Starting
your own business is more achievable than you think, says entrepreneur and
founder of Innocent Drinks Richard Reed, as he shares his tips for budding
entrepreneurs.
The matter is not about understanding which is not involved at all but it
is programming that is at the heart of the matter.
The person has a plan of how to become your own boss (that may differ
from others) that he wants to transmit to those receptive and these who are
receptive (because they are greedy or stirred mentally to succeed as their own
bosses that has nothing to do with reason) will study and remember in detail or
approximately or even incorrectly and put what they remembered into practice in
which they become robots of what they read and remembered and carried out.
THE MATTER IS ABOUT TRANSMITTING A PLAN OF HOW TO BECOME YOUR OWN BOSS
TO OTHERS WHO ARE DRIVEN BY GREED TO READ OR BE PROGRAMMED AND THUS PROGRAMMED
THEY CARRY OUT PRECISELY OR APPROXIMATELY OR EVEN INCORRECTLY WHAT WAS
INSTRUCTED IN WHICH THEY HAVE CONSIGNED THEMSELVES TO BE ROBOTS.
KUANTAN:
A renowned nuclear scientist from Germany feels the Lynas Advanced Materials
Plant (LAMP) in Gebeng here is safe, provided the company follows all
guidelines.
Whether Lynas is safe or not is never a matter of feeling but it is a
matter of seeing and knowing and so what kind of expert is this? Leave your
feelings out and tell you what you know. It may be an admission that he himself
does not know but ‘feels’. If you speak without knowing you must stir
self-resistance that conditions you to resist yourself leading to entrapment in
permanent stress.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING ALWAYS UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE IS SAYING AND
HE UNDERSTANDS THAT WHETHER LYNAS IS SAFE OR NOT IS NOT A MATTER OF FEELING BUT
SEEING AND KNOWING. WITHOUT SEEING AND KNOWING HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO SPEAK.
PEOPLE HAVE THIS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT GERMAN MEANS HIGH QUALITY WHEN
THEY ARE WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING AND INCOMPETENT JUST LIKE THE REST.
It
is ARM chips that make iPhone possible:
If anything, it is the designers of the ARM chips that make smartphones
a possibility. Intel chips were too bulky, hot and consumed too much power for
use in smartphones and so without ARM chips iPhone would be impossible. And so
Apple may be in the right place at the right time to 'pioneer’ smartphones.
Why
you need to shout and repeat:
Often, even with people supposedly intelligent you have to shout or
speak emphatically and even repeat what you say before the other person ‘gets
it’. By ‘gets it’ is not that he understands but he is finally programmed, your
message has gone through and lodged in his head.
The reason why you have to shout and repeat what you say is because
people do not have true understanding, you can only program them and often they
are in a daze, not present, their minds are remote, lost.
When you shout and speak repeatedly you are trying to program according
to a plan what you want to convey. You need force to program or record and that
added force in shouting is to program and repetition is to ensure the
programming is secured.
A person who is not a robot, who is in full contact with reality or the
present does not need to be shouted to, does not require repetition. He fully
or truly understands what is conveyed to him. The shouting or additional
accompanying force actually is a detraction from what is said and so it is
inimical if you want the other person to understand what you want to say, it is
when you want the person to register or record what you say that you emphasize
with more force to assist in its recording.
RATHER THAN AN AID, SHOUTING AND REPETITION IS INIMICAL TO TRUE
UNDERSTANDING AND IT IS ONLY IF THE PERSON HAS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING AND YOU
WANT TO PROGRAM HIM ACCORDING TO A PLAN WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU NEED TO
SHOUT AND REPEAT IT TO MAKE THE PROGRAMMING MORE SECURE.
Could
there be iPhone without ARM chips?
Could iPhone be possible if there were no ARM (reduced instructions)
chips?
If it is not possible to have iPhones without ARM chips (which were not
invented by Apple) then ARM and not Apple is more indispensable to iPhone.
iPhone
only 5 years old:
iPhone was released on June 2007 and so it is 5 years old. Now the field
is crowded and Android phones sell 4 to 5 times more. The Beatles lasted barely
10 years and so it is presumptuous to bet heavily on Apple continuing as top
dog like Microsoft once was.
IT IS EMOTION (NOT REASON) AND HYPE OF WHICH APPLE AND STEVE JOBS ARE
GUILTY OF CONSPIRING THAT HAS RESULTED IN THE AURA OF APPLE’S INVINCIBILITY AND
SUPPOSED MIDAS TOUCH. IT IS TOO EARLY TO TELL IF THE MIDAS TOUCH WILL CONTINUE.
Does
the iPhone5 Dazzle?
Only a fool without true understanding will pose that question and if
you think he has a case then you too do not understand.
It is never the phone that dazzles but it is the person’s falsely and
meaninglessly stirred mental force that makes the phone dazzling.
HE IS SAYING THE PHONE DAZZLES. THAT IS DELUSION BECAUSE IT IS A
PERSON’S STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT MAKES AN OBJECT (EG CERTAIN GIRL) DAZZLING.
IF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED (AS IS POSSIBLE) THEN NOTHING CAN BE
DAZZLING.
DAZZLING IS MEANINGLESS AND SUFFERING, IT IS A USELESS STIRRING OF
MENTAL FORCE WITHOUT DOING WORK THAT SUBJECTS THAT MIND TO HARMFUL FORCE.
Dazzling
is fickle:
The same object that you find so dazzling on some occasions can turn
loathsome on other occasions eg that girl you are crazy about can sometimes
look ugly, uncouth. When you are sick or there is a gun pointed at your head,
let me hear you say the iPhone is dazzling you.
EVEN THE SAME PERSON IS NOT ALWAYS DAZZLED BY THE SAME OBJECT, WHEN
IPHONE 6 COMES ALONG, THEN IPHONE 5 LOSES ITS ALLURE AND IS NOT SO DAZZLING
ANYMORE.
BECAUSE DAZZLING IS ABOUT STIRRED MENTAL FORCE THAT IS MEANINGLESS AND
SUFFERING EVEN IF YOU THINK IT IS PLEASURABLE, IT CANNOT BE SUSTAINED FOREVER
AND IS DEPENDENT ON MOOD OR LACK OF SUFFERING. WHEN YOU ARE SICK THE MOST
DAZZLING GIRLS LOOK SICKENING.
Spend
some money and stimulate the economy:
COULD the
tiny but pricey new iPhone finally convince Aussies to spend some money and
stimulate our economy?
People talk about sustainability and yet they do not understand this sustainability they talk about.
If your purpose of buying iPhone is not because you can afford it and
you need it but to stimulate the economy then the economy may be stimulated
whilst you are buying but it is not sustainable and even has disastrous
consequences.
In the end the consumer and thus the system pays for the product you
buy, everything is priced in and so even if the sale of the iphone stimulates
the economy temporarily, it permanently drains the economy or system of wealth
that accrues to a minority like Apple and those dealers, logistics, packaging,
storage and whatever suppliers that make profit from their services.
EVERYTHING IS PRICED IN SO THAT THE CONSUMER AND ULTIMATELY THE ECONOMY
OR SYSTEM PAYS FOR THE PRODUCT WHOSE SALE STIMULATES THE ECONOMY. MONEY IS
BEING TRANSFERRED FROM THE MAJORITY TO THE FEW (EG APPLE, MANUFACTURERS,
TRANSPORTERS, RETAILERS) AND THIS HAS THE EFFECT OF DRAINING THE SYSTEM AND
DEPOSITING WEALTH IN THE HANDS OF THE FEW WHO GAME THE SYSTEM TO ENCOURAGE YOU
TO BUY (EG NEW MODELS, GIVING CREDIT).
THOSE WHO THINK OF SPENDING MONEY AND STIMULATING THE ECONOMY ARE
DELUDED BECAUSE IT HAS THE EFFECT OF DRAINING THE WEALTH OF THE SYSTEM INTO THE
HANDS OF THE FEW THAT ENDS IN IMBALANCE.
Everything
you need on a smartphone and more:
This is a false statement that leads to madness and if you do not know
what to make of it, it means you do not understand what is presented to you.
If something is everything you need on a smartphone then there cannot be
more and what is said is said falsely with the purpose of exaggerating how
wonderful the phone is.
THERE CANNOT BE ANYTHING MORE IF THE SMARTPHONE HAS EVERYTHING YOU NEED.
THIS NOT HARMLESS BUT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE SUFFERING.
No right telling others phone has everything they need:
No right telling others phone has everything they need:
Different people have different needs and you have no right telling
others a phone has everything they need and so you are speaking falsely.
It is impossible for anyone to speak thus knowing what they speak is
true and so it must stir self resistance that leads to stress. Self resistance
is conditioning and so the person has an appointment with torment.
The iPhone Stimulus
(Krugman)A
recent research note from JPMorgan argued that the new iPhone might add
between a quarter- and a half-percentage point to G.D.P. growth in the last
quarter of 2012. How so? First, the report argued that Apple was likely to sell
a lot of phones in a short period of time. Second, it noted that although
iPhones are manufactured overseas, most of the price you pay when you buy one
is domestic value-added — retailing and wholesaling, advertising and profits —
all of which counts as part of G.D.P. So where can more spending come from? Businesses are sitting on lots of cash but, for the most part, have seen little reason to do a lot of investment. Why expand your capacity when you don’t have enough sales to make full use of the capacity you already have? And because businesses aren’t spending a lot, incomes are low, so consumer demand is low, which perpetuates those low sales.
This is part of a piece excited Krugman wrote and it is deluded, like
the rest of mankind.
iPhone will stimulate the economy, it is a matter of extent just like
pouring kerosene on a fire will stimulate the fire. But the stimulus is
temporary and harmful to the economy because whatever the employment it creates
is priced in and passed on to consumers or the system and the net effect of new
consumer goods like the iPhone is to drain wealth from the many to the few so
that with time there is a system destroying imbalance.
The more and intensely you stimulate the economy by creating new toys
for the public to buy, the faster and severe the depletion of system wealth
even if it is regenerated (from nature or the earth or by keep printing
worthless currency).
Businesses are sitting on a lot of cash (many corporations are sitting
on a lot of debts that need refinancing) but they will only spend it if the
spent money will help them transfer more wealth from the many to them and so
you are a fool looking to businesses as your saviour.
WHILST IT IS TRUE MANY BUSINESSES ARE SITTING ON A LOT OF CASH, MANY ARE
DEPENDENT ON FINANCING OR DEBT TO CONTINUE AND THEY WILL ONLY SPEND OR INVEST
TO FACILITATE THE TRANSFER OF WEALTH (IN PROFITS) FROM THE SYSTEM INTO THEIR
OWN HANDS THAT ULTIMATELY DEPLETES AND COLLAPSES THE SYSTEM.
IT IS DELUSION THAT THIS DEPRESSION WILL ULTIMATELY RECOVER. DO NOT
ASSUME BECAUSE JUST AS YOU CAN HAVE FLU YOU CAN ALSO HAVE CANCER OR A HEART
ATTACK THAT CAN BE FATAL.
Several
fans of Prince William and Catherine Middleton were left on cloud nine after
they managed to shake hands with the famous British couple. The Duke and
Duchess of Cambridge met with their ardent fans during their cultural walkabout
at KLCC Park.
There is nothing right or wrong, good or bad about a royal encounter and
it is a copied rehash statement driven by emotion to hype the occasion that is
not harmless but leads to insanity and future suffering.
Meeting the prince is no big deal, it is all about niceties from him and
the ‘excited’ fans, nothing of substance ensues from such encounters only
memories of stirred emotions of stirred force.
There is nothing right about such encounters and if it is about
hypocrisy, make belief or hollow or meaningless that it is a wrong royal
encounter.
IF ANYTHING IT IS A WRONG ROYAL ENCOUNTER BECAUSE IT IS AN EXERCISE IN
MEANINGLESSNESS, NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE RESULTS FROM SUCH MEETINGS.
Exactly what is the nature of the ‘charming’ that you experience and
write about can be known. If this charming is a stirring of your mental force
to be excited or infatuated because of the way a person looks, carries himself
and speak then you are a deluded person who perceives what is a function of
blind, harmful and meaningless force (charming) as full of meaning and good.
AND SO IT IS THAT EMOTIONAL PEOPLE ARE ATTRACTED TO CHARM, THEY FIND
‘CHARMING’ MEANINGFUL BECAUSE THEY ARE DELUDED, THEY PERCEIVE STIRRED FORCE
THAT IS EVIL AND HARMFUL MEANINGFUL.
What
has happened to the money?
Whilst it may be true that a lot of companies (and wealthy individuals)
are sitting on a lot of cash, there are also a lot of companies whose survival
depend on finance, on borrowing.
The money or ‘fabulous’ wealth of the system may not be there in the
first place, it is an illusion created by debt, money commonly deposited in the
banking system and repeatedly lent out has stoked debt many times the actual or
true wealth of the system. Now that there is a liquidity crunch with many
debtors unable to repay and keep the system or charade going, reserve banks are
indulging in massive printing which will never cure the debts because the
actual wealth in the system is much smaller than the debts incurred.
THE WEALTH IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM IS ENORMOUS AND IN THE HANDS OF
THE FEW BUT THERE ARE MULTIPLE CLAIMANTS TO THE SAME WEALTH AS A RESULTED OF
MANY CYCLES OF DEPOSITION IN BANKS AND LENDING OUT AND NOW THAT MANY HAVE
DEFAULTED THEIR DEBTS, THE MONEY IN THE SYSTEM IS UNABLE TO SUPPORT THE CHARADE
AND SO IN LIEU OF DEFAULT, CENTRAL BANKS ARE FURIOUSLY PUMPING OUT PRINTED
MONEY BUT IN PAPER THE DEBTS ARE COVERED BY SUCH PRINTING BUT IN REALITY THE
WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM REMAINS FAR SHORT OF THE EXISTING DEBTS.
THE MONEY OR WEALTH WAS NEVER THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. THERE ARE
MULTIPLE CLAIMANTS OR OWNERS TO A SINGLE DOLLAR AS A RESULT OF MANY CYCLES OF
DEPOSITION AND LENDING AND ALL THE DESPERATE MONEY PRINTING WILL NOT REDRESS
THE DEBT WEALTH DISCREPANCY.
It
is too late and checkmate:
DEBT IS REPAID BY PROVIDING SERVICES AND
GOODS FOR WHICH YOU WILL GET NOTHING EXCEPT THE CANCELLING THE DEBT. AND WHILST
YOU ARE WORKING TO REPAY YOUR DEBTS GETTING NOTHING FOR IT, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO
BE BULLISH, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO SPENT ROBUSTLY YOURSELF TO STIMULATE THE
ECONOMY? AND SO UNTIL YOU BECOME DEBT FREE, YOUR SPENDING POWER IS SEVERELY
CURTAILED, YOU ARE STRAITJACKETED.
No amount of money printing will resolve the financial woes in the
world.
A lot of people should not have been allowed to borrow so much for so
long (credit card, car and mortgage finance) and the corrupt plundering of the
system by politicians and big business should not have been allowed to go on
for so long.
THE DEBT BINGE AND CORRUPT PLUNDER OF THE SYSTEM HAS SADDLED THE SYSTEM
WITH DEBTS THAT DWARFS ITS CONSIDERABLE WEALTH AND YOU DO NOT OVERCOME SUCH
DEBTS BY PRINTING MONEY BUT YOU OVERCOME THEM BY REPAYING WITH SWEAT (WORK)
PRODUCING THE GOODS THAT CANCEL THOSE DEBT. WHILST A PERSON IS REPAYING HIS
DEBTS, HE WORKS BUT HE GETS PAID NOTHING FOR IT AND SO WHERE IS HE TO GET MONEY
TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY?
Do
you understand the world’s economic plight?
The world’s economic and financial crisis is essentially about debt.
A significant number have defaulted on their debts and cannot repay and
there is an even bigger proportion that will default or would have defaulted
had not the authorities acted deceptively to cover up and pour fuel to keep the
fire of debt going.
The correct action when those who borrowed defaulted is to tell those
whose money had been lent that they have lost their money and so those with
savings in banks and retirement funds have to be told their money is gone and
they are much poorer than they think they are. Knowing they are much poorer,
they would have to spend much less.
But those in charge cannot come clean, cannot tell savers their money is
gone forever and so they keep the charade going by guaranteeing deposits and
printing money furiously that can never resolve the crisis.
PRINTING MONEY IS NEVER THE TRUE OR WORKABLE ANSWER TO A DEBT CRISIS BUT
IF THOSE WHO BORROWED CANNOT EARN TO REPAY THEIR DEBTS THEN THOSE SAVERS WHOSE
MONEY HAS BEEN RECKLESSLY LENT HAVE TO BE TOLD THEIR MONEY IS LOST AND THEY
WOULD HAVE TO MAKE PROVISIONS NOW THAT THEIR SAVINGS ARE GONE AND THEY TOO WILL
SPEND LESS AND THE ECONOMY MUST DECLINE CONSIDERABLY TO MORE REALISTIC LEVELS.
THE WORLD ECONOMY (FUELED BY THE US PRINTING MONEY TO BUY GOODS) IS FAR
ABOVE THE REALISTIC LEVELS AND THE LONGER IT REMAINS AT UNREALISTIC LEVELS THE
MORE CRUSHING THE DEBT BURDEN AND THE MORE PAINFUL THE FINAL CRASH.
iPhone 5 will boost US
economy more than QE3, says former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh
Apple's iPhone 5 will do more for the American
economy than Ben Bernanke's latest aggressive stimulus plan, former Federal
Reserve governor Kevin Warsh told CNBC.
His views can be objectively determined that cannot be disputed as
either true or deluded.
He thinks iPhone is a saviour, a boon when it is another dose of alcohol
that leads to another hangover that becomes harder and harder to recover for a
debilitated alcoholic.
THE NET EFFECT OF IPHONE IS TO TRANSFER WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM INTO THE
HANDS OF THE FEW AND WHILST WEALTH IS BEING TRANSFERRED THE ECONOMY IS
STIMULATED BUT WHEN THE TRANSFER IS OVER, THE SYSTEM BECOMES THAT MUCH POORER
THAT CANNOT BE SUSTAINED INDEFINITELY.
THERE HAVE BEEN INNUMERABLE BOOSTS TO THE ECONOMY BY PAST TECHNOLOGICAL
INNOVATIONS SO HOW COME THE ECONOMY IS STILL MORIBUND? IPHONE IS LIKE A SHOT IN
THE ARM OF HEROIN THAT MAY TEMPORARILY INDUCE EUPHORIA BUT ENDS IN A HANGEOVER.
Start
and end with the same:
To the undiscerning there is no pattern or format in videos they watch
at websites but to one who understands there is a robotic, programmed format
that renders the videos robotically produced.
The video begins with billowing clouds from an erupting volcano and then
moves on to busloads of people fleeing and interviews with relevant officials
and then returns to the visage of the erupting volcano.
VIDEOS ARE WITH FORMAT NOT WITHOUT FORMAT THAT PRODUCERS STICK TO, THERE
IS A PREAMBLE OR INTRODUCTION, A MAIN COURSE AND THEN A CONCLUSION.
IF YOU THINK THIS IS NECESSARY OR IT IS FRESHLY COMPOSED FOR THE
SITUATION YOU ARE DELUDED. IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO FOLLOW SUCH A FORMAT WHICH
MEANS WHAT IS PRESENTED IS MECHANICAL, ACCORDING TO A PLAN. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO
RETURN TO THE BILLOWING VOLCANO, IT HAS ALREADY BEEN SHOWN AT THE ONSET. IT IS
A COMMON TECHNIQUE OF PRODUCTION COPIED FROM EACH OTHER TO RETURN TO THE
INTRODUCTION TO CONCLUDE A FILM.
VIDEOS PRODUCED BY PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS CONFORM TO CERTAIN PATTERNS
THAT MAY VARY FROM PRODUCER TO PRODUCER BUT IS QUITE FIXED IN AN INDIVIDUAL.
YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE VIEWING A SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION VIDEO BUT YOU
ARE VIEWING A (STANDARDIZED) VIDEO CONFORMING TO A PARTICULAR FORMAT THAT IS
THE TRADEMARK OF THE PARTICULAR PRODUCER.
People do not know what to make of such statements or they accept it as
valid which is never harmless because it must generate resistance and
disturbance.
That iPhone 5 is Ofcom’s 4G gamble is never true but is a fabrication of
the person’s mind that he wants to sell to others as true or reality because he
wants to tout his expertise but he does not realize he is dicing with mad
perception.
What has happened in reality is that Ofcom has decided to adopt or carry
iPhone 5 which has 4G. Whether it is a gamble or not is only a concern of
people who are calculating, who are always looking for avenues of gains and
losses.
WHEN YOU UNDERTAKE SOMETHING, WHETHER THERE IS GAIN OR LOSS, WHETHER IT
IS A GAMBLE SHOULD NOT BE A CONSIDERATION BUT WHETHER IT IS RIGHT OR WRONG,
GOOD OR BAD, ESSSENTIAL (NEEDED) OR UNESSENTIAL SHOULD BE THE CONSIDERATIONS.
IF SOMETHING IS ESSENTIAL AND GOOD IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT’S A GAMBLE, STILL
IT SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
THUS HE IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE. WHAT HE SHOULD TELL YOU IS NOT
OFCOM’S GAMBLE BUT WHETHER IT IS A CORRECT OR GOOD THING FOR OFCOM TO DO. WHAT
IS SAID IS THE PRODUCT OF A CALCULATING MIND ALWAYS SEEING THINGS IN TERMS OF
RISKS (LOSSES) AND GAINS.
The
correct criteria for choice:
If something is correct or beneficial then you go ahead and undertake it
even if there are risks involved so you are mad to talk about the risks of
Ofcom’s iPhone 5 choice. Monetary gains or losses should not be an issue for
consideration except if money is very important if not the foremost concern for
you.
If something is incorrect or harmful then you do not go ahead even if
there are no or little risks involved. If something is incorrect or harmful (eg
setting up a casino or pub) and you go ahead because of the potential or sure
fire gains then you are setting yourself up for horrendous karma.
Often when a ‘good’ venture failed, it is because the venture is truth
is not good. If something is truly good it always has a true or good product or
result.
A VENTURE THAT IS TRUE, GOOD OR ESSENTIAL WILL ALWAYS PRODUCE TRUE AND
GOOD/BENEFICIAL RESULTS, IT IS ONLY WHEN A VENTURE IS NOT GOOD, ONLY PERCEIVED
AS GOOD THROUGH DELUSION THAT IT CAN END IN FAILURE AND LOSS.
WHETHER A VENTURE IS A GAMBLE, A RISK FOR LOSS SHOULD NEVER BE A
CONSIDERATION. IT IS WHETHER A VENTURE IS ESSENTIAL OR UNESSENTIAL, BENEFICIAL
OR HARMFUL THAT SHOULD BE THE CONSIDERATIONS.
THUS IT REFLECTS DELUSION TO SPEAK OF THE IPHONE 5 BEING OFCOM’S 4G
GAMBLE AND IT REFLECTS NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO BE UNABLE TO MAKE UP WHAT IS
SAID TO YOU OR THINK HE HAS A CASE.
Apple
is mostly the orchestrator or packager:
The tablet was actually ‘invented’ by Microsoft but at its conception,
the material to make it a success was not available.
It is the availability of the efficient compact ARM chip and the
miniaturisation and expansion of storage of flash memory plus touch screens
that enable (greedy) Apple with an eye for avenues for money making to come
along and be the first amongst other competitors to fashion a ‘smartphone’ that
emotional people raved about and made into an icon just like the mass hysteria
swept Beatles into seeming they can do nothing wrong fame.
Thus Apple is merely a packager, an assembler of various pieces of
technological advances that had emerged then to create the iPhone.
In fact Apple is evil in deliberately choosing the ‘I’ as in ipod, iPad
to subconsciously promote the cult of self (as in ‘I’) adulation.
A
smartphone is simply a miniature copy of computer:
You don’t need insight or inspiration, a smartphone is a copy of the
desktop computer made possible by the availability of a miniature reasonably
powerful efficient ARM chip, touch screens (ATMs were already using touch
screens and so it is no act of genius to copy them for the phone), miniature
flash drives with big enough storage and software are miniature or trim down
copies of bulky desktop software.
ALL THE INGREDIENTS FOR MAKING A SMARTPHONE IS AROUND AND THE DESKTOP
COMPUTER IS A MODEL FROM WHICH TO FASHION A SMARTPHONE WHICH ESSENTIALLY SHARE
ALL ITS CHARACTERISTICS EG SCREEN, PROCESSOR (ARM), HARD DISK (FLASH DRIVE),
SOFTWARE (IOS OR ANDROID ICS) AND POWER SUPPLY.
A SMARTPHONE IS SIMPLY A COPY OF A COMPUTER, IT SHARES ALL THE
CHARACTERISTICS AND INNARDS OF A COMPUTER AND SO IT IS NO UNPRECEDENTED
INNOVATION.
A
smartphone is a copy not an original:
A smartphone is more or less, to greater or lesser extent, a copy of a
desktop computer, not an original (unprecedented) and you do not need to have
any insight or creativity to produce it but you need to be an inveterate
copycat to copy.
A SMARTPHONE IS NOT AN ORIGINAL OR PURE CREATION BUT IT IS TO GREATER OR
LESSER EXTENT A COPY OF THE DESKTOP, A SUCCESSFUL MINIATURIZATION OF A DESKTOP.
The
Buddha is truly an original:
The Buddha, what he taught is truly an original never a copy of anyone.
NO ONE BEFORE OR AFTER HAS DESCRIBED THE WORLD, PRESENTED A
COMPREHENSIVE FULLY RATIONAL TEACHING THAT EXPLAINS ALL EXISENCES IN THEIR
ENTIRETY AS THE BUDDHA HAS AND SO THE BUDDHA IS TRULY NOT A COPY BUT AN
ORIGINAL NOT SEEN BEFORE AND AFTER. THE SMARTPHONE BY CONTRAST IS A COPY, A
RIPOFF A DESKTOP COMPUTER MADE POSSIBLE BY TECHNOLOGY SHRINKING THE COMPUTER’S
INNARDS.
THE RADIO, TV, (BELL) TELEPHONE ARE TRULY ORIGINALS WHEN THEY APPEARED
BECAUSE THERE WERE NO PRECEDENTS.
Innovation
versus adaptation:
There are two different things that can happen with gadgets, innovation
or adaptation. An adaptation or modification is an adjustment or change in
something for a new purpose and so a case may be made that the smartphone
involves the adaptation of the desktop computer for a handheld phone device.
What
makes a mobile phone possible?
IT
IS NOT STEVE JOBS AND APPLE THAT MAKE MOBILE PHONES POSSIBLE BUT IT IS THE
EXISTENCE OF POWERFUL PIE SIZED TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS OF RADIO SIGNALS.
A mobile phone (also known as a cellular phone, cell
phone and a hand phone) is a device that can make and receive telephone
calls over a radio link whilst moving around a wide
geographic area. It does so by connecting to a cellular
network provided by a mobile phone operator, allowing access to the
public telephone network.
By contrast, a cordless telephone is used only within the short
range of a single, private base station.
I read somewhere that a mobile phone is built on a powerful transmitter
and receiver of radio signals that is about the size of a pea.
IT IS THE EXISTENCE OF (MAYBE EXOTIC) MATERIALS THE SIZE OF A PEA THAT
CAN POWERFULLY TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE RADIO WAVES THAT MAKES MOBILE PHONES POSSIBLE.
IF YOU NEED MACHINERY THE SIZE OF A LUNCH BOX TO TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE
RADIO SIGNALS, MOBILE PHONES WILL NOT BE FEASIBLE.
ONCE YOU HAVE THESE ‘AMAZING’ TRANSMITTERS AVAILABLE THEN THE INVENTION
OF A SMARTPHONE IS FEASIBLE AND IT IS MERELY AN ACT OF ADAPTATION OR
MODIFICATION THAT INVOLVES COPYING TO TACK ON A MINIATURE COMPUTER TO THIS
MOBILE PHONE TO GET A SMARTPHONE.
Apple
sell out deliberately created?
There are suggestions Apple deliberately stage manage an apparent sell
out to stir mass hysteria for its products that the media pick up and amplify.
Apple may be more devious than appears to the gullible public.
Not so long ago Apple was struggling and iPod was its breadwinner and it
was only in 2007 that it surged ahead with the iPhone and then iPad and it is
touted as the most valuable company in the world.
Australian
journalist Matthew Powell, who has covered Apple for decades, said Apple CEO
Tim Cook was known as one of the smartest operations guys in the business so
"would have known exactly how many units were required and where they
needed to be allocated".
Powell
said he would never pre-order again after he ordered an iPad 2 that was
supposed to be delivered on launch day but took three weeks to arrive even
though Powell ordered the device within seconds of pre-orders opening.
"By
doing the allocations this way, Apple gets two stories - 'pre-orders sellout'
and 'queues around the block on launch day'," he said. "If it isn't deliberate it's
awfully fortuitous."
Iain
McDonald, founder of digital marketing agency Amnesia, previously owned by
Microsoft, agreed. "Absolutely. It's all part of the spectacle that Apple
loves to create around its products and it's in a good position to amplify this
because Apple has its own stores making it a very visible specacle," he
said.
A
powerful dangerous microwave in your hand phone:
In order to function, a hand phone must transmit a microwave (a form of
radio wave) powerful enough to penetrate walls or obstacles and be received by
the network receiver that may be located km away.
There is no such thing as safe and dangerous microwave, all microwave is
a harmful dose of force. There are things that can shield microwave like metal
that are used to surround a microwave oven.
DESPITE INDUSTRY ASSURANCE THAT MAY BE VESTED, EVEN A COVER-UP THERE IS
EVIDENCE OF BRAIN CANCER THAT MAY BE RELATED TO EXCESSIVE MICROWAVE EXPOSURE
FROM HAND PHONE USE AND LOGIC TELLS YOU THAT YOU WIELD A POWERFUL MICROWAVE
TRANSMITTER CLOSE TO YOUR BRAIN (EVEN THOUGH IT MAY BE SHIELDED IN THE PHONE
AND BY BONE AND FLESH) THAT DEPENDING ON YOUR EXCESSIVE USAGE AND INDIVIDUAL
VULNERABILITY MAY PROVE HARMFUL TO YOU, NOT JUST IN TERMS OF CANCER BUT BRAIN
DAMAGE.
If it is true hand phones come with danger then all those who promote
the use of hand phones, who exalt their status is asking for debt to be repaid
as suffering.
Hand phones should be used sparingly as when required to communicate,
not for idle chatter or abusively and as a status symbol.
What investors driven by greed are celebrating is not good for the
system or the public but good for Apple because they are celebrating the
presumptuous transfer of considerable wealth from the masses in the pockets of
the vested few that include not just Apple but people along the feeding chain
(eg major retailers, telcos).
It is bad for the system because not only is wealth transferred from the
masses to the few in the process but debt is created, many will be ‘assisted’
in their purchase by credit provided. And this credit may be virtual than real,
through repeated cycles of deposit and lending, the same money can be lent many
times to finance the purchase of articles like iPhone many times the actual
amount of money available for lending.
THUS IF YOU THINK SUCH BOOSTING OF THE ECONOMY IS GOOD FOR THE SYSTEM
YOU ARE DELUDED. SUCH BOOSTING CAN BE COMPARED TO ALCOHOL. WHILST YOU ARE ON A
HIGH THE ALCOHOL IS WONDERFUL. LATER THE HANGOVER MAY BE SEVERE EVEN LEAD TO
SUICIDE OR HOMICIDE.
Excessively
boosted shares or asset values cripple the system:
If the shares of entities like Apple, Facebook, Microsoft or even
property values are artificially excessively boosted it artificially instantly
creates massive wealth where there previously did not exist that rivals the
existent value in the system, takes away value from the system. For example,
where you can exchange one Apple share for 2 items in the past, now you can
exchange one Apple share for 5 items because its share price has been falsely
boosted.
If the entry of speculators has pushed up oil (and now grain) prices
from $25 per barrel to $150 per barrel, in the end it is the public who have to
pay much more for the oil.
SHARE PRICES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE PUSHED HIGH BY GREEDY RECKLESS
INVESTORS BECAUSE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE REPOSITORIES OF WEALTH, BY SUDDENLY
PUSHING FALSELY UP A SHARE YOU ARE SAYING YOUR SHARE IS NOW WORTH MUCH MORE AND
BECAUSE THESE SHARES DO NOT EXIST IN A VACUUM BUT ARE PART OF THE SYSTEM, IT
DRAWS WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM PROPORTIONATELY.
EXCESSIVELY FALSELY BOOSTED SHARE PRICES (EG FACEBOOK) UNFAIRLY TRANSFER
OR DRAWS WEALTH FROM THE SYSTEM TO ENTITIES THAT ARE ACTUALLY WORTH MUCH LESS
AND THIS HARMS AND EVEN POTENTIALLY DESTROYS THE SYSTEM WHEN ALLOWED TO
CONTINUE UNCONTROLLED. THE REGULATORS ARE EITHER SLEEPING ON THE JOB OR
DELUDED.
High
Apple share prices are the concern of the system:
If Apple share prices are rising excessively driven by euphoria to
artificially or falsely high levels, it is not just a matter for concern of
those directly involved, the potential losses are not only to those who stand
to be burnt should prices drop later but it is of concern to the system too
because Apple is part of the system and if its new claims for wealth are
fraudulent, unjustified, it detracts or draws from the system.
THUS IF APPLE (OR GOOGLE OR FACEBOOK) SHARE PRICES RISES ARE
UNWARRANTED, IT IS AN ABUSE
OF THE SYSTEM THAT SHOULD BE CHECKED FOR THE SAKE OF EVERYONE, IT IS NOT A PRIVATE
MATTER ONLY OF CONCERN TO THOSE WHO BUY AND SELL APPLE SHARES.
Why
high Apple share prices is everybody’s business:
Suppose Apple share prices has risen from $20 to $40 driven by
speculator greed/emotion when it is actually worth $25. Thus the person who
owns Apple shares can sell his share at $40 and buy goods worth $40 when he
should only be able to buy $25 worth of goods.
ASSET PRICE RISES (BE IT PROPERTY OR SHARES OR COMMODITIES) DO NOT OCCUR
IN A VACUUM AND IF THEY ARE UNWARRANTED, EXCESSIVE IT ALWAYS IMPACTS
NEGATIVELY, DETRIMENTALLY ON THE SYSTEM. THUS IF YOUR HOUSE SUDDENLY RISES
UNWARRANTED FROM $100,000 TO $200,000 YOU CAN SELL IT AND BUY $200,000 W0RTH OF
GOODS WHERE YOU SHOULD ONLY BUY $100,000. IN THE SAME WAY IF APPLE SHARE PRICE
RISES ARE UNWARRANTED, APPLE SHARE HOLDERS ARE SUDDENLY WEALTHIER UNWARRANTED
WHICH MEANS SUDDENLY THEY ARE WORTH MORE THAN YOU WHEN PREVIOUSLY YOU WERE
WORTH THE SAME AS THEM.
NOT JUST HERE BUT THERE ARE OTHER NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF EXCESSIVE ASSET
PRICE RISES AND THEY SPARK AN ARMS RACE OF PRICE RISES TO TRY TO CANCEL OUT,
PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO MAKE MORE MONEY TO AFFORD A HOUSE NOW COSTING $200,000
WHERE IT COST $100,000 PREVIOUSLY.
Why
Apple is far from innovative:
Apple is about greed, making money anyway it could (eg exploiting) and
getting away with it and wiping out its competitors so that it can have the
table all for itself if possible.
Thus if Apple is anywhere near as innovative or geniuses as it is touted
to be, it would be swarming the market with amazing new gadgets every month if not
everyday rather than the trickle which are actually more adaptations or
improvements than innovations.
IF APPLE HAD ITS WAY IT WOULD GRAB BOTH THE MARKET (BY KILLING OFF ALL
COMPETITORS) AND GRAB ALL YOUR MONEY BY CHURNING OUT ENDLESS NEW GADGETS TO WREST
YOUR MONEY AWAY AND THE FACT THAT ITS ‘NEW’ PRODUCTS ARE FEW AND FAR BETWEEN
REFLECTS A PAUCITY OF INNOVATION RATHER THAN INGENUITY.
Unwarranted
share price rises are daylight robbery:
If an asset (share, property, commodity) price rise is unwarranted it
tantamount to daylight robbery or rape of the system and it reflects delusion
that authorities or regulators see nothing wrong and see it even as naturally
and inevitable when it is unnatural and preventable.
For instance, register all who buy oil and make sure those who buy have
valid use for the oil rather than to keep and sell when price rises.
iPhone
may depress the economy:
If consumers are tight with money, the money spent on buying an iPhone
may be scrounged from elsewhere and so even as iPhone purchases drive up
economy, purchases elsewhere may dip and the money that would have ended up in
many pockets now end up in Apple’s pockets.
Further if credit is also tight, the money lent to fund iPhone purchases
would mean less money for other funding.
GERARD HENDERSON The banners included such
messages as ''Behead Those Who Insult Islam!!!'' and ''Obama, Obama, We Love
Osama!!!''. But what was of particular interest was the destination.
By multiculturalism is meant a plural society with different races and
cultures (that in truth are at variance or odds with each other) living
‘harmoniously’ together.
‘Multiculturism’ does not exist in reality but it is a fabrication, a
false concept in the minds of deluded people. There may be people of different
race and culture living together but that does mean there is multiculturism.
By long road to travel is meant in time to come there will be ideal true
multiculturism which may be a pipe dream, delusion. Multiculturism may not have
a long road to travel but it may be a road to nowhere and so you are guilty of
delusion.
So long as people living together identify with their races and cultures
that must differ from each other and inevitably clash with each other, it is
impossible to have true harmony but it is contrived, pretended, enforced
harmony. As soon as people cease to identify with the colour on their skins,
cease to believe in and practice cultures that differ and must clash with each
other, what multiculturism are you madly talking about?
THERE IS ONLY ONE TRUE UNITY AMONGST MEN AND IT IS UNITY THROUGH TRUTH
AND GOODNESS. YOU ARE DELUDED IF YOU THINK THERE IS TRUE UNITY AND HARMONY IN
MULTI-CULTURISM AND SO YOU CAN KEEP TRAVELLING ON THE ROAD OF MULTICULTURISM
AND NEVER REACH TRUE HARMONY.
TO ME MULTICULTURISM IS MEANINGLESS, WHAT MORE THAT I THINK IT STILL HAS
A LONG ROAD TO TRAVEL OR IT CAN AND WILL ACHIEVE ITS OBJECTIVE OF PEACE AND
HARMONY.
AND SO WHAT IS SAID IS A LOAD OF NONSENSE AND IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO
MAKE OF IT OR YOU THINK HE HAS A POINT YOU TOO DO NOT UNDERSTAND TRULY.
Multi-culturism
does not exist and it is about culture that is false:
You exist, I exist but multi-culturism does not exist, it is an
invention in the minds of deluded men.
Culture is not about truth and goodness but it is about beliefs and
practices that are remembered, recorded and rehashed or put into practice
regularly to keep alive the traditions or culture.
If something said or done is true and specific to a need or event, it is
not rehashed by rote based on tradition, if it is rehashed based on tradition
it is never true or specifically intended except in your dense delusion.
Thus a person of truth and true understanding never abide or go by
traditions or culture or custom but he sees and understands the need of a
situation arising and act and speaks accordingly.
CULTURE IS ABOUT BELIEFS AND RITUALS REMEMBERED AND REHASHING EVEN
PRECISELY AND SO IT IS ABOUT FALSITY AND MULTICULTURISM IS NOT A MATTER OF
TRUTH BUT UPHOLDING FALSITY WHICH CANNOT LEAD TO ANYWHERE MEANINGFUL AND YOU
ARE DELUDED TO THINK IT STILL HAS A LONG ROAD TO TRAVEL IMPLYING IT IS
PLAUSIBLE TO REACH AN UTOPIA OF MULTI-CULTURISM.
YOU AND I EXIST BUT MULTICULTURISM DOES NOT EXIST, IT IS A FABRICATION OR
IDEA OF DELUDED MINDS.
Quality
time:
Modern people speak with aplomb about spending ‘quality time’ with their
loved ones, yet what they speak is senseless, everything is reduced to a
commodity to be consumed, ‘quality time’.
If what you do with your family or loved ones is meaningful it is not
about spending quality time with them but what you did with them and if what
you did is about spending quality time with them it means what you did with
them is not important, what is important is that the time is ‘quality’ as
determined by your fickle judgment. By ‘quality time’ is usually meant
‘satisfying’ or they reaped their quota of emotional or pleasure satisfaction.
TRULY MEANINGFUL AND SATISFYING TIME WITH YOUR LOVED ONE IS NOT ABOUT
QUALITY TIME OR EXTRACTING PLEASURE AND EMOTION BUT IT IS ABOUT WHAT YOU DID
TOGETHER THAT WAS MEANINGFUL, HAPPY AND SPECIFIC.
QUALITY TIME IS NON-SPECIFIC, IMPERSONAL, IT IS THE TIME THAT IS
IMPORTANT NOT WHAT IS DONE AND CAN BE APPLIED TO MANY QUITE DIFFERENT
SITUATIONS, WHAT YOU PARTICULARLY DID WITH YOUR FAMILY THAT WAS HAPPY AND
MEANINGFUL IS NOT ABOUT QUALITY TIME.
TO THE DEVOTEE OF ‘QUALITY TIME’ EVERYTHING IS AN OBJECTIVE, A TARGET TO
BE ACHIEVED OR OBTAINED, HE IS A CONSUMER.
IF SOMETHING IS MEANINGFUL OR TRUE, IT IS ABOUT WHAT YOU DID, NOT
‘QUALITY TIME’, NOT THE TIME YOU SPENT. IF IT IS QUALITY TIME THAT YOU PURSUE,
IT IS ABOUT MINDLESS MECHANICAL SENSUAL GRATIFICATION IN WHICH WHAT WAS DONE IS
NOT IMPORTANT, IT IS THE QUALITY TIME THAT IS IMPORTANT.
TIME IS TIME THERE IS NOTHING QUALITY OR NOT QUALITY ABOUT IT AND YOU
ARE CULTIVATING FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION TALKING ABOUT TIME
THAT IS QUALITY AND LOW GRADE. IN OTHER WORDS WHEN THE TIME IS NOT QUALITY YOU
ARE MERELY DISHING IT OUT OR FAKING IT TO GET ALONG.
THE PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING DOESN’T TALK ABOUT QUALITY TIME BUT
WHAT IN PARTICULAR HE DID ON AN OCCASION THAT WAS HAPPY OR ENJOYABLE.
If the reader does not know who Putin is then stating he is Russia’s
will not make any sense. And so it reflects muddled thinking and lacking of
understanding to speak of Russia’s Putin. You should either logically say
“Russia’s president” or “Putin” rather than the incoherent or mumbo jumbo
Russia’s Putin.
IF THE READER DOES NOT KNOW WHO PUTIN IS, THEN SAYING HE IS ‘RUSSIA’S
PUTIN’ IS NOT GOING TO HELP AND SO IF YOU ARE RATIONAL YOU WOULD SAY “RUSSIA’S PRESIDENT”
RATHER THAN “RUSSIA’S PUTIN”. PUTIN IS RUSSIA’S PRESIDENT NOT RUSSIA’S PUTIN.
BECAUSE IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AND YOU THINK IT IS OK YOU ARE HEADING FOR
MADNESS.
A
night to remember:
This statement can only be truly understood as false and evil.
Leave others to decide for themselves whether it is a night to remember,
just because you think it is a night to remember does not mean it would be so
to others and by saying it is a night to remember you imply it is truly so and
it applies to everyone.
By ‘night to remember’ is meant a night to cherish and cherishing is
never about substance and truth but blind stirred harmful mental force. Without
stirring your mental force an event cannot be cherished or to be remembered.
The Buddha said everything going on is empty, false (whatever is
changing is false) and so if you perceive that are transient, phantasms as
meaningful and to be cherished you are deluded headed for torment not happiness
and you have debt to be repaid as suffering telling others it is a night to
remember. All is not self, the Buddha said and if you did not identify with a
self, there would not be a night to remember. It is only because you identify
with yourself, with a self that something is a night to remember. You need
someone, you need yourself to remember. If you have no self, what is there to
remember?
THUS THE STATEMENT ‘A NIGHT TO REMEMBER’ IS NOT GOOD BUT FALSE, INTENDED
TO STIR EMOTIONS IN OTHERS AND COERCE THEM TO SIMILARLY PERCEIVE ‘A NIGHT TO
REMEMBER’ THAT ACCRUES DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, TO
THOSE WHO ARE NOBLE NOTHING IS DEAR OR NOT DEAR, WHAT MORE A NIGHT TO REMEMBER
OR CHERISH?
It
is not the night, not the remembering he is speaking about:
Anyone who has partaken of an event does not need to told to remember it
but to greater or lesser extent he will remember and if you were not party to
what happened that night you have no right to tell them to remember it and it
is mischievous, to stir envy telling them it is a night to remember.
It is not remembering that the person means but it is cherishing and remembering and
cherishing are two different things and you are guilty of speaking falsely.
Cherishing is about the stirring of mental force to like and it is meaningless
and harmful.
Further it is not the night that he wants remembered or cherished but it
is the events, festivities or celebrations and so here again he does not say
what he means.
ANYONE WHO HAS PARTAKEN OF THE EVENTS OF THE NIGHT DOES NOT NEED TO BE
TOLD TO REMEMBER IT NOR WILL IT BE OF ANY EFFECT AND SO IT IS NONSENSE. IT IS
MEANINGLESS TO TELL ANYONE WHO HAS NOT PARTAKEN THAT IT IS A NIGHT TO REMEMBER
EXCEPT TO FALSELY STIR ENVY.
IT IS NOT REMEMBERING HE MEANS BUT IT IS CHERISHING, THE BLIND,
MEANINGLESS UNNECESSARY HARMFUL STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IN RELATION TO WHAT
HAS HAPPENED THAT NIGHT.
IT IS NOT THE NIGHT THAT HE WANTS CHERISHED BUT IT IS THE FESTIVITIES OR
EVENTS OF THE NIGHT AND SO THE STATEMENT IS FALSE IN MORE THAN ONE WAY.
An
instance of robo-speak:
“A night to remember” is never about specifics or particulars but
generalities and could be rehashed for many occasions eg your wedding night,
your meeting with a dignitary, your first kiss and so it is typical of robots
who rehash to speak non-specifically for efficient rehashing for many different
occasions.
PEOPLE WHO ARE ROBOTS ARE FOND OF SPEAKING IN TERMS THAT ARE VAGUE OR
NONSPECIFIC BECAUSE THESE ARE SUITABLE FOR REHASHING FOR MANY DIFFERENT
OCCASIONS.
It
is no secret:
It is no secret that the U.S. government propped up the housing market
after the financial crisis.
The person of true understanding always speaks fully understanding what
he says and so he cannot be guilty of speaking falsely or what is insensible.
If a person does not have true understanding and speaks by rehash it is
possible and likely he will speak what under scrutiny turns out to be nonsense.
There is no need to say ‘it is no secret’, just say the US government
propped up the housing market if that is true, a fact. The reason for saying it
is no secret is emotional, you un-righteously want the reader to accept what he
may not know is fact that the US government supported the housing market.
THUS THE BASIS FOR SAYING ‘IT IS NO SECRET’ IS NOT BECAUSE IT IS
RELEVANT OR MEANINGFUL BUT THE BASIS IS EMOTIONAL, TO FORCE READERS WHO MAY NOT
KNOW TO ACCEPT AS FACT WHAT THEY DO NOT KNOW AS FACT AND THAT IS MALICIOUS,
WRONG. FURTHER IT CLUTTERS AND DISTRACTS THE READER FROM THE SUBSTANCE OF THE
MATTER AND THIS HAS KARMA FOR THE PERPETRATOR.
THERE IS NO NEED TO SAY ‘IT IS NO SECRET’ AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT
IS RELEVANT REFLECTS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT LEADS TO MAD PERCEPTION. ‘IT IS NO
SECRET’ IS A COPIED REHASHED STANDARD LINE OF SPEECH, MANY ARE FOND OF SPICING
UP WHAT THEY SAY THUS.
But
Harvard professor who presented the fragment at conference says that doesn't
prove he had one, and other experts urge caution
Whether Jesus had a wife is not important, even irrelevant in the
context of his mission and it reflects delusion that people are stirred,
fascinated by its possibility.
What is important is Jesus’ message that men are guilty of sin and there
is judgment and punishment, there is the Father, there is heaven and hell and
eternal punishment and there will be a close of the Age that is far sooner than
you realize.
No comments:
Post a Comment