No
need to agree, just see:
Whatever a person says, it is the truth, it does not need anyone’s
agreement but what it needs is for the recipient to see the truth of what is said.
You hear often people say (emotionally) eg, “I agree with you
wholeheartedly that there are constant changes in speed and loudness in the
speech of everyone here” when agreement is totally irrelevant and reflects
self-identity views as if truth needs anyone to agree with.
You could say “I see as you say that there are constant speed and
loudness changes in everyone’s speech” but you are wrong to say “I agree with
you”. You do not need to bring personal matters into the transaction which is
not about two individuals agreeing with each other but it is about a statement
of the truth and perceiving that truth, not agreement. Agreement is
subconsciously to foster bonding between the two as if they are friendly and to
stir each other’s emotions.
In Merdeka mode:
In Merdeka mode: Recording artiste Irene Thor Siao
Ching waving the national flag enthusiastically while performing a patriotic
Mandarin song with popular local singer Chye Seng Aun at the kotai (stage show)
in Sungai Nibong, Penang
There is no such thing as ‘merdeka mode’ and it is a fabrication or
falsification that is never harmless but has deadly consequences in future
suffering.
In their efforts to make more than there is, to play up the significance
of the merdeka event, people resort to fabrication that leads to stress because
they cannot see what they say is true and they are courting future insanity and
suffering for misleading others.
IT REFLECTS THE BANALITY OR COMMONESS OF FALSITY THAT PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW
WHAT TO MAKE OF IT WHEN PRESENTED TO SUCH THINGS AS ‘MERDEKA MODE’. THEY SMILE
AS IF THEY AGREE BUT THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS PRESENTED IS FALSE AND DEADLY.
The
day the earth stood still:
This is the title for a film. The earth never stands still and so it is
a false statement.
Not even for the sake of a film title is it OK to lapse into falsity and
the reason it was chosen is to falsely attract audiences to find out and watch
the movie.
ANYONE WHO THINKS IT IS OK TO LAPSE INTO FALSITY FOR THE SAKE OF BEING A
TITLE FOR A MOVIE IS DELUDED. THE TITLE IS TO FALSELY OR UNRIGHTEOUSLY PROMOTE
THE FILM AND HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES IN KARMA.
HP
gives false self-serving advice:
In the midst of printing (using refilled cartridge), a light began to
blink and the printer stopped printing and there was an error message that said
I need to replace the cartridge with helpful internet shopping links.
What happened is that the surrounds of the printing window was clogged
with dirt and after I cleaned it with an alcohol wetted cotton bud, it worked
but the problem recurred, this time I gave a meticulous clean up and now it
works fine.
When you give advice or program a computer to give advice you have a
duty to make sure your advice is accurate or true or you are liable for karma.
The programmed HP advice to change cartridge is wrong because it is not
a change that was needed but a cleaning of the cartridge that was needed.
Thus the correct HP programmed response should be your cartridge may
need replacement or it needs inspection and cleaning.
There are many in this world who are robots who will do as they are told
and accept what they are told as gospel when it may be misleading and this is
one of many instances where the ‘expert’ advice is false.
That
is really of concern:
"That is really of concern because it means this manufacturing
slowdown [in Japan], negative growth in the industrial sector, will continue
for some time."
Do you mean that concern can be real and not real?
Concern is concern and it cannot be real and not real and so you are
admitting that you can fake your concern, you have a false perception that
concern can be real and ‘unreal’ or pretence and you want to sell that deluded
or false premise to others.
TO SPEAK OF ‘REALLY OF CONCERN’ IS NO MINOR SEMANTICS OR INCONSEQUENTIAL
BUT IT IS THE CULTIVATION OF FALSITY IN SELF AND INNOCULATION OF THAT FALSITY
ON OTHERS THAT HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE SUFFERING FOR THE FOOL
SPEAKING BLINDLY THUS.
It is impossible for anyone to truly justify the verdict but it is
always false, an exercise in delusion.
Even if Samsung copied, how can anyone truly quantify the loss of the
copying? Beings in this world including animals copy each other and if they
were to start suing and claiming damages then there would be no end to
litigation.
The universal law is that all is not self, what you invent is not yours
and what you invented should be shared and so Apple is committing a serious
infraction suing others for copying it (as if Apple never copied others).
AS THE BUDDHA SAID, ALL IS NOT SELF, YOUR MIND, YOUR PERCEPTIONS AND
FEELINGS, EVEN CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SELF AND ANYONE WHO CLAIMS SELF IN
ANYTHING, WHO MAKES ACQUISITIONS IN THIS WORLD IS HEADED FOR SUFFERING THE
BUDDHA SAID.
AND SO IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO YOU ARE, THE MORE POSSESSIVE YOU ARE, THE
MORE YOU PROTECT YOUR BELONGINGS AND INVENTIONS, THE MORE YOU SUFFER AND SO IT
IS APPLE THAT IS UNRIGHTEOUS IN SELFISHLY SEEKING LEGAL REDRESS FOR
INTELLECTUAL AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES IT DEEMS IN DELUSION IS ITS.
THE BUDDHA SAID IF YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR YOU, YOU MUST SHARE
EVERYTHING YOU HAVE AND NOT HOARD FOR YOURSELF AND SO APPLE’S ACTIONS IS NOT IN
KEEPING WITH WHAT IS RIGHT AND IT IS PILING UP KARMA FOR FUTURE WOE.
AND SO ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OF JUSTIFYING APPLE’S VERDICT IS A FOOL PUTTING
HIS HEAD ON THE CHOPPING BOARD.
Whatever
is meritorious requires no stimulus:
US
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke expresses deep worry over the US economy
and argues for fresh action to stimulate growth from the central bank
How to truly understand the situation?
Whatever is true, genuine, based on merit does not require stimulus and
whatever requires stimulus is not meritorious and such stimuli is delaying the
inevitable reckoning that becomes increasingly severe and even fatal the longer
it is allowed to fester.
Thus if the US and world economy is based on merit, truth then it should
not require stimulus to keep it humming and if it requires repeated stimuli as
have been done and yet it remains listless it means it has become terminal and
in danger of even death or destruction.
In the same way if the relationship between a couple is based on true
love and happiness then it should not require stimulus (eg sexual toys, sexual
or sensual stimuli, holidays in resorts) and if the relation requires stimuli
to rekindle its ‘fire’ then it will end in breakup, even if the couple remain
physically together.
Again if your life is truly enjoyable and happy you do not need stimuli
of drugs, alcohol or whatever and if it requires stimuli it is false and
meaningless and you are headed for an appointment with even worse suffering.
Catholic Church is "200 years
behind" the times
Top Italian Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini says in an interview published
the day after his death that the Catholic Church is "200 years
behind" the times.
Why is he saying this? He is saying it because he is upset, the church
does not behave according to his liking (attractive blind meaningless stirring
of his mental force) and so he is attacking the church.
What he says is always false, deluded, barking up the wrong tree and if
you do not know what to make of it or you think maybe he has a case you do not
truly understand.
It is not a case of the church being 200 years behind time or even 200
years before time, but it is a case of what the church is doing that is right
or wrong and that has nothing to do with being behind or before time.
By saying the church is 200 years behind times you are advocating the
church should pander to the whims, fashions and tastes of the time. Thus if
mankind has become more scientific then the church should adopt a more
scientific stance, if people become more liberal and open to homosexuality or
paedophilia then the church should similarly adopt a more open attitude.
CHANGING WITH THE TIMES IMPLIES YOU ARE LIKE A CHAMELEON CHANGING WITH
THE ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH YOU ARE JUST PANDERING TO THE WHIMS AND FANCIES, THE
FASHIONS OF THE TIME. THE TRUTH IS UNCHANGING AND ALWAYS TRUE WHATEVER THE
TIMES AND SO IF WHAT THE CHURCH IS DOING IS TRUE AND RIGHT, IT IS TRUE AND
RIGHT FOR ALL TIMES AND SO ARE YOU A FOOL TO SAY THE CHURCH IS 200 YEARS BEHIND
TIMES?
THIS IS THE UTTERING OF A PERSON WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING, WHO DOES
NOT LIKE (NOTHING TO DO WITH UNDERSTANDING, MERELY A REPULSIVE STIRRING OF HIS
MENTAL FORCE) WHAT HE SEES IN THE CHURCH AND IS DRIVEN TO BERATE THE CHURCH AS
200 YEARS BEHIND TIMES.
THERE IS PLENTY WRONG WITH THE CHURCH BUT IT IS A MATTER OF WHAT THE
CHURCH DOES THAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG, NOT 200 OR 300 YEARS BEHIND TIME.
(IF MY VIEW ABOVE IS RIGHT AND NO ONE HAS THIS VIEW THEN ALL VIEWS THAT
DIFFER ARE WRONG VIEW OR THEY DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SAID.)
Only
robots keep up with the times:
You have to be a robot in order to keep up with the times as implied by
the statement ‘church is 200 years behind times’.
It takes a person who is out to please and impress others with what he
says or does to ‘constantly’ be on the lookout for what is changing around him
and then adopt those changes in some form so that he is updated, has kept
abreast of times.
In order to consistently keep up with the times, a person must train or
program himself to be attuned to changes around him, adopt them either
wholesale or with modifications and then practice these changes. (Thus if
others are having ‘rock’ masses then since it is in line with the times, you
have rock bands blasting at church meetings.
If what you say or do 200 years ago was true and good it will still be
true and good today so what is the need to keep up with the times? It is only
fashions and fads that are matters of style or falsity that keep changing and
you need to change to keep up with these fads.
Thus theories of evolution, of creation can change with time because
they are false or products of conjecture and you have to modify yourself to
keep up with times.
WITHOUT BEING A ROBOT PROGRAMMED TO LOOKOUT FOR CHANGES AROUND YOU THAT
MAY HAVE BEARING ON THE ‘RELEVANCE’ OR SURVIVAL OF THE CHURCH AND THEN ADOPTING
AND PRACTICING THOSE CHANGES YOU CANNOT KEEP UP WITH THE TIMES. IF YOU THINK
YOU CAN KEEP UP WITH TIMES AND NEVERTHELESS BE A TRUE SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION
PERSON YOU MAY RIGHT OR DELUDED.
Can
you imagine Jesus telling you to keep up with the times?
Can you imagine Jesus exhorting you to keep up with the times? Thus if
tuxedos is the fashion of the times, if you obey Jesus you would swap your
jeans for tuxedos.
I can imagine Jesus exhorting you to be indifferent to the times and to
keep up with truth and goodness but I cannot imagine Jesus to tell you to pay
attention to keep up with the times.
What is said only makes sense if what Barisan does is programmed and
although it may suit the times in the past, times are changing and so Barisan
is being exhorted to change its act or programming to suit the new political
reality eg where there was no competition in the past and BN can do as it
pleases, now it has serious alternative and it must change its tune or act.
IT IS NEVER TRUE OR WONDERFUL TO BE ROBOTS BUT IT IS TORMENTING AND
FALSE TO BE ROBOTS AND TO ADAPT TO NEW POLITICAL REALITY IS TO CHANGE ONE’S
PROGRAMMING, CHANGE ONE’S TUNES OR ACT AND THAT MANDATES A ROBOTIC EXISTENCE
THAT IS THE PATH TO FUTURE DESTRUCTION AND EVEN AN ETERNITY OF WEEPING AND
GNASHED TEETH. THE MESSAGE IS A VARIATION OF THE CARDINAL'S LAMENT THE CHURCH IS
200 YEARS BEHIND TIMES.
It
is never time but truth and goodness that you must keep up with:
The Buddha: "'One should not be negligent of
discernment, should guard the truth, be
devoted to relinquishment, and train only for calm.'
The Buddha said you must guard the truth. It does not matter if you are
secular or spiritual, if it is happiness you seek and suffering you desire to
avoid then you must guard the truth.
When you say the church is 200 years behind times it means the church
must keep up with times.
The person who speaks about ‘keeping up with times’ is guilty of falsity
(with karma and suffering attached) because it is not keeping up with times
that he actually means (no one can truly keep up with time) but he means keeping
up with the changes in society, culture and life or adapting oneself to
changing circumstances (that implies your behaviour is programmed by rehash and
you need to keep adapting or re-programming yourself to meet the needs of
changing circumstances).
Conditions may change, circumstances always change but the truth and
what is good always remains the same. What is true and good 200 years ago
remain true and good today and so are you mad to talk about change if what you
did 200 years ago is true and good.
ANYONE WHO PANDERS TO CHANGING TIMES, WHO ADVOCATES CHANGE TO MEET
CHANGING TIMES IS A COMPROMISED MAN WHO IS NOT DEVOTED TO TRUTH AND GOODNESS
AND ALWAYS, UNLESS YOU WANT TO EMBRACE SUFFERING, YOU MUST REMAIN FAITHFUL AND
PROTECT TRUTH AND GENUINE GOODNESS WHICH ARE UNCHANGING, ALWAYS REMAINS THE
SAME.
The Buddha said you should train only for calm, whatever is change is
restless and suffering and so if you are advocating change with changing times
you are like the dog chasing its tail, headed for turmoil, restlessness and
suffering.
This is nothing new but a copycat move (maybe someone should sue Osborne
for damages), when faced with financial crisis, governments all over the world
launched infrastructure boosts, Hitler started depressed Germany on massive
infrastructure, highway constructions, so did America, so did countries like
Malaysia when their economies started to totter but what worked in the past may
not work now.
You are already full of debts so where do you find the money for
infrastructure boosts? By borrowing more eg printing paper that actually is a
form of IOU (that must be redeemed in the future) or by attracting foreign
investors (to buy your sovereign bonds). Such infrastructure boosts are
unlikely to work, especially if they are overpriced with cronies using them as
pretext to plunder the system and saddle it with white elephants.
Infrastructure
boost may work when you are a young man:
Infrastructure boosts may work when you are a fit young man but if you
have become aged, decrepit with serious debilities then all the boosting in the
world may not restore you to economic health. Similarly if society is aging,
the population has reached to maximum the earth can support and the earth
itself is tottering on the brink of instability from rampant abusive pillage by
humans then more infrastructure boost becomes delusional, dangerous even fatal
piling of even more debt.
Why
does your computer and phone need updates?
The only reason your phone and computer needs updates is because it is a
robot that works by programming that becomes outdated (it keeps doing the same
old things even when conditions change, new viruses have arisen) and so it need
updates, re-written programming that addresses the changes.
And so it is that only robots need to keep up with times, a person who
is not a robot does not need to change or modify himself with changing times.
It is because what you say or do is programmed, rehashed from programming to
meet demands of a certain time in the past and you keep rehashing the same old
things whilst times have changed that you need to update yourself.
THE NEED FOR CHANGING WITH THE TIMES ONLY APPLIES FOR BEINGS OR ENTITIES
(EG CHURCH) THAT BEHAVE BY ROBOTIC RIGID OR INFLEXIBLE REHASH THAT WAS DESIGNED
FOR A PARTICULAR AGE BUT BECOMES INAPPROPRIATE FOR A LATER DATE.
IF YOUR COMPUTER HAD TRUE UNDERSTANDING, NEVER FUNCTIONED BY
PROGRAMMING, IT NEVER NEEDS UPDATES. IT IS BECAUSE YOUR COMPUTER IS VERY
DEPENDENT ON PROGRAMMING, ITS VERY BASIS IS RIGID INFLEXIBLE PROGRAMMING THAT
IT NEEDS REGULAR UPDATES OR RISK BECOMING OUTMODED OR LEFT BEHIND.
Same
old windows desktop:
There are true and there are cosmetic changes in Windows 8 and it is
mostly cosmetic changes designed to appeal or attract.
The only significant change I can spot is that the computer boots and
shuts much faster and that would be reason to switch, the removal of the start
button is mad because I think it should be easy to access the start button
rather than hide it away under settings.
When you revert to desktop, there are cosmetic and minor changes but the
interface is largely unfriendly to touch input because the buttons are small
and too close that mistakes can easily happen. Actually Android suffers from
the same because browser buttons are very close that mistakes often happen.
Chrome has come up with the innovation in that adjacent buttons pop up so that
you are asked to make the definitive selection if your touch is borderline.
I HAVE NOT USED WINDOWS 8 MUCH TO SPEAK DEFINITIVELY. THE GOOD THING IS
THAT NOW IT IS MUCH FASTER TO BOOT AND CLOSE WINDOWS. THE REMOVAL OF THE START
BUTTON IS A SILLY COUNTERPRODUCTIVE THING. WITHIN DESKTOP MODE, THERE ARE MANY
MINOR OFTEN COSMETIC CHANGES, IT IS STILL NOT VERY FRIENDLY TO THE TOUCH
INTERFACE.
Microsoft
flip flops, no revolution:
Befitting its true nature, Microsoft flip flops in a muddled way rather
than revolutionarily in a rational way which it is incapable of.
It is a flop to take away the start button that is actually quite
useful.
What Microsoft has done is fuse Windows 7 with minor and cosmetic tweaks
(rather than overhaul) with the Metro interface, web or app based computing
where Android and iPad is about web or app based computing.
IF ANYONE EXPECTS FEATS OF GENIUS FROM MICROSOFT THEY ARE DELUDED, DO
NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND MICROSOFT. WHAT MICROSOFT IS GOOD AT IS COPYING,
MODIFYING, TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT AND MONEY GRABBING. THUS IN THE FACE OF
CHALLENGES IT HAS TIDIED UP ITS ACT, MADE WINDOWS LESS PONDEROUS, SLIM IT DOWN
(QUITE EASY) AND MAKE BOOTING AND SHUTTING FASTER. IT HAS ESSENTIALLY JOINED
TWO PARTS TOGETHER, THE DESKTOP AND THE METRO OR APP COMPUTING, THE DESKTOP AS
EXPECTED IS LARGELY THE SAME (TOO MUCH HARD WORK TO TRULY REVAMP IT). IT IS
STUPID TO TAKE AWAY THE START BUTTON.
Keeping secret about when the polls will be held is never good but it is
calculating and bestows serious karma on those guilty.
You have been elected to a term of government and so you should finish
your allotted time and call elections at the allotted time. The reason for
calling early even snap elections is to disadvantage the opposition and that is
unrighteous conduct that accrues karma.
The purpose of keeping the election date secret is again to disadvantage
to opposition and here again there is karma to be experienced as suffering.
IT IS BEING CALCULATED TO SELF ADVANTAGE AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS TO
CALL EARLY SNAP ELECTIONS AND KEEP ITS DATE SECRET. BEING CALCULATED IS A
CONDITIONED ROBOTIC WAY OF BEHAVIOR THAT IS SUFFERING AND LEADS EVEN TO ETERNAL
SUFFERING.
YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG ABOUT HINTS AT NOVEMBER ELECTIONS BECAUSE YOU HAVE
WRONG UNDERSTANDING. WHAT IS DONE IS SERIOUSLY, DEADLY WRONG.
By wasted is not meant emaciated but ‘drunk’. It is serious, not
harmless defilement of language that has karmic consequences for people tag on
new meanings to words that confuses the uninitiated.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HARRY IS WASTED, EMACIATED BUT HE WAS DRUNK AND SO YOU
ARE SPEAKING FALSELY IN AN ARROGANT MANNER EQUATING WASTING WITH DRUNKENESS
THAT WILL END IN YOUR OWN CONFUSION AND INSANITY AND YOU HAVE KARMA TRYING TO
CULTIVATE THE SAME IN OTHERS.
The
fact about change:
The person who lives in truth and goodness never needs change, he just
continues as he is doing living in truth and goodness.
If a person does not live in truth and goodness then no matter how much
he keeps changing himself, as long as he does not attain truth and goodness, it
is all in vain.
IF YOU DO NOT LIVE IN TRUTH AND GOODNESS THEN WHATEVER CHANGE YOU MAKE AND
HOWEVER MANY TIMES YOU CHANGE YOURSELF IT IS ALL FRUITLESS VEXATION, YOU REMAIN
IN FALSITY AND HARMFULNESS.
A PERSON WHO LIVES IN TRUTH AND GOODNESS DOES NOT REQUIRE CHANGE, HE
NEEDS TO CARRY ON AS HE IS.
Only
one meaningful change:
There all kinds of changes possible eg change in appearance, change in
behaviour.
All changes can be examined, understood and classified as true or false,
meaningful or meaningless, for show or substance.
There is only one true meaningful change and it is from false to true,
from bad to good.
UNLESS A CHANGE IS FROM BAD TO GOOD, FALSE TO TRUTH, IT IS ALL FRUITLESS
MEANINGLESS CHANGE.
THUS IF A NEW MICROSOFT VERSION IS GOOD; IT TRULY BENEFITS THE USER THEN
IT IS A MEANINGFUL AND TRUE CHANGE.
THE MYRIAD OF CHANGES IN THIS WORLD ARE FOR SHOW, FROM ONE FORM OF
FALSITY TO ANOTHER, ONE FORM OF HARMFULNESS TO ANOTHER.
ONLY CHANGES FROM FALSE TO TRUE, FROM HARMFULNESS TO GOODNESS IS
MEANINGFUL (TO UNDERTAKE).
Change
for true and material benefits:
If a change is not from bad to good, false to true then it is change for
the sake of material benefits eg to make money, to obtain sensual gains.
And only change from bad to good, false to true gives true, meaningful
lasting benefit to the person, whatever false to false, harmful to harmful
changes is meaningless and ends in insanity for the pursuer of such changes.
CHANGES FROM ONE FORM OF FALSITY TO ANOTHER, ONE FORM OF HARMFULNES TO
ANOTHER IS ALWAYS FOR MATERIAL OR SENSATE REASONS OR OBJECTIVES AND BECAUSE
THEY ARE MEANINGLESS WILL END IN RUIN AND INSANITY FOR UNDERTAKERS OF SUCH
CHANGES.
Confidence
must come first:
This is pure nonsense and if you are not sure what to make of it then
you do not understand what is presented to you.
Confidence is only needed let alone come first if you do not know what
you are doing, you are not sure it is the correct thing to do. If you
understand the problem and what you are doing, you do not need any confidence
at all.
Whatever the measures you undertake, first understand correctly exactly
what the problem is and if you correctly understand, the answer is usually if
not always straightforward (that does not mean the problem is within your
powers or ability to resolve), whence the need for confidence.
CONFIDENCE IS NEEDED AND FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND, WHO ARE NOT
SURE WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND WHAT THEY ARE UNDERTAKING IS THE CORRECT ANSWER.
WHATEVER MEASURES YOU TAKE, CORRECT UNDERSTANDING MUST COME FIRST AND
THEN WHATEVER MEASURES YOU TAKE IS STRAIGHTFORWARD.
Confidence
is not about meaning but force:
What is the nature of confidence that you so value as needing to come
first, whatever measures you take?
By confidence is meant belief in what you are undertaking. You need
belief or trust if you do not know what you are doing, you are doing something
blind and you need faith or force backing it.
Confidence is the orchestration of force that is blind and meaningless
and dangerous.
By confidence is meant faith, trust, belief which means doing something
blindly driven or guided by force when you should do something guided by true
understanding what the thing is about.
If what you are doing is rote, by rehash to fit into a situation (and cannot perfectly
fit the situation) you need confidence, if what you do is specifically intended for the
situation out of correct understanding of the situation, no confidence
whatsoever is needed to carry it out.
Confidence
is a concern only of robots:
There are two mutually exclusive ways of existing, one is to record and
playback whatever you want to say or do, the other is to attentively perceive
and fully understand and then freshly compose for the occasion what you want to
say or do.
It is only if a person is an actor, who is rehashing from recording what
he wants to say or do who needs confidence, acting confidence to carry out what
he wants to say or do. A person who is not rehashing, who is undertaking what
he wants to say or do out of true specific to the occasion understanding does
not require confidence.
IF YOU ARE ACTING OUT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING OR DOING TO BE INSERTED YOU
MUST BE SELF CONSCIOUS AND ANXIOUS AND YOU NEED TO HAVE CONFIDENCE. IF YOU ARE
NOT ACTING, NOT FAKING IT, YOU DO NOT NEED CONFIDENCE.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE WHO IS REHASHING TO KNOW WHAT SAYS OR DOES
IS TRUE BECAUSE IT IS A FAKE OR COUNTERFEIT AND SO HE IS SPEAKING OR DOING
WITHOUT KNOWING AND MUST HAVE CONFIDENCE, FAITH OR BELIEF.
Even God cannot ensure the people are happy what more the PM and his
party.
And so this is speaking without knowing what is said is true that must
generate self-resistance that leads to stress and conditions the person to
speak with self-resistance.
The purpose for saying that is to please and impress the people that you
have concern for their welfare and hopefully this would be translated into
votes in the election.
Only
you can ensure you are happy:
The Buddha said there are things that are shared and things that are not
shared. Birth, death, suffering and karma are not shared.
It is your karma, what you say and do that brings punishment and reward
that determines your happiness now and later.
As the Buddha said, the highest happiness correspond to the higher
states of minds (serenity with thinking, no thinking, no like or dislike, no
pain or pleasure). There are no higher happiness apart from the happiness
obtained through attaining increasingly higher states of the mind and if you
will not develop the higher states of the mind, you deprive yourself of happiness.
HAPPINESS THAT CAN REACH VERY SUBLIME LEVELS THAT YOU HAVE NEVER
EXPERIENCED IS POSSIBLE AND IT IS FREE AND DEPENDENT ON YOU DEVELOPING THE
HIGHER STATES OF THE MIND.
IF YOU WILL NOT EXERT YOURSELF TO ACHIEVE THE HIGHER STATES OF YOUR MIND
THEN YOU DEPRIVE YOURSELF OF EVEN EXTREME HAPPINESS AND NOBODY, NOT EVEN GOD
CAN GIVE YOU HAPPINESS IF YOU SPURN IT FOR MEAGRE MATERIAL PERISHABLE
‘HAPPINESS’ HERE.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON WITH HEAVY KARMA TO BE HAPPY AND SO IF YOU
HAVE CREATED MUCH BAD DEBTS FOR YOURSELF, HAPPINESS IS NOT EASILY FOUND FOR
YOU.
First
of all, are you happy yourself?
BEFORE YOU MAKE OTHERS HAPPY, FIRST MAKE YOURSELF HAPPY.
Before you talk about making others happy, have you obtained happiness
yourself or not?
If you are not happy, beset by stress, burdened and harassed, it is
impossible that you can make others happy. You are like an emperor with no
clothes preaching the virtues of wearing clothes.
It is impossible for ordinary people who have not even attained the
first higher state of mind (no style, no using force to stretch syllables,
change speed and loudness) to experience meaningful, significant happiness and
they are not qualified to make others happy.
IF YOU ARE BESET BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND UNABLE TO CONCENTRATE HOW
CAN YOU MAKE OTHERS HAPPY? IT IS ALL EMPTY BABBLE.
Do
you mean satisfied, not happy?
Reflecting their muddled, approximate, anything goes mind set, it may be
keeping the people satisfied that is meant than keeping them happy.
Satisfaction and happiness are two very different things and if your
intention is to keep the people satisfied then you keep doing things that
pleases them eg shower more money, for free services, bribe them with various
things that satisfy them but not necessarily make them happier.
SATISFACTION IS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH HAPPINESS. IN KEEPING WITH THEIR
MUDDLED THINKING WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE SAY ‘HAPPINESS’ WHEN THEY
MEAN ‘SATISFACTION’.
Printing
money is not magic but has serious problems later:
It seems like waving a magic wand printing money to repay your debts
when you have no money to repay but it is postponing a reckoning with debt, not
a resolution of debt.
WHEN A CENTRAL BANK PRINTS MONEY, THE RECIPIENT IS IN POSSESSION OF MONEY
THAT IT CAN AND ULTIMATELY WILL RETURN TO THE CENTRAL BANK OR COUNTRY TO CASH
IN THAT THE CENTRAL BANK MUST REDEEM BY PROVIDING GOODS OR SERVICES TO THE
EQUIVALENT VALUE FOR WHICH THE NATION WILL GET NOTHING IN RETURN EXCEPT FOR THE
PIECES OF PAPER IT PRINTED EARLIER.
IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR PRINTED MONEY WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU IN THE FUTURE
IN RETURN FOR GOODS AND SERVICES THAT YOU MUST PROVIDE FOR THOSE PIECES OF
PAPER AND NOTHING ELSE. YOU WORK FOR FREE TO PAY OFF YOUR DEBTS OR REPOSSESS
THE PIECES OF PAPER YOU PRINT.
SO DON’T GET TOO CARRIED AWAY, THRILLED THAT YOU CAN PRINT YOUR WAY OUT
OF DEBT LIKE MAGIC.
Spending
tomorrow today:
Mankind went for broke, it spent tomorrow today and now that tomorrow
has arrived it is not only on empty tank but has massive debts to repay.
Thus if you see the impressive government offices full of well-dressed
staff manning modern computers in air-conditioned comfort, it may be built on
debt rather than wealth, built on the government borrowing money to build and
maintain that may be unaffordable so that when the future arrives there are
massive debts to be repaid.
MANY EVEN BIG COMPANIES BORROWED MASSIVE MONEY TO BUILD PRESTIGIOUS
CORPORATE OFFICES BUT WHEN BUSINESS DECLINE SHARPLY, THE CEOS ARE NOT IN
TROUBLE BUT THE COMPANY AND SOCIETY IS IN TROUBLE AND SO IT IS FACED WITH
MASSIVE DEBTS THAT THERE IS NO MONEY TO REPAY AND IN DESPERATION CENTRAL BANKS
PRINT MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MONEY TO COVER BUT THIS IS BUYING TIME BECAUSE THE
MONEY PRINTED CAN BE USED TO REDEEM IN GOODS AND SERVICES THAT THE GOVERNMENT
OR NATION CANNOT SUPPLY.
NOT ONLY HAS MANKIND SPENT TOMORROW TODAY, THEY HAVE DONE IT ON A
MASSIVE SUSTAINED SCALE SUCH THAT NOW THE DEBT BURDEN IS CRUSHING.
How
debt is truly repaid:
Debt is never repaid by printing money yourself because unless you are
going to renege on the money you printed, you have to provide value in terms of
goods (gold or diamonds are forms of goods), services or equivalent currency
(that you did not print but earned eg US returning yuan not USD to China) to
the satisfaction of the holder of the currency you printed.
THUS DEBT IS ALWAYS REPAID IN KIND, NEVER BY PRINTING, IT IS NEVER THAT
EASY. YOU CREATED DEBT BY OBTAINING GOODS AND SERVICES FROM OTHERS USING THE
CURRENCY YOU PRINTED AND TO REPAY THAT DEBT YOU MUST RETURN IN GOODS AND
SERVICES TO THE VALUE OF THE CURRENCY YOU PRINTED FOR WHICH YOU WILL GET
NOTHING EXCEPT REPOSSESSION OF THOSE PIECES OF PAPER AND SO THE WISE PERSON
WILL BE CAREFUL WHEN CREATING DEBT FOR HIMSELF.
IF THE US REPAYS CHINA IN YUAN, IT MUST EARN THE YUANS IT USED TO REPAY
BY PROVIDING GOODS AND SERVICES TO EARN THOSE YUANS AND SO IT IS REPAYING IN
KIND FOR DEBT.
IN THE SAME WAY, KARMIC DEBT IS ALWAYS REPAID IN KIND, WHOEVER CAUSES
SUFFERING FOR OTHERS EVEN IF HE THINKS HE IS BENEFITING OTHERS MUST RETURN THE
DEBT IN SUFFERING FOR HIMSELF. WHOEVER KILLS ANOTHER MAY HAVE TO BE KILLED
HIMSELF IN REPAYMENT. ANY ACTION IN THE WORLD RISKS KARMA AND THE WISE PERSON
IS THUS DISENTANGLED, HE DOES NOT MEDDLE WITH AFFAIRS OF OTHERS.
That is delusion and nonsense and if you buy that or do not know what to
make of it, you do not have true understanding.
Rowing or verbal fights are not good for any party, there is serious
deadly karma for both and so if you believing a quarrel was good for you then
you are a fool.
BOTH PARTIES TO ANY QUARREL HAS SERIOUS KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING
AND SO IF YOU THINK A QUARREL IS GOOD FOR YOU, YOU ARE A FOOL.
Why
quarrels are never good for anyone:
Quarrels are verbal fights and they are not just suffering for both
parties but they are conditioning. Each time you quarrel you are conditioning
or programming yourself to quarrel that can be easily triggered or provoked by
others and the stronger your urge to quarrel, the harder to exit quarrelling.
There is no quarrelling in heaven and so anyone who does not extinguish
the urge to quarrel is not going to heaven and that means eternal punishment
building a pile of skeletons as high as a mountain, the Buddha said.
Debates
are deadly:
There is never any need for debates. The truth of whatever matter or
issue can be established and it is not subject to debate by anyone. Debate is a
form of verbal argument.
THERE ARE DIFFERENT STYLES OF ARGUMENTS, YOU CAN HAVE HEATED ARGUMENTS
AND THE MOST ‘MILD’ POLITE CIVILIZED ARGUMENTS BUT STILL THEY HAVE DEADLY
CONSEQUENCES. UNTIL YOU OVERCOME YOUR DELUSION THAT DEBATES ARE NECESSARY AND
GOOD AND YOU EXTINGUISH ALL DESIRE TO ENGAGE OTHERS IN DEBATES YOU ARE IN
DANGER OF WOE.
Dr
M: Restore the Malays’ past glory
Whatever glory (if it is actually possible) that is restored is
contrived or artificial and not genuine. Genuine glory happens on its own or is
spontaneous, not created purposely.
If you speak without knowing what you say is true, you are cultivating
self-resistance that is the cause of stress.
HOW IS ANYONE GOING TO TAKE UP WHAT HE URGED AND RESTORE MALAYS’ PAST
GLORIES? IF NO ONE CAN OR WILL DO THAT THEN IT IS SO MUCH WASTED BREATH OR
SILLY. IF MALAYS ARE GLORIOUS IT WILL HAPPEN BY ITSELF, IT IS NOT SUBJECT TO
EFFORT BY ANYONE.
Greatness
is the preoccupation of vain men:
Greatness or glory that is always false or deluded is the preoccupation
(not consideration) of vain men and you need to be a robot to want to make
yourself or things you identify with (eg your race) great.
Thus you have a perception or idea that may be detailed or sketchy of
greatness or glory that differs from others and then you proceed to act precisely
or approximately according to the plan (eg build great pyramid for yourself or
conquer other nations) in which you are actually a slave or robot of that plan.
True greatness is never by design but is the consequence of actions that
you are capable that is beyond the ability of most other men. Hence God is the
highest and greatest and the Buddha said he is the highest, he has no equal and
no one is fit to be his teacher. The Buddha is the highest or greatest but he
did not set out to make himself great but to conquer suffering and bring all
suffering to an end for himself.
Hit
& Miss:
People routinely talk about their actions being hit and miss, sometimes
it is correct, sometimes it is wrong or ‘a mistake’ and yet they do not realize
the significance of what they say.
Only a person who is rehashing what he says or does or who does things
without knowing (he is guessing) or knowing it is false (eg to cheat someone by
lying or faking it) is capable of hitting and missing.
A person who does not rehash, who freshly composes his speech and
actions specifically for the occasion, who only says and does after freshly,
truly understanding what is happening can never be guilty of hit and miss.
Always his actions is hit never miss.
HIT AND MISS ARE THE HALLMARKS OF PEOPLE WHO REHASH ACTIONS TO MEET
SITUATIONAL DEMANDS, WHO SAY OR DO THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING OR INTENTIONALLY SAY
OR DO FALSE THINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DECEIVING OTHERS (EG MAN TRYING TO SEDUCE
WOMEN WITH FALSE TALK THAT SOMETIMES WORK SOMETIMES FAIL).
ALWAYS A PERSON DEVOTED TO TRUTH HITS, NEVER MISSES BECAUSE HE NEVER
SAYS OR DOES ANYTHING WITHOUT HAVING TRULY UNDERSTOOD THE SITUATION.
Things
to do:
So, you think you understand ‘things to do’? This is how I understand
‘things to do’.
People routinely remind themselves of the things to do eg ‘take the
rubbish out’, turn off the lights, take a bath, go to the bank, pump petrol.
Whenever a person tells or reminds himself of things he must do or say
he is behaving according to a plan and permitting himself to act as a robot.
And it is never fun being a robot and so whenever you carry out ‘things to do’
you must submit yourself to be a robot and the more things you commit or assign
yourself to do, the more you must suffer. The person who has truly given up
this world like the Buddha has nothing to do and he is utterly freed of being a
robot or slave.
IF YOU HAVE THINGS TO DO IT MEANS YOU MUST BEHAVE LIKE A ROBOT TO
FULFILL IT AND SO THE MORE THINGS TO DO THAT YOU ASSIGN YOURSELF THE MORE
BURDENED AND ROBOTIC YOU BECOME AND IT CAN BE MADDENING AND THERE MAY BE ONE
TASK OR THING TO DO TOO MANY TO BREAK THE CAMEL’S BACK.
YOU HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING TO THINK NOTHING, THINK MARVELLOUS OF
HAVING THINGS TO DO.
THE DISCERNING PERSON WHO SEES THINGS AS THEY TRULY ARE SEES ‘THINGS TO
DO’ AS TRAINING ONESELF TO BE A ROBOT CARRYING OUT THOSE THINGS TO DO AND SO HE
WOULD WISELY NOT BURDEN HIMSELF WITH TOO MANY THINGS TO DO.
‘GO FOR A JOG, DROP BY AT SEVEN 11 FOR SOME BREAD, PUMP PETROL, CALL
YOUR WIFE’ THESE ENSLAVING TASKS CAN BECOME MADDENING, HARRASSING. AND SO THE
WISE PERSON WILL ASSIGN VERY FEW THINGS FOR HIMSELF TO DO.
Navakammika Sutta: The Builder
Now
at that time the brahmin Navakammika ("Builder") Bharadvaja was
getting some work done in that forest thicket. He saw the Blessed One sitting
under a sala tree -- his legs folded crosswise, his body held erect, with
mindfulness set to the fore. The thought occurred to the brahmin: "Here I
am, taking delight in getting work done. But what does this contemplative take
delight in getting done?"
So he went to the Blessed One ,saying:
"What jobs are getting done,
monk in the sala forest?
Alone in the wilderness, in what does Gotama
find delight?"
Alone in the wilderness, in what does Gotama
find delight?"
[The Buddha:]
I have no work to do in the forest.
The forest of restless dancing about I've cut
at the root.
Though in the forest, I'm deforested, de-arrowed.
I delight alone, discontent cast away.
The forest of restless dancing about I've cut
at the root.
Though in the forest, I'm deforested, de-arrowed.
I delight alone, discontent cast away.
It
is the premeditation that enslaves:
What makes ‘things to do’ enslaving is the forethought, the plan of
something to do that must be carried out accordingly, obediently by you that
makes it not just robotic but conditions you ever more addictively and
submissively to repeat in the future.
NOT ONLY IS CARRYING OUT ‘THINGS TO DO’ SUFFERING, IT CONDITIONS THE
PERSON TO BECOME BETTER AT CARRYING OUT THINGS TO DO SO THAT IN TIME HE BECOMES
A HELPLESS ROBOT ACCEPTING GLUMLY HIS LOT AS ROBOT OR SLAVE.
SO USED OR ACCUSTOMED ARE PEOPLE IN TELLING THEMSELVES THINGS TO DO AND
CARRYING THEM OUT THEY SEE NOTHING WRONG, SEE NO DANGER EVEN THOUGH OCCASIONALLY
THEY MAY GRUMBLE AND CURSE AT HAVING TOO MANY THINGS TO DO.
Why
things to do lead to stress:
No matter how spontaneous or masterly or natural you think you are
carrying out successfully your ample list of things to do, you are actually
behaving approximately or precisely according to a plan in which you have
surrendered control of yourself to that plan and so this must automatically
stir self resistance as you carry out your plan and it is this doing against
self resistance that causes stress.
The person who has given up this world, has few wants, does not wish to
please and impress others have few things to do or he even does not need to
conform to a list of things to do, he does or says things as he sees, as it
happens.
IT IS GREED FOR GAIN AND FEAR (ANXIETY) FOR LOSS THAT IS THE DRIVE FOR
PEOPLE HAVING A LONG LIST OF THINGS TO DO AND THIS LEADS TO STRESS. FURTHER
WHEN YOU CONFORM TO THINGS TO DO YOU ARE SURRENDERING CONTROL OF YOURSELF
WHILST DOING SO AND THIS LEADS TO SELF RESISTANCE OR RELUCTANCE WHILST DOING SO.
Reluctance:
Whenever a person says or does something reluctantly it means he is
saying or doing it with self-resistance aroused and this leads to stress and
trains himself to say or do things with attending self resistance.
Did you realize or understand that?
WHEN YOU DO OR SAY SOMETHING RELUCTANTLY IT MEANS YOU ARE DOING OR
SAYING WITH SELF-RESISTANCE AROUSED THAT NOT ONLY LEAD TO STRESS BUT CONDITIONS
YOURSELF TO SAY OR DO WITH SELF RESISTANCE.
Never
do things reluctantly or eagerly:
Reluctance and eagerness are deadly, the way even to eternal suffering.
Jesus said let your yes be yes only, anything more (eagerness and
reluctance) comes from evil not good.
When a person says or does things reluctantly he is speaking or doing
with aroused self resistance that is added suffering and conditions to speak
and act with self-resistance that leads to woe.
Eagerness is often faked until it becomes second nature and it too must
arouse self-resistance because the eagerness is meaningless, unnecessary and
subjects self to additional harmful force and so eagerness too trains the
person to speak and act with self resistance that leads to stress.
YOU HAVE SERIOUS WRONG UNDERSTANDING IF YOU THINK NOTHING OF DOING WITH
RELUCTANCE OR EAGERNESS. THEY ARE BOTH UNNECESSARY SUFFERING AND CONDITIONS THE
PERSON TO SPEAK OR DO WITH ACCOMPANYING SELF RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
Train yourself to either say something or don’t say it, don’t say or do
something reluctantly if you want to keep your life, go to heaven.
This is a false statement that sows conflict in those who do not
understand.
Fat is either unfit or it isn’t not some fat and unfit some fat and fit.
It is unhealthy in many ways being fat and it is the result of
overeating in some way and the fatter you are the more unhealthy and self
abusive you are.
IT REFLECTS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION, THEIR TENDENCY TO STOKE THEIR
INNATE SELF-CONFLICT THAT PEOPLE COME OUT WITH SUCH STATEMENTS. IF SOMETHING IS
TRULY GOOD IT IS GOOD AND IF OBESITY IS TRULY BAD IT IS BAD, IT IS SOWING
CONFUSION IN SELF AND OTHERS TO SAY BAD MAY NOT BE BAD.
IF MAD IS BAD IT IS BAD NOT MAD MAY NOT BE BAD UNLESS YOU WANT TO GO
MAD.
How to truly understand what is happening?
Even if Samsung is guilty of copying, it is ungenerous and persecutory
of Apple to sue Samsung and those within Apple responsible (including Steve
Jobs) have horrendous karma being so petty and calculating and it reflects that
Apple is unsavoury not wholesome as it likes to presents itself.
EVEN IF SAMSUNG IS GUILTY OF COPYING, IT IS WRONG WITH SERIOUS KARMA
ATTACHED FOR THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLE TO PURSUE SAMSUNG AND IT REFLECTS THAT
APPLE IS NOT A GREAT COMPANY IT TRIES TO PRESENTS ITSELF TO BE BUT IT IS PETTY
AND MEAN.
No comments:
Post a Comment