What you must do to go to heaven:
Jesus said you must be perfect, as your Father in heaven is perfect. According to the Buddha even if you were pushed by someone in a milling crowd (not your fault) to spill just one drop of oil from a jar brim full on your head your head will be cut off. The path to heaven is simply: pay attention to stop stretching syllables, change speed and loudness and yet it is the most difficult if not impossible task for people enmeshed in this world.
If you don’t go to heaven even an eternity of torment awaits you.
"No, lord."
" The bowl filled to the brim with oil stands for mindfulness immersed in the body. Thus you should train yourselves: 'We will develop mindfulness immersed in the body. We will pursue it, and undertake it well.' "
Zaid: ‘Nothing wrong with RPK supporting PM’
PETALING JAYA: Kita president Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has poured scorn on supporters of Raja Petra Kamaruddin who have turned their backs on the controversial blogger after he admitted on national television that he was pressured to thwart Datuk Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak from becoming Prime Minister.
IF RPK IS SUPPORTING PM, IT IS WRONG. WHAT RPK SAYS SHOULD BE TRUE NOT SUPPORTING THE PM AND SO IF RPK IS SPEAKING TO SUPPORT THE PM IT IS WRONG AND SO IT IS WRONG VIEW TO SAY NOTHING WRONG WITH RPK SUPPORTING PM. IF WHAT RPK SAID IS TRUE IT IS NOT SUPPORTING THE PM BUT THE TRUTH AND SO ZAID IS A MUDDLED MAN WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SPEAKS WHICH HAVE SERIOUS IMPLICATIONS FOR HIM.
Mindfulness immersed in the body:
The Buddha said mindfulness in the body must be fully developed and pursued if one is to escape from suffering to heaven.
HOW IS IT THAT A PERSON CAN HAVE MINDFULNESS IMMERSED IN HIS BODY AND NOT BE AWARE OF HIS CONSTANT TOTALLY UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS FOR SHOW AND CREATES MOUNTING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION?
IN ORDER TO ATTAIN THE MINDFULNESS IMMERSED IN THE BODY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS KEY TO SURVIVAL AND GOING TO HEAVEN, YOU MUST PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING THAT IS NECESSARY AND UNNECESSARY AND THAN MEANS NO USELESS EVIL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
God is absolutely fair and that means you will be punished:
God is absolutely fair and that means you will be punished not rewarded. What emotional people call their goodness is also their evil and so they expected to be rewarded by a fair God when in fact God will be absolutely fair to you which means you will be punished.
As the Buddha said, there is great benefit in developing the dharma eye because with the eye for truth you will avoid doing bad you think is doing good and therefore escape punishment and suffering.
How to counter roof burglary:
My sister’s house was likely a target for early morning burglary via the roof. It leaked badly during an early morning rain and it seemed a couple of roof tiles were moved suggesting a burglary attempt.
Each ceiling has one or two ports for access to the roof and it is through these ports that burglars descend. Close off these ports and burglars cannot come in without prying or making noises.
BURGLARS MAY BE ARMED AND TO AVOID HARM IT IS BEST TO PREVENT THEM DESCENDING FROM THE ROOF. THIS CAN BE DONE BY SEALING OFF FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PANELS THAT ALLOW ACCESS TO THE CEILING FROM BELOW EG WITH A LATCH OR CROSS BEAM.
BY SEALING FROM THE BOTTOM, YOU CAN GO UP THE CEILING BUT SOMEONE ABOVE THE CEILING CANNOT COME DOWN WITHOUT MAKING NOISES.
Swear in mosque if you dare, says Eskay
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah has dared Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to take the sumpah laknat (an oath-cum-curse) on his innocence together with him after Friday prayers today.
The purpose of the statement is to further exploit the situation knowing that Anwar on past record is unlikely to swear in a mosque and so it gives the appearance his accusation is genuine and Anwar is afraid because he is guilty.
THERE IS NO NECESSITY TO BRING UP THE ISSUE OF SWEARING BUT IT IS A LOADED CHALLENGE TO EXPLOIT THE SITUATION TO TRY CONVINCE GULLIBLE PUBLIC HE IS GENUINE AND ANWAR IS GUILTY. THIS SHOWS THAT THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE ALLEGATION ARE INSCRUPULOUS, WANT TO ATTACK AND DAMAGE ANWAR, WHAT REMAINS IS WHETHER THE VIDEO TAPE IS GENUINE OR FABRICATED.
Soi Lek speaks like a fool:
Soi Lek said he would be the first to vote PKR if it abolished Malay special rights.
His purpose for speaking thus is to emotionally mock PKR as hypocrites unfairly doubting their commitment to racial equality (let PKR rule first and then criticise their race record), what he does not realize in his foolishness that belies his stature as doctor and leader is that he is admitting he is a hypocrite and expedient in supporting Malay special rights.
BY SAYING HE WILL BE THE FIRST TO VOTE PKR IF IT ABOLISHED MALAY SPECIAL RIGHTS, SOI LEK IS UNWITTINGLY ADMITTING HE IS A HYPOCRITE IN SUPPORTING MALAY SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR REASONS OF EXPEDIENCY AND SO HE IS NOT A MAN OF TRUTH.
WHAT HE SAID IS ALSO FALSE BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN BE THE FIRST TO VOTE PKR, THERE ARE OTHERS WHO WILL VOTE BEFORE HIM AND SO HE IS FOOLISHLY COMMITTING FALSITY THAT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM BECAUSE HE CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN.
Why is Datuk Eskay so desperate to swear Anwar’s guilt?
Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah took an oath against the opposition leader.
Shazryl performed the “sumpah laknat” oath yesterday by swearing in God’s name that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is the man featured in a sex video recently shown to journalists.
If Anwar was so desperate to clear his name, he might have sworn falsely he was not the man and so Anwar may have reason to swear.
Why is Eskay so desperate to swear another’s guilt that is none of his business? The reason is to destroy Anwar in the eyes of the public.
Rather than proof that he is speaking the truth, this swearing only demonstrates the venom in his pursuit to ruin Anwar and such a man is likely to stray into falsity, fabrication and the tape is possibly a fraud.
WHY SHOULD ESKAY BE SO DESPERATE TO DISCREDIT ANWAR HE IS RESORTING TO SWEARING ON SOMEONE’S GUILT THAT IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS, DOES NOT HARM HIM NOR THE PUBLIC (THE PUBLIC STILL HAS TO ELECT ANWAR AS PM)? IF HE IS SO DESPERATE TO DESTROY ANWAR, MIGHT HE NOT HAVE GONE A STEP FURTHER AND FABRICATED THE TAPE.
NO ONE EXCEPT THE PRODUCERS OF THE TAPE CAN KNOW IF THE TAPE IS GENUINE BECAUSE THERE CANNOT BE TECHNOLOGICAL MEANS TO VERIFY THE SHADOWY BLACK AND WHITE FIGURE IS OR IS NOT ANWAR.
God will punish Eskay even if it is true:
The exposure of the tape already tarnishes Anwar’s reputation. Anyone with decency or fair play will know it is impossible for the public to know if the sextape allegation is true and would not unfairly exert pressure on the public to believe it is true by swearing in a mosque apparently with God as witness.
ANYONE WITH A SENSE OF FAIRNESS OR DECENCY WILL REALIZE THAT IT IS UNFAIR TO FURTHER DISADVANTAGE ANWAR IN THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC BY SWEARING WITH GOD AS WITNESS IN A MOSQUE. NO MATTER HOW IT IS SWORN THE PUBLIC STILL DO NOT KNOW IF THE TAPE IS GENUINE OR NOT, WHAT IT WILL DO IS TO SWAY THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT IT IS TRUE BECAUSE ESKAY HAS SWORN IN A MOSQUE. THIS IS UNFAIR AND SO THE PERSON IS AN UNSCRUPULOUS PERSON.
EVEN IF IT IS TRUE, GOD WILL PUNISH HIM BECAUSE HIS ACTION SERVES NO PURPOSE BECAUSE THE PUBLIC THAT HE WANTS TO ACCEPT HIS ALLEGATION CANNOT SEE IT IS TRUE.
All swearing is evil:
Jesus said do not swear (and that has no caveats) and the reason is because you are committing evil NEVER good by swearing.
Ordinary people do not know what to make of swearing, they cannot tell whether it is good or bad or neutral. The correct understanding is that all swearing is evil, abominable.
When you swear you want others to accept as true what they cannot know is true and that is evil, wanting others to accept as true what they did not and cannot see as true.
IT IS NEVER GOOD BUT EVIL TO SWEAR AND YOU WILL BE PUNISHED OR HEAD FOR SUFFERING BY SWEARING IN WHATEVER FORM BECAUSE YOU WANT OTHERS TO BLINDLY ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT THEY CANNOT SEE AS TRUE.
THUS ALL OATH TAKING, SWEARING IN COURT AND ASSUMING OFFICE IS EVIL, NEVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TRUTH AND GOODNESS.
BE GOOD AND TRUE TO YOUR WIFE, DON’T SWEAR TO BE TRUE AND GOOD AND THEN AFTERWARDS FAIL.
Sex-tape too good to be true:
It is said that Eskay accidentally stumbled upon the secret recording searching for Anwar’s watch so he had no part in making the tape but he is an incontrovertible witness because he was captured in the film.
THUS HE CANNOT BE CHARGED FOR MAKING PORNOGRAPHY BUT HE IS A DEFINITE WITNESS BECAUSE HE APPEARED IN THE FILM.
And so up till recently he had the close confidence of Anwar to be on the film and yet now he has suddenly turned so bitterly against Anwar to challenge him to resign, to swear in a mosque and to himself swear in the mosque that the tape is genuine.
A MAN WHO WAS UNTIL THE SEX TAPE A CONFIDANTE OF ANWAR HAS SUDDENLY TURNED HIS MOST IMPLACABLE ENEMY OUT TO DESTROY ANWAR POLITICALLY. AND IF HE HATES ANWAR AND WANTS TO DESTROY ANWAR, HE IS NOT A RELIABLE OR NEUTRAL SOURCE OF NEGATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT ANWAR BECAUSE HE IS BIASED.
World 'safer' without Bin Laden, says Obama
It is impossible for anyone to see that the world is safer without Bin Laden and so either he is deluded or he has motive either to gain credit for killing him for political gains (because the world is safer they should thank Obama and he is a great leader) or it is to justify killing Osama amongst those who support Osama (Muslims).
UNLESS WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT YOU WANT TO CULTIVATE IN OTHERS THAT HAS DEADLY KARMA FOR YOU. YOU WANT ME TO BELIEVE THE WORLD IS SAFER WITHOUT OSAMA? IF NOT YOU ARE ASKING FOR KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING TELLING ME THIS.
OSAMA’S DEATH IS A NON-EVENT, ANYONE WHO MAKES MUCH OF IT, EITHER IN CELEBRATION OR MOURNING IS ASKING FOR FUTURE SUFFERING THAT STRETCHES EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.
You call this a no fly zone?
Nato is not only targeting ground forces, it is attacking Gadaffi’s palaces killing his son.
This is not a no fly zone but much more and so either Nato commanders do not understand what is meant by a no fly zone or it is flagrantly violating its mandate.
WHY CALL IT NO FLY ZONE? CALL IT WAR, DECLARE WAR ON LIBYA OR GADAFFI.
The coward’s fight:
The way western nations fight is the cowards’ way, they zap their enemies from far away with warplanes or cruise missiles, hitting their enemies but do not permit their enemies to hit them and when the enemies destroy their WTC, they scream with rage.
IF YOU TALK OF ATROCITIES THE US HAVE PERPETRATED EVEN WORSE ATROCITIES IN VIETNAM, IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN WITH LITTLE ACCOUNTABILITY EXCEPT EXPRESSION OF REGRET.
Eskay dares Anwar to a lie-detector challenge
KUALA LUMPUR: Businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah is prepared to take a polygraph test to proof he was not lying about Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim being the man in the controversial sex video.
Because it is an exercise in futility Eskay is headed for insanity and that is never pleasant. He is not mad yet but he does not realize he is heading for the cliff of insanity down which he must plunge.
No matter how many times he and Anwar swears or undergo the lie detector test, others cannot know whether the tape is genuine or not and what does it matter except that if the public accept the tape it is Anwar (not Eskay) who will be discredited. So why is he so anxious to see Anwar destroyed especially when, up to his ‘accidental’ discovery of the tape, he was a confidante of Anwar?
THE PURPOSE OF THE SWEARING AND LIE DETECTOR TEST IS TO PROVE HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH AND ANWAR IS LYING, BUT JUST AS NO AMOUNT OF SWEARING PROVE WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH, SUCH LIE DETECTOR TESTS CANNOT PROVE WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH.
HIS PURSUIT TO DESTROY ANWAR HAS VERGED ON THE OBSESSED OR DERANGED AND THIS REFLECTS HE IS NOT A BONA FIDE EXPOSER OF ANWAR’S DIRTY LINENS.
BECAUSE THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON FOR HIM TO PROVE ANWAR’S GUILT EVEN TO SUCH EXTREME DESPERATE LIMITS, HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY. NO AMOUNT OF SWEARING CAN PROVE AND SO HE IS EITHER EXERCISING MAD PERCEPTION OR HIS MOTIVE IS TO WANT THE PUBLIC TO BELIEVE ANWAR IS DIRTY.
CHALLENGING IS ABOUT BRAVADO AND THAT IS ABOUT FORCE NEVER REASON, IT IS A MATTER OF WHO HAS ENOUGH FORCE ACCORDING TO A PLAN TO SAY HE IS RIGHT.
IF EVERYONE ALWAYS SPOKE THE TRUTH THEN THERE IS NEVER A NEED TO CHALLENGE AND WHAT HE SAYS IS ENOUGH PROOF OF WHAT ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE, IF PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK THE TRUTH THEN NO AMOUNT OF CHALLENGING AND OATH TAKING WILL PRODUCE THE TRUTH AND EVEN IF IT IS SWORN TRUTHFULLY, HOW WOULD YOU KNOW? YOU ARE FORCED TO ACCEPT WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IS SWORN BY PEOPLE WHO MAY TELL LIES IS TRUE.
Unbelievable Eskay did not make tape himself:
IF ESKAY DID NOT ACCIDENTALLY STUMBLE ON THAT SECRET VIDEOTAPE THEN ANWAR’S DIRTY SECRET WILL REMAIN UNKNOWN.
CONSIDERING THAT ESKAY IS PRIVY TO ANWAR’S DIRTY SECRETS (HE HANGS AROUND ENOUGH TO BE CAUGHT IN THE VIDEO) AND HIS IMPLACABLE PURSUIT OF ANWAR SUBSEQUENTLY, IT IS INCREDIBLE OR UNBELIEVABLE HE DID NOT UNDERTAKE TO VIDEO TAPE ANWAR’S SHENANIGANS HIMSELF BUT HAD TO DEPEND ON A FORTUITOUS DISCOVERY OF ANOTHER’S CLANDESTINE RECORDING.
HE SHOULD HAVE PERSONALLY UNDERTAKEN TO TAPE ANWAR HIMSELF AND MAKE IT HIGH DEFINITION FULL COLOUR RATHER THAN SHADOWY BLACK AND WHITE.
THUS HIS STORY DOES NOT TALLY, IS TOO TALL A TALE FOR THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND.
What Osama’s death achieves:
The true achievements of Osama’s death is satisfaction of America’s thirst for revenge and maintains its delusion of ascendancy, top dog and nobody can escape the technology and prowess of the world’s ‘supreme’ superpower. Similarly those who are deluded are falsely overawed by America’s seeming technological superiority.
Why is the US so keen to intervene in Libya but not elsewhere in the Arab world? Maybe it is because Gadaffi is a gadfly for the west and there is plenty of oil that the west avariciously eyes potential control.
All sucked in to die:
It is never true reason that brings them together to watch with intense suspense the spectacle of Osama’s final moments being played out but it is interest or attraction (greed) and hate plus delusion and all these three lower fetters are bonds to future woe according to the Buddha and to one with true understanding, everyone here is interested and headed for future woe that stretches even for at least another eternity.
Obama: We got him
That is a very foolish thing to say and only a deluded man putting his head on the chopping board will say that.
Driven by thrill (a proxy of force) never reason, he is moved (by force) never true understanding to say that.
NOW YOU GOT HIM, LATER SOMEONE ELSE WILL GET OBAMA IN ENDLESS CYCLES OF GETTING AND BEING GOT. WHEN YOU ARE GOT, YOU WON’T BE SO COCK A HOOP.
Why Obama will be got:
Who is it who has got Osama with a bullet in his left eye with him apparently cowering behind his young wife?
It is either Obama himself or we (USA) of which Obama is part of and so now Obama is thrilled at his success at getting Osama.
WHAT HE DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT HE TOO WILL GET NOT ‘A’ BUT EVEN COUNTLESS CHANCES TO BE GOT AT BY OTHERS AS ANIMALS AND HUMANS AS THE PRICE OF THE THRILL FOR MERCILESSLY GUNNING DOWN ALBEIT VICARIOUSLY OTHERS.
KARMA WILL ARRANGE FOR EVERYONE TO GET (NOT ‘A’ BUT MANY) TASTES OF HIS OWN MEDICINE SO BETTER PRESCRIBE PALATABLE RATHER THAN BITTER MEDICINE FOR OTHERS.
With truth comes credibility:
People like to sound impressive with what they say that they do not truly understand.
IT IS WITHOUT TRUTH COMES CREDIBILITY, NEVER WITH TRUTH COMES CREDIBILITY.
This is a false statement that does not make sense.
With truth comes the end of credibility, the end of the need for credibility, without truth comes credibility, the need for credibility.
With truth comes knowledge, you know, so what is the need for credibility. It is only without truth, without knowledge that you need credibility and no matter how much credibility, you still do not know the truth.
‘WITH TRUTH COMES CREDIBILITY’ IS A NONSENSICAL STATEMENT THAT REFLECTS FALSE UNDERSTANDING IN THE SPEAKER AND BECAUSE EMOTIONAL PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEMSELVES THEY SORT OF ACCEPT IT AS TRUE.
Osama’s Unarmed Resistance:
Many do not realize what they say does not make sense and therefore they are either lying or terminally deluded.
Do you expect Osama to rush to and embrace his ‘liberators’? How could he have resisted if he was unarmed, not even with a knife? The unspoken truth is that Obama had no intention of taking Osama alive but the mission was to kill him and dispose off his body at sea and it is called murder and taking justice in your own hands summarily killing him thus.
UNLESS AMERICA EXPECT OBAMA TO RUSH TO GREET HIS LIBERATORS, THEN HE WAS MURDERED, NOT KILLED IN A FIGHT, THE KARMA OF MURDER OR SHOOTING SOMEONE IN COLD BLOOD IS DIFFERENT FROM KILLING IN A ‘FAIR’ FIGHT, OSAMA WAS FIRING AT YOU AND YOU FIRED AND KILLED HIM.
TO TAKE OSAMA’S COMPUTER INFORMATION IS STEALING AND IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT IS NATIONAL SECURITY AND ANTI TERRORISM, WHOEVER STEALS IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT THAT IS FAR GRAVER THAN YOU IMAGINE.
Bin Laden 'was shot unarmed' - US
Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was unarmed when he was killed by US troops on Sunday after resisting capture, the White House has said.
Osama de facto murdered by US:
According to this definition of murder, Osama was murdered by order by America. It does not matter whether you are America or not and what ‘just’ purpose the murder was carried out for, it is still murder and there is karma to be repaid.
Quote: Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought", and generally this state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide (such as manslaughter). As the loss of a human being inflicts enormous grief upon the individuals close to the victim, as well as the fact that the commission of a murder is highly detrimental to the good order within society, most societies both present and in antiquity have considered it a most serious crime worthy of the harshest of punishment. In most countries, a person convicted of murder is typically given a long prison sentence, possibly a life sentence where permitted, and in some countries, the death penalty may be imposed for such an act. A person who commits murder is called a murderer .
Obama is guilty of murder:
The mission was to unlawfully intentionally kill Bin Laden and it must have been approved by Obama and so when you look at Obama you are looking at a murderer not hero.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT OBAMA YOU ARE LOOKING AT A MURDERER NOT HERO AND IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION OF ORDINARY PEOPLE THAT THEY SEE A HERO.
WITHOUT OBAMA’S APPROVAL THE MISSION COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT AND ALL ALONG THE PURPOSE WAS TO KILL OSAMA RATHER THAN CAPTURE HIM, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN EASY SINCE HE WAS UNARMED.
My view it is murder shared by someone:
Bin Laden's summary execution maketh the man, martyr and myth
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/bin-ladens-summary-execution-maketh-the-man-martyr-and-myth-20110503-1e6md.html#ixzz1LLajoWTP
The US resembles the land of the munchkins as it celebrates the death of the wicked witch of the East. The joy is understandable but, to many outsiders, unattractive. It endorses what looks increasingly like a cold-blooded assassination ordered by a president who, as a former law professor, knows the absurdity of his statement that "justice was done".
Amoral diplomats and triumphant politicians join in applauding the summary execution of Osama bin Laden because they claim that real justice - arrest, trial and sentence - would have been too difficult in the case of public enemy No. 1. But should it not at least have been attempted?
The future depends on respect for international law, with which the US has always had an uneasy relationship. The circumstances of bin Laden's killing are unclear and the initial objection (by Pakistan's former president Pervez Musharraf and others) that the operation was an illegitimate invasion of state sovereignty must be rejected. This indicted and active international criminal needed to be captured, and Pakistan's abject failure to do so (whether through incompetence or connivance) justified Obama's order.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Osama bin Laden ... redefined the threat of terrorism.
But the terms of that order, as yet undisclosed, are all important. Bill Clinton admitted recently he had secretly approved the assassination of bin Laden by the CIA in the 1990s, and George Bush publicly stated after September 11, 2001, that he wanted bin Laden's "head on a plate". Did Obama order his capture, or his execution?
Details of the ''fire-fight'' are still obscure. The law permits criminals to be shot if they or their accomplices resist arrest in ways that endanger those striving to apprehend them. They should be given the opportunity to surrender, if possible, but even if they do not come out with their hands up, they must be taken alive if that can be achieved without risk. Exactly how bin Laden came to be ''shot in the head'' therefore requires explanation. And why a hasty burial at sea without an autopsy, as the law requires?
The US is celebrating summary execution, rationalised on the basis that this is one terrorist for whom a trial would be unnecessary, difficult and dangerous. It overlooks the downsides - that killing bin Laden has made him a martyr, more dangerous in that posthumous role than in hiding, and that his legend and the conspiracy theories about September 11 will live on, undisputed by the evidence that would have been called to convict him.
Moreover, killing bin Laden gave him the consummation he most devoutly wished, namely a fast-track to paradise. His belief system required him to die mid-Jihad, from an infidel bullet - not of old age on a prison farm in upstate New York. He would have refused any offer to surrender, and no doubt died with a smile on his lips.
I do not minimise the security problems of holding a trial or overlook the danger of it ending up as a squalid circus like that of Saddam Hussein. But the notion that any legal process would have been too hard must be rejected. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed - also alleged to be an architect of September 11 - will go on trial shortly. Had bin Laden been captured he should have been in the dock alongside him, so that their shared responsibility could have been properly examined.
Bin Laden could not have been tried for the attacks on the twin towers at the International Criminal Court, since its jurisdiction only came into existence nine months later. But the United Nations Security Council could have set up an ad hoc tribunal in The Hague, with international judges (including Muslim jurists), to provide a fair trial and a reasoned verdict that would have convinced the Arab street of his guilt.
This would have been the best way of demystifying this man, debunking his cause and de-brainwashing his followers. In the dock he would have been reduced in stature - never more to be remembered as the tall, soulful figure on the mountain, but as a hateful and hate-filled old man. Since his videos exult in the killing of innocent civilians, any cross-examination would have emphasised his inhumanity. These benefits that flow from real justice have been forgone.
The obsessive belief of the US in capital punishment - alone among advanced nations - is reflected in its rejoicing at the manner of bin Laden's demise. Barack Obama has most likely secured re-election by approving the execution. This may be welcome, given the alternatives of Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee (who have both urged that Julian Assange be hunted down in similar fashion) or Donald Trump. But it is a sad reflection on the continuing attraction of summary execution.
It was not always thus. When the time came to consider the fate of men more steeped in wickedness than bin Laden - the Nazi leaders - the British government wanted them hanged within six hours of capture. The president Harry Truman demurred, citing the conclusion of Justice Robert Jackson that summary execution "would not sit easily on the American conscience or be remembered by our children with pride … the only course is to determine the innocence or guilt of the accused after a hearing as dispassionate as the times will permit and upon a record that will leave our reasons and motives clear".
He insisted upon judgment at Nuremberg, which has confounded Holocaust-deniers ever since. Killing bin Laden instead of capturing him was a missed opportunity to prove this charismatic leader was a vicious criminal, who deserved to die in prison, not as a martyr to his inhuman cause.
Geoffrey Robertson, QC, is the author of Crimes Against Humanity (New Press).
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/bin-ladens-summary-execution-maketh-the-man-martyr-and-myth-20110503-1e6md.html#ixzz1LLaTNbmE
The dancing first lady:
This is Michelle Obama. The Buddha said dancing is insanity and it applies to everyone. Did you dance or like to go to parties? You may have forgotten about it but the wild emotions, drinking and partying is still etched in your mind waiting to torment you later.
DANCING IS INSANITY BECAUSE IT IS ALL FOR SHOW, DOES NOT ACHIEVE ANY MEANINGFUL FRUIT. THIS IS NOT A NOBLE OR GOOD PERSON BUT A DELUDED PERSON DOING SOMETHING DELUDED. NOW YOU DANCE, LATER YOU WILL WEEP WHEN YOU GO INSANE LIKE INMATES GYRATING IN MENTAL HOSPITALS.
You need to be a robot to dance:
Dancing is always according to a plan that may be very organized (eg rumba, cha cha cha) or flexible (twist and shout) that must be remembered and reproduced from memory and so you are training yourself to be a robot, to be a slave to a dancing plan that in your delusion is meaningful and charming.
WHETHER A PERSON IS MEMORIZING AND REPRODUCING ACCORDING TO A PLAN WHEN DANCING CANNOT BE DISPUTED. IF IT IS ROTE REPRODUCTION, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO BE A ROBOT DOING SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS BUT FOR SHOW, DANCING AND THAT IS A SUREFIRE PATH TO FUTURE INSANITY.
Why he will go mad:
What he is doing is what people are accustomed to seeing without seeing anything wrong when it has everything wrong.
What he is doing is saying something that does not require the pained look and raised finger.
BECAUSE THE GRIMACED LOOK AND RAISED FINGER IS NOT NECESSARY TO SAY WHAT HE IS SAYING HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY. THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG SEE FALSELY, DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
WHAT HE SAYS IS THE SUBSTANCE THAT MAY BE TRUE OR FALSE, THE GRIMACED FACE AND RAISED FINGER IS THE FALSE STYLE THAT HAS TO BE REHASHED AND SO HE IS A ROBOT BECAUSE THAT IS CONSISTENTLY WHAT HE DOES WHEN HE SPEAKS.
ANYONE WHO REFUTES WHAT I SAY BETTER KNOWS WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE BECAUSE IF I AM RIGHT YOU ARE WRONG AND WRONG VIEW IS THE PATH TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
Obama: “We don't trot out this stuff as trophies."
But Mr Obama believed the images (of Bin Laden) could inflame sensitivities, saying: "We don't trot out this stuff as trophies."
IF YOU ACCEPT ‘WE DON’T TROT OUT THIS STUFF AS TROPHIES’ AS THE VALID OR TRUE REASON FOR NOT RELEASING THE PHOTOS OR YOU DO NOT KNOW WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR NOT, YOU ARE A GULLIBLE PERSON WHO DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND. ‘WE DON’T TROT OUT THIS STUFF AS TROPHIES’ IS ALWAYS A LIE, AN EXCUSE FOR THE TRUE REASONS FOR NOT RELEASING THAT MAY INCRIMINATE O BE NEGATIVE FOR AMERICA AND OBAMA.
THERE ARE OTHER REASONS FOR NOT RELEASING THE PHOTOS (EG NEGATIVE PUBLICITY FOR AMERICA) BUT IT IS NEVER ‘WE DON’T TROT OUT THIS STUFF AS TROPHIES’.
THEREFORE OBAMA IS A STRAIGHT FACED LIAR. IF YOU WANT TO GIVE REASONS FOR NOT RELEASING THEN YOU MUST SAY EXACTLY ALL THE REASONS YOU DO NOT RELEASE, NOT SANITIZED REASONS.
Exactly what are the reasons for not releasing can be known and if the reasons given are not true he is guilty of lying with insanity and punishment in future suffering due.
"We don't trot out this stuff as trophies" is definitely a lie because of Obama and America’s self serving bragging nature, they would have trout out this stuff as trophies except that the photos may be incriminating, showed the brutal nature of the execution.
America fears inflaming sensitivities?
Since when has America been concerned with inflaming sensitivities? If it has such fears it would not have mounted such a raid into others’ countries, killed Osama that will definitely inflamed sensitivities.
IF THE POSITIVE PUBLICITY OUTWEIGHED THE INFLAMING OF SENSITIVITIES AMERICA WOULD HAVE RELEASED THE PHOTOS IRREGARDLESS, FEAR OF INFLAMING SENSITIVITIES IS AN EXCUSE. THUS TO HELL WITH INFLAMING SENSITIVITIES IF AMERICA WANTS OSAMA DEAD AT ALL COSTS AND NOW AMERICA HAS SUDDENLY TURNED MEEK, NO PHOTOS PLEASE FOR FEAR OF INFLAMING SENSITIVITIES. YOU BUY THIS LIE?
Jesus said you must be perfect, as your Father in heaven is perfect. According to the Buddha even if you were pushed by someone in a milling crowd (not your fault) to spill just one drop of oil from a jar brim full on your head your head will be cut off. The path to heaven is simply: pay attention to stop stretching syllables, change speed and loudness and yet it is the most difficult if not impossible task for people enmeshed in this world.
If you don’t go to heaven even an eternity of torment awaits you.
Sedaka Sutta : At Sedaka
(2: The Beauty Queen)
And suppose that the beauty queen is highly accomplished at singing & dancing, so that an even greater crowd comes thronging, saying, 'The beauty queen is singing! 'Then a man comes along, desiring life & desiring pleasure. They say to him, ' You must take this bowl filled to the brim with oil and carry it on your head in between the great crowd & the beauty queen. A man with a raised sword will follow, and if you spill even a drop, right there will he cut off your head.' Now what do you think, monks: Will that man, not paying attention to the bowl of oil, let himself get distracted outside?" (2: The Beauty Queen)
"No, lord."
" The bowl filled to the brim with oil stands for mindfulness immersed in the body. Thus you should train yourselves: 'We will develop mindfulness immersed in the body. We will pursue it, and undertake it well.' "
Zaid: ‘Nothing wrong with RPK supporting PM’
PETALING JAYA: Kita president Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has poured scorn on supporters of Raja Petra Kamaruddin who have turned their backs on the controversial blogger after he admitted on national television that he was pressured to thwart Datuk Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak from becoming Prime Minister.
IF RPK IS SUPPORTING PM, IT IS WRONG. WHAT RPK SAYS SHOULD BE TRUE NOT SUPPORTING THE PM AND SO IF RPK IS SPEAKING TO SUPPORT THE PM IT IS WRONG AND SO IT IS WRONG VIEW TO SAY NOTHING WRONG WITH RPK SUPPORTING PM. IF WHAT RPK SAID IS TRUE IT IS NOT SUPPORTING THE PM BUT THE TRUTH AND SO ZAID IS A MUDDLED MAN WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE SPEAKS WHICH HAVE SERIOUS IMPLICATIONS FOR HIM.
Mindfulness immersed in the body:
The Buddha said mindfulness in the body must be fully developed and pursued if one is to escape from suffering to heaven.
HOW IS IT THAT A PERSON CAN HAVE MINDFULNESS IMMERSED IN HIS BODY AND NOT BE AWARE OF HIS CONSTANT TOTALLY UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS FOR SHOW AND CREATES MOUNTING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION?
IN ORDER TO ATTAIN THE MINDFULNESS IMMERSED IN THE BODY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS KEY TO SURVIVAL AND GOING TO HEAVEN, YOU MUST PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING THAT IS NECESSARY AND UNNECESSARY AND THAN MEANS NO USELESS EVIL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
God is absolutely fair and that means you will be punished:
God is absolutely fair and that means you will be punished not rewarded. What emotional people call their goodness is also their evil and so they expected to be rewarded by a fair God when in fact God will be absolutely fair to you which means you will be punished.
As the Buddha said, there is great benefit in developing the dharma eye because with the eye for truth you will avoid doing bad you think is doing good and therefore escape punishment and suffering.
How to counter roof burglary:
My sister’s house was likely a target for early morning burglary via the roof. It leaked badly during an early morning rain and it seemed a couple of roof tiles were moved suggesting a burglary attempt.
Each ceiling has one or two ports for access to the roof and it is through these ports that burglars descend. Close off these ports and burglars cannot come in without prying or making noises.
BURGLARS MAY BE ARMED AND TO AVOID HARM IT IS BEST TO PREVENT THEM DESCENDING FROM THE ROOF. THIS CAN BE DONE BY SEALING OFF FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PANELS THAT ALLOW ACCESS TO THE CEILING FROM BELOW EG WITH A LATCH OR CROSS BEAM.
BY SEALING FROM THE BOTTOM, YOU CAN GO UP THE CEILING BUT SOMEONE ABOVE THE CEILING CANNOT COME DOWN WITHOUT MAKING NOISES.
Swear in mosque if you dare, says Eskay
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah has dared Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to take the sumpah laknat (an oath-cum-curse) on his innocence together with him after Friday prayers today.
The purpose of the statement is to further exploit the situation knowing that Anwar on past record is unlikely to swear in a mosque and so it gives the appearance his accusation is genuine and Anwar is afraid because he is guilty.
THERE IS NO NECESSITY TO BRING UP THE ISSUE OF SWEARING BUT IT IS A LOADED CHALLENGE TO EXPLOIT THE SITUATION TO TRY CONVINCE GULLIBLE PUBLIC HE IS GENUINE AND ANWAR IS GUILTY. THIS SHOWS THAT THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE ALLEGATION ARE INSCRUPULOUS, WANT TO ATTACK AND DAMAGE ANWAR, WHAT REMAINS IS WHETHER THE VIDEO TAPE IS GENUINE OR FABRICATED.
Soi Lek speaks like a fool:
Soi Lek said he would be the first to vote PKR if it abolished Malay special rights.
His purpose for speaking thus is to emotionally mock PKR as hypocrites unfairly doubting their commitment to racial equality (let PKR rule first and then criticise their race record), what he does not realize in his foolishness that belies his stature as doctor and leader is that he is admitting he is a hypocrite and expedient in supporting Malay special rights.
BY SAYING HE WILL BE THE FIRST TO VOTE PKR IF IT ABOLISHED MALAY SPECIAL RIGHTS, SOI LEK IS UNWITTINGLY ADMITTING HE IS A HYPOCRITE IN SUPPORTING MALAY SPECIAL RIGHTS FOR REASONS OF EXPEDIENCY AND SO HE IS NOT A MAN OF TRUTH.
WHAT HE SAID IS ALSO FALSE BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN BE THE FIRST TO VOTE PKR, THERE ARE OTHERS WHO WILL VOTE BEFORE HIM AND SO HE IS FOOLISHLY COMMITTING FALSITY THAT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM BECAUSE HE CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN.
Why is Datuk Eskay so desperate to swear Anwar’s guilt?
Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah took an oath against the opposition leader.
Shazryl performed the “sumpah laknat” oath yesterday by swearing in God’s name that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is the man featured in a sex video recently shown to journalists.
If Anwar was so desperate to clear his name, he might have sworn falsely he was not the man and so Anwar may have reason to swear.
Why is Eskay so desperate to swear another’s guilt that is none of his business? The reason is to destroy Anwar in the eyes of the public.
Rather than proof that he is speaking the truth, this swearing only demonstrates the venom in his pursuit to ruin Anwar and such a man is likely to stray into falsity, fabrication and the tape is possibly a fraud.
WHY SHOULD ESKAY BE SO DESPERATE TO DISCREDIT ANWAR HE IS RESORTING TO SWEARING ON SOMEONE’S GUILT THAT IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS, DOES NOT HARM HIM NOR THE PUBLIC (THE PUBLIC STILL HAS TO ELECT ANWAR AS PM)? IF HE IS SO DESPERATE TO DESTROY ANWAR, MIGHT HE NOT HAVE GONE A STEP FURTHER AND FABRICATED THE TAPE.
NO ONE EXCEPT THE PRODUCERS OF THE TAPE CAN KNOW IF THE TAPE IS GENUINE BECAUSE THERE CANNOT BE TECHNOLOGICAL MEANS TO VERIFY THE SHADOWY BLACK AND WHITE FIGURE IS OR IS NOT ANWAR.
God will punish Eskay even if it is true:
The exposure of the tape already tarnishes Anwar’s reputation. Anyone with decency or fair play will know it is impossible for the public to know if the sextape allegation is true and would not unfairly exert pressure on the public to believe it is true by swearing in a mosque apparently with God as witness.
ANYONE WITH A SENSE OF FAIRNESS OR DECENCY WILL REALIZE THAT IT IS UNFAIR TO FURTHER DISADVANTAGE ANWAR IN THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC BY SWEARING WITH GOD AS WITNESS IN A MOSQUE. NO MATTER HOW IT IS SWORN THE PUBLIC STILL DO NOT KNOW IF THE TAPE IS GENUINE OR NOT, WHAT IT WILL DO IS TO SWAY THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT IT IS TRUE BECAUSE ESKAY HAS SWORN IN A MOSQUE. THIS IS UNFAIR AND SO THE PERSON IS AN UNSCRUPULOUS PERSON.
EVEN IF IT IS TRUE, GOD WILL PUNISH HIM BECAUSE HIS ACTION SERVES NO PURPOSE BECAUSE THE PUBLIC THAT HE WANTS TO ACCEPT HIS ALLEGATION CANNOT SEE IT IS TRUE.
All swearing is evil:
Jesus said do not swear (and that has no caveats) and the reason is because you are committing evil NEVER good by swearing.
Ordinary people do not know what to make of swearing, they cannot tell whether it is good or bad or neutral. The correct understanding is that all swearing is evil, abominable.
When you swear you want others to accept as true what they cannot know is true and that is evil, wanting others to accept as true what they did not and cannot see as true.
IT IS NEVER GOOD BUT EVIL TO SWEAR AND YOU WILL BE PUNISHED OR HEAD FOR SUFFERING BY SWEARING IN WHATEVER FORM BECAUSE YOU WANT OTHERS TO BLINDLY ACCEPT AS TRUE WHAT THEY CANNOT SEE AS TRUE.
THUS ALL OATH TAKING, SWEARING IN COURT AND ASSUMING OFFICE IS EVIL, NEVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH TRUTH AND GOODNESS.
BE GOOD AND TRUE TO YOUR WIFE, DON’T SWEAR TO BE TRUE AND GOOD AND THEN AFTERWARDS FAIL.
Sex-tape too good to be true:
It is said that Eskay accidentally stumbled upon the secret recording searching for Anwar’s watch so he had no part in making the tape but he is an incontrovertible witness because he was captured in the film.
THUS HE CANNOT BE CHARGED FOR MAKING PORNOGRAPHY BUT HE IS A DEFINITE WITNESS BECAUSE HE APPEARED IN THE FILM.
And so up till recently he had the close confidence of Anwar to be on the film and yet now he has suddenly turned so bitterly against Anwar to challenge him to resign, to swear in a mosque and to himself swear in the mosque that the tape is genuine.
A MAN WHO WAS UNTIL THE SEX TAPE A CONFIDANTE OF ANWAR HAS SUDDENLY TURNED HIS MOST IMPLACABLE ENEMY OUT TO DESTROY ANWAR POLITICALLY. AND IF HE HATES ANWAR AND WANTS TO DESTROY ANWAR, HE IS NOT A RELIABLE OR NEUTRAL SOURCE OF NEGATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT ANWAR BECAUSE HE IS BIASED.
World 'safer' without Bin Laden, says Obama
It is impossible for anyone to see that the world is safer without Bin Laden and so either he is deluded or he has motive either to gain credit for killing him for political gains (because the world is safer they should thank Obama and he is a great leader) or it is to justify killing Osama amongst those who support Osama (Muslims).
UNLESS WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT YOU WANT TO CULTIVATE IN OTHERS THAT HAS DEADLY KARMA FOR YOU. YOU WANT ME TO BELIEVE THE WORLD IS SAFER WITHOUT OSAMA? IF NOT YOU ARE ASKING FOR KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING TELLING ME THIS.
OSAMA’S DEATH IS A NON-EVENT, ANYONE WHO MAKES MUCH OF IT, EITHER IN CELEBRATION OR MOURNING IS ASKING FOR FUTURE SUFFERING THAT STRETCHES EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.
You call this a no fly zone?
Nato is not only targeting ground forces, it is attacking Gadaffi’s palaces killing his son.
This is not a no fly zone but much more and so either Nato commanders do not understand what is meant by a no fly zone or it is flagrantly violating its mandate.
WHY CALL IT NO FLY ZONE? CALL IT WAR, DECLARE WAR ON LIBYA OR GADAFFI.
The coward’s fight:
The way western nations fight is the cowards’ way, they zap their enemies from far away with warplanes or cruise missiles, hitting their enemies but do not permit their enemies to hit them and when the enemies destroy their WTC, they scream with rage.
IF YOU TALK OF ATROCITIES THE US HAVE PERPETRATED EVEN WORSE ATROCITIES IN VIETNAM, IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN WITH LITTLE ACCOUNTABILITY EXCEPT EXPRESSION OF REGRET.
Eskay dares Anwar to a lie-detector challenge
KUALA LUMPUR: Businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah is prepared to take a polygraph test to proof he was not lying about Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim being the man in the controversial sex video.
Because it is an exercise in futility Eskay is headed for insanity and that is never pleasant. He is not mad yet but he does not realize he is heading for the cliff of insanity down which he must plunge.
No matter how many times he and Anwar swears or undergo the lie detector test, others cannot know whether the tape is genuine or not and what does it matter except that if the public accept the tape it is Anwar (not Eskay) who will be discredited. So why is he so anxious to see Anwar destroyed especially when, up to his ‘accidental’ discovery of the tape, he was a confidante of Anwar?
THE PURPOSE OF THE SWEARING AND LIE DETECTOR TEST IS TO PROVE HE IS TELLING THE TRUTH AND ANWAR IS LYING, BUT JUST AS NO AMOUNT OF SWEARING PROVE WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH, SUCH LIE DETECTOR TESTS CANNOT PROVE WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH.
HIS PURSUIT TO DESTROY ANWAR HAS VERGED ON THE OBSESSED OR DERANGED AND THIS REFLECTS HE IS NOT A BONA FIDE EXPOSER OF ANWAR’S DIRTY LINENS.
BECAUSE THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON FOR HIM TO PROVE ANWAR’S GUILT EVEN TO SUCH EXTREME DESPERATE LIMITS, HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY. NO AMOUNT OF SWEARING CAN PROVE AND SO HE IS EITHER EXERCISING MAD PERCEPTION OR HIS MOTIVE IS TO WANT THE PUBLIC TO BELIEVE ANWAR IS DIRTY.
CHALLENGING IS ABOUT BRAVADO AND THAT IS ABOUT FORCE NEVER REASON, IT IS A MATTER OF WHO HAS ENOUGH FORCE ACCORDING TO A PLAN TO SAY HE IS RIGHT.
IF EVERYONE ALWAYS SPOKE THE TRUTH THEN THERE IS NEVER A NEED TO CHALLENGE AND WHAT HE SAYS IS ENOUGH PROOF OF WHAT ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE, IF PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK THE TRUTH THEN NO AMOUNT OF CHALLENGING AND OATH TAKING WILL PRODUCE THE TRUTH AND EVEN IF IT IS SWORN TRUTHFULLY, HOW WOULD YOU KNOW? YOU ARE FORCED TO ACCEPT WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IS SWORN BY PEOPLE WHO MAY TELL LIES IS TRUE.
Unbelievable Eskay did not make tape himself:
IF ESKAY DID NOT ACCIDENTALLY STUMBLE ON THAT SECRET VIDEOTAPE THEN ANWAR’S DIRTY SECRET WILL REMAIN UNKNOWN.
CONSIDERING THAT ESKAY IS PRIVY TO ANWAR’S DIRTY SECRETS (HE HANGS AROUND ENOUGH TO BE CAUGHT IN THE VIDEO) AND HIS IMPLACABLE PURSUIT OF ANWAR SUBSEQUENTLY, IT IS INCREDIBLE OR UNBELIEVABLE HE DID NOT UNDERTAKE TO VIDEO TAPE ANWAR’S SHENANIGANS HIMSELF BUT HAD TO DEPEND ON A FORTUITOUS DISCOVERY OF ANOTHER’S CLANDESTINE RECORDING.
HE SHOULD HAVE PERSONALLY UNDERTAKEN TO TAPE ANWAR HIMSELF AND MAKE IT HIGH DEFINITION FULL COLOUR RATHER THAN SHADOWY BLACK AND WHITE.
THUS HIS STORY DOES NOT TALLY, IS TOO TALL A TALE FOR THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND.
What Osama’s death achieves:
The true achievements of Osama’s death is satisfaction of America’s thirst for revenge and maintains its delusion of ascendancy, top dog and nobody can escape the technology and prowess of the world’s ‘supreme’ superpower. Similarly those who are deluded are falsely overawed by America’s seeming technological superiority.
Why is the US so keen to intervene in Libya but not elsewhere in the Arab world? Maybe it is because Gadaffi is a gadfly for the west and there is plenty of oil that the west avariciously eyes potential control.
All sucked in to die:
It is never true reason that brings them together to watch with intense suspense the spectacle of Osama’s final moments being played out but it is interest or attraction (greed) and hate plus delusion and all these three lower fetters are bonds to future woe according to the Buddha and to one with true understanding, everyone here is interested and headed for future woe that stretches even for at least another eternity.
Obama: We got him
That is a very foolish thing to say and only a deluded man putting his head on the chopping board will say that.
Driven by thrill (a proxy of force) never reason, he is moved (by force) never true understanding to say that.
NOW YOU GOT HIM, LATER SOMEONE ELSE WILL GET OBAMA IN ENDLESS CYCLES OF GETTING AND BEING GOT. WHEN YOU ARE GOT, YOU WON’T BE SO COCK A HOOP.
Why Obama will be got:
Who is it who has got Osama with a bullet in his left eye with him apparently cowering behind his young wife?
It is either Obama himself or we (USA) of which Obama is part of and so now Obama is thrilled at his success at getting Osama.
WHAT HE DOES NOT REALIZE IS THAT HE TOO WILL GET NOT ‘A’ BUT EVEN COUNTLESS CHANCES TO BE GOT AT BY OTHERS AS ANIMALS AND HUMANS AS THE PRICE OF THE THRILL FOR MERCILESSLY GUNNING DOWN ALBEIT VICARIOUSLY OTHERS.
KARMA WILL ARRANGE FOR EVERYONE TO GET (NOT ‘A’ BUT MANY) TASTES OF HIS OWN MEDICINE SO BETTER PRESCRIBE PALATABLE RATHER THAN BITTER MEDICINE FOR OTHERS.
With truth comes credibility:
People like to sound impressive with what they say that they do not truly understand.
IT IS WITHOUT TRUTH COMES CREDIBILITY, NEVER WITH TRUTH COMES CREDIBILITY.
This is a false statement that does not make sense.
With truth comes the end of credibility, the end of the need for credibility, without truth comes credibility, the need for credibility.
With truth comes knowledge, you know, so what is the need for credibility. It is only without truth, without knowledge that you need credibility and no matter how much credibility, you still do not know the truth.
‘WITH TRUTH COMES CREDIBILITY’ IS A NONSENSICAL STATEMENT THAT REFLECTS FALSE UNDERSTANDING IN THE SPEAKER AND BECAUSE EMOTIONAL PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND THEMSELVES THEY SORT OF ACCEPT IT AS TRUE.
Osama’s Unarmed Resistance:
Many do not realize what they say does not make sense and therefore they are either lying or terminally deluded.
Do you expect Osama to rush to and embrace his ‘liberators’? How could he have resisted if he was unarmed, not even with a knife? The unspoken truth is that Obama had no intention of taking Osama alive but the mission was to kill him and dispose off his body at sea and it is called murder and taking justice in your own hands summarily killing him thus.
UNLESS AMERICA EXPECT OBAMA TO RUSH TO GREET HIS LIBERATORS, THEN HE WAS MURDERED, NOT KILLED IN A FIGHT, THE KARMA OF MURDER OR SHOOTING SOMEONE IN COLD BLOOD IS DIFFERENT FROM KILLING IN A ‘FAIR’ FIGHT, OSAMA WAS FIRING AT YOU AND YOU FIRED AND KILLED HIM.
TO TAKE OSAMA’S COMPUTER INFORMATION IS STEALING AND IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT IS NATIONAL SECURITY AND ANTI TERRORISM, WHOEVER STEALS IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT THAT IS FAR GRAVER THAN YOU IMAGINE.
Bin Laden 'was shot unarmed' - US
Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was unarmed when he was killed by US troops on Sunday after resisting capture, the White House has said.
Osama de facto murdered by US:
According to this definition of murder, Osama was murdered by order by America. It does not matter whether you are America or not and what ‘just’ purpose the murder was carried out for, it is still murder and there is karma to be repaid.
Quote: Murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with "malice aforethought", and generally this state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide (such as manslaughter). As the loss of a human being inflicts enormous grief upon the individuals close to the victim, as well as the fact that the commission of a murder is highly detrimental to the good order within society, most societies both present and in antiquity have considered it a most serious crime worthy of the harshest of punishment. In most countries, a person convicted of murder is typically given a long prison sentence, possibly a life sentence where permitted, and in some countries, the death penalty may be imposed for such an act. A person who commits murder is called a murderer .
Obama is guilty of murder:
The mission was to unlawfully intentionally kill Bin Laden and it must have been approved by Obama and so when you look at Obama you are looking at a murderer not hero.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT OBAMA YOU ARE LOOKING AT A MURDERER NOT HERO AND IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION OF ORDINARY PEOPLE THAT THEY SEE A HERO.
WITHOUT OBAMA’S APPROVAL THE MISSION COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT AND ALL ALONG THE PURPOSE WAS TO KILL OSAMA RATHER THAN CAPTURE HIM, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN EASY SINCE HE WAS UNARMED.
My view it is murder shared by someone:
Bin Laden's summary execution maketh the man, martyr and myth
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/bin-ladens-summary-execution-maketh-the-man-martyr-and-myth-20110503-1e6md.html#ixzz1LLajoWTP
The US resembles the land of the munchkins as it celebrates the death of the wicked witch of the East. The joy is understandable but, to many outsiders, unattractive. It endorses what looks increasingly like a cold-blooded assassination ordered by a president who, as a former law professor, knows the absurdity of his statement that "justice was done".
Amoral diplomats and triumphant politicians join in applauding the summary execution of Osama bin Laden because they claim that real justice - arrest, trial and sentence - would have been too difficult in the case of public enemy No. 1. But should it not at least have been attempted?
The future depends on respect for international law, with which the US has always had an uneasy relationship. The circumstances of bin Laden's killing are unclear and the initial objection (by Pakistan's former president Pervez Musharraf and others) that the operation was an illegitimate invasion of state sovereignty must be rejected. This indicted and active international criminal needed to be captured, and Pakistan's abject failure to do so (whether through incompetence or connivance) justified Obama's order.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Osama bin Laden ... redefined the threat of terrorism.
But the terms of that order, as yet undisclosed, are all important. Bill Clinton admitted recently he had secretly approved the assassination of bin Laden by the CIA in the 1990s, and George Bush publicly stated after September 11, 2001, that he wanted bin Laden's "head on a plate". Did Obama order his capture, or his execution?
Details of the ''fire-fight'' are still obscure. The law permits criminals to be shot if they or their accomplices resist arrest in ways that endanger those striving to apprehend them. They should be given the opportunity to surrender, if possible, but even if they do not come out with their hands up, they must be taken alive if that can be achieved without risk. Exactly how bin Laden came to be ''shot in the head'' therefore requires explanation. And why a hasty burial at sea without an autopsy, as the law requires?
The US is celebrating summary execution, rationalised on the basis that this is one terrorist for whom a trial would be unnecessary, difficult and dangerous. It overlooks the downsides - that killing bin Laden has made him a martyr, more dangerous in that posthumous role than in hiding, and that his legend and the conspiracy theories about September 11 will live on, undisputed by the evidence that would have been called to convict him.
Moreover, killing bin Laden gave him the consummation he most devoutly wished, namely a fast-track to paradise. His belief system required him to die mid-Jihad, from an infidel bullet - not of old age on a prison farm in upstate New York. He would have refused any offer to surrender, and no doubt died with a smile on his lips.
I do not minimise the security problems of holding a trial or overlook the danger of it ending up as a squalid circus like that of Saddam Hussein. But the notion that any legal process would have been too hard must be rejected. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed - also alleged to be an architect of September 11 - will go on trial shortly. Had bin Laden been captured he should have been in the dock alongside him, so that their shared responsibility could have been properly examined.
Bin Laden could not have been tried for the attacks on the twin towers at the International Criminal Court, since its jurisdiction only came into existence nine months later. But the United Nations Security Council could have set up an ad hoc tribunal in The Hague, with international judges (including Muslim jurists), to provide a fair trial and a reasoned verdict that would have convinced the Arab street of his guilt.
This would have been the best way of demystifying this man, debunking his cause and de-brainwashing his followers. In the dock he would have been reduced in stature - never more to be remembered as the tall, soulful figure on the mountain, but as a hateful and hate-filled old man. Since his videos exult in the killing of innocent civilians, any cross-examination would have emphasised his inhumanity. These benefits that flow from real justice have been forgone.
The obsessive belief of the US in capital punishment - alone among advanced nations - is reflected in its rejoicing at the manner of bin Laden's demise. Barack Obama has most likely secured re-election by approving the execution. This may be welcome, given the alternatives of Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee (who have both urged that Julian Assange be hunted down in similar fashion) or Donald Trump. But it is a sad reflection on the continuing attraction of summary execution.
It was not always thus. When the time came to consider the fate of men more steeped in wickedness than bin Laden - the Nazi leaders - the British government wanted them hanged within six hours of capture. The president Harry Truman demurred, citing the conclusion of Justice Robert Jackson that summary execution "would not sit easily on the American conscience or be remembered by our children with pride … the only course is to determine the innocence or guilt of the accused after a hearing as dispassionate as the times will permit and upon a record that will leave our reasons and motives clear".
He insisted upon judgment at Nuremberg, which has confounded Holocaust-deniers ever since. Killing bin Laden instead of capturing him was a missed opportunity to prove this charismatic leader was a vicious criminal, who deserved to die in prison, not as a martyr to his inhuman cause.
Geoffrey Robertson, QC, is the author of Crimes Against Humanity (New Press).
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/bin-ladens-summary-execution-maketh-the-man-martyr-and-myth-20110503-1e6md.html#ixzz1LLaTNbmE
The dancing first lady:
This is Michelle Obama. The Buddha said dancing is insanity and it applies to everyone. Did you dance or like to go to parties? You may have forgotten about it but the wild emotions, drinking and partying is still etched in your mind waiting to torment you later.
DANCING IS INSANITY BECAUSE IT IS ALL FOR SHOW, DOES NOT ACHIEVE ANY MEANINGFUL FRUIT. THIS IS NOT A NOBLE OR GOOD PERSON BUT A DELUDED PERSON DOING SOMETHING DELUDED. NOW YOU DANCE, LATER YOU WILL WEEP WHEN YOU GO INSANE LIKE INMATES GYRATING IN MENTAL HOSPITALS.
You need to be a robot to dance:
Dancing is always according to a plan that may be very organized (eg rumba, cha cha cha) or flexible (twist and shout) that must be remembered and reproduced from memory and so you are training yourself to be a robot, to be a slave to a dancing plan that in your delusion is meaningful and charming.
WHETHER A PERSON IS MEMORIZING AND REPRODUCING ACCORDING TO A PLAN WHEN DANCING CANNOT BE DISPUTED. IF IT IS ROTE REPRODUCTION, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO BE A ROBOT DOING SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS BUT FOR SHOW, DANCING AND THAT IS A SUREFIRE PATH TO FUTURE INSANITY.
Why he will go mad:
What he is doing is what people are accustomed to seeing without seeing anything wrong when it has everything wrong.
What he is doing is saying something that does not require the pained look and raised finger.
BECAUSE THE GRIMACED LOOK AND RAISED FINGER IS NOT NECESSARY TO SAY WHAT HE IS SAYING HE IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN INSANITY. THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING WRONG SEE FALSELY, DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
WHAT HE SAYS IS THE SUBSTANCE THAT MAY BE TRUE OR FALSE, THE GRIMACED FACE AND RAISED FINGER IS THE FALSE STYLE THAT HAS TO BE REHASHED AND SO HE IS A ROBOT BECAUSE THAT IS CONSISTENTLY WHAT HE DOES WHEN HE SPEAKS.
ANYONE WHO REFUTES WHAT I SAY BETTER KNOWS WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE BECAUSE IF I AM RIGHT YOU ARE WRONG AND WRONG VIEW IS THE PATH TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
Obama: “We don't trot out this stuff as trophies."
But Mr Obama believed the images (of Bin Laden) could inflame sensitivities, saying: "We don't trot out this stuff as trophies."
IF YOU ACCEPT ‘WE DON’T TROT OUT THIS STUFF AS TROPHIES’ AS THE VALID OR TRUE REASON FOR NOT RELEASING THE PHOTOS OR YOU DO NOT KNOW WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR NOT, YOU ARE A GULLIBLE PERSON WHO DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND. ‘WE DON’T TROT OUT THIS STUFF AS TROPHIES’ IS ALWAYS A LIE, AN EXCUSE FOR THE TRUE REASONS FOR NOT RELEASING THAT MAY INCRIMINATE O BE NEGATIVE FOR AMERICA AND OBAMA.
THERE ARE OTHER REASONS FOR NOT RELEASING THE PHOTOS (EG NEGATIVE PUBLICITY FOR AMERICA) BUT IT IS NEVER ‘WE DON’T TROT OUT THIS STUFF AS TROPHIES’.
THEREFORE OBAMA IS A STRAIGHT FACED LIAR. IF YOU WANT TO GIVE REASONS FOR NOT RELEASING THEN YOU MUST SAY EXACTLY ALL THE REASONS YOU DO NOT RELEASE, NOT SANITIZED REASONS.
Exactly what are the reasons for not releasing can be known and if the reasons given are not true he is guilty of lying with insanity and punishment in future suffering due.
"We don't trot out this stuff as trophies" is definitely a lie because of Obama and America’s self serving bragging nature, they would have trout out this stuff as trophies except that the photos may be incriminating, showed the brutal nature of the execution.
America fears inflaming sensitivities?
Since when has America been concerned with inflaming sensitivities? If it has such fears it would not have mounted such a raid into others’ countries, killed Osama that will definitely inflamed sensitivities.
IF THE POSITIVE PUBLICITY OUTWEIGHED THE INFLAMING OF SENSITIVITIES AMERICA WOULD HAVE RELEASED THE PHOTOS IRREGARDLESS, FEAR OF INFLAMING SENSITIVITIES IS AN EXCUSE. THUS TO HELL WITH INFLAMING SENSITIVITIES IF AMERICA WANTS OSAMA DEAD AT ALL COSTS AND NOW AMERICA HAS SUDDENLY TURNED MEEK, NO PHOTOS PLEASE FOR FEAR OF INFLAMING SENSITIVITIES. YOU BUY THIS LIE?
No comments:
Post a Comment