Thursday, May 10, 2012

Media must be allowed to perform its duties


Media must be allowed to perform its duties
How do you understand what is said to you?
‘Perform its duties’ sounds mechanical or robotic as if journalists are assigned certain programmed roles and they must perform their duties as programmed rather than ascertaining the news or facts of events and presenting them to readers.
UNLESS REPORTERS ARE ROBOTS, THEIR JOB IS TO BE PRESENT, GATHER/ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH OF THE OCCASION AND PRESENT IT ACCURATELY TO READERS, NOT A SET OF DUTIES THEY MUST PERFORM ROBOTICALLY AS PROGRAMMED.
FURTHER IS THE RULING COALITION OF WHICH HE IS PART OF, GUILTY OF ‘NOT ALLOWING THE MEDIA TO PERFORM ITS DUTIES, OF MUZZLING AND CENSORING AND INTIMIDATING THE MEDIA. IF IT IS GUILTY THEN IT IS HYPOCRISY TALKING ABOUT ALLOWING THE MEDIA TO PERFORM ITS DUTIES.
PERCEIVING THE MEDIA AS HAVING A ROLE OR DUTIES TO PERFORM IS AN ODD OR FALSE WAY OF PERCEIVING THE MEDIA. GATHERING FACTS AND REPORTING IT IS NOT A DUTY BUT AN OBJECTIVE AND ONLY ROBOTS DEAL IN DUTIES, SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH PEOPLE HAVING DUTIES OR ROLES AND STICKING TO THOSE DUTIES AND ROLES ONLY.
Calls, calls, calls:
People think they are such wonderful, alive beings but what they are doing is rehashing, rehashing, rehashing.
‘Media must be allowed to perform their duties’ can be classified as a call and some people are ‘forever’ issuing calls to others which is not about meaning but commands or programs.
A PERSON WHO ISSUES CALLS IS TRYING TO PROGRAM OTHERS TO CONFORM TO HIS CALLS AND SO HE IS A SLAVE MASTER WITH KARMA NEVER MERIT ATTACHED. NO UNDERSTANDING IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY TO CALLS, EITHER YOU EMBRACE THE CALLS AND ACT ACCORDINGLY OR YOU IGNORE IT. EVEN IF PEOPLE IGNORE YOUR CALL, YOU ARE GUILTY OF MAKING CALLS THAT OTHERS ARE FORCED TO IGNORE, WHICH IS ALWAYS SUFFERING.
ONLY A PERSON WHO IS A ROBOT IS FOREVER ISSUING CALLS BECAUSE HIS LIFE IS ABOUT FOLLOWING CALLS, FASHIONING CALLS.
ANYONE ISSUING CALLS IS ASKING FOR SUFFERING BECAUSE YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE ROBOTS OF OTHERS OBEYING YOUR CALLS AND EVEN IF THEY REJECT, REFUSE TO ACCEPT YOUR CALLS YOU ARE GUILTY OF PRESENTING THEM WITH A CALL THAT THEY MUST SUFFER OR BE STIRRED TO REJECT.
Is this the media’s duty that it must be allowed to perform?
Is it the duty of the media (that it must be allowed to perform) to rabidly defend the ruling elite even to the extent of fabricating stories?
Apparently Australia’s independent senator was here to observe the rally and he was critical of police actions and in reprisal, a state controlled paper fabricated a story that would besmirch him in the eyes of readers.
Description: L-R: Independent MP Andrew Wilkie and Independent Senator Nick Xenophon comment on the Coalition's policy on gambling reform during a doorstop at Parliament House Canberra on Wednesday 2 November 2011.
Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
DANIEL FLITTON Independent senator Nick Xenophon subjected to an extraordinary attack by a state-controlled newspaper - publishing speech in which he was critical of Scientology, but replacing it with the word 'Islam'.
How low NST has stooped:
Xenophon verballed in Malaysia
May 3, 2012
  •  
INDEPENDENT senator Nick Xenophon has been subjected to an extraordinary attack by a state-controlled Malaysian newspaper - publishing a 2009 speech in which he was critical of Scientology, but replacing it with the word ''Islam''.
The deception has left Senator Xenophon flabbergasted following a visit to Malaysia at the weekend to observe protests aimed at the ruling party.
He told The Age last night the word switch was an example of the kind of dirty tricks the ruling party employs and had used against opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim. The article appeared in the New Straits Times and is an attempt to discredit Senator Xenophon and Dr Anwar after the two met in recent days.
Advertisement: Story continues below
Headlined ''Anti-Islam Australian lawmaker comes under fire'', the article quotes from a 2009 speech Senator Xenophon delivered in Parliament.
The article claims he said: ''Islam is not a religious organisation. It is a criminal organisation that hides behind its so-called religious beliefs.''
Hansard - the Australian Parliament's record - records those exact words, except has ''Scientology'', not ''Islam''.
Dr Anwar was sacked as deputy prime minister in the late 1990s and jailed for sodomy, which he has always denied.
The headline is trying to tell you something that the author deems is meaningful or interesting and so how does one truly understand what is being transmitted to him?
It is meaningless to tell others that Bin Laden was frustrated at the end and the fact that you are interested (attracted to, a product of force not understanding), accept it as bona fide news and see nothing wrong reflects your absent or wrong understanding.
Frustrated means Bin Laden was upset, his mental force stirred to dislike (angry) and agitated because he was powerless.
What is the point of him being frustrated and what is the point of knowing he is frustrated? The relevant points or substance of the situation is what he wanted to do that he could not do.
IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT SUBSTANCE OR MATTER THEN YOU SHOULD DWELL ON WHAT BIN LADEN WANTED TO DO AND COULD NOT RATHER THAN TELL OTHERS OF HIS FRUSTRATION AND AS A READER WHO UNDERSTANDS TRULY, YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT BIN LADEN WANTED TO DO BUT COULD NOT RATHER THAN HIS FRUSTRATIONS THAT STIRS YOUR MENTAL FORCE DEPENDING ON WHETHER YOU SIDE WITH HIM OR HATE HIM TO SYMPATHIZE OR APPLAUD HIS FRUSTRATIONS.
IT IS SOMNOLENT CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT PEOPLE ARE PREOCCUPIED WITH THE EMOTIONS OF THE OCCASION (BIN LADEN’S FRUSTRATION) RATHER THAN WHAT HE WANTED TO ACHIEVE BUT COULD NOT.
WHAT MATTERS IS WHAT PLANS HE HAD RATHER THAN HIS FRUSTRATIONS WHICH ARE ABOUT MEANINGLESS STIRRED MENTAL FORCE AND BECAUSE YOU THINK WHAT IS IRRELEVANT IS RELEVANT YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC THAT CAN ONE DAY COST YOUR LIFE.
India: Rare Buddhist manuscript Lotus Sutra to be released
(People get excited with this discovery but do they understand the nature of what they treasure as precious? I had a brief encounter with the Lotus Sutra many years ago and my understanding is that it is not in keeping with the teachings of the Buddha, it is a corruption of what the Buddha taught and those who embrace it as authentic are deluded. Many versions of Buddhism sprang up later but they are corruptions, perversions of what the Buddha taught and there is terrible karma for anyone who corrupts the Buddha’s message, the Buddha said. If the Buddha did not say this and you say he said this or he said this and you say he did not say this, you are asking for suffering much worse than you bargained for)
A rare Buddhist manuscript, discovered by cattle grazers in 1931, is set to be released in a book form in India on Thursday.
The Lotus Sutra was found in Gilgit, now in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
The document, which dates back to 5th century, is perhaps the only Buddhist manuscript discovered in India.
Believed to be one of the most revered Buddhist scriptures, it represents the discourse delivered by Buddha towards the end of his life.
The Lotus Sutra is one of the most sacred scriptures of Mahayana Buddhism which is strongest in Tibet, China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, and Mongolia.
Why you want to know Bin Laden frustrated?
Why does anyone want to know that Bin Laden was frustrated, that his mental force was stirred to be angry and confused and ‘upset’? Does it make you feel better, happy or liking that he is frustrated or hurt he was frustrated because you side with him? It takes force not reason to side with anyone, siding is a function of force never reason or meaning.
THUS HERE AS EVERYWHERE MANKIND IS DWELLING ON THE FORCE OF THE OCCASION, ON THE STIRRED FORCE OR EMOTION OR FRUSTRATION OF THE OCCASION RATHER THAN THE SUBSTANCE OF THE OCCASION WHICH IS WHAT BIN LADEN WANTED TO DO BUT COULD NOT.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT HE WANTED TO DO BUT COULD NOT, WHY DO YOU DWELL ON OR FOCUS ON HIS FRUSTRATIONS? ARE YOU MAD? YOU ARE NOT MAD (YET) BUT IF YOU CONTINUE TO DWELL ON EMOTIONS OR FORCE THAN MEANING YOU WILL IN DUE COURSE TURN MAD.
Never what the Buddha taught:
Below is an excerpt from the Lotus Sutta and it is not a minor but gross deviation of what the Buddha taught, you do not create merit or attain to the path enlightenment by making stupas, the Buddha never exhorted people to create stupas.

Those who made rock stupas,
Stupas out of sandal, aloe, deodar, and other woods,
As well as brick, tile, mud, and other materials;
All those who made buddha stupas
Out of piles of earth in desolate places;
And even children in play
Who made buddha stupas out of heaps of sand—
All such people have certainly attained
The path of the buddhas.
And all those who made images of the buddhas
Carved with their extraordinary marks
Have certainly attained the path of the buddhas.
IT REFLECTS THE TOTAL LACK OF UNDERSTANDING AMONGST HUMANS THAT THEY CANNOT SEE THE GLARING DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE VARIOUS SCHOOLS OF BUDDHISM AND HOW THIS MUST MEAN THAT THEY ARE FRAUDULENT.
Merit maybe but not the path of the Buddhas:
You require discernment, understanding and concentration of your mind far higher than ordinary concentration to attain the path of the Buddhas and you do not achieve that by building stupas of the Buddha. There may be merit creating stupas of the Buddha and if that is the case it leads to a measure of future happiness that once expended becomes nought.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID, EVEN THE MAN WHO TOSSES THE RINSING FROM HIS FOOD BOWL INTO A POND AND WISHES WHATEVER CREATURES THEREIN DERIVE SUSTENANCE HAS GAINED MERIT, BUILDING STUPAS MAY OR MAY NOT LEAD TO MERIT BUT THESE ARE EXPENDIBLES, ONCE YOUR MERIT IS EXHAUSTED YOU START AT SQUARE ONE AGAIN AND THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS ATTAINING THE PATH OF THE BUDDHAS AS TOUTED IN THE LOTUS SUTTA.
THE MAN WHO HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND ENJOYS ONE AGE IN HEAVENLY BLISS AS A RESULT OF HIS MERIT, THE PERSON WHO CAN STOP THINKING AND ACHIEVE THE SECOND HIGHER STATE OF MIND ENJOYS TWO AGES IN HEAVEN AS A RESULT OF HIS MERIT BUT ONCE HIS MERIT IS EXHAUSTED, HE HAS USED UP HIS LIFEPSPAN IN HEAVEN, HE CAN GO DOWN EVEN TO HELL DEPENDING ON HIS PREVIOUS KARMA, SO SAYS THE TRUE BUDDHA.
WITHOUT DISCERNMENT/UNDERSTANDING, GREAT VIRTUES (NO STEALING, LYING, HARMING, NO SEX) AND DEVELOPING THE CONCENTRATION OF YOUR MIND THAT NO AMOUNT OF STUPA BUILDING CAN PRODUCE, YOU CANNOT ATTAIN THE PATH OF THE BUDDHAS.
Apart from reflecting a evil calculating nature costing everything, it is all money, money, money, it is a totally wrong or deluded way of looking at what happened.
The slump did not rob every household of that amount because it was never there. What happened before was built on debt, borrowing rather than actual wealth and the slump burst the façade and exposed a more realistic (but still not accurate) representation of wealth.
THE WEALTH BEFORE THE SLUMP WAS AN ILLUSION CREATED BY DEBT THAT COULD NOT BE SUSTAINED AND THE SLUMP DID NOT COST EACH HOUSEHOLD 30,000 BUT IT PORTRAYED MORE ACCURATELY THE ACTUAL WEALTH OF PEOPLE. IT REFLECTS A CALCULATING NATURE THAT IS THE WAY TO WOE TO COST EVERYTHING, WHAT MATTERS IS WORTH OR MONEY OR WHAT IS IN IT FOR ME.
Deeds and changing oneself:
There are two different things a person can do, act or perform deeds in this world or change himself either genuinely or in delusion that he has changed for the better when he hasn’t.
Acts or deeds can bring either merit to be experienced as future happiness or freedom from suffering even in a heavenly state or demerit to be experienced as suffering eg sickness, short life, deformities, existences in the ghost, animal or even hell realms.
True change involves conversion of a person from sinful (lying, cheating, harming, killing, chattering, intoxicating, lascivious) to noble nature, from a rehashing, stressed, restless distracted styled (prolonging, changing speed and strength) existence to the unstressed non rehashing non-styled existence that gives the first higher state of mind, from a helplessly constantly thinking person to the at will non-thinking person, from an automatically liking-disliking person to a neither liking nor disliking person.
IN ORDER TO ENTER THE PATH OF THE BUDDHAS YOU NEED TO CHANGE YOURSELF, ATTAINING PROGRESSIVELY THE HIGHER STATES OF MIND FROM NON-STYLE TO NON-THINKING TO NON LIKING NOR DISLIKING TO NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE AND EVEN HIGHER TO NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING. BUILDING STUPAS OF THE BUDDHA IS AN ACT OR DEED THAT CAN BRING EITHER MERIT OR DEMERIT TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE HAPPINESS OR SUFFERING BUT IT CAN NEVER SET YOU ON THE PATH TO ENLIGHTENMENT.
It is the cessation of ignorance that gives enlightenment:
The Buddha said from ignorance as a cause comes fabrications thence consciousness, thence name & form thence sense media, contact, feelings, clinging, becoming and birth and suffering. From the cessation of ignorance comes the cessation of fabrications and thence the whole mass of suffering, complications and falsity that ensues.
The Buddha spoke of the three knowledge man, the person who knows all his past lives, who knows the passing and birth of beings and the path to the total permanent extinction of all suffering.
THUS IN ORDER TO BE ENLIGHTENED, YOU MUST BANISH YOUR IGNORANCE AND ALL BEINGS WHO EXIST EVEN TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS IN HEAVEN ARE TAINTED BY IGNORANCE TO SOME DEGREE AND THE PERSON WHO HAS ATTAINED THE THREE KNOWLEDGES, KNOWLEDGE OF ALL (NOT JUST SOME) OF HIS PAST LIVES, KNOWLEDGE OF THE RISING AND PASSING OF BEINGS, KNOWLEDGE OF THE PATH COMPLETELY OUT OF SUFFERING WILL NO LONGER FABRICATE AND HE EXTINGUISHES HIMSELF AND MAKES A COMPLETE END TO ALL FUTURE BECOMING.
DEPENDING ON YOUR MERIT YOU CAN BE BORN AS AN FORMED ANGEL OR FORMLESS BRAHMA IN HEAVEN FOR 1, 2, 4, 500 TO 60,000 AGES BUT IF YOU ARE STILL SHROUDED IN IGNORANCE AND DESIRE MORE EXISTING THEN DEPENDING ON YOUR PREVIOUS KARMA YOU CAN DEPART EVEN FOR HELL.
THE BUDDHA SAID ALL IS NOT SELF, CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SELF, FABRICATIONS IS NOT SELF, FORM IS NOT SELF, WHATEVER IS CHANGING IS FALSE OR DECEPTIVE, ONLY NIBBANA THE CHANGELESS IS TRUE AND THE BEING WHO HAS TRULY COME TO THIS REALIZATION UPON LISTENING TO THE BUDDHA AND REALIZING IT FOR HIMSELF WILL ACHIEVE ENLIGHTENMENT.
THUS ENLIGHTENMENT OR BUDDHA-HOOD IS THE PRESERVE OF THOSE WHO HAVE DEVELOPED THEIR MINDS TO THE HIGHEST AND UNDERSTOOD THE NATURE OF EXISTING AS POINTED OUT BY THE BUDDHA AND WHO THUS TOTALLY WITHOUT ANY MORE DESIRE, EXTINGUISHES HIMSELF FOR NO MORE FUTURE SUFFERING.
Concentration is the key to knowledge:
It is the development of a mind to a certain high concentration that cannot be disrupted that enables him to realize his past lives, see the rising and passing of beings and see the path to total escape from all suffering.
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of recollecting my past lives. I recollected my manifold past lives, i.e., one birth, two...five, ten...fifty, a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand, many eons of cosmic contraction, many eons of cosmic expansion, many eons of cosmic contraction & expansion: 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure & pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure & pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus I remembered my manifold past lives in their modes & details.
"This was the first knowledge I attained in the first watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was destroyed; light arose -- as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, & resolute.
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of the passing away & reappearance of beings. I saw -- by means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human -- beings passing away & re-appearing, and I discerned how they are inferior & superior, beautiful & ugly, fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma: 'These beings -- who were endowed with bad conduct of body, speech & mind, who reviled noble ones, held wrong views and undertook actions under the influence of wrong views -- with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the plane of deprivation, the bad destination, the lower realms, in hell. But these beings -- who were endowed with good conduct of body, speech, & mind, who did not revile noble ones, who held right views and undertook actions under the influence of right views -- with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the good destinations, in the heavenly world.' Thus -- by means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human -- I saw beings passing away & re-appearing, and I discerned how they are inferior & superior, beautiful & ugly, fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma.
"This was the second knowledge I attained in the second watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was destroyed; light arose -- as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, & resolute.
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of the ending of the mental fermentations. I discerned, as it was actually present, that 'This is stress...This is the origination of stress...This is the cessation of stress...This is the way leading to the cessation of stress...These are fermentations...This is the origination of fermentations...This is the cessation of fermentations...This is the way leading to the cessation of fermentations.' My heart, thus knowing, thus seeing, was released from the fermentation of sensuality, released from the fermentation of becoming, released from the fermentation of ignorance. With release, there was the knowledge, 'Released.' I discerned that 'Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for this world.'
"This was the third knowledge I attained in the third watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was destroyed; light arose -- as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, & resolute.
"Now, brahmin, if the thought should occur to you, 'Perhaps Gotama the contemplative is even today not free of passion, not free of aversion, not free of delusion, which is why he resorts to isolated forest & wilderness dwellings,' it should not be seen in that way. It's through seeing two compelling reasons that I resort to isolated forest & wilderness dwellings: seeing a pleasant abiding for myself in the present, and feeling sympathy for future generations."
"How truly future generations have been shown sympathy by Master Gotama in the manner of one who is worthy & rightly self-awakened! Magnificent, Master Gotama! Magnificent! Just as if he were to place upright what had been overturned, were to reveal what was hidden, were to show the way to one who was lost, or were to hold up a lamp in the dark so that those with eyes could see shapes, in the same way Master Gotama has -- through many lines of reasoning -- made the Dhamma clear. I go to Master Gotama for refuge, to the Dhamma, and to the Sangha of monks. May Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone to him for refuge, from this day forward, for life."
Celebrating love and joy:
This is the heading for a newspaper advertisement and it is a mad statement.
Love and joy does not require any celebration and rather than enhancing happiness, the very act of celebrating eg by buying jewellery detracts from it.
IN THEIR DECEIT TO PROMOTE JEWELLERY PEOPLE SPEAK OF CELEBRATING LOVE AND JOY BY BUYING CERTAIN PRECIOUS ORNAMENTS WHEN IT IS MAD, YOU CANNOT CELEBRATE LOVE AND JOY. YOU CAN EXPERIENCE LOVE AND JOY AND THE MOMENT YOU TRY TO CELEBRATE BY DOING THIS OR THAT YOU LAPSE INTO FALSITY THAT LEADS TO FUTURE SUFFERING.
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU CAN CELEBRATE LOVE AND JOY BUT IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU ARE DICING WITH FUTURE INSANITY IN THE NAME OF SELLING JEWELLERY TO OTHERS.
Microsubmarines could clean oil:
True understanding is not necessarily present nor involved when humans fashion microsubmarines to clean oil; there are existing plans of how oil can be cleaned and how robots can be designed and programmed to do particular tasks and all it takes is combining them in a rehashed way to come up with a new combo, microsubmarines to clean oil and those with false perception and understanding are suitably impressed mankind is a true understanding genius when it is combined rehashed plans involved that may be copied from nature eg submarines are shaped copying fish and dolphins, planes with wings copy birds.
WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING ORDINARY STYLISH PEOPLE IS RECORDED AND REHASHED FROM RECORDINGS TO APPLY TO A CURRENT SITUATION AND THAT IS NEVER TRUE UNDERSTANDING EXCEPT IN DELUSION. THEY ARE MERELY JUGGLING WITH EXISTING RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS IN THEIR MINDS AND RECORDING FRESH UNDERSTANDINGS THAT MAY BE DELUSIONAL COPIED FROM OTHERS OR FASHIONED BY THEMSELVES.
FASHIONING MICROSUBMARINES TO CLEAN OIL MAY APPEAR VERY CLEVER BUT IT IS FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION TO THINK THAT EQUALS TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHICH MAY NOT BE NECESSARY NOR IS IT PRESENT IN THE ENTERPRISE. 
Rich poor gulf in Singapore:
The gap between rich and poor in Singapore is the second widest in the world, and the government has promised utmost efforts to put it right.
Singapore is a middle class city. An estimated 70% of citizens consider themselves middle class rather than working class. Who forms the middle class?
There is no universally accepted definition, but Singaporeans generally base it on earnings. People who earn S$4,000-S$7,000 (RM9,800-RM17,200) are considered middle and upper middle classes.
Singapore is an admired model of prosperity but what is happening there may be shrewd (ugly) exploitation by an elite class who have garnered the lion share of the wealth whilst there is an army of pawns either local or imported who help the elite transfer wealth from the masses, region and the world into their already stuffed pockets.
CAPITALISM IS ABOUT THE RELENTLESS HEARTLESS TRANSFER OF WEALTH FROM THE COMMON WEALTH INTO THE POCKETS OF AN ELITE MINORITY IN WHICH WORKERS ARE PAWNS HELPING THE TRANSFER THAT IS AUGMENTED BY HOOK AND CROOK SUCH THAT THE SYSTEM BECOMES SADDLED WITH DEBTS MANY TIMES ITS WEALTH BY SUPPLYING THE SYSTEM AND MASSES WITH CREDIT, WHATEVER SAVINGS THE MASSES HAVE ARE IN NAME ONLY BECAUSE BANKERS HAVE RECKLESSLY LENT THEM AWAY.
No such thing as caring or humane capitalism:
Anyone who believes capitalism can be caring or humane is deluded.
Communism is the system of heaven, it is all about sharing which is why Jesus said they are not given in marriage in heaven.
IT IS THE PRACTITIONERS WHO GIVE COMMUNISM A BAD NAME NOT THE SYSTEM ITSELF. CAPITALISM IS THE EVIL ONE.
This was said by the Blessed One: "If beings knew, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they would not eat without have given, nor would the stain of selfishness overcome their minds. Even if it were their last bite, their last mouthful, they would not eat without having shared, if there were someone to receive their gift. But because beings do not know, as I know, the results of giving & sharing, they eat without have given. The stain of selfishness overcomes their minds."
If beings knew what the Great Seer said,
how the result of sharing has such great fruit,
then, subduing the stain of selfishness
with brightened awareness,
they'd give in season to the noble ones,
where a gift bears great fruit.
Having given food as an offering
to those worthy of offerings, many donors,
when they pass away from here,
the human state, go to heaven.
They, having gone there to heaven, rejoice,
enjoying sensual pleasures.
Unselfish, they partake of the result of sharing.
Experts tip even more rate cuts as Reserve Bank warns of weak growth
Whatever he says has deadly consequences but because he is deluded and greedy to assume the mantle of ‘expert’ he says so.
Since you the expert tip more rate cuts there may be those tempted to borrow since costs will drop and if they suffer from their debts that you encouraged or something happened that made rates rise contrary to your expert opinion, you are to blame, with suffering due for misleading others.
I WOULD NEVER VENTURE ANY OPINION LET ALONE ‘EXPERT’ OPINION OF MORE RATE CUTS TO COME FOR FEAR OF THE NOOSE BUT DELUDED PEOPLE WHO LIKE TO ASSUME THE MANTLE OF EXPERT ARE EAGER TO FORECAST NOT REALIZING A NOOSE MAY BE AROUND THEIR NECKS.
The delusion of balancing the criticism:
Quote: First, let's give credit where it's due. MS Word is one of the best word processors I've ever used. Its designers have never failed to impress with the amount of new features they've stuffed into each new iteration of the software.
If what you say is the truth you do not have to give credit where it is due, whatever criticism you state is correct, with or without credit which is aimed consciously or unconsciously to allay any allegation of partisanship.
ANYONE WHO BALANCES HIS CASE, WHO PRAISES A PRODUCT AT THE SAME TIME HE LEVELS CRITICISM IS PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY BECAUSE WHAT HE GIVES CREDIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MATTER AT HAND WHICH IS WHAT IS WRONG AS YOU SEE AND STATE IT. LET’S GIVE CREDIT IS TO APPEAR FAIR. YOU DON’T HAVE TO DO THAT, IT IS MAD, JUST MAKE SURE YOUR CRITICISM IS TRUE, OBJECTIVE NOT SUBJECTIVE.
People think they talk great sense and others think they hear great sense when it is all empty niceties or platitudes. You mean every day you are too busy with daily life, forget about the Buddha’s teaching and come Wesak, it is a day to reflect on the teachings of the Buddha? If every day you reflect the Buddha’s teachings, why pick out Wesak day in particular.
IT SOUNDS LIKE A ONE DAY LIP SERVICE BUDDHIST OF CONVENIENCE THAT WESAK IS A DAY TO REFLECT ON THE BUDDHA’S TEACHINGS.
It is pointless reflecting the teachings of the Buddha and you do not need Wesak day to do so except that it is not whole hearted or meant but brought on by circumstances namely Wesak day, what is needed is finding out what the Buddha taught, understanding and putting it into practice not for the Buddha or anyone’s sake but for your own sake, for no further suffering that can be as vast as an ocean and as long as eternities.
IT IS NOT REFLECTION OF THE BUDDHA’S TEACHING THAT IS MEANINGFUL BUT IT IS UNDERSTANDING AND PUTTING INTO PRACTICE. WHAT IS THE POINT OF REFLECTING IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND WRONG AND DO NOT PUT INTO PRACTICE?
IF YOU THINK REFLECTING IS SYNONYMOUS WITH PUTTING INTO PRACTICE YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION.
YOU MEAN EVERYDAY YOU DON’T PRACTICE WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT, YOU DON’T EVEN REFLECT ON WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT AND COME WESAK DAY, IT IS A DAY TO REFLECT ON HIS TEACHINGS? HOW CONVENIENT AND SHALLOW AND FOR SHOW HYPOCRISY.
Buddhism is a discipline to be practiced not reflected on:
There are two equal parts of Buddhism, a doctrine or teaching and a discipline, things a devotee must put into practice in his daily life not put into practice only on Wesak day let alone reflect on come Wesak day.
BUDDHISM IS NOT A BOOK THAT YOU PICK UP ON A CERTAIN DAY ONCE A YEAR TO READ, IT IS A WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF BUDDHISM, THE DISCIPLINE OF BUDDHISM (RIGHT VIEW, RIGHT SPEECH, RIGHT CONDUCT, RIGHT RESOLVE, RIGHT EFFORT, RIGHT LIVELIHOOD, RIGHT CONCENTRATION) MUST BE ADHERED DAILY NOT JUST ON WESAK DAY. IT IS POINTLESS REFLECTING ABOUT THE DISCIPLINE OF BUDDHISM, WHAT MATTERS IS PUTTING INTO PRACTICE, NOT FOR ANYONE’S SAKE BUT FOR YOUR OWN SAKE.
It is pointless reflecting about Buddhism or Christianity:
It is pointless, mad to reflect about Buddhism or Christianity, it serves no purpose and reflects a person with no understanding.
Jesus said the one who obeys his commands is the one who loves him and so you must practice the discipline or commands of Jesus in order to be a true Christian. You can go to church every Sunday and reflect on Jesus’ teachings everyday but it is mad and pointless if you do not obey what Jesus commanded. If you put into practice what Jesus commanded daily, are mad to talk about reflecting on his teachings come Christmas or Easter?
RELIGION IS NOT FOR REFLECTING BUT PRACTICING AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK YOU SHOULD REFLECT ON CERTAIN DAYS REFLECTS DELUSION, WRONG UNDERSTANDING HERE AS EVERYWHERE YOU THINK YOU UNDERSTAND TRULY.
Reflect on your conduct not the Buddha’s teachings:
The Buddha’s teaching is very well spelt out that requires no reflection but understanding, remembering and putting into practice.
What require reflection is the things you say and do, whether they are meaningful or deceitful, for show, how they create stress for yourself and others and condition yourself to continue sinful conduct.
IT IS NOT SO MUCH THE BUDDHA’S TEACHINGS THAT REQUIRE REFLECTION BUT YOUR CONDUCT AND SPEECH REQUIRES REFLECTION, EXAMINATION TO SEE IF IT IS RIGHT OR WRONG, BLAMEWORTHY OR BLAMELESS.
Brain cancer and your phone:
Mankind will tell what lies it takes to gain advantage and shirk responsibility and so there are studies (linked to the industry) that rubbish the link between handphones and brain cancer whilst others have found a link.
FATAL brain cancer is on the rise and could be caused by radiation from mobile phones, which would mean we're heading for devastation "on a scale never before witnessed in history".
Or there may be nothing to worry about.
Right now, no one knows for sure – and Dr Charlie Teo, one of Australia's top neurosurgeons, says some people are too afraid to find out because of the enormous consequences.
Some studies have found there is no link between mobiles and brain cancer. Others have found a link. Dr Teo told News.com.au that studies that found no link were usually at least partly funded by telecommunications companies – and that the telcos have in the past refused to release records of phone usage that would allow a more robust study to be done.
The largest study done, the international and partly telco-funded Interphone study, found phones were safe – unless you are a "heavy user", or a child (children were not included in the study).
"(Brain cancer) is a terrible disease, it's the most lethal cancer known to mankind. It kills young people and it appears to be affecting more people than it did ten years ago. I believe there may be a link between mobile phones and brain cancer," Dr Teo said.
"Finding a definite link would be devastating – and the telecommunications companies are too afraid to find out."
Dr Teo – whose opinion is published in full on The Punch today – thinks we need to find out for sure, and soon.
"Why wait until half the world's population has brain cancer?" he asked.
He also went to great pains to emphasise that there may not be a link; that he is not a radiation expert, and that he is not a zealot who wants to get rid of mobile phones. But he has looked at all the available evidence, at least a third of his patients' tumours are in the area of the brain near the ear, and he wants to find out what is going on.
The Cancer Council NSW also says more research is always good, but they add that in general people shouldn't get too uptight. Chief executive officer Dr Andrew Penman said it was "difficult to prove that mobile phones cause cancer but even more difficult to prove they don't cause cancer".
He says the "real world" shows that if there was any effect from phones it would be "very small".
Dr Penman says any rise in brain cancer incidences are in older people, and that because large studies such as the Interphone study have not found a link there is no need for people to panic.
"It's fine to be aware of the debate, but as the evidence has accumulated the level of alarm and concern … that prompted warnings about use in young children … has abated," he said.
"People tend to cast around for exotic causes of cancer they can control – but the big thing is tobacco, lack of exercise, obesity, sun exposure, the use of hormone replacement therapy. We know those things have a big effect, and you can actually do something about those."
Dr Penman says there is no need for people to change their behaviour.
Dr Teo says he personally minimises his usage and always uses a hands-free kit.
The World Health Organisation says the non-ionising radiation emitted by phones is possibly carcinogenic and recommends hands-free or texting.
And in the instructions for iPhones and Blackberries lurks a warning to keep phones slightly away from your body.
Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association Chief Executive Officer Chris Althaus said AMTA rejected "Dr Teo's baseless claims of alleged improper industry influence over research into mobile phone health and safety".
He said while they respected his work and acknowledged his right to express his opinion, expert opinion and the weight of evidence showed there were no adverse health effects from mobile phone use.
He said the industry was committed to supporting expert research to help consumers make informed choices, that funding was provided under strict protocols – and that sometimes governments made funding conditional on some funds coming from industry.
Mr Althaus also said the industry had cooperated fully with researchers.
The statement is totally unnecessary and foolish because it heaps karma to be repaid as suffering.
It is just a football game and title at stake and even if it is something absolutely major you are committing your head to the chopping board ruling out or in something.
The motive saying so is to exaggerate the resilience and marvel of Manchester United that you never rule them out until it becomes a fact. They are not that great and so you are speaking falsely and you do not say what you mean which is that United are a special case.
UNITED ARE NOT THAT SPECIAL THAT THEY CANNOT BE RULED OUT UNTIL THE VERY LAST KICK, IN FACT WELL BEFORE THE LAST KICK IT MAY BE EVIDENT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO WIN THE TITLE (EG CITY IS WINNING) AND SO HE IS SPEAKING FALSELY WITH KARMA ATTACHED.
EVEN IF THE MATTER IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IN THE WORLD, YOU NEVER RULE OUT OR RULE IN SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE AND EVEN IF YOU GUESSED RIGHT, YOU ARE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO FALSITY, UNCERTAINTY, GUESSING RULING IN AND OUT THINGS THAT ARE NEVER MOTIVATED BY TRUE REASON BUT BY GREED OR INTEREST TO KNOW WHAT YOU DO NOT KNOW.
GUESSING IS NEVER A HARMLESS PASTIME BUT GUESSING HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES AND THE WISE PERSON REFRAINS FROM GUESSING, FROM ADOPTING POSITIONS HE DOES NOT KNOW IS TRUE.
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO ADOPT A POSITION IN A MATTER YOU DO NOT KNOW THE OUTCOME, IF YOU DO, YOU ARE EMBRACING FALSITY, DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY AND FORFEITED YOUR LIFE EVEN FOR AN ETERNITY.
Corwell: Cheryl shouldn’t complain:
He is correct but for the wrong reasons and that means karma not merit.
He is saying it to tick off or scold her and that is the wrong reason for telling her not to complain.
The true reason people should not complain is because it is suffering and leads to future suffering. Complaining is discontent, not satisfied and not letting your yes be yes only, it is never a pleasure to complain but it is trouble, argument and suffering for self and other that also creates karma leading to future suffering. Further complaining is conditioning, addictive and the complaining person is a robot of complaining, programming himself ever stronger to complain or take issue.
IT IS NONE OF HIS BUSINESS IF CHERYL COMPLAINS ALL THE MORE WHEN HE IS SAYING IT TO TICK OFF OR SCOLD HER. HERE IS A DELUDED MAN HEAPING BOND AFTER BOND UPON HIMSELF TO BE REPAID AS FUTURE SUFFERING INSTEAD OF HAPPINESS.
You spent yourself into trouble now you want to spend yourself out of trouble?
A reason cited for Sarkozy’s defeat was the desire for the masses to revert from austerity or belt tightening to spending hopefully out of trouble which has many advocates like Krugman.
The rules (not true specific to the occasion) logic is that austerity makes many jobless, the economy shrinks that further diminishes the capacity of the economy to repay its debts, even though governments like the US are in massive debt, they should borrow more to spend that boosts the economy and jobs thereby enhancing the ability to repay debts.
The specific to the occasion true (not rules) logic is that much of the past spending responsible for the past prosperity was wasteful, extravagant, overconsumption based on borrowed money on items (eg houses, clothes, defence, sports, resorts, hotels, air travel) that did not lead to returns that would enhance future productivity or ability to generate income to repay borrowings and what resumption of spending that is proposed are similarly wasteful & unaffordable and will not lead to future ability to repay the mountains of debts.
UNLESS YOU HAVE WELL DEFINED PLANS ON WHAT YOU WANT TO SPEND THAT WILL BE TRULY PRODUCTIVE, WILL GENERATE RETURNS THAT CAN BE USED TO REPAY OFF YOUR MOUNTAIN OF DEBT, TO PROPOSE TO SPEND INDISCRIMINATELY ON ACTIVITIES JUST TO KEEP PEOPLE EMPLOYED AND THE ECONOMY HUMMING IS LIKE SHOOTING WILDLY WITH LIMITED AMMUNITION.
IT IS ESSENTIALLY A RETURN TO SPENDING ON THE STATUS QUO, SPENDING ON THE SAME THINGS THAT LED TO THIS COLLAPSE AND ANYONE WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL REALIZE THAT IT IS SUICIDAL LIKE THE MAN WHO HAS ALREADY DUG HIMSELF A DEEP HOLE OF DEBT TRYING TO DIG HIS WAY OUT. NO MATTER HOW PAINFUL, THE FIRST STEP IS TO STOP DIGGING, STOP THE TAP DRAINING PRECIOUS WATER WASTEFULLY. YOU SPENT YOURSELF INTO SUCH A MESS AND IT IS TIME TO CONFRONT AND REDRESS THAT MESS, NOT SPEND YOURSELF OUT IN DELUSION WITHOUT ANY CONCRETE PLANS WHAT YOU WANT TO SPEND ON THAT IS PRODUCTIVE, WILL GENERATE RETURNS.  
Spending is not a panacea:
Spending is not a panacea, cure all or magic wand but it depends on what you want to spend on that will provide returns you can use to repay your debts and so if you are already heavily in debt it is even more important that you should embark on future spending with even greater circumspection.
Supposed you are heavily in debt and you spend money to set up a roadside eatery and it succeeds ‘spectacularly’ generating fabulous income that wipes off your debt then you are correct to spend, if the business fails then you may wipe off whatever money you spend setting up the roadside business and you are no nearer paying your debts.
THUS IN ORDER TO SPEND YOURSELF OUT OF TROUBLE YOU MUST HAVE CREDIBLE OBJECTS FOR SPENDING THAT WOULD PROVIDE RETURNS THAT CAN BE USED TO REPAY YOUR DEBTS, NOT SIMPLY SPEND BLINDLY AND HOPE FOR THE BEST.
SPENDING IS NEVER A PANACEA, ONE SHOULD ALWAYS BE CAREFUL ON WHAT YOU SPEND, EVEN IF THE ECONOMY IS WEAKENING, ONE SHOULD NOT SPEND JUST TO BOOST IT, TO UNDERTAKE DEBT SPENDING ON WASTEFUL CONSUMPTION IS GROSS FOLLY AND WHAT MANKIND HAS BEEN DOING ALL ALONG AND SO UNLESS YOU HAVE SPECIFIC PROPOSALS ON WHAT TO SPEND THAT WILL LIKELY PROVIDE RETURNS TO REPAY YOUR DEBTS, YOU SHOULD NOT BORROW TO SPEND TO SUPPORT THE ECONOMY.
Different views of the "supermoon" from the U.S., Russia and Greece
There is no supermoon, it is still the same old moon and it is hype and irresponsible speech that is responsible for this ‘super’ moon.
WHETHER YOU ARE CORRECT TO SPEAK OF ‘SUPERMOON’ OR YOU ARE FALSE, DICING WITH FUTURE INSANITY AND SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED. I SAY IT IS THE SAME OLD MOON, THERE IS NO SUPERMOON EXCEPT IN A PERSON’S ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN FUTURE MAD PERCEPTION.
$8 billions is never peanuts and he is indulging in boastfulness. He is downplaying $8 billion to up-play himself.
YOU THINK IT IS LIGHT HEARTED BANTER BUT YOU ARE DELUDED BECAUSE THERE IS PAINFUL KARMA. IT IS NOT WITHOUT PURPOSE PEOPLE TALK THUS BUT IT IS TO BOAST AND STIR ENVY AMONGST FOOLS THAT ‘WOW’ $8 BILLION IS PEANUTS TO HIM.
The fallacy of spending:
The rationale of spending is this: By austerity, the economy shrinks and many become jobless and this further undermines the economy’s ability to repay its debts. By government spending in lieu of private spending, it keeps GDP up and provides employment and tax returns to repay existing debts.
But the reality is that the government becomes the surrogate spender (of printed or borrowed money) the bulk of which will be collected by capitalists, going into their already swollen coffers whilst they and the government provide employment that may not be truly productive or essential to keep the economy going at a higher rate than otherwise and a bulk of the money the government spends will end up in the already coffers of capitalists whilst whatever money collected by workers that enable them to pay tax to support the economy is not cost effective.
IN THEORY GOVERNMENT SPENDING IN LIEU OF COLLAPSING PRIVATE SPENDING IS THE SHINING WHITE KNIGHT RIDING TO THE RESCUE OF A MORIBUND ECONOMY BUT IN PRACTICE, IT IS LIKE TRYING TO CATCH WATER WITH A NET, THE AMOUNT OF MONEY SPENT BY THE GOVERNMENT DRAINING TO CAPITALISTS WHOSE COFFERS ARE ALREADY SWOLLEN FAR EXCEED WHATEVER TAXES GENERATED FROM THESE CAPITALISTS AND THE WORKERS EMPLOYED BY THEM AND THE GOVERNMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS GOVERNMENT SPENDING STIMULUS WHICH IF EXAMINED IS LARGELY SPENT ON USELESS UNAFFORDABLE EXTRAVAGANT ITEMS.
IN THEORY OR GENERAL, GOVERNMENT SPENDING STIMULUS MAKE SENSE BUT IF YOU LOOK INTO THE SPECIFICS IT IS MAD, SUICIDAL, DIGGING AN EVEN BIGGER HOLE. BETTER LET THE ECONOMY SHRINK FROM ITS BLOATED PRESENT UNTIL IT FINDS A MORE SUSTAINABLE AND REASONABLE BASE WHILST PROVIDING SOCIAL SECURITY LIKE TENT HOUSING, FOOD, WATER, AMENITIES FOR THE STRICKEN.
The bankers bankrupted the system:
According to the Governor of the Bank of England it is the bankers who have devastated the UK financial system and economy whilst rewarding themselves with oversized bonuses and perks.
The coming together of the retail and investment banking sectors in the hands of rogue bankers is like asking the fox to guard the chickens, they used depositors’ money to speculate. Thus all this printed money by governments to stave off collapse may not end up in retail banking where profit margins are slim but end up speculating on the currency and commodity markets driving up prices of things like oil to the detriment of the economy at large but continuing to build fat profits for investment banks.
IT WAS THESE GREEDY BANKERS WHO THROUGH LOBBYING ENABLE GIANT RETAIL BANKS TO MERGE WITH INVESTMENT BANKS AND ONCE MERGED, DEPOSITORS’ MONEY CAN BE DIVERTED FROM RETAIL TO SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PURPOSES BY THE BANKS TO FATTEN PROFITS FOR THEMSELVES AND WHEN THINGS COLLAPSED, THE SHIT WAS PASSED BACK TO THE MASSES TO CLEAR.
Quote:
The Governor of the Bank of England has blamed the banks for the recession and stressed that an overhaul of the financial system, including the separation of retail banking from "risky investment banking", was essential "to make our economy safer".
"We don't build nuclear power stations in densely populated areas, nor should we allow essential banking services and risky investment banking activities to be carried out in the same 'too important to fail' bank," Sir Mervyn said on Wednesday. "
He also pledged to crack down on the "vested interests [who] rise up to defend their bonuses and profits".
Sir Mervyn underlined the scale of the financial crisis by claiming that "almost all Britain's banks would have failed had not taxpayer support been extended" to the entire system at the end of 2008, and not just Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group, the two state-backed lenders.
This was a bust without a boom," he said. "Our banking and financial system over-extended itself... The realisation of the true state of the banking system led to a ... deep global recession. Unemployment in Britain rose by over a million.
Sir Mervyn also used the occasion to make a rare admission of failings at the Bank. "Why did the Bank not do more to prevent the disaster? We should have," he said. "We should have shouted from the rooftops... We should have tried harder."
iPhone killer & refuseniks:
Quote: Samsung Galaxy S3 launch: Android's 'iPhone killer' brings eye-tracking and voice control technology to the smartphone battle
The smartphone market moves on once more, with the hi-tech voice-controlled Galaxy S3 likely to becomes a standard-bearer for Google’s Android operating system - and a device for the Apple refuseniks.
This is a hype or falsity ridden message that is never harmless but conditions self and others to false perception that ends in mad perception.
It is never an iPhone killer, can never kill the iPhone and so he is speaking falsely. It may be a big rival but it is not a iPhone killer and so he is speaking falsely with deadly karma involved.
It is presumptuous that just because people embrace the Android phone they are Apple refuseniks. Whilst there are some who are Apple refuseniks, it is false to say it is a device for Apple refuseniks.
JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY AND YOU ARE SPEAKING CARELESSLY CALLING THE GALAXY AN IPHONE KILLER WHEN IT CANNOT BE A KILLER NOR IS IT NECESSARILY A DEVICE FOR APPLE REFUSENIKS.
This is an illogical statement. The BN has no perpetual rights to rule and opposition plot to topple the government is not a valid reason to vote BN.
YOU DO NOT VOTE BN JUST NOT TO FALL FOR THE OPPOSITION PLOT TO TOPPLE THE GOVERNMENT, WHAT IS THE POINT OF ELECTIONS IF NOT TO SELECT THE NEXT GOVERNMENT, TO CHANGE GOVERNMENT WHEN NEEDED AND SO IF THE BN DESERVES TO BE TOPPLED SO IT SHOULD AND IT REFLECTS FOOLISHNESS TO STATE THUS.
Reforms apply only to robots:
Reforms are only necessary and valid if what you do is rehashed, standardized over a period of time that was appropriate or correct in the past but because times have changed, circumstances have changed, it is no longer suitable even counterproductive and you need to change to a new form or tactic, you need to reprogram yourself.
REFORMS ONLY MAKE SENSE IF WHAT YOU DO IS REHASHED ACCORDING TO A PLAN THAT WAS CORRECT IN THE PAST BUT IS NOW ANACHRONISTIC OR OUT OF DATE AND YOU NEED TO REFORM OR REJIG OR REPROGRAM YOURSELF TO MEET CURRENT CONDITIONS AND SO IT IS ONLY ROBOTS WHO NEED REFORMS AND REFORMS IS PROOF MANKIND ARE ROBOTS.
NON-ROBOTS NEVER REQUIRE REFORMS BECAUSE WHATEVER THEY SAY OR DO IS AFTER FULLY UNDERSTANDING THE CURRENT SITUATION, TAILORED TO THE CURRENT SITUATION AND THEREFORE CORRECT. IF HE DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND A SITUATION HE DOES NOT ACT OR SAY.
Serious karma telling others how to vote:
It is not wise but foolish undertaking karma to be experienced as future suffering telling others who to vote or not vote for. Let others decide who they want to vote, you may present your case or opinion of rival factions but you don’t tell others who to vote unless you want your head chopped even many times.
Have airports become a horrible experience?
This is a false statement for anyone with true understanding.
Airports can never be horrible experiences, it is a person’s false perception and stirred emotion that makes it horrible. Without stirring your mental force or emotion to dislike or be upset, you cannot experience horror, it is your conditioned stirring of mental force that makes something horrible, if a person does not stir his mental force that is blind, meaningless and suffering he cannot experience horror.
Airport experiences can be an unpleasant or painful which is a feeling on contact with sense objects and that is correct. But even here, if a person has elevated his mind to the fourth highest state, neither pain nor pleasure, it is not unpleasant for him.
AIRPORTS CAN BE UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCES EVEN EXTREMELY UNPLEASANT BUT IT CANNOT BE HORRIBLE WHICH REQUIRES A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE TO BE STIRRED TO DREAD OR DISLIKE WHAT IS HAPPENING AND IT IS THE PERSON’S FAULT NOT AIRPORTS THAT MAKE IT HORRIBLE AND YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSELY BLAMING AIRPORTS INSTEAD OF YOURSELF FOR MAKING AIRPORTS HORRIBLE EXPERIENCES.
The excitement has been mounting:
Quote: The excitement has been mounting for weeks. Fans have speculated about the precise specifications of the device, the company behind it has been doing everything it can to preserve the mystery and build up the anticipation. Yes, Samsung has learned quite a lot from Apple about the art of hype.
What is said above is improper, false and meaningless and it is designed to jazz up the event and stir emotions in readers and there is serious karma to be experienced as future suffering.
Even if you and others are excited by the coming event, it is not necessarily true of everyone, not everyone is aware let alone excited about the launch and in any case excitement is meaningless and suffering. Why should anyone be excited, stir his mental force to do nothing when it creates stress, restlessness and inability to suffer?
And so if you focus on excitement and try to spread it amongst your readers you are guilty of recommending suffering to others with karma attached.
IT IS SENSELESS, USELESS AND SUFFERING TO BE EXCITED THAT LEAVES AN AFTERTASTE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE AND IT IS NOT NECESSARILY TRUE EVERYONE IS EXCITED OR IT HAS BEEN MOUNTING. PEOPLE LIKE TO WRITE IN A DRAMATIC STYLE INTENDED TO STIR PASSION IN READERS AND THERE IS TERRIBLE KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING FOR THIS.
YOU DO NOT LIKE TO SUFFER? THEN BY SPEAKING LIKE HIM, YOU ARE CONSIGNING YOURSELF TO FUTURE SUFFERING INSTEAD OF PLEASANTNESS.
Supposed the jogger goes on to live another 10 years and then subsequently as a result of his actions he heads for eternal punishment then Dustin has saved his life for another 10 years and did not save him from eternal punishment. And so if your medication or health food or exercise saved your life it is only temporarily and will not deliver you from eternal punishment that your sins will condemn you.
By contrast if someone taught you and you succeeded in shedding your style, in not prolonging, changing speed and loudness and that is the path to one Age or eternity in heaven free from suffering, disease and death, he taught you and you succeeded in putting an end to thinking and that is two Ages or eternities in heaven then which is greater, saving your life for 10 years and then proceeding even to hell or saving your life for one or two Ages free of all suffering?
WHICH IS GREATER, DUSTIN SAVING YOUR LIFE FOR 10 YEARS OR SOMEONE POINTING YOU THE WAY TO HEAVEN AND SAVING YOUR LIFE FOR AN ETERNITY?
Earth’s water will fit into 860 miles diameter globe:
As vast (and deep) as the oceans may be, they are actually very shallow and all the water in this world can be contained in a globe 860 miles in diameter:
How all the water on Earth would fit into one 860-mile-wide ball
PUBLISHED: 15:08 GMT, 8 May 2012 | UPDATED: 15:40 GMT, 8 May 2012
·         
    •  
    •  
    •  
When people talk about our water supply running out, it's often difficult to imagine - but according to the U.S. government's Geological Survey, all the water on Earth would fit into an 860-mile-wide bubble.
Around 70% of Earth's surface IS water-covered - but it's a very, very thin layer.
Description: Although 70% of Earth's surface is water-covered, it's a very, very thin layer
Although 70% of Earth's surface is water-covered, it's a very, very thin layer
Every sea, river and underground lake would fit into what looks like a tiny blue 'blister' on the side of our planet.
'As you know, the Earth is a watery place - but all the water on, in, and above the Earth would fill a ball the size of that tiny blue sphere sitting on the United States, reaching from about Salt Lake City, Utah to Topeka, Kansas,' says a USGS release.
The oceans hold about 96.5 percent of all Earth's water.
Water also exists on Earth in the air as clouds and water vapour, in lakes and rivers, in icecaps and glaciers, and in living creatures - but all of that would fit into the tiny ball.
'The vast majority of water on the Earth's surface, over 96 percent, is saline water in the oceans,' says the USGS.

More...
'But it is the freshwater resources, such as the water in streams, rivers, lakes, and groundwater that provide people (and all life) with most of the water they need everyday to live. Water sitting on the surface of the Earth is easy to visualize, and your view of the water cycle might be that rainfall fills up the rivers and lakes.
'But, the unseen water below our feet is critically important to life, also. How would you account for the flow in rivers after weeks without rain? In fact, how would you account for the water flowing down this driveway on a day when it didn't rain? The answer is that there is more to our water supply than just surface water, there is also plenty of water beneath our feet.'

No comments: