment and doubt and uncertainty. After saying so, he must believe or use force to accept as true what he said.
Only when a person sticks to speaking what he sees and knows will he be not in danger of future suffering. There is no need to speak of towers of strength except to stir emotion and make much about an occasion that is not letting your yes be yes only that comes from evil according to Jesus.
Do you mean LKY was a weakling who needs the tower of strength of his wife?
‘TOWER OF STRENGTH’ IS FABRICATED, COPIED FROM OTHERS TO BE REHASHED ROBOTICALLY SOMETIMES MORE APTLY SOMETIMES MORE BIZARRE, WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING, IT IS MEANT TO BE FALSELY NICE, TO MAKE MUCH OF SOMETHING AND UNNECESSARILY UNDERTAKING FUTURE SUFFERING COMPARED TO SOMEONE WHO ABSTAINS.
What you need is wisdom not strength:
In times of distress or when faced with adversity, you need a source of (genuine) wisdom to help find a way through, not strength and so either the speaker mistakes a tower of strength to be a fountain of wisdom or he is deluded. What strength can a woman lend a man? If you need strength or brute muscle, better to hire a few thugs than rely on your wife.
THUS IN TIMES OF DISTRESS YOU NEED A FOUNTAIN OF GENUINE WISDOM TO FIND A PATH OUT IF THERE IS RATHER THAN A TOWER OR SOURCE OF STRENGTH. FORCE CAN ONLY RESIST AND FIGHT AND IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT LKY SHOULD NEED HIS WOMAN’S STRENGTH TO CARRY HIM THROUGH.
IT IS GENUINE PRAISE TO SAY SOMEONE IS A FOUNTAIN OF WISDOM AND IT REFLECTS FALSE UNDERSTANDING AND FORCE WORSHIP THAT PEOPLE PERCEIVE IT IS PRAISE TO DESCRIBE SOMEONE AS A TOWER OF STRENGTH.
Only force has strength and work is its only true function:
When faced with the statement A is a tower of strength for B, the person with true understanding immediately sees it as a baseless statement to be nice or stir mental forces.
It is possible to work out by true logic why it is a senseless and therefore false statement. He was not the first nor last to use that statement and so it is copied without understanding the falsity of the statement.
Tower means tall or enormous and only force has strength and the only source in A is her mental force and so by saying A is a tower of strength for B you can only truly mean A’s mental force is a source of enormous strength for B.
Force can only do work and the only meaningful work A’s enormous strength can do for B is like taking care of B when he is sick, taking care of his children, helping out in his office work. It is farfetched that just because A does all these for B she is a tower of strength for A.
So whatever A’s enormous strength can do for B is not meaningful work but in terms of something virtual or false like support or inspiration, somehow, A’s enormous strength of force inspires or supports B.
If A inspires B it means somehow B’s mental force is stirred or inspired by A and thus inspired or stirred he went on to achieve everything he achieved and so his achievements is based on the blind meaningless stirring of force facilitated by B not genuine understanding why he should do what he did.
THUS IF A’S TOWER OF STRENGTH INSPIRED B TO HIS ACHIEVEMENTS IT MEANS HIS ACHIEVEMENTS IS BASED ON STIRRED BLIND FORCE TRIGGERED BY ‘A’.
If by A being a tower of strength to B you mean A supported B, it means B is weak, depended on A for support to achieve rather than achieving without anyone’s support. Support is about dependency and there are no good dependencies; all dependencies is about suffering and based on force that is blind and harmful.
THUS IF A’S TOWER OF STRENGTH TRULY SUPPORTED B, IT MEANS B IS DEPENDENT ON A, LEANED ON A TO ACHIEVE WHAT HE ACHIEVED.
WHEN YOU SAY A IS A TOWER OF STRENGTH FOR B YOU CAN ONLY MEAN THAT A INSPIRES OR SUPPORTS B AND THIS CAN ONLY HAPPEN THROUGH A’S MENTAL FORCE STIRRING B’S MENTAL FORCE TO BE INSPIRED OR SUPPORTED AS THE CASE MAY BE AND THESE ARE NOT TRUE MEANING BUT FALSE, ABOUT BLIND HARMFUL FORCE BEING THE BASIS OF B’S ACHIEVEMENTS.
Whatever not work done by force is false:
Stirring your mental force to stir another's mental force is not work. Stirring mental force to write is work.
Because force can only do work, unless by A being a tower of strength for B you mean A did a lot of work for B like looking after him, caring for his children and helping out with his work, if you mean A is a tower of strength for B by inspiring or supporting him then you are talking about something that is not work and therefore out of the true domain of force, namely work and therefore false.
Inspiring and supporting another is not about your mental force doing work but your mental force stirred to stir another’s mental force so that he is inspired or supported and these are about false meaningless harmful stirring of one person’s mental force to stir another’s mental force to inspire or support him.
YOU MEAN YOU CANNOT DO SOMETHING ON YOUR OWN, WITHOUT INSPIRATION OR SUPPORT BUT YOU NEED ANOTHER PERSON TO STIR HER MENTAL FORCE TO STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE INSPIRED OR SUPPORTED BEFORE YOU CAN ACHIEVE SOMETHING? IF YOU AGREE IT IS SILLY, DOES NOT MAKE SENSE THEN THE STATEMENT THAT A IS A TOWER OF STRENGTH FOR B IS SILLY, DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AND IS THEREFORE FALSE.
Isn’t it silly and thus false?
If by ‘Mrs Lee is a tower of strength for MMLee’ you mean Mrs Lee inspired and supported him tremendously you are actually saying that Mrs Lee stirred her mental force to stir MMLee’s mental force to be inspired and supported that contributed ‘tremendously’ to his achievements.
You mean you need your blind mental force to be stirred by another’s blind mental force to achieve what you did?
Because only force has strength, substance and truth has no strength, by tower of strength you are talking about force and force only. You need force to inspire and support, truth and substance has no force to support or inspire or stir and so if by ‘tower of strength’ you mean tower of inspiration and support, you are talking about force and without doing useful work, it must mean Mrs Lee stirring her mental force to stir MMLee’s mental force to be inspired or supported.

Is a Third Force the answer?

SPECIAL REPORTS

Tuesday, 05 October 2010 Super Admin Although we are not optimistic about the current development of a third party, it is undeniable that a third force can indeed help break through the political shackle of either black or white. In the process of democratic development, a third force would be like a moth searching for brightness that risks even its life to fly towards the flames!
By LIM MUN FAH, Sin Chew
This is the thinking of a deluded man divorced from reality posing as a reporter. He may be driven by disenchantment with the bickering in the opposition ranks to propose to propose the alternative of another opposition party (it is not force as he alludes falsely but party).
A lot of the negative publicity is falsely created by the government through agent provocateurs or deliberate misinformation by government aligned presses.
Already the opposition is handicapped and another party will weaken the opposition more than BN and so what he is proposing will weaken the opposition and so either he is a BN agent or he is an idiot.
Dicing with mad perception:
D you see Mrs Lee as the wife of MMLee? This is a true perception and you will be wise to stick just to this.
Do you see Mrs Lee as a tower of strength for MMLee?
If you cannot see it then it is a fabrication, you must imagine it and that is dicing with mad perception with karma to be experienced as suffering for promoting false perception in others.
IT IS TRUE AND YOU CAN SEE IT THAT MRS LEE IS THE WIFE OF MMLEE BUT IT IS NOT TRUE BUT MUST BE IMAGINED THAT MRS LEE IS A TOWER OF STRENGTH FOR MMLEE.
A is A and nothing else:
A is A and not B, C or anything else. This is a fundamental principle of truth and yet reflecting their lack of true understanding, emotional people flout it without knowing.
Mrs Lee is Mrs Lee, not a tower of strength let alone a tower of strength specifically for MMLee and so whoever touts Mrs Lee as a tower of strength for MMLee is advocating complication and difficulties, falsity for himself and others and setting himself up for future suffering.
BECAUSE MRS LEE IS MRS LEE, NOT A TOWER OF STRENGTH, THE STATEMENT IS FALSE DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO FALSELY EXAGGERATE THE STATURE OF MRS LEE.
Meet my maker:
You hear emotional people routinely speak of ‘my maker’ without understanding what they say nor is it possible they saw truly they were made by their maker. It may be for fear of offending God or to curry favour with God that they speak deferentially thus thinking God is pleased with that when it may not be the case.
This world and whatever there is in it is a creation and God (and the Buddha) can create things instantly out of nothing at any moment but all beings great and small are something separate according to the Buddha. As to the origin of beings, they can only be speculated but it would lead to vexation and madness. The Buddha said all beings are trapped in existence which is always suffering and impermanent and whatever is changing is false and suffering, only Nibbana the unchanging is true. Each being is owner of his own karma as a result of his deeds, there is no sharing of birth, death, suffering and experiences, no brahma or devil can share your birth, death or sufferings (and pleasures). God is the Father because He is the first and creator of everything is this realm of existence, He has powers over everyone, sees and knows everything, can create and uncreate at any moment as He wishes but He is He and you are you, however piddling a worm you are.
EMOTIONAL PEOPLE SPEAK WITHOUT KNOWING ABOUT ‘MY MAKER’ AND THEIR VIEW IS WRONG, THEY DON’T TRULY UNDERSTAND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD, THE FATHER OR CREATOR.
THE BUDDHA SAID THIS WORLD IS LIKE A MASS OF FOAM, EMPTY AND MEANINGLESS, IT IS MEANINGFUL AND REAL ONLY TO THE DELUDED. YOU CAN MOVE A MOUNTAIN IF YOU HAVE FAITH AS LITTLE AS A PEA AND YET DELUDED PEOPLE THINK MOUNTAINS AND THIS WORLD IS SACROSANCT, IMMUTABLE, HAS SUBSTANCE.
‘MY MAKER’ IS INTENDED TO FLATTER OR APPEASE AND WITHOUT KNOWING THE NATURE OF ‘MY MAKER’ YOU WILL BE WISE NOT TO VENTURE INTO A VIEW THAT IF WRONG ALWAYS LEADS TO SUFFERING.
The motivations of ‘my maker’:
Self identity views or possessiveness which is a fetter to future suffering according to the Buddha is an important motivation for saying ‘my maker’. It is because a person identifies with himself as a meaningful being who desires permanence and pleasures that he speaks without seeing but emotionally in pride about ‘my maker’. The wise have shed all self identity according to the Buddha, for them there is no mine and yours and so how is it that he can have ‘his maker’? It is from ignorance that a being is born and goes on wandering in terrible suffering, having shed his own blood greater than the four great oceans according to the Buddha. With enlightenment as a result of mastering the four higher states of minds, ignorance is destroyed and the being becomes owner of the three knowledges, knowledge of all his past lives, knowledge of the passing and arising of beings and knowledge of the way totally out of all sufferings and he then extinguishes himself as a fire extinguishes itself through lack of fuel and he no longer exists as a being but has gone beyond to nibbana the eternal city of the unchanging.
Ignorant beings desire life and fear suffering and so they think they can appease God by calling Him ‘my maker’. If you are afraid of suffering and want life, it better if you see danger in the slightest faults because it is what you say or do that is false or harms others that will consign you to suffering.
JUST AS PEOPLE MAKE OFFERINGS TO DEITIES AND BRIBE OFFICIALS, THEY SPEAK OF MY MAKER TO BRIBE AND OUT OF DELUSION OF IDENTIFYING WITH A SELF THAT IS FALSE THAT DESIRES GAINS AND FEARS LOSSES.
Why ‘my’ and not ‘the’ maker:
How is it that people talk of ‘my’ maker and not ‘the’ maker or creator as if the maker is theirs?
EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAVE IN MIND WHEN YOU SPEAK OF ‘MY MAKER’ CANNOT BE DISPUTED, IF YOU SPEAK AS IF THE MAKER IS YOURS THEN YOU ARE DELUDED AND HAVE FALSE SELF IDENTITY VIEWS THAT ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS (TOGETHER WITH FAITH IN RULES AND RITUALS AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY) TO FUTURE WOE NOT HEAVEN.
WHEN PEOPLE TALK ABOUT ‘MY MAKER’ THEY ARE SPEAKING WITH STIRRED PRIDE AS IF THE MAKER IS THEIRS AND THAT IS DELUSION.
Your maker is ignorance says the Buddha:
The Buddha said he is the highest teacher, the seer and knower of all, even beyond and if you understood him truly then what he says is that ignorance and nothing else is your maker.
From ignorance as a cause comes fabrications (activities of the mind driven by force), from fabrications come consciousness, from consciousness comes this world, from this world comes the sensory media (sight, sound, taste, smell, touch), from sensory media comes contact, from contact comes feelings (pleasant, unpleasant, neither pleasant nor unpleasant), from feelings come craving and thenceforth to birth, death and despair.
THUS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, IT IS IGNORANCE & NOT GOD WHO IS YOUR CREATOR AND SO EITHER HE, WHO CLAIMS TO BE THE HIGHEST TEACHER AND KNOWER OF ALL IS RIGHT OR YOU. WITH THE CESSATION OF IGNORANCE, THE BEING KNOWS AND CEASES TO DESIRE EXISTENCE ANYWHERE NOT EVEN THE HIGHEST REACHES OF HEAVEN.
Before a being can be enlightened he must have mastered the four higher states of mind and beyond, without mastering or be consummate in accessing the higher states in sequence at will he cannot become enlightened.
Thus before he can be enlightened, the person must be skilled at attaining the first higher state of mind, serenity of mind and body freed of greed and anxieties, the second higher state, cessation of all thinking with one pointed or singular mind, the third higher state, his mental force neither stirred attractively or repulsively by events, the fourth higher state, his consciousness experiencing neither pain nor pleasure (totally rid of force that is the ingredient of pain and pleasure, without force there can be no pain or pleasure). Further after being skilful at attaining neither pain nor pleasure, overcoming considerations of forms he accesses the sphere of the infinitude of space, overcoming considerations of space, he accesses the sphere of the infinitude of consciousness and overcoming all considerations of consciousness he accesses the sphere of nothingness or activities. Overcoming considerations of fabrications he banishes his ignorance and becomes enlightened and no longer desires any existence anywhere.
You want to refute the Buddha?
You want to refute the Buddha? Then you better know what you are talking about because as Jesus said, you will be judged for every careless word you say.
The Buddha said what he taught cannot be refuted by any brahma or Mara and you want to refute him, say he is wrong (without knowing he is wrong)?
The Buddha said faith in the highest (him) confers the highest rewards, rejecting the highest too confers the highest punishment. The Buddha said a person who developed an evil mind towards his two deputies was born in the deepest of hells for even many eternities.
Jesus said if you have faith as little as a mustard seed you can tell a mountain to move and it shall be done and you can walk on water. And so you too can be a very powerful being as the Buddha said and God must have created a theoretically very powerful being in you.
THE WISE DO NOT STICK THEIR NECKS OUT TO BE CHOPPED, FOOLS ARE EAGER TO PRESENT THEIR NECKS TO BE CHOPPED, THEY WILL NOT BE DENIED BUT MUST HAVE THEIR SAY OR OPINION.
Why activities precede consciousness:
The Buddha taught that activities of the mind (perceiving, thinking, speaking, doing) precede consciousness and that objectively is so or true.
Activities are independent of consciousness, can occur without consciousness.
Thus you can breathe without being conscious of breathing, you can do things or say things even without awareness or consciousness. A tape recorder or computer can do many complicated things without having consciousness.
ACTIVITIES DO NOT REQUIRE CONSCIOUSNESS AND CAN OCCUR WITHOUT CONSCIOUSNESS AND SO ACTIVITIES OF THE MIND PRECEDE CONSCIOUSNESS AND IT IS ACTIVITIES THAT CAUSE CONSCIOUSNESS TO ARISE TO MONITOR AND EXPERIENCE THOSE ACTIVITIES.
Again the Buddha said from name and form or this world of objects comes the sensory media (sight, sound, touch, taste and smell) and not the other way round and so this is the case.
The world of sight exists even if you are blind and so the world that is possible to be seen can exist even if you do not possess the sensory media or sight to see it. Even though there is no one to see things on Mars, Mars with all its sights and landscapes exist and so name and form or this world of objects exists before sensory media.
THIS WORLD CAN EXIST INDEPENDENT OF THE SENSORY MEDIA OR SIGHT, SOUND, TOUCH, TASTE AND SMELL AND THE SENSORY MEDIA COMES AFTER TO EXPERIENCE THIS WORLD.
The Buddha said from contact at the sensory media comes feelings which can only be pleasant (as in pleasure), unpleasant (as in pain) or neither pain nor pleasure (paper tastes bland, neither pleasant nor unpleasant). Only force can contact and so contact is about a meeting of force and so it is that pain and pleasure are products of force, it is force on contact that gives pleasure (when mild to moderate) and it is contact with severe force that gives pain.Buddhism is King Kong religion, says convert ustaz
Apparently a Chinese ustaz said this. He will be judged and he is putting his head on the chopping block.
If Buddhism is not king kong religion but the ultimate religion, you are dead wrong and heaping unnecessary suffering on yourself in the future.
There is nothing King Kong about Buddhism:
Although there are many perversions of Buddhism as there are of Christianity and Islam, there is a true version of Buddhism and one should study and know it before calling it king kong.
FOR ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS THE TRUE BUDDHISM THERE IS NOTHING KING KONG ABOUT IT, IT IS A VERY SOLEMN RELIGION AND IF YOU SUMMARILY DISMISS IT AS KING KONG WITHOUT DELVING INTO IT, YOU ARE ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT. WAIT UNTIL YOU BECOME KING KONG FOR AN ETERNITY AND SEE HOW FUNNY THAT IS.
Yes, God can make you a monkey:
Yes, in a sense God is your maker; He has powers over you and can make you a monkey and destroy your soul in hell as punishment for your sins.
This is not what you have in mind:
That God can make you a monkey or even far worse is not what you have in mind when you say, ‘meet my maker’.
PEOPLE HAVE THIS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT GOD MADE THEM TO BE THE ‘WONDROUSLY SENTIENT’ & ‘GOOD’ BEINGS THEY THINK THEY ARE NOT REALIZING THAT THIS GOD THAT MADE THEM THUS CAN ALSO MAKE THEM A MONKEY AS PUNISHMENT, AND FAR WORSE AND SEND THEM TO BE ROASTED IN HELL EVEN FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

Keng Yaik: My heart is bleeding

What he means is that he is hurt but he is a foolish man because his heart is not bleeding and for his careless words he may have to experience his heart truly bleeding because he said his heart is bleeding.
DO YOU ENJOY YOUR HEART BLEEDING? IF YOU DON’T THEN BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY. YOUR HEART IS BLEEDING DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE HURT BUT BECAUSE YOU PERCEIVE THEY ARE SYNONIMOUS YOU WILL GO MAD.
My friend & my God:
In Buddhist literature, monks address others including laity as ‘friend’ not ‘my friend’ and it is not the same.
My friend denotes the friend belongs to you and that is false. Similarly people have false perception that it is true and good to refer to God as ‘my God’. God is God and He is not yours so it may be offensive rather than meritorious to refer to ‘my God’.
IT IS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS AND POSSESSIVENESS THAT DRIVES PEOPLE TO HAVE THE PREDILECTION TO SAY MORE, ‘MY FRIEND’ INSTEAD OF ‘FRIEND’, ‘MY GOD’ INSTEAD ‘GOD’.
PEOPLE ADDRESS OTHERS 'MY FRIEND' INSTEAD OF 'FRIEND' TO FALSELY IMPRESS THEY ARE PERSONAL OR INTIMATE.
Double false views:
It is false view and understanding to say Buddhism is a king kong religion because there is nothing king kong about Buddhism except in your false perception and understanding that will end in mad perception.
Further, it is false perception to perceive that ‘king kong’ denotes inferiority or is insulting. King Kong is the name given to a certain gorilla and there is nothing insulting or inferior or negative about being King Kong and it is the false perception of the person and those who are receptive who take it as an insult.
ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES THE LABEL ‘KING KONG RELIGION’ IS AN INSULT, IMPLIES BUDDHISM IS RUBBISH HAS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION, IT IS MUTUAL SHARED DELUSION THAT KING KONG MEANS BAD OR WHATEVER.
THUS THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS OF BUDDHISM BEING A KING KONG RELIGION HAS FALSE PERCEPTION ON TWO COUNTS, THERE IS NOTHING KING KONG ABOUT BUDDHISM AND HE PERCEIVES KING KONG IS INSULTING WHEN IT JUST REFERS TO A PARTICULAR MYTHICAL GORILLA.