Chandra Mudzaffar: Let’s not forget our values
By speaking about not forgetting, he is admitting that values are programmes that are remembered and rehashed to be applied and can be forgotten (conveniently) when expediencies and greed override values.
Only a person who is a robot without true understanding has values, someone who is not a robot and fully understands things has no values, no yardsticks to guide him. Whatever is presented to him, he sees truly as true or false and he rejects what is false (for sake of not suffering, for his own sake), harmful or beneficial and he undertakes what is beneficial and avoids what is harmful, what has values got to do with this, he does need values as crutches to lean on.
A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT, WHO FULLY UNDERSTANDS DOES NOT HAVE VALUES NOR DOES HE NEED THEM, SINCE HE FULLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT HAPPENS, HE SEES AS IT ACTUALLY IS SOMETHING IS TRUE OR FALSE, MAKES SENSE OR NO SENSE, IS GOOD OR BAD AND THUS SEEING AS IT ACTUALLY IS, FOR THE SAKE OF NOT SUFFERING, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO UNDERTAKE WHAT IS FALSE, SENSELESS OR HARMFUL. IT IS ONLY THOSE WHO ARE BLIND, DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO HAVE VALUES TO UPHOLD WHERE IT IMPRESSES OTHERS OR FOR SHOW AND WHEN IT DOES NOT SUITS THEM OR THEY STAND TO GAIN UNRIGTHEOUSLY, THEY TOSS THEIR VALUES OUT OF THE WINDOW.
ANYONE WHO HAS VALUES IS A ROBOT AND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND ENDS IN INSANITY.
Time for hard decisions: ZoellickThere is never truly any time for hard decisions but always it is time for the correct or right decision.
It is only a correct decision that will correct a situation and there is never anything difficult or hard about the decision except stirred emotion, antagonism and irrationality.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING SPEAKS OF TRULY UNDERSTANDING A SITUATION AND THENCE THE CORRECT DECISION THAT WILL CORRECT THE SITUATION, NOT HARD DECISION THAT BETRAYS FALSE OR NO UNDERSTANDING.
HARD DECISIONS ARE ALWAYS WRONG, IF YOU TRULY WANT TO CORRECT A SITUATION AND YOU UNDERSTAND THE SITUATION AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CORRECT RESPONSE SHOULD BE, WHAT IS SO HARD ABOUT THAT?
Malaysia to scrap security laws:
Something has happened, security laws are being ‘scrapped’ or is it modified. How does one of true understanding truly understand the event?
The correct reason for scrapping the laws is if they are truculent, wrong and if that was the reason, the law would have been scrapped long ago because it was designed to meet with emergency arrest of communists without trial, not throw dissidents and Anwar in jail without trial.
And so it cannot be ‘scrapped’ for the correct reason because if that was so it would have been scrapped long ago without reservations.
Another reason may be to pander to and manipulate public opinion favourably, for political gains with view to coming elections to appear as if reforms are genuine to entice voters who are naïve.
Analysis: going the way of Japan?
“Going the way of Japan” is a false, generalized rehashed understanding of the matter at hand. Japan is Japan and the US is the US not Japan and so it is totally unnecessary and false to say the US is going the way of Japan. What is relevant is to state specifically what you think is going wrong with the US instead of saying the US is going the way of Japan when that is not possible. Emotional people have recorded understandings of everything they experience and they are always referring to them, viewing current events in terms of recorded understandings that are rehashed and applied to explain the current situation instead of seeing all the strands of the current situation and then concluding what it all means which never requires concluding falsely ‘going the way of Japan’.
China 'losing manufacturing edge'
Indonesia and Bangladesh are benefiting as China loses its edge as the world's cheapest place to manufacture goods, a new report suggests
All these multinationals seek the lowest cost manufacturing bases to produce goods they sell for maximal profits in developed countries making oversized profits that do not belong to the people but are confiscated from the community making it increasingly poorer through the years whilst the companies become increasingly cash rich until a destabilizing imbalance occurs when society become impoverished and these companies lose their opium addicts who buy their profit seeking products.
PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG BECAUSE THEY HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING, THIS SYSTEM OF COMPANIES SELLING PRODUCTS THAT PEOPLE NEED ENRICHING THE COMPANIES IS UNSUSTAINABLE, RESULTS IN THE SHIFT OF WEALTH FROM THE MASSES TO THESE FEW.
NASA Detects Planet Dancing With a Pair of Stars
What is said is not harmless but asking for suffering because it is feeding others falsity that poisons them.
The planet is not dancing with a pair of stars but orbiting them and whoever equates orbiting with dancing is guilty of plying others with harmful falsity that leads to future suffering in repayment.
Rakyat turn up in full force for Merdeka, M'sia Day celebrations
PATRIOTISM was in the air at Dataran Merdeka as thousands of Malaysians and tourists turned up as early as 7am to join in the 54th Merdeka and 48th Malaysia Day celebrations.
It is impossible for people to turn up in full force, it is a fabrication or falsification to exaggerate the turnout.
IT IS BLIND FORCE THAT IS THE BASIS OF BEINGS HERE, THEY ALL WORSHIP FORCE AND SO IT IS THEY SPEAK OF FULL FORCE NEVER FULL REASON FOR MERDEKA.
Malaysia's security shift raises hope for genuine reform
This is an Australian new site headline. Only a deluded person without true understanding can hope for genuine reform.
Notice he said hope implying he does not know it will lead to reform but he hopes. Unless you want future suffering you should never commit yourself, never hope without seeing what you see is true, that there will be genuine reform.
IT IS NOT THE LAWS THAT IS THE STUMBLING BLOCK BUT IT IS THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE LAWS AND IF THEY WILL ‘BEND’ LAWS AND PULL PUPPET STRINGS ATTACHED TO THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM THEN SUCH SHIFTS ARE FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION AND YOUR HOPES WILL DEFINITELY BE DASHED AND YOU ARE A FOOL TO SPEAK OF HOPE. DON’T EVEN HOPE, NOR IS HOPE THE RIGHT ACTION. THERE IS KARMA SPEAKING THUS BECAUSE HE IS RAISING HOPE FALSELY IN THOSE WHO ARE SIMILARLY GULLIBLE.
The basis of capitalism:
It is not because capitalism is meritorious, virtuous, the best option and based on truth that it is default system in this world but it is because mankind needs to hoard and enjoy for himself whatever material goods or wealth there is and he has no genuine or meaningful care for the community or others, what care he has is merely hypocritical symbolic token concerns that fall far short that this state of affairs where capitalism has become the default system in the world.
Because all this hoarding or grabbing is at the expense of the system or community, speeded up by the process of leveraged lending (the same amount of money can be lent in many cycles creating debts many times the true wealth in the system) in time to come it unfailingly leads to disaster, financial collapse and thence social mayhem.
AND SO YOU ARE NOW SEEING THE DEATH THROES OF THE MODERN AND FINAL CHAPTER OF CAPITALISM, THE EARTH IS TOO SICK TO COME TO MANKIND’S RESCUE AGAIN AND ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE WHEN THIS HOUSE OF STACKED CARDS START TO FALL.
IT IS NOT BECAUSE CAPITALISM IS GOOD THAT IT RULES SUPREME BUT IT IS BAD, EVIL AND THE REASON IT RULES SUPREME IS BECAUSE MANKIND IS SIMILARLY BAD, SELFISH AND GREEDY, WANTS TO HOARD AND NOT SHARE ANYTHING AND HAVE NO GENUINE OR MEANINGFUL CARE FOR OTHERS AND THE SYSTEM.
Capitalism rules because mankind is deluded and selfish:
It is not because capitalism is wondrous that it is ascendant in this world but it is because mankind is deluded and selfish, has no genuine or meaningful concern for the community as a whole that it is so.
CAPITALISM IS NEVER SUSTAINABLE, ALWAYS LEADS TO COLLAPSE AND SOCIAL MAYHEM BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO CATER FOR MANKIND’S DELUSION THAT HE CAN HAVE THE CAKE AND EAT IT TOO AND HIS IMPLACABLE SELFISHNESS, URGE TO HOARD AND NOT SHARE.
Living together yet apart:
This is a schizophrenic world wherein beings are living together yet apart. This is not a paradox or puzzle or riddle but it can be truly understood without any conflict.
The living together is for show only, immaculate pretence or make believe, in truth all beings are living apart, even their spouses and ‘loved’ ones are walled off, there is an invisible wall of personal private lonely suffering that separates all beings.
Thus in name capitalism is about cohabiting to mutual advantage exploiting the system for mutual gain but in reality it is every man for himself, grab as much as you can and it is at the expense of others never at nobody’s expense except in delusion.
NO MATTER HOW GREGARIOUS OR CONVIVIAL IT IS A VERY LONELY WORLD HERE WHERE EVERYONE IS FEEDING YOU POISONOUS SWEET NICENESS NEVER TRUE GOODNESS. YOU CAN STARE OR GAZE INTIMATELY INTO ANOTHER’S EYES AND YET THERE IS AN INVISIBLE INPENETRABLE WALL OF FALSITY OR DECEIT SEPARATING AND EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD, NO MATTER HOW THEY SWEAR OTHERWISE, HAS A CONTRACT TO KILL EACH OTHER OFF, EITHER SOFTLY OR VIOLENTLY.
Why I jumped on Droid Bionic and not on iPhone 5
You need force never reason to jump and so he is speaking about and focusing on force as the cause of his preference for Droid Bionic rather than reason.
A person of true understanding never speaks of jumping but he might say, why I CHOOSE Droid Bionic. Thus he is not a man of reliable opinion and it is not worth taking his views into account.
WHATEVER HE SAYS IS NOT RELIABLE, ONLY HIS PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION OF DROID BIONIC MAY BE USEFUL, BECAUSE HE IS A MAN DRIVEN BY EMOTION OR FORCE NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING, HIS PREFERENCES CANNOT BE RELIED UPON TO BE TRUE.
Debt can be a double edged sword:
DEBT can be a double-edged sword. It’s useful for taking advantage of opportunities quickly and it can smoothen things out when people are in a pinch.
People see nothing wrong, thinks she has a case for it when it is always deluded. She is not the first to say debt is a double edged sword, it is copied from others and rehashed without understanding truly.
Debt is not a double edged sword, debt is evil and to be avoided if one does want suffering.
THE BUDDHA IS SAID TO WANDER DEBT FREE IN THE WORLD. SO LONG AS YOU ARE PARTY TO THIS WORLD YOU ARE HEAPING DEBT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING AND NOT JUST IN LIFE MUST YOU STRIVE TO BE DEBT FREE, IN FINANCIAL MATTERS TOO IT IS A VIRTUE TO REMAIN DEBT FREE, FINANCIAL DEBT IS BONDAGE WITH DANGER AND THAT IS NEVER A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD BUT A DEADLY DANGEROUS SWORD.
DEBT IS A DANGEROUS SWORD AND JUST AS ONE AVOIDS A SWORD, ONE AVOIDS DEBT AND IT REFLECTS THE TERRIBLE EVEN TERMINAL MESS THIS WORLD IS THAT MANY NATIONS ARE UP TO THEIR NECKS IN DEBT.
Debt is only necessary if you are greedy, impatient:
The Buddha said that whoever makes an acquisition in this world is a fool headed for suffering.
Debt is only necessary if you are impatient, want to acquire before your time something with borrowed money and so borrowing is feeding and nurturing and conditioning your greed that will end in your bondage with terrible greed that leads to danger, excesses and death.
EVEN IF YOU ARE A DIEHARD, HARDCORE MATERIALISTIC DEVOTED TO THIS WORLD, ACQUIRING BE IT MONEY, OBJECT OR PERSONS (WIVES, CHILDREN) OR TITLES (DOCTOR, FAMED STAR) IS SUFFERING AND TO BORROW IN ORDER TO ACQUIRE IS TO FURTHER BOND YOURSELF TO GREED AND IMPATIENCE THAT WILL END IN SUFFERING AND SO DEBT IS NEVER A TWO EDGED SWORD BUT IT IS A SWORD THAT WILL SLAY THE BORROWER AND WHOEVER SPEAKS OF IT BEING TWO EDGED HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING OR IS DELUDED.
Fickle false deadly relationships here:
To one who truly understands, relationships here are fickle and false and they are deadly never harmless because to be engaged in fickle false relationships is to be caught in a mesh that will end in eternal suffering. Better you have no friends or relations than to be entangled in manipulative fickle false relationships that is always suffering here and will consign you to further suffering after you die.
In what sense are relationships here fickle?
Even though people say they are devoted to each other, they are great undying friends of each other, they regularly get crossed with each other even over petty matters and they regularly break and make up with each other, seeing nothing wrong, seeing it as natural when it is deadly wrong and unnatural and false.
In what sense are relationships here false?
Relations here are always false, not true, based on using and manipulating each other for material and emotional gains, people are never being real or true to each other putting on a front or show trying to please and impress the opposite party.
WHETHER WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TO PARTLY OR TOTALLY PLEASE OR IMPRESS THE OPPOSITE PARTNER IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DENIED AND CAN BE DISCERNED BY THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND EVEN IF YOU ARE AS BLIND AS A BAT AND THINKS IT IS FROM THE BOTTOM OF YOUR HEART. IF THE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS THE OTHER PARTNER, THAT RELATIONSHIP IS BASED ON FALSITY, ON SHOW, DECEIT.
People get crossed with their partners over even petty matters (not attending dinner, forget to bring home something), they argue or quarrel ‘in good nature’ and then quickly forget not realizing that such episodes are not harmless but evil and deadly, these are temporary breaks in the relationships that reflects the relation is false, based on pleasing and impressing each other and on occasions when the person is not pleased or impressed over even a trivial matter he is crossed or you are temporarily not his partner.
And then there are major flare ups where they may engage in even violent quarrels, depart in a huff, swear they may never meet each other again and yet ‘sheepishly’ make up later and blame momentarily emotion seized insanity for their actions.
IF YOU ENTERTAIN ANY ASPIRATIONS OF GOING TO HEAVEN YOU MUST NOT ENGAGE IN RELATIONSHIPS WITH UPS AND DOWNS (VIOLENT OR ‘FRIENDLY’, WITH FREQUENTLY DISAGREEMENTS, ‘FRIENDLY’ DIFFERENCES IN OPINIONS, SUCH RELATIONSHIPS ARE DEADLY, NOT ONLY SUFFERING HERE BUT EXERCISE IN MAKE BELIEVE IN THE NAME OF REAPING MATERIAL BENEFITS FROM YOUR PARTNER AND WILL END IN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT NOT HEAVEN.
BETTER YOU GO THROUGH LIFE ALONE WITHOUT TRUE FRIENDS THAN FRIENDS FROM HELL WHO SMILES AND DO THEIR UTMOST TO PLEASE YOU BUT WHEN CROSSED, PUT THE KNIFE IN YOU EITHER PHYSICALLY OR IN WORDS.
EVEN IF IT IS NEVER SEEN IN THIS WORLD, IT IS POSSIBLE FOR TWO PERSONS WHO ARE TRULY LOVING, TRULY HAPPY IN THEMSELVES NOT DEPENDENT ON OTHERS, NOT REQUIRING OTHERS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS THEM, WHO DO NOT PRETENTIOUSLY DO OR SAY THINGS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS EACH OTHER EXPECTING MATERIAL AND EMOTIONAL RETURNS FROM THEIR EFFORTS TO CO-HABIT WITHOUT HAVING REGULAR DISAGREEMENTS, BICKERING OR VIOLENT BREAKS UP AND MAKE UPS.
Cohabiting in sin:
All relationships fraught with bickering, disagreements, differences even violent break ups and make ups are sinful never meritorious and leads to torment after death.
Jesus said he has come with a sword, not to bring peace and henceforth your enemies are without your own family and so better alone with no friends than to cohabit in sinful make up and break up relationships.
Jesus: "Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; 36 and a man's foes will be those of his own household. 37* He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; 38 and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.
SO LONG AS WHAT EACH PARTNER SAYS OR DOES IS INTENDED PARTLY OR WHOLLY TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS THE OTHER, DEMANDS THE OTHER TO PLEASE HIM OR BE IMPRESSED, THAT IS A FALSE RELATIONSHIP BASED ON STIRRING OF BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE THAT IS COHABITTING IN SIN THAT LEADS TO DOOM AND TORMENT.
Cheryl who? Simon Cowell to offer Tulisa and Kelly Rowland 'DOUBLE pay for X Factor ret
He knows who Cheryl is and is pretending not to know her to mock and that is deadly sin with suffering due.
By asking ‘who’ you are saying you don’t know who is being spoken about, if you know who is being referred to, then you are pretending not without purpose but to mock and that has deadly consequences in future suffering for you.
Fancy a crack at the Olympics? Try out for the GB handball team (even if you've never played before)
Do you understand what is meant by ‘fancy’?
By fancy is meant whether your mental force is stirred attractively by prospects of a crack at the Olympics.
It is never a matter of whether you fancy or don’t fancy but it is whether there is any need or meaning for you to participate, what is the point of stirring your mental force to fancy?
IT IS ADMISSION THAT THE BASIS FOR PEOPLE TO DO THINGS IS NOT REASON BUT THE STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE, IF YOU HAVE A CRACK AT THE OLYMPICS BECAUSE YOUR FANCY IS STIRRED IT MEANS YOUR PARTICIPATION IS DRIVEN BY A BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE NOT BY TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
'It was a moral mistake and I'm not proud of it': Strauss-Kahn
The important message is his acknowledgement the incidents actually happened and because his version of events is implausible then he is guilty as charged both regarding the maid and the French girl and it is confirmation that this is a world where the rich and powerful can get away with almost anything even murder, eg America is guilty of reckless indiscriminate homicide of other nationals (Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam) even as it accuses others of human rights abuses.
Notice he is self centred preoccupied with his losses without regard for the even terrible emotional toll he extracted on both women. Even if the maid solicited for sex, it is still wrong.
IT IS NOT A MORAL MISTAKE BUT A CRIMINAL ACT THAT HAS HARMED OTHERS AS IT HAS HARMED HIMSELF, PRIDE OR BEING NOT PROUD IS ABOUT THE MEANINGLESS BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE AND HE IS A MAN OF WRONG OR NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING. ALL HE SAID IS FALSE OR DELUDED. THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY WHAT HE SAID CAN BE TRUE.
Week Ahead: Fed aims to restore confidence
Anyone who sees nothing wrong with the statement and thinks it makes sense has false understanding, understands wrongly because it is a silly statement.
It does not matter how confident you are in the current situation or what you are doing, if it leads to disaster, it will still lead to disaster so what is the point of restoring confidence? What is relevant is if you fully understand your current plight and what you are doing and thus understanding you know you are on the path to safety, out of trouble so what need is there to be confident?
THUS ALL THIS TALK ABOUT RESTORING CONFIDENCE IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE THAT IS NOT WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES BUT IT MEANS YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SITUATION AND WHAT IS NEEDED BUT THE FED IS GROPING BLINDLY AND IT WILL SURELY LEAD TO DISASTER. STOP WASTING YOUR TIME RESTORING CONFIDENCE, IT IS USELESS AND WRONG. FOCUS ON UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS WRONG AND WHAT YOU ARE DOING THAT IS CORRECT OR WRONG AND THEN TAKE ACTIONS TO RECTIFY.
YOU DON’T LOWER INTERESTS OR PRINT MONEY TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE BUT YOU DO SO IF THEY WILL ACTUALLY CORRECT THE SITUATION.
You need your confidence restored?
Anyone who needs his confidence restored is a man who does things without understanding what he is doing or without understanding the situation; he is doing things blindly and thus require reassurance from others to continue with his blind path and this is a recipe for certain future disaster.
The person who only does things he fully understands, who only acts if he understands the situation at hand so that his action is fully appropriate and correct for the situation does not require confidence let alone restoration of his shaken confidence.
IF YOU ADMIT YOUR CONFIDENCE CAN BE SHAKEN IT MEANS CONFIDENCE IS NOT BASED ON REASON WHICH POSSESSES NO FORCE THAT CAN BE SHAKEN BUT YOUR CONFIDENCE IS A FUNCTION OF FORCE THAT CAN BE SHAKENED. CONFIDENCE IS A BLIND MAKE BELIEF PERCEPTION THAT WHAT YOU DO IS CORRECT AND THE SITUATION IS FINE WHEN IT IS HAZARDOUS AND WHEN YOUR CONFIDENCE IS SHAKENED IT MEANS THAT UNREALISTIC FALSE COMPLACENCY IS CRUMBLING.
When is confidence needed?
If a person is a rehashing robot whose actions and speech are fakes, counterfeits that do not truly fit the situation, he needs confidence or composure to carry out whatever he says or does which is faked, a counterfeit tendered as genuine and no matter how iron willed his confidence or belief in what he says or does, his confidence can be shaken, he must harbour doubt about whatever he says and does.
Only a person whose perceptions, understandings of things happening, whose speech and actions are false, undertaken without understanding its nature or undertaken without understanding the situation at hand needs confidence in what he is doing or confidence in his understanding of the situation.
If a person does not rehash what he says or does which is freshly composed after full true understanding of what his actions are, what the situation is, he does not require confidence or belief or will that his understanding is correct and what he does is correct.
Thus a smile is false, rehashed according to a plan that is memorized and differ from others, it is meaningless, only for show to please and impress others and so in order to smile immaculately, you need confidence or grim ‘unshakeable’ belief that your smile is genuine, meaningful, good for yourself and others when it is in truth faked, rehashed, meaningless, bad for self and others.
HOW COME THERE IS NO ONE IS THIS WHOLE WIDE WORLD WHO CAN SPEAK LIKE ME? IS THIS THE FALSITY THAT THE WORLD CANNOT ACCEPT OR IT THIS THE TRUTH THAT THE WORLD CANNOT RECEIVE, FOR IT NEITHER SEES NOR KNOWS IT?
IF YOU ARE AN ACTOR LIVING IN A MAKE BELIEF WORLD YOU NEED CONFIDENCE, IF YOU ARE NOT AN ACTOR, NOT A FAKE, YOU LIVE IN TRUTH AND REALITY, YOU DO NOT NEED CONFIDENCE.
History is truth:
This is a false statement. History is history and truth is truth, anyone who says history is truth is lying for some motive, training himself and others to perceive falsely with debt to be repaid as future suffering.
History is a story of the past that is subject to interpretation dependent on the predilection of the historian and so it is wrong to say history is truth.
A good indicator we are heading for economic disaster:
If it is true that confidence plays a key part in our economic wellbeing, it means our economic wellbeing is not based on reality or truth but based on hype, falsity, make belief, pretence and whatever is false, unrealistic cannot be sustained indefinitely but the longer it is allowed to fester the worse the final unravelling and so we are headed for financial and economic disaster.
Latest move in deepening crisis:
Italy has had its sovereign debt rating cut by Standard & Poor's, the latest move in a deepening European debt crisis.
Latest move in a deepening European debt crisis does not exist, it is a fabrication by the writer to exaggerate the situation, what truly happened is Italy had its rating cut, it is presumptuous and fabricating to speak of a deepening crisis. This is not harmless but trains himself and foolish others to perceive falsely what is fabricated is reality.
I see no crisis, it is only if a person is emotional and vested, worried, then he will perceive a crisis and be agitated. If a person is detached (that is how to retain your sanity), he just sees the rating cut and what it might mean but he does not see a crisis. You can see Italy’s rating cut but can you see a crisis which does not exist except in the concoction of his deluded mind that he wants to transfer to others.
Osborne's '£12bn black hole'
15 hours ago
Some bad news for the chancellor as a report suggests that slow growth has opened up a £12bn hole in the country's finances.
It is not a black hole, there is no hole neither is it black but there is a deficit and so it reflects false perception that is programmed and rehashed for her to say so.
“Black hole” is a nonspecific recorded understanding that can be applied in many situations that is remembered because it sounds or is falsely perceived as trendy or savvy and it is rehashed to be applied to falsely label an event.
If you talk about a fiscal deficit it is immediately obvious to the reader, if you speak of black hole then those who have not been similarly falsely programmed will think there is an astronomical black hole belonging to Osborne.
YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO CALL A DEFICIT A BLACK HOLE BECAUSE A DEFICIT IS NOT A BLACK HOLE AND YOU HAVE TO BE INITIATED INTO THE FALSE ASSOCIATION TO ‘UNDERSTAND’ BLACK HOLE MEANS DEFICIT. THE PRIZE FOR SUCH ‘CLEVERNESS’ IS CERTAIN FUTURE INSANITY.
Why I Am a Naturalist
This is a NY Times headline and it is false or deluded.
No one is truly a naturalist but it is a program or false identification he has adopted and now he is living according to that plan not realizing he is a robot headed for insanity.
He is speaking falsely trying to explain why he is a naturalist because there is no true reason why anyone should be a naturalist.
You are not Buddhist or Christian but it is a false image that you have come to adopt and perceive yourself that is not good, not harmless but it is self-identity views that the Buddha said is the path to future woe.
People ask me whether I am Buddhist, I do not see myself as Buddhist, do not identify myself with Buddhism.
A NATURALIST DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN THE IMAGINATION OR DELUSION OF THE FOOL. NO MATTER HOW VAGUE OR DIFFERENT YOUR IDEA OF A NATURALIST IS, THERE IS A PLAN OF IT THAT YOU MUST REMEMBER AND LIVED TO OR CONFORM TO AND THAT IS CONVERTING YOURSELF INTO A ROBOT OF NATURALISM. HE IS KIDDING HIMSELF IF HE THINKS HE DOES NOT IDENTIFY HIMSELF AS A NATURALIST, HE IS PROUD, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY TO ADVERTISE HIS AFFILIATION WITH NATURALISM.
Why he is a naturalist:
The reason he is a naturalist is not what he thinks that he wants you to share but the reason he is a naturalist is because he is deluded and that is never a pleasure or harmless but it is suffering and deadly.
WHEN YOU PROFFER TO EXPLAIN WHY YOU ARE A NATURALIST YOU MUST PROFFER THE CORRECT NOT FALSE ANSWER. THE REASON HE IS A NATURALIST IS NOT BECAUSE HE IS RIGHT OR TRUE BUT BECAUSE HE IS DELUDED.
DELUSION, GREED AND HATE ARE THE THREE FETTERS THAT BOND BEINGS TO THIS LOWER REALM ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Anwar’s DNA but not Anwar’s sperm:
What the defence is (rightfully) contending is that the DNA allegedly extracted may belong to Anwar but the prosecution has failed to show the DNA was extracted from Anwar’s sperm rather than other cellular sources and the pathologists were not scrupulous in their handling of specimens failing to eliminate possibility of contamination or tampering by police or vested parties.
If the case is genuine, how can the prosecution be so sure that DNA from male Y is Anwar’s so that they have proceeded to this advance stage that may risk wrongly convicting a man based on the testimony of one man Saiful and detection of DNA of male Y when they have not got a reference specimen from Anwar?
If the case is bogus with the purpose of putting Anwar away ‘at all costs’ then it is perfectly understandable the prosecution would pursue the case with such unwavering determination based on the testimony of Saiful that they cannot be certain is true and the extraction of DNA of male Y that they cannot confirm but seems dead certain is Anwar’s and therefore will nail him, but they cannot prove it came from Anwar’s sperm.
IT IS FAR EASIER TO OBTAIN ANWAR’S DNA THAN ANWAR’S SPERM AND IT APPEARS THE PROSECUTION HAS ANWAR’S DNA BUT THEY CANNOT SHOW THEY HAD ANWAR’S SPERM. ANWAR’S DNA COULD COME FROM SPURIOUS SOURCES, ANWAR’S SPERM WOULD BE MUCH MOR INCRIMINATING.
Dr M supports repeal of ISA:
Repeal of the ISA (if sincere) is either good or bad and this can be objectively determined and irrespective of whatever support, it remains either good or bad and it is meaningless and even mad that it needs the support of anyone.
Support only makes sense if people by themselves are befuddled, do not know what to make of the ISA repeal or do not understand what the repeal of the ISA entails, they need to look to others to tell what to do (if Dr M supports, it must be good, so I go along) or certain people think their views and understanding are superior to others so that they declare their support to buttress the decision, it is self exaltation by the person who supports, he is such an important person that his support is needed and this is always delusion, whatever is true and good does not need the support of anyone, it is true and good.
THUS DR M’S SUPPORT OF ISA REPEAL ONLY MAKES SENSE IF HE IS SUCH A SPECIAL OR IMPORTANT PERSON HIS OPINIONS ARE ESTEEMED OR REVERED WITHOUT QUESTION OR PEOPLE ARE FOOLS WHO DO NOT KNOW WHAT THINGS ARE ABOUT AND NEED TO LOOK TO OTHERS, LOOK TO DR M FOR GUIDANCE.
Cutting off all feelings:
Beings here (animals, humans) are not at liberty to cut off feelings except in their delusion they can, they are subject constantly to feelings that may only be pleasant, unpleasant or neither pleasant nor unpleasant, they cannot help not feeling and rather than a great boon, it is detention in suffering and a person who has TRULY cut off all feelings, is capable AT WILL of cutting off all feelings have achieved the FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND, has shed all avenues for suffering to reach him.
Feelings are entirely the products of the reception or impact of force on a person’s consciousness. It is the reception of mild force in various forms (tactile, sight, sound, smell, taste) that gives rise to the feeling of pleasure and in perverted cases, it is strong force (eg being whipped, abused or tied) that gives that fool pleasure. It is contact with strong even intense force that gives pain, without contact with strong force there cannot be pain.
Because force is the root for suffering, harm, degradation and death, exposure to force always leads to suffering, even pleasure or pleasant is suffering and it is the false perception of deluded people that make them perceive pleasure as wonderful, the cutting off of all feelings of pain and pleasure is the cutting off of all suffering and it is the fourth and highest state of the mind.
FIRST YOU CUT OFF THE TOTALLY INSANE AND UNNCESSARY FOR SHOW USE OF FORCE TO FASHION STYLE, CONSTANT PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO ACHIEVE THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT GIVES ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN.
NEXT YOU CUT OFF ALL USE OF FORCE THAT IS NECESSARY TO POWER ALL THINKING TO ACHIEVE AN UNIFIED MIND THAT IS THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT GIVES TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
THEN YOU CUT OFF ALL TOTALLY UNNECESSARY INSANE STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED TO (LIKE) OR REPULSED BY (DISLIKE) THINGS HAPPENING THAT GIVES THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
FINALLY YOU CUT OFF ALL RECEPTION OF FORCE TO EXPERIENCE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE AND THIS TOTAL DIVORCE FROM FORCE MEANS YOU ARE FREED FROM DEGRADING DEATH GIVING FORCE WHICH IS WHY YOU EXIST FOR A VERY LONG TIME, 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
IT IS CONTACT WITH FORCE THAT ULTIMATELY KILLS AND SO THE PERSON WHO HAS SHED ALL CONTACT FROM FORCE HAS ESCAPED THE CLUTCHES OF DEATH AND LIVES 500 ETERNITIES IN DEATHLESS BLISS.
IN ORDER TO FEEL, YOU MUST OPEN OR EXPOSE YOUR MIND TO EVIL, DEGRADING DEATH INDUCING FORCE AND DIE. ONCE YOU STOPPED FEELING, YOU STOP ALL DYING AND DYING IS NEVER PLEASANT BUT IT IS ‘DEADLY’.
Ready to drop? Jessica Biel struggles with her fake baby bump on the set of New Year's Eve
You need force never reason to drop and when you pose a question that demands action, you are guilty of inciting action, inciting in the other person that has attached debt to be experienced as suffering especially if the question is facetious, totally unwarranted.
YOU NEED TO STIR FORCE TO DO THINGS, IF YOU ASK SOMEONE IF THEY ARE READY TO DROP, YOU ARE ASKING THEM IF THEY ARE READY TO DO SOMETHING THAT STIRS THEM AND IT IS NEVER MERIT BUT DEMERIT WITH PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU. LEAVE ACTIONS TO OTHERS, IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS EXCEPT IF YOU WANT YOUR HEAD CHOPPED.
A TOTALLY WRONG UNDERSTANDING:
Miracle babies: Mother defies odds of one in five million to deliver twins from SEPARATE wombs
Just because she delivered extremely rare twins does not mean and never means she defied the odds. Defying odds is the person’s false perception and understanding that he wants to convert others to with deadly karma.
THERE WAS NEVER ANY DEFIANCE INVOLVED EXCEPT IN THE DELUDED PERSON’S FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING HE DOES NOT REALIZE WILL END IN INSANITY.
Predicting the rise of planes is no marvel:
Boy of 12 who was the Nostradamus of 1913 predicted the rise of planes and bicycles
The Buddha said there have been countless Ages each lasting countless years and they are basically replays with some variations of the same settings over and over again. For instance in one eternity, there was a magnificent city in India and in another eternity this was a magnificent Sala forest, in one age people live 100 years in another they lived 1000 years.
THUS THE RISE OF PLANES OR COMPUTERS OR HANDPHONES IS NOT UNPRECEDENTED, IN PAST EONS THERE HAVE BEEN COMPUTERS AND HANDPHONES AND IT IS POSSIBLE FOR BEINGS TO REMEMBER PARTIALLY OR TOTALLY ALL THEIR PAST LIVES AND SO THUS REMEMBERING IT IS NOT SUCH A MARVEL THAT HAVING SEEN PLANES IN PAST EXISTENCES THEY PREDICT THEM.
BNP for one:
BNP for one insists that it is in nothing like the same poor shape as many UK and US banks back in 2008.
Truly understanding what is presented to you, how do you understand ‘BNP for one’?
He is not the first to speak thus and it is copied from others. It sounds nice or impressive but it is senseless and therefore controlled insanity for him and for those who accept it as meaningless.
There is no need to say ‘for one’, it is totally irrelevant and is only there to exaggerate or hype. The substance of the matter is BNP insists that is in good shape.
‘For one’ does not add meaning but distracts:
“For one’ not only requires effort and memory to rehash, not only does it not add any meaning to the situation, it distracts, creates unnecessary diversion from the matter at hand and so it is evil never true, meaningful or good.
Why people have a mentality:
People talk of the male mentality, female mentality, Malaysian, Chinese, American mentality, yet do they understand what it means?
A person’s or a subset of persons’ mentality is his or their way of perceiving or interpreting happenings and responding to them that is stereotyped in them (eg male, Malay) and differs from others (eg females, Chinese).
The only way possible for a person to have a mentality is if his way of perceiving and reacting to events is programmed and he is a robot.
THUS WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT MENTALITY IN PEOPLE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT PROGRAMMING AND IT IS AN UNWITTING ADMISSION PEOPLE HERE ARE ALL ROBOTS.
IMF warns of new threat to banks
The International Monetary Fund warns that the global financial system is more vulnerable now than at any time since the 2008 financial crisis.
You may think what is spoken is the truth but it may be far from the truth.
Supposed the banks are insolvent or its assets are worth far less than listed or it is running out of money to maintain its banking activities, would it be accurate or true to warn of a new threat to banks or is it an euphemism, a vague false statement that avoids saying the truth?
And so it is that mankind may be far less capable of telling the truth that it imagines. A lot of the truth you hear are niceties, euphemisms to avoid the unpalatable truth.
Blogged
By speaking about not forgetting, he is admitting that values are programmes that are remembered and rehashed to be applied and can be forgotten (conveniently) when expediencies and greed override values.
Only a person who is a robot without true understanding has values, someone who is not a robot and fully understands things has no values, no yardsticks to guide him. Whatever is presented to him, he sees truly as true or false and he rejects what is false (for sake of not suffering, for his own sake), harmful or beneficial and he undertakes what is beneficial and avoids what is harmful, what has values got to do with this, he does need values as crutches to lean on.
A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT, WHO FULLY UNDERSTANDS DOES NOT HAVE VALUES NOR DOES HE NEED THEM, SINCE HE FULLY UNDERSTANDS WHAT HAPPENS, HE SEES AS IT ACTUALLY IS SOMETHING IS TRUE OR FALSE, MAKES SENSE OR NO SENSE, IS GOOD OR BAD AND THUS SEEING AS IT ACTUALLY IS, FOR THE SAKE OF NOT SUFFERING, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO UNDERTAKE WHAT IS FALSE, SENSELESS OR HARMFUL. IT IS ONLY THOSE WHO ARE BLIND, DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO HAVE VALUES TO UPHOLD WHERE IT IMPRESSES OTHERS OR FOR SHOW AND WHEN IT DOES NOT SUITS THEM OR THEY STAND TO GAIN UNRIGTHEOUSLY, THEY TOSS THEIR VALUES OUT OF THE WINDOW.
ANYONE WHO HAS VALUES IS A ROBOT AND THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING AND ENDS IN INSANITY.
Time for hard decisions: ZoellickThere is never truly any time for hard decisions but always it is time for the correct or right decision.
It is only a correct decision that will correct a situation and there is never anything difficult or hard about the decision except stirred emotion, antagonism and irrationality.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING SPEAKS OF TRULY UNDERSTANDING A SITUATION AND THENCE THE CORRECT DECISION THAT WILL CORRECT THE SITUATION, NOT HARD DECISION THAT BETRAYS FALSE OR NO UNDERSTANDING.
HARD DECISIONS ARE ALWAYS WRONG, IF YOU TRULY WANT TO CORRECT A SITUATION AND YOU UNDERSTAND THE SITUATION AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CORRECT RESPONSE SHOULD BE, WHAT IS SO HARD ABOUT THAT?
Malaysia to scrap security laws:
Something has happened, security laws are being ‘scrapped’ or is it modified. How does one of true understanding truly understand the event?
The correct reason for scrapping the laws is if they are truculent, wrong and if that was the reason, the law would have been scrapped long ago because it was designed to meet with emergency arrest of communists without trial, not throw dissidents and Anwar in jail without trial.
And so it cannot be ‘scrapped’ for the correct reason because if that was so it would have been scrapped long ago without reservations.
Another reason may be to pander to and manipulate public opinion favourably, for political gains with view to coming elections to appear as if reforms are genuine to entice voters who are naïve.
Analysis: going the way of Japan?
“Going the way of Japan” is a false, generalized rehashed understanding of the matter at hand. Japan is Japan and the US is the US not Japan and so it is totally unnecessary and false to say the US is going the way of Japan. What is relevant is to state specifically what you think is going wrong with the US instead of saying the US is going the way of Japan when that is not possible. Emotional people have recorded understandings of everything they experience and they are always referring to them, viewing current events in terms of recorded understandings that are rehashed and applied to explain the current situation instead of seeing all the strands of the current situation and then concluding what it all means which never requires concluding falsely ‘going the way of Japan’.
China 'losing manufacturing edge'
Indonesia and Bangladesh are benefiting as China loses its edge as the world's cheapest place to manufacture goods, a new report suggests
All these multinationals seek the lowest cost manufacturing bases to produce goods they sell for maximal profits in developed countries making oversized profits that do not belong to the people but are confiscated from the community making it increasingly poorer through the years whilst the companies become increasingly cash rich until a destabilizing imbalance occurs when society become impoverished and these companies lose their opium addicts who buy their profit seeking products.
PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG BECAUSE THEY HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING, THIS SYSTEM OF COMPANIES SELLING PRODUCTS THAT PEOPLE NEED ENRICHING THE COMPANIES IS UNSUSTAINABLE, RESULTS IN THE SHIFT OF WEALTH FROM THE MASSES TO THESE FEW.
NASA Detects Planet Dancing With a Pair of Stars
What is said is not harmless but asking for suffering because it is feeding others falsity that poisons them.
The planet is not dancing with a pair of stars but orbiting them and whoever equates orbiting with dancing is guilty of plying others with harmful falsity that leads to future suffering in repayment.
Rakyat turn up in full force for Merdeka, M'sia Day celebrations
PATRIOTISM was in the air at Dataran Merdeka as thousands of Malaysians and tourists turned up as early as 7am to join in the 54th Merdeka and 48th Malaysia Day celebrations.
It is impossible for people to turn up in full force, it is a fabrication or falsification to exaggerate the turnout.
IT IS BLIND FORCE THAT IS THE BASIS OF BEINGS HERE, THEY ALL WORSHIP FORCE AND SO IT IS THEY SPEAK OF FULL FORCE NEVER FULL REASON FOR MERDEKA.
Malaysia's security shift raises hope for genuine reform
This is an Australian new site headline. Only a deluded person without true understanding can hope for genuine reform.
Notice he said hope implying he does not know it will lead to reform but he hopes. Unless you want future suffering you should never commit yourself, never hope without seeing what you see is true, that there will be genuine reform.
IT IS NOT THE LAWS THAT IS THE STUMBLING BLOCK BUT IT IS THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE LAWS AND IF THEY WILL ‘BEND’ LAWS AND PULL PUPPET STRINGS ATTACHED TO THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM THEN SUCH SHIFTS ARE FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION AND YOUR HOPES WILL DEFINITELY BE DASHED AND YOU ARE A FOOL TO SPEAK OF HOPE. DON’T EVEN HOPE, NOR IS HOPE THE RIGHT ACTION. THERE IS KARMA SPEAKING THUS BECAUSE HE IS RAISING HOPE FALSELY IN THOSE WHO ARE SIMILARLY GULLIBLE.
The basis of capitalism:
It is not because capitalism is meritorious, virtuous, the best option and based on truth that it is default system in this world but it is because mankind needs to hoard and enjoy for himself whatever material goods or wealth there is and he has no genuine or meaningful care for the community or others, what care he has is merely hypocritical symbolic token concerns that fall far short that this state of affairs where capitalism has become the default system in the world.
Because all this hoarding or grabbing is at the expense of the system or community, speeded up by the process of leveraged lending (the same amount of money can be lent in many cycles creating debts many times the true wealth in the system) in time to come it unfailingly leads to disaster, financial collapse and thence social mayhem.
AND SO YOU ARE NOW SEEING THE DEATH THROES OF THE MODERN AND FINAL CHAPTER OF CAPITALISM, THE EARTH IS TOO SICK TO COME TO MANKIND’S RESCUE AGAIN AND ALL HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE WHEN THIS HOUSE OF STACKED CARDS START TO FALL.
IT IS NOT BECAUSE CAPITALISM IS GOOD THAT IT RULES SUPREME BUT IT IS BAD, EVIL AND THE REASON IT RULES SUPREME IS BECAUSE MANKIND IS SIMILARLY BAD, SELFISH AND GREEDY, WANTS TO HOARD AND NOT SHARE ANYTHING AND HAVE NO GENUINE OR MEANINGFUL CARE FOR OTHERS AND THE SYSTEM.
Capitalism rules because mankind is deluded and selfish:
It is not because capitalism is wondrous that it is ascendant in this world but it is because mankind is deluded and selfish, has no genuine or meaningful concern for the community as a whole that it is so.
CAPITALISM IS NEVER SUSTAINABLE, ALWAYS LEADS TO COLLAPSE AND SOCIAL MAYHEM BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO CATER FOR MANKIND’S DELUSION THAT HE CAN HAVE THE CAKE AND EAT IT TOO AND HIS IMPLACABLE SELFISHNESS, URGE TO HOARD AND NOT SHARE.
Living together yet apart:
This is a schizophrenic world wherein beings are living together yet apart. This is not a paradox or puzzle or riddle but it can be truly understood without any conflict.
The living together is for show only, immaculate pretence or make believe, in truth all beings are living apart, even their spouses and ‘loved’ ones are walled off, there is an invisible wall of personal private lonely suffering that separates all beings.
Thus in name capitalism is about cohabiting to mutual advantage exploiting the system for mutual gain but in reality it is every man for himself, grab as much as you can and it is at the expense of others never at nobody’s expense except in delusion.
NO MATTER HOW GREGARIOUS OR CONVIVIAL IT IS A VERY LONELY WORLD HERE WHERE EVERYONE IS FEEDING YOU POISONOUS SWEET NICENESS NEVER TRUE GOODNESS. YOU CAN STARE OR GAZE INTIMATELY INTO ANOTHER’S EYES AND YET THERE IS AN INVISIBLE INPENETRABLE WALL OF FALSITY OR DECEIT SEPARATING AND EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD, NO MATTER HOW THEY SWEAR OTHERWISE, HAS A CONTRACT TO KILL EACH OTHER OFF, EITHER SOFTLY OR VIOLENTLY.
Why I jumped on Droid Bionic and not on iPhone 5
You need force never reason to jump and so he is speaking about and focusing on force as the cause of his preference for Droid Bionic rather than reason.
A person of true understanding never speaks of jumping but he might say, why I CHOOSE Droid Bionic. Thus he is not a man of reliable opinion and it is not worth taking his views into account.
WHATEVER HE SAYS IS NOT RELIABLE, ONLY HIS PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION OF DROID BIONIC MAY BE USEFUL, BECAUSE HE IS A MAN DRIVEN BY EMOTION OR FORCE NOT GENUINE UNDERSTANDING, HIS PREFERENCES CANNOT BE RELIED UPON TO BE TRUE.
Debt can be a double edged sword:
DEBT can be a double-edged sword. It’s useful for taking advantage of opportunities quickly and it can smoothen things out when people are in a pinch.
People see nothing wrong, thinks she has a case for it when it is always deluded. She is not the first to say debt is a double edged sword, it is copied from others and rehashed without understanding truly.
Debt is not a double edged sword, debt is evil and to be avoided if one does want suffering.
THE BUDDHA IS SAID TO WANDER DEBT FREE IN THE WORLD. SO LONG AS YOU ARE PARTY TO THIS WORLD YOU ARE HEAPING DEBT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING AND NOT JUST IN LIFE MUST YOU STRIVE TO BE DEBT FREE, IN FINANCIAL MATTERS TOO IT IS A VIRTUE TO REMAIN DEBT FREE, FINANCIAL DEBT IS BONDAGE WITH DANGER AND THAT IS NEVER A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD BUT A DEADLY DANGEROUS SWORD.
DEBT IS A DANGEROUS SWORD AND JUST AS ONE AVOIDS A SWORD, ONE AVOIDS DEBT AND IT REFLECTS THE TERRIBLE EVEN TERMINAL MESS THIS WORLD IS THAT MANY NATIONS ARE UP TO THEIR NECKS IN DEBT.
Debt is only necessary if you are greedy, impatient:
The Buddha said that whoever makes an acquisition in this world is a fool headed for suffering.
Debt is only necessary if you are impatient, want to acquire before your time something with borrowed money and so borrowing is feeding and nurturing and conditioning your greed that will end in your bondage with terrible greed that leads to danger, excesses and death.
EVEN IF YOU ARE A DIEHARD, HARDCORE MATERIALISTIC DEVOTED TO THIS WORLD, ACQUIRING BE IT MONEY, OBJECT OR PERSONS (WIVES, CHILDREN) OR TITLES (DOCTOR, FAMED STAR) IS SUFFERING AND TO BORROW IN ORDER TO ACQUIRE IS TO FURTHER BOND YOURSELF TO GREED AND IMPATIENCE THAT WILL END IN SUFFERING AND SO DEBT IS NEVER A TWO EDGED SWORD BUT IT IS A SWORD THAT WILL SLAY THE BORROWER AND WHOEVER SPEAKS OF IT BEING TWO EDGED HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING OR IS DELUDED.
Fickle false deadly relationships here:
To one who truly understands, relationships here are fickle and false and they are deadly never harmless because to be engaged in fickle false relationships is to be caught in a mesh that will end in eternal suffering. Better you have no friends or relations than to be entangled in manipulative fickle false relationships that is always suffering here and will consign you to further suffering after you die.
In what sense are relationships here fickle?
Even though people say they are devoted to each other, they are great undying friends of each other, they regularly get crossed with each other even over petty matters and they regularly break and make up with each other, seeing nothing wrong, seeing it as natural when it is deadly wrong and unnatural and false.
In what sense are relationships here false?
Relations here are always false, not true, based on using and manipulating each other for material and emotional gains, people are never being real or true to each other putting on a front or show trying to please and impress the opposite party.
WHETHER WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TO PARTLY OR TOTALLY PLEASE OR IMPRESS THE OPPOSITE PARTNER IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DENIED AND CAN BE DISCERNED BY THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND EVEN IF YOU ARE AS BLIND AS A BAT AND THINKS IT IS FROM THE BOTTOM OF YOUR HEART. IF THE PURPOSE OF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS THE OTHER PARTNER, THAT RELATIONSHIP IS BASED ON FALSITY, ON SHOW, DECEIT.
People get crossed with their partners over even petty matters (not attending dinner, forget to bring home something), they argue or quarrel ‘in good nature’ and then quickly forget not realizing that such episodes are not harmless but evil and deadly, these are temporary breaks in the relationships that reflects the relation is false, based on pleasing and impressing each other and on occasions when the person is not pleased or impressed over even a trivial matter he is crossed or you are temporarily not his partner.
And then there are major flare ups where they may engage in even violent quarrels, depart in a huff, swear they may never meet each other again and yet ‘sheepishly’ make up later and blame momentarily emotion seized insanity for their actions.
IF YOU ENTERTAIN ANY ASPIRATIONS OF GOING TO HEAVEN YOU MUST NOT ENGAGE IN RELATIONSHIPS WITH UPS AND DOWNS (VIOLENT OR ‘FRIENDLY’, WITH FREQUENTLY DISAGREEMENTS, ‘FRIENDLY’ DIFFERENCES IN OPINIONS, SUCH RELATIONSHIPS ARE DEADLY, NOT ONLY SUFFERING HERE BUT EXERCISE IN MAKE BELIEVE IN THE NAME OF REAPING MATERIAL BENEFITS FROM YOUR PARTNER AND WILL END IN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT NOT HEAVEN.
BETTER YOU GO THROUGH LIFE ALONE WITHOUT TRUE FRIENDS THAN FRIENDS FROM HELL WHO SMILES AND DO THEIR UTMOST TO PLEASE YOU BUT WHEN CROSSED, PUT THE KNIFE IN YOU EITHER PHYSICALLY OR IN WORDS.
EVEN IF IT IS NEVER SEEN IN THIS WORLD, IT IS POSSIBLE FOR TWO PERSONS WHO ARE TRULY LOVING, TRULY HAPPY IN THEMSELVES NOT DEPENDENT ON OTHERS, NOT REQUIRING OTHERS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS THEM, WHO DO NOT PRETENTIOUSLY DO OR SAY THINGS TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS EACH OTHER EXPECTING MATERIAL AND EMOTIONAL RETURNS FROM THEIR EFFORTS TO CO-HABIT WITHOUT HAVING REGULAR DISAGREEMENTS, BICKERING OR VIOLENT BREAKS UP AND MAKE UPS.
Cohabiting in sin:
All relationships fraught with bickering, disagreements, differences even violent break ups and make ups are sinful never meritorious and leads to torment after death.
Jesus said he has come with a sword, not to bring peace and henceforth your enemies are without your own family and so better alone with no friends than to cohabit in sinful make up and break up relationships.
Jesus: "Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; 36 and a man's foes will be those of his own household. 37* He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; 38 and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.
SO LONG AS WHAT EACH PARTNER SAYS OR DOES IS INTENDED PARTLY OR WHOLLY TO PLEASE AND IMPRESS THE OTHER, DEMANDS THE OTHER TO PLEASE HIM OR BE IMPRESSED, THAT IS A FALSE RELATIONSHIP BASED ON STIRRING OF BLIND MEANINGLESS FORCE THAT IS COHABITTING IN SIN THAT LEADS TO DOOM AND TORMENT.
Cheryl who? Simon Cowell to offer Tulisa and Kelly Rowland 'DOUBLE pay for X Factor ret
He knows who Cheryl is and is pretending not to know her to mock and that is deadly sin with suffering due.
By asking ‘who’ you are saying you don’t know who is being spoken about, if you know who is being referred to, then you are pretending not without purpose but to mock and that has deadly consequences in future suffering for you.
Fancy a crack at the Olympics? Try out for the GB handball team (even if you've never played before)
Do you understand what is meant by ‘fancy’?
By fancy is meant whether your mental force is stirred attractively by prospects of a crack at the Olympics.
It is never a matter of whether you fancy or don’t fancy but it is whether there is any need or meaning for you to participate, what is the point of stirring your mental force to fancy?
IT IS ADMISSION THAT THE BASIS FOR PEOPLE TO DO THINGS IS NOT REASON BUT THE STIRRING OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE, IF YOU HAVE A CRACK AT THE OLYMPICS BECAUSE YOUR FANCY IS STIRRED IT MEANS YOUR PARTICIPATION IS DRIVEN BY A BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE NOT BY TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
'It was a moral mistake and I'm not proud of it': Strauss-Kahn
The important message is his acknowledgement the incidents actually happened and because his version of events is implausible then he is guilty as charged both regarding the maid and the French girl and it is confirmation that this is a world where the rich and powerful can get away with almost anything even murder, eg America is guilty of reckless indiscriminate homicide of other nationals (Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam) even as it accuses others of human rights abuses.
Notice he is self centred preoccupied with his losses without regard for the even terrible emotional toll he extracted on both women. Even if the maid solicited for sex, it is still wrong.
IT IS NOT A MORAL MISTAKE BUT A CRIMINAL ACT THAT HAS HARMED OTHERS AS IT HAS HARMED HIMSELF, PRIDE OR BEING NOT PROUD IS ABOUT THE MEANINGLESS BLIND STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE THAT IS INAPPROPRIATE AND HE IS A MAN OF WRONG OR NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING. ALL HE SAID IS FALSE OR DELUDED. THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY WHAT HE SAID CAN BE TRUE.
Week Ahead: Fed aims to restore confidence
Anyone who sees nothing wrong with the statement and thinks it makes sense has false understanding, understands wrongly because it is a silly statement.
It does not matter how confident you are in the current situation or what you are doing, if it leads to disaster, it will still lead to disaster so what is the point of restoring confidence? What is relevant is if you fully understand your current plight and what you are doing and thus understanding you know you are on the path to safety, out of trouble so what need is there to be confident?
THUS ALL THIS TALK ABOUT RESTORING CONFIDENCE IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE THAT IS NOT WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES BUT IT MEANS YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SITUATION AND WHAT IS NEEDED BUT THE FED IS GROPING BLINDLY AND IT WILL SURELY LEAD TO DISASTER. STOP WASTING YOUR TIME RESTORING CONFIDENCE, IT IS USELESS AND WRONG. FOCUS ON UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS WRONG AND WHAT YOU ARE DOING THAT IS CORRECT OR WRONG AND THEN TAKE ACTIONS TO RECTIFY.
YOU DON’T LOWER INTERESTS OR PRINT MONEY TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE BUT YOU DO SO IF THEY WILL ACTUALLY CORRECT THE SITUATION.
You need your confidence restored?
Anyone who needs his confidence restored is a man who does things without understanding what he is doing or without understanding the situation; he is doing things blindly and thus require reassurance from others to continue with his blind path and this is a recipe for certain future disaster.
The person who only does things he fully understands, who only acts if he understands the situation at hand so that his action is fully appropriate and correct for the situation does not require confidence let alone restoration of his shaken confidence.
IF YOU ADMIT YOUR CONFIDENCE CAN BE SHAKEN IT MEANS CONFIDENCE IS NOT BASED ON REASON WHICH POSSESSES NO FORCE THAT CAN BE SHAKEN BUT YOUR CONFIDENCE IS A FUNCTION OF FORCE THAT CAN BE SHAKENED. CONFIDENCE IS A BLIND MAKE BELIEF PERCEPTION THAT WHAT YOU DO IS CORRECT AND THE SITUATION IS FINE WHEN IT IS HAZARDOUS AND WHEN YOUR CONFIDENCE IS SHAKENED IT MEANS THAT UNREALISTIC FALSE COMPLACENCY IS CRUMBLING.
When is confidence needed?
If a person is a rehashing robot whose actions and speech are fakes, counterfeits that do not truly fit the situation, he needs confidence or composure to carry out whatever he says or does which is faked, a counterfeit tendered as genuine and no matter how iron willed his confidence or belief in what he says or does, his confidence can be shaken, he must harbour doubt about whatever he says and does.
Only a person whose perceptions, understandings of things happening, whose speech and actions are false, undertaken without understanding its nature or undertaken without understanding the situation at hand needs confidence in what he is doing or confidence in his understanding of the situation.
If a person does not rehash what he says or does which is freshly composed after full true understanding of what his actions are, what the situation is, he does not require confidence or belief or will that his understanding is correct and what he does is correct.
Thus a smile is false, rehashed according to a plan that is memorized and differ from others, it is meaningless, only for show to please and impress others and so in order to smile immaculately, you need confidence or grim ‘unshakeable’ belief that your smile is genuine, meaningful, good for yourself and others when it is in truth faked, rehashed, meaningless, bad for self and others.
HOW COME THERE IS NO ONE IS THIS WHOLE WIDE WORLD WHO CAN SPEAK LIKE ME? IS THIS THE FALSITY THAT THE WORLD CANNOT ACCEPT OR IT THIS THE TRUTH THAT THE WORLD CANNOT RECEIVE, FOR IT NEITHER SEES NOR KNOWS IT?
IF YOU ARE AN ACTOR LIVING IN A MAKE BELIEF WORLD YOU NEED CONFIDENCE, IF YOU ARE NOT AN ACTOR, NOT A FAKE, YOU LIVE IN TRUTH AND REALITY, YOU DO NOT NEED CONFIDENCE.
History is truth:
This is a false statement. History is history and truth is truth, anyone who says history is truth is lying for some motive, training himself and others to perceive falsely with debt to be repaid as future suffering.
History is a story of the past that is subject to interpretation dependent on the predilection of the historian and so it is wrong to say history is truth.
A good indicator we are heading for economic disaster:
If it is true that confidence plays a key part in our economic wellbeing, it means our economic wellbeing is not based on reality or truth but based on hype, falsity, make belief, pretence and whatever is false, unrealistic cannot be sustained indefinitely but the longer it is allowed to fester the worse the final unravelling and so we are headed for financial and economic disaster.
Latest move in deepening crisis:
Italy has had its sovereign debt rating cut by Standard & Poor's, the latest move in a deepening European debt crisis.
Latest move in a deepening European debt crisis does not exist, it is a fabrication by the writer to exaggerate the situation, what truly happened is Italy had its rating cut, it is presumptuous and fabricating to speak of a deepening crisis. This is not harmless but trains himself and foolish others to perceive falsely what is fabricated is reality.
I see no crisis, it is only if a person is emotional and vested, worried, then he will perceive a crisis and be agitated. If a person is detached (that is how to retain your sanity), he just sees the rating cut and what it might mean but he does not see a crisis. You can see Italy’s rating cut but can you see a crisis which does not exist except in the concoction of his deluded mind that he wants to transfer to others.
Osborne's '£12bn black hole'
15 hours ago
Some bad news for the chancellor as a report suggests that slow growth has opened up a £12bn hole in the country's finances.
It is not a black hole, there is no hole neither is it black but there is a deficit and so it reflects false perception that is programmed and rehashed for her to say so.
“Black hole” is a nonspecific recorded understanding that can be applied in many situations that is remembered because it sounds or is falsely perceived as trendy or savvy and it is rehashed to be applied to falsely label an event.
If you talk about a fiscal deficit it is immediately obvious to the reader, if you speak of black hole then those who have not been similarly falsely programmed will think there is an astronomical black hole belonging to Osborne.
YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO CALL A DEFICIT A BLACK HOLE BECAUSE A DEFICIT IS NOT A BLACK HOLE AND YOU HAVE TO BE INITIATED INTO THE FALSE ASSOCIATION TO ‘UNDERSTAND’ BLACK HOLE MEANS DEFICIT. THE PRIZE FOR SUCH ‘CLEVERNESS’ IS CERTAIN FUTURE INSANITY.
Why I Am a Naturalist
This is a NY Times headline and it is false or deluded.
No one is truly a naturalist but it is a program or false identification he has adopted and now he is living according to that plan not realizing he is a robot headed for insanity.
He is speaking falsely trying to explain why he is a naturalist because there is no true reason why anyone should be a naturalist.
You are not Buddhist or Christian but it is a false image that you have come to adopt and perceive yourself that is not good, not harmless but it is self-identity views that the Buddha said is the path to future woe.
People ask me whether I am Buddhist, I do not see myself as Buddhist, do not identify myself with Buddhism.
A NATURALIST DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN THE IMAGINATION OR DELUSION OF THE FOOL. NO MATTER HOW VAGUE OR DIFFERENT YOUR IDEA OF A NATURALIST IS, THERE IS A PLAN OF IT THAT YOU MUST REMEMBER AND LIVED TO OR CONFORM TO AND THAT IS CONVERTING YOURSELF INTO A ROBOT OF NATURALISM. HE IS KIDDING HIMSELF IF HE THINKS HE DOES NOT IDENTIFY HIMSELF AS A NATURALIST, HE IS PROUD, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY TO ADVERTISE HIS AFFILIATION WITH NATURALISM.
Why he is a naturalist:
The reason he is a naturalist is not what he thinks that he wants you to share but the reason he is a naturalist is because he is deluded and that is never a pleasure or harmless but it is suffering and deadly.
WHEN YOU PROFFER TO EXPLAIN WHY YOU ARE A NATURALIST YOU MUST PROFFER THE CORRECT NOT FALSE ANSWER. THE REASON HE IS A NATURALIST IS NOT BECAUSE HE IS RIGHT OR TRUE BUT BECAUSE HE IS DELUDED.
DELUSION, GREED AND HATE ARE THE THREE FETTERS THAT BOND BEINGS TO THIS LOWER REALM ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Anwar’s DNA but not Anwar’s sperm:
What the defence is (rightfully) contending is that the DNA allegedly extracted may belong to Anwar but the prosecution has failed to show the DNA was extracted from Anwar’s sperm rather than other cellular sources and the pathologists were not scrupulous in their handling of specimens failing to eliminate possibility of contamination or tampering by police or vested parties.
If the case is genuine, how can the prosecution be so sure that DNA from male Y is Anwar’s so that they have proceeded to this advance stage that may risk wrongly convicting a man based on the testimony of one man Saiful and detection of DNA of male Y when they have not got a reference specimen from Anwar?
If the case is bogus with the purpose of putting Anwar away ‘at all costs’ then it is perfectly understandable the prosecution would pursue the case with such unwavering determination based on the testimony of Saiful that they cannot be certain is true and the extraction of DNA of male Y that they cannot confirm but seems dead certain is Anwar’s and therefore will nail him, but they cannot prove it came from Anwar’s sperm.
IT IS FAR EASIER TO OBTAIN ANWAR’S DNA THAN ANWAR’S SPERM AND IT APPEARS THE PROSECUTION HAS ANWAR’S DNA BUT THEY CANNOT SHOW THEY HAD ANWAR’S SPERM. ANWAR’S DNA COULD COME FROM SPURIOUS SOURCES, ANWAR’S SPERM WOULD BE MUCH MOR INCRIMINATING.
Dr M supports repeal of ISA:
Repeal of the ISA (if sincere) is either good or bad and this can be objectively determined and irrespective of whatever support, it remains either good or bad and it is meaningless and even mad that it needs the support of anyone.
Support only makes sense if people by themselves are befuddled, do not know what to make of the ISA repeal or do not understand what the repeal of the ISA entails, they need to look to others to tell what to do (if Dr M supports, it must be good, so I go along) or certain people think their views and understanding are superior to others so that they declare their support to buttress the decision, it is self exaltation by the person who supports, he is such an important person that his support is needed and this is always delusion, whatever is true and good does not need the support of anyone, it is true and good.
THUS DR M’S SUPPORT OF ISA REPEAL ONLY MAKES SENSE IF HE IS SUCH A SPECIAL OR IMPORTANT PERSON HIS OPINIONS ARE ESTEEMED OR REVERED WITHOUT QUESTION OR PEOPLE ARE FOOLS WHO DO NOT KNOW WHAT THINGS ARE ABOUT AND NEED TO LOOK TO OTHERS, LOOK TO DR M FOR GUIDANCE.
Cutting off all feelings:
Beings here (animals, humans) are not at liberty to cut off feelings except in their delusion they can, they are subject constantly to feelings that may only be pleasant, unpleasant or neither pleasant nor unpleasant, they cannot help not feeling and rather than a great boon, it is detention in suffering and a person who has TRULY cut off all feelings, is capable AT WILL of cutting off all feelings have achieved the FOURTH HIGHER STATE OF MIND, has shed all avenues for suffering to reach him.
Feelings are entirely the products of the reception or impact of force on a person’s consciousness. It is the reception of mild force in various forms (tactile, sight, sound, smell, taste) that gives rise to the feeling of pleasure and in perverted cases, it is strong force (eg being whipped, abused or tied) that gives that fool pleasure. It is contact with strong even intense force that gives pain, without contact with strong force there cannot be pain.
Because force is the root for suffering, harm, degradation and death, exposure to force always leads to suffering, even pleasure or pleasant is suffering and it is the false perception of deluded people that make them perceive pleasure as wonderful, the cutting off of all feelings of pain and pleasure is the cutting off of all suffering and it is the fourth and highest state of the mind.
FIRST YOU CUT OFF THE TOTALLY INSANE AND UNNCESSARY FOR SHOW USE OF FORCE TO FASHION STYLE, CONSTANT PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO ACHIEVE THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT GIVES ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN.
NEXT YOU CUT OFF ALL USE OF FORCE THAT IS NECESSARY TO POWER ALL THINKING TO ACHIEVE AN UNIFIED MIND THAT IS THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT GIVES TWO ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
THEN YOU CUT OFF ALL TOTALLY UNNECESSARY INSANE STIRRING OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BE ATTRACTED TO (LIKE) OR REPULSED BY (DISLIKE) THINGS HAPPENING THAT GIVES THE THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
FINALLY YOU CUT OFF ALL RECEPTION OF FORCE TO EXPERIENCE NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE AND THIS TOTAL DIVORCE FROM FORCE MEANS YOU ARE FREED FROM DEGRADING DEATH GIVING FORCE WHICH IS WHY YOU EXIST FOR A VERY LONG TIME, 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
IT IS CONTACT WITH FORCE THAT ULTIMATELY KILLS AND SO THE PERSON WHO HAS SHED ALL CONTACT FROM FORCE HAS ESCAPED THE CLUTCHES OF DEATH AND LIVES 500 ETERNITIES IN DEATHLESS BLISS.
IN ORDER TO FEEL, YOU MUST OPEN OR EXPOSE YOUR MIND TO EVIL, DEGRADING DEATH INDUCING FORCE AND DIE. ONCE YOU STOPPED FEELING, YOU STOP ALL DYING AND DYING IS NEVER PLEASANT BUT IT IS ‘DEADLY’.
Ready to drop? Jessica Biel struggles with her fake baby bump on the set of New Year's Eve
You need force never reason to drop and when you pose a question that demands action, you are guilty of inciting action, inciting in the other person that has attached debt to be experienced as suffering especially if the question is facetious, totally unwarranted.
YOU NEED TO STIR FORCE TO DO THINGS, IF YOU ASK SOMEONE IF THEY ARE READY TO DROP, YOU ARE ASKING THEM IF THEY ARE READY TO DO SOMETHING THAT STIRS THEM AND IT IS NEVER MERIT BUT DEMERIT WITH PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR YOU. LEAVE ACTIONS TO OTHERS, IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS EXCEPT IF YOU WANT YOUR HEAD CHOPPED.
A TOTALLY WRONG UNDERSTANDING:
Miracle babies: Mother defies odds of one in five million to deliver twins from SEPARATE wombs
Just because she delivered extremely rare twins does not mean and never means she defied the odds. Defying odds is the person’s false perception and understanding that he wants to convert others to with deadly karma.
THERE WAS NEVER ANY DEFIANCE INVOLVED EXCEPT IN THE DELUDED PERSON’S FALSE PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING HE DOES NOT REALIZE WILL END IN INSANITY.
Predicting the rise of planes is no marvel:
Boy of 12 who was the Nostradamus of 1913 predicted the rise of planes and bicycles
The Buddha said there have been countless Ages each lasting countless years and they are basically replays with some variations of the same settings over and over again. For instance in one eternity, there was a magnificent city in India and in another eternity this was a magnificent Sala forest, in one age people live 100 years in another they lived 1000 years.
THUS THE RISE OF PLANES OR COMPUTERS OR HANDPHONES IS NOT UNPRECEDENTED, IN PAST EONS THERE HAVE BEEN COMPUTERS AND HANDPHONES AND IT IS POSSIBLE FOR BEINGS TO REMEMBER PARTIALLY OR TOTALLY ALL THEIR PAST LIVES AND SO THUS REMEMBERING IT IS NOT SUCH A MARVEL THAT HAVING SEEN PLANES IN PAST EXISTENCES THEY PREDICT THEM.
BNP for one:
BNP for one insists that it is in nothing like the same poor shape as many UK and US banks back in 2008.
Truly understanding what is presented to you, how do you understand ‘BNP for one’?
He is not the first to speak thus and it is copied from others. It sounds nice or impressive but it is senseless and therefore controlled insanity for him and for those who accept it as meaningless.
There is no need to say ‘for one’, it is totally irrelevant and is only there to exaggerate or hype. The substance of the matter is BNP insists that is in good shape.
‘For one’ does not add meaning but distracts:
“For one’ not only requires effort and memory to rehash, not only does it not add any meaning to the situation, it distracts, creates unnecessary diversion from the matter at hand and so it is evil never true, meaningful or good.
Why people have a mentality:
People talk of the male mentality, female mentality, Malaysian, Chinese, American mentality, yet do they understand what it means?
A person’s or a subset of persons’ mentality is his or their way of perceiving or interpreting happenings and responding to them that is stereotyped in them (eg male, Malay) and differs from others (eg females, Chinese).
The only way possible for a person to have a mentality is if his way of perceiving and reacting to events is programmed and he is a robot.
THUS WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT MENTALITY IN PEOPLE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT PROGRAMMING AND IT IS AN UNWITTING ADMISSION PEOPLE HERE ARE ALL ROBOTS.
IMF warns of new threat to banks
The International Monetary Fund warns that the global financial system is more vulnerable now than at any time since the 2008 financial crisis.
You may think what is spoken is the truth but it may be far from the truth.
Supposed the banks are insolvent or its assets are worth far less than listed or it is running out of money to maintain its banking activities, would it be accurate or true to warn of a new threat to banks or is it an euphemism, a vague false statement that avoids saying the truth?
And so it is that mankind may be far less capable of telling the truth that it imagines. A lot of the truth you hear are niceties, euphemisms to avoid the unpalatable truth.
Blogged
No comments:
Post a Comment