Impenetrable world
Kim Jong-il's death announcement surprised all, but is no intel failure
Just because his death announcement surprised ‘all’ does not justify the conclusion it is an impenetrable world.
His death announcement surprised some never all and so he is speaking falsely apart from making a false illogical presumptuous conclusion that the world is impenetrable. He is headed for suffering, insanity.
Anyone reading who does not understand what is said is false and to be rejected or does not know what to make of it must experience disturbance of his mind. Only the person who understands what is said as false and in what ways it is false is not disturbed.
CORRECTLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS PRESENTED TO YOU IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE EVENTS HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES FOR A PERSON NOT JUST IMMEDIATELY BUT EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY AFTERWARDS. THIS IS A WORLD OF MANY DANGERS AND ANYONE WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND FALSELY EXPOSES HIMSELF TO LOSS AND HARM, IF YOU PARTAKE OF WHAT CREATES DEADLY KARMA AS RECOMMENDED BY OTHERS (EG GAMBLE OR DRINK OR MOCK OTHERS), YOU WILL BE DRAG TO EVEN HELL, TO EVEN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
THE PERSON WITH CORRECT UNDERSTANDING IS SAFE, HE KNOWS WHAT TO ACCEPT AND WHAT TO REJECT. HE CAN SEE THROUGH THE DECEIT, DELUSIONS AND MACHINATIONS OF OTHERS.
Brazil and Barca
Why Neymar and co still have much to learn from Messi's Barcelona
Exactly what he has in mind can be known, if not by him then by those who discern.
What he calls learning is false, not learning, what he means is ‘copy’, Neymar has much to copy from Messi.
There is nothing to learn or truly understand in soccer, because it is false and meaningless, what there is in soccer is to copy and program is about observing others play, the tactics they employ and copying yourself, with adaptions or individual touches.
THERE MAY BE NOTHING THAT CAN BE LEARNT IN SOCCER, SOCCER IS NOT ABOUT LEARNING BUT PROGRAMMING HOW TO PLAY THE GAME, PROGRAMMING ABOUT WHAT THE RULES ARE AND COPYING OTHERS’ ‘SKILLS’ AND TACTICS TO BE SUCCESSFUL AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LEARNING BUT IT IS MECHANICAL PROCESS OF OBSERVING, REMEMBERING, PRACTICING TO REHASH FROM MEMORY AND BECOMING EVEN A SLICK EXECUTOR OF WHAT YOU PROGRAMMED YOURSELF.
First the cronyism, now race creeps in:
Without seeing and knowing it is true that initially there was (only) cronyism without racism and now racism is creeping in, you are fabricating unnecessarily risking future suffering saying so that is never derived from reason but emotion to speak to mock. The purpose to speak first the cronyism now race is to mock or deride and that is about stirring force not reason and what is said is never what actually happened but a fabrication.
It is a form of rehashed robot-speak that correspond to the pattern, ‘first the X, then the Y’ eg first the carrot, now the stick and it is a sign the person is a robot whose speech is programmed. It is copied from others because there are many who speak according to this pattern, “First X, now Y”.
Joyful resides the man not stirred:
Once my mind is centred (as described by the Buddha), I am not stirred by things happening eg what I read on the internet, by sudden sounds, by having to get up, by the phone ringing, unlike in the past.
It is my experience that existence is far more exquisitely blissful if I am not disturbed by things happening (eg someone coughing aggressively or spitting in my presence) compared with if I am stirred or provoked or upset.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES IF THEY THINK THEY ARE CAPABLE OF NOT BEING STIRRED, EVEN A SLIGHT SQUEAK IS ENOUGH TO STIR OR DISTURB THEM. THEY HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE INCOMPARABLY SANER AND HAPPIER EXISTENCE OF ONE WHOSE MENTAL FORCE IS NOT PROVOKED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHATEVER IS HAPPENING. NOT ONLY IS IT A HAPPY DWELLING HERE, EVEN 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS AWAITS SOMEONE WHO IS SKILLFUL IN DWELLING UNPERTURBED.
THIS WAS TAUGHT BY THE BUDDHA, THE FULLY SELF AWAKENED ONE AND I HAVE REALIZED IT, EXPERIENCED IT MYSELF, SO HOW CAN THE BUDDHA BE A FAKE WHEN NO ONE ELSE WILL POINT THIS OUT TO YOU?
Laughing, smiling and joking disturb the mind:
Laughing, smiling and joking always disturbs or stirs the mind and after the mind is disturbed or stirred it takes time for it to resettle and before it resettles, there is an urge to renew the disturbance such that in time the mind is constantly disturbed or stirred and this is never a pleasure it is made to be but torment that can reach homicidal or suicidal levels.
SO LAUGH, SMILE AND JOKE ALL YOU WANT, UPHOLD THEM AS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD BUT YOU MAY BE PUTTING A NOOSE OF DISTURBANCE ON YOUR MIND THAT WILL RUN OUT OF CONTROL SO THAT YOU WANT TO KILL YOURSELF.
I hear, even better but I am not disturbed:
Nowadays with my mind centred, I hear even better than before but I am not disturbed by what I hear. Once a person is disturbed he not only suffers but he is distracted and so he hears worse, misses things that are actually there.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO HEAR BUT NOT BE STIRRED BUT YOU NEED A MIND THAT IS STEADY LIKE A MOUNTAIN, TRULY UNSHAKEABLE, UNMOVEABLE TO DO SO AND IT IS OBTAINED THROUGH TRAINING YOURSELF NOT TO BE STIRRED BY NOT SMILING, NOT LAUGHING, NOT JOKING, MEDITATING TO CALM YOUR MIND UNTIL YOUR MENTAL FORCE STOPS STIRRING, HAS COME TO A REST AND BECOMES RELUCTANT TO BE STIRRED.
The big thing:
''The big thing Harvey Norman's got going for it is we've got sites in every town in Australia,'' says Harvey.
“The big thing” is a trendy vague term that can be copied and applied to many situations and so it suits people who are robots.
“The big thing” is an inappropriate expression because what is meant is ‘a major advantage’.
THE BIG THING IS VAGUE ROBOT LINGO COPIED FROM OTHERS AND DOES NOT FIT THE SITUATION. ‘A MAJOR ADVANTAGE’ IS NOT THE SAME AS ‘THE BIG THING’ WHICH CAN HAVE A VARIETY OF MEANING LIKE ‘THE IMPORTANT THING.
BECAUSE IT IS INCORRECT AND YOU PERCEIVE IT AS OK, THAT IS TRAINING SELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE PERCEPTION THAT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.
Again ‘got going for it’ is slang improper nonspecific language that is the way to future suffering not happiness. This is how someone’s speech is labelled as hackneyed, clichéd, cut and paste rehashed.
Neat places?
Bill Gates: "They (his family) thought it would be fun to come down and see some of the neat places around Australia. Sydney is a great place and it's summer here. Wish it was a tiny bit warmer, but it hasn't been too bad"
“Neat” has specific meaning and by ‘neat’ he means something else apart from the traditional meaning of ‘tidy’. What he may have meant is ‘wow’ places, ‘cool’ places and even these are false because there is never anything ‘wow’ or ‘cool’ about a place except in his false perception. “Scenic” or beautiful places are the correct epithets if you do not want to court insanity.
PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE VERY CLEVER, THEY THINK THEY ARE VERY IMPRESSIVE USING UNCONVENTIONAL ‘CHIC’ TERMS LIKE ‘NEAT’ TO DESCRIBE PLACES, WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT THEY MAY BE PLACING A NOOSE OF FUTURE INSANITY ON THEIR NECKS.
30% Australian bank funds sourced internationally:
Quote: Australian banks are exposed to any rising borrowing costs associated with tighter credit on international markets because they source about a third of their funds from outside Australia.
Without the availability of international funds, Australian banks would have 30% less money to lend and the economy would not have been boosted as much. It is likely if not certainly this money was spent wastefully on consumption rather than productively.
THE SOURCING OF FUNDS FROM OVERSEAS ENABLES CONSUMERS IN MANY COUNTRIES TO SPEND MORE THAN THEY WOULD IF SUCH FUNDS WERE OFF LIMITS AND IF SUCH BORROWINGS WERE SPENT ON CONSUMPTION RATHER THAN PRODUCTIVELY, THE CONSEQUENCES IN INSOLVENCY IS EVEN DIRE.
US durable goods orders jump 3.8%
Orders for durable manufactured goods in the US rose by more than expected in November, official figures show.
People get optimistic even excited by such news when it reflects wrong understanding and false logic.
Only when society is making meaningful progress in repaying its mountain of debt and at the same time maintaining and even increasing spending that stimulates the economy would there be cause to think we are recovering.
US durable goods orders jumping will benefit the companies making the goods, improving their profits by further draining wealth from the system that buys those durable goods. What benefit in increased employment created by such increased orders is only an adjunct to assist in the relentless transfer of wealth that ultimately depletes the system and fattens the corporate minority.
ONLY WHEN CONSUMERS & NATIONS ARE MAKING SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS IN PARING DOWN THEIR MOUNTAINS OF DEBTS WHILST MAINTAINING OR INCREASING EXPENDITURE THAT KEEPS THE ECONOMY AFLOAT SHOULD THERE BE CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM THAT THINGS ARE ON THE MEND. SUCH ISOLATED DURABLE GOODS ORDERS ‘JUMP’ ARE FLASHES IN THE PAN THAT STIR PEOPLE WITH FALSE UNDERSTANDING, SUCH INCREASE WILL BOOST COMPANY PROFITS THAT FURTHER DRAINS WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM AND WHETHER THE SYSTEM CAN AFFORD IT IS ANOTHER MATTER, WHATEVER INCREASE IN EMPLOYMENT ACCOMPANYING IS MERELY TO ASSIST IN THE ONGOING TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW.
(What I say may be wrong but is there anyone who tenders such an opinion in this world, no economist will subscribe to the scenario I paint and yet I may be largely correct. If I am correct, it means this world has a totally wrong understanding about economics, they are deluded).
He doesn’t believe in God:
'I was an atheist at eight': Ricky Gervais caught up in Twitter spat with Christians after saying he doesn't believe in God
What is said is not the truth but false. It is not a matter of whether he believes in God but he is upholding himself in his disbelief in God and he harbours animosity or resentment against a God he says he does not believe in.
IT IS ALWAYS WRONG, NEVER RIGHT (UNJUSTIFIED) TO SAY YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD WHICH IS ADOPTING A POSITION WITHOUT KNOWING THAT IS THE PATH TO FALSITY AND SUFFERING. THE MAN OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING CAN ONLY ADOPT THE POSITION, “I DO NOT KNOW IF GOD EXISTS” AND THAT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM BELIEVING OR NOT BELIEVING IN GOD.
NOT ONLY IS THE PERSON SPEAKING FALSELY, UNJUSTLY SAYING HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN GOD, THAT IS NOT WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE HE IS ADOPTING A STANCE THAT HE IS DEFENDING AND PROUD OF AND HE HARBORS ANIMOSITY OR RESENTMENT OR OPPOSITION TO GOD THAT BELIES HIS STATED DISBELIEF. IN OTHER WORDS NOT ONLY DOES HE NOT BELIEVE IN GOD, HE HAS ANIMOSITY TOWARDS GOD AND HE IS DEFIANT.
Animosity to God is always concomitant with disbelief:
Whether a person harbours animosity to God in his disbelief of God is not a matter of maybe or subjective but it is objective because he is adopting a position that God is not possible without knowing that this is the case.
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD IS ALWAYS A REJECTION OF GOD AND BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN KNOW THIS IS TRUE, IT IS AN EMOTION DRIVEN STATEMENT OF PREJUDICE, REJECTION OR ANIMOSITY WHICH SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED BY HIMSELF EXCEPT THAT HE IS A DELUDED FOOL NOT REALIZING HE IS PRESENTING HIMSELF INTO THE ARMS OF WOE BY ADOPTING A POSITION WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING IT IS TRUE THERE IS NO GOD.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WITH NO ANIMOSITY OR PREJUDICE AGAINST GOD TO EXPRESS DISBELIEF IN GOD.
What's Firefox worth to Google? Nearly $1 billion
Sure, this has been a year of growing pains for Firefox, but the renewed search deal that parent Mozilla reached with Google could be just what the doctor ordered.
This is a false totally unnecessary statement that trains the person in false perception and logic that ends in mad perception and logic that is never fun but terrible suffering.
Just because Google paid millions to Firefox to remain its search engine does not mean it is worth that much to Google nor is it possible to put a true figure to it.
SUFFICE TO SAY GOOGLE PAID FIREFOX SO MUCH TO REMAIN ITS SEARCH ENGINE BUT TO SAY IT IS WORTH SO MUCH IS UNNECESSARILY, PRESUMPTUOUSLY JUMPING TO CONCLUSION THAT TRAINS YOU FURTHER TO FALSELY PERCEIVE AND REASON.
IT IS TOTALLY UNWARRANTED, MISLEADING SELF AND OTHERS TO SAY FIREFOX IS WORTH 1 BILLION TO GOOGLE.
Firefox’s cost not worth:
Firefox costs Google $1 billion not worth because it is what Google had to pay to remain the main search engine. Firefox’s worth depends on the profits it will bring to Google through its association with Firefox.
THUS A LOT OF THINGS PEOPLE SAY AND ACCEPT AS TRUE ARE FALSE, MISLEADING.
Reason to believe in God, never not to believe God:
There is reason to believe in God even though you do not know He exists but there is never reason not to believe in God except driven by ill will (hate) & haughtiness.
There is reason to believe in God even though you do not know if He exists because life here is uniformly suffering even to tormenting levels, everyone here is hounded by lurking death and fears and if there is a possibility of escape, of eternal life free of suffering and persecution from others then the reasonable man would explore and keep faith in the possibility for the sake of escaping suffering.
The person who is angry or hateful or resentful because he is suffering, not entirely at the hands of others, he himself has much to blame for the suffering he experiences, is defiant and thus defiant, he adopt the position, “I do not believe in God” when the reasonable man will say, “I do not see or know if God exists or He doesn’t”.
BECAUSE OF THE TERRIBLE SUFFERING ACCOMPANYING LIFE HERE, THERE IS REASON FOR PEOPLE TO BELIEVE IN GOD EVEN IF THEY DO NOT KNOW HE EXISTS OR NOT BUT THERE IS NEVER TRUE REASON NOT TO BELIEVE IN GOD EXCEPT OUT OF DEFIANCE AND ANIMOSITY.
Living within means mandates serious recession:
If it is possible to live beyond one’s means in perpetuity, the current potentially deadly crisis would not have happened. It is because it is not possible to live beyond one’s means forever that the current crisis has happened.
Because the lifestyle in the recent past was based on living beyond one’s means, based on unfettered reckless borrowing which may have depleted savers’ savings even many times over, to begin to live within one’s means automatically means much less consumption plus a need to make reparations or repay borrowings, the reality that is inevitable, for one with true understanding, is a serious if not severe extended downturn in the economy and even the earth’s resources are not depleted to permit, if we are not going to dig ourselves another hole in the future, it means permanently living within our means in the future and that means a substantially subdued consumption.
IF YOU ACCEPT AS FACT THAT THE CONSUMPTION OF THE PAST WAS MASS LIVING BEYOND MEANS DEPLETING THE SAVINGS OF SAVERS EVEN MANY TIMES OVER DUE TO BANK RECYCLING OF DEPOSITS AND TAPPING INTERNATIONAL MARKETS FOR MONEY TO LEND LOCALLY, THEN THE FACT THAT WE HAVE TO BE FORCED BY CIRCUMSTANCES TO START LIVING WITHIN OUR MEANS, MEANS A SERIOUS DOWNTURN IN CONSUMPTION THAT MUST BE EXTENDED IF NOT PERMANENT (WE CANNOT GO BACK TO ‘THE GOOD OLD DAYS’ OF PROFLIGACY) AND THIS DOWNTURN WILL BE MADE WORSE BY NEED TO REPAY DEBTS THAT FURTHER REDUCES INCOME FOR SPENDING.
NOW THERE ARE JOKERS IN THE PACK, TOO MUCH MONEY IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF TOO FEW AND THE MAJORITY HAVE LOST JOBS, LOST SAVINGS IN BANKS RECKLESSLY LENT OUT OR THEY HAVE FOOLISHLY SADDLED THEMSELVES WITH CRIPPLING DEBTS, ASSET BUBBLES (SHARES, PROPERTIES) MEANS THERE IS AN EVEN FATAL MISMATCH BETWEEN ACTUAL AND VIRTUAL WEALTH THAT CANNOT BE RESOLVED WITHOUT TERRIBLE PAIN, MANY MULTINATIONALS HAVE FATALLY SEPARATED THEIR PRODUCTION TO CENTRES OF LOW COST TO SELL TO CENTRES OF HIGH PROFIT DEPRIVING CONSUMERS IN HIGH PROFIT CENTRES OF VITAL JOBS. AGAIN POWERFUL SPECULATORS HAVE CORNERED OR SERIOUSLY INFESTED COMMODITY MARKETS IN THE NAME OF PROFIT DRIVING UP CRUCIAL COMMODITIES LIKE OIL TO UNREALISTIC LEVELS THAT CRIPPLE ECONOMIES.
The iPad is a consumptive device not productive tool:
Whatever productive usage of many innovations like the Apple iPad is dwarfed by its principal purpose, which is for useless consumption or pleasure. Similarly even though Microsoft’s Office suite is for productivity purposes, it has morphed through much jazzing up or for show adornment ‘improvements’ to greatly increase it costs in relation to its usefulness. In other words a lot of the improvements are gimmicks that cost money and add little value. You may say making films provide jobs for many people apart from actors, actresses and directors, provide jobs in cinemas and what nots, but films are themselves not tools for productivity but consumption. In the same way many industries like sports (golf, football), gambling (casinos and resort cities), alcohol (pubs, breweries), airplanes and airlines (tourists and social visit passengers far exceed business travellers), even housing and construction are tailored far more for useless consumption than productivity. Whilst cars may have some productivity uses, they are overwhelmingly vehicles for leisure or consumption use.
IF ONE EXAMINES WITH DISCERNMENT ALL THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OF MANKIND, THEY ARE OVERWHELMINGLY GEARED TOWARDS CONSUMPTION, EVEN PROFLIGATE CONSUMPTION WAY BEYOND MEANS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE RETURNS, THEY ARE MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN AND SO IF SUCH CONSUMPTION WAS BASED ON BORROWING IT MEANS BORROWING TO THROW MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN THAT WILL NOT GENERATE RETURNS TO HELP REPAY BORROWINGS AND THAT MEANS THESE FOOLISH BORROWERS ARE IN FOR TERRIBLE PAIN WHEN THE TIME COMES TO MEET THEIR LOAN SHARKS.
When banks can't borrow, they can't lend.
This is a statement by BBC’s Robert Peston about the current euro crisis. Does he or mankind’s erudite fraternity understand what that means?
Why is it that banks must borrow in order to lend? Banks are supposed to receive depositors’ money and scrupulously lent it to needy borrowers so if you say that banks cannot lend if they cannot borrow, it means they have exhausted depositors’ money and they need to borrow in order to lend.
IT SHOULD NOT BE A CASE THAT BANKS NEED TO BORROW FROM OTHERS TO LEND, BANKS SHOULD HAVE AMPLE FUNDS FROM DEPOSITORS WHO ENTRUST THEIR MONEY TO THE BANKS AND SO THE FACT THAT BANKS NEED TO BE ABLE TO BORROW TO LEND MEANS THERE IS SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH THEM, THEY HAVE LOST SAVERS’ MONEY AND NEED TO BORROW TO KEEP AFLOAT.
A statement that makes no sense:
When banks cannot borrow they cannot lend is spoken as if it is a truism, very logical and correct when it is illogical, demands explanation why this should be the case.
Normally banks do not rely on borrowings as a source of funds, they have an ample source of funds from money deposited in them by the public and so the fact that banks need to borrow in order to lend should raise questions as to the solvency of banks, as to the safety or integrity of money deposited in them.
WHAT KIND OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS IT THAT POINTS OUT TO OTHERS THAT ‘WHEN BANKS CANNOT BORROW THEY CANNOT LEND’ AS IF IT IS NATURAL, PERFECTLY LOGICAL WHEN IT IS INDICATION OF ABNORMALITY, THAT BANKS MUST HAVE DEPLETED, OVER-STRETCHED THEMSELVES IN ORDER TO REACH THE STAGE WHERE THEY NEED TO BORROW IN ORDER TO KEEP LENDING.
Silent Night? Not With Us
What says Christmas to me is a chorus of voices, all talking at once.
The person is practicing false associations that will lead to future torment and he is also training others in false associations that harm them with karma due for advocating false associations.
Silent night has nothing to do with Christmas being a chorus of voices all taking at once, it is a false association conjured up to stir irony or contradiction or conflict or emotion or force in self and others.
THAT ‘SILENT NIGHT’ IS LINKED TO THE MATTER UNDER DISCUSSION IS FABRICATED, A FALSE ASSOCIATION DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO STIR EMOTION OR CONFLICT OR IRONY IN OTHERS THAT WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ‘A’ IS ‘B’. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING SILENT NIGHT INTO THE DISCUSSION AT ALL, IT IS A FALSE, FRIVOLOUS ASSOCIATION THAT CONDITIONS SELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE ASSOCIATIONS THAT HAVE CONSEQUENCES IN SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT YOU THAT IT IS NOT WITH YOU? IF YOU DON’T AGREE WITH THE CACOPHONY, YOU DON’T JOIN IN, WHY TAKE ISSUE WITH ‘SILENT NIGHT’?
TAKE ISSUE WITH THE ‘ALL AT ONCE CACOPHONY’ DON’T TAKE ISSUE WITH SILENT NIGHT BY SPEAKING THUS. IF YOU ARE DECRYING THE SENSELESS CACOPHONY, WHY LAMENT THAT IT IS NOT THE SILENT NIGHT WITH YOU? IF YOU APPROVE THE CACOPHONY, WHY DECRY SILENT NIGHT? ARE YOU MAD?
For them age is just a number:
This is a newspaper headline. If you do not understand what you hear you should not accept and report it or pass it on, without understanding and you pass it on, you are training yourself to have doubt and uncertainty, one of three lower fetters the Buddha said led to future woe not happiness.
If by ‘to them age is just a number’ you mean they don’t care about getting old then that is a false conclusion because you don’t care about getting old is not synonymous with ‘age is just a number’.
AGE IS NEVER JUST A NUMBER, BECAUSE AGE IS A COMMONLY ACCEPTED YARDSTICK CONVEYING HOW OLD A PERSON IS AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY IF BY ‘AGE IS JUST A NUMBER’ YOU MEAN ‘THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT AGE’.
Only a number is a number:
If you do not want to go mad, you should only accept a number as a number, anything else is not just a number except in your delusion or false understanding that is the path to future woe.
Thus age is not just a number but it is the number of years or months or whatever yardstick of time the object has been in existence.
Black is not good, only good is good. She can be a good woman but woman is not good.
ANYONE WHO SAYS ‘A’ IS ‘B’, ‘AGE’ IS ‘JUST A NUMBER’ IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY.
Weak consumer spending hits US growth hopes
Consumer spending in America rose by less than expected in November, casting fresh doubt on the country's economic recovery.
Consumer spending is the ‘kingpin’ for economic growth and so it is that consumption not true productivity is the drive for the economy.
Consumption means for usage (and usually to be discarded immediately or some time later) not for productive or constructive purposes that lasts and contributes to accruing wealth and improvements in the system.
And so if consumption is the kingpin of the economy and bearing in mind the unproductive or wasteful nature of consumption, one of true understanding will ensure that it is done well within the ability to afford of the society rather than borrowing even extensively to fuel that consumption.
EVEN TODAY PEOPLE ARE LOOKING TO CONSUMPTION TO ‘KICKSTART’ THE MORIBUND ECONOMY WHEN CONSUMPTION WAY IN EXCESS OF AFFORDABILITY WAS THE REASON WHY WE ARE IN SUCH A MESS. WHEN PEOPLE ARE FULL OF DEBTS, LOSING OR CANNOT FIND JOBS, ECONOMISTS ARE LOOKING TO CONSUMPTION AS THEIR SAVIOURS, HOPING THAT CONSUMPTION BY PEOPLE DROWNING IN DEBTS WOULD COME RIDING TO THE RESCUE OF THE ECONOMY. SUCH THINKING REFLECTS DELUSION, NO UNDERSTANDING. RATHER THAN DOING SOMETHING, THEY ARE ANXIOUSLY LOOKING FOR A BOOST OF CONSUMPTION TO (SOMEHOW, THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW) COME RIDING TO THE RESCUE.
Hoping for the best:
Rather than fully understanding what when wrong, the scale of the problem, knowing what the problems are and what the correct answers are, mankind may be like Nero fiddling whilst Rome burns, tinkering here and there (printing money, lowering interest rates) whilst looking anxiously at data (eg consumer spending) to signal all is over or we are back on track to recovery.
TINKERING WITHOUT KNOWING AND HOPING FOR THE BEST IS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH FULLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE CRISIS IS AND TAKING CORRECT STEPS TO REDRESS (EG CHARGE AND CHANGE THE BANKERS, POLITICIANS, BAN SPECULATORS FROM OIL MARKETS). IF THE PAST BOOM IS HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON CONSUMPTION THAT WAS WAY BEYOND MEANS, IT IS A PIPE DREAM (DELUSION) THAT YOU CAN (SOMEHOW) QUICKLY RETURN TO CONSUMPTION WAY BEYOND MEANS AND HAPPILY EVER AFTER.
Deadly Nigeria attacks condemned
There is no need to condemn the attacks, they are wrong or evil and this condemnation is merely an empty useless, painful of stirring of emotion that also stirs others’ emotions with debt not merit incurred. Condemned means they are angry, upset but it is effete or powerless, you cannot bring the culprit to account.
Jesus spoke of condemnation, “by your words you will be condemned”. There is a difference between his condemnation and human condemnation. Divine condemnation is not based on stirred emotion or wrath but reason and God knows who is involved and what happened and He can and will punish those guilty.
DIVINE CONDEMNATION IS NOT BASED ON WRATH AND IT HAS BACKING, GOD CAN AND WILL PUNISH THOSE INVOLVED, CONDEMNED MEANS YOU ARE DOOMED TO REPAY.
HUMAN CONDEMNATION IS A STIRRING OF IRE, ANGER THAT IS USELESS AND SUFFERING TO SELF AND OTHERS AND IT IS POWERLESS, THERE IS NO ABILITY TO PUNISH CULPRITS.
BY DIVINE CONDEMNATION IS MEANT YOU ARE SENTENCED TO BE PUNISHED, TO REPAY, BY HUMAN CONDEMNATION IS MEANT YOU ARE DESPISED, A PARIAH.
Mankind’s wrong understanding of condemnation:
What condemnation truly means is that you are destined, sentenced to repay. What mankind understands by condemnation is incurring wrath or cursed.
Here as everywhere, mankind thinks it truly understands but it may be delusion. The fact that people can still insist that condemnation has an element of stirred ire or wrath, is stirred wrath reflects the intensity of their false perception.
It is impossible for condemnation to mean stirred wrath because stirred wrath is a blind meaningless exercise of force and for condemnation to be meaningful, something about substance, it must mean something rational like sentenced or destined to repay.
“Sentenced to repay” is about something meaningful, “directing my wrath or stirred repulsive mental force or hate at you for the action” is about a meaningless exercise of force.
CONDEMNATION IS SOMETHING WORTHLESS OR MEANINGLESS IF IT STANDS FOR A HATEFUL STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN RELATIONSHIP TO AN EVENT. IF BY CONDEMNATION IS MEANT YOU ARE DOOMED TO REPAY THEN THAT IS A MEANINGFUL.
US consumer spending disappoints
Anyone who is disappointed is practicing controlled insanity that ends in torment never happiness. US consumer spending may be lower or depressed, never disappointing; it is the stirred mental force of the perceiver to be disliking, sad or hurt that makes it disappointing and it is conditioning or addictive such that the person is increasingly prone to be helplessly stirred to be disappointed or excited by happenings. The stirring of mental force is always suffering and meaningless and so it is controlled insanity or suffering to be disappointed by events.
FURTHER YOU HAVE KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING TELLING OTHERS IT IS DISAPPOINTING WHEN IT IS NOT SO, IT IS MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL TO WANT OTHERS TO BE DISAPPOINTED BY THE NEWS.
The King of Death:
Whatever the Buddha says must be true and many times the Buddha has referred to the King of Death and so there must be such an entity and if you refute the Buddha without knowing you are correct, you are asking for doubt and uncertainty adopting a position without knowing it is true there is no King of Death.
Death is not blameless or without a king, death has cause and it has a king and that king is the Devil or Satan or Mara and he finds everyone, pursues everyone and overcomes everyone except those like the Buddha who have gone to the place where the King of death cannot find him.
Even divine beings are subject to death, to passing away, when their merit is exhausted then after lifespans that may be 1,2,4, 500 up to 60,000 eternities in heaven, they pass away even to hell or the animal womb. Similarly it is demerit that causes beings to be born in hell even for many eternities and after the exhaustion of that demerit, they are released from hell.
THE KING OF DEATH HAS ACCESS TO AND HOUNDS AND TRIES TO TRICK EVERYONE TO CONTINUE EXISTING AND SUCCUMB TO PAINFUL DEATH, ONLY THE BUDDHA AND THOSE ENLIGTHENED HAVE ESCAPED THE CLUTCHES OF THE KING OF DEATH, HAS GONE TO WHERE THE KING OF DEATH CANNOT GO.
DEATH HAS A KING, NOT WITHOUT A KING AND THE KING IS THE DEVIL AND HE PURSUES EVERYONE, WANTS EVERYONE TO BE SUBJECT TO DEATH AND SUFFERING.
Obama in tax victory over House
There is a crucial difference between success and victory, if it is a success rather than victory you are cultivating false perception in yourself and others talking about victory.
Victory implies celebration, vanquishing; if what is involved is successful persuasion of the house to pass the bill, you are speaking erroneously with suffering due.
China's place in the world economy
China’s place is never something true or objective but it is a consideration, a fabrication of the mind that this fool wants to implant in others. The motive for conjecturing China’s place in the world economy is not to determine the truth, but driven by calculation, the person greedy for gains is interested (attracted) to know China’s place that may have material implications for him.
There is no need to determine China’s place in the world economy, it is not something that exists but created or fabricated and then imagined as if it is fact, is subject to dispute and it is driven by being calculating that the Buddha said is never the path to heaven.
THE PERSON WHO IS ALWAYS CALCULATING, EVEN WITHOUT REALIZING, TRYING TO ASSESS WHAT IS IN IT FOR HIM, WHAT VALUE THIS AND THAT IS HEADED FOR TORMENT NEVER HAPPINESS.
When the king of death finds you:
When the king of death finds someone, he is never up to any good but he attempts to seize and grapple the person to death and it is the being’s resistance to overcome the King of death that enables him to survive but the relentless assault of death ultimately overwhelms him and he finally dies.
DEATH DOES NOT STALK A PERSON ONLY AT THE END OF HIS LIFE BUT DAILY DEATH STALKS ALL BEINGS EXISTING IN THIS WORLD. THE DAILY INUNDATION OR FLOOD OF STRESS, THE STRUGGLE TO WAKE UP AND SHAKE OFF THE DARK FORCES OF GLOOM IN THE MORNING, THE PERIODIC VISITATION OF ILLNESSES AND DISEASES, INJURIES ARE ALL SYMPTOMATIC OF THE RELENTLESS ASSAULT OF DEATH THAT THE BEING STRUGGLES WITH ALL HIS MIGHT TO RESIST BUT IT IS ALWAYS A LOSING BATTLE THAT THE KING OF DEATH FINALLY WINS.
WHEN THE KING OF DEATH FINDS A PERSON, HE IS UP TO NO GOOD, UP TO INFLICT SUFFERING AND ENGAGE YOU IN BATTLE AND KILL YOU OFF.
Kit Siang has his hands full
IPOH: While the feud in Penang DAP continues between national chairman Karpal Singh and Deputy Chief Minister II Dr P. Ramasamy, party adviser Lim Kit Siang has his hands full with another squabble blowing up in Perak.
Having his hands full is often said as if it is funny or jovial or friendly but it is hypocritical intended to falsely dramatize to exploit for partisan gain.
Even if Lim Kit Siang has many problems, it does not mean his hands are full which is falsely said to dramatize as if he is besieged on all sides and DAP is a collapsing house to paint DAP negatively before the public.
WHATEVER FRIENDLINESS CONVEYED IS HYPOCRITICAL, THE NEWS IS STATED IN A WAY THAT IS INTENDED TO SMEAR DAP’S IMAGE.
Impossible Jesus and Buddha are fakes:
Reflecting their doubt and uncertainty, their lack of true understanding, even those who are faithful express reservations, are not sure if Jesus and the Buddha could be fakes when the person of true understanding knows it is impossible Jesus can be a fake, the Buddha is a fake.
Why is that so?
If something is true and crucially important (in terms of pointing to the way out of suffering) and no one in this world is capable of telling you and someone (extraordinary) comes along and points it out to you, it is impossible that person is a fake but he must be a real life person WITH EXCEPTIONAL WISDOM OR DISCERNMENT.
There are many things that Jesus has stated, pointed out to you that is true, leads to never before release from suffering even insanity here, leads to eternal life that he tells you is possible that no one here has ever or are capable of telling you, so how can he possibly be a fake except in your delusion or serious false perception or lack of true understanding?
Jesus said you shall not care for what you shall eat or wear and that is true because it is controlled insanity and does not work being obsessed with foods that are merely about chemical or force reactions that ultimately will kill you just as animals and plants must be killed for you to eat your fresh ‘health giving’ delicious food. Fussing about food is barking up the wrong tree that has deadly consequences because it leads to woe and death even for an eternity.
IF YOU TRULY DID NOT CARE FOR WHAT YOU SHALL EAT OR WEAR AS JESUS COMMANDED THEN YOU WILL HAVE A PLEASANT EXISTENCE HERE AND EVEN ETERNAL LIFE AWAITS YOU AFTER DEATH.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS JESUS SAID THAT IS TRUE, BENEFICIAL (EVEN EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL), NEVER BEFORE SAID, THAT NO ORDINARY PERSON CAN EVEN DREAM OF SAYING LET ALONE CAN SAY IT, SO HOW CAN JESUS BE POSSIBLY A FAKE? IT IS NOT THE FAULT OF AVAILABLE DATA THAT YOU ARE STILL UNCERTAIN IF JESUS IS REAL, IT IS YOUR FAULT, YOUR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS THE CAUSE FOR YOUR DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY WHICH THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE.
AGAIN THE BUDDHA TAUGHT, WHERE NO ONE WILL TELL YOU, THAT SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, FAITH IN RITUALS AND RULES AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ARE THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE. ANYONE WHO HAS UNDERSTOOD AND SHED HIS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, SHED RITUALS AND RULES, SHED HIS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY WILL KNOW WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT IS NOT ONLY TRULY BUT HIGHLY BENEFICIAL IN TERMS OF RELIEF OF SUFFERING HERE AND THEREAFTER.
BASED ON THE RECORD OF WHAT JESUS SAID, WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID, THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING KNOWS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE JESUS AND THE BUDDHA ARE FAKES, THEY ARE HISTORICAL FIGURES AND WHO THEY CLAIM TO BE BECAUSE WHAT THEY TAUGHT ARE TRUE AND EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL THAT NO ORDINARY MAN HERE CAN TELL YOU, LET ALONE FAKE TO GIVE YOU A DECEPTION THEY EXISTED WHEN THEY DID NOT.
I too cannot be a fake:
It is impossible that I can be a fake in anyway eg an imaginary being created by some ghost writer because what I say is true, extremely beneficial and no one can even imagine let alone tell you.
What is it that I have said that is true, beneficial that no one can imagine let alone tell you?
I said there is constant prolonging or stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness that is the source of constantly renewing insoluble stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate, that necessitates a robotic rehashing existence that is memory intensive and leads to destruction of your memory apparatus and thence dementia.
Without stopping stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness you cannot escape stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate to access the first higher state of mind and even one eternity of heavenly existence free of all suffering and disease.
BECAUSE WHAT I SAY ABOVE IS TRUE AND EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL HERE AND LEADS TO EVEN ETERNAL LIFE AND NO ONE HERE CAN EVEN IMAGINE THE TRUTH (EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS UNDER THEIR NOSES), LET ALONE TEACH YOU THIS, I CANNOT BE A FAKE BUT MUST BE SOMEONE OF EXCEPTIONAL WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT.
Trapped in a vast field of tall grass:
All beings here are trapped in a vast field of tall grass extending for great distances in all directions. Rather than the pleasure it is made to be, existence in this vast field of tall grasses is tormenting, there is disease, predators, dangers lurking behind the palisade of leaves apart from the insects, ants and mosquitos that assail. At the edges of field, should you manage to reach it is all round hell except for one corner where there is blissful repose or heaven.
Many are content to sit around idly, taking whatever suffering that comes their way like dumb chicken in the coop awaiting their slaughter after being fattened.
Of the few who are alarmed and tormented enough to seek escape, because of the tall grass through which they cannot see through, they may end up going around in circles not reaching safety even though it exists. Of the fewer who managed to head in a straight line, persist to finally reach the distant edges, they find hell greeting them.
The Buddha said he is the one who closes off the gates to suffering and opened the gate to safety and happiness and so it is that with their guidance, if a being were to move steadfast, unwavering in the direction they (Jesus and the Buddha) point, they will find safety and escape from the torment of existing in a blinding field of tall grass.
BEINGS HERE ARE TRAPPED IN A VAST FIELD OF TALL GRASS AND CANNOT SEE TO THE EDGES OF THE FIELD WHICH IS SURROUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY TORMENT, EVEN HELL. THUS EVEN IF THEY DESIRE ESCAPE THEY MAY END UP GOING AROUND IN CIRCLES OR SHOULD THEY FIND THE EDGE, FIND HELL INSTEAD OF SAFETY THAT EXIST ONLY IN ONE LITTLE CORNER.
WITHOUT A BEING LIKE THE BUDDHA OR JESUS POINTING OUT WHICH DIRECTION TO HEAD, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT BEINGS BY THEMSELVES SHOULD FIND ESCAPE FROM TERRIBLE SUFFERING EVEN THOUGH IT EXISTS.
"Suppose, monks, there were a large low-lying marsh, in dependence on which there lived a large herd of deer; and a certain malevolent man were to appear. He would close off the safe, restful path that led to their rapture, and would open up a false path, set out a decoy, and thus the large herd of deer would fall into ruin & disaster. Then suppose that a certain benevolent man were to appear. He would open up the safe, restful path that led to their rapture, would close off the false path.
"I have given this simile in order to convey a meaning. 'The large marsh' is a term for sensual pleasures. 'The large herd of deer' is a term for beings. 'The man not desiring their benefit is a term for Mara, the Evil One. 'The false path' is a term for the eightfold wrong path, 'The male decoy' is a term for passion & delight, ignorance. 'The man desiring their benefit is a term for the Tathagata. 'The safe, restful path is a term for the noble eightfold path, i.e., right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, & right concentration.
" Practice jhana (meditation), monks. Don't be heedless. Don't later fall into regret. "
Have you read the New Testament?
Without having read the New Testament and you cast judgment or opinion about the veracity of Jesus, you are unrighteous and asking for suffering if there be judgment and punishment.
If you have read the New Testament carefully and found that you cannot tell if Jesus is true or not or you think he is a fake then it proves you have false or no understanding.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HAVING READ THE NEW TESTAMENT, EVEN AFTER TAMPERING BY WICKED HUMAN HANDS TO COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT JESUS’ NATURE IS INCONCLUSIVE.
Amongst the many things Jesus taught, he said ‘let your yes be yes, anything more comes from evil’.
This is a true statement that if truly followed brings great benefits in relief from daily suffering for the person, it is wisdom that no ordinary person ever thought of, let alone that they can tell you.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE PEOPLE, EVEN FERVENT CHRISTIANS NEVER LET THEIR YES BE YES ONLY BUT SAY AND DO MUCH MORE THAT JESUS SAID COMES FROM EVIL (NEVER GOOD), EVERYONE HERE INCLUDING THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD ARE RECOMMENDING OTHERS TO NOT LET THEIR YES BE YES ONLY BUT TO SAY AND DO MUCH MORE.
BECAUSE NO ONE WILL TELL YOU THIS AND IT IS OF CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE IN ESCAPING SUFFERING HERE AND THEREAFTER, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO SAY THIS IF HE WAS A FAKE, NOT A TEACHER HE CLAIMS TO BE.
A happy sinless life here:
Anyone who truly puts into practice what Jesus commanded, ‘let your yes be yes only, anything more comes from evil’ would be free from evil and therefore leading a sinless or blameless life here. Furthermore, anyone who truly lets his yes be yes only will have a pleasant abiding here compared to those who do not let their yes be yes only and if there be eternal life and letting your yes be yes only is an essential requisite to eternal life then what Jesus taught points you even to eternal life.
Rushing and delaying is the more that according to Jesus comes from evil.
If you let your yes be yes only, you say or do it without rushing or delaying it. Speaking in a rushed or lingering (delaying) fashion is the more that Jesus said comes from evil.
THUS RUSHING AND DELAYING IS NEVER THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT ETERNAL PUNISHMENT. THE PERSON WHO NEITHER RUSHES NOR DELAYS, HE JUST DOES OR SAYS WHATEVER WITHOUT RUSHING/URGENCY, WITHOUT DELAYING OR DRAGGING OR BEATING AROUND THE BUSH, IS THE ONE WHO ENJOYS HIS LIFE HERE AND IS HEADED FOR SAFETY, ETERNAL LIFE.
DON’T BLAME THE NEW TESTAMENT OR JESUS IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT OR YOU ARE UNCERTAIN, BLAME YOUR FALSE OR ABSENT TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Let the punishment fit the crime
GUEST COLUMNISTS
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
The balance of evidence in the public domain does not indicate Anwar is guilty of sodomy but contrarily, it is a trumped up charge and by implying Anwar is guilty but he should not be punished harshly, Zaid is saying either he is privy to special information that tells him Anwar is guilty or he is gullible to think the prosecution case against Anwar is convincing.
IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR HIM TO WADE IN NOT REALIZING HE IS PUTTING HIS NECK IN A NOOSE BUT THE MOTIVE MAY BE TO LEND HIS WEIGHT TO HIS PERVERTED PERCEPTION THAT HE IS A FAIR MAN, EITHER IN DELUSION OR PREJUDICE HE THINKS ANWAR IS A SODOMIST BUT AS A FAIR RIGHTEOUS GOOD MAN HE THINKS HE IS, HE IS WRITING IN MITIGATION FOR ANWAR.
HE IS ALREADY CONVICTED ANWAR OF THE CRIME OF SODOMY AND HE IS PETITIONING FOR CLEMENCY ON ANWAR’S BEHALF. IF ANWAR IS NOT GUILTY HE IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT SPEAKING FALSELY MALIGNING ANWAR.
THERE ARE MANY WHO THINK THEY ARE VERY GOOD, THINK THEY ARE FAIR MINDED WHEN THEY ARE DELUDED. HE BETTER MAKE SURE HE KNOWS ANWAR IS GUILTY BEFORE PLEADING ON ANWAR’S BEHALF, OTHERWISE EVEN HIS HEAD IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD.
Anwar must be a non-practicing homosexual:
If Anwar is a homosexual, he must be a non-practicing homosexual because with such powerful enemies with access to police surveillance arrayed against him it would be suicidal and a matter of time before he is entrapped with irrefutable evidence against him. If one of his partners were to squeal, to succumb to bribery and ‘spill the beans’ Anwar would be finished.
HENCE ANWAR MUST BE A SUPERHUMAN SUPER CAREFUL HOMOSEXUAL OR HE IS A NON PRACTICING HOMOSEXUAL BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CANNOT BE NAILED BY THE POLICE SNOOPING ON HIM.
AND WITH ALL THE POLICE RESOURCES SNOOPING ON HIM, WITH THE TOP POLICE OFFICERS AWARE OF THE TRYSTS BETWEEN SAIFUL AND ANWAR BEFORE THE LAST ACT, THEY FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ENTRAP ANWAR BY VIDEO-AUDIO RECORDING, HE SAW A STREET SIDE DOCTOR ONLY 3 DAYS AFTER AND DNA SAMPLES WERE LEFT IN A DRAWER COLLECTING DUST FOR 3 DAYS.
YET ZAID WANTS YOU AND EVERYONE TO ACCEPT AS FACT ANWAR IS GUILTY AND PLEAD FOR ANWAR FOR LENIENCY.
UNLESS HE IS CORRECT, IT IS A VERY WICKED OR CRIMINAL ACT SUBJECT TO DIVINE IF NOT HUMAN PUNISHMENT.
Who will listen to Zaid?
Don’t address the public with your plea for leniency because the public cannot do anything for Anwar.
If you think the authorities will take into account your plea when it will fall on deaf ears then you are either deluded or doing something ineffective that will end in insanity. Only doing something that is useful will not end in insanity.
So either Zaid is very powerful, has clout with the authorities or he is deluded to plead when it will fall on deaf ears or he is Machiavellian, deceptive, trying to act as if a fair man but condemning Anwar as guilty in his eyes and because he is a person of stature, the public should follow suit and his plea is for adornment only, will not do anything for Anwar except serve Zaid himself to present himself as a fair minded man and to presumptuous brand Anwar as guilty.
IF THE AUTHORITIES WILL NOT LISTEN TO ZAID, WHAT HE IS SAYING IS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY OR IT IS JUST FOR SHOW, SELF SERVING TO SHOW HE IS A FAR MINDED MAN AND BY IMPLICATION, HE THINKS AND WANTS YOU TO THINK ANWAR IS GUILTY.
Think again:
Want a pet cat? Think again, researchers say
TEMPTED by the playful antics of that adorable kitten in the pet shop? If you've never had a cat before you may want to think again, especially if you have other allergies, researchers warn.
What is said is controlled insanity, dramatized and styled never a true statement.
There is no need to bring the subject of wanting a pet cat with the matter that it may cause allergies.
Often people speak overanxiously as if they are so concerned with your welfare but it is all for show with ulterior motive either because they want something from you or to impress you with their importance or authoritativeness.
Just because cats can cause allergies does not mean they are to be avoided as pets. How would you know if they will cause allergies until you have kept one?
Suffice to say cats can cause allergies and what they are, it is for show concern to ask people about wanting to keep a pet and ask them to think again.
WHAT IS SAID, THE WAY IT IS SAID IS NEVER LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY AS JESUS COMMANDED BUT MORE THAT COMES FROM EVIL AND NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY INSIST IT IS TRUE IT IS FABRICATED, HAS STYLE AND THE WAY TO INSANITY.
What is the subject?
Whenever you speak you must have a purpose otherwise you will go mad.
So, is the subject about cats causing allergies especially in those prone to allergies or is the subject whether you want to own a cat and you should think again about it?
If the topic is about cats causing allergies then you should stick to it rather than stray or side track yourself and others into talk about ownership and thinking again.
IF THE SUBJECT IS ABOUT CATS CAUSING ALLERGIES THEN YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS TO FALSELY ASSOCIATE BY DWELLING ON OTHER MATTERS; FURTHER IT MAY FALSELY INFLUENCE OTHERS TO THE DETRIMENT OF CATS BECAUSE THEY WILL THEN AVOID CATS. WHAT ABOUT BIRDS AND DOGS, THEY TOO CAN CAUSE ALLERGIES, SO YOU ADVOCATE NO PETS?
Kim Jong-il's death announcement surprised all, but is no intel failure
Just because his death announcement surprised ‘all’ does not justify the conclusion it is an impenetrable world.
His death announcement surprised some never all and so he is speaking falsely apart from making a false illogical presumptuous conclusion that the world is impenetrable. He is headed for suffering, insanity.
Anyone reading who does not understand what is said is false and to be rejected or does not know what to make of it must experience disturbance of his mind. Only the person who understands what is said as false and in what ways it is false is not disturbed.
CORRECTLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS PRESENTED TO YOU IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE EVENTS HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES FOR A PERSON NOT JUST IMMEDIATELY BUT EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY AFTERWARDS. THIS IS A WORLD OF MANY DANGERS AND ANYONE WHO DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND FALSELY EXPOSES HIMSELF TO LOSS AND HARM, IF YOU PARTAKE OF WHAT CREATES DEADLY KARMA AS RECOMMENDED BY OTHERS (EG GAMBLE OR DRINK OR MOCK OTHERS), YOU WILL BE DRAG TO EVEN HELL, TO EVEN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.
THE PERSON WITH CORRECT UNDERSTANDING IS SAFE, HE KNOWS WHAT TO ACCEPT AND WHAT TO REJECT. HE CAN SEE THROUGH THE DECEIT, DELUSIONS AND MACHINATIONS OF OTHERS.
Brazil and Barca
Why Neymar and co still have much to learn from Messi's Barcelona
Exactly what he has in mind can be known, if not by him then by those who discern.
What he calls learning is false, not learning, what he means is ‘copy’, Neymar has much to copy from Messi.
There is nothing to learn or truly understand in soccer, because it is false and meaningless, what there is in soccer is to copy and program is about observing others play, the tactics they employ and copying yourself, with adaptions or individual touches.
THERE MAY BE NOTHING THAT CAN BE LEARNT IN SOCCER, SOCCER IS NOT ABOUT LEARNING BUT PROGRAMMING HOW TO PLAY THE GAME, PROGRAMMING ABOUT WHAT THE RULES ARE AND COPYING OTHERS’ ‘SKILLS’ AND TACTICS TO BE SUCCESSFUL AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LEARNING BUT IT IS MECHANICAL PROCESS OF OBSERVING, REMEMBERING, PRACTICING TO REHASH FROM MEMORY AND BECOMING EVEN A SLICK EXECUTOR OF WHAT YOU PROGRAMMED YOURSELF.
First the cronyism, now race creeps in:
Without seeing and knowing it is true that initially there was (only) cronyism without racism and now racism is creeping in, you are fabricating unnecessarily risking future suffering saying so that is never derived from reason but emotion to speak to mock. The purpose to speak first the cronyism now race is to mock or deride and that is about stirring force not reason and what is said is never what actually happened but a fabrication.
It is a form of rehashed robot-speak that correspond to the pattern, ‘first the X, then the Y’ eg first the carrot, now the stick and it is a sign the person is a robot whose speech is programmed. It is copied from others because there are many who speak according to this pattern, “First X, now Y”.
Joyful resides the man not stirred:
Once my mind is centred (as described by the Buddha), I am not stirred by things happening eg what I read on the internet, by sudden sounds, by having to get up, by the phone ringing, unlike in the past.
It is my experience that existence is far more exquisitely blissful if I am not disturbed by things happening (eg someone coughing aggressively or spitting in my presence) compared with if I am stirred or provoked or upset.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES IF THEY THINK THEY ARE CAPABLE OF NOT BEING STIRRED, EVEN A SLIGHT SQUEAK IS ENOUGH TO STIR OR DISTURB THEM. THEY HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE INCOMPARABLY SANER AND HAPPIER EXISTENCE OF ONE WHOSE MENTAL FORCE IS NOT PROVOKED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHATEVER IS HAPPENING. NOT ONLY IS IT A HAPPY DWELLING HERE, EVEN 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS AWAITS SOMEONE WHO IS SKILLFUL IN DWELLING UNPERTURBED.
THIS WAS TAUGHT BY THE BUDDHA, THE FULLY SELF AWAKENED ONE AND I HAVE REALIZED IT, EXPERIENCED IT MYSELF, SO HOW CAN THE BUDDHA BE A FAKE WHEN NO ONE ELSE WILL POINT THIS OUT TO YOU?
Laughing, smiling and joking disturb the mind:
Laughing, smiling and joking always disturbs or stirs the mind and after the mind is disturbed or stirred it takes time for it to resettle and before it resettles, there is an urge to renew the disturbance such that in time the mind is constantly disturbed or stirred and this is never a pleasure it is made to be but torment that can reach homicidal or suicidal levels.
SO LAUGH, SMILE AND JOKE ALL YOU WANT, UPHOLD THEM AS MEANINGFUL AND GOOD BUT YOU MAY BE PUTTING A NOOSE OF DISTURBANCE ON YOUR MIND THAT WILL RUN OUT OF CONTROL SO THAT YOU WANT TO KILL YOURSELF.
I hear, even better but I am not disturbed:
Nowadays with my mind centred, I hear even better than before but I am not disturbed by what I hear. Once a person is disturbed he not only suffers but he is distracted and so he hears worse, misses things that are actually there.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO HEAR BUT NOT BE STIRRED BUT YOU NEED A MIND THAT IS STEADY LIKE A MOUNTAIN, TRULY UNSHAKEABLE, UNMOVEABLE TO DO SO AND IT IS OBTAINED THROUGH TRAINING YOURSELF NOT TO BE STIRRED BY NOT SMILING, NOT LAUGHING, NOT JOKING, MEDITATING TO CALM YOUR MIND UNTIL YOUR MENTAL FORCE STOPS STIRRING, HAS COME TO A REST AND BECOMES RELUCTANT TO BE STIRRED.
The big thing:
''The big thing Harvey Norman's got going for it is we've got sites in every town in Australia,'' says Harvey.
“The big thing” is a trendy vague term that can be copied and applied to many situations and so it suits people who are robots.
“The big thing” is an inappropriate expression because what is meant is ‘a major advantage’.
THE BIG THING IS VAGUE ROBOT LINGO COPIED FROM OTHERS AND DOES NOT FIT THE SITUATION. ‘A MAJOR ADVANTAGE’ IS NOT THE SAME AS ‘THE BIG THING’ WHICH CAN HAVE A VARIETY OF MEANING LIKE ‘THE IMPORTANT THING.
BECAUSE IT IS INCORRECT AND YOU PERCEIVE IT AS OK, THAT IS TRAINING SELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE PERCEPTION THAT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.
Again ‘got going for it’ is slang improper nonspecific language that is the way to future suffering not happiness. This is how someone’s speech is labelled as hackneyed, clichéd, cut and paste rehashed.
Neat places?
Bill Gates: "They (his family) thought it would be fun to come down and see some of the neat places around Australia. Sydney is a great place and it's summer here. Wish it was a tiny bit warmer, but it hasn't been too bad"
“Neat” has specific meaning and by ‘neat’ he means something else apart from the traditional meaning of ‘tidy’. What he may have meant is ‘wow’ places, ‘cool’ places and even these are false because there is never anything ‘wow’ or ‘cool’ about a place except in his false perception. “Scenic” or beautiful places are the correct epithets if you do not want to court insanity.
PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE VERY CLEVER, THEY THINK THEY ARE VERY IMPRESSIVE USING UNCONVENTIONAL ‘CHIC’ TERMS LIKE ‘NEAT’ TO DESCRIBE PLACES, WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT THEY MAY BE PLACING A NOOSE OF FUTURE INSANITY ON THEIR NECKS.
30% Australian bank funds sourced internationally:
Quote: Australian banks are exposed to any rising borrowing costs associated with tighter credit on international markets because they source about a third of their funds from outside Australia.
Without the availability of international funds, Australian banks would have 30% less money to lend and the economy would not have been boosted as much. It is likely if not certainly this money was spent wastefully on consumption rather than productively.
THE SOURCING OF FUNDS FROM OVERSEAS ENABLES CONSUMERS IN MANY COUNTRIES TO SPEND MORE THAN THEY WOULD IF SUCH FUNDS WERE OFF LIMITS AND IF SUCH BORROWINGS WERE SPENT ON CONSUMPTION RATHER THAN PRODUCTIVELY, THE CONSEQUENCES IN INSOLVENCY IS EVEN DIRE.
US durable goods orders jump 3.8%
Orders for durable manufactured goods in the US rose by more than expected in November, official figures show.
People get optimistic even excited by such news when it reflects wrong understanding and false logic.
Only when society is making meaningful progress in repaying its mountain of debt and at the same time maintaining and even increasing spending that stimulates the economy would there be cause to think we are recovering.
US durable goods orders jumping will benefit the companies making the goods, improving their profits by further draining wealth from the system that buys those durable goods. What benefit in increased employment created by such increased orders is only an adjunct to assist in the relentless transfer of wealth that ultimately depletes the system and fattens the corporate minority.
ONLY WHEN CONSUMERS & NATIONS ARE MAKING SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS IN PARING DOWN THEIR MOUNTAINS OF DEBTS WHILST MAINTAINING OR INCREASING EXPENDITURE THAT KEEPS THE ECONOMY AFLOAT SHOULD THERE BE CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM THAT THINGS ARE ON THE MEND. SUCH ISOLATED DURABLE GOODS ORDERS ‘JUMP’ ARE FLASHES IN THE PAN THAT STIR PEOPLE WITH FALSE UNDERSTANDING, SUCH INCREASE WILL BOOST COMPANY PROFITS THAT FURTHER DRAINS WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM AND WHETHER THE SYSTEM CAN AFFORD IT IS ANOTHER MATTER, WHATEVER INCREASE IN EMPLOYMENT ACCOMPANYING IS MERELY TO ASSIST IN THE ONGOING TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW.
(What I say may be wrong but is there anyone who tenders such an opinion in this world, no economist will subscribe to the scenario I paint and yet I may be largely correct. If I am correct, it means this world has a totally wrong understanding about economics, they are deluded).
He doesn’t believe in God:
'I was an atheist at eight': Ricky Gervais caught up in Twitter spat with Christians after saying he doesn't believe in God
What is said is not the truth but false. It is not a matter of whether he believes in God but he is upholding himself in his disbelief in God and he harbours animosity or resentment against a God he says he does not believe in.
IT IS ALWAYS WRONG, NEVER RIGHT (UNJUSTIFIED) TO SAY YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD WHICH IS ADOPTING A POSITION WITHOUT KNOWING THAT IS THE PATH TO FALSITY AND SUFFERING. THE MAN OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING CAN ONLY ADOPT THE POSITION, “I DO NOT KNOW IF GOD EXISTS” AND THAT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM BELIEVING OR NOT BELIEVING IN GOD.
NOT ONLY IS THE PERSON SPEAKING FALSELY, UNJUSTLY SAYING HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN GOD, THAT IS NOT WHAT HE MEANS BECAUSE HE IS ADOPTING A STANCE THAT HE IS DEFENDING AND PROUD OF AND HE HARBORS ANIMOSITY OR RESENTMENT OR OPPOSITION TO GOD THAT BELIES HIS STATED DISBELIEF. IN OTHER WORDS NOT ONLY DOES HE NOT BELIEVE IN GOD, HE HAS ANIMOSITY TOWARDS GOD AND HE IS DEFIANT.
Animosity to God is always concomitant with disbelief:
Whether a person harbours animosity to God in his disbelief of God is not a matter of maybe or subjective but it is objective because he is adopting a position that God is not possible without knowing that this is the case.
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD IS ALWAYS A REJECTION OF GOD AND BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN KNOW THIS IS TRUE, IT IS AN EMOTION DRIVEN STATEMENT OF PREJUDICE, REJECTION OR ANIMOSITY WHICH SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED BY HIMSELF EXCEPT THAT HE IS A DELUDED FOOL NOT REALIZING HE IS PRESENTING HIMSELF INTO THE ARMS OF WOE BY ADOPTING A POSITION WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING IT IS TRUE THERE IS NO GOD.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WITH NO ANIMOSITY OR PREJUDICE AGAINST GOD TO EXPRESS DISBELIEF IN GOD.
What's Firefox worth to Google? Nearly $1 billion
Sure, this has been a year of growing pains for Firefox, but the renewed search deal that parent Mozilla reached with Google could be just what the doctor ordered.
This is a false totally unnecessary statement that trains the person in false perception and logic that ends in mad perception and logic that is never fun but terrible suffering.
Just because Google paid millions to Firefox to remain its search engine does not mean it is worth that much to Google nor is it possible to put a true figure to it.
SUFFICE TO SAY GOOGLE PAID FIREFOX SO MUCH TO REMAIN ITS SEARCH ENGINE BUT TO SAY IT IS WORTH SO MUCH IS UNNECESSARILY, PRESUMPTUOUSLY JUMPING TO CONCLUSION THAT TRAINS YOU FURTHER TO FALSELY PERCEIVE AND REASON.
IT IS TOTALLY UNWARRANTED, MISLEADING SELF AND OTHERS TO SAY FIREFOX IS WORTH 1 BILLION TO GOOGLE.
Firefox’s cost not worth:
Firefox costs Google $1 billion not worth because it is what Google had to pay to remain the main search engine. Firefox’s worth depends on the profits it will bring to Google through its association with Firefox.
THUS A LOT OF THINGS PEOPLE SAY AND ACCEPT AS TRUE ARE FALSE, MISLEADING.
Reason to believe in God, never not to believe God:
There is reason to believe in God even though you do not know He exists but there is never reason not to believe in God except driven by ill will (hate) & haughtiness.
There is reason to believe in God even though you do not know if He exists because life here is uniformly suffering even to tormenting levels, everyone here is hounded by lurking death and fears and if there is a possibility of escape, of eternal life free of suffering and persecution from others then the reasonable man would explore and keep faith in the possibility for the sake of escaping suffering.
The person who is angry or hateful or resentful because he is suffering, not entirely at the hands of others, he himself has much to blame for the suffering he experiences, is defiant and thus defiant, he adopt the position, “I do not believe in God” when the reasonable man will say, “I do not see or know if God exists or He doesn’t”.
BECAUSE OF THE TERRIBLE SUFFERING ACCOMPANYING LIFE HERE, THERE IS REASON FOR PEOPLE TO BELIEVE IN GOD EVEN IF THEY DO NOT KNOW HE EXISTS OR NOT BUT THERE IS NEVER TRUE REASON NOT TO BELIEVE IN GOD EXCEPT OUT OF DEFIANCE AND ANIMOSITY.
Living within means mandates serious recession:
If it is possible to live beyond one’s means in perpetuity, the current potentially deadly crisis would not have happened. It is because it is not possible to live beyond one’s means forever that the current crisis has happened.
Because the lifestyle in the recent past was based on living beyond one’s means, based on unfettered reckless borrowing which may have depleted savers’ savings even many times over, to begin to live within one’s means automatically means much less consumption plus a need to make reparations or repay borrowings, the reality that is inevitable, for one with true understanding, is a serious if not severe extended downturn in the economy and even the earth’s resources are not depleted to permit, if we are not going to dig ourselves another hole in the future, it means permanently living within our means in the future and that means a substantially subdued consumption.
IF YOU ACCEPT AS FACT THAT THE CONSUMPTION OF THE PAST WAS MASS LIVING BEYOND MEANS DEPLETING THE SAVINGS OF SAVERS EVEN MANY TIMES OVER DUE TO BANK RECYCLING OF DEPOSITS AND TAPPING INTERNATIONAL MARKETS FOR MONEY TO LEND LOCALLY, THEN THE FACT THAT WE HAVE TO BE FORCED BY CIRCUMSTANCES TO START LIVING WITHIN OUR MEANS, MEANS A SERIOUS DOWNTURN IN CONSUMPTION THAT MUST BE EXTENDED IF NOT PERMANENT (WE CANNOT GO BACK TO ‘THE GOOD OLD DAYS’ OF PROFLIGACY) AND THIS DOWNTURN WILL BE MADE WORSE BY NEED TO REPAY DEBTS THAT FURTHER REDUCES INCOME FOR SPENDING.
NOW THERE ARE JOKERS IN THE PACK, TOO MUCH MONEY IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF TOO FEW AND THE MAJORITY HAVE LOST JOBS, LOST SAVINGS IN BANKS RECKLESSLY LENT OUT OR THEY HAVE FOOLISHLY SADDLED THEMSELVES WITH CRIPPLING DEBTS, ASSET BUBBLES (SHARES, PROPERTIES) MEANS THERE IS AN EVEN FATAL MISMATCH BETWEEN ACTUAL AND VIRTUAL WEALTH THAT CANNOT BE RESOLVED WITHOUT TERRIBLE PAIN, MANY MULTINATIONALS HAVE FATALLY SEPARATED THEIR PRODUCTION TO CENTRES OF LOW COST TO SELL TO CENTRES OF HIGH PROFIT DEPRIVING CONSUMERS IN HIGH PROFIT CENTRES OF VITAL JOBS. AGAIN POWERFUL SPECULATORS HAVE CORNERED OR SERIOUSLY INFESTED COMMODITY MARKETS IN THE NAME OF PROFIT DRIVING UP CRUCIAL COMMODITIES LIKE OIL TO UNREALISTIC LEVELS THAT CRIPPLE ECONOMIES.
The iPad is a consumptive device not productive tool:
Whatever productive usage of many innovations like the Apple iPad is dwarfed by its principal purpose, which is for useless consumption or pleasure. Similarly even though Microsoft’s Office suite is for productivity purposes, it has morphed through much jazzing up or for show adornment ‘improvements’ to greatly increase it costs in relation to its usefulness. In other words a lot of the improvements are gimmicks that cost money and add little value. You may say making films provide jobs for many people apart from actors, actresses and directors, provide jobs in cinemas and what nots, but films are themselves not tools for productivity but consumption. In the same way many industries like sports (golf, football), gambling (casinos and resort cities), alcohol (pubs, breweries), airplanes and airlines (tourists and social visit passengers far exceed business travellers), even housing and construction are tailored far more for useless consumption than productivity. Whilst cars may have some productivity uses, they are overwhelmingly vehicles for leisure or consumption use.
IF ONE EXAMINES WITH DISCERNMENT ALL THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OF MANKIND, THEY ARE OVERWHELMINGLY GEARED TOWARDS CONSUMPTION, EVEN PROFLIGATE CONSUMPTION WAY BEYOND MEANS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE RETURNS, THEY ARE MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN AND SO IF SUCH CONSUMPTION WAS BASED ON BORROWING IT MEANS BORROWING TO THROW MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN THAT WILL NOT GENERATE RETURNS TO HELP REPAY BORROWINGS AND THAT MEANS THESE FOOLISH BORROWERS ARE IN FOR TERRIBLE PAIN WHEN THE TIME COMES TO MEET THEIR LOAN SHARKS.
When banks can't borrow, they can't lend.
This is a statement by BBC’s Robert Peston about the current euro crisis. Does he or mankind’s erudite fraternity understand what that means?
Why is it that banks must borrow in order to lend? Banks are supposed to receive depositors’ money and scrupulously lent it to needy borrowers so if you say that banks cannot lend if they cannot borrow, it means they have exhausted depositors’ money and they need to borrow in order to lend.
IT SHOULD NOT BE A CASE THAT BANKS NEED TO BORROW FROM OTHERS TO LEND, BANKS SHOULD HAVE AMPLE FUNDS FROM DEPOSITORS WHO ENTRUST THEIR MONEY TO THE BANKS AND SO THE FACT THAT BANKS NEED TO BE ABLE TO BORROW TO LEND MEANS THERE IS SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH THEM, THEY HAVE LOST SAVERS’ MONEY AND NEED TO BORROW TO KEEP AFLOAT.
A statement that makes no sense:
When banks cannot borrow they cannot lend is spoken as if it is a truism, very logical and correct when it is illogical, demands explanation why this should be the case.
Normally banks do not rely on borrowings as a source of funds, they have an ample source of funds from money deposited in them by the public and so the fact that banks need to borrow in order to lend should raise questions as to the solvency of banks, as to the safety or integrity of money deposited in them.
WHAT KIND OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS IT THAT POINTS OUT TO OTHERS THAT ‘WHEN BANKS CANNOT BORROW THEY CANNOT LEND’ AS IF IT IS NATURAL, PERFECTLY LOGICAL WHEN IT IS INDICATION OF ABNORMALITY, THAT BANKS MUST HAVE DEPLETED, OVER-STRETCHED THEMSELVES IN ORDER TO REACH THE STAGE WHERE THEY NEED TO BORROW IN ORDER TO KEEP LENDING.
Silent Night? Not With Us
What says Christmas to me is a chorus of voices, all talking at once.
The person is practicing false associations that will lead to future torment and he is also training others in false associations that harm them with karma due for advocating false associations.
Silent night has nothing to do with Christmas being a chorus of voices all taking at once, it is a false association conjured up to stir irony or contradiction or conflict or emotion or force in self and others.
THAT ‘SILENT NIGHT’ IS LINKED TO THE MATTER UNDER DISCUSSION IS FABRICATED, A FALSE ASSOCIATION DRIVEN BY EMOTION TO STIR EMOTION OR CONFLICT OR IRONY IN OTHERS THAT WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ‘A’ IS ‘B’. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING SILENT NIGHT INTO THE DISCUSSION AT ALL, IT IS A FALSE, FRIVOLOUS ASSOCIATION THAT CONDITIONS SELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE ASSOCIATIONS THAT HAVE CONSEQUENCES IN SUFFERING NOT HAPPINESS.
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT YOU THAT IT IS NOT WITH YOU? IF YOU DON’T AGREE WITH THE CACOPHONY, YOU DON’T JOIN IN, WHY TAKE ISSUE WITH ‘SILENT NIGHT’?
TAKE ISSUE WITH THE ‘ALL AT ONCE CACOPHONY’ DON’T TAKE ISSUE WITH SILENT NIGHT BY SPEAKING THUS. IF YOU ARE DECRYING THE SENSELESS CACOPHONY, WHY LAMENT THAT IT IS NOT THE SILENT NIGHT WITH YOU? IF YOU APPROVE THE CACOPHONY, WHY DECRY SILENT NIGHT? ARE YOU MAD?
For them age is just a number:
This is a newspaper headline. If you do not understand what you hear you should not accept and report it or pass it on, without understanding and you pass it on, you are training yourself to have doubt and uncertainty, one of three lower fetters the Buddha said led to future woe not happiness.
If by ‘to them age is just a number’ you mean they don’t care about getting old then that is a false conclusion because you don’t care about getting old is not synonymous with ‘age is just a number’.
AGE IS NEVER JUST A NUMBER, BECAUSE AGE IS A COMMONLY ACCEPTED YARDSTICK CONVEYING HOW OLD A PERSON IS AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY IF BY ‘AGE IS JUST A NUMBER’ YOU MEAN ‘THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT AGE’.
Only a number is a number:
If you do not want to go mad, you should only accept a number as a number, anything else is not just a number except in your delusion or false understanding that is the path to future woe.
Thus age is not just a number but it is the number of years or months or whatever yardstick of time the object has been in existence.
Black is not good, only good is good. She can be a good woman but woman is not good.
ANYONE WHO SAYS ‘A’ IS ‘B’, ‘AGE’ IS ‘JUST A NUMBER’ IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY.
Weak consumer spending hits US growth hopes
Consumer spending in America rose by less than expected in November, casting fresh doubt on the country's economic recovery.
Consumer spending is the ‘kingpin’ for economic growth and so it is that consumption not true productivity is the drive for the economy.
Consumption means for usage (and usually to be discarded immediately or some time later) not for productive or constructive purposes that lasts and contributes to accruing wealth and improvements in the system.
And so if consumption is the kingpin of the economy and bearing in mind the unproductive or wasteful nature of consumption, one of true understanding will ensure that it is done well within the ability to afford of the society rather than borrowing even extensively to fuel that consumption.
EVEN TODAY PEOPLE ARE LOOKING TO CONSUMPTION TO ‘KICKSTART’ THE MORIBUND ECONOMY WHEN CONSUMPTION WAY IN EXCESS OF AFFORDABILITY WAS THE REASON WHY WE ARE IN SUCH A MESS. WHEN PEOPLE ARE FULL OF DEBTS, LOSING OR CANNOT FIND JOBS, ECONOMISTS ARE LOOKING TO CONSUMPTION AS THEIR SAVIOURS, HOPING THAT CONSUMPTION BY PEOPLE DROWNING IN DEBTS WOULD COME RIDING TO THE RESCUE OF THE ECONOMY. SUCH THINKING REFLECTS DELUSION, NO UNDERSTANDING. RATHER THAN DOING SOMETHING, THEY ARE ANXIOUSLY LOOKING FOR A BOOST OF CONSUMPTION TO (SOMEHOW, THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW) COME RIDING TO THE RESCUE.
Hoping for the best:
Rather than fully understanding what when wrong, the scale of the problem, knowing what the problems are and what the correct answers are, mankind may be like Nero fiddling whilst Rome burns, tinkering here and there (printing money, lowering interest rates) whilst looking anxiously at data (eg consumer spending) to signal all is over or we are back on track to recovery.
TINKERING WITHOUT KNOWING AND HOPING FOR THE BEST IS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH FULLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE CRISIS IS AND TAKING CORRECT STEPS TO REDRESS (EG CHARGE AND CHANGE THE BANKERS, POLITICIANS, BAN SPECULATORS FROM OIL MARKETS). IF THE PAST BOOM IS HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON CONSUMPTION THAT WAS WAY BEYOND MEANS, IT IS A PIPE DREAM (DELUSION) THAT YOU CAN (SOMEHOW) QUICKLY RETURN TO CONSUMPTION WAY BEYOND MEANS AND HAPPILY EVER AFTER.
Deadly Nigeria attacks condemned
There is no need to condemn the attacks, they are wrong or evil and this condemnation is merely an empty useless, painful of stirring of emotion that also stirs others’ emotions with debt not merit incurred. Condemned means they are angry, upset but it is effete or powerless, you cannot bring the culprit to account.
Jesus spoke of condemnation, “by your words you will be condemned”. There is a difference between his condemnation and human condemnation. Divine condemnation is not based on stirred emotion or wrath but reason and God knows who is involved and what happened and He can and will punish those guilty.
DIVINE CONDEMNATION IS NOT BASED ON WRATH AND IT HAS BACKING, GOD CAN AND WILL PUNISH THOSE INVOLVED, CONDEMNED MEANS YOU ARE DOOMED TO REPAY.
HUMAN CONDEMNATION IS A STIRRING OF IRE, ANGER THAT IS USELESS AND SUFFERING TO SELF AND OTHERS AND IT IS POWERLESS, THERE IS NO ABILITY TO PUNISH CULPRITS.
BY DIVINE CONDEMNATION IS MEANT YOU ARE SENTENCED TO BE PUNISHED, TO REPAY, BY HUMAN CONDEMNATION IS MEANT YOU ARE DESPISED, A PARIAH.
Mankind’s wrong understanding of condemnation:
What condemnation truly means is that you are destined, sentenced to repay. What mankind understands by condemnation is incurring wrath or cursed.
Here as everywhere, mankind thinks it truly understands but it may be delusion. The fact that people can still insist that condemnation has an element of stirred ire or wrath, is stirred wrath reflects the intensity of their false perception.
It is impossible for condemnation to mean stirred wrath because stirred wrath is a blind meaningless exercise of force and for condemnation to be meaningful, something about substance, it must mean something rational like sentenced or destined to repay.
“Sentenced to repay” is about something meaningful, “directing my wrath or stirred repulsive mental force or hate at you for the action” is about a meaningless exercise of force.
CONDEMNATION IS SOMETHING WORTHLESS OR MEANINGLESS IF IT STANDS FOR A HATEFUL STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN RELATIONSHIP TO AN EVENT. IF BY CONDEMNATION IS MEANT YOU ARE DOOMED TO REPAY THEN THAT IS A MEANINGFUL.
US consumer spending disappoints
Anyone who is disappointed is practicing controlled insanity that ends in torment never happiness. US consumer spending may be lower or depressed, never disappointing; it is the stirred mental force of the perceiver to be disliking, sad or hurt that makes it disappointing and it is conditioning or addictive such that the person is increasingly prone to be helplessly stirred to be disappointed or excited by happenings. The stirring of mental force is always suffering and meaningless and so it is controlled insanity or suffering to be disappointed by events.
FURTHER YOU HAVE KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING TELLING OTHERS IT IS DISAPPOINTING WHEN IT IS NOT SO, IT IS MEANINGLESS AND HARMFUL TO WANT OTHERS TO BE DISAPPOINTED BY THE NEWS.
The King of Death:
Whatever the Buddha says must be true and many times the Buddha has referred to the King of Death and so there must be such an entity and if you refute the Buddha without knowing you are correct, you are asking for doubt and uncertainty adopting a position without knowing it is true there is no King of Death.
Death is not blameless or without a king, death has cause and it has a king and that king is the Devil or Satan or Mara and he finds everyone, pursues everyone and overcomes everyone except those like the Buddha who have gone to the place where the King of death cannot find him.
Even divine beings are subject to death, to passing away, when their merit is exhausted then after lifespans that may be 1,2,4, 500 up to 60,000 eternities in heaven, they pass away even to hell or the animal womb. Similarly it is demerit that causes beings to be born in hell even for many eternities and after the exhaustion of that demerit, they are released from hell.
THE KING OF DEATH HAS ACCESS TO AND HOUNDS AND TRIES TO TRICK EVERYONE TO CONTINUE EXISTING AND SUCCUMB TO PAINFUL DEATH, ONLY THE BUDDHA AND THOSE ENLIGTHENED HAVE ESCAPED THE CLUTCHES OF THE KING OF DEATH, HAS GONE TO WHERE THE KING OF DEATH CANNOT GO.
DEATH HAS A KING, NOT WITHOUT A KING AND THE KING IS THE DEVIL AND HE PURSUES EVERYONE, WANTS EVERYONE TO BE SUBJECT TO DEATH AND SUFFERING.
Obama in tax victory over House
There is a crucial difference between success and victory, if it is a success rather than victory you are cultivating false perception in yourself and others talking about victory.
Victory implies celebration, vanquishing; if what is involved is successful persuasion of the house to pass the bill, you are speaking erroneously with suffering due.
China's place in the world economy
China’s place is never something true or objective but it is a consideration, a fabrication of the mind that this fool wants to implant in others. The motive for conjecturing China’s place in the world economy is not to determine the truth, but driven by calculation, the person greedy for gains is interested (attracted) to know China’s place that may have material implications for him.
There is no need to determine China’s place in the world economy, it is not something that exists but created or fabricated and then imagined as if it is fact, is subject to dispute and it is driven by being calculating that the Buddha said is never the path to heaven.
THE PERSON WHO IS ALWAYS CALCULATING, EVEN WITHOUT REALIZING, TRYING TO ASSESS WHAT IS IN IT FOR HIM, WHAT VALUE THIS AND THAT IS HEADED FOR TORMENT NEVER HAPPINESS.
When the king of death finds you:
When the king of death finds someone, he is never up to any good but he attempts to seize and grapple the person to death and it is the being’s resistance to overcome the King of death that enables him to survive but the relentless assault of death ultimately overwhelms him and he finally dies.
DEATH DOES NOT STALK A PERSON ONLY AT THE END OF HIS LIFE BUT DAILY DEATH STALKS ALL BEINGS EXISTING IN THIS WORLD. THE DAILY INUNDATION OR FLOOD OF STRESS, THE STRUGGLE TO WAKE UP AND SHAKE OFF THE DARK FORCES OF GLOOM IN THE MORNING, THE PERIODIC VISITATION OF ILLNESSES AND DISEASES, INJURIES ARE ALL SYMPTOMATIC OF THE RELENTLESS ASSAULT OF DEATH THAT THE BEING STRUGGLES WITH ALL HIS MIGHT TO RESIST BUT IT IS ALWAYS A LOSING BATTLE THAT THE KING OF DEATH FINALLY WINS.
WHEN THE KING OF DEATH FINDS A PERSON, HE IS UP TO NO GOOD, UP TO INFLICT SUFFERING AND ENGAGE YOU IN BATTLE AND KILL YOU OFF.
Kit Siang has his hands full
IPOH: While the feud in Penang DAP continues between national chairman Karpal Singh and Deputy Chief Minister II Dr P. Ramasamy, party adviser Lim Kit Siang has his hands full with another squabble blowing up in Perak.
Having his hands full is often said as if it is funny or jovial or friendly but it is hypocritical intended to falsely dramatize to exploit for partisan gain.
Even if Lim Kit Siang has many problems, it does not mean his hands are full which is falsely said to dramatize as if he is besieged on all sides and DAP is a collapsing house to paint DAP negatively before the public.
WHATEVER FRIENDLINESS CONVEYED IS HYPOCRITICAL, THE NEWS IS STATED IN A WAY THAT IS INTENDED TO SMEAR DAP’S IMAGE.
Impossible Jesus and Buddha are fakes:
Reflecting their doubt and uncertainty, their lack of true understanding, even those who are faithful express reservations, are not sure if Jesus and the Buddha could be fakes when the person of true understanding knows it is impossible Jesus can be a fake, the Buddha is a fake.
Why is that so?
If something is true and crucially important (in terms of pointing to the way out of suffering) and no one in this world is capable of telling you and someone (extraordinary) comes along and points it out to you, it is impossible that person is a fake but he must be a real life person WITH EXCEPTIONAL WISDOM OR DISCERNMENT.
There are many things that Jesus has stated, pointed out to you that is true, leads to never before release from suffering even insanity here, leads to eternal life that he tells you is possible that no one here has ever or are capable of telling you, so how can he possibly be a fake except in your delusion or serious false perception or lack of true understanding?
Jesus said you shall not care for what you shall eat or wear and that is true because it is controlled insanity and does not work being obsessed with foods that are merely about chemical or force reactions that ultimately will kill you just as animals and plants must be killed for you to eat your fresh ‘health giving’ delicious food. Fussing about food is barking up the wrong tree that has deadly consequences because it leads to woe and death even for an eternity.
IF YOU TRULY DID NOT CARE FOR WHAT YOU SHALL EAT OR WEAR AS JESUS COMMANDED THEN YOU WILL HAVE A PLEASANT EXISTENCE HERE AND EVEN ETERNAL LIFE AWAITS YOU AFTER DEATH.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS JESUS SAID THAT IS TRUE, BENEFICIAL (EVEN EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL), NEVER BEFORE SAID, THAT NO ORDINARY PERSON CAN EVEN DREAM OF SAYING LET ALONE CAN SAY IT, SO HOW CAN JESUS BE POSSIBLY A FAKE? IT IS NOT THE FAULT OF AVAILABLE DATA THAT YOU ARE STILL UNCERTAIN IF JESUS IS REAL, IT IS YOUR FAULT, YOUR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT IS THE CAUSE FOR YOUR DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY WHICH THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE.
AGAIN THE BUDDHA TAUGHT, WHERE NO ONE WILL TELL YOU, THAT SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, FAITH IN RITUALS AND RULES AND DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ARE THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE. ANYONE WHO HAS UNDERSTOOD AND SHED HIS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS, SHED RITUALS AND RULES, SHED HIS DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY WILL KNOW WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT IS NOT ONLY TRULY BUT HIGHLY BENEFICIAL IN TERMS OF RELIEF OF SUFFERING HERE AND THEREAFTER.
BASED ON THE RECORD OF WHAT JESUS SAID, WHAT THE BUDDHA SAID, THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING KNOWS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE JESUS AND THE BUDDHA ARE FAKES, THEY ARE HISTORICAL FIGURES AND WHO THEY CLAIM TO BE BECAUSE WHAT THEY TAUGHT ARE TRUE AND EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL THAT NO ORDINARY MAN HERE CAN TELL YOU, LET ALONE FAKE TO GIVE YOU A DECEPTION THEY EXISTED WHEN THEY DID NOT.
I too cannot be a fake:
It is impossible that I can be a fake in anyway eg an imaginary being created by some ghost writer because what I say is true, extremely beneficial and no one can even imagine let alone tell you.
What is it that I have said that is true, beneficial that no one can imagine let alone tell you?
I said there is constant prolonging or stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness that is the source of constantly renewing insoluble stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate, that necessitates a robotic rehashing existence that is memory intensive and leads to destruction of your memory apparatus and thence dementia.
Without stopping stretching of syllables, changing speed and loudness you cannot escape stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate to access the first higher state of mind and even one eternity of heavenly existence free of all suffering and disease.
BECAUSE WHAT I SAY ABOVE IS TRUE AND EXTREMELY BENEFICIAL HERE AND LEADS TO EVEN ETERNAL LIFE AND NO ONE HERE CAN EVEN IMAGINE THE TRUTH (EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS UNDER THEIR NOSES), LET ALONE TEACH YOU THIS, I CANNOT BE A FAKE BUT MUST BE SOMEONE OF EXCEPTIONAL WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT.
Trapped in a vast field of tall grass:
All beings here are trapped in a vast field of tall grass extending for great distances in all directions. Rather than the pleasure it is made to be, existence in this vast field of tall grasses is tormenting, there is disease, predators, dangers lurking behind the palisade of leaves apart from the insects, ants and mosquitos that assail. At the edges of field, should you manage to reach it is all round hell except for one corner where there is blissful repose or heaven.
Many are content to sit around idly, taking whatever suffering that comes their way like dumb chicken in the coop awaiting their slaughter after being fattened.
Of the few who are alarmed and tormented enough to seek escape, because of the tall grass through which they cannot see through, they may end up going around in circles not reaching safety even though it exists. Of the fewer who managed to head in a straight line, persist to finally reach the distant edges, they find hell greeting them.
The Buddha said he is the one who closes off the gates to suffering and opened the gate to safety and happiness and so it is that with their guidance, if a being were to move steadfast, unwavering in the direction they (Jesus and the Buddha) point, they will find safety and escape from the torment of existing in a blinding field of tall grass.
BEINGS HERE ARE TRAPPED IN A VAST FIELD OF TALL GRASS AND CANNOT SEE TO THE EDGES OF THE FIELD WHICH IS SURROUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY TORMENT, EVEN HELL. THUS EVEN IF THEY DESIRE ESCAPE THEY MAY END UP GOING AROUND IN CIRCLES OR SHOULD THEY FIND THE EDGE, FIND HELL INSTEAD OF SAFETY THAT EXIST ONLY IN ONE LITTLE CORNER.
WITHOUT A BEING LIKE THE BUDDHA OR JESUS POINTING OUT WHICH DIRECTION TO HEAD, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT BEINGS BY THEMSELVES SHOULD FIND ESCAPE FROM TERRIBLE SUFFERING EVEN THOUGH IT EXISTS.
"Suppose, monks, there were a large low-lying marsh, in dependence on which there lived a large herd of deer; and a certain malevolent man were to appear. He would close off the safe, restful path that led to their rapture, and would open up a false path, set out a decoy, and thus the large herd of deer would fall into ruin & disaster. Then suppose that a certain benevolent man were to appear. He would open up the safe, restful path that led to their rapture, would close off the false path.
"I have given this simile in order to convey a meaning. 'The large marsh' is a term for sensual pleasures. 'The large herd of deer' is a term for beings. 'The man not desiring their benefit is a term for Mara, the Evil One. 'The false path' is a term for the eightfold wrong path, 'The male decoy' is a term for passion & delight, ignorance. 'The man desiring their benefit is a term for the Tathagata. 'The safe, restful path is a term for the noble eightfold path, i.e., right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, & right concentration.
" Practice jhana (meditation), monks. Don't be heedless. Don't later fall into regret. "
Have you read the New Testament?
Without having read the New Testament and you cast judgment or opinion about the veracity of Jesus, you are unrighteous and asking for suffering if there be judgment and punishment.
If you have read the New Testament carefully and found that you cannot tell if Jesus is true or not or you think he is a fake then it proves you have false or no understanding.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HAVING READ THE NEW TESTAMENT, EVEN AFTER TAMPERING BY WICKED HUMAN HANDS TO COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT JESUS’ NATURE IS INCONCLUSIVE.
Amongst the many things Jesus taught, he said ‘let your yes be yes, anything more comes from evil’.
This is a true statement that if truly followed brings great benefits in relief from daily suffering for the person, it is wisdom that no ordinary person ever thought of, let alone that they can tell you.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE PEOPLE, EVEN FERVENT CHRISTIANS NEVER LET THEIR YES BE YES ONLY BUT SAY AND DO MUCH MORE THAT JESUS SAID COMES FROM EVIL (NEVER GOOD), EVERYONE HERE INCLUDING THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD ARE RECOMMENDING OTHERS TO NOT LET THEIR YES BE YES ONLY BUT TO SAY AND DO MUCH MORE.
BECAUSE NO ONE WILL TELL YOU THIS AND IT IS OF CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE IN ESCAPING SUFFERING HERE AND THEREAFTER, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO SAY THIS IF HE WAS A FAKE, NOT A TEACHER HE CLAIMS TO BE.
A happy sinless life here:
Anyone who truly puts into practice what Jesus commanded, ‘let your yes be yes only, anything more comes from evil’ would be free from evil and therefore leading a sinless or blameless life here. Furthermore, anyone who truly lets his yes be yes only will have a pleasant abiding here compared to those who do not let their yes be yes only and if there be eternal life and letting your yes be yes only is an essential requisite to eternal life then what Jesus taught points you even to eternal life.
Rushing and delaying is the more that according to Jesus comes from evil.
If you let your yes be yes only, you say or do it without rushing or delaying it. Speaking in a rushed or lingering (delaying) fashion is the more that Jesus said comes from evil.
THUS RUSHING AND DELAYING IS NEVER THE WAY TO HEAVEN BUT ETERNAL PUNISHMENT. THE PERSON WHO NEITHER RUSHES NOR DELAYS, HE JUST DOES OR SAYS WHATEVER WITHOUT RUSHING/URGENCY, WITHOUT DELAYING OR DRAGGING OR BEATING AROUND THE BUSH, IS THE ONE WHO ENJOYS HIS LIFE HERE AND IS HEADED FOR SAFETY, ETERNAL LIFE.
DON’T BLAME THE NEW TESTAMENT OR JESUS IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT OR YOU ARE UNCERTAIN, BLAME YOUR FALSE OR ABSENT TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Let the punishment fit the crime
GUEST COLUMNISTS
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
| By Zaid Ibrahim Just because society creates offences for reasons of its own does not mean that the person committing the offence is undesirable, bad or a danger to others. Sometimes offences are created because the acts are frowned upon by religion. However, in a democracy we should not create offences just because acts are considered sinful. |
The balance of evidence in the public domain does not indicate Anwar is guilty of sodomy but contrarily, it is a trumped up charge and by implying Anwar is guilty but he should not be punished harshly, Zaid is saying either he is privy to special information that tells him Anwar is guilty or he is gullible to think the prosecution case against Anwar is convincing.
IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR HIM TO WADE IN NOT REALIZING HE IS PUTTING HIS NECK IN A NOOSE BUT THE MOTIVE MAY BE TO LEND HIS WEIGHT TO HIS PERVERTED PERCEPTION THAT HE IS A FAIR MAN, EITHER IN DELUSION OR PREJUDICE HE THINKS ANWAR IS A SODOMIST BUT AS A FAIR RIGHTEOUS GOOD MAN HE THINKS HE IS, HE IS WRITING IN MITIGATION FOR ANWAR.
HE IS ALREADY CONVICTED ANWAR OF THE CRIME OF SODOMY AND HE IS PETITIONING FOR CLEMENCY ON ANWAR’S BEHALF. IF ANWAR IS NOT GUILTY HE IS ASKING FOR PUNISHMENT SPEAKING FALSELY MALIGNING ANWAR.
THERE ARE MANY WHO THINK THEY ARE VERY GOOD, THINK THEY ARE FAIR MINDED WHEN THEY ARE DELUDED. HE BETTER MAKE SURE HE KNOWS ANWAR IS GUILTY BEFORE PLEADING ON ANWAR’S BEHALF, OTHERWISE EVEN HIS HEAD IS ON THE CHOPPING BOARD.
Anwar must be a non-practicing homosexual:
If Anwar is a homosexual, he must be a non-practicing homosexual because with such powerful enemies with access to police surveillance arrayed against him it would be suicidal and a matter of time before he is entrapped with irrefutable evidence against him. If one of his partners were to squeal, to succumb to bribery and ‘spill the beans’ Anwar would be finished.
HENCE ANWAR MUST BE A SUPERHUMAN SUPER CAREFUL HOMOSEXUAL OR HE IS A NON PRACTICING HOMOSEXUAL BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CANNOT BE NAILED BY THE POLICE SNOOPING ON HIM.
AND WITH ALL THE POLICE RESOURCES SNOOPING ON HIM, WITH THE TOP POLICE OFFICERS AWARE OF THE TRYSTS BETWEEN SAIFUL AND ANWAR BEFORE THE LAST ACT, THEY FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ENTRAP ANWAR BY VIDEO-AUDIO RECORDING, HE SAW A STREET SIDE DOCTOR ONLY 3 DAYS AFTER AND DNA SAMPLES WERE LEFT IN A DRAWER COLLECTING DUST FOR 3 DAYS.
YET ZAID WANTS YOU AND EVERYONE TO ACCEPT AS FACT ANWAR IS GUILTY AND PLEAD FOR ANWAR FOR LENIENCY.
UNLESS HE IS CORRECT, IT IS A VERY WICKED OR CRIMINAL ACT SUBJECT TO DIVINE IF NOT HUMAN PUNISHMENT.
Who will listen to Zaid?
Don’t address the public with your plea for leniency because the public cannot do anything for Anwar.
If you think the authorities will take into account your plea when it will fall on deaf ears then you are either deluded or doing something ineffective that will end in insanity. Only doing something that is useful will not end in insanity.
So either Zaid is very powerful, has clout with the authorities or he is deluded to plead when it will fall on deaf ears or he is Machiavellian, deceptive, trying to act as if a fair man but condemning Anwar as guilty in his eyes and because he is a person of stature, the public should follow suit and his plea is for adornment only, will not do anything for Anwar except serve Zaid himself to present himself as a fair minded man and to presumptuous brand Anwar as guilty.
IF THE AUTHORITIES WILL NOT LISTEN TO ZAID, WHAT HE IS SAYING IS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY OR IT IS JUST FOR SHOW, SELF SERVING TO SHOW HE IS A FAR MINDED MAN AND BY IMPLICATION, HE THINKS AND WANTS YOU TO THINK ANWAR IS GUILTY.
Think again:
Want a pet cat? Think again, researchers say
TEMPTED by the playful antics of that adorable kitten in the pet shop? If you've never had a cat before you may want to think again, especially if you have other allergies, researchers warn.
What is said is controlled insanity, dramatized and styled never a true statement.
There is no need to bring the subject of wanting a pet cat with the matter that it may cause allergies.
Often people speak overanxiously as if they are so concerned with your welfare but it is all for show with ulterior motive either because they want something from you or to impress you with their importance or authoritativeness.
Just because cats can cause allergies does not mean they are to be avoided as pets. How would you know if they will cause allergies until you have kept one?
Suffice to say cats can cause allergies and what they are, it is for show concern to ask people about wanting to keep a pet and ask them to think again.
WHAT IS SAID, THE WAY IT IS SAID IS NEVER LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY AS JESUS COMMANDED BUT MORE THAT COMES FROM EVIL AND NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY INSIST IT IS TRUE IT IS FABRICATED, HAS STYLE AND THE WAY TO INSANITY.
What is the subject?
Whenever you speak you must have a purpose otherwise you will go mad.
So, is the subject about cats causing allergies especially in those prone to allergies or is the subject whether you want to own a cat and you should think again about it?
If the topic is about cats causing allergies then you should stick to it rather than stray or side track yourself and others into talk about ownership and thinking again.
IF THE SUBJECT IS ABOUT CATS CAUSING ALLERGIES THEN YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS TO FALSELY ASSOCIATE BY DWELLING ON OTHER MATTERS; FURTHER IT MAY FALSELY INFLUENCE OTHERS TO THE DETRIMENT OF CATS BECAUSE THEY WILL THEN AVOID CATS. WHAT ABOUT BIRDS AND DOGS, THEY TOO CAN CAUSE ALLERGIES, SO YOU ADVOCATE NO PETS?
No comments:
Post a Comment