'She can literally feel Lauren's pain': Mother of model who lost her eye and hand in a plane propeller claims special 'connection' allows twin to share her sister's injuries
“She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” is a useless or meaningless statement intended to stir others’ mental forces that has no merit but is demeritorious.
Whatever pain felt is never real but virtual, self-created triggered by awareness of something and so long as you can be triggered to feel pain or hurt or suffering on seeing the suffering of others, so long will you be bonded to suffering. It is not OK or good to feel pain as a result of others’ suffering but it is a conditioned false or mad state of the mind that detains and leads to future woe.
Part of the reason she felt pain is self identity with the person, if she did not identify with the victim her pain might be less or absent. Rather than feel others’ pain, one should be aware of the many avenues for pain in this world, resolve to never lead others to woe and to extricate oneself from this world.
YOU CAN FEEL ALL THE PAIN IN THE WORLD FOR ANOTHER’S MISERY OR MISFORTUNE BUT IT WILL NOT DO ANY GOOD BUT IS NEEDLESS SUFFERING TO SELF THAT IS CONDITIONING AND LEADS TO MORE FUTURE WOE. WHAT IS NEEDED IS KNOWLEDGE THAT TERRIBLE SUFFERING IS POSSIBLE IN THIS WORLD, TO RESOLVE NEVER TO CAUSE SUFFERING TO OTHERS AND TO EXTRICATE ONESELF, AS IT POSSIBLE FROM THIS WORLD, NEVER TO RETURN.
THUS IT IS NOT ONLY USELESS TALKING ABOUT HOW SOMEONE COULD FEEL ANOTHER’S PAIN, IT IS WANTING TO STIR PAIN OR FORCE IN OTHERS AND THAT HAS KARMA NOT MERIT. WHAT IS SAID IS TO MAKE MUCH OF THE PAIN OR TERRIBLENESS OF WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING BUT IT IS A FORCE OR PAIN COMMUNICATION. THIS STATEMENT HAS DEMERIT NOT MERIT.
The substance of the statement is force:
“She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” is a message that conveys how terrible or bad a pain experience is and because pain is a product of force that is blind and meaningless apart from the unpleasantness that may be extreme and prolonged, the statement is about dwelling on the experience of force not something that is meaningful. And so the statement is with regard to force not meaning or reason, it is a transaction regarding force and because force is meaningless and evil, whoever dwells on force, dwells on pain to sanctify or legitimize it is creating karma not merit.
Idle chatter:
“She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” is a form of idle chatter that not only serves no true purpose but it is transacting about the force or pain experience that bonds participants to blind meaningless force.
Yes, it was terrible but what are they going to do about it? Nothing, just acknowledging and reliving vicariously that painful experience.
Idle chatter, the Buddha said is a form of wrong speech that can lead even to hell, is never the way to hell.
Anwar optimistic he will be acquitted?
It has been reported that Anwar is optimistic he will be acquitted.
Someone who is realistic would expect his conviction to be foregone.
You mean the authorities went through all this trouble to acquit Anwar that would exonerate him and make them climb down or eat humble pie that there is no case against Anwar? Even if Anwar is convicted, the ruling elite may have shot themselves in the foot in this hare brained scheme to get rid of Anwar because there is perception it is a trumped up charge.
IT WOULD BE AGAINST EXPECTATIONS IF ANWAR IS ACQUITTED AND THE SIGNS POINT TOWARDS CONVICTION, THE JUDGE SAID HE FOUND SAIFUL AND EVIDENCE CREDIBLE.
Why it is idle chatter:
Why is talking about “She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” idle chatter?
It is pointless talking and sharing pain experiences except to draw lessons from the pain and to escape pain if it is possible.
Not only can pain be avoided, it can be permanently escaped so that the person never experiences pain anymore. If others will not give up their pain experiences, then there is no use appreciating their pain, feeling pain for them because they are deluded and recalcitrant and you are a fool or mad or misguided (it is never merit to be misguided) to persist with them.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE TOPIC OF PAIN WAS BROUGHT UP TO LEARN LESSONS FROM IT NOR ARE AVENUES FOR ESCAPE FROM PAIN EXPLORED OR SOUGHT AND SO IT IS FRIVOLOUS OR IDLE CHATTER TALKING ABOUT HER LITERALLY FEELING LAUREN’S PAIN AS IF IT IS THAT TERRIBLE.
PAIN IS A MEANINGLESS TOPIC NOT WORTHY OF DISCUSSION BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS AND ITS RESULT OR SUFFERING. IT IS USELESS TO DWELL ON PAIN EXCEPT TO DRAW LESSONS AND FIND AN ESCAPE IF POSSIBLE, ANYTHING IS IDLE CHATTER, VAIN TALK, EXALTING SUFFERING.
Going forward:
Quote: "Going forward, manufacturing output still looks dodgy," said Song Seng Wun of CIMB Research.
Only a greedy man with stakes at risk would look forward and backwards in search of guidance and it is actually based on force, greed and fear rather than true reason.
The Buddha said let there be nothing of the future or past for you and so if you must look forwards and backwards, it is always suffering to trouble yourself to think anxiously and because you are attached to your life here, you will be back here for even suffering that the Buddha said is as vast as an ocean.
NO ONE HAS TRUE REASON TO LOOK FORWARD OR BACKWARDS EXCEPT FOR FALSE EMOTIONAL (GREED FOR GAIN, FEAR, ANXIETY FOR LOSS) REASONS AND IT IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT THAT THERE SHALL BE NOTHING OF THE FUTURE FOR YOU WHICH MEANS SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN FOR THE FORWARD LOOKING GREEDY PERSON.
The big uncertainty:
Quote: The big uncertainty over that is developments in the eurozone," he said.
People speak of the big uncertainty as if it is a fact and people read it as if it is a fact when it is delusion and wrong understanding.
What is reality is that it is unknown not uncertainty, uncertainty is when a person’s mind is stirred in confusion mixed with fear or anxiety or worry.
UNCERTAINTY IS ABOUT A FALSE FORCE BASED STATE OF A PERSON’S MIND, IT IS NOT ABOUT A PHYSICAL SITUATION THAT CAN ONLY BE KNOWN OR UNKNOWN. JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING IS UNKNOWN DOES NOT MEAN IT IS AN UNCERTAINTY. WHAT PEOPLE CALL ‘CERTAINTY’ IS NOT TRUTH BUT THEY ARE DAMNED SURE IT IS TRUE OR CERTAIN WHEN IT IS MERELY THEIR ASSUMPTION THAT MAY NOT COME TRUE, WHAT THEY CALL UNCERTAINTY IS WHEN THEIR MINDS ARE DISTURBED, ROILED, VACILLATING AS TO WHAT WILL HAPPEN.
UNCERTAINTY IS NEVER ABOUT REALITY, IT IS ABOUT A PERSON’S STATE OF MIND AS A RESULT OF BEING UNSURE OR UNABLE TO PREDICT WHAT WILL HAPPEN. THUS IT IS THE UNKNOWN OVER THAT, NOT THE BIG UNCERTAINTY. THERE IS NOTHING BIG OR SMALL ABOUT THAT UNKNOWN EXCEPT IN THAT PERSON’S ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION.
Looking forward is a programmed state:
Looking forward in ordinary people is a programmed state driven by emotions eg greed for gain and fear for losses.
It is force or emotion that drives them to look forward copied or aping others and when well programmed they automatically look forward in any matter with material stakes for them.
LOOKING FORWARD IS A PROGRAMMED STATE IN EMOTIONAL PEOPLE AND SO THEY ARE ROBOTS AND THE PROGRAMMING IS DRIVEN BY EMOTION, BY GREED OR ANXIETY.
Proof the Buddha is no fake:
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING AFTER EXAMINING THE BUDDHA’S DHARMA TO BE UNCERTAIN OR COME TO A CONCLUSION THE BUDDHA IS A FAKE OR MAY BE A FAKE. ONLY SOMEONE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING CAN BE UNCERTAIN OR CONCLUDE THE BUDDHA IS A MERE MORTAL WHEN HE IS AS HE CLAIMED, THE HIGHEST BEING, THE ONE PERFECT IN EVERY WAY AND PEERLESS.
It is not the Buddha’s fault or the fault of records relating to the Buddha that you are in doubt and uncertainty but the fault lies in your lack of true understanding.
IT IS NOT THE FAULT OF EXISTING RECORDS THAT MANY ARE UNCERTAIN ABOUT WHO THE BUDDHA IS BUT THE FAULT LIES IN THEIR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
REFLECTING THE SCALE OF NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AMONST MANKIND, EVEN TODAY EVEN TOP BUDDHIST PROFESSIONALS HAVE FAILED TO GRASP WHAT THE BUDDHA IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS IN MANY WAYS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE BUDDHA SAID HIS DHARMA IS WELL TAUGHT NOT POORLY TAUGHT), FAILED TO DO JUSTICE TO WHAT HE TAUGHT AND ARE GUILTY OF LEADING OTHERS ASTRAY (WITH KARMA ATTACHED, SAID THE BUDDHA).
(As the Buddha said, anyone who says what he taught is not taught or what he did not teach is taught is asking for demerit)
Below are samples of the many proofs that tells the person with true understanding that the Buddha cannot be a fake.
Counsel to the Bhikkhus
"Such and such is virtue; concentration; and wisdom. Great becomes the fruit, great is the gain of concentration when fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes the fruit& gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration. Utterly freed from lust, becoming, and ignorance is the mind that is fully developed in wisdom."
What the Buddha is telling the person with true understanding is that virtue, concentration and wisdom are clearly defined as such and such that cannot be refuted.
Thus virtue is not harming, killing, not stealing, lying, no idle chatter, divisive speech, no sexual misconduct, drinking, no joking, laughing, singing and dancing (and many more), concentration comprises the first (serenity of mind with thinking), second (fully conscious cessation of thinking), third (neither liking nor disliking) and fourth (neither pain nor pleasure) higher states of mind and wisdom comprises the ability to see things as they actually are and thus avoid actions that lead to karma and future suffering.
Further, the Buddha is saying that virtue is the indispensable requisite to great concentration and great concentration is the mandatory requisite for great wisdom. Without great virtue you cannot have great concentration, without great concentration you cannot have great wisdom and this is as it actually is for one who knows and because NO ONE HAS EVER BEFORE AND AFTER TAUGHT THIS AND IT IS TRUE AND ESSENTIAL TO THE HAPPINESS OF A BEING, IT IS PROOF THE BUDDHA CANNOT BE A FAKE.
"There are five strands of sense desire. Forms cognizable by the eye that are desirable, bound up with sensual desire and tempting to lust. Sounds...odors...flavors...tangibles, that are desirable, bound up with sense desire, and tempting to lust. The pleasure arising dependent on these five strands of sense desire, that is called sensual pleasure.
"Now, if someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses. Here, quite secluded from sensual desires, unwholesome states of mind, a monk enters upon and abides in the first meditative absorption (jhana), which is accompanied by thought conception and discursive thinking and has in it joy born of seclusion. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that. Here, with the stilling of thought conception and discursive thinking...a monk enters upon and abides in the second meditative absorption...in the sphere of the infinity of space... consciousness ... no-thingness... neither-perception-nor-non-perception.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses. Here, by completely surmounting the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, a monk enters upon and abides in the cessation of perception and feeling.
"It may happen, Ananda, that Wanderers of other sects will be saying this: 'The recluse Gotama speaks of the Cessation of Perception and Feeling and describes it as pleasure. What and how is this (a pleasure)?'
"Those who say so, should be told: 'The Blessed One describes as pleasure not only the feeling of pleasure. But a Tathagata describes as pleasure whenever and whereinsoever it is obtained.'"
What the Buddha points out is true, the happiness of the first higher state of mind (no style, no use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness) is far higher than whatever happiness the person can obtain through sensual pleasures, the happiness of the second higher state of mind (cessation of thinking), the third state (neither stirring mental force attractively or repulsively) and the fourth state (neither experiencing pain nor pleasure) are progressively incomparably higher.
FOR THOSE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED FOR THEMSELVES THE INCREASINGLY HIGHER, MORE SUBLIME HAPPINESSES OF THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND, HE KNOWS WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT THAT NO ELSE BEFORE OR EVER SINCE HAS TAUGHT, CANNOT BE ANYTHING BUT TRUE AND SO THE BUDDHA IS NO FAKE, HE GENUINELY SEES AND KNOWS EVERYTHING, POINTS THE (ONLY) WAY OUT OF SUFFERING IN ITS ENTIRETY OR COMPLETELY FOR THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND.
IT IS NEVER THE FAULT OF THE BUDDHA OR THE LACK OF FACTS THAT CAUSES PEOPLE TO BE UNCERTAIN AS TO WHO THE BUDDHA IS, IT IS THE FAULT OF THEIR NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS SO.
Why no copycat Buddhas & Jesus?
It is with reason, with cause, not without reason, without cause why there are no copycat Buddhas and Jesuses.
There are copycat Buddhas and Jesuses every now and then but they are far cries, even clear cut cranks or madcaps whose conduct and teachings are much at variance to the actual or original Buddha and Jesus.
So what is the reason why there are no copycat Buddhas and Jesuses?
Anyone who will be a copycat must be a person of no true understanding given to falsity or shameless copying or imitation of others, and they will only imitate others that are themselves false, bad and impressive, never true and good and so because the Buddha and Jesus are genuinely true and good, it is impossible copycats will want to ape someone and something true.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO IS TRULY GOOD TO COPY OTHERS BECAUSE THAT IS INDULGING IN FALSITY AND DECEPTION AND SO ONLY EVIL, IRRESPONSIBLE PEOPLE WILL COPY OR IMITATE ANOTHER. AND THEY WILL ONLY IMITATE OTHERS BECAUSE IT IS FALSE AND IMPRESSIVE FOR SELFISH GAINS (EG POWER, MATERIAL, SENSATE GAINS) NEVER IMITATE WHAT IS THE TRUTH THAT THEY ACTUALLY NEVER KNEW, NEVER UNDERSTOOD AND HATED.
COPYCATS NEVER HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH AND THEY HATE THE TRUTH SO HOW CAN THEY GET THEMSELVES TO COPY WHAT IS AT VARIANCE WITH THEIR OWN NATURES? HOW CAN A LIAR SPEAK IN PRAISE OF TRUTH AND TRANSMIT THE TRUTH? THUS THEY WILL NEVER SPEAK OR IMITATE THE TRUTH THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW AND HATE BUT THEY WILL ONLY IMITATE WHAT IS FALSE AND HAVE MATERIAL GAINS FOR THEM.
THUS THE FACT THAT THERE ARE NEVER CREDIBLE FAKE JESUSES OR BUDDHAS IS PROOF THEY ARE GENUINE.
You can rehash by rote without understanding or falsely understanding the many things Jesus and the Buddha preached and yet even this is anathema, shunned, never done. Seldom if ever do you hear Christian and Buddhist clerics preach the letter of what their masters taught.
In order to be a faked Jesus or Buddha you must truly understand what Jesus and the Buddha taught. Because all copycats have no true understanding and they hate what the Buddha and Jesus stand for, how can they get themselves to copy or imitate the Buddha and Jesus?
WHATEVER IS TRUE CANNOT BE FAKED BUT IT CAN ONLY BE STATED AFTER HAVING TRULY UNDERSTOOD IT. BECAUSE FAKERS HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND THEY HATE THE TRUTH THAT IS AT ODDS WITH THEIR NATURES, THEY CAN NEVER GET THEMSELVES TO FAKE OR EVEN REHASH BY ROTE THE TRUTH AND WHATEVER FAKING OF THE BUDDHA OR JESUS IS BY PEOPLE WHO ARE ADVANCED DELUDED OR MAD AND A FAR CRY FROM THE ACTUAL BUDDHA AND JESUS.
Copy anything under the sun except the truth:
Fakers will copy anything under the sun for selfish or mad reasons but they will never copy the truth because they can never truly understand the truth, they hate the truth and truth is at odds with their false, falsifying nature.
Thus it is impossible for anyone in this world to copy the Jesus or the Buddha because what Jesus and the Buddha stands for is at variance with fakers’ natures.
THUS THAT THERE ARE NO CREDIBLE FAKES OF JESUS AND THE BUDDHA, ONLY INCREDIBLE FAKES IS TESTAMENT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA ARE NO FAKES.
Whoever speaks the truth cannot be a fake:
Truth is universal and transcends anyone and so whoever speaks the truth is always true and can never be a fake. Only what is spoken that is false can come from a fake.
WHATEVER IS TRUE CANNOT COME FROM A FAKE AND SO WHOEVER SPEAKS WHAT IS TRUE, WHAT TURNS OUT TO BE TRUE, WHAT IS PROVEN LATER TO BE TRUE MUST BE TRUE, NEVER A FAKE.
TRUTH DOES NOT BELONG TO ANYBODY AND SO IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO THE PERSON IS, IF HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH, HE IS TRUE.
THE BUDDHA IS THE HIGHEST EXPOSITIONER OF THE TRUTH WHICH DOES NOT BELONG TO HIM. HE SAID HE IS THIS EON’S FULLY AWAKENED ONE, THERE WERE PAST BUDDHAS AND WILL BE FUTURE BUDDHAS. HE NEVER CLAIMED THE TRUTH BELONGED TO HIM.
THUS IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO THE PERSON IS, SO LONG AS HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH, HE IS TRUE AND CANNOT BE A FAKE.
THUS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT JESUS TEACHES MANY TRUTHS UNSPOKEN IN THIS WORLD AND THEN TELL A LIE THAT HE IS THE SON OF GOD AND THERE IS A FATHER WHEN HE IS NOT THE SON OF GOD AND GOD IS NOT THE FATHER.
Nothing mystical or exotic or Buddhist about meditation:
Meditation is crucial according to the Buddha, He said, ‘meditate, don’t afterwards regret’.
There is no other goal of meditation except achieving the four higher states of the mind and there is nothing mystical or exotic or Buddhist or unchristian about them except in your delusion.
Stop stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness and you have achieved the first higher state of mind that is the first goal of meditation and you will have a pleasant abiding here and even 1 eternity of heavenly bliss awaits you.
Fail to stop stretching your syllables, change speed and loudness and you have failed to achieve the first goal of meditation no matter how frequently or expertly you meditate.
Stop thinking fully conscious and you have achieved the second higher state of mind that is the next goal of meditation and you will have an even happier existence here and two eternities in heavenly bliss awaits you according to the Buddha.
Fail to stop thinking and no matter how assiduous you meditate, you are a meditative failure, you have meditated in vain, in delusion, for show.
Stop stirring your mental force to be attracted or like, repulsed or dislike and you have achieved the third higher state of mind that gives 4 eternities in heaven.
Fail to stop liking or disliking and you have failed to achieve the goal of meditation, you have meditated in vain, in delusion.
Stop experiencing pain or pleasure and you have achieved the 4th highest state of the mind that gives 500 eternities in heaven. Cannot stop experiencing pain nor pleasure and you have failed to achieve the 4th goal of meditation.
China's GPS rival is switched on
This statement is potentially misleading because it may be just a case of ‘China’s own GPS is switched on’, it is presumptuous and misleading to say it is a rival. Having your own GPS does not mean it is to rival or compete and it is speaking carelessly, misleading to say so.
IT IS PRESUMPTUOUS AND MISLEADING WITH KARMA ATTACHED TO SPEAK OF RIVALRY JUST BECAUSE CHINA HAS SWITCHED ON ITS OWN GPS.
Why so critical:
There may be those confronted by what I say that ‘IT IS PRESUMPTUOUS AND MISLEADING WITH KARMA ATTACHED TO SPEAK OF RIVALRY JUST BECAUSE CHINA HAS SWITCHED ON ITS OWN GPS’ would retort and attack me saying I am so critical or nit picking when it is further proof of their lack of true understanding.
IT IS NEVER A MATTER OF WHETHER I AM TOO CRITICAL OR NOT BUT IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER MY CRITICISM IS TRUE OR VALID OR NOT AND SO TO SAY ‘WHY SO CRITICAL’ IS TO DISPLAY YOUR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND TO ATTACK ME WITH KARMA INVOLVED.
THE REASON WHY OTHERS CANNOT SPEAK LIKE ME IS BECAUSE YOU NEED TO SEE THINGS TRULY, TO UNDERSTAND THINGS TRULY TO SPEAK LIKE ME AND BECAUSE OTHERS DO NOT SEE THINGS TRULY, THEY NEVER SEE THINGS AS I SEE THEM, WHAT I SEE DIFFERS FROM EVERYONE HERE, WHICH IS WHY OTHERS CAN NEVER SPEAK LIKE I SPEAK, THAT THEY SHOULD SPEAK LIKE ME IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY AND I AM TRULY UNIQUE HERE.
Faking is an act inextricable to falsity never needed for truth:
Falsity is whatever is false, did not happen, truth is whatever happened.
Faking is an act, something a person indulging in falsity must do and it is to act or pretend as if true what is not true. In order to commit a falsity you must always act as if it is true in order to sell the falsity to others and if you keep acting as if true what is false in time you begin to perceive falsely what is false is true and you do not realize you are faking it and what you are saying or doing is false or harmful.
Whatever is recorded and rehashed from recording is a faked generalized nonspecific action or speech, never genuine or specifically intended for an occasion and so if you are rehashing all the time as ordinary emotional stylish people are doing, you are faking or acting or pretending as if true the how and what of everything you say or do. And so you cannot do anything without faking it or acting as if true.
Whatever is true does not require faking, does not require acting or pretending as if it is true because it is true so why act as if it is true?
Thus because the default mode of people in this world is to ALWAYS FAKE IT and whatever is true does not require faking it, they are incapable of speaking or doing what is truly true, only what is faked true.
IN ORDER TO SPEAK WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA SAYS, YOU MUST BE CAPABLE OF NOT FAKING IT, NOT ACTING AS IS TRUE WHAT IS FALSE AND BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE INCAPABLE OF NOT FAKING IT, THEY CAN NEVER SAY WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA SAID, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY CAN SAY OR DO WHAT JESUS OR THE BUDDHA SAID OR DID AND SO IT IS THAT THERE ARE NEVER CREDIBLE OR CONVINCING FAKES OF JESUS OR THE BUDDHA, NOR ARE ORDINARY PEOPLE CAPABLE OF TRULY UNDERSTANDING WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA TAUGHT, WHICH IS WHY NO ONE, EVEN THOSE ASSOCIATED TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF CHRISTIANITY AND BUDDHISM ARE CAPABLE OF, AS JESUS SAID, TAKING FROM WHAT IS HIS AND MAKING IT KNOWN TO YOU. THEY DON’T TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT JESUS SAID, SO HOW CAN THEY TRULY EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?
FALSITY IS ONE THING, FAKING IS ANOTHER THING, THE TWO ARE SEPARATE BUT INTERTWINED. BECAUSE OF THE DESIRE TO CONVINCE OTHERS WHAT IS TENDERED THAT IS FALSE IS TRUE, PARTAKERS OF FALSITY MUST LEARN TO FAKE, TO ACT AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE AND SO EVERYTHING THEY SAY OR DO IS FALSE THAT NEEDS TO BE AND IS ACTED AS IF TRUE AND THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF DOING OR SAYING ANYTHING WITHOUT FAKING, WITHOUT ACTING AS IF IT IS TRUE. BECAUSE WHAT IS TRUE NEVER REQUIRES ACTING AS IF TRUE BECAUSE IT IS TRUE, THEY ARE EUNUCHS OF THE TRUTH, INCAPABLE OF THE TRUTH THAT THEIR DEFAULT FAKING OR ACTING AS IF TRUE DISQUALIFIES THEM FROM.
A faker can never tell the truth:
In order to speak falsely you must be a faker, must learn or condition yourself that becomes permanent to act what is false is true and so you can only restrict yourself to saying what is false that you can then fake or act as true.
BECAUSE OF THE NECESSITY TO FAKE OR ACT AS IF IT IS TRUE WHAT IS FALSE, A PERSON WHO PARTAKES OF FALSITY MUST TRAIN HIMSELF TO ACT AS IF IS TRUE WHAT HE SAYS THAT IS FALSE AND IN TIME HE IS A PERMANENT UNCONSCIOUS ACTOR NEEDING TO ACT AS IF TRUE EVERYTHING HE SAYS OR DOES. THIS AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM SPEAKING THE TRUTH WHICH REQUIRES THAT HE NOT ACT AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE BECAUSE WHAT IS TRUE DOES NOT REQUIRE FAKING OR ACTING AS IF TRUE THAT HE PERVERSELY IS INCAPABLE OF, LIKE AN EUNUCH OF TRUTH.
AS JESUS SAID, NO MAN CAN SERVE TWO MASTERS, NO MAN CAN SERVE TRUTH AND FALSITY, HE WILL LEARN TO LOVE ONE AND HATE THE OTHER AND MEN HAVE CHOSEN TO LOVE FAKING AND HATE TRUTH.
THUS WHOEVER IS PROVEN TO BE A SPEAKER OF THE TRUTH AS JESUS AND THE BUDDHA CAN BE PROVEN TO HAVE SPOKEN THE TRUTH CANNOT BE A FAKE, THEY ARE WHO THEY CLAIM TO BE BECAUSE NO FAKE CAN SAY WHAT THEY SAID.
How come no one fakes like I fake it?
No one fakes like I fake because what I say is not faked but it is the truth that requires no faking, no acting as if true what is not true and because they must always fake as if true what is not true, they can never ‘fake’ like I ‘fake’.
IT MAY NOT BE AN ACCIDENT OR SHEER COINCIDENCE THAT ONE IN THIS WORLD CAN SPEAK WHAT I SAY BUT IT IS PROOF THERE IS AN INSURMOUNTABLE BARRIER THAT RENDERS THEM INCAPABLE OF SAYING WHAT I SAY BECAUSE WHAT I SAY IS THE TRUTH THAT REQUIRES NOT FAKING IT OR ACTING AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE TO SAY AND BECAUSE THEY ARE WEDDED TO FALSITY, WEDDED TO FAKING OR ACTING AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE, THEY ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM SAYING IT.
Thirty simple steps to happiness
Have a truly Happy New Year with these guaranteed mood boosters.
This is a deluded statement and if you are not sure then you do not have true understanding.
You can have whatever numbers of simple steps to happiness but so long as you remain in stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you will never gain meaningful happiness but as soon as a person has shed his style, shed his prolonging syllables, changing speed and loudness he has gained incomparable happiness as not to need 30 steps.
IN ORDER TO HAVE 30 STEPS YOU MUST BECOME A ROBOT PRACTICING SOMEHOW THOSE STEPS AND IT IS NEVER HAPPINESS BEING A ROBOT TIED TO 30 STEPS BUT IT IS TORMENTING AND NEVER WORKS.
A mad, harmful distracting conditioned mental state:
The stirring of a person’s mental force to experience primarily like or dislike and secondarily sadness, hurt, confusion and fear is a conditioned or trained state that is mad because it serves no purpose, does not enhance any experience but actually detracts because the simultaneous stirring of mental force to like or dislike draws attention away from the presenting subject or experience or pleasure. It is harmful because force is harmful, painful and leads to death or destruction and so anyone who exposes himself to unnecessary force whether endogenous or exogenous is a fool.
FORCE IS HARMFUL EVEN DEADLY AND SO ANYONE WHO EXPOSES HIS MIND TO FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY BE IT SELF OR OTHER GENERATED IS A BIG FOOL PUTTING HIS HEAD IN A NOOSE. THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE IS TOTALLY USELESS, DOES NOT ADD BUT SUBTRACTS FROM WHATEVER PLEASURE OF THE EXPERIENCE. IT DIVERTS ATTENTION FROM THE PLEASURE OR SUBSTANCE OF THE SITUATION.
THUS ANYONE WHO DOES NOT PAY ATTENTION TO DETECT HIS MENTAL FORCE STIRRING WITHOUT DOING ANY WORK TO EXPERIENCE EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION AND FEAR) AND THENCE TO STEADFASTLY SCRUB OFF SUCH UNNECESSARY OR MAD STIRRINGS IS HEADED FOR FUTURE TORMENT AND DESTRUCTION OF HIS MIND. ANYONE WHO HAS SUCCESSFULLY STILLED THE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE IS HEADED FOR EVEN 4 ETERNITIES OF HEAVENLY BLISS FREE FROM DISEASE, AGING AND DEATH.
FORCE CAN ONLY DO WORK THAT MAY BE USEFUL (EG WASH DISHES) OR USELESS (STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS FOR SHOW) BUT TO STIR ONE’S MENTAL FORCE FOR NO PURPOSE BUT TO EXPERIENCE LIKE OR DISLIKE IS MAD, LIKE THE MAN SITTING IN A CAR REVVING HIS CAR ENGINE AT THE PASSING OF A PRETTY GIRL OR UGLY SIGHT. THE FACT THAT HE CANNOT HELP IT IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS NATURAL BUT BECAUSE IT IS STRONGLY CONDITIONED IN HIM LIKE THE SMOKING ADDICT WHO CANNOT HELP PULLING OUT A CIGARETTE.
YOU MAY BE A TOP NOTCH CHRISTIAN AND AVOWED DENIER OF THE BUDDHA BUT SO LONG AS YOU ARE GUILTY OF STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE AND DISLIKE, IF I AM CORRECT, THERE IS AGONY IN THE FUTURE FOR YOU. THE BUDDHA SAID WHAT HE TAUGHT CANNOT BE DENIED BY ANYONE, NO BRAHMA OR MARA CAN REFUTE WHAT HE TEACHES AND SO ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH THE BUDDHA IS A BRAVE FOOL.
Sins are based on emotions:
Emotions are themselves sinful and many sins are driven by evil emotions never true reason.
Thus such emotions as pride, greed, lust, covetousness, envy are fanciful names for stirred like or attraction and they are all sinful for those who understand correctly.
Hate, anger & jealousy are fanciful names for dislike, the repulsive stirring of a person’s mental force.
Driven by hate people harm others, driven by fear people tell lies to protect themselves or deny responsibility, driven by confusion, people commit wrong. These are forms of wrongdoing under the influence of stirred mental force or emotions. Stealing, harming, sexual debauchery are all driven by stirred mental force or emotions.
THUS EMOTIONS OR STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT DOES NO WORK, LET ALONE USEFUL WORK ARE THEMSELVES SIN (LUST, GREED, PRIDE, HATE) OR THEY ARE THE DRIVES FOR SIN (KILLING, PERSECUTING OTHERS, TELLING LIES).
WITHOUT STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE IT IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO SIN.
It all begins with style:
All emotions are mad, senseless self-inflicted suffering rather than the pleasure or wonder they may be made out to be, they are sins or the motivators of sins (eg stealing, cheating, lying, killing, harming).
And what is the progenitor or father of emotions?
It is style or the senseless constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness.
Why is it that style is the father of emotions and not emotions the father of style?
Emotions are conditioned, not natural states and after being well conditioned it hard if not impossible for the conditioned person not to be emotional.
It is the constant totally unnecessary (initially fully intended or conscious or deliberate) use of force to prolong, change speed and strength that is the basis of style that trains a person’s mental force to automatically prolong, change speed and strength that serves as the template to fashion emotions.
WHENEVER A PERSON FABRICATES STYLE, HE IS TRAINING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS UNNECESSARY, ONLY FOR SHOW AND ONCE WELL TRAINED, HIS MENTAL FORCE HAS GREAT TENDENCY OR URGE TO AUTOMATICALLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT ARE THE BASIC INGREDIENTS FOR FASHIONING EMOTIONS.
LIKE IS THE ATTRACTIVE OR ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ON SEEING SOMETHING (EG PRETTY GIRL), DISLIKE IS THE REPULSIVE ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ON SEEING SOMETHING (EG BLACK MAN), SADNESS IS THE PROLONGING OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TRIGGERED BY SOMETHING, HURT IS THE UNPROTECTED EXPOSURE OF A PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS TO THE ACCELERATING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS TRIGGERED MENTAL FORCE, CONFUSION IS THE HAPHAZARD STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS MENTAL FORCE TRIGGERED BY SOMETHING, FEAR IS THE SUDDEN DROP IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CAUSING A SURGE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS UNOPPOSED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION.
STYLE TRAINS THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH FOR NO TRUE REASONS AND THUS TRAINED THE MENTAL FORCE CAN DISSOCIATE AND STIR IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH ON ITS OWN WITHOUT DOING WORK TRIGGERED BY EVENTS AND THIS DE FACTO IS EMOTIONS AND THUS STYLE IS THE FATHER OF EMOTIONS NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND.
BY ITS OWN A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE WILL NEVER STIR AND IT MUST BE TRAINED TO DO SO AND THIS IS PROVIDED BY THE INITIALLY DELIBERATE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH TO FASHION STYLE.
THE FACT THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIT EMOTIONS MEANS IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME UNSTIRRED WHICH MEANS THE EMOTIONAL STATE IS A CONDITIONED STATE AND SOMETHING MUST HAVE CONDITIONED IT, IT DID NOT CONDITION SPONTANEOUSLY AND IT IS STYLE AND NOTHING ELSE THAT CONDITIONS A MIND TO BE EMOTIONAL.
STOP STYLE AND YOU STOP ALL EMOTIONS FOREVER, FAIL TO STOP STYLE AND YOU WILL NEVER END EMOTIONS NO MATTER WHAT YOU TRY.
Diet 'can stop brain shrinking'
Eating a diet rich in vitamins and fish may protect the brain from ageing while trans fats have the opposite effect, research suggests
So long as you keep pummelling or hammering your mind with even violent mental force, violent emotions, all the diet in the world will not save you from a final destruction of your mind. As soon as you cease all the senseless bombardment of your mind with force fabricating style, force fabricating emotions then what diet do you need?
IN ORDER FOR THE DIET TO WORK YOU MUST REMEMBER AND REHASH OR FOLLOW THAT DIET AND THAT MEANS COMMITTING YOURSELF TO BE A ROBOT AND THAT IS THE PATH OF TORMENT NOT FREEDOM AND SO IT IS DELUSION TO THINK ANY DIET CAN SAVE YOUR BRAIN.
No harm trying?
Anyone who says ‘no harm trying’ the diet even if it does not work has wrong view because there is even terrible harm because you are committing yourself to doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha taught is one of three lower fetters (self identity views, faith in rituals and rules) to future suffering.
WITHOUT KNOWING SOMETHING WORKS (DIET PREVENTS BRAIN SHRINKING) AND YOU DO IT OR EMBRACE IT, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO DO OR SAY THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE THAT DELIVERS YOURSELF INTO THE ARMS OF UNCERTAINTY AND THENCE DOUBT. ONLY WHEN YOU STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW IS TRUE ARE YOU SAFE FROM THE CURSE OF DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT IS SUFFERING HERE AND LEADS TO EVEN FUTURE SUFFERING OF ETERNAL DURATION.
ANYONE WHO HAS THE ATTITUDE OF NO HARM TRYING SOMETHING NEW HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT IS DEADLY.
No harm trying is programmed rules logic:
It is never an accident why some people regularly sprout ‘no harm trying’ in response to certain situations.
‘No harm trying’ is a programming, a rules logic or recorded rehashed understanding that is not fresh specific but generalized rehashed to apply to a situation response.
NO HARM TRYING IS A RULES LOGIC (FAITH IN RULES AND RITUALS IS A LOWER FETTER TO WOE SAYS THE BUDDHA) THAT IS RECORDED AND REHASHED REGULARLY TO FIT SITUATIONS AND SO ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS A ROBOT WITH REHASHED NEVER TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Better safe than sorry:
This is another form of recorded rules logic that denotes the person as a rehashing robot without genuine understanding.
If you think Jesus or the Buddha subscribes to such rules, ‘better safe than sorry’ (as you and everyone here do), you may be right or deluded.
THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND DO NOT NEED SUCH RECORDED RULES LOGIC TO GUIDE THEM.
Quake rattles New Zealand's Christchurch
Christchurch: An earthquake with a magnitude of 5.3 struck close to the New Zealand city of Christchurch on Saturday, the U.S. Geological Survey reported, but there were no immediate reports of damage or casualties.
So called experts came out with statements that earthquakes today are no more frequent or more powerful than the past.
Ask residents of Christchurch if the frequency and strengths of earthquakes they are now experiencing is the same as the past. Just as Christchurch residents are terrorized by frequent strong earthquakes now, it is possible for the frequency and strength of earthquakes to increase or decrease with time and so all these experts are talking nonsense driven by emotion not reason. What is the worth of such ‘experts’ when they talk without knowing driven by prejudices?
The requisites of a robot:
In order to be a robot, you need sensors to receive or perceive (eg good vision, good hearing), a recording and storage medium (hard disk), a means of reading what is recorded and thence relay it to actuators (muscles, limbs or appendages) that carry out or convert into action and speech what is recorded as the correct response.
For more complicated robots with many recordings and a variety of responses that can be applied to a situation, you need some sort of central processor NOT TO UNDERSTANDING THE INCOMING DATA but to detect the jumble or permutations of cues present to compute what the appropriate speech and action responses should be.
THE EXISTENCE OF SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS THAT CAN SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATE A CAR FAST AROUND A COMPLICATED MOUNTAIN TRACK IS PROOF THAT A ROBOT CAN FUNCTION EVEN AT VERY SOPHISTICATED LEVEL WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING OR CONSCIOUSNESS.
THE ROBOT DOES NOT EVEN NEED TO THOROUGHLY PERCEIVE ITS ENVIRONMENT, WHAT IT NEEDS ARE SENSORS THAT ARE PROGRAMMED TO DETECT VITAL CUES TO COMPLETE ITS MISSION, A CENTRAL PROCESSOR TO MAKE SENSE OF THE PERMUTATIONS OF CUES DETECTED AND DECIDE WHICH OF THE MANY RECORDED RESPONSES IN ITS HARD DISK TO EXECUTE, TO READ AND THEN RELAY THOSE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE ACTUATORS THAT WILL CARRY OUT THE RECORDED RESPONSES.
NOWHERE IS THERE UNDERSTANDING OR SEEING AND KNOWING THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE NEEDED NOR INVOLVED EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION IT IS.
HUMAN ROBOTS ARE LIKE THIS EXCEPT THAT IN ADDITION THERE IS ALSO CONSCIOUSNESS, THERE IS A VOYEUR EXPERIENCING THE THINGS HAPPENING AND HE ACTS AS SOMETIME DISC JOCKEY DECIDING WHICH RECORDING TO ACTIVATE. OFTEN HE IS ON AUTO PILOT, DIRECT KNEE JERK JUKEBOX ACTIVATION BYPASSES HIM, HIS JUKEBOX AUTOMATICALLY DECIDES FOR HIM WHAT TO DO OR SAY.
What a robot needs:
A ROBOT HAS NO UNDERSTANDING AND NO UNDERSTANDING IS EVER REQUIRED TO BE A ROBOT.
WHILST A ROBOT MAY HAVE VERY IMPRESSIVE EVEN LIFE LIKE PRESENCE, IT CAN ONLY CARRY OUT WHAT IT IS PROGRAMMED TO DETECT AND PROGRAMMED TO SAY.
IF SOMETHING IS NOT PROGRAMMED TO BE DETECTED, IT WILL NOT DETECT IT EVEN IF PRESENT. AFTER REPROGRAMMING THEN IT CAN DETECT IT.
IF SOMETHING IS NOT PROGRAMMED TO BE SAID OR DONE, IT WILL NOT DO OR SAY IT EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE. AFTER REPROGRAMMING THEN IT CAN SAY OR DO IT.
HUMANS ARE CONSUMMATE ROBOTS BUT ON TOP THAT THEY HAVE CONSCIOUSNESS AND ARE VOYEURS EXPERIENCING AND ENJOYING THE PLEASURES AND PAINS OF THEIR ROBOTIC EXISTENCE, THEY ARE ALSO PART TIME DISC JOCKEYS WHO DECIDE SOMETIMES WHAT THEIR ROBOTS DO BASED ON RECORDED RESPONSES.
Oh, my God!
The reason why some people always exclaim, “Oh, my God” is because they are programmed to say it and the reason why others never say it is because they are not programmed to say it and so they never say it even when it is possible for them to say it.
Certain environmental triggers (that has nothing to do with reason or understanding) will trigger some people to exclaim ‘oh, my God’ because it is recorded or programmed in them whilst others will never say it because it is not programmed in them.
What say you?
This question is not good or meritorious but bad, creates demerit to be experienced as future suffering.
It is inviting others to have a say in issues that are raise and rather than good as is commonly falsely perceived, it is bad.
In any issue there is only one truth, one reality as it actually is and only those who see it as it actually is, has right view and there are no alternative views that are right and so whoever courts a diversity of different opinions about a subject is courting falsity, fostering differences and conflict.
THERE IS NEVER ANY NEED TO INVITE PEOPLE TO AIR THEIR OPINIONS ON ANY MATTER BECAUSE THAT MATTER CAN BE EXAMINED, UNDERSTOOD SUCH THAT IT CAN BE DETERMINED WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG. WHAT SAY YOU IS SANCTIFYING FALSITY, SANCTIFYING THE CORRECTNESS OF DIFFERENT OPINIONS THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE. IN ANY ISSUE IF THERE ARE TWO DIFFERING OPINIONS, EITHER BOTH ARE WRONG OR ONE IS RIGHT AND THE OTHER WRONG, NEVER BOTH CORRECT AND SO FOR THE SAKE OF TRUTH THERE SHOULD BE NO TOLERANCE FOR DIFFERING OPINIONS.
You need cues, predilection to rehash never understanding:
If a person rehashes what is approximately or precisely determined or recorded beforehand, what he needs is not true understanding of what he is doing or saying, understanding what the situation he is rehashing into, but he needs cues or signals or predilection or preferences to decide what he will rehash into the situation.
SINCE WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY HAS ALREADY BEEN DECIDED BEFOREHAND, FIXED WHAT IS THERE TO UNDERSTAND EXCEPT TO PAY ATTENTION TO RENDER IT AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE ACCORDING TO PLANS OR RECORDING?
AND IF WHAT YOU SAY IS REHASHED, YOU NEED CUES, SIGNALS OR CLUES (THESE ARE NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION) TO TELL YOU TO REHASH THIS PARTICULAR RECORDING AND NOT ANOTHER RECORDING OR PREFERENCES/PREDILECTION (LIKE AND DISLIKE) TO DETERMINE WHAT YOU SHALL REHASH.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO UNDERSTANDING INVOLVED AND THE PERSON DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND, HE ONLY FAKES HE UNDERSTANDS, THIS ARRANGEMENT IS VULNERABLE TO ‘EMBARRASSING’ MISCUES, GAFFS, INAPPOPRIATE REHASHES AND HE IS VULNERABLE TO LOSS, INJURY EVEN FATALITY IF, WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE (ABSENT MINDEDLY) MISCUES THE WRONG ACTION (EG PRESS ACCELERATOR INSTEAD OF BRAKES).
THERE ARE SERIOUS EVEN DEADLY RISKS IN NOT HAVING TRUE UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE YOUR ACTIONS DO NOT TRULY FIT THE OCCASION AND YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS AND RISKS OF THE SITUATION AND EVERY NOW AND THEN WRONG REHASHES CAN EMBARRASS, CAUSE LOSSES (SHOPKEEPER GIVE WRONG CHANGE TO CUSTOMER), INJURY AND EVEN DEATH TO SELF OR OTHERS BUT BY AND LARGE SOMEHOW, PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS MANAGE TO MUDDLE THROUGH LIFE SAFELY TO OLD AGE.
For one who discerns, everything people say and do is rehashed and because everything is rehashed, they do not need true understanding nor is it present.
Their actions are actually driven by predilection, by stirred like, dislike, sadness, hurt, confusion and fear eg their fear aroused, they ran away. People ignore certain people eg beggars not because of reason but dislike, driven by dislike (based on force) they sneer at someone.
Apart from predilection, it is cues that they need to decide what action to take and this may be a direct knee jerk, see this do that eg see someone approaching and say “Hi there” or smile or in more complex situations, programmed rules logic.
PROGRAMMED RULES LOGIC ARE GENERALIZED RECORDED COMMANDS THAT TELL THE ROBOT WHAT TO SAY OR DO FROM HIS REPERTOIRE OF RECORDINGS, THEY ARE PROGRAMS THAT RUN PROGRAMS OF RECORDED ACTIONS.
The reason why people turn away from what I say is not because it is false but it is because they are robots and do not have true understanding which is necessary to digest what I say that is crucially important in understanding life and escaping terrible suffering here. They suffer and they seek help or escape but what they are searching for is fresh programmings that they do not have, for a magical pill, they are quite content to somnolently continue their rehashing lives even though they sometimes exclaim life is meaningless and suffering. The underlying reason why life is meaningless is not the nature of life itself but because they are rehashing and whatever is rehashed is meaningless not matter how meaningful you swear it is and it is always terrible suffering being a robot rather than the wonderful life they want others to believe they are enjoying.
Life is meaningless:
You hear people moan, “Life is meaningless” and they think they speak the truth and listeners agree, they think they have a point there and what they hear is the truth.
LIFE IS MEANINGLESS IS SPOKEN FALSELY AND THOSE WHO THINK WHAT IS SAID IS CORRECT HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING.
IT IS NOT LIFE ITSELF THAT IS MEANINGLESS BUT IT IS PEOPLE’S INCESSANT MECHANICAL REHASHING OF EVERYTHING AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO THAT MAKES IT MEANINGLESS AND TORMENTING.
IF A PERSON DOES NOT REHASH MECHANICALLY MAKING HIMSELF A ROBOT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING, LIFE WILL TAKE ON A VERY DIFFERENT MEANINGFUL NATURE.
HENCE IT IS NOT LIFE THAT IS MEANINGLESS BUT IT IS YOU WHO MAKES LIFE MEANINGLESS BY BECOMING A MINDLESS ROBOT OR PARROT.
HERE AS EVERYWHERE PEOPLE THINK THEY SPEAK THE TRUTH, PEOPLE THINK THEY HEAR THE TRUTH BUT THEY HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING, WHAT THEY SPEAK AND HEAR IS FALSE.
You are meaningless, not life:
It is you who is meaningless by constantly mindlessly mechanically rehashing not life itself. Do not blame life or you will be judged.
Because you are meaningless, you are not worth saving, you are worthless according to the Buddha and Jesus and will perish even for another eternity.
Impossible for anyone to find meaning here:
No matter how rich, successful, intellectually or scientifically or artistically acclaimed anyone here is, his life is meaningless because there is a substance and style combo in him that renders him a meaningless mechanical robot, he is incessantly pounded on all sides by force radiating from others, from others mechanically rehashing to him so it is impossible for anyone to find meaning here.
ONLY WHEN THE PERSON EXITS THE TORMENTING PRISON OF STYLE TO BECOME A NON ROBOT WILL HE EXPERIENCE A SIGNIFICANT MEASURE OF TRUE MEANING IN HIS LIFE. IF HE FURTHER SUCCEEDS IN FULLY CONSIOUS STOP THINKING THAT IS A FURTHER MEASURE OF MEANING IN HIS LIFE, IF HE STOPS LIKING AND DISLIKING THAT IS AN EVEN HIGHER MEANING AND HAPPINESS TO HIS LIFE.
FORMS, SOUNDS, TOUCH, SMELLS & TASTES ARE FABRICATIONS, CREATIONS THAT ARE FALSE, CAN INSTANTLY BE CREATED OR DISAPPEARED BY GOD AND WHOSOEVER WHOSE LIFE IS DEPENDENT ON FORMS AND SOUNDS MUST HAVE A MEANINGLESS LIFE.
It is robotic, thinking, liking disliking life that is meaningless:
One must be careful or discerning in what one says.
It is not life per se that is meaningless but it is firstly robotic life, secondly life with non-stop thinking, thirdly life with nonstop like and dislike and fourthly life with pain and pleasure that is meaningless.
IN OTHER WORDS IT IS BEING A ROBOT, CONSTANTLY HELPLESSLY THINKING, LIKING AND DISLIKING, PAIN AND PLEASURE THAT MAKES LIFE MEANINGLESS, NOT LIFE ITSELF.
RPK: Anwar guilty and trial fair:
The sodomy charge against Anwar was not trumped up and he will be found guilty on Jan 9, says popular blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin.
“I think it is a foregone conclusion: Anwar is going to be found guilty. PKR will certainly go to town on the issue, but PAS and DAP will not be too excited about turning the Pakatan agenda into a ‘free Anwar campaign’.
K. Kabilan, Free Malaysia Today
Reform activist and influential blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin believes that Anwar Ibrahim was a victim of a honey-trap, but quickly added that the opposition leader was given a fair trial.
By his many actions and deeds, RPK has proven himself to those who discern that he is not a man of truth and goodness but a deluded man.
It is RPK not Anwar who has lost all credibility to me.
Anwar was never given a fair trial and whoever said it was fair is asking for judgment. His lawyers were denied police reports, lists of witnesses, etc and that is not fair. The many actions of the court shows it is not fair except if you are mad. The case is based on the testimony of one man and DNA evidence that can be planted.
If Anwar was a practicing homosexual, it would be gross incompetence they could not nail him better and Saiful took 3 days to see a street doctor and the specimens were left lying around after collection and so anyone who think RPK is good, a bastion of truth is a fool, gullible. Why did he do the TV3 interview that said Rosmah was not at the scene? The fact that the policemen charged and Razak Baginda is a close associate points to complicity regardless of whether she was at the scene or not.
RPK is tiptoeing on the tightrope of sanity:
Like all emotional people (there is plenty of evidence of emotional abuses in his own admission), RPK’s mind is getting increasingly dishevelled with age and so increasingly he talks nonsense, things that do not add up and like the man wobbling on the tightrope of sanity, he is waiting for the final fatal slip and plunge into the chasm of torment.
HIS PAST ABUSES OF HIS MIND HAS RAVAGED IT AND NOW HIS INSANITY IS GETTING OUT OF CONTROL AND HE IS FACING A SHATTERED MIND AND YET EVEN NOW HE IS CREATING FURTHER KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE PAIN UTTERING IRRESPONSIBLY.
Lofty targets for the new year:
This is a Star columnist headline.
If you do not mean your targets, it is mere lip service then you prize will be insanity for saying things that you do mean, just for show.
If you mean your lofty targets then you must be a robot to subscribe either approximately or precisely to it and that too is the path to insanity because to be a robot fulfilling targets is mad.
THUS PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE WHAT THEY SAY ARE MAD, THE WAY TO WOE. A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT DOES NOT SET HIMSELF TARGETS BECAUSE IT MEANS HE BECOMES THE SLAVES OF TARGET. ONLY MEN GREEDY FOR GAINS NEED TARGETS AND GREED LEADS TO SUFFERING NEVER HAPPINESS. IF YOU DO NOT MEAN YOUR TARGETS THEN YOU ARE A LIAR AND THAT TOO IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.
Anwar treated fairly?
Is a commando style arrest of Anwar, stripping him naked and examining him in a cubicle fair?
His future is at stake and he has reasonable request to interview in court the PM and his wife and they were refused.
Contrast the treatment on corruption by BN politicians eg Shahrizat.
ANYONE WHO SAYS ANWAR WAS GIVEN A FAIR TRIAL BETTER EXAMINE CAREFULLY THE EVIDENCE. IF SOMETHING IS SHIT AND YOU TELL OTHERS IT IS FOOD, ONE DAY YOU MAY BE MADE TO EAT THE SHIT YOU TELL OTHERS IS FOOD. RPK IS TELLING OTHERS SHIT IS FOOD. MAKE SURE IT IS FOOD OTHERWISE HE WILL HAVE TO EAT THE SHIT ONE DAY.
RPK hates Anwar:
For some hidden reason, RPK hates Anwar and hate or blind stirred force is the basis of his utterances that are against Anwar that will have credence with some people because they think he has connections and privy to secrets others don’t know.
In the same way, Zaid is a closet Anwar hater, for some reason he hates Anwar and that is the basis of his actions.
RPK’S MANY UTTERANCES ARE INCONSISTENT AND THE REASON IT IS SO IS BECAUSE HIS MANY UTTERANCES ARE NEVER BASED ON UNEMOTIONAL TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT BASED ON PREDILECTION, EMOTIONS AND BECAUSE THESE ARE BLIND, CANTANKEROUS, SO TOO ARE HIS UTTERANCES AND HE IS A FOOL MISLEADING OTHERS HEAPING KARMA ON HIMSELF.
Make money from volatility
Questor's timely stock market tip.
This is the call and the creed of the opportunist, a nice word for predator and so he is headed for the animal world if not hell, never heaven.
The opportunist or predator is not interested in the substance of any matter, he is only interested in what is in it for him, what material gains and so he is doomed for eternal torment. That he can care for others is impossible.
A wrong trial proves Anwar innocent:
Regarding their (collective) wrong understanding again here as everywhere, they perceive it as a matter of a fair or unfair trial but it is in truth a matter of a correct or incorrect (wrong), proper or improper trial that proves to a discerning observer that this is a ‘shambolic’ trial intended to convict at all costs.
There are many things that are incorrect or wrong about this trial that proves Anwar innocent even without knowing whether the act happened.
THE SYSTEM IS LOADED AGAINST ANWAR AND SO IF ANWAR IS TRULY GUILTY, IT NEED NOT FEAR GIVING ANWAR A FAIR TRIAL BECAUSE A GUILTY MAN WILL BE FOUND GUILTY AFTER A CORRECT TRIAL BECAUSE HE IS GUILTY.
JUST AS THE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN TEOH BENG HUAT’S DEATH NEED NOT FEAR COOPERATING IF THEY WERE INNOCENT BECAUSE THE SYSTEM WILL NEVER FRAME THEM BUT IT MAY FRAME YOU OR ME, THE FACT THAT THEY GANGED UP IN SILENCE IS SELF PROOF OF GUIT. IN THE SAME WAY IF ANWAR WAS TRULY GUILTY THERE IS NO FEAR OF GIVING HIM A FAIR TRIAL BECAUSE HE WILL BE FOUND GUILTY.
If I guess correctly, even today no police report of Saiful’s accusation has been produced maybe because there was never such reports which takes effort to fabricate and they are arrogant enough to flaunt it.
Police refuse to provide Anwar’s defence with details of the police report, the witnesses it will call and what evidence it has until very late, contravening conventions allowing Anwar to adequately defend himself.
IF EVIDENCE AGAINST ANWAR IS GENUINE THERE IS NO FEAR REVEALING THEM BECAUSE GENUINE EVIDENCE CAN NEVER BE TOTALLY REFUTED.
The trial has ended and only a verdict is awaited. And what is the evidence adduced or offered?
The prosecution’s case is based on the uncorroborated accusations of Saiful that it happened, no other witnesses have come forward to support his contention and DNA evidence that did not prove conclusively came from Anwar’s sperm but may have come from a toothbrush.
I heard that the charge was made for consensual sodomy because Anwar is known to have a bad back that would make it difficult for him to sodomize Saiful against his wishes.
AND SO IF IT IS CONSENSUAL AND NOT THE FIRST TIME, WHY ARE AUTHORITIES SO ANXIOUS TO SEEK JUSTICE FOR SAIFUL THAT WOULD CONVENIENTLY DESTROY THE SYSTEM’S NEMESIS WHEN MINISTERS ARE THEMSELVES FAR FROM FREE FROM SEXUAL MISCONDUCT?
The circumstances of the case is implausible, here was a ‘golden’ opportunity to nail Anwar with Saiful in contact with the deputy PM, top police officers and he went to the last liaison with Anwar without attempting to frame him with audio video recording, he presented himself for medical examination three days later and his specimens were said to have been left lying around in a drawer for days.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS WRONG IN ANWAR’S TRIAL AND EVEN IF ANWAR IS GUILTY, THIS IS A CONSENSUAL MATTER AND IT IS WRONG OR UNJUST OR IMPROPER TO ATTEMPT TO SECURE A CONVICTION BY WRONG OR IMPROPER MEANS.
RPK is an idiot:
RPK is an idiot or fool because he does realize his many actions and speech are deluded and sets him up for future suffering of mega proportions.
He likes to boast of his inside connections, he boasts about being surrounded by bevies of pretty girls in his London exile and recently there was a picture of him languishing on a friend’s yacht somewhere off a Thai beach.
He then flippantly or seriously tells others that Anwar is guilty and the trial is fair.
WHATEVER HAPPINESS HE MAY ENJOY SURROUNDED BY A BEVY OF ‘PRETTY’ GIRLS OR LANGUISHING ON A FRIEND’S YACHT IS FLEETING AND ENJOYED WITH AN UNEASY MIND AND WHAT AWAITS HIM, SUFFERING THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS LIKE AN OCEAN IS FAR WORSE AND SO HE IS AN IDIOT, A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IS BEST FOR HIMSELF LET ALONE OTHERS.
Only an idiot or loose cannon will say Anwar trial fair:
In my perception the trial is far from fair, there are many things not right or proper about Anwar’s trial and so if you or RPK is trying to tell me it is a fair trial you are telling me I am wrong and you better make sure you are correct because the consequences are terrible for you and so if you utter it without circumspect consideration you are either an idiot or loose cannon and either way, it is not the path to happiness and heaven.
Fleeting happiness enjoyed with an uneasy mind:
Whatever the happiness that people in this world find through sensate or material pursuit is shallow, fleeting (quickly disappears), unreliable (sometimes cannot be reproduced eg sex or marvellous food sometimes do not give pleasure) and enjoyed with an uneasy (tense) mind. They are not free must be paid for somehow (your wife requires support) and there is much danger in creating karma to be repaid by future suffering in the pursuit or obtaining of that pleasure.
There are much higher pleasures or happiness that are free, deep (sublime), secure, everlasting and they are as the Buddha said, never of the flesh, not obtained with the flesh.
WHENEVER A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE HAS TRULY STOPPED PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, THE PERSON AUTOMATICALLY EXPERIENCES THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND THAT IS THE FIRST HIGHER, SUBLIME, FREE, SECURE AND EVERLASTING HAPPINESS THAT REQUIRES NO DEEDS THAT MAY INCUR KARMA TO OBTAIN.
NEXT, IF HE SUCCEEDS IN STOPPING THE MAD INCESSANT THINKING, HE HAS EXPERIENCED THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT IS EVEN HIGHER HAPPINESS THAT REQUIRES NO KARMA TO OBTAIN AND LEADS TO 2 ETERNITIES OF HEAVENLY BLISS.
Yes there is happiness in enjoying the air condition in sweltering heat but it demands money, is shallow, fleeting and insecure and so long as you continue to have style your respite from suffering is transient not permanent.
IT IS SUFFERING WHICH BECOMES UNBEARABLE THAT DRIVES PEOPLE TO SEEK AN ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING. AND BECAUSE SUFFERING IS A PRODUCT OF FORCE, IT IS BLIND FORCE THAT DRIVES TORMENTED PEOPLE TO SEEK ESCAPE AND THAT IS NOT UNDERSTANDING AND SO NEVER LEADS TO TRUE ESCAPE BUT HEARTBREAK AND DEATH IN AGONY.
THE PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SEES THE SENSELESSNESS AND SUFFERING OF HIS ACTIONS AND SEEKS AN ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING THROUGH REASON, THUS UNDERSTANDING HOW HIS CONDUCT CREATES THE SEEDS OF FUTURE SUFFERING, HE WITH REASON ABSTAINS FROM HARMFUL CONDUCT AND THUS TRULY FINDS AN ESCAPE TO SUFFERING.
I DO NOT HAVE TO DENY MYSELF AND IT IS NOT SUFFERING GIVING UP WORLDLY PLEASURES (MONEY, SENSATE GRATIFICATIONS, STATUS, FAME) & SENTIMENTS LIKE EXCITEMENT, POIGNANCY) BUT IT IS WITHOUT REGRET, WITHOUT LOSS BUT GOOD RIDDANCE AS I SAY GOODBYE TO WHAT IN THE PAST I HELD DEAR. THE PLEASURES OR GRATIFICATIONS OF THIS WORLD ARE BAITS THAT LEAD TO TERRIBLE SUFFERING AND FOOLS ARE TOTALLY MESMERIZED BY THEM.
Europe leaders warn of grim 2012
European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, warn of more hardship and sacrifices in 2012 as the eurozone wrestles with a debt crisis.
From the wasteful celebrations, fireworks displays seen you would think the world is facing a grim 2012.
If there is so much joblessness and poverty sweeping the developed world then it is an abomination, hypocrisy to waste so much money organizing useless celebrations but the money would be better spent feeding, clothing and sheltering the needy.
IT GOES TO SHOW THE HYPOCRISY OF THIS WORLD, THERE ARE MANY WHO ARE VERY RICH AND THROWING AWAY MONEY CELEBRATING WHEN IT SHOULD BE CHANNELED TO HELPING THE DOWNTRODDEN AND SO IT IS SOCIAL UPHEAVAL WILL ARISE AND AGGRAVATE THE ECONOMIC DECLINE.
Nibbana, where the Devil cannot find you:
The Devil pursues and finds everyone and he is up to mischief, up to leading to suffering, it is the Devil who always approaches the Buddha (awakened one), never the Buddha and the Buddha always sees him and rebukes the Devil for approaching him.
Even in heaven the Devil has access and he spoke to rebuke the Buddha through one angel or deva.
The Buddha said the Devil will never find him, nibbana is the place where the Devil can never go, it is the place of no falling away.
THERE IS FALLING AWAY FROM HEAVEN, AFTER YOU HAVE EXHAUSTED YOUR MERIT, BE IT 60, 000 ETERNITIES OF HEAVENLY BLISS, YOU WILL FALL AWAY, ONLY NIBBANA IS PERMANENT, THERE IS NO FALLING AWAY FROM NIBBANA, THE CITY OF THE ENLIGHTENED WHICH IS CHANGELESS, UNCHANGING.
There are never perfect lies:
If you think it is possible to tell a perfect lie then you may be right or you understand falsely.
There are never perfect lies, especially when lies are orchestrated by fools who are never perfect. If you are not a fool you will never tell a lie because when you lie to others you are also lying to yourself and conditioning yourself to insanity, perceiving what is false is true.
HENCE IT TAKES A FOOL TO LIE AND FOOLS CAN NEVER FASHION PERFECT LIES BUT THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES THAT TELL THOSE DISCERNING IT IS A LIE.
FURTHER WHAT IS A LIE NEVER HAPPENED AND WHAT NEVER HAPPENED CANNOT BE ENTIRELY PLAUSIBLE BUT IT IS ALWAYS JUST A PROBABILITY.
OFTEN THE LIES AND FALSITIES FOOLS ORCHESTRATE ARE VERY SHODDY, THEIR FALSITY IS EVIDENT TO THOSE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Thus if the bodyguards and Razak Baginda are not involved with Altanturya’s murder, they would never have been charged because they have people in high places to protect them and if they were not involved the system will never frame its own kind. And so if they are charged and convicted it means they are involved and they are, as they themselves stated, scapegoats sacrificed for people who were never brought to court. The policemen said they were offered money to kill her.
Again in Teoh Beng Huat’s case, the Royal Commission noted the three officers were uncooperative as if in a pact. The reason they are uncooperative is because they are guilty somehow. If they were innocent they should have no fear telling exactly what happened that night and the system will never frame them and the truth will absolve them since they were truly not involved. So their silence is an admission of guilt.
And again the conduct of Anwar’s trial, police refusal to permit Anwar access to police reports, lists of evidence and witnesses, the total absence of corroborative witnesses to Saiful and merely dependence on DNA that has not been proven to come from sperm is clear evidence of impropriety.
Only truth is perfect:
Only truth is perfect because it happens or happened. Whatever is false is fabricated, did not happen and can never be perfect because if examined, there must be discrepancies, it does not fit reality perfectly because it never happened.
NO MATTER HOW ASTUTE OR CUNNING THE LIAR, A LIE IS NEVER PERFECT BECAUSE IT DID NOT HAPPEN BUT WAS FABRICATED, A CONCOCTION OF THE MIND AS IF IT HAPPENED. THUS IT CAN NEVER FIT REALITY PERFECTLY.
ONLY WHAT IS TRUE IS PERFECT BECAUSE IT HAPPENED AND SO MUST FIT PERFECTLY WITHOUT ANY EFFORT.
NO MATTER WHAT THE EFFORT PUT INTO A LIE, IT NEVER FITS PERFECTLY AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF LIARS ARE SHODDY, THEIR MINDS DISHEVELLED, THEY ARE LIKELY TO LEAVE A TRIAL OF SHIT THAT LEAD THE WISE TO THE INVARIABLE CONCLUSION IT IS ALL A LIE.
ONLY TRUTH IS PERFECT WITHOUT ANY EFFORT.
FALSITY REMAINS IMPERFECT EVEN WITH ALL THE EFFORTS OF THE WORLD.
RPK an arrogant deluded man:
I saw a bit of RPK being interviewed on You tube it seems by the NST about issues like Anwar’s trial and its fairness.
IT IS EVIDENT BY HIS STYLE, HIS AIRS, HIS HIGH PITCHED STYLISH VOICE THAT THIS IS NOT A MAN OF TRUTH BUT AN ARROGANT OR PROUD MAN FULL OF SHIT OR DELUSION BECAUSE MANY OF THE THINGS HE SPEAK IS IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTOOD AS FALSE TO ME.
AND SO HIS VERDICT ON ANWAR’S TRIAL IS NOT NECESSARILY THE PRODUCT OF DISCERNMENT OR INFORMATION HE IS PRIVY TO BUT A PRODUCT OF HIS DELUSION AND CONCEALED HATE FOR ANWAR.
WHETHER RPK IS A FOUNTAIN OF TRUTH AND WISDOM AS HE LIKES OR FANCIES HIMSELF TO BE OR HE IS ARROGANT, MISGUIDED AND DELUDED IS EVIDENT.
HE KISSED DR M’S MANY TIMES AND DEFENDED DR M MANY TIMES AND THESE ARE ACTIONS THAT HAVE DEADLY CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
ßTo man a dagger is born in the mouth, saying evil words with it,
The fool destroys himself, by praising the blameworthy,
Blaming the praiseworthy. He choses bad luck and does not feel pleasant.
BE CAREFUL WHO YOU PRAISE AND KISS HIS HAND, THE BUDDHA SAID PRAISE FOR THOSE WHO ARE BLAMEWORTHY LEADS EVEN TO HELL. IF YOU KISS DR M’S HAND AND DEFEND HIS WORDS, YOU BETTER MAKE SURE DR M IS A MAN OF VIRTUE OTHERWISE YOU WILL JOIN YOUR IDOL IN HIS DESTINY AND SO YOU WILL EMBRACE DR M IN HELL OR HEAVEN WHICHEVER IT IS.
RPK is living proof how diehard evil this world is:
In a nutshell, RPK is living proof how diehard evil, how extensive evil is because here is a man who likes to project himself as a fountain of truth, fairness, who says he was reformed from his wild samseng days to become a devout religious man but he is as deluded as ever but in a sly or cunning way that deceives and confuses many, leads many astray because they have come to see him as a hero when he is a villain in the disguise of a hero and that is even more worse.
IF YOU ARE A VILLIAN AND YOU MAKE NO BONES ABOUT THAT, DO NOT HIDE THAT THEN YOU ARE BAD THAT FAR.
WORSE IS THE VILLIAN WHO PRESENTS HIMSELF AS A HERO, WHO FANCIES HIMSELF AN AUTHORITY OF TRUTH AND GOODNESS, HE WILL RECEIVE GREATER CONDEMNATION, ACCORDING TO JESUS.
Jesus: Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes, and love salutations in the market places and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts, 47 who devour widows' houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation."
RPK has wrong size to go to heaven:
The Buddha said that those with fat or muscular legs are not going to heaven. If you have legs like a deer then you have the right size for heaven.
LOOK AT RPK, HE IS PORTLY, OVERWEIGHT AND MUSCULAR AND SPORT A TRADEMARK CAP OR BERET THAT BETRAYS DELUSION (YOU DON’T SEE ANWAR OR KARPAL SINGH OR LIM KIT SIANG WITH A BERET), EVEN THESE ARE SIGNS HE DOES NOT MATCH THE BUDDHA’S DESCRIPTION OF ONE WHO GOES TO HEAVEN.
AND SO IF YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO MUSCULAR OR HE-MAN LEGS YOU ADMIRE THOSE NOT GOING TO HEAVEN AND WON’T GO TO HEAVEN YOURSELF.
TTDI traders stage peaceful protest
ABOUT 100 traders and residents staged a peaceful demonstration in front of the TTDI market on New Year’s Eve against the demolition of the 25-year-old complex which has been slated for a mixed development.
The demonstration was held to show their disappointment at Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for failing to consult the traders on the proposed development and to push for the market to be upgraded instead.
Everything is about money, exploitation and corruption. Isn’t there enough development to be digested over even many lifetimes and yet they are hell bent to develop because there is money to be made.
Already there is a property glut to kill many times over and people’s savings in banks are recklessly lent to pursue such property bubbles that will end in systemic collapse.
THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE COUNTRY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE OR WISE PEOPLE BUT EVEN VERY CORRUPTED AND THEY WILL RUN THE COUNTRY TO THE GROUND IF THEY HAVE NOT ALREADY DONE SO.
Good riddance, no regrets, not deprivation:
There are many things that people here hold dear, will not, cannot give up and if they say they have given up they are either deluding themselves or speaking falsely.
All these things I now happily, effortlessly, without regret or depriving myself give up as good riddance to a whole lot of suffering not happiness.
What are these things that people here find hard or impossible to give up?
They find it hard if not impossible to give up their sentimentality, their treasured memories, their ties (friends, relatives), their sensate pleasures (food, smells, touches, sights and sounds or music), their humour (jokes, mirth and laughter), their style or niceness they deem very real and good when it is a senseless harmful product of stretching, changing speed and loudness, their likes and dislikes, sadness, hurts and fears, and many more.
HAVING FOUND INCOMPARABLE REFUGES IN THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND, AT PEACE AND BLISS WITH MYSELF, IT IS NO DEPRIVATION, NO HARDSHIP OR REGRETS FOR ME TO GIVE UP THE MANY THINGS PEOPLE DERIVE PLEASURE FROM IN THIS WORLD. IT IS GOOD RIDDANCE RATHER THAN SUFFERING.
The Buddha: "What others call happiness, that the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering that the Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand the Dhamma. For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those who cannot see it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.
You know and understand suffering?
Many would think that although there are many things they don’t understand, there are some things they do and challenged, they think they know or understand what suffering is when their understanding may be totally wrong and rehashed, that is recorded and replayed from recording each time.
To truly or correctly understand suffering one must realize suffering is deadly, dangerous, addictive like drugs or alcohol, it has causes that can be totally eliminated and if you don’t cut off suffering by the head so that it never arises in the future again, each time you experience suffering you are conditioning yourself to suffer so that YOU GET BETTER AND BETTER AT SUFFERING AND WILL END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND UNCONTROLLABLE SUFFERING THAT IS NEVER THE PATH TO HEAVEN OR FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING BUT EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING.
If your so called understanding does not match what I describe above you may be deluded to think you understand suffering.
There is no major or minor, good or harmless or bad suffering, all suffering is to be treated as warning, danger, conditioning or bonding to be expunged swiftly by seclusion and meditation to summon the higher states of mind.
THE CAUSE OF SUFFERING IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE, PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THE WILFUL EXPOSURE TO THE FORCE BOMBARDMENT OF OTHERS IN THE NAME OF GETTING ALONG AND GREED FOR GAINS AND THE PERMANENT CURE FOR SUFFERING IS TO BE ALERT LIKE A HAWK TO DETECT SUFFERING ARISING, SWIFTLY DISENGAGE AND SUMMON THE HIGHER STATES BY MEDITATING, SUMMON NOT PROLONGING, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ENCOURAGE EACH OTHER TO TAKE A LAX, TOLERANT VIEW ON SUFFERING, THEY SAY IT IS LIKE THAT WHEN THAT IS WRONG VIEW, WRONG UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE SUFFERING IS LIKE A CANCER THAT YOU SEEK EARLY TREATMENT AND DESTROY THAT CANCER BEFORE IT SURELY DESTROYS YOU.
Suffering always has blame:
Suffering is never inevitable or natural but it always has blame, there is someone to blame for suffering and you are very much to blame for your suffering.
IF YOU NEVER SUBJECT YOUR MIND TO CONSTANT UNNECESSARY FORCE BY USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IF YOU NEVER EXPOSED YOURSELF UNNECESSARILY TO THE FORCE BOMBARDMENT FROM WICKED OTHERS YOU CALL YOUR FRIENDS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU CAN BE BESEIGED BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, ALL FORMS OF SUFFERING IN THEIR OWN RIGHTS.
THUS IF YOU DON’T CARE, DON’T GET OFF YOUR BACKSIDES AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, SUFFERING WILL SEIZE YOU EVER TIGHTER IN ITS GRIP SO IT GETS HARDER TO ESCAPE AND THEN SUFFERING WILL STRANGLE YOU LIKE A PYTHON.
Here is proof Anwar is not a sodomist:
You do not need RPK’s insider information or supernatural powers to know that the Anwar trial is rigged and he is no sodomist as charged.
What you need is discernment and because people in this world totally are undiscerning, they are lost, do not know what to make of it.
IF ANWAR TRULY SODOMIZED SAIFUL, SINCE IT IS TRUE AND THE PEOPLE IN POWER HAS THE SYSTEM TOTALLY IN THEIR CONTROL SO THAT ANWAR CANNOT BE ACQUITTED UNFAIRLY TO GET ANWAR CONVICTED WHATEVER HAPPENS (SHORT OF DIVINE INTERVENTION), WHY DO THEY PERSIST TO HAMPER ANWAR’S DEFENCE, REFUSE TO SUPPLY HIS LAWYERS WITH DOCUMENTS OF THE CASE LIKE THE POLICE REPORT, WHAT EVIDENCE POLICE HAS AND WHO THE WITNESSES ARE?
IT IS BECAUSE THIS IS A BOGUS CASE, THEY MAY EVEN HAVE NOT BOTHERED TO FABRICATE A POLICE REPORT (REFLECTING THEIR ARROGANCE), THEY HAVE NO WITNESSES (AS HAS NOW BEEN REALIZED, NO WITNESSES WERE CALLED APART FROM SAIFUL), THEY ONLY HAVE DUBIOUS DNA THAT THEY MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR ANWAR’S DEFENCE.
IN SOME COUNTRIES, THERE IS A RISK OF MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE (EG IN AMERICA LAWYERS CAN GET GUILTY PEOPLE LIKE OJ SIMPSON ACQUITTED) AND SO YOU MIGHT EXPECT PROSECUTION TO HINDER THEIR OPPONENTS, BUT IN MALAYSIA, IF YOU ARE RIGHT, ANWAR IS GUILTY, YOU HAVE THE POLICE AND COURT UNDER YOUR CONTROL, WHY SHOULD YOU FEAR ANWAR WOULD BE WRONGLY ACQUITTED AS TO PLAY DIRTY BY OBSTRUCTING HIS DEFENCE?
BECAUSE THE PROSECUTION HAS THE SYSTEM (POLICE & COURT) ON THEIR SIDES THERE IS NEVER EVER ANY FEAR THAT ANWAR WILL ESCAPE JUSTICE IF HE IS TRULY GUILTY SO WHY IS IT PLAYING DIRTY BY DENYING ANWAR ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS HE NEED TO MOUNT HIS DEFENCE?
THE REASON IS BECAUSE THE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT THERE, IT IS ALL A FAKE AND TO MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR ANWAR WHICH MEANS THIS CASE IS BUILT ON MALICE NOT GENUINE SEEKING OF JUSTICE.
THUS THE FACT THAT THERE ARE MANY DIRTY TACTICS INVOLVED IN THE CASE AND THERE IS NEVER REASON FOR THAT SINCE THE PROSECUTION HAS THE SYSTEM SOWN UP IN ITS FAVOR SO THAT IF ANWAR IS TRULY A SODOMIST EVEN GOD CANNOT COMPLAIN IF ANWAR IS FOUND GUILTY, WHY THE HELL IS IT THEY ARE RESORTING TO UNDERHAND TACTICS EXCEPT TO FOOLISHLY EXPOSE IT IS A PLOT.
DR M HIMSELF HAS ADMITTED THE FIRST CASE IS A PLOT IN HIS HASTE TO SELL THIS SECOND CASE AS GENUINE, IF ANWAR IS A PRACTICING SODOMIST, IT IS AMAZING THE POLICE HAVE NOT NAILED HIM YET.
SO YOU HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, WHY DID YOU NOT REASON TRULY THUS?
Never reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is guilty:
If Anwar truly sodomized Saiful, the system can throw Anwar into jail without any pangs of their conscience even if the evidence is faulty or wrong and the trial is to show the people that justice is seen to be done and you don’t assist your objective by obstructing Anwar and treating his defence in a manner that can be seen to be unfair by refusing to let him see the police report, list of witnesses, evidence lined up.
In some countries were lawyers can argue so that guilty people can get off the hook on technicalities as OJ Simpson was acquitted falsely there is a case for playing dirty but even then not to the brazen levels in Malaysia, in order to ensure conviction.
AND SO WITH THE POLICE AND COURT ON YOUR SIDE SO THAT YOU CAN SECURE A CONVICTION RIGHTEOUSLY EVEN WITH FAULTY EVIDENCE, INCOMPETENT PROSECUTION, WHY DOES THE SYSTEM HAVE TO RESORT TO UNDERHAND TACTICS IN TREATING ANWAR EXCEPT THAT THIS IS A BOGUS CASE?
THE ONLY WAY TO TRULY EXPLAIN HAPPENINGS IN ANWAR’S CASE IS THAT IT IS ALL TRUMPED UP, THEY ARE ARROGANT AND DO NOT EVEN BOTHER TO DISGUISE THEIR CASE WELL THAT PERMITS THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND TO COME TO A CONCLUSION IT IS TRUMPED UP.
IT IS BECAUSE THEY CAN GET THEIR WAY AND THEY FLAUNT IT THAT THEY HAVE NOT BOTHERED TO COVER THEIR TRACKS BETTER, IN THE PROCESS EXPOSING THE TRUTH OF THEIR CASE.
THE SYSTEM NEED NOT FEAR ANWAR CAN ESCAPE JUSTICE IF HE WAS TRULY GUILTY SINCE THE SYSTEM IS UNDER THEIR CONTROL UNLIKE SOME COUNTRIES WHERE ‘CLEVER’ LAWYERS CAN ARGUE THEIR CLIENTS OUT OF JUSTICE, SO WHY IS IT RESORTING TO CLEAR UNDERHAND TACTICS EXCEPT TO DISPLAY THEIR ARROGANCE, THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH IMPUNITY LIKE A CAT TOYING WITH A MOUSE.
IF YOU THINK IN THE LIGHT OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED IT IS STILL POSSIBLE ANWAR IS GUILTY YOU HAVE ADVANCED INCURABLE DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
Why Anwar’s defence was obstructed:
The reason Anwar’s defence is obstructed is because the charges are false in order to make it difficult if not impossible for Anwar to mount a meaningful defence against charges.
How is Anwar or his lawyers going to rebut charges and evidence that they do not know about?
THE REFUSAL TO SUPPLY EVIDENCE IS PRECISELY TO KEEP ANWAR AND HIS DEFENCE IN THE DARK SO THAT THEIR HANDS ARE TIED, THEY CANNOT PREPARE THE DEFENCE FOR SOMETHING THEY DO NOT KNOW IS IN POLICE HANDS.
THUS THERE IS REASON TO WITHOLD CRUCIAL INFORMATION BY AUTHORITIES.
IF THIS CASE IS FAKED, YOU DENY THE DEFENCE INFORMATION INTO THE CASE THAT ENABLES THEM TO MOUNT A DEFENCE.
THERE IS ALL THE MORE THE REASON TO WITHOLD DETAILS OF THE CASE TO THE DEFENCE IF IT IS FAKED SINCE WHATEVER IS FAKED CAN BE REBUTTED AND YOU WANT TO SABOTAGE THE DEFENCE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE BY KEEPING THEM IN THE DARK.
THUS THERE IS EVERY REASON TO WITHOLD POLICE EVIDENCE FROM THE DEFENCE IF IT IS FAKED BECAUSE WHAT IS FAKED CAN BE REBUTTED AND YOU WANT TO SABOTAGE TO DEFENCE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE IN THE COURT.
IF ANWAR DID SODOMIZE SAIFUL THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIS LAWYERS TO PROVE OTHERWISE, SO WHY FEAR ALLOWING HIM TO SEE EVIDENCE? IF HE IS GUILTY YOU CAN JAIL HIM WITHOUT FEELING GUILTY AND THE SYSTEM WILL OBEY YOU AND JAIL HIM.
Every reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is innocent:
Thus it is the case of never a reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is guilty but every reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is innocent.
IT ONLY MAKES SENSE TO OBSTRUCT ANWAR’S DEFENCE IF HE IS INNOCENT TO FURTHER HANDICAP HIM IN HIS EFFORT TO CLEAR HIMSELF.
IF ANWAR IS GUILTY IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO OBSTRUCT HIS DEFENCE SINCE TRUE EVIDENCE CANNOT BE REFUTED AND EVEN IF THE PROSECUTION IS INCOMPETENT THE SYSTEM WILL NEVERTHELESS NEVER ACQUIT ANWAR, SO WHY BOTHER? ANWAR CAN DO WHAT HE LIKES AND STILL HE ENDS IN JAIL.
THUS THE REASON TO OBSTRUCT ANWAR IS IF HE IS INNOCENT AND IT IS TO HANDICAP HIM FURTHER BUT IN THE PROCESS YOU FOOLISHLY EXPOSE YOUR SCAM TO THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND.
Obstruction only makes sense if Anwar is innocent:
Obstruction only makes sense if Anwar is innocent because it is to further handicap him in his quest to clear his name.
But in the process of handicapping him, you are foolishly exposing your hand, exposing the true nature of the charges.
Obstruction does not make sense if Anwar is guilty because Anwar and his lawyers can what they like but the system will still throw him into jail.
THUS BECAUSE OBSTRUCTION ONLY MAKES SENSE IF ANWAR IS INNOCENT, HE MUST BE INNOCENT AND THE CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL SO FAR ALL POINT TO A SCAM. WHO NEEDS RPK TO TELL HIM ANWAR IS GUILTY AND IT IS A FAIR TRIAL? YOU?
THUS YOU JUST HAVE TO ESTABLISH THIS: WAS ANWAR OBSTRUCTED IN HIS DEFENCE, WAS HIS TEAM REFUSED ACCESS TO POLICE REPORTS AND WITNESSES?
Everything is with reason, with cause:
Until they go mad, whatever people do in this world has reason, can be explained even if their reasons are false or deluded or based on force or emotion.
Even when people go mad, what they do or say when mad is also not without reason but can be understood, what people do or say when mad are not without precedents, not out of the blue, but have connections with their pasts.
Thus it is never without purpose that authorities chose to obstruct Anwar’s defence by withholding the police report and details of evidence they have against Anwar but there is reason and it is 1) they do not have the evidence eg police report and 2) to further sabotage Anwar’s defence by not supplying evidence that they can work on to mount a defence. If your charge is bogus, you want to make it as difficult as possible for the defence to mount a credible defence.
WHATEVER PEOPLE SAY OR DO (EVEN WHEN THEY BECOME MAD) HAS REASON EVEN IF IT IS FALSE OR DRIVEN BY FORCE. EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD HAS CAUSE, CAN BE EXPLAINED AND UNDERSTOOD.
Ahah! Gotcha!
If the police case against Anwar is genuine, the police and system should be celebrating, cock-a hoop, saying gotcha and displaying to all and sundry proof of Anwar’s perfidy rather than hide and refuse to reveal what case they have.
Since they have proof of Anwar’s perfidy and there is no danger the system will deny them, why should police withhold what evidence they have against Anwar?
ON THE CONTRARY, FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BOASTFUL AND LIKE TO SHOW OFF, IF THEY HAVE CAUGHT YOU BY YOUR BALLS, THEY WILL GLEEFULLY ANNOUNCE TO THE WORLD WITH MUCH FANFARE WHAT IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE THEY HAVE AGAINST YOU. WHY SO COY?
TV3 regularly showed clips of compromised Anwar:
Even when it is not proven Anwar is the man in the black & white prostitute video, TV3 regularly prefaced their evening news broadcasts with a screening and so it would be totally out of character for the system to withhold evidence that is genuine that would prove Anwar is homosexual and so if Anwar is guilty the system would be keen to supply what evidence it has that would smear Anwar irreparably even if it is faked.
EVEN IF IT IS FAKED, THE SYSTEM WOULD GLADLY FEED TO THE MASSES SO IF IT HAS GENUINE EVIDENCE OF ANWAR’S PERFIDY AND THERE IS NO RISK THE COURT CAN BE HIJACKED BY SHREWD LAWYERS TO ACQUIT ANWAR, WHY SHOULD IT BE RELUCTANT TO REVEAL WHAT EVIDENCE IT HAS?
IN THE LIGHT OF WHAT TV3 DOES AND MANY THINGS ELSE, IT WOULD BE OUT OF CHARACTER FOR THE PROSECUTION TO COYLY REFUSE TO REVEAL WHAT EVIDENCE IT HAS AGAINST ANWAR EXCEPT THAT IT IS ALL A SCAM AND IT IS TO OBSTRUCT ANWAR’S DEFENCE OR THERE IS NO SUCH EVIDENCE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Not my theory but a product of logic that is true:
Anyone who thinks what I say is just my theory has advanced false perception because it is not my theory but a product of logic that is true and whatever is the product of true logic is true.
People in this world will not tell you the truth, they will lie to you but you do not need supernatural powers to find out the truth because there are invariably tell tale signs of falsity.
WITH WISDOM OR DISCERNMENT YOU CAN NAVIGATE THROUGH THE TREACHEROUS WATERS OF OTHERS’ TRICKERY TO ESCAPE HARM EVEN DEATH. PEOPLE WILL NOT TELL YOU THE TRUTH BUT WITH DISCERNMENT YOU CAN ARRIVE AT THE TRUTH MORE RELIABLY THAN LISTENING TO ARROGANT FOOLS LIKE RPK.
A THEORY IS SOMETHING CONCOCTED WITHOUT KNOWING TO EXPLAIN EVENTS. A PRODUCT OF LOGIC IS WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED THAT YOU CONSTRUCT OUT OF STRANDS OF FACTS AVAILABLE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
True logic always leads to the truth:
If there are three separate elements or facets and you understand correctly or truly each element or facet then by adding them together they may be sufficient to lead a discerning person to the truth.
The reason why it does not lead others to the truth is because they fail to understand some or all of the three elements or they understand or interpret incorrectly some or all of the three elements that then lead them to a wrong conclusion.
IF THERE ARE THREE PRESENTING ELEMENTS IN A CASE AND A PERSON UNDERSTANDS EACH OF THE ELEMENTS CORRECTLY THEN BY STRINGING THEM TOGETHER IT MAY BE SUFFICIENT FOR HIM TO ARRIVE AT A CORRECT CONCLUSION THE TRUTH OF A MATTER.
IT IS ONLY WHEN SOMEONE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND WRONGLY SOME OR ALL OF THE ELEMENTS THAT HE ARRIVES AT THE WRONG CONCLUSION.
Impossible not improbable:
Confronted by the fact that Saiful saw a doctor only 3 days after he was allegedly sodomized, many would express incredulity, their mental forces will be stirred to find it odd and then they would conclude it is improbable but possible when the conclusion should be that it is impossible sodomy actually took place in this particular case.
IN GENERAL IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO PRESENT TO A DOCTOR THREE DAYS AFTER BEING SODOMIZED BUT IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.
THE REASON IS THAT BEFORE THE LAST ACT, SAIFUL HAD CONTACTED THE DEPUTY PM AND WAS IN LIAISON WITH TOP POLICE OFFICIALS AND EVEN IF SAIFUL IS NOT KEEN TO PROSECUTE ANWAR (UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE), THE SYSTEM WOULD BE VERY KEEN TO DESTROY ANWAR AND WOULD HAVE MONITORED SAIFUL, KEPT IN FREQUENT TOUCH WITH HIM TO KNOW SODOMY HAD TAKEN PLACE AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THEY WOULD ALLOW SAIFUL TO CARRY ANWAR’S SPERM FOR 3 DAYS BEFORE TELLING HIM TO SEE ANY DOCTOR.
AGAIN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE NOT IMPROBABLE IF AS ESTABLISHED IN COURT THE SPECIMENS TAKEN FROM SAIFUL WERE LEFT IN A DRAWER FOR 3 DAYS BECAUSE THOSE INVOLVED WILL KNOW THIS IS A VERY SPECIAL CASE AS TO FOLLOW PROTOCOL.
IF ANWAR WAS THE PM, THIS CASE WOULD HAVE BEEN DISMISSED BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON THE ACCUSATIONS OF SOMEONE WHO HAS VESTED INTERESTS TO SAY WHAT HE SAID WITHOUT BACKING OR CORROBORATION OF ANYONE. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE ANWAR IS THE ENEMY OF THE STATE THAT HIS ACCUSER IS ACCORDED ABSOLUTE CREDIBILITY WITHOUT SUPPORTING WITNESSES. WHERE IN COURT WAS ANY SUPPORTING WITNESS PRODUCED?
‘DON’T KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT’ IS THE WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF INFORMATION SAIFUL SAW DOCTOR THREE DAYS LATER, SPECIMEN LEFT LYING FOR 3 DAYS AND POLICE REFUSING TO PROVIDE ANWAR’S DEFENCE DETAILS OF POLICE REPORT, CHARGES AND EVIDENCE. THAT THEY ALL POINT TO FRAUD IS THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING.
You say you understand human nature?
Now if you have an enemy of the state, Anwar whom you wish to destroy given the slightest of opportunity (without implicating or besmirching yourself) and here you have a ‘godsend’ Saiful who was truly being sodomized by the state enemy number 1, would you not monitor Saiful even daily to find out if he had recently been sodomized, you never think of setting an audio-video trap for Anwar and you only waited for 3 days after the last act to ask him to see a doctor?
IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING IS NOT TRUE OR GENUINE, IF SOMETHING IS NOT PROGRAMMED IN THEM SO AS TO BE REHASHED, THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND SUCH THAT THEY ARE LOST, ALL AT SEA AS TO HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
Before you try to understand anything:
Before try to (truly) understand anything, make sure you do not stir or let your mental force be stirred because that is a fatal intrusion that deactivates, renders impossible any true understanding.
A person’s stirred mental force to like, dislike, be sad, hurt, confused or fear is actually his force based immediate understanding of an event and this fatally colours if not render impossible his correct understanding of what is happening.
BECAUSE PEOPLE HERE HAVE TRAINED THEMSELVES SO WELL TO STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES, THEIR MENTAL FORCES ARE AUTOMATICALLY STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHATEVER HAPPENS, THEY ARE RENDERED INCAPABLE OF TRULY UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING, THEY ARE RESTRICTED TO REHASHING PRE-RECORDED FIXED STANDARDIZED UNDERSTANDING THAT NEVER PERFECTLY FIT THE SITUATION AND ARE OFTEN VERY INACCURATE.
NOWADAYS MY MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED AND I EFFORTLESSLY UNDERSTAND THINGS I SEE.
Stirred force, not force is the nemesis of understanding:
Force can either do work that is useful (cook food) or useless (eg fashion style) or it can be stirred to prolong, change speed or strength triggered by events.
Thus if a person’s mental force is stirred to like, dislike, feel sad, hurt, confused or fearful, it means what happened stirred his mental force that is blind and blinding, in effect his understanding of what has happened is the stirring of blind blinding force that renders him incapacitated in understanding what has happened.
There is evidence that this is the case. When you have a hearty laugh or are very excited or angry, you struggle to keep touch with reality, become dizzy or dazed, let alone that you are able to then understand what is happening.
THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFICULTY STAYING IN TOUCH WITH REALITY LET ALONE UNDERSTAND REALITY WHEN THEY BECOME INEBRIATED BY VIOLENT LAUGHTER, EXCITEMENT AND ANGER IS PROOF THE STIRRING OF FORCE IS INIMICAL TO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
A PERSON’S STIRRED FORCE, HIS STIRRED LIKING, DISLIKING, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION OR FEAR IS DE FACTO HIS UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THIS IS SUBSEQUENTLY BUTTRESSED BY REASONABLY APPROPRIATE OR INAPPROPRIATE REHASHED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAPPENED.
THUS WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT HIS INITIAL UNDERSTANDING IS EMOTIONAL OR STIRRED FORCE AND SUBSEQUENTLY HE SUPPLEMENTS THAT UNDERSTANDING WITH RETRIEVED RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS THAT NEVER FIT THE SITUATION PERFECTLY AND MAY BE BIZARRE.
THUS IN ORDER TO TRULY UNDERSTAND YOU MUST SUCCEED IN NOT STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE SO THAT YOU CAN CLEARLY IMBIBE WHAT IS HAPPENING.
Have you heard Anwar attack Dr M, RPK?
You have heard Dr M and RPK attack Anwar (RPK says Anwar has lost all credibility) but have you heard Anwar say anything nasty about Dr M or RPK? I haven’t.
EVEN AFTER THE TERRIBLE THINGS DR M HAS DONE TO ANWAR, HE SAYS HE HAS FORGIVEN HIM AND ANWAR HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING NASTY ABOUT DR M WHILST DR M CONTINUES TO SPEW VENOM AT ANWAR.
THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT ANWAR IS SOMEONE OF EXCEPTIONAL INTEGRITY, UNLIKE TO BE A SODOMIST. IF ANWAR IS CORRUPT AND DEVIANT THEN HE COULD EASILY AVOID RISKING HIS LIFE FIGHTING THE RULING ELITE BY STRIKING A DEAL TO BE PAID OFF AND RETIRE TO ENSURE FULLTIME HIS HOBBY OF SODOMY.
It is always nonsense Anwar has lost all credibility:
Anyone who accuses Anwar of having lost all credibility is talking nonsense, hitting unfairly below his belt and asking for karma.
Credibility is never about substance but style, believability.
It is not believability that you should seek in others but it is what they have done right or wrong.
HENCE SPEAK PRECISELY WHAT ANWAR HAS DONE WRONG, DON’T VAGUELY, IRRESPONSIBLY SAY HE HAS LOST CREDIBILITY.
THUS EVEN THIS IS CREATING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE PAIN FOR RPK WHO THINKS HE IS A RELIGIOUS MAN BUT HE MAY HAVE SUFFERING THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.
It can be proven this world is mind made:
Even if you and everyone hold this world so real and dear, are in doubt and uncertainty whether it is merely mind made or it is an independent or separate entity apart from mind, it can be indisputably proven whether this world is mind made or not.
IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A BEING TO KNOW WITH CERTAINTY THAT THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE, THERE IS NO INDEPENDENT ENTITY AND IT DOES NOT EXIST APART FROM MIND.
How is that so?
Supposed you are the Buddha or Jesus and you can instantly create (eg bread, fish) and disappear objects (make someone sitting beside you disappear, the Buddha can disappear from one place and reappear at another place) then you can know without a doubt this world is mind made because if this world was true, immutable, sacrosanct, it would be impossible for anyone through the agency of his mind to create and disappear objects.
IF THIS WORLD IS INDEPENDENT, IMMUTABLE, IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE THROUGH THE AGENCY OF HIS MIND TO INSTANTLY CREATE OR DISAPPEAR OBJECTS, TO DISAPPEAR FROM ONE PLACE AND REAPPEAR IN ANOTHER, TO WALK ON WATER, WALK THROUGH WALLS, FLY IN THE AIR, HEAL THE MAIMED, BRING THE DEAD ALIVE, COMMAND A MOUNTAIN TO MOVE AS JESUS SAID.
IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON THROUGH HIS MIND OR HIS WILL TO CHANGE THE WORLD PHYSICALLY THEN MIND HAS POWERS OVER THIS MATERIAL WORLD, IT IS NOT AS SOLID OR INDEPENDENT AS YOU DELUDE YOURSELF.
YOU NEED TIME AND MATERIAL TO CREATE A FERRARI, IF GOD WISHES HE CAN IN AN INSTANCE, IMMEDIATELY CREATE A FERRARI FAR MORE SOPHISTICATED AND RELIABLE THAN ANY FERRARI IN EXISTENCE AND FOR HIM AND WITNESSES, HE UNDERSTANDS THIS WORLD IS MIND CREATED, HAS NO INDEPENDENT BASIS APART FROM MIND AND THUS KNOWING THE ILLUSORY NATURE OF THIS WORLD, HE BECOMES DISENCHANTED, NO LONGER HOLDS THIS WORLD TO THE GREAT VALUE AS IN THE PAST.
I have personally experienced objects disappearing and reappearing instantly and these are proofs the world is mind made, not true or independently existent.
I searched many times a pile of CDs for a particular CD and could not find it but later when I returned, it was lying at the top of the heap. It is not possible someone returned it and either I am blind or someone supernatural must have caused it to disappear and then reappear.
Again, I found one CD in a set of 4 missing and no matter how I searched I could not find it until I gave up. Many months later I had a hunch it might be back and so I opened the locker the CD set was stored together with many CDs and it had returned, pristine without any dust or scratches.
Yet again once someone supernatural cause my CD recorder to be swapped with a DVD player on another table, the cords were all pulled out, one power cord disappear and a big sticker on top of the DVD player disappeared. No one has access to the place and so someone supernatural must have swapped the players and disappeared the big sticker.
IF IT IS TRUE THAT THINGS CAN DISAPPEAR AND REAPPEAR ON COMMAND BY A BEING’S MIND, THAT IS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE, MIND CAN CREATE AND UNCREATE OBJECTS.
IT REFLECTS HUMANITY’S DELUSION, WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY THINK THIS WORLD IS REAL, IMMUTABLE OR NO ONE CAN SAY FOR SURE IT IS MIND MADE OR NOT.
THE PERSON WHO SAYS NO ONE CAN BE SURE IF THE WORLD IS MIND MADE OR NOT HAS A WRONG UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE IF SOMEONE CAN CAUSE OBJECTS TO APPEAR OR DISAPPEAR BY COMMAND, HE CAN KNOW FOR SURE THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE.
You would be a fool to hold a mirage dear:
If you know something is a mirage would you still be attached to it, hold it dear especially with it is the cause of terrible mind warping sleep depriving suffering?
THUS WHEN A BEING HAS COME TO A RIGHT KNOWING THAT THIS WORLD IS A MIRAGE CREATED BY HIS MIND IN COMMONALITY SHARED BY ALL BEINGS, HE BECOMES DISENCHANTED, NO LONGER HOLDS THIS WORLD OF ILLUSIONS DEAR ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS THE SOURCE OF SO MUCH HARDSHIP EVEN TERRIBLE SUFFERING FOR HIM FOR WHICH WHATEVER PLEASURE HE EXTRACTS IS SCANT FLEETING REWARD.
IF YOU KNOW THE GOLD YOU SO VALUE CAN BE INSTANTLY CREATED AND DISAPPEARED WOULD YOU VALUE IT AS MUCH AS BEFORE? THE DEVIL SAID THE BUDDHA CAN TURN A MOUNTAIN TO GOLD IF HE WANTS.
It is possible to tell if the world is mind made:
Anyone who holds the view no one can tell for sure if this world is mind made only or not has wrong view, wrong understanding and headed for hell or the animal womb.
It can be known if this world is true or mind made and that is if a person can at will make things disappear and reappear.
IF YOU CAN WITH YOUR MIND MAKE A MOUNTAIN MOVE AS JESUS SAID YOU CAN THEN YOU HAVE PROVEN FOR YOURSELF AND FOR THOSE WHO WITNESS THAT THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE, MIND IS THE MASTER OF THIS WORLD AND SO IF YOU THINK IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THE WORLD IS MIND MADE YOU HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING.
IT IS POSSIBLE NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH WHETHER THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE OR NOT. IF YOU THINK IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, NO ONE CAN TELL, YOU ARE DELUDED.
I find music loathsome nowadays:
Nowadays it is not a deprivation, not a loss, not a pain to deny myself music because the music and songs that I hold dear in the past are now even a pain to my ears, I do not appreciate the sentiments even substance conveyed and so it is no loss but even good riddance for me. It would be absurd for me to pay exorbitant prices to the singers and industry for CDs when the music is a pain in the ear and poisons me.
THOSE WHO THINK MUSIC IS A BALM, SOOTHES HAS WRONG VIEW BECAUSE MUSIC IS AT BEST SWEET POISON AND IN THE END IT IS THE POISON THAT COUNTS NOT THE SWEETNESS. EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE CONDITIONED AND DEPENDENT ON MUSIC, ADDICTED TO MUSIC AND IT IS A BONDAGE RATHER THAN TRUE HAPPINESS, NOWADAYS WITH MY MIND GETTING STEADIER AND STEADIER, IT IS NO LOSS, NO SUFFERING BUT GOOD RIDDANCE TO MUSIC.
PEOPLE THINK THEY KNOW MUSIC, THEY UNDERSTAND MUSIC BUT HERE AS EVERYWHERE THEY ARE DELUDED, THEY FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUE NATURE OF MUSIC ESPECIALLY HERE WHERE IT IS A REHASHED COCKTAIL OF POISONING FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS ACCORDING TO A PLAN OF NOTES AND WORDS.
Redknapp: An Englishman should manage England
This is an expression of delusion and self-identity that is the path to woe.
What is the goal of the manager of England? If it is possible for a manager to win the world cup for England and there are no restrictions as to who can be a national manager then the man best able to deliver the world cup to England should manage England and so he has false logic.
IT IS NOT THAT YOU ARE MY WIFE OR SON OR BROTHER OR SAME RACE THAT YOU ARE GOOD, IT IS ALWAYS ONLY BECAUSE YOU ARE GOOD THAT YOU ARE GOOD. DELUDED PEOPLE SIDE WITH THEIR RELATIONS, THEIR RACE AND THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS TO THINK THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE CHINESE, THE CHINESE ARE GOOD.
The Buddha also created:
Just as Jesus created many loaves of bread to feed the masses, it is recorded the Buddha also created many fires to keep people warm.
At that time in the cold winter nights, in the time between the ashtaka festivals (68), when snow falls, the Jañilas plunged into the river Nera¤jarà , and emerged again, and repeatedly plunged into the water and emerged. And the Blessed One created five hundred vessels with burning fire (69); at those the Jañilas coming out of the river warmed themselves. And the Jañilas thought: `Doubtless this is the magical power and the high faculty of the Great Samaõa that these vessels with fire have been caused to appear here.' And the Jañila Uruvelà . Kassapa thought: `Truly the Great Samaõa possesses high magical powers and great faculties, since he can create such great vessels with fire. He is not, however, holy like me.
The Buddha can make it impossible for the strongest men to split a log, he can disappear from one place to reappear in another (eg the opposite bank of the Ganges), he said he can walk on water, walk through walls, fly through the air, he can read your mind to precisely know what you are thinking, he can make you invisible to others, with his hand he can touch the moon and the sun.
ALL THESE, IF TRUE ARE PROOFS THAT THE WORLD IS MIND MADE NOT SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT, THE MIND CAN CHANGE THE WORLD AT WILL.
How did the Buddha know about the 4 great oceans?
Even today there are people living within the great land masses who have never seen and do not know oceans exist and so how did a landlocked Buddha living in the foothills of the Himalayas know about oceans, know there are continental shelves that descend gradually to suddenly plunge into the depths of the ocean?
If he can fly through the air as he claimed then it is to be expected he will know this.
Even today few will be hard pressed to state how many oceans there and the Buddha could name 4 great oceans (Indian, Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic. Antarctic not an ocean)
The Blessed One said: "From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on.
What do you think, monks: Which is greater, the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, separated from what is pleasing -- or the water in the four great oceans?"
"As we understand the Dhamma, this is the greater: the tears we have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- not the water in the four great oceans."
"Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father... a brother... a sister... a son... a daughter...a relatives... wealth... disease. The tears you have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing -- are greater than the water in the four great oceans.
" Long have you thus experienced stress, pain, loss, swelling the cemeteries -- enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released."
The ocean has a gradual shelf, a gradual inclination, with a sudden drop-off only after a long stretch. This is the first amazing fact.
US high-speed rail network finds support among Republican candidates
The project would be a government project spending public money and the reason Republicans support is not necessarily because it would be good for the common good but the project would benefit them, benefit big companies who get to supply to the project.
If this project does not pay itself back in terms of revenue generated then it will worsen the public position which is already saddled by much even insoluble debt.
People like Krugman are deluded to think national debt is relative, it does not matter the government spends money it does not have by borrowing or printing but it does matter as the crisis now demonstrates.
NOBODY CARES ABOUT WHAT IS FOR THE COMMON GOOD, WHAT THEY CARE ABOUT IS WHAT IS IN IT FOR THEM, FOR RICH REPUBLICANS IT IS A SHARE OF THE PROFITS FOR TAKING PART IN THE PROJECT, FOR DEMOCRATS IT IS PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT FOR THE UNEMPLOYED SO THAT THEY WILL VOTE DEMOCRAT. BUT THE NATION IS SADDLED WITH MASSIVE DEBT AND SUCH DEFICIT SPENDING IF UNWISE WILL ADD TO FUTURE DEBT.
A global boom based on massive debt based unproductive consumption:
For one seeing correctly the recently ended boom may be based on massive debt based unproductive consumption that even now is being continued and this is a recipe for certain catastrophic final collapse.
Unproductive consumption (houses for luxurious living, expensive cars, infrastructure for entertainment like stadiums, spanking new highways to nowhere, airlines for tourist, sports, hotels etc) are all consumption that have little productive returns and if this is based on borrowed money, it is money mostly down the drain leaving the majority and big debt bill that they cannot hope to repay and if they tried to replay it would cause a massive drop in consumption as money is diverted to debt repayment.
Anwar fraudulently charged with fraudulent methods:
No wise man would sin and only fools who do not know the horrendous suffering they are bequeathing themselves would undertake sin in the name of material gains.
Reflecting they are fools, they expose themselves, they foolishly do unnecessary things that prove to those who understand the sodomy case against Anwar is faked.
In order to convince the public the case is genuine, the prosecution should not be seen to sabotage the defence; if you are seen to sabotage the defence it means you are intent on securing a conviction rather than justly seeking a conviction. If your case is genuine, Saiful was truly sodomized then in a system where it is impossible for a brilliant lawyer to get a guilty Anwar acquitted (there is no possibility here where everything is in cohort for brilliant lawyers to get Anwar acquitted as OJ Simpson and many others overseas were), you do not have to resort to visible unfairness in your dealings with the defence that only serves to undermine your claim to true judicial redress for Saiful’s grievances.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE HERE TO WRONGLY ACQUIT ANWAR AS A RESULT OF BRILLIANT LEGAL ARGUMENTS BY ANWAR’S LAWYERS, THE PROSECUTION DOES NOT HAVE TO RESORT TO UNDERHAND TACTICS THAT GIVES THEIR GAME AWAY THAT THIS IS A PERSECUTION NOT PROSECUTION IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE AND TRUTH.
Normally Saiful would file a police report alleging sodomy by Anwar and police will look into the matter. After completing investigations and satisfied there is a case against Anwar their documents would be passed to the Attorney General who will then decide whether to prosecute Anwar or not and so when Anwar is charged with sodomy, all investigations together with police report by Saiful must be completed and in all cases, the defence will demand access to the police report and whatever list of witnesses and evidence the police has in order to prepare to defend Anwar.
By refusing to supply Anwar and his lawyers such basic requirements, you are obstructing Anwar, it means either you do not have the case ready before prosecuting or you are unfairly preventing Anwar from preparing for his defence or you are still toying with evidence or fabrications to be subsequently added.
If your case is genuine, Saiful was sodomized and the evidence is genuine, it can never be refuted and so why fear revealing to Anwar as early as possible.
IF HOWEVER YOUR CASE IS BOGUS, YOU ARE STILL IN FLUX OR AT WORK ABOUT WHAT ‘EVIDENCE’ OR FABRICATIONS TO ADD TO YOUR CASE OR YOU CHARGED WITHOUT EVIDENCE, CHARGED WITHOUT A POLICE REPORT AND YOU WANT TO MAKE IT EVEN MORE DIFFICULT TO DEFEND AGAINST A FABRICATED CHARGE THEN YOU DISREGARD THE GLARING OR INCRIMINATING DEFIANCE OF RULES TO REFUSE TO PROVIDE ANWAR WITH THE NECESSARY DETAILS OF THE CASE AGAINST HIM, IN THE PROCESS EXPOSING TO THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS NOT A NATURAL CASE BUT A VESTED OR LOADED CASE.
IF THEIR CASE IS GENUINE, POLICE SHOULD NOT FOOLISHLY UNNECESSARILY OBSTRUCT ANWAR IN HIS DEFENCE BY REFUSING TO DENY HIM ACCESS TO DETAILS OF THE CASE AGAINST HIM THAT WILL REFLECT NEGATIVELY AGAINST THEM BUT IF THE CASE IS NOT GENUINE THEN IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE WHY THEY WOULD REFUSE TO ALLOW ANWAR ACCESS, BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE MAY NOT BE READY, MAY NOT BE THERE AND TO MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO DEFEND AGAINST FALSE CHARGES.
FALSE CHARGES ARE MUCH EASIER TO DEFEND AGAINST THAN TRUE CHARGES AND IN ORDER TO ADVANTAGE YOURSELF WITH YOUR FALSE CHARGES AND OBSTRUCT ANWAR’S DEFENCE AGAINST FALSE CHARGES, YOU REFUSE HIM ACCESS SO THAT HE CANNOT PREPARE UNTIL THE LAST MOMENT.
Saiful: Anwar asked me, “May I fuck you”
This is clearly a fabrication by Saiful and proves he is a liar and a hopeless or unconvincing one at that.
A person seized by lust to fuck Saiful will not ask for permission but would grab him or order him to pull down his pants and go on his knees rather than politely ask “May I fuck you?”
In general a person can have two personalities, one for public show and another in private. But always it is the polite public entity and the monstrous private entity and so it is impossible for Anwar to be who he is in public and be such a polite private entity as to ask for permission to fuck Saiful.
If you are familiar with Anwar, he is not the pretentious polite or decorous person depicted by his request for permission to fuck Saiful but Saiful is far more likely to be such a pretentious polite entity and so it is a figment of his foolish incompetent lying.
IN HIS DELUDED FANTASY OR WISH, ANWAR MAY ASK HIM POLITELY ASK HIM, ‘MAY I FUCK YOU’. FOR HYPOCRITS IT IS ALWAYS THE PUBLIC PERSONA THAT IS POLITE AND THE PRIVATE PERSONA THAT IS MONSTROUS EVEN MURDEROUS.
Why Anwar will be convicted:
The only way Anwar can be discharged if it is for political expediency, he can never be discharged in the name of justice or truth because it would be a victory for Anwar and a slap on the face of the system and many UMNO supporters would cry foul if Anwar was acquitted.
Because there is no political expediency to acquit him, even erstwhile so called champions of truth like RPK say it is a fair trial and Anwar is guilty, how can he be discharged?
EVEN ERSTWHILE AVOWED CHAMPIONS OF ALLAH LIKE RPK SAY ANWAR IS GUILTY AND IT IS A FAIR TRIAL, SO HOW CAN ANWAR BE ACQUITTED IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE AND TRUTH?
If RPK says Anwar guilty and fair trial how can Anwar be freed?
If even RPK says Anwar is guilty and it is a fair trial, what hope has Anwar or anyone that he can be acquitted by a system that has motive to jail him, to finish him off for good, who made a mistake releasing him early last time?
THUS IT IS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION ONLY HYPOCRISY, THE SENTENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PASSED IMMEDIATELY.
THE TRIAL HAS ALREADY SHOWN THAT ANWAR IS CONVICTED BASED ON THE ACCUSATIONS OF ONE MAN WITHOUT WITNESS BACKING AND DNA EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE FABRICATED. NO INDEPENDENT WITNESSES WERE CALLED TO SUPPORT SAIFUL, NO AUDIO VIDEO EVIDENCE WAS TENDERED.
“She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” is a useless or meaningless statement intended to stir others’ mental forces that has no merit but is demeritorious.
Whatever pain felt is never real but virtual, self-created triggered by awareness of something and so long as you can be triggered to feel pain or hurt or suffering on seeing the suffering of others, so long will you be bonded to suffering. It is not OK or good to feel pain as a result of others’ suffering but it is a conditioned false or mad state of the mind that detains and leads to future woe.
Part of the reason she felt pain is self identity with the person, if she did not identify with the victim her pain might be less or absent. Rather than feel others’ pain, one should be aware of the many avenues for pain in this world, resolve to never lead others to woe and to extricate oneself from this world.
YOU CAN FEEL ALL THE PAIN IN THE WORLD FOR ANOTHER’S MISERY OR MISFORTUNE BUT IT WILL NOT DO ANY GOOD BUT IS NEEDLESS SUFFERING TO SELF THAT IS CONDITIONING AND LEADS TO MORE FUTURE WOE. WHAT IS NEEDED IS KNOWLEDGE THAT TERRIBLE SUFFERING IS POSSIBLE IN THIS WORLD, TO RESOLVE NEVER TO CAUSE SUFFERING TO OTHERS AND TO EXTRICATE ONESELF, AS IT POSSIBLE FROM THIS WORLD, NEVER TO RETURN.
THUS IT IS NOT ONLY USELESS TALKING ABOUT HOW SOMEONE COULD FEEL ANOTHER’S PAIN, IT IS WANTING TO STIR PAIN OR FORCE IN OTHERS AND THAT HAS KARMA NOT MERIT. WHAT IS SAID IS TO MAKE MUCH OF THE PAIN OR TERRIBLENESS OF WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON OR MEANING BUT IT IS A FORCE OR PAIN COMMUNICATION. THIS STATEMENT HAS DEMERIT NOT MERIT.
The substance of the statement is force:
“She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” is a message that conveys how terrible or bad a pain experience is and because pain is a product of force that is blind and meaningless apart from the unpleasantness that may be extreme and prolonged, the statement is about dwelling on the experience of force not something that is meaningful. And so the statement is with regard to force not meaning or reason, it is a transaction regarding force and because force is meaningless and evil, whoever dwells on force, dwells on pain to sanctify or legitimize it is creating karma not merit.
Idle chatter:
“She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” is a form of idle chatter that not only serves no true purpose but it is transacting about the force or pain experience that bonds participants to blind meaningless force.
Yes, it was terrible but what are they going to do about it? Nothing, just acknowledging and reliving vicariously that painful experience.
Idle chatter, the Buddha said is a form of wrong speech that can lead even to hell, is never the way to hell.
Anwar optimistic he will be acquitted?
It has been reported that Anwar is optimistic he will be acquitted.
Someone who is realistic would expect his conviction to be foregone.
You mean the authorities went through all this trouble to acquit Anwar that would exonerate him and make them climb down or eat humble pie that there is no case against Anwar? Even if Anwar is convicted, the ruling elite may have shot themselves in the foot in this hare brained scheme to get rid of Anwar because there is perception it is a trumped up charge.
IT WOULD BE AGAINST EXPECTATIONS IF ANWAR IS ACQUITTED AND THE SIGNS POINT TOWARDS CONVICTION, THE JUDGE SAID HE FOUND SAIFUL AND EVIDENCE CREDIBLE.
Why it is idle chatter:
Why is talking about “She can literally feel Lauren’s pain” idle chatter?
It is pointless talking and sharing pain experiences except to draw lessons from the pain and to escape pain if it is possible.
Not only can pain be avoided, it can be permanently escaped so that the person never experiences pain anymore. If others will not give up their pain experiences, then there is no use appreciating their pain, feeling pain for them because they are deluded and recalcitrant and you are a fool or mad or misguided (it is never merit to be misguided) to persist with them.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THE TOPIC OF PAIN WAS BROUGHT UP TO LEARN LESSONS FROM IT NOR ARE AVENUES FOR ESCAPE FROM PAIN EXPLORED OR SOUGHT AND SO IT IS FRIVOLOUS OR IDLE CHATTER TALKING ABOUT HER LITERALLY FEELING LAUREN’S PAIN AS IF IT IS THAT TERRIBLE.
PAIN IS A MEANINGLESS TOPIC NOT WORTHY OF DISCUSSION BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT FORCE THAT IS BLIND AND MEANINGLESS AND ITS RESULT OR SUFFERING. IT IS USELESS TO DWELL ON PAIN EXCEPT TO DRAW LESSONS AND FIND AN ESCAPE IF POSSIBLE, ANYTHING IS IDLE CHATTER, VAIN TALK, EXALTING SUFFERING.
Going forward:
Quote: "Going forward, manufacturing output still looks dodgy," said Song Seng Wun of CIMB Research.
Only a greedy man with stakes at risk would look forward and backwards in search of guidance and it is actually based on force, greed and fear rather than true reason.
The Buddha said let there be nothing of the future or past for you and so if you must look forwards and backwards, it is always suffering to trouble yourself to think anxiously and because you are attached to your life here, you will be back here for even suffering that the Buddha said is as vast as an ocean.
NO ONE HAS TRUE REASON TO LOOK FORWARD OR BACKWARDS EXCEPT FOR FALSE EMOTIONAL (GREED FOR GAIN, FEAR, ANXIETY FOR LOSS) REASONS AND IT IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT THAT THERE SHALL BE NOTHING OF THE FUTURE FOR YOU WHICH MEANS SUFFERING AS VAST AS AN OCEAN FOR THE FORWARD LOOKING GREEDY PERSON.
The big uncertainty:
Quote: The big uncertainty over that is developments in the eurozone," he said.
People speak of the big uncertainty as if it is a fact and people read it as if it is a fact when it is delusion and wrong understanding.
What is reality is that it is unknown not uncertainty, uncertainty is when a person’s mind is stirred in confusion mixed with fear or anxiety or worry.
UNCERTAINTY IS ABOUT A FALSE FORCE BASED STATE OF A PERSON’S MIND, IT IS NOT ABOUT A PHYSICAL SITUATION THAT CAN ONLY BE KNOWN OR UNKNOWN. JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING IS UNKNOWN DOES NOT MEAN IT IS AN UNCERTAINTY. WHAT PEOPLE CALL ‘CERTAINTY’ IS NOT TRUTH BUT THEY ARE DAMNED SURE IT IS TRUE OR CERTAIN WHEN IT IS MERELY THEIR ASSUMPTION THAT MAY NOT COME TRUE, WHAT THEY CALL UNCERTAINTY IS WHEN THEIR MINDS ARE DISTURBED, ROILED, VACILLATING AS TO WHAT WILL HAPPEN.
UNCERTAINTY IS NEVER ABOUT REALITY, IT IS ABOUT A PERSON’S STATE OF MIND AS A RESULT OF BEING UNSURE OR UNABLE TO PREDICT WHAT WILL HAPPEN. THUS IT IS THE UNKNOWN OVER THAT, NOT THE BIG UNCERTAINTY. THERE IS NOTHING BIG OR SMALL ABOUT THAT UNKNOWN EXCEPT IN THAT PERSON’S ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION.
Looking forward is a programmed state:
Looking forward in ordinary people is a programmed state driven by emotions eg greed for gain and fear for losses.
It is force or emotion that drives them to look forward copied or aping others and when well programmed they automatically look forward in any matter with material stakes for them.
LOOKING FORWARD IS A PROGRAMMED STATE IN EMOTIONAL PEOPLE AND SO THEY ARE ROBOTS AND THE PROGRAMMING IS DRIVEN BY EMOTION, BY GREED OR ANXIETY.
Proof the Buddha is no fake:
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING AFTER EXAMINING THE BUDDHA’S DHARMA TO BE UNCERTAIN OR COME TO A CONCLUSION THE BUDDHA IS A FAKE OR MAY BE A FAKE. ONLY SOMEONE WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING CAN BE UNCERTAIN OR CONCLUDE THE BUDDHA IS A MERE MORTAL WHEN HE IS AS HE CLAIMED, THE HIGHEST BEING, THE ONE PERFECT IN EVERY WAY AND PEERLESS.
It is not the Buddha’s fault or the fault of records relating to the Buddha that you are in doubt and uncertainty but the fault lies in your lack of true understanding.
IT IS NOT THE FAULT OF EXISTING RECORDS THAT MANY ARE UNCERTAIN ABOUT WHO THE BUDDHA IS BUT THE FAULT LIES IN THEIR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
REFLECTING THE SCALE OF NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AMONST MANKIND, EVEN TODAY EVEN TOP BUDDHIST PROFESSIONALS HAVE FAILED TO GRASP WHAT THE BUDDHA IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS IN MANY WAYS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE BUDDHA SAID HIS DHARMA IS WELL TAUGHT NOT POORLY TAUGHT), FAILED TO DO JUSTICE TO WHAT HE TAUGHT AND ARE GUILTY OF LEADING OTHERS ASTRAY (WITH KARMA ATTACHED, SAID THE BUDDHA).
(As the Buddha said, anyone who says what he taught is not taught or what he did not teach is taught is asking for demerit)
Below are samples of the many proofs that tells the person with true understanding that the Buddha cannot be a fake.
Counsel to the Bhikkhus
"Such and such is virtue; concentration; and wisdom. Great becomes the fruit, great is the gain of concentration when fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes the fruit& gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration. Utterly freed from lust, becoming, and ignorance is the mind that is fully developed in wisdom."
What the Buddha is telling the person with true understanding is that virtue, concentration and wisdom are clearly defined as such and such that cannot be refuted.
Thus virtue is not harming, killing, not stealing, lying, no idle chatter, divisive speech, no sexual misconduct, drinking, no joking, laughing, singing and dancing (and many more), concentration comprises the first (serenity of mind with thinking), second (fully conscious cessation of thinking), third (neither liking nor disliking) and fourth (neither pain nor pleasure) higher states of mind and wisdom comprises the ability to see things as they actually are and thus avoid actions that lead to karma and future suffering.
Further, the Buddha is saying that virtue is the indispensable requisite to great concentration and great concentration is the mandatory requisite for great wisdom. Without great virtue you cannot have great concentration, without great concentration you cannot have great wisdom and this is as it actually is for one who knows and because NO ONE HAS EVER BEFORE AND AFTER TAUGHT THIS AND IT IS TRUE AND ESSENTIAL TO THE HAPPINESS OF A BEING, IT IS PROOF THE BUDDHA CANNOT BE A FAKE.
"There are five strands of sense desire. Forms cognizable by the eye that are desirable, bound up with sensual desire and tempting to lust. Sounds...odors...flavors...tangibles, that are desirable, bound up with sense desire, and tempting to lust. The pleasure arising dependent on these five strands of sense desire, that is called sensual pleasure.
"Now, if someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses. Here, quite secluded from sensual desires, unwholesome states of mind, a monk enters upon and abides in the first meditative absorption (jhana), which is accompanied by thought conception and discursive thinking and has in it joy born of seclusion. This is the other kind of pleasure which surpasses.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses that. Here, with the stilling of thought conception and discursive thinking...a monk enters upon and abides in the second meditative absorption...in the sphere of the infinity of space... consciousness ... no-thingness... neither-perception-nor-non-perception.
"If someone were to say: 'This is the highest pleasure,' I would not concede that. Because there is another kind of pleasure which surpasses. Here, by completely surmounting the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, a monk enters upon and abides in the cessation of perception and feeling.
"It may happen, Ananda, that Wanderers of other sects will be saying this: 'The recluse Gotama speaks of the Cessation of Perception and Feeling and describes it as pleasure. What and how is this (a pleasure)?'
"Those who say so, should be told: 'The Blessed One describes as pleasure not only the feeling of pleasure. But a Tathagata describes as pleasure whenever and whereinsoever it is obtained.'"
What the Buddha points out is true, the happiness of the first higher state of mind (no style, no use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness) is far higher than whatever happiness the person can obtain through sensual pleasures, the happiness of the second higher state of mind (cessation of thinking), the third state (neither stirring mental force attractively or repulsively) and the fourth state (neither experiencing pain nor pleasure) are progressively incomparably higher.
FOR THOSE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED FOR THEMSELVES THE INCREASINGLY HIGHER, MORE SUBLIME HAPPINESSES OF THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND, HE KNOWS WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT THAT NO ELSE BEFORE OR EVER SINCE HAS TAUGHT, CANNOT BE ANYTHING BUT TRUE AND SO THE BUDDHA IS NO FAKE, HE GENUINELY SEES AND KNOWS EVERYTHING, POINTS THE (ONLY) WAY OUT OF SUFFERING IN ITS ENTIRETY OR COMPLETELY FOR THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND.
IT IS NEVER THE FAULT OF THE BUDDHA OR THE LACK OF FACTS THAT CAUSES PEOPLE TO BE UNCERTAIN AS TO WHO THE BUDDHA IS, IT IS THE FAULT OF THEIR NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS SO.
Why no copycat Buddhas & Jesus?
It is with reason, with cause, not without reason, without cause why there are no copycat Buddhas and Jesuses.
There are copycat Buddhas and Jesuses every now and then but they are far cries, even clear cut cranks or madcaps whose conduct and teachings are much at variance to the actual or original Buddha and Jesus.
So what is the reason why there are no copycat Buddhas and Jesuses?
Anyone who will be a copycat must be a person of no true understanding given to falsity or shameless copying or imitation of others, and they will only imitate others that are themselves false, bad and impressive, never true and good and so because the Buddha and Jesus are genuinely true and good, it is impossible copycats will want to ape someone and something true.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO IS TRULY GOOD TO COPY OTHERS BECAUSE THAT IS INDULGING IN FALSITY AND DECEPTION AND SO ONLY EVIL, IRRESPONSIBLE PEOPLE WILL COPY OR IMITATE ANOTHER. AND THEY WILL ONLY IMITATE OTHERS BECAUSE IT IS FALSE AND IMPRESSIVE FOR SELFISH GAINS (EG POWER, MATERIAL, SENSATE GAINS) NEVER IMITATE WHAT IS THE TRUTH THAT THEY ACTUALLY NEVER KNEW, NEVER UNDERSTOOD AND HATED.
COPYCATS NEVER HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH AND THEY HATE THE TRUTH SO HOW CAN THEY GET THEMSELVES TO COPY WHAT IS AT VARIANCE WITH THEIR OWN NATURES? HOW CAN A LIAR SPEAK IN PRAISE OF TRUTH AND TRANSMIT THE TRUTH? THUS THEY WILL NEVER SPEAK OR IMITATE THE TRUTH THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW AND HATE BUT THEY WILL ONLY IMITATE WHAT IS FALSE AND HAVE MATERIAL GAINS FOR THEM.
THUS THE FACT THAT THERE ARE NEVER CREDIBLE FAKE JESUSES OR BUDDHAS IS PROOF THEY ARE GENUINE.
You can rehash by rote without understanding or falsely understanding the many things Jesus and the Buddha preached and yet even this is anathema, shunned, never done. Seldom if ever do you hear Christian and Buddhist clerics preach the letter of what their masters taught.
In order to be a faked Jesus or Buddha you must truly understand what Jesus and the Buddha taught. Because all copycats have no true understanding and they hate what the Buddha and Jesus stand for, how can they get themselves to copy or imitate the Buddha and Jesus?
WHATEVER IS TRUE CANNOT BE FAKED BUT IT CAN ONLY BE STATED AFTER HAVING TRULY UNDERSTOOD IT. BECAUSE FAKERS HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND THEY HATE THE TRUTH THAT IS AT ODDS WITH THEIR NATURES, THEY CAN NEVER GET THEMSELVES TO FAKE OR EVEN REHASH BY ROTE THE TRUTH AND WHATEVER FAKING OF THE BUDDHA OR JESUS IS BY PEOPLE WHO ARE ADVANCED DELUDED OR MAD AND A FAR CRY FROM THE ACTUAL BUDDHA AND JESUS.
Copy anything under the sun except the truth:
Fakers will copy anything under the sun for selfish or mad reasons but they will never copy the truth because they can never truly understand the truth, they hate the truth and truth is at odds with their false, falsifying nature.
Thus it is impossible for anyone in this world to copy the Jesus or the Buddha because what Jesus and the Buddha stands for is at variance with fakers’ natures.
THUS THAT THERE ARE NO CREDIBLE FAKES OF JESUS AND THE BUDDHA, ONLY INCREDIBLE FAKES IS TESTAMENT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA ARE NO FAKES.
Whoever speaks the truth cannot be a fake:
Truth is universal and transcends anyone and so whoever speaks the truth is always true and can never be a fake. Only what is spoken that is false can come from a fake.
WHATEVER IS TRUE CANNOT COME FROM A FAKE AND SO WHOEVER SPEAKS WHAT IS TRUE, WHAT TURNS OUT TO BE TRUE, WHAT IS PROVEN LATER TO BE TRUE MUST BE TRUE, NEVER A FAKE.
TRUTH DOES NOT BELONG TO ANYBODY AND SO IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO THE PERSON IS, IF HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH, HE IS TRUE.
THE BUDDHA IS THE HIGHEST EXPOSITIONER OF THE TRUTH WHICH DOES NOT BELONG TO HIM. HE SAID HE IS THIS EON’S FULLY AWAKENED ONE, THERE WERE PAST BUDDHAS AND WILL BE FUTURE BUDDHAS. HE NEVER CLAIMED THE TRUTH BELONGED TO HIM.
THUS IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO THE PERSON IS, SO LONG AS HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH, HE IS TRUE AND CANNOT BE A FAKE.
THUS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT JESUS TEACHES MANY TRUTHS UNSPOKEN IN THIS WORLD AND THEN TELL A LIE THAT HE IS THE SON OF GOD AND THERE IS A FATHER WHEN HE IS NOT THE SON OF GOD AND GOD IS NOT THE FATHER.
Nothing mystical or exotic or Buddhist about meditation:
Meditation is crucial according to the Buddha, He said, ‘meditate, don’t afterwards regret’.
There is no other goal of meditation except achieving the four higher states of the mind and there is nothing mystical or exotic or Buddhist or unchristian about them except in your delusion.
Stop stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness and you have achieved the first higher state of mind that is the first goal of meditation and you will have a pleasant abiding here and even 1 eternity of heavenly bliss awaits you.
Fail to stop stretching your syllables, change speed and loudness and you have failed to achieve the first goal of meditation no matter how frequently or expertly you meditate.
Stop thinking fully conscious and you have achieved the second higher state of mind that is the next goal of meditation and you will have an even happier existence here and two eternities in heavenly bliss awaits you according to the Buddha.
Fail to stop thinking and no matter how assiduous you meditate, you are a meditative failure, you have meditated in vain, in delusion, for show.
Stop stirring your mental force to be attracted or like, repulsed or dislike and you have achieved the third higher state of mind that gives 4 eternities in heaven.
Fail to stop liking or disliking and you have failed to achieve the goal of meditation, you have meditated in vain, in delusion.
Stop experiencing pain or pleasure and you have achieved the 4th highest state of the mind that gives 500 eternities in heaven. Cannot stop experiencing pain nor pleasure and you have failed to achieve the 4th goal of meditation.
China's GPS rival is switched on
This statement is potentially misleading because it may be just a case of ‘China’s own GPS is switched on’, it is presumptuous and misleading to say it is a rival. Having your own GPS does not mean it is to rival or compete and it is speaking carelessly, misleading to say so.
IT IS PRESUMPTUOUS AND MISLEADING WITH KARMA ATTACHED TO SPEAK OF RIVALRY JUST BECAUSE CHINA HAS SWITCHED ON ITS OWN GPS.
Why so critical:
There may be those confronted by what I say that ‘IT IS PRESUMPTUOUS AND MISLEADING WITH KARMA ATTACHED TO SPEAK OF RIVALRY JUST BECAUSE CHINA HAS SWITCHED ON ITS OWN GPS’ would retort and attack me saying I am so critical or nit picking when it is further proof of their lack of true understanding.
IT IS NEVER A MATTER OF WHETHER I AM TOO CRITICAL OR NOT BUT IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER MY CRITICISM IS TRUE OR VALID OR NOT AND SO TO SAY ‘WHY SO CRITICAL’ IS TO DISPLAY YOUR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND TO ATTACK ME WITH KARMA INVOLVED.
THE REASON WHY OTHERS CANNOT SPEAK LIKE ME IS BECAUSE YOU NEED TO SEE THINGS TRULY, TO UNDERSTAND THINGS TRULY TO SPEAK LIKE ME AND BECAUSE OTHERS DO NOT SEE THINGS TRULY, THEY NEVER SEE THINGS AS I SEE THEM, WHAT I SEE DIFFERS FROM EVERYONE HERE, WHICH IS WHY OTHERS CAN NEVER SPEAK LIKE I SPEAK, THAT THEY SHOULD SPEAK LIKE ME IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY AND I AM TRULY UNIQUE HERE.
Faking is an act inextricable to falsity never needed for truth:
Falsity is whatever is false, did not happen, truth is whatever happened.
Faking is an act, something a person indulging in falsity must do and it is to act or pretend as if true what is not true. In order to commit a falsity you must always act as if it is true in order to sell the falsity to others and if you keep acting as if true what is false in time you begin to perceive falsely what is false is true and you do not realize you are faking it and what you are saying or doing is false or harmful.
Whatever is recorded and rehashed from recording is a faked generalized nonspecific action or speech, never genuine or specifically intended for an occasion and so if you are rehashing all the time as ordinary emotional stylish people are doing, you are faking or acting or pretending as if true the how and what of everything you say or do. And so you cannot do anything without faking it or acting as if true.
Whatever is true does not require faking, does not require acting or pretending as if it is true because it is true so why act as if it is true?
Thus because the default mode of people in this world is to ALWAYS FAKE IT and whatever is true does not require faking it, they are incapable of speaking or doing what is truly true, only what is faked true.
IN ORDER TO SPEAK WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA SAYS, YOU MUST BE CAPABLE OF NOT FAKING IT, NOT ACTING AS IS TRUE WHAT IS FALSE AND BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE INCAPABLE OF NOT FAKING IT, THEY CAN NEVER SAY WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA SAID, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY CAN SAY OR DO WHAT JESUS OR THE BUDDHA SAID OR DID AND SO IT IS THAT THERE ARE NEVER CREDIBLE OR CONVINCING FAKES OF JESUS OR THE BUDDHA, NOR ARE ORDINARY PEOPLE CAPABLE OF TRULY UNDERSTANDING WHAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA TAUGHT, WHICH IS WHY NO ONE, EVEN THOSE ASSOCIATED TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF CHRISTIANITY AND BUDDHISM ARE CAPABLE OF, AS JESUS SAID, TAKING FROM WHAT IS HIS AND MAKING IT KNOWN TO YOU. THEY DON’T TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT JESUS SAID, SO HOW CAN THEY TRULY EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?
FALSITY IS ONE THING, FAKING IS ANOTHER THING, THE TWO ARE SEPARATE BUT INTERTWINED. BECAUSE OF THE DESIRE TO CONVINCE OTHERS WHAT IS TENDERED THAT IS FALSE IS TRUE, PARTAKERS OF FALSITY MUST LEARN TO FAKE, TO ACT AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE AND SO EVERYTHING THEY SAY OR DO IS FALSE THAT NEEDS TO BE AND IS ACTED AS IF TRUE AND THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF DOING OR SAYING ANYTHING WITHOUT FAKING, WITHOUT ACTING AS IF IT IS TRUE. BECAUSE WHAT IS TRUE NEVER REQUIRES ACTING AS IF TRUE BECAUSE IT IS TRUE, THEY ARE EUNUCHS OF THE TRUTH, INCAPABLE OF THE TRUTH THAT THEIR DEFAULT FAKING OR ACTING AS IF TRUE DISQUALIFIES THEM FROM.
A faker can never tell the truth:
In order to speak falsely you must be a faker, must learn or condition yourself that becomes permanent to act what is false is true and so you can only restrict yourself to saying what is false that you can then fake or act as true.
BECAUSE OF THE NECESSITY TO FAKE OR ACT AS IF IT IS TRUE WHAT IS FALSE, A PERSON WHO PARTAKES OF FALSITY MUST TRAIN HIMSELF TO ACT AS IF IS TRUE WHAT HE SAYS THAT IS FALSE AND IN TIME HE IS A PERMANENT UNCONSCIOUS ACTOR NEEDING TO ACT AS IF TRUE EVERYTHING HE SAYS OR DOES. THIS AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM SPEAKING THE TRUTH WHICH REQUIRES THAT HE NOT ACT AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE BECAUSE WHAT IS TRUE DOES NOT REQUIRE FAKING OR ACTING AS IF TRUE THAT HE PERVERSELY IS INCAPABLE OF, LIKE AN EUNUCH OF TRUTH.
AS JESUS SAID, NO MAN CAN SERVE TWO MASTERS, NO MAN CAN SERVE TRUTH AND FALSITY, HE WILL LEARN TO LOVE ONE AND HATE THE OTHER AND MEN HAVE CHOSEN TO LOVE FAKING AND HATE TRUTH.
THUS WHOEVER IS PROVEN TO BE A SPEAKER OF THE TRUTH AS JESUS AND THE BUDDHA CAN BE PROVEN TO HAVE SPOKEN THE TRUTH CANNOT BE A FAKE, THEY ARE WHO THEY CLAIM TO BE BECAUSE NO FAKE CAN SAY WHAT THEY SAID.
How come no one fakes like I fake it?
No one fakes like I fake because what I say is not faked but it is the truth that requires no faking, no acting as if true what is not true and because they must always fake as if true what is not true, they can never ‘fake’ like I ‘fake’.
IT MAY NOT BE AN ACCIDENT OR SHEER COINCIDENCE THAT ONE IN THIS WORLD CAN SPEAK WHAT I SAY BUT IT IS PROOF THERE IS AN INSURMOUNTABLE BARRIER THAT RENDERS THEM INCAPABLE OF SAYING WHAT I SAY BECAUSE WHAT I SAY IS THE TRUTH THAT REQUIRES NOT FAKING IT OR ACTING AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE TO SAY AND BECAUSE THEY ARE WEDDED TO FALSITY, WEDDED TO FAKING OR ACTING AS IF TRUE WHAT IS FALSE, THEY ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM SAYING IT.
Thirty simple steps to happiness
Have a truly Happy New Year with these guaranteed mood boosters.
This is a deluded statement and if you are not sure then you do not have true understanding.
You can have whatever numbers of simple steps to happiness but so long as you remain in stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you will never gain meaningful happiness but as soon as a person has shed his style, shed his prolonging syllables, changing speed and loudness he has gained incomparable happiness as not to need 30 steps.
IN ORDER TO HAVE 30 STEPS YOU MUST BECOME A ROBOT PRACTICING SOMEHOW THOSE STEPS AND IT IS NEVER HAPPINESS BEING A ROBOT TIED TO 30 STEPS BUT IT IS TORMENTING AND NEVER WORKS.
A mad, harmful distracting conditioned mental state:
The stirring of a person’s mental force to experience primarily like or dislike and secondarily sadness, hurt, confusion and fear is a conditioned or trained state that is mad because it serves no purpose, does not enhance any experience but actually detracts because the simultaneous stirring of mental force to like or dislike draws attention away from the presenting subject or experience or pleasure. It is harmful because force is harmful, painful and leads to death or destruction and so anyone who exposes himself to unnecessary force whether endogenous or exogenous is a fool.
FORCE IS HARMFUL EVEN DEADLY AND SO ANYONE WHO EXPOSES HIS MIND TO FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY BE IT SELF OR OTHER GENERATED IS A BIG FOOL PUTTING HIS HEAD IN A NOOSE. THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE IS TOTALLY USELESS, DOES NOT ADD BUT SUBTRACTS FROM WHATEVER PLEASURE OF THE EXPERIENCE. IT DIVERTS ATTENTION FROM THE PLEASURE OR SUBSTANCE OF THE SITUATION.
THUS ANYONE WHO DOES NOT PAY ATTENTION TO DETECT HIS MENTAL FORCE STIRRING WITHOUT DOING ANY WORK TO EXPERIENCE EMOTIONS (LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION AND FEAR) AND THENCE TO STEADFASTLY SCRUB OFF SUCH UNNECESSARY OR MAD STIRRINGS IS HEADED FOR FUTURE TORMENT AND DESTRUCTION OF HIS MIND. ANYONE WHO HAS SUCCESSFULLY STILLED THE STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE IS HEADED FOR EVEN 4 ETERNITIES OF HEAVENLY BLISS FREE FROM DISEASE, AGING AND DEATH.
FORCE CAN ONLY DO WORK THAT MAY BE USEFUL (EG WASH DISHES) OR USELESS (STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS FOR SHOW) BUT TO STIR ONE’S MENTAL FORCE FOR NO PURPOSE BUT TO EXPERIENCE LIKE OR DISLIKE IS MAD, LIKE THE MAN SITTING IN A CAR REVVING HIS CAR ENGINE AT THE PASSING OF A PRETTY GIRL OR UGLY SIGHT. THE FACT THAT HE CANNOT HELP IT IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS NATURAL BUT BECAUSE IT IS STRONGLY CONDITIONED IN HIM LIKE THE SMOKING ADDICT WHO CANNOT HELP PULLING OUT A CIGARETTE.
YOU MAY BE A TOP NOTCH CHRISTIAN AND AVOWED DENIER OF THE BUDDHA BUT SO LONG AS YOU ARE GUILTY OF STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE AND DISLIKE, IF I AM CORRECT, THERE IS AGONY IN THE FUTURE FOR YOU. THE BUDDHA SAID WHAT HE TAUGHT CANNOT BE DENIED BY ANYONE, NO BRAHMA OR MARA CAN REFUTE WHAT HE TEACHES AND SO ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH THE BUDDHA IS A BRAVE FOOL.
Sins are based on emotions:
Emotions are themselves sinful and many sins are driven by evil emotions never true reason.
Thus such emotions as pride, greed, lust, covetousness, envy are fanciful names for stirred like or attraction and they are all sinful for those who understand correctly.
Hate, anger & jealousy are fanciful names for dislike, the repulsive stirring of a person’s mental force.
Driven by hate people harm others, driven by fear people tell lies to protect themselves or deny responsibility, driven by confusion, people commit wrong. These are forms of wrongdoing under the influence of stirred mental force or emotions. Stealing, harming, sexual debauchery are all driven by stirred mental force or emotions.
THUS EMOTIONS OR STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT DOES NO WORK, LET ALONE USEFUL WORK ARE THEMSELVES SIN (LUST, GREED, PRIDE, HATE) OR THEY ARE THE DRIVES FOR SIN (KILLING, PERSECUTING OTHERS, TELLING LIES).
WITHOUT STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE IT IS DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO SIN.
It all begins with style:
All emotions are mad, senseless self-inflicted suffering rather than the pleasure or wonder they may be made out to be, they are sins or the motivators of sins (eg stealing, cheating, lying, killing, harming).
And what is the progenitor or father of emotions?
It is style or the senseless constant use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness.
Why is it that style is the father of emotions and not emotions the father of style?
Emotions are conditioned, not natural states and after being well conditioned it hard if not impossible for the conditioned person not to be emotional.
It is the constant totally unnecessary (initially fully intended or conscious or deliberate) use of force to prolong, change speed and strength that is the basis of style that trains a person’s mental force to automatically prolong, change speed and strength that serves as the template to fashion emotions.
WHENEVER A PERSON FABRICATES STYLE, HE IS TRAINING HIS MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS UNNECESSARY, ONLY FOR SHOW AND ONCE WELL TRAINED, HIS MENTAL FORCE HAS GREAT TENDENCY OR URGE TO AUTOMATICALLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT ARE THE BASIC INGREDIENTS FOR FASHIONING EMOTIONS.
LIKE IS THE ATTRACTIVE OR ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ON SEEING SOMETHING (EG PRETTY GIRL), DISLIKE IS THE REPULSIVE ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE ON SEEING SOMETHING (EG BLACK MAN), SADNESS IS THE PROLONGING OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TRIGGERED BY SOMETHING, HURT IS THE UNPROTECTED EXPOSURE OF A PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS TO THE ACCELERATING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS TRIGGERED MENTAL FORCE, CONFUSION IS THE HAPHAZARD STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS MENTAL FORCE TRIGGERED BY SOMETHING, FEAR IS THE SUDDEN DROP IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CAUSING A SURGE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS UNOPPOSED FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION.
STYLE TRAINS THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH FOR NO TRUE REASONS AND THUS TRAINED THE MENTAL FORCE CAN DISSOCIATE AND STIR IN PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH ON ITS OWN WITHOUT DOING WORK TRIGGERED BY EVENTS AND THIS DE FACTO IS EMOTIONS AND THUS STYLE IS THE FATHER OF EMOTIONS NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND.
BY ITS OWN A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE WILL NEVER STIR AND IT MUST BE TRAINED TO DO SO AND THIS IS PROVIDED BY THE INITIALLY DELIBERATE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH TO FASHION STYLE.
THE FACT THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIT EMOTIONS MEANS IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME UNSTIRRED WHICH MEANS THE EMOTIONAL STATE IS A CONDITIONED STATE AND SOMETHING MUST HAVE CONDITIONED IT, IT DID NOT CONDITION SPONTANEOUSLY AND IT IS STYLE AND NOTHING ELSE THAT CONDITIONS A MIND TO BE EMOTIONAL.
STOP STYLE AND YOU STOP ALL EMOTIONS FOREVER, FAIL TO STOP STYLE AND YOU WILL NEVER END EMOTIONS NO MATTER WHAT YOU TRY.
Diet 'can stop brain shrinking'
Eating a diet rich in vitamins and fish may protect the brain from ageing while trans fats have the opposite effect, research suggests
So long as you keep pummelling or hammering your mind with even violent mental force, violent emotions, all the diet in the world will not save you from a final destruction of your mind. As soon as you cease all the senseless bombardment of your mind with force fabricating style, force fabricating emotions then what diet do you need?
IN ORDER FOR THE DIET TO WORK YOU MUST REMEMBER AND REHASH OR FOLLOW THAT DIET AND THAT MEANS COMMITTING YOURSELF TO BE A ROBOT AND THAT IS THE PATH OF TORMENT NOT FREEDOM AND SO IT IS DELUSION TO THINK ANY DIET CAN SAVE YOUR BRAIN.
No harm trying?
Anyone who says ‘no harm trying’ the diet even if it does not work has wrong view because there is even terrible harm because you are committing yourself to doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha taught is one of three lower fetters (self identity views, faith in rituals and rules) to future suffering.
WITHOUT KNOWING SOMETHING WORKS (DIET PREVENTS BRAIN SHRINKING) AND YOU DO IT OR EMBRACE IT, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO DO OR SAY THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE THAT DELIVERS YOURSELF INTO THE ARMS OF UNCERTAINTY AND THENCE DOUBT. ONLY WHEN YOU STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW IS TRUE ARE YOU SAFE FROM THE CURSE OF DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT IS SUFFERING HERE AND LEADS TO EVEN FUTURE SUFFERING OF ETERNAL DURATION.
ANYONE WHO HAS THE ATTITUDE OF NO HARM TRYING SOMETHING NEW HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT IS DEADLY.
No harm trying is programmed rules logic:
It is never an accident why some people regularly sprout ‘no harm trying’ in response to certain situations.
‘No harm trying’ is a programming, a rules logic or recorded rehashed understanding that is not fresh specific but generalized rehashed to apply to a situation response.
NO HARM TRYING IS A RULES LOGIC (FAITH IN RULES AND RITUALS IS A LOWER FETTER TO WOE SAYS THE BUDDHA) THAT IS RECORDED AND REHASHED REGULARLY TO FIT SITUATIONS AND SO ANYONE WHO SAYS THAT IS A ROBOT WITH REHASHED NEVER TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Better safe than sorry:
This is another form of recorded rules logic that denotes the person as a rehashing robot without genuine understanding.
If you think Jesus or the Buddha subscribes to such rules, ‘better safe than sorry’ (as you and everyone here do), you may be right or deluded.
THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND DO NOT NEED SUCH RECORDED RULES LOGIC TO GUIDE THEM.
Quake rattles New Zealand's Christchurch
Christchurch: An earthquake with a magnitude of 5.3 struck close to the New Zealand city of Christchurch on Saturday, the U.S. Geological Survey reported, but there were no immediate reports of damage or casualties.
So called experts came out with statements that earthquakes today are no more frequent or more powerful than the past.
Ask residents of Christchurch if the frequency and strengths of earthquakes they are now experiencing is the same as the past. Just as Christchurch residents are terrorized by frequent strong earthquakes now, it is possible for the frequency and strength of earthquakes to increase or decrease with time and so all these experts are talking nonsense driven by emotion not reason. What is the worth of such ‘experts’ when they talk without knowing driven by prejudices?
The requisites of a robot:
In order to be a robot, you need sensors to receive or perceive (eg good vision, good hearing), a recording and storage medium (hard disk), a means of reading what is recorded and thence relay it to actuators (muscles, limbs or appendages) that carry out or convert into action and speech what is recorded as the correct response.
For more complicated robots with many recordings and a variety of responses that can be applied to a situation, you need some sort of central processor NOT TO UNDERSTANDING THE INCOMING DATA but to detect the jumble or permutations of cues present to compute what the appropriate speech and action responses should be.
THE EXISTENCE OF SOPHISTICATED ROBOTS THAT CAN SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATE A CAR FAST AROUND A COMPLICATED MOUNTAIN TRACK IS PROOF THAT A ROBOT CAN FUNCTION EVEN AT VERY SOPHISTICATED LEVEL WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING OR CONSCIOUSNESS.
THE ROBOT DOES NOT EVEN NEED TO THOROUGHLY PERCEIVE ITS ENVIRONMENT, WHAT IT NEEDS ARE SENSORS THAT ARE PROGRAMMED TO DETECT VITAL CUES TO COMPLETE ITS MISSION, A CENTRAL PROCESSOR TO MAKE SENSE OF THE PERMUTATIONS OF CUES DETECTED AND DECIDE WHICH OF THE MANY RECORDED RESPONSES IN ITS HARD DISK TO EXECUTE, TO READ AND THEN RELAY THOSE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE ACTUATORS THAT WILL CARRY OUT THE RECORDED RESPONSES.
NOWHERE IS THERE UNDERSTANDING OR SEEING AND KNOWING THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE NEEDED NOR INVOLVED EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION IT IS.
HUMAN ROBOTS ARE LIKE THIS EXCEPT THAT IN ADDITION THERE IS ALSO CONSCIOUSNESS, THERE IS A VOYEUR EXPERIENCING THE THINGS HAPPENING AND HE ACTS AS SOMETIME DISC JOCKEY DECIDING WHICH RECORDING TO ACTIVATE. OFTEN HE IS ON AUTO PILOT, DIRECT KNEE JERK JUKEBOX ACTIVATION BYPASSES HIM, HIS JUKEBOX AUTOMATICALLY DECIDES FOR HIM WHAT TO DO OR SAY.
What a robot needs:
- Sensors not to detect the field as it actually is but programmed sensors with instructions to tell the sensors what to look for that is important to fulfil the robot’s mission.
- A central processor able to process the permutations of cues detected and based on the permutations of cues detected to decide which of the many programmed responses to execute. It is all a mechanical process of 1+1+3= response 5.
- An ability to search and select recorded responses in its hard disk storage and then read and relay the instructions to the correct actuators to carry out the recorded responses.
A ROBOT HAS NO UNDERSTANDING AND NO UNDERSTANDING IS EVER REQUIRED TO BE A ROBOT.
WHILST A ROBOT MAY HAVE VERY IMPRESSIVE EVEN LIFE LIKE PRESENCE, IT CAN ONLY CARRY OUT WHAT IT IS PROGRAMMED TO DETECT AND PROGRAMMED TO SAY.
IF SOMETHING IS NOT PROGRAMMED TO BE DETECTED, IT WILL NOT DETECT IT EVEN IF PRESENT. AFTER REPROGRAMMING THEN IT CAN DETECT IT.
IF SOMETHING IS NOT PROGRAMMED TO BE SAID OR DONE, IT WILL NOT DO OR SAY IT EVEN WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE. AFTER REPROGRAMMING THEN IT CAN SAY OR DO IT.
HUMANS ARE CONSUMMATE ROBOTS BUT ON TOP THAT THEY HAVE CONSCIOUSNESS AND ARE VOYEURS EXPERIENCING AND ENJOYING THE PLEASURES AND PAINS OF THEIR ROBOTIC EXISTENCE, THEY ARE ALSO PART TIME DISC JOCKEYS WHO DECIDE SOMETIMES WHAT THEIR ROBOTS DO BASED ON RECORDED RESPONSES.
Oh, my God!
The reason why some people always exclaim, “Oh, my God” is because they are programmed to say it and the reason why others never say it is because they are not programmed to say it and so they never say it even when it is possible for them to say it.
Certain environmental triggers (that has nothing to do with reason or understanding) will trigger some people to exclaim ‘oh, my God’ because it is recorded or programmed in them whilst others will never say it because it is not programmed in them.
What say you?
This question is not good or meritorious but bad, creates demerit to be experienced as future suffering.
It is inviting others to have a say in issues that are raise and rather than good as is commonly falsely perceived, it is bad.
In any issue there is only one truth, one reality as it actually is and only those who see it as it actually is, has right view and there are no alternative views that are right and so whoever courts a diversity of different opinions about a subject is courting falsity, fostering differences and conflict.
THERE IS NEVER ANY NEED TO INVITE PEOPLE TO AIR THEIR OPINIONS ON ANY MATTER BECAUSE THAT MATTER CAN BE EXAMINED, UNDERSTOOD SUCH THAT IT CAN BE DETERMINED WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG. WHAT SAY YOU IS SANCTIFYING FALSITY, SANCTIFYING THE CORRECTNESS OF DIFFERENT OPINIONS THAT IS ALWAYS FALSE. IN ANY ISSUE IF THERE ARE TWO DIFFERING OPINIONS, EITHER BOTH ARE WRONG OR ONE IS RIGHT AND THE OTHER WRONG, NEVER BOTH CORRECT AND SO FOR THE SAKE OF TRUTH THERE SHOULD BE NO TOLERANCE FOR DIFFERING OPINIONS.
You need cues, predilection to rehash never understanding:
If a person rehashes what is approximately or precisely determined or recorded beforehand, what he needs is not true understanding of what he is doing or saying, understanding what the situation he is rehashing into, but he needs cues or signals or predilection or preferences to decide what he will rehash into the situation.
SINCE WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO SAY HAS ALREADY BEEN DECIDED BEFOREHAND, FIXED WHAT IS THERE TO UNDERSTAND EXCEPT TO PAY ATTENTION TO RENDER IT AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE ACCORDING TO PLANS OR RECORDING?
AND IF WHAT YOU SAY IS REHASHED, YOU NEED CUES, SIGNALS OR CLUES (THESE ARE NOT TRUE UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION) TO TELL YOU TO REHASH THIS PARTICULAR RECORDING AND NOT ANOTHER RECORDING OR PREFERENCES/PREDILECTION (LIKE AND DISLIKE) TO DETERMINE WHAT YOU SHALL REHASH.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO UNDERSTANDING INVOLVED AND THE PERSON DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND, HE ONLY FAKES HE UNDERSTANDS, THIS ARRANGEMENT IS VULNERABLE TO ‘EMBARRASSING’ MISCUES, GAFFS, INAPPOPRIATE REHASHES AND HE IS VULNERABLE TO LOSS, INJURY EVEN FATALITY IF, WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE (ABSENT MINDEDLY) MISCUES THE WRONG ACTION (EG PRESS ACCELERATOR INSTEAD OF BRAKES).
THERE ARE SERIOUS EVEN DEADLY RISKS IN NOT HAVING TRUE UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE YOUR ACTIONS DO NOT TRULY FIT THE OCCASION AND YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS AND RISKS OF THE SITUATION AND EVERY NOW AND THEN WRONG REHASHES CAN EMBARRASS, CAUSE LOSSES (SHOPKEEPER GIVE WRONG CHANGE TO CUSTOMER), INJURY AND EVEN DEATH TO SELF OR OTHERS BUT BY AND LARGE SOMEHOW, PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS MANAGE TO MUDDLE THROUGH LIFE SAFELY TO OLD AGE.
For one who discerns, everything people say and do is rehashed and because everything is rehashed, they do not need true understanding nor is it present.
Their actions are actually driven by predilection, by stirred like, dislike, sadness, hurt, confusion and fear eg their fear aroused, they ran away. People ignore certain people eg beggars not because of reason but dislike, driven by dislike (based on force) they sneer at someone.
Apart from predilection, it is cues that they need to decide what action to take and this may be a direct knee jerk, see this do that eg see someone approaching and say “Hi there” or smile or in more complex situations, programmed rules logic.
PROGRAMMED RULES LOGIC ARE GENERALIZED RECORDED COMMANDS THAT TELL THE ROBOT WHAT TO SAY OR DO FROM HIS REPERTOIRE OF RECORDINGS, THEY ARE PROGRAMS THAT RUN PROGRAMS OF RECORDED ACTIONS.
The reason why people turn away from what I say is not because it is false but it is because they are robots and do not have true understanding which is necessary to digest what I say that is crucially important in understanding life and escaping terrible suffering here. They suffer and they seek help or escape but what they are searching for is fresh programmings that they do not have, for a magical pill, they are quite content to somnolently continue their rehashing lives even though they sometimes exclaim life is meaningless and suffering. The underlying reason why life is meaningless is not the nature of life itself but because they are rehashing and whatever is rehashed is meaningless not matter how meaningful you swear it is and it is always terrible suffering being a robot rather than the wonderful life they want others to believe they are enjoying.
Life is meaningless:
You hear people moan, “Life is meaningless” and they think they speak the truth and listeners agree, they think they have a point there and what they hear is the truth.
LIFE IS MEANINGLESS IS SPOKEN FALSELY AND THOSE WHO THINK WHAT IS SAID IS CORRECT HAS WRONG UNDERSTANDING.
IT IS NOT LIFE ITSELF THAT IS MEANINGLESS BUT IT IS PEOPLE’S INCESSANT MECHANICAL REHASHING OF EVERYTHING AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND DO THAT MAKES IT MEANINGLESS AND TORMENTING.
IF A PERSON DOES NOT REHASH MECHANICALLY MAKING HIMSELF A ROBOT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING, LIFE WILL TAKE ON A VERY DIFFERENT MEANINGFUL NATURE.
HENCE IT IS NOT LIFE THAT IS MEANINGLESS BUT IT IS YOU WHO MAKES LIFE MEANINGLESS BY BECOMING A MINDLESS ROBOT OR PARROT.
HERE AS EVERYWHERE PEOPLE THINK THEY SPEAK THE TRUTH, PEOPLE THINK THEY HEAR THE TRUTH BUT THEY HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING, WHAT THEY SPEAK AND HEAR IS FALSE.
You are meaningless, not life:
It is you who is meaningless by constantly mindlessly mechanically rehashing not life itself. Do not blame life or you will be judged.
Because you are meaningless, you are not worth saving, you are worthless according to the Buddha and Jesus and will perish even for another eternity.
Impossible for anyone to find meaning here:
No matter how rich, successful, intellectually or scientifically or artistically acclaimed anyone here is, his life is meaningless because there is a substance and style combo in him that renders him a meaningless mechanical robot, he is incessantly pounded on all sides by force radiating from others, from others mechanically rehashing to him so it is impossible for anyone to find meaning here.
ONLY WHEN THE PERSON EXITS THE TORMENTING PRISON OF STYLE TO BECOME A NON ROBOT WILL HE EXPERIENCE A SIGNIFICANT MEASURE OF TRUE MEANING IN HIS LIFE. IF HE FURTHER SUCCEEDS IN FULLY CONSIOUS STOP THINKING THAT IS A FURTHER MEASURE OF MEANING IN HIS LIFE, IF HE STOPS LIKING AND DISLIKING THAT IS AN EVEN HIGHER MEANING AND HAPPINESS TO HIS LIFE.
FORMS, SOUNDS, TOUCH, SMELLS & TASTES ARE FABRICATIONS, CREATIONS THAT ARE FALSE, CAN INSTANTLY BE CREATED OR DISAPPEARED BY GOD AND WHOSOEVER WHOSE LIFE IS DEPENDENT ON FORMS AND SOUNDS MUST HAVE A MEANINGLESS LIFE.
It is robotic, thinking, liking disliking life that is meaningless:
One must be careful or discerning in what one says.
It is not life per se that is meaningless but it is firstly robotic life, secondly life with non-stop thinking, thirdly life with nonstop like and dislike and fourthly life with pain and pleasure that is meaningless.
IN OTHER WORDS IT IS BEING A ROBOT, CONSTANTLY HELPLESSLY THINKING, LIKING AND DISLIKING, PAIN AND PLEASURE THAT MAKES LIFE MEANINGLESS, NOT LIFE ITSELF.
RPK: Anwar guilty and trial fair:
The sodomy charge against Anwar was not trumped up and he will be found guilty on Jan 9, says popular blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin.
“I think it is a foregone conclusion: Anwar is going to be found guilty. PKR will certainly go to town on the issue, but PAS and DAP will not be too excited about turning the Pakatan agenda into a ‘free Anwar campaign’.
K. Kabilan, Free Malaysia Today
Reform activist and influential blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin believes that Anwar Ibrahim was a victim of a honey-trap, but quickly added that the opposition leader was given a fair trial.
By his many actions and deeds, RPK has proven himself to those who discern that he is not a man of truth and goodness but a deluded man.
It is RPK not Anwar who has lost all credibility to me.
Anwar was never given a fair trial and whoever said it was fair is asking for judgment. His lawyers were denied police reports, lists of witnesses, etc and that is not fair. The many actions of the court shows it is not fair except if you are mad. The case is based on the testimony of one man and DNA evidence that can be planted.
If Anwar was a practicing homosexual, it would be gross incompetence they could not nail him better and Saiful took 3 days to see a street doctor and the specimens were left lying around after collection and so anyone who think RPK is good, a bastion of truth is a fool, gullible. Why did he do the TV3 interview that said Rosmah was not at the scene? The fact that the policemen charged and Razak Baginda is a close associate points to complicity regardless of whether she was at the scene or not.
RPK is tiptoeing on the tightrope of sanity:
Like all emotional people (there is plenty of evidence of emotional abuses in his own admission), RPK’s mind is getting increasingly dishevelled with age and so increasingly he talks nonsense, things that do not add up and like the man wobbling on the tightrope of sanity, he is waiting for the final fatal slip and plunge into the chasm of torment.
HIS PAST ABUSES OF HIS MIND HAS RAVAGED IT AND NOW HIS INSANITY IS GETTING OUT OF CONTROL AND HE IS FACING A SHATTERED MIND AND YET EVEN NOW HE IS CREATING FURTHER KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE PAIN UTTERING IRRESPONSIBLY.
Lofty targets for the new year:
This is a Star columnist headline.
If you do not mean your targets, it is mere lip service then you prize will be insanity for saying things that you do mean, just for show.
If you mean your lofty targets then you must be a robot to subscribe either approximately or precisely to it and that too is the path to insanity because to be a robot fulfilling targets is mad.
THUS PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE WHAT THEY SAY ARE MAD, THE WAY TO WOE. A PERSON WHO IS NOT A ROBOT DOES NOT SET HIMSELF TARGETS BECAUSE IT MEANS HE BECOMES THE SLAVES OF TARGET. ONLY MEN GREEDY FOR GAINS NEED TARGETS AND GREED LEADS TO SUFFERING NEVER HAPPINESS. IF YOU DO NOT MEAN YOUR TARGETS THEN YOU ARE A LIAR AND THAT TOO IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.
Anwar treated fairly?
Is a commando style arrest of Anwar, stripping him naked and examining him in a cubicle fair?
His future is at stake and he has reasonable request to interview in court the PM and his wife and they were refused.
Contrast the treatment on corruption by BN politicians eg Shahrizat.
ANYONE WHO SAYS ANWAR WAS GIVEN A FAIR TRIAL BETTER EXAMINE CAREFULLY THE EVIDENCE. IF SOMETHING IS SHIT AND YOU TELL OTHERS IT IS FOOD, ONE DAY YOU MAY BE MADE TO EAT THE SHIT YOU TELL OTHERS IS FOOD. RPK IS TELLING OTHERS SHIT IS FOOD. MAKE SURE IT IS FOOD OTHERWISE HE WILL HAVE TO EAT THE SHIT ONE DAY.
RPK hates Anwar:
For some hidden reason, RPK hates Anwar and hate or blind stirred force is the basis of his utterances that are against Anwar that will have credence with some people because they think he has connections and privy to secrets others don’t know.
In the same way, Zaid is a closet Anwar hater, for some reason he hates Anwar and that is the basis of his actions.
RPK’S MANY UTTERANCES ARE INCONSISTENT AND THE REASON IT IS SO IS BECAUSE HIS MANY UTTERANCES ARE NEVER BASED ON UNEMOTIONAL TRUE UNDERSTANDING BUT BASED ON PREDILECTION, EMOTIONS AND BECAUSE THESE ARE BLIND, CANTANKEROUS, SO TOO ARE HIS UTTERANCES AND HE IS A FOOL MISLEADING OTHERS HEAPING KARMA ON HIMSELF.
Make money from volatility
Questor's timely stock market tip.
This is the call and the creed of the opportunist, a nice word for predator and so he is headed for the animal world if not hell, never heaven.
The opportunist or predator is not interested in the substance of any matter, he is only interested in what is in it for him, what material gains and so he is doomed for eternal torment. That he can care for others is impossible.
A wrong trial proves Anwar innocent:
Regarding their (collective) wrong understanding again here as everywhere, they perceive it as a matter of a fair or unfair trial but it is in truth a matter of a correct or incorrect (wrong), proper or improper trial that proves to a discerning observer that this is a ‘shambolic’ trial intended to convict at all costs.
There are many things that are incorrect or wrong about this trial that proves Anwar innocent even without knowing whether the act happened.
THE SYSTEM IS LOADED AGAINST ANWAR AND SO IF ANWAR IS TRULY GUILTY, IT NEED NOT FEAR GIVING ANWAR A FAIR TRIAL BECAUSE A GUILTY MAN WILL BE FOUND GUILTY AFTER A CORRECT TRIAL BECAUSE HE IS GUILTY.
JUST AS THE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN TEOH BENG HUAT’S DEATH NEED NOT FEAR COOPERATING IF THEY WERE INNOCENT BECAUSE THE SYSTEM WILL NEVER FRAME THEM BUT IT MAY FRAME YOU OR ME, THE FACT THAT THEY GANGED UP IN SILENCE IS SELF PROOF OF GUIT. IN THE SAME WAY IF ANWAR WAS TRULY GUILTY THERE IS NO FEAR OF GIVING HIM A FAIR TRIAL BECAUSE HE WILL BE FOUND GUILTY.
If I guess correctly, even today no police report of Saiful’s accusation has been produced maybe because there was never such reports which takes effort to fabricate and they are arrogant enough to flaunt it.
Police refuse to provide Anwar’s defence with details of the police report, the witnesses it will call and what evidence it has until very late, contravening conventions allowing Anwar to adequately defend himself.
IF EVIDENCE AGAINST ANWAR IS GENUINE THERE IS NO FEAR REVEALING THEM BECAUSE GENUINE EVIDENCE CAN NEVER BE TOTALLY REFUTED.
The trial has ended and only a verdict is awaited. And what is the evidence adduced or offered?
The prosecution’s case is based on the uncorroborated accusations of Saiful that it happened, no other witnesses have come forward to support his contention and DNA evidence that did not prove conclusively came from Anwar’s sperm but may have come from a toothbrush.
I heard that the charge was made for consensual sodomy because Anwar is known to have a bad back that would make it difficult for him to sodomize Saiful against his wishes.
AND SO IF IT IS CONSENSUAL AND NOT THE FIRST TIME, WHY ARE AUTHORITIES SO ANXIOUS TO SEEK JUSTICE FOR SAIFUL THAT WOULD CONVENIENTLY DESTROY THE SYSTEM’S NEMESIS WHEN MINISTERS ARE THEMSELVES FAR FROM FREE FROM SEXUAL MISCONDUCT?
The circumstances of the case is implausible, here was a ‘golden’ opportunity to nail Anwar with Saiful in contact with the deputy PM, top police officers and he went to the last liaison with Anwar without attempting to frame him with audio video recording, he presented himself for medical examination three days later and his specimens were said to have been left lying around in a drawer for days.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS WRONG IN ANWAR’S TRIAL AND EVEN IF ANWAR IS GUILTY, THIS IS A CONSENSUAL MATTER AND IT IS WRONG OR UNJUST OR IMPROPER TO ATTEMPT TO SECURE A CONVICTION BY WRONG OR IMPROPER MEANS.
RPK is an idiot:
RPK is an idiot or fool because he does realize his many actions and speech are deluded and sets him up for future suffering of mega proportions.
He likes to boast of his inside connections, he boasts about being surrounded by bevies of pretty girls in his London exile and recently there was a picture of him languishing on a friend’s yacht somewhere off a Thai beach.
He then flippantly or seriously tells others that Anwar is guilty and the trial is fair.
WHATEVER HAPPINESS HE MAY ENJOY SURROUNDED BY A BEVY OF ‘PRETTY’ GIRLS OR LANGUISHING ON A FRIEND’S YACHT IS FLEETING AND ENJOYED WITH AN UNEASY MIND AND WHAT AWAITS HIM, SUFFERING THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS LIKE AN OCEAN IS FAR WORSE AND SO HE IS AN IDIOT, A FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IS BEST FOR HIMSELF LET ALONE OTHERS.
Only an idiot or loose cannon will say Anwar trial fair:
In my perception the trial is far from fair, there are many things not right or proper about Anwar’s trial and so if you or RPK is trying to tell me it is a fair trial you are telling me I am wrong and you better make sure you are correct because the consequences are terrible for you and so if you utter it without circumspect consideration you are either an idiot or loose cannon and either way, it is not the path to happiness and heaven.
Fleeting happiness enjoyed with an uneasy mind:
Whatever the happiness that people in this world find through sensate or material pursuit is shallow, fleeting (quickly disappears), unreliable (sometimes cannot be reproduced eg sex or marvellous food sometimes do not give pleasure) and enjoyed with an uneasy (tense) mind. They are not free must be paid for somehow (your wife requires support) and there is much danger in creating karma to be repaid by future suffering in the pursuit or obtaining of that pleasure.
There are much higher pleasures or happiness that are free, deep (sublime), secure, everlasting and they are as the Buddha said, never of the flesh, not obtained with the flesh.
WHENEVER A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE HAS TRULY STOPPED PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH, THE PERSON AUTOMATICALLY EXPERIENCES THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND THAT IS THE FIRST HIGHER, SUBLIME, FREE, SECURE AND EVERLASTING HAPPINESS THAT REQUIRES NO DEEDS THAT MAY INCUR KARMA TO OBTAIN.
NEXT, IF HE SUCCEEDS IN STOPPING THE MAD INCESSANT THINKING, HE HAS EXPERIENCED THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT IS EVEN HIGHER HAPPINESS THAT REQUIRES NO KARMA TO OBTAIN AND LEADS TO 2 ETERNITIES OF HEAVENLY BLISS.
Yes there is happiness in enjoying the air condition in sweltering heat but it demands money, is shallow, fleeting and insecure and so long as you continue to have style your respite from suffering is transient not permanent.
IT IS SUFFERING WHICH BECOMES UNBEARABLE THAT DRIVES PEOPLE TO SEEK AN ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING. AND BECAUSE SUFFERING IS A PRODUCT OF FORCE, IT IS BLIND FORCE THAT DRIVES TORMENTED PEOPLE TO SEEK ESCAPE AND THAT IS NOT UNDERSTANDING AND SO NEVER LEADS TO TRUE ESCAPE BUT HEARTBREAK AND DEATH IN AGONY.
THE PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SEES THE SENSELESSNESS AND SUFFERING OF HIS ACTIONS AND SEEKS AN ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING THROUGH REASON, THUS UNDERSTANDING HOW HIS CONDUCT CREATES THE SEEDS OF FUTURE SUFFERING, HE WITH REASON ABSTAINS FROM HARMFUL CONDUCT AND THUS TRULY FINDS AN ESCAPE TO SUFFERING.
I DO NOT HAVE TO DENY MYSELF AND IT IS NOT SUFFERING GIVING UP WORLDLY PLEASURES (MONEY, SENSATE GRATIFICATIONS, STATUS, FAME) & SENTIMENTS LIKE EXCITEMENT, POIGNANCY) BUT IT IS WITHOUT REGRET, WITHOUT LOSS BUT GOOD RIDDANCE AS I SAY GOODBYE TO WHAT IN THE PAST I HELD DEAR. THE PLEASURES OR GRATIFICATIONS OF THIS WORLD ARE BAITS THAT LEAD TO TERRIBLE SUFFERING AND FOOLS ARE TOTALLY MESMERIZED BY THEM.
Europe leaders warn of grim 2012
European leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, warn of more hardship and sacrifices in 2012 as the eurozone wrestles with a debt crisis.
From the wasteful celebrations, fireworks displays seen you would think the world is facing a grim 2012.
If there is so much joblessness and poverty sweeping the developed world then it is an abomination, hypocrisy to waste so much money organizing useless celebrations but the money would be better spent feeding, clothing and sheltering the needy.
IT GOES TO SHOW THE HYPOCRISY OF THIS WORLD, THERE ARE MANY WHO ARE VERY RICH AND THROWING AWAY MONEY CELEBRATING WHEN IT SHOULD BE CHANNELED TO HELPING THE DOWNTRODDEN AND SO IT IS SOCIAL UPHEAVAL WILL ARISE AND AGGRAVATE THE ECONOMIC DECLINE.
Nibbana, where the Devil cannot find you:
The Devil pursues and finds everyone and he is up to mischief, up to leading to suffering, it is the Devil who always approaches the Buddha (awakened one), never the Buddha and the Buddha always sees him and rebukes the Devil for approaching him.
Even in heaven the Devil has access and he spoke to rebuke the Buddha through one angel or deva.
The Buddha said the Devil will never find him, nibbana is the place where the Devil can never go, it is the place of no falling away.
THERE IS FALLING AWAY FROM HEAVEN, AFTER YOU HAVE EXHAUSTED YOUR MERIT, BE IT 60, 000 ETERNITIES OF HEAVENLY BLISS, YOU WILL FALL AWAY, ONLY NIBBANA IS PERMANENT, THERE IS NO FALLING AWAY FROM NIBBANA, THE CITY OF THE ENLIGHTENED WHICH IS CHANGELESS, UNCHANGING.
There are never perfect lies:
If you think it is possible to tell a perfect lie then you may be right or you understand falsely.
There are never perfect lies, especially when lies are orchestrated by fools who are never perfect. If you are not a fool you will never tell a lie because when you lie to others you are also lying to yourself and conditioning yourself to insanity, perceiving what is false is true.
HENCE IT TAKES A FOOL TO LIE AND FOOLS CAN NEVER FASHION PERFECT LIES BUT THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES THAT TELL THOSE DISCERNING IT IS A LIE.
FURTHER WHAT IS A LIE NEVER HAPPENED AND WHAT NEVER HAPPENED CANNOT BE ENTIRELY PLAUSIBLE BUT IT IS ALWAYS JUST A PROBABILITY.
OFTEN THE LIES AND FALSITIES FOOLS ORCHESTRATE ARE VERY SHODDY, THEIR FALSITY IS EVIDENT TO THOSE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Thus if the bodyguards and Razak Baginda are not involved with Altanturya’s murder, they would never have been charged because they have people in high places to protect them and if they were not involved the system will never frame its own kind. And so if they are charged and convicted it means they are involved and they are, as they themselves stated, scapegoats sacrificed for people who were never brought to court. The policemen said they were offered money to kill her.
Again in Teoh Beng Huat’s case, the Royal Commission noted the three officers were uncooperative as if in a pact. The reason they are uncooperative is because they are guilty somehow. If they were innocent they should have no fear telling exactly what happened that night and the system will never frame them and the truth will absolve them since they were truly not involved. So their silence is an admission of guilt.
And again the conduct of Anwar’s trial, police refusal to permit Anwar access to police reports, lists of evidence and witnesses, the total absence of corroborative witnesses to Saiful and merely dependence on DNA that has not been proven to come from sperm is clear evidence of impropriety.
Only truth is perfect:
Only truth is perfect because it happens or happened. Whatever is false is fabricated, did not happen and can never be perfect because if examined, there must be discrepancies, it does not fit reality perfectly because it never happened.
NO MATTER HOW ASTUTE OR CUNNING THE LIAR, A LIE IS NEVER PERFECT BECAUSE IT DID NOT HAPPEN BUT WAS FABRICATED, A CONCOCTION OF THE MIND AS IF IT HAPPENED. THUS IT CAN NEVER FIT REALITY PERFECTLY.
ONLY WHAT IS TRUE IS PERFECT BECAUSE IT HAPPENED AND SO MUST FIT PERFECTLY WITHOUT ANY EFFORT.
NO MATTER WHAT THE EFFORT PUT INTO A LIE, IT NEVER FITS PERFECTLY AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF LIARS ARE SHODDY, THEIR MINDS DISHEVELLED, THEY ARE LIKELY TO LEAVE A TRIAL OF SHIT THAT LEAD THE WISE TO THE INVARIABLE CONCLUSION IT IS ALL A LIE.
ONLY TRUTH IS PERFECT WITHOUT ANY EFFORT.
FALSITY REMAINS IMPERFECT EVEN WITH ALL THE EFFORTS OF THE WORLD.
RPK an arrogant deluded man:
I saw a bit of RPK being interviewed on You tube it seems by the NST about issues like Anwar’s trial and its fairness.
IT IS EVIDENT BY HIS STYLE, HIS AIRS, HIS HIGH PITCHED STYLISH VOICE THAT THIS IS NOT A MAN OF TRUTH BUT AN ARROGANT OR PROUD MAN FULL OF SHIT OR DELUSION BECAUSE MANY OF THE THINGS HE SPEAK IS IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTOOD AS FALSE TO ME.
AND SO HIS VERDICT ON ANWAR’S TRIAL IS NOT NECESSARILY THE PRODUCT OF DISCERNMENT OR INFORMATION HE IS PRIVY TO BUT A PRODUCT OF HIS DELUSION AND CONCEALED HATE FOR ANWAR.
WHETHER RPK IS A FOUNTAIN OF TRUTH AND WISDOM AS HE LIKES OR FANCIES HIMSELF TO BE OR HE IS ARROGANT, MISGUIDED AND DELUDED IS EVIDENT.
HE KISSED DR M’S MANY TIMES AND DEFENDED DR M MANY TIMES AND THESE ARE ACTIONS THAT HAVE DEADLY CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
ßTo man a dagger is born in the mouth, saying evil words with it,
The fool destroys himself, by praising the blameworthy,
Blaming the praiseworthy. He choses bad luck and does not feel pleasant.
BE CAREFUL WHO YOU PRAISE AND KISS HIS HAND, THE BUDDHA SAID PRAISE FOR THOSE WHO ARE BLAMEWORTHY LEADS EVEN TO HELL. IF YOU KISS DR M’S HAND AND DEFEND HIS WORDS, YOU BETTER MAKE SURE DR M IS A MAN OF VIRTUE OTHERWISE YOU WILL JOIN YOUR IDOL IN HIS DESTINY AND SO YOU WILL EMBRACE DR M IN HELL OR HEAVEN WHICHEVER IT IS.
RPK is living proof how diehard evil this world is:
In a nutshell, RPK is living proof how diehard evil, how extensive evil is because here is a man who likes to project himself as a fountain of truth, fairness, who says he was reformed from his wild samseng days to become a devout religious man but he is as deluded as ever but in a sly or cunning way that deceives and confuses many, leads many astray because they have come to see him as a hero when he is a villain in the disguise of a hero and that is even more worse.
IF YOU ARE A VILLIAN AND YOU MAKE NO BONES ABOUT THAT, DO NOT HIDE THAT THEN YOU ARE BAD THAT FAR.
WORSE IS THE VILLIAN WHO PRESENTS HIMSELF AS A HERO, WHO FANCIES HIMSELF AN AUTHORITY OF TRUTH AND GOODNESS, HE WILL RECEIVE GREATER CONDEMNATION, ACCORDING TO JESUS.
Jesus: Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes, and love salutations in the market places and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts, 47 who devour widows' houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation."
RPK has wrong size to go to heaven:
The Buddha said that those with fat or muscular legs are not going to heaven. If you have legs like a deer then you have the right size for heaven.
LOOK AT RPK, HE IS PORTLY, OVERWEIGHT AND MUSCULAR AND SPORT A TRADEMARK CAP OR BERET THAT BETRAYS DELUSION (YOU DON’T SEE ANWAR OR KARPAL SINGH OR LIM KIT SIANG WITH A BERET), EVEN THESE ARE SIGNS HE DOES NOT MATCH THE BUDDHA’S DESCRIPTION OF ONE WHO GOES TO HEAVEN.
AND SO IF YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO MUSCULAR OR HE-MAN LEGS YOU ADMIRE THOSE NOT GOING TO HEAVEN AND WON’T GO TO HEAVEN YOURSELF.
TTDI traders stage peaceful protest
ABOUT 100 traders and residents staged a peaceful demonstration in front of the TTDI market on New Year’s Eve against the demolition of the 25-year-old complex which has been slated for a mixed development.
The demonstration was held to show their disappointment at Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for failing to consult the traders on the proposed development and to push for the market to be upgraded instead.
Everything is about money, exploitation and corruption. Isn’t there enough development to be digested over even many lifetimes and yet they are hell bent to develop because there is money to be made.
Already there is a property glut to kill many times over and people’s savings in banks are recklessly lent to pursue such property bubbles that will end in systemic collapse.
THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE COUNTRY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE OR WISE PEOPLE BUT EVEN VERY CORRUPTED AND THEY WILL RUN THE COUNTRY TO THE GROUND IF THEY HAVE NOT ALREADY DONE SO.
Good riddance, no regrets, not deprivation:
There are many things that people here hold dear, will not, cannot give up and if they say they have given up they are either deluding themselves or speaking falsely.
All these things I now happily, effortlessly, without regret or depriving myself give up as good riddance to a whole lot of suffering not happiness.
What are these things that people here find hard or impossible to give up?
They find it hard if not impossible to give up their sentimentality, their treasured memories, their ties (friends, relatives), their sensate pleasures (food, smells, touches, sights and sounds or music), their humour (jokes, mirth and laughter), their style or niceness they deem very real and good when it is a senseless harmful product of stretching, changing speed and loudness, their likes and dislikes, sadness, hurts and fears, and many more.
HAVING FOUND INCOMPARABLE REFUGES IN THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND, AT PEACE AND BLISS WITH MYSELF, IT IS NO DEPRIVATION, NO HARDSHIP OR REGRETS FOR ME TO GIVE UP THE MANY THINGS PEOPLE DERIVE PLEASURE FROM IN THIS WORLD. IT IS GOOD RIDDANCE RATHER THAN SUFFERING.
The Buddha: "What others call happiness, that the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering that the Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand the Dhamma. For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those who cannot see it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.
You know and understand suffering?
Many would think that although there are many things they don’t understand, there are some things they do and challenged, they think they know or understand what suffering is when their understanding may be totally wrong and rehashed, that is recorded and replayed from recording each time.
To truly or correctly understand suffering one must realize suffering is deadly, dangerous, addictive like drugs or alcohol, it has causes that can be totally eliminated and if you don’t cut off suffering by the head so that it never arises in the future again, each time you experience suffering you are conditioning yourself to suffer so that YOU GET BETTER AND BETTER AT SUFFERING AND WILL END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND UNCONTROLLABLE SUFFERING THAT IS NEVER THE PATH TO HEAVEN OR FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING BUT EVEN ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING.
If your so called understanding does not match what I describe above you may be deluded to think you understand suffering.
There is no major or minor, good or harmless or bad suffering, all suffering is to be treated as warning, danger, conditioning or bonding to be expunged swiftly by seclusion and meditation to summon the higher states of mind.
THE CAUSE OF SUFFERING IS THE CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE, PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THE WILFUL EXPOSURE TO THE FORCE BOMBARDMENT OF OTHERS IN THE NAME OF GETTING ALONG AND GREED FOR GAINS AND THE PERMANENT CURE FOR SUFFERING IS TO BE ALERT LIKE A HAWK TO DETECT SUFFERING ARISING, SWIFTLY DISENGAGE AND SUMMON THE HIGHER STATES BY MEDITATING, SUMMON NOT PROLONGING, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ENCOURAGE EACH OTHER TO TAKE A LAX, TOLERANT VIEW ON SUFFERING, THEY SAY IT IS LIKE THAT WHEN THAT IS WRONG VIEW, WRONG UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE SUFFERING IS LIKE A CANCER THAT YOU SEEK EARLY TREATMENT AND DESTROY THAT CANCER BEFORE IT SURELY DESTROYS YOU.
Suffering always has blame:
Suffering is never inevitable or natural but it always has blame, there is someone to blame for suffering and you are very much to blame for your suffering.
IF YOU NEVER SUBJECT YOUR MIND TO CONSTANT UNNECESSARY FORCE BY USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IF YOU NEVER EXPOSED YOURSELF UNNECESSARILY TO THE FORCE BOMBARDMENT FROM WICKED OTHERS YOU CALL YOUR FRIENDS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU CAN BE BESEIGED BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, ALL FORMS OF SUFFERING IN THEIR OWN RIGHTS.
THUS IF YOU DON’T CARE, DON’T GET OFF YOUR BACKSIDES AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, SUFFERING WILL SEIZE YOU EVER TIGHTER IN ITS GRIP SO IT GETS HARDER TO ESCAPE AND THEN SUFFERING WILL STRANGLE YOU LIKE A PYTHON.
Here is proof Anwar is not a sodomist:
You do not need RPK’s insider information or supernatural powers to know that the Anwar trial is rigged and he is no sodomist as charged.
What you need is discernment and because people in this world totally are undiscerning, they are lost, do not know what to make of it.
IF ANWAR TRULY SODOMIZED SAIFUL, SINCE IT IS TRUE AND THE PEOPLE IN POWER HAS THE SYSTEM TOTALLY IN THEIR CONTROL SO THAT ANWAR CANNOT BE ACQUITTED UNFAIRLY TO GET ANWAR CONVICTED WHATEVER HAPPENS (SHORT OF DIVINE INTERVENTION), WHY DO THEY PERSIST TO HAMPER ANWAR’S DEFENCE, REFUSE TO SUPPLY HIS LAWYERS WITH DOCUMENTS OF THE CASE LIKE THE POLICE REPORT, WHAT EVIDENCE POLICE HAS AND WHO THE WITNESSES ARE?
IT IS BECAUSE THIS IS A BOGUS CASE, THEY MAY EVEN HAVE NOT BOTHERED TO FABRICATE A POLICE REPORT (REFLECTING THEIR ARROGANCE), THEY HAVE NO WITNESSES (AS HAS NOW BEEN REALIZED, NO WITNESSES WERE CALLED APART FROM SAIFUL), THEY ONLY HAVE DUBIOUS DNA THAT THEY MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR ANWAR’S DEFENCE.
IN SOME COUNTRIES, THERE IS A RISK OF MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE (EG IN AMERICA LAWYERS CAN GET GUILTY PEOPLE LIKE OJ SIMPSON ACQUITTED) AND SO YOU MIGHT EXPECT PROSECUTION TO HINDER THEIR OPPONENTS, BUT IN MALAYSIA, IF YOU ARE RIGHT, ANWAR IS GUILTY, YOU HAVE THE POLICE AND COURT UNDER YOUR CONTROL, WHY SHOULD YOU FEAR ANWAR WOULD BE WRONGLY ACQUITTED AS TO PLAY DIRTY BY OBSTRUCTING HIS DEFENCE?
BECAUSE THE PROSECUTION HAS THE SYSTEM (POLICE & COURT) ON THEIR SIDES THERE IS NEVER EVER ANY FEAR THAT ANWAR WILL ESCAPE JUSTICE IF HE IS TRULY GUILTY SO WHY IS IT PLAYING DIRTY BY DENYING ANWAR ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS HE NEED TO MOUNT HIS DEFENCE?
THE REASON IS BECAUSE THE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT THERE, IT IS ALL A FAKE AND TO MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR ANWAR WHICH MEANS THIS CASE IS BUILT ON MALICE NOT GENUINE SEEKING OF JUSTICE.
THUS THE FACT THAT THERE ARE MANY DIRTY TACTICS INVOLVED IN THE CASE AND THERE IS NEVER REASON FOR THAT SINCE THE PROSECUTION HAS THE SYSTEM SOWN UP IN ITS FAVOR SO THAT IF ANWAR IS TRULY A SODOMIST EVEN GOD CANNOT COMPLAIN IF ANWAR IS FOUND GUILTY, WHY THE HELL IS IT THEY ARE RESORTING TO UNDERHAND TACTICS EXCEPT TO FOOLISHLY EXPOSE IT IS A PLOT.
DR M HIMSELF HAS ADMITTED THE FIRST CASE IS A PLOT IN HIS HASTE TO SELL THIS SECOND CASE AS GENUINE, IF ANWAR IS A PRACTICING SODOMIST, IT IS AMAZING THE POLICE HAVE NOT NAILED HIM YET.
SO YOU HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, WHY DID YOU NOT REASON TRULY THUS?
Never reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is guilty:
If Anwar truly sodomized Saiful, the system can throw Anwar into jail without any pangs of their conscience even if the evidence is faulty or wrong and the trial is to show the people that justice is seen to be done and you don’t assist your objective by obstructing Anwar and treating his defence in a manner that can be seen to be unfair by refusing to let him see the police report, list of witnesses, evidence lined up.
In some countries were lawyers can argue so that guilty people can get off the hook on technicalities as OJ Simpson was acquitted falsely there is a case for playing dirty but even then not to the brazen levels in Malaysia, in order to ensure conviction.
AND SO WITH THE POLICE AND COURT ON YOUR SIDE SO THAT YOU CAN SECURE A CONVICTION RIGHTEOUSLY EVEN WITH FAULTY EVIDENCE, INCOMPETENT PROSECUTION, WHY DOES THE SYSTEM HAVE TO RESORT TO UNDERHAND TACTICS IN TREATING ANWAR EXCEPT THAT THIS IS A BOGUS CASE?
THE ONLY WAY TO TRULY EXPLAIN HAPPENINGS IN ANWAR’S CASE IS THAT IT IS ALL TRUMPED UP, THEY ARE ARROGANT AND DO NOT EVEN BOTHER TO DISGUISE THEIR CASE WELL THAT PERMITS THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND TO COME TO A CONCLUSION IT IS TRUMPED UP.
IT IS BECAUSE THEY CAN GET THEIR WAY AND THEY FLAUNT IT THAT THEY HAVE NOT BOTHERED TO COVER THEIR TRACKS BETTER, IN THE PROCESS EXPOSING THE TRUTH OF THEIR CASE.
THE SYSTEM NEED NOT FEAR ANWAR CAN ESCAPE JUSTICE IF HE WAS TRULY GUILTY SINCE THE SYSTEM IS UNDER THEIR CONTROL UNLIKE SOME COUNTRIES WHERE ‘CLEVER’ LAWYERS CAN ARGUE THEIR CLIENTS OUT OF JUSTICE, SO WHY IS IT RESORTING TO CLEAR UNDERHAND TACTICS EXCEPT TO DISPLAY THEIR ARROGANCE, THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH IMPUNITY LIKE A CAT TOYING WITH A MOUSE.
IF YOU THINK IN THE LIGHT OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED IT IS STILL POSSIBLE ANWAR IS GUILTY YOU HAVE ADVANCED INCURABLE DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
Why Anwar’s defence was obstructed:
The reason Anwar’s defence is obstructed is because the charges are false in order to make it difficult if not impossible for Anwar to mount a meaningful defence against charges.
How is Anwar or his lawyers going to rebut charges and evidence that they do not know about?
THE REFUSAL TO SUPPLY EVIDENCE IS PRECISELY TO KEEP ANWAR AND HIS DEFENCE IN THE DARK SO THAT THEIR HANDS ARE TIED, THEY CANNOT PREPARE THE DEFENCE FOR SOMETHING THEY DO NOT KNOW IS IN POLICE HANDS.
THUS THERE IS REASON TO WITHOLD CRUCIAL INFORMATION BY AUTHORITIES.
IF THIS CASE IS FAKED, YOU DENY THE DEFENCE INFORMATION INTO THE CASE THAT ENABLES THEM TO MOUNT A DEFENCE.
THERE IS ALL THE MORE THE REASON TO WITHOLD DETAILS OF THE CASE TO THE DEFENCE IF IT IS FAKED SINCE WHATEVER IS FAKED CAN BE REBUTTED AND YOU WANT TO SABOTAGE THE DEFENCE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE BY KEEPING THEM IN THE DARK.
THUS THERE IS EVERY REASON TO WITHOLD POLICE EVIDENCE FROM THE DEFENCE IF IT IS FAKED BECAUSE WHAT IS FAKED CAN BE REBUTTED AND YOU WANT TO SABOTAGE TO DEFENCE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE IN THE COURT.
IF ANWAR DID SODOMIZE SAIFUL THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIS LAWYERS TO PROVE OTHERWISE, SO WHY FEAR ALLOWING HIM TO SEE EVIDENCE? IF HE IS GUILTY YOU CAN JAIL HIM WITHOUT FEELING GUILTY AND THE SYSTEM WILL OBEY YOU AND JAIL HIM.
Every reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is innocent:
Thus it is the case of never a reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is guilty but every reason to obstruct Anwar’s defence if he is innocent.
IT ONLY MAKES SENSE TO OBSTRUCT ANWAR’S DEFENCE IF HE IS INNOCENT TO FURTHER HANDICAP HIM IN HIS EFFORT TO CLEAR HIMSELF.
IF ANWAR IS GUILTY IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO OBSTRUCT HIS DEFENCE SINCE TRUE EVIDENCE CANNOT BE REFUTED AND EVEN IF THE PROSECUTION IS INCOMPETENT THE SYSTEM WILL NEVERTHELESS NEVER ACQUIT ANWAR, SO WHY BOTHER? ANWAR CAN DO WHAT HE LIKES AND STILL HE ENDS IN JAIL.
THUS THE REASON TO OBSTRUCT ANWAR IS IF HE IS INNOCENT AND IT IS TO HANDICAP HIM FURTHER BUT IN THE PROCESS YOU FOOLISHLY EXPOSE YOUR SCAM TO THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND.
Obstruction only makes sense if Anwar is innocent:
Obstruction only makes sense if Anwar is innocent because it is to further handicap him in his quest to clear his name.
But in the process of handicapping him, you are foolishly exposing your hand, exposing the true nature of the charges.
Obstruction does not make sense if Anwar is guilty because Anwar and his lawyers can what they like but the system will still throw him into jail.
THUS BECAUSE OBSTRUCTION ONLY MAKES SENSE IF ANWAR IS INNOCENT, HE MUST BE INNOCENT AND THE CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL SO FAR ALL POINT TO A SCAM. WHO NEEDS RPK TO TELL HIM ANWAR IS GUILTY AND IT IS A FAIR TRIAL? YOU?
THUS YOU JUST HAVE TO ESTABLISH THIS: WAS ANWAR OBSTRUCTED IN HIS DEFENCE, WAS HIS TEAM REFUSED ACCESS TO POLICE REPORTS AND WITNESSES?
Everything is with reason, with cause:
Until they go mad, whatever people do in this world has reason, can be explained even if their reasons are false or deluded or based on force or emotion.
Even when people go mad, what they do or say when mad is also not without reason but can be understood, what people do or say when mad are not without precedents, not out of the blue, but have connections with their pasts.
Thus it is never without purpose that authorities chose to obstruct Anwar’s defence by withholding the police report and details of evidence they have against Anwar but there is reason and it is 1) they do not have the evidence eg police report and 2) to further sabotage Anwar’s defence by not supplying evidence that they can work on to mount a defence. If your charge is bogus, you want to make it as difficult as possible for the defence to mount a credible defence.
WHATEVER PEOPLE SAY OR DO (EVEN WHEN THEY BECOME MAD) HAS REASON EVEN IF IT IS FALSE OR DRIVEN BY FORCE. EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD HAS CAUSE, CAN BE EXPLAINED AND UNDERSTOOD.
Ahah! Gotcha!
If the police case against Anwar is genuine, the police and system should be celebrating, cock-a hoop, saying gotcha and displaying to all and sundry proof of Anwar’s perfidy rather than hide and refuse to reveal what case they have.
Since they have proof of Anwar’s perfidy and there is no danger the system will deny them, why should police withhold what evidence they have against Anwar?
ON THE CONTRARY, FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BOASTFUL AND LIKE TO SHOW OFF, IF THEY HAVE CAUGHT YOU BY YOUR BALLS, THEY WILL GLEEFULLY ANNOUNCE TO THE WORLD WITH MUCH FANFARE WHAT IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE THEY HAVE AGAINST YOU. WHY SO COY?
TV3 regularly showed clips of compromised Anwar:
Even when it is not proven Anwar is the man in the black & white prostitute video, TV3 regularly prefaced their evening news broadcasts with a screening and so it would be totally out of character for the system to withhold evidence that is genuine that would prove Anwar is homosexual and so if Anwar is guilty the system would be keen to supply what evidence it has that would smear Anwar irreparably even if it is faked.
EVEN IF IT IS FAKED, THE SYSTEM WOULD GLADLY FEED TO THE MASSES SO IF IT HAS GENUINE EVIDENCE OF ANWAR’S PERFIDY AND THERE IS NO RISK THE COURT CAN BE HIJACKED BY SHREWD LAWYERS TO ACQUIT ANWAR, WHY SHOULD IT BE RELUCTANT TO REVEAL WHAT EVIDENCE IT HAS?
IN THE LIGHT OF WHAT TV3 DOES AND MANY THINGS ELSE, IT WOULD BE OUT OF CHARACTER FOR THE PROSECUTION TO COYLY REFUSE TO REVEAL WHAT EVIDENCE IT HAS AGAINST ANWAR EXCEPT THAT IT IS ALL A SCAM AND IT IS TO OBSTRUCT ANWAR’S DEFENCE OR THERE IS NO SUCH EVIDENCE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Not my theory but a product of logic that is true:
Anyone who thinks what I say is just my theory has advanced false perception because it is not my theory but a product of logic that is true and whatever is the product of true logic is true.
People in this world will not tell you the truth, they will lie to you but you do not need supernatural powers to find out the truth because there are invariably tell tale signs of falsity.
WITH WISDOM OR DISCERNMENT YOU CAN NAVIGATE THROUGH THE TREACHEROUS WATERS OF OTHERS’ TRICKERY TO ESCAPE HARM EVEN DEATH. PEOPLE WILL NOT TELL YOU THE TRUTH BUT WITH DISCERNMENT YOU CAN ARRIVE AT THE TRUTH MORE RELIABLY THAN LISTENING TO ARROGANT FOOLS LIKE RPK.
A THEORY IS SOMETHING CONCOCTED WITHOUT KNOWING TO EXPLAIN EVENTS. A PRODUCT OF LOGIC IS WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED THAT YOU CONSTRUCT OUT OF STRANDS OF FACTS AVAILABLE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
True logic always leads to the truth:
If there are three separate elements or facets and you understand correctly or truly each element or facet then by adding them together they may be sufficient to lead a discerning person to the truth.
The reason why it does not lead others to the truth is because they fail to understand some or all of the three elements or they understand or interpret incorrectly some or all of the three elements that then lead them to a wrong conclusion.
IF THERE ARE THREE PRESENTING ELEMENTS IN A CASE AND A PERSON UNDERSTANDS EACH OF THE ELEMENTS CORRECTLY THEN BY STRINGING THEM TOGETHER IT MAY BE SUFFICIENT FOR HIM TO ARRIVE AT A CORRECT CONCLUSION THE TRUTH OF A MATTER.
IT IS ONLY WHEN SOMEONE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND WRONGLY SOME OR ALL OF THE ELEMENTS THAT HE ARRIVES AT THE WRONG CONCLUSION.
Impossible not improbable:
Confronted by the fact that Saiful saw a doctor only 3 days after he was allegedly sodomized, many would express incredulity, their mental forces will be stirred to find it odd and then they would conclude it is improbable but possible when the conclusion should be that it is impossible sodomy actually took place in this particular case.
IN GENERAL IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO PRESENT TO A DOCTOR THREE DAYS AFTER BEING SODOMIZED BUT IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.
THE REASON IS THAT BEFORE THE LAST ACT, SAIFUL HAD CONTACTED THE DEPUTY PM AND WAS IN LIAISON WITH TOP POLICE OFFICIALS AND EVEN IF SAIFUL IS NOT KEEN TO PROSECUTE ANWAR (UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE), THE SYSTEM WOULD BE VERY KEEN TO DESTROY ANWAR AND WOULD HAVE MONITORED SAIFUL, KEPT IN FREQUENT TOUCH WITH HIM TO KNOW SODOMY HAD TAKEN PLACE AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THEY WOULD ALLOW SAIFUL TO CARRY ANWAR’S SPERM FOR 3 DAYS BEFORE TELLING HIM TO SEE ANY DOCTOR.
AGAIN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE NOT IMPROBABLE IF AS ESTABLISHED IN COURT THE SPECIMENS TAKEN FROM SAIFUL WERE LEFT IN A DRAWER FOR 3 DAYS BECAUSE THOSE INVOLVED WILL KNOW THIS IS A VERY SPECIAL CASE AS TO FOLLOW PROTOCOL.
IF ANWAR WAS THE PM, THIS CASE WOULD HAVE BEEN DISMISSED BECAUSE IT IS BASED ON THE ACCUSATIONS OF SOMEONE WHO HAS VESTED INTERESTS TO SAY WHAT HE SAID WITHOUT BACKING OR CORROBORATION OF ANYONE. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE ANWAR IS THE ENEMY OF THE STATE THAT HIS ACCUSER IS ACCORDED ABSOLUTE CREDIBILITY WITHOUT SUPPORTING WITNESSES. WHERE IN COURT WAS ANY SUPPORTING WITNESS PRODUCED?
‘DON’T KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT’ IS THE WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF INFORMATION SAIFUL SAW DOCTOR THREE DAYS LATER, SPECIMEN LEFT LYING FOR 3 DAYS AND POLICE REFUSING TO PROVIDE ANWAR’S DEFENCE DETAILS OF POLICE REPORT, CHARGES AND EVIDENCE. THAT THEY ALL POINT TO FRAUD IS THE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING.
You say you understand human nature?
Now if you have an enemy of the state, Anwar whom you wish to destroy given the slightest of opportunity (without implicating or besmirching yourself) and here you have a ‘godsend’ Saiful who was truly being sodomized by the state enemy number 1, would you not monitor Saiful even daily to find out if he had recently been sodomized, you never think of setting an audio-video trap for Anwar and you only waited for 3 days after the last act to ask him to see a doctor?
IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING IS NOT TRUE OR GENUINE, IF SOMETHING IS NOT PROGRAMMED IN THEM SO AS TO BE REHASHED, THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND SUCH THAT THEY ARE LOST, ALL AT SEA AS TO HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.
Before you try to understand anything:
Before try to (truly) understand anything, make sure you do not stir or let your mental force be stirred because that is a fatal intrusion that deactivates, renders impossible any true understanding.
A person’s stirred mental force to like, dislike, be sad, hurt, confused or fear is actually his force based immediate understanding of an event and this fatally colours if not render impossible his correct understanding of what is happening.
BECAUSE PEOPLE HERE HAVE TRAINED THEMSELVES SO WELL TO STIR THEIR MENTAL FORCES, THEIR MENTAL FORCES ARE AUTOMATICALLY STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHATEVER HAPPENS, THEY ARE RENDERED INCAPABLE OF TRULY UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING, THEY ARE RESTRICTED TO REHASHING PRE-RECORDED FIXED STANDARDIZED UNDERSTANDING THAT NEVER PERFECTLY FIT THE SITUATION AND ARE OFTEN VERY INACCURATE.
NOWADAYS MY MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED AND I EFFORTLESSLY UNDERSTAND THINGS I SEE.
Stirred force, not force is the nemesis of understanding:
Force can either do work that is useful (cook food) or useless (eg fashion style) or it can be stirred to prolong, change speed or strength triggered by events.
Thus if a person’s mental force is stirred to like, dislike, feel sad, hurt, confused or fearful, it means what happened stirred his mental force that is blind and blinding, in effect his understanding of what has happened is the stirring of blind blinding force that renders him incapacitated in understanding what has happened.
There is evidence that this is the case. When you have a hearty laugh or are very excited or angry, you struggle to keep touch with reality, become dizzy or dazed, let alone that you are able to then understand what is happening.
THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFICULTY STAYING IN TOUCH WITH REALITY LET ALONE UNDERSTAND REALITY WHEN THEY BECOME INEBRIATED BY VIOLENT LAUGHTER, EXCITEMENT AND ANGER IS PROOF THE STIRRING OF FORCE IS INIMICAL TO TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
A PERSON’S STIRRED FORCE, HIS STIRRED LIKING, DISLIKING, SADNESS, HURT, CONFUSION OR FEAR IS DE FACTO HIS UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THIS IS SUBSEQUENTLY BUTTRESSED BY REASONABLY APPROPRIATE OR INAPPROPRIATE REHASHED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HAPPENED.
THUS WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT HIS INITIAL UNDERSTANDING IS EMOTIONAL OR STIRRED FORCE AND SUBSEQUENTLY HE SUPPLEMENTS THAT UNDERSTANDING WITH RETRIEVED RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS THAT NEVER FIT THE SITUATION PERFECTLY AND MAY BE BIZARRE.
THUS IN ORDER TO TRULY UNDERSTAND YOU MUST SUCCEED IN NOT STIRRING YOUR MENTAL FORCE SO THAT YOU CAN CLEARLY IMBIBE WHAT IS HAPPENING.
Have you heard Anwar attack Dr M, RPK?
You have heard Dr M and RPK attack Anwar (RPK says Anwar has lost all credibility) but have you heard Anwar say anything nasty about Dr M or RPK? I haven’t.
EVEN AFTER THE TERRIBLE THINGS DR M HAS DONE TO ANWAR, HE SAYS HE HAS FORGIVEN HIM AND ANWAR HAS NEVER UTTERED ANYTHING NASTY ABOUT DR M WHILST DR M CONTINUES TO SPEW VENOM AT ANWAR.
THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT ANWAR IS SOMEONE OF EXCEPTIONAL INTEGRITY, UNLIKE TO BE A SODOMIST. IF ANWAR IS CORRUPT AND DEVIANT THEN HE COULD EASILY AVOID RISKING HIS LIFE FIGHTING THE RULING ELITE BY STRIKING A DEAL TO BE PAID OFF AND RETIRE TO ENSURE FULLTIME HIS HOBBY OF SODOMY.
It is always nonsense Anwar has lost all credibility:
Anyone who accuses Anwar of having lost all credibility is talking nonsense, hitting unfairly below his belt and asking for karma.
Credibility is never about substance but style, believability.
It is not believability that you should seek in others but it is what they have done right or wrong.
HENCE SPEAK PRECISELY WHAT ANWAR HAS DONE WRONG, DON’T VAGUELY, IRRESPONSIBLY SAY HE HAS LOST CREDIBILITY.
THUS EVEN THIS IS CREATING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE PAIN FOR RPK WHO THINKS HE IS A RELIGIOUS MAN BUT HE MAY HAVE SUFFERING THAT IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.
It can be proven this world is mind made:
Even if you and everyone hold this world so real and dear, are in doubt and uncertainty whether it is merely mind made or it is an independent or separate entity apart from mind, it can be indisputably proven whether this world is mind made or not.
IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A BEING TO KNOW WITH CERTAINTY THAT THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE, THERE IS NO INDEPENDENT ENTITY AND IT DOES NOT EXIST APART FROM MIND.
How is that so?
Supposed you are the Buddha or Jesus and you can instantly create (eg bread, fish) and disappear objects (make someone sitting beside you disappear, the Buddha can disappear from one place and reappear at another place) then you can know without a doubt this world is mind made because if this world was true, immutable, sacrosanct, it would be impossible for anyone through the agency of his mind to create and disappear objects.
IF THIS WORLD IS INDEPENDENT, IMMUTABLE, IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE FOR ANYONE THROUGH THE AGENCY OF HIS MIND TO INSTANTLY CREATE OR DISAPPEAR OBJECTS, TO DISAPPEAR FROM ONE PLACE AND REAPPEAR IN ANOTHER, TO WALK ON WATER, WALK THROUGH WALLS, FLY IN THE AIR, HEAL THE MAIMED, BRING THE DEAD ALIVE, COMMAND A MOUNTAIN TO MOVE AS JESUS SAID.
IF IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A PERSON THROUGH HIS MIND OR HIS WILL TO CHANGE THE WORLD PHYSICALLY THEN MIND HAS POWERS OVER THIS MATERIAL WORLD, IT IS NOT AS SOLID OR INDEPENDENT AS YOU DELUDE YOURSELF.
YOU NEED TIME AND MATERIAL TO CREATE A FERRARI, IF GOD WISHES HE CAN IN AN INSTANCE, IMMEDIATELY CREATE A FERRARI FAR MORE SOPHISTICATED AND RELIABLE THAN ANY FERRARI IN EXISTENCE AND FOR HIM AND WITNESSES, HE UNDERSTANDS THIS WORLD IS MIND CREATED, HAS NO INDEPENDENT BASIS APART FROM MIND AND THUS KNOWING THE ILLUSORY NATURE OF THIS WORLD, HE BECOMES DISENCHANTED, NO LONGER HOLDS THIS WORLD TO THE GREAT VALUE AS IN THE PAST.
I have personally experienced objects disappearing and reappearing instantly and these are proofs the world is mind made, not true or independently existent.
I searched many times a pile of CDs for a particular CD and could not find it but later when I returned, it was lying at the top of the heap. It is not possible someone returned it and either I am blind or someone supernatural must have caused it to disappear and then reappear.
Again, I found one CD in a set of 4 missing and no matter how I searched I could not find it until I gave up. Many months later I had a hunch it might be back and so I opened the locker the CD set was stored together with many CDs and it had returned, pristine without any dust or scratches.
Yet again once someone supernatural cause my CD recorder to be swapped with a DVD player on another table, the cords were all pulled out, one power cord disappear and a big sticker on top of the DVD player disappeared. No one has access to the place and so someone supernatural must have swapped the players and disappeared the big sticker.
IF IT IS TRUE THAT THINGS CAN DISAPPEAR AND REAPPEAR ON COMMAND BY A BEING’S MIND, THAT IS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE, MIND CAN CREATE AND UNCREATE OBJECTS.
IT REFLECTS HUMANITY’S DELUSION, WRONG UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY THINK THIS WORLD IS REAL, IMMUTABLE OR NO ONE CAN SAY FOR SURE IT IS MIND MADE OR NOT.
THE PERSON WHO SAYS NO ONE CAN BE SURE IF THE WORLD IS MIND MADE OR NOT HAS A WRONG UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE IF SOMEONE CAN CAUSE OBJECTS TO APPEAR OR DISAPPEAR BY COMMAND, HE CAN KNOW FOR SURE THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE.
You would be a fool to hold a mirage dear:
If you know something is a mirage would you still be attached to it, hold it dear especially with it is the cause of terrible mind warping sleep depriving suffering?
THUS WHEN A BEING HAS COME TO A RIGHT KNOWING THAT THIS WORLD IS A MIRAGE CREATED BY HIS MIND IN COMMONALITY SHARED BY ALL BEINGS, HE BECOMES DISENCHANTED, NO LONGER HOLDS THIS WORLD OF ILLUSIONS DEAR ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS THE SOURCE OF SO MUCH HARDSHIP EVEN TERRIBLE SUFFERING FOR HIM FOR WHICH WHATEVER PLEASURE HE EXTRACTS IS SCANT FLEETING REWARD.
IF YOU KNOW THE GOLD YOU SO VALUE CAN BE INSTANTLY CREATED AND DISAPPEARED WOULD YOU VALUE IT AS MUCH AS BEFORE? THE DEVIL SAID THE BUDDHA CAN TURN A MOUNTAIN TO GOLD IF HE WANTS.
It is possible to tell if the world is mind made:
Anyone who holds the view no one can tell for sure if this world is mind made only or not has wrong view, wrong understanding and headed for hell or the animal womb.
It can be known if this world is true or mind made and that is if a person can at will make things disappear and reappear.
IF YOU CAN WITH YOUR MIND MAKE A MOUNTAIN MOVE AS JESUS SAID YOU CAN THEN YOU HAVE PROVEN FOR YOURSELF AND FOR THOSE WHO WITNESS THAT THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE, MIND IS THE MASTER OF THIS WORLD AND SO IF YOU THINK IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THE WORLD IS MIND MADE YOU HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING.
IT IS POSSIBLE NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH WHETHER THIS WORLD IS MIND MADE OR NOT. IF YOU THINK IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, NO ONE CAN TELL, YOU ARE DELUDED.
I find music loathsome nowadays:
Nowadays it is not a deprivation, not a loss, not a pain to deny myself music because the music and songs that I hold dear in the past are now even a pain to my ears, I do not appreciate the sentiments even substance conveyed and so it is no loss but even good riddance for me. It would be absurd for me to pay exorbitant prices to the singers and industry for CDs when the music is a pain in the ear and poisons me.
THOSE WHO THINK MUSIC IS A BALM, SOOTHES HAS WRONG VIEW BECAUSE MUSIC IS AT BEST SWEET POISON AND IN THE END IT IS THE POISON THAT COUNTS NOT THE SWEETNESS. EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE CONDITIONED AND DEPENDENT ON MUSIC, ADDICTED TO MUSIC AND IT IS A BONDAGE RATHER THAN TRUE HAPPINESS, NOWADAYS WITH MY MIND GETTING STEADIER AND STEADIER, IT IS NO LOSS, NO SUFFERING BUT GOOD RIDDANCE TO MUSIC.
PEOPLE THINK THEY KNOW MUSIC, THEY UNDERSTAND MUSIC BUT HERE AS EVERYWHERE THEY ARE DELUDED, THEY FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUE NATURE OF MUSIC ESPECIALLY HERE WHERE IT IS A REHASHED COCKTAIL OF POISONING FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS ACCORDING TO A PLAN OF NOTES AND WORDS.
Redknapp: An Englishman should manage England
This is an expression of delusion and self-identity that is the path to woe.
What is the goal of the manager of England? If it is possible for a manager to win the world cup for England and there are no restrictions as to who can be a national manager then the man best able to deliver the world cup to England should manage England and so he has false logic.
IT IS NOT THAT YOU ARE MY WIFE OR SON OR BROTHER OR SAME RACE THAT YOU ARE GOOD, IT IS ALWAYS ONLY BECAUSE YOU ARE GOOD THAT YOU ARE GOOD. DELUDED PEOPLE SIDE WITH THEIR RELATIONS, THEIR RACE AND THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED MADNESS TO THINK THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE CHINESE, THE CHINESE ARE GOOD.
The Buddha also created:
Just as Jesus created many loaves of bread to feed the masses, it is recorded the Buddha also created many fires to keep people warm.
At that time in the cold winter nights, in the time between the ashtaka festivals (68), when snow falls, the Jañilas plunged into the river Nera¤jarà , and emerged again, and repeatedly plunged into the water and emerged. And the Blessed One created five hundred vessels with burning fire (69); at those the Jañilas coming out of the river warmed themselves. And the Jañilas thought: `Doubtless this is the magical power and the high faculty of the Great Samaõa that these vessels with fire have been caused to appear here.' And the Jañila Uruvelà . Kassapa thought: `Truly the Great Samaõa possesses high magical powers and great faculties, since he can create such great vessels with fire. He is not, however, holy like me.
The Buddha can make it impossible for the strongest men to split a log, he can disappear from one place to reappear in another (eg the opposite bank of the Ganges), he said he can walk on water, walk through walls, fly through the air, he can read your mind to precisely know what you are thinking, he can make you invisible to others, with his hand he can touch the moon and the sun.
ALL THESE, IF TRUE ARE PROOFS THAT THE WORLD IS MIND MADE NOT SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT, THE MIND CAN CHANGE THE WORLD AT WILL.
How did the Buddha know about the 4 great oceans?
Even today there are people living within the great land masses who have never seen and do not know oceans exist and so how did a landlocked Buddha living in the foothills of the Himalayas know about oceans, know there are continental shelves that descend gradually to suddenly plunge into the depths of the ocean?
If he can fly through the air as he claimed then it is to be expected he will know this.
Even today few will be hard pressed to state how many oceans there and the Buddha could name 4 great oceans (Indian, Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic. Antarctic not an ocean)
The Blessed One said: "From an inconstruable beginning comes transmigration. A beginning point is not evident, though beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are transmigrating & wandering on.
What do you think, monks: Which is greater, the tears you have shed while transmigrating & wandering this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, separated from what is pleasing -- or the water in the four great oceans?"
"As we understand the Dhamma, this is the greater: the tears we have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- not the water in the four great oceans."
"Long have you (repeatedly) experienced the death of a father... a brother... a sister... a son... a daughter...a relatives... wealth... disease. The tears you have shed while transmigrating this long, long time -- weeping from being joined with what is displeasing, being separated from what is pleasing -- are greater than the water in the four great oceans.
" Long have you thus experienced stress, pain, loss, swelling the cemeteries -- enough to become disenchanted with all fabricated things, enough to become dispassionate, enough to be released."
The ocean has a gradual shelf, a gradual inclination, with a sudden drop-off only after a long stretch. This is the first amazing fact.
US high-speed rail network finds support among Republican candidates
The project would be a government project spending public money and the reason Republicans support is not necessarily because it would be good for the common good but the project would benefit them, benefit big companies who get to supply to the project.
If this project does not pay itself back in terms of revenue generated then it will worsen the public position which is already saddled by much even insoluble debt.
People like Krugman are deluded to think national debt is relative, it does not matter the government spends money it does not have by borrowing or printing but it does matter as the crisis now demonstrates.
NOBODY CARES ABOUT WHAT IS FOR THE COMMON GOOD, WHAT THEY CARE ABOUT IS WHAT IS IN IT FOR THEM, FOR RICH REPUBLICANS IT IS A SHARE OF THE PROFITS FOR TAKING PART IN THE PROJECT, FOR DEMOCRATS IT IS PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT FOR THE UNEMPLOYED SO THAT THEY WILL VOTE DEMOCRAT. BUT THE NATION IS SADDLED WITH MASSIVE DEBT AND SUCH DEFICIT SPENDING IF UNWISE WILL ADD TO FUTURE DEBT.
A global boom based on massive debt based unproductive consumption:
For one seeing correctly the recently ended boom may be based on massive debt based unproductive consumption that even now is being continued and this is a recipe for certain catastrophic final collapse.
Unproductive consumption (houses for luxurious living, expensive cars, infrastructure for entertainment like stadiums, spanking new highways to nowhere, airlines for tourist, sports, hotels etc) are all consumption that have little productive returns and if this is based on borrowed money, it is money mostly down the drain leaving the majority and big debt bill that they cannot hope to repay and if they tried to replay it would cause a massive drop in consumption as money is diverted to debt repayment.
Anwar fraudulently charged with fraudulent methods:
No wise man would sin and only fools who do not know the horrendous suffering they are bequeathing themselves would undertake sin in the name of material gains.
Reflecting they are fools, they expose themselves, they foolishly do unnecessary things that prove to those who understand the sodomy case against Anwar is faked.
In order to convince the public the case is genuine, the prosecution should not be seen to sabotage the defence; if you are seen to sabotage the defence it means you are intent on securing a conviction rather than justly seeking a conviction. If your case is genuine, Saiful was truly sodomized then in a system where it is impossible for a brilliant lawyer to get a guilty Anwar acquitted (there is no possibility here where everything is in cohort for brilliant lawyers to get Anwar acquitted as OJ Simpson and many others overseas were), you do not have to resort to visible unfairness in your dealings with the defence that only serves to undermine your claim to true judicial redress for Saiful’s grievances.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE HERE TO WRONGLY ACQUIT ANWAR AS A RESULT OF BRILLIANT LEGAL ARGUMENTS BY ANWAR’S LAWYERS, THE PROSECUTION DOES NOT HAVE TO RESORT TO UNDERHAND TACTICS THAT GIVES THEIR GAME AWAY THAT THIS IS A PERSECUTION NOT PROSECUTION IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE AND TRUTH.
Normally Saiful would file a police report alleging sodomy by Anwar and police will look into the matter. After completing investigations and satisfied there is a case against Anwar their documents would be passed to the Attorney General who will then decide whether to prosecute Anwar or not and so when Anwar is charged with sodomy, all investigations together with police report by Saiful must be completed and in all cases, the defence will demand access to the police report and whatever list of witnesses and evidence the police has in order to prepare to defend Anwar.
By refusing to supply Anwar and his lawyers such basic requirements, you are obstructing Anwar, it means either you do not have the case ready before prosecuting or you are unfairly preventing Anwar from preparing for his defence or you are still toying with evidence or fabrications to be subsequently added.
If your case is genuine, Saiful was sodomized and the evidence is genuine, it can never be refuted and so why fear revealing to Anwar as early as possible.
IF HOWEVER YOUR CASE IS BOGUS, YOU ARE STILL IN FLUX OR AT WORK ABOUT WHAT ‘EVIDENCE’ OR FABRICATIONS TO ADD TO YOUR CASE OR YOU CHARGED WITHOUT EVIDENCE, CHARGED WITHOUT A POLICE REPORT AND YOU WANT TO MAKE IT EVEN MORE DIFFICULT TO DEFEND AGAINST A FABRICATED CHARGE THEN YOU DISREGARD THE GLARING OR INCRIMINATING DEFIANCE OF RULES TO REFUSE TO PROVIDE ANWAR WITH THE NECESSARY DETAILS OF THE CASE AGAINST HIM, IN THE PROCESS EXPOSING TO THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS NOT A NATURAL CASE BUT A VESTED OR LOADED CASE.
IF THEIR CASE IS GENUINE, POLICE SHOULD NOT FOOLISHLY UNNECESSARILY OBSTRUCT ANWAR IN HIS DEFENCE BY REFUSING TO DENY HIM ACCESS TO DETAILS OF THE CASE AGAINST HIM THAT WILL REFLECT NEGATIVELY AGAINST THEM BUT IF THE CASE IS NOT GENUINE THEN IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE WHY THEY WOULD REFUSE TO ALLOW ANWAR ACCESS, BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE MAY NOT BE READY, MAY NOT BE THERE AND TO MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO DEFEND AGAINST FALSE CHARGES.
FALSE CHARGES ARE MUCH EASIER TO DEFEND AGAINST THAN TRUE CHARGES AND IN ORDER TO ADVANTAGE YOURSELF WITH YOUR FALSE CHARGES AND OBSTRUCT ANWAR’S DEFENCE AGAINST FALSE CHARGES, YOU REFUSE HIM ACCESS SO THAT HE CANNOT PREPARE UNTIL THE LAST MOMENT.
Saiful: Anwar asked me, “May I fuck you”
This is clearly a fabrication by Saiful and proves he is a liar and a hopeless or unconvincing one at that.
A person seized by lust to fuck Saiful will not ask for permission but would grab him or order him to pull down his pants and go on his knees rather than politely ask “May I fuck you?”
In general a person can have two personalities, one for public show and another in private. But always it is the polite public entity and the monstrous private entity and so it is impossible for Anwar to be who he is in public and be such a polite private entity as to ask for permission to fuck Saiful.
If you are familiar with Anwar, he is not the pretentious polite or decorous person depicted by his request for permission to fuck Saiful but Saiful is far more likely to be such a pretentious polite entity and so it is a figment of his foolish incompetent lying.
IN HIS DELUDED FANTASY OR WISH, ANWAR MAY ASK HIM POLITELY ASK HIM, ‘MAY I FUCK YOU’. FOR HYPOCRITS IT IS ALWAYS THE PUBLIC PERSONA THAT IS POLITE AND THE PRIVATE PERSONA THAT IS MONSTROUS EVEN MURDEROUS.
Why Anwar will be convicted:
The only way Anwar can be discharged if it is for political expediency, he can never be discharged in the name of justice or truth because it would be a victory for Anwar and a slap on the face of the system and many UMNO supporters would cry foul if Anwar was acquitted.
Because there is no political expediency to acquit him, even erstwhile so called champions of truth like RPK say it is a fair trial and Anwar is guilty, how can he be discharged?
EVEN ERSTWHILE AVOWED CHAMPIONS OF ALLAH LIKE RPK SAY ANWAR IS GUILTY AND IT IS A FAIR TRIAL, SO HOW CAN ANWAR BE ACQUITTED IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE AND TRUTH?
If RPK says Anwar guilty and fair trial how can Anwar be freed?
If even RPK says Anwar is guilty and it is a fair trial, what hope has Anwar or anyone that he can be acquitted by a system that has motive to jail him, to finish him off for good, who made a mistake releasing him early last time?
THUS IT IS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION ONLY HYPOCRISY, THE SENTENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PASSED IMMEDIATELY.
THE TRIAL HAS ALREADY SHOWN THAT ANWAR IS CONVICTED BASED ON THE ACCUSATIONS OF ONE MAN WITHOUT WITNESS BACKING AND DNA EVIDENCE THAT CAN BE FABRICATED. NO INDEPENDENT WITNESSES WERE CALLED TO SUPPORT SAIFUL, NO AUDIO VIDEO EVIDENCE WAS TENDERED.
No comments:
Post a Comment