Using and stirring force:

Using and stirring force:

Force is not an inevitable, permanent fixture of a mind, it can be stopped and that is always happiness compared with when force is present in a mind. Ordinary people have never experienced this state with the absence of force because their mental force never stops, only idles like an engine or ticking heart.

THE MIND WHEN FORCE HAS STOPPED IS ALWAYS HAPPIER COMPARED WITH THE MIND WHERE FORCE IS ACTIVE, HOWEVER MILDLY.

There are two different categories of force activation; using force to do (useful) work that does not lead to woe and stirring force (something seen and heard stirs one’s mental force) which is always suffering compared with being not stirred and leads to even an eternity of woe.

Whenever work that may be meaningful or meaningless needs to be done, force must be activated. Thus you need to activate or use force if you want to speak or lift an object. This work may be useful or useless, for show. Thus stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, singing and dancing requires the use of force to do work but that work is useless, for show to please and impress others and because it is useless, it stirs resistance that must be overcome and leads to suffering and insanity.

The stirring in prolonging, changing speed and strength of one’s mental force as a result of something seen, heard or smelt, touched or tasted is something totally useless and meaningless and so it is suffering that is conditioning and leads to future suffering not release from suffering.

THE REASON WHY SOMETHING HEARD OR SEEN STIRS A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH IS BECAUSE THERE IS FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH IN THE SOUNDS (SPEECH) HEARD OR SIGHTS (HOW SOMEONE IS DANCING) SEEN. THE PURPOSE OF STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS TO TRANSMIT THESE FORCE CHANGES WITH THE INTENTION TO STIR THE RECIPIENT, WHO IS FOOLISHLY DULY STIRRED.

ANOTHER REASON WHY A PERSON IS STIRRED IS BECAUSE OF CONDITIONING, EG HE SEES A DEAD BODY AND HIS MENTAL FORCE IS CONDITIONED TO BE STIRRED TO BE REPULSED.

ONLY WHEN A PERSON IS A MASTER OF HIS OWN MENTAL FORCE, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED BY ANYTHING HAPPENING AND HE ONLY ACTIVATES FORCE TO ACCOMPLISH MEANINGFUL WORK IS HE SAFE, NOT SUFFERING HERE AND HEADED FOR SAFETY EVEN FOR MANY ETERNITIES.

THE PERSON WHOSE MENTAL FORCE CAN BE STIRRED BY THINGS SEEN OR HEARD, WHO IN ADDITION USES FORCE TO DO WORK THAT IS MEANINGLESS OR FALSE (FASHIONING STYLE, SINGING, DANCING, MAKING MONEY, SAYING THINGS TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS) SUFFERS HERE AND IS HEADED EVEN FOR ETERNITIES OF SUFFERING.

Shareholders grumble about Barclays executives' rewards

Grumbling is about being upset or not liking and that is the wrong force based response. Shareholder disapproval or objection is the reason based response.

Here again is evidence people in this world has no true understanding, otherwise they would not speak of grumbling when the correct reason or truth based consideration is objection or disapproval.

GRUMBLING IS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH OBJECTION OR DISAPPROVAL, GRUMBLING IS EMOTIONAL, COMPLAINING WHILST OBJECTION OR DISAPPROVAL IS A STATEMENT OF WRONG. HOW IS IT THAT A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SPEAKS OF GRUMBLING AND NOT OBJECTION?

Rules logic is not an understanding:

Rules logic are programs that you call up to help you decide what is the correct thing to do or make sense or decide what is happening.

This is never true understanding of a situation which is seeing clearly totally what is happening as it actually is, how is it that you can then refer to recorded rules logic to help you make sense of what is happening?

A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING DOES NOT NEED RULES LOGIC AND NEVER RESORTS TO RULES LOGIC TO HELP HIM MAKE SENSE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING. ‘NEVER SAY NEVER’ IS A RULES LOGIC THAT IS OFTEN REHASHED TO HELP A PERSON MAKE SENSE OF A SITUATION. A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING DOES NOT NEED TO CONSULT TO SUCH RULES LOGIC.

THE FACT THAT RULES LOGIC EXISTS IN ABUNDANCE IN THIS WORLD, PEOPLE ARE USING RULES LOGIC TO EXPLAIN THINGS IS EVIDENCE PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD EVEN VERY INTELLECTUAL ONES DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.

RULES LOGIC IS SOMETHING YOU RECORD AND RETRIEVE TO HELP YOU MAKE SENSE OF WHAT IS BEFORE YOU. EVERYTHING HAPPENING IS SENSIBLE TO A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE CAN UNDERSTAND AS IT ACTUALLY IS THAT IT IS TRUE, FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE AND DOES NOT HAVE TO FALL BACK ON RULES LOGIC TO GUIDE HIM.

ONLY THE BLIND NEED A WALKING STICK (RULES LOGIC) THOSE WHO ARE NOT BLIND DOES NOT NEED A WALKING STICK (RULES LOGIC).

What is good for markets/capitalists may not be good for you:

Quote: We’re now in the crazy situation where, as far as asset markets are concerned, bad news is good news. Why? Because worrying payroll gain numbers mean Ben Bernanke has a better excuse to crank up his virtual printing press once more – money that’s meant to boost bank lending, of course, so helping the broader economy, but which the banks prefer just to park in speculative “momentum bets”.

The interests of markets or Wall Street or capitalists do not necessarily coincide with the masses.

Authorities’ options to respond to economic downturns may be crude and self-defeating, counterproductive than useless.

The Fed is not flushed with savings but it is printing worthless money that it hopes will flow into the economy to stimulate the economy but the banks prefer to make speculative bets with it eg on the commodity even currency markets where they can make better profits often at the expense of the people eg high oil prices or extreme currency movements gives profits that is at the expense of consumers and the economy.

THE TOOLS THE FED HAVE TO TREAT THE AILING ECONOMY ARE CRUDE. IT IS CHEATING TO PRINT MONEY IT DOES NOT HAVE BUT ALL THIS HAMFISTED PRINTING OF WORTHLESS MONEY MAY END UP HARMING THE ECONOMY BECAUSE THE BANKS PREFER TO USE THE MONEY FOR SPECULATIVE PURPOSES THAT DOES NOT STIMULATE THE ECONOMY BUT MAY BE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE ECONOMY.

Self stress proves two opposing mental forces:

Just as it is only possible to drive with the handbrakes on if the force of propulsion (engine) is separate from the braking system, it is only possible to resistance one’s own actions to create stress if there are two SEPARATE OPPOSING mental forces in a person’s mind. If there was only a single mental force without an opposing mental force, it is not possible, IMPOSSIBLE for a person to resist his own speech and actions to cause self-stress. The sole purpose of a person’s force of self-preservation is to oppose or resist a person’s other force that is the drive of all his actions. Whenever the person’s actions in speech and deed is inimical, harmful to that person and he proceeds, then the force of self-preservation must act to resist and bring to a stop that action in lieu of his true reason or wisdom which would have told him not to do or say in the first place.

WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF TWO OPPOSITE MENTAL FORCES IN A PERSON’S MIND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON’S OWN ACTIONS TO CAUSE HIM STRESS WHICH IS THE RESULT OF HIS OWN RESISTANCE TO HIS OWN ACTIONS. THUS THE FACT THAT A PERSON CAN CAUSE HIMSELF STRESS WITH HIS OWN ACTIONS IS EVIDENCE THERE ARE TWO OPPOSITE FORCES PRESENT IN HIS MIND.

THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE FORCE OF SELF-PRESERVATION IS TO OPPOSE THE ACTIONS OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT IS THE DRIVE TO ALL THE PERSON’S ACTIONS & EMOTIONS. THERE IS NO OTHER PURPOSE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE FORCE OF SELF-PRESERVATION EXCEPT OPPOSE THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF.

IF WHAT THE PERSON SAYS AND DOES IS MEANINGFUL, BENEFICIAL OR DOES NOT HARM OR ENDANGER SELF, THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO INTERCEDE TO OPPOSE AND TRY TO STOP THAT ACTION.

BECAUSE THE PERSON LACKS WISDOM THAT WOULD ALWAYS ADVOCATE AGAINST ALL HARMFUL AND FALSE ACTIONS, HE HAS TO DEPEND ON BLIND FORCE, DEPEND ON A FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO RESIST, CONTROL OR CHAPERONE AND BRING TO AN END ALL ACTIVITIES THAT ARE HARMFUL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. TRUE WISDOM WILL NEVER COUNSEL ACTS THAT ARE SILLY/MEANINGLESS (EG DANCING, SINGING, FASHIONING STYLE) OR HARMFUL (EG STEAL OR LIE AND RISK BEING CAUGHT AND BEATEN) AND ONE WITH TRUE WISDOM DOES NOT NEED TO DEPEND ON A BLIND FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO SURVIVE.

THUS MY POSTULATION THAT THERE ARE TWO OPPOSING MENTAL FORCES, NOT JUST ONE IN THE MINDS OF BEINGS IS NOT WITHOUT BASIS, WITHOUT EVIDENCE. THE FACT THAT YOU CAN STRESS YOURSELF IS EVIDENCE THERE ARE TWO OPPOSING FORCES.

Truisms? You are deluded:

Such sayings below strike a chord in the hearts (stirs emotions) only of those without true understanding.

He may think he is very clever or wise but he is just lamenting, decrying, embarking a list of so called achievements or improvements or advancements and shooting them down one by one. This is never based on true understanding but it is an emotional pursuit to stir irony or conflict in self and others and that has karma to be experienced as future suffering, not wisdom and merit.

It is not an accident that he has a long list of dualities (eg life easier, time less) but it is a form of rote repetition by searching for and fabricating them and it is never based on true reason but based on emotion to stir irony (contradiction) in self and others.

The things he list as good (life is easier) is not necessarily good and the things he lists as bad (less time) is not necessarily bad and so his ironies may be deluded, based on false premises. Life is not necessarily easier today nor is time always less.

THE BASIS OF HIS LITANY OF IRONY IS NEVER WISDOM BUT IT IS EMOTION, A DESIRE TO STIR EMOTION OR IRONY IN SELF AND OTHERS AND IMPRESS OTHERS AS IF HE IS VERY WISE WHEN IT IS A CASE OF A FOOL WHO THINKS HIMSELF WISE. IT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT HE HAS COMPILED SUCH A LONG LIST WHICH IS BASICALLY REPETITION OF THE SAME RULE THAT GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS MAY BE GOOD TODAY BUT IT IS NEGATED BY SOMETHING BAD.

AND WHAT IS HIS SOLUTIONS TO THE IRONIES HE STIRS? HE THERE IS A LIST OF ‘DOS’ OR COMMANDS THAT ARE PROGRAMMING OTHERS TO OBEY HIM AND ARE NOT THE ANSWERS. HE TELLS YOU TO ENJOY YOUR FOND FOODS WHICH IS BAD, LEADS TO RETURN HERE EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY. THE BUDDHA AND JESUS NEVER TELLS YOU TO ENJOY YOUR FOND FOODS. JESUS SAID YOU SHALL NOT CARE FOR WHAT YOU SHALL EAT SO HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO ENJOY YOUR FOND FOODS?

生活越來越方便，但是時間卻越來越少。
Life is easier, but time, less and less.

我們的學位越來越高，常識卻越來越少。
Our education level is higher and higher, but common sense, less and less.

知識越來越多，判斷力卻越來越差。

Knowledge is getting more and more, but judgement becomes worse and worse.

我們有更多的專家，但是也有更多的問題。

We have more professionals, but there are more and more problems.

醫藥越來越好，但健康越來越少。

Medicine has improved greatly, but health is becoming worse and worse.

我們花費太多，歡笑太少。
We expend a lot, but enjoy life very little.

車開得太快，火氣上來也更快。
We drive cars very fast, but temper bursts out faster.

睡得太晚，閱讀太少，電視看得太多，而且禱告太少。
Sleep very late, read very little, view too much TV and pray very little.

我們所擁有的資產倍增，但是價值卻遞減。
Our fortune is doubled, but value reduced.

我們說得太多，但是愛心太少，且謊話連篇。
We talk a lot, but love very little and lies abound.

我們學習如何經營生活，但沒有建造生命。
We learn how to lead a life, but we careless creating life.

我們在生命中加增歲月，卻沒有在歲月中增長生命。
We extend our life span, but never increase life in our days.

我們有越來越高的建築，但也有越來越低的 EQ。
We have taller and taller buildings, but less and less EQ.

有更寬廣的高速公路，但有更狹窄的視野。
We have wider high speed motorways, but have narrower viewpoints.

我們花費得更多，但擁有的更少。
We spend a great deal, but own very little.

我們買得更多，但享受得更少。
We buy more, but enjoy less.

我們可以登陸月球回來。但是卻無法拜訪對街的鄰居。
We travel to the moon and back, but never stir to visit our neighbors.

我們可以征服外太空。但是卻無法掌控內心世界。
We conquer the outer space, but have no clue as to how to control our prejudice.

我們可以分裂原子核，但是卻無法挪去心中的偏見。
We can dissect atoms, but are unable to remove our biased thinking.

我們更多書寫，卻更少學習。
We write more, but learn little.

更多計畫，卻更少成就。
More schemes, but little success.

我們學會忙碌，但學不會等候。
We learn how to busy ourselves, but never learn how to wait.

我們的收入更高了，但道德更低了。
Our income has risen, but morality, declined.

我們生產更多電腦，掌握更多資訊，
We produce more and more computers, control more information,

複製更多拷貝，但我們的溝通卻更貧乏。
Multiply more and more copies, but our communications with others very lacking.

我們的數量提高了，品質卻降低了
We produce more, but quality deteriorates.

這是快速食品充斥卻消化不良的時代。
This is the year when fast food is aplenty and digestion failing.

高大的身軀與低劣的性格並存的時代。
Huge physique with lowly temperament coexisting era.

更多休閒卻更少歡樂。
Lots of rest, but little enjoyment.

更多食物卻更少營養。
More food, less nutrition.

更多雙收入家庭，但更高的離婚率。
More family income, more divorce cases.

更多千萬豪宅，但 卻更多破碎的家庭。
Many more millionaires, but more broken families.

我建議，在今天這樣的世代，
I propose. In such an era,

你不要保留任何事情到特殊的場合才做，
You do not keep what you want to do till a specific time to do,

因為你活著的每一天都是特殊場合。
Because the day you are alive and kicking is the specific occasion you should do.

勤加閱讀，追求知識，
Read more and obtain more knowledge.

坐在你家的前廊上欣賞自然美景，
Sit in your front veranda and enjoy the beauty of nature.

無需汲汲營營於生活需要。
Do not have to worry about life's essential needs.

多花時間與家人及好友在一起，
Spend more time with your friends and families,

享受喜歡的食物，
Enjoy your fond food.

到你喜愛的地方去遊覽。
Travel to places you like to visit.

生命不只是為了存活，
Life does not depend on maintaining one's existence.

而是一連串愉快事件組成的的鏈條。
It consists of many happy occasions chained together.

將你的水晶高腳杯拿出來，
Bring out your crystal champagne glass,

不要將妳最好的香水存起來，
Never keep your best perfume on the shelf.

任何時候你想要用的時候就用它吧。
Any time you want to use it, do so.

把「有一天」「將來的某一天」從你的字典中刪除。
Remove "one day" "some day in the future" from your dictionary.

現在就去寫那一封
Go now to write that letter

你曾經想過要等到「有一天」才來寫的信。
The letter you want to write one day.

讓我們現在就告訴我們的家人我們多愛他們。
Let us now tell our family that we love them very much.

不要將會帶給你歡笑及喜樂的任何事情拖延到未來。
Do not postpone telling them your happiness and love till one day.

每一天，每一小時，每一分鐘都是特別的，
Every day, every hour and every minute is all very special,

而且你不知道那是否是你的最後一刻。
Also, you do not know if it is your last minute of life.

如果你太忙以致於無法將這封信傳給你所愛的人，
If you are too busy and unable to forward this email to people you love,

你告訴自己說，「等到有一天」我再傳。
You tell yourself "Wait till one day" I shall forward.
那請你相信我 "等到有一天" 你或許沒有機會傳了。

In that case, please believe me "Wait till one day" you will never have any opportunity to do so.

Self-resistance is conditioned:

Self-resistance is not inevitable or natural but it is conditioned and it can be eliminated and with it, the person is delivered from the curse of stress.

Stress that is caused by self-resistance is not an inevitable accompaniment of existence but it is conditioned so well it is automatic because of the foolish being’s grim will to undertake actions that harm himself and so must be resisted or controlled. With the cessation of all conduct that is inimical, harms his own being, the person has no reason to resist his own actions and this cessation of resistance is the cessation of stress.

THE REASON WHY A PERSON HAS TO RESIST HIS OWN ACTIONS/SPEECH IS BECAUSE THEY ARE HARMFUL TO SELF AND THEY ARE HARMFUL TO SELF BECAUSE THEY ARE SAID AND DONE KNOWING IT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL OR DONE/SAID WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL. SO WELL TRAINED IS A PERSON BY HIMSELF AND OTHERS TO DO OR SAY THINGS KNOWING IT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL, WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR BENEFICIAL THAT SELF-RESISTANCE AUTOMATICALLY ACCOMPANIES ALL HIS ACTIONS SO THAT HE IS CURSED BY STRESS.

IF A PERSON STOPS SAYING OR DOING THINGS THAT ARE FALSE OR HARMFUL, STOP SAYING OR DOING WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR BENEFICIAL, HIS SELF-RESISTANCE IS AUTOMATICALLY SILENCED AND WITH IT, HE IS FREED FROM THE CURSE OF STRESS.

You can never run away from stress but you can kill stress:

Stress is standard for everyone, it is unpleasant even extremely unpleasant, like a noose around the neck and no matter how good (holy) you think you are or recalcitrantly evil you are, stress is the standard tormenting unpleasant curse of your existence.

You can never run away from your stress because it is caused by resistance that is internal and accompanies whatever actions you take. You can take holidays in the most wonderful tropical paradise island, escape all social contacts, take the most expensive medicines in the world, seek the wisest philosophers mankind can offer, make as many prayers as you like per day but so long as there is falsity, harmfulness and nonsensicality in your speech and conduct, you must generate self-resistance and with it stress must haunt you like your shadow that never leaves you.

YOU CAN NEVER RUN AWAY FROM STRESS AND STRESS IS NEVER A WONDERFUL OR TOLERABLE BEDFELLOW NO MATTER HOW TOUGH YOU ARE BUT IT IS LIKE A NOOSE THAT REGULARLY TIGHTENS AND NEEDS TO BE LOOSENED. BUT I DO SAY THAT WITHOUT GOING TO THE ENDS OF THE WORLD AND WITHIN THIS SIX FOOT BODY IS THE CAUSE AND CURE FOR STRESS. SO LONG AS A PERSON STOPS ROUSING SELF-RESISTANCE TO WHAT HE SAYS OR DOES, SO LONG WILL STRESS EFFORTLESSLY VANISH LIKE A NOOSE LIFTED FROM YOUR NECK.

THERE IS ONLY ONE FREE PERMANENT CURE FOR STRESS AND YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY THROUGH YOUR NOSE OR GO TO THE ENDS OF THE EARTH TO OBTAIN. JUST STOP DOING OR SAYING THINGS THAT HARM YOURSELF, STOP SAYING OR DOING THINGS YOU KNOW ARE FALSE OR HARMFUL, STOP DOING OR SAYING THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING THEY ARE TRUE OR BENEFICIAL OR MEANINGFUL.

Green until the day I die:

Quote: BOB Brown has quit as Greens leader and will leave the Senate, but promises: "I'll be a Green until the day I die".

It is not a wise but a foolish statement. People think it is good to be green.

You are not green, yellow or red, you are you and it is a form of false self-identity to think you are green that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe not heaven.

PEOPLE SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH SEEING THEMSELVES AS GREEN OR RED OR LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE. THAT IS A FALSE IDENTIFICATION, IS A FORM OF SELF-IDENTITY THAT THE BUDDHA SAYS IS A FETTER TO FUTURE WOE.

Why even eating is stressful:

Eating is not good but bad, food is a bait and ultimately kills you. The Buddha advocates moderation in food, he only takes one meal a day only in the morning, he does not eat at night.

RELATIVELY FOOD IS GOOD FOR YOU IN THAT IT SUSTAINS YOU HERE BUT ULTIMATELY FOOD KILLS BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT CHEMICAL REACTIONS OR BATTLES THAT WILL KILL YOU.

THUS ULTIMATELY EATING IS BAD AND TO BE INDULGED ESSENTIALLY, MINIMALLY AND SO IF YOU LIKE TO EAT, YOU HAVE A BIG APPETITE THEN WHAT YOU DO IS BAD FOR YOU NO MATTER HOW YOU DELUDEDLY PERCEIVE IT AS GOOD AND BECAUSE YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING BAD, IF YOU HABITUALLY EAT A LOT IT MUST GENERATE SELF-RESISTANCE ND THUS STRESS.

PEOPLE WHO EAT WITH GREED SENSUALLY MUST EAT WITH RESISTANCE AND THAT CAUSES STRESS TO THEM BECAUSE EATING IS DOING IS SOMETHING BAD THAT MUST GENERATE SELF-RESISTANCE.

Styled eating for the wrong reasons leads to stress:

So long as there is style in your eating, there is falsity in your eating that leads to stress. If you eat for the wrong reasons (eg for adornment, pleasure, to build up your sexy body) it must cause stress in your eating.

Rushing is a style of eating and it leads to stress. Some people are very slow and fussy in their eating ritual and that too causes stress. Slurping is a style of eating with unnecessary force changes and prolonging and that too causes stress. Different people have different styles of eating, different styles of holding and moving forks and knives and these too cause stress when eating.

IF YOU EAT WITH STYLE FOR WRONG REASONS THAT TOO CAUSES SELF-RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS COMPARED TO STYLE FREE EATING FOR THE CORRECT REASONS. IT IS NOT EATING THAT IS ITSELF STRESSFUL BUT IT IS THE FALSE STYLE AND FALSE REASONS FOR EATING THAT GIVES EATING A BAD NAME.

Why smiling, laughing, joking must stress:

Smiling, laughing, joking are not free but work must be done to smile, laugh and joke and they are meaningless and even harmful to yourself let alone others.

IT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE REFUTED THAT SMILING, LAUGHING AND JOKING ARE FALSE, MEANINGLESS, FOR SHOW TO STIR EVIL EMOTIONS IN SELF AND OTHERS AND BECAUSE THEY ARE EVIL THEY MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE AND THUS STRESS EVEN IF YOU ARE DELUDED TO PERCEIVE THEM AS GOOD.

How to truly understand eating:

So you think you understand what eating is all about? You may be right or misguided that you understand when you don’t here as elsewhere.

Here is how I understand eating and if your view differs then if I am right you do not understand eating.

Eating is not blameless but blameworthy, animals and plants have to be destroyed to feed you or they have to produce or work (lay eggs) to feed you. There is no eating in heaven and so if you like to eat, cannot live without eating, heaven is not for you.

Eating is to be indulged minimally without style for the right reason which is just to keep your life going here.

NOT ONLY IS EATING ULTIMATELY HARMFUL, WORK HAS TO BE DONE TO EAT AND FOOD IS A CHEMICAL OR FORCE REACTION THAT ULTIMATELY DEGRADES YOU JUST AS YOU DEGRADE THE FOOD, THERE IS A STYLE IN HOW PEOPLE EAT (RUSHING, ELABORATE, FUSSY, FULL OF RITUALS OR PROTOCOLS THAT MUST BE FOLLOWED) THAT IS FALSE AND REHASHED THAT MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE AND THUS STRESS, THEY EAT FOR WRONG REASONS (FOR PLEASURE OR FUN, TO FATTEN THEMSELVES, BECAUSE THEY ARE STRESSED OR RESTLESS) THAT MUST ALSO GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE THAT AGAIN LEADS TO STRESS.

Time to put euro out of its misery:

Jeremy Warner

Time to put the doomed euro out of its misery

How do you understand the statement? It is delusional.

It was never the euro that was the cause of the problem and killing the euro will never solve the problem which goes much deeper than that.

It was crass mismanagement, lack of understanding of economic realities and pandering to debt or credit driven prosperity that is the cause and as long as you do not reform (much easier said than done), no destruction of the euro or whatever will deliver you from your woe, the euro is just a scapegoat.

THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS GOES DEEPER AND MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN THE ILL CONCEIVED EURO AND ITS DISMANTLING IS NOT THE CURE. MANKIND HAS TOTALLY NO UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT GOOD ECONOMIC AND FINACIAL HUSBANDRY IS AND UNLESS IT GETS A MASSIVE INFUSION OF THAT NOTHING DONE WILL HELP. ONE USEFUL STEP IS TO GO AFTER SPECULATORS WHO ARE DRIVING COMMODITY PRICES TOO HIGH AT THE EXPENSE OF THE ECONOMY. STOP SHORT SELLING AND OIL BUYING WITHOUT USE. DISMANTLING DANGEROUS DERIVATIVES IF IT DOES CAUSE A SYSTEMIC CRASH WOULD BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN DISMANTLING THE EURO.

The dangers and evil of social networking sites:

Facebook is at the forefront and there are many social networking sites on the internet.

How to understand such social networking sites?

They are evil and dangerous in this world of predators and they are started by opportunistic avaricious people out to make money and fame for themselves. Posting a site with a picture of yourself might pander to the narcissistic tendencies of the gullible but it is an invitation to be targeted by criminals and sexual predators and so there is serious karma for those promoting such social networking sites which are not good but avenues for much evil including people to self identify and broadcast themselves on the web.

Mark Zuckenberg looks like a clone of Steve Jobs, his persona when he makes a presentation on stage is a variation on the theme of Steve Jobs and so they are all copycats, probably Steve Jobs imitated someone else and then CEOs deem it fashionable to adopt a certain geeky style, whatever that means.

THERE MAY BE ONLY ONE WAY TO UNDERSTAND SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES AND IT IS THAT THEY ARE DANGEROUS IN A WORLD OF CRIMINALS. THEY PANDER TO PEOPLE’S NARCISSISTIC TENDENCIES, PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THEIR FOUNDERS TO MAKE A LOT OF MONEY AND BY PROVIDING A PHOTO, INFORMATION AND A CHANNEL FOR COMMUNICATION TO THE PUBLIC, IT IS A DANGER TO THE GULLIBLE TO BECOME VICTIMS OF CRIME. THOSE RUNNING THESE SITES ARE FAR FROM INNOCENT, THEY SOLICIT AND ENTICE YOU TO LOOSEN YOUR INHIBITIONS AND EXPOSE YOURSELF TO ATTRACT ATTENTION OF OTHERS.

IF MY VIEW IS CORRECT ALL THESE FOUNDERS OF SUCH SITES HAVE TERRIBLE KARMA.

Social networking is against the Buddha’s teaching:

The Buddha said his teaching is for those who are disentangled not entangled.

Social networking promotes entanglement and is thus against the Buddha’s teaching.

Anuruddha Sutta:To Anuruddha

In seclusion, this line of thinking arose in Ven. Anuruddha's awareness: "This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing. This Dhamma is for one who is content, not is discontent. This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled. This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not lazy. This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused. This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not uncentered. This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not whose discernment is weak."

Then the Blessed One, realizing with his awareness the line of thinking in Ven. Anuruddha's awareness disappeared from among the Bhaggas, and re-appeared right in front of Ven. Anuruddha. The Blessed One said to him, "Good, Anuruddha. It's good that you think these thoughts of a great person.' Now then, Anuruddha, think the eighth thought of a great person: 'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.'

"Anuruddha, when you think these eight thoughts, then -- whenever you want -- quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful qualities, you will enter & remain in the first jhana: rapture & pleasure born from withdrawal, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. When you think these eight thoughts, then -- whenever you want -- with the stilling of directed thought and evaluation, you will enter & remain in the second jhana: rapture & pleasure born of composure, unification of awareness free from directed thought & evaluation -- internal assurance...with the fading of rapture, you will remain in equanimity, mindful & alert, physically sensitive to pleasure. You will enter & remain in the third jhana, 'Equanimous and mindful, he has a pleasurable abiding.' When you think these eight thoughts of a great person, then -- whenever you want -- with the abandoning of pleasure & pain, you will enter & remain in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither-pleasure-nor-pain.

"Now, when you think these eight thoughts and become a person who can attain at will, these four jhanas then your robe of cast-off rags will seem just like the clothes chest of a householder, full of clothes of many colors. As you live contented, it will serve for your delight, comfortable abiding, non-agitation, & for alighting on Unbinding.

" your meal of almsfood will seem like the rice of a householder served with a variety of sauces & seasonings...your dwelling at the foot of a tree will seem like the gabled mansion of a householder, your bed on a spread of grass will seem like the couch of a householder .

Then, the Blessed One disappeared and reappeared among the Bhaggas. He sat down and addressed the monks: "Monks, I will teach you the eight thoughts of a great person. "

"'This Dhamma is for one who is modest, not self-aggrandizing.' There is the case where a monk, being modest, does not want it to be known that 'He is modest.' Being content, he does not want it to be known that 'He is content.' Being reclusive, he does not want it to be known that 'He is reclusive.' His mindfulness being established, he does not want it to be known that 'His mindfulness is established.' Being endowed with discernment, he does not want it to be known that 'He is endowed with discernment.' Enjoying non-complication, he does not want it to be known that 'He is enjoying non-complication.'

"'This Dhamma is for one who is content, not for one who is discontent.' There is the case where a monk is content with any old robe cloth at all, any old almsfood, any old lodging, any old medicinal requisites at all.

"'This Dhamma is for one who is reclusive, not entangled.' There is the case where a monk, when living in seclusion, is visited by monks, nuns, lay men, kings. With his mind bent on seclusion, he converses with them only as much is necessary.

"'This Dhamma is for one whose persistence is aroused, not is lazy.' There is the case where a monk keeps his persistence aroused for abandoning unskillful mental qualities and taking on skillful mental qualities. He is steadfast, solid in his effort.

"'This Dhamma is for one whose mindfulness is established, not confused.' There is the case where a monk is mindful, remembering even things that were done & said long ago.

"'This Dhamma is for one whose mind is centered, not for one whose mind is uncentered.' There is the case where a monk, quite withdrawn from sensuality, unskillful mental qualities, enters & remains in the first jhana. With the stilling of directed thought & evaluation, he enters & remains in the second jhana. With the fading of rapture he remains in equanimity, mindful & alert, and physically sensitive of pleasure. He enters & remains in the third jhana.' With the abandoning of pleasure & pain he enters & remains in the fourth jhana: purity of equanimity & mindfulness.

"'This Dhamma is for one endowed with discernment, not for one whose discernment is weak.' There is the case where a monk is endowed with discernment of arising & passing away -- leading to the right ending of stress.

"'This Dhamma is for one who enjoys & delights in non-complication, not for one who enjoys & delights in complication.' There is the case where a monk's mind grows confident, firm in the cessation of complication.

Facebook popularity by crook:

Facebook can boast of millions of users but it may not be a true measure of its popularity. In order to access sites within Facebook eg Samsung or whatever, you must log in or create a new account which I refused and so I have never entered Facebook although in the past I wanted to have a look.

I REFUSE TO SET UP A FACEBOOK ACCOUNT JUST TO ACCESS THE SITE AND IT IS A STRONG ARM TACTIC TO GARNER MORE MEMBERS TO COMPEL VISITORS TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT. RECENTLY I PARTIALLY CREATED AN ACCOUNT FOR ANOTHER NETWORKING SITE AND I HAVE BEEN HARRASSED BY EMAILS ASKING ME TO PLACE A PHOTO, TELLING A GIRL IN A FOREIGN LAND WANTS TO KNOW ME AND HOW AM I DOING IN MY TOWN. THIS IS EVIL.

Why calories count:

This is a false statement and whoever counts calories is headed for eternal suffering.

How many calories are in the food you take is of no importance, does not count unless you are attached to or obsessed with your petty life here that you will finally lose and perish.

In order for calories to count you must program yourself to become adept at estimating the calories in the foods that you usually take, to juggle the amounts of the food so that you remain within the ‘ideal’ calorie intake. Thus when well programmed you see all food in terms of how much calories and that is false perception.

IN ORDER FOR CALORIES TO COUNT YOU MUST BE PROGRAMMED AS A ROBOT TO ALWAYS COUNT CALORIES WHEN YOU EAT AND YOU HAVE TO SEE CALORIES IN ALL THE FOOD YOU EAT AND THAT IS FALSE PERCEPTION. RATHER THAN SEEING FOOD YOU SEE CALORIES.

BETTER YOU DIE OF OBESITY AND UNHEALTHY FOOD THAN YOU BECOME A FREAK PROGRAMMED TO SEE CALORIES IN ALL THE FOOD YOU EAT AND TRYING TO MAINTAIN A PARTICULAR CALORIE INTAKE.

CALORIES COUNT ONLY IF YOU WANT TO GO MAD AND SUFFER.

Heavenly messengers:

Death, disease and degeneration are not natural but are built into this world as heavenly messengers that something is seriously wrong with existence here, according to the Buddha. Thus whoever has found his life here, celebrates his life here, upholds existence here is defying heavenly messengers and headed for woe not safety.

ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA, DEATH, DISEASE AND DEGENERATION ARE CELESTIAL MESSENGERS, BUILT INTO THIS WORLD (GOD CAN BRING YOU BACK TO LIFE, CURE YOUR BLINDNESS IF HE WANTS) AS WARNING THAT ALL IS NOT WELL IN THIS WORLD AND YOU SHOULD ABANDON IT. ANYONE WHO SEES NOTHING WRONG WITH DEATH, DISEASE AND DEGENERATION WILL HEAD FOR MORE DEATH, DISEASE AND DEGENERATION BUILDING A PILE OF SKELETONS THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS HIGH AS A MOUNTAIN.

Money makes the world go round:

He is not the first nor will he be the last to say that and the only way for the statement to be repeatedly proffered it must be rehashed and it is false.

Without knowing what you say is true you are courting doubt and uncertainty and self-resistance (that leads to stress) saying so.

Money may be a very important commodity in this world but it is not possible for anyone to see money making the world go round and so it is said without seeing to exaggerate the importance of money.

MONEY MAY BE VERY IMPORTANT IN THIS WORLD BUT IT IS NOT VALUED BY EVERYONE AND IT DOES NOT MAKE THE WORLD ROUND WHICH IS A FABRICATION TO FALSELY EXAGGERATE THE IMPORTANCE OF MONEY.

FURTHER IT IS COPIED FROM OTHERS AND THE PERSON IS REHASHING AND THEREFORE A SOMNOLENT ROBOT.

Say it and stress is your companion:

Saying “Money makes the world go round” is saying without knowing it is true (to exaggerate) and that is the path to certain stress.

Why is that so?

Whenever a person says anything he did not see as true, he must rouse self-resistance saying it and this conditioning, he is training himself to speak with self-resistance that is the cause of stress.

STRESS IS CAUSED BY SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS WITH SELF-RESISTANCE ACCOMPANYING.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO KNOW HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH SAYING ‘MONEY MAKES THE WORLD GO ROUND’ AND SO HE IS SPEAKING WITHOUT KNOWING THAT IS ACCOMPANIED BY SELF RESISTANCE THAT IS CONDITIONING SO THE HIS DEFAULT WAY OF SPEAKING IS WITH SELF-RESISTANCE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRESS.

Are you talking about the earth or world?

If by world you are talking about the earth then it is not money but the earth’s rotation that has nothing to do with money that makes it goes round.

If you are not talking about the earth then the world does not go round and you speaking falsely saying the world goes round powered by money.
THE WORLD DOES NOT GO ROUND, THE EARTH GOES ROUND. IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE WORLD THEN IT DOES NOT GO ROUND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY SAYING IT GOES ROUND DRIVEN BY MONEY. IF BY WORLD YOU MEAN THE EARTH THEN IT IS NOT MONEY BUT THE EARTH’S ROTATION THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MONEY THAT MAKES IT GO ROUND. THIS IS MUDDLED SPEECH TALKING ABOUT THE WORLD WHEN YOU MEAN EARTH AND VICE VERSA THAT IS DEADLY, LEADS TO INSANITY.

Why frogs matter

They can cure human diseases - if saved from a deadly fungus

It is not because frogs can cure human diseases that they matter and if they don’t cure they don’t matter.

Such statements come from wrong perception of reality, is teaching others to be self-serving or calculating and so it has deadly karma.

People think they are very good teaching others such ‘facts’ but they are heaping deadly karma to be repaid as future suffering.

IT IS SELF SERVING TO SAY FROGS MATTER BECAUSE THEY CAN CURE HUMAN DISEASES AND IT IS NOT HARMLESS BUT IT LEADS TO INSANITY AND THERE IS KARMA TEACHING OTHERS TO BE CALCULATING.

Mad Obama:

Obama: 'Angry' if Secret Service allegations true

CARTAGENA, Colombia (AP) - President Barack Obama, speaking for the first time about allegations that Secret Service agents hired prostitutes, said Sunday that "of course I'll be angry" if those accusations are proven true by an investigation.

‘Of course, I’ll be angry’ says Obama.

Sometimes people substitute ‘mad at you’ for ‘angry at you’ and so it is they think they are meaningful and good being angry at wrongdoing when they are headed for future insanity.

What is the substance of the matter is that it is wrong conduct and should be censured even punished, if you think that is synonymous with being angry or upset you may be right or you have advanced false perception.

TO BE ANGRY IS THE WRONG FORCE BASED UNDERSTANDING AND RESPONSE TO AN EVENT, THE CORRECT RESPONSE IS TO UNDERSTAND THE AGENTS’ CONDUCTS WAS WRONG OR BAD AND THEY SHOULD BE REPRIMANDED EVEN PUNISHED. ‘OF COURSE’ IS SELF JUSTIFICATION OF A TOTALLY MEANINGLESS BLIND FORCE RESPONSE, ‘ANGER’. THE CONSEQUENCES ARE SERIOUS, YOU ARE DICING WITH FUTURE INSANITY.

A dangerous exercise of false logic:

Forget global warming: Scientists discover glaciers in Asian mountain range are actually getting BIGGER

Just because glaciers are getting bigger does not warrant the logical conclusion that there is no global warming. In fact it may be in line with global warming because more precipitation due to global warming may cause those glaciers to grow than shrink.

THERE IS NO NEED AND IT IS DANGEROUS FALSE LOGIC TO CONCLUDE THAT JUST BECAUSE CERTAIN GLACIERS ARE GROWING MEANS THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING. IT GOES TO SHOW EVEN WELL EDUCATED PEOPLE SUFFER FROM FALSE LOGIC THAT MAY ONE DAY KILL THEM AND OTHERS.

PEOPLE THINK THEY HAVE GREAT LOGIC BUT THEY MAY HAVE SERIOUSLY FLAWED LOGIC THAT IS A HAZARD TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.

Colombia scandal 'embarrasses' US

Allegations that US Secret Service agents consorted with prostitutes in Colombia have "let the boss down", says the US military's top officer.

Why should anyone be embarrassed except that they put up a false image of respectability about themselves that has been exposed as fraudulent.

A person does not project an image of himself and so even if you maintain your squeakily clean image you are guilty of sin, guilty of putting up and maintaining a false image of respectability.

WITHOUT PRESENTING AN IMAGE OF RESPECTABILITY OF YOURSELF YOU CANNOT BE EMBARRASSED (SHAMED, HURT) WHEN SOMETHING EXPOSES ITS FALSE NATURE. ONLY PRETENTIOUS PEOPLE CAN BE EMBARRASSED AND EMBARRASSMENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUBSTANCE AND IT IS ALL ABOUT THE STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE HURT/SHAMED BY EXPOSURE.

EVEN IF YOU METICULOUSLY MAINTAIN YOUR IMAGE YOU ARE LIVING IN FALSITY AND SIN PROJECTING AN IMAGE OF YOURSELF EG AS JOVIAL, RESPECTABLE, GOOD NATURED OR GUNG HO.

What is embarrassment?

Embarrassment is hurt or pain caused by the stirring one one’s mental force to significant strength as to cause pain triggered by an event that exposes one’s true nature that is at variance to the publicly broadcast image and it usually leads to agitation, an emotion caused by the disorganised stirring in speed and strength of one’s mental force.

EMBARRASSMENT IS MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE CONTROLLED INSANITY, AN AFFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL PRETENTIOUS PEOPLE. IT IS SIMPLY HURT OR PAIN CAUSED BY THE SIGNIFICANT RISING IN STRENGTH OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE THAT LEADS TO AGITATION OR CONFUSION (AS ONE STRUGGLES TO APPLY DAMAGE CONTROL) WHEN AN EVENT EXPOSES SOMETHING UNSAVOURY THAT IS AT VARIANCE TO THE IMAGE ONE PROJECTS.

THUS EMBARRASSMENT IS A COMPOUND OF TRIGGERED SELF HURT OR PAIN LEADING TO EMOTIONAL AGITATION OR CONFUSION THAT DRIVES THE PERSON TO RESTLESSLY SEEK TO DAMAGE CONTROL, EG FIND EXCUSES.

Shame is a feeling not emotion:

Shame is an unpleasant feeling caused by self-generated force as a result of something happening.

Feelings arise from contact with force with mild force giving pleasant feelings and strong force giving pain. This force contacted may be generated externally or internally by self. When a person is shamed, his own mental force rises to sufficient strength as to cause pain or hurt to be felt by him and this is the essence of the shame that usually gives rise to emotions like sadness, anger, agitation.

SHAME IS SIMPLY SELF-GENERATED PAIN BUT IT IS OFTEN ACCOMPANIED RAPIDLY BY EMOTIONS LIKE SADNESS, ANGER (AT SELF AND OTHERS) AND AGITATION.

The truth about the euro?

Jeremy Warner

The IMF still won't admit the truth about the euro

Pundits line up everywhere to castigate the euro when it may not be the euro but it is derivatives that is responsible for the mess and so they are heading for insanity.

It is derivatives, an American invention or hocus pocus, that gives the false impression that loans are somehow guaranteed and so you should have no fears lending that may be at the heart of the euro crisis, not the euro itself. Without assurances about the safety of their money, banks would be more judicious in their lending but since their money is supposed to be safe, has been insured, who cares, lend to any idiot who walks through the door.

IT MAY NOT BE THE EURO THAT IS AT FAULT AND IF IT IS AT FAULT, THE USD IS EVEN WORSE BECAUSE IT PERMITTED THE US TO BUILD UP MOUNTAINOUS DEBTS WITHOUT EARNING THE MONEY, BY JUST PRINTING, IT IS A MASSIVE FREE LOAN TO THE US WHEN PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD CONVERT THEIR ASSETS INTO USD AND IT IS USED AS A CURRENCY OF SETTLEMENT BY COUNTRIES INDEPENDENT OF THE US.

AT THE HEART OF THE TERRIBLE DEBT CRISIS MAY BE THE EVIL DERIVATIVES CONCOCTED BY AMERICAN FINANCIAL ‘WIZARDS’ OR WITCHES.

IF WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT THEN THESE SO CALLED PUNDITS ARE DELUDED, DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING.

Playing politics:

Quote: Anwar merely playing politics.

‘Playing politics’ is a non-specific statement that can be retrieved to be applied to many situations, he is not the first to say this and so the only way it can come about is that it was memorized and rehashed from memory.

You can play football or the violin but you cannot play politics except in your advanced false perception you can and so it copied falsity that ends in insanity. Anwar trying to exploit the issue for political gains is the correct statement and it is different from playing politics which is a vague general statement to blanket apply to many situations where one may not understand what is going on.

‘PLAYING POLITICS’ IS A SLOGAN, A CATCH PHRASE THAT IS IDEAL FOR RECORDING AND PLAYBACK WITH WIDE CURRENCY AND MAY HIDE A PERSON’S LACK OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS HAPPENING. IT MAY SOUND NICE TO PEOPLE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING BUT IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND.

It is not a matter of playing politics:

Playing politics is not a correct answer so the person has an appointment with mad logic and perception.

What is relevant is whether Anwar is correct or wrong, his proposal is beneficial or harmful. By implication he is admitting that Anwar’s proposal has merit but he is insincere, will not implement it but is using it as a false promise to entice voters. In this case he is speaking unrighteously doubting or questioning Anwar.

NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO DOUBT OR QUESTION ANWAR’S WILL TO FULFILL WHAT HE PROMISED, UNTIL ANWAR HAS RENEGED ON HIS PROMISES YOU CANNOT CRITICISE OR DISPARAGE HIM AND SO IF BY SAYING ‘PLAYING POLITICS’ YOU MEAN ANWAR’S PROPOSALS ARE GOOD BUT HE HAS NO INTENTION OF UNDERTAKING IT, YOU ARE ASKING FOR KARMA DOUBTING ANWAR.

PLAYING POLITICS IS THE INCORRECT ANSWER, WHAT MATTERS IS IF ANWAR’S PROPOSAL IS RIGHT OR WRONG AND IF IT IS RIGHT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO QUESTION HIS RESOLVE TO FULFILL IT.

UK is surviving on interest only mortgages:

35% of UK mortgages are currently interest only, people only pay interest and nothing on principal owed and so this is delaying or postponing a reckoning with default when the day comes for them to pay principal in addition or if interest rates start to soar eg to protect the sterling.

Quote: Of the 11.2million mortgages in Britain, 35 per cent are on interest-only deals.

Andrea Leadsom, a Conservative member of the Treasury Select Committee, said: “People are switching to interest-only because it gives them smaller outgoings now, but it is storing up problems for the future.”

WITHOUT INTEREST ONLY MORTGAGES UK WOULD HAVE DESCENDED INTO DEPRESSION AND WHEN THE TIME COMES TO PAYING PRINCIPAL IT IS LIKELY TO CREATE MASS INSOLVENCY AND DRAG THE ECONOMY EVEN LOWER.

Is shale gas the new GM?

Public concern, political support, commercial imperatives... sound familiar?

There is no need to see shale gas in terms of GM crops but it reflects emotional people’s understanding of a current situation is not true, fresh specific to the occasion that they refer to some past event, see similarities and see the current situation in terms of the past event. What is needed is to examine the current shale gas situation and understand as it actually is, whatever similarity with GM is irrelevant and serves to distract. People fall back on past situations to see the current situation in terms of that past situation and it is a guide for them to rehash past solutions to apply to the present.

THERE IS NEVER A NEED OR RELEVANCE TO SEE SHALE GAS AS THE NEW GM, IT IS NEVER SO AND IT REFLECTS PEOPLE’S UNDERSTANDING OF THINGS HAPPENING ARE NEVER TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION BUT THEY HAVE RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS THAT THEY REFER TO AND REHASH TO EXPLAIN CURRENT EVENTS AND ALSO APPLY PAST SOLUTIONS TO THE PRESENT. UNDERSTAND THE SHALE GAS SITUATION AS IT TRULY IS, WHENCE THE NEED TO COMPARE IT WITH GM? IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE BLIND, CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE SHALE GAS SITUATION THAT YOU ARE ‘FOREVER’ REFERRING TO RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS TO TRY AND EXPLAIN THE CURRENT SITUATION.

IT IS MAD TO SEE SOMETHING (SHALE GAS) IN TERMS OF ANOTHER (GM CROPS), YOU SEE SOMETHING IN ITS OWN TERMS. NOT ONLY HAS WORK OR THINKING TO BE DONE TO SEE SOMETHING IN TERMS OF ANOTHER, IT NEVER QUITE FITS EXCEPT APPROXIMATELY.

SO, TRULY UNDERSTANDING, DID YOU UNDERSTAND LIKE I EXPRESS ABOVE?

It’s not about BN or PR — it’s about changing the system

People think they talk great sense and they are maverick, unconventional and clever but they talk nonsense and those who hear who do not understand think maybe they have a case.

It is not about changing the system. The system, whatever it is, parliamentary system or the constitution is fine, does not require change, it is the gross abuses of the system perpetrated by politicians entrusted by voters that is responsible for the mess and the need for change. Thus it is not the system that needs change except in your delusion, it is those entrusted to carry out the system who need to change and so he is talking nonsense headed for nonsense (aka insanity).

HE IS TALKING NONSENSE AND HEADED FOR NONSENSE. THE SYSTEM IS FINE, IT IS THE ABUSE OF THE SYSTEM BY RULING POLITICIANS (EG ELECTORAL GERRYMANDER EVEN FRAUD, ABUSE OF THE JUDICIARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, THE MEDIA) THAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE MESS THAT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED. BECAUSE HE IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE, HE IS TALKING WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHAT HE SAYS AND THAT IS THE PATH TO INSANITY.

WHAT HE SAID CAN ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD ONE WAY: IT IS FALSE. IF YOU THINK HE MAY HAVE A CASE, WHO KNOWS THEN YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND.

Change the corrupt policeman or the police system?

Is it the police system that is rotten or the personnel that is rotten or corrupted? Do you change the police system just because corruption is endemic and do you think that with corruption still in place, changing the system is the answer? Supposed you replace the police from top to bottom with people of integrity, would that solve the corruption problem?

In the same way, is it the judiciary system that needs to be change or the practice of ruling politicians influencing court decisions behind the scene and judges being corrupt? What use would it be to change the judiciary system if judges remain corrupt?

The sin of running errands for others:

It is specifically instructed by the Buddha that his monks should not run errands for others, thus if you buy medicines for your patients you are running errands. If someone asks you to pass a message to another, or meet another on his behalf you are running errands.

When you run errand in return for material gains, you become a mercenary and a slave and being a slave and mercenary is never the path to heaven.

THUS PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE DELUDED. THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG EVEN GOOD IN RUNNING ERRANDS FOR OTHERS WHEN IT MEANS ENSLAVING YOURSELF, BEING A ROBOT FOR OTHERS. EVEN MONKS RUN ERRANDS FOR OTHERS.

People may disagree but they do not understand:

People may disagree with the statement ‘it is not about BN or PR, it is about changing the system’ but they never truly understand the statement.

THERE IS NO NEED TO DISPUTE THE STATEMENT. IT IS OBJECTIVELY TRUTHFULLY WRONG AND THE PERSON IS DELUDED.

DO YOU OR PEOPLE REALIZE THIS? IF YOU DON’T THEN YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID TO YOU.

WHATEVER THE FAULTS OF THE SYSTEM, IT IS FAR LESS IN NEED OF CHANGE THAN THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED WITH RUNNING THE SYSTEM AND SO YOU ARE BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE WANTING TO CHANGE THE SYSTEM INSTEAD OF THE PERSONNEL RUNNING THE SYSTEM. WHATEVER THE FAULTS OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM, THE CORRUPTION AND INCOMPETENCE OF THE PERSONNEL FAR OUTWEIGH AND SO YOU SHOULD DIRECT YOUR EFFORT AT CHANGE (IF THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT AND THOSE CHANGES ARE FOR THE GOOD OF THE PEOPLE) AT THE PERSONNEL THAN SYSTEM.

YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS PROPOSED NOR IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO TELL IF HE IS CORRECT OR NOT, A DISCERNING PERSON CAN TELL HE HAS NO CASE THAT THE SYSTEM NEEDS CHANGE. THE PERSONNEL OR PEOPLE RUNNING THE SHOW ARE IN NEED OF CHANGE FAR MORE THAN THE SYSTEM AND THIS CANNOT BE DISPUTED NOR DO YOU NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO KNOW THAT.

I am part Neanderthal - and so might you be

Whether you are part Neanderthal or not, you are still you and so it is always an irrelevant issue and the purpose of saying that is to stir emotions as if it is that great or interesting or wonderful being Neanderthal. It is not an accident he spoke on personal terms (I & you) rather than in terms of humanity but it is to stir emotion eg ‘wow’.

WHETHER WE ARE PART NEANDERTHAL OR NOT IS A NON-ISSUE, THERE ARE MORE PRESSING ISSUE FOR A PERSON TO CONSIDER AND SO HE IS WASTING HIS AND OTHERS’ TIME AND HEADED FOR INSANITY MAKING A MOUNTAIN OUT OF A MOLE HILL. WHETHER HE OR YOU IS A NEANDERTHAL DOES NOT MATTER, YOU ARE STILL YOU. WHAT MATTERS IS THE FALSITY AND HARMFULNESS THAT YOU ARE CONSTANTLY PERPETRATING CAUSING PRESENT SUFFERING AND HEAPING FUTURE SUFFERING FOR YOU.

WHETHER A TOPIC IS WORTHY OF MENTION AND EXACTLY FOR WHAT PURPOSE IT IS BROACHED IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED, IF IT IS NOT WORTHY OF MENTION OR IT IS BROACHED FOR EMOTIONAL MOTIVES THAT BELIES ITS APPARENT OR NOMINAL VALUE, YOU ARE COURTING FUTURE INSANITY.