Thursday, April 05, 2012

Suffering is not acceptable:

Suffering is not acceptable:
Anyone who accepts suffering as a fact of life, to be put up with or coped, is harmless has wrong view and is headed even for endless suffering, endless death and that is never the way to heaven.
Only the person who does not accept suffering as natural, an unavoidable fact of life, not to be tolerated and tend seeks an end to all his suffering even here, has right view and effort and is headed for the total end of all suffering.
Even if you are at wits end, cannot find an escape to suffering, an escape to suffering even here, exists. This escape is none other than via the first higher state of mind which means no style, no prolonging, changing speed and strength leading to a stopping of thinking thence neither liking nor disliking and finally neither pain nor pleasure. There is no other escape path from suffering except this.
There are many kinds of suffering here, physical suffering (eg disease, degenerating, knocks, bodily pains), stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, even emotions are suffering rather than pleasure it is made out to be. All these have causes that can be stopped to exit suffering. If you prefer to wallow in your suffering, accept suffering and try to cope with it instead of seeking a way out of this mire of suffering, you will be dragged down deeper and deeper into suffering and thence even an eternity of suffering awaits you.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT A PERSON FREE OF SIN CAN SUFFER AND SO IF YOU SUFFER YOU ARE TO BE BLAMED AND UNLESS YOU EXTRICATE YOURSELF FROM SUFFERING BY WASHING YOUR HANDS OFF A SIN, YOU SHALL HEAD TO EVEN ANOTHER OCEAN OF SUFFERING.
When are you going to quit suffering?
Suffering is something a person can quit just like a smoker can quit smoking. Not everyone can quit smoking and very few do so. Even so it is possible to quit suffering but even more cannot or do not wish to quit suffering partly because they do not realize their suffering will turn cancerous and they are heading for even an ocean of suffering.
SUFFERING CAN BE QUITTED JUST AS SMOKING CAN BE QUITTED.
JUST AS MANY WILL NOT QUIT SMOKING EVEN WHEN IT IS SUFFERING, MANY WILL NOT QUIT SUFFERING. THEY HAVE NO IDEA, CANNOT BELIEVE THEIR SUFFERING WILL TURN CANCEROUS AND TORTURE THEM FAR MORE THAN PRESENT AND THEN CONSIGN THEM TO EVEN AN ETERNITY OF SUFFERING.
THE FIRST FUNDAMENTAL STEP TO QUIT SUFFERING IS TO ABOLISH YOUR STYLE, TO STOP USING FORCE TO CONSTANTLY STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS. WITHOUT ABOLISHING STYLE YOU ARE KIDDING YOURSELF YOU ARE QUITTING SUFFERING. THE NEXT HIGHER STEP IS TO STOP THINKING, STOP LIKING AND DISLIKING AND FINALLY NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE.
If I drive dangerously please call 1-880XXX
The above message was emblazoned on the back of a commercial van and rather than a case of bad English, it is intentionally false to make as if the driver is so conscientious he is inviting others to snitch on him.
It is not the driver who has put up the notice but it may be the owner or licencing authorities who have placed that message and so it is false, with karma attached not merit stating so.
Truthfully, it should be stated “If he drives dangerous call XXXX”. What has ‘please’ or ‘not please’ got to do with it? ‘Please’ or ‘kindly’ is a routine rehashed nicety and is irrelevant, merely a hypocritical adornment copied from others.
THE MESSAGE IS NOT TRUE OR GOOD BUT IT IS FALSE AND MISCHIEVOUS TO GIVE THE FALSE IMPRESSION THE DRIVER IS SO GOOD HE INVITES OTHERS TO REPORT HIM. ‘PLEASE’ OR ‘KINDLY’ HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MATTERS, IT IS A REHASHED COPIED NICETY THAT HAS KARMA NOT MERIT.
Vettel is cry baby - Karthikeyan
Both were involved in a race incident. The statement is always false aimed to attack with deadly karma involved whoever you are.
What matters is who was at fault and what is the fault and so he can state that Vettel was at fault and in what ways but he has no right to call Vettel a cry baby which is always an attack.
CALLING SOMEONE ‘A CRY BABY’ IS NEVER THE TRUTH OR RELEVANT BUT IT IS AN UNWARRANTED ATTACK. WHOEVER ATTACKS ANOTHER WITH WORDS OR STICK IS ASKING FOR SERIOUS SUFFERING AND SO THERE IS KARMA HERE. BECAUSE WHAT IS STATED IS NOT PERTINENT AND HE AND YOU THINK IT IS JUSTIFIED, HE AND YOU ARE GOING MAD.
ALWAYS, NOT MAYBE, THE STATEMENT IS AIMED TO ATTACK.
Elder Bush endorses Mitt Romney
George Bush Snr formally endorses Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, as the party establishment swings behind the former governor.
If Mitt Romney is not wholesome and you endorse him you are unnecessarily putting your neck on the chopping board of karma.
PEOPLE THINK NOTHING, THINK THEY ARE GOOD ENDORSING THIS OR THAT CANDIDATE. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, THE WISE DO NOT TAKE SIDES, THERE IS KARMA TAKING SIDES AND IF THE PERSON YOU ENDORSE OR RECOMMEND FOR OTHERS IS EVIL, GREEDY AND HARMFUL YOU ARE PUTTING A NOOSE TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING.
I WOULD NOT ENDORSE MITT ROMNEY, NOT THAT I WOULD PLUMB FOR HIS RIVALS OR EVEN OBAMA, BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL NOT RECOMMENDABLE. I ENDORSE THE BUDDHA.
The duty of a leader:
Having accepted the appointment of leader, the person cannot do as he wishes and has responsibility for his followers that must be fulfilled whatever he does.
Thus when Kassapa who was leader of 500 janilas sought to become the Buddha’s disciple, the Buddha told him to first inform his followers before becoming his disciple.
Despite the Buddha having performed many miracles, Kassapa nevertheless thought he and not the Buddha was holy until the Buddha rebuked him.
17. Then the Blessed One thought: `This foolish man will still for a long time think thus: "Truly the Great Samaõa possesses high magical powers and great faculties; he is not, however, holy like me." What if I were to move the mind of this Jañila (in order to show him my superiority).'
And the Blessed One said to the Jañila Uruvelà Kassapa: `You are not holy (arahat), Kassapa, nor have you entered the path of arahatship, nor do you walk in such a practice as will lead you to arahatship, or to entering the path of arahatship.' [\q 132/]
Then the Jañila Uruvelà Kassapa prostrated himself, inclining his head to the feet of the Blessed One, and said to the Blessed One: `Lord, let me receive the pabbajjà and upasampadà ordinations from the Blessed One.'
18. (Buddha replied): `You, Kassapa, are chief, leader, foremost, first, and highest of five hundred Jañilas; go first and inform them of your intention, and let them do what they think fit.'
Then the Jañila Uruvelà Kassapa went to those Jañilas; having gone to them, he said to those Jañilas: `I wish, Sirs, to lead a religious life under the direction of the Great Samaõa; you may do, Sirs, what you think fit.'
(The Jañilas replied): `We have conceived, Sir, an affection for the Great Samaõa long since; if you will lead, Sir, a religious life under the Great Samaõa's direction, we will all lead a religious life under the Great Samaõa's direction.'
IF A LEADER WANTS TO APPOINT ANOTHER AS HIS LEADER HE HAS TO FIRST INFORM HIS FOLLOWERS OF HIS INTENTION BEFORE DOING SO. AND SO THE BUDDHA WHO IS SKILLFUL IN ALL MATTERS, INSTRUCTED KASSAPA TO INFORM HIS FOLLOWERS FIRST BEFORE BECOMING THE BUDDHA’S DISCIPLE.
Whoever would be first must be your servant:
Jesus said whoever would be first must be the servant of the rest and so it is that big responsibilities come with leadership and the captain is the last to leave a sinking ship unlike the captain of the Costa Concordia who abandoned the ship before his passengers.
RATHER THAN A PRIVILEGE TO BE EXPLOITED, LEADERSHIP COMES WITH HEAVY RESPONSIBILITIES THAT RESULT IN SEVERE PUNISHMENT NOT JUST HUMAN BUT DIVINE IF SHIRKED OR DERELICTED AND SO ONLY FOOLS OR THE DELUDED ARE EAGER TO PROFFER THEMSELVES AS LEADERS.
But Jesus called them to him and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. 26*  It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great among you must be your servant, 27 and whoever would be first among you must be your slave; 28*  even as the Son of man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many."
Gamuda targets 12% margin from tunnel job:
It is improper to target and it is a manifestation of being calculating that the Buddha said is the path to future woe, anyone who is committed to targets is a robot, a slave of the target.
IT IS WRONG OR IMPROPER TO HAVE TARGETS BECAUSE IT BETRAYS A CALCULATING NATURE THAT IS THE PATH TO FUTURE WOE.
IN ORDER TO CONFORM TO TARGETS, YOU MUST BECOME A ROBOT WORKING MECHANICALLY TOWARDS THAT TARGET AND THAT IS ALWAYS WOE NEVER HAPPINESS.
IN ORDER TO TARGET 12% MARGIN YOU MUST REVIEW YOUR OPERATIONS TO SEE WHAT YOUR CURRENT MARGINS ARE AND TO CUT COSTS HERE AND THERE JUST FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF MEETING OR EXCEEDING THAT TARGET AND SO RESPONSIBILITY AND SAFETY IS DOWNGRADED IN FAVOUR OF PROFIT TARGETS.
Targets are not valid reasons for doing things:
Targets are not a valid reason for doing something and so if you are motivated by targets you are practicing controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.
YOU MAY MAKE A LOT OF MONEY SETTING AND ACHIEVING TARGETS IN YOUR ENTERPRISES BUT BECAUSE IT IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR DOING THINGS YOU ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY.
CUTTING COSTS, DISREGARDING SAFETY CONCERNS AND RACING TO FINISH THE JOB IN ORDER TO MEET A PROFIT TARGET IS AN INVALID AND MAD REASON FOR DOING SOMETHING AND SO ANYONE WHO PRACTICES TARGETS ARE HEADING FOR TORMENT.
Doing something for money is not a valid reason:
No matter how fabulously paid you are for doing something (eg hitting a football), doing something for the sake of money (or even for the pleasure of it as some swear they play golf for the love or pleasure of it).
Because working for money is not a valid reason, if you do so you are engaged in controlled insanity that ends in uncontrolled insanity.
EVEN IF YOU DO WORK FOR MONEY, YOU EARN FABULOUS MONEY FOR YOUR WORK (EG DANCING & SINGING ON STAGE), KNOW THAT WORKING FOR MONEY IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR DOING IT AND YOU DO SOMETHING ONLY IF THERE IS A VALID REASON (EG SWEEP THE FLOOR IN ORDER TO CLEAN IT, COOK FOOD IN ORDER TO HAVE SOMETHING TO EAT). THUS ALL THOSE WHO ARE DEVOTED TO WORKING FOR MONEY, WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH MAKING MONEY WITH THEIR WORK OR ENTERPRISES ARE HEADED FOR THE CLIFF OF INSANITY NOT SO MUCH BECAUSE IT IS A SIN BUT IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY DOING SOMETHING TO MAKE MONEY.
Love and happiness (not excitement) are valid reasons for doing:
Love and happiness are valid reasons for doing something and you won’t go mad doing something for love or happiness.
If you do something for the love of someone, to make the person happy or release him from suffering or alleviate his suffering then that is always a valid reason for doing it.
If you do something for the sake of happiness (eg seclusion, meditation) then that is a valid reason for doing something.
Excitement or to stir your mental force attractively is not a valid reason for doing something (eg singing, shouting, having sex) and so if you keep doing things for excitement you are headed for insanity.
Similarly doing something for hate, dislike, sadness, fear, hurt and agitation are invalid reasons for doing something that end in insanity.
(IS THERE ANYONE WHO SPEAKS LIKE ME? DO YOU NEED TO BE A GENIUS TO SPEAK THUS?)
Proof you perceive incorrectly:
I say making money is an invalid (mad) reason for doing something and most if not all will object because they see nothing wrong even perfectly right that one should do things to make money.
Similarly they think they are right to scold you because they are angry when being angry (dislike) is not a valid reason for doing anything.
They feel sad and driven by their sadness they give a beggar some money and so their action is based wrongly on emotion not reason.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD PERCEIVE FALSELY THAT MAKING MONEY, EXCITEMENT, ANGER, HURT, SADNESS, AGITATION AND FEAR ARE VALID REASONS FOR DOING OR SAYING THINGS WHEN THEY ARE INVALID AND CONTROLLED INSANITY.
THIS IS PROOF THEIR PERCEPTION IS WRONG; THEY PERCEIVE THINGS FALSELY OR INCORRECTLY.
When you are mad then you will care too late you did not care:
You don’t care whether something is a correct reason for doing something?
You don’t care if making money is a wrong reason for working?
You don’t care being angry is the wrong reason for scolding someone?
When you get mad as a result of doing things for the wrong reason then you will care too late you did not care.
Pleasing, impressing, intimidating and dominating others are not valid reasons for action:
Whether your action (eg singing and dancing) is intended to impress others, is just for show is objective, no matter how you may deny it.
If you should do something for the sake of pleasing, impressing, intimidating ( I will report you to the police) and dominating others, you are practicing controlled insanity that will end in your final uncontrollable insanity and many do not realize they are heading for the cliff of insanity, they think insanity is for others not them.
Before you accuse me:
Before you accuse me or others of also working for money, look at yourself in a mirror too.
Exactly how devoted you are to making money, how obsessed you are about making money, how calculating you are and how devoted and obsessed I am to making money can be known, if you are much more devoted then you are asking for judgment.
HOW DEVOTED I AM OR OTHERS ARE DEVOTED TO MAKING MONEY IS NONE OF YOUR CONCERN. WHAT IS OF CONCERN IS YOUR DEVOTION TO MAKING MONEY, IT IS THIS THAT WILL DETERMINE YOUR FUTURE HAPPINESS OR SUFFERING.
I EAT, YOU ALSO EAT BUT WHEREAS YOU EAT WITH LUST, SENSUOUSLY, WITH GUSTO,  I MAY NOT EAT WITH THE SAME LUST, SENSUALITY AS YOU. YOU SPEAK WITH EVIL HARMFUL STYLE, I MAY NOT SPEAK WITH STYLE LIKE YOU OR EVERYONE HERE.
How to attain eternal life for 1-500 world cycles:
Below the Buddha describes the path to eternal life for 1-500 forward world cycles:

3. Pañhamananakaraõasuttaü - The first on diversity.
013.03. Bhikkhus, these four persons are evident in the world. What four?
Here, bhikkhus, a certain person secluding from sensual desires and demeritorious thoughts, with thoughts and discursive thoughts and with joy and pleasantness born of seclusion attains to the first higher state of mind (that means no style, no constant mad use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness). Enjoying it, longing for it, he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it and not decreasing from it, he dies and is born with the gods of the sphere of Brahma (The Father). The life span of those gods is a forward world cycle. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
Again, bhikkhus, a certain person overcoming thoughts and discursive thoughts and internally appeasing the mind making it one pointed without thoughts and discursive thoughts and with joy and pleasantness born of concentration attains to the second higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it, not decreasing from it he dies and is born with the gods of Radiance. The life span of those gods is two forward world cycles. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
Again, bhikkhus, a certain person with equanimity to joy and detachment abides mindfull and aware experiencing pleasantness with the body tooòo this the noble ones say mindfull abiding in pleasantness with equanimity (neither stirring mental force to like nor dislike). He attains to this third higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it and not decreasing he dies and is born with the lustrous gods. The life span of those gods is four forward world cycles. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
Again, bhikkhus, a certain person dispelling pleasantness and unpleasantness, and earlier having dispelled pleasure and displeasure without unpleasantness and pleasantness (neither pain nor pleasure) and purifying mindfulness with equanimity attains to the fourth higher state of mind. Enjoying it, longing for it he attains prosperity in it. Keenly applying himself to it, making much of it and not decreasing he dies and is born with the gods of Space. The life span of those gods is five hundred forward world cycles. Finishing his complete life span there, he would either be born in hell, as a beast, or as a ghost. As for the noble disciples of The Blessed One, they would finish the complete life span there and would extinguish in that same birth. Bhikkhus, this is the difference and diversity between the learned noble disciple and the not learned ordinary man in their course of action, birth and conscience
How long is a world cycle?
3. Sitting on a side the monk said to the Blessed One: ßVenerable sir, how long is a world cycle?û
4. ßMonk, a world cycle is very long and it is not easy to innumerate it as, `it's this amount of years' or `this amount of hundred years,' or `this amount of thousand years,' or `this amount of hundred thousand years'.û
5. ßVenerable sir, is it possible to give a comparison?û
6. The Blessed One said: ßPossible. Monk, in a poor city there is a block of mustard seeds seven miles by the length, breath and the height bound together by the roots. After the lapse of one hundred years a man comes and takes out one of the seeds. By this method the mustard seeds diminish and vanish but the world cycle does not come to an end.
7. ßMonk, so long is the world cycle. Many of these world cycles make a several world cycle and a collection of a hundred of the several world cycles make a several hundred world cycle and a collection of a thousand of the several world cycles make a several thousand world cycle and a collection of a hundred thousand of the several world cycles make a several hundred thousand world cycle.
8. ßWhat is the reason? Monks, without an end is the train of existence, a beginning cannot be pointed out of beings enveloped in ignorance and bound by craving, running from one existence to another.
ßMonks, it is suitable that you should turn away from all determinations, fade and be released from them.û
How many world cycles have there been?
3. Sitting on a side, the Brahmin said to the Blessed One: ßGood Gotama, has a large number of world cycles gone by and finished?û
4. ßBrahmin, a large number of world cycles have gone by, it is not easy to innumerate them as, it's this amount of world cycles,' or `this amount of hundred world cycles,' or `this amount of thousand world cycles,' or `this amount of hundred thousand world cycles'.û
5. ßGood Gotama, is it possible to give a comparison?û
6. The Blessed One said: ßPossible. Brahmin, the river Ganges from its source until it enters the ocean holds sand and pebbles and it is not easy to innumerate the sand as it is `this amount of grains of sand.' Or as `this much hundred grains of sand,' or `this much thousand grains of sand' or `this much hundred thousand grains of sand.'
7. ßIndeed brahmin, a large number of world cycles have gone by, it is not easy to innumerate them as, `it's this amount of world cycles,' or `this amount of hundred world cycles,' or `this amount of thousand world cycles,' or `this amount of hundred thousand world cycles.'
Valid and invalid reasons for actions:
Whatever action or speech a person undertakes has underlying reasons, if there is no reason the person is mad. If you have reason for your action and you do not know the actual reasons, you think it is something else or you deny the actual reasons then you are a fool who does not know or denies the actual reasons for his actions. Only when you know the actual reasons for your actions and know correctly that they are valid or invalid can you finally embark on the path away from invalid to valid reasons for your actions, embark from a path of danger, controlled insanity and suffering to the path of safety, sanity and freedom from suffering.
What are invalid reasons for actions?
  1. To please, impress, intimidate and dominate others. To do something for show to please and impress rather than truly meant.
  2. By programming. Because you have been trained by yourself and others to say or do certain things which you rehash automatically by association or on cue.
  3. To deceive, harm, destroy or deprive others of their possessions.
  4. Actions or speech triggered by stirred mental force, triggered by like, dislike, sadness, hurt, confusion and fear.
  5. Prolonging syllables, changing speed and loudness are invalid actions that serve no true purpose; it is only for sound effects because deluded people perceive the sound effects as meaningful and good when it is foul and evil.
  6. Actions for the sake of making money. Thus if you build a condo not because you need a place to stay but to sell to others to make money then it is a false purpose for building the condo.

What are valid reasons for actions?
  1. When the actions or speech serve truly useful purposes.
  2. Love is a valid reason for action. Thus if you obeyed Jesus’ command out of love for him then that is a valid reason for action.
  3. Assisting or helping others is a valid reason for action.
  4. Happiness is a valid reason for action. If you undertake a certain action because it bears happiness (destroys suffering) then that is a valid reason. Happiness is not to be confused with pleasure and excitement which are not valid reasons for action. Because pleasure is a product of mild force received through the senses, it is fruit that does not last and not a correct reason for action. Seeking excitement is about seeking your mental force stirred even in violent acceleration in speed and strength.
THE BUDDHA SAID ‘GOOD IS CESSATION’ AND SO WHATEVER ACTION IS SUFFERING COMPARED WITH INACTION OR CESSATION. THERE ARE VERY FEW VALID REASONS FOR ACTIONS BECAUSE ALL ACTIONS REQUIRE THE USE OF FORCE THAT IS HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND SO THE WISE PERSON WITH CORRECT UNDERSTANDING WILL MINIMIZE HIS ACTIONS TO ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL AND NO MORE. THUS VALID REASONS FOR SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING IS IF IT IS TRULY NECESSARY, TO ASSIST OR HELP OTHERS, OUT OF LOVE AND TO SEEK (TRUE) HAPPINESS FOR SELF AND OTHERS.
EVERY ACTION UNDERTAKEN BY ANY BEING HAS PURPOSE THAT CAN BE DETERMINED, IF NOT BY YOURSELF THEN BY THE WISE AND IF THE PURPOSE FOR THE ACTION IS INVALID YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY SOONER OR LATER.
Fuel for thought
Should Indonesia raise fuel prices and axe subsidies?
They think they pose a very clever question but it reflects mankind is thoroughly clueless.
The question is not whether Indonesia should raise fuel prices and axe subsidies but whether speculators who may have cornered the oil market should be eliminated from the oil market. In the past there were strict regulations in the US as to who are permitted to trade on the commodity markets which were withdrawn at the behest of investment banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs.
IF GOVERNMENTS BAN ALL SPECULATORS FROM OIL MARKETS SO THAT ONLY THOSE WITH VALID USE FOR THE OIL THEY PURCHASE ARE PERMITTED TO BUY, OIL PRICES MAY COME DOWN DRAMATICALLY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PEOPLE. REFLECTING THEIR DELUSION, PEOPLE ACCEPT HIGH PRICES AS JUSTIFIED AND TALK ABOUT SUBSIDIES AS EVIL.
All speculators are pests and harmful:
There is a prevalent argument that speculators serve a useful role, are needed to provide a buffer to stabilize prices of commodities but this is a false argument that only the gullible are receptive.
Speculators are there not for anybody’s benefits, they are there to make money for themselves at the expense of others, usually the end consumer who has to foot the bill of their profits. Speculators artificially drive up or down prices so that they can profit from price differences and it is consumers who have to pay for it.
THAT MANKIND IS TOLERANT TO THE PRESENCE OF SPECULATORS, THINK THEY ARE HARMLESS OR SERVE A PRODUCTIVE PURPOSE FOR SOCIETY REFLECTS DELUSION AND A LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING EVEN ON MATTERS OF MONEY THAT ARE DEAR TO THEIR HEARTS. SPECULATORS ARE PARASITES OUT TO MAKE A PROFIT BY DRIVING PRICES UP AND DOWN TO THE DETRIMENT OF CONSUMERS AND THE HIGH PRICES OF OIL TODAY IS NEVER BECAUSE COSTS OF PRODUCTION HAVE RISEN SO HIGH BUT SPECULATORS HAVE PUSHED IT SO HIGH IN THEIR QUEST FOR UNRIGHTEOUS GAINS THAT BENEFIT OIL PRODUCERS AT THE EXPENSE OF CONSUMERS.
Not so fast, neutrino:
It is not for others’ sake that you should speak the truth but foremost it is for your own sake, for avoiding your own insanity.
A neutrino is not a being that you can talk to and so you are speaking falsely encouraging others to do the same with karma attached. The fact that you think it is funny, clever reflects delusion.
YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO PERCEIVE FALSELY WHEN YOU SPEAK TO A NEUTRINO AND THIS WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION. FURTHER YOU HAVE KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING FOR FOSTERING THE SAME IN OTHERS. THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT FUNNY, CLEVER REFLECTS INTENSE DELUSION.
Bin Laden 'fathered four on run'
What is stated is never the unemotional reflection of events but it is emotion driven homing in on the predilection of the author intended to stir readers’ emotions.
Many things happened on Bin Laden’s fugitive years so what is so special about fathering 4 children except that it reflects the warped perspective of the writer.
Rightly speaking it should be ‘Events of Bin Laden’s fugitive life’, of which fathering 4 children is merely one aspect.
WHAT IS HEADLINED IS NOT THE TRUTH BUT SALACIOUS, INTENDED TO STIR EMOTIONS AND THAT IS KARMA TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING. WHAT IS SO IMPORTANT ABOUT HIM FATHERING FOUR CHILDREN EXCEPT IN YOUR PERVERTED SENSE OF PERSPECTIVE?
MANY THINGS PEOPLE TAKE FOR GRANTED AS REASONABLE ARE ACTUALLY ABSURD, REFLECTS THEIR FALSE PERCEPTION.
Idle chatter ends in hell:
Exactly how useful the information that Bin Laden fathered 4 children is can be known; if it is frivolous idle chatter then the Buddha said it is the practice that leads even to hell.
IF SOMETHING YOU SPEAK OF HAS NO INTRINSIC VALUE, IT IS ONLY TO WHET YOUR APPETITE FOR GOSSIP AND SCANDAL THEN IT IS AN INVALID REASON FOR SPEAKING THAT ENDS IN MADNESS FOR YOU.
The Buddha: "Frivolous chattering -- when indulged in, developed & pursued -- is something that leads to hell, leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to the realm of the hungry shades. The slightest of all the results coming from frivolous chattering is that, when one becomes a human being, it leads to words that aren't worth taking to heart.
Pleasure is mild pain:
Pleasure is essentially mild pain and it may not be an accident it is called pleasure instead of mild pain. The reasons for mislabelling mild pain as pleasure is because people have false perception, do not know the true nature of pleasure and the King of Death (the Devil) wants to bind people here by tricking them to perceive mild pain as something different ‘pleasure’.
IT IS MILD FORCE RECEIVED THAT IS THE BASIS OF PLEASURE AND SO PLEASURE IS ULTIMATELY PAIN OR MILD SUFFERING, AFTER PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO ‘PLEASURE’ (EG SEX, GOOD FOOD) ONE SUFFERS OR IS PAINED.
IT IS FALSE PERCEPTION AND DELUSION TO PERCEIVE PLEASURE AS THE OPPOSITE AND SOMETHING WHOSE NATURE IS DIFFERENT FROM PAIN. PAIN AND PLEASURE ARE PRODUCTS OF EVIL HARMFUL BLIND FORCE.
THUS NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE, THE FOURTH HIGHEST STATE OF THE MIND IS THE HIGHEST LIBERATION FROM SUFFERING, FROM FORCE, THE PERSON’S CONSCIOUSNESS IS SHORN OFF, DEVOID OF FORCE WHICH GIVES THE HIGHEST FREEDOM FROM SUFFERING.
EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE WILL NOT GIVE UP PLEASURE, IS HOOKED TO PLEASURE, NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE, THE FOURTH HIGHEST STATE OF THE MIND IS THE HAPPIEST STATE AND GIVES THE BEING EVEN 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
How do you know pleasure-less existence is terrible?
You have never experienced existence devoid of pleasure and pain, your whole existence here is an unbroken subjugation by force so how do you know existence without pain or pleasure is inferior?
A mind devoid of force, shorn of force is the happiest one because it is entirely freed of woe, freed of suffering and it is the purest state of the mind and the mode by which the highest beings exist which is why it gives a lifespan of 500 eternities where neither like nor dislike gives merely 4 eternities.
The differences amongst brahmas:
Just as there is a vast diversity in intelligence, skills, properties and knowledge amongst ordinary beings trapped here, there is even a big or extreme diversity amongst brahmas, formless beings at the highest levels of heavenly existence.
Whoever has attained the first higher state or concentration of the mind which means no style, no use of force to prolong, change speed and strength is accorded a place in a formed heaven for one Age but even amongst these angels there is a vast diversity of properties and knowledge.
Similarly whoever has attained the ability to stop thinking, can stop thinking at will has reached the second higher concentration of mind and he is accorded a place in heaven for two Ages but even amongst these beings there is a vast diversity in properties and so those who have understood and followed the Buddha’s teaching puts an end to all existing once they have completed their allotted lifespan there.
And so the same for those who have attained neither like nor dislike the third higher state of mind and those who have attained neither pain nor pleasure, there is even a vast diversity of properties amongst those beings but what they have in common is the achievement of the higher states of the mind.
WHAT BRAHMAS HAVE IN COMMON IS THE ATTAINMENT OF THE SAME HIGHER STATE OF THEIR MINDS EG NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE, NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE. ATTAINMENT OF THE SAME HIGHER STATE OF MIND IS MERELY ONE ASPECT OF THEIR BEING, EVEN AMONGST THOSE WHO HAVE ATTAINED TO SAME CONCENTRATION OF THEIR MINDS THERE IS EVEN VAST DIVERSITIES IN PROPERTIES, IN KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING AND SUPERNATURAL POWERS EVEN OF AN EXTREME SCALE WITH THE FATHER BEING THE HIGHEST, THE CONQUEROR, THE UNCONCQUERED WHO WIELDS SUPREME POWERS. THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS THE HIGHEST, HE ALONE IS ABSOLUTE BUDDHA, PERFECT IN EVERY WAY, THERE IS NO ONE WHO IS HIS EQUAL, SARIPUTTA HIS DEPUTY IS HIS EQUAL IN WISDOM WHILST MOGGALANA IS HIS EQUAL IN SUPERNATURAL POWERS.
The Buddha is the highest in restraint:
Jesus said you should deny yourself (not join in) and it is again the programmed rehashed false understanding of ordinary people that they think restraint is terrible and pain and not to deny is unadulterated pleasure.
The Buddha said he is highest in restraining himself and amongst his disciple, Kassapa is his co-equal in denying himself.
TO PARTAKE IS TO SUFFER AND TO DENY OR RESTRAIN YOURSELF IS NOT TO SUFFER AND EVEN AMONGST BEINGS THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE EVEN INFINITE SCALE OF RESTRAIN, WITH THE BUDDHA SAYING HE IS THE HIGHEST OF RESTRAINT. HE SAYS HE IS PERFECT IN EVERY WAY, IN CONDUCT, IN KNOWLEDGE, IN CONCENTRATION AND SUPERNATURAL POWERS.
The body is a burden:
The body is a burden that far exceeds whatever pleasures the being may derive from it and even these pleasures when correctly seen are actually mild pains derived from his or her body.
THE BODY IS A BURDEN ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE OVERWEIGHT. EVEN IF YOU ARE ‘FIT AS A FIDDLE’ DAILY LIFE IS A CHALLENGE OF OBJECTS JUST OUT OF REACH OR BEHIND YOU SO THAT YOU MUST STRETCH AND TWIST (OVEREXTEND) YOURSELF TO REACH IN THE PROCESS SPRAINING YOUR MUSCLES AND LIGAMENTS. IT DOES NOT TAKE HEAVY LOADS OR PROLONGED LABOR TO CAUSE BACKACHES AND ASSORTED MUSCLE SPRAINS, DAILY LIFE IS FILLED WITH CHALLENGES TO STRETCH AND TWIST YOURSELF TO REACH THAT MAY CAUSES PAINFUL ACHES AND PAINS.
FURTHER THE BODY IS SUBJECT TO DEGENERATION & DISEASE AND SO NO MATTER HOW SEXY YOU THINK YOUR BODY IS, IT IS A BURDEN (AND MAY BE A SOURCE OF HARM AS WHEN YOU ARE RAPED BECAUSE OF YOUR SEXY BODY THAT YOU FLAUNT). WHATEVER PLEASURES THAT CAN BE DERIVED FROM THE BODY ARE PERISHABLE, MEAGRE COMPARED WITH THE PAINS AND PLEASURES IS ACTUALLY MILD PAIN AND THEREFORE BAD NOT GOOD.
AND SO ANYONE WHO HOLDS HIS BODY DEAR IS DELUDED, HAS WRONG VIEW AND HEADED FOR SUFFERING. WHOEVER VIEWS HIS BODY AS A BURDEN HAS RIGHT VIEW. YOU CAN EXIST WITHOUT BODY, FORMLESSLY AND THAT IS A SHEDDING OF A BIG BURDEN THAN LOSS. MOSQUITOES CANNOT BITE YOU IF YOU HAVE NO BODY.
Jane Fonda 'to play Nancy Reagan'
What is the point of playing or acting like Nancy Reagan if what you act does not resemble Nancy Reagan approximately or precisely? Thus in order to act like Nancy, Jane must temporarily put aside her own act and put on the Nancy act as far as she can manage.
In order to act like Nancy Reagan you must study and learn to act or behave like her in the process acting or behaving according to a plan of how and what Nancy does.
THUS TO ACT IS ABOUT COPYING, HAVING A PLAN OF WHAT AND HOW TO POSE, SPEAK AND DO RESEMBLING SOMEONE WHO IS THE TARGET OF YOUR ACT AND THAT MEANS YOU MUST BECOME A MINDLESS REHASHING ROBOT MEMORISING WHAT AND HOW TO ACT AND REHASHING IT AS FAITHFULLY AS POSSIBLE SO THAT AUDIENCES CAN SEE THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN YOU AND THE CHARACTER YOU ARE PLAYING.
THUS IN ORDER TO BE AN ACTOR YOU MUST BE A ROBOT NOT JUST DURING THE ACT BUT IT IS CONDITIONING AND REMAINS IN YOU AND IT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY NO MATTER HOW MUCH MONEY YOU MAKE AND HOW CELEBRATED YOU ARE BY THIS WORLD.
Inspiring others to protect the planet
THE Green Warriors and Eco Ambassadors marched into Bangsar Village II echoing the worldwide campaign message to protect the planet during the Earth Hour celebration on Saturday.
So long as you have no true understanding, you can have all the inspiration in the world but it is empty, hollow. Inspiring is about stirring mental force and it is the blind instrument to summon to save the earth and so it reflects delusion when someone speaks of inspiration. What you need is understanding not inspiration.
THIS EARTH HOUR IS JUST A GIMMICK, SERVES NO USEFUL PURPOSE, IS NOT THE WAY TO SAVE THE EARTH EVEN IF IT IS POSSIBLE. SAVING THE EARTH IS ABOUT UNDERSTANDING HOW MANKIND IS DESTROYING THE EARTH AND THEN TAKING ACTIONS TO STOP THE DESTRUCTION AND AID RECOVERY AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EARTH HOURS WHICH IS ALL FOR SHOW, A GIMMICK. WHETHER IT IS A GIMMICK OR NOT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED AND IF IT IS A GIMMICK AND YOU THINK IT IS REAL, ACHIEVES ANYTHING, YOU ARE DELUDED AND THAT IS THE PATH TO WOE.
IF YOU WANT TO SAVE THE EARTH YOU MUST SPELL OUT PRECISELY IN WHAT WAYS WE ARE DESTROYING THE EARTH AND SPELL OUT THE WAYS WE CAN REDRESS. WHAT HAS THAT GO TO DO WITH SWITCHING OFF LIGHTS FOR AN HOUR? IF YOU THINK THERE IS A CONNECTION YOU MAY BE BARKING MAD.
Basement terror: Couple recounts horror
Terror and horror are all about stirred emotions, stirred mental force that is blind and meaningless.
The substance of the matter is ordeal, a difficult or dangerous experience.
THE MAN OF SUBSTANCE SPEAKS OF THE COUPLE’S ORDEAL NOT HORROW, THE PERSON WHO DOES NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING SIMPLY GRABS WORDS WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING TO DRAMATIZE AND SO HE SPEAKS OF ‘TERROR’ AND ‘HORROW’ TO STIR READERS WITH KARMA ATTACHED.
Why earth hour is a gimmick:
If something is purported to work and it does not work or serves no useful function then it is a gimmick.
IT WOULD TAKE MUCH MORE THAN ORGANIZING ANNUAL EARTH HOURS TO SAVE THE EARTH AND YOU BETTER STOP WASTING YOUR TIME CELEBRATING EARTH HOURS AND INSTEAD GET STUCK INTO IT. IF THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT FOLLOW UP ACTIONS AFTER YOUR ANNUAL EARTH HOURS THEN IT IS A GIMMICK.
Postponing the reckoning:
Quote: Spanish lenders have increased their dependence on loans from the European Central Bank to a record €152bn, using the money to roll over debts or buy Spanish government bonds – concentrating risk further.
Such actions are not isolated to the Spanish but typical, they do not help resolve the crisis but merely postpone reckoning with collapse, hoping somehow the world economy will miraculously recover when it will not.
Borrowing money to roll over debts maintains the façade longer but it is not a true solution, it is like sweeping the dirt under the carpet hoping it will go away somehow.
Only robots like and dislike:
Because likes and dislikes are consistent in a person and varies from person to person, they must be programmed or conditioned stirrings of a person’s mental force in which he is a slave not master and so a person who likes or dislike is a robot, programmed by himself and others to consistently stir his mental force to like or dislike what he experiences.
LIKES AND DISLIKES ARE NEVER SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION STIRRINGS OF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE BUT THEY ARE CONDITIONED OR PROGRAMMED REFLEXIVE STIRRINGS OF HIS MENTAL FORCE AND SO THE PERSON WHO LIKES AND DISLIKES IS A ROBOT. PREJUDICES ARE MERELY CONDITIONED DISLIKES OF CERTAIN THINGS (EG BLACKS, WOMEN, GAYS) AND SO ONLY ROBOTS CAN BE PREJUDICED, WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MEANING OR UNDERSTANDING, IT IS SIMPLY A REPULSIVE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TOWARDS ALL INSTANCES OF GAY OR BLACKS.
IT IS MEANINGLESS AND THERE IS NEVER A TRUE REASON TO STIR A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE ANYTHING AND SO LIKE AND DISLIKE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH UNDERSTANDING OR MEANING AND THE FACT THAT A PERSON CAN CONSISTENTLY STIR HIS MENTAL FORCE TO LUST AFTER GIRLS AND DISLIKE GAYS REFLECTS PROGRAMMING, CONDITIONING AND THE PERSON IS ALWAYS A ROBOT NOT JUST HERE BUT EVERYWHERE ELSE.
BECAUSE LIKE AND DISLIKE IS CONDITIONED AND DRIVEN BY FORCE IT IS HARD IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO ERADICATE ESPECIALLY IF THEY HAVE BEEN STRONGLY CONDITIONED AND ONLY WHEN A PERSON REALIZES HE IS TORMENTED BY HIS LIKE AND DISLIKE, MAKES PERSISTENT EFFORT TO REVERSE THEM CAN HE SET HIMSELF FREE. HE HAS NEVER TASTED THE INCOMPARABLE SANITY AND FREEDOM OF NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING AND SO HE DOES NOT REALIZE WHAT HE IS MISSING.
No right minded person likes:
Not to like nor dislike is the third higher state of mind that accords the person even 4 eternities in heavenly bliss.
No right minded person likes nor dislikes because like and dislike are totally meaningless, harmful stirring of mental force that does no useful work and drowns out the reception of mild force that is the basis of the pleasure that they seek.
LIKING IS SELF DEFEATING BECAUSE THE STIRRED MENTAL FORCE DROWNS OUT THE RECEPTION OF MILD FORCE THAT IS ESSENTIAL IN EXPERIENCING PLEASURE.
STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE IS STRESSFUL, LEADS TO RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND IT IS MEANINGLESS, SERVES NO USEFUL PURPOSE AND SO IT IS MAD TO LIKE AND DISLIKE.
Always conveying emotions:
No matter how softly, slowly or calmly they think they speak there is always accompanying emotion (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation, fear) conveyed through the force changes of their speech.
The purpose of the force prolonging, changing speed and loudness during a speech is to convey accompanying emotion (like, dislike, sadness, hurt, agitation, fear) to similarly stir or expect the listener to be stirred.
People do not just say something, they say it expressing they like you, like what they are saying and they expect an emotional response from you.
Because this accompanying emotion, accompanying force changes is meaningless and harmful to self and others, so long as a person has accompanying style he is guilty of harming himself and no others no matter what good he does.
Eagerness is like:
People often speak with an eagerness in their voices and that is a form of ‘like’, their eagerness is to convey they like what they speak or they like you which may all be faked. It is the acceleration in speed and loudness in what they say that gives the impression of eagerness.
Patience is not good:
Impatience is not good, neither is patience and it again reflects the false understanding of this world that it thinks is true that patience is a virtue.
If patience and impatience exists, it must be something you can do to be patient or impatient. Patience and impatience are both false, suffering and something that the wise do not do.
Patience implies the awareness of something you want to do immediately that circumstances do not permit that you then have to use force to restrain or keep on hold until later. This is always a fabrication, artificial and suffering, leads to stress, no matter how patient you are.
The person who is impatient is full of greed, full of wants, full of desires that he wants to execute immediately to acquire and the patient person is the person who has learnt or has programmed himself to exercise restraint on his wants so as not to harm himself eg by rushing head on when the timing may be inappropriate. He has learnt to bide his time in obtaining his objective.
The person who is truly not greedy, who does not want to grab does not need to be patient because he is not impatient, he understands the circumstances present as it actually is and he understands it is not possible to undertake what he wants at the moment and he leaves it as it is without any urge to undertake that must be suppressed.
Patience and impatience are considerations for people who are robots who have many programs of actions and speech that want to activate themselves that they are greedy to activate and the patient robot is the one who has learnt or programmed himself to sometimes exercise restrain to suppress expression of the programs where desirable.
IMPATIENCE IS NOT GOOD, NEITHER IS PATIENCE WHICH ARE CONSIDERATIONS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS, HAVE PROGRAMS FOR ACTIONS THAT WANT TO BE TRIGGERED THAT NEED TO BE SUPPRESSED OR PUT ON HOLD TO BE PATIENT. IT IS SUFFERING TO BE PATIENT JUST AS IT IS SUFFERING TO BE IMPATIENT. THE PERSON WHO ABIDES IN TRUTH IS NEITHER PATIENT NOR IMPATIENT. HE SEES THE NEED AND TIME FOR A CERTAIN ACTION AND WHEN THAT CIRCUMSTANCE IS PRESENT HE EXECUTES THAT ACTION. WHEN THAT CIRCUMSTANCE IS NOT PRESENT, HE DOES NOT EXECUTE THAT ACTION, WHAT IS THERE TO BE PATIENT OR IMPATIENT ABOUT? ISN’T IT SILLY AND MAD?
Patience and impatience are about force & programming not meaning:
Patience and impatience are not meaningful matters, not matters of meaning but they are about having plans of what you want to do and then using force to drive it through immediately even when circumstances may be inappropriate or dangerous or using force to suppress or put on hold those plans because the time is not right or dangerous.
If an action is composed freshly specific for the occasion, then it need the occasion for it to be undertaken and it cannot be undertaken impatiently before its time nor be put on hold patiently until the time is right. It is only actions that are programmed and rehashed to fit a situation that can be impatiently or rushed executed even when the situation is not quite right or dangerous or be suspended to be patient, that is subject to considerations of patience and impatience.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ACTIONS THAT ARE SPECIFICALLY COMPOSED FOR SITUATIONS AT HAND RATHER THAN REHASHED TO FIT THE SITUATION TO BE IMPATIENT AND PATIENT. THUS PATIENCE AND IMPATIENCE PERTAIN TO REHASHED ACTIONS THAT THE ROBOT IS ANXIOUS TO ACTIVATE COME WHAT MAY OR HE HAS LEARNT TO EXERCISE SOME CONTROL TO SUSPEND BECAUSE HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION COUNSELS AGAINST ACTIVATION.
Only robots can be patient or impatient:
Only robots or people whose actions are pre-programmed and rehashed based on snapshots of circumstances rather than fully understanding the circumstances can be guilty of impatience and patience.
Thus when the robot takes hasty inadequate snapshots of a situation and thinks a certain recorded action is appropriate and he irresistibly activates that action without consideration of its inappropriateness or dangers, he is impatient. If the robot has programmed actions that he wishes to activate based on snapshots he has taken of the situation but he realizes that activation may not be advisable and he suspends activation then he is patient.
A person who is not a robot, who freshly composes his action after fully understanding the situation at hand always undertakes action that is correct for the situation, not rushed or hastily enacted for the situation and so the question of whether it is impatient or he is patient to wait until the time is more suitable does not apply.
You need to have an idea of what you want to do:
In order to be patient or impatient, you need to have an idea of what you want to do that you then immediately execute having taken snapshots that may be hasty or insufficient or you counsel suspension because snapshots tell you it may not be appropriate at this time and so you postpone that plan or idea of what you want to do to a later time. Without an existing plan of what you want to do that you delay execution you cannot be patient.
A person who has no plans of what he wants to do that he must do even at a later time does not need to be patient. Once the occasion has passed for doing it what remains is the future that has it specific future demands.
IN ORDER TO BE PATIENT YOU MUST HAVE AN IDEA OR PLAN OF WHAT YOU WANT TO DO THAT YOU DELAY EXECUTION BECAUSE PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE DEEMED NOT APPROPRIATE THAT YOU LATER ACTIVATE WHEN CIRCUMSTANCES ARE DEEMED APPROPRIATE. THAT DE FACTO MEANS YOU ARE A ROBOT CARRYING OUT THOSE PLANS.
Brooks: Respect the Future
Only a deluded man with no true understanding will speak thus:
The future is not a being that you can respect and so he is cultivating false perception for himself and others speaking thus.
Respect is a function of blind meaningless force, is about stirring mental force. What you should do is understand someone, understand what he is about and who he is, not respect him.
When you speak of respect you are speaking of fear or awe or deference or looking up to (impressed).
IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT ‘RESPECT’ IS VALUED AND PRIZED BY EMOTIONAL PEOPLE BECAUSE RESPECT IS ABOUT STIRRED MENTAL FORCE NOT REASON OR UNDERSTANDING OR SUBSTANCE. FORCE IS WHAT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE UNDERSTAND AND CRAVE AND REFLECTING THEIR LACK OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING, THEY THINK IT IS PLAUSIBLE TO RESPECT THE FUTURE.

EMOTIONAL PEOPLE DEMAND TO BE RESPECTED, THEY WANT TO BE ADMIRED OR FOR OTHERS TO LOOK AT THEM WITH STIRRED MENTAL FORCE TO BE AWED OR MARVELLED. WHAT IS THE POINT OF OTHERS STIRRING THEIR MENTAL FORCES AT YOU? YOU MAY FIND IT FULL OF MEANING BUT I FIND IT SENSELESS AND STRESSFUL, AN INSANE MEANINGLESS EXERCISE OF FORCE.
Car park turned war zone
THERE was rubble everywhere and thick white dust covered the basement car park at Lee Gardens Plaza Hotel in Haadyai, Thailand — the site of Saturday’s bomb blast.
Just because the car park suffered severe damage does not means it is turned into a war zone. “War zone” is a recorded nonspecific understanding that is rehashed to fit the situation and it is again evidence people do not understand fresh specific to the occasion but they have recorded understandings that they retrieve to apply to current situations.
CAR PARK SUSTAINED SEVERE DAMAGE IS A FRESH SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION UNDERSTANDING, ‘TURNED TO WAR ZONE’ IS A RECORDED REHASHED UNDERSTANDING THAT DOES NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT REALITY. THERE IS NO WAR, SUBVERSIVES SETTING OFF BOMBS DOES NOT MEAN IT IS A WAR.
What are clichés?
Cliches are copied generalities that are rehashed to fit a situation. ‘Turned war zone’ is a cliché that can be rehashed for many situations.
PEOPLE WHO REHASH ARE FOND OF SPEAKING IN CLICHES BECAUSE WHAT THEY SAY ARE NOT SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION AND CLICHES FIT THE BILL IN THAT THEY ARE IMPRESSIVE (STIRS EMOTIONS IN SELF AND OTHERS) AND CAN BE REHASHED FOR A VARIETY OF SITUATIONS WITH SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS.
What is there to be patient or impatient?
Supposed I have reached a busy junction that I want to enter and I see there is approaching traffic from both sides that make it unfeasible to enter, I therefore do not enter. Again 10 seconds later there is still approaching traffic and I think it is not feasible to enter and I do not enter. What is so patient about that?
It is only when the person has a program to enter the junction and he has a (strong even irresistible) urge to activate that he has to suppress it to be patient or he takes a calculated risk to activate that he is impatient.
THUS IN ORDER TO BE PATIENT OR IMPATIENT YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PLAN OF ACTION THAT WANTS TO BE ACTIVATED IN WHICH YOU ARE A ROBOT THAT YOU DESIRE TO ACTIVATE IN A RUSH (IMPATIENT) OR DELAY ACTIVATION (PATIENT).
IF A PERSON IS NOT A ROBOT, HE HAS NO PLANS THAT HE WANTS TO ACTIVATE, HE MERELY ASSESSES IF THE MOMENT IS THE CORRECT TIME TO DO SO AND IF IT NOT CORRECT HE DOES NOT DO SO AND WHEN THE MOMENT IS RIGHT TO DO SO HE DOES SO.

No comments: