Thursday, January 13, 2011

Nearly choked from laughing too much:

Nearly choked from laughing too much:
Posted by masterwordsmith On Saturday, December 4, 2010
I received this from a friend Kak F. via email just now and nearly choked from laughing so much. Thanks Kak F. for sharing this post. I translated it myself. Apologies for any errors in my BM. I am posting this for humor BUT I do hope that one day, our education standards will not deteriorate to such a level!!!
This was written by someone who is a regular receiver of my mail and it reflects that he has no understanding because it is impossible for anyone who understands what I say, what Jesus and the Buddha said to laugh till he choked.
Laughter is not only meaningless, it is an expression of force stirring in the person’s mind that is to impress or please others. Because laughter is according to a plan, it is rehashed and robotic and you are a robot of laughter, because laughter exposes your mind to even violently stirring force that does no useful work it is mad apart from harming your mind with force creating stress, restlessness and distraction.
Why should anything stir your laughter except that you are a slave with a mental force that can be easily stirred or triggered to laugh that conditions you ever stronger to be excitable that will end in your insanity and that is the way to perdition not heaven.
Jesus said woe to you who laughs, for you shall weep. Did he make special dispensations for Christians or you? You think it is funny but when your head is on the chopping board it is not very funny and then you have no choice but to let it be chopped.
No one calls himself ‘masterwordsmith’ except through conceit and being a master of word smith is about style, writing in a stylish way with bombastic words to impress, not about substance.
IF WHAT YOU SAY IS ABOUT TRUTH AND SUBSTANCE THEN THERE IS NO CONSIDERATION ABOUT BEING A WORDSMITH, IF THE TRUTH OF WHAT YOU SAY IS NOT IMPORTANT, WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT IS THE STYLE OR WAY YOU SAY THAT IS DESIGNED TO IMPRESS, THEN YOU CALL YOURSELF MASTERWORDSMITH, AS IF IT IS AGREED UNIVERSALLY YOU ARE A MASTER OF WORDS.
You are you, not masterwordsmith:
You are you only and nothing else, to call and therefore perceive yourself as ‘masterwordsmith’ is to train yourself to perceive falsely that ends in mad perception. You are not mad yet, only controlled mad to show off or boast but when you are mad, cannot control insane even deadly impulses you will weep.
‘Masterwordsmith’ is a false perception of self as such and such that moulds the person just as someone thinks he is a cassanova and keeps training himself to be a cassanova that ends in torment never pleasure.

Renault warns of threat to assets

French carmaker Renault says suspected industrial espionage against its business threatens its "strategic assets".
See nothing wrong with the item? Then you don’t understand truly.
Either Renault is mad or it does not mean what it says.
Why warn of threats to its assets? If you are concerned about threats, you take measures to counter those threats, what is the use of warning others about those threats? So Renault is either mad, behaving bizarrely or there is ulterior motive in its warning, it may be to boast that it has made significant breakthroughs that others should be envious or jealous or something else.
IT IS BIZARRE FOR RENAULT TO WARN OTHERS ABOUT THREATS TO ITS ASSETS INSTEAD OF TAKING STEPS TO COUNTER THOSE THREATS. WHAT IT MAY BE TRYING TO DO IS BOAST ABOUT ITS BREAKTHROUGHS AS IF IT IS THAT VALUABLE.
Oil price is a risk to recovery:
This is a false statement that reflects no understanding.
High oil prices will definitely depress demand and the economy and so it is not a risk but will definitely affect the economy negatively.
Even without high oil prices there may not be a recovery reflecting how badly battered or terminally sick the economy is and so to speak of recovery is to understand falsely.
PEOPLE THINK THEY TALK SUCH GREAT SENSE BUT IT IS FALSE TO SPEAK OF RISK WHEN HIGH OIL PRICES DEFINITELY DEPRESSES THE ECONOMY, YOU DON’T NEED HIM TO TELL YOU THIS AND FURTHER IF RECOVERY IS IMPOSSIBLE BASED ON FACTS AVAILABLE TO ANYONE WITH EYES TO SEE, THEN HE IS DELUDED.
Mirror, mirror on the wall..
This was a heading for a topic.
The person thinks he is very clever but he is courting insanity trying to be witty or funny to impress others.
‘Mirror, mirror on the wall’ has nothing to do with the matter at hand except in his and others’ false perception. It is also rehashed, copied from others.
HE AND YOU DO NOT BELIEVE, BUT HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF BEING WITTY TO IMPRESS THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.

Chua: Politicising death will only prolong family’s suffering

KUALA LUMPUR: The MCA, in extending its sympathy to the family of 30-year-old political aide Teoh Beng Hock, said politicising the tragic incident would only prolong the suffering of the deceased’s family.
What he does not realize is that what he says does not make sense and he is berating the victim, rubbing salt into the injury with karma attached for him.
Unless he understands the situation, he should not comment. Here is someone who died suddenly falling off a building in the midst of a bizarre late night interrogation over minor corruption suspicions, because he died in custody, the onus is on his detainers to explain and yet after a lengthy and at times bizarre inquest, the coroner returns an open verdict.
IT IS NOT A MATTER OF POLITICIZING THE DEATH BUT AN INJUSTICE HAS CLEARLY BEEN PERPETRATED AND IF HE TRULY BELIEVES IT IS POLITICIZING, HE IS TRAINING HIMSELF IN FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION. HE HAS DISCREDITED HIMSELF AS A PERSON WITH INTEGRITY.
TO ACCUSE PEOPLE OF POLITICIZING IS ADDING SALT TO THE WOUND THAT CREATES DEADLY KARMA FOR HIM, WHATEVER POLITICAL GAINS HE MAY ACHIEVE.
HOW IS THE FAMILY’S SUFFERING SHORTENED BY NOT POLITICIZING OR ACCEPTING THE CORONER’S VERDICT? THIS IS A FOOL TALKING.
What Chua says is false:
Exactly how much politicizing is present in the clamour caused by the verdict is objective, not for Chua to assert it is politicizing and others to refute. UMNO is consummate in politicizing events but politicizing may be fringe in this case and so Chua is perceiving falsely if he truly perceives it is politicising.
Whether accepting the verdict will shorten or prolong the family’s suffering is objective, not for him to tell others and if the lack of justice (no one was found responsible) extends the family’s grief, Chua is speaking falsely with deadly karma attached saying the opposite, pursuing the issue will prolong their suffering.
EVEN CHUA DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SAYS IS MAD, WILL END IN TORMENT FOR HIM BUT A PERSON WHO IS DISCERNING DOES NOT NEED TO ASK HIM OR ANYONE TO KNOW IT IS FALSE AND MAD.
What do you mean by politicizing?
Politicizing is seizing on an issue to attack or discredit your opponents or seek unfair advantage for yourself in the eyes of voters.
UMNO are masters of this, seizing on issues eg like ban on 1 Malaysia advertisements, accusing Karpal and opposition of treason over minor matters where treason does not apply.
Here is an unexplained death occurring in custody of authorities and after a lengthy trial, an UNSATISFACTORY conclusion is reached and so the plaintiffs have right to express dissatisfaction and ask for more accountability.
EXACTLY HOW MUCH POLITICKING IS INVOLVED CAN BE ASCERTAINED AND IF IT IS FRINGE OR NONEXISTENT, ANYONE WHO ACCUSES OTHERS OF POLITICKING IS PUTTING A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK.
Why the world economy is so robust:
It is not virtue or substance that the world economy is so hardy or robust so far but it is because of cheating, countries have been secretly and now openly printing money to keep the party going, lowering interest rates, paying the jobless (benefits) and borrowing from other countries and funds whose money belongs to a few rich goats who have now cornered a significant share of the common wealth.
YOU CAN KEEP DILUTING THE ALCOHOL (BY PRINTING MORE MONEY) BUT A TIME COMES WHEN THE ALCOHOL WILL BECOME PLAIN WATER AND LOSES ITS ‘KICK’ AND THE ALCOHOLIC IS DEPRIVED OF HIS SUSTENANCE.

Pak Lah explains silence over Rais case

PETALING JAYA: Former prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said he kept silent on the alleged rape case involving Datuk Seri Rais Yatim because he was of the opinion that the incident did not take place.
How convenient the explanation or excuse.
What Badawi is saying acknowledges that such an accusation existed then. Even if Rais told him it was false, how can Badawi know? His opinion is not enough, in a matter of some seriousness he should acknowledge the allegation and ask the police to investigate and clear the minister then. Unless you want to go mad, you should not act on opinion but fact or truth.
THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND MAY BE CONNED TO ACCEPT THE EXPLANATION WHICH IS UNTENABLE.
IT IS WRONG TO ACT ON OPINION, WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE ALLEGATION WHICH HE IS NOW ADMITTING EXISTED THEN, YOU CANNOT DISMISS IT MERELY ON OPINION BUT BECAUSE THE MATTER IS OF SOME SERIOUSNESS, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED AND CLARIFIED THEN. IN DIVINE LAW YOU CAN BE CHARGED AND JUDGED FOR DERELICTION OF DUTY IN WHICH OPINION IT DID NOT HAPPEN IS NOT A VALID DEFENCE.
UNLESS YOU UNDERSTAND HIS STATEMENT AS INVALID AND WHY IT IS SO AS I DETAILED, YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND BADAWI’S EXPLANATION.

Good idea to have a royal commission, says Dr Mahathir

KUALA LUMPUR: Setting up a Royal Commission of Inquiry for the Teoh Beng Hock case is a good idea, former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said.
It is not a good idea but a necessity, because someone died in circumstances clearly pointing to foul play and the coroner recorded a nonsensical conclusion.
Thus ‘good idea’ is a wrong, rehashed inappropriate response of someone who does not understand truly the circumstances of the case.
BECAUSE ‘GOOD IDEA’ IS AN INAPPROPRIATE RESPONSE, IT IS FALSE UNDERSTANDING (ALWAYS REHASHED THAT DOES NOT FIT THIS CASE) IT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.
MANY HAVE THIS STANDARD ANSWER ‘GOOD IDEA’ THAT CAN BE FAKED TO BE A GENUINE UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION BUT IN SOME CASES, THEY ARE FOUND OUT AS ROTE.
YOU DON’T NEED A ROYAL COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH THE TRUTH, THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INDICATES FOUL PLAY FOR WHICH THOSE GUILTY SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE KNOWN AND PUNISHED. IF YOU REFUSE TO DO SO, ALL THE ROYAL COMMISSIONS IN THE WORLD WILL NOT DO ANY GOOD AND SO IT IS NOT A GOOD IDEA.
Blissful marriage:
Anyone who utters this is either deluded or a liar. It is impossible for any marriage to be truly blissful for two reasons.
a)   There are extraneous and internal pressures (in laws, children, society) on any marriage that tends to destroy or seriously taint any bliss.
b)   Seeing all males and females here are emotional stylish people who must be robots, it is impossible for anyone to have a blissful marriage with a robot, with someone who is radiating force in their style and emotion at you. Because all people here are robots it is impossible to have a blissful marriage but there must be strains and stresses in any marriage.
Badawi is judge and jury:
By saying he hushed things up because he was of the opinion that it did not occur Badawi is acting as judge and jury so why have police and courts?
How convenient Rais is the beneficiary of his opinion whilst Anwar escaped his generosity.
BADAWI AS PM NOT AS PERSONAL CAPACITY HAS A DUTY TO SEE THAT JUSTICE IS DONE ALWAYS AND SO WHATEVER ALLEGATIONS SHOULD NOT BE HUSHED BUT INVESTIGATED AND CLEARED, THAT IS HOW IT IS PROPERLY DONE, NOT TREATED WITH THE SEIVE OF OPINION.
Tablets do battle in Las Vegas:
This is a false statement that conditions the person and others to perceive falsely that there is a battle when there is none and so he is headed for insanity and has debts inducing others to follow.
The truth is there is a tablet competition in Vegas and that has nothing to do with battle.
‘TABLETS COMPETE IN VEGAS’ IS A CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF THE SITUATION, ‘TABLETS DO BATTLE’ IS A FALSE FABRICATED UNDERSTANDING DESIGNED TO STIR EMOTION AND ENDS IN WOE FOR THE FOOL.
Staying afloat down-under:
This is a ‘witty’ NYT headline playing on the Australian flood devastation.
If you like (mental force stirred attractively, nothing to do with reason) to speak like this, heaven is out of bounds to you and that means eternal perdition building a pile of skeletons as high as a mountain, says the Buddha.
What is said has nothing to do with reality except in his and your delusion. It is a fabrication to poke fun at the situation and when your head is on the chopping board it won’t be very funny.
Opinionator:
This is contrived and no such entity exists. It is copycat, first you have terminator then opinionator and on and on.
What the Buddha and Jesus said are not their opinions but they are the truth.
THE TRUTH IS NOT AN OPINION AND APPLIES TO EVERYONE AND SO ALL OPINIONS ARE FALSE OR REFLECTS DELUSION AND SELF INDENTITY VIEWS. IF WHAT YOU SAY IS THE TRUTH, IT IS NOT AN OPINION, IT IS ONLY IF WHAT YOU SAY IS NOT THE TRUTH BUT YOUR FALSE INTEPRETATION OF REALITY (THAT YOU ARE ATTACHED TO AND THEREFORE MEMORIZED AND KEEP REHASHING FROM MEMORY AS A ROBOT) THAT IT IS AN OPINION.
WHOEVER TREASURES HIS OPINIONS IS HEADED FOR WOE.

Rosmah gets courtesy call from Prince Faisal

RIYADH: Saudi Education Minister Prince Faisal bin Abdullah bin Mohamad Al-Saud paid a courtesy call on the Prime Minister’s wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor at the Intercontinental Hotel’s Royal Suite here
The correct or sane reason for visiting another is if there is a meaningful matter to meet him about and so if a call is courtesy, it is insincere, contrived out of expectation or to fulfil an obligation and necessitates pretence of both parties and rather than a pleasure, it is stressful and the rewards for its participants are a passing boost to their pride, they are thrilled by the importance or prestige accorded them to be visited by another of status.
COURTESY VISITS ARE ALWAYS CONTRIVED AND THEREFORE STRESSFUL, INVOLVES PRETENCE AND PUTTING UP WITH AND THE REWARD IS A BOOST TO THE EGO THAT IS NEVER EVERLASTING TO BE VISITED BY SOMEONE OF IMPORTANCE OR STATUS.
Roar of the wild:
A lion or tiger has a roar but the wild has no roar and it reflects an absence of true understanding that listeners accept what is stated as valid when it is deadly false, conditions the accepting person to falsity that ends in torment never bliss.

High blood pressure combination pill 'better than one'

140/90 mmHg or above
A combination of drugs is better than a single one in treating high blood pressure, a study has suggested.
Suppose the cause of high blood pressure in the vast majority of people is not too much salt intake or genetics or whatever but stress, it is stress from a combination of constantly using force to fabricate style (stretching, changing speed and loudness) and being bombarded by force from others’ styles, then the cure for high blood pressure is never drugs let alone a combination of drugs.
IF IN TRUTH THE CAUSE OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IS STRESS, IF THEY NEVER UNNECESSARILY INDUCED STRESS IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS BY CONSTANTLY USING TOTALLY UNNECESSARY FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE, THEN ALL THE MEDICINES IN THE WORLD LET ALONE COMBINATION OF TWO IS NOT THE TRUE ANSWER TO HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE BUT IT IS THE ELIMINATION OF STRESS THROUGH ABOLITION STYLE THAT IS THE ONLY CERTAIN CURE AND IF YOU WILL NOT ABOLISH YOUR STYLE NOTHING WILL CONTROL YOUR HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE.
YOU THINK DRUGS CAN CONTROL PRESSURE, YOU MAY BE DELUDED. FOR A WHILE, MAY BE THROUGH A COMBINATION OF OTHER FACTORS BLOOD PRESSURE MAY REMAIN CONTROLLED BUT WITH TIME IT ESCALATES OUT OF CONTROL NEEDING MORE AND MORE DRUGS BECAUSE IT IS NEVER THE LACK OF MEDICINE THAT CAUSES HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND SO MEDICINE IS NEVER THE TRUE ANSWER.
THIS RECOMMENDATION OF DOUBLE THERAPY IF DELUDED (ACTUALLY HAS NO BASIS) HARMS OTHERS AND SO THESE MISGUIDED DELUDED DOCTORS ARE HEAPING KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE EVEN TERRIBLE SUFFERING ON THEMSELVES. THERE IS SELF INTEREST IN THIS RECOMMENDATION EG IN MAKING A NAME FOR YOURSELF AS PIONEER APART FROM FINANCIAL GAINS.
Without seeing what is recommended is true no one is entitled to accept or follow it and if you do so because ‘experts’ recommend it, you are conditioning yourself to be a robot to do as you are told whilst training yourself to do and perceive what you did not see or know as true, as true that ends in insanity.
The great dangers of doing as told:
People severely underestimate the amount of knowledge they have that they think is true but in fact are beliefs either fabricated by themselves or accepted from others without knowing it is true.
This is a world where people eagerly tout themselves as scientific and religious and whatever expert (food experts, cooking experts). It is impossible for even doctors to know what they are taught, eg double drug therapy is superior to single drug therapy for hypertension let alone the layman and yet this is what people want to stuff down others’ throats as true and practiced.
PEOPLE THINK NOTHING ABOUT ACCEPTING (EVEN EAGERLY ACCEPT) AND PRACTICING AS TRUE WHAT OTHERS TELL THEM IS TRUE WHEN IT IS DEADLY, CONDITIONING THEM TO BE ROBOTS AND EMBRACING CERTAIN INSANITY OF PERCEIVING AS TRUE WHAT THEY DID NOT SEE OR KNOW AS TRUE.
You must always use force to accept as true:
If what is presented to you as true is not seen as true, you must always use force to accept the plan of what is said as true. This force is blind and banishes your reason which tells you that you did not see or know and so should not accept. With each subsequent banishment of true reason, it atrophies and even dies and so the person becomes blinded by his force that eagerly forces him to embrace what is said to him that he did not know as true usually because of the inducement of material gain or out of fear or intimidation.
FORCE MUST ALWAYS BE USED AND TRUE REASON SUSPENDED TO ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT OTHERS SAY THAT YOU DID NOT SEE AS TRUE AND WITH INNUMERABLE REPEATS, THE PERSON BECOMES CONDITIONED TO ACCEPT EVEN EAGERLY WHAT IS SAID THAT HE DID NOT SEE AS TRUE AS TRUE AND HE BECOMES A SLAVE OF FORCE AND A ROBOT.

Predictions for 2011

How 2011 will treat Julia Gillard - and more
It is impossible he saw as true what he is predicting and so he is a fool conditioning himself to false perception that he can see what he cannot see, the future.
It is for your own sake and sanity that you should not venture to predict what you cannot see as true, even if you are right, you have put the noose of false perception on your neck that will strangle you in the future.
What Jesus said about the close of the Age and terrible devastation is not a prediction in the same category, it is a statement of knowing and again it is another delusion of humans that the future cannot be known.
TO SOME BEINGS, TO GOD, WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE CAN BE KNOWN AS TRUE, IT IS NOT A PREDICTION WITH ANY CHANCE OF FAILURE. BUT WITHOUT HAVING THIS POWER OF KNOWING THE FUTURE YOU ARE DICING WITH INSANITY GUESSING AND CALCULATING THE FUTURE (EG FORECASTS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH FOR 2011).
WITHOUT KNOWING, IT TAKES WORK AND VEXATIONS TO FORECAST THE FUTURE AND THAT IS UNNECESSARY EVEN MAD SUFFERING BECAUSE IT IS TOTALLY USELESS (EXCEPT IN SEARCH OF MATERIAL GAINS) IN TRYING TO DIVINE THE FUTURE WITHOUT POWERS OF SEEING THE FUTURE. IF YOU KNOW THE FUTURE AS GOD DOES, THEN IT IS NOT WORK, NO SWEAT PREDICTING THE FUTURE.

No comments: