Thursday, October 28, 2010

A very Australian saint:
There are things that are related and things that are not related.
Nationality, culture, sex, age are totally unrelated to sainthood and so by implying there is a link, a saint that is very Australian, you are either speaking without knowing or fabricating (lying).
What things are related? Virtue, concentration and wisdom are related and the relation is without true virtue (not the type worshipped by humans), you cannot have great concentration, without great concentration you cannot have great wisdom.
WHETHER IT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE A VERY AUSTRALIAN SAINT OR IT IS A SPURIOUS ASSOCIATION AS A RESULT OF YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION IS OBJECTIVE. IF YOU ARE SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING THEN INSANITY IS YOUR DESTINATION. THE PURPOSE FOR SAYING A VERY AUSTRALIAN SAINT IS TO MAKE MUCH OF HER, TO SEE MORE TO A SITUATION THAN THERE ACTUALLY IS, EG SHE IS NOT JUST A SAINT BUT A VERY AUSTRALIAN SAINT (HO, HO, HO).
A very feminine saint?
In the same vein as a saint can be very Australian, can a saint be very feminine or masculine, a saint who in involved in the fishing industry is a very fishy saint?
IF YOU SEE IT IS SILLY OR ABSURD THEN THE PERSON IS CONDITIONING HIMSELF TO FALSE PERCEPTION, IT IS HIS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION DRIVEN BY EMOTION THAT STIRS HIM TO SPEAK OF A VERY AUSTRALIAN SAINT.
Do not take what is not given:
Not to take what is not given is a fundamental tenet of Buddhism.
Reflecting people’s false rote understanding, they think it means ‘don’t steal’ when it is much more.
Thus if you pick up a $10 note on the ground you are taking what is not given to you which is why you do not have great virtue and therefore has no great concentration and thus great wisdom.
If you visit your ‘best’ friend and open his cookie jar and take a cookie you are taking what is not given with penance due. Even if you ask for a cookie and he accedes you are taking what is not given because you asked or demanded it.
A person with few wants or greed does not ask for sweets or cookies he sees lying around and in asking you are exerting pressure to get what you want and therefore you are taking what is not given but asked by you.
“DO NOT TAKE WHAT IS NOT GIVEN” IS NOT JUST NOT STEALING BUT MUCH MORE, IT MEANS NOT PICKING UP A COIN THAT WAS NOT GIVEN TO YOU, NOT PRESUMPTUOUSLY TAKING SWEETS EVEN IF THE PERSON IS YOUR ‘GREAT’ FRIEND AND NOT ASKING TO BE GIVEN IF YOU THINK IT IS MINOR.
It is you who will lose and suffer:
The Buddha has no vested interest, even his self he has given up for no further becoming that is meaningless and needless suffering and he is merely pointing the way out of suffering even permanently, forever to those whose minds are open and understanding at the request of a Brahma who implored him to teach.
Therefore you may think you are a great Christian or muslim, you don’t trust the Buddha (what is there to trust, either you understand or do not understand what the Buddha is saying?) but if it is true as the Buddha taught that you can train yourself(without hard work or persistence it will not be on a plate for you) to fully conscious going about stop thinking and rather than dumb and suffering, it is an incomparable release from the torment of ceaseless emotion driven thinking, enables you to see and therefore know better and it is the way even to 2 eternities or Ages in heavenly bliss, then you (and nobody else) will miss out on a pleasant abiding here, will miss out on two eternities in heaven.
IN THE SAME WAY IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO TRAIN HIMSELF TO LET HIS MENTAL FORCE BE NOT STIRRED TO BE ATTRACTED (EXCITED, LIKE) OR REPULSED (HATE, DISLIKE) BY WHATEVER IS HAPPENING (AS THE BUDDA TAUGHT) AND IT IS AN INCOMPARABLY PLEASANT ABIDING HERE AND RESULTS IN 4 AGES OF HEAVENLY BLISS THEN IT IS YOU WHO WILL LOSE AND THEREFORE SUFFER BECAUSE YOU REJECTED THE BUDDHA WITHOUT SEEING AS TRUE HE IS A FAKE.
Anyone who rejects me will suffer:
I say there is constant use of force to stretch (eg syllables), change speed and loudness in the speech and actions of all beings here and it is the source of the renewing, insoluble stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate that must beset them and mandates a rehashing tormenting robotic existence and the only way out of suffering for you is to pay attention and work persistently to scrub off all use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness that is totally meaningless (and therefore controlled insanity) only for show to impress or please others and this abolition of style results in an incomparably pleasant existence here and is the path to one Age in heaven.
Anyone who rejects what I teach rejects this and is doomed to suffering here and after he departs, even for another eternity.
Prying & spying is stealing:
It is not just material objects that can be stolen, immaterial objects can be stolen.
Many people ask questions that have ulterior motive to extract information of a personal nature from others (eg doctors ask questions that may not be relevant but because of morbid interest), people pretend to pass by a house but their purpose is to see what is going on. There are people who make a profession out of prying or spying as with detectives and industrial spies.
ALL THESE ARE FORMS OF TAKING WHAT IS NOT GIVEN AND INCURS KAMMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE PAIN JUST AS STEALING GOODS.
Sleeping with style:
These people are not only sleeping but sleeping with a style that differs from each other and the ways they sleep are improper or wrong that leads to future woe.
It is impossible that they should have a good sleep sleeping like depicted but even asleep they are stressed.
The general consensus and view of this world is that it is good to sleep, sleep is desirable and just as everywhere else, it is wrong understanding and view.
SLEEP TOGETHER WITH LAZINESS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS ONE OF FIVE HINDRANCES TO ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING. INSTEAD YOU SHOULD PRACTICE WATCHFULNESS, ALERTNESS, FULLY FOCUSING YOUR ATTENTION IN FRONT OF YOU AT THIS MOMENT.
THE BUDDHA AND THOSE WHO ARE NOBLE SLEEP SPARINGLY. BUDDHAS DON’T DREAM WHICH IS A FORM OF FALSE FABRICATING.
IF YOU UNDERSTAND THE BUDDHA CORRECTLY, SLEEP IS EVIL NOT GOOD AND IT IS ACTUALLY LISTED BY HIM AS ONE OF THE FIVE HINDRANCES TO SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT.

It's not for sleeping, the night garlanded
with zodiac stars.
The night, for one who knows, is for staying awake.

Does God sleep?
It may be that only those whose minds are ruled by force, who are stressed and exhausted by their force driven machinations sleep and require sleep to recharge them.
Because God and higher beings in heaven (brahmas) exist freed from force, neither experiencing pain nor pleasure, they may not require sleep and do not sleep.
THUS YOU HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING AND PERCEPTION IF YOU THINK SLEEP IS NATURAL, GOOD FOR YOU AND OTHERS WHEN YOU SLEEP YOUR WAY TO WOE, ASLEEP YOU WILL BE SWEPT AWAY BY THE FLOODS.
Paint job for special school:
There is actually no such thing as ‘paint job’ and it reflects the false understanding of people that they think they understand and hear the truth.
Reflecting they are robots who are programmed, ‘paint job’ is a nonspecific fabricated appellation that can be retrieved and applied to many future situations.
The truth is ‘special school repainted or to be repainted’, paint job is an nonspecific robotic imagined entity used to describe a situation.
Similarly people remember ‘upgrade’ and keep rehashing it even indiscriminately like ‘upgrade your knowledge’.
IF YOU THINK PAINT JOB DESCRIBES REALITY ACCURATELY YOU MAY BE DELUDED, IT MAY BE USED DISRESPECTFULLY, ROBOTICALLY OR IMPERSONALLY TO BELITTLE AN EVENT, THE PAINTING OF A SCHOOL.
KEEP TALKING ABOUT PAINT JOBS, ‘GIGS’, ‘A DO’ AND YOU WILL FIND YOURSELF IN HELL NOT HEAVEN.
IT WAS NOT A PAINT JOB BUT THE SCHOOL WAS REPAINTED.
Evil not good:
Although some people may hate their looks and this too is a totally mad perception, the consensus perception is that they are being friendly or good smiling thus.
They are both smiling to impress not please and what they are doing is radiating or plying others with stirred force that invites others to also stir their force and reciprocate.
Because it is meaningless to stir your mental force and express it by smiling they are practicing controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.
Because they want to stir others’ mental force that harms others, they are heaping karma to be experienced as future pain not merit to be experienced as future happiness.
Because they are you perceive what they are doing is good and friendly they and you have false perception or are deluded.
Because the stirred force exposes their minds to force, they must suffer stress (the seizure by force of their minds that takes time to dissipate), restlessness (and urge to say or do things, anything) and distraction (inability to concentrate).
THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUE WAY TO VIEW THEIR SMILES AND IT IS MEANINGLESS, EVIL AND HARMFUL NOT MEANINGFUL, GOOD (FRIENDLY) AND BENEFICIAL.
Lure of the food business:
Do you see anything wrong with the statement?
It is not the food business which is not even a physical entity that can attract or lure but it is people who have mental force that are stirred who are lured.
IT IS FALSE UNDERSTANDING AND PERCEPTION TO PERCEIVE THAT THE FOOD BUSINESS WHICH IS NOT A PHYSICAL ENTITY CAN LURE. IT IS A PERSON’S GREEDY STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY THAT MAKES HIM LURED. FOOD INDUSTRY EMBRACES MANY DIVERSE FORMS BUT IS ITSELF NOT AN OBJECT LIKE GOLD OR A PRETTY GIRL THAT CAN LURE OR ATTRACT YOU. EVEN FOR A PHYSICAL OBJECT LIKE GOLD, DIAMOND OR PRETTY GIRL, IT IS NOT PER SE THE GOLD OR GIRL THAT ATTRACTS BUT THE PERSON’S MEANINGLESSLY, STRESSFULLY STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT MAKES HIM LURED.
If you can be lured you are a slave:
If you can be lured by anything eg gold, money, pretty girl you are a slave to that object and rather than sheer pleasure it is actually tormenting and conditioning such that the seized fool throws all caution to the wind to fulfil what he is lured.
IT IS NOT AN OBJECT OR PERSON THAT LURES YOU BUT IT IS YOUR FOOLISHLY, MEANINGLESSLY, STRESSFULLY ATTRACTIVE STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT MAKES YOU LURED AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY BLAMING THE OBJECT FOR LURING YOU.
Admitting his basis of action is force not reason:
When a person speaks of the lure of the food business, he is unwittingly acknowledging that the basis for his entry into the food business is not made on rational understanding but blindly driven by stirred force which is the basis of ‘lured’.
HERE AS EVEN EVERYWHERE ELSE, PEOPLE THINK THE BASIS OF THEIR ACTIONS AND SPEECH IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT THEY ARE DELUDED, THE BASIS IS STIRRED FORCE. IT IS STIRRED FORCE THAT IS THE BASIS OF THEIR ACTIONS AND THAT IS DANGEROUS BECAUSE FORCE IS BLIND AND SO THEIR BASIS OF ACTION IS BLIND, A RECIPE FOR CERTAIN EVEN FATAL DISASTER SOONER OR LATER.
It is the rewards not lure:
One speaking rationally speaks of the rewards or gains of the food industry, it is muddled speaking to speak of lure which if true means your venture into the food industry is capricious, driven by stirred force.
What is so special about the food industry?
You will be hard pressed to list lures or rewards peculiar to the food industry. If you are talking about ‘fabulous’ profits to be made, then many industries eg singer, stock broker, property too can give great wealth. If talk about satisfaction then that is not peculiar to the food industry.
SO ARE YOU MAD OR TALKING NONSENSE SINGING LYRICAL PRAISE ABOUT THE LURE OF THE FOOD INDUSTRY AS IF IT IS SOMETHING SPECIAL?
Palin: Obama should apologize to unemployed:
Here is a person touted as potential Republican presidential candidate and she is exhibiting bizarre logic.
What she is saying implies she can do a much better job reducing the unemployment rate and if she cannot she is asking for suffering.
The purpose of her statement is to unfairly attack Obama. Obama did not cause the economy to collapse, the Republicans were in power then and there may be little if any he can do to revert the economy to growth.
WHAT SHE SAYS REFLECTS THAT SHE IS A ‘LOOSE CANNON’, WHO TALKS NONSENSE DRIVEN BY THE URGE TO DEPRECATE.
Ericsson sees profit quadruple:
It is totally unnecessary to add ‘see’ and it is added reflecting the tendency of emotional stylish people to embellish for attraction their speech to impress themselves and others.
IF IT IS ONLY NECESSARY TO SAY ‘ERICSSON’S PROFITS QUADRUPLE’ AND YOU PERCEIVE IT AS MEANINGFUL TO ADD ‘SEE’ THEN YOU ARE WASTING YOUR ENERGY AND TROUBLING OTHERS THAT WILL END IN FUTURE SUFFERING AND INSANITY FOR YOU.
Ericsson cannot see:
When you say “Ericsson sees” you mean it is a being that can see and it saw profits quadruple. This is false, Ericsson cannot and does not see and the truth of the matter is Ericsson’s profit quadrupled, not it saw its profit quadruple and you are speaking falsely dicing with mad perception.
Who invented the telescope?
Let dead dogs lie, it does not matter much who invented the telescope. What matters is the telescope has been invented. It is impossible for anyone to know with certainty who invented the telescope which is open to dispute and so the person is deluded asking a question that cannot be truthfully answered by people (but can be by God). The purpose of asking the question is never guided by reason because it is not important who invented the telescope but the purpose is emotional, to dispute or refute the established view.
The Buddha’s teaching does not belong to the Buddha:
The Buddha’s teachings do not belong to him nor was it invented by him, what he taught is the universal undying changeless truth that is obscured from beings trapped in existence, is the same as the teachings of Buddhas of the past eons or Ages and the Buddha of this Age is merely the current exponent of the dharma.
THE TRUTH AND THE BUDDHA’S TEACHING DOES NOT BELONG TO THE BUDDHA, THE TRUTH AND DHARMA IS UNIVERSAL AND CHANGELESS AND IS THE SAME TRUTH AND DHARMA TAUGHT BY BUDDHAS OF THE PAST EONS AND OUR BUDDHA IS MERELY THIS AGE’S FULLY SELF AWAKENED ONE.
THUS YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK THE BUDDHA’S TEACHINGS ONLY APPLY TO BUDDHISTS, DOES NOT HOLD UNIVERSALLY AND IS CHANGEABLE.
THE TRUTH IN ITS ENTIRETY IS UNIVERSAL AND THE BUDDHA IS MERELY THE EXPONENT WHO MAKES KNOWN THAT TRUTH HAVING DISCOVERED IT FOR HIMSELF.
Low sex drive may be brain disorder:
Scans appear to show differences in brain functioning in women with persistently low sex drives, claim researchers.
Males and females are said to vary in sex drive and activity between low, moderate to high. Sex drive is something indiscriminate, it is actually a conditioning or robotic programming or addiction, the more you perform sex, the more urge and ease the activation of the desire to perform is. Sex has nothing to do with love but just using bodies of the same or other sex to satisfy lust or whatever pleasures tactile, odorous, auditory and visual stimulation may bring.
SEX DRIVE IS NOT NATURAL, IT IS CONDITIONED WHICH IS WHY IT VARIES BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS. ONCE CONDITIONED AND REPEATEDLY PARTAKEN THE PERSON BECOMES ADDICTED AND SEEKS FREQUENT FIXES AND THIS IS NOT A STRUCTURAL PROBLEM BUT A BEHAVIOURAL OR CONDITIONED PROBLEM THAT IS HARD IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO WEAN AND IT IS DELUSIONAL TO BLAME BRAIN STRUCTURE OR HORMONE FOR ONE’S SEX DRIVE.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID THERE IS NO SATISFACTION IN SEX AND IT LEADS TO TORMENT, IT IS THE POTENT COMBINATION OF STIRRED EMOTION AND SENSORY PLEASURES THAT KEEP SEX ADDICTS HOOKED AND THEY ARE HEADING FOR MADNESS.
SEX DRIVE IS A PROGRAMMING THAT IS INDISCRIMINATE, YOU MAY SEEK SEX WITH PRETTY GIRLS BUT THAT IS A NONSPECIFIC IMPERSONAL TARGET TO SATISFY YOUR LUST. THERE IS NO LOVE INVOLVED EVEN IF YOU ‘PARTICULARLY’ FEEL FOR SOME OF YOUR VICTIMS. IT IS USING OTHERS TO SATISFY YOUR CRAVING.
Hormones and moods:
You hear people attribute moods to hormones eg women’s moodiness due to menstrual cycle but this is delusion. Hormones are chemicals and they trigger chemical reactions in the body and mind but they are not the cause of moods per se, which is why not all women get menstrual ‘blues’. Just as words and even sights seen even mild or gentle can trigger intense emotions like hurt in a person, in the same way, hormonal changes act as catalysts in vulnerable people to stir emotion and when a emotion eg sadness is sustained it becomes a mood as in blue mood.
IF A PERSON NEVER CONDITIONED HIS MENTAL FORCE TO STIR USELESSLY IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH TO FASHION STYLE THAT IS MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW THAT ONCE DECOUPLED FROM ANY ACTIVITY LIKE A CAR REVVING IN FREE GEAR BECOMES EMOTIONS, HORMONAL CHANGES CANNOT CAUSE MOODS.
AS A RESULT OF LIFELONG WILLING THE MENTAL FORCE TO STIR FOR SHOW IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, THE MENTAL FORCE HAS IRRESISTIBLE TENDENCY TO STIR ON ITS OWN DECOUPLED FROM ANY ACTIVITY AND THIS MAKES IT VULNERABLE TO BE TRIGGERED TO CAUSE MOOD CHANGES AS A RESULT OF HORMONAL CHANGES WHICH ARE LIKE CATALYSTS.
DON’T BLAME HORMONES FOR YOUR MOODS THAT UPSET YOU, BLAME YOURSELF FOR CONDITIONING YOUR MIND TO BECOME EMOTIONAL BY CONSTANTLY PRACTICING STYLE OR USING YOUR MENTAL FORCE MEANINGLESSLY TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
The aetiology of sex drives and hormonal moods:
The bait of sex is the sensory pleasure generated on contact with mild to moderate force through the senses (eg sight of female private parts, smells even tastes, tactile, sounds of the sighs and grunts) that leads those hooked to return again and again for more, how to perform the act may be copied from others and so once introduced to the pleasure of sex, in search of sensory gratification the person is driven to return again and again to sexual activities that he does not realize increasingly addicts him and rather than being the master of his sexual pleasures and prowess, he is hopelessly and increasingly enslaved to sex that may end in exposure to loss, danger and even death as when a prostitute is strangulated or gagged by a customer.
In the same way, the chemical reactions attendant to menstrual hormonal changes can trigger emotion like broodiness (dislike) in the irritable person and this has memory so that the next time she has her menses, there is urge to be broody as before and each time she becomes broody, she is training herself to be broody with her menses such that in time it becomes automatic to quite severe levels and she blames her menstruation for her ‘bitchiness’.
BP seeks to rebuild its reputation:
If you have a reputation you must be aware what that reputation is eg reputation as bad guy, trouble maker, sexual prowess, shrewd investor, you must remember what your reputation is and behave according to that reputation and hence you must commit yourself to become a robot of that reputation.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE A REPUTATION AND NOT BECOME A ROBOT OF THAT REPUTATION AND SO THE FOOL WHO CULTIVATES REPUTATIONS IS A ROBOT ACTING AND SPEAKING IN ACCORDANCE TO HIS FALSELY PERCEIVED OR DELUDED REPUTATION.
THE WISE PERSON DOES NOT BUILD REPUTATIONS, DOES NOT LIVE BY REPUTATIONS AND HE IS TRULY FREE.
WHY DOES BP WANT TO REBUILD ITS REPUTATION? IT IS SELFISHNESS, GREED FOR GAINS THAT IT BUILT A FALSE REPUTATION OF WHOLESOMENESS AND NOW THAT THIS REPUTATION IS TARNISHED, IT WANTS TO REBUILD THAT FALSE REPUTATION SO THAT IT CAN GAIN PUBLIC TRUST.
REPUTATIONS DO NOT EXIST BUT THEY ARE FALSE PERCEPTIONS OR MAKE BELIEFS IN THE EYES OF PEOPLE WITH FALSE PERCEPTION WHO DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE HEADED FOR MAD PERCEPTION.
What use is a reputation you don’t remember?
What is the point of having a reputation if you do not remember it and live by it?
Thus if you think you have a reputation for being ‘a clever boy’, you must remember that, keep telling yourself you are a clever boy and try and device as many ways in speech and actions that will enhance and justify your reputation and rather than being clever, you have consigned yourself to be a robot of your reputation.
THUS PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DO NOT UNDERSTAND, THEY UNDERSTAND FALSELY THAT REPUTATIONS ARE GOOD, TO BE CULTIVATED AND LIVED BY WHEN IT IS EVIL, MEANINGLESS AND CONSIGNING ONE TO BE A ROBOT THAT WILL END IN TORMENT AND ROBOT FAILURE INSANITY.
HOW COME NO ONE TALKS LIKE ME EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO TALK THUS? IS WHAT I SAY NONSENSICAL OR IS IT THE TRUTH THAT THIS WORLD CANNOT RECEIVE BECAUSE THEY NEITHER SEE NOR KNOW IT?
Steve Job’s mumbo jumbo:
Quote: “I think it’s going to be a challenge for them (RIM) to create a competitive marketplace.”
This is a gross distortion of what he intended to say.
WHY SHOULD RIM WANT TO CREATE A COMPETITIVE MARKET PLACE? IT IS NOT CREATING A COMPETITIVE MARKETPLACE THAT CONCERNS BLACKBERRY BUT REMAINING COMPETITIVE IN THE MARKET PLACE. ONLY SOMEONE WHO REHASHES CAN GET IT ALL MUDDLED UP DRIVEN BY STIRRED EMOTION AND THE URGE TO SAY MORE THAN THERE ACTUALLY IS. IN A BLUR DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO ATTACK AND ANOTHER URGE TO EXAGGERATE OR INFLATE, THEY END UP SPEAKING NONSENSE.
Another clanger by Microsoft CEO:
"We believe we will win by out-innovating our competitors and even by out-innovating ourselves," said Mr Capossela.
It is possible to out-innovate competitors but it is impossible to out-innovate yourself and so it sounds stirring or impressive but he is making a fool of himself and heading for insanity.
A PERSON WHO TRULY, SPECIFICALLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE SAYS CANNOT SAY THINGS THAT TURN OUT TO BE NONSENSE. IT IS ONLY A PERSON WITH NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHO IS MERELY REHASHING GENERALLY WHO CAN BE CAUGHT OUT BECAUSE HE DID NOT REALIZE WHAT HE REHASHED MAKES NO SENSE IN THIS SITUATION.
What is the purpose?
Like the rest of humanity who find it meaningful when it is meaningless, they are both smiling.
What is the purpose of their smiles?
The purpose is to show they are friendly, they like you or they like what is happening or they are happy.
But friendly or happy is what you are, you do not need to show it especially when smiling destroys whatever happiness you have by subjecting your mind and body to force and thence stress, smiling destroys whatever friendliness because the force changes radiated in your smile stirs the mental force of the recipient harming him, so how friendly can you truly be?
IF THE PURPOSE OF YOUR SMILE IS TO SHOW YOU ARE HAPPY THEN THE VERY ACT OF STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO SMILE EXPOSES YOUR MIND TO FORCE THAT CAUSES STRESS THAT DESTROYS WHATEVER HAPPINESS YOU WANT TO SHOW OTHERS.
IF THE PURPOSE OF YOUR SMILE IS TO SHOW YOU ARE FRIENDLY THEN THE FORCE CHANGES IN THE SMILE INCITE THE MENTAL FORCES OF RECIPIENTS TO RECIPROCATE EG BY SMILING THAT HARMS THEM, SO HOW FRIENDLY CAN YOUR SMILE BE EXCEPT IN YOUR ABIDING DELUSION YOU ARE FRIENDLY?
IF YOUR SMILE IS TO SHOW YOU LIKE SOMEONE OR LIKE SOMETHING HAPPENING THEN BECAUSE LIKING IS JUST A MEANINGLESS BLIND, HARMFUL ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE AT THE SIGHT OF SOMETHING, YOU ARE SUBJECTING YOUR MIND TO BLIND HARMFUL FORCE JUST TO SHOW OTHERS YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY TO LIKE HIM OR WHAT IS HAPPENING.
THUS THERE IS NO SENSIBLE OR TRULY UNDERSTANDABLE PURPOSE FOR ANYONE TO SMILE, IT IS JUST FOR SHOW, A WASTE OF ENERGY AND SUBJECTING THE MIND UNNECESSARILY TO CORROSIVE FORCE THAT CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
Exactly what is the purpose of your smile can be determined. If you are smiling and you do not know what it was for, then you are a fool who does not know the purposes of what he does. There are no meaningful purposes for smiling, it is just using force to exercise the facial muscles for show to impress others you are friendly, happy or liking.
Friendliness is what you are, not for show:
True friendliness is what you are, what you do or say or your thoughts that have no ill will, does not harm others directly or indirectly (eg sarcasms or killing others softly).
IF YOU THINK YOU CAN SHOW FRIENDLINESS EG BY SMILING OR EAGERLY RUSHING TO HELP A ‘DAMSEL IN DISTRESS’ AND IT IS TRUE, NOT DECEITFUL TO DECEIVE OTHERS WITH SELFISH MOTIVES THEN YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU HAVE WRONG PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY THENCE HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
FRIENDLINESS IS NOT TO BE SHOWN BUT IT IS WHAT YOU SAY OR DO OR THINK THAT DOES NOT HARM OTHERS BUT BENEFIT THEM AND MAKE THEM TRULY HAPPY.
I think & I reason:
Quote: "I think if Yahoo Mail performs well, they will win people over," he said.
What he says is that he is not sure but he is speculating or making a guess. Even if your guess turns out right, you are training yourself to take up positions blindly or take risk that will end in doubt and uncertainty, one of three fetters to future woe according to the Buddha apart from risk from material losses from wrong bets.
UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO MAD WITH DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY, YOU MUST NOT ‘THINK’ OR SPECULATE WHAT YOU DID NOT SEE OR KNOW.
YOU CAN REASON AND IF YOUR REASONING OR UNDERSTANDING IS TRUE THEN THE CONCLUSION OF THAT REASONING MUST ALWAYS BE TRUE ALSO AND YOU ARE NOT IN DANGER OF INSANITY.
For instance in the case of the missing UK tourist in the Australian outback in which a man was charged and jailed for the murder when it could be insurance fraud, it is impossible as charged that a lone gun man did it because the couple’s combi van was found miles away from the scene and it is impossible for the lone gunman to drive his and the couple’s car at the same time. Hence unless the couple’s car was found at the crime scene he could not have done it.
Again, Najib was purported to have SMS Razak (which he did not deny) saying he was seeing the IGP, all is not lost, stay cool. This is a self admission of guilt. This conclusion is not speculation but the inevitable result of true reasoning.
WHERE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO MAKE A CONCLUSION THEY SAY YOU CANNOT, WHERE THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO MAKE A CONCLUSION THEY SAY YOU CAN, SEE HOW CONFUSED AND WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING THEY ARE.
Indonesia hit by deadly tsunami:
Supposed this same tsunami did not cause any deaths, would it be still called deadly?
The recent NZ earthquake was massive but it did not cause any death and so it is ‘not deadly’.
IN THE NAME OF EXAGGERATION, PEOPLE ARE DRIVEN TO HYPE CALLING THE TSUNAMI DEADLY WHEN IF THERE WAS NO DEATHS IT WOULD NOT BE CALLED DEADLY. JUST BECAUSE IT CAUSED DEATHS DOES MEAN IT IS DEADLY. THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING THE TSUNAMI DEADLY IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS TRUE BUT TO BEAT THE DRUM AND HYPE WHAT HAPPENED.
Hurt & trying to hide it:
What she is expressing involuntarily is that she is hurt or distressed and the hand is raised to shield or hide her distress from others’ view and so she is guilty of lying. There are things emotional people want everyone to see and things they try in vain to hide from others.
Hiding or avoidance or denial is controlled insanity that leads to uncontrollable insanity.
To be, do and say is to suffer:
To be (eg a wife, a mother, a being, an animal), to do (liking, prolonging, changing speed and strength of force is doing) and to speak is always suffering compared to not being, not doing and saying and it reflects ignorance, delusion and restlessness, greed and hate that beings are eager to be, do and say.
TO BE, DO OR SAY IS ALWAYS SUFFERING COMPARED TO NO SUFFERING IF ONE DID NOT BE, DO OR SAY. THIS IS THE UNIVERSAL LAW AND HOLD TRUE FOR EVERYONE AND IT IS THEIR IGNORANCE, DELUSION, GREED, HATE AND RESTLESSNESS THAT CAUSES BEINGS TO BE EAGER TO BE, SPEAK AND DO AND TO PERCEIVE SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER TASTED (NOT TO BE, SAY OR DO) IS SUFFERING OR DEPRIVATION. (PEOPLE MAY THINK THEY HAVE TASTED NOT DOING AND SPEAKING AS WHEN THEY REMAIN STILL OR SILENT BUT EVEN THEN THEIR MINDS ARE CEASELESSLY THINKING AND THAT IS STILL DOING OR SPEAKING).
THEY HAVE NEVER TASTED THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE OF SUFFERING FROM THE CESSATION OF BEING, SAYING AND DOING AND THUS BLINDED AND DELUDED, THEY ARE HOOKED TO BEING, SAYING AND DOING.
Why is being, doing and saying always suffering compared to their absence? In order to be, say or do one must use force and subject one’s mind to force and that is always suffering compared to a person who does not use force or subject his mind to force by being, saying or doing.
To prolong or stretch syllables or units of motion, accelerate and decelerate in speed and loudness (strength of force) are forms of doing even if it is automated and unconscious and so it is anyone with style or stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness suffers more than someone without style.
TO SPEAK IS SUFFERING COMPARED WITH NOT TO SPEAK.
TO IN ADDITION SPEAK WITH CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS ADDITIONAL SUFFERING COMPARED WITH THEIR ABSENCE.
TO LIKE OR DISLIKE IS TO DO, TO STIR ONE’S MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY OR REPULSIVELY AT AN EVENT AND IT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING COMPARED TO SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY OR REPULSIVELY.
To be is suffering, eg to be a being with a restrictive form (animal, insect, human, angel), formless being, to be a father, mother, doctor is always suffering compared with not to be. People in this world crave, have ambition and want to be a doctor, mother and wife.
THE BUDDHA TAUGHT OF CESSATION, REMAINDERLESS EXTINGUISHING OF ALL DESIRES THAT IS NOT NIHILLISM OR NEGATIVENESS BUT WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL DESIRES THERE IS AWAKENING AND ESCAPE TO A DESTINATION OF PERMANENT DEATHLESSNESS.
It is because people are ignorant, they do not know, or they are deluded that they are eager to be, say or do.
It is because people are greedy for gains and driven by ill will or hate that they want to be, say or do things that they would not have to be, say or do if they were not greedy or hateful.
It is because people are restless, they have great conditioned even hard to resist or irresistible urge to say or do things well recorded in their mental jukeboxes that they cannot help saying or doing things when situational cues trigger.
FOR A PERSON WHO IS NOT DELUDED, GREEDY OR HATEFUL, IS FREE FROM RESTLESSNESS, HE KNOWS AND HAS TASTED THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING FROM NOT WANTING TO BE, NOT SAYING OR DOING UNLESS IT IS NECESSARY.
IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO STRETCH SYLLABLES OR CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHEN SPEAKING AND SO IF YOU DO SO, YOU ARE HEAPING UNNECESSARY SUFFERING ON YOURSELF, NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE AND HOW YOU INSIST IT IS MARVELLOUS AND MEANINGFUL.
Fwd: You will like this:
This is the speech of a fool heaping karma on himself.
It is impossible everyone will like it, there will be some who may even be offended and so in saying ‘you will like this’ you are speaking falsely with suffering due in the future and if you think you are going to heaven you may be right or deluded.
LIKING IS MEANINGLESS AND SUFFERING BECAUSE IT IS A BLIND ATTRACTIVE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE AND SO IN TELLING OTHERS THEY WILL LIKE IT YOU ARE SAYING THEY WILL STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES MEANINGLESSLY CAUSING STRESS TO LIKE IT.
What caused him to say this?
What caused the person to say “You will like this”?
It is never true understanding but emotion, a proxy of blind force that made him said this. His mental force stirred to be excited, he perceives all others will also be similarly stirred and so hastily he pens, “you will like this”.
HERE AS IN MANY IF NOT ALL PLACES, PEOPLE THINK IT IS TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS THE BASIS OF WHAT THEY SAY OR DO BUT IT IS EITHER BLIND EMOTION (A PROXY OF FORCE) AND PROGRAMMED REHASHED LOGIC THAT ARE ALWAYS THE SOURCES OF THEIR ACTIONS AND SPEECH.

No comments: