Erdogan's remark objectionable:
New
US Secretary of State John Kerry said in Ankara that Washington found Mr
Erdogan's remark "objectionable".
His remarks are either right or wrong, evil or good, true or false,
never objectionable or acceptable which requires a being to interpose his
personal like or dislike into the matter at hand.
THE WORLD SEES NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT HE SAID AND THINKS IT IS VALID
AND SHOWS TRUE UNDERSTANDING WHEN IT IS WRONG AND INCORRECT. IT IS NEVER A
MATTER OF WHETHER THE REMARKS ARE OBJECTIONABLE OR NOT, THERE IS NO NEED FOR
ANYONE TO OBJECT BUT ARE THE REMARKS CORRECT, TRUE OR INCORRECT, FALSE? IT
SHOWS THE PERSON DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING AND IT HAS DEADLY
CONSEQUENCES IN TERMS OF FUTURE WOE THAT EXTENDS EVEN FOR ETERNITY. IT TAKES A
PERSON WITH SELF IDENTITY THAT IS IMPORTANT FOR HIM TO OBJECT, IF YOU HAVE NO
SELF IDENTITY, WHERE IS THAT SELF TO OBJECT? AND SELF IDENTITY THE BUDDHA SAID
IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE WOE.
Notwithstanding that ‘Best of British’ is not something clearly defined
and possible to determine objectively irrefutably, whatever is determined by
voting is never the truth but always false, worthless and the fact that you
bother reflects your silliness that ends in insanity you do not realize.
IF ‘BEST OF BRITISH’ IS SOMETHING TRUE THEN IT IS NOT DETERMINED BY
VOTING, BY POPULARITY BUT OBJECTIVE. EVEN IF SOMETHING IS NOT POPULAR, NOT
VOTED ‘BEST OF BRITISH’ IT IS STILL BEST OF BRITISH SO ARE YOU SILLY TO
UNDERTAKE A VOTE TO DETERMINE BEST OF BRITISH? IF YOUR RESULT IS BASED ON A
POPULARITY CONTEST IT IS NEVER THE TRUTH EXCEPT IN DELUSION.
THE BUDDHA SAID HE IS THE HIGHEST, HE IS PERFECT IN EVERY WAY AND HE HAS
THE HIGHEST KNOWLEDGE AND POWER AND THAT IS OBJECTIVELY DETERMINABLE AND NOT
THE RESULT OF A VOTE.
THERE IS NO NEED TO ENGAGE IN SUCH VOTING THAT NEVER DETERMINES THE
TRUTH AND BECAUSE YOU SEE IT AS MEANINGFUL YOU ARE SILLY AND HEADED FOR
UNCONTROLLABLE SILLINESS.
It is not a matter or rejecting or accepting but whether new polls are
feasible or not, wise or foolish, useful or useless and so by speaking thus you
are barking up the wrong tree, does not truly understand the situation and
headed for woe.
The
truth is never determined by voting:
If something eg best of British, best actor or footballer is true rather
than delusion (there is no such thing as best actor or footballer, acting and
footballing are about falsity, meaninglessness) then it is never determined by
calling for a vote but can be determined objectively.
If something is frivolous and bad and you are calling a vote to
determine the best of what is frivolous or meaningless or bad then you are a
fool asking for insanity.
WHATEVER IS TRUE DOES NOT REQUIRE VOTING TO DETERMINE, IT IS TRUE EVEN
IF IT IS LEAST POPULAR. WHATEVER IS TRUE IS NOT ENHANCED BY A VOTE MAKING IT
POPULAR, DOES NOT REQUIRE A VOTE TO DETERMINE IT IS TRUE. THUS IF YOU ARE
CARRYING OUT A VOTE TO DETERMINE THE TRUTH THAT SO AND SO IS THE BEST OF
BRITISH OR BEST ACTOR THEN YOU ARE DELUDED. IF YOU CONCEDE IT IS NOT THE TRUTH
THAT YOU ARE INTERESTED, JUST WHO IS THE MOST POPULAR ACTOR OR FOOTBALLER THEN
YOU ARE DELVING IN FALSITY CALLING THE RESULT THE BEST ACTOR OR BEST FOOTBALLER
WHICH IMPLIES IT IS TRUE, THE SELECTED PERSON IS BEST ACTOR OR FOOTBALLER.
The
most popular of British not best of British:
There is a critical difference between the most popular of British or
actors or footballers and the best of British, actors or footballers and if you
think the two are interchangeable you are fostering false perception that ends
in mad perception.
A VOTE DOES NOT DETERMINE THE BEST OF BRITISH BUT THE MOST POPULAR OF
BRITISH OR ACTORS OR FOOTBALLERS AND IF YOU THINK THEY ARE IDENTICAL THEN YOU
HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION.
The
karma of confusing others:
If you confuse others, there is serious karma to be repaid by future
suffering.
You are confusing others if you say your vote determines Attenborough is
the best of British, he is not the best of British but MOST POPULAR of British
and you are speaking falsely confusing others with karma attached.
JESUS SAID YOU WILL BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY. YOU ARE
JUMPING TO FALSE CONCLUSION NOT WITHOUT MOTIVE BUT WITH MOTIVE TO MAKE MORE
THAN THERE ACTUALLY IS, TO SAY THAT JUST BECAUSE ATTENBOROUGH WON THE POPULAR
VOTE FOR BRITISH HE IS THE BEST OF BRITISH.
THE TWO THINGS ARE VERY DIFFERENT, THE MOST POPULAR OF BRITISH AND BEST
OF BRITISH AND SO IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY YOU SHOULD HAVE
UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU SAY IS WRONG, UNWARRANTED.
Best
is determined by study, measuring and examination:
Assuming that the characteristic is not false or frivolous, best is
determined objectively by studying and examining not be voting.
WHATEVER THAT IS TRUE AND BEST IS DETERMINED BY STUDYING, EXAMINING NOT
BY VOTING. EVEN IF A PANEL OR BODY OF PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALLERS VOTE ‘X’ AS BEST
FOOTBALLER IT IS NOT CORRECT AND THOSE VOTING MAY BE BIASED BECAUSE THEY ARE
AFFILIATED WITH ONE AND DISLIKE THE ANOTHER.
'Kids want happy parents!'
Unrepentant Giuliana Rancic and Bill Rancic jet off without baby Duke after
saying 'marriage must come first'
Happiness is never something you demand as if it is a right or will be
gotten when asked and so you are talking rubbish saying ‘kids want happy
parents’ because happy parents are not something anyone can produce at will.
There is true happiness and it can be very satisfying but it is not
compatible with the ways people in this world behave and relate to each other
and it is talking nonsense to speak of ‘kids want happy parents’.
HAPPINESS IS NOT SOMETHING ANYONE CAN OBTAIN ON DEMAND. HAPPINESS IS NOT
EASILY FOUND IN THIS WORLD AND IT IS UNSTABLE EASILY DISRUPTED IN THIS WORLD
WHERE EVERYONE IS RADIATING FORCE AT OTHERS DESTROYING THEIR HAPPINESS,
BLOCKADING THEIR WAY TO TRUE HAPPINESS AND PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD WANT OTHERS TO
SUFFER.
WHATEVER HAPPINESS THAT IS DEPENDENT IN THIS WORLD IS FRAGILE, DOES NOT
LAST LONG, IS EASILY DESTROYED BY FORCE INTRUSION EVERYWHERE AND IN ADDITION
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE WICKED, OUT TO DESTROY EACH OTHERS’ HAPPINESS AND
CAUSE SUFFERING.
‘KIDS WANT HAPPY PARENTS’ IS NOT A REASONABLE STATEMENT TO MAKE, NOT
SOMETHING A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL SAY.
HAPPINESS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU WANT BUT DO YOU DESERVE HAPPINESS? AS THE
BUDDHA SAID, HAPPINESS IS NOT EASILY FOUND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DONE WRONG.
Happiness
is something a person creates & deserves, not want:
Happiness exists and to levels and duration beyond the wildest
imaginations of suffering beings trapped here.
But happiness is never something you want or demand but it is something
you deserve or not, if you have done wrong then you disqualify yourself from
happiness.
HAPPINESS EVEN TO EVERLASTING EXTREME HIGH LEVELS IS THE PRESERVE OF
THOSE WHO HAVE DONE GOOD, HAVE NOT DONE HARM TO OTHERS AND WHO HAVE DEVELOPED
THEIR MINDS TO THE HIGHEST LEVELS TO ‘NO THINKING’, ‘NO LIKE NOR DISLIKE’, ‘NO
PAIN OR PLEASURE’. THIS I KNOW FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.
HAPPINESS IS SOMETHING A PERSON CREATES FOR HIMSELF (BY DEVELOPING HIS
CONCENTRATION) AND DESERVES THROUGH VIRTUOUS CONDUCT.
Delusion
precludes happiness:
The Buddha said there are things that are possible and things that are
impossible.
It is impossible for those who are deluded, who have wrong views, who
perceive what is false to be true to have anything more than shallow easily
lost happiness based on sensuality.
True deep happiness is only possible for those who are not deluded, who
see things truly as they actually are.
Whether a person is deluded or not is objective, never partial but total
and if you are deluded you are like the man chasing the pot of gold at the end
of the rainbow seeking happiness.
That is what the Blessed One said. Having said that,
the One Well-Gone, the Teacher, said further:
If you hold
yourself dear
then don't fetter yourself with evil,
for happiness isn't easily gained
by one who commits a wrong-doing.
then don't fetter yourself with evil,
for happiness isn't easily gained
by one who commits a wrong-doing.
When seized by the End-maker as you
abandon the human state,
what's truly your own?
What do you take along when you go?
What follows behind you like a shadow that never leaves?
what's truly your own?
What do you take along when you go?
What follows behind you like a shadow that never leaves?
Both the merit & evil that you
as a mortal perform here:
that's what's truly your own, what you take along when you go;
that's what follows behind you
like a shadow that never leaves.
that's what's truly your own, what you take along when you go;
that's what follows behind you
like a shadow that never leaves.
So do what is admirable, as an
accumulation
for the future life.
Deeds of merit are the support for beings
when they arise in the other world.
for the future life.
Deeds of merit are the support for beings
when they arise in the other world.
This is a misleading statement that should not be made and incurs karma.
National debt up $trillion in Obama’s tenure but it is not because of
too much socialist spending but because of the profligacy and recklessness of
the capitalists.
National debt ‘exploded’ mainly because of bailouts for the mess
capitalists and bankers wrought on the system rather than welfare spending for
the masses.
IT WAS THE CAPITALISTS, RECKLESS AND PROFLIGATE BANKERS WHO ARE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BALLOONING NATIONAL DEBT THAN WELFARE SPENDING ON THE
PEOPLE AS GOVERNMENTS STEP IN TO ASSUME DEBTS CREATED BY BANKERS.
Virginity has no feelings, does not require feelings and anyone who has
feelings about virginity or its loss is deluded, heading for suffering.
Before you speak about how Mary feels about being a virgin you had
better ascertained it from her otherwise you are guilty of falsity that can
send you even to hell.
VIRGINITY IN TRUTH HAS NO FEELINGS AND SO THE MATTER IS FALSE AND ANYONE
WHO IS INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT MARY’S (DELUDED) FEELINGS ABOUT VIRGINITY OR
DWELLING ON THIS TOPIC IS DELUDED HEADING FOR FUTURE WOE NOT SAFETY.
Feeling
and thinking are two different things:
Sometimes when people speak of feeling about something (eg sex before
marriage), they actually mean think about sex before marriage. This is false,
reflects no true understanding that confuses self and others and the way to
future woe.
OFTEN WHEN PEOPLE TALK ABOUT FEEL ABOUT PREMARITAL SEX THEY MEAN THINK
ABOUT PREMARITAL SEX AND RATHER THAN HARMLESS THIS IS DEADLY SPEAKING WITHOUT
UNDERSTANDING WHAT YOU SAY THAT CONFUSES SELF AND OTHERS AND HAS DEBT TO BE
REPAID AS SUFFERING.
(Inept
governance and Dr M’s wilful allowance of immigration for political expediency
may have allowed large concentrations of Filipinos to build up along the East
coast of Sabah that now threaten civil war even secession)
Saturday, 02 March 2013 Super Admin
Ida Lim, TMI
Malaysia’s failure to stop foreigners from entering and
seizing territory here could endanger the future of Sabah and genuine Sabahans,
Umno leader Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah has said, amid warnings of a civil war in
the state by a Filipino rebel leader.
Tengku Razaleigh (picture), popularly known as Ku Li,
raised the alarm over the “foreboding” events in Sabah, including the siege in
Lahad Datu by a Sulu rebel army.
“I had used the term ‘foreboding’ because the population
structure has changed to the extent that a different dimension to the events is
possible in future.
“The failure of those responsible to secure our border is so
serious that I feel I had to raise this warning as I believe the integrity of
Sabah and the genuine Sabahans must be protected at all costs as a political
responsibility,” Tengku Razaleigh said in a statement yesterday.
The Gua Musang MP could likely be hinting at testimonies at
an ongoing royal inquiry that Filipino immigrants living in Sabah had been
given citizenship through irregular means.
Tengku Razaleigh also spoke of the grave concern over the breach
of Malaysian borders and the government’s failure to secure the country’s
sovereignty.
“All Malaysians and understandably particularly our Sabah
brothers must be alarmed and concerned with the failure of securing our borders
and safety of our sovereignty from foreign invasion.
“The seizure of Malaysian territory without any prior
knowledge or measures to prevent this from happening must be of deep concern.
The integrity and safety of Sabah is challenged as never before,” the
politician said.
Yesterday, former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad also
said that security at the borders and territorial waters of Malaysia must be
tightened.
“It was so easy for the unsophisticated group to enter our
country. This means that we must upgrade security so that nobody can intrude,”
he was quoted saying by state news agency Bernama.
Yesterday, a Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) leader
reportedly warned that the Lahad Datu gunfight could spark off a civil war in
Sabah, while the Sultanate of Sulu said its group of fighters, which had set
foot here about three weeks ago, will continue their fight
Matt
Shirvington on his Olympic days and the shocking news of fellow athlete, Oscar
Pistorius.
What is the point of telling others Pistorius was introverted or
extroverted? What is the point of knowing he was introverted or extroverted?
If there is no point and you think there is a point then you are
practicing controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity and the
fact that you do not realize that reflects the density of your delusion.
Extroversion and Introversion are not about meaning but they are
conditioned forms of behaviour and so an introverted or extroverted person is a
robot, programmed to perform in certain ways to be classified as introvert or
extrovert. There may be reasons why a person is introverted, he may be hiding a
dark side to himself but that does not mean an extroverted man is not hiding a
dark side to himself behind the façade or act of ‘well-adjusted’ outgoingness.
THERE IS NO POINT IN DWELLING ABOUT PISTORIUS’ INTROVERSION OR
EXTROVERSION WHICH ARE MERELY PROGRAMMED FORMS OF BEHAVIOUR AND IF HE IS
INTROVERTED HE HAS TO BE A ROBOT, HIS BEHAVIOR IS NOT GENUINE BUT REHASHED FROM
PROGRAMMING AND WHAT HE PROJECTS TO OTHERS. THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT
PERTINENT TO TELL OTHERS HE IS INTROVERTED REFLECTS WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT
IS MEANINGLESS AS MEANINGFUL.
WHAT HAS HIS INTROVERSION GOT TO DO WITH HIS KILLING HIS GIRLFRIEND?
‘PISTORIUS WAS EVIL’ IF THAT IS TRUE IS A RELEVANT OR SUBSTANCE
STATEMENT (AND IT IS TRUE HE IS EVIL).
You can end up with millions of years burning in hell and what is so
human right about that? There is no such things as human rights and rights of a
being, they are artificial concoctions and delusions not of good men but men
who are hypocrites and pretentious.
What matters is not human rights and conventions of human rights but
doing the right thing to others meaning not harming them (injury, depriving,
confiscating) or killing them, not because they have rights but you will incur
karma to be repaid by even horrible suffering.
Only robots subscribe to and follow or try to maintain a falsely
perceived British reputation in human rights. You should not betray or follow
faithfully Britain’s human rights reputation but you should seek to treat
people correctly with compassion and care on a case by case basis.
HUMAN RIGHTS DO NOT NATURALLY EXIST BUT THEY ARE ARTIFICIALLY FORMULATED
OR DRAFTED (EG FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION) AND ONLY ROBOTS FORMULATE AND
CONFORM TO SUCH PLANS.
IN ORDER TO HAVE A REPUTATION YOU HAVE TO BEHAVE CONSISTENTLY IN A
CERTAIN WAY AND SO ONLY ROBOTS CHERISH REPUTATIONS AND MAINTAIN REPUTATIONS
WHEN THEY ARE EVIL RATHER THAN GOOD. YOU SHOULD NOT BEHAVE ACCORDING TO
REPUTATION BUT WHAT YOU UNDERSTAND IS THE CORRECT THING FOR A PARTICULAR
SITUATION.
Only
robots have reputation:
If you think it is possible to have reputations and yet not be a robot
you may be right or deluded.
In order to have a reputation eg as sex maniac, miser, wicked, bully you
must behave consistently, predictably in a certain manner generally perceived
as being sex maniac, etc.
IF A PERSON’S ACTION IS FRESH SPECIFIC TO AN OCCASION IT IS NOT TO
CONFORM TO A REPUTATION, NOT ACCORDING TO A REPUTATION. IT IS ONLY IF A
PERSON’S BEHAVIOR IS REHASHED, IS CONSISTENTLY THE SAME THAT HE DEVELOPS A
REPUTATION WHICH IS NEVER GOOD BUT EVIL, HE IS A REHASHING COUNTERFEITOR.
Ordinary people who do not realize they are robots are concerned about
establishing and projecting images and reputations (eg hardworking, honest) in
order to reap material benefit from such reputations that drive them on to
continue behaving according to the dictates of their reputations (or honour)
which is very important to them, become even obsessions to them.
Two
kinds of reputation:
There is the kind of reputation you gain by notoriety eg sex maniac,
nymphomaniac, gambler, boozer, joker, eccentric and there is the reputation
that people falsely project and nurture eg hardworking, clever, wise, honest.
People try to build a reputation for themselves so that they can reap
material benefits from that reputation.
In addition there is the reputation that comes from notoriety, behaving
consistently in a certain manner.
WHETHER YOU TRY TO BUILD A REPUTATION OR GAIN A REPUTATION BY NOTORIETY
OR ‘FAME’ THEY ARE ALL FORMS OF CONSISTENT BEHAVIOR ACCORDING TO A PATTERN IN
WHICH THE PERSON BECOMES A ROBOT AND THAT IS THE PATH TO WOE NOT HAPPINESS.
If a person has true understanding he does not need Lahad Datu to tell
him valuable lessons and if he has no true understanding all the lessons from
Lahad Datu will do no good.
What is the point of lessons if they are not good? Thus it is silly to
speak of valuable lessons as if there are lessons without value. The purpose of
speaking of valuable lessons is to falsely make more of the lessons than there
is.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A TRUE LESSON THAT HAS NO VALUE AND SO YOU ARE
SILLY TALKING ABOUT VALUABLE LESSONS OR YOU ARE TRYING TO FALSELY MAKE MORE OF
THOSE LESSONS THAN THERE ACTUALLY IS.
YOU DON’T NEED LAHAD DATU OR THINGS TO HAPPEN TO TELL YOU VALUABLE
LESSONS EXCEPT IF YOU ARE CLUELESS, DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOURSELF IN WHICH CASE THE
VALUABLE LESSONS WILL BE LOST ON YOU SINCE YOU DON’T TRULY UNDERSTAND.
Lahad
Datu has no lessons only understanding:
Exactly what is happening in Lahad Datu can be known and understood
correctly as such and such and this is not a lesson or lessons of Lahad Datu.
Once you understood correctly as it actually is, Lahad Datu, there is no need
to draw lessons which are for people who have no true understanding, who do not
truly understand Lahad Datu and refer to their jukeboxes of recorded
understanding to retrieve and apply recorded understandings that they tout as
lessons of Lahad Datu.
WHATEVER HAS HAPPENED IN LAHAD DATU IS SUCH AND SUCH NOT THE LESSONS OF
LAHAD DATU AND SO A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING SPEAKS OF LAHAD DATU AS SUCH
AND SUCH NOT THE LESSONS OF LAHAD DATU. IT IS THE PERSON WITHOUT TRUE
UNDERSTANDING, WHO IS NOT SURE OF WHAT TO MAKE OF LAHAD DATU WHO WILL REFER TO
RECORDED UNDERSTANDINGS IN HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX TO APPLY AS THE LESSONS OF LAHAD
DATU.
EXACTLY WHAT YOU REFER TO AS LESSONS OF LAHAD DATU CAN BE DETERMINED, IF
THEY ARE WORTHLESS, OF A MATERIAL NATURE THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF MISLEADING
OTHERS WHAT YOU SAY IS VALUABLE IS WORTHLESS. YOU CAN SAY GOLF OR TENNIS IS A
VALUABLE SKILL TO LEARN BUT IF IT IS WORTHLESS THEN YOU ARE GUILTY OF
MISLEADING OTHERS.
It
suffices to understand Lahad Datu:
If a person truly understands, it suffices for him to see and understand
Lahad Datu and when asked, he says ‘My understanding of Lahad Datu is such and
such’, he does not speak of ‘the valuable lessons of Lahad Datu’ which are
artificial, fabricated and the more that Jesus said comes from evil not good.
JESUS SAID LET YOUR YES BE YES, ANYTHING MORE COMES FROM EVIL.
THUS IF YOU TRULY UNDERSTOOD LAHAD DATU AND WHEN ASKED, YOU SAY ‘MY
UNDERSTANDING OF LAHAD DATU IS SUCH AND SUCH’ NOT ‘THE VALUABLE LESSONS OF
LAHAD DATU’ WHICH ARE FABRICATED, CONTRIVED AND THE MORE THAT JESUS SAID COMES
FROM EVIL NOT GOOD.
It is not so much the unaffordability of domestic programs that is responsible
for the current debt crisis in America and the world but it is the reckless
actions of bankers (eg derivatives) who have short circuited the system, the
hijacking of high salaries by a privileged few who are doing overrated and even
useless jobs depriving others of money to be employed with and so it would be
much better to go after all these (protected) high flyers who have escaped
accountability than to go after the (defenceless) little guys.
The
facts not lessons of Lahad Datu:
The facts or truth of Lahad Datu is not the same as the lessons of Lahad
Datu except in your delusion they are interchangeable.
WHAT OTHERS NEED ARE THE FACTS OR TRUTH OF LAHAD DATU. LET OTHERS DECIDE
THE LESSONS (IF ANY THERE ARE OR NEEDED) AND IF YOUR VALUABLE LESSONS ARE FALSE
YOU ARE PRESENTING YOURSELF FOR THE CHOP UNNECESSARILY OR FOOLISHLY.
THERE ARE ACTUALLY NO LESSONS OF LAHAD DATU BUT THERE IS A TRUE
UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT LAHAD DATU IS ABOUT AND WHAT IS NEEDED IS THE FACTS ABOUT
LAHAD DATU NOT THE VALUABLE LESSONS OF LAHAD DATU.
Below
standard cardinal:
His sexual behaviour is not below standard but wrong, contravenes the
oath of his office.
IT IS NOT SPEAKING THE TRUTH TO SAY YOUR SEXUAL CONDUCT IS BELOW
STANDARD, IT IS NOT ABOUT STANDARDS BUT RIGHT AND WRONG AND SO SPEAKING RIGHTLY
AND TRUTHFULLY HE SHOULD SAY HIS SEXUAL CONDUCT WAS WRONG NOT BELOW STANDARD.
THE BUDDHA ABSTAINS NOT BECAUSE HE IS BEHAVING ACCORDING TO A STANDARD,
NOT BECAUSE HE SEES THE DIFFICULTIES AND SUFFERING SEX LEADS TO BUT HE HAS
ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST IN SEX, SEX OR SEXUAL DESIRE IS EXTINCT IN HIM.
TRUE ABSOLUTE SEXUAL ABSTINENCE OCCURS WHEN THE PERSON SEES CORRECTLY
THE MEANINGLESSNESS, SUFFERING (NOT HAPPINESS TOUTED) AND FUTURE DIFFICULTIES
THAT SEX LEADS TO.
YOU CANNOT GIVE UP SEX BECAUSE YOU (INCORRECTLY) SEE SEX AS FULL OF
MEANING, IRRESISTIBLE PLEASURE NOT SUFFERING AND YOU CANNOT SEE THE FUTURE
SUFFERING IT LEADS TO.
Indoctrination
disguised as lessons?
The lessons of Lahad Datu may be the indoctrinations or programming of
Lahad Datu in lieu of the facts of Lahad Datu. They don’t want to tell you the
facts of Lahad Datu but they want to tell you its lessons.
The facts of Lahad Datu are objective whilst the lessons are subjective
dependent on what the ‘teacher’ wants taught.
To
teach you must be able to tell the truth and few can teach:
A lecturer does not teach but he is disseminating programming that
students scramble to jot down to help them memorize what was ‘taught’. What
people call teaching in this world is purely programming because before someone
can teach he must first be able to tell the truth and because people in this
world are incapable of telling the truth except in their delusion, they cannot
truly teach others lessons, they cannot teach correctly of the lessons of Lahad
Datu.
Not everyone can teach and in Buddhism, only certain elders are
designated as teachers that monks can approach for guidance about what the
Buddha taught and it is said there are private Buddhas who are enlightened but
cannot teach. Teaching is the highest miracle according to the Buddha and not
everyone is equipped to teach.
TELL US THE TRUTH OF LAHAD DATU BEFORE YOU TEACH THE LESSONS OF LAHAD
DATU AND IF YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF SEEING OR ELUCIDATING THE TRUTH OF LAHAD DATU
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU CAN TEACH OTHERS THE LESSONS OF LAHAD DATU AS YOU TOUT.
Just because he scores and Manchester City wins does not mean Tevez
earns City victory and it is thus said to make more than there is, to try to be
too clever. “Tevez scores in City 1-0 victory” is an accurate depiction, no
earning was involved and you are training yourself and others to perceive what
is false (there was earning involved) is true.
TEVEZ DID NOT EARN MANCHESTER CITY 1-0 VICTORY, HE SCORED IN CITY’S 1-0
VICTORY. WHAT ABOUT THE EFFORTS OF OTHER PLAYERS COLLECTIVELY, THEY DID NOTHING
TO EARN VICTORY? THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING EARNING INTO THE SITUATION; IT IS
NOT INVOLVED EXCEPT IN YOUR ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION IN THE MAD PURSUIT OF
JAZZING OR HYPING THINGS UP. YOU ARE SEEING MORE TO IT THAN THERE IS NOT
REALIZING YOU ARE SLIPPING THE NOOSE OF INSANITY AROUND YOUR NECK AND YOU HAVE
DEBT RECOMMENDING FALSE PERCEPTION AS TRUE TO OTHERS.
Gay
men massively overrepresented within church:
Quote: An openly
gay former Dominican friar insisted today that homosexuality is the ‘ticking
time bomb in the Catholic Church’ and that homosexual men are ‘massively over-represented’ within the Church.
People like to think they speak the truth but what they say is not the
truth. It is not a matter of homosexual men being over-represented because they
are not there to represent the gay but they are overly present in the church.
ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT CALL A SPADE A SPADE BUT THEY MUST SOMEHOW TWIST
OR DISTORT REALITY NOT REALIZING THEY ARE COURTING INSANITY. GAYS ARE NOT
OVERLY REPRESENTED IN THE CHURCH, THEY ARE NOT THERE TO REPRESENT THE GAY BUT
ON THEIR OWN BEHALVES AND SO THEY ARE OVER-PRESENT IN THE CHURCH AND IF YOU
SPEAK FALSELY THAT HAS CONSEQUENCES IN FUTURE SUFFERING FOR YOU.
As if any economy in the world can claim to be economically exemplary.
There are many signs that China too is tottering rather than a mighty economy
and even Germany may not be impeccable as appear (there are commentators who
say German banks are bankrupt).
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD HAVE NO TROUBLE SEEING OTHERS’ SHIT BUT THEY HAVE
GREAT DIFFICULTY SEEING THEIR OWN SHIT. WHAT IS THE POINT OF SAYING THE
ECONOMIC MUDDLE OF CHAVEZ LEGACY WHEN THERE ARE NO EXEMPLARY ECONOMIES IN THIS
WORLD?
By PETER EAVIS 4:10 PM ET
The Dow
Jones industrial average on Tuesday surpassed its previous record close as well
as its record intraday high, both from 2007, building on an ascent in recent
years that has stunned even seasoned stock market
watchers.
Everything that happens have reasons and can be understood and so if
seasoned stock market watchers are stunned it means they have no true
understanding, they have programmed understandings that are clearly wrong and
this (if true) has led them to stir their mental forces violently so they are
stunned.
It may not be a surprise at all why stock markets are running strong.
Stocks are a ‘safe haven’ like gold because unless new shares are issued, they
are fixed unlike dollars that can be printed infinitely so that its value may
be desecrated and so stocks attract money just as gold attracts pushing gold to
stratospheric levels.
SHARES LIKE GOLD ARE FIXED REPOSITORIES OF VALUE THAT CANNOT BE PRINTED
OR DEBASED LIKE CURRENCY CAN AND SO IT ATTRACTS MONEY AS A FORM OF SAFE HAVEN
AND EVEN HOWEVER MORIBUND THE ECONOMY, UNLESS IT HAS COLLAPSED INTO CHAOS, YOU
STILL NEED TO BUY FROM ENTRENCHED BIG COMPANIES. THOSE WHO HAVE DESERTED SHARES
HAVE DONE SO IN THE PAST AND SO WHAT IS LEFT NOW IS A HARDCORE SHAREHOLDERS WHO
CAN DICTATE AND PUSH UP SHARES AND THESE HIGH PRICES OF SHARES CAN BE CONVERTED
INTO MORE CURRENCY TO BUY GOODS THAT IS A FORM OF PLUNDERING THE WEALTH OF THE
SYSTEM. EVEN IF YOU DON’T OWN A SINGLE SHARE, SUCH HIGH PRICES ROB YOU OF MONEY
BECAUSE THOSE WHO OWN THESE HIGH PRICED SHARES CAN GET MORE DOLLARS WITH WHICH
TO BUY MORE IN THE COMMON MARKET.
FUND MANAGERS NOW CORNER A FAIR SHARE OF THE SHARE MARKETS AND IT IS NOT
THEIR MONEY THAT THEY ARE LOSING IF SHARES COLLAPSE AND THEY GET REWARDED IF
THEY MAINTAIN AND PUSH SHARES HIGHER THAT WOULD ATTRACT MORE GREEDY INVESTORS
TO HAND OVER THEIR MONEY TO THEM TO MANAGE.
Asset
value rises plunder the system:
You may not care because the value of your house has gone up from
$200,000 to $1 million but collectively, all asset (eg property, shares) value
rises serve to plunder (not truly deserved acquisition) wealth of the system
into the hands of the minority that cannot go on indefinitely but leads to the
ultimate collapse and social unrest of the community.
If your property that you bought for $200,000 is now worth $1 million it
means you can convert it into $1 million and obtain $1 million worth of goods
compared to only $200,000 in the past and so if there is a generalized rise in
prices of property and shares they serve to unfairly, unrighteously stake
claims on the shared wealth of the community or nation.
WHILST THEY MAY EXCITE THEIR BENEFICIARIES, SHARE AND PROPERTY PRICE
RISES SERVE TO TRANSFER COMMONLY HELD WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM INTO THE HANDS OF
THOSE WHO OWN SHARES AND PROPERTY BECAUSE THESE SHARES AND HOUSES CAN BE SOLD
FOR HIGHER VALUES OR MORE MONEY AND THE SYSTEM STRUGGLES TO FIGHT BACK BY
RAISING PRICES OF ITS GOODS AND SERVICES SO AS TO NEUTRALIZE SUCH UNRIGHTEOUS
PLUNDERING CLAIMS.
YOU AND EVERYONE HERE DON’T CARE BUT WHEN THE SYSTEM TOTTERS AND
COLLAPSES AND CRUSHES YOU, THEN YOU WILL WEEP.
Capitalism
always ends in chaos and this is just the descent:
Capitalism cannot be sustained indefinitely but it leads to chaos and
what we are seeing at the moment is the early stages of that descent into
anarchy.
NOBODY CARES, IT IS GRAB EVERYBODY AND THE SHREWDEST AND TOUGHEST GOATS
WILL END UP WITH THE LION SHARE AND THEN THE DEPRIVED GOATS WILL SEEK REDRESS
AND SKIN ALIVE THE SUCCESSFUL GOATS AND IT WILL BE A FREE FOR ALL.
Referee
was probably right to send Nani off:
Many even so called seasoned football commentators said Nani’s send off
was wrong and it unfairly swung the match Real Madrid’s way. I saw the
challenge replay on the internet and I would say Nani appeared to have used his
raised foot to push the Madrid player’s chest when he came in to challenge for
the ball.
NANI DISGUISED HIS FOUL, AS THE REAL MADRID PLAYER ROBBED HIM OF THE
BALL, IN THE SPLIT SECOND AFTER CONTACT HE USED HIS FOOT TO PUSH THE REAL
PLAYER CAUSING HIM TO SPIN AROUND AWAY FROM HIS DIRECTION TOWARDS THE BALL.
EITHER SEASONED OBSERVERS ARE NOT THAT SHARP EYED OR THEY ARE BLINDED BY
EMOTION BUT TO ME, IN SLOW MOTION IT APPEARED NANI TRIED TO DISGUISE HIS USE OF
HIS FOOT TO UNFAIRLY PUSH AT THE CHEST OF THE REAL PLAYER.
Shares
are playthings of the rich than reliable economic barometer:
The rich have many playthings like expensive cars, football clubs,
mistresses and the stock market or shares is another plaything of the rich.
You need money to invest in the stock market and so those without money
cannot take part in the stock market which is a barometer of those with money
rather than the whole economy that embraces those with little or no money.
Most shares have major shareholders who have lots of money who can
support or push down their shares and today most small investors entrust their
money with funds that themselves become big players with lots of money.
The dabblers or part timers are a minority like mosquitos who can cause
irritant stings but no big damage, they are in there for minor pickings, to
feed off crumbs falling off the table of the big fishes.
Thus share markets are not barometers of the overall economy but those
with money especially lots of money who usually own big chunks of companies
with which they can dictate the price of their shares.
Because blue chips are involved in businesses and products that they
sell to the masses, they will always do quite well unless there is total collapse
and so there is a rationale for making them valuable.
Further because shares are priced in currency shared in common with
others, pushing up prices of shares you own is a means of pushing up your worth
dramatically without doing any work especially when you own major stakes that
enable you to dictate prices.
Because shares are fixed in number unlike currency that can be diluted
by printing, it becomes a safe haven for those who seek to protect their wealth
and this will ensure some support for shares.
Man Utd v Real Madrid: Sir
Alex Ferguson's silence speaks volumes
This is always a false statement that has karma to be experienced as
future suffering for misleading others and indicates the person does not truly
understand what he says otherwise he would not have said it and if you accept
it as valid then you similarly do not understand what you hear and that must be
accompanied by resistance that leads to stress.
SILENCE IS SILENCE AND CANNOT SPEAK, LET ALONE SPEAK VOLUMES AND SO HE IS
DESCENDING INTO FALSITY AND RECOMMENDING FALSE PERCEPTION TO OTHERS IN HIS
HASTE TO MAKE MORE THAN THERE IS IN THE REFUSAL TO TALK. THAT THE OPINIONS OF
SUCH A MAN IS RELIABLE IS NOT POSSIBLE.
SILENCE SPEAKING VOLUMES IS A FORM OF UNNECESSARY COMPLICATION THAT THE
BUDDHA SAID IS NOT THE SIGN OF A GREAT MAN.
IT IS EVIDENCE THAT MEN DO NOT (TRULY) UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY SPEAK. IF HE
UNDERSTOOD TRULY WHAT HE SPOKE HE WOULD KNOW IT IS NONSENSE.
No comments:
Post a Comment