Why would always false, unrighteous, argumentative

Always false, unrighteous and argumentative:

No matter what the context it is raised, whoever utters ‘why would’ is speaking falsely, unrighteously and argumentative with future suffering due.

You hear it bandied, ‘why would I kill my wife’, ‘why would your government fake it’ and no matter what the context, it is false, unrighteous and argumentative.

If it is possible I killed my wife, what is the point of posing the question, ‘why would’? It is only because you are falsely suggesting it is impossible for me to kill my wife, impossible for your government to fake it when they are possibilities that you pose the question why would. Hence the person is falsely implying what is possible is impossible.

It is unrighteous because the person is speaking without knowing what he said is impossible is true. If he knew what he said is true eg your government did not fake it, why pose the question? Just say, “I know your government did not fake it”, why ask the question. Thus by implication, the person is saying something is impossible without seeing and knowing it is so and that is unrighteous.

WHY POSE A QUESTION WHEN YOU KNOW SOMETHING IS AS IT IS? IT IS ONLY BECAUSE A PERSON DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS QUESTIONING IS TRUE THAT HE IS POSING THE QUESTION AS IN “I DON’T KNOW IF YOUR GOVERNMENT IS FAKING OR NOT BUT WHY WOULD THEY DO IT?” IF YOU DON’T KNOW, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO QUESTION OR SAY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE. IT IS ONLY IF YOU KNOW IT IS TRUE THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY IT IS TRUE YOUR GOVERNMENT DID NOT FAKE IT.

Asking someone a question is an invitation for argument and it is sinful and asking for karma to invite argument. Just say what you know eg I did or did not kill my wife, don’t pose others a question that invites argument.

IT IS SIN TO SPEAK FALSELY WHAT IS POSSIBLE IS IMPOSSIBLE.

IT IS SIN TO SPEAK WITHOUT KNOWING.

IT IS SIN TO INVITE ARGUMENT.

HENCE THE PERSON WHO WOULD POSE THE QUESTION ‘WHY WOULD’ IS A FOOL INVITING FUTURE SUFFERING.

Why it is an unfair or ridiculous question:

If the person asked knows whether the government faked or did not fake it, whether you killed or did not kill your wife, it would be silly to ask him a question he already knows the answer.

It is because he does not know the answer that you pose the question and if it is impossible for him to answer you truly, you are asking an impossible question for him to answer and that is karma, invites him to speculate and take up a position and argue with you or he must accede with you, yes it is impossible you killed your wife and therefore you did not kill her.

IF YOU ARE ASKING AN UNFAIR QUESTION THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE ADDRESSEE TO ANSWER, YOU ARE NOT MERITORIOUS BUT CREATING DEBT TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING.

Unreasonable, false, unrighteous and argumentative:

Anyone understanding truly when he is asked, ‘why would’ must understand it as an evil loaded question.

It is unreasonable because it is impossible for the addressee to answer.

It is argumentative because it invites the person to take up a position without knowing the truth of the subject.

It is false because what is said to be impossible is possible.

It is unrighteous because you are saying something is impossible (the government faked it) without knowing that this is true.

How many in this world can understand the true nature of this question ‘why would’ as I elucidated? Is it false or is it the truth that this world cannot receive because it neither sees nor knows it?

Why ask me?

You tell me whether you killed your wife or not, why ask me an impossible question that I do not have the answer.

You tell me whether the government did or did not fake it, why ask me a question you did not know the answer? If you know the answer truly, why ask me who does not know the answer?

ANYONE WHO ASKS OTHERS UNREASONABLE OR IMPOSSIBLE QUESTIONS TO ANSWER IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT.

What is a reasonable question?

Whenever a question is asked by you or by others of you, the most important question to ask is whether it is reasonable or not. If the question is unreasonable, the person is asking for future suffering.

A reasonable question is one that is truly meant (not sarcastic eg why are you so rude), a question the questioner knows the answer that is meaningful so that he can impart the answer on the questioner or a question that the addressee can answer truthfully without resorting to guessing.

Thus if you ask the question where are the keys, it is a question the person can answer truthfully as there or ‘I don’t know’.

If you ask a question that is impossible for the addressee to answer then you are asking an unreasonable question that incurs debt eg why would I kill my wife? Questions should not be trivial about trivial matters but they must meaningful, over matters that are important.

WHEN A QUESTION IS POSED TO YOU, THE FIRST QUESTION TO ASK IS WHETHER IT IS REASONABLE. IF IT IS NOT REASONABLE, YOU ARE A FOOL TO TRY ANSWER IT AND BLAME YOURSELF FOR BEING DISTURBED AND THE FAULT LIES WITH THE POSER.

Before you answer:

Before you answer any questions, the first thing is to determine (or understand) whether the question is reasonable or not, if it is unreasonable what is the point of answering it nor is it possible to truly answer it without resorting to falsity, guessing.

THERE IS NO POINT ANSWERING AN UNREASONABLE QUESTION NOR IS IT POSSIBLE TO ANSWER WITHOUT RESORTING TO FALSITY OR GUESSING.

There is grave karma in posing unreasonable questions to others. As the Buddha said, so and so was wise, he did not pester me. You can only pester someone if you keep on questioning him with unreasonable questions. There are many in this world who have developed the habit of asking people lots of difficult questions partly to make life difficult for others as they openly or secretly enjoy others struggling to answer. What they do not realize is that they are setting themselves up for even an eternity of torment.

ALL QUESTIONS NO MATTER HOW SIMPLE REQUIRE ANSWERS AND TROUBLE THE ADDRESSEE AND SO THE WISE PERSON WILL ASK FEW REASONABLE QUESTIONS LET ALONE ANY UNREASONABLE QUESTIONS BUT FOOLS ARE EVER TO ASK OTHERS LOTS OF QUESTIONS AND PESTER THEM NOT REALIZING THEY ARE SETTING THEMSELVES UP FOR TORMENT.

The Buddha never asks difficult questions, his questions which are always relevant are easy to answer if not by you then he has the TRUE answers.

THE ONLY REASON A QUESTION IS DIFFICULT IS BECAUSE IT IS UNREASONABLE, BOTH THE QUESTIONER AND ADDRESSEE DO NOT TRULY KNOW THE ANSWER AND IT IS AN INVITATION FOR GUESSING AND ARGUMENT.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT ANY REASONABLE QUESTION SHOULD BE DIFFICULT TO ANSWER.

Thus anyone who poses the question ‘is the universe finite or infinite’ is asking an unreasonable question without himself truly seeing or knowing it is finite or infinite requiring the addressee to similarly guess without seeing or knowing. Only the person who sees everything, as the Buddha claims can answer this question and so it is unreasonable for an ordinary person to ask another ordinary person to answer this question.

(The universe is infinite in space according to the Buddha but it is not permanent or true because space and the universe is a false fabrication of consciousness and with the cessation of consciousness, space disappears so whence the question of finite or infinite?)

All frivolous questions are unreasonable eg ‘have you eaten’. If you have no intention of supplying me a meal, it is frivolous to ask whether I have eaten.

All questions intended to please, impress and humiliate others are unreasonable eg what car do you drive intended to look down if he drives a junk or determine his status. A person may ask where do you live not because he is truly interested but to determine your status. If you said you live in Beverly Hills he is suitably impressed and treat you with more respect.

REFLECTING THEY ARE ROBOTS WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND, WHENEVER PEOPLE ARE ASKED QUESTIONS, THEY PLUNGE IN IRREGARDLESS TO ANSWER OR FABRICATE AN FALSE ANSWER TO IT WITHOUT ASKING THEMSELVES IS THE QUESTION REASONABLE?

BEFORE YOU ANSWER ANY QUESTION, ASK YOURSELF IF IT IS REASONABLE. IF IT IS UNREASONABLE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ANSWER TRULY AND THERE IS NO POINT IN TRYING TO ANSWER.

Why the Buddha remains silent:

It is recorded that when the Buddha is asked unreasonable questions, he remains silent and that is the ONLY wise response to unreasonable questions.

IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND AN UNREASONABLE QUESTION AS UNREASONABLE AND YOU ATTEMPT TO ANSWER AN UNREASONABLE QUESTION BY FABRICATING A FALSE OR GUESSED ANSWER, YOU HAVE BEEN INDUCTED INTO THE REALM OF FALSITY AND SUFFERING.

IT IS NOT BLAMELESS OR HARMLESS TO ANSWER AN UNREASONABLE QUESTION BUT IT IS DEADLY TO BE FOOLISHLY DRAWN TO ATTEMPT TO ANSWER UNREASONABLE QUESTIONS.

Malaysia MPs suspend Anwar Ibrahim over Israel comment

Lawmakers voted to suspend Mr Anwar over allegedly misleading statements that a government unity policy was inspired by an Israeli initiative

There is speculation that with four opposition MPs suspended the government will have a two thirds majority necessary to pass legislation to amend electoral boundaries favouring BN.

There are leaked documents available on internet that supports Anwar’s contention and so it is a travesty of reality and arrogance to suspend him. Even if the allegations are false, there is no reason to suspend him as he has a right to question the government on wrongdoings.

ANYONE WHO THINKS ANWAR, KARPAL AND LIM KIT SIANG IN POWER CAN PERPETRATE SUCH FLAGRANT TRAVESTY OF REALITY AND ABUSE OF POWER IS DELUDED, MAD. THUS ALL THESE PEOPLE INCLUDING RPK TALKING ABOUT A THIRD FORCE ARE EITHER DELUDED, EXPECTING TOO MUCH WHEN THEY THEMSELVES ARE FAR FROM PERFECT AND PLAYING INTO THE HANDS OF BN BY DISUNITING THE OPPOSITION.

What kind of setup is this?

YOU CAN ONLY TRULY CALL SOMETHING A SETUP IF YOU SAW IT HAPPENING OR YOU HAVE INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE LIKE A VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDING OF PROCEEDINGS.

HEARSAY FROM OTHERS IS NOT EVIDENCE. IF IT IS BASED ON HEARSAY YOU WILL BE WISE TO NOT COMMIT YOURSELF FOR FEAR OF SLANDERING OTHERS IF IT TURNS OUT FALSE.

BASED ON EVIDENCE, A FRAME UP IS LIKELY, A SETUP IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE. IF FACED WITH AVAILABLE EVIDENCE YOU CONCLUDE A SET UP WHEN IT IS A FRAME UP THEN YOU HAVE FALSE UNDERSTANDING.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT THE DIPLOMATS SAW THE ACT THEMSELVES NOR HAD THEY INCONTROVERTIBLE VIDEO OR AUDIO EVIDENCE OTHERWISE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN PASSED TO POLICE BEARING IN MIND SINGAPORE’S PREJUDICE AGAINST ANWAR. IF EVEN THE CONSPIRATORS FORGOT TO COLLECT VIDEO EVIDENCE, HOW WOULD SPIES OF DIPLOMATS HAVE TO PRESCIENCE TO RECORD?

BEARING IN MIND THAT THERE WAS NO ATTEMPT TO RECORD PROCEEDINGS AND OBTAIN SPERM IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACT, ANY RESPONSIBLE PERSON WOULD HESITATE TO LABEL IT A SETUP BECAUSE THERE IS AT LEAST A POSSIBILITY IT WAS A FRAME UP NOT A SET UP AND SO THESE DIPLOMATS ARE IRRESPONSIBLE PEOPLE OR DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY TALK ABOUT WITH GRAVE KARMA DUE.

The entirety of evidence is for frame up:

The entirety not on balance of the evidence available to the public, the person who is unbiased and has calm clearly thinking correct or true understanding comes to the conclusion that a frame up of Anwar was likely if not certainty, not a setup for Anwar.

Apart from the failure to record proceedings and collect sperm immediately, there is admission of Saiful meeting the PM, the IGP and a senior police officer secretly in a hotel room, how convenient for Saiful to not wash his backside for 3 days to retain the sperm when he should get over immediately and see a doctor, Saiful having affair with prosecutor, refusal to allow Anwar access to medical and police reports.

ALL THESE AND MORE POINT TO A FRAME UP NOT SET UP AND YOU ARE A BRAVE MAN COURTING INSANITY AND PUNISHMENT TO NEVERTHELESS INSIST IT IS A SETUP.

IT IS NOT ON BALANCE OF EVIDENCE BUT THE ENTIRETY OF EVIDENCE IS AGAINST SETUP.

Impossible diplomats know Anwar is homosexual:

It is impossible diplomats should know Anwar is homosexual let alone he sodomized Saiful.

As I said, hearsay is not evidence unless you want to go mad.

In order to know Anwar is a homosexual, you must see him doing it or have audiovisual evidence.

If diplomats have audiovisual evidence of Anwar as homosexual, Anwar would be a dead man because the evidence would have been exposed publicly by the enemies of Anwar.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO HAVE AUDIOVISUAL EVIDENCE ANWAR IS HOMOSEXUAL LET ALONE ANWAR SODOMIZING SAIFUL BECAUSE IF IT WAS AVAILABLE, ANWAR’S ENEMIES WOULD HAVE OBTAINED IT BY HOOK OR CROOK AND PUBLICIZED IT LONG AGO AND SO NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXISTS. THEREFORE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE DIPLOMATS SPEAKS TRUTHFULLY THAT ANWAR WAS SET UP.

India and China set $100bn trade target by 2015

It is not harmless but controlled madness to talk about and set trade targets.

If the trade is genuine then it will achieve the target by itself without need to think about it or set targets, if you are trading to achieve that target then it is insanity because it is trading for the sake of boosting trade not because it is needed. If you have no intention of meeting that target then you are not a man of your words which are empty and the path to insanity.

IF YOU HAVE LITTLE OR NO INTENTION OF MEETING THAT TARGET, WHY TALK ABOUT IT AND SET THE TARGET?

IF YOU MAKE ANY ATTEMPTS TO ACHIEVE THE TARGET THEN YOU ARE TRADING FOR THE SAKE OF ACHIEVING THE TARGET RATHER THAN TRADING BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGFUL.

IF TRADING WILL ACHIEVE THAT TARGET MEANINGFULLY, IT WILL ACHIEVE THAT TARGET WITHOUT ANY SETTING AND SO YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT WILL END IN INSANITY FOR YOU AND THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG. HEREIN IS ANOTHER EXCESS NOT VIRTUE OF CAPITALISM. IT IS GREED AT WORK, GREED IS THE DRIVE FOR BOOSTING TRADE FOR THE SAKE OF BOOSTING.

Evil and mad to set targets:

It is not good or sane to set targets but evil and mad to set targets.

Would you set targets for yourself to be enlightened in two years time?

What is required is you devote your attention and effort to achieve enlightenment and enlightenment will be achieved in due course if you have practiced correctly, what is the need for setting targets?

TARGETS LIKE HOPE IS TOTALLY USELESS, AND IT REFLECTS HUMAN DELUSION THEY THINK HOPE AND TARGETS ARE REAL, USEFUL WHEN THEY ARE EVIL AND CONTROLLED MADNESS.

A robot of your target:

You may think you are a master of your target but you are a slave.

UNLESS YOU IGNORE YOUR TARGET IN WHICH CASE YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE, ONCE A PERSON SETS A MEANINGFUL TARGET, HE HAS BECOME A ROBOT OR SLAVE OF THE TARGET AND SO IT IS THAT ONLY ROBOTS SET TARGETS, THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND TRULY HAVE NO TARGETS.

The Buddha is always present:

It is delusion and false understanding to think being dazed is natural and harmless when it is unnatural and harmful and it is the path to doom.

The Buddha is never in a daze but always fully alert, guarding the doors of his senses and rooted in the present, he does not stray in a daze or daydreaming.

The reason why people fall into a daze either voluntarily or involuntarily is because their minds are roiled by force constantly, their attention is constantly divided into many parts by the substance and style combo of sensory inputs.

AFTER LIFE LONG WILFUL PRACTICE OF THE SIMULTANEOUS COMBO OF SUBSTANCE AND FORCE BASED STYLE, THE DEFAULT CONCENTRATION OF PEOPLE IS SCATTERED AND THEY HAVE A TENDENCY TO LAPSE OR SINK INTO DAZES OF VARYING SEVERITY WHICH IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND WARNING OF A PERMANENT SEVERE FINAL DAZE IF NOTHING IS DONE TO CORRECT.

Why not?

This is a heading for a Star column.

It is an unreasonable question because its aim is not to ask a meaningful question but to challenge and that is about radiating force at others.

WHY NOT IS ALWAYS AN UNREASONABLE QUESTION BECAUSE ITS PURPOSE IS TO ISSUE A CHALLENGE NOT ASK A MEANINGFUL QUESTION AND WHOEVER ASKS IT IS ASKING FOR WOE.

Whither Anwar and Pakatan?

COMMENT
By BARADAN KUPPUSAMY

He is asking a question but it is not because he wants to know the answer from those asked but it is an excuse for him to launch into a derisive veiled dressing down of Anwar & PKR.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE WANTS YOU TO TELL HIM WHERE ANWAR AND PAKATAN IS HEADING NOR IS IT POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO TRULY KNOW AND SO HE IS ASKING AN UNREASONABLE QUESTION WITH AN EVIL HIDDEN AGENDA ON HIS MIND. SO HE IS A FOOL PUTTING A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK, HARDLY WORTH READING WHAT HE HAS TO SAY.

Why is he asking the question?

Can he truly (not speculate) answer the question he poses, ‘whither Anwar & Pakatan’?

Can you truly (not speculate) answer the question he poses, ‘whither Anwar & Pakatan’?

If you agree he and you cannot, then he is asking an unreasonably question inviting you to sin by speculating what he and you cannot know. You are a fool to accept his invitation to answer.

So that he can answer falsely for you:

The reason he is asking the question ‘whither Anwar and Pakatan’ is not for you to answer it for him but so that he can falsely, unrighteously answer it for you in a way that will fulfil his undisclosed agenda.

Thus he is heaping deadly karma on himself to be experienced as future suffering.

The curse not efficiency of capitalism:

According to Stiglitz, American economist, America will spend (print) $600 billion to buy its treasuries in an attempt to boost the American economy but bankers getting the money, in the name of efficiency of markets or greed will not invest in the moribund American economy but seek ‘better returns’ in developing countries like China and Far East where it is not welcomed as it stokes bubbles and inflation and countries there are already erecting capital controls to stem this greedy influx.

AND SO YOU HAVE IT, CAPITALISM IS ABOUT BLIND UNFETTERED GREED TO MAXIMIZE SHORT TERM GAIN WITHOUT THOUGHT ABOUT THE COMMON GOOD AND THE AUTHORITIES ARE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE AND CLUELESS OR INCOMPETENT TRYING TO REVIVE THE ECONOMY.

Capitalism is like a nuclear reactor:

Just as a nuclear reactor is dangerous, is capable of meltdown that destroys the reactor and kills through radioactive contamination, capitalism is dangerous, can meltdown and destroy itself and the society that practices it.

Just as a nuclear reactor has nothing to do with reason, it is all about nuclear or fissionable materials harnessed to generate energy, capitalism has nothing to do with reason, is blind and all about greed and selfishness harnessed to drive material consumption and wealth creation.

Just as a nuclear reactor requires control via boron rods to ensure it does not overheat and meltdown, capitalism requires governmental and regulatory bodies control to sustain it.

Just as a nuclear reactor may be poorly controlled leading to meltdown, regulators and governments who are supposed to provide strict supervision have not only been sleeping but sleeping with those they are supposed to regulate such that the system has gone into disastrous meltdown that will get worse.

CAPITALISM IS IRRATIONAL NOT RATIONAL, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT IT IS ABOUT HARNESSING IN A CONTROLLED FASHION TWO DEADLY BLIND FORCES, GREED AND SELFISHNESS IN THE NAME OF ECONOMIC WELLBEING BUT IN RECENT YEARS GOVERNMENTS AND REGULATORS HAVE NOT ONLY BEEN SLEEPING BUT SLEEPING WITH THOSE THEY SHOULD CONTROL SCRUPULOUSLY THE RESULT OF WHICH IS A MELTDOWN THAT IS IRREVERSIBLE, WILL BREAK DOWN THE SOCIAL FABRIC.

I have not had a nightmare for a long time:

The Buddha said the person headed for heaven sleeps easily, wakes easily and dreams no evil dreams.

I have not had dreams that trouble me for a long time and nowadays I sleep easily and wake easily proving that what the Buddha said is true.

Metta Sutta: Good Will

"Monks, for one whose release of awareness through good will is cultivated, consolidated, and well-undertaken, eleven benefits can be expected.

"One sleeps easily, wakes easily, dreams no evil dreams. One is dear to human beings & non-human beings. The devas protect one. Neither fire, poison, nor weapons can touch one. One's mind gains concentration quickly. One's complexion is bright. One dies unconfused and -- if penetrating no higher -- is headed for the Brahma worlds.

Nothing to prove:

Many think nothing wrong, think they are right to prove themselves or challenge themselves to achieve certain things eg prove they can stand on their own two feet, succeed in business, prove they are clever.

It is because you identify with yourself, have self identity and are deluded that you need to prove yourself. Proving yourself is a program and the person is a deluded robot.

The Buddha did not set out to prove himself that he can achieve enlightenment or discover the truth. He was uncommonly determined to put an end to what he saw were the miseries and meaninglessness of existence, he was resolved that he would do battle even to the death to discover the way out of his darkness if possible, he was not interested in worldly pursuits, only locked in a battle to the death, trying everything to seek an answer to the miseries of existence here.

YOU ARE DELUDED IF YOU THINK THE BUDDHA WAS TRYING TO PROVE HIMSELF WHEN HE SET OFF ON THE PATH TO SEEKING THE TRUTH.

THE PERSON WHO SEEKS TO PROVE HIMSELF IS DELUDED, A ROBOT AND HAS SIGNIFICANT SELF IDENTITY AND PRIDE THAT IS THE WAY TO WOE NOT HEAVEN.

IF YOU HAVE GIVEN UP ALL IDENTIFICATION WITH YOUR SELF, WHAT IS THERE TO PROVE?

Buddhist monks distributing food?

Buddhist religious leaders bring cheer to elderly folk

GEORGE TOWN: A group of 40 Buddhist monks and novitiates displayed their spirit of giving and sharing by distributing food and provisions to elderly residents at Little Sisters of the Poor, Home for the Aged.

A true Buddhist monk owns nothing other than his bowl, two sets of clothes, so how can he distribute food to others? If he is acting as a go-between, distributing food for others, that is also against the discipline of the Buddha.

IT REFLECTS THE GROSS DELUSION OF THIS WORLD, IGNORANCE AND FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND AND FOLLOW WHAT THE BUDDHA PRESCRIBED THAT MONKS DEEM IT GOOD THAT THEY STORE AND DISTRIBUTE FOOD FOR OTHERS.

The lucrative, secretive unregulated world of derivatives:

It seems an exclusive club of big banks run the derivative market and it is lucrative, the most profitable business for these banks compared with any other banking businesses and these banks will not reveal their profit margins nor what they do thus people may think they are insured or hedged, their risks limited and so they can take more risk than they normally would but these secretive bankers may be raking in fat premiums without having the means to meet their commitments when calamity strikes (like AIG could not pay up).

IT IS A DELUSION OF THIS WORLD THAT THEY CAN MINIMIZE EVEN CANCEL OUT RISK IN THEIR UNDERTAKINGS AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF FINANCIAL CONMEN WILLING TO PLAY ON THEIR FEARS TO MAKE BIG PROFITS WITHOUT ACTUALLY HAVING TRULY LIMITED OR CANCELED THEIR RISKS, A SHAM THAT IN NORMAL TIMES WORKS FINE BUT WHEN SOMETHING UNEXPECTED AND SEVERE HAPPENS THESE INSURERS ARE CAUGHT WITH THEIR PANTS DOWN AND CANNOT FULFILL THEIR OBLIGATIONS.

FECKLESS BANKERS PREY ON THE FEARS OF PEOPLE TO OFFER INSURANCE OR TAKE OVER THEIR RISKS FOR THEM FOR A (FAT) FEE. WHETHER THEY HAVE SUCCESSFULLY MINIMIZED OR CANCELLED THE RISK IS ANOTHER MATTER THAT IN NORMAL TIMES CAN BE CONCEALED.

Quote:
Derivatives shift risk from one party to another, and they offer many benefits, like enabling Mr. Singer to sell his fixed plans without having to bear all the risk that oil prices could suddenly rise. Derivatives are also big business on Wall Street. Banks collect many billions of dollars annually in undisclosed fees associated with these instruments — an amount that almost certainly would be lower if there were more competition and transparent prices.
Perhaps no business in finance is as profitable today as derivatives. Not making loans. Not offering credit cards. Not advising on mergers and acquisitions. Not managing money for the wealthy.

The precise amount that banks make trading derivatives isn’t known, but there is anecdotal evidence of their profitability.

And the profits on most derivatives are masked. In most cases, buyers are told only what they have to pay for the derivative contract, say $25 million. That amount is more than the seller gets, but how much more — $5,000, $25,000 or $50,000 more — is unknown. That’s because the seller also is told only the amount he will receive. The difference between the two is the bank’s fee and profit. So, the bigger the difference, the better for the bank — and the worse for the customers.

What is capitalism?

Capitalism exists in name only, in reality, the playing field is not level, there is collusion between the rich or big business and the politicians elected by people to run the economy and country.

In theory, capitalism is a system where there is a licence or permission for anyone to make his money through his own enterprise and because in the nature of things beings will resort to all kinds of unfair (crooked or cheating and forceful or plundering or robbing) means the system must be governed and supervised or policed.

CAPITALISM IS A SYSTEM WHERE LICENCE OR PERMISSION IS GIVEN TO MAKE MONEY BY WHATEVER MEANS YOU CAN THINK OF OR DEVICE WITH THE PROVISO THAT IT DOES NOT BLATANTLY HARMS SOCIETY ( EG GAMBLING IS PERMITTED BUT ROBBERY TO MAKE MONEY IS NOT) AND BECAUSE THIS PERMISSION OR FREE FOR ALL TO MAKE MONEY TENDS TO EXCESSES THAT MAY THREATEN SOCIETY THERE MUST BE SOME GOVERNANCE IMPOSED, RULES ENACTED AND POLICED.

IN REALITY IT IS NEVER FREE FOR ALL, THOSE WHO ARE RICH ABUSE THEIR POSITIONS TO MAKE THEM RICHER BY BULLYING LESSER COMPETITORS AND BRIBING GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHO ALSO HAVE BUSINESS CRONIES TO ENRICH THEMSELVES USING ELECTED POWERS.

CAPITALISM IS NEVER ABOUT REASON OR MEANING, UNDERLYING CAPITALISM ARE GREED AND SELFISHNESS (TO NOT SHARE AND HOARD IRRATIONALLY FOR ONE’S ENJOYMENT ONLY), TWO PROXIES OF BLIND MENTAL FORCE THAT ARE ADDICTIVE THAT TENDS TO INCREASING INTENSITY AND LOSS OF CONTROL.

BECAUSE IT IS BLIND ADDICTIVE GREED AND SELFISHNESS THAT IS AT THE HEART OF CAPITALISM, IT IS NEVER SELF SUSTAINING BUT ENDS IN DESTRUCTION AND DECAY.

The basis of capitalism is greed and selfishness:

The basis of capitalism is greed and selfishness and these have nothing to do with reason or meaning.

Greed or acquisitiveness is merely the attractive stirring of a person’s mental force on perception of potential gains or desirable objects like money, diamonds, gold, fancy car or big house. Thus greed is just a stirring of mental force to want to acquire.

Selfishness is a program or plan that commands the person who is its robot to enjoy by himself or his related ones whatever he has obtained to the exclusion of others. Selfishness is simply not to share, to deny others outside his circle access to enjoyment he has and this is a program which is based on force.

SELFISHNESS IS A PROGRAM IMPRINTED IN HIS MIND AND THE PERSON IS MERELY A SLAVE OR ROBOT USING FORCE TO ACTIVATE SELFISHNESS WHEN THE OCCASION ARISES AND SO SELFISHNESS IS DRIVEN BY BLIND IRRATIONAL FORCE.

IT IS TO BE EXPECTED THAT SOMETHING BASED ON BLIND IRRATIONAL FORCE, AND CAPITALISM IS BASED ON BLIND GREED AND SELFISHNESS WILL END IN DISASTER IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER.

Admiring capitalism is admiring greed and selfishness:

Worshipping capitalism is worshipping greed and selfishness.

Defending capitalism is defending greed and selfishness.

Advocating capitalism is advocating greed and selfishness.

Because the basis of capitalism is greed and selfishness and these are evil, whoever worships, admires, defends and advocates capitalism is advocating sin and evil and headed for woe.

If you talk about capitalism as if it is wonderful, great without understanding truly the nature of capitalism you are a fool who does not know what he is talking about and that is a recipe for suffering.

ONLY GREEDY SELFISH PEOPLE LOVE CAPITALISM WHICH GIVES THEM THE LICENCE TO GRAB AS MUCH AS THEY CAN AND SO IF YOU WORSHIP CAPITALISM YOU MUST BE A CAPITALIST AT HEART, GREEDY AND SELFISH AT HEART. CAPITALISM IS ABOUT FOOD THAT PERISHES AND SO IF YOU LOVE FOOD THAT PERISHES YOU TOO WILL PERISH.

Why derivatives are so lucrative:

It has been said that derivatives are by far the most lucrative business for bankers and it is not difficult to understand why it may be so.

For people who are anxious to farm out their risks, then you can assume their risks for them at your bidding and they will pay and should nothing happen, you just pocket the fee but it may be like playing poker, calling the bluff or Russian roulette, if your bluff fails or there be a bullet in the chamber, you are dead.

AND SO IT IS THAT IF YOU ARE RECKLESS, GREEDY FOR GAINS THEN IF NOTHING GOES WRONG, YOU JUST POCKET THE FEES PAID FOR ASSURING OTHERS’ RISKS, WHETHER YOU HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL TO FULFILL YOUR OBLIGATIONS IS ANOTHER MATTER AND SO LONG AS NOTHING HAPPENS YOU POCKET THE FAT FEES BUT SHOULD SOMETHING DISASTROUS HAPPENS YOU COULD BE CAUGHT WITH YOUR PANTS DOWN, LIKE AIG WHO HAD TO RUN TO THE GOVERNMENT TO BAIL IT OUT.

How iPad Changed 2010:

This is a headline and it is always false:

The iPad was introduced in 2010 and no matter how good it was, it did not change 2010 except in his false perception and understanding that he wants to inoculate into others.

Nothing happening or born in 2010 can change it, 2010 is a year that has a beginning, course and end, things can happen in it but NEVER change 2010.

2010 IS 2010, NOTHING HAPPENING OR BORN IN IT CAN CHANGE IT AND IT REFLECTS FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS SO AND THIS AGAIN IS PROOF PEOPLE HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING.

It is true to say I changed the world in 1977 because as a result of unprecedented, unthinkable consciousness change I initiated in myself I saw others changing too in an unprecedented way as visible with their demeanour and behaviour.

THUS I CHANGED THE WORLD AFTER 1977 BUT I DID NOT CHANGE 1977 BY WHAT I DID IN 1977.

Why true capitalism is never possible:

Because at the heart of capitalism, shorn of all pretence is greed and selfishness and it is in the nature of people controlled by greed and selfishness that should they become rich and powerful they should abuse their wealth and power to not just consolidate their wealth and power but bully and exterminate rivals and get away with it if they can and so capitalism degenerates into corruption, vested interests, hypocrisy, bullying, making the masses become prostitutes to the few rich and powerful (politicians) who are the pimps and this is not pure capitalism but crony capitalism.

Major US bank cuts off Wikileak:

What has US banks got to do with Wikileaks’ deeds and has Wikileaks been charged and found guilty of any crime.

This action is an indication that justice is arbitrary, summary in this world and at the whims of those who are dominant.

WHAT IS SAID IS NOT WHAT IS DONE.

IF AUTHORITIES DO NOT OBEY THE LAW, THEY USE THEIR VESTED POWERS TO ABUSE AND PERSECUTE OTHERS, WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM CRIMINALS? THIS IS A WORLD OF HYPOCRISY AND FALSITY FAR MORE THAN PEOPLE CONCEDE.

And what has Wilikleaks done?

What has Wikileaks done to warrant such heavy high handed actions that exposes the hypocrisy of the US in the eyes of those who are discerning?

At most, Wikileaks has embarrassed and hurt the egos of politicians, it has not done anything physically harmful like bombing the US.

AND SO IT IS ABSURD, COMING DOWN SO HEAVILY ON PEOPLE WHO ARE IRRITANTS THAN A PHYSICAL THREAT. BECAUSE IT IS ABSURD THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE HAS FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY. IT IS NOT REASON BUT REVENGE THAT IS THE DRIVE AND THAT IS THE WAY TO INSANITY.

Outsourcing risk:

The delusion of modern times, not without greed and selfishness as the basis or drive is that you can outsource risk to others so that you can take risks in excess of what you would normally take with little or no impunity to loss and thus emboldened you take even greater risks.

WHERE THERE IS GREED FOR GAIN THERE IS RISK AND FEAR FOR LOSSES AND THE ONUS IS ON THE INDIVIDUAL TO BE NOT SO GREEDY SO THAT HE DOES NOT BET THE HOUSE ON HIS VENTURES BUT BECAUSE THE GREED FOR GAIN BECOMES COMPELLING AND INSATIABLE WITH CONDITIONING AND COUPLED WITH DELUSION, PEOPLE THINK THEY CAN OUTSOURCE RISKS TO OTHERS AND OTHERS GREEDY TO CAPITALIZE ON THE FEARS OF OTHERS THINK THEY CAN EFFICIENTLY ASSUME THE RISKS OF OTHERS WITHOUT THEMSELVES GETTING BURNT AND SO THEY DEVISED COMPLICATED DELUDED MATHEMATICAL DERIVATIVES THEY THINK WILL ENABLE EVERYONE TO TAKE RISKS (AT A PRICE IN PROFIT TO BANKERS IN CHARGE) WITHOUT FEAR OF SYTEMIC BREAKDOWN OR THERMO NUCLEAR EXPLOSION.

BUT BECAUSE IT IS A DELUSION, IT IS A TICKING TIME BOMB WAITING TO EXPLODE AND BLOW EVERYONE OUT OF THE WATER.

Emotional people will tell you as if they understand, “You cannot have your cake and eat it” yet the rationale behind derivatives is you can have your cake and eat it too. See what great idiots (blinded by greed and delusion) they are.

You should be responsible for your own risk:

It is a fundamental rule that the person should be responsible for the risks he takes and that way he will behave responsibly because his neck is on the line.

It shows governments are not doing their jobs that they have allowed the outsourcing of risk to become such a burgeoning and lucrative industry shrouded in secrecy controlled by big bankers.

The reason why bankers are not willing to open up is because it a can of worms, they may be taking in premiums paid without truly having the capacity to guarantee risks.

SURELY YOU SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RISKS YOU TAKE AND GOVERNMENTS SHOULD ENSURE THAT THIS HAPPENS AS IT PROMOTES RESPONSIBLE ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR. IT SHOWS GOVERNMENTS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR THEY ARE IN COHORT WITH BANKERS THAT THEY ALLOW DERIVATIVES TO GROW TO SUCH MAGNITUDES, IN THE END THE COSTS ARE PASSED ON TO THE PUBLIC, WHAT INSURANCE COMPANY PAY TO MINIMIZE RISKS (WHETHER EFFECTIVE OR NOT) IS PASSED ON TO CONSUMERS.

No style in your seeing?

For one who sees correctly, people see with like and dislike, they cast furtive or exploratory or tentative glances at things around them, people around them and if they like what they see they will focus their attention on it, if they don’t like what they see, they will ignore it or pretend not to see it.

THUS WHAT THEY SEE OR HEAR IS PRE-SELECTED FOR THEM BY FORCE, BY LIKE AND DISLIKE, IT IS THEIR LIKE OR DISLIKE OR STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT IS BLIND THAT TELLS THEM WHAT TO SEE AND NOT SEE, NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING.

PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS ARE FOREVER SEEING OR HEARING WHAT THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES TELL THEM TO SEE/HEAR OR NOT SEE/HEAR AND THAT IS ABOUT BLIND FORCE NOT REASON.

Looking for things they like:

Whenever people use their eyes eg on arrival at a party or lecture hall, they use their eyes to look for things they like, people they like and make a beeline for them, they avoid things they see that they don’t like and that is not true seeing but programmed force (like-dislike) based seeing that is dangerous because it is blind and a recipe for disaster sooner or later.

PEOPLE DON’T USE THEIR EYES TO SEE BUT THEY USE THEIR EYES TO SEARCH FOR WHAT THEY LIKE AND HOME IN WHICH IS WHY THEY SEE PARTIALLY AND NEVER SEE THINGS AS THEY TRULY ARE.

Ten Man Everton:

Ten-man Everton deny Manchester City top spot.

This is a headline and it is always driven by emotion to make much never genuine reason.

Ten man has nothing to do with the substance of the matter, if he and you think it is relevant, then you have false perception and understanding which means you don’t understand.

THE SUBSTANCE OF THE MATTER IS EVERTON DENIES CITY TOP SPOT. TEN MAN HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OCCASION ALTHOUGH YOU CAN MENTION IN THE BODY OF THE NEWS THAT THIS HAPPENED.

THE REASON FOR MENTIONING TEN MAN IS TO EXAGGERATE, MAKE MUCH OF THE EVENT TO STIR EMOTION OR FORCE IN OTHERS TO BE ‘WOWED’ AND THIS IS MEANINGLESS AND FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS IRRELEVANT AS RELEVANT THAT ENDS IN TORMENT.

IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER OR GO MAD, YOU BETTER MAKE SURE YOU SPEAK UNEMOTIONALLY AND ONLY STATE WHAT IS RELEVANT. TO EXAGGERATE AND STIR EMOTION IS AN ADDICTIVE PROGRAM THAT BECOMES CONSTANT AND THAT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.

A separate issue:

Everton denies City top spot is one issue.

Everton was down to ten men is another issue.

The two issues have nothing to do with each other.

By saying ten man Everton denies City you imply that the two issues are linked or one issue when they are separate.

IT IS ALWAYS FALSE TO SAY TEN MAN EVERTON BEAT CITY BECAUSE THE TWO ARE SEPARATE ISSUES. THE FACT THAT YOU PERCEIVE THEY ARE LINKED IS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION AND YOU HAVE DEBT TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING FOSTERING SUCH FALSE PERCEPTION IN OTHERS.

IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEY ARE SEPARATE ISSUES THAT SHOULD NOT BE MENTIONED IN THE SAME SENTENCE, YOU MUST EXPERIENCE DISTURBANCE OR UNEASINESS OF YOUR MIND BECAUSE YOU ARE BEING FED SHIT THAT YOU ACCEPTED AS FOOD.

MACC to charge two top Sime Darby men

You can rest assured such statements are never true but for public consumption to be seen as doing something about corruption when it is barely scratching the surface.

There is no need to tell the public you will prosecute so and so, just do it.

IF YOU ARE SINCERE ABOUT ‘CRACKING DOWN ON CORRUPTION’ WHY WASTE TIME AND ENERGY TELLING OTHERS WHAT YOU WILL DO? BETTER CONSERVE YOUR ENERGY AND GO AFTER CROOKS AND IT WILL BE SELF EVIDENT FROM CASES PROSECUTED THAT YOU ARE GOING AFTER THEM.

YOU DON’T NEED TO BEAT YOUR DRUM TO GO AFTER BIG FISHES, IF YOU ARE SINCERE IN GOING AFTER THEM IT WILL BE SELF EVIDENT FROM THE STREAM OF PROSECUTIONS BUT BECAUSE IT IS A TRICKLE NOT STREAM, IT IS ALL FOR SHOW, FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION WITH ELECTIONS IN MIND.

The third force can barely talk coherently:

All these third force agitators disenchanted by the perceived failure of the PR coalition are deluded.

I just saw one activist who was ‘roped in’ to be part of the third force, hearing him speak, he may be elected but it is unlikely he would be very competent as an administrator.

MANY OF THE ACTIVISTS HAVE GOT ONE OR TWO SCREWS LOOSE IN THEIR BRAINS THEMSELVES AND IF THEY WERE TO BE ELECTED, IT DOES NOT NECESSARY MEAN THEY WILL BE COMPETENT TO RUN THE COUNTRY.

Blazing a new trail:

Do you see yourself forming a trail let alone it is ablaze?

This is a falsity copied from others and so the person is a rehashing robot with no understanding, to exaggerate the importance of some achievement.

ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OF BLAZING TRAILS IS A MINDLESS ROBOT OR COPYCAT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHOSE PURPOSE IS TO IMPRESS AND THAT IS THE WAY TO THE GRAVEYARD OF ETERNAL DAMNATION.

IT TAKES SELF IDENTITY AND EXALTATION TO TALK OF BLAZING A NEW TRAIL.

Hurley begs husband to take her back

Anyone who begs is sinning and asking for suffering. You need force to beg and it exerts unfair pressure on the other person to comply.

You can rightfully ask (not beg) husband to take you back, anything more, the emotional baggage, weepiness and acted contrition comes from evil not good.

ASKING IS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE MATTER, BEGGING IS THE ACCOMPANIMENT OF THE ASKING BY FORCE, BY DEMAND OR COERCION AND IT IS EVIL TO BEG INSTEAD OF CALMLY ASKING.

My posted cheque stolen and altered:

I just received notification by bank that a cheque for $100 I posted to a charity had been intercepted and altered to become $4100 to a Chinese man.

Looks like there is a scam stealing posted cheques and you have to be careful posting cheques.

Apparently they can alter the cheques so well that it is passed off as unaltered.

Vince Cable: 'I could bring down the Government if I'm pushed'

 

Exclusive: Vince Cable privately threatens to “bring the Government down” if he is “pushed too far” during fractious discussions with his Conservative colleagues

He has no right to say that, it is a threat with deadly karma for him.

If you are pushed is not a valid reason for bringing down the government. If what you do is right for the good of people and the government does is wrong then if you voted in opposition and the government is brought down, that is a righteous reason for bringing down the government.

HE IS REVEALING HIMSELF AS A BAD MAN WHO CANNOT BE TRUSTED, WHO WILL HOLD OTHERS TO HOSTAGE OVER PERSONAL AGENDAS.

BECAUSE BEING PUSHED IS NOT A REASON TO BRING DOWN THE GOVERNMENT, HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY.

James Shaft: Europe must choose its lies wisely:

There are no wise lies, all lies are foolish, ALWAYS because there is punishment and it leads to difficulties apart from punishment.

Thus it is delusion and speaking falsely telling others to choose their lies wisely as if there are wise lies.

ALL LIES LEAD TO DIFFICULTIES AND ACCRUES DEBT AND SO IT IS DELUSION TO TALK OF WISE LIES.

Anwar is better than Obama:

Anwar too is emotional but for one who discerns, he has more integrity than Obama who won the Nobel Peace Prize bizarrely and even he himself may be privately wondering what he has done to deserve it.

Thus all these Malaysians who talk about third forces are bonkers, fools shooting themselves in the foot.

Banks may be liable for such fraud:

I was told by a Public Bank officer that in the case of fraud involving interception and alteration of cheques, the bank may be liable for losses unless they rang you and you wrongly confirmed the fraudulent cheque.

Nevertheless it was quite a hassle for me, although the police station was nearby without parking problems, it took an hour for the ponderous officer to compose a short report and even that he made a mistake.

These people responsible do not realize the suffering they have due them for causing trouble for others.

The Buddha meets God:

All beings to greater or lesser extent are vulnerable to wrong understandings of the nature of things, even to the highest levels, only the Buddha has seen completely through the impermanence, un-satisfactoriness and falsity of all being or existence.

The Buddha said for 7 Ages he himself was the holder of power like God and for many times he was ruler of the gods. There may be many island universes each presided by its Father or Lord.

5. 9. Brahmanimantanasuttaü
(49) An Address to Brahma

I heard thus.
At one time the Blessed One was living in the monastery, offered by Anàthapiïóika in Jeta's grove in Sàvatthi. The Blessed One addressed the bhikkhus from there.
Bhikkhus, at one time I was living in Ukaññha, at the root of a big Sàla tree in the Subhaga forest. At that time, to Baka brahmà an evil view like this had arisen: “This (my existence) is permanent, eternal, complete and a not changing thing. This is not born, does not decay, does not die, is not re-born, and there is no refuge higher than this.”
As a strong man would stretch his bent arm, or bend his stretched arm, I disappeared from the Subhaga forest and appeared in the Brahma world. Seeing me in the distance Baka brahma said, welcome! good sir. It's after a long time, that you have come. Sir, this is permanent, eternal, complete and a not changing thing. Not born does not decay, does not die, is not re-born and there is no refuge higher than this.
When this was said, I said thus to Baka brahma: Indeed Baka brahma is deluded, that he says, an impermanent, not eternal, incomplete, changing thing is permanent, eternal, complete and not subject to change. To a born, decaying, dying, fading and reappearing thing, he says is not born, does not decay, does not die, fade and is not re-born. When there is a refuge more noble than this (nibbana or the unborn), he says there is no refuge more noble than this (heaven).
Then Death the Evil One took possession of a member of the retinue of Brahma and said to me (it appears the Devil has access to the minds of beings and cause them to say or do evil things): Bhikkhu (Buddha), do not hinder this one (God). He is the great conquerer, the unvanquished one, he wields power over everything. He is the ruler of creations, the chief among creators, the father wielding power over all creators. Bhikkhu (Buddha), there were recluses and brahmins before you. They loathed and reviled, earth, water, fire, air, the born, the gods, brahma, the creators and the wives of creators. After death they were born in a lower state. Bhikkhu (Buddha), there were recluses and brahmins before you, they praised, and took pleasure in earth, water, fire, air, the born, the gods, brahma, the creators, the wives of creators. After death they were born in a higher state. (The angel was ticking off the Buddha for disagreeing with God)
Bhikkhu(Buddha), I tell you this, Come sir, do what Brahma asks you to do. Bhikkhu(Buddha), if you exceed the words of Brahma, like a man come to give splendour is turned out with a stick. Or like a man trying to fall into hell was pulled out from earth with hands and feet. Such a thing will happen to you. Come! Good sir, do whatever Brahma asks you to do and do not exceed him. Do you see the retinue of Brahma seated? The Evil One pointed out the retinue of Brahma to me. When this was said, I said thus to the Death Evil One: Evil One, I know you, Brahma and all his retinue are under your power, do you think that I’m in your power?
When this was said, Baka brahma said thus to me: Sir, I'm permanent, stable, eternal, complete and not doomed to fall and say that I'm permanent, stable, eternal, complete, and not doomed to fall. Not born, not decaying, not dying, not fading, not re-born, and not seeing any refuge more exalted than this, say I not born, will not decay, die, fade and be re-born, and see no refuge more exalted than this. Bhikkhu, there were recluses and brahmins before this. Their austerities lasted as long as their sign of concentration lasted. Would they know whether there is a refuge more noble than this, or there is no refuge more noble than this? Even if there be no refuge more noble than this, it will bring you only fatigue and trouble. Bhikkhu (Buddha), if you cleave to earth, water, fire, air, the born, to gods, to the lords of the populace, to Brahma, I will be at your bidding, protecting wealth, doing your wishes and standing outside.
The Buddha: Brahma, I know your goings and your splendour. Baka brahma has such powers and such splendour. Good sir, what do you know about my powers and splendour?

As far as the moon and sun wield power illuminating, the directions,
As far as the thousandfold world systems, you wield power,
You know this world and the other world, and those with greed and without,
And the movements of thoughts of beings `to be' here and there.

Thus I know your movements, splendour, and power. Baka brahma is so powerful and has such splendour. Brahma you have three other bodies, do you know and see that? You have a body named âbhassara. (lustrous) Fading from that is born here. Owing to settling there long, lost mindfulness, you do not know, or see that. So I'm your better in higher knowledge. Brahma you have names Subhakinnà (full of good) and Vehapphalà(power in the air) You do not know and see that. So I'm your better in higher knowledge. Brahma, I thoroughly know, and become earth to the least possible extent. (Yet I) Do not appropriate it, or take pleasure in it. Brahma, I thoroughly know water, fire, air, the born, those wielding power over the populace, gods, Brahma, âbhassarà, Subhàkinnà, Vehapphalà, The Almighty Brahma and All I thoroughly know and become All, to the least possible extent. (Yet I) Do not appropriate All and take pleasure in All. So I'm your better in higher knowledge.
God: Good sir, if you are not born of All, you would be useless and empty. Consciousness is non-indicative limitless and illuminates all over. If you were not born of earth, water, fire, air, gods, the lords of the populace, brahma, âbhassarà, Subhàkinnà, Vehapphalà, the Almighty brahma, I will now disappear you. (God says He will banish the Buddha)
The Buddha: Brahma if it is possible do so.
Then Brahma saying I will make the recluse Gotama disappear was not able to do so.
The Buddha: Then bhikkhus, I said, brahma I will make you disappear. Then I performed a fete of super normal power in which Brahma, his retinue and his gathering could not see me, yet could hear me and I said this verse.

I saw fear in being and non-being, not desiring any being. [1]
I did not hold with interest to anything. (The Buddha says he has abandoned everything, there is nothing he has not abandoned, unlike even the brahmas  who have not totally abandoned everything)

Then bhikkhus, Brahma, the brahma gathering and his retinue were surprised, and said, wonderful is the majesty and the power of the recluse Gotama. Before this we have not seen a recluse or brahmin so majestic and wonderful as the recluse Gotama, the son of the Sakyas, who has gone forth from the clan of the Sakyas. Friends, the populace is amused in being, fond of being and has arisen from being, has completely come out of being. [2]
Then bhikkhus, Death the Evil One took possession of one of the retinue of Brahma and said thus to me. Good sir, since you know so well and is enlightened, do not lead or teach disciples, or give them the going forth. Do not greed for disciples. Bhikkhu, before this there were recluses and brahmins, in the world, who acknowledged they were perfect and rightfully enlightened. They gave the going forth to the disciples and were greedy for disciples. After death they were born in lower states Bhikkhu (Buddha), before this there were recluses and brahmins, in the world, who acknowledged they were perfect and rightfully enlightened. They did not give the going forth to the disciples and were not greedy for disciples. After death they were born in exalted states. Therefore, bhikkhu (Buddha), live at ease, abide in pleasantness here and now, the not told is clever, do not advise others.
Then I said thus to Death the Evil One (speaking through angel): Death I know you, it is not out of compassion that you speak thus. You know that to whomever the recluse Gotama gives the Teaching, they go beyond your power (The Devil is anxious that The Buddha refrain from imparting his knowledge that would lead to those beings escaping the grasp of death and suffering). Evil One, there are those not rightfully enlightened, acknowledging they are rightfully enlightened. As for me, Evil One, I'm rightfully enlightened, and acknowledge I'm rightfully enlightened. Evil One, whether the Thus Gone One teaches and leads disciples or not it is the same to the Thus gone One. What is the reason? Evil One, those defiled desires of demerit heavy with future unpleasant results of birth, decay, death are dispelled from me, pulled out from the roots, made a palm stump, made things that would not rise again. Evil One when the top is cut the palm does not grow. In the same manner, those defiled desires of demerit heavy with future unpleasant results of birth, decay, death are dispelled from me, pulled out from the roots, made a palm stump, made things that would not rise again.
As this discourse is addressed to Màra, and Brahma, so this discourse has a synonymn as `An address to Brahma.'

Jesus scolds Satan speaking through Peter:

When an angel in the retinue of Brahma spoke against the Buddha, the Buddha addressed him as Evil One or the Devil. When Peter spoke to reproach Jesus, he scolded the Devil as if it was the Devil not Peter who addressed him:

From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised. 22 And Peter took him and began to rebuke him, saying, "God forbid, Lord! This shall never happen to you." 23*  But he turned and said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance * to me; for you are not on the side of God, but of men."

THUS THE BUDDHA CALLING THE PERSON WHO ADDRESSED HIM ‘EVIL ONE’ AS IF IT WAS MARA OR SATAN CORRESPONDS TO JESUS SCOLDING SATAN WHEN IT WAS PETER WHO SPOKE TO HIM.

I do not belong to this world:

I do not subscribe to the values of beings in this world, everywhere I see many different views but I do not subscribe to these views.

Not only do I not subscribe to these views, my views are different and not subscribed by beings in this world.

And my views have fruits, it endows me with a calm clear seeing, ease of mind even bliss that was unthinkable even by me in the past, I had no idea it could be possible to exists so effortlessly woe free as I now do.

I DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THE VIEWS OF THIS WORLD.

MY VIEWS DIFFER FROM OTHERS IN THE MYRIAD FORMS IN THIS WORLD.

IT IS BECAUSE MY VIEWS DIFFER FROM OTHERS THAT I BEHAVE AND SPEAK DIFFERENTLY AND THERE ARE FRUITS EVEN WONDERFUL FRUITS OF SUCH DIFFERING VIEWS OF MINE BECAUSE MY EXISTENCE HERE IS IMBUED WITH A CALM CLEAR THINKING THAT WAS IMPOSSIBLE, UNTHINKABLE, UNIMAGINABLE PREVIOUSLY.

Apple bans iPhone Wikileaks app

Apple confirms that it banned an unofficial iPhone app that gave people access to the Wikileaks Twitter feed and documents held on its website.

This is an indication of the political leanings of Apple and Steve Jobs. What people do with their phones is none of Apple’s business just as it is none of Bank Of America’s business to ban Wikileaks accounts.

I WAS NEVER ENAMOURED BY APPLE, NOT THAT I LOVE MICROSOFT, APPLE DOES NOT STAND FOR GOOD, IT IS MERCENARY TOO.